Fo e on in Sociology & Poli ical Sciences
Volume. 2, Issue. 2, 2025, 9–14
E-ISSN: 3048-7617. www.scien i ic o e on .o g
THEORETICAL ARTICLE
THEORETICAL ARTICLE
Sys emic Rejec ion Theo y: Disman ling Ha m ul Social
Sys ems
Saayam Chowdhu y ID 1
1Independen Resea che , Wes Bengal, India
s[email p o ec ed].
Recei ed: Augus 27, 2025; Accep ed: Sep embe 02, 2025; Published: Sep embe 15, 2025.
Abs ac
Social s uc u es ha a e highly s igma ized ye pe sis in mode n imes o en lead us o belie e ha social change is a slow
and a duous ea o achie e. Howe e , his pape in oduces Sys emic Rejec ion Theo y (SRT), a heo e ical amewo k ha
explains how deeply sea ed ha m ul sys ems, such as pa ia chy, a e sus ained by a iadic s uc u e: men al (passi e public
accep ance), cul u al (ac i e ein o cemen h ough media and/o adi ion), and economic ( angible ma e ial incen i es o
dependencies). SRT p oposes ha wi h he implemen a ion o social echniques o manipula e any one o he a o emen ioned
pilla s, change is seen ac oss all h ee dimensions. When one pilla is ac i ely and sys ema ically ejec ed and demolished,
he emaining s uc u e loses cohe ence, leading he sys em o ecede in o he "imagina y ealm"—a space whe e i no
longe a ec s li ed eali y. Fu he in o he pape , cases om he pas ha illus a e how a ge ed disman ling o one
pilla will lead o he spon aneous disin eg a ion o o he s a e ecalled o applica ion in con empo a y imes. Las ly, while
SRT ad oca es disman ling ha m ul social s uc u es, i also has an in e se model; ha is, p ese ing mo al alues and
mode nizing e ec i e sys ems ha bene i humani y may be sus ained o b ough in o he " eali y ealm" by ein o cing
he h ee pilla s. This pape concludes by ou lining s a egies ha can be implemen ed o enable bo h disin eg a ion and
p ese a ion in he ans o ma ion o social eali ies.
Keywo ds: S uc u alism, Sys emic Rejec ion Theo y, Pa ia chy, P ese a ionism.
In oduc ion
Despi e a en ion om ac i ism and decades o educa ion and pol-
icy e o ms, pa ia chy pe sis s while being publicly condemned.
Why and how is his possible? The ins i u ional ine ia is on he
side o p og ess, bu o mal e o ms canno p ac ically ou un he
dynamics o wha socie y hinks. Implici bias is ha de o legis-
la e. In classic social heo y, schola s like Émile Du kheim looked
a "social ac s" wi h coe ci e powe and s a ed ha indi iduals a e
bound by ex e nal ac o s[
1
]. Ka l Ma x loca ed hese s uc u es p i-
ma ily in he economy and p oposed ha he ma e ial base is wha
de e mines social eali y. Michel Foucaul la e ede ined he powe
in oduced by Du kheim and decen alized i , o e ing a ew ways o
disman le such sys ems. Howe e , wi h each o hese amewo ks,
he same gap exis s: he dimension o he p oblem is isola ed on o
a single c i ical insigh . These heo ies do no ecognize he in e -
dependence o all h ee ac o s— he men al, cul u al, and angible
pilla s, which uphold any social s uc u e.
SRT, on he o he hand, sugges s a s aigh o wa d app oach o dis-
man ling ha m ul social sys ems h ough h ee in e dependen pil-
la s. We will explo e, in u he essays, how ac i ely ejec ing a sin-
gle pilla o ces he en i e s uc u e o collapse. All social s uc u es
ha cease o exis become a pa o he “imagina y ealm.” Exam-
ples o ideas ha belong he e a e he Fla Ea h Theo y, which was
disman led wi h hea y scien i ic p oo ; wi ch hun s, as ins i u ional
p ac ices ha e la gely aded in he Wes , hough ce ain belie s pe -
sis in pa s o he Global Sou h; ph enology ( he s udy o he human
skull o de e mine pe sonali y), which was debunked by neu ology;
bloodle ing; geocen ism; e c. Some ideologies a e also known o
ha e been ebo n in o he “ eali y ealm.” Fo example, eminism and
en i onmen alism we e ma ginalized and widely dismissed in hei
ea ly s ages; bo h a e now mains eam mo emen s in he mode n
e a. Again, democ a ic socialism, hough ma ginalized du ing he
neolibe al e a, egained mains eam accep ance in he la e 20 h and
ea ly 21s cen u ies.
