scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Beyond a Shared History: A Biosocial Perspective on Sociogenomics and Racism in Germany

Author: Aikins, Muna AnNisa,Willems, Yayouk Eva,Fraemke, Deniz,Raffington, Laurel
Publisher: Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH,Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
Year: 2024
DOI: 10.1007/s11577-024-00934-6
Source: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/315424/1/11577_2024_Article_934.pdf
Aikins, Muna AnNisa; Willems, Yayouk E a; F aemke, Deniz; Ra ing on, Lau el
A icle — Published Ve sion
Beyond aSha ed His o y: ABiosocial Pe spec i e on
Sociogenomics and Racism in Ge many
KZ SS Kölne Zei sch i ü Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie
P o ided in Coope a ion wi h:
Sp inge Na u e
Sugges ed Ci a ion: Aikins, Muna AnNisa; Willems, Yayouk E a; F aemke, Deniz; Ra ing on, Lau el
(2024) : Beyond aSha ed His o y: ABiosocial Pe spec i e on Sociogenomics and Racism in
Ge many, KZ SS Kölne Zei sch i ü Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, ISSN 1861-891X, Sp inge
Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Wiesbaden, Vol. 76, Iss. 3, pp. 573-602,
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s11577-024-00934-6
This Ve sion is a ailable a :
h ps://hdl.handle.ne /10419/315424
S anda d-Nu zungsbedingungen:
Die Dokumen e au EconS o dü en zu eigenen wissenscha lichen
Zwecken und zum P i a geb auch gespeiche und kopie we den.
Sie dü en die Dokumen e nich ü ö en liche ode komme zielle
Zwecke e iel äl igen, ö en lich auss ellen, ö en lich zugänglich
machen, e eiben ode ande wei ig nu zen.
So e n die Ve asse die Dokumen e un e Open-Con en -Lizenzen
(insbesonde e CC-Lizenzen) zu Ve ügung ges ell haben soll en,
gel en abweichend on diesen Nu zungsbedingungen die in de do
genann en Lizenz gewäh en Nu zungs ech e.
Te ms o use:
Documen s in EconS o may be sa ed and copied o you pe sonal
and schola ly pu poses.
You a e no o copy documen s o public o comme cial pu poses, o
exhibi he documen s publicly, o make hem publicly a ailable on he
in e ne , o o dis ibu e o o he wise use he documen s in public.
I he documen s ha e been made a ailable unde an Open Con en
Licence (especially C ea i e Commons Licences), you may exe cise
u he usage igh s as speci ied in he indica ed licence.
h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/
ABHANDLUNGEN
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s11577-024-00934-6
Köln Z Soziol (2024) 76:573–602
Beyond a Sha ed His o y: A Biosocial Pe spec i e on
Sociogenomics and Racism in Ge many
Muna AnNisa Aikins · Yayouk E a Willems ·DenizF aemke ·
Lau el Ra ing on
Recei ed: 11 Ap il 2023 / Accep ed: 23 Janua y 2024 / Published online: 11 Ma ch 2024
© The Au ho (s) 2024
Abs ac Recen ad ances in sociogenomics o e new oppo uni ies o in eg a e
gene ic and epigene ic measu es in o social science esea ch on human li espan de-
elopmen . Now, Ge man social science coho s ha e ollowed sui wi h his global
end. We an icipa e ha he in eg a ion o gene ic measu es in o Ge man social
science coho s is likely o be me wi h hesi a ion and dismay. His o ically, acial-
ized pseudo-science disguised as gene ic esea ch was used o jus i y he poli ical
exploi a ion, opp ession, and genocide conduc ed by colonial and Nazi Ge many
egimes. In esponse, Ge man ins i u ions and social sciences ac i ely a oided ace-
ela ed esea ch. Howe e , a oiding he in e sec ion o socially cons uc ed ace and
gene ics may s all he decons uc ion o endu ing acial disc imina ion and he iden-
i ica ion o acialized social inequali ies. Recen su ey s udies show ha hal o
he Ge man popula ion s ill belie e in he exis ence o biologically dis inc human
“ aces” and ha acism is ampan . This a icle is aimed a p o iding a biosocial
Du ing he wo k on hei disse a ions, Muna AnNisa Aikins and Deniz F aemke we e p e-doc o al
ellows o he In e na ional Max Planck Resea ch School on he Li e Cou se (LIFE, www.imp s-li e.
mpg.de; pa icipa ing ins i u ions: Max Planck Ins i u e o Human De elopmen , F eie Uni e si ä
Be lin, Humbold -Uni e si ä zu Be lin, Uni e si y o Michigan, Uni e si y o Vi ginia, Uni e si y o
Zu ich).
M. A. Aikins · Y. E. Willems · D. F aemke · L. Ra ing on
Max Planck Resea ch G oup Biosocial—Biology, Social Dispa i ies, and De elopmen , Max Planck
Ins i u e o Human De elopmen
Len zeallee 94, 14195 Be lin, Ge many
E-Mail: [email p o ec ed].de
M. A. Aikins
E-Mail: aikins@mpib-be lin.mpg.de
Y. E. Willems
E-Mail: willems@mpib-be lin.mpg.de
D. F aemke
E-Mail: aem[email p o ec ed].de
K
574 M. A. Aikins e al.
pe spec i e on sociogenomics and acism in Ge many. Fi s , we discuss he biolo-
gis ic cons uc ion o ace ha became p e alen in colonial and Nazi Ge many. We
a gue ha acis legacies a e sou ces o social inequali y in con empo a y Ge man
socie y. We u he e iew ecen human genomic science ha clea ly demons a es
ha he e is no biological basis o socially cons uc ed ace. Second, we p opose
a biosocial pe spec i e ha in eg a es how genes “ge ou o he skin” and acism
“ge s unde he skin”. T ansac ional gene ic e ec s, which in ol e human beha io
and in e ac ions be ween people in socie y, a e expec ed o depend on en i onmen al
inequali ies ied o sys emic acism. We summa ize ecen sociogenomics s udies us-
ing polygenic indices and epigene ic p o ile sco es showing ha a) genes con ibu e
o complex human ai s and b) he exp ession o gene ic a ia ion is a ec ed by
socioeconomic and acialized inequali y. Finally, we o e a oadmap owa d ace-
c i ical biosocial esea ch ha b eaks wi h he his o ically in o med a oidance o
ace o econs uc ace-c i ical concep s, da ase s, and scien i ic sys ems.
Keywo ds Gene ics · Racism · Gene–en i onmen in e play · Epigene ics ·
Ge many · Social de e minan s o heal h
Jensei s eine e knüp en Ve gangenhei : Eine biosoziale Pe spek i e
au Soziogenomik und Rassismus in Deu schland
Zusammen assung De Bei ag beleuch e die jüngs en Fo sch i e in de Sozioge-
nomik und de en Po enzial, gene ische und epigene ische Fak o enindiesozialwis-
senscha liche Fo schung zu menschlichen En wicklung zu in eg ie en. Aus eine
neuen biosozialen Pe spek i e au Soziogenomik und Rassismus in Deu schland
wi d die Wechselwi kung zwischen Genen, menschlichem Ve hal en, sozialen In e -
ak ionen und Umwel ak o en, insbesonde e sys emischem Rassismus, un e such .
Du ch die Zusammen assung ak uelle soziogenomische S udien wi d e deu lich ,
dass Gene zu komplexen menschlichen Me kmalen bei agen und dass de Ausd uck
gene ische Un e schiede on sozioökonomischen und assi izie en Ungleichhei en
beein luss wi d. Im Bei ag wi d auße dem die his o isch o he schende biologis-
ische Kons uk ion on „Rasse“ im kolonialen und na ionalsozialis ischen Deu sch-
land behandel und au gezeig , wie dieses E be soziale Ungleichhei in de mode nen
deu schen Gesellscha beein luss . Die ak uells en E kenn nisse de Humangenomik
we den he angezogen, um eindeu ig es zuhal en, dass es keine biologische G und-
lage ü das Konzep on „Rasse“ gib . Abschließend bie e de Bei ag einen Aus-
blick au assismus-k i ische biosoziale Fo schung in Deu schland. Diese Fo schung
s eb an, Konzep e, Da ensä ze und wissenscha liche Sys eme assismus-k i isch
zu übe p ü en und neu zu ges al en.
Schlüsselwö e Gene ik · Rassismus · Gen-Umwel -Zusammenspiel ·
Epigene ik · Deu schland · Soziale De e minan en de Gesundhei
K
Beyond a Sha ed His o y: A Biosocial Pe spec i e on Sociogenomics and Racism in Ge many 575
1 In oduc ion
Recen ad ances in sociogenomics1o e new oppo uni ies o in eg a e gene ic
and epigene ic measu es in o esea ch on human beha io s, heal h, and well-being.
Fo example, sociogenomics esea che s ha e iden i ied gene ic a ian s co ela ed
wi h ai s commonly in es iga ed by social and de elopmen al scien is s, such as
educa ional a ainmen , body mass index, and sexual beha io (Ganna e al. 2019;
Okbay e al. 2022; Puli e al. 2019). A ca alys o sociogenomics esea ch has
been he addi ion o biological measu es o big-da a coho s udies in he USA, UK,
Ne he lands, No way, and o he coun ies (Mills and T op 2020). In sho , “ he
gene ic da a e olu ion is unde way” and science is apidly ad ancing (Ma schenko
2022, p. 717). Now, Ge man social science coho s, such as he Socioeconomic
Panel S udy and TwinLi e, ha e ollowed sui wi h his global end (Koellinge
e al. 2023; Mönkediek e al. 2019). We an icipa e ha he in eg a ion o gene ic
measu es in o Ge man social science coho s is likely o be me wi h hesi a ion and
dismay (Bu 2022; Mills and T op 2020). The e a e good easons o his wa iness.
Disguised as “gene ic esea ch,” acialized pseudo-science was used o jus i y
he poli ical exploi a ion, opp ession, and genocide conduc ed by colonial and Nazi
Ge many egimes. In esponse, Ge man ins i u ions and social sciences ac i ely
a oided ace- ela ed esea ch o se e al decades. Pe haps unsu p isingly, his ace-
e asi e app oach has no decons uc ed acis belie s; ecen su ey s udies show
ha almos hal (49%) o he Ge man popula ion s ill belie e in he exis ence o
Fig. 1 A biosocial pe spec i e ames he biological and he social as in e dependen and mu ually con-
s i u ing o ces. Ou side he skin social inequali y becomes measu able unde he skin by in luencing ou
p oxima e en i onmen s, beha io s, and in e pe sonal ela ionships (yellow a ows). Unde he skin ge-
ne ic di e ences in luence no only ou biological a ibu es bu also ou beha io s and ela ionships ia
gene-en i onmen in e play (g een a ow). Sys ems o social inequali y impose a hie a chy on gene ically
in luenced indi idual di e ences, which in u n a ec s he de elopmen o ansac ional ai s
1Bolded e ms a e included in ou glossa y.
K
576 M. A. Aikins e al.
“human aces” (DeZIM 2022). Mo eo e , nascen su ey s udies documen acial
disc imina ion in Ge man public social sys ems, including heal h ca e, educa ion,
housing, and employmen , ha need o be u he in es iga ed as po en ial sou ces
o popula ion dispa i ies in heal h and well-being (Aikins e al. 2021).
