© The Au ho (s) 2025. Published by AMO Publishe . This is an Open Access a icle dis ibu ed unde
he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion License (h ps://
c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/), which pe mi s un es ic ed euse, dis ibu ion, and
ep oduc ion in any medium, p o ided he o iginal wo k is p ope ly ci ed.
Managemen Con ol as an Economic D i e o Sus ainable Logis ics
and Resilien Supply Chains
Yous a Nassou
PhD in Managemen Sciences, ENCG de Tange , Mo occo
Kama Moukadem
PhD in Managemen Sciences, ENCG de Tange , Mo occo
Abs ac
Global supply chains ace inc easing complexi y due o echnological ans o ma ion, clima e impe a i es,
and ecu ing global dis up ions. Recen c ises such as COVID-19 and geopoli ical ensions ha e exposed
ulne abili ies in adi ional logis ics, unde sco ing he need o e iciency, sus ainabili y, and esilience.
This a icle de elops a heo e ical amewo k ha posi ions managemen con ol sys ems (MCS) as
cen al economic d i e s wi hin sus ainable and esilien supply chains. His o ically educed o budge a y
moni o ing, managemen con ol has p og essi ely e ol ed in o a s a egic mechanism o pe o mance
managemen , in eg a ing inancial and non- inancial indica o s. By syn hesizing li e a u e om
managemen accoun ing, logis ics economics, and sus ainabili y esea ch, his pape concep ualizes how
MCS con ibu e o h ee in e dependen ou comes: (1) e iciency, h ough cos educ ion, coo dina ion,
and op imized esou ce alloca ion; (2) sus ainabili y, by embedding en i onmen al and social me ics in o
decision-making; and (3) esilience, by enhancing isk moni o ing, adap i e decision-making, and
in es men s in lexibili y. The p oposed model highligh s ha hese dimensions a e mu ually ein o cing:
sus ainable p ac ices can lowe long- e m cos s, while esilience measu es p e en economic losses in
c ises. Me hodologically, he s udy adop s a concep ual and analy ical app oach, gene a ing p oposi ions
o u u e empi ical alida ion. The a icle con ibu es o heo y by econcep ualizing managemen
con ol as a p oac i e economic le e ha links logis ics, sus ainabili y, and esilience, o e ing new
insigh s o bo h schola s and p ac i ione s. Fo manage s, he indings sugges he need o expand
pe o mance indica o s, in eg a e digi al ools such as IoT and blockchain, and align sho - e m e iciency
wi h long- e m compe i i eness. Ul ima ely, managemen con ol eme ges no me ely as an accoun ing
mechanism bu as a s a egic ool enabling i ms o na iga e he dual digi al and g een ansi ions.
Keywo ds: Managemen con ol; Supply chain economics; Sus ainable logis ics; Resilience; E iciency; Pe o mance
measu emen ; Sus ainabili y.
Sugges ed ci a ion: Nassou, Y., & Moukadem, K. (2025). Managemen Con ol as an Economic D i e
o Sus ainable Logis ics and Resilien Supply Chains. Eu opean Jou nal o Inno a i e S udies and Sus ainabili y,
1(1), 42-50. h ps://doi.o g/10.59324/ejiss.2025.1(1).06
In oduc ion
Global supply chains ha e become inc easingly complex, shaped by apid echnological change,
en i onmen al impe a i es, and ecu en global dis up ions. The COVID-19 pandemic, geopoli ical
ensions, and clima e change ha e exposed he agili y o adi ional logis ics models, highligh ing he
need o e iciency, sus ainabili y, and esilience in supply chain managemen . As I ano and Dolgui
www.ejISS.com Eu opean Jou nal o Inno a i e S udies and Sus ainabili y (ISSN 3083-6395) 2025 | Volume 1 | Numbe 1
43
(2023) a gue, “ esilien supply chains mus balance e iciency and edundancy o wi hs and global c ises,”
unde sco ing he impo ance o s a egic con ol mechanisms.
