scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

The effect of predeformation on creep strength of 9% Cr steel

Abstract

Martensitic creep-resistant P92 steel was deformed by different methods of severe plastic deformation such as rotation swaging, high-pressure sliding, and high-pressure torsion at room temperature. These methods imposed significantly different equivalent plastic strains of about 1-30. It was found that rotation swaging led to formation of heterogeneous microstructures with elongated grains where low-angle grain boundaries predominated. Other methods led to formation of ultrafine-grained (UFG) microstructures with high frequency of high-angle grain boundaries. Constant load tensile creep tests at 873 K and initial stresses in the range of 50 to 300 MPa revealed that the specimens processed by rotation swaging exhibited one order of magnitude lower minimum creep rate compared to standard P92 steel. By contrast, UFG P92 steel is significantly softer than standard P92 steel, but differences in their strengths decrease with increasing stress. Microstructural results suggest that creep behavior of P92 steel processed by severe plastic deformation is influenced by the frequency of high-angle grain boundaries and grain coarsening during creep.

Read accessible full text

The effect of predeformation on creep strength of 9% Cr steel

Author: Král, Petr
Publisher: MDPI
Year: 2020
DOI: 10.3390/ma13235330
Source: https://dspace.vsb.cz/bitstreams/d015b154-ea0d-4104-a5bb-6fac3afe4c5a/download
ma e ials
A icle
The E ec o P ede o ma ion on C eep S eng h o
9% C S eel
Pe K ál1,* , Jiˇ íD oˇ ák1, Wol gang Blum 2, Václa Skleniˇcka 1, Zenji Ho i a 3,4,5,
Yoichi Takizawa 6, Yongpeng Tang 7, Lenka Kunˇcická1, Radim Kocich 8, Ma ie K apilo á1
and Ma ie S obodo á9
1Ins i u e o Physics o Ma e ials, Academy o Sciences o he Czech Republic,
Zizko a 22, 616 62 B no, Czech Republic; [email p o ec ed] (J.D.); [email p o ec ed] (V.S.);
[email p o ec ed] (L.K.); [email p o ec ed] (M.K.)
2Depa men o Ma e ials Science, Ins i u e I, Uni e si y o E langen-Nu embe g,
D-91058 E langen, Ge many; [email p o ec ed]
3Depa men o Ma e ials Science, Kyushu Ins i u e o Technology, Ki akyushu 804-8550, Japan;
[email p o ec ed]
4Magnesium Resea ch Cen e , Kumamo o Uni e si y, Kumamo o 860-8555, Japan
5Synch o on Ligh Applica ion Cen e , Saga Uni e si y, Saga 840-8502, Japan
6Technology Depa men , Nagano Fo ging Co., L d., Nagano 381-0003, Japan; [email p o ec ed]
7Wo ld P emie In e na ional Resea ch Ini ia i e,
In e na ional Ins i u e o Ca bon-Neu al Ene gy Resea ch (WPI-I2CNER), Kyushu Uni e si y,
Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan; [email p o ec ed]
8Facul y o Ma e ials Science and Technology, Technical Uni e si y o Os a a,
17. Lis opadu 15, 708 00 Os a a, Czech Republic; [email p o ec ed]
9UJP PRAHA a.s., 156 10 P aha-Zb asla , Czech Republic; [email p o ec ed]
*Co espondence: [email p o ec ed]
Recei ed: 2 No embe 2020; Accep ed: 23 No embe 2020; Published: 25 No embe 2020


Abs ac :
Ma ensi ic c eep- esis an P92 s eel was de o med by di e en me hods o se e e plas ic
de o ma ion such as o a ion swaging, high-p essu e sliding, and high-p essu e o sion a oom
empe a u e. These me hods imposed signi ican ly di e en equi alen plas ic s ains o abou
1–30. I was ound ha o a ion swaging led o o ma ion o he e ogeneous mic os uc u es wi h
elonga ed g ains whe e low-angle g ain bounda ies p edomina ed. O he me hods led o o ma ion
o ul a ine-g ained (UFG) mic os uc u es wi h high equency o high-angle g ain bounda ies.
Cons an load ensile c eep es s a 873 K and ini ial s esses in he ange o 50 o 300 MPa e ealed
ha he specimens p ocessed by o a ion swaging exhibi ed one o de o magni ude lowe minimum
c eep a e compa ed o s anda d P92 s eel. By con as , UFG P92 s eel is signi ican ly so e han
s anda d P92 s eel, bu di e ences in hei s eng hs dec ease wi h inc easing s ess. Mic os uc u al
esul s sugges ha c eep beha io o P92 s eel p ocessed by se e e plas ic de o ma ion is in luenced
by he equency o high-angle g ain bounda ies and g ain coa sening du ing c eep.
Keywo ds: c eep- esis an 9% C s eels; se e e plas ic de o ma ion; mic os uc u e
1. In oduc ion
Sligh p ede o ma ion (up o 0.2) o ma e ials can cause bo h imp o emen and de e io a ion o
c eep p ope ies [
1
]. In es iga ion o c eep beha io o p ede o med hea esis an aus eni ic s eels
e ealed ha he e ec o p ede o ma ion on c eep beha io depends on de o ma ion mode. I was
demons a ed ha p ede o ma ion in ension leads o imp o emen o c eep esis ance [
2
]. Howe e ,
he opposi e e ec was ound a e applica ion o comp ession p ede o ma ion [
1
]. De e io a ion o
Ma e ials 2020,13, 5330; doi:10.3390/ma13235330 www.mdpi.com/jou nal/ma e ials
Ma e ials 2020,13, 5330 2 o 17
c eep p ope ies was also obse ed in 2.25C –1Mo e i ic s eel p ocessed by ension p ede o ma ion a
873 K. Kikuchi and Ilschne [
3
] in es iga ed he e ec o 1% p ede o ma ion a di e en empe a u es
on c eep and e ealed ha he highe he p ede o ma ion empe a u e, he smalle he di e ence in
c eep esis ance wi h espec o he unde o med s a e.
Simila esul s we e ound in P92 s eel p ocessed by ho bending a 1193–1233 K and subsequen
c eep a 873 K. I was shown [
4
] ha ho bending caused insigni ican di e ences in c eep s eng h
alling wi hin a sca e band o he unben pipe. Howe e , insigni ican di e ences in c eep s eng h o
9% o C s eels we e obse ed a e cold bending [5].
F. Abe [
6
] in es iga ed c eep beha io o P91 s eel a 873 K and 78 MPa a e cold olling wi h
plas ic s ains o 0.2 and 0.4. I was ound ha ime o ac u e dec eases wi h inc easing cold
olling de o ma ion.
