Model of sustainability of SMEs in V4 countries

Z a iko a, Ka a ina; D o ský, Ján; Belás, Ja osla J .; Me zke , Zdenko
A icle
Model o sus ainabili y o SMEs in V4 coun ies
Jou nal o Business Economics and Managemen (JBEM)
P o ided in Coope a ion wi h:
Vilnius Gediminas Technical Uni e si y (VILNIUS TECH)
Sugges ed Ci a ion: Z a iko a, Ka a ina; D o ský, Ján; Belás, Ja osla J .; Me zke , Zdenko (2024) :
Model o sus ainabili y o SMEs in V4 coun ies, Jou nal o Business Economics and Managemen
(JBEM), ISSN 2029-4433, Vilnius Gediminas Technical Uni e si y, Vilnius, Vol. 25, Iss. 2, pp. 226-245,
h ps://doi.o g/10.3846/jbem.2024.20729
This Ve sion is a ailable a :
h ps://hdl.handle.ne /10419/317677
S anda d-Nu zungsbedingungen:
Die Dokumen e au EconS o dü en zu eigenen wissenscha lichen
Zwecken und zum P i a geb auch gespeiche und kopie we den.
Sie dü en die Dokumen e nich ü ö en liche ode komme zielle
Zwecke e iel äl igen, ö en lich auss ellen, ö en lich zugänglich
machen, e eiben ode ande wei ig nu zen.
So e n die Ve asse die Dokumen e un e Open-Con en -Lizenzen
(insbesonde e CC-Lizenzen) zu Ve ügung ges ell haben soll en,
gel en abweichend on diesen Nu zungsbedingungen die in de do
genann en Lizenz gewäh en Nu zungs ech e.
Te ms o use:
Documen s in EconS o may be sa ed and copied o you pe sonal
and schola ly pu poses.
You a e no o copy documen s o public o comme cial pu poses, o
exhibi he documen s publicly, o make hem publicly a ailable on he
in e ne , o o dis ibu e o o he wise use he documen s in public.
I he documen s ha e been made a ailable unde an Open Con en
Licence (especially C ea i e Commons Licences), you may exe cise
u he usage igh s as speci ied in he indica ed licence.
h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/
This is an Open Access a icle dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion License (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/
licenses/by/4.0/), which pe mi s un es ic ed use, dis ibu ion, and ep oduc ion in any medium, p o ided he o iginal au ho and sou ce
a e c edi ed.
Copy igh © 2024 The Au ho (s). Published by Vilnius Gediminas Technical Uni e si y
ISSN 1611-1699 / eISSN 2029-4433
2024
Volume 25
Issue 2
Pages 226–245
h ps://doi.o g/10.3846/jbem.2024.20729
MODEL OF SUSTAINABILITY OF SMEs IN V4 COUNTRIES
Ka a ina ZVARIKOVA 1, Jan DVORSKY 1, Ja osla J . BELAS 2, Zdenko METZKER 3
1Depa men o Economics, Uni e si y o Zilina, Zilina, Slo akia
2Facul y o Social and Economic Rela ions, Alexande Dubcek Uni e si y in T encin, T encin, Slo akia
3Facul y o Managemen and Economic, Tomas Ba a Uni e si y in Zlin, Zlin, Czech Republic
A icle His o y: Abs ac . The esea ch’s objec i e was o de elop a ho ough model o he iabili y o SMEs
in he V4 coun ies based on p ede e mined a iables. The ollowing ac o s we e de ined:
human esou ces managemen , business e hics, co po a e social esponsibili y, company dig-
i alisa ion, en i onmen al conside a ions, inancial managemen , and sus ainabili y o SMEs.
The model was de eloped on he solid empi ical esea ch ca ied ou in he Viseg ad Fou
coun ies in June 2022 by he enowned ex e nal agency MNFORCE using a sample o 1,398
esponden s and he “Compu e Assis ed Web In e iewing” echnique. Acco ding o he e-
sea ch, he de eloped complex model o SMEs’ sus ainabili y depending on he lis ed c i e ia
is s a is ically signi ican . Each in es iga ed ac o has a a ou able impac on SMEs’ sus aina-
bili y. The s udy’s indings suppo ed he no ion ha he en i onmen al aspec s o he busi-
ness ha e he s onges posi i e impac on he long- e m sus ainabili y o SMEs. The s udy’s
indings indica e ha he managemen o human esou ces, inances, and he deg ee o dig-
i alisa ion o SMEs signi ican ly in luence he iabili y o businesses. The indings p o ide an
impo an pla o m o manage s esponsible o he sus ainabili y o he SME segmen a he
wo ldwide le el (In e na ional council o small business), na ional le el (pa icula ly o V4
na ions), as well as ins i u ions suppo ing SMEs and SME owne s.
■ ecei ed 26 Ap il 2023
■ accep ed 18 Decembe 2023
Keywo ds: small and medium en e p ises, SME sus ainabili y model, human esou ces managemen , e hics in business, CSR, digi isa ion
o companies, en i onmen al aspec s, inancial managemen .
JEL Classi ica ion: L26.
Co esponding au ho . E-mail: [email p o ec ed]
JOURNAL o BUSINESS
ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT
1. In oduc ion
I companies wan o inc ease he e iciency o hei ope a ion and be compe i i e, hey mus
change hei ocus om p o i -only o sus ainabili y (El-Kassa & Singh, 2019; Abdul-Rashid
e al., 2017; Ok ęglicka & Pichugina, 2021; Khan e al., 2023), which also helps o shape he
quali y o he business en i onmen (Cepel, 2019).
Due o he signi ican con ibu ion ha small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs)
make o he global economic sys em (Me zke & Z a iko a, 2021), his opic is now he
subjec o heo e ical s udy and p ac ical solu ions. Sus ainabili y ep esen s a complex
and mul i-dimensional concep (Kiba-Janiak e al., 2022). Economic, social, and en i on-
men al conside a ions a e all in eg a ed in o one concep (Elking on, 1994) and hese
a iables should be in a dynamic equilib ium wi h a mul iplie impac . Howe e , many
s udies look a he p oblem o sus ainabili y h ough he lens o sepa a e esponsibili ies
o a e no add essed in de ail (Abdul-Rashid e al., 2017; Wije hilake & Lama, 2019). De-
Jou nal o Business Economics and Managemen , 2024, 25(2), 226–245 227
spi e he g owing in e es o manage s in implemen ing sus ainabili y in p ac ice, many
companies canno de ine sus ainabili y in he con ex o hei business (Lu e al., 2022;
Sil es e e al., 2022).