Al hough he a i al o sociogenomics in Ge many ca ies he isk o misappli-
ca ion, a biosocial pe spec i e o e s an oppo uni y o coun e ac pe asi e bio-
de e minis ic no ions abou how genes may in luence li e cou se p ocesses. Bioso-
cial esea ch is “a b oad concep e e encing he dynamic, bidi ec ional in e ac ions
be ween biological phenomena and social ela ionships and con ex s, which con-
s i u e p ocesses o human de elopmen o e he li e cou se” (see Fig. 1; Ha is
and McDade 2018, p. 2). I anscends he dicho omy be ween dis al and p oxima e
le els o analysis, and ames he biological and he social as in e dependen and
mu ually cons i u ing o ces. Biosocial esea ch p o ides a lens h ough which he
e ec s o bo h genes and acism on human de elopmen can be in eg a ed.
Ou a icle comp ises h ee sec ions. Fi s , we p esen a sha ed his o y o gene ics
and acism in Ge many ha led o ace-e asi e social science. We a gue ha acis
legacies a e sou ces o social inequali y in con empo a y Ge man socie y. Mo e-
o e , we b ie ly e iew ecen human genomic science ha clea ly shows ha he e
is no biological basis o socially cons uc ed ace. In Sec . 2, we summa ize ecen
sociogenomics s udies using polygenic indices (PGI) and epigene ic p o ile sco es
indica ing ha (1) genes ma e o human de elopmen and (2) he pheno ypic ex-
p ession o gene ic a ia ion is a ec ed by socioeconomic and acialized inequali y.
We p esen a biosocial pe spec i e ha con ex ualizes e ec s o genes on human
de elopmen wi hin la ge sys ems o acialized and economic social inequali y. In
Sec . 3, we o e a ace-c i ical oadmap ha s eng hens (1) ace-c i ical biosocial
esea ch and (2) a ace-c i ical scien i ic sys em.
2 The Biologis ic Cons uc ion o Race
2.1 A Sha ed His o y o Gene ics and Racism in Ge many
Black Ge man schola s ha e long a gued ha unde s anding con empo a y acism
in Ge many equi es e iewing he his o y o Eu opean colonialism in A ica and
o he pa s o he wo ld (El-Tayeb 2001; Kilomba 2008; Ogun oye e al. 1992). In
1884–1885, he Ge man chancello on Bisma ck in i ed Ame ican and Eu opean
colonize s o o malize he pa i ioning o A ica. This esul ed in he Ge man occu-
pa ion o e i o ies in Togo, Came oon, “Ge man Eas A ica,” and “Ge man Sou h-
Wes A ica,” and he i s genocide o he wen ie h cen u y in oday’s Namibia,
whe e, in 1904–1908, Lo ha on T o ha o de ed he killing o housands o He e o
and Nama, pa ially in concen a ion camps (Aikins 2008; Olusoga and E ichsen
2010; Zimme e and Zelle 2008).
A con inuum o acis ideologies can be aced ex ending om he colonial con-
s uc ion o whi e biological sup emacy o genocidal heo ies and p ac ices (Bauche
2021; Mohsen 2020). The biologis ic cons uc ion o ace and acial hygiene i s
eme ged du ing Ge man colonialism. Eugen Fische in oduced he edisco e y o
K

Beyond a Sha ed His o y: A Biosocial Pe spec i e on Sociogenomics and Racism in Ge many 577
Mendel’s wo k on gene ic inhe i ance in pea plan s in o he ield o physical an h o-
pology. The “whi e” o “A yan ace” was posi ed o possess supe io in elligence,
pe sonali y cha ac e is ics, and a ious heal h ad an ages compa ed wi h o he “hu-
man aces.” Ge man colonies we e used as “labo a o y condi ions” o u he de elop
eugenic and acial hygiene ideology in physical and psychological heal h (G osse
2000). Fische s udied descendan s o Du ch se le s and local Khoikhoi women o
he Rehobo he communi y as esea ch subjec s in Ge man Sou h-Wes A ica o
es ablish he he edi y o “ acial cha ac e is ics” and “ ace” as a biological cons uc
(Bauche 2021; Lippha d 2012; Plümecke 2013).
In Ge many, Fische and his colleagues conduc ed s udies on se e al hund ed
Ge man-bo n child en o whi e mo he s and Black a he s om A ican colonial
oops, whom he F ench s a ioned in pos -WWI occupied Ge many (Weindling
2022). Fische la e became he di ec o o he no o ious Kaise Wilhelm Ins i-
u e o An h opology, Human He edi y, and Eugenics, which u he expanded he
cons uc ion o biological ace and acial pu i y ha became he co ne s one o
Nazi eugenic ideology. In 1937, he Nazi egime o cibly s e ilized hese Ge man-
bo n child en o whi e mo he s and Black a he s, who we e de oga i ely called
“Rhineland Bas a ds,” o p e en u u e acial impu i y o he desi ed “A yan” Ge -
man na ion (Weindling 2022).
The academics O ma on Ve schue , Emil Abde halden, and Jose Mengele
we e in ol ed in ins i u ionalizing acialized pseudoscien i ic heo ies by conduc ing
dehumanizing acis expe imen s o medical and gene ic esea ch (Bauche e al.
2022). Mengele, a doc o om Auschwi z-Bi kenau, was pa icula ly no o ious o
his expe imen s on p isone s du ing he Holocaus . The biological cons uc ion o
ace and acial hygiene culmina ed in he eugenic policies o Nazi Ge many ha led
o he sys ema ic mu de o millions o people du ing he Holocaus .
Un o una ely, acial iolence did no end wi h Nazi Ge many. Examples include
heigh ened acial iolence agains e ugees, “ o eigne s,” and/o “un-Ge man” peo-
ple in he yea s ollowing Ge man euni ica ion, mu de s by he Na ional Socialis
Unde g ound o ganiza ion (2000 o 2011), and an i-Semi ic and acially mo i a ed
e o is a acks in Halle (2019) and Hanau (2020) (Ka akayalı e al. 2017; Ka apin
2002; Schellenbe g 2013). An i-Black, an i-Semi ic, an i-Muslim, an i-Asian, and
an i-Roma and Sin i acism p esen in Ge many oday is his o ically ied o he sci-
en i ic heo ies o whi e supe io i y and acial pu i y s emming om colonial and
Nazi Ge many (DeZIM 2022).
2.2 Race E asi eness in Con empo a y Ge many
In an explici a emp a p e en ing u u e s a e-commissioned acial a oci ies, Ge -
man poli ical and scien i ic ins i u ions we e made “ ace e asi e.” We use he e m
ace e asi eness o desc ibe he delibe a e a oidance o add essing ace, acial-
iza ion, and acism. This concep acknowledges ha such a oidance is no passi e
bu pu pose ul, e lec ing an e o o uphold a s a us quo ha a o s whi eness.
Race e asi eness can mani es in a ious ways, om ac i ely a oiding discussions
o ace o downplaying he impo ance o ace and acism (Annamma e al. 2017;
Bonilla-Sil a 2013). Race-e asi e app oaches in Ge many obscu e acism empo a -
K
578 M. A. Aikins e al.
ily, socially and geog aphically. Fo example, acism is commonly es ic ed o Nazi
policies, he igh -wing pa liamen a y pa y “Al e na i e o Ge many,” B i ish and
F ench colonialism, o iewed as a US-speci ic issue (Bojadzije e al. 2017). Con-
sequen ly, he e is a lack o da a on he expe iences o acialized g oups (Ahyoud
e al. 2018).
Recen ly, an amendmen o emo e o eplace he e m “Rasse” ( ace) in he Ge -
man cons i u ion has been p oposed (F oese and Thym 2022). Cap u ing he p esen
meaning o “Rasse” is di icul , because i is a oided in public discou ses owing
o i s associa ion wi h Nazi Ge many and a - igh poli ical g oups (E bach e al.
2023). Con e sa ions abou he e m “Rasse” p edominan ly e ol e a ound his o i-
cal de ini ions ha e e ence biological ca ego iza ions, o igin, cul u al backg ound,
o na ional backg ound (Ka mann 2017; Lippha d 2019).
Howe e , e o s o eplace he Ge man e m “Rasse” unde es ima e he adap abil-
i y o he concep o ace. I is i s agueness and ambigui y ha make i a pe sis en
amewo k (Bauche 2021). By upholding an elusi e discou se in which “nei he ace
has o be explici ly add essed no does acism ha e o be o ensi ely de ended” (Bo-
jadžije 2015, p. 276), ace-e asi e pa e ns a e sus ained ac oss gene a ions. This
is well cap u ed by Baliba ’s concep o “ acism wi hou aces,” whe e cul u e and
e hnici y eplace ace (Baliba 1990). In he i s s udy on an i-Black disc imina ion
in Ge many called “A ozensus,” 99.1% o 2452 esponden s indica ed ha “people
ask me whe e I eally come om and how long I ha e li ed in Ge many” and 78.6%
s a e: “I am old o go back o whe e I came om” (Aikins e al. 2021, p. 213).
C i ical s ances agains acism equi e a nuanced unde s anding o acism ha is no
solely based on adi ional acis e minology.
Recen su ey s udies by he newly es ablished “Na ional Disc imina ion and
Racism Moni o ” documen ha acis belie s in biologis ic ca ego iza ions, cul u al
hie a chies, and in he legi imiza ion o social inequali ies a e ound in 33–50% o he
Ge man popula ion (DeZIM 2022). Acco dingly, acism is p esen in essen ially all
Ge man social sys ems, including heal h ca e, educa ion, housing, and employmen ,
ha need o be u he in es iga ed as po en ial sou ces o popula ion dispa i ies
in heal h and well-being (Aikins e al. 2021). Racism is no isola ed o igh -wing
o ganiza ions; i is e e ywhe e. We will e u n o sociogenomics esea ch, explo ing
how hese social s uc u es may ge unde he skin,inSec .2.Bu i s ,we u n o
lessons om human genomics ha add ess he alsehood o gene ic my hs s ill held
by so many.
2.3 Human Gene ic Va ia ion is Inhe en ly Biosocial
Genomics has p o ided powe ul ools o display how humans a e simila o each
o he . “Ins ead o de inable bounda ies, gene ic g adien s un be ween human g oups.
Among he 3.2 billion base pai s in he human genome, he e is no ixed di e ence
ha sepa a es, o example, A icans om non-A icans” (Fische e al. 2019)2.Pu
di e en ly, “we’ e all ela ed o each o he o a ying ex en s, in a complex web o
2Quo e om he websi e o he Jena Decla a ion: h ps://www.uni-jena.de/en/190910-je-en.
K
Beyond a Sha ed His o y: A Biosocial Pe spec i e on Sociogenomics and Racism in Ge many 579
genealogical ela ions ha o m an unimaginably complica ed amily ee” (Coop
2022,p.3).
Thus, we can use genomic da a o map ou deg ee o ela edness and ace
pa e ns o mig a ion. Fo example, ancien DNA echnology has shown ha humans
ha e always mig a ed ac oss geog aphically widesp ead egions (Liu e al. 2021;
Skoglund and Ma hieson 2018). When people mig a e, hei language and i uals
o en accompany hem, i.e., cul u es mig a e. The e o e, genes and cul u es co ela e
(Abdellaoui e al. 2022).