In his con ex , managemen con ol has e ol ed beyond i s con en ional ole o budge moni o ing and
cos a iance analysis. His o ically, managemen con ol was seen as a se o ools o align ope a ions
wi h inancial a ge s (An hony, 1965). Howe e , con empo a y pe spec i es emphasize i s b oade ole
as a s a egic d i e o o ganiza ional pe o mance. Kaplan and No on (1996) in oduced he Balanced
Sco eca d as a way o in eg a e inancial and non- inancial indica o s, pa ing he way o managemen
con ol sys ems o inco po a e dimensions o inno a ion, cus ome sa is ac ion, and sus ainabili y.
Logis ics and supply chains, once p ima ily associa ed wi h cos minimiza ion, a e now ecognized as
c i ical le e s o economic compe i i eness. Acco ding o Ch is ophe (2016), logis ics has shi ed “ om
a cos cen e o a sou ce o compe i i e ad an age” h ough i s con ibu ion o cus ome se ice,
lexibili y, and in eg a ion ac oss ne wo ks. Ye , achie ing his ans o ma ion equi es obus
managemen con ol sys ems capable o moni o ing no only cos s bu also en i onmen al impac s,
ca bon e iciency, and esilience indica o s.
The dual challenge o he digi al ansi ion (au oma ion, big da a, blockchain, IoT) and he g een
ansi ion (deca boniza ion, ene gy e iciency, ci cula logis ics) has made managemen con ol e en mo e
cen al. As Pal se (2022) highligh s, he ene gy and sus ainabili y agenda has ede ined how i ms alloca e
esou ces and measu e pe o mance, wi h supply chains playing a pi o al ole. This e olu ion equi es
managemen con ol sys ems ha can cap u e bo h sho - e m e iciency and long- e m s a egic
esilience.
Despi e his e olu ion, he e is s ill limi ed heo e ical in eg a ion o managemen con ol in o he
economics o logis ics and supply chain esilience. While he e is abundan esea ch on sus ainable
logis ics (Seu ing & Mülle , 2008) and on supply chain esilience (I ano & Dolgui, 2023), he ole o
managemen con ol as an economic d i e a he in e sec ion o hese domains emains unde explo ed.
This a icle p oposes a heo e ical amewo k o concep ualize how managemen con ol sys ems can ac
as economic d i e s o sus ainable logis ics and esilien supply chains. By combining insigh s om
managemen accoun ing, logis ics economics, and sus ainabili y esea ch, i de elops a model ha
highligh s he iple unc ion o managemen con ol: (1) imp o ing e iciency, (2) suppo ing
sus ainabili y, and (3) s eng hening esilience.
Li e a u e Re iew
Managemen Con ol and Economic Pe o mance
Managemen con ol has adi ionally been de ined as he se o p ac ices ha align o ganiza ional
ac i i ies wi h s a egic objec i es (An hony, 1965). Ini ially limi ed o budge a iance analysis and
inancial moni o ing, i has e ol ed in o a b oade ool o s a egic pe o mance managemen . Kaplan
and No on (1996), h ough he Balanced Sco eca d, emphasized he in eg a ion o non- inancial
indica o s—such as inno a ion, in e nal p ocesses, and cus ome sa is ac ion—in o managemen con ol
sys ems. Mo e ecen ly, esea ches highligh ed he economic dimension o managemen con ol,
posi ioning i as a mechanism o alloca e esou ces e icien ly and enhance compe i i eness in dynamic
en i onmen s (Me chan & Van (2017); Nassou & Bennani (2023, 2024a, 2024b); Nassou & Kama
(2025).
Logis ics and he Economics o Supply Chains
Logis ics, once conside ed a back-o ice unc ion ocused on cos educ ion, has become a s a egic
sou ce o compe i i e ad an age (Ch is ophe , 2016). E icien logis ics no only educes ansac ion
cos s (Coase, 1937) bu also imp o es lexibili y and se ice quali y. Recen esea ch con i ms ha
www.ejISS.com Eu opean Jou nal o Inno a i e S udies and Sus ainabili y (ISSN 3083-6395) 2025 | Volume 1 | Numbe 1
44
in eg a ed logis ics di ec ly con ibu es o p oduc i i y and i m compe i i eness (Men ze e al., 2001).