Cu en me hods o se e e plas ic de o ma ion (SPD) allow signi ican ly la ge s ain o be
imposed in compa ison wi h s anda d o ming me hods such as olling o bending [
7
–
9
]. In he case
whe e ex emely la ge de o ma ion is imposed o he ma e ial, ans o ma ion o a coa se-g ained
s uc u e o an ul a ine-g ained one (g ain size 0.1–1
µ
m) occu s [
7
]. Ne e heless, ans o ma ion o
he mic os uc u e using SPD me hods p oceeds subsequen ly. A he beginning o he ans o ma ion,
he mic os uc u e con ains, in pa icula , cell walls con aining angles wi h e y high disloca ion
densi y. The u he de o ma ion leads o subsequen inc easing o miso ien a ion be ween cells and
o ma ion o an ul a ine-g ained mic os uc u e. Thus, he mic os uc u es o med by SPD con ain
a ious p opo ions o low-angle (LA) and high-angle (HA) g ain bounda ies (GB), depending on he
le el o imposed plas ic s ain. Fo his eason, SPD echniques p o ide a unique oppo uni y o s udy
he in luence o signi ican ly di e en mic os uc u es on c eep beha io o me als. Recen esul s
showed ha di e ences in he c eep s eng h o SPD-p ocessed s a e and i s unde o med coun e pa
depend on he alue o plas ic s ain imposed in o he ma e ial [
10
–
14
], empe a u e, and applied s ess
used du ing c eep es ing [15–17].
The aim o his wo k is o s udy he in luence o p ede o ma ion on c eep s eng h and he
mic os uc u e o P92 p ocessed by se e e plas ic de o ma ion (SPD), wi h equi alen s ains anging
om 1 o 20.
2. Ma e ials and Me hods
The expe imen al ma e ial used in he p esen wo k was ad anced ungs en-modi ied ma ensi ic
9%C P92 s eel. The chemical composi ion o P92 s eel (w .%) was as ollows: 0.11C, 8.58C , 0.33Mo,
1.67W, 0.37Si, 0.48Mn, 0.23V, 0.06Nb, 0.013P, 0.037N, 0.005S, 0.0015B, and 0.017Al. Hea ea men o
he as- ecei ed coa se-g ained (CG) s a e consis ed o no maliza ion a 1323 K o 60 min, ollowed by
empe ing a 1013 K o 140 min [4].
Discs o 30 mm diame e and 1.1 mm hickness and shee s wi h dimensions o 10
×
100
×
1.1 mm
3
we e cu om he as- ecei ed and ela i ely coa se-g ained P92 s eel (CG). The discs we e p ocessed
by 1 o a ion high-p essu e o sion (HPT) a oom empe a u e unde he p essu e o 6 GPa and
o a ion speed o 0.1 mm pe second. The shee s we e p ocessed by high-p essu e sliding (HPS) a
oom empe a u e wi h a sliding dis ance o 5 mm (HPS5) and 15 mm (HPS15) unde he p essu e o
4 GPa. The alue o on Mises equi alen s ain du ing HPT [
7
] g ows wi h he dis ance, , om he
cen e o he disc acco ding o
εSPD =
2
π N/√3
whe e Nis he numbe o u ns and is he hickness
o disc. The alue o on Mises equi alen s ain du ing he HPS p ocess [
18
] was es ima ed as
εSPD =x
√3
, whe e xis he sliding dis ance o he plunge wi h espec o he an il and is he hickness
o he sample.
The equi alen s ain imposed by o a ion swaging (RS) [
19
,
20
] was es ima ed by
εSPD
=ln(D
0
/D
n
)
2
,
whe e D
0
is he ini ial diame e ~30 mm and D
n
is he inal diame e ~15 mm a e applica ion o RS
a oom empe a u e. The alues o equi alen s ain
εSPD
imposed by selec ed me hods o SPD a e
shown in Table 1.
Ma e ials 2020,13, 5330 3 o 17
Table 1. P ede o ma ion (εSPD) imposed by me hods o se e e plas ic de o ma ion (SPD).
Ma e ial S a e o P92 S eel RS HPS5 HPS15 HPT
εSPD 1.4 2.6 7.9 25 ±5
Cons an load ensile c eep es s we e conduc ed a 873 K (~0.48 o mel ing empe a u e) in
p o ec i e a gon a mosphe e using la specimens wi h a gauge leng h o 10 mm and a c oss sec ion o
3
×
1 mm
2
. The es ed HPT specimens we e manu ac u ed om he disc egion wi h equi alen s ain
o abou 25
±
5 [
12
,
21
]. The gauge leng hs o he HPS ensile specimens we e aken om he cen al
pa o he shee .
Mic os uc u e in es iga ions we e pe o med in a scanning elec on mic oscope (SEM, Tescan
Ly a 3, (B no, Czech Republic), equipped wi h No dlysNano EBSD (High Wycombe, UK) de ec o
ope a ing a accele a ing ol age o 20 kV wi h specimen il ed a 70
◦
) and a ansmission elec on
mic oscope (TEM, JEOL 2100F, Tokyo, Japan). SEM was used o de e mine he miso ien a ions
θ
be ween neighbo ing g ains.
θ
=15
◦
was aken o dis inguish HAGBs om LAGBs consis en wi h
p e ious wo ks [
10
–
12
]. The mean spacing o LAGBs along es lines is called w, and he mean spacing
o HAGBs is called d. The ac ion o HAGBs is es ima ed as HAGB =w/d.
3. Resul s
3.1. Mic os uc u e be o e C eep
In he ollowing sec ion we epo mic os uc u al de ails o he P92 a ian s in es iga ed in his
wo k ega ding g ains and hei o ien a ions (Figu e 1), g ain miso ien a ions (Figu e 2), and bounda y
spacings (Figu e 3). They a y depending on he s ain
εSPD
applied du ing SPD (Figu e 3). As usual,
he as- ecei ed s a e CG consis s o p io aus eni e g ains con aining la hs bounda ies and o he LA
subg ain bounda ies (no isible in Figu e 1) in hei in e io s esul ing om ma ensi ic ans o ma ion.
The mic os uc u e o as- ecei ed s a e esul s om no maliza ion a 1323 K o 60 min in ai and
subsequen empe ing a 1013 K o 140 min.
Ma e ials 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 o 19
Table 1. P ede o ma ion (εSPD) imposed by me hods o se e e plas ic de o ma ion (SPD).
Ma e ial S a e o P92 S eel RS HPS5 HPS15 HPT
εSPD 1.4 2.6 7.9 25 ± 5
Cons an load ensile c eep es s we e conduc ed a 873 K (~0.48 o mel ing empe a u e) in
p o ec i e a gon a mosphe e using la specimens wi h a gauge leng h o 10 mm and a c oss sec ion
o 3 × 1 mm2. The es ed HPT specimens we e manu ac u ed om he disc egion wi h equi alen
s ain o abou 25 ± 5 [12,21]. The gauge leng hs o he HPS ensile specimens we e aken om he
cen al pa o he shee .
Mic os uc u e in es iga ions we e pe o med in a scanning elec on mic oscope (SEM, Tescan
Ly a 3, (B no, Czech Republic), equipped wi h No dlysNano EBSD (High Wycombe, UK) de ec o
ope a ing a accele a ing ol age o 20 kV wi h specimen il ed a 70°) and a ansmission elec on
mic oscope (TEM, JEOL 2100F, Tokyo, Japan). SEM was used o de e mine he miso ien a ions θ
be ween neighbo ing g ains. θ = 15° was aken o dis inguish HAGBs om LAGBs consis en wi h
p e ious wo ks [10–12]. The mean spacing o LAGBs along es lines is called w, and he mean spacing
o HAGBs is called d. The ac ion o HAGBs is es ima ed as HAGB = w/d.
