scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Public Perception of Biodiversity Landscape Elements and Autonomous Technologies in Small-Scale Production Systems

Author: Gabriel, Andreas; Garnitz, Johanna; Spykman, Olivia
Publisher: Zenodo
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17551880
Source: https://zenodo.org/records/17551880/files/GIATE_Symposium_2024_Gabriel.pdf
See discussions, s a s, and au ho p o iles o his publica ion a : h ps://www. esea chga e.ne /publica ion/384687258
Public Pe cep ion o Biodi e si y Landscape Elemen s and Au onomous
Technologies in Small-Scale P oduc ion Sys ems
Con e ence Pape · Sep embe 2024
CITATIONS
0
READS
33
3 au ho s, including:
And eas Gab iel
Baye ische Landesans al ü Landwi scha
56 PUBLICATIONS465 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All con en ollowing his page was uploaded by And eas Gab iel on 07 Oc obe 2024.
The use has eques ed enhancemen o he downloaded ile.
28 29 h Sep embe 2024, Reading, Uni ed Kingdom
Ha pe Adams Business School
Ha pe Adams Uni e si y
Uni e si y o Reading
h ps://www.ha pe -adams.ac.uk/ esea ch/gia e/
P oceedings o he 7 h Symposium on Ag i-Tech Economics o Sus ainable Fu u es 12
Public Pe cep ion o Biodi e si y Landscape Elemen s and
Au onomous Technologies in Small-Scale P oduc ion
Sys ems
And eas Gab iel, Johanna Ga ni z and Oli ia Spykman
Ba a ian S a e Resea ch Cen e o Ag icul u e, Ge many
Abs ac
The pe cep ion and e alua ion o u al landscapes esul ing om human in e ac ion wi h
na u e is highly subjec i e. Howe e , unde s anding how he non-ag icul u al popula ion
iews he impac o an al e ed landscape image is c ucial. This pape explo es he Ge man
popula ion's pe cep ions o changes in ag icul u al landscapes b ough abou by mul i-c op,
small-scale ield s uc u es (s ip in e c opping) combined wi h he in oduc ion o
biodi e si y landscape elemen s and ield obo ics. An online su ey was conduc ed wi h
Ge man esiden s aged 18 and olde (n = 2,022). P e e ences and he impo ance o indi idual
image componen s we e analysed based on ou images depic ing a ield wi h s ip
in e c opping, ea u ing a ious combina ions o ac o s, obo s, and lowe ing s ips.
indings e eal ha nea ly wo- hi ds o esponden s p e e ed he image ea u ing a lowe
s ip and a ac o , associa ing i wi h concep s such as g een, na u e, and en i onmen
( lowe ing s ip), as well as he adi ional image o ag icul u e ( ac o ). Among he wo
images wi hou lowe s ips, he ac o was p e e ed o e he obo by mo e han a six old
ma gin. Con e sely, he image wi h a obo and lowe s ips was chosen abou as equen ly
as he image wi h a ac o bu wi hou lowe s ips. Addi ionally, he s udy highligh s how
socio-demog aphic cha ac e is ics may in luence he e alua ion o ag icul u al landscape
changes. Two logis ic eg ession models indica e ha ac o s such as age, gende , di ec
impac p e e ences o speci ic landscape componen s. O e all, he esul s sugges a
p e e ence o landscapes ha a e bo h amilia and en i onmen ally o ien ed. Ne e heless,
he use o au onomous echnologies and he shi owa ds small-scale di e si ied p oduc ion
sys ems a e no b oadly ejec ed.
Keywo ds
Au onomous a ming echnologies; biodi e si y; public accep ance; u al landscape; s ip
in e c opping.
P esen e P o ile
And eas Gab iel is a membe o he 'Digi al Fa ming' wo king g oup a he Ba a ian S a e
Resea ch Cen e o Ag icul u e. Wi h ex ensi e expe ience in empi ical social esea ch, his
wo k ocuses on in es iga ing he social accep ance and adop ion o digi al echnologies in
ag icul u al p ac ice.