Gene–cul u e co ela ion can se iously con ound associa ions o gene ic a ian s
wi h complex human ai s in genomic s udies ( o an illus a i e example see Hame
and Si o a 2000). I g oups di e , e en a li le bi , in he equency o a gene ic
a ian owing o popula ion s a i ica ion (i.e., pa e ns o mig a ion and he lack o
p olonged in e b eeding be ween subpopula ions) and also di e in a pheno ype o
en i ely cul u al/en i onmen al easons, his can induce a spu ious associa ion and
scien i ically inco ec conclusions. The e o e, i is impe a i e o genomic s udies
o complex human ai s o accoun o popula ion s a i ica ion, which hey ypically
a emp o do by es ic ing analyses o mo e o less homogenous popula ions and
by including “p incipal componen s o ances y” as co a ia es (P ice e al. 2006).
Homogenous popula ions in genomics a e o en de ined in e ms o so-called ge-
ne ic ances y, e.g., “Eu opean gene ic ances y” o “A ican gene ic ances y.” The
usage o gene ic ances y labels in genomic science has ecei ed a g ea deal o c i -
icism. The jus i ied ea is ha a gene ic science ha pa i ions humans in o “gene ic
ances y g oups” using con inen al geog aphic labels will ein o ce alse belie s in
he exis ence o biologically dis inc acial g oups (Fujimu a and Rajagopalan 2011;
Olson e al. 2005). As acial assignmen s “inco po a e in o ma ion (alongside be-
lie s) abou indi iduals’ pheno ypic cha ac e is ics o geog aphic o igins, hey can
be said o be in o med by (o co ela ed wi h) biology” (Mo ning 2014, p. 191). Al-
hough he biological concep o ace has been scien i ically delegi imized, he e is
isk o con using biological and social concep s ela ed o ace, e hnici y, mig a ion,
popula ion, and ances y ( o guidance see Ba am e al. 2023; Ka mann 2017;
Lippha d 2019). Gene icis s he e o e inc easingly emphasize ha gene ic ances y
is no conside ed a unidimensional sco e linked o con inen al geog aphic ca ego ies
bu a mul idimensional iew o who you ances o s we e and whe e hey mo ed o
(Lewis e al. 2022).
Scien i ically, e ms such as “Eu opean gene ic ances y” a e imp ecise desc ip-
ions o gene ic simila i y o some p ede ined se o e e ence g oups (Coop 2022).
Ra he han e lec ing some kind o s able biological bounda y be ween human
g oups, he numbe and egional speci ici y o he e e ence g oups a e dependen
on da a a ailabili y. As mo e people pa icipa e and mo e DNA da a become a ail-
able, DNA-based es ima es o ances y will change. Gene ic ances y labels and he
de ini ion o wha cons i u es a popula ion e lec he social con ex o how samples
we e chosen and desc ibed by esea che s.
E en es ic ing analyses o samples wi h appa en ly high gene ic simila i y, such
as “people whose ou g andpa en s all come om he UK,” and including p incipal
componen s o gene ic simila i y, has been ound o no ully accoun o popu-
la ion s a i ica ion (Leslie e al. 2015; Olalde e al. 2018). The e o e, esea che s
K
580 M. A. Aikins e al.
a e inc easingly using wi hin- amily designs o s udy gene ic e ec s (Howe e al.
2021). Fo example, examining how siblings aised in he same amily di e om
each o he is a scien i ically and concep ually powe ul app oach o hinking abou
how gene ic di e ences may in luence complex human ai s. In con as , looking
a DNA om di e en people li ing in di e en en i onmen s is use ul o s udy-
ing ou ela edness and gene ic simila i y ac oss his o ies o mig a ion, ma ing, and
mo ali y.
In he nex sec ion, we e iew sociogenomics esea ch ha has used DNA-based
measu es o s udy how economic and acialized inequali y may ge unde he skin.
Sociogenomics is a new scien i ic ield ha in eg a es gene ic and epigene ic mea-
su es and heo y in o he social sciences o s udy eme gen social, beha io al, and
heal h ou comes.
3 Genes and Social Inequali y Ma e o Human De elopmen
3.1 Genes Con ibu e o Complex Human T ai s
Al hough all humans a e 99.9% gene ically he same, mos pa en s o wo o mo e
child en will ha e obse ed ha he emaining 0.1% make a di e ence no only
o how we look bu also o who we a e. Twin and amily s udies ha e empi ically
es ablished ha genes con ibu e o ou appea ance, beha io s, heal h, pe sonali y,
and cogni ion h ough p ocesses s a ing e y ea ly in on ogeny (Tu kheime 2000;
Polde man e al. 2015).
A e some unsuccess ul candida e gene app oaches, genomic s udies oday a e
commonly based on genome-wide associa ion s udies (GWAS) o hund eds o
housands o millions o people ( o a e iew on compu a ional me hods see Abdel-
laoui e al. 2023). Fo example, owing o GWAS we now know common gene ic
egions associa ed wi h human heigh (Yengo e al. 2022), ma ke s o ch onic in-
lamma ion (Lig ha e al. 2018), body mass index (Puli e al. 2019), and dep ession
(Howa d e al. 2019). Simila ly, common gene ic egions ha e been iden i ied ha
co ela e wi h highly social ou comes, such as educa ional a ainmen (Okbay e al.
2022), income (Hill e al. 2019), and isk- aking beha io s (Ka lsson Linné e al.
2019).
Resul s om GWAS can be used o compu e polygenic indices (PGIs). PGIs
a e DNA-based co ela es o indi idual di e ences in human ai s. Compa ed wi h
candida e gene s udies, PGIs ha summa ize housands o gene ic a ian s, each wi h
miniscule e ec sizes iden i ied in e y la ge GWAS, ha e esul ed in ep oducible
associa ions o non-negligible size (Dick e al. 2015; an de Weije e al. 2022).
Fo example, he mos ecen PGI o educa ional a ainmen accoun s o up o 16%
o he a iance in educa ional a ainmen in sepa a e a ge samples (Okbay e al.
2022). (No e ha he u ili y o PGIs o he social sciences is an a ea o ac i e deba e,
e.g., Meye e al. 2023).
The biological, de elopmen al, and en i onmen al mechanisms in ol ed in as-
socia ing hese PGIs wi h pheno ypes a e no well unde s ood. Impo an ly, hey
a e likely o di e as ly be ween di ec gene ic e ec s ha a e la gely exp essed
K
Beyond a Sha ed His o y: A Biosocial Pe spec i e on Sociogenomics and Racism in Ge many 587
Plain-language FAQs and educa ion p og ams can imp o e he accu acy o scien-
i ic news co e age and public accessibili y (Ganna e al. 2019). This, in u n, could
acili a e he de elopmen and implemen a ion o policies and in e en ions aimed
a elimina ing inequali ies. Mo eo e , biosocial esea che s can engage in scien i ic
ou each. A unique andomized con olled school expe imen in he USA sugges s
ha when s uden s lea n abou ace and con empo a y genomics—in con as o
Mendelian gene ics as is common in Ge man biology cu icula— hei gene ic es-
sen ialis belie s abou ace migh decline signi ican ly (Dono an e al. 2023).
5Conclusion
His o ically, acialized pseudo-science disguised as gene ic esea ch was used o
jus i y he poli ical exploi a ion, opp ession, and genocide conduc ed by colonial
and Nazi egimes. Thus, we an icipa e ha he in eg a ion o gene ic measu es in o
Ge man social science coho s is likely o be me wi h jus i ied eluc ance. Recen
su ey s udies ha e e ealed ha a la ge p opo ion o he Ge man popula ion s ill
belie es ha ace is a biological a he han a social cons uc . To mi iga e he isk o
misapplica ion o sociogenomics in Ge many, we p oposed a oadmap o ace-c i -
ical biosocial science ha b eaks wi h he his o ically in o med a oidance o ace o
econs uc ace-c i ical concep s, da ase s, and scien i ic sys ems. Al hough ace is
no de ined by biological bounda ies, acism has biosocial e ec s on people’s heal h
and well-being h ough hei li ed expe iences. Indeed, no el sociogenomics ools
ha e been used o s udy how social inequali y a ec s he pheno ypic exp ession o
gene ically in luenced cha ac e is ics. A biosocial pe spec i e in eg a es how genes
ge ou o he skin and how acism ge s unde he skin.
Glossa y
Ances y Ances y e e s o in o ma ion abou he people ha an indi idual is biologically
descended om, including hei gene ic ela ionships. Gene ic in o ma ion can
be combined wi h his o ical in o ma ion o in e whe e an indi idual’s (dis an )
ances o s li ed/.
Bio-de e minis ic Bio-de e minism o “gene ic de e minism” is he belie ha human beha io is
de e mined by “inna e” physiology— ypically a pe son’s gene ic makeup.
Black A e m e e ing o acialized people o A ican descen . Black is o en
associa ed wi h naming and analyzing an i-Black acism. I is also used as
a socio-poli ical and cul u al iden i y o indi iduals and communi ies who
expe ience an i-Black acism.
Di ec gene ic e ec s Di ec gene ic e ec s e e o e ec s ha la gely anspi e h ough inside
he skin p ocesses, whe e he in luence o geno ype on pheno ype can be
sa is ac o ily explained ia biological p ocesses ha a e minimally con ingen
upon he en i onmen .
DNA me hyla ion DNA me hyla ion (DNAm) desc ibes he p esence o absence o a me hyl
g oup a achmen o a CpG si e on he genome. DNAm allows di e en cells in
he body wi h he same DNA o de elop in o di e en issues. I is c i ical o
de elopmen and changes dynamically wi h age and en i onmen al inpu s.
Epigene ic P o ile Sco es Epigene ics a e he biological mechanisms h ough which he exp ession o
genes is egula ed. This includes DNA me hyla ion, his one modi ica ion, and
noncoding RNA ac ion. One class o epigene ic p o ile sco es is compu ed
on he basis o genome-wide DNA me hyla ion. P ominen examples include
K

588 M. A. Aikins e al.
epigene ic p o ile sco es o biological aging, also known as “epigene ic clocks.
He e, we ocus on DNAm, acknowledging ha epigene ic mechanisms unc ion
syne gis ically. DNAm desc ibes he p esence o absence o a me hyl g oup
a achmen o a CpG si e on he genome. DNAm allows di e en cells in he
body wi h he same DNA o de elop in o di e en issues. Thus, i is c i ical o
de elopmen and changes dynamically wi h de elopmen (F aga and Es elle
2007; Wilson and Jones 1983).
Akin o de i ing polygenic indices om GWAS, esea che s ha e used
s a is ical me hods o mine DNAm da ase s and de i e epigene ic p o ile
sco es o smoking, body mass index, in lamma ion, educa ional a ainmen ,
cogni ion, and agg essi e beha io s, among o he s (Lig ha e al. 2016;
McCa ney e al. 2022; Ru ledge e al. 2022;Wahle al.2017). The majo i y
o epigene ic social science s udies ha e ocused on epigene ic p o ile sco es
o heal h and aging, some imes e e ed o as “epigene ic clocks” ( o e iew
see Ra ing on and Belsky 2022). DNAm and o he epigene ic modi ica ions
a e conside ed hallma ks o aging and heo ized o be key ansduce s o he
biological embedding o social ad e si y (López-O ín e al. 2013). The e ha e
been se e al gene a ions o epigene ic p o ile sco es o aging- ela ed heal h
and hese measu es di e in hei sensi i i y o social de e minan s o heal h
(Ra ing on and Belsky 2022).
