!
1!
Ope a o –Topological Uni ica ion o Ma e , G a i y, and Gauge Fields
Bo os A ne h, Philipps Uni e si y Ma bu g, Jus us Liebig Uni e si y Giessen, Ge many,
[email p o ec ed]
Abs ac
We in oduce an ope a o – opological amewo k in which ma e , g a i a ion, and gauge
in e ac ions eme ge om a uni ied en opic–p ojec i e s uc u e. The o malism ex ends
he Diag am Hilbe Space (DHS) app oach, de ining weakly non-commu ing mass–
cha ge ope a o s and an e ec i e en opic ac ion ha ep oduces g a i a ional dynamics
in he semiclassical limi . P ojec ion ope a o s gene a e pa icle masses ia opological
cons ain s, while eno maliza ion o he ope a o algeb a yields he obse ed gauge
hie a chies. The amewo k embeds consis en ly wi hin local quan um ield heo y and
admi s a co espondence o opological sigma models and AdS/CFT duals.
1. In oduc ion
The uni ica ion o quan um ield heo y (QFT) and g a i a ion emains one o he mos
undamen al challenges o mode n physics. While gene al ela i i y desc ibes
mac oscopic space ime cu a u e, he S anda d Model accoun s o gauge and ma e
dynamics wi hin a eno malizable QFT amewo k. Thei concep ual ension a ises om
he non- eno malizabili y o pe u ba i e g a i y [1–3]. App oaches such as s ing heo y
[4,5], loop quan um g a i y [6], and en opic g a i y [7,8] ha e add essed di e en
aspec s o his incompa ibili y, ye a compac ope a o -based syn hesis emains elusi e.
Quan um ch omodynamics (QCD) demons a es how gauge con inemen and asymp o ic
eedom eme ge om a local non-Abelian ield s uc u e [9,10]. The p esen amewo k
ex ends such local gauge p inciples in o an ope a o - opological domain, whe e he
undamen al deg ees o eedom a e diag amma ic p ojec ions in a Hilbe space o
in e ac ion con igu a ions. These p ojec ions, deno ed 𝑃
"!, de ine e ec i e subspaces
associa ed wi h physical s a es and media e bo h cu a u e and mass gene a ion ia
en opic cons ain s. The o mal s uc u e pa allels pa h-in eg al opologies in QCD and
wo ldshee geome ies in s ing heo y [11,12].
2. Ope a o Founda ions and he Diag am Hilbe Space
We de ine he Diag am Hilbe Space ℋ" as he enso comple ion o in e ac ion
diag ams encoded by ope a o uples
!
2!
Φ
%=(𝑋
"#,𝑃
"#,𝑄
"$)
whe e 𝑋
"# and 𝑃
"# deno e posi ion–momen um ope a o s, and 𝑄
"$ gene a e gauge
symme ies. The me ic o his space is de ined ia a diag am inne p oduc
⟨Ψ∣Φ⟩"=T (𝑃
"%
&𝑃
"'𝜌")
wi h 𝜌" an en opic densi y ope a o . The e ec i e dynamics a ise om an en opic–
opological ac ion
𝑆(=∫d)𝑥 7−𝑔 T [𝑅
"+𝜆 𝑃
"!logA𝑃
"!]
whe e 𝑅
" ep esen s a cu a u e ope a o in he ope a o algeb a. Va ia ion o 𝑆( yields
bo h Eins ein-like ield equa ions and gauge-co a ian conse a ion ela ions.
The p ojec ion ope a o s 𝑃
"! o m a weakly non-commu ing algeb a,
[𝑃
"!,𝑃
"*]=𝑖𝜖!*+Σ
"+
whe e Σ
"+ encode opological lux sec o s analogous o ins an on numbe s in Yang–Mills
heo y [13].
3. En opic and Topological Eme gence o G a i a ion
The en opic e m in 𝑆( p oduces an eme gen g a i a ional po en ial. Iden i ying 𝑆( wi h
he coa se-g ained en opy o mic oscopic deg ees o eedom leads o
𝛿𝑆(=0AAAAA⇒AAAAAAAAAAAA𝑅#, −1
2𝑔#,𝑅 =8𝜋𝐺-..𝑇#,
whe e 𝐺-.. a ises as an en opic coupling p opo ional o he in e se o he Hilbe space
in o ma ion cu a u e [7,8]. The geome ic– he modynamic link pa allels Jacobson’s
de i a ion o Eins ein equa ions om local Clausius ela ions [14], ye he e he en opy
unc ional is ope a o - alued and gauge-co a ian .
Topological in a ian s in he ope a o algeb a, such as he Che n cha ac e T (𝐹
"∧𝐹
"),
de ine quan ized cu a u e luxes associa ed wi h elemen a y in e ac ion channels,
analogous o QCD ins an ons and lux ubes [9,13,15].
!
3!