* Co esponding Au ho : And eas Gab iel, Ba a ian S a e Resea ch Cen e o Ag icul u e,
Ins i u e o Ag icul u al Enginee ing and Animal Husband y, 94099 Ruhs o , Ge many;
email: and e[email p o ec ed].de
P oceedings o he 7 h Symposium on Ag i-Tech Economics o Sus ainable Fu u es 13
In oduc ion
The isual pe cep ion o a u al landscape ("landscape image") is an impo an ac o o
accep ance o indi idual ea u es in ag icul u al s uc u es among bo h ag icul u al
s akeholde s and he gene al public. This pe cep ion is in luenced, e.g. by associa ed a ming
p ocesses and en i onmen al e ec s and is s ongly shaped by he subjec i e pe spec i e o
he indi idual (c . Ro h e al., 2011). The e o e, in e ac ions such as he in oduc ion o new
p oduc ion sys ems and s uc u al elemen s (e.g., ag o o es y sys ems, lowe s ips, e c.) o
he use o new echnologies (e.g., ield obo s) o p omo e ecological sus ainabili y mus also
be discussed and e alua ed in e ms o i s impac on he landscape.
In ligh o cu en e o s o p omo e biodi e si y-enhancing p oduc ion sys ems (FAO, 2023;
Rugge i Lade chi e al., 2024), small-scale di e si ied c op p oduc ion sys ems such as s ip
in e c opping a e gaining impo ance (c . Ala cón-Segu a e al., 2022; Spykman e al., 2023).
S ip in e c opping e e s o he simul aneous cul i a ion o di e en c ops on he same ield
in pa allel s ips (Vande mee , 1989). I es ablished on a la ge scale, his p oduc ion sys em
has a - eaching impac s on he landscape image compa ed o con en ional a ming. I is
assumed ha he managemen o such small-scale di e si ied p oduc ion sys ems can be
made labou -e icien h ough au oma ion (e.g., au oma ic s ee ing sys ems and sec ion
con ol), o by using au onomous echnologies such as ield obo s o d ones (c . Lowenbe g-
DeBoe , 2021; Gacks e e e al., 2023). Pa icula ly, he in oduc ion o au onomous
echnologies would u he change bo h he aes he ic appea ance o he landscape and
ag icul u al p ac ices.
P e ious esea ch has demons a ed he in luence o use expe ience and knowledge abou a
Den zmann and Goldbe ge (2020) examined images o a biodeg adable al e na i e o
con en ional polye hylene mulching oil in ocus g oup discussions wi h a me s. I was ound
ha he e alua ion o his al e na i e was s ongly dependen on he expe iences o he
esponden s, wi h unc ional knowledge in luencing he isual assessmen (Den zmann and
Goldbe ge , 2020). The isual assessmen o he landscape image wi hin he p o essional
g oup is hus also based on knowledge abou a ming me hods, hei easibili y, and economic
p ospec s.
Howe e , i is no easy o de e mine how g oups ha a e no amilia wi h he ope a ional
unc ions o landscape-shaping a ming measu es will eac o changes in he landscape.