Compa ed wi h PGIs, he de elopmen o epigene ic p o ile sco es ends
o equi e smalle disco e y samples, esul in mo e po able measu es ac oss
popula ions, and ha e la ge e ec sizes in sepa a e a ge samples (Hamil on
e al. 2019). This may pa ially be due o he ac ha epigene ic p o ile sco es
a e cap u ing en i onmen al exposu es, gene ic a ia ion, and de elopmen al
idiosync asy (Ra ing on e al. 2023b).
Genome-wide
associa ion
s udies
(GWAS)
Genome-wide associa ion s udies associa e di e ences in single-nucleo ide
polymo phisms (SNPs) wi h di e ences in a pheno ype. In mos cases, he
pheno ype o in e es is sys ema ically eg essed on o a single SNP and
a s anda d se o co a ia es, such as age, sex, bi h coho , and he in e ac ions
among hem. This model is es ima ed o each SNP in he da ase , o en
esul ing in a wide a ie y o SNPs ela ed o he ou come.
Pheno ype A pheno ype is a ai o cha ac e is ic (i.e., dep essi e symp oms) ha is
nei he a gene ic a iable (i.e., SNPs) no an en i onmen al a iable (i.e., li ing
condi ions), al hough i is he ou come o gene–en i onmen in e play.
Physical an h opology Physical an h opology ca ego ized people in o aces based on physical ai s,
including skin one, eye colo , hai ex u e, and skull shape, ha we e hough
o e lec di e ging gene ics and e olu iona y his o ies.
Polygenic indices Polygenic indices a e calcula ed as a weigh ed sum o a pe son’s alleles,
whe e weigh s co espond o e ec es ima es epo ed in he GWAS summa y
s a is ics. They a e no measu es o some hing “inna e” abou a pe son.
Popula ion A g oup o indi iduals who sha e ce ain cha ac e is ics and who a e o en
simila in hei common ances y, geog aphic loca ion, o o he demog aphic
ac o s. Di e en scien i ic ields ha e di e en ways o de ining popula ions.
Popula ion
s a i ica ion
Popula ion s a i ica ion desc ibes ha popula ions o mo e dis al ances y
di e in which gene ic a ian s a e p esen , how common o a e hose a ian s
a e, and how hose a ian s co ela e wi h each o he ac oss he genome
(i.e., pa e ns o linkage disequilib ium). The genome-wide di e ences ha
esul in popula ion s a i ica ion a ise because o mig a ion and he esul ing
lack o p olonged in e b eeding be ween subpopula ions. This causes allele
equencies ac oss he genome o di e ge be ween g oups, mos ly due o
andom luc ua ions called “gene ic d i ” and o a lesse ex en due o na u al
selec ion and/o non andom ma ing. Owing o popula ion s a i ica ion, he
esul s o GWAS conduc ed in one popula ion a e no po able o ano he
popula ion.
P incipal componen s
o gene ic simila i y
P incipal componen s o gene ic simila i y e e o linea combina ions o
geno ypes o SNPs, whe e each SNP has a “loading” gi ing i s con ibu ion o
he p incipal componen . They a e o en used as s a is ical ep esen a ions o
K
Beyond a Sha ed His o y: A Biosocial Pe spec i e on Sociogenomics and Racism in Ge many 589
gene ic simila i y among people due o popula ion s a i ica ion and/o c yp ic
ela edness. These p incipal componen s a e included in gene ically in o ma i e
s udies o educe he bias o con ounding.
Quan i a i e c i ical
app oaches
Quan i a i e c i ical (Quan C i ) esea ch is an eme ging ield oo ed in c i ical
heo y ha ecognizes he p esence o s uc u al acism and sexism wi hin
a ious socie al sys ems, such as he economy, poli ics, and educa ion. In
Quan C i esea ch, he goal is o challenge na a i es ha po ay ma ginalized
g oups as de icien and ac i ely wo k o disman le opp essi e sys ems h ough
an i- acis and an i-sexis e o s (Ga cia e al. 2018).
Race-c i ical A ace-c i ical app oach is based on pe spec i e, posi ion, and p ac ice ha is
di ec ed owa d an i- acism. I analyzes and c i icizes acializa ion p ocesses,
acis domina ion, and inequali y, as well as hei ideological legi imiza ion,
and s i es o social change.
Race e asi eness Race e asi eness se es as a s a egy o disengage om con e sa ions abou
ace and acism. I expands he amewo k o colo blindness by acknowledging
he in en ionali y in a oiding subs an i e discussion o acknowledgmen o ace
and i s connec ion o whi e sup emacy, powe , and/o p i ilege.
Racism Social and ins i u ional acism includes he gene a ional legacy o s a e-
sanc ioned social powe , esou ces, ep esen a ion, and a o i ism li ed by
p i ileged people, e.g., whi e p i ilege, which comes a he cos o ma ginalized
acial and e hnic g oups.
Social inequali y Social inequali y desc ibes unequal challenges and oppo uni ies o di e en
social s a uses, which occu a he in e sec ion o socially cons uc ed dimen-
sions o ace, e hnici y, skin one, gende , weal h, educa ion, physical abili y,
sexuali y, na ionali y, and age, among o he s.
Sociogenomics Sociogenomics, also called social and beha io al genomics, in eg a es gene ic
and epigene ic measu es and heo y in o he social sciences o s udy eme gen
social, beha io al, and heal h ou comes.
T ansac ional gene ic
e ec s
T ansac ional gene ic e ec s e e o e ec s ha o igina e om a pe son’s
own genome, bu equi e in e ac ion wi h he en i onmen , he eby anspi ing
h ough p ocesses inside and ou side he skin. Mos ai s o in e es o psy-
chologis s and sociologis s, such as men al heal h, physical heal h, pe sonali y,
cogni i e skills, and educa ion depend on ansac ional gene–en i onmen
e ec s.
Whi e Whi e desc ibes a acial g oup ha was de i ed om pseudoscien i ic acism.
I was used as a poli ical ool bene i ing whi e people poli ically and economi-
cally.
Acknowledgemen s We hank he Uni e si y o Texas a Aus in “Biosocial Wo king G oup” and Joshua
Kwesi Aikins om he Uni e si y o Kassel o hei eedback on an ea lie e sion o his manusc ip .
Au ho Con ibu ion M.A. Aikins and L. Ra ing on w o e he i s d a o he manusc ip . All au ho s
con ibu ed c i ical e isions o he manusc ip .
Funding Open Access unding enabled and o ganized by P ojek DEAL.
Con lic o in e es M.A. Aikins, Y.E. Willems, D. F aemke, and L. Ra ing on decla e ha hey ha e no
compe ing in e es s.
Open Access This a icle is licensed unde a C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 4.0 In e na ional License,
which pe mi s use, sha ing, adap a ion, dis ibu ion and ep oduc ion in any medium o o ma , as long as
you gi e app op ia e c edi o he o iginal au ho (s) and he sou ce, p o ide a link o he C ea i e Com-
mons licence, and indica e i changes we e made. The images o o he hi d pa y ma e ial in his a icle
a e included in he a icle’s C ea i e Commons licence, unless indica ed o he wise in a c edi line o he
ma e ial. I ma e ial is no included in he a icle’s C ea i e Commons licence and you in ended use is no
pe mi ed by s a u o y egula ion o exceeds he pe mi ed use, you will need o ob ain pe mission di ec ly
om he copy igh holde . To iew a copy o his licence, isi h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.
0/.
K
590 M. A. Aikins e al.
Re e ences
Abdellaoui, Abdel, Cono V. Dolan, Ka in J. H. Ve weij and Michel G. Ni a d. 2022. Gene–En i onmen
Co ela ions ac oss Geog aphic Regions A ec Genome-Wide Associa ion S udies. Na u e Gene ics
54(9):1345–1354.
Abdellaoui, Abdel, Loic Yengo, Ka in J. H. Ve weij and Pe e M. Vissche . 2023. 15 Yea s o GWAS
Disco e y: Realizing he P omise. Ame ican Jou nal o Human Gene ics 110(2):179–194.
Ahyoud, Nasiha, Joshua Kwesi Aikins, Same a Ba sch, Naomi Beche , Daniel Gyame ah and Lucienne
Wagne . 2018. We nich gezähl wi d, zähl nich . An idisk iminie ungs- und Gleichs ellungsda en
in de Einwande ungsgesellscha – eine anwendungso ien ie e Ein üh ung, ed. Ci izens Fo Eu ope.
Be lin.
Aikins, Joshua Kwesi. 2008. Die all ägliche Gegenwa de kolonialen Ve gangenhei – En inne ung, E in-
ne ung und Ve an wo ung in de Kolonialme opole Be lin. In A ika – Eu opas e kann e Nachba ,
Vol. 2., ed. He a Däuble -Gmelin, 47–68. F ank u /M.: Lang.
Aikins, Muna AnNisa, Te esa B embe ge , Joshua Kwesi Aikins, Daniel Gyame ah and Deniz Yıldı ım-
Caliman. 2021. A ozensus 2020. A ozensus 2020 – De Repo .h ps://a ozensus.de/ epo s/2020/.
(Accessed: 14 Feb. 2023)
Ama an e, Ve ónica, Ronelle Bu ge , G ie e Chelwa, John Cockbu n, Ana Kassou , And ew McKay and
Julie a Zu b igg. 2022. Unde ep esen a ion o De eloping Coun y Resea che s in De elopmen Re-
sea ch. Applied Economics Le e s 29(17):1659–1664.
Annamma, Subini Ancy, Da ell D. Jackson and Deb Mo ison. 2017. Concep ualizing Colo -E asi eness:
Using Dis/Abili y C i ical Race Theo y o Expand a Colo -Blind Racial Ideology in Educa ion and
Socie y. Race E hnici y and Educa ion 20(2):147–162.
A ms ong-Ca e , E., S. T ejo, L. Hill, K. C ossley, D. Mason and B. Domingue. 2019. The Ea lies O i-
gins o Gene ic Nu u e: P ena al En i onmen Media es he Associa ion be ween Ma e nal Gene ics
and Child De elopmen . psya Xi : P ep in .
Baliba , E ienne. 1990. Gib es einen ,Neo-Rassismus‘? In Rasse, Klasse, Na ion. Ambi alen e Iden i ä en,
eds. Immanuel Walle s ein and E ienne Baliba , 23–38. Hambu g: A gumen .
Ba cellos, Sil ia H., Leand o S. Ca alho and Pa ick Tu ley. 2018. Educa ion Can Reduce Heal h Di -
e ences Rela ed o Gene ic Risk o Obesi y. P oceedings o he Na ional Academy o Sciences
115(42):E9765–72.
Ba am, Isabelle, Lau a Schniede , Nils Elleb ech , Flo ian Ruland, Tino Plümecke and And ea zu
Nieden. 2023. Ca ego izing People in he Ge man Li e Sciences: A Sys ema ic Li e a u e Re iew o
Classi ica ions o Human Di e si y. Disco e Social Science and Heal h 3(1):4.
Bauche, Manuela. 2021. Sehnsüch e nach gene ische Eindeu igkei . Das Kaise -Wilhelm-Ins i u ü An-
h opologie, menschliche E bleh e und Eugenik (1927–1945) und sein E be, in: Zei geschich e-on-
line, Feb ua 2021, h ps://zei geschich e-online.de/ hemen/sehnsuech e-nach-gene ische -eindeu ig
kei #_ n10 (Accessed: 31 Jan. 2023).