Obse ing he imagina y ealm and he eali y ealm, he simila -
i y ound in all o hese ideologies is he iadic model o pilla s,
Copy igh
©
All igh s a e ese ed by Au ho (s) 2025. Published by Fo e on in Sociology & Poli ical Sciences. This is an Open Access a icle which
pe mi s un es ic ed euse, dis ibu ion, and ep oduc ion in any medium, p o ided he o iginal wo k is p ope ly ci ed.
9
10 |Fo e on in Sociology & Poli ical Sciences, 2025, Volume. 2, Issue. 2
which is p esen in all o hem as long as hey ha e no aded. This
pape p oposes ha he c i ical dissimila i y be ween dead and
hibe na ing sys ems may lie in he p esence o wha I call ‘pilla
memo y.’ ‘Pilla memo y,’ as de ined he e, loosely pa allels he idea
o esidual cul u al capi al (Bou dieu 1986), bu wi hin a disman ling
amewo k[
2
]. The sys ems ha wen in o he imagina y ealm wi h
all hei pilla s demolished emained dead, bu he ones ha we e
ebo n had a subconscious memo y o a leas one pilla , be i cul-
u al a i ac s, linge ing economic e ec s, o supp essed a en ion.
Reco ds o his o ical e en s sugges ha once an idea is ac i ely
ejec ed by a c i ical mass, i ends o disin eg a e apidly. Fo in-
s ance, belie in wi ch ials diminished quickly a e judicial and
public ejec ion in Enligh enmen -e a Eu ope (Mon e 2002)[
3
]. I is
ascina ing o ind ha he mind does no eel he need o ques ion
some hing widely accep ed, bu once he idea su e s ac i e ejec-
ion, i c umbles in a su p isingly quick and ho ough manne .
In en ion is he p ime de e mining ac o in he dea h and ebi h o
sys ems. Fo ins ance, despi e cul u al idicule o as ology in many
scien i ic ci cles, he lack o ins i u ional in en ion o disman le
i has allowed i s economic and cul u al pilla s o su i e. Le us
also ake he example o eminism and he o ganic ein o cemen
o media and p o es cul u e in he las cen u y. I hibe na ed wi h
a pilla memo y o economic e ec s ela ed o i , and once he o he
pilla o cul u e was ein o ced, his ideology was ebo n. In en-
ional disin eg a ion was also he eason due o which eminism
was ini ially declined; howe e , he economic e ec s pe sis ed due
o a lack o in en ion.
The goal o SRT is o ack hese unique changes in a way all can
comp ehend. We ha e a be e unde s anding o how a sys em col-
lapses unde he p essu e o ac i e ejec ion. A e ha , one o mo e
pilla s spon aneously disman le, excep in cases o pilla memo y,
whe e a pilla emains signi ican due o a lack o in en ion, and
hence, hese excep ions may be ebo n i ano he pilla is ein o ced
h ough ac i e accep ance.
Findings
The indings o his s udy a e heo e ical bu g ounded in his o ical
e e ences and e idence om cul u es ac oss he wo ld. Fi s , he
analysis demons a es ha he all and ise o social s uc u es a e
no andom; mo e impo an ly, social changes can be acked o
p edic disman ling and e o ming p ocesses and po en ially ma-
nipula e hem owa d social bene i . His o ical e idence shows ha
collec i e in en ion is he decisi e ac o ha causes and accele -
a es sys emic b eakdown. Second, he indings sugges ha e e y
social sys em is suppo ed by h ee in e dependen pilla s—cul u al,
men al, and economic. Due o his iadic in e dependence, he
all o one pilla can lead o he disman ling o he o he s and, ul i-
ma ely, he collapse o he whole sys em. Thi d, social sys ems can
be b ough back om he “imagina y ealm” unde ce ain condi-
ions. I he disman ling o a pas sys em lacked collec i e in en ion,
one o mo e pilla s may emain do man as men al, cul u al, o eco-
nomic s uc u es, o cing he sys em in o a “hibe na ing” phase,
which di e s om comple e collapse. In his phase, sys ems a e oo
agile o be conside ed pa o he “ eali y ealm,” as hey lack sig-
ni ican angible e ec s on socie y. Finally, by ac i ely ein o cing
one o mo e pilla s o a “hibe na ing” social sys em wi h collec i e
in en ion, i may be possible o es o e i o he “ eali y ealm” and
e u n i o ull powe wi h angible social e ec s. These indings
highligh he explana o y powe o Sys emic Rejec ion Theo y (SRT)
in cap u ing bo h he agili y and esilience o social sys ems.