Posi i e ecological e ec s o en occu as pa o conse a ion measu es associa ed wi h
"diso de ", bu hese measu es do no necessa ily diminish a ce ain p e e ence o " idy"
landscapes and amilia landscape images. In his ega d, a me s di e om he non-
ag icul u al socie y in hei pe cep ion and e alua ion o he landscape (Bu on, 2012). In
con as o a me s, he non-ag icul u al socie y pa ly e alua es linea i y in landscape images
as nega i e and "unna u al" (La oche e al., 2018). The aes he ic pe cep ion weighs hea ie
han o he e alua ion c i e ia such as ag icul u al p oduc ion o conse a ion. I is pos ula ed
ha plan ing na u al elemen s (e.g., bushes) in linea , s uc u ed cul i a ion o ms (e.g.,
s aigh ows) can e oke eelings o "cul u al dissonance" (La oche e al., 2018). Howe e , he
ype o landscape image cul u ally es ablished is ele an in his con ex . Fo example, an
ag o o es y sys em wi hin adi ional o cha ds gene a es highe accep ance (e.g., measu ed
in highe willingness o pay) i mo e han one c op is g own be ween he ee ows (Alcon e
al., 2020), i.e., i mo e s uc u es a e p esen . Howe e , no only he isual quali y o he
P oceedings o he 7 h Symposium on Ag i-Tech Economics o Sus ainable Fu u es 14
landscape was e alua ed, bu also he associa ed ecosys em se ices and cul u al he i age,
ep esen ed by manual managemen as opposed o a ac o (Alcon e al., 2020). This
app oach also poin s o he complex in e play o isual pe cep ion and associa ed p ocesses
o he non-ag icul u al popula ion. Wa en-K e zschma and Von Haa en (2014) emphasize
he ele ance o posi i e isual e alua ion by socie y as an impo an aspec besides he
ecological bene i s o ag icul u al p ac ice. This likely also gene a es accep ance o a change
in he cul u al landscape.
In addi ion o changes in he landscape image h ough new ag icul u al sys ems o s uc u al
elemen s, an impac om he use o echnologies in he ields is expec ed. Al hough
au onomous echnologies such as ield obo s a e associa ed wi h a ious bene i s, including
educed labou cos s (Lowenbe g-DeBoe e al., 2021), a su ey o a me s showed ha
conce ns abou a nega i e image o "aliena ed ag icul u e" in he popula ion can in luence
he planned acquisi ion o ield obo s (Spykman e al., 2021). P e ious esea ch on he
popula ion sugges s ha ield obo s end o be a ed neu al o posi i e (P ei e e al., 2020).
Howe e , Willmes e al. (2022) desc ibe a nega i e impac on he willingness o pay o ood
p oduced wi h he help o digi al echnologies. The au ho s add ha his nega i e impac can
be educed by addi ional ecological bene i s o he echnologies. These indings a e e lec ed
in a choice expe imen on au onomous echnologies in weed con ol, whe e he me hod o
weed con ol (mechanical s. he bicide b oadcas and spo -sp aying) in luenced he decision
mo e han he deg ee o au onomy o he echnologies used (Spykman e al., 2022). Howe e ,
a join conside a ion o au onomous echnologies and al e ed p oduc ion sys ems has no ye
been unde aken.
The aim o his pape is o analyse he pe cep ion o he Ge man popula ion ega ding new
small-scale di e si ied p oduc ion sys ems, he in eg a ion o s uc u al (biodi e si y)
elemen s such as lowe s ips, and he use o au onomous echnologies such as ield obo s
using an online su ey. A special ocus is on iden i ying and e alua ing he igge s o po en ial
p e e ences and he connec ions o indi idual isual componen s. This is done by ca ego izing
sho associa ions p o ided by su ey pa icipan s in connec ion wi h hei p e e ence
decisions. Fu he mo e, his pape also includes a segmen a ion analysis and illus a es how
a ious sociodemog aphic cha ac e is ics o he popula ion in luence he e alua ion o
ag icul u al elemen s such as lowe s ips o he use o au oma ed echnologies.
Me hods
Online su ey among he Ge man popula ion
A na ionwide online su ey o he Ge man popula ion aged 18 and olde was conduc ed om
mid-Sep embe o mid-Oc obe 2023. Access o his consume panel was acili a ed h ough
he engagemen o a ield se ice p o ide . The use o a consume panel allows he sepa a ion
o pe sonal da a and con en da a, so ha esea ch e hics can be assu ed. The panel enables
a p e-s a i ica ion o he sample o ensu e ha pa icipan s we e ep esen a i e o he
Ge man popula ion in e ms o age, gende , size o esiden ial a ea, and ede al s a e. In
addi ion o a ious sociodemog aphic da a, in o ma ion on leisu e ac i i ies in u al a eas,
pe sonal connec ions o ag icul u e, a i udes owa ds echnology, local ood p oduc ion and
sus ainable consump ion, and knowledge o ag icul u e, was ga he ed using es ablished
ma ke esea ch me hods. A e he inal da a alida ion, he su ey sample comp ised 2,022
usable and comple ed da a se s.