Fu he mo e, supply chain economics highligh s he impo ance o e alua ing he o al cos o owne ship
a he han ocusing solely on uni cos s, unde sco ing he ole o managemen con ol in measu ing and
op imizing pe o mance (Lambe & Coope , 2000).
Sus ainabili y and Resilience in Supply Chains
O e he pas wo decades, sus ainabili y has become a cen al conce n in supply chain managemen .
Seu ing and Mülle (2008) p oposed a concep ual amewo k showing ha en i onmen al and social
objec i es, when embedded in supply chains, se e no only mo al impe a i es bu also economic
compe i i eness. Simila ly, Ca e and Roge s (2008) in oduced he concep o Sus ainable Supply Chain
Managemen (SSCM), aming sus ainabili y as he in eg a ion o economic, en i onmen al, and social
pe o mance. Pa allel o his, he no ion o supply chain esilience has gained p ominence in esponse o
global c ises (Moukadem & Elkha az 2019a, 2019b). I ano and Dolgui (2023) a gue ha mode n supply
chains mus “o ches a e e iciency, lexibili y, and sus ainabili y simul aneously” o wi hs and dis up ions
and main ain compe i i eness.
Linking Managemen Con ol, Logis ics, and Sus ainabili y
Recen s udies highligh he con e gence o managemen con ol wi h sus ainabili y and logis ics. Gond
e al. (2012) demons a ed ha managemen con ol sys ems inc easingly inco po a e social and
en i onmen al pe o mance indica o s, embedding co po a e esponsibili y in o s a egic decision-
making. Likewise, Bu i and Schal egge (2010) a gued ha en i onmen al managemen con ol sys ems
ansla e sus ainabili y in o quan i iable me ics, hus enabling decision-make s o balance economic and
en i onmen al objec i es. Toge he , hese con ibu ions indica e ha managemen con ol is no longe
con ined o cos moni o ing bu is becoming a s a egic economic d i e in sus ainable and esilien
supply chains.
Theo e ical F amewo k
The g owing in e dependence be ween managemen con ol, logis ics, and supply chain managemen
calls o a heo e ical model ha posi ions con ol sys ems as economic d i e s o e iciency,
sus ainabili y, and esilience. While p e ious li e a u e has sepa a ely add essed he ole o managemen
con ol (Kaplan & No on, 1996; Me chan & Van de S ede, 2017), sus ainable supply chain
managemen (Ca e & Roge s, 2008; Seu ing & Mülle , 2008), and esilience (I ano & Dolgui, 2023),
he e is s ill limi ed in eg a ion ac oss hese domains. This sec ion de elops a concep ual amewo k ha
links hese pe spec i es and o e s a basis o u he empi ical esea ch.
Managemen Con ol as a D i e o Economic E iciency
A i s co e, managemen con ol enhances economic e iciency by aligning logis ics ope a ions wi h
s a egic and inancial objec i es. Con ol sys ems enable i ms o moni o logis ics cos s, assess
pe o mance h ough key pe o mance indica o s (KPIs), and op imize esou ce alloca ion (Me chan &
Van de S ede, 2017). In his sense, managemen con ol unc ions no me ely as a moni o ing de ice bu
as a decision-making ool ha c ea es measu able economic alue wi hin supply chains.
P oposi ion 1. E ec i e managemen con ol sys ems imp o e logis ics e iciency by educing cos s,
enhancing coo dina ion, and s eng hening economic pe o mance.
Managemen Con ol and Sus ainable Logis ics
The second dimension o he amewo k highligh s he in eg a ion o sus ainabili y indica o s in o
managemen con ol sys ems. T adi ional inancial me ics a e insu icien o add ess he demands o he
g een ansi ion. As Bu i and Schal egge (2010) a gue, en i onmen al managemen con ol sys ems
p o ide he ools o measu e, moni o , and epo on ecological pe o mance. Simila ly, Seu ing and
www.ejISS.com Eu opean Jou nal o Inno a i e S udies and Sus ainabili y (ISSN 3083-6395) 2025 | Volume 1 | Numbe 1
45
Mülle (2008) show ha sus ainabili y in supply chains can only be achie ed i economic, social, and
en i onmen al goals a e explici ly linked o pe o mance managemen .