3. Resul s
3.1. Mic os uc u e be o e C eep
In he ollowing sec ion we epo mic os uc u al de ails o he P92 a ian s in es iga ed in
his wo k ega ding g ains and hei o ien a ions (Figu e 1), g ain miso ien a ions (Figu e 2), and
bounda y spacings (Figu e 3). They a y depending on he s ain εSPD applied du ing SPD (Figu e 3).
As usual, he as- ecei ed s a e CG consis s o p io aus eni e g ains con aining la hs bounda ies and
o he LA subg ain bounda ies (no isible in Figu e 1) in hei in e io s esul ing om ma ensi ic
ans o ma ion. The mic os uc u e o as- ecei ed s a e esul s om no maliza ion a 1323 K o 60
min in ai and subsequen empe ing a 1013 K o 140 min.
Figu e 1. Con .
Ma e ials 2020,13, 5330 4 o 17
Ma e ials 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 o 19
Figu e 1. G ain mic os uc u e (o ien a ion con as wi h high-angle g ain bounda ies (HAGB) only,
no mal di ec ion (ND) and ex u e (poles o {110} planes) a oom empe a u e be o e c eep o (a) as-
ecei ed coa se-g ained (CG), (b) o a ion swaging (RS), and (c) high-p essu e sliding, HPS5 and (d)
HPS15; high-p essu e o sion (HPT) is simila o HPS15. Rolling di ec ions (RD) a e pa allel wi h he
pipe axis in CG s a e and shea di ec ion in SPD-p ocessed s a es.
RS has a he e ogeneous g ain s uc u e wi h bands o ine nea ly equiaxed submic on g ains and
la ge g ains exceeding 30 μm ha a e signi ican ly elonga ed pa allel o he di ec ion o swaging. The
g ain s uc u e o HPS5 is also ela i ely coa se bu mo e homogeneous. HPS15 has much mo e
e ined g ains simila o HPT.
Figu e 2. Miso ien a ion: cumula i e equency (F) o bounda ies wi h miso ien a ions θ in CG (as-
ecei ed) and p ede o med P92. In e sec ion wi h he dashed line θ = 15° gi es he low-angle g ain
bounda ies (LAGB) ac ion 𝑓 =𝐹(15°).
Figu e 1.
G ain mic os uc u e (o ien a ion con as wi h high-angle g ain bounda ies (HAGB) only,
no mal di ec ion (ND) and ex u e (poles o {110} planes) a oom empe a u e be o e c eep o
(
a
) as- ecei ed coa se-g ained (CG), (
b
) o a ion swaging (RS), and (
c
) high-p essu e sliding, HPS5 and
(
d
) HPS15; high-p essu e o sion (HPT) is simila o HPS15. Rolling di ec ions (RD) a e pa allel wi h
he pipe axis in CG s a e and shea di ec ion in SPD-p ocessed s a es.
Ma e ials 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 o 19
Figu e 1. G ain mic os uc u e (o ien a ion con as wi h high-angle g ain bounda ies (HAGB) only,
no mal di ec ion (ND) and ex u e (poles o {110} planes) a oom empe a u e be o e c eep o (a) as-
ecei ed coa se-g ained (CG), (b) o a ion swaging (RS), and (c) high-p essu e sliding, HPS5 and (d)
HPS15; high-p essu e o sion (HPT) is simila o HPS15. Rolling di ec ions (RD) a e pa allel wi h he
pipe axis in CG s a e and shea di ec ion in SPD-p ocessed s a es.
RS has a he e ogeneous g ain s uc u e wi h bands o ine nea ly equiaxed submic on g ains and
la ge g ains exceeding 30 μm ha a e signi ican ly elonga ed pa allel o he di ec ion o swaging. The
g ain s uc u e o HPS5 is also ela i ely coa se bu mo e homogeneous. HPS15 has much mo e
e ined g ains simila o HPT.
Figu e 2. Miso ien a ion: cumula i e equency (F) o bounda ies wi h miso ien a ions θ in CG (as-
ecei ed) and p ede o med P92. In e sec ion wi h he dashed line θ = 15° gi es he low-angle g ain
bounda ies (LAGB) ac ion 𝑓 =𝐹(15°).
Figu e 2.
Miso ien a ion: cumula i e equency Fo bounda ies wi h miso ien a ions
θ
in CG
(as- ecei ed) and p ede o med P92. In e sec ion wi h he dashed line
θ
=15
◦
gi es he low-angle g ain
bounda ies (LAGB) ac ion HAGB =F(15◦).
Ma e ials 2020,13, 5330 5 o 17
Ma e ials 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 o 19
Figu e 1 shows a sligh endency in CG o o ien a e {101} c ys allog aphic planes nea ly pa allel
o he pipe axis, which is iden ical o he s ess axis du ing c eep es ing. The mic os uc u e o he
RS s a e con ains a s ong ibe ex u e {hkl}<101> pa allel o he swaging axis (Figu e 1b).
The HPS-p ocessed specimens (Figu e 1c,d) exhibi ed a ibe ex u e <110> pe pendicula o he
shea di ec ion o HPS wi h {110}<111> and {110}<100> s ongly p onounced a ian s. A simila
ex u e was also obse ed in he HPT-p ocessed specimens [21].
Figu e 3. Bounda y spacings d and
w
e sus equi alen SPD s ain (εSPD) (a) a e SPD and (b) a e
annealing; CG da a a e displayed a εSPD = 0.6 o compa ison easons; he e ical ex ension o shaded
a ea sh inks wi h inc easing 𝑓.
Figu e 2 displays he cumula i e equency (F) o b ounda ies wi h miso ien a ions up o θ. Fo
θ = 15°, F equals he LAGB ac ion 𝑓 ≡1−𝑓
. The s eep inclina ion o he GC cu e shows
p edominance o LAGBs wi h θ < 15° and HAGBs wi h high θ > 40° and a concen a ion nea Σ 3
(60°/111). A e SPD, such a gap in he dis ibu ion is missing. In RS and HPS5, HAGB is s ongly aised
by SPD-induced LAGB gene a ion. Wi h inc ease o εSPD, s ain-induced LABGs ge con e ed in o
HAGBs, and HAGB inc eases o 0.85 o HPT.
Figu e 3a isualizes he exis ing da a o he mean bounda y spacings in he in es iga ed
ma e ial a ian s a e SPD. The w- and d-lines a e no p ima ily p ecise i s o he limi ed esul s. The
Figu e 3.
Bounda y spacings dand w e sus equi alen SPD s ain (
εSPD
) (
a
) a e SPD (
b
) a e annealing;
CG da a a e displayed a
εSPD
=0.6 o compa ison easons; he e ical ex ension o shaded a ea
sh inks wi h inc easing HAGB.
RS has a he e ogeneous g ain s uc u e wi h bands o ine nea ly equiaxed submic on g ains
and la ge g ains exceeding 30
µ
m ha a e signi ican ly elonga ed pa allel o he di ec ion o swaging.
The g ain s uc u e o HPS5 is also ela i ely coa se bu mo e homogeneous. HPS15 has much mo e
e ined g ains simila o HPT.