Bauche, Manuela, Pa icia Pibe ge , Sébas ien T emblay and Hannah Tzube i. 2022. F om ‘Op e konku -
enz’ o Solida i y. A Round Table. Round Table 44 (Special Issue “Memo y Cul u es 2.0. F om
‘Op e konku enz’ o Solida i y”).
Bauman, Anne-Luise, Ve a Egenbe ge and Linda Supik. 2018. E hebung on An idisk iminie ungsda en
in ep äsen a i en Wiede holungsbe agungen. Bes andsau nahme und En wicklungsmöglichkei en.
An idisk iminie ungss elle des Bundes: Be lin.
Bojadžije , Manuela. 2015. Rassismus ohne Rassen, ik i e E hnizi ä en und das genealogische Schema.
Übe legungen zu É ienne Baliba s heo e ischem Vokabula ü eine k i ische Mig a ions- und Ras-
sismus o schung. In Schlüsselwe ke de Mig a ions o schung: Pionie s udien und Re e enz heo ien,
eds. Julia Reu e and Paul Meche il, 275–288. Wiesbaden: Sp inge -Ve lag.
Bojadzije , Manuela, Ka he ine B aun, Benjamin Op a ko, Manuel Liebig and Alexand a Hei e . 2017.
En solida isie ung und Rassismus. Fo schungs-In e en ions-Clus e ,Solida i ä im Wandel?‘.
Fo schungsbe ich . Be line Ins i u ü empi ische In eg a ions- und Mig a ions o schung.
Bonilla-Sil a, Edua do. 2013. Racism wi hou Racis s: Colo -Blind Racism and he Pe sis ence o Racial
Inequali y in Ame ica. Lanham, Boulde , New Yo k, To on o, Ox o d: Rowman & Li le ield Pub-
lishe s.
Bu meis e , S e an. 2021. Does he Concep o Gene ic Ances y Rein o ce Racism? A Commen a y on he
Discou se P ac ice o A chaeogene ics. TATuP – Zei sch i ü Technik olgenabschä zung in Theo ie
und P axis 30(2):41–46.
K
Beyond a Sha ed His o y: A Biosocial Pe spec i e on Sociogenomics and Racism in Ge many 591
Bu , Callie H. 2022. Challenging he U ili y o Polygenic Sco es o Social Science: En i onmen al Con-
ounding, Downwa d Causa ion, and Unknown Biology. Beha io al and B ain Sciences 1–36.
Campbell, F ances, Gab iella Con i, James J. Heckman, Seong Hyeok Moon, Rod igo Pin o, Elizabe h
Pungello and Yi Pan. 2014. Ea ly Childhood In es men s Subs an ially Boos Adul Heal h. Science
343(6178):1478–1485.
Commi ee on he Use o Race, E hnici y, and Ances y as Popula ion Desc ip o s in Genomics Resea ch,
Boa d on Heal h Sciences Policy, Commi ee on Popula ion, Heal h and Medicine Di ision, Di ision
o Beha io al and Social Sciences and Educa ion, and Na ional Academies o Sciences, Enginee -
ing, and Medicine. 2023. Using Popula ion Desc ip o s in Gene ics and Genomics Resea ch: A New
F amewo k o an E ol ing Field. Washing on, D.C.: Na ional Academies P ess.
Coop, G aham. 2022. Gene ic simila i y e sus gene ic ances y g oups as sample desc ip o s in human
gene ics. h ps://a xi .o g/abs/2207.11595, p ep in .
C immins, Eileen M., Bha a Thyaga ajan, Mo gan E. Le ine, Da id R. Wei and Jessica Faul. 2021.
Associa ions o Age, Sex, Race/E hnici y, and Educa ion Wi h 13 Epigene ic Clocks in a Na ionally
Rep esen a i e U.S. Sample: The Heal h and Re i emen S udy. The Jou nals o Ge on ology: Se ies
A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 76(6):1117–1123.
Dawkins, Richa d. 1982. The Ex ended Pheno ype. Vol. 8. Ox o d: Ox o d Uni e si y P ess.
Deu sches Zen um ü In eg a ions- und Mig a ions o schung (DeZIM) (ed.). 2022. Rassis ische Real-
i ä en: Wie se z sich Deu schland mi Rassismus auseinande ? Au ak s udie zum na ionalen Disk i-
minie ungs- und Rassismusmoni o (NaDiRa). Be lin.
Dick, Danielle M., A pana Ag awal, Ma hew C. Kelle , Amy Adkins, Fazil Alie , Sco Mon oe, John
K. Hewi , Kenne h S. Kendle and Kenne h J. She . 2015. Candida e Gene–En i onmen In e ac ion
Resea ch: Re lec ions and Recommenda ions. Pe spec i es on Psychological Science 10(1):37–59.
Dono an, B ian, Monica Weindling, Jamie Amemiya, B ae Salaza , Dennis Lee, Awais A. Syed, Molly
S uhlsa z and Je ey Snowden. 2023. Mo ing gene ics educa ion beyond Mendel can educe acial
p ejudice. h ps://doi.o g/10.31234/os .io/z 49j: P ep in .
Duncan, G eg J., Ka he ine Magnuson and Elizabe h Vo uba-D zal. 2017. Mo ing beyond Co ela ions in
Assessing he Consequences o Po e y. Annual Re iew o Psychology 68(1):413–434.
El-Tayeb, Fa ima. 2001. Schwa ze Deu sche: de Disku s um „Rasse“ und na ionale Iden i ä 1890–1933.
F ank u : Campus.
Emi baye , Mus a a, and Ma hew Desmond. 2012. Race and Re lexi i y. E hnic and Racial S udies
35(4):574–599.
Engelha d , Lau a E., Jessica A. Chu ch, Ka h yn Paige Ha den and Ellio M. Tucke -D ob. 2019. Accoun -
ing o he Sha ed En i onmen in Cogni i e Abili ies and Academic Achie emen wi h Measu ed
Socioecological Con ex s. De elopmen al Science 22(1):e12699.
E bach, Ku , Benedic Kenyah-Damp ey, Leda Be io, Daniel James and Es he Sey a h. 2023. A Com-
pa a i e Co pus S udy o Race and Rasse. Applied Co pus Linguis ics 3(1):100044.
E zkowi z, Hen y, and Loe Leydesdo . 2000. The Dynamics o Inno a ion: F om Na ional Sys ems
and ‘Mode 2’ o a T iple Helix o Uni e si y–Indus y–Go e nmen Rela ions. Resea ch Policy
29(2):109–123.
Fische , Ma in S., Uwe Hoss eld, Johannes K ause and S e an Rich e . 2019. The Jena Decla a ion: Jena,
Haeckel and he Ques ion o Human Races, o , Racism C ea es Races. F ied ich Schille Uni e si y
Jena. h ps://www.uni-jena.de/en/190910-jenae e klae ung-en (Accessed: 28 Feb. 2023).
F aga, Ma io F., and Manel Es elle . 2007. Epigene ics and Aging: The Ta ge s and he Ma ks. T ends in
Gene ics 23(8):413–418.
F ank, Mi jam, Nico D agano, Ma ina A end , And eas J. Fo s ne , Ma kus M. Nö hen, Susanne Moebus,
Raimund E bel, Ka l-Heinz Jöckel and Bö ge Schmid . 2019. A Gene ic Sum Sco e o Risk Alleles
Associa ed wi h Body Mass Index In e ac s wi h Socioeconomic Posi ion in he Heinz Nixdo Recall
S udy. PLOS ONE 14(8):e0221252.
F oese, Judi h, and Daniel Thym (eds.). 2022. G undgese z und Rassismus. 1s ed. Tübingen: Moh
Siebeck
Fujimu a, Joan H., and Ramya Rajagopalan. 2011. Di e en Di e ences: The Use o ‘Gene ic Ances y’
e sus Race in Biomedical Human Gene ic Resea ch. Social S udies o Science 41(1):5–30.
Ganna, And ea, Ka in J. H. Ve weij, Michel G. Ni a d, Robe Maie , Robbee Wedow, Alexande
S. Busch, Abdel Abdellaoui, Sheng u Guo, J. Fah Sa hi apongsasu i, Paul Lich ens ein, Sebas ian
Lunds öm, Niklas Långs öm, Adam Au on, Ka hleen Mullan Ha is, Ga y W. Beecham, Eden
R. Ma in, Alan R. Sande s, John R. B. Pe y, Benjamin M. Neale and B endan P. Zie sch. 2019.
La ge-Scale GWAS Re eals Insigh s in o he Gene ic A chi ec u e o Same-Sex Sexual Beha io .
Science 365(6456):eaa 7693.
K
592 M. A. Aikins e al.
Ga cia, Nichole M., Nancy López and Ve ónica N. Vélez. 2018. Quan C i : Rec i ying Quan i a i e Me h-
ods h ough C i ical Race Theo y. Race E hnici y and Educa ion 21(2):149–157.
Goosby, B idge J., Jacob E. Cheadle and Col e Mi chell. 2018. S ess-Rela ed Biosocial Mechanisms o
Disc imina ion and A ican Ame ican Heal h Inequi ies. Annual Re iew o Sociology 44(1):319–340.
G a , Glo ia Huei-Jong, Ch is ophe L. C owe, Mee aj Ko ha i, Dayoon Kwon, Jenni e J. Manly, Indi a
C. Tu ney, Linda Vale i and Daniel W. Belsky. 2022. Tes ing Black-Whi e Dispa i ies in Biological
Aging in Olde Adul s in he Uni ed S a es: Analysis o DNA-Me hyla ion and Blood-Chemis y
Me hods. Ame ican Jou nal o Epidemiology 191(4):613–625.
G a lee, Cla ence C. 2009. How Race Becomes Biology: Embodimen o Social Inequali y. Ame ican
Jou nal o Physical An h opology 139(1):47–57.
G osse, Pascal. 2000. Kolonialismus, Eugenik und bü ge liche Gesellscha in Deu schland 1850–1918.
F ank u /Main, New Yo k: Campus.
Hame , Dean H., and L. Si o a. 2000. Bewa e he Chops icks Gene. Molecula Psychia y 5(1):11–13.
Hamil on, Oli ia K. L., Qian Zhang, Allan F. McRae, Rosie M. Walke , S ewa W. Mo is, Paul Redmond,
A chie Campbell, Alison D. Mu ay, Da id J. Po eous, Ka h yn L. E ans, And ew M. McIn osh, Ian
J. Dea y and Ricca do E. Ma ioni. 2019. An Epigene ic Sco e o BMI Based on DNA Me hyla ion
Co ela es wi h Poo Physical Heal h and Majo Disease in he Lo hian Bi h Coho . In e na ional
Jou nal o Obesi y 43(9):1795–1802.
Ha den, K. Paige. 2021. The Gene ic Lo e y: Why DNA Ma e s o Social Equali y. P ince on: P ince on
Uni e si y P ess.
Ha den, K. Paige. 2023. Gene ic de e minism, essen ialism and educ ionism: seman ic cla i y o con-
es ed science. Na u e Re iews Gene ics 24(3):197–204.
Ha den, K. Paige, Benjamin W. Domingue, Daniel W. Belsky, Jason D. Boa dman, Robe C osnoe,
Ma ghe i a Malanchini, Michel Ni a d, Ellio M. Tucke -D ob and Ka hleen Mullan Ha is. 2020.