P oceedings o he 7 h Symposium on Ag i-Tech Economics o Sus ainable Fu u es 15
Analysis o p e e ences, mo i es, and sho associa ions
In a ques ion se ega ding isual e alua ion, pa icipan s we e asked o assess a ious aspec s
o a landscape image wi h s ip in e c opping using ou pho omon ages. All ou image
a ian s we e based on an iden ical s ip in e c opping image which shows a machine passage.
The di e ences included he use o a ield obo ins ead o a ac o and he p esence o lowe
s ip. All ou images we e pho omon ages ha we e delibe a ely no ealis ic (sligh ly
di e gen size o he machines) bu we e designed o inc ease he ecognizabili y o he
a ious componen s o pa icipan s (Table 1).
Table 1: Choice o image a ian s o esponden s
No e: Image sou ces: Pho omon ages, Ba a ian S a e Resea ch Cen e o Ag icul u e, 2023.
The ou images we e p esen ed simul aneously o he pa icipan s and wi hou andomised
a angemen s. A e selec ing hei p e e ed image a ian , pa icipan s we e asked o
choose h ee ou o six p ede e mined image componen s ha in luenced hei decision,
he la e componen e e s o he o de
and s aigh ness o he pa allel ield s ips as a s uc u ed o m o cul i a ion wi hou any
beau i ul ow o ees in he b
esponse. The selec ed image componen s we e coun ed and weigh ed acco ding o hei
speci ied ank ank 1 ecei ed a iple weigh , ank 2 double weigh s, and ank 3 single
weigh s. This app oach allows o he conside a ion o all h ee men ioned image componen s
and a composi e anking.
In a ollow-up ques ion, su ey pa icipan s we e asked o p o ide up o h ee sho
associa ions in he o m o keywo ds ela ed o he decisi e image componen ( i s ank).
These a he spon aneous associa ions o he pic u e componen s shown o e addi ional
insigh s in o he decisi e image componen and he choice o image a ian . While he anking
o p ede e mined image componen s se ed he cogni i e e alua ion by he pa icipan s, he
a ec i e and hus emo ion-based app oach o sho associa ions p o ides ano he dimension
o de e mining accep ance (Busch e al., 2019; P ei e e al., 2020; Lange e al., 2022). A e
da a cleaning, a o al o 4,872 usable keywo ds as spon aneous associa ions o he
componen s o he ou images we e a ailable. Mos o hese we e ela ed o image 4
( ac o /wi h lowe s ip), o which a o al o 3,092 keywo ds we e analysed and ca ego ised,
manually and in se e al i e a ions, in o 33 ca ego ies. F om hese, he 16 mos equen ly
men ioned ca ego ies (co e ing 2,995 keywo ds) we e iden i ied and p epa ed o his
con ibu ion.