Figu e 1shows a sligh endency in CG o o ien a e {101} c ys allog aphic planes nea ly pa allel o
he pipe axis, which is iden ical o he s ess axis du ing c eep es ing. The mic os uc u e o he RS
s a e con ains a s ong ibe ex u e {hkl}<101>pa allel o he swaging axis (Figu e 1b).
The HPS-p ocessed specimens (Figu e 1c,d) exhibi ed a ibe ex u e <110>pe pendicula o he
shea di ec ion o HPS wi h {110}<111>and {110}<100>s ongly p onounced a ian s. A simila
ex u e was also obse ed in he HPT-p ocessed specimens [21].
Figu e 2displays he cumula i e equency (F) o b ounda ies wi h miso ien a ions up o
θ
.
Fo
θ
=15
◦
,Fequals he LAGB ac ion
LAGB ≡
1
− HAGB
. The s eep inclina ion o he GC cu e
shows p edominance o LAGBs wi h
θ
<15
◦
and HAGBs wi h high
θ
>40
◦
and a concen a ion nea
Σ
3 (60
◦
/111). A e SPD, such a gap in he dis ibu ion is missing. In RS and HPS5,
HAGB
is s ongly
aised by SPD-induced LAGB gene a ion. Wi h inc ease o
εSPD
, s ain-induced LABGs ge con e ed
in o HAGBs, and HAGB inc eases o 0.85 o HPT.
Figu e 3a isualizes he exis ing da a o he mean bounda y spacings in he in es iga ed ma e ial
a ian s a e SPD. The w- and d-lines a e no p ima ily p ecise i s o he limi ed esul s. The w-line
wi h
w∝
1
/ε0.5
SPD
is mo i a ed by pa abolic wo k ha dening,
σ∝ε0.5
SPD
, du ing SPD a oom empe a u e
owa d he inal s a iona y (sa u a ion) s age and o ma ion o quasi-s a iona y subg ain s uc u es

Ma e ials 2020,13, 5330 6 o 17
wi h
wqs ∝
1
/σ
. The
d
-line wi h
d∝
1
/εSPD
dec eases mo e s ongly wi h
εSPD
han w because
miso ien a ion o
θ
-dis ibu ion shi s owa d highe
θ
wi h
εSPD
by ans o ma ion o LAGBs in o
HAGBs. Ve ical ex ension o he shaded a ea ma ks
HAGB
; as he lines o dand wapp oach each
o he , LAGB sh inks and HAGB app oaches 1.
Imposing
εSPD
=1.4 by RS educes he g ain size d o 1.6
µ
m, and 35% o he bounda ies a e
HAGBs (Figu e 2) wi h ela i ely equal
θ
-dis ibu ion be ween 15–65
◦
. P ocessing wi h HPS wi h a
sliding dis ance o 5 mm o
εSPD
=2.6 gene a es a g ain size o abou 1.25
µ
m and a simila po ion
o HAGBs. Imposing
εSPD
=7.9 by HPS15 led o a signi ican dec ease o mean g ain size down o
0.35
µ
m and an inc ease o
HAGB
up o 0.7. The lowes g ain size, d, and he highes ,
HAGB
, a e ound
o HPT subjec ed o he highes SPD s ain, εSPD =25 ±5.
Howe e , g ain pa ame e s a e SPD a oom empe a u e a e no he ones de e mining c eep,
as he g ains coa sen du ing hea ing o he es empe a u e and subsequen soaking un il he beginning
o c eep. While his annealing ea men be o e c eep has li le e ec o mic on-sized g ains, i causes
signi ican coa sening o submic on g ains. This is seen in Figu e 3b (see a ow “ eco e y”).
Figu e 4shows he e ec o annealing o 5 h a 873 K; his ea men simula es he annealing e ec
o hea ing o he es empe a u e. Despi e di e en deg ees o
εSPD
in RS, HPS5, HPS15, and HPT,
he subg ain s uc u es look quali a i ely simila . Reco e y o disloca ion line leng h and bounda y
a ea in ol es mo ion o bo h ee disloca ions and bounda ies o si es o eco e y by ecombina ion
and annihila ion. While his occu s, many ela i ely s aigh ee disloca ions (see a ows) a e seen
o ex end be ween neighbo ing bounda ies. The subg ain sizes w(mean in e cep s) es ima ed om
mic og aphs like hose o Figu e 5a e plo ed in Figu e 3b. The w- and d-coa sening is small o he
ela i ely coa se g ains o RS and HPS5, bu i is p ominen o he ul a ine g ains o HPT whe e
dgoes up o 0.35 µm wi h a ac ion o HAGB a ea ( HAGB) ~90%.
Ma e ials 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 o 19
w-line wi h 𝑤∝1/𝜀

. is mo i a ed by pa abolic wo k ha dening, 𝜎∝𝜀

. , du ing SPD a oom
empe a u e owa d he inal s a iona y (sa u a ion) s age and o ma ion o quasi-s a iona y subg ain
s uc u es wi h 𝑤 ∝1/𝜎. The 𝑑-line wi h 𝑑∝1/𝜀
 dec eases mo e s ongly wi h 𝜀 han w
because miso ien a ion o 𝜃-dis ibu ion shi s owa d highe 𝜃 wi h 𝜀 by ans o ma ion o
LAGBs in o HAGBs. Ve ical ex ension o he shaded a ea ma ks
HAGB; as he lines o d and w
app oach each o he , LAGB sh inks and HAGB app oaches 1.
Imposing εSPD = 1.4 by RS educes he g ain size, d, o 1.6 μm, and 35% o he bounda ies a e
HAGBs (Figu e 2) wi h ela i ely equal θ-dis ibu ion be ween 15–65°. P ocessing wi h HPS wi h a
sliding dis ance o 5 mm o εSPD = 2.6 gene a es a g ain size o abou 1.25 μm and a simila po ion o
HAGBs. Imposing εSPD = 7.9 by HPS15 led o a signi ican dec ease o mean g ain size down o 0.35
μm and an inc ease o HAGB up o 0.7. The lowes g ain size, d, and he highes , HAGB, a e ound o
HPT subjec ed o he highes SPD s ain, εSPD = 25 ± 5.
Howe e , g ain pa ame e s a e SPD a oom empe a u e a e no he ones de e mining c eep,
as he g ains coa sen du ing hea ing o he es empe a u e and subsequen soaking un il he
beginning o c eep. While his annealing ea men be o e c eep has li le e ec o mic on-sized
g ains, i causes signi ican coa sening o submic on g ains. This is seen in Figu e 3b (see a ow
“ eco e y”).
Figu e 4 shows he e ec o annealing o 5 h a 873 K; his ea men simula es he annealing
e ec o hea ing o he es empe a u e. Despi e di e en deg ees o εSPD in RS, HPS5, HPS15, and
HPT, he subg ain s uc u es look quali a i ely simila . Reco e y o disloca ion line leng h and
bounda y a ea in ol es mo ion o bo h ee disloca ions and bounda ies o si es o eco e y by
ecombina ion and annihila ion. While his occu s, many ela i ely s aigh ee disloca ions (see
a ows) a e seen o ex end be ween neighbo ing bounda ies. The subg ain sizes w (mean in e cep s)
es ima ed om mic og aphs like hose o Figu e 5 a e plo ed in Figu e 3b. The w- and d-coa sening
is small o he ela i ely coa se g ains o RS and HPS5, bu i is p ominen o he ul a ine g ains o
HPT whe e d goes up o 0.35 μm wi h a ac ion o HAGB a ea ( HAGB) ~90%.