4. P ojec ion-De i ed Pa icle Masses
Wi hin he DHS, he e ec i e mass ope a o a ises om p ojec i e weigh ing,
𝑀
%-.. =𝑚/S𝑤!𝑃
"!+𝛿𝐻
%
!
whe e 𝑤! encode en opic weigh s and 𝛿𝐻
% ep esen s weak symme y-b eaking
pe u ba ions. Diagonaliza ion yields disc e e eigen alues consis en wi h obse ed
e mion mass hie a chies. The dependence o 𝑤! on local en opic cu a u e implies ha
mass a ios eme ge om opological cons ain s a he han a bi a y Yukawa couplings.
This app oach pa allels ex u e-based and seesaw mechanisms [16,17] while emaining
ope a o -geome ic.
5. Quan um Field Theo e ic Embedding and Gauge Uni ica ion
P ojec i e subspaces ℋ01(3),ℋ01(5),ℋ1(6) co espond o gauge sec o s o he S anda d
Model. Thei combined algeb a o ms a non-commu a i e de o ma ion o SU(5) wi h
weakly b oken commu a ion s uc u e,
[𝑄
"$,𝑄
"7]=𝑖𝑓$78𝑄
"8+𝜖$7
whe e 𝜖$7 encodes en opic co ec ions o gauge coupling con e gence. The one-loop
eno maliza ion g oup (RG) low o he e ec i e couplings ep oduces asymp o ic
eedom o SU(3) and nea -con e gence a 𝜇 ∼1069 GeV[9,18].
The ope a o o malism ensu es eno malizabili y by cons uc ion: di e gences a e
ein e p e ed as loga i hmic de o ma ions o he en opic densi y 𝜌". In he in a ed limi ,
he amewo k educes o local QFT wi h e ec i e Lag angian densi y
ℒ-.. =−1
4𝐹#,
$𝐹$#, +𝜓
¯(𝑖𝛾#𝐷#−𝑀
%-..)𝜓+Λ(T (𝑃
"!logA𝑃
"!)
6. S ing-Theo e ic Co espondence and Holog aphy
The ope a o algeb a admi s a dual ep esen a ion as a opological sigma model on a
wo ldshee wi h coo dina es (𝜎,𝜏):
!
4!
𝑆:;<=>? =1
4𝜋𝛼@∫d5𝜎 𝐺AB(Φ
%)∂C𝑋
"A∂C𝑋
"B+Θ(𝐹
")
whe e 𝐺AB(Φ
%) is an ope a o - alued a ge me ic. The co espondence iden i ies
diag amma ic en opic cu a u e wi h wo ld-shee opological cha ge, es ablishing an
AdS/CFT-like duali y [19,20]. Unde his mapping, QCD lux ubes co espond o
p ojec ed s ing su aces, and g a i a ional en opic low co esponds o he
eno maliza ion o bounda y ope a o en opy.
7. Discussion and Ou look
The p esen ed ope a o – opological uni ica ion p o ides a single algeb aic s uc u e
unde lying g a i y, gauge ields, and ma e . I gene alizes en opic g a i y by embedding
i in an ope a o -p ojec i e o malism ha is compa ible wi h QFT eno maliza ion and
s ing duali ies. Fu u e wo k includes explici compu a ion o coupling uni ica ion
h esholds, non-pe u ba i e co ec ions om ope a o ins an ons, and connec ions o
da k-sec o phenomenology h ough hidden p ojec i e subspaces.
Re e ences
1. Weinbe g, S. Re . Mod. Phys. 61, 1 (1989).
2. Donoghue, J. F. Phys. Re . D 50, 3874 (1994).
3. Bu gess, C. P. Li ing Re . Rela i . 7, 5 (2004).
4. G een, M. B., Schwa z, J. H. & Wi en, E. Supe s ing Theo y (Camb idge Uni .
P ess, 1987).
5. Polchinski, J. S ing Theo y (Camb idge Uni . P ess, 1998).
6. Ro elli, C. Quan um G a i y (Camb idge Uni . P ess, 2004).
7. Ve linde, E. JHEP 04, 029 (2011).
8. Padmanabhan, T. Rep. P og. Phys. 73, 046901 (2010).
9. G oss, D. J. & Wilczek, F. Phys. Re . Le . 30, 1343 (1973).
10. Poli ze , H. D. Phys. Re . Le . 30, 1346 (1973).
11. Polyako , A. M. Gauge Fields and S ings (Ha wood Academic, 1987).
12. Maldacena, J. M. Ad . Theo . Ma h. Phys. 2, 231 (1998).
13. ’ Hoo , G. Phys. Re . Le . 37, 8 (1976).
14. Jacobson, T. Phys. Re . Le . 75, 1260 (1995).
15. A iyah, M. F. & Singe , I. M. Ann. Ma h. 87, 484 (1968).
16. F i zsch, H. Phys. Le . B 70, 436 (1977).
17. Minkowski, P. Phys. Le . B 67, 421 (1977).
18. Geo gi, H. & Glashow, S. L. Phys. Re . Le . 32, 438 (1974).
19. Wi en, E. Ad . Theo . Ma h. Phys. 2, 253 (1998).
20. Gubse , S. S., Klebano , I. R. & Polyako , A. M. Phys. Le . B 428, 105 (1998).
