scieee Science in your language
[es] (orig)

La territorialización de las políticas de inclusión social desde el punto de vista de los espacios rurales españoles: comparativa autonómica

Abstract

En el artículo examinamos cómo se materializa la atención al medio rural en los planes de inclusión social españoles. Analizamos el marco estatal y autonómico clasificando las Comunidades Autónomas según su grado de ruralidad (OCDE). Así, establecemos si existe relación entre el carácter territorial de cada CCAA y el tipo de acciones inclusivas planteadas para los espacios rurales, y cuáles son los temas abordados. Los resultados evidencian que, al contrario de lo que cabría esperar, las CC.AA. predominantemente rurales no registran la mayor cantidad de actuaciones destinadas al medio rural, y que las temáticas sobre las que más se actúan atienden a la planificación y desarrollo territorial, la mejora formativa y educativa, y al apoyo a colectivos vulnerables.

Read accessible full text

La territorialización de las políticas de inclusión social desde el punto de vista de los espacios rurales españoles: comparativa autonómica

Author: Escribano-Pizarro, Jaime; Serrano-Lara, José Javier; Valero-López, Diana Esmeralda
Publisher: Universidad de Sevilla
Year: 2020
DOI: 10.12795/rea.2020.i39.02
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/7ab6c47b-ab8d-4a5f-a6b9-81e44d6e9c1f/download
Re is a de Es udios Andaluces (REA) | Núm. 39, eb e o (2020) | e-ISSN: 2340-2776.
h ps://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/ ea.2020.i39 | © Edi o ial Uni e sidad de Se illa 2020
h ps://edi o ial.us.es/es/ e is as/ e is a-de-es udios-andaluces
h ps:// e is ascien i icas.us.es/index.php/REA
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
184
184
h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/ ea.2020.i39.02
The Te i o ialisa ion o Social Inclusion Policies om he Pe spec i e o
he Spanish Ru al A eas: Regional Compa a i e
Jaime Esc ibano-Piza o
jaime.esc ibano@u .es h p://o cid.o g/0000-0002-2349-9997
José Ja ie Se ano-La a
j.ja ie .se ano@u .es h p://o cid.o g/0000-0003-0349-4176
G upo de In es igación de Desa ollo Ru al –Unidad de Desa ollo Ru al y E aluación de Polí icas Públicas– UDERVAL
(Ins i u o In e uni e si a io de Desa ollo Local), Depa amen o de Geog a ía, Facul ad de Geog a ía e His o ia
Uni e sidad de Valencia. A da. Blasco Ibáñez, 28. 46010 Valencia
Diana Esme alda Vale o-López
diana. ale [email p o ec ed] h ps://o cid.o g/0000-0001-7565-770X
Cen e o Moun ain S udies. Pe h College, Uni e si y o he Highlands and Islands (Sco land).
C ie Road, Pe h, Sco land, PH1 2NX (UK)
Simón Sánchez-Mo al e al.
Jaime Esc ibano-Piza o e al.
KEYWORDS
Social Policies
Ru al A eas
Po e y
Social Exclusion
Social Inclusion
TOPIC AND OBJECTIVES
This a icle explo es how he a en ion o social exclusion and po e y in u al a eas is ma e ialised in he
plans o social inclusion in Spain.
The popula ion in u al a eas is e y ulne able o social exclusion p ocesses due o ou in e connec ed
and o e lapping dynamics ela ed o i) he limi ed job ma ke , ii) demog aphic p ocesses o depopula ion
and ageing, iii) lack (o e y limi ed) o educa ion oppo uni ies and i ) accessibili y issues o essen ial se -
ices and adequa e in as uc u es (Be olini, P., e al., 2008; CES, 2008). The eedback o hose dynamics
esul s in a icious ci cle o po e y and exclusion om which is e y di icul o escape o many u al a eas,
pa icula ly o he mos ulne able g oups (Milbou ne, P., 2010; Bock, B., e al., 2015).
We s udy he policies on social inclusion de eloped in Spain seeking o es ablish which a e he main
ac ions add essed o u al a eas. In Spain, social policies in gene al and in pa icula hose add essed o
ackle po e y, and social exclusion a e a compe ence o he cen al go e nmen and he go e nmen o he
Au onomous Communi ies (ACs).
Ou objec i es a e wo. Fi s , o analyse he social inclusion policies exis ing in he ACs in o de o es ab-
lish he a en ion paid o u al a eas. And second, o check i u al ACs ha e mo e speci ic ac ions o u al
a eas han u ban ACs.
SUMMARY OF ARTICLE: doi: h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/ ea.2020.i39.02
DOI: h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/ ea.2020.i39.02
Fo ma o de ci a / Ci a ion: Esc ibano-Piza o, J., Se ano-La a, J. J. y Vale o-López, D.E. (2020). The Te i o ialisa ion o Social Inclusion Policies
om he Pe spec i e o he Spanish Ru al A eas… Re is a de Es udios Andaluces, 39, 23-44 h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/ ea.2020.i39.02
Co espondencia au o es: jaime.esc ibano@u .es (Jaime Esc ibano-Piza o).
Jaime Esc ibano-Piza o e al. / REA N. 39 (2020) 23-44
185
© Edi o ial Uni e sidad de Se illa 2020 | Se illa, España| CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 | e-ISSN: 2340-2776 | doi: h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/ ea.2020.i39.02
METHODS
We ocus ou analysis in he Social Inclusion Plans as hey ga he app oaches, objec i es and ac ions ad-
d essed o ackling po e y and social exclusion.
Fi s , we iden i ied and ga he ed he exis ing plans on social inclusion a na ional and AC le el. Second,
we pe o med a con en analysis on he plans in o de o iden i y he measu es explici ly add essed o u al