Va ian s
Robo /
no lowe s ip
T ac o /
no lowe s ip
Robo /
wi h lowe s ip
T ac o /
wi h lowe s ip
Visualiza ion
o he image
a ian s o
selec ion
P oceedings o he 7 h Symposium on Ag i-Tech Economics o Sus ainable Fu u es 16
Modelling he ac o s in luencing p e e ences
Ano he goal o his con ibu ion is o iden i y possible sociodemog aphic in luences on he
p e e ence o one o he ou image a ian s. Based on simila s udies, i was assumed ha
pe sonal ac o s such as age, gende , size o esiden ial a ea, o li ing in a speci ic egion (e.g.,
Eas Ge many wi h la ge-s uc u ed landscapes) play a ole, as may he esponden s' di ec
connec ion o an ag icul u al en i onmen (De lin, 2005; Booga d e al., 2008; P ei e e al.,
2020). Addi ionally, he G een Consump ion Value (GCV), which e lec s he esponden s'
endency owa ds en i onmen ally iendly shopping beha iou , was used as a alue- and
a i ude-based ac o . This was measu ed using six i ems (Haws e al., 2014). These six i ems,
p esen ed in a Like - ype scale o ma , we e condensed in o an indi idual s anda dized ac o
sco e h ough ac o analysis and conside ed as a me ic p edic o o he selec ion o he
image a ian . Since esponden s could also choose be ween he use o a ac o and a ield
obo in he images shown, he a i ude owa ds echnology (ATT) was assessed using nine
i ems in a Like scale o ma and condensed in o a s anda dized ac o sco e (Edison and
Geissle , 2003). Fo bo h scales, nega i e ac o alues indica e a s onge mani es a ion o
his cha ac e is ic, while posi i e alues indica e a lowe mani es a ion. While he ypology o
su ey pa icipan s ega ding GCV is igh -skewed, indica ing ha pa icipan s' pu chasing
beha iou is p edominan ly en i onmen al-conscious acco ding o hei s a emen s, a i ude
owa ds echnology is mo e e enly dis ibu ed, showing a balanced a io be ween echnology-
o ien ed and ech-a e se esponden s (Figu e 1).
Figu e 1: Dis ibu ion o he ac o alues o g een consump ion alue (GCV) and he
a i ude owa ds echnology (ATT) o he esponden s (n = 2,022); GVC: median: -0.11;
skewness: 0.774; ku osis: 0.525; ATT: median: -0.09, skewness: 0.339; ku osis: -0.127
Mul i a ia e eg ession models de e mine he ela ionships be ween mul iple p edic o
a iables and a dependen a iable. Fo binomial and ca ego ical dependen a iables, logis ic
p ocedu es a e used o de e mine he p obabili y o he occu ence o non-occu ence o an
e en (e.g., selec ion o an image) based on he alues o he included p edic o a iables
(Backhaus e al., 2018). Logis ic eg ession p o ides in o ma ion abou he ans o ma ion o
he dependen a iable logi (p):
(1)
whe e p is he p obabili y ha he selec ion o a pa icula image is in luenced by he
-selec ion. The odds a io
P oceedings o he 7 h Symposium on Ag i-Tech Economics o Sus ainable Fu u es 17
ep esen s he a io o hese wo p obabili ies. When inco po a ing k p edic o a iables, he
model akes he ollowing o m:
(2)
The eg ession equa ion p o ides in o ma ion abou he impo ance o each p edic o based
), allowing o he c ea ion o a hie a chy o he measu ed
a iables' e ec s on g oup assignmen (Backhaus e al., 2018).
To cap u e he o e all e ec s and explana o y con ibu ion o he selec ed in luencing ac o s
ed. Fo his pu pose,
he image p e e ence was dummy coded as he dependen a iable (Model A: 1 = one o he
wo images wi h a obo was chosen; Model B: 1 = one o he wo images wi h a lowe s ip
was chosen). Sociodemog aphic cha ac e is ics included gende (1 = emale), age (1 = < 40
yea s), size o esiden ial a ea (1 = < 20,000 inhabi an s), geog aphical loca ion (1 = wes e n
Ge man s a es), and educa ional le el (1 = no gene al highe educa ion en ance
quali ica ion). Responden s' s a emen s ega ding pe sonal connec ion o ag icul u e was
included in he modelling ei he as pe sonal employmen in he sec o (1 = yes) o h ough
pe sonal con ac wi h ag icul u e in he ci cle o iends o acquain ances (1 = yes) (c . P ei e
e al., 2020). The me ic ac o sco es o GCV and ATT we e also in eg a ed in o he wo models
as addi ional independen cha ac e is ics.
Resul s
Dis ibu ion o p e e ences and selec ion mo i es
In a cen al ques ion, pa icipan s we e asked o e alua e changes in he landscape based on
single images, conside ing bo h he use o obo s ins ead o ac o s and he addi ional use o
lowe s ip. The o e all dis ibu ion o he s a ed p e e ences indica es ha he a ian wi h
lowe s ip in conjunc ion wi h ieldwo k pe o med by ac o s is p e e ed (Image 4 in Table
15.3% o he 2,022 esponden s, while 14.6% chose he obo in combina ion wi h lowe s ip
(Image 3 in Table 1). Only 2.5% o he su ey pa icipan s a ou ed image 1 (see Table 1), in
which he obo was depic ed on he ield wi hou lowe s ip.
