ISSN 3028-1261
10.5281/zenodo.17308776/NIJSE.2025
Holis ic P o essional G ow h and Class oom Obse a ion Ra ing
o Teache s: A One-Way ANOVA App oach
Honey Jane F. Sa e
Abs ac . This s udy examined how componen s o Holis ic P o essional G ow h, namely,
Collabo a i e P o essional De elopmen , Men o ship P og ams, and P o essional E alua ion
Sys ems, a ec he class oom obse a ion a ings o English eache s in he Ma o Sou h Dis ic ,
Schools Di ision o Ma i Ci y. Using a desc ip i e-co ela ional esea ch design, da a we e
ga he ed om 100 English eache s h ough a s uc u ed su ey, and analyzed using desc ip i e
s a is ics, One-Way ANOVA, and mul iple eg ession analysis. Findings e ealed ha mos
eache s epo ed mode a e o high le els o engagemen in p o essional g ow h ac i i ies.
Class oom obse a ion a ings we e gene ally high, wi h an a e age sco e o 4.30. Howe e ,
One-Way ANOVA esul s indica ed no s a is ically signi ican di e ence in obse a ion a ings
based on exposu e o he h ee p o essional g ow h componen s. Simila ly, eg ession analysis
showed ha none o he componen s signi ican ly p edic ed class oom obse a ion a ings,
wi h he o e all model yielding an R² o 0.059 (p = 0.120). These esul s sugges ha while
p o essional g ow h sys ems a e in place, hei implemen a ion may no be su icien o in luence
obse ed ins uc ional pe o mance di ec ly. The s udy ecommends enhancing he s uc u e,
cohe ence, and de elopmen al alignmen o school p o essional de elopmen , men o ing, and
e alua ion p ocesses.
KEY WORDS
1. Holis ic P o essional G ow h 2. Collabo a i e P o essional De elopmen
3. Men o ship P og am 4. P o essional E alua ion Sys em 5. Class oom
Obse a ion Ra ings 6. English Teache s
Da e Recei ed: Augus 15, 2025 — Da e Re iewed: Sep embe 20, 2025 — Da e Published: Oc obe
10, 2025
1. In oduc ion
Holis ic p o essional g ow h is essen ial o
enhancing eache e ec i eness, bu p esen s
challenges in class oom obse a ion pe o -
mance. A key challenge was he di e se needs
o eache s om di e en backg ounds, neces-
si a ing ailo ed p o essional de elopmen p o-
g ams ha a e o en lacking. In eg a ing a i-
ous g ow h componen s, collabo a i e de elop-
men , men o ship, and e alua ions can c ea e
inconsis ency in suppo . Addi ionally, each-
e s o en ace ime cons ain s due o exis ing
wo kloads, limi ing hei engagemen in g ow h
ac i i ies. A non-suppo i e school cul u e ha
discou ages isk- aking and imp o emen can
u he hinde eache s’ adop ion o new p ac-
ices, a ec ing hei class oom obse a ion pe -
o mance. One o he p ima y si ua ional chal-
lenges o holis ic p o essional g ow h a he in-
NIJSE (2025) -
e na ional le el is he as a ay o cul u al di -
e ences ha in luence eaching p ac ices and
p o essional de elopmen app oaches. Educa-
ional sys ems wo ldwide a e deeply embedded
in hei unique cul u al con ex s, which shape
educa o s’ belie s, alues, and expec a ions e-
ga ding eaching and lea ning. Consequen ly,
educa o s may s uggle o adap o p o essional
g ow h ini ia i es ha do no align wi h hei
cul u al alues, leading o esis ance and dimin-
ished e ec i eness in imp o ing class oom ob-
se a ion pe o mance (Campbell, 2023). An-
o he signi ican challenge is he dispa i y in e-
sou ces a ailable o p o essional de elopmen
ac oss di e en coun ies and egions. In many
de eloping na ions, limi ed unding and in as-
uc u al cons ain s hinde he implemen a ion
o comp ehensi e p o essional g ow h p og ams
o eache s. This lack o esou ces can mani-
es in insu icien aining ma e ials, inadequa e
access o echnology, and a sho age o quali-
ied aine s o men o s. As a esul , eache s
may no ecei e he necessa y suppo o en-
gage in meaning ul p o essional de elopmen ,
which can ad e sely a ec hei class oom pe -
o mance and obse a ion a ings. In con as ,
coun ies wi h mo e obus educa ional sys ems
o en ha e he means o in es in high-quali y
p o essional de elopmen ini ia i es, c ea ing
an imbalance ha can pe pe ua e inequi ies in
eaching e ec i eness (Fan, 2023). The a iabil-
i y in educa ional s anda ds and expec a ions
ac oss coun ies p esen s ano he challenge o
holis ic p o essional g ow h on an in e na ional
scale. Di e en na ions ha e unique cu icula,
assessmen amewo ks, and pe o mance e alu-
a ion c i e ia, which can complica e es ablishing
a cohesi e p o essional de elopmen s a egy.
The di e gence in educa ional p io i ies can c e-
a e con usion o educa o s seeking o imp o e
hei p ac ices based on in e na ional bes p ac-
ices. Addi ionally, eache s who mo e be ween
coun ies may ind adap ing o new expec a ions
challenging, leading o inconsis en eaching
pe o mance. To add ess his challenge, he e is
a need o in e na ional dialogue and collabo a-
ion o ha monize educa ional s anda ds while
espec ing local con ex s, ensu ing ha p o es-
sional g ow h ini ia i es a e ele an and e ec-
i e ac oss di e se educa ional landscapes (Salo,
e .al., 2023). In he Philippine se ing, one o he
key challenges o holis ic p o essional g ow h
o eache s is he cul u al a i udes owa ds p o-
essional de elopmen . The adi ional iew
o eaching as a hie a chical p o ession o en
limi s collabo a ion and open communica ion
among educa o s. In many schools, he e is a
p e ailing no ion ha senio i y equa es o au-
ho i y, which can discou age younge o less
expe ienced eache s om ac i ely pa icipa -
ing in collabo a i e p o essional de elopmen
ac i i ies. This cul u al dynamic can c ea e a
eluc ance among eache s o sha e hei chal-
lenges and successes, ul ima ely hinde ing he
collec i e lea ning p ocess. As a esul , he e -
ec i eness o men o ship p og ams and collabo-
a i e ini ia i es may be diminished, nega i ely
impac ing eache s’ pe o mance du ing class-
oom obse a ions (Chung and Choe, 2024).
Many schools, pa icula ly in u al a eas, ace
budge cons ain s ha es ic access o high-
quali y aining p og ams, ma e ials, and acili-
ies necessa y o e ec i e p o essional g ow h.
Teache s o en s uggle wi h inadequa e aining
oppo uni ies, insu icien men o ing suppo ,
and a lack o access o echnology ha could
enhance hei eaching p ac ices (Salih, 2023).
This dispa i y in esou ces a ec s he quali y
o p o essional de elopmen and con ibu es o
he e en ion o quali ied educa o s, as eache s
may eel unsuppo ed in hei p o essional jou -
neys. Wi hou adequa e esou ces, eache s may
ind implemen ing new s a egies lea ned om
p o essional de elopmen p og ams di icul , ul-
ima ely impac ing hei class oom pe o mance
and obse a ion a ings (Caniglia, e .al., 2023).