Gene ic associa ions wi h ma hema ics acking and pe sis ence in seconda y school. NPJ science o
lea ning 5(1).
Ha ding, Sand a. 2015. Objec i i y and Di e si y: Ano he Logic o Scien i ic Resea ch. Chicago: Uni e -
si y o Chicago P ess.
Ha ding, Sand a. 2016. La in Ame ican Decolonial Social S udies o Scien i ic Knowledge: Alliances and
Tensions. Science, Technology, & Human Values 41(6):1063–1087.
Ha is, Ka hleen Mullan, and Thomas W. McDade. 2018. The Biosocial App oach o Human De elopmen ,
Beha io , and Heal h Ac oss he Li e Cou se. RSF: The Russell Sage Founda ion Jou nal o he Social
Sciences 4(4):2–26.
Haywa d, Ma k D., and B idge K. Go man. 2004. The Long A m o Childhood: The In luence o Ea ly-
Li e Social Condi ions on Men’s Mo ali y. Demog aphy 41(1):87–107.
Heckman, James J. 2006. Skill Fo ma ion and he Economics o In es ing in Disad an aged Child en.
Science 312(5782):1900–1902.
Hill, W. Da id, Neil M. Da ies, S ua J. Ri chie, Na han G. Skene, Julien B yois, S e en Bell, Emanuele
Di Angelan onio, Da id J. Robe s, Shen Xueyi, Gail Da ies, Da id C. M. Liewald, Da id J. Po eous,
Ca oline Haywa d, Adam S. Bu e wo h, And ew M. McIn osh, Ca ha ine R. Gale and Ian J. Dea y.
2019. Genome-Wide Analysis Iden i ies Molecula Sys ems and 149 Gene ic Loci Associa ed wi h
Income. Na u e Communica ions 10(1):5741.
Howa d, Da id M., Ma k J. Adams, Toni-Kim Cla ke, Jona han D. Ha e y, Jude Gibson, Masoud Shi-
ali, Jona han R. I. Coleman, Saskia P. Hagenaa s, Joey Wa d, Eleano M. Wigmo e, Cla a Alloza,
Xueyi Shen, Mi una C. Ba bu, Eileen Y. Xu, Hea he C. Whalley, Ricca do E. Ma ioni, Da id
J. Po eous, Gail Da ies, Ian J. Dea y, Gib an Hemani, Klaus Be ge , Henning Teismann, Rajesh
Rawal, Volke A ol , Be nha d T. Baune, Udo Dannlowski, Ka ha ina Domschke, Chao Tian, Da id
A. Hinds, Maciej T zaskowski, Enda M. By ne, S ephan Ripke, Daniel J. Smi h, Pa ick F. Sulli an,
Naomi R. W ay, Ge ome B een, Ca h yn M. Lewis and And ew M. McIn osh. 2019. Genome-Wide
Me a-Analysis o Dep ession Iden i ies 102 Independen Va ian s and Highligh s he Impo ance o
he P e on al B ain Regions. Na u e Neu oscience 22(3):343–352.
Howe, Lau ence J., Michel G. Ni a d, Tim T. Mo is, Ailin F. Hansen, Humai a Rasheed, Yoonsu Cho,
Gee ha Chi oo , Penelope A. Lind, Teemu Pal iainen, Ma hijs D. an de Zee, Rosa Cheesman,
Massimo Mangino, Yunzhang Wang, Shuai Li, Lucija Kla ic, Sco M. Ra li , Law ence F. Bielak,
Ma ianne Nygaa d, Chand a A. Reynolds, Ja ed V. Balbona, Ch is ophe R. Baue , Do e I.
Boomsma, A is Ba as, A chie Campbell, Ha y Campbell, Zhengming Chen, Pa aske i Ch is o idou,
Ch is ina C. Dahm, Deepika R. Doku u, Luke M. E ans, Eco JC de Geus, Sudhee Giddalu u,
Sco D. Go don, K. Paige Ha den, Alexand a Ha dahl, W. Da id Hill, Shona M. Ke , Yongkang
Kim, Hyeokmoon Kweon, An i La ala, Liming Li, Kuang Lin, Pekka Ma ikainen, Pa ik K. E.
K

Beyond a Sha ed His o y: A Biosocial Pe spec i e on Sociogenomics and Racism in Ge many 593
Magnusson, Melinda C. Mills, Debo ah A. Lawlo , John D. O e on, Nancy L. Pede sen, Da id J.
Po eous, Je ey Reid, Ka i Sil en oinen, Melissa C. Sou hey, T a is T. Malla d, Ellio M. Tucke -
D ob, Ma ga e J. W igh , Social Science Gene ic Associa ion Conso ium, Wi hin Family Con-
so ium, John K. Hewi , Ma hew C. Kelle , Michael C. S allings, Kaa e Ch is ensen, Sha on LR
Ka dia, Pa icia A. Peyse , Jenni e A. Smi h, James F. Wilson, John L. Hoppe , Sa a Hägg, Tim D.
Spec o , Jean-Bap is e Pingaul , Robe Plomin, Meike Ba els, Nicholas G. Ma in, Anne E. Jus ice,
Iona Y. Millwood, K is ian H eem, Øy ind Naess, C is en J. Wille , Bjø n Ola Ås old, Philipp D.
Koellinge , Jaakko Kap io, Sa ah E. Medland, Robin G. Wal e s, Daniel J. Benjamin, Pa ick Tu ley,
Da id M. E ans, Geo ge Da ey Smi h, Ca oline Haywa d, Ben B ump on, Gib an Hemani and Neil
M. Da ies. 2021. Wi hin-Sibship GWAS Imp o e Es ima es o Di ec Gene ic E ec s. bioRxi 2021-
03.
Isungse , Ma in A., Dal on Conley, Hen ik D. Zach isson, Ei ind Ys om, Alexand a Ha dahl, Pål
R. Njøls ad and To kild Ho de Lyngs ad. 2022. Social and Gene ic Associa ions wi h Educa ional
Pe o mance in a Scandina ian Wel a e S a e. P oceedings o he Na ional Academy o Sciences
119(25):e2201869119.
James, Sa ah, Sa a McLanahan and Jeanne B ooks-Gunn. 2021. Con ibu ions o he F agile Families
and Child Wellbeing S udy o Child De elopmen . Annual Re iew o De elopmen al Psychology
3(1):187–206.
Judd, Nicholas, B uno Sauce and To kel Klingbe g. 2022. Schooling Subs an ially Imp o es In elligence,
bu Nei he Lessens no Widens he Impac s o Socioeconomics and Gene ics. Npj Science o Lea n-
ing 7(1):33.
Ka akayalı, Juliane, Ça˘
g ı Kah eci, Do is Liebsche and Ca l Melche s (eds.). 2017. Den NSU-Komplex
analysie en. Ak uelle Pe spek i en aus de Wissenscha . Edi ion Poli ik Band 38. Biele eld: an-
sc ip .
Ka apin, Roge . 2002. An imino i y Rio s in Uni ied Ge many: Cul u al Con lic s and Mischanneled Po-
li ical Pa icipa ion. Compa a i e Poli ics 34(2):147–167.
Ka lsson Linné , Richa d, Pie o Bi oli, Edwa d Kong, S. Fleu W. Meddens, Robbee Wedow, Ma k Alan
Fon ana, Maël Leb e on, S ephen P. Tino, Abdel Abdellaoui, Anke R. Hamme schlag, Michel G. Ni-
a d, Aysu Okbay, Co nelius A. Rie eld, Pascal N. Timshel, Maciej T zaskowski, Ronald de Vlam-
ing, Ch is ian L. Zünd, Yanchun Bao, Lau a Buzdugan, Ann H. Caplin, Chia-Yen Chen, Pe e Eibich,
Pie e Fon anillas, Juan R. Gonzalez, Pe e K. Joshi, Ville Ka hunen, Aa on Kleinman, Remy Z.
Le in, Ch is ina M. Lill, Ge a dus A. Meddens, Ge a d Mun ané, Sand a Sanchez-Roige, F ank J.
an Rooij, E dogan Taskesen, Yang Wu, Fu ao Zhang, 23and Me Resea ch Team, eQTLgen Con-
so ium, In e na ional Cannabis Conso ium, Social Science Gene ic Associa ion Conso ium, Adam
Au on, Jason D. Boa dman, Da id W. Cla k, And ew Conlin, Cono C. Dolan, U s Fischbache ,
Pa ick J. F. G oenen, Ka hleen Mullan Ha is, G ego Hasle , Albe Ho man, Mohammad A. Ik am,
Sonia Jain, Robe Ka lsson, Ronald C. Kessle , Maa en Kooyman, James MacKillop, Minna Män-
nikkö, Ca los Mo cillo-Sua ez, Ma hew B. McQueen, Klaus M. Schmid , Melissa C. Sma , Ma hias
Su e , A. Roy Thu ik, And é G. Ui e linden, Jon Whi e, Ha ie de Wi , Jian Yang, La s Be am,
Do e I. Boomsma, Tõnu Esko, E ns Feh , Da id A. Hinds, Magnus Johannesson, Meena Kuma i,
Da id Laibson, Pa ik K. E. Magnusson, Michelle N. Meye , A cadi Na a o, Ab aham A. Palme ,
Tune H. Pe s, Danielle Pos huma, Daniel Schunk, Mu ay B. S ein, Rauli S en o, Henning Tiemeie ,
Paul R. H. J. Timme s, Pa ick Tu ley, Robe J. U sano, Ge G. Wagne , James F. Wilson, Jacob
G a en, James J. Lee, Da id Cesa ini, Daniel J. Benjamin, Philipp D. Koellinge and Jona han P.
Beauchamp. 2019. Genome-Wide Associa ion Analyses o Risk Tole ance and Risky Beha io s in
o e 1 Million Indi iduals Iden i y Hund eds o Loci and Sha ed Gene ic In luences. Na u e Gene ics
51(2):245–257.
Ka mann, Ul ich. 2017. Re lec ions on ‘Race’ in Science and Socie y in Ge many. Jou nal o An h opo-
logical Sciences (95):311–318.
Kilomba, G ada. 2008. Plan a ion Memo ies. Episodes o E e yday Racism. Müns e : Un as Ve lag.
Ki kpa ick, Robe M., Lisa N. Leg and, William G. Iacono and Ma McGue. 2011. A Twin and Adop-
ion S udy o Reading Achie emen : Explo a ion o Sha ed-En i onmen al and Gene-En i onmen -
In e ac ion E ec s. Lea ning and Indi idual Di e ences 21(4):368–375.
Koellinge , Philipp D., Aysu Okbay, Hyeokmoon Kweon, Annema ie Schweine , Richa d Ka lsson Lin-
né , Jan Goebel, Da id Rich e , Lisa Reibe , Be ina Ma ia Zweck, Daniel W. Belsky, Pie o Bi oli,
Rui Ma a, Ellio M. Tucke -D ob, K. Paige Ha den, Ge Wagne and Ralph He wig. 2023. Coho
p o ile: Gene ic da a in he Ge man Socio-Economic Panel Inno a ion Sample (SOEP-G).PLOS
ONE. h ps://doi.o g/10.1371/jou nal.pone.0294896.