(a) RS εSPD = 1.4
(b) HPS5 εSPD = 2.6
Ma e ials 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 o 19
(c) HPS15 εSPD = 7.9
(d) εSPD ~ 25 ± 5
Figu e 4. Mic os uc u e (TEM) a e annealing a 873 K o 5 h in (a) RS, (b) HPS5, (c) HPS15, and (d)
HPT; no e he highe magni ica ion in (c,d).
Figu e 5. Mic os uc u e o P92 s eel p ocessed by HPT and annealed a 923 K o 500 h.
E en mo e (sub)g ain coa sening occu s in annealing o 500 h a 923 K (Figu e 5). He e he
g ains coa sen o d ~0.85 μm wi h HAGB ~87%. The high alue o HAGB is unde s andable as no LABGs
a e o med du ing s a ic annealing whe e no ne plas ic de o ma ion occu s.
3.2. C eep Beha io
Figu e 6 shows e olu ion o s ain a e (𝜀󰇗) wi h s ain in c eep a σ0 = 150 MPa o all P92 a ian s.
All cu es display a p onounced ela i e minimum o c eep a e (𝜀󰇗). HPT, HPS5, and HPS15 ha e
simila 𝜀󰇗. CG and RS c eep much mo e slowly. Duc ili ies o di e en SPD specimens di e
g ea ly. RS has he lowes duc ili y. The esul s will be discussed below in ela ion o mic os uc u e.
Figu e 7 shows he c eep a es o CG, RS, and HPS e sus s ess. Tes s a cons an load ha e he
ad an age o show bo h he e olu ion wi h s ain and he in luence o s ess in a single plo . This is
because s ess a ies a cons an load wi h s ain, as
Figu e 4.
Mic os uc u e (TEM) a e annealing a 873 K o 5 h in (
a
) RS, (
b
) HPS5, (
c
) HPS15,
and (d) HPT; no e he highe magni ica ion in (c,d).
Ma e ials 2020,13, 5330 7 o 17
Ma e ials 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 o 19
(c) HPS15 εSPD = 7.9
(d) εSPD ~ 25 ± 5
Figu e 4. Mic os uc u e (TEM) a e annealing a 873 K o 5 h in (a) RS, (b) HPS5, (c) HPS15, and (d)
HPT; no e he highe magni ica ion in (c,d).
Figu e 5. Mic os uc u e o P92 s eel p ocessed by HPT and annealed a 923 K o 500 h.
E en mo e (sub)g ain coa sening occu s in annealing o 500 h a 923 K (Figu e 5). He e he
g ains coa sen o d ~0.85 μm wi h HAGB ~87%. The high alue o HAGB is unde s andable as no LABGs
a e o med du ing s a ic annealing whe e no ne plas ic de o ma ion occu s.
3.2. C eep Beha io
Figu e 6 shows e olu ion o s ain a e (𝜀󰇗) wi h s ain in c eep a σ0 = 150 MPa o all P92 a ian s.
All cu es display a p onounced ela i e minimum o c eep a e (𝜀󰇗). HPT, HPS5, and HPS15 ha e
simila 𝜀󰇗. CG and RS c eep much mo e slowly. Duc ili ies o di e en SPD specimens di e
g ea ly. RS has he lowes duc ili y. The esul s will be discussed below in ela ion o mic os uc u e.
Figu e 7 shows he c eep a es o CG, RS, and HPS e sus s ess. Tes s a cons an load ha e he
ad an age o show bo h he e olu ion wi h s ain and he in luence o s ess in a single plo . This is
because s ess a ies a cons an load wi h s ain, as
Figu e 5. Mic os uc u e o P92 s eel p ocessed by HPT and annealed a 923 K o 500 h.
E en mo e (sub)g ain coa sening occu s in annealing o 500 h a 923 K (Figu e 5). He e he g ains
coa sen o d~0.85
µ
m wi h
HAGB
~87%. The high alue o
HAGB
is unde s andable as no LABGs a e
o med du ing s a ic annealing whe e no ne plas ic de o ma ion occu s.
3.2. C eep Beha io
Figu e 6shows e olu ion o s ain a e
.
ε
wi h s ain in c eep a
σ0
=150 MPa o all P92 a ian s.
All cu es display a p onounced ela i e minimum o c eep a e
.
εmin
. HPT, HPS5, and HPS15 ha e
simila
.
εmin
. CG and RS c eep much mo e slowly. Duc ili ies o di e en SPD specimens di e g ea ly.
RS has he lowes duc ili y. The esul s will be discussed below in ela ion o mic os uc u e.
Ma e ials 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 o 19
σ = σ0 exp(ε) (1)
p o ided ha de o ma ion is uni o m. Empi ically i is known ha uni o mi y o de o ma ion along
he gauge leng h is p o ided in ela i ely duc ile ma e ials un il he s ain has eached abou hal he
ac u e s ain [22]. Acco ding o Equa ion (1), he loga i hmic s ess axis co esponds o a linea
s ain axis.
Figu e 6. E olu ion o s ain a e wi h s ain in ensile c eep a cons an load wi h σ0 = 150 MPa o
di e en SPD s ains εSPD.
Thus, he indi idual cu es in Figu e 7 can be iewed as 𝜀󰇗–ε cu es like hose o Figu e 6 bu
shi ed along he abscissa. De o ma ion begins a 𝜎=𝜎
; he scale ba ma ks an in e al Δ𝜀 = 0.5 o
uni o m s ain. No only do he minima o he cu es displayed in Figu e 7 show dependence on
s ess, hey also show he ull e olu ion o a e om he beginning, ia s eng hening and so ening
up o he second hal o he cu es whe e ex e nal and in e nal necking cause an o e -exponen ial
inc ease o a e un il inal ac u e.
Figu e 7 shows wo main ea u es. Fi s , he global s ess dependences o a es di e s ongly
o he a ian s HPS and HPT wi h he highes εSPD and he a ian s RS and CG wi h he lowes εSPD.
Roughly speaking, he s ess exponen 𝑛 = 𝑑𝑙𝑜𝑔𝜀󰇗/𝑑𝑙𝑜𝑔𝜎 o he a es is abou 6 o 7 o HPS and HPT
and wice ha high o RS and CG. This la ge n-di e ence leads o he esul ha he minimum c eep
a es o all a ian s a e simila a a high s ess o abou 400 MPa, while CG and RS c eep much mo e
slowly a he lowe s ess o 150 MPa. Figu e 7 also displays so ening du ing c eep ha is e iden
om he p onounced minimum due o he ac ha he a e inc eases dis inc ly mo e s ongly a e
he minimum han would be expec ed om s ess sensi i i y alone. In he li e a u e, his s eep
inc ease is e med e ia y c eep and is o en linked o “damage” and ac u e. Howe e , i
de o ma ion is ai ly uni o m a e he minimum, as in ou ul a ine-g ained (UFG) ma e ials wi h
ac u e s ains > 0.5, he a e inc ease mus be a ibu ed o so ening by in e nal mic os uc u al
changes, e.g., coa sening p ocesses (see Discussion) a he han ac u e. The ollowing subsec ion
desc ibes he obse ed changes.