Discussion
Sys em Compa ison wi h Theo e ical G ounding
Classic sociological amewo ks ha e long a emp ed o explain and
sol e he linge ing sys emic powe ; hose heo ies e ol ed a ound
a singula oo cause, be i economic, cul u al, o men al. Such a
educ ionis app oach ails o add ess he iadic in e dependency
o he ac o s due o which hese s uc u es a e upheld.
Émile Du kheim’s idea o unc ionalism p ima ily s a es ha a soci-
e y is shaped h ough he equilib ium o social ac s such as no ms
and alues ha influence beha iou . Howe e , his amewo k o e -
looks conflic and opp ession and ad oca es o na u al social s abil-
i y. and Du kheim’s no ion o “social ac s” la gely igno es he no ms
and cul u al implica ions ha a e pai ed wi h angible economic
sus enance. Du kheim’s no ion emphasises men al adhe ence o
social no ms as ex e nal, coe ci e o ces.
Ka l Ma x’s p ima y ocus was on class s uggle; he desc ibed how
he economic base de e mines he cul u al supe s uc u e. His con-
flic heo y and his o ical ma e ialism made he economy he base o
socie y. Again, his ideology ails o explain why opp essed classes
may adop o accep ha m ul sys ems e en i he e is no economic
gain om hem.
The concep o discou se and biopowe in oduced by Michel Fou-
caul says ha , o ins ance, a p ison o a school shapes an indi id-
ual no jus h ough o ce bu h ough no ms and su eillance[
4
].
Foucaul ’s objec i e pos -s uc u alism, which was o show decen-
alised powe , e en co e s men al and cul u al con ol. Howe e ,
his amewo k ailed o es ablish he domino e ec when one o
he pilla s is undone; i also s uggled o explain he endu ance o
sys ems h ough ma e ialis ic independence. Some also c i icised
he heo y o being o e ly abs ac and lacking a clea model ha
explains collapse sus enance.
Unlike i s p edecesso s, SRT add esses e e y ac o and shows how
sys emic s abili y is achie ed when all h ee pilla s a e upheld. I u -
he in oduces he concep s o ac i e ejec ion and how i collapses
s uc u es in o pe manen s agna ion o a la en s a e when pilla
memo y pe sis s. SRT can explain bo h he agili y and esilience
h ough he concep o in en ion, which ea lie s udies s uggled o
explain.
In en ional ac ion is he c ucial ac o ha de e mines whe he a
sys em su i es o collapses. Ja ed Diamond, in his book Collapse:
How Socie ies Choose o Fail o Succeed, emphasises ha socie ies
capable o making an icipa o y decisions based on en i onmen al
o s uc u al eedback o en a oid collapse[
5
]. Fo ins ance, in he
16 h cen u y, Japan implemen ed in en ional o es managemen
policies (unde he Tokugawa shoguna e), e e sing en i onmen al
deg ada ion. In con as o success, he No se se le s in G eenland
could no mo e on om hei Eu opean a ming iden i y, bu a he
han adap ing o Inui p ac ices, leading o sys emic ailu e caused
by en i onmen al misma ch due o cul u al igidi y (Diamond 2005).
These examples highligh how he p esence o absence o collec i e
in en g ea ly influences sys emic endu ance o disin eg a ion.
Di ec ion o In eg a ion
Case S udies
Le us u he disco e how in en ion and ac i e ejec ion caused
he ing ained sys ems o all apa wi h his o ical e idence. Tha is,
we will explo e cases whe e ac i ism and ejec ion disman led all
h ee pilla s.
Wi h he explici aim o abolish eudalism, he F ench e olu iona y
mo emen a ge ed he economic pilla o he ancien égime. I was
soon dec eed ha he eudal egime was o be disman led in i s
en i e y. He e, in en b oke he pilla o angible economic alue
and hence disman led he whole sys em o class p i ilege.
Gandhi’s non- iolen mo emen s in en ionally a ge ed he
hough s o he powe ul mass (e.g., he Sal Ma ch, 1930) and made
he cen u y-old cul u al pilla collapse, ul ima ely o cing B i ain o
g an India’s independence.
Simila ac i ism was seen in A ican-Ame ican mo emen s,
whe e legal challenges and g ass oo s ac i ism, coupled wi h
no maliza ion h ough media, led o he collapse o bo h o pilla s.
Un o una ely, angible e ec s pe sis due o a lack o collec i e
in en ion; howe e , he Ci il Righ s Ac (1964) and Vo ing Righ s
Ac (1965) a e big wins.
Saayam Chowdhu y |11
The Polish Solida i y mo emen was an in en ional s uggle
agains communism, a cul u ally sound and economically angible
pilla [
6
]. Solida i y’s clea pu pose di ec ly a acked he communis
egime by exposing i s alse claims and hence disman led Poland’s
au ho i a ian sys em in a peace ul manne .