In Ma i Ci y, a coas al ci y in Da ao O ien-
al, eache s’ challenges o holis ic p o essional
2ISSN 3028-1261
10.5281/zenodo.17308776/NIJSE.2025
NIJSE (2025) -
g ow h a e pa icula ly p onounced due o ge-
og aphic and socio-economic ac o s. Many
schools in he a ea ace di icul ies ela ed o
accessibili y and in as uc u e, wi h some e-
mo e ba angays lacking adequa e anspo a ion
and communica ion acili ies. This si ua ion
hampe s eache s’ abili y o pa icipa e in p o-
essional de elopmen wo kshops and aining
p og ams ha a e o en held in u ban cen e s,
c ea ing a dispa i y in access o quali y educa-
ion and aining esou ces. Mo eo e , he local
educa ion sys em g apples wi h a sho age o
quali ied aine s who can p o ide ongoing sup-
po and men o ship o eache s in u al a eas.
This lack o localized p o essional de elopmen
a ec s eache s’ skills and con idence. I im-
pac s hei pe o mance in class oom obse a-
ions, as hey may no ha e he necessa y ools
o s a egies o implemen e ec i e eaching
p ac ices. Thus, his pape is p esen ed.
1.1. Re iew o Signi ican Li e a u e—
1.1.1. Holis ic P o essional G ow h—P o-
essional g ow h in ol es no only pedagogi-
cal skills bu also emo ional in elligence, well-
being, and li elong lea ning. Teache s g ow
h ough men o ship, e lec ion, collabo a i e de-
elopmen , and exposu e o di e se p ac ices
(Nichols e al., 2023). Holis ic app oaches en-
su e educa o s a e p epa ed o mee complex
class oom demands and sus ain hei ca ee s.
1.1.2. Collabo a i e P o essional De el-
opmen —Collabo a ion h ough PLCs, pee
coaching, and wo kshops os e s sha ed ac-
coun abili y and inno a ion. P o essional
G ow h Plans (PGPs) embedded in PLCs im-
p o e inclusi e eaching and s uden ou comes
(McLeskey e al., 2019, as ci ed in Caniglia e
al., 2023). Filipino eache s also cons uc p o-
essional iden i ies balancing oles as expe s,
ca e ake s, and in e na ional educa o s (Jung
Choe, 2024). Resea ch unde sco es ha p o-
essional lea ning mus in eg a e social us ,
ecogni ion, and agency o h i e (Salo e al.,
2024).
1.1.3. Men o ship P og ams—Men o ship
p o ides guidance, con idence-building, and e-
lec i e p ac ice in eaching. I suppo s lesson
planning, class oom managemen , and ins uc-
ional echniques. Make spaces, o example,
enhance bo h eache p o essional de elopmen
and child-cen e ed STEM lea ning (Kay Bux-
on, 2024). In he Philippines, Mad asah Educa-
ion highligh s cu iculum planning challenges
and he need o consensus-d i en, cul u ally
ele an de elopmen (Sali, 2023).
1.1.4. P o essional E alua ion Sys ems—
E alua ion sys ems use obse a ions, s uden
ou comes, and pee e iews o gi e cons uc i e
eedback o g ow h. Howe e , s udies show
inequi ies, wi h Black women eache s a ed
lowe despi e equal e ec i eness, aising con-
ce ns abou bias (No h Ca olina case s udy).
In he Philippines, he PPST shi ed om col-
lec i is o indi idualis amewo ks, ocusing
mo e on eache s han p ac ices (Macam, 2022).
Facul y sabba icals also demons a e he impo -
ance o sel -di ec ed g ow h and balance (Ga d-
ne , 2022).
1.1.5. Class oom Obse a ion—Class-
oom obse a ions measu e eache e ec i e-
ness bu aise conce ns abou subjec i i y, eed-
back gaps, and eliance on s uden es esul s
(Fan, 2023). Tools like LIDO ack discou se a-
lidi y and highligh eache -s uden in e ac ion
quali y (LaRusso e al., 2024). Obse a ional
s udies s ess pu pose ul, in e ac i e, and e lec-
i e class oom en i onmen s as key o deepe
lea ning and lea ne au onomy (Søl ik Glenna,
2022; Upa a Chusanacho i, 2023).
1.2. Syn hesis—The s udy ”Holis ic P o-
essional G ow h and Class oom Obse a ion
Ra ing o Teache s: A One-Way ANOVA Ap-
p oach” highligh s he in e connec edness o
hese a iables and hei collec i e impac on
eache pe o mance. Resea ch indica es ha
collabo a i e p o essional de elopmen os e s
a cul u e o sha ed lea ning and con inuous im-
p o emen , enabling eache s o exchange bes
3ISSN 3028-1261
10.5281/zenodo.17308776/NIJSE.2025
NIJSE (2025) -
p ac ices and e ine hei ins uc ional s a egies,
which can lead o enhanced class oom e ec-
i eness. Addi ionally, li e a u e on men o ship
p og ams unde sco es hei signi icance in p o-
iding pe sonalized suppo and guidance, pa -
icula ly o no ice eache s, he eby inc easing
con idence and eaching e icacy. Fu he mo e,
s udies examining pe o mance e alua ion sys-
ems e eal hei po en ial o se e no only as
accoun abili y measu es bu also as de elopmen-
al ools ha p o ide cons uc i e eedback and
os e e lec i e p ac ices. By in eg a ing hese
h ee componen s, he li e a u e sugges s ha a
comp ehensi e app oach o p o essional g ow h
can signi ican ly imp o e class oom obse a-
ion a ings, ul ima ely con ibu ing o be e
s uden ou comes. This unde sco es he need o
educa ional s akeholde s o p io i ize he imple-
men a ion o cohesi e p o essional de elopmen
ini ia i es ha le e age collabo a ion, men o -
ship, and pe o mance e alua ion o enhance he
o e all quali y o eaching in he class oom.
1.3. Theo e ical F amewo k—In he s udy
i led ” Holis ic P o essional G ow h and Class-
oom Obse a ion Ra ing o Teache s: A One-
Way ANOVA App oach,” se e al educa ional
heo ies p o ide a obus heo e ical amewo k
o unde s anding he in e play be ween educa-
ional managemen s a egies and eache pe o -
mance. Fi s ly, Cons uc i is Theo y, no ably
ad anced by heo is s such as Piage and Vygo -
sky, emphasizes he ole o social in e ac ions
and collabo a i e lea ning in de eloping knowl-
edge and skills. This heo y aligns well wi h
he inclusion o collabo a i e p o essional de-
elopmen and men o ship p og ams, as hese
s a egies os e a suppo i e communi y whe e
eache s can sha e expe iences, ecei e eed-
back, and engage in e lec i e p ac ice. By p o-
mo ing collabo a ion, hese app oaches help ed-
uca o s e ine hei eaching p ac ices, he eby
posi i ely in luencing class oom obse a ion a -
ings (Nichols e al., 2023). Secondly, T ans o -
ma ional Leade ship Theo y is pe inen , pa ic-
ula ly in he con ex o pe o mance e alua ion
sys ems. This heo y, oo ed in he wo k o Bass
and A olio, posi s ha e ec i e leade ship can
inspi e and mo i a e eache s o exceed hei
own sel -in e es s o he sake o he o ganiza-
ion. Educa ional leade s who employ ans-
o ma ional p ac ices cul i a e an en i onmen
o us , encou age p o essional g ow h, and
ecognize eache achie emen s, all o which
con ibu e o enhanced class oom pe o mance.
