ISSN: 2582-4686 SJIF 2021-3.261,SJIF 2022-
2.889, 2024-6.875 Resea chBib IF: 9.948 / 2024
VOLUME-5, ISSUE-11
861
“ZAMONAVIY EKOTURIZIMNING ASOSIY TERMINOLOGIK KONSEPSIYALARI
YO’NALISHLARI VA SHAKLLARI (INGLIZ VA UZBEK TILLARI MATERIALLARI
ASOSIDA)”
Mi zayo o a Sa inoz Sa a o na
Aniq a ij imoiy anla uni e si e i
2-bosqich magis an i
mi zayo o [email p o ec ed] +998943389498
Anno a siya: Ushbu adqiqo zamona iy eko u izmning asosiy e minologik ushunchala i,
i ojlanish yo‘nalishla i a ashkiliy shaklla ini ingliz a o‘zbek illa idagi ma e ialla asosida
qiyosiy ahlil qiladi. Dunyo bo‘yicha eko u izmning jadal i ojlanib bo ishi ilmiy adqiqo la , a’lim
a ba qa o amaliyo uchun aniq a yagona e minologiyaning muhimligini yanada oshi moqda.
Tadqiqo da ba qa o u izm, abiiy u izm, mas’uliya li sayoha a hamjamiya ga asoslangan
eko u izm kabi asosiy ushunchala ahlil qilinib, ula ning ingliz a o‘zbek manbala ida
qo‘llanishidagi o‘xshashlik a a qla yo i iladi. Shuningdek, eko u izmning zamona iy
yo‘nalishla i — biologik xilma-xillikni saqlash, madaniy me osni as ash a mahalliy
hamjamiya la ni qo‘llab-qu a lash masalala i ko‘ ib chiqiladi. Tadqiqo u li ashkiliy shaklla ni
— qo‘ iqlanadigan hududla da eko u izm, qishloq eko u izmi, sayyohlik-sa guzash u izmi a
ko‘ngilli u izmini ham o‘ ganadi. Mazku qiyosiy ling is ik yondashu eko u izm e minologiyasini
yanada aniq oq ushunishga a ikki ilda s anda lashgan a amala ni shakllan i ishga xizma
qiladi.
Kali so‘zla : eko u izm; ba qa o u izm; e minologiya; ingliz–o‘zbek qiyosiy ahlili; abiiy
u izm; hamjamiya ga asoslangan u izm; abia ni muho aza qilish; zamona iy u izm yo‘nalishla i.
“ОСНОВНЫЕ ТЕРМИНОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ ПОНЯТИЯ, НАПРАВЛЕНИЯ И ФОРМЫ
СОВРЕМЕННОГО ЭКОТУРИЗМА (НА МАТЕРИАЛАХ НА АНГЛИЙСКОМ И
УЗБЕКСКОМ ЯЗЫКАХ)”
Аннотация: В данном исследовании рассматриваются основные терминологические
понятия, направления развития и организационные формы современного экотуризма на
основе сравнительных материалов на английском и узбекском языках. По мере глобального
роста экотуризма необходимость точной и унифицированной терминологии становится все
более важной для научных исследований, образования и устойчивой практики. В работе
анализируются ключевые понятия, такие как устойчивый туризм, природно-
ориентированный туризм, ответственное путешествие и общинный экотуризм, с акцентом
на сходства и различия их употребления в английских и узбекских источниках. Кроме того,
исследуются основные направления современного экотуризма, включая сохранение
биоразнообразия, защиту культурного наследия и расширение возможностей местных
сообществ. Также рассматриваются различные организационные формы — такие как
туризм в охраняемых природных территориях, сельский экотуризм, приключенческий
экотуризм и волонтерский туризм. Компаративный лингвистический подход исследования
способствует более глубокому пониманию терминологии экотуризма и поддерживает
развитие стандартизированного употребления терминов в обоих языках.
ISSN: 2582-4686 SJIF 2021-3.261,SJIF 2022-
2.889, 2024-6.875 Resea chBib IF: 9.948 / 2024
VOLUME-5, ISSUE-11
862
Ключевые слова: экотуризм; устойчивый туризм; терминология; англо-узбекское
сравнение; природно-ориентированный туризм; общинный туризм; сохранение природы;
современные тенденции туризма.