P oblems wi h p ope implemen a ion in SMEs a e mos o en ela ed o he ac ha
hey y o apply p ocedu es cha ac e is ic o la ge companies wi hou conside ing hei
capi al, esou ce o pe sonnel limi s (Belas J . e al., 2021), and ha e insu icien con ic ion
and knowledge abou sus ainabili y (Jansson e al., 2017). E en hough SMEs ace a lo
o challenges nowadays, he e a e s ill ewe s udies on SMEs’ sus ainabili y han he e
a e on la ge co po a ions (Yumei e al., 2021; Suo o, 2022). Due o his, he uniqueness
o his s udy esides in he ac ha i is concen a ed on building a ho ough model o
SMEs’ sus ainabili y based on business iewpoin s. The esea ch iden i ies and quan i ies
he aspec s ha a ec a company’s sus ainabili y based on p e ious li e a u e esea ch
and own au ho ’s expe ise (e. g. Z a iko a e al., 2023; Rozsa e al., 2022; Belas e al.,
2021; e c.). The o iginali y o he s udy lies in he subjec i e a i udes o en ep eneu s
om he coun ies o Cen al Eu ope (The Viseg ad g oup) ega ding he signi icance
o he selec ed ac o s on he SMEs’ sus ainabili y. The model is based on a ques ion-
nai e su ey, which p o ides subjec i e opinions o en ep eneu s abou he in luence
o indi idual ac o s on he sus ainabili y o hei business. Acco ding o he au ho s’
bes knowledge, mos s udies a e o ien ed on he pe cep ion o sus ainabili y om he
cus ome s, employees, o o he s akeholde s’ poin o iew, no en ep eneu s and i he
en ep eneu s’ a i udes a e inco po a ed in he s udy, hey ep esen only one ac o
o sus ainabili y (e.g. Mag izos e al. (2021), who made quali a i e esea ch on CSR o
10 SMEs). Howe e , in he case o SMEs, en ep eneu s a e he bea e s o manage ial
and decision-making unc ions (Alonso-Almeida e al., 2018; Amoah e al., 2021). They
se he business di ec ion and a e o en he ole models o hei employees (Z a iko a
e al., 2023; Cheng e al., 2022). Based on his knowledge, we conside hei app oach
o sus ainabili y as c ucial. Finally, we mus no o ge ha al hough SMEs a e ela i ely
he e ogeneous (e.g., na ional con ex , sec o o company size), in many espec s, hey
a e s ill homogeneous (e.g., he in luence o he en ep eneu ’s pe sonal cha ac e is ics
on business managemen , in o mal ela ionships, e c.) (Vi ie , 2013).
The li e a u e esea ch o p e ious s udies e eals ha sus ainabili y issues do no
p o ide a ho ough e alua ion, which cons i u es a signi ican heo e ical issue. Thus, he
c ea ion o a heo e ical model and i s subsequen alida ion may con ibu e no jus o
he la ge discou se on he p oblem o SME sus ainabili y. I can also ha e subs an ial
e ec s on economic policymake s inside he Viseg ad G oup.
The s uc u e o he a icle is as ollows: The impo an disco e ies ha cha ac e ise
he scien i ic gap a e desc ibed in he heo e ical pa , which analyses and summa ises
exis ing case s udies in he esea ch using a c i ical lens. The esea ch me hodology and
objec i e a e explained in he nex sec ion. I includes he echnique o cons uc ing a
ques ionnai e (Table 1), he me hodology o collec ing da a, as well as he c ea ion o
s a is ical hypo heses and me hods o e i ying hem. The s udy’s indings a e p esen ed
in he hi d chap e . The sec ions ha ollow con ain he discussion o he esea ch, which
includes a summa y o majo indings and a compa ison wi h o he signi ican s udies
aimed a sol ing he p oblem. Key empi ical indings, heo e ical and p ac ical conse-
quences, and u u e esea ch goals a e included in he conclusion.
228 K. Z a iko a e al. Model o sus ainabili y o SMEs in V4 coun ies
2. Li e a u e e iew
Sus ainabili y should no be conside ed an impedimen o he SMEs´ compe i i eness, mo e-
o e , he indings o Lopez-To ez (2022) p o e ha he sus ainabili y o SMEs has a consid-
e able bene icial in luence on hei compe i i eness in many ways. Based on his knowledge,
we mus be awa e o he ac o s which a e ele an o his opic and hei signi icance.
En i onmen al and social ini ia i es ha e his o ically been seen as ma ginal in sus aina-
bili y. Howe e , oday hey a e implemen ed in co po a e s a egies wi h a di ec impac on
he le el o p o i (G ewal e al., 2021), cus ome sa is ac ion and loyal y (Sou o, 2022; Dabija
e al., 2022), business pa ne s (Klies ik e al., 2023; Sha iq e al., 2017), isk o bank up cy
(Michalko a e al., 2022), o employees hemsel es (Mi chell & Walinga, 2017; Van Bu en III,
2022). Fu he mo e, in pa icula , social pe o mance is la gely neglec ed in he p o essional
li e a u e (Buyukozkan & Ka abulu , 2018; Yasin e al., 2022), al hough acco ding o Yasin
e al. (2022), whe he Alonso-Almeida e al. (2018), i is conside ed he co ne s one o e e y
business. On he con a y, en i onmen al esponsibili y has he mos conno a ions in he
p o essional li e a u e ela ed o i s mo e ob ious impac on sus ainabili y (Cheng e al., 2022).
Wi hin he amewo k o social esponsibili y in he con ex o SMEs, publica ions mainly
ocus on employees (Alonso-Almeida e al., 2018), as he mos impo an capi al o any com-
pany. Nowadays, companies ha e di icul y inding an adequa e wo k o ce wi h he necessa y
compe encies and expe iences (Sou o, 2022; Belas & Rahman, 2023), especially wi h he
g owing mig a ion o he wo k o ce (P i a o a e al., 2022). F om he abo e, we can conclude
ha e aining expe ienced employees is a key managemen ask (Van Bu en III, 2022; El-Kas-
sa & Singh, 2019). Companies implemen ing social esponsibili y p ac ices a e cha ac e ised
by sa is ied and loyal employees, low u no e (Sch ode e al., 2022), and a highe le el o
inno a ion (Flamme , 2015; León-Gómez e al., 2022) as he key d i e s o sus ainable en e-
p eneu ship. Acco ding o his knowledge hypo hesis 1 was s a ed as ollows:
H1: Human esou ce managemen has a posi i e e ec on he sus ainabili y o SMEs.
As men ioned abo e, expe s a e mos o en conce ned wi h sus ainabili y in en i onmen-
al p o ec ion, and i is SMEs ha a e mainly o ien ed owa ds en i onmen al esponsibili y
(Jaya a hna e al., 2022). Howe e , El-Kasa and Singh (2019) a gue ha imp o ing en i on-
men al pe o mance is usually achie ed a he expense o economic g ow h, a leas in he
sho e m. This is also suppo ed by Abdul-Rashid e al. (2017), which claim ha p oduc s
p oduced sus ainably ha e a posi i e e ec on en i onmen al pe o mance bu a nega i e
e ec on economic and social pe o mance. Ne e heless, many s udies con i m ha he
en i onmen al esponsible ac i i ies o companies ha e a posi i e impac on business sus ain-
abili y (Cheng e al., 2022; Ahmed e al., 2021; Moisecu e al., 2020).
H2: En i onmen al aspec s o he business ha e a posi i e e ec on he sus ainabili y o
SMEs.
Many s udies p o e a posi i e ela ionship be ween inancial pe o mance and sus ain-
abili y esul ing di ec ly om cos sa ings (Alonso-Almeida e al., 2018; Valls Ma ínez e al.,
2022) bu also om non-economic indica o s such as employee sa is ac ion (Van Bu en III,
2022; So ibes e al., 2021), main aining o imp o ing ma ke posi ion (Yasin e al., 2022),
image suppo (Ahmed e al., 2021) and cus ome sa is ac ion (Moisescu & Gica, 2020), sus-
ainable consume s (Alhou i e al., 2021), imp o emen o e hics (Sil es e e al., 2018), o
highe c edibili y (Gaio e al., 2022). Also, in es o s a e o ien a ed owa ds companies ha
Jou nal o Business Economics and Managemen , 2024, 25(2), 226–245 229
ca y ou hei ac i i ies in a sus ainable manne (Flamme , 2015), which is e idenced by
hei g owing in e es in non- inancial s a emen s (Ca ajal & Nadeem, 2022) o inco po a e
his in o ma ion in o he e alua ion o hei in es men s (Du e al., 2017) o iden i y u u e
business pe o mance, business oppo uni ies as well as isks (Didenko e al., 2022). Bu as
Cha zis amoulou and Tyllianakis (2022) emphasise, inancial ba ie s ep esen he key ob-
s acle o SMEs o implemen sus ainabili y. Companies’ social and en i onmen al policies
canno be sepa a ed om p o i ocus. Acco ding o P zychodzen e al. (2016), success ul
SMEs’ ansi ion o sus ainabili y depends on leade ship and clea p o i o ien a ion and
managemen .