Figu e 2 shows he esul s o he anking o he image componen s ha we e decisi e o he
pa icipan s' p e e ence choices. Fo images 3 and 4, which depic he obo and he ac o
espec i ely, he lowe s ip shown in bo h images is he p ima y componen (41% and 43%,
espec i ely).
This is ollowed by he echnical aspec obo o ac o wi h 27% and 28%, espec i ely.
also equen ly men ioned o bo h images 3 and 4, wi h 13% each. Fo images 1 and 2, which
depic he obo o ac o wi hou he lowe s ip, he ocus is p ima ily on he echnological
aspec , ci ed as he eason by 39% o he obo and 40% o he ac o . The second place in
he amilia image o adi ional ag icul u e and ha he lowe s ip is pe cei ed as a he
dis up i e o co e ieldwo k. Rega ding image 4 ( ac o wi h lowe s ip), some esponden s
ema ked ha he lowe s ip speci ically symbolizes na u e and animal conse a ion o
P oceedings o he 7 h Symposium on Ag i-Tech Economics o Sus ainable Fu u es 18
hem. Fo images 1 and 3, which show ieldwo k done by a obo , inno a ion, po en ial
e iciency gains, and no el y we e men ioned as dis inc mo i es o selec ion.
Figu e 2: Dis ibu ion o p e e ences and selec ion mo i es
Fac o s in luencing p e e ences
The wo binominal logis ic eg ession models examining he in luence o sociodemog aphic
cha ac e is ics on he selec ion o images wi h obo s and images wi h lowe s ip
demons a e dis inc e ec s. Gende in luences he selec ion o images wi h he obo (Table
2) as emale pa icipan s a e signi ican ly less likely o choose images wi h a obo compa ed
o men (Odds Ra io = 0.434). I esponden s ha e pe sonal con ac s wi h acquain ances in he
ag icul u al sec o , he likelihood o selec ing he obo image is signi ican ly lowe .
In e es ingly, esponden s wi h pe sonal ag icul u al expe ience exhibi an opposi e, hough
no s a is ically signi ican e ec . No addi ional in luence ac o s, such as he a i ude owa ds
echnology o o igin om wes e n o eas e n Ge man s a es, a ec he p e e ence o a ield
obo compa ed o a ac o .
P edic o s Model A Field obo
B SE Wald p
Odds
Ra io
95% CI
LL UL
Gende (1= emale)* -0.835 0.337
6.137 0.013
0.434
0.224 0.840
Age (1=younge han 40 yea s) 0.067 0.392
0.029 0.864
1.069
0.496 2.304
Educa ion (1=no A-le els and below) 0.100 0.332
0.090 0.764
1.105
0.576 2.118
Size o place o esidence (1=less han 20k
inhabi an s)
-0.288 0.342
0.706 0.401
0.750
0.384 1.467
Region (1=Wes e n Ge many s a es) -0.314 0.367
0.730 0.393
0.731
0.356 1.501
Own ag icul u al expe ience (1=yes) 0.405 0.670
0.365 0.545
1.499
0.403 5.572
Pe sonal con ac wi h a me s (1=yes)* -2.088 1.043
4.008 0.045
0.124
0.016 0.957
A i ude owa ds echnology (ATT)
(nega i e ac o alue = highe deg ee)
-0.034 0.141 0.059 0.808
0.966
0.732 1.275
G een Consump ion Value (GCV)
(nega i e ac o alue = highe deg ee)
0.087 0.178
0.239 0.625
1.091
0.770 1.546
Cons an *** -1.398 0.406
11.892
0.000
0.247
No e:
assignmen classi ica ion (con ibu ion o p edic o a iables) = 90.3% | Sou ce: own su ey