I would also like o men ion Lo a Femminis a (1973), who
showcased women’s unpaid domes ic labo in he spo ligh o
shame[
7
]. This was among he i s p o es pos e s agains he
s uggle o wages o housewo k. This ins ance illus a es how
socially conscious mo emen s can o ce long-held cul u al pilla s
o collapse (gende bias) h ough ac i ely disman ling he pilla o
economic e ec s.
In essence, hese examples showcase how in en ion and ac i e
ejec ion o a leas one pilla a e c ucial in demolishing a social
s uc u e in i s en i e y. I one ounda ional pilla alls, he sys em is
seen o collapse. In his con ex , we can ake he chaos unde Maois
China’s igid social s uc u es as an example o how Deng Xiaoping
in en ionally ocused on ma ke economies du ing a pe iod o
cul u al e olu ion and ins abili y. Rein o cemen o he economic
pilla esul ed in he ease o he o he pilla s and sa ed he sys em
om a ce ain economic b eakdown. Again, hype infla ion in
Zimbabwe o Cambodia unde “Pol Po ” (e adica ing eligion,
educa ion, and ade) illus a es ha emo ing he economic
pilla may p ecipi a e social b eakdown. In a gene al app oach,
schola s emphasize he in eg a ion o cul u al and social alues
wi h p og ess in he economy o ensu e s abili y; na ions ha
delibe a ely s eng hen one pilla o en es o e social cohesion in
i s en i e y.
Ho s ede a gued ha “a socie y’s cul u al alues lead o s abili y and
consis ency o e ime[
8
].” This implies how cul u al no ms, hough
pa e ns, and wo ld iews, when in ac , di ec ly bu ess poli ics
and he economy. An h opologis s add o his poin , no ing ha
an economy canno unc ion ou side social and cul u al concep s
(Polanyi 2001)[
9
]. In o he wo ds, social concep s bea a iadic
s uc u e; he embedded e ec s o cul u e and men ali y in an
economy con i m his. In he con ex o he sus enance o pilla s,
an in e na ional de elopmen e iew unde sco es how men al
alues and economic p ac ices co-e ol e. Socie ies “mus conside
local... eligious and e hical pa adigms” in planning g ow h (Tamas
2007)[
10
]. Classic sociology also suppo s his app oach;[
11
] Pa sons’
AGIL Model p edic s sys emic b eakdown when one unc ion o
AGIL is neglec ed, concu ing wi h he in e dependen balance
among hese pilla s.
Dea h by Rejec ionism s. Hibe na ion by Rejec-
ionism
Ea lie in his pape , we disco e ed qui e a ew examples o ei he
economic, cul u al, o men al pilla s’ collapse and hence social
b eakdowns. A e one mo e in e es ing example o such, we will
mo e on o a ew sys ems ha hibe na ed and we e ebo n.
A widesp ead, heinous social c ime in 13 h-cen u y Bengal in India
was he p ac ice o Sa i. I in ol ed a widow being bu ned ali e
on he deceased husband’s une al py e. Young gi ls ma ied a
an ea ly age we e e y o en coe ced in o his p ac ice. De o ees
claimed ha his was an ac o eligion and ai h. Howe e , his
ac was no only immo al and equi alen o mu de bu also h ea -
ened se e e economic e ec s due o he deple ion o he numbe o
young emales and he des uc ion o na u al ha mony. Re o me s
like Raja Ram Mohan Roy and William Ca ey eme ged as impo an
igu es in ying o s op Sa i. Roy s udied Hindu ex s and sc ip u es
and ound no e idence o ules desc ibing he need o engage in
his ac . This changed he mo al backg ound o he whole si ua ion.
Many commone s g ew ea ul o pe o ming Sa i, belie ing i was
no longe a eligious du y and hus mo ally punishable. Howe e ,
impo an Hindu ac ions (like Dha ma Sabha) ied hei bes o
s op he legal ban (by showing a conflic wi h non-in e e ence in e-
ligious ac s) o Sa i[
12
]. Howe e , wi h e o s om he hen Go e no
Gene al Lo d Ben inck and Roy’s subs an ial e idence o he ac no
being eligious, he P i y Council deemed his p ac ice illegal; o e
ime, his ac comple ely disappea ed wi h he comple e collapse o
all pilla s, s a ing wi h he cul u al one. This example shows he
in e dependence o he pilla s as sugges ed by he SRT, and i also
shows he e ec i eness o he collapse when one o he pilla s is
ac i ely ejec ed wi h collec i e in en ion om a majo pe cen age
o socie y.