H3: Financial managemen o he company posi i ely a ec s he sus ainabili y o SMEs.
Sil es e e al. (2018) claim ha companies a e socially and en i onmen ally esponsible
wi h he aim o inc ease hei inancial pe o mance and only hei commi men o business
e hics di e en ia es hem. E hics ep esen a code o alues and p inciples ha guide he
ac ions o a pe son o g oup o people ega ding wha is igh and wha is w ong (Z a iko a
e al., 2023; P ochazko a & Micak, 2023). In a business en i onmen , being e hical means
applying he p inciples o hones y and jus ice in ela ionships wi h s akeholde s (Pizzi e al.,
2020) wi h a di ec impac on SMEs’ sus ainabili y (Huang e al., 2022).
Hocke s and Sea cy (2023) published a icle wi h he aim o be e unde s anding o
ela ionships be ween co po a e sus ainabili y and business e hics o e esea che s. Au ho s
p esen ed keys aspec s o ou pu s om empi ical esea ch – o spu inno a i e hinking and
cons uc i e discussion o he ela ionships be ween business e hics and co po a e sus ain-
abili y.
Kha ak e al. (2023) showed esea ch esul s om business en i onmen o SME segmen
o Pakis an ( esea ch sample is 611 SMEs). The manage age and i m age do no mode a e
he nexus be ween inancial esou ces and sus ainabili y pe o mance. In his con ex , au ho s
also ound, ha connec ion be ween inancial esou ces and sus ainabili y pe o mance is
signi ican . Au ho s ecommends SMEs o ocus on expe ienced and educa ed manage s as
compa ed o olde ones o u ilize hei inancial esou ces e icien ly in sus ainable ac i i ies.
H4: Applying e hics in business has a posi i e e ec on he sus ainabili y o SMEs.
In hei empi ical esea ch om he business en i onmen o V4 na ions, Belas e al. (2021)
disco e ed ha awa eness o he CSR concep and i s applica ion in business play a c ucial
ole in he business sus ainabili y o SMEs. Skypalo a e al. (2016) examined ha engagemen
o o ganiza ions in he CSR ac i i ies g ow hs wi h he size o he o ganiza ion. Au ho s also
ound ha only 30% o mic o and small en e p ises in he Czech Republic know and make use
o he CSR concep comp ehensi ely and a e ac i e in all h ee pilla s o CSR. Bu as Mag izos
e al. (2021) poin ed ou , he e is s ill li le e idence abou he impac o CSR on SMEs. A his
poin , we conside impo an o emphasise ha CSR and sus ainabili y a e no synonymous.
Acco ding o O iz-Ma inez e al. (2023), we migh de ine CSR as he mic oeconomic pa o
he la ge mac oeconomic idea o sus ainabili y, so CSR is pe cei ed as a ool o sus ainabili y.
Be ako a e al. (2023) ound ha demog aphics cha ac e is ics as ia age, le el o educa ion
o business sec o s play kay ole in CSR implemen a ion.
Skypalo a e al. (2023) ealised empi ical esea ch on he 360 Slo ak and Czech en e -
p ises. Thei indings indica e ha exis di e ences among he wo coun ies in he imple-
men a ion o CSR. Au ho s also ound ha CSR implemen a ion had s onge e ec on he
sus ainabili y o SMEs in Czech en e p ises han Slo ak en e p ises.

230 K. Z a iko a e al. Model o sus ainabili y o SMEs in V4 coun ies
D o ský e al. (2023a) on he base o case s udy o 1,090 SMEs om he business en i-
onmen Viseg ad g oup coun ies showed ha did no con i m he nega i e e ec s o c isis
e en s in business on he inancial managemen , bu le el o implemen a ion CSR is signi i-
can in he con ex o co po a e sus ainabili y.
H5: Co po a e social esponsibili y has a posi i e e ec on he sus ainabili y o SMEs.
The p esen ime is cha ac e ized by a la ge amoun o da a ha p o ides in o ma ion
suppo ing decision-making p ocesses (El-Kassa & Singh, 2019) wi h adequa e digi al com-
pe encies (O ensalo e al., 2022). The Fede al Minis y o Economic A ai s and Ene gy (2018)
de ines digi alisa ion as “ he ans o ma ion o business models due o undamen al changes
in basic in e nal p ocesses, in e aces wi h cus ome s, p oduc s and se ices, as well as he
use o in o ma ion and communica ion echnologies.” On he o he hand, some esea che s,
e.g., an de Velden (2018), poin ou he con adic ion wi h he posi i e e ec s o digi alis-
ing businesses on en i onmen al sus ainabili y. The ad e se e ec s o widesp ead usage o
digi al echnology necessi a e a sus ainable digi alisa ion p ocess since hey include, e.g.,
g eenhouse gas emissions, high low o elec onic was e, e c.
A ela e al. (2024) ealised s udy wi h he da a om he Flash Eu oba ome e 486 ga h-
e ed h ough in e iews wi h 16.365 SMEs in he EU27 and 12 non-EU coun ies. The indings
show ha mos en ep eneu s do no exp ess in e es in a p o-g ow h agenda, which limi s
he each o p o-en ep eneu ship and p o-inno a ion discou se. Fu he mo e, i ms’ you h
a ec sus ainabili y, no inno a ion and digi aliza ion dynamics.
B occa do e al. (2023) ealised ques ionnai e su ey om I alian business en i onmen
wi h esea ch sample o 353 I alian i ms. Thei indings e eal a signi ican ela ionship be-
ween digi aliza ion, sus ainabili y, and p o i abili y pe o mance and ha when posi i e
esul s a e achie ed unde he en i onmen al and social lens, economic pe o mance also
imp o es.
H6: Digi iza ion o companies has a posi i e e ec on he sus ainabili y o SMEs.
3. Me hodology
The esea ch aimed o c ea e a comp ehensi e model o he sus ainabili y o SMEs in he V4
coun ies based on de ined ac o s.
3.1. Resea ch design
The comp ehensi e SME sus ainabili y model was buil based on obus empi ical esea ch
conduc ed in he Viseg ad Fou coun ies (Czech Republic (CR), Slo ak Republic (SR), Poland
(PL), and Hunga y (HU)) in June 2022.
The da a collec ion was ca ied ou by he enowned ex e nal company MNFORCE using
“Compu e Assis ed Web In e iewing” (CAWI Resea ch Me hod). Ma ke esea ch agency
MNFORCE is specialis o empi ical da a collec ion om V4 coun ies. They pay g ea a -
en ion o he quali y con ol o da a and ou pu s, while complying wi h ESOMAR quali y
s anda ds.
The da a collec ion c i e ia gi en o he ex e nal company be o e he ac ual da a collec ion
we e as ollows: i. he numbe o mic o-en e p ises in he sample se was wice he ange o
small and medium-sized en e p ises; ii. acco ding o selec ed demog aphic c i e ia, selec ed
Jou nal o Business Economics and Managemen , 2024, 25(2), 226–245 231
g oups o esponden s we e ep esen ed p opo ionally o he p opo ional ep esen a ion
in he p ima y se o esponden s in he selec ed coun y. Only he owne o op manage o
an SME pa icipa ed in he esea ch.
The inal sample se o SMEs (n = 1398 esponden s) did no show signi ican de ia ions
om he da a collec ion c i e ia de ined by he a icle’s au ho s. The ques ionnai e con ained
52 ques ions. The ques ionnai e consis ed o he ollowing pa s: demog aphic ques ions,
selec ed ac o s and s a emen s o mula ed abou hem. The esponden could answe he
s a emen s wi h only one o he ollowing answe s: I comple ely ag ee wi h he s a emen
( alue = 1), ..., I comple ely disag ee wi h he s a emen ( alue = 5). All s a emen s examined
we e iden ically scaled. The analysis o he size o he sample se con i med ha he ange
o SMEs in he numbe o 1398 esponden s mo e han doubled he minimum numbe o
SMEs (n = 684), which is imposed on he size o he sample se in V4 and he applica ion o
he SEM me hod.