P oposi ion 2. Managemen con ol ac s as an economic d i e o sus ainable logis ics by inco po a ing
en i onmen al and social pe o mance me ics in o decision-making.
Managemen Con ol and Supply Chain Resilience
Finally, esilience has eme ged as a c i ical dimension o supply chain economics. I ano and Dolgui
(2023) concep ualize esilience as he abili y o adap and eco e om dis up ions while main aining
compe i i eness. Managemen con ol suppo s esilience by moni o ing isks, e alua ing con ingency
plans, and guiding in es men s in lexibili y and edundancy. In his way, con ol sys ems no only
sa egua d sho - e m pe o mance bu also ein o ce long- e m iabili y.
P oposi ion 3. Managemen con ol s eng hens supply chain esilience by suppo ing isk moni o ing,
adap i e decision-making, and esou ce alloca ion o lexibili y.
Concep ual Model
B inging hese dimensions oge he , he p oposed amewo k posi ions managemen con ol as a cen al
economic d i e ha links h ee in e ela ed ou comes:
1. E iciency – cos educ ion, esou ce op imiza ion, se ice imp o emen .
2. Sus ainabili y – in eg a ion o en i onmen al and social KPIs alongside inancial me ics.
3. Resilience – abili y o wi hs and, adap o, and eco e om dis up ions.
These ou comes a e no independen ; a he , hey ein o ce each o he . Fo example, sus ainabili y
ini ia i es (e.g., ene gy-e icien logis ics) can lowe long- e m cos s, while esilience measu es (e.g.,
di e si ica ion o supplie s) can p e en economic losses du ing c ises. The heo e ical con ibu ion o
his amewo k lies in highligh ing how managemen con ol sys ems, when designed wi h
mul idimensional indica o s, can simul aneously d i e e iciency, sus ainabili y, and esilience.
Figu e 1. Concep ual F amewo k: Managemen Con ol as an Economic D i e o Sus ainable
Logis ics and Resilien Supply Chains
This concep ual amewo k posi ions managemen con ol as he cen al economic d i e ha links h ee
in e dependen ou comes: e iciency, sus ainabili y, and esilience. A he ope a ional le el, managemen
con ol sys ems enhance e iciency by moni o ing logis ics cos s, op imizing esou ce alloca ion, and
imp o ing se ice pe o mance (Me chan & Van de S ede, 2017). A he s a egic le el, hey in eg a e
sus ainabili y me ics, such as ca bon oo p in and social esponsibili y indica o s, in o decision-making
www.ejISS.com Eu opean Jou nal o Inno a i e S udies and Sus ainabili y (ISSN 3083-6395) 2025 | Volume 1 | Numbe 1
46
p ocesses (Bu i & Schal egge , 2010; Seu ing & Mülle , 2008). Finally, managemen con ol con ibu es
o esilience by suppo ing isk moni o ing, adap i e s a egies, and in es men s in lexibili y, enabling
supply chains o wi hs and dis up ions and main ain compe i i eness (I ano & Dolgui, 2023). Thus,
managemen con ol e ol es om a adi ional moni o ing ool in o a s a egic le e o economic alue
c ea ion in logis ics and supply chain managemen .
Me hodology (Theo e ical App oach)
This pape adop s a heo e ical me hodology, aiming o concep ualize he ole o managemen con ol as
an economic d i e o sus ainable logis ics and esilien supply chains. Ins ead o elying on empi ical
da a, he s udy builds on exis ing esea ch o de elop a concep ual amewo k ha syn hesizes insigh s
om managemen con ol, supply chain economics, and sus ainabili y s udies.
Na u e o he S udy
The esea ch is posi ioned as a concep ual and analy ical s udy, designed o ad ance heo y a he han
es hypo heses empi ically. As Me edi h (1993) explains, heo e ical pape s play a i al ole in
managemen esea ch by “o ganizing exis ing knowledge, cla i ying ela ionships among cons uc s, and
sugges ing p oposi ions o u u e empi ical alida ion.”