The e a e cases in his o y whe e social s uc u es, apa om sys-
ems and no ms, we e ebo n a e a long hibe na ion. Le us explo e
some linguis ic and cul u al e i als[
13
]. Heb ew is one such lan-
guage ha was s ic ly used o li u gical pu poses, wi h p ac ically
no na i e speake s. In he 19 h cen u y, pionee ing Zionis s (no ably
Elieze Ben-Yehuda) s a ed e i ing Heb ew as an e e yday na-
i e language o Jews in Is ael and Pales ine[
14
]. By he mid-20 h
cen u y, Mode n Heb ew was ully e o med and used as a na i e
language and la e e en as Is ael’s na ional language. A simila e-
bi h was seen in New Zealand wi h he M
¯
ao i Cul u al Renaissance.
In he 1970s, he M
¯
ao i communi y began he cul u al e i al o
p ese e hei p ac ices and language. The communi y in oduced
M
¯
ao i-language schools (Ku a Kaupapa M
¯
ao i), b oadcas ing se -
ices, and he implemen a ion o he communi y’s mo als in daily
ac i i ies. This mo emen was p ima ily aimed a coun e ac ing he
e ec s o coloniza ion, bu i also se ed he pu pose o p omo ing
he M¯
ao i communi y.
In e es ingly, in bo h he a o emen ioned examples, all h ee pilla s
we e simul aneously ein o ced. Howe e , he ac i e economic ein-
o cemen was he s onges (c ea ing a comp ehensi e dic iona y,
coining use ul e ms, and p omo ing Heb ew educa ion in he o -
me case; educa ion and media ins i u ions’ influence in he la e
case); and ollowing he in e dependency o he pilla s, he cul u e
and men al pilla s we e spon aneously ein o ced, as well as al eady
ac i ely being accep ed. We can also men ion he g ow h o Cel ic
cul u e (I eland and Sco land) in he ea ly 20 h cen u y and Yiddish
cul u e (Uni ed S a es), which we e simila ly p ese ed as a sign o
and o keep he digni y o language and cul u e ali e amongs he
younge gene a ions.
In SRT, a c i ical dimension o collapse, whe he a sys em dies com-
ple ely o goes in o a la en phase, is he ype o ejec ion i was
ea ed wi h. The e may be a ew di e en classi ica ions o mass
ejec ions in his con ex : ac i e ejec ion, passi e ejec ion, and
collec i e ejec ion. When he in en ion o he majo i y o he whole
socie y collec i ely ejec s an idea wi h he collapse o a leas one
pilla , he sys em is no obse ed o na u ally e i e. This is he
powe ul e ec o collec i e ejec ion on ha m ul social sys ems;
he in e se model has he same e ec s on sys ems ha a e in need
o being p ese ed. SRT also d aws s eng h om ac i e ejec ion,
ha is, in en ional and coo dina ed e o s h ough mass media,
law, p o es , o discou se in o de o delegi imize and disman le a
speci ic sys em. SRT ad oca es o ac i e ejec ion, as i is he only
o m o ejec ion ha ensu es a sys em’s en y in o he imagina y
ealm. While passi e ejec ion, which shows as neglec , silence, o
wi hd awal in belie , migh be called “slow abandonmen ,” i isks
lea ing he sys em hanging in a hibe na ing o mu a ing s a e. Rec-
ognizing he ype o ejec ion and linking policies o mass p o es s
g ea ly heigh ens he ex en o e e y ac ion.
The las pa ag aph also opens a place o us o conside he limi a-
ions o SRT. The model o he amewo k o e ed h ough his heo y
is powe ul and helps unde s and sys emic shi s clea ly. Howe e ,
schola s cau ion ha eal-wo ld changes obse ed in a sys em may
be a mo e complex. Fo example, Kemp (2009) a gued ha he non-
linea i y and unp edic abili y o a social s uc u e “mus be backed
up by app op ia e e idence[
15
].” Diep and Kau man e al. (2020) no e
ha sys em models o en “o e simpli y he...dynamics” o social
conflic . In p ac ice, changes a e seen o be blended and pa ial and
e en in ol e eedback loops; some sys ems may e en adap a he
han die ou igh , so ejec ed ideas linge in mu a ed o ms. C i ical
sys ems hinke s (e.g., Jackson 2000) cau ion agains igno ing he
con ex o e e y case[
16
]. Howe e , a he han s ic ly limi ing SRT,
12 |Fo e on in Sociology & Poli ical Sciences, 2025, Volume. 2, Issue. 2
he insigh s om a ious schola s s eng hen i by making he con-
cep e en mo e dynamic and p o iding a mul i-laye ed app oach
o unde s anding sys emic esilience and up u e. The inhe en
p ope ies o ejec ion, in en ion, and iadic in e dependence, as
p oposed by SRT, emain aluable ools o unde s anding sys emic
changes and in o ming a ious ac ions o influence hem.