3.2. Ques ionnai e – ac o s and i ems de ini ion
The ollowing ac o s (la en a iables) we e de ined in he esea ch: human esou ce man-
agemen (HRM), business e hics (BE), co po a e social esponsibili y (CSR), digi alisa ion o
companies (DG), en i onmen al aspec s (EA), inancial managemen (FM), sus ainabili y o
SMEs (S). Table 1 con ains de ined s a emen s (mani es a iables) o selec ed ac o s.
Table 1. Claims o de ined ac o s and o he sus ainabili y o SMEs
HRM Human Resou ces Managemen
HRM1 People a e he mos impo an o ganiza ion asse s.
HRM2 Human esou ces managemen is he mos impo an a ea o co po a e managemen .
HRM3 I egula ly e alua e he pe o mance o my subo dina es and mo i a e hem o inno a e
hei wo k p ocedu es.
HRM4 I apply a pa icipa i e managemen s yle (I encou age employee pa icipa ion in decision-
making).
HRM5 I de o e a lo o ime o pe sonnel managemen in my managemen wo k.
HRM6 I hea ily in es in imp o ing he quali ica ions o ou employees.
HRM7 I ha e de eloped a sys em o ma e ial in ol emen o employees.
BE Business e hics
BE1 I conside business e hics o be necessa y.
BE2 In managing a company, I conside he e hical implica ions o my decisions.
BE3 E hical beha iou has a posi i e e ec on he company’s pe o mance.
BE4 I eel good when I beha e e hically in business.
BE5 Ou company en o ces he ules o e hical beha iou in business.
CSR Co po a e Social Responsibili y
CSR1 I know he concep o co po a e social esponsibili y (CSR).
CSR2 When managing a company, I conside he concep o CSR.
CSR3 Implemen a ion o he CSR concep enables ou company o gain compe i i e ad an ages
(be e company image, highe cus ome loyal y, new business oppo uni ies, e c.).
CSR4 The implemen a ion o he CSR concep has a posi i e e ec on he long- e m ela ionship
wi h business pa ne s.
CSR5 CSR helps us o gain new cus ome s.
232 K. Z a iko a e al. Model o sus ainabili y o SMEs in V4 coun ies
CSR6 CSR helps us o gain g ea employees.
CSR7 CSR helps us o gain loyal and mo i a ed employees.
CSR8 CSR has a posi i e e ec on a company’s pe o mance.
EA En i onmen aspec
EA1 En i onmen al esponsibili y is an impo an pa o co po a e go e nance.
EA2 When managing a company, I conside esponsibili y o he en i onmen .
EA3 En i onmen al esponsibili y b ings highe cos s o he company.
EA4 Ou company is ac i ely in ol ed in en i onmen al p o ec ion.
FM Financial managemen
FM1 I unde s and he mos c i ical aspec o a company’s inancial managemen .
FM2 I conside he inancial isk o be a pa o he daily li e o a company.
FM3 I can adequa ely manage inancial isks in ou company.
FM4 I e alua e he inancial pe o mance o ou company posi i ely.
FM5 Ou company will su i e on he ma ke in he nex i e yea s.
DG Digi aliza ion
DG1 I posi i ely e alua e ou company’s digi iza ion le el (use o digi al echnologies).
DG2 Digi aliza ion imp o es cus ome pe cep ion o ou company.
DG3 Digi iza ion allows us o inno a e ou business models.
DG4 Digi iza ion allows us o gain knowledge om new sou ces and hus mi iga e he isks.
S Sus ainabili y
S1 I unde s and he concep o sus ainable business g ow h.
S2 Sus ainable g ow h should pu sue no only he economic in e es s o he companies bu
also he posi i e impac on he social sys em and en i onmen al aspec s.
S3 I is essen ial o pe cei e also he social impac o en ep eneu ship.
S4 I is essen ial o pe cei e also he en i onmen al impac s o en ep eneu ship.
S5 I e alua e ou company as sus ainable.
3.3. S a is ical hypo heses and es ima ion echniques
To ul il he main goal o he a icle, s a is ical hypo heses (H1, ..., H6) we e e i ied using s a-
is ical me hods h ough ac o analysis (FA) and s uc u al equa ion modelling (SEM). FA is a
mul i a ia e me hod ha is no p ima ily in ended o ind ela ionships be ween a iables bu
o classi y claims o a ac o (Zhang & B owne, 2012). FA aims o de e mine whe he a iables
a e simila in he selec ed mani es a iables. The simila i y in he sample da a se means he
simila i y o he choice o a i udes o en ep eneu s o he selec ed s a emen s. I he answe s
o he selec ed s a emen s a e simila , hen we can combine hem and y o name he gi en
g oup o a iables (call hem a ac o ). Applying he FA explo a o y echnique can be logically
o ganised in o h ee s eps. The i s s ep: e i ying he sui abili y o he da a – o see i he
a iables a e su icien ly co ela ed so ha i makes sense o look o mo e gene al ac o s
behind hei s uc u e (Kaise -Meye -Olkin es , Ba le ’s es ). I he alue o KMO is lowe
han 0.5, i makes no sense o pe o m ac o analysis (Hai e al., 2012). Second s ep: ac o
ex ac ion – P incipal componen analysis, ma ix o componen s; BIC – Schwa z’s Bayesian
in o ma ion c i e ion; Sc ee plo ) (Rose e al., 1991). Thi d s ep: o a ion o ac o s – choice
o me hod, in e p e a ion o ac o loadings (Va imax – o hogonal o a ion) (Ne els, 1986).
End o Table 1
Jou nal o Business Economics and Managemen , 2024, 25(2), 226–245 233
The SEM me hod is sui able o cons uc ing, iden i ying and quan i ying ela ionships
be ween la en a iables and hei g aphical ep esen a ion using a s uc u al ( inal) model.
The inal model is a combina ion o eg ession and ac o analysis, he esul o which is he
eg ession o la en a iables (e.g., Jann, 2014). The SEM me hod is a me hod o mul i a ia e
s a is ics sui able o e alua ing esea ch aimed a examining esponden s’ a i udes in he
economic and psychological sphe es (Sa s ed e al., 2022; Bo iso & Vinog ado , 2022). The
sui abili y o he inal model can be e i ied by selec ed measu es (p ocessed acco ding o
Hai e al., 2012): Goodness o Fi (GFI); CMIN/DF – The minimum disc epancy; Compa a i e
Fi Index (CFI); Roo Mean Squa e E o o App oxima ion (RMSEA); No med i index (NFI).
The esul s we e ou pu ed om he IBM SPSS S a is ics so wa e. G aphical isualisa ion o
ela ionships was c ea ed in IBM SPSS Amos.
3.4. S uc u e o esponden s
S uc u e o SMEs (n = 1398) acco ding o: coun y o ope a ion o he company: 347 (24.8%)
SMEs om Czech epublic (CR); 322 (23.0%) SMEs om Slo ak epublic; 381 (28.1%) SMEs
om Poland (PL) and 348 (24.9%) SMEs om Hunga y (H); size o he en e p ise (numbe
o employees): 678 (48.5%) – mic oen e p ise (0–9 employees), 347 (28.4%) – small en e -
p ise (10–49 employees), 323 (23.1%) – medium-sized en e p ise (mo e han 49 employees);
business sec o : 368 (26.3%) – se ices, 264 (18.9%) – ade, 226 (16.2%) – p oduc ion, 112
(8.0%) – cons uc ion, 46 (3.3%) – ag icul u e, 54 (3.9%) – anspo , 226 (16.2%) – ou ism,
102 (7.3%) – o he ield o business; ime o ope a ion o he en e p ise in business: 370
(26.5%) – en e p ise up o 3 yea s, 550 (39.3%) – en e p ises mo e han 3 and up o 10 yea s,
478 (34.2%) en e p ises mo e han 10 yea s; loca ion o business: 410 (29.3%) – capi al o he
coun y, 988 (70.9%) – o he egion o business.
