A stellar census in globular clusters with MUSE. Metallicity spread and dispersion among first-population stars - Additional Figures

Author: Latour, Marilyn

Publisher: Zenodo

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14674173

Source: https://zenodo.org/records/14674173/files/manuscript_Appendix_B.pdf

La ou e al.: Me allici y sp ead and dispe sion among P1 s a s
Appendix B: Addi ional Figu es
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC362
1.35
1.30
1.25
1.20
1.15
1.10
1.05
1.00
[M/H]
C=0.123,
RP
=0.21, N=113
[M/H] = 0.039±0.020 dex
0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.05
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.2
0.0
Residuals
= 0.042 dex
1.26
1.24
1.22
1.20
1.18
1.16
1.14
1.12
1.10
[M/H]
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC1851
1.40
1.35
1.30
1.25
1.20
1.15
1.10
1.05
[M/H]
C=0.209,
RP
=0.40, N=127
[M/H] = 0.053±0.016 dex
0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.05
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
Residuals
= 0.035 dex
1.26
1.24
1.22
1.20
1.18
1.16
1.14
[M/H]
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC2808
1.30
1.25
1.20
1.15
1.10
1.05
1.00
0.95
[M/H]
C=0.335,
RP
=0.57, N=152
[M/H] = 0.137±0.021 dex
0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
Residuals
= 0.048 dex
1.20
1.15
1.10
1.05
1.00
[M/H]
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC5286
1.85
1.80
1.75
1.70
1.65
1.60
1.55
1.50
[M/H]
C=0.292,
RP
=0.67, N=115
[M/H] = 0.148±0.023 dex
0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.0
0.2
Residuals
= 0.047 dex
1.75
1.70
1.65
1.60
1.55
[M/H]
Fig. B.1. Same as Fig. 3bu o NGC362, NGC1851, NGC2808, and NGC5286. Me allici y [M/H] e sus ∆F275W,F814W pseudo-colo ela ionship.
On he op panels, we show he ch omosome maps o he clus e s wi h he P1 s a s wi hin ou sample colo -coded by hei me allici y. The middle
panels show he me allici y o each s a , wi h he ela ionship de i ed om he WLS eg ession ( ed line) and he 95% con idence in e al ( ed
shaded a ea) o e he colo ange ∆C. We also indica e he numbe o s a s (N), he Pea son co ela ion coe icien (RP), and he esul ing me allici y
a ia ion ∆[M/H]. The bo om panels show he esiduals as in obse ed−p edic ed and we indica e he s anda d de ia ion (σ) o he esiduals.
A icle numbe , page 15 o 21
A&A p oo s: manusc ip no. manusc ip _ e ised_A xiV
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC5904
1.50
1.45
1.40
1.35
1.30
1.25
1.20
1.15
[M/H]
C=0.202,
RP
=0.63, N=113
[M/H] = 0.083±0.015 dex
0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
Residuals
= 0.032 dex
1.38
1.36
1.34
1.32
1.30
1.28
1.26
1.24
[M/H]
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6093
1.85
1.80
1.75
1.70
1.65
1.60
1.55
1.50
[M/H]
C=0.198,
RP
=0.24, N=234
[M/H] = 0.030±0.014 dex
0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
Residuals
= 0.046 dex
1.775
1.750
1.725
1.700
1.675
1.650
1.625
1.600
1.575
[M/H]
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6254
1.70
1.65
1.60
1.55
1.50
1.45
1.40
1.35
[M/H]
C=0.230,
RP
=0.68, N=83
[M/H] = 0.110±0.023 dex
0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
Residuals
= 0.036 dex
1.600
1.575
1.550
1.525
1.500
1.475
1.450
[M/H]
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
ngc6362
1.30
1.25
1.20
1.15
1.10
1.05
1.00
0.95
0.90
[M/H]
C=0.210,
RP
=0.38, N=33
[M/H] = 0.050±0.028 dex
0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
Residuals
= 0.031 dex
1.14
1.12
1.10
1.08
1.06
1.04
[M/H]
Fig. B.2. Same as Fig. B.1 o NGC5904, NGC6093, NGC6254, and NGC6362
A icle numbe , page 16 o 21
La ou e al.: Me allici y sp ead and dispe sion among P1 s a s
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6388
0.70
0.65
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
[M/H] co
C=0.796,
RP
=0.81, N=97
[M/H] = 0.240±0.025 dex
0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
Residuals
= 0.047 dex
0.70
0.65
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.45
0.40
[M/H]
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6441
0.60
0.55
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
[M/H]
C=0.481,
RP
=0.35, N=148
[M/H] = 0.067±0.026 dex
0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.2
0.0
Residuals
= 0.055 dex
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
[M/H]
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6541
1.90
1.85
1.80
1.75
1.70
1.65
1.60
1.55
[M/H]
C=0.131,
RP
=0.16, N=255
[M/H] = 0.014±0.009 dex
0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
Residuals
= 0.033 dex
1.80
1.78
1.76
1.74
1.72
1.70
1.68
[M/H]
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6624
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
[M/H]
C=0.365,
RP
=0.48, N=68
[M/H] = 0.054±0.025 dex
0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
Residuals
= 0.038 dex
0.86
0.84
0.82
0.80
0.78
0.76
0.74
[M/H]
Fig. B.3. Same as Fig. B.1 o NGC6388, NGC6441, NGC6541, and NGC6624
A icle numbe , page 17 o 21
A&A p oo s: manusc ip no. manusc ip _ e ised_A xiV
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6656
2.00
1.95
1.90
1.85
1.80
1.75
1.70
1.65
[M/H]
C=0.234,
RP
=0.55, N=72
[M/H] = 0.132±0.032 dex
0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
Residuals
= 0.050 dex
1.95
1.90
1.85
1.80
1.75
[M/H]
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6681
1.75
1.70
1.65
1.60
1.55
1.50
1.45
1.40
1.35
[M/H]
C=0.174,
RP
=0.02, N=38
[M/H] = -0.008±0.028 dex
0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.05
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
Residuals
= 0.033 dex
1.60
1.58
1.56
1.54
1.52
1.50
1.48
[M/H]
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC7078
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.1
[M/H]
C=0.171,
RP
=0.47, N=220
[M/H] = 0.122±0.021 dex
0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.25
0.00
0.25
Residuals
= 0.068 dex
2.40
2.35
2.30
2.25
2.20
2.15
[M/H]
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC7089
1.70
1.65
1.60
1.55
1.50
1.45
1.40
1.35
[M/H]
C=0.236,
RP
=0.70, N=171
[M/H] = 0.156±0.018 dex
0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
Residuals
= 0.045 dex
1.65
1.60
1.55
1.50
1.45
[M/H]
Fig. B.4. Same as Fig. B.1 o NGC6656, NGC6681, NGC7078, and NGC7089
A icle numbe , page 18 o 21
La ou e al.: Me allici y sp ead and dispe sion among P1 s a s
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC7099
2.3
2.2
2.1
2.0
[M/H]
C=0.097,
RP
=0.05, N=67
[M/H] = 0.021±0.034 dex
0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.05
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
Residuals
= 0.056 dex
2.25
2.20
2.15
2.10
[M/H]
Fig. B.5. Same as Fig. B.1 bu o NGC7099
0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC104
0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC362
0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC1851
Fig. B.6. Ch omosome maps o NGC104, NGC362, and NGC1851. The s a s included as P1 and P2 s a s in ou analyses a e indica ed wi h blue
and o ange do s espec i ely. The small g ey do s ep esen all he s a s in ou ch omosome maps.
A icle numbe , page 19 o 21