This is especially ele an when assessing how
pe o mance e alua ion sys ems a e pe cei ed
and u ilized by English eache s (Jung Choe,
2024). Las ly, he Sel -De e mina ion Theo y
(SDT), p oposed by Deci and Ryan, unde sco es
he impo ance o in insic mo i a ion and he
ul illmen o psychological needs, compe ence,
au onomy, and ela edness in p omo ing op i-
mal pe o mance. This heo y is signi ican o
unde s anding how a ious educa ional manage-
men s a egies, such as men o ship and p o-
essional de elopmen , can enhance eache s’
sense o compe ence and au onomy. When
eache s eel suppo ed and empowe ed h ough
hese s a egies, hey a e mo e likely o en-
gage in e ec i e eaching p ac ices, leading o
imp o ed class oom obse a ion a ings (Sali,
2023). Figu e 1 p esen s he amewo k o he
s udy ” Holis ic P o essional G ow h and Class-
oom Obse a ion Ra ing o Teache s: A One-
Way ANOVA App oach. ” This s udy highligh s
he in e ela ionships be ween independen and
dependen a iables, unde pinned by ele an
educa ional heo ies. The independen a iables
(IVs) include Collabo a i e P o essional De-
elopmen , Men o ship P og ams, and Pe o -
mance E alua ion Sys ems, while he depen-
den a iable (DV) is Class oom Obse a ion
Ra ings. The Cons uc i is Theo y is a ounda-
ion o unde s anding he ole o Collabo a i e
P o essional De elopmen in os e ing an en i-
onmen o social in e ac ion and collabo a i e
lea ning among eache s. This heo y empha-
sizes ha when English eache s engage in pee -
4ISSN 3028-1261
10.5281/zenodo.17308776/NIJSE.2025
NIJSE (2025) -
Fig. 1. Concep ual F amewo k o he S udy
o-pee lea ning and sha e hei p ac ices, hey
a e mo e likely o e lec on and enhance hei
eaching me hodologies. Such e lec i e p ac-
ices can imp o e pe o mance, as e idenced by
highe a ings du ing class oom obse a ions.
Addi ionally, he T ans o ma ional Leade ship
Theo y is c ucial o examining he impac o
Pe o mance E alua ion Sys ems on English
eache s. E ec i e educa ional leade s employ
hese e alua ion sys ems as assessmen ools
and a enues o p o essional g ow h and mo i-
a ion. By adop ing a ans o ma ional leade -
ship s yle, school leade s can inspi e eache s
o imp o e hei p ac ices, c ea ing a cul u e o
con inuous de elopmen ha con ibu es posi-
i ely o class oom obse a ion a ings. Fu he -
mo e, Sel -De e mina ion Theo y (SDT) em-
phasizes he impo ance o in insic mo i a ion
in d i ing op imal pe o mance. Implemen ing
Men o ship P og ams exempli ies his heo y,
as hese p og ams p o ide essen ial suppo ha
enhances eache s’ eelings o compe ence and
au onomy. When English eache s ecei e guid-
ance and encou agemen om men o s, hei in-
insic mo i a ion will likely inc ease, leading o
mo e e ec i e eaching p ac ices and imp o ed
class oom obse a ion a ings. Gi en his, he
heo e ical amewo k illus a es he in ica e
connec ions be ween educa ional managemen
s a egies and pe o mance ou comes in English
eaching. This heo e ical g ounding allows o
a meaning ul explo a ion o he e ec i eness
o a ious educa ional managemen s a egies
in enhancing he pe o mance o English each-
e s, as e lec ed in hei class oom obse a ion
a ings.
1.4. Resea ch Ques ions—The s udy is
pu posely conduc ed o analyze he e ec o
collabo a i e p o essional de elopmen , men-
o ship p og ams, and p o essional e alua ion
sys ems on class oom obse a ion a ings o
eache s in Ma o Sou h, Ma i Ci y Schools Di-
ision. This speci ically seeks o answe he
ollowing s a emen o he p oblem:
(1) Wha is he le el o he Holis ic P o essional G ow h o English Teache s in e ms o
(1) Collabo a i e P o essional De elopmen
(2) Men o ship P og am
(3) P o essional E alua ion Sys em
(2) Wha is he ex en o class oom obse a ion a ings among English Teache s?
(3) I
s he e a signi ican di e ence in class oom obse a ion a ings when eache s a e ex-
5ISSN 3028-1261
10.5281/zenodo.17308776/NIJSE.2025
NIJSE (2025) -
posed o collabo a i e p o essional de elopmen , men o ship p og ams, and p o essional
e alua ion sys ems?
(4) Which among he Holis ic P o essional G ow h signi ican ly impac s class oom obse a-
ion a ings?
1.5. Hypo heses—To p o ide empi ical e -
idence gi en he posed heo e ical and concep-
ual amewo ks as claimed by he s udy, null
hypo heses we e es ed a a 0.05 alpha le el o
signi icance, s a ing: Ho 1: The e is no signi i-
can di e ence in class oom obse a ion a ings
when eache s a e exposed o collabo a i e p o-
essional de elopmen , men o ship p og ams,
and p o essional e alua ion sys ems. and, Ho2:
None o he Holis ic P o essional G ow h signi -
ican ly impac s class oom obse a ion a ings.
This s udy de ined he e ms ope a ionally o
acili a e a be e unde s anding and e e ence
hem when discussing esul s in he p eceding
chap e s.
1.5.1. Collabo a i e P o essional De el-
opmen —Re e s o a s uc u ed app oach o
enhancing educa o s’ skills and knowledge
h ough collec i e pa icipa ion in lea ning ex-
pe iences. This concep emphasizes he impo -
ance o collabo a ion among educa o s, such as
eache s, ins uc ional coaches, and school lead-
e s, o os e a cul u e o con inuous imp o e-
men and sha ed expe ise. I ypically in ol es
a ious ac i i ies, including wo kshops, pee ob-
se a ions, co- eaching, and e lec i e p ac ice
sessions, whe e educa o s wo k oge he o ana-
lyze hei eaching me hods, sha e bes p ac ices,
and suppo one ano he ’s p o essional g ow h.
This s udy will ope a ionalize collabo a i e P o-
essional De elopmen h ough s uc u ed ac-
i i ies designed o acili a e eache collabo a-
ion and p o essional g ow h. Speci ically, he
s udy will include wo kshops and aining ses-
sions o in oduce inno a i e eaching s a egies,
pee obse a ion and eedback o p omo e e-
lec i e p ac ice, co- eaching oppo uni ies ha
allow eache s o lea n om one ano he , and
egula collabo a i e planning mee ings whe e
educa o s can discuss s uden da a and ins uc-
ional plans. Addi ionally, men o ship p og ams
will pai expe ienced eache s wi h no ices o
acili a e knowledge sha ing and p o essional
de elopmen .
1.5.2. Men o ship P og am—Is a s uc-
u ed ini ia i e designed o pai expe ienced
educa o s (men o s) wi h less expe ienced o
no ice eache s (men ees) o os e p o essional
g ow h, enhance eaching skills, and imp o e
educa ional ou comes. This p og am ypically
in ol es egula in e ac ions whe e men o s p o-
ide guidance, suppo , and eedback, helping
men ees na iga e challenges in hei eaching
p ac ice and de elop hei p o essional iden i y.
This s udy will include scheduled mee ings o
one-on-one coaching sessions, class oom ob-
se a ions, and discussions ocused on ins uc-
ional s a egies, class oom managemen , and
cu iculum implemen a ion. The men o s will
sha e hei expe ise and expe iences while en-
cou aging men ees o e lec on hei p ac ices
and se p o essional goals.