“THE MAIN TERMINOLOGICAL CONCEPTS, DIRECTIONS, AND FORMS OF
MODERN ECOTOURISM (BASED ON MATERIALS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK
LANGUAGES)”
Abs ac : This s udy examines he main e minological concep s, de elopmen di ec ions, and
o ganiza ional o ms o mode n eco ou ism based on compa a i e ma e ials in English and Uzbek.
As eco ou ism con inues o g ow globally, he need o p ecise and uni ied e minology becomes
inc easingly impo an o esea ch, educa ion, and sus ainable p ac ice. The pape analyzes key
concep s such as sus ainable ou ism, na u e-based ou ism, esponsible a el, and communi y-
based eco ou ism, highligh ing simila i ies and di e ences in hei usage ac oss English and Uzbek
sou ces. Addi ionally, i explo es he p ima y di ec ions o mode n eco ou ism, including
biodi e si y conse a ion, cul u al he i age p ese a ion, and local communi y empowe men .
Va ious o ganiza ional o ms—such as p o ec ed-a ea ou ism, u al eco ou ism, ad en u e-based
eco ou ism, and olun ee ou ism—a e also discussed. The compa a i e linguis ic app oach o he
s udy con ibu es o a clea e unde s anding o eco ou ism e minology and suppo s he
de elopmen o s anda dized usage in bo h languages.
Keywo ds: eco ou ism; sus ainable ou ism; e minology; English–Uzbek compa ison; na u e-
based ou ism; communi y-based ou ism; conse a ion; mode n ou ism ends
.INTRODUCTION
In ecen decades, eco ou ism has eme ged as one o he mos dynamic and apidly de eloping sec o s
o he global ou ism indus y. As en i onmen al conce ns, sus ainable de elopmen goals, and he
need o esponsible a el p ac ices gain in e na ional signi icance, eco ou ism se es as a i al
b idge be ween na u e conse a ion and socio-economic g ow h. Despi e i s global ele ance,
eco ou ism emains a complex and mul i-dimensional phenomenon, equi ing p ecise e minological
de ini ions, clea concep ual amewo ks, and comp ehensi e unde s anding o i s a ious di ec ions
and o ms. These challenges a e pa icula ly impo an in mul ilingual con ex s, whe e e minological
di e ences may in luence how eco ou ism is unde s ood, de eloped, and p omo ed. Examining he
main e minological concep s o eco ou ism h ough ma e ials in English and Uzbek languages is
especially aluable due o he g owing ole o Uzbekis an as a egional hub o sus ainable ou ism.
While English se es as he leading in e na ional language o academic esea ch and ou ism
discou se, Uzbek-language sou ces e lec local pe spec i es, cul u al alues, and na ional
de elopmen p io i ies. Compa a i e analysis o e minology and concep ual app oaches in bo h
languages allows o iden i ying common de ini ions, e ealing linguis ic nuances, and unde s anding
how in e na ional eco ou ism s anda ds a e in e p e ed wi hin he local con ex . Fu he mo e, mode n
eco ou ism encompasses a wide ange o di ec ions— om wildli e obse a ion, p o ec ed a ea
ou ism, and u al communi y engagemen o ad en u e eco ou ism, educa ional a el, and cul u al-
ecological expe iences. These di e se o ms con ibu e no only o en i onmen al p o ec ion bu also
o he economic empowe men o local communi ies, he p ese a ion o adi ional li es yles, and
he p omo ion o sus ainable esou ce use. This s udy aims o explo e he key e minological concep s,
main di ec ions, and con empo a y o ms o eco ou ism by syn hesizing English and Uzbek academic
ISSN: 2582-4686 SJIF 2021-3.261,SJIF 2022-
2.889, 2024-6.875 Resea chBib IF: 9.948 / 2024
VOLUME-5, ISSUE-11
863
sou ces, ou ism guidelines, and policy documen s. By doing so, i p o ides a clea e , mo e uni ied
unde s anding o eco ou ism as bo h a global and locally adap ed phenomenon. The compa a i e
app oach enhances e minological accu acy and suppo s he de elopmen o a mo e cohe en and
cul u ally ele an amewo k o eco ou ism esea ch and p ac ice in Uzbekis an and beyond.
Resea ch Objec i es
The main objec i es o his s udy a e as ollows:
1. To iden i y and analyze he co e e minological concep s ela ed o eco ou ism in English and
Uzbek academic, p o essional, and policy-based sou ces.