Snu ing Ou Pilla Memo y and Sus aining Pilla s
In he con ex o SRT, pilla memo y e e s o he emaining con en
in a pilla o a la en o hibe na ing social sys em a e i collapsed.
Pilla memo y may exis as supp essed cul u al, economic, o men-
al no ms, ex s, ideas, and ins i u ions as aces o he sys em. This
linge ing pilla memo y is c ea ed h ough a lack o collec i e in-
en ion when a sys em collapses o when he e is a lack o ac i e
ejec ion in he p ocess. Lea ing pilla memo y unchecked is, p ac i-
cally, isking he e-eme gence o a ha m ul social sys em. In e sely,
ein o cing pilla memo y wi h ac i e accep ance and o he me h-
ods can b ing back bene icial social sys ems. Pilla memo y is no
necessa ily a ha m ul objec ; a he , we should heed changes in
pilla memo y wi h neu ali y as we y o emo e he memo y o
ha m ul sys ems and also use i o y o ein o ce a pilla o a bene-
icial sys em.
The ele ance o pilla memo y lies in i s dicho omy: i may na -
u ally ein o ce a pilla and hence ein eg a e a sys em h ough
nos algia, misin o ma ion, o con enience. Fo ins ance, a e he
collapse o colonialism, a ious pos -colonial na ions and socie ies
s ill p ac ised classis s uc u es. Add essing pilla memo y is c u-
cial, especially in he case o ha m ul sys ems. The pilla memo y
o coloniza ion being used co up ly lea es a isk o i en e ing he
eali y ealm once again. On he o he hand, do man belie s can
also eac i a e a sys em h ough ac i e ein o cemen o any o
he pilla s. The e almos always exis s some pilla memo y pos -
aboli ion, and when kep un ea ed, i is h ough ac ions such as
media oman iciza ion (e.g., idealizing mona chies and igid gende
oles), lack o educa ion o misin o ma ion leading o blind us ,
and e en poli ical manipula ion and populis agendas.
Le us go o e some SRT-d i en s a egies ha can be applied in
he eal wo ld o elimina e he esidual aces o a pilla and hence
elimina e all pilla memo y, which educes he isk o ebi h o a
ha m ul sys em.
Cul u al displacemen can be a ool ha p omo es c i ical ein e -
p e a ion o his o ical e en s by using educa ional ins i u ions and
public discou se. Socie ies can eplace eligious symbols, such as
holidays and i uals ha glo i y ou da ed o ha m ul sys ems, while
also p o iding inclusi e al e na i es. Men al econdi ioning can be
implemen ed h ough schooling (in oducing new mo al alues ia
cu icula), li e a u e, media, and communi y na a i es. Encou ag-
ing public acknowledgemen and healing can also lead o signi ican
p og ess in accep ance and he le ing go o en enched social s uc-
u es.
We can u he a ge he media (cul u al and men al pilla s) and
economic pilla s by depla o ming and de unding ins i u ions o
companies ha influence o bene i om old sys ems (e.g., nepo ism,
misogyny, e c.). Simila ly, incen i ising inclusi e g ow h pla o ms
and p omo ing hem will help he public ejec exploi a i e sys ems
and no malise di e si y and equi able de elopmen .
To sus ain pilla s, we mus ein o ce he iad. Cul u ally sound
p osocial no ms ha a e isible in media and adi ions mus be
es ablished and p io i ised. The alues o he sys em mus be em-
bedded wi hin he men ali y by p omo ing psychological owne ship
and emo ional connec ion o he sys ems o alues we a e ying
o uphold. Th ough he economy, we can c ea e ewa d s uc u es
and laws ha sus ain posi i e sys ems, no by de aul bu h ough
in en ional ein o cemen o he pilla s.
No e ha hese s a egies a e o be ea ed as examples. In p ac ice,
he con ex o each social sys em mus be ca e ully s udied be o e
employing any ac ic o a oid an agonis ic e ec s. The eal chal-
lenge lies in main aining he balance be ween he decons uc ion
o he pas and he cons uc ion o he u u e. Pilla memo y is
as much a h ea as i is an oppo uni y. I can e i e opp essi e
sys ems bu also p ese e p og essi e alues when in en ionally
cul i a ed.