Figu e 6.
E olu ion o s ain a e wi h s ain in ensile c eep a cons an load wi h
σ0
=150 MPa o
di e en SPD s ains εSPD.
Ma e ials 2020,13, 5330 8 o 17
Figu e 7shows he c eep a es o CG, RS, and HPS e sus s ess. Tes s a cons an load ha e he
ad an age o show bo h he e olu ion wi h s ain and he in luence o s ess in a single plo . This is
because s ess a ies a cons an load wi h s ain, as
σ=σ0exp(ε) (1)
p o ided ha de o ma ion is uni o m. Empi ically i is known ha uni o mi y o de o ma ion along he
gauge leng h is p o ided in ela i ely duc ile ma e ials un il he s ain has eached abou hal he ac u e
s ain [22]. Acco ding o Equa ion (1), he loga i hmic s ess axis co esponds o a linea s ain axis.
Ma e ials 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 o 19
Figu e 7. C eep a e–s ess cu es o HPT, CG, and RS.
3.3. Changes o Mic os uc u e du ing C eep Tes ing
The mic os uc u e o ac u ed ensile specimens was in es iga ed a di e en loca ions along
hei leng h. In he g ip pa s, he local s ess, σloc, is negligible. In he gauge leng h, he s esses and
s ains a y wi h loca ion. The local s ain was oughly es ima ed as εloc = ln(Sloc/S0) om he local
c oss sec ion, S, and he ini ial c oss sec ion, S0. The local s ess ollows om Equa ion (1) as σloc =
σ0exp(εloc).
Figu es 8 and 9 show examples o he mic os uc u e in SEM and TEM o he mode a ely
p ede o med a ian RS a e c eep o ac u e a di e en σ0 and di e en σloc.
(a) g ip pa , local s ain (εloc) ~ 0
Figu e 7. C eep a e–s ess cu es o HPT, CG, and RS.
Thus, he indi idual cu es in Figu e 7can be iewed as
.
ε
–
ε
cu es like hose o Figu e 6bu
shi ed along he abscissa. De o ma ion begins a
σ=σ0
; he scale ba ma ks an in e al
∆ε
=0.5 o
uni o m s ain. No only do he minima o he cu es displayed in Figu e 7show dependence on s ess,
he cu es also show he ull e olu ion o a e om he beginning, ia s eng hening and so ening
up o he second hal o he cu es whe e ex e nal and in e nal necking cause an o e -exponen ial
inc ease o a e un il inal ac u e.
Figu e 7shows wo main ea u es. Fi s , he global s ess dependences o a es di e s ongly o
he a ian s HPS and HPT wi h he highes
εSPD
and he a ian s RS and CG wi h he lowes
εSPD
.
Roughly speaking, he s ess exponen
n=dlog .
ε/dlogσ
o he a es is abou 6 o 7 o HPS and HPT and
wice ha high o RS and CG. This la ge n-di e ence leads o he esul ha he minimum c eep a es
o all a ian s a e simila a a high s ess o abou 400 MPa, while CG and RS c eep much mo e slowly
a he lowe s ess o 150 MPa. Figu e 7also displays so ening du ing c eep ha is e iden om he
p onounced minimum due o he ac ha he a e inc eases dis inc ly mo e s ongly a e he minimum
han would be expec ed om s ess sensi i i y alone. In he li e a u e, his s eep inc ease is e med
e ia y c eep and is o en linked o “damage” and ac u e. Howe e , i de o ma ion is ai ly uni o m
a e he minimum, as in ou ul a ine-g ained (UFG) ma e ials wi h ac u e s ains >0.5, he a e
inc ease mus be a ibu ed o so ening by in e nal mic os uc u al changes, e.g., coa sening p ocesses
(see Discussion) a he han ac u e. The ollowing subsec ion desc ibes he obse ed changes.
Ma e ials 2020,13, 5330 9 o 17
3.3. Changes o Mic os uc u e du ing C eep Tes ing
The mic os uc u e o ac u ed ensile specimens was in es iga ed a di e en loca ions along
hei leng h. In he g ip pa s, he local s ess,
σloc
, is negligible. In he gauge leng h, he s esses
and s ains a y wi h loca ion. The local s ain was oughly es ima ed as
εloc
=ln(S
loc
/S
0
) om he
local c oss sec ion, S
loc
, and he ini ial c oss sec ion, S
0
. The local s ess ollows om Equa ion (1) as
σloc =σ0exp(εloc).
Figu es 8and 9show examples o he mic os uc u e in SEM and TEM o he mode a ely
p ede o med a ian RS a e c eep o ac u e a di e en σ0and di e en σloc.
Ma e ials 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 o 19
Figu e 7. C eep a e–s ess cu es o HPT, CG, and RS.
3.3. Changes o Mic os uc u e du ing C eep Tes ing
The mic os uc u e o ac u ed ensile specimens was in es iga ed a di e en loca ions along
hei leng h. In he g ip pa s, he local s ess, σloc, is negligible. In he gauge leng h, he s esses and
s ains a y wi h loca ion. The local s ain was oughly es ima ed as εloc = ln(Sloc/S0) om he local
c oss sec ion, S, and he ini ial c oss sec ion, S0. The local s ess ollows om Equa ion (1) as σloc =
σ0exp(εloc).
Figu es 8 and 9 show examples o he mic os uc u e in SEM and TEM o he mode a ely
p ede o med a ian RS a e c eep o ac u e a di e en σ0 and di e en σloc.
(a) g ip pa , local s ain (εloc) ~ 0
Ma e ials 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 o 19
(b) gauge nea ac u e su ace, εloc ~ 0.09
Figu e 8. Mic os uc u e and ex u e o RS a e c eep a σ0 = 200 MPa in (a) g ip pa and (b) gauge
leng h nea he ac u e. RD di ec ions a e pa allel wi h he s ess axis.
G ain s uc u e and ex u e, subg ain, and disloca ion s uc u e look ela i ely simila o be o e
c eep (Figu es 1b and 4a). I is no ed ha he disloca ion s uc u es ha e all unde gone eco e y,
ei he be o e c eep o a e ac u e; he e o e, Figu e 9 p obably is no ep esen a i e o he
disloca ion s uc u e in si u unde c eep s ess.