4. Resul s
Basic desc ip i e cha ac e is ics (M – Mean; SD – S anda d De ia ion; Skw. – Skewness; K –
Ku osis) o he in es iga ed independen ac o s (HRM, CSR, BE, FM, EA, DG) and he de-
penden ac o (S) oge he wi h he esul s o he links be ween he s a emen and o he
ac o (CI-TC – Co ec ed I em –To al Co ela ion) a e he subjec o Table 2.
Resul s (see Table 2) show ha he esponden s’ mos signi ican deg ee o ag eemen
is wi h he impo ance and implemen a ion o business e hics (BE (M: BE1+…+BE5)/5; M =
1.643). On he con a y, he smalles deg ee o ag eemen o he esponden s in he assess-
men o applica ion and unde s anding o social esponsibili y (M: CSR (CSR1+...+CSR8)/8;
M = 2.114). Also, he mos signi ican in e nal consis ency o he esponden s’ e alua ions
o he indica o s is o he BE ac o (SD = 0.957), and he smalles in e nal consis ency o
he esponden s’ e alua ions o he indica o s is o he CSR ac o (SD = 0.720). Co ela ions
be ween indica o s and de ined ac o s showed good links (CI-TC ≥ 0.5; Hai e al., 2012). The
alues o skewness and ku osis (Skw., K ≤ 2.0; excep o BE5: S = 2.099) indica e mul iple
no mal dis ibu ions, which con i ms he assump ion o applying SEM modelling.
The esul s o he KMO es and Ba le ’s sphe ici y es a e he subjec s o Table 3.
The KMO es (see Table 3) con i med ha he de ined ac o s explain he sha e o he
o al a iance dis ibu ion o indi idual a iables in he backg ound (KMO es = 0.965; a
alue close o 1.000). Ba le ’s es con i med ha he ac o s a e o hogonal o each o he
(i.e., hey a e no co ela ed).
240 K. Z a iko a e al. Model o sus ainabili y o SMEs in V4 coun ies
Acknowledgemen s
This esea ch was inancially suppo ed by he G an Agency Academia Au ea – G an
No. GAAA/2022/5: Impac o CSR concep implemen a ion in small and medium-sized en-
e p ises in he egion V4. The esea ch was suppo ed by he Scien i ic G an Agency o he
Minis y o Educa ion, Science, Resea ch, and Spo o he Slo ak Republic and he Slo ak
Academy o Sciences (VEGA), p ojec No 1/0364/22: Resea ch on eco-inno a ion po en ial o
SMEs in he con ex o sus ainable de elopmen .
In o med consen s a emen
In o med consen was ob ained om all subjec s in ol ed in he s udy.
Da a a ailabili y
Da a sha ing no applicable.
Con lic o in e es
The au ho s decla e no con lic o in e es .
Re e ences
Abdul-Rashid, S. H., Sakunda ini, N., Ghazilla, R. A. R., & Thu asamy, R. (2017). The impac o sus ainable
manu ac u ing p ac ices on sus ainabili y pe o mance: Empi ical e idence om Malaysia. In e na ional
Jou nal o Ope a ions & P oduc ion Managemen , 37(2), 182–204.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/IJOPM-04-2015-0223
Adda, G., Bosco Azigwe, J., & Awuni, A. R. (2016). Business e hics and co po a e social esponsibili y
o business success and g ow h. Eu opean Jou nal o Business and Inno a ion Resea ch, 4(6), 26–42.
Ahmad, N., Ullah, Z., AlDhaen, E., Han, H., & Scholz, M. (2022). A CSR pe spec i e o os e employee
c ea i i y in he banking sec o : The ole o wo k engagemen and psychological sa e y. Jou nal o
Re ailing and Consume Se ices, 67, A icle 102968. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.j e conse .2022.102968
Ahmed, R. R., S eimikiene, D., & Zheng, X. (2021). The impac o p oac i e en i onmen al s a egy on
compe i i e and sus ainable de elopmen o o ganiza ions. Jou nal o Compe i i eness, 13(4), 5–24.
h ps://doi.o g/10.7441/joc.2021.04.01
Alhou i, S., W igh , S. A., & Bake , T. L. (2021). Cus ome s need o ela e: The condi ional wa m glow e ec
o CSR on nega i e cus ome expe iences. Jou nal o Business Resea ch, 124, 240–253.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jbus es.2020.11.047
Alonso-Almeida, M. D., Bagu -Femenias, L., Llach, J., & Pe amon, J. (2018). Sus ainabili y in small ou is
businesses: The link be ween ini ia i es and pe o mance. Cu en Issues Tou ism, 21(1), 1–20.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/13683500.2015.1066764
Amoah, J., Jib il, A. B., Luki, B. N., Odei, M. A., & Yawson, C. (2021). Ba ie s o SMEs’ sus ainabili y in Sub-
Saha an A ica: A PLS-SEM app oach. In e na ional Jou nal o En ep eneu ial Knowledge, 9(1), 10–24.
h ps://doi.o g/10.37335/ijek. 9i1.129
A ela , S., Bo ges-Tiago, T., Almeida, A., & Tiago, F. (2024). Con luence o sus ainable en ep eneu ship,
inno a ion, and digi aliza ion in SMEs. Jou nal o Business Resea ch, 170, A icle 114346.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jbus es.2023.114346
Belas, J., & Rahman, A. (2023). Financial managemen o he company. A e he e di e ences o opinion
be ween owne s and manage s in he SME segmen ? Jou nal o Business Sec o s, 1(1), 1–9.
h ps://doi.o g/10.62222/UQAH6943

Jou nal o Business Economics and Managemen , 2024, 25(2), 226–245 241
Belas, J., Çe a, G., D o sky, J., & Cepel, M. (2021). Co po a e social esponsibili y and sus ainabili y issues
o small- and medium-sized en e p ises. Co po a e Social Responsibili y and En i onmen al Manage-
men , 28(2), 721–730. h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/cs .2083
Belas, J. J ., Z a iko a, K., Ma ousek, J., & Me zke , Z. (2021). The pe cep ion o signi ican aspec s o
pe sonnel isk in he managemen o SMEs. Ekonomicko-manaze ske spek um, 15(2), 1–12.
h ps://doi.o g/10.26552/ems.2021.2.1-12
Be ako a, J., Pie zak, M. B., & Iglinski, B. (2023). E ec o demog aphic cha ac e is ics o en e p ises on
he implemen a ion o co po a e social esponsibili y in SMEs con ex . Jou nal o Business Sec o s, 1(1),
53–62. h ps://doi.o g/10.62222/XQKO8567
Bo iso , I., & Vinog ado , S. (2022). Inclusi eness as a key de e minan o wo k engagemen : E idence
om V4 coun ies. Equilib ium. Qua e ly Jou nal o Economics and Economic Policy, 17(4), 1015–1050.