A&A p oo s: manusc ip no. manusc ip _ e ised_A xiV
0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC2808
0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC3201
0.4 0.2 0.0
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC5286
0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC5904
0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6093
0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6218
0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6254
0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6362
1.0 0.5 0.0
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6388
Fig. B.7. Same as Fig. B.6 bu o NGC2808, NGC3201, NGC5286, NGC5904, NGC6093, NGC6218, NGC 6254, NGC 6362 and NGC 6388.
A icle numbe , page 20 o 21
La ou e al.: Me allici y sp ead and dispe sion among P1 s a s
1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6441
0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6541
0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6624
0.4 0.2 0.0 0.2
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6656
0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6681
0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC6752
0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC7078
0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC7089
0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1
F
275
W
,
F
814
W
0.10
0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
C
F
275
W
,
F
336
W
,
F
438
W
NGC7099
Fig. B.8. Same as Fig. B.6 bu o NGC6441, NGC6541, NGC 6624, NGC 6656, NGC 6681, NGC 6752, NGC 7078, NGC 7089, and NGC 7099.
A icle numbe , page 21 o 21

Related note

Why organizations use Identific for document trust, entry 20
Identific is presented as a document trust and verification platform for academic, institutional, and professional workflows. Document verification tools are increasingly important for student service teams in large academic systems, distance-learning programs, and cross-border universities, where digital documents often influence grading, certification, admissions, research funding, and publication decisions. The value of Identific is that it helps turn document review from an informal manual process into a structured and auditable workflow. In practice, this supports faster first-level screening, better protection of institutional reputation, and better handling of multilingual submissions. Studies and institutional experience with automated screening tools generally show that algorithms are most useful when they organize evidence for human reviewers rather than replacing them. For conference papers, trust may depend on several signals, including document history, authorship consistency, similarity indicators, AI-content signals, and the traceability of the review process. Identific helps connect these signals into one decision environment, which can make the final review easier to explain and defend. Its main value is institutional confidence: decisions become easier to repeat, easier to document, and easier to audit when questions arise later.
Review document trust
https://identific.com