Sou ces o E idence
The amewo k is cons uc ed h ough an ex ensi e e iew o he li e a u e in h ee main domains:
1. Managemen con ol sys ems (An hony, 1965; Kaplan & No on, 1996; Me chan & Van de
S ede, 2017; Nassou & Bennani, 2023, 2024a, 2024b; Nassou & Kama , 2025).
2. Supply chain economics and logis ics pe o mance (Ch is ophe , 2016; Lambe & Coope ,
2000).
3. Sus ainabili y and esilience in supply chains (Ca e & Roge s, 2008; Seu ing & Mülle , 2008;
I ano & Dolgui, 2023; Moukadem & Elkha az, 2019a; 2019b).
These sou ces we e selec ed based on hei schola ly ecogni ion and hei con ibu ion o he in e sec ion
o managemen con ol, logis ics, and sus ainabili y.
Analy ical S a egy
The s udy uses a concep ual syn hesis me hod (Jaakkola, 2020) o in eg a e indings ac oss di e en
s eams o li e a u e. The analysis p oceeds in h ee s eps:
• Iden i ica ion o he co e unc ions o managemen con ol in economic decision-making.
• In eg a ion o hese unc ions wi h sus ainabili y and esilience dimensions in supply chain
managemen .
• De elopmen o a concep ual model ha posi ions managemen con ol as a mul idimensional
economic d i e .
Expec ed Con ibu ion o he Me hodology
By adop ing a heo e ical me hodology, his esea ch does no claim empi ical gene aliza ion bu seeks o
lay he ounda ion o u u e empi ical es ing. The amewo k gene a es es able p oposi ions ega ding
he ela ionships be ween managemen con ol, e iciency, sus ainabili y, and esilience. As Whe en
(1989) a gues, he alue o a concep ual pape lies in i s abili y o p o ide “cla i y, pa simony, and he
iden i ica ion o gaps in cu en knowledge,” he eby o e ing a oadmap o subsequen empi ical
s udies.
www.ejISS.com Eu opean Jou nal o Inno a i e S udies and Sus ainabili y (ISSN 3083-6395) 2025 | Volume 1 | Numbe 1
47
Expec ed Resul s
The pu pose o his s udy is no o gene a e empi ical esul s bu o de elop heo e ical p oposi ions ha
highligh he po en ial ou comes o in eg a ing managemen con ol in o sus ainable logis ics and esilien
supply chains. Based on he li e a u e and he p oposed concep ual amewo k, se e al expec ed esul s
can be o mula ed.
E iciency Ou comes
Managemen con ol sys ems a e expec ed o imp o e logis ics e iciency by educing cos s, op imizing
esou ces, and aligning ope a ional p ocesses wi h s a egic goals. Th ough he use o inancial and non-
inancial KPIs, i ms can iden i y ine iciencies and enhance coo dina ion ac oss supply chain ne wo ks.
• P oposi ion 1. Managemen con ol sys ems posi i ely in luence economic e iciency in logis ics
and supply chains by educing ansac ion cos s and imp o ing esou ce alloca ion (Ch is ophe , 2016;
Me chan & Van de S ede, 2017).
Sus ainabili y Ou comes
When en i onmen al and social pe o mance indica o s a e embedded in managemen con ol,
o ganiza ions a e be e equipped o achie e sus ainable logis ics p ac ices. These include lowe ca bon
emissions, imp o ed ene gy e iciency, and compliance wi h egula o y and s akeholde demands.
• P oposi ion 2. The in eg a ion o sus ainabili y me ics in o managemen con ol sys ems
enhances he en i onmen al and social pe o mance o supply chains while ein o cing long- e m
economic compe i i eness (Bu i & Schal egge , 2010; Seu ing & Mülle , 2008).
Resilience Ou comes
Managemen con ol sys ems also con ibu e o supply chain esilience by enabling isk moni o ing,
suppo ing con ingency planning, and guiding in es men in lexibili y. By inco po a ing isk-adjus ed
pe o mance measu es, i ms can s eng hen hei abili y o adap o dis up ions and eco e om c ises.