1.5.3. A P o essional E alua ion Sys em—
I was a s uc u ed amewo k designed o assess
and enhance educa o s’ pe o mance h ough
sys ema ic obse a ion, eedback, and e al-
ua ion p ocesses. This sys em ypically in-
cludes a se o c i e ia and s anda ds agains
which eache s a e assessed, inco po a ing a -
ious da a sou ces such as class oom obse a-
ions, s uden pe o mance me ics, and sel -
assessmen s. These e alua o s will u ilize s an-
da dized ub ics o assess eaching p ac ices,
p o iding cons uc i e eedback o os e p o-
essional g ow h. Addi ionally, he sys em will
inco po a e eache sel -assessmen s and s u-
den pe o mance da a o c ea e a holis ic iew
o each educa o ’s e ec i eness.
6ISSN 3028-1261
10.5281/zenodo.17308776/NIJSE.2025
NIJSE (2025) -
1.5.4. Class oom Obse a ion Ra ings
based on he Resul s—Based Pe o mance Man-
agemen Sys em (RPMS) Mul i-Yea Re e o
he sys ema ic e alua ion o eache s’ ins uc-
ional p ac ices as pa o a s uc u ed ame-
wo k es ablished by educa ional au ho i ies o
ensu e quali y eaching and imp o e s uden ou -
comes. This a ing sys em u ilizes speci ic c i e-
ia aligned wi h educa ional s anda ds o assess
a ious dimensions o eaching, such as lesson
deli e y, s uden engagemen , class oom man-
agemen , and assessmen s a egies. T ained
e alua o s will conduc egula class oom ob-
se a ions, using es ablished ub ics o assign
a ings ha e lec he e ec i eness o eaching
p ac ices. These a ings will hen be analyzed
o de e mine co ela ions wi h he implemen ed
Collabo a i e P o essional De elopmen and
Men o ship P og ams.
2. Me hodology
In his chap e , he esea che ou lines he essen ial p ocesses and s eps equi ed o conduc
he s udy. These include selec ing he s udy design, de e mining he esponden s and sampling
me hod, choosing he esea ch ins umen s o da a ga he ing, ou lining he p ocedu e, add essing
e hical conside a ions, and conduc ing da a analysis. These s eps a e c ucial o ensu ing he
app op ia eness and co ec ness o he s udy and p oducing sound da a collec ion, analysis, and
in e p e a ion.
2.1. Resea ch Design—The esea ch de-
sign o his s udy is a quan i a i e, compa -
a i e analysis o assess Holis ic P o essional
G ow h’s e ec on collabo a i e p o essional
de elopmen , men o ship p og ams, and pe o -
mance e alua ion sys ems on class oom obse -
a ion a ings o English Teache s in Ma i Sou h
Dis ic , Ma i Ci y. The One-Way Analysis o
Va iance (ANOVA) is u ilized o analyze he
di e ences among collabo a i e p o essional
de elopmen , men o ship p og ams, and pe o -
mance e alua ion sys ems (C eswell, 2020) and
he dependen a iable, class oom obse a ion
a ings.
One-way ANOVA (Analysis o Va iance) I
was a s a is ical me hod ha was highly applica-
ble o he s udy. I allows o compa ing means
among mul iple g oups o de e mine i s a is i-
cally signi ican di e ences exis be ween hem.
In he s udy, he One-Way Analysis o Va iance
(ANOVA) is employed as he p ima y s a is ical
me hod o e alua e he impac o Holis ic P o es-
sional G ow h on class oom obse a ion a ings.
This s a is ical echnique is pa icula ly sui able
o compa ing he means o h ee o mo e inde-
penden g oups, allowing esea che s o assess
whe he he pedagogical app oaches employed
in di e en class ooms lead o signi ican di e -
ences in s uden ou comes. In he s udy con ex ,
One-Way ANOVA (Analysis o Va iance) will
be used o analyze he di e ences in class oom
obse a ion a ings among a ious g oups o En-
glish eache s who ha e expe ienced di e en
p o essional de elopmen s a egies. Speci i-
cally, he s udy will ca ego ize eache s based
on hei pa icipa ion in dis inc p o essional
g ow h ini ia i es, such as Collabo a i e P o es-
sional De elopmen , Men o ship P og ams, and
implemen ing Pe o mance E alua ion Sys ems.
By applying One-Way ANOVA, he s udy aims
o de e mine whe he he e a e s a is ically sig-
ni ican di e ences in he class oom obse a ion
a ings a ibu able o he ype o p o essional
de elopmen ecei ed. This analysis p o ided
insigh s in o which s a egies a e mos e ec i e
in enhancing eaching pe o mance, allowing
o a clea e unde s anding o how di e en ap-
p oaches o p o essional de elopmen impac
7ISSN 3028-1261
10.5281/zenodo.17308776/NIJSE.2025
NIJSE (2025) -
educa o s’ ins uc ional p ac ices. The indings
will also help in o m educa ional leade s and
policymake s abou he e ec i eness o hese
ini ia i es, guiding u u e decisions on esou ce
alloca ion and p o essional de elopmen p o-
g am design. Th ough his igo ous s a is ical
analysis, he s udy seeks o con ibu e aluable
e idence o he discou se on eache e ec i e-
ness and p o essional g ow h in educa ional se -
ings.
2.2. E hical Conside a ions—The e hical
conside a ion sec ion o his s udy will add ess
he key p inciples ha ensu e he p o ec ion
and well-being o he eache - esponden s in-
ol ed. This includes adhe ing o social alues,
in o med consen and assen , ulne abili y o e-
sea ch esponden s, p i acy and con iden iali y,
isks, bene i s, and sa e y, jus ice, anspa ency,
quali ica ion o he esea che , con lic o in e -
es , adequacy o acili ies, and communi y in-
ol emen . P i acy and Con iden iali y The e-
sea ch will implemen s ic measu es o p o ec
pa icipan s’ iden i ies and pe sonal in o ma ion.
Da a collec ed om eache s a e anonymized,
meaning ha indi idual esponses will no be
linked o hei names o iden i iable cha ac e -
is ics. Addi ionally, access o he da a is e-
s ic ed o au ho ized esea ch pe sonnel only,
and any epo ing o indings will agg ega e
da a o p e en he iden i ica ion o indi idual
pa icipan s. By p io i izing p i acy and con-
iden iali y, he s udy aims o c ea e a us ing
en i onmen ha encou ages eache s o p o-
ide hones and open eedback wi hou ea o
epe cussions, ul ima ely enhancing he alidi y
and eliabili y o he esea ch indings.
2.3. Resea ch Responden s—The s udy’s
esponden s will be he eache s o he Ma i
Sou h Dis ic in he Schools Di ision o he
Ci y o Ma i, speci ically hose eaching English
subjec s. The o al popula ion consis s o 133
eache s om he dis ic ’s schools, which in-
clude Sanghay Elemen a y School, F ancisco C.
Hinayon Elemen a y School, Galacio G. Y ac
Elemen a y School, Dawan Elemen a y School,
Paciano A. Ge on Elemen a y Memo ial School,
and Lanca In eg a ed School. Using Slo in’s
o mula wi h a 95 % con idence le el and a
ma gin o e o o 5 %, a sample size o 100
eache s will be selec ed o pa icipa e in he
s udy. These schools will se e as he sou ces
o he s udy’s esponden s. The inclusion c i-
e ia o he s udy’s esponden s a e ca e ully
es ablished o ensu e he ele ance and eliabil-
i y o he da a collec ed. Fi s , only eache s
assigned o English subjec ins uc ion will be
included, as he s udy speci ically ocuses on
English eaching p ac ices, challenges, and in-
e en ions. Limi ing he esponden s o hose
o icially designa ed o each English ensu es
ha he da a collec ed align wi h he s udy’s ob-
jec i es, p e en ing po en ial con ounding a i-
ables om eache s o o he subjec s. Second,
he esponden s mus be cu en ly employed
in he Ma o Dis ic schools wi hin he Da ao
Occiden al Schools Di ision. This c i e ion en-
su es ha he s udy cap u es insigh s speci ic
o he dis ic ’s eaching condi ions, adminis a-
i e policies, and s uden demog aphics wi hin
he dis ic . Including eache s om ou side
his dis ic may in oduce a ia ions in educa-
ional con ex s ha a e no ele an o he s udy.