2. To compa e and con as he usage, meaning, and in e p e a ion o eco ou ism e minology
ac oss he wo languages, highligh ing simila i ies, di e ences, and linguis ic nuances.
3. To classi y he majo di ec ions o mode n eco ou ism, including na u e-based, cul u al-
ecological, communi y-based, educa ional, and ad en u e-o ien ed o ms.
4. To examine con empo a y o ms and models o eco ou ism de elopmen , emphasizing hei
ole in sus ainabili y, en i onmen al p o ec ion, and local economic de elopmen .
5. To assess how global eco ou ism concep s a e adap ed o he Uzbek con ex , including he
coun y’s na u al esou ces, cul u al adi ions, legisla ion, and ou ism s a egies.
6. To con ibu e o a uni ied e minological amewo k ha suppo s academic esea ch,
p o essional communica ion, and policy-making in he ield o eco ou ism.
Li e a u e Re iew
Mode n esea ch on eco ou ism has expanded signi ican ly, co e ing en i onmen al science, ou ism
s udies, linguis ics, cul u al an h opology, and sus ainable de elopmen . In e na ional English-
language li e a u e, such as wo ks by Ma ha Honey, Da id Fennell, and he In e na ional Eco ou ism
Socie y (TIES), p o ides widely accep ed de ini ions emphasizing esponsible a el o na u al a eas,
conse a ion- ocused p ac ices, and socio-economic bene i s o local communi ies. Many schola s
also highligh he impo ance o en i onmen al educa ion, low-impac a el, and communi y
pa icipa ion as in eg al componen s o eco ou ism. In pa allel, Uzbek-language sou ces ha e g own
apidly o e he pas decade, e lec ing Uzbekis an’s inc eased a en ion o sus ainable ou ism and
eco- iendly de elopmen . Resea ch pape s, go e nmen s a egies, and academic publica ions in
Uzbekis an o en emphasize he coun y’s ich biodi e si y, p o ec ed e i o ies, na ional pa ks, and
unique cul u al landscapes as key ounda ions o eco ou ism. Uzbek au ho s also explo e he
in eg a ion o eco ou ism wi h u al de elopmen , e hno- ou ism, and communi y-based ou ism,
aligning wi h global sus ainabili y s anda ds while main aining local cul u al iden i y. Compa a i e
s udies show ha while co e eco ou ism concep s a e simila in bo h languages, ce ain e ms—such
as “ecological ou ism,” “ esponsible ou ism,” and “en i onmen al educa ion”—may ca y sligh ly
di e en in e p e a ions depending on linguis ic, cul u al, and policy con ex s. This highligh s he
need o p ecise e minology when de eloping educa ional p og ams, ou ism p ojec s, and na ional
s anda ds. O e all, exis ing li e a u e unde sco es eco ou ism’s ole as a ool o conse a ion and
sus ainable de elopmen , while also e ealing he impo ance o cul u ally adap ed app oaches.
Howe e , a sys ema ic compa ison o English and Uzbek e minological amewo ks is s ill limi ed,
c ea ing a gap ha his s udy aims o add ess.
The body o esea ch on eco ou ism is b oad and in e disciplina y, encompassing en i onmen al
science, ou ism managemen , and linguis ics. Fo he pu poses o his disse a ion on e minological
ISSN: 2582-4686 SJIF 2021-3.261,SJIF 2022-
2.889, 2024-6.875 Resea chBib IF: 9.948 / 2024
VOLUME-5, ISSUE-11
864
aspec s, he mos ele an wo ks ocus on de ini ions, e m o ma ion, ansla ion, and he
de elopmen o eco ou ism in di e en con ex s, especially in Uzbekis an.
One majo s and o li e a u e deals wi h de ini ional and concep ual ounda ions. The concep
o eco ou ism i sel has e ol ed signi ican ly since i i s appea ed. De ini ions om global
o ganiza ions emphasize esponsible a el o na u al a eas, conse a ion, local communi y bene i ,
and educa ion. [1-561,567p ] In he Uzbek con ex , au ho s such as Tu aye a, Ikh iyo o na, and
o he s ha e p o ided de ailed compa isons o he English and Uzbek e minological sys ems o
eco ou ism.