h ps://doi.o g/10.24136/eq.2022.034
B iege , S. A., Ande e , S., F öhlich, A., Ba o, A., & Meynha d , T. (2020). Too much o a good hing? On he
ela ionship be ween CSR and employee wo k addic ion. Jou nal o Business E hics, 166(2), 311–329.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s10551-019-04141-8
B occa do, L., T uan , E., & Dana, L.-P. (2023). The in e link be ween digi aliza ion, sus ainabili y, and
pe o mance: An I alian con ex . Jou nal o Business Resea ch, 158, A icle 113621.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jbus es.2022.113621
Buyukozkan, G., & Ka abulu , Y. (2018). Sus ainabili y pe o mance e alua ion: Li e a u e e iew and u u e
di ec ions. Jou nal o En i onmen al Managemen , 217, 253–267.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jen man.2018.03.064
Ca oll, A. B. (2016). Ca oll’s py amid o CSR: Taking ano he look. In e na ional Jou nal o Co po a e
Social Responsibili y, 1(1), 1–8. h ps://doi.o g/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6
Ca ajal, M., & Nadeem, M. (2022). Financially ma e ial sus ainabili y epo ing and i m pe o mance in
New Zealand. Medi a i Accoun ancy Resea ch. h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/MEDAR-06-2021-1346
Cepel, M. (2019). Social and cul u al ac o s and hei impac on he quali y o business en i onmen in
he SME segmen . In e na ional Jou nal o En ep eneu ial Knowledge, 7(1), 65–73.
h ps://doi.o g/10.2478/ijek-2019-0005
Cha zis amoulou, N., & Tyllianakis, E. (2022). G een g ow h & sus ainabili y ansi ion h ough in o ma-
ion. A e he g eene be e in o med? E idence om Eu opean SMEs. Jou nal o En i onmen al Man-
agemen , 306, A icle 114457. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jen man.2022.114457
Cheng, Y. H., Chang, K. C., Cheng, Y. S., & Hsiao, C. J. (2022). How g een ma ke ing in luences cus ome s’
g een beha io al in en ions in he con ex o ho -sp ing ho els. Jou nal o Tou ism and Se ices, 13(24),
190–208. h ps://doi.o g/10.29036/jo s. 13i24.352
Dabija, D. C., Câmpian, V., Pop, A.-R., & Băbuț, R. (2022). Gene a ing loyal y owa ds as ashion s o es: A
c oss-gene a ional app oach based on s o e a ibu es and socio-en i onmen al esponsibili y. Oeco-
nomia Cope nicana, 13(3), 891–934. h ps://doi.o g/10.24136/oc.2022.026
Dadhich, M., & Kan Hi an, K. (2022). Empi ical in es iga ion o ex ended TOE model on Co po a e En-
i onmen Sus ainabili y and dimensions o ope a ing pe o mance o SMEs: A high o de PLS-ANN
app oach. Jou nal o Cleane P oduc ion, 363, A icle 132309.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jclep o.2022.132309
Didenko, I., Valasko a, K., A yukho , A., Lyeono , S., & Vasa, L. (2022). Quali y o scien i ic ac i i y as a
de e minan o socio-economic de elopmen . Economics and Sociology, 15(3), 301–318.
h ps://doi.o g/10.14254/2071-789X.2022/15-3/17
Du, S., Yu, K., Bha acha ya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2017). The business case o sus ainabili y epo ing: E idence
om s ock ma ke eac ions. Jou nal o Public Policy & Ma ke ing, 36(2), 313–330.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1509/jppm.16.112
D o ský, J., Š ihlíko á, I., Kozubíko á, L., F aj o a Michalíko á, K., & Balce zak, A. P. (2023a). E ec o CSR
implemen a ion and c isis e en s in business on he inancial managemen o SMEs. Technological
and Economic De elopmen o Economy, 29(5), 1496–1519. h ps://doi.o g/10.3846/ ede.2023.19821
242 K. Z a iko a e al. Model o sus ainabili y o SMEs in V4 coun ies
D o ský, J., Bedna z, J., & Blaje -Gołębiewska, A. (2023b). The impac o co po a e epu a ion and social
media engagemen on he sus ainabili y o SMEs: Pe cep ions o op manage s and he owne s. Equi-
lib ium. Qua e ly Jou nal o Economics and Economic Policy, 18(3), 779–811.
h ps://doi.o g/10.24136/eq.2023.025
El-Kassa , A. N., & Singh, S. K. (2019). G een inno a ion and o ganiza ional pe o mance: The in luence
o big da a and he mode a ing ole o managemen commi men and HR p ac ices. Technological
Fo ecas ing and Social Change, 144, 483–498. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j. ech o e.2017.12.016
Elking on, J. (1994). Towa ds he sus ainable co po a ion: Win-win-win business s a egies o sus ain-
able de elopmen . Cali o nia Managemen Re iew, 36(2), 90–100. h ps://doi.o g/10.2307/41165746
Fede al Minis y o Economic A ai s and Ene gy. (2018). DIGITAL Economy – Moni o ing Repo 2018.
h ps://www.bmwk.de/Redak ion/EN/Publika ionen/moni o ing- epo -digi al-economy-2018.pd ?__
blob=publica ionFile& =2
Flamme , C. (2015). Does co po a e social esponsibili y lead o supe io inancial pe o mance? A eg es-
sion discon inui y app oach. Managemen Science, 61(11), 2549–2568.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2038
Flamme , C., & Luo, J. (2017). Co po a e social esponsibili y as an employee go e nance ool: E idence
om a quasi-expe imen . S a egic Managemen Jou nal, 38(2), 163–183.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/smj.2492
F anco, M., & Rod igues, M. (2022). Role o human esou ces o SME sus ainabili y: Wha he li e a u e
says and wha we can expec o he u u e. The impo ance o sus ainabili y p ac ices is SMEs. Re is a
de Adminis açao de Emp esas, 62(5), 1–7. h ps://doi.o g/10.1590/s0034-759020220512x
Gaio, C., Goncal es, T., & Sousa, M. V. (2022). Does co po a e social esponsibili y mi iga e ea nings
managemen ? Managemen Decision, 60(11), 2972–2989. h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/MD-05-2021-0719
G ewal, J., Haup mann, C., & Se a eim, G. (2021). Ma e ial sus ainabili y in o ma ion and s ock p ice in-
o ma i eness. Jou nal o Business E hics, 171, 513–544. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s10551-020-04451-2
Habek, P. (2017). CSR epo ing p ac ices in Viseg ad G oup coun ies and he quali y o disclosu e.
Sus ainabili y, 9(12), A icle 2322. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/su9122322
Hai , J. F., Sa s ed , M., Piepe , T. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2012). The use o pa ial leas squa es s uc u al
equa ion modeling in s a egic managemen esea ch: A e iew o pas p ac ices and ecommenda-
ions o u u e applica ions. Long Range Planning, 45(5–6), 320–340.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.l p.2012.09.008
Hocke s K., & Sea cy, C. (2023). How o sha pen ou discou se on co po a e sus ainabili y and business
e hics – a iew om he sec ion edi o s. Jou nal o Business E hics, 187(2), 225–235.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s10551-023-05386-0
Huang, X., Chau, K. Y, Tang, Y. M., & Igbal, W. (2022): Business e hics and i a ionali y in SME du ing
COVID-19: Does i impac on sus ainable business esilience? F on ie s in En i onmen al Science, 10,
A icle 870476. h ps://doi.o g/10.3389/ en s.2022.870476
Isensee, C., Teu ebe g, F., G iese, K. M., & Topi, C. (2020). The ela ionship be ween o ganiza ional cul u e,
sus ainabili y, and digi aliza ion in SMEs: A sys ema ic e iew. Jou nal o Cleane P oduc ion, 275,
A icle 122944. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jclep o.2020.122944
Jann, B. (2014). Plo ing eg ession coe icien s and o he es ima es. S a a Jou nal, 14(4), 708–737.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/1536867X1401400402
Jansson, J., Nilsson, J., Modig, F., & Hed Vall, G. (2017). Commi men o sus ainabili y in small and me-
dium sized en e p ises: The in luence o s a egic. Business S a egy and he En i onmen , 26(1), 69–83.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/bse.1901
Jaya a hna, C. P., Agdas, D., Dawes, L., & Miska, M. (2022). Explo ing sec o -speci ic sus ainabili y indica-
o s: A con en analysis o sus ainabili y epo s in he logis ics sec o . Eu opean Business Re iew, 34(3),
321–343. h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/EBR-02-2021-0047
Kalino a, E., & Kos ecko a, D. (2022). E ec i eness o jus -in- ime p inciple in oday´s ci cula economy
and i s nega i e e ec . Socialno-Ekonomicka Re ue, 1, 35–42.