Las ly, eache s mus ha e a leas one yea o
expe ience eaching English. This equi emen
ensu es ha esponden s ha e encoun e ed in-
s uc ional challenges, s uden lea ning dynam-
ics, and cu iculum implemen a ion issues, mak-
ing hei insigh s aluable o unde s anding he
eali ies o English ins uc ion in he dis ic .
Newly hi ed eache s wi h less han one yea
o expe ience may no ha e had su icien ex-
posu e o hese ac o s, which could a ec he
dep h and eliabili y o he da a.
2.4. Resea ch Ins umen —In his e-
sea ch s udy, he esea che de eloped a sel -
made su ey h ough adap ed su ey ins u-
men s om Fan’s (2023) s udy on Accoun -
abili y in he E alua ion o Teache E ec i e-
8ISSN 3028-1261
10.5281/zenodo.17308776/NIJSE.2025
NIJSE (2025) -
ness: Views o Teache s and Adminis a o s,
and o he sou ces like Campbell’s (2023) on
Ra ings in Black and Whi e: A Quan i a i e
Examina ion o Race and Gende in Teache
E alua ion Re o m. The con en s o he espec-
i e ools we e adop ed and modi ied based on
he p oblem s a emen , he a iables, and he
s udy’s con en ion. The esea che made a ded-
ica ed e o o collec and analyze li e a u e
o iden i y concep s ha in o med he con en
and p o ided suppo o he ins umen and i s
associa ed componen s. This ca e ul p ocess
esul ed in ques ion i ems add essing po en ial
h ea s o he s udy’s alidi y. The su ey ques-
ionnai e had wo pa s. One pa de e mined he
ex en o Holis ic P o essional G ow h in e ms
o collabo a i e de elopmen , men o ship p o-
g am, and p o essional e alua ion sys em. Like-
wise, he second pa o he su ey measu es
he ex en o class oom obse a ion a ings in
a Resul s-based Pe o mance Managemen Sys-
em. This sys em is a s a egic amewo k used
in educa ional se ings o assess and enhance
he pe o mance o eache s and educa ional
s a based on clea ly de ined ou comes and ob-
jec i es. This sys em emphasizes accoun abil-
i y and esul s by linking pe o mance e alua-
ions o speci ic pe o mance indica o s aligned
wi h he educa ional ins i u ion’s goals. In he
RPMS, eache s a e e alua ed on hei abili y
o mee es ablished c i e ia, including s uden
achie emen , ins uc ional e ec i eness, class-
oom managemen , and p o essional de elop-
men e o s. The p ocess ypically in ol es
se ing pe o mance a ge s, conduc ing egula
obse a ions, and ga he ing da a h ough a i-
ous me hods such as sel -assessmen s and pee
e iews. This comp ehensi e e alua ion p o-
ides eedback on indi idual pe o mance and
highligh s a eas o imp o emen and p o es-
sional g ow h. Fu he , he su ey s a emen s
will be subjec ed o a es - e es o alidi y and
eliabili y es ing using C onbach’s Alpha a
a .05 con idence le el. C onbach’s alpha is a
measu e o scale eliabili y ha assesses he de-
g ee o which su ey i ems co ela e wi h each
o he , hus p o iding a uni ied measu e o a
cons uc . A alue abo e 0.70 is gene ally con-
side ed accep able, wi h alues abo e 0.80 in-
dica ing good eliabili y and alues abo e 0.90
signi ying excellen eliabili y (Tabachnik Fi-
del, 2019). The ins umen o he s udy is a
ca ego ical su ey ques ionnai e designed o
ga he nominal da a on he Holis ic P o essional
G ow h o English eache s. I consis s o h ee
sec ions, each add essing a speci ic ca ego y:
Collabo a i e P o essional De elopmen , Men-
o ship P og am, and P o essional E alua ion
Sys em. Each sec ion con ains closed-ended
ques ions wi h h ee dis inc op ions, allowing
esponden s o selec he ca ego y ha bes ap-
plies o hei p o essional expe ience. The e-
sponses a e classi ied in o mu ually exclusi e
g oups wi hou anking o hie a chy, ensu ing
ha he da a emains pu ely nominal. The in-
s umen is s uc u ed o acili a e clea classi-
ica ion and equency analysis, making i an
e ec i e ool o iden i ying pa e ns in p o-
essional de elopmen among English eache s.
Meanwhile, o de e mine he ex en o class-
oom obse a ion a ings in he Resul s-based
Pe o mance Managemen Sys em, a 5-poin
Like scale was used in his s udy, as p esen ed
below;
The ca ego iza ion o indica o s unde S a e-
men o he P oblem 1 was pu pose ully de-
signed o cap u e he mul idimensional na u e
o holis ic p o essional g ow h among English
eache s. Th ee domains we e examined: col-
labo a i e p o essional de elopmen , men o -
ship p og ams, and p o essional e alua ion sys-
ems. Each domain was classi ied in o ca e-
go ical le els Low, Mode a e, and High, o e-
lec he dep h and equency o eache engage-
9ISSN 3028-1261
10.5281/zenodo.17308776/NIJSE.2025
NIJSE (2025) -
Table 4. Class oom Obse a ion Ra ings among English Teache s
No Class oom Obse a ion n Mean Desc ip i e
In e p e a ion
1
My class oom obse a ion a ings in Mul i-Yea
3 e lec signi ican imp o emen s due o he
skills and s a egies I gained om collabo a i e
p o essional de elopmen ac i i ies
100 4.60 Ve y Ex ensi e
2
The guidance p o ided by my men o has di-
ec ly in luenced my class oom obse a ion a -
ings in Mul i-Yea 3
100 4.29 Ve y Ex ensi e
3
I belie e ha he eedback ecei ed om he
pe o mance e alua ion sys em has con ibu ed
o enhanced class oom obse a ion a ings in
Mul i-Yea 3
100 3.58 Ex ensi e
4
Pa icipa ing in collabo a i e p o essional de el-
opmen and men o ship has led o no iceable
imp o emen s in my class oom obse a ion a -
ings o e he pas h ee yea s
100 4.06 Ex ensi e
5
My o e all e ec i eness as a eache , as e i -
denced by my class oom obse a ion a ings
in Mul i-Yea 3, has signi ican ly bene i ed
om he in eg a ion o collabo a i e p o essional
g ow h, men o ship, and pe o mance e alua-
ions
100 4.06 Ex ensi e
6
The collabo a i e lea ning expe iences I engaged
in o e he pas h ee yea s ha e had a las ing
impac on my class oom obse a ion a ings
100 4.70 Ve y Ex ensi e
7
I eel ha he combina ion o men o ship suppo
and pe o mance e alua ions has di ec ly led o
highe class oom obse a ion a ings in Mul i-
Yea 3
100 4.57 Ve y Ex ensi e
8
The s a egies and echniques I lea ned h ough
collabo a i e p o essional de elopmen ha e
been ins umen al in achie ing posi i e class-
oom obse a ion a ings du ing Mul i-Yea 3
100 4.53 Ve y Ex ensi e
A e age
Mean
100 4.30 Ve y Ex ensi e
16 ISSN 3028-1261
10.5281/zenodo.17308776/NIJSE.2025
NIJSE (2025) -
men , Men o ship P og ams, And P o essional
E alua ion Sys ems —Table 5 p esen s he e-
sul s o he One-Way ANOVA conduc ed o de-
e mine whe he he e a e signi ican di e ences
in class oom obse a ion a ings based on each-
e s’ exposu e o Collabo a i e P o essional De-
elopmen (CPD), Men o ship P og ams (MP),
and P o essional E alua ion Sys ems (PES), in-
cluding hei in e ac ion e ec s. The analysis e-
ealed ha CPD had an F- alue o 2.806 and a p-
alue o 0.066. While his esul does no mee
he con en ional le el o s a is ical signi icance
( = 0.05), i indica es a ma ginal e ec , sugges -
ing ha a ia ions in eache s’ engagemen wi h
collabo a i e p o essional de elopmen may po-
en ially in luence hei class oom obse a ion
a ings. On he o he hand, he e ec s o men-
o ship p og ams and p o essional e alua ion
sys ems we e no signi ican , wi h MP yield-
ing an F- alue o 0.724 (p = 0.488) and PES
an F- alue o 1.520 (p = 0.225), espec i ely.