A second g oup o s udies looks a heo e ical and me hodological ounda ions o eco ou ism
e minology. Fo example, Abdullaye a (in he wo k “Scien i ic-Theo e ical and Me hodological
Founda ions o Eco ou ism Te minology”) highligh s he in e disciplina y na u e o he opic and
p oposes amewo ks o he classi ica ion and analysis o eco ou ism e ms. [ 2- 74,77] Rela ed o
his, esea ch in o lexico-seman ic me hods shows how e ms in bo h English and Uzbek a e o med,
e ol e, and en e he e minological sys em. [ 3- 246,248]
The e m “ ou ism” has e ol ed o e cen u ies, bo h linguis ically and concep ually, o
ep esen a complex social, cul u al, economic, and en i onmen al phenomenon. E ymologically, he
wo d “ ou ism” is oo ed in he La in e b o na e, meaning “ o u n (on a la he),” and in he ancien
G eek o nos (τόρνος), which e e s o a la he o a ci cula mo ion. The no ion is one o a ci cula
jou ney — lea ing om a poin and e en ually e u ning o i . The su ix “-ism,” deno ing ac ion o
p ac ice, u ns ou in o ou ism, li e ally implying he ac i i y o making a ci cui o jou ney. [3-
24.26] His o ically, he mode n concep o ou ism eme ged in he 17 h and 18 h cen u ies. The so-
called “G and Tou ,” popula among young Eu opean a is oc a s, exempli ies his: hese long
jou neys ac oss he Eu opean con inen we e no jus pleasu e ips bu also educa ional oyages o
cul u al and a is ic en ichmen . [ 4- 45, 48] O e ime, as anspo a ion echnologies ad anced and
a el became mo e accessible, “ ou ism” cemen ed i s meaning as a el away om one’s usual
en i onmen o pleasu e, lea ning, o business. Thus, when we speak o “ ou ism,” we e e no jus
o a el in he li e al sense, bu o a s uc u ed, o en cyclical, cul u al and economic p ac ice shaped
by his o ical de elopmen s.
De ini ion and Eme gence o Eco ou ism.
Wi hin he b oad ield o ou ism, eco ou ism has eme ged since he la e 20 h cen u y as a dis inc
niche ha explici ly links a el wi h en i onmen al e hics. The e m “eco ou ism” is commonly
a ibu ed o Héc o Ceballos-Lascu áin, a Mexican a chi ec and conse a ionis . In 1987, Ceballos-
Lascu áin de ined eco ou ism as: “ a eling o ela i ely undis u bed o uncon amina ed na u al a eas
wi h he speci ic objec i e o s udying, admi ing, and enjoying he scene y and i s wild plan s and
animals, as well as any exis ing cul u al mani es a ions (bo h pas and p esen ) ound in hese a eas.
”He u he emphasized ha eco ou ism “implies a scien i ic, es he ic, o philosophical app oach,”
al hough an eco ou is need no be a p o essional scien is , a is , o philosophe . [5-34,36] Wha
ma e s is he oppo uni y o imme se onesel
in na u e in a way ha os e s deep consciousness o en i onmen al and cul u al alue. Ano he
widely ecognized de ini ion comes om The In e na ional Eco ou ism Socie y (TIES): “ esponsible
a el o na u al a eas ha conse es he en i onmen and imp o es he well-being o local people.”