Wi hou con inuous e o s o ein o cemen o b eakdown, we isk
lea ing he sys em in a loose, hanging phase and hence isk hibe na-
ion (which may lead o la e ebi h o ha m ul sys ems o comple e
loss o bene icial ones). Such is he dual goal o SRT. The ue p io -
i y is building a s able and well-o ganized socie y by snu ing ou
po en ially ha m ul pilla memo y and sus aining he memo y o
collec i e mo al ic o ies.
Conclusion
Sys emic Rejec ion Theo y (SRT) o e s a unique app oach o sol -
ing he gap in unde s anding o sys emic collapse. The iadic model
o SRT illus a es how ha m ul sys ems collapse when one o hei
pilla s is ea ed wi h ac i e ejec ion wi h collec i e in en . The
pilla s a e men al, cul u al, and economic. SRT sugges s ha ejec-
ion and in en a e he p ima y o ces o sys emic disin eg a ion
and ha he pilla s ollow iadic in e dependence; hence, when
one is damaged o ein o ced, o he pilla s eflec he same e ec .
Case s udies o nume ous his o ical e en s and wo ks o se e al
schola s demons a e he dicho omy o he phenomena when a sys-
em is seen o collapse in o he imagina y ealm: a sys em may
die o hibe na e unde he influence o ejec ion. In dea h, all he
pilla s a e obse ed o ha e allen wi h almos no hope o ebi h.
Howe e , mo e o en, a sys em is seen o ha e linge ing aces o
one o mo e ounda ional ac o s—pilla memo y; his lea es a isk
o ha m ul social s uc u es jumping back o he eali y ealm and,
on he o he hand, a chance o eeme gence o bene icial sys ems,
cul u es, and alues. SRT also wa ns abou he isk o lea ing an
opp essi e sys em in a mu a ing o hibe na ing s a e and he s akes
in ol ed in passi e ole ance e sus he ce ain dea h p o ided
h ough ac i e ejec ion. Again, SRT is no wi hou i s limi a ions.
In li ed eali y, sys ems esis gene al classi ica ions o up u e and
pe sis ence; hey a he show a ious local complexi ies, adap a-
ion, and an o e all nonlinea p ocess. Ul ima ely, hese challenges,
a he han unde mining SRT, e ine i . A mo e dynamic applica-
ion o he heo y will accommoda e hyb id ou comes and de elop
u he p ac ical e ec i eness. SRT empowe s bo h schola s and ac-
i is s by p o iding a clea amewo k o sys emic collapse, posing
i no as spon aneous changes o ine i abili y bu as an in en ional
choice. A socie y can wi hd aw i s belie , esou ces, and legi imacy
om a sys em o ini ia e and lead i s all. The same mechanisms o
accep ance may be di ec ed a sys ems wo h p ese ing. In bo h
di ec ions, ejec ion is no me ely a esponse; i is an ac i e o ce o
e olu ion in a socie y, a o ce o ans o ma ion.
Re e ences
1.
É. Du kheim, The Rules o Sociological Me hod, S. Lukes, Ed.
New Yo k: F ee P ess, 1982, o iginally published 1895.
2.
P. Bou dieu, “The o ms o capi al,” in Handbook o Theo y and
Resea ch o he Sociology o Educa ion, J. Richa dson, Ed. New
Yo k: G eenwood, 1986, pp. 241–258.
3.
W. Mon e , Wi chc a in F ance and Swi ze land: The Bo de -
lands du ing he Re o ma ion. I haca, NY: Co nell Uni e si y
P ess, 2002.
4.
M. Foucaul , Discipline and Punish: The Bi h o he P ison.
New Yo k: Vin age Books, 1995, o iginally published 1975.
5.
J. Diamond, Collapse: How Socie ies Choose o Fail o Succeed.
New Yo k: Penguin Books, 2005.
6.
T. G. Ash, The Polish Re olu ion: Solida i y. New Ha en: Yale
Uni e si y P ess, 2002.
7.
Lo a Femminis a, 8 Ma zo: Gio na a In e nazionale della Donna.
Ams e dam: In e na ional Ins i u e o Social His o y, 1973.
8.
G. Ho s ede, G. J. Ho s ede, and M. Minko , Cul u es and O gani-
za ions: So wa e o he Mind, 3 d ed. New Yo k: McG aw-Hill,
2010.
Saayam Chowdhu y |13
9.
K. Polanyi, The G ea T ans o ma ion: The Poli ical and Eco-
nomic O igins o Ou Time. Bos on: Beacon P ess, 2001, o igi-
nally published 1944.
10.
P. Tamas, “The ole o eligious alues in de elopmen decision-
making,” h ps://be kleycen e .geo ge own.edu, 2007, accessed:
2025-05-17.
11. T. Pa sons, The Social Sys em. New Yo k: F ee P ess, 1951.
12.