These indings imply ha di e ences in expo-
su e o men o ship and e alua ion sys ems do
no signi ican ly impac class oom pe o mance
as measu ed by obse a ion ools. Fu he mo e,
he in e ac ion e ec s among he h ee a iables
CPD MP, CPD PES, MP PES, and CPD MP
PES also yielded non-signi ican esul s, wi h
p- alues anging om 0.331 o 0.900. This
indica es ha combina ions o p o essional de-
elopmen , men o ing, and e alua ion s a egies
do no signi ican ly in luence class oom obse -
a ion a ings when examined simul aneously.
The esidual a iance (SS = 7.779; d = 81) ac-
coun s o he emaining unexplained a ia ion,
highligh ing ha o he ac o no included in he
model may con ibu e o di e ences in each-
ing pe o mance. Based on hese indings, he
esul s suppo he e en ion o he posed null
hypo heses: (1) ha he e is no signi ican di -
e ence in class oom obse a ion a ings based
on eache s’ exposu e o collabo a i e p o es-
sional de elopmen , men o ship p og ams, and
p o essional e alua ion sys ems; and (2) ha
none o he componen s o holis ic p o essional
g ow h signi ican ly in luence class oom obse -
a ion a ings. These ou comes a e consis en
wi h p io esea ch, such as he s udy by Lopez
and Panganiban (2021), which ound ha p o-
essional de elopmen e o s mus be sus ained,
con ex ually ele an , and embedded wi hin in-
s uc ional suppo sys ems o yield obse able
imp o emen s in class oom p ac ice. Simila ly,
Singh and Sha ma (2023) emphasized ha pee
men o ing alone may no signi ican ly a ec pe -
o mance unless accompanied by o mal eed-
back and s uc u ed implemen a ion. Gonzales
and de Ve a (2021) also unde sco ed he im-
po ance o aligning e alua ion p ac ices wi h
de elopmen al goals o ensu e ha eedback
leads o meaning ul eache imp o emen . In
conclusion, while collabo a i e p o essional de-
elopmen demons a ed a ma ginal e ec , he
absence o s a is ically signi ican esul s ac oss
all a iables and hei in e ac ions sugges s ha
cu en implemen a ion p ac ices o hese p o-
essional g ow h componen s may no be su -
icien ly obus o p oduce measu able gains
in class oom obse a ion a ings. This calls
o a mo e in eg a ed and s a egic app oach o
eache de elopmen —one ha combines p o-
essional lea ning, men o ing, and e alua ion
wi h e lec i e p ac ice and ins i u ional suppo .
3.4. Componen o Holis ic P o essional
G ow h Signi ican ly Impac Class oom Ob-
se a ion Ra ings —The s udy sough o de-
e mine which componen s o holis ic p o es-
sional g ow h, speci ically Collabo a i e P o-
essional De elopmen (CPD), Men o ship P o-
g ams (MP), and P o essional E alua ion Sys-
ems (PES), signi ican ly p edic o in luence
he class oom obse a ion a ings o English
eache s. Using mul iple linea eg ession anal-
17 ISSN 3028-1261
10.5281/zenodo.17308776/NIJSE.2025
NIJSE (2025) -
Table 5. One-Way ANOVA Summa y: Signi ican Di e ence in Class oom Ob-
se a ion Ra ings Based on Teache s’ Exposu e o Collabo a i e P o essional
De elopmen , Men o ship P og ams, and P o essional E alua ion Sys ems
Cases Sum o Squa es d Mean Squa e F p
CPD 0.539 2 0.270 2.806 .066
MP 0.139 2 0.070 0.724 .488
PES 0.292 2 0.146 1.520 .225
CPD ×MP 0.056 3 0.019 0.194 .900
CPD ×PES 0.156 4 0.039 0.405 .804
MP ×PES 0.448 4 0.112 1.167 .331
CPD ×MP ×PES 0.004 1 0.004 0.045 .833
Residuals 7.779 81 0.096 — —
No e. Type II Sum o Squa es.
ysis, he esul s e ealed ha none o he p o es-
sional g ow h componen s showed s a is ically
signi ican p edic i e powe a he 0.05 le el.
Among he p edic o s, he a iable Collabo a-
i e P o essional De elopmen (Mode a e) had a
coe icien o -0.069 (p = .324), E alua ion Sys-
em (Low) had a coe icien o +0.075 (p = .439),
and E alua ion Sys em (Mode a e) showed a
coe icien o -0.115 (p = .124). The o e all
model yielded an R² o 0.059, indica ing ha
only 5.9These indings imply ha no indi id-
ual componen s o holis ic p o essional g ow h,
as ca ego ized in he s udy, exe ed a s a is i-
cally signi ican in luence on English eache s’
pe o mance as obse ed h ough class oom a -
ings. This ou come suppo s he e en ion o
he null hypo hesis: None o he componen s o
holis ic p o essional g ow h signi ican ly in lu-
ence class oom obse a ion a ings. While his
esul may seem coun e in ui i e, i esona es
wi h ecen esea ch highligh ing he gap be-
ween p o essional de elopmen pa icipa ion
and measu able pe o mance ou comes when in-
e en ions a e no deeply embedded in p ac ice.
Fo ins ance, Bal aci and Yildiz (2022) ound
ha p o essional de elopmen ac i i ies o en
ail o yield pe o mance gains unless hey a e
di ec ly connec ed o ins uc ional coaching and
ollow-up suppo . Simila ly, Rami ez and Lim
(2022) no ed ha he impac o e alua ion sys-
ems on eaching pe o mance is signi ican ly
mode a ed by he quali y o eedback and he
p esence o e lec i e pos -obse a ion dialogue.
Lee and Kim (2023) u he emphasized ha
men o ing only in luences class oom p ac ice
when s uc u ed, con inuous, and aligned wi h
speci ic eaching goals. In his s udy’s con ex ,
he lack o signi ican p edic o s may e lec
implemen a ion challenges, such as inconsis en-
cies in men o ing s uc u es, supe icial pa ici-
pa ion in p o essional de elopmen , o e alua-
ion sys ems ha unc ion mo e as compliance
ools han o ma i e mechanisms. The e o e,
while p o essional g ow h s uc u es may exis
wi hin he school sys em, hei e ec i eness in
shaping obse able eaching p ac ices depends
on dep h, cohe ence, and he p o essional cul-
u e wi hin which hey a e deli e ed. In conclu-
sion, he indings sugges ha holis ic p o es-
sional g ow h mus be in en ionally designed,
sys ema ically deli e ed, and closely moni o ed
o ideli y o i o in luence class oom obse -
a ion a ings meaning ully. P og ams ha a e
agmen ed o disconnec ed om eache s’ ac-
ual ins uc ional eali ies may no p oduce he
desi ed imp o emen s in obse able eaching
quali y.