[6-56,58] This emphasizes esponsibili y, conse a ion, and social bene i — h ee co e pilla s o
eco ou ism. Fu he , some schola s no e ha he oo s o he wo d “eco-” come om he G eek oikos,
ISSN: 2582-4686 SJIF 2021-3.261,SJIF 2022-
2.889, 2024-6.875 Resea chBib IF: 9.948 / 2024
VOLUME-5, ISSUE-11
865
meaning “house” o “en i onmen ,” which unde lies concep s like ecology and economy. Thus,
eco ou ism is no simply “g een ou ism,” bu a mode o a el ha inhe en ly acknowledges and
espec s he home (oikos) o li ing beings. Eco ou ism occupies a unique heo e ical space because
i a emp s o econcile wo o en compe ing goals: en i onmen al conse a ion and local
socioeconomic de elopmen . F om he en i onmen al pe spec i e, eco ou ism is seen as a
mechanism o incen i ize he p o ec ion o na u al a eas. By b inging ou is s o ela i ely undis u bed
ecosys ems, eco ou ism can gene a e income ha suppo s conse a ion e o s, such as habi a
p ese a ion, biodi e si y moni o ing, and sus ainable esou ce managemen . Ceballos-Lascu áin
himsel a gued ha h ough imme si e a el, isi o s can de elop g ea e en i onmen al awa eness
and a conse a ion-minded e hic. F om he social and economic side, eco ou ism is a gued o bene i
local communi ies. Acco ding o some analyses, o an ac i i y o uly be eco ou ism, i mus
“ac i ely in ol e he local communi ies in he ou ism p ocess so ha hey may bene i om i …
he eby con ibu ing o a be e alua ion o he na u al esou ces in ha locali y.” [8-123’126] The
idea is ha local people, when s akeholde s in eco ou ism, will ha e a inancial and cul u al in e es
in main aining hei en i onmen , hus aligning local de elopmen wi h conse a ion. Despi e i s
appealing heo e ical amewo k, eco ou ism aces p ac ical and e hical challenges. Fi s , de ini ional
ambigui y emains a p oblem: no all “na u e-based” ou ism quali ies as eco ou ism. Some ou ism
ope a ions labeled “eco” may simply exploi na u al a eas wi hou eal conse a ion o communi y
bene i s. Second, e en well-in en ioned eco ou ism can ha e nega i e en i onmen al impac . The
p esence o ou is s, howe e limi ed, can dis u b wildli e, in oduce pollu ion, and s ain agile
ecosys ems. To ul ill Ceballos-Lascu áin’s ision o low-impac , scien i ically o
philosophically in o med imme sion, ca e ul planning, managemen , and moni o ing a e equi ed.
Thi d, socioeconomic inequi ies may limi local pa icipa ion. I he “bene i s” o eco ou ism a e
cap u ed mainly by ou side in es o s o well-connec ed eli es, hen he s a ed goal o communi y
de elopmen may be unde mined. Some schola s a gue ha wi hou s ong go e nance amewo ks,
he p omise o empowe men and local bene i emains idealis ic. Finally, g eenwashing is a conce n:
some ou is ope a o s and des ina ions b and hemsel es “eco-” o “g een” simply o a ac e hically
minded a ele s, wi hou implemen ing meaning ul en i onmen al managemen o communi y
engagemen . This aises he ques ion: can eco ou ism, in p ac ice, li e up o i s philosophical and
e hical aspi a ion. Gi en hese ensions, he disse a ion ques ion — How does eco ou ism econcile
en i onmen al conse a ion wi h local communi y de elopmen ? — is bo h imely and c i ical.
Empi ically, his econcilia ion depends on: The educa ion and a i ude o ou is s: Do eco ou is s
genuinely engage in low-impac , espec ul beha io , o do hey ea he en i onmen as a backd op
o ec ea ion? The economic model: Does e enue om eco ou ism low back o conse a ion and
communi y, o is i siphoned o by ex e nal ac o s? The egula o y con ex : A e he e policies (local,
na ional, o in e na ional) ha ensu e s anda ds o sus ainabili y, conse a ion, and social equi y?
F om a heo e ical poin o iew, success ul eco ou ism se es as a b idge be ween en i onmen al
e hics and sus ainable de elopmen . [9-56,58] I is no jus a ma ke segmen bu po en ially a
ans o ma ional p ac ice, os e ing conse a ion-minded global ci izens and p o iding angible
bene i s o hos communi ies. Howe e , he “ideal” eco ou ism model—g ounded in he de ini ions
o Ceballos-Lascu áin and TIES— equi es ongoing c i ical assessmen . Wi hou igo ous
implemen a ion and genuine commi men , eco ou ism isks becoming ano he o m o exploi a i e
ou ism, masked by g een he o ic.
ISSN: 2582-4686 SJIF 2021-3.261,SJIF 2022-
2.889, 2024-6.875 Resea chBib IF: 9.948 / 2024
VOLUME-5, ISSUE-11
866
De ini ions o Uzbek academic li e a u e.
In ecen Uzbek academic li e a u e, he concep o eco ou ism is gene ally amed in line wi h
in e na ional de ini ions (such as hose o Ceballos-Lascu áin and The In e na ional Eco ou ism
Socie y), bu adap ed o he socio-economic and ecological condi ions o Uzbekis an. Schola s
emphasize h ee ecu ing elemen s: p o ec ion o na u al a eas and ecosys ems, imp o emen o he
well-being o local communi ies, and minimiza ion o en i onmen al impac wi hin a b oade
sus ainable de elopmen agenda.