Khan, K. A., Akh a , M. A., Vishwaka ma, R., K., & Hoang, H. C. (2023). A sec o al pe spec i e on he
sus ainable g ow h o SMEs. Empi ical esea ch in he V4 coun ies. Jou nal o Business Sec o s, 1(1),
10–19. h ps://doi.o g/10.62222/CVFW6962
Jou nal o Business Economics and Managemen , 2024, 25(2), 226–245 243
Kha ak, M. S., Wu, Q., & Ahmad, M. Q. (2023). In luence o inancial esou ces on sus ainabili y pe -
o mance o SMEs in eme ging economy: The ole o manage ial and i m le el a ibu es. Business
S a egy and De elopmen , 6(4), 669–683. h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/bsd2.270
Kiba-Janiak, M., Cheba, K., Mucowska, M., & de Oli ei a, L. K. (2022). Segmen a ion o e-cus ome s in
e ms o sus ainable las -mile deli e y. Oeconomia Cope nicana, 13(4), 1117–1142.
h ps://doi.o g/10.24136/oc.2022.032
Klies ik, T., Nagy, M., & Valasko a, K. (2023). Global alue chains and Indus y 4.0 in he con ex o lean
wo kplaces o enhancing company pe o mance and i s comp ehension ia he digi al eadiness and
expe ise o wo k o ce in he V4 na ions. Ma hema ics, 11(3), A icle 601.
h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/ma h11030601
Kozubiko a, L., Belas, J., Kljucniko , A., & Vi gle o a, Z. (2015). Di e ences in app oach o selec ed con-
s uc s o en ep eneu ail o ien a ion in SME segmen ega ding he selec ed socio-demog aphic
ac o s. T ans o ma ion in Business and Economic, 14(3C-36C), 333–355.
Lashley, C. (2016). Business e hics and sus ainabili y. Resea ch in Hospi ali y Managemen , 6(1), 1–7.
h ps://doi.o g/10.2989/RHM.2016.6.1.1.1289
León-Gómez, A., San os-Jaén, J. M., Ruiz-Palomo, D., & Palacios-Manzano, M. (2022). Disen angling he
impac o ICT adop ion on SMEs pe o mance: The media ing oles o co po a e social esponsibili y
and inno a ion. Oeconomia Cope nicana, 13(3), 831–866. h ps://doi.o g/10.24136/oc.2022.024
Lopez-To es, G. C. (2022). The impac o SMEs’ sus ainabili y on compe i i eness. Measu ing Business
Excellence, 27(1), 107–120. h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/MBE-12-2021-0144
Lu, J., Rodenbu g, K., Fo i, L., & Pego a o, A. (2022). A e i ms wi h be e sus ainabili y pe o mance mo e
esilien du ing c ises? Business S a egy and he En i onmen , 31(7), 3354–3370.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/bse.3088
Maslak, O., Yako enko, Y., Pi ogo , D., G ishko, N., & Poch o iuk, K. (2022). Digi aliza ion o he social
sphe e o Uk aine: Use o specialized so wa e based on sys ems hinking. Auspicia, 2022(2), 34-41.
h ps://doi.o g/10.36682/a_2022_2_3
Mag izos, S., Apospo i, E., Ca igan, M., & Jones, R. (2021). Is CSR he panacea o SMEs? A s udy o
socially esponsible SMEs du ing economic c isis. Eu opean Managemen Jou nal, 39(2), 291–303.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.emj.2020.06.002
Me zke , Z., & Z a iko a, K. (2021). The pe cep ion o company employees by SMEs wi h CSR concep
implemen a ion. In e na ional Jou nal o En ep eneu ial Knowledge, 9(1), 81–96.
h ps://doi.o g/10.37335/ijek. 9i1.128
Me zke , Z., Ma ousek, J., Z a iko a, K., & Hlawiczka, R. (2021). The pe cep ion o SMEs bank up cy con-
ce ning CSR implemen a ion. In e na ional Jou nal o En ep eneu ial Knowledge, 9(2), 85–95.
h ps://doi.o g/10.37335/ijek. 9i2.146
Michalko a, L., Ko aco a, M., Cepel, M., & Belas, J. (2022). Insol ency p edic ion and co po a e bank u -
pcy model in Viseg ad g oup coun ies. T ans o ma ions in Business & Economics, 21(2A), 529–548.
Mi chell, I. K., & Walinga, J. (2017). The c ea i e impe a i e: The ole o c ea i i y, c ea i e p oblem sol -
ing and insigh as key d i e s o sus ainabili y. Jou nal o Cleane P oduc ion, 140(Pa 3), 1872–1884.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jclep o.2016.09.162
Moisescu, O.-I., & Gica, O.-A. (2020). The impac o en i onmen al and social esponsibili y on cus ome
loyali y: A mul ig oup analysis among gene a ions X and Y. In e na ional Jou nal o En i onmen al
Resea ch and Public Heal h, 17(18), A icle 6466. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/ije ph17186466
Nagypal, N. C. (2014). Co po a e social esponsibili y o Hunga ian SMEs wi h good en i onmen al p ac-
ices. Jou nal o Eas Eu opean Managemen S udies, 19(3), 327–347.
h ps://doi.o g/10.5771/0949-6181-2014-3-327
Ne els, K. (1986). A di ec solu ion o pai wise o a ions in Kaise ’s a imax me hod. Psychome ika, 51(2),
327–329. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/BF02293988
Ok ęglicka, K., & Pichugina, M. (2021). Selec ed elemen s o change managemen and business pe o -
mance o mic oen e p ises. Socialno-Ekonomicka Re ue, 19(1), 38–45.
h ps://doi.o g/10.52665/se 20210104
244 K. Z a iko a e al. Model o sus ainabili y o SMEs in V4 coun ies
O ensalo, T., B ush, C., & Nikou, S. (2022). En ep eneu s’ in o ma ion-seeking beha io s in he digi al
age – A sys ema ic li e a u e e iew. Jou nal o Small Business Managemen .