BBC News, “Sa i: How he igh o ban bu ning o wid-
ows in india was won,” h ps://www.bbc.com/news/
wo ld-asia-india-65311042, Ap il 18 2023, accessed: 2025-05-17.
13.
Encyclopedia.com, “Cul u al e i als,” h ps://www.
encyclopedia.com/his o y/, n.d., accessed: 2025-05-17.
14.
Academy o he Heb ew Language, “Elieze ben-yehuda,”
h ps://eng.heb ew-academy.o g.il/heb ew-language/
elieze -ben-yehuda/elieze -ben-yehuda/, n.d., accessed:
2025-05-17.
15. S. Kemp, “Unp edic abili y and nonlinea i y in complexi y he-
o y: A c i ical app aisal,” Eme gence: Complexi y and O ganiza-
ion, ol. 11, no. 1, pp. 84–93, 2009.
16.
M. C. Jackson, Sys ems App oaches o Managemen . New Yo k:
Kluwe Academic/Plenum Publishe s, 2000.
17.
E. E ans, The Poli ics o Thi d Wa e Feminisms. London: Pal-
g a e Macmillan, 2015.
18.
F. Fu e , In e p e ing he F ench Re olu ion. Camb idge: Cam-
b idge Uni e si y P ess, 1981.
19.
A. Giddens, The Thi d Way: The Renewal o Social Democ acy.
Camb idge: Poli y P ess, 2013.
20.
S. J. Gould, The Mismeasu e o Man. New Yo k: W. W. No on
& Company, 1996.
21.
R. Guha, En i onmen alism: A Global His o y. New Yo k: Long-
man, 2000.
22.
A. Koy é, F om he Closed Wo ld o he In ini e Uni e se. New
Yo k: Ha pe & Row, 1957.
23.
B. P. Le ack, The Wi ch-Hun in Ea ly Mode n Eu ope, 3 d ed.
Ha low: Pea son Educa ion, 2006.
24.
D. E. Lips ad , Denial: Holocaus His o y on T ial. New Yo k:
Ha pe Collins Publishe s, 1993.
25.
K. Ma x, Capi al: A C i ique o Poli ical Economy, Volume I. Lon-
don: Penguin Books, 1990, o iginally published 1867.
26.
M. Meisne , Mao’s China and A e : A His o y o he People’s
Republic. New Yo k: F ee P ess, 1999.
27.
D. Rosenblum, “How new yo k’s yi o ins i u e is keeping
yiddish cul u e ali e,” h ps://nypos .com/2025/01/04/li es yle/
how-new-yo ks-yi o-ins i u e-is-keeping-yiddish-cul u e-ali e/,
Janua y 4 2025, accessed: 2025-05-17.
28. B. Sande s, Ou Re olu ion. New Yo k: Thomas Dunne Books,
2016.
29.
H. E. Sige is , The His o y o Medicine. New Yo k: Ox o d
Uni e si y P ess, 1941.
30.
N. S e n, The Economics o Clima e Change: The S e n Re iew.
Camb idge: Camb idge Uni e si y P ess, 2007.
31.
R. Tong, Feminis Though : A Mo e Comp ehensi e In oduc ion,
2nd ed. Boulde , CO: Wes iew P ess, 2009.
32.
M. Webe , The P o es an E hic and he Spi i o Capi alism.
Los Angeles: Roxbu y Publishing Company, 2002, o iginally
published 1905.
33.
S. Basu, Religious Re i alism as Na ionalis Discou se: Swami
Vi ekananda and New Hinduism in Nine een h-Cen u y Bengal.
New Delhi: Ox o d Uni e si y P ess, 2002.
34.
T. B anch, Pa ing he Wa e s: Ame ica in he King Yea s,
1954–63. New Yo k: Simon & Schus e , 1988.
35.
B. Chand a, India’s S uggle o Independence: 1857–1947. New
Delhi: Penguin Books, 1989.
36.
R. W. Connell, Gende and Powe : Socie y, he Pe son and Sexual
Poli ics. S an o d, CA: S an o d Uni e si y P ess, 1987.
37.
N. Cope nicus, De Re olu ionibus O bium Coeles ium. Nu em-
be g: Johannes Pe eius, 1543.
38.
H. T. Diep, M. Kau man, and S. Kau man, “Social conflic s s udied
by s a is ical physics app oach and mon e ca lo simula ions,”
P oceedings, ol. 46, no. 1, p. 4, 2020.
39.
N. B. Di ks, Cas es o Mind: Colonialism and he Making o
Mode n India. P ince on, NJ: P ince on Uni e si y P ess, 2001.