K
594 M. A. Aikins e al.
Kong, Augus ine, Gudma Tho lei sson, Michael L. F igge, Bja ni J. Vilhjalmsson, Alexande I. Young,
Tho gei E. Tho gei sson, S e ania Benonisdo i , Asmundu Oddsson, Bja ni V. Halldo sson,
Gisli Masson, Daniel F. Gudbja sson, Agna Helgason, Gyda Bjo nsdo i , Unnu Tho s eins-
do i and Ka i S e ansson. 2018. The Na u e o Nu u e: E ec s o Pa en al Geno ypes. Science
359(6374):424–428.
K iege , Nancy. 2020. Measu es o Racism, Sexism, He e osexism, and Gende Bina ism o Heal h Equi y
Resea ch: F om S uc u al Injus ice o Embodied Ha m—An Ecosocial Analysis. Annual Re iew o
Public Heal h 41(1):37–62.
K iege , Nancy. 2021. S uc u al Racism, Heal h Inequi ies, and he Two-Edged Swo d o Da a: S uc u al
P oblems Requi e S uc u al Solu ions. F on ie s in Public Heal h 9:655447.
Leslie, S ephen, B uce Winney, Ga e Hellen hal, Dan Da ison, Abdelhamid Boume i , Tammy Day,
Ka a zyna Hu nik, Ellen C. Roy ik, Ba y Cunli e, Daniel J. Lawson, Daniel Falush, ColinF eeman,
Ma i Pi inen, Simon Mye s, Ma k Robinson, Pe e Donnelly and Wal e Bodme . 2015. The ine-
scale gene ic s uc u e o he B i ish popula ion. Na u e 519(7543):309–314.
Lewis, Anna C. F., San iago J. Molina, Paul S. Appelbaum, Bege Dauda, Anna Di Rienzo, Agus in Fuen es,
S ephanie M. Fulle on, Nanibaa’ A. Ga ison, Nayanika Ghosh, E elynn M. Hammonds, Da id
S. Jones, Eimea E. Kenny, Pe e K a , Sand a S. J. Lee, Madelyn Mau o, John No emb e, Aa on
Pano sky, Mashaal Sohail, Benjamin M. Neale and Danielle S. Allen. 2022. Ge ing Gene ic Ances y
Righ o Science and Socie y. Science 376(6590):250–252.
Lewon in, R. C. 1974. The Analysis o Va iance and he Analysis o Causes. In e na ional Jou nal o
Epidemiology 35(3):520–525.
Lig ha , Symen, Ca ola Ma zi, S ella Aslibekyan, Michael M. Mendelson, Ka en N. Conneely, Toshiko
Tanaka, Elena Colicino, Lindsay L. Wai e, Roby Joehanes, Weihua Guan, Jenni e A. B ody, Ca hy
Elks, Ricca do Ma ioni, Min A. Jhun, Gola eh Agha, Jan B essle , Ca in K. Wa d-Ca iness, B ian
H. Chen, Tianxiao Huan, Kelly Bakulski, Elias L. Sal a i, WHI-EMPC In es iga o s, Gio anni Fio -
i o, CHARGE epigene ics o Co ona y Hea Disease, Simone Wahl, Ka ha ina Sch amm, Jin Sha,
Dena G. He nandez, Allan C. Jus , Jenni e A. Smi h, Nona So oodehnia, Luke C. Pilling, James S.
Pankow, Phil S. Tsao, Chunyu Liu, Wei Zhao, Simone a Gua e a, Vasiliki J. Michopoulos, Alicia
K. Smi h, Ma jolein J. Pe e s, Da id Melze , Pan el Vokonas, My iam Fo nage, Holge P okisch,
Joshua C. Bis, Aud ey Y. Chu, Ch is ian He de , Ha ald G alle , Chen Yao, Sonia Shah, Allan F.
McRae, Honghuang Lin, S e e Ho a h, Daniele Fallin, Albe Ho man, Nicholas J. Wa eham, Ke i
L. Wiggins, And ew P. Feinbe g, John M. S a , Pe e M. Vissche , Joanne M. Mu abi o, Sha on L.
R. Ka dia, De in M. Abshe , Elisabe h B. Binde , And ew B. Single on, S e ania Bandinelli, Anne e
Pe e s, Melanie Waldenbe ge , Giuseppe Ma ullo, Joel D. Schwa z, Ellen W. Deme a h, And é G.
Ui e linden, Joyce B. J. an Meu s, Osca H. F anco, Yii-De Ida Chen, Daniel Le y, S ephen T.
Tu ne , Ian J. Dea y, Ke y J. Ressle , Josée Dupuis, Luigi Fe ucci, Ken K. Ong, Themis ocles L.
Assimes, E ic Boe winkle, Wol gang Koenig, Donna K. A ne , And ea A. Bacca elli, Emelia J. Ben-
jamin and Abbas Dehghan. 2016. DNA Me hyla ion Signa u es o Ch onic Low-G ade In lamma ion
A e Associa ed wi h Complex Diseases. Genome Biology 17(1):255.
Lig ha , Symen, Ahmad Vaez, U mo Võsa, Ma ia G. S a hopoulou, Paul S. de V ies, B am P. P ins, Pe-
e J. Van de Mos , Toshiko Tanaka, Elnaz Nade i, Lynda M. Rose, Ying Wu, Robe Ka lsson,
Maja Ba balic, Honghuang Lin, René Pool, Gu Zhu, Au élien Macé, Ca lo Sido e, S ella T ompe ,
Massimo Mangino, Ma ia Saba e -Lleal, John P. Kemp, Ali Abbasi, Tim Kacp owski, Niek Ve -
weij, Albe V. Smi h, Tao Huang, Ca ola Ma zi, Ma y F. Fei osa, Ku K. Lohman, Ma cus E.
Klebe , Yu i Milaneschi, Ch is ian Muelle , Mahmudul Huq, E hymia Vlachopoulou, Leo-Pekka
Lyy ikäinen, Ch is ophe Oldmeadow, Jo is Deelen, Ma kus Pe ola, Jing Hua Zhao, Bja ke Feen-
s a, Ma zyeh Amini, Ja i Lah i, Ka ha ina E. Sch au , My iam Fo nage, Bhoom Suk i ipa , Wei-Min
Chen, Xiaohui Li, Te esa Nu ile, Gio anni Male ba, Jian’an Luan, Tom Bak, Nicholas Scho k, Fabi-
ola Del G eco M., Elisabe h Thie ing, Anubha Mahajan, Ricca do E. Ma ioni, E elin Mihailo , Joel
E iksson, Ayse Bilge Ozel, Weihua Zhang, Ma ia Ne hande , Yu-Ching Cheng, S ella Aslibekyan,
Wei Ang, Ila ia Gandin, Loïc Yengo, Lau a Po as, Cha les Koope be g, Edi h Ho e , Kuma B. Ra-
jan, Claudia Schu mann, Wou e den Hollande , Ta un ee S. Ahluwalia, Jing Zhao, Ha men H. M.
D aisma, Ian Fo d, Nicholas Timpson, Alexande Teume , Hongyan Huang, Simone Wahl, YongMei
Liu, Jie Huang, Hae-Won Uh, F ank Gelle , Pe e K. Joshi, Lisa R. Yanek, Elisabe a T abe i, Ben-
jamin Lehne, Diego Vozzi, Ma ie Ve banck, Gine a Biino, Yasaman Saba, Ing id Meulenbel , Je
R. O’Connell, Ma kku Laakso, F anco Giulianini, Pa ik K. E. Magnusson, Ch is ie M. Ballan yne,
Jouke Jan Ho enga, G an W. Mon gome y, Fe nando Ri adinei a, Rico Rueedi, Ma is ella S e i,
Ka l-Heinz He zig, Da id J. S o , C is ina Menni, Ma ias F ånbe g, Bea e S . Pou cain, S ephan
K
Beyond a Sha ed His o y: A Biosocial Pe spec i e on Sociogenomics and Racism in Ge many 595
B. Felix, Tune H. Pe s, S ephan J. L. Bakke , Pe e K a , Anne e Pe e s, Dhananjay Vaidya, G a-
ciela Delgado, Johannes H. Smi , Ve a G oßmann, Juha Sinisalo, Ilkka Seppälä, S ephen R. Williams,
Elizabe h G. Holliday, Ma hijs Moed, Claudia Langenbe g, Ka i Räikkönen, Jingzhong Ding, Ha y
Campbell, Michele M. Sale, Yii-De I. Chen, Alan L. James, Daniela Ruggie o, Nicole So anzo,
Ca ha ina A. Ha man, E in N. Smi h, Ge ald S. Be enson, Ch is ian Fuchsbe ge , Dena He nandez,
Ca la M. T. Tiesle , Vilman as Gied ai is, Da id Liewald, K is a Fische , Dan Mells öm, Ande s
La sson, Yunmei Wang, William R. Sco , Ma hias Lo en zon, John Beilby, Ka hleen A. Ryan, C aig
E. Pennell, D agana Vucko ic, Be e ly Balkau, Ma ia Pina Concas, Reinhold Schmid , Ca los F.
Mendes de Leon, E win P. Bo inge , Ma g ee Kloppenbu g, La inia Pa e nos e , Michael Boehnke,
A. W. Musk, Gonneke Willemsen, Da id M. E ans, Pamela A.F. Madden, Mika Kähönen, Zol án Ku-
alik, Magdalena Zoledziewska, Ville Ka hunen, S ephen B. K i che sky, Na eed Sa a , Gene ie e
Lachance, Robe Cla ke, Tama a B. Ha is, Olli T. Rai aka i, John R. A ia, Diana an Heems , Ee o
Kajan ie, Rossella So ice, Gio anni Gamba o, Robe A. Sco , And ew A. Hicks, Luigi Fe ucci,
Ma ie S andl, Cecilia M. Lindg en, John M. S a , Magnus Ka lsson, La s Lind, Jun Z. Li, John
C. Chambe s, T e o A. Mo i, Eco J. C. N. de Geus, And ew C. Hea h, Nicholas G. Ma in, Juha
Au inen, B endan M. Buckley, An on J. M. de C aen, Melanie Waldenbe ge , Kons an in S auch,
Thomas Mei inge , Rodney J. Sco , Ma k McE oy, Ma ian Beekman, C is ina Bombie i, Paul M.
Ridke , Ka en L. Mohlke, Nancy L. Pede sen, Alanna C. Mo ison, Do e I. Boomsma, John B.
Whi ield, Da id P. S achan, Albe Ho man, Pe e Vollenweide , F ancesco Cucca, Ma jo-Rii a
Ja elin, J. Wou e Jukema, Tim D. Spec o , Ande s Hams en, Tanja Zelle , And é G. Ui e linden,
Ma hias Nauck, Vilmundu Gudnason, Lu Qi, Ha ald G alle , Ing id B. Bo ecki, Je ome I. Ro e ,
Win ied Mä z, Philipp S. Wild, Ma ja-Liisa Lokki, Michael Boyle, Veikko Salomaa, Mads Melbye,
Johan G. E iksson, James F. Wilson, B enda W. J. H. Penninx, Diane M. Becke , B ad o d B. Wo all,
G eg Gibson, Ronald M. K auss, Ma ina Ciullo, Gianluigi Zaza, Nicholas J. Wa eham, Albe ine J.
Oldehinkel, Lyle J. Palme , Sa ah S. Mu ay, Pe e P. P ams alle , S e ania Bandinelli, Joachim Hein-
ich, E ik Ingelsson, Ian J. Dea y, Reedik Mägi, Liesbe h Vandenpu , Pim an de Ha s , Ka l C.