Conclusion
The s udy o he main e minological concep s, di ec ions, and o ms o mode n eco ou ism—based
on English and Uzbek ma e ials—demons a es ha eco ou ism oday is no only a b anch o ou ism
bu also a complex in e disciplina y phenomenon ha connec s en i onmen al p o ec ion, cul u al
p ese a ion, educa ion, and sus ainable economic de elopmen . The analysis o English-language
sou ces e eals globally accep ed de ini ions o eco ou ism, emphasizing esponsible a el,
biodi e si y conse a ion, and communi y pa icipa ion. Meanwhile, Uzbek-language ma e ials
highligh he local ecological po en ial, na ional p io i ies, and cul u al alues ha shape how
eco ou ism is unde s ood and implemen ed wi hin he coun y. The compa a i e examina ion o
e minology shows ha al hough co e ideas a e consis en ac oss bo h languages, ce ain e ms
acqui e dis inc shades o meaning in luenced by linguis ic s uc u e, cul u al con ex , and na ional
policy amewo ks. This unde sco es he impo ance o de eloping uni ied and p ecise e minology
o ensu e e ec i e communica ion among esea che s, p ac i ione s, policymake s, and educa o s.
Fu he mo e, he s udy iden i ies key di ec ions and o ms o mode n eco ou ism—including wildli e-
based ou ism, p o ec ed a ea ou ism, educa ional and scien i ic a el, communi y-based
eco ou ism, and cul u al-ecological expe iences. These o ms play an essen ial ole in p omo ing
conse a ion e o s, imp o ing he li elihoods o local popula ions, and os e ing en i onmen al
awa eness among a ele s. O e all, he esea ch highligh s ha he success ul de elopmen o
eco ou ism depends on he in eg a ion o global s anda ds wi h local eali ies, ensu ing ha ou ism
g ow h does no comp omise ecological sus ainabili y. By analyzing English and Uzbek schola ly
ma e ials, his s udy con ibu es o a deepe unde s anding o eco ou ism e minology and o e s a
ounda ion o u he academic esea ch and p ac ical ini ia i es in sus ainable ou ism de elopmen .
I ein o ces he idea ha eco ou ism, when p ope ly guided, can become a powe ul ool o
en i onmen al s ewa dship, cul u al p ese a ion, and long- e m socio-economic p og ess.
REFERENCES
1. Abdullaye a, U. N. (2025). Scien i ic-Theo e ical and Me hodological Founda ions o
Eco ou ism Te minology. Jou nal o En i onmen al Managemen and Tou ism, 13(2), 561–571.
2. Abdullaye a, U. N. (2025). T ansla ion and Lexicog aphic Fea u es o Eco ou ism Te ms in
English and Uzbek Languages. In e na ional Jou nal o A i icial In elligence, 5(10), 74–77.
3. Ikh iyo o na, T. D., Mi sidiko na, A. N., Is oil kizi, I. G., & Tohi kizi, J. N. (2021). The Te ms
o Eco ou ism in English and Uzbek Languages. In e na ional Jou nal on In eg a ed Educa ion,
4(6), 246–248.
4. Ceballos-Lascu áin, H. (1987). In In e na ional Re iew o En i onmen al S a egies, “ a eling
o ela i ely undis u bed …”
5. Eco ou ism: The E ol ing Con empo a y De ini ion, Academia.edu: “Ceballos-Lascu aín, 1987:
14
ISSN: 2582-4686 SJIF 2021-3.261,SJIF 2022-
2.889, 2024-6.875 Resea chBib IF: 9.948 / 2024
VOLUME-5, ISSUE-11
867
6.E ymologyWo ld. “Tou ism e ymology.”
7. Toshpula o a, M. (2025). Eco ou ism as a Sus ainable De elopmen Tool o Uzbekis an.
In e na ional Con e ence on Economics, Finance, Banking and Managemen (ICEFBM).
8. Abdu axmono a, Z. (2025). O‘zbekis onda ekologik u izmni i ojlan i ish masalala i. Yashil
Iq isodiyo a Ta aqqiyo .
9. Ismoilo a, M. M. (2025). Eco ou ism in P o ec ed A eas: A Li e a u e Re iew. Yashil Iq isodiyo
a Ta aqqiyo .
10. The In e na ional Eco ou ism Socie y (TIES). De ini ion o Eco ou ism.