Figu e 9. Disloca ion mic os uc u e in he gauge leng hs o specimens es ed: (a) 300 MPa and (b)
150 MPa.
Nex , we conside he mos se e ely p ede o med ma e ials HPS15 and HPT. Figu e 10 shows
g ain s uc u e and ex u e o HPS15 in dependence o εloc. Compa ed o he s a e be o e c eep
(Figu e 4c), he ul a ine g ains ha e coa sened s a ically in he g ip pa and e en mo e so in gauge
leng h. The ex u e did no change in he g ip pa and a e sligh c eep s ain in he gauge leng h
(Figu e 10a,b). The miso ien a ion dis ibu ion e ol es du ing c eep (Figu e 11). The e is a signi ican
inc ease o HAGB ac ion ( HAGB) du ing c eep as εloc inc eases o 0.12 and 0.38. I appea s ha LAGBs
mig a e as e du ing g ain coa sening by eco e y h ough ecombina ion wi h o he bounda ies
han HAGBs do and so disappea ea lie . Nea he ac u e su ace, he HAGB ac ion, HAGB,
dec eased again. This sugges s massi e de o ma ion connec ed wi h o ma ion o small subg ains in
la ge g ains a he high local s esses ac ing he e.
(a)
(b)
Figu e 8.
Mic os uc u e and ex u e o RS a e c eep a
σ0
=200 MPa in (
a
) g ip pa and (
b
) gauge leng h
nea he ac u e. RD di ec ions a e pa allel wi h he s ess axis.
Ma e ials 2020, 13, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 o 19
(b) gauge nea ac u e su ace, εloc ~ 0.09
Figu e 8. Mic os uc u e and ex u e o RS a e c eep a σ0 = 200 MPa in (a) g ip pa and (b) gauge
leng h nea he ac u e. RD di ec ions a e pa allel wi h he s ess axis.
G ain s uc u e and ex u e, subg ain, and disloca ion s uc u e look ela i ely simila o be o e
c eep (Figu es 1b and 4a). I is no ed ha he disloca ion s uc u es ha e all unde gone eco e y,
ei he be o e c eep o a e ac u e; he e o e, Figu e 9 p obably is no ep esen a i e o he
disloca ion s uc u e in si u unde c eep s ess.
Figu e 9. Disloca ion mic os uc u e in he gauge leng hs o specimens es ed: (a) 300 MPa and (b)
150 MPa.
Nex , we conside he mos se e ely p ede o med ma e ials HPS15 and HPT. Figu e 10 shows
g ain s uc u e and ex u e o HPS15 in dependence o εloc. Compa ed o he s a e be o e c eep
(Figu e 4c), he ul a ine g ains ha e coa sened s a ically in he g ip pa and e en mo e so in gauge
leng h. The ex u e did no change in he g ip pa and a e sligh c eep s ain in he gauge leng h
(Figu e 10a,b). The miso ien a ion dis ibu ion e ol es du ing c eep (Figu e 11). The e is a signi ican
inc ease o HAGB ac ion ( HAGB) du ing c eep as εloc inc eases o 0.12 and 0.38. I appea s ha LAGBs
mig a e as e du ing g ain coa sening by eco e y h ough ecombina ion wi h o he bounda ies
han HAGBs do and so disappea ea lie . Nea he ac u e su ace, he HAGB ac ion, HAGB,
dec eased again. This sugges s massi e de o ma ion connec ed wi h o ma ion o small subg ains in
la ge g ains a he high local s esses ac ing he e.
(a)
(b)
Figu e 9.
Disloca ion mic os uc u e in he gauge leng hs o specimens es ed: (
a
) 300 MPa and (
b
) 150 Mpa.
Ma e ials 2020,13, 5330 16 o 17
5.
The he e ogeneous mic os uc u e o RS con aining la ge elonga ed g ains wi h subg ains exhibi s
he highes c eep esis ance bu he lowes duc ili y.
The obse ed c eep so ening ela ed wi h g ain e inemen by SPD indica es ha he e a e only
limi ed means o imp o e c eep esis ance. Howe e , he eno mous inc ease in duc ili y may be
a signi ican ad an age in some cases. In any case, he p esen indings seem o be o ele ance
o he p oblem o c eep a e y low s esses and c eep a es in long- e m applica ion o empe ed
ma ensi e C s eels. Due o in e se s ess dependence, he qs subg ain size becomes e y la ge unde
hese condi ions so ha he g ains become mo e and mo e subg ain- ee and he ac ion o LAGBs
app oaches and exceeds 0.5. In his si ua ion, one mus expec ha he s ess dependence o he
c eep a e changes compa ed o he con en ional CG case wi h d>> wbecause dynamic eco e y is
accele a ed by HAGB con ol. This expec a ion o so ening, accompanied by declining s ess exponen
o c eep a e, ag ees wi h many obse a ions made in he ange o e y slow c eep, which so a ha e
no ound a sa is ac o y and gene ally accep ed explana ion.
Au ho Con ibu ions:
Concep ualiza ion, P.K., W.B., V.S., and Z.H.; me hodology, P.K., W.B., V.S., J.D., R.K.
and Z.H.; so wa e, W.B.; alida ion, P.K., J.D., Z.H., Y.T. (Yoichi Takizawa), Y.T. (Yongpeng Tang) and M.S.; o mal
analysis, W.B. and P.K.; in es iga ion, P.K., J.D., V.S., L.K., M.K., M.S. and Y.T. (Yoichi Takizawa); esou ces, P.K., J.D.,
R.K., M.S., Y.T. (Yoichi Takizawa) and Y.T. (Yongpeng Tang); da a cu a ion, P.K., J.D. and W.B.; w i ing—o iginal
d a p epa a ion, P.K., W.B. and V.S.; w i ing— e iew and edi ing, P.K., W.B. and V.S.; isualiza ion, P.K., W.B.;
J.D., L.K., R.K. and M.K.; supe ision, W.B. and V.S. All au ho s ha e ead and ag eed o he published e sion o
he manusc ip .
Funding: This esea ch was unded by he Czech Science Founda ion, g an numbe 19-18725S.
Acknowledgmen s:
The au ho s acknowledge inancial suppo om he Czech Science Founda ion
(g an No. 19-18725S). The wo k was suppo ed in pa by a g an -in-aid om MEXT, Japan, o scien i ic
esea ch (A) (No. 19H00830). The HPT p ocess was ca ied ou a he In e na ional Resea ch Cen e o Gian
S aining o Ad anced Ma e ials (IRC-GSAM) a Kyushu Uni e si y, Fukuoka, Japan.
Con lic s o In e es : The au ho s decla e no con lic o in e es .
Re e ences
1.
Li, D.F.; Dowd, N.P.O.; Da ies, C.M.; Nikbin, K.M. A e iew o he e ec o p io inelas ic de o ma ion on
high empe a u e mechanical esponse o enginee ing alloys. In . J. P ess. Vessel. Pip.
2010
,87, 531–542.
[C ossRe ]
2.
Usami, S.; Mo i, T. C eep de o ma ion o aus eni ic s eels a medium and low empe a u es. C yogenics
2000
,
40, 117. [C ossRe ]
3.
Kikuchi, S.; Ilschne , B. E ec s o a small p es ain a high empe a u es on he c eep beha iou o AISI
304 s ainless s eel. Sc . Me al. 1986,20, 159–162. [C ossRe ]
4.
Skleniˇcka, V.; Kuchaˇ o
á
, K.; K
á
l, P.; K apilo
á
, M.; S obodo
á
, M.; ˇ
Cmakal, J. The e ec o ho bending
and he mal ageing on c eep and mic os uc u e e olu ion in hick-walled P92 s eel pipe. Ma e . Sci. Eng. A
2015,644, 297–309. [C ossRe ]
5.