Desch, Jaspal S. Koone , Claes Ohlsson, Ca oline Haywa d, Te ho Leh imäki, Alan R. Shuldine ,
Donna K. A ne , Law ence J. Beilin, An onie a Robino, Philippe F oguel, Ma io Pi as u, Tine
Jess, Wol gang Koenig, Ru h J. F. Loos, Denis A. E ans, Helena Schmid , Geo ge Da ey Smi h,
P. Eline Slagboom, Gudny Ei iksdo i , And ew P. Mo is, B uce M. Psa y, Russell P. T acy, Ilja M.
Nol e, E ic Boe winkle, Sophie Vis ikis-Sies , Alex P. Reine , My on G oss, Joshua C. Bis, Lude
F anke, Osca H. F anco, Emelia J. Benjamin, Daniel I. Chasman, Josée Dupuis, Ha old Sniede ,
Abbas Dehghan, Beh ooz Z. Alizadeh, Beh ooz Z. Alizadeh, H. Ma ike Boezen, Lude F anke, Pim
an de Ha s , Ge jan Na is, Ma ianne Ro s, Ha old Sniede , Mo is Swe z, B uce H. R. Wol en-
bu el, Cisca Wijmenga, Emelia Benjamin, Daniel I. Chasman, Abbas Dehghan, Ta un ee Singh
Ahluwalia, James Meigs, Russell T acy, Beh ooz Z. Alizadeh, Symen Lig ha , Josh Bis, Gudny
Ei iksdo i , Na han Pank a z, My on G oss, Alex Raine , Ha old Sniede , James G. Wilson, B uce
M. Psa y, Josee Dupuis, B am P ins, U mo Vaso, Ma ia S a hopoulou, Lude F anke, Te ho Leh imaki,
Wol gang Koenig, Yalda Jamshidi, Sophie Sies , Ali Abbasi, And e G. Ui e linden, Mohammad eza
Abdollahi, Rena e Schnabel, U sula M. Schick, Ilja M. Nol e, Aldi K aja, Yi-Hsiang Hsu, Daniel
S. Tylee, Alyson Zwicke , Rudol Uhe , Geo ge Da ey-Smi h, Alanna C. Mo ison, And ew Hicks,
Co nelia M. an Duijn, Ca in Wa d-Ca iness, E ic Boe winkle, J. Ro e , Ken Rice, Leslie Lange,
Ma kus Pe ola, Eco de Geus, And ew P. Mo is, Ka i Ma i Makela, Da id S acey, Johan E iksson,
Tim M. F ayling and Eline P. Slagboom. 2018. Genome Analyses o >200,000 Indi iduals Iden i y
58 Loci o Ch onic In lamma ion and Highligh Pa hways Tha Link In lamma ion and Complex
Diso de s. The Ame ican Jou nal o Human Gene ics 103(5):691–706.
Lippha d , Ve onika. 2012. Isola es and C osses in Human Popula ion Gene ics; o , A Con ex ualiza ion
o Ge man Race Science. Cu en An h opology 53(S5):S69–82.
Lippha d , Ve onika. 2019. Fo um Gene ic His o y II. NTM Zei sch i ü Geschich e de Wissenscha en,
Technik und Medizin 27(2):165–199.
Liu, Yichen, Xiaowei Mao, Johannes K ause and Qiaomei Fu. 2021. Insigh s in o Human His o y om he
Fi s Decade o Ancien Human Genomics. Science 373(6562):1479–1484.
López-O ín, Ca los, Ma ia A. Blasco, Linda Pa idge, Manuel Se ano and Guido K oeme . 2013. The
Hallma ks o Aging. Cell 153(6):1194–1217.
Ma in, Alicia R., Masahi o Kanai, Yoichi o Kama ani, Yukino i Okada, Benjamin M. Neale and Ma k
J. Daly. 2019. Clinical Use o Cu en Polygenic Risk Sco es May Exace ba e Heal h Dispa i ies.
Na u e Gene ics 51(4):584–591.
K
596 M. A. Aikins e al.
Ma schenko, Daphne Oluwaseun. 2022. ‘The Elephan in he Room’: Social Responsibili y in he P o-
duc ion o Sociogenomics Resea ch. BioSocie ies 17(4):713–731.
McCa ney, Daniel L., Robe F. Hilla y, Eleano L. S. Conole, Daniel T ejo Banos, Danni A. Gadd,
Rosie M. Walke , Cli Nangle, Robin Flaig, A chie Campbell, Alison D. Mu ay, Susana Muñoz
Maniega, Ma ía del C. Valdés-He nández, Ma hew A. Ha is, Ma k E. Bas in, Joanna M. Wa dlaw,
Sa ah E. Ha is, Da id J. Po eous, Ellio M. Tucke -D ob, And ew M. McIn osh, Ka h yn L. E ans,
Ian J. Dea y, Simon R. Cox, Ma hew R. Robinson and Ricca do E. Ma ioni. 2022. Blood-Based
Epigenome-Wide Analyses o Cogni i e Abili ies. Genome Biology 23(1):26.
Meye , Michelle N., Paul S. Appelbaum, Daniel J. Benjamin, Shawneequa L. Callie , Na haniel Com o ,
Dal on Conley, Je emy F eese, Nanibaa’ A. Ga ison, E elynn M. Hammonds, K. Paige Ha den, San-
d a Soo-Jin Lee, Alicia R. Ma in, Daphne Oluwaseun Ma schenko, Benjamin M. Neale, Rohan H.
C. Palme , James Tabe y, E ic Tu kheime , Pa ick Tu ley and E ik Pa ens. 2023. W es ling wi h So-
cial and Beha io al Genomics: Risks, Po en ial Bene i s, and E hical Responsibili y. Has ings Cen e
Repo 53(S1):S2–49.
Meye s, J. L., M. Ce dá, S. Galea, K. M. Keyes, A. E. Aiello, M. Uddin, D. E. Wildman and K. C. Koenen.
2013. In e ac ion be ween Polygenic Risk o Ciga e e Use and En i onmen al Exposu es in he
De oi Neighbo hood Heal h S udy. T ansla ional Psychia y 3(8):e290–e290.
Mills, Melinda C., and Felix C. T op . 2020. Sociology, Gene ics, and he Coming o Age o So-
ciogenomics. Annual Re iew o Sociology 46(1):553–581.
Mönkediek, Bas ian, Volke Lang, Lena Weigel, My iam A. Baum, Eike F iede ike Ei le , Elisabe h Hahn,
Anke Hu e , Ch is oph H. Kla zka, Ani a Ko wi z, K is ina K ell, Amelie Niks a , Ma in Diewald,
Raine Riemann and F ank M. Spina h. 2019. The Ge man Twin Family Panel (TwinLi e). Twin
Resea ch and Human Gene ics 22(6):540–547.
Mohsen, Hussein. 2020. Race and Gene ics: Sombe His o y, T oubled P esen . The Yale Jou nal o Biol-
ogy and Medicine 93(1):215–219.
Mo ning, Ann. 2014. Does Genomics Challenge he Social Cons uc ion o Race? Sociological Theo y
32(3):189–207.
Mowe y, Da id C., and Bha en N. Sampa . 2006. Uni e si ies in Na ional Inno a ion Sys ems. In The
Ox o d Handbook o Inno a ion, eds. Jan Fage be g and Da id C. Mowe y. Ox o d Uni e si y P ess.
Niccodemi, Gianma ia, Gio gia Men a, Jona han Tu ne and Conchi a D’Amb osio. 2022. Pace o ag-
ing, amily en i onmen and cogni i e skills in child en and adolescen s. SSM—Popula ion Heal h
20:101280.
Ogun oye, Ka ha ina, May Ayim, Aud e Lo de and Dagma Schul z (eds.). 1992. Fa be bekennen: A o-
deu sche F auen au den Spu en ih e Geschich e. Ak ualisie e Ausg., 9.–10. Tsd. F ank u /Main:
Fische .
Okbay, Aysu, Yeda Wu, Nancy Wang, Ha iha an Jayashanka , Michael Benne , Seyed Moeen Nehza i,
Julia Sido enko, Hyeokmoon Kweon, G an Goldman, Tama a Gjo gjie a, Yunxuan Jiang, Ba y
Hicks, Chao Tian, Da id A. Hinds, Ra ael Ahlskog, Pa ik K. E. Magnusson, S en Oska sson, Ca o-
line Haywa d, A chie Campbell, Da id J. Po eous, Je emy F eese, Pamela He d, 23andMe Resea ch
Team, Michelle Agee, Babak Alipanahi, Adam Au on, Robe K. Bell, Ka a zyna B yc, Sa ah L.
Elson, Pie e Fon anillas, Nicholas A. Fu lo e, Da id A. Hinds, Ka en E. Hube , Aa on Kleinman,
Nadia K. Li e man, Jenni e C. McC eigh , Ma hew H. McIn y e, Joanna L. Moun ain, Ca ie A.
M. No ho e , S e en J. Pi s, J. Fah Sa hi apongsasu i, Olga V. Sazono a, Janie F. Shel on, Suyash
Sh inga pu e, Joyce Y. Tung, Vladimi Vacic, Ca he ine H. Wilson, Social Science Gene ic Associ-
a ion Conso ium, Ma k Alan Fon ana, Tune H. Pe s, Co nelius A. Rie eld, Guo-Bo Chen, Valu
Emilsson, S. Fleu W. Meddens, Joseph K. Pick ell, Ke in Thom, Pascal Timshel, Ronald de Vlam-
ing, Abdel Abdellaoui, Ta un ee S. Ahluwalia, Jonas Bacelis, Clemens Baumbach, Gyda Bjo ns-
do i , Johannes H. B andsma, Ma ia Pina Concas, Jaime De inge , Tessel E. Galesloo , Gio gia
Gi o o, Richa Gup a, Leanne M. Hall, Sa ah E. Ha is, Edi h Ho e , Momoko Ho ikoshi, Jenni e E.
Hu man, Kad i Kaasik, Ioanna P. Kala a i, Robe Ka lsson, Ja i Lah i, S en J. an de Lee, Ch is-
iaan de Leeuw, Penelope A. Lind, Ka l-Oska Lindg en, Tian Liu, Massimo Mangino, Jona han
Ma en, E elin Mihailo , Michael B. Mille , Pe e J. an de Mos , Ch is ophe Oldmeadow, An ony
Pay on, Na alia Pe jako a, Wou e J. Pey o , Yong Qian, Olli Rai aka i, Rico Rueedi, E ika Sal i,
Bö ge Schmid , Ka ha ina E. Sch au , Jianxin Shi, Albe V. Smi h, Raymond A. Poo , Bea e S Pou -
cain, Alexande Teume , Gudma Tho lei sson, Niek Ve weij, D agana Vucko ic, Jue gen Wellmann,
Ha m-Jan Wes a, Jingyun Yang, Wei Zhao, Zhihong Zhu, Beh ooz Z. Alizadeh, Naja Amin, An-
d ew Bakshi, Sebas ian E. Baumeis e , Gine a Biino, Klaus Bønnelykke, Pa icia A. Boyle, Ha y
Campbell, F ancesco P. Cappuccio, Gail Da ies, Jan-Emmanuel De Ne e, Panos Deloukas, Ilja De-
K