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/00472778.2022.2100896
O iz-Ma inez, E., Ma ín-He nández, S., & San os-Jaén, J. (2023). Sus ainabili y, co po a e social espon-
sibili y, non- inancial epo ing and company pe o mance: Rela ionships and media ing e ec s in
Spanish small and medium sized en e p ises. Sus ainable P oduc ion and Consump ion, 35, 349–364.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.spc.2022.11.015
Palacios-Manzano, M., G as-Gil, E., & San os-Jaen, J. M. (2021). Co po a e social esponsibili y and i s
e ec on ea nings managemen : An empi ical esea ch on Spanish i ms. To al Quali y Managemen
and Business Excellence, 32(7–8), 921–937. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/14783363.2019.1652586
P is e , P., & Lehmann, C. (2022). Digi al alue c ea ion in Ge man SMEs – a e u n-on-in es men analy-
sis. Jou nal o Small Business and En ep eneu ship. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/08276331.2022.2037065
Pizzi, S., Capu o, F., & Ven u elli, A. (2020). Does i pay o be an hones en ep eneu ? Add essing he
ela ionship be ween sus ainable de elopmen and bank up cy isk. Co po a e Social Responsibili y and
En i onmen al Managemen , 27(3), 1478–1486. h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/cs .1901
P i a o a, M., Ma inco a, M., T no sky, K., & Haca , D. (2022). Labou mig a ion and ou ism lows: The
case o he EU. Jou nal o Tou ism and Se ices, 13(24), 271–289.
h ps://doi.o g/10.29036/jo s. 13i24.374
P ochazko a, K., & Micak, P. (2023). CEO gende and i s e ec on co po a e social esponsibili y and he
pe cep ion o business e hics. Ekonomicko-manaze ske spek um, 17(1), 29–38.
h ps://doi.o g/10.26552/ems.2023.1.29-38
P zychodzen, W., P zychodzen, J., & Le ne , D. A. (2016). C i ical ac o s o ans o ming c ea i i y in o sus-
ainabili y. Jou nal o Cleane P oduc ion, 135, 1514–1523. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jclep o.2016.04.102
Rose, V. S., Wood, J., & Mac ie, H. J. H. (1991). Single class disc imina ion using p incipal componen
analysis (SCD-PCA). Quan i a i e S uc u e-Ac i i y Rela ionships, 10(4), 359–368.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/qsa .19910100408
Rozsa, Z., Tupa, M., Belas J , J., Me zke , Z., & Sule , P. (2022). CSR concep ion and i s p ospec i e imple-
men a ion in he SMEs business o Viseg ad coun ies. T ans o ma ions in Business and Economics,
21(1), 274–289.
Sa s ed , M., Hai , J. F., Pick, M., Liengaa d, B. D., Radomi , L., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). P og ess in pa ial
leas squa es s uc u al equa ion modeling use in ma ke ing esea ch in he las decade. Psychology
and Ma ke ing, 39(5), 1035–1064. h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/ma .21640
Sch ode , S., Wiek, A., Fa ny, S, & Lu ha d , P. (2022) Towa d holis ic co po a e sus ainabili y –De elop-
ing employees’ ac ion compe ence o sus ainabili y in small and medium-sized en e p ises h ough
aining. Business S a egy and he En i onmen . h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/bse.3210
Sha iq, A., Johnson, F., Klassen, R. D., & Awaysheh, A. (2017). Explo ing he implica ions o supply isk
on sus ainabili y pe o mance. In e na ional Jou nal o Ope a ions & P oduc ion Managemen , 37(10),
1386–1407. h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/IJOPM-01-2016-0029
Sil es e, W. J., An unes, P., & Leal, W. F. (2018). The co po a e sus ainabili y ypology: Analysing sus ain-
abili y d i e s and os e ing sus ainabili y a en e p ises. Technological and Economic De elopmen o
Economy, 24(2), 1–21. h ps://doi.o g/10.3846/20294913.2016.1213199
Sil es e, W. J., Fonseca, A., & Mo ioka, S. N. (2022). S a egic sus ainabili y in eg a ion: Me ging man-
agemen ools o suppo business model decisions. Business S a egy and he En i onmen , 31(5),
2052–2067. h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/bse.3007
Skypalo a, R., Kozako a, J., U bano a, M., & Di Saba o, V. (2023). Co po a e social esponsibili y in busi-
ness p ac ices o mul ina ional companies: S udy o di e ences be ween Czech and Slo ak. Business
Managemen and Economics Enginee ing, 21(1), 106–123. h ps://doi.o g/10.3846/bmee.2023.18942
Skypalo a, R., Kuce o a, R., & Blasko a, V. (2016). De elopmen o he co po a e social esponsibili y
concep in small and medium-sized en e p ises. P ague Economic Pape s, 25(3), 287–303.
h ps://doi.o g/10.18267/j.pep.558
Jou nal o Business Economics and Managemen , 2024, 25(2), 226–245 245
So ibes, J., Celma, D., & Ma ínez-Ga cia, E. (2021). Sus ainable human esou ces managemen in c isis
con ex s: In e ac ion o socially esponsible labou p ac ices o he wellbeing o employees. Co po a e
Social Responsibili y and En i onmen al Managemen , 28(2), 936–952. h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/cs .2111
Sou o, J. E. (2022). O ganiza ional c ea i i y and sus ainabili y-o ien ed inno a ion as d i e s o sus ain-
able de elopmen : O e coming i ms’ economic, en i onmen al, and social sus ainabili y challenges.
Jou nal o Manu ac u ing Technology Managemen , 33(4), 805–826.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/JMTM-01-2021-0018
T unina, I., Bilyk, M., Yako enko, Y., & Lomonos, A. (2022). Resea ch on digi aliza ion p ocesses in Uk aine in
he con ex o pos -wa econs uc ion. Auspicia, 2022(2), 42-52. h ps://doi.o g/10.36682/a_2022_2_5
Valls Ma ínez, M. del C., So iano Román, R., & Ma ín-Ce an es, P. A. (2022). Should isk-a e se in es-
o s a ge he po olios o socially esponsible companies? Oeconomia Cope nicana, 13(2), 439–474.
h ps://doi.o g/10.24136/oc.2022.014
Van Bu en III, H. J. (2022). The alue o including employees: a plu alis pe spec i e on sus ainable HRM.
Employee Rela ions, 44(3), 686–701. h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/ER-01-2019-0041
an de Velden, M. (2018). Digi alisa ion and he UN Sus ainable De elopmen Goals: Wha ole o
design. In e ac ion Design and A chi ec u e(S), 37, 160–174. h ps://doi.o g/10.55612/s-5002-037-008
Vi ie , E. (2013). A ough line o wo k h ough’: E hical ambigui ies in a Sou h A ican SME. A ican Jou nal
o Business E hics, 7(2), 68–78. h ps://doi.o g/10.15249/7-2-42
Wije hilake, C., & Lama, T. (2019). Sus ainabili y co e alues and sus ainabili y isk managemen : Mod-
e a ing e ec s o op managemen commi men and s akeholde p essu e. Business S a egy and he
En i onmen , 28(1), 143–154. h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/bse.2245
Wong, D. T. W., & Ngai, E. W. T. (2021). Economic, o ganiza ional, and en i onmen al capabili ies o
business sus ainabili y compe ence: Findings om case s udies in he ashion business. Jou nal o
Business Resea ch, 126, 440–471. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jbus es.2020.12.060
Yasin, R., Huseyno a, A., & A i , M. (2022). G een human esou ce managemen , a ga eway o employe
b anding: Media ing ole o co po a e en i onmen al sus ainabili y and co po a e social sus ainabili y.
Co po a e Social Responsibili y and En i onmen al Managemen , 1–15. h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/cs .2360
Yumei, H., Iqbal, W., Nu unnabi, M., Abbas, M., Jingde, W., & Chaudh y, I. S. (2021). Nexus be ween co -
po a e social esponsibili y and i m’s pe cei ed pe o mance: E idence om SME sec o o de eloping
economies. En i onmen al Science and Pollu ion Resea ch In e na ional, 28(2), 2132–2145.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s11356-020-10415-w
Zhang, G., & B owne, M. W. (2009). Dynamic ac o analysis wi h o dinal mani es a iables. In S a is ical
me hods o modeling human dynamics: An in e disciplina y dialogue (pp. 241–264). Rou ledge.
h ps://doi.o g/10.4324/9780203864746
Zhang, Z. X. (2008). Asian ene gy and en i onmen al policy: P omo ing g ow h while p ese ing he en-
i onmen . Ene gy Policy, 36(10), 3905–3924. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.015
Z a iko a, K., Ba ino a, D., Belas, J., & Palcak, L. (2023). Empi ical esea ch on business e hics o SMEs in
he V4 coun ies. E hics & Bioe hics, 13(1–2), 51–53. h ps://doi.o g/10.2478/ebce-2023-0007