18 ISSN 3028-1261
10.5281/zenodo.17308776/NIJSE.2025
NIJSE (2025) -
4. Conclusions and Recommenda ions
This chap e p esen s he conclusions d awn om he esul s and indings discussed in he
p eceding chap e and o e s p ac ical ecommenda ions based on he implica ions o he s udy.
The pu pose o his esea ch was o examine he ex en o which he componen s o Holis ic
P o essional G ow h—namely, Collabo a i e P o essional De elopmen , Men o ship P og ams,
and P o essional E alua ion Sys ems—in luence he class oom obse a ion a ings o English
eache s in he Ma o Sou h Dis ic , Schools Di ision o Ma i Ci y. Guided by he s udy’s
objec i es and s a is ical analyses, his chap e p o ides a syn hesis o key insigh s wi h espec o
he le els o eache engagemen in p o essional g ow h ac i i ies and hei obse ed ins uc ional
pe o mance. The conclusions a e ancho ed on bo h he desc ip i e and in e en ial analyses o he
da a and a e amed in ela ion o he es ed hypo heses and aligned li e a u e. Subsequen ly, his
chap e ou lines e idence-based ecommenda ions o school leade s, policymake s, and eache
de elopmen s akeholde s. These ecommenda ions aim o enhance he design and implemen a ion
o p o essional g ow h ini ia i es o imp o e eaching quali y and ins uc ional accoun abili y in
English educa ion.
4.1. Findings—The le el o holis ic p o-
essional g ow h among English eache s was
assessed ac oss h ee main componen s. In
e ms o Collabo a i e P o essional De elop-
men (CPD), a subs an ial po ion o eache s
epo ed mode a e o high le els o engagemen ,
while a smalle g oup indica ed low in ol e-
men . This sugges s ha many eache s a e ac-
i ely pa icipa ing in collabo a i e ini ia i es
ha suppo con inuous p o essional lea ning.
Rega ding Men o ship P og ams (MP), mos e-
sponden s expe ienced a mode a e le el o men-
o ship suppo . Fewe eache s indica ed ei he
low o high le els o pa icipa ion. These ind-
ings poin o he po en ial bene i o enhancing
men o ship e o s o p o ide mo e consis en
and meaning ul suppo o educa o s in hei
p o essional jou ney. Fo P o essional E alua-
ion Sys ems (PES), a conside able numbe o
eache s epo ed mode a e engagemen wi h
e alua ion p ocesses. Some eache s no ed high
engagemen , while o he s epo ed lowe le -
els. These esul s imply ha while e alua ion
mechanisms a e in place, pa icipa ion and pe -
cei ed impac a y among educa o s. The a -
e age class oom obse a ion a ing among En-
glish eache s e lec ed a high le el o obse ed
ins uc ional pe o mance. This indica es ha ,
in gene al, he quali y o class oom ins uc ion
demons a ed by he eache s was s ong and
aligned wi h expec ed eaching s anda ds. Find-
ings om he analysis o a iance e ealed no
signi ican di e ences in class oom obse a ion
a ings when g ouped acco ding o eache s’ ex-
posu e o CPD, MP, o PES. Addi ionally, in-
e ac ion e ec s among hese componen s we e
also no s a is ically signi ican , sugges ing ha
indi idual o combined exposu e o hese p o-
essional g ow h ac o s did no p oduce no-
able a ia ions in ins uc ional pe o mance
a ings. Las ly, he esul s o he eg ession
analysis showed ha none o he componen s
CPD, MP, o PES eme ged as signi ican p e-
dic o s o class oom obse a ion a ings. The
o e all model was no s a is ically signi ican ,
indica ing ha hese p o essional g ow h ac o s
explained only a minimal po ion o he di e -
ences obse ed in ins uc ional pe o mance.
4.2. Conclusions—Based on he indings,
he s udy concludes he ollowing: English
eache s in he s udied di ision demons a e
mode a e o high pa icipa ion in holis ic p o-
essional g ow h ac i i ies. Howe e , he e a e
s ill eache s wi h limi ed engagemen , pa ic-
19 ISSN 3028-1261
10.5281/zenodo.17308776/NIJSE.2025
NIJSE (2025) -
ula ly in o mal men o ing and e alua ion sys-
ems. Class oom obse a ion a ings a e gene -
ally high ac oss he esponden g oup, e lec ing
posi i ely on ins uc ional pe o mance ega d-
less o he ex en o exposu e o p o essional
g ow h componen s. The le els o exposu e
o CPD, MP, and PES do no signi ican ly in-
luence class oom obse a ion ou comes. This
sugges s ha implemen ing hese p o essional
g ow h componen s may no be su icien ly in-
eg a ed, s a egic, o e lec i e o impac ob-
se ed eaching beha io di ec ly. The e is a
need o ee alua e how p o essional de elop-
men , men o ing, and e alua ion sys ems a e de-
signed and deli e ed o ensu e alignmen wi h
eache needs and pe o mance ou comes.
4.3. Recommenda ions—Fo Lea ne s
S eng hening he in eg a ion o p o essional
g ow h componen s ensu es ha lea ne s bene i
om consis en ly imp o ed and well-suppo ed
ins uc ion. When eache s ecei e con inuous
and in e connec ed suppo h ough CPD, men-
o ship, and e alua ion, s uden s a e mo e likely
o expe ience high-quali y, lea ne -cen e ed
eaching ha enhances hei academic achie e-
men and engagemen . Fo Teache s Teache s
s and o gain om o malized men o ship p o-
g ams wi h clea ly de ined objec i es, eedback
mechanisms, and suppo i e s uc u es. These
p og ams, pa icula ly bene icial o no ice and
s uggling eache s, p o ide a sa e and guided
en i onmen o p o essional lea ning. Addi-
ionally, enhancing he de elopmen al unc ion
o e alua ion sys ems p omo es e lec i e p ac-
ice and ins uc ional imp o emen , helping
eache s g ow in bo h compe ence and con i-
dence. Fo School Heads School heads a e
encou aged o lead he in eg a ion and align-
men o CPD, men o ship, and e alua ion as
pa o a comp ehensi e eache de elopmen
s a egy. Conduc ing needs-based p o essional
de elopmen aligned wi h class oom obse -
a ion indings allows school heads o ailo
in e en ions ha di ec ly add ess ins uc ional
gaps, he eby imp o ing school-wide eaching
e ec i eness and lea ne ou comes. Fo DepEd
Top O icials Top-le el decision-make s a e
ad ised o ins i u ionalize con inuous moni-
o ing and impac assessmen s o p o essional
g ow h ini ia i es. These assessmen s will help
de e mine he e ec i eness o p og ams in im-
p o ing ins uc ional quali y and in o m policy
adjus men s a he egional and na ional le -
els, ensu ing ha esou ces a e di ec ed owa d
impac ul and e idence-based p ac ices. Fo
Fu u e Resea che s This s udy unde sco es he
impo ance o examining he in e play be ween
CPD, men o ship, and e alua ion sys ems. Fu-
u e esea che s may explo e he long- e m
e ec s o hese in eg a ed p o essional g ow h
componen s on eaching pe o mance and s u-
den ou comes, p o iding u he insigh s ha
can in o m p og am e inemen and policy o -
mula ion.