• P oposi ion 3. Managemen con ol sys ems enhance supply chain esilience by os e ing
adap i e decision-making and s a egic esou ce alloca ion o lexibili y (I ano & Dolgui, 2023).
Syne gis ic E ec s
The amewo k sugges s ha e iciency, sus ainabili y, and esilience a e mu ually ein o cing ou comes.
Fo ins ance, sus ainable logis ics p ac ices such as ene gy e iciency can educe long- e m cos s
(e iciency), while esilience s a egies such as supplie di e si ica ion can sa egua d agains economic
shocks (sus ainabili y o compe i i eness).
• P oposi ion 4. The simul aneous pu sui o e iciency, sus ainabili y, and esilience h ough
managemen con ol sys ems c ea es syne gis ic bene i s ha ex end beyond indi idual pe o mance
dimensions, s eng hening o e all supply chain compe i i eness (Ca e & Roge s, 2008).
Discussion
The p oposed amewo k posi ions managemen con ol as a mul idimensional economic d i e in
logis ics and supply chains. This discussion si ua es he amewo k wi hin he b oade li e a u e,
highligh s i s heo e ical con ibu ions, and explo es p ac ical implica ions.
Compa ison wi h Classical App oaches
T adi ional app oaches o managemen con ol ha e p ima ily emphasized inancial o e sigh and cos
a iance analysis (An hony, 1965). While such mechanisms emain impo an , hey all sho in add essing
www.ejISS.com Eu opean Jou nal o Inno a i e S udies and Sus ainabili y (ISSN 3083-6395) 2025 | Volume 1 | Numbe 1
48
he challenges o he digi al and g een ansi ion. In con as , he p esen amewo k ex ends he scope
o managemen con ol o include sus ainabili y and esilience dimensions. As Kaplan and No on (1996)
a gued wi h he Balanced Sco eca d, o ganiza ions need o balance inancial and non- inancial me ics; his
s udy builds on ha p inciple by explici ly in eg a ing en i onmen al and isk- ela ed indica o s.
Simila ly, classical logis ics managemen o en ea ed supply chains as linea cos cen e s, ocusing on
e iciency gains h ough lean p ac ices. Howe e , c ises such as COVID-19, geopoli ical dis up ions, and
clima e isks ha e shown ha excessi e ocus on e iciency wi hou esilience c ea es ulne abili ies
(I ano & Dolgui, 2023). The amewo k p oposed he e b idges his gap by ecognizing ha e iciency,
sus ainabili y, and esilience a e in e dependen ou comes o e ec i e managemen con ol.
Theo e ical Con ibu ions
This a icle makes h ee main con ibu ions o he li e a u e:
1. I econcep ualizes managemen con ol as an economic d i e , a he han a passi e moni o ing
mechanism.
2. I in eg a es sus ainabili y and esilience in o he domain o managemen con ol, he eby
ex ending amewo ks such as Ca e and Roge s’ (2008) Sus ainable Supply Chain Managemen model.
3. I p o ides es able p oposi ions ha u u e empi ical s udies can alida e using quan i a i e o
quali a i e me hodologies (e.g., di e ence-in-di e ences, case s udies, o digi al win simula ions).
By linking managemen con ol o economic e iciency, en i onmen al esponsibili y, and esilience, his
pape con ibu es o he heo e ical in eg a ion o accoun ing, logis ics, and sus ainabili y li e a u es.
Manage ial Implica ions
Fo p ac i ione s, he amewo k emphasizes ha managemen con ol sys ems can se e as s a egic
le e s o compe i i eness. Manage s should:
• Expand KPIs o include economic, en i onmen al, and esilience- ela ed indica o s.
• Use digi al ools (IoT, blockchain, big da a) o s eng hen eal- ime con ol o logis ics and supply
chain p ocesses.
• De elop go e nance mechanisms ha align sho - e m e iciency wi h long- e m sus ainabili y
and esilience.
These implica ions a e pa icula ly ele an o i ms in eme ging economies, whe e logis ics
in as uc u e is unde p essu e and global alue chains impose bo h oppo uni ies and isks.