Caminada, S.; Cumino, G.; Cipolla, L.; Di Gian ancesco, A. Cold bending o ad anced s eels: ASTM g ades
T23, T92, T92. In . J. P ess. Vessel. Pip. 2009,86, 853–861. [C ossRe ]
6.
Abe, F. E ec o quenching, empe ing, and cold olling on c eep de o ma ion beha io o a empe ed
ma ensi ic 9C -1W s eel. Me all. Ma e . T ans. A 2003,34, 913–925. [C ossRe ]
7.
Valie , R.Z.; Islamgalie , R.K.; Alexand o , I.V. Bulk nanos uc u ed ma e ials om se e e plas ic ma e ials.
P og. Ma e . Sci. 2000,45, 103–189. [C ossRe ]
8.
Renk, O.; Pippan, R. Sa u a ion o G ain Re inemen du ing Se e e Plas ic De o ma ion o Single Phase
Ma e ials: Reconside a ions, Cu en S a us and Open Ques ions. Ma e . T ans.
2019
,60, 1270–1282.
[C ossRe ]
9.
Ganee , A.; Niki ina, M.; Si diko , V.; Islamgalie , R.; Ho man, A.; Wen, H. E ec s o he Tempe ing and
High-P essu e To sion Tempe a u es on Mic os uc u e o Fe i ic/Ma ensi ic S eel G ade 91. Ma e ials
2018
,
11, 627. [C ossRe ]
10.
Blum, W.; D o ak, J.; K al, P.; Eisenloh , P.; Sklenicka, V. E ec o g ain e inemen by ECAP on c eep o pu e Cu.
Ma e . Sci. Eng. A 2014,590, 423–432. [C ossRe ]

Ma e ials 2020,13, 5330 17 o 17
11.
K al, P.; D o ak, J.; Sklenicka, V.; Langdon, T.G. The Cha ac e is ics o c eep in me allic ma e ials p ocessed
by se e e plas ic de o ma ion. Ma e . T ans. 2019,60, 1506–1517. [C ossRe ]
12.
K al, P.; D o ak, J.; Sklenicka, V.; Masuda, T.; Ho i a, Z.; Kucha o a, K.; K apilo a, M.; S obodo a, M.
The e ec o ul a ine-g ained mic os uc u e on c eep beha iou o 9% C s eel. Ma e ials
2018
,11, 787.
[C ossRe ] [PubMed]
13.
Kos ka, A.; Tak, K.-G.; Hellmig, R.J.; Es in, Y.; Eggele , G. On he con ibu ion o ca bides and mic og ain
bounda ies o he c eep s eng h o empe ed ma ensi e e i ic s eel. Ac a Ma e .
2007
,55, 539–550.
[C ossRe ]
14.
K al, P.; D o ak, J.; Sklenicka, V.; Ho i a, Z.; Takizawa, Y.; Tang, Y.; K apilo a, M.; S obodo a, M. E ec
o ul a ine-g ained mic os uc u e on c eep beha iou in 304L aus eni ic s eel. Ma e . Sci. Eng. A
2020
,
785, 139383. [C ossRe ]
15.
Blum, W.; D o ak, J.; K al, P.; Eisenloh , P.; Sklenicka, V. E ec s o g ain e inemen by ECAP on he
de o ma ion esis ance o Al in e p e ed in e ms o bounda y-media ed p ocesses. J. Ma e . Sci. Technol.
2016,32, 1309–1320. [C ossRe ]
16.
Blum, W.; Eisenloh , P. A simple disloca ion model o he in luence o high-angle bounda ies on he
de o ma ion beha io o ul a ine-g ained ma e ials. In P oceedings o he 15 h In e na ional Con e ence on
he S eng h o Ma e ials (ICSMA-15), D esden, Ge many, 16–21 Augus 2009; IOP Publishing: B is ol, UK,
2010; Volume 240, p. 012136. [C ossRe ]
17.
Blum, W.; D o ak, J.; K al, P.; Eisenloh , P.; Sklenicka, V. Quasi-s a iona y s eng h o ECAP-p ocessed Cu-Z
a 0.5 Tm.Me als 2019,9, 1149. [C ossRe ]
18.
Fujioka, T.; Ho i a, Z. De elopmen o high-p essu e sliding p ocess o mic os uc u al e inemen o
ec angula me allic shee s. Ma e . T ans. 2009,50, 930–933. [C ossRe ]
19.
Kunˇcick
á
, L.; Kocich, R.; D oˇ
á
k, K.; Mach
á
ˇcko
á
, A. Ro a y swaged lamina ed Cu-Al composi es: E ec o
s uc u e on esidual s ess and mechanical and elec ic p ope ies. Ma e . Sci. Eng. A
2019
,742, 743–750.
[C ossRe ]
20.
Mach
á
ˇcko
á
, A.; K
á
k
á
, L.; Pe michl, R.; Kunˇcick
á
, L.; Kocich, R. A ec ing s uc u e cha ac e is ics o o a y
swaged ungs en hea y alloy ia a iable de o ma ion empe a u e. Ma e ials 2019,12, 4200. [C ossRe ]
21.
K al, P.; D o ak, J.; Sklenicka, V.; Masuda, T.; Ho i a, Z.; Kucha o a, K.; K apilo a, M.; S obodo a, M.
Mic os uc u e and c eep beha iou o P92 s eel a e HPT. Ma e . Sci. Eng. A
2018
,723, 287–295. [C ossRe ]
22.
S aub, S.; Meie , M.; Os e mann, J.; Blum, W. De elopmen o mic os uc u e and s eng hening in he
e i ic S eel X20C MoV121 a 823K du ing long- e m c eep es s and du ing annealing. VGB K a w.
1993
,
73, 646–653.
23.
Blum, W.; Zeng, X.H. A simple disloca ion model o de o ma ion esis ance o ul a ine-g ained ma e ials
explaining Hall–Pe ch s eng hening and enhanced s ain a e sensi i i y. Ac a Ma e .
2009
,57, 1966–1974.
[C ossRe ]
24.
Li, Y.; Zeng, X.; Blum, W. T ansi ion om s eng hening o so ening by g ain bounda ies in ul a ine-g ained
Cu. Ac a Ma e . 2004,52, 5009–5018. [C ossRe ]
25.
Raj, S.V.; Pha , G.M. A compila ion and analysis o da a o he s ess dependence o he subg ain size.
Ma e . Sci. Eng. A 1986,81, 217–237. [C ossRe ]
26. F os , H.J.; Ashby, M.F. De o ma ion-Mechanism Maps; Pe gamon P ess: Ox o d, UK, 1982; pp. 62–63.
27.
Abe, F. E ec o ine p ecipi a ion and subsequen coa sening o Fe2W La es phase on he c eep de o ma ion
beha iou o empe ed ma ensi ic 9C -W s eels. Me al. Ma e . T ans. A 2005,26, 321–332. [C ossRe ]
Publishe ’s No e:
MDPI s ays neu al wi h ega d o ju isdic ional claims in published maps and ins i u ional
a ilia ions.
©
2020 by he au ho s. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land. This a icle is an open access
a icle dis ibu ed unde he e ms and condi ions o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion
(CC BY) license (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/).