5. Re e ences
Al a ez, L. M., & San os, R. D. (2023). Ba ie s o e ec i e eache pe o mance e alua ion in
philippine public seconda y schools. Sou heas Asian Jou nal o Educa ional Adminis a-
ion,7(1), 44–59. h ps://doi.o g/10.5281/zenodo.7788990
Andal, M. C., & Requin o, J. T. (2022). Impac o s uc u ed class oom obse a ion on ins uc ional
p ac ices o english eache s. Philippine Jou nal o Language Teaching and Assessmen ,
4(1), 35–52. h ps://doi.o g/10.5281/zenodo.7081245
Bal aci, H. S., & Yildiz, M. (2022). The ole o a collabo a i e p o essional de elopmen in
imp o ing eache e icacy and ins uc ional quali y: A me a-analysis. In e na ional
20 ISSN 3028-1261
10.5281/zenodo.17308776/NIJSE.2025
NIJSE (2025) -
Jou nal o Educa ional Resea ch Open,3, 100185. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.ijed o.2022.
100185
Campbell, S. L. (2023). Ra ings in black and whi e: A quan c i examina ion o ace and gende
in eache e alua ion e o m. Race, E hnici y and Educa ion,26(7), 815–833. h ps :
//doi.o g/10.1080/13613324.2020.1842345
Caniglia, C., Picanco, K., A nold, K., & Nacca a o, S. (2023). Educa o s’ pe cep ions o p o es-
sional g ow h plans in he con ex o p o essional lea ning communi ies. h ps:// iles.e ic.
ed.go / ull ex /EJ1409597.pd
C eswell, J. W. (2020). Resea ch design: Quali a i e, quan i a i e, and mixed me hods app oaches.
Sage Publica ions.
C uz, M. C., & Bau is a, J. E. (2021). Men o ing ma e s: Add essing he eache e en ion
and ins uc ional capaci y h ough s uc u ed men o ing p og ams. Philippine Jou nal o
Teache Educa ion,5(2), 115–128. h ps://doi.o g/10.56745/pj e.2021.52.115
C uz, R. A., & Be na dino, L. C. (2021). Class oom obse a ion and eache pe o mance: A basis
o p o essional de elopmen among seconda y english eache s. Asia Paci ic Jou nal o
Mul idisciplina y Resea ch,9(2), 21–28. h ps://doi.o g/10.5281/zenodo.5342321
Fan, X. (2023). Accoun abili y in he e alua ion o eache e ec i eness: Views o eache s and
adminis a o s. Educa ional Assessmen , E alua ion, and Accoun abili y,35(4), 585–611.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s11092-023-09419-0
Ga dne , S. K. (2022). Facul y lea ning and p o essional g ow h in he sabba ical lea e. Inno a i e
Highe Educa ion,47(3), 435–451. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s10755-021-09584-4
Gonzales, M. E., & de Ve a, C. R. (2021). Re aming e alua ion o english language eache s in
he philippines: Towa d p o essional g ow h and ins uc ional e o m. Asia Paci ic Jou nal
o Educa ion,41(4), 582–597. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/02188791.2021.1913180
Jung, C., & Choe, H. (2024). P o essional iden i y o ilipino english eache s eaching in e -
na ional s uden s in a global ci y in he philippines. h ps:// iles.e ic.ed.go / ull ex /
EJ1434440.pd
Kay, L., & Bux on, A. (2024). Make spaces and he cha ac e is ics o e ec i e lea ning in he
ea ly yea s. Jou nal o Ea ly Childhood Resea ch,22(3), 343–358. h ps://doi.o g/10.
1177/1476718X231210633
LaRusso, M. D., Al-Adeimi, S., Kim, H. Y., Ha baugh, A. G., & O’Conno , C. (2024). Cap u ing
class oom alk wi h he low-in e ence discou se obse a ion ool: A alida ion s udy. Jou -
nal o Ea ly Adolescence,44(4), 486–516. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/02724316231182291
Lee, Y., & Kim, H. J. (2023). Men o ing as a ehicle o english eache s’ de elopmen : Insigh s
om longi udinal quali a i e esea ch. TESOL Qua e ly,57(1), 150–174. h ps://doi.o g/
10.1002/ esq.3202
Lopez, F. J., & Panganiban, R. T. (2021). Teache e alua ion sys ems and p o essional g ow h:
Implica ions o pe o mance-based assessmen s in philippine public schools. Asia Paci ic
Jou nal o Educa ion,41(3), 465–481. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/02188791.2021.1885312
Macam, A. A. F. (2022). Wha is behind a policy? examining he ideological in en s o eache
p o essional s anda ds in he philippines. In e na ional Educa ion Jou nal: Compa a i e
Pe spec i es,21(2), 100–115. h ps://openjou nals.lib a y.sydney.edu.au/IEJ/a icle/ iew/
15905
21 ISSN 3028-1261
10.5281/zenodo.17308776/NIJSE.2025
NIJSE (2025) -
Nichols, S. L., Conno , S. M., Kas anis, M. P., & Co so, R. M. (2023). P o essional p epa a ion,
g ow h, and ecogni ion in he se ice coo dina ion wo k o ce. In an s and Young Child en,
36(1), 2–20. h ps://doi.o g/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000229
Rami ez, C. J., & Lim, M. A. (2022). Fo ma i e eache e alua ion sys ems and hei impac on
ins uc ional imp o emen : E idence om english class ooms. In e na ional Re iew o
Educa ion,68(3), 315–332. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s11159-022-09915-7
Sali, A. H. A. (2023). Democ a iza ion o cu iculum de elopmen : Theo izing he na u alis ic
model in philippine mad asah educa ion. h ps:// iles.e ic.ed.go / ull ex /EJ1383080.pd
Salo, P., F ancisco, S., & Almq is , A. O. (2024). Unde s anding p o essional lea ning in and
o p ac ice. P o essional De elopmen in Educa ion,50(3), 444–459. h ps://doi.o g/10.
1080/19415257.2024.2311108
Søl ik, R. M., & Glenna, A. E. H. (2022). Teache s’ po en ial o p omo e s uden s’ deepe
lea ning in whole-class eaching: An obse a ion s udy in no wegian class ooms. Jou nal
o Educa ional Change,23(3), 343–369. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s10833-021-09420-8
Suh, S., & Pa k, J. (2022). Collabo a i e p o essional de elopmen and ins uc ional change: A
case s udy o seconda y english eache s in sou h ko ea. P o essional De elopmen in
Educa ion,48(2), 303–317. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/19415257.2021.1879235
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using mul i a ia e s a is ics. Pea son.
Upa a, S., & Chusanacho i, R. (2023). F om eal wo ld o class oom: Na iga ing english language
lea ning h ough au onomy-suppo i e ins uc ion and ou -o -class esou ces in he hai
e l con ex . h ps:// iles.e ic.ed.go / ull ex /EJ1401617.pd
Valdez, R. G., & Tolen ino, M. A. (2021). Challenges in he implemen a ion o he pms obse a-
ion ool among public school eache s. Jou nal o Educa ional Policy and Leade ship
Resea ch,3(1), 44–57. h ps://doi.o g/10.56745/jepl .2021.31.44
Whi e, H., Galloway, E. P., & Jim
´
enez, R. T. (2024). B idging heo y o p ac ice: Explo ing he
ole o an educa i e anslingual cu iculum o suppo linguis ically di e se class oom
p ac ices. TESOL Qua e ly,58(2), 802–829. h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/ esq.3258
Yu, D. J., & So iano, A. V. (2023). Linking class oom obse a ion esul s wi h english language
p o iciency ou comes: A co ela ional analysis. TESOL Resea ch Jou nal,17(1), 89–106.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/ j.2023.110
22 ISSN 3028-1261
10.5281/zenodo.17308776/NIJSE.2025