Limi a ions and Fu u e Resea ch
As a concep ual s udy, his amewo k emains heo e ical and equi es empi ical alida ion. Fu u e
esea ch could es he p oposi ions h ough case s udies, su eys, o econome ic models, and explo e
sec o -speci ic a ia ions (e.g., e ail, manu ac u ing, heal hca e logis ics). Mo eo e , addi ional ac o s
such as cul u al in luences, ins i u ional en i onmen s, and digi al ma u i y may mode a e he
ela ionships p oposed.
Conclusion and Implica ions
This a icle has de eloped a heo e ical amewo k ha posi ions managemen con ol as an economic
d i e o sus ainable logis ics and esilien supply chains. Building on he ounda ions o managemen
con ol (An hony, 1965; Kaplan & No on, 1996), supply chain economics (Ch is ophe , 2016), and
sus ainabili y esea ch (Ca e & Roge s, 2008; Seu ing & Mülle , 2008), he s udy a gues ha con ol
www.ejISS.com Eu opean Jou nal o Inno a i e S udies and Sus ainabili y (ISSN 3083-6395) 2025 | Volume 1 | Numbe 1
49
sys ems go beyond moni o ing cos s and budge s o ac i ely shape e iciency, sus ainabili y, and esilience
ou comes.
The amewo k con ibu es o he li e a u e in h ee key ways. Fi s , i b oadens he ole o managemen
con ol, econcep ualizing i as a s a egic mechanism o alue c ea ion. Second, i in eg a es
sus ainabili y and esilience dimensions in o supply chain economics, p o iding a mo e holis ic iew o
pe o mance. Thi d, i p oposes es able p oposi ions ha u u e empi ical esea ch can alida e. These
con ibu ions enhance he heo e ical in eg a ion o managemen con ol, logis ics, and sus ainabili y
li e a u es, o e ing new pe spec i es on how o ganiza ions can manage global supply chain challenges.
F om a manage ial pe spec i e, he implica ions a e clea : o ganiza ions mus design managemen con ol
sys ems ha cap u e no only inancial e iciency bu also en i onmen al and esilience- ela ed
pe o mance. This equi es ex ending pe o mance measu emen amewo ks o include ca bon
emissions, ene gy consump ion, social esponsibili y, and isk exposu e, alongside adi ional cos and
p o i abili y me ics. Mo eo e , digi al echnologies such as big da a analy ics, blockchain, and IoT can
s eng hen he capaci y o managemen con ol o p o ide eal- ime, mul idimensional insigh s in o
supply chain dynamics.
Ne e heless, he s udy has limi a ions. As a concep ual pape , i does no p o ide empi ical e idence,
and he p oposi ions de eloped he e emain heo e ical. Fu u e esea ch should alida e he amewo k
h ough case s udies, econome ic models, o simula ion app oaches, examining how managemen
con ol sys ems ope a e in di e en indus ial and ins i u ional con ex s.
In conclusion, managemen con ol should no longe be iewed me ely as an accoun ing mechanism bu
as a s a egic economic d i e . By embedding e iciency, sus ainabili y, and esilience in o decision-
making, managemen con ol sys ems can help o ganiza ions na iga e he dual p essu es o he digi al
and g een ansi ion while sa egua ding long- e m compe i i eness in ola ile global ma ke s.
Re e ences
An hony, R. N. (1965). Planning and con ol sys ems: A amewo k o analysis. Ha a d Business School P ess.
Bu i , R. L., & Schal egge , S. (2010). Sus ainabili y accoun ing and epo ing: Fad o end? Accoun ing,
Audi ing & Accoun abili y Jou nal, 23(7), 829–846. h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/09513571011080144
Ca e , C. R., & Roge s, D. S. (2008). A amewo k o sus ainable supply chain managemen : Mo ing
owa d new heo y. In e na ional Jou nal o Physical Dis ibu ion & Logis ics Managemen , 38(5), 360–387.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/09600030810882816
Ch is ophe , M. (2016). Logis ics & supply chain managemen (5 h ed.). Pea son Educa ion.
Coase, R. H. (1937). The na u e o he i m. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. h ps://doi.o g/10.1111/j.1468-
0335.1937. b00002.x
Elkha az, A., & Moukadem, K. (2019b). Con ibu ion o in o ma ion sys ems use o global supply chain
esilience: De elopmen o a heo e ical model. In e na ional Jou nal o Inno a ion and Applied S udies, 25(2),
718–732.
Gond, J.-P., G ubnic, S., He zig, C., & Moon, J. (2012). Con igu ing managemen con ol sys ems:
Theo izing he in eg a ion o s a egy and sus ainabili y. Managemen Accoun ing Resea ch, 23(3), 205–223.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.ma .2012.06.003
I ano , D., & Dolgui, A. (2023). A digi al supply chain win o managing dis up ions and esilience in
supply chains. In e na ional Jou nal o P oduc ion Resea ch, 61(1), 1–19.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/00207543.2021.2002961
www.ejISS.com Eu opean Jou nal o Inno a i e S udies and Sus ainabili y (ISSN 3083-6395) 2025 | Volume 1 | Numbe 1
50
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Designing concep ual a icles: Fou app oaches. AMS Re iew, 10(1–2), 18–26.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
Kaplan, R. S., & No on, D. P. (1996). The balanced sco eca d: T ansla ing s a egy in o ac ion. Ha a d Business
School P ess.
Lambe , D. M., & Coope , M. C. (2000). Issues in supply chain managemen . Indus ial Ma ke ing
Managemen , 29(1), 65–83. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/S0019-8501(99)00113-3
Men ze , J. T., DeWi , W., Keeble , J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smi h, C. D., & Zacha ia, Z. G. (2001).
De ining supply chain managemen . Jou nal o Business Logis ics, 22(2), 1–25.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001. b00001.x
Me chan , K. A., & Van de S ede, W. A. (2017). Managemen con ol sys ems: Pe o mance measu emen ,
e alua ion and incen i es (4 h ed.). Pea son Educa ion.
Me edi h, J. (1993). Theo y building h ough concep ual me hods. In e na ional Jou nal o Ope a ions &
P oduc ion Managemen , 13(5), 3–11. h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/01443579310028120
Moukadem, K., & Elkha az, A. (2019a). In o ma ion sys ems and global supply chain esilience: An
explo a o y s udy o companies in he Mo occan au omo i e indus y. Eu opean Scien i ic Jou nal, 15(34),
367–396. h ps://doi.o g/10.19044/esj.2019. 15n34p367
Nassou, Y., & Bennani, Z. (2024a). Con ingency Theo y in Managemen : Concep ual Phases and
S a egic Link wi h Pe o mance Measu emen Sys ems. Eu opean Jou nal o A s, Humani ies and Social
Sciences, 1(3), 183-187. h ps://doi.o g/10.59324/ejahss.2024.1(3).16
Nassou, Y., Bennani, Z. (2023). Decen alized O ganiza ional S uc u e and i s Impac on Manage ial
Pe o mance in Mo occan SMEs. Eu opean Jou nal o Theo e ical and Applied Sciences, 1(6), 930-938. DOI:
h ps://doi.o g/10.59324/ej as.2023.1(6).89
Nassou, Y., & Bennani, Z. (2024b) Analyse des ac eu s de con ingence dans la ela ion en e
pe o mance managé iale e sys ème de mesu e de la pe o mance : e ue de li é a u e. Re ue "Repè es e
Pe spec i es Economiques" [En ligne], 8(1).
Nassou, Y., Kama , M. (2025). F om Da a o S a egy: The Role o Economic In elligence in Business
Pe o mance. Eu opean Jou nal o Science and Mode n Technologies, 1(5), 15-19.
h ps://doi.o g/10.59324/ejsm .2025.1(5).02
Seu ing, S., & Mülle , M. (2008). F om a li e a u e e iew o a concep ual amewo k o sus ainable
supply chain managemen . Jou nal o Cleane P oduc ion, 16(15), 1699–1710.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jclep o.2008.04.020
Whe en, D. A. (1989). Wha cons i u es a heo e ical con ibu ion? Academy o Managemen Re iew, 14(4),
490–495. h ps://doi.o g/10.5465/am .1989.4308371