a eas and o ca ego ise hem depending on hei heme o ield o ac ion. Las , we compa ed he numbe ,
p opo ion and ype o measu es iden i ied ac oss u al and u ban ACs. The compa ison conside s ha
social policies in Spain a e a compe ence o he ACs which b ings he e ogenei y o he landscape. Fo his
compa ison, he ACs we e classi ied as u al o u ban using he c i e ia se by he OECD in 1994 based on he
h eshold o 150 inhabi an s / squa e kilome e (Goe lich, F. J., e al., 2016). Acco ding o hese c i e ia, he
Balea ic Islands, Cana y Islands, Basque Coun y, Mad id, Ca alonia and Valencian Communi y a e u ban.
MAIN RESULTS
The esul ing landscape o ac ions add essing social exclusion in u al a eas in no homogeneous. The ACs
we e no a he same si ua ion ega ding he de elopmen o plans o s a egies o coo dina e he e o s
add essing social exclusion a he momen in which his esea ch was done (Sep embe 2018). While he ma-
jo i y o ACs had in o ce o ecen ly inished some ype o plan o s a egy (cases o As u ias, Can ab ia and
Ca alonia), some o hem had e y ou da ed ools (La Rioja and he Cana y Islands), and o he s ne e had
e en de eloped one (Mu cia and Balea es). Among he ACs ha had an upda ed plan, Andalusia, Ca alonia
and Mad id, did no include any objec i e o measu e explici ly add essed o u al a eas.
The esul s o he compa a i e analysis deepen in he desc ip ion o his di e se si ua ion in igh ing
social exclusion. In o al, we iden i ied 117 ac ions ac oss all he 13 ACs plans analysed, bu hey we e no
e enly dis ibu ed ac oss ACs. 73.5% o he iden i ied ac ions we e se in p edominan ly u al ACs. Mo eo e ,
hal o hose measu es a e concen a ed in only wo ACs (Galicia and Cas illa y León). Thus, he e is an impo -
an deg ee o he e ogenei y also among he u al ACs. In h ee u al ACs (As u ias, Na a a and Can ab ia),
he numbe ac ions speci ically designed o u al a eas is below he na ional a e age (5.2%), while in o he
ou u al ACs (Cas illa-La Mancha, Ex emadu a, Cas illa y León and A agón) he numbe o ac ions doubles
he na ional a e age. I should be no ed ha he single ACs ha includes mo e ac ions add essed o u al
a eas is he Valencian Communi y, which is classi ied as an u ban egion. I is wo hy o highligh he e ha
he Valencian plan includes an axis dedica ed o e i o ial equi y and is designed wi h an in eg a i e and
ans e sal pe spec i e.
The u ban- u al classi ica ion o he ACs does no p ede e mine he numbe o ac ions add essing social
exclusion in u al a eas. In ela i e e ms, when looking a he p opo ion o measu es add essed o u al
a eas upon he o al o ac ions included in he plan, o he conside a ions a e ele an . On he one hand,
among u al ACs, he ela i e p opo ion o speci ic ac ions is highe as he o al numbe o ac ions ends o
be lowe : (see o example he cases o Cas illa y León, A agón, Ex emadu a, and Cas illa-La Mancha). On
he o he hand, in he wo u ban ACs ha include speci ic measu es o u al a eas (Valencian Communi y
and Basque Coun y), he ela i e ele ance o hose measu es is dilu ed (a ound 5%) due o he la ge num-
be o ac ions included in hei plans. In any case, we in e p e hese numbe s as aligned o he social in is-
ibili y o social exclusion in u al a eas ha has al eady been highligh ed by a numbe o au ho s (Commins,
P., 2004; Be olini, P., e al., 2008; Bock, B., e al., 2015; Be na d, J., e al., 2019).
The hema ic analysis o he measu es dedica ed explici ly o u al a eas e idences he p e-eminence o
aspec s ela ed o he ollowing opics: egional de elopmen , educa ion and aining, suppo o speci ic
g oups, employmen , ex ension o ICTs, ene gy po e y, housing, amily and communi y in e en ion, and
issues ela ed o he go e nance and implemen a ion o he policies (e alua ion and adminis a i e coo di-
na ion and ne wo king). Howe e , 50% o he ac ions a e ocused on only h ee opics, which indica es he
p io i ies and main lines o ac ion in social inclusion policies. Fi s , he e i o ial and socio-economic de el-
opmen and planning (18,8%) link o he idea ha sol ing social needs ha speci ic collec i es (i.e. women,
Jaime Esc ibano-Piza o e al. / REA N. 39 (2020) 23-44
186
© Edi o ial Uni e sidad de Se illa 2020 | Se illa, España| CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 | e-ISSN: 2340-2776 | doi: h p://dx.doi.o g/10.12795/ ea.2020.i39.02
young people and immig an s) migh ha e ela es o he wellbeing and quali y o li e s anda ds a ailable
in he e i o y in gene al. Second, he measu es add essed o he enhancemen o capaci ies and employ-
abili y h ough educa ion and aining (17.9%). Thi d, i is essen ial o pay speci ic a en ion o he speci ic
needs o key ulne able g oups, pa icula ly women and immig an s, bu also people wi h disabili ies, olde
people and child en (14.53%), wha equi es he acknowledge o demog aphic and socio-cul u al di e si y
in u al a eas.
CONCLUSION
Social policies should inco po a e he e i o ial pe spec i e in hei design o a leas in he implemen a ion
in o de o be e ec i e and ele an agains social exclusion in a u al a ea. Social policies in Spain speci ical-
ly add essed o u al a eas o a leas wi h some capaci y o ac o e hem acco ding o hei demands and
needs, a e an excep ion. In he analysed ACs plans, he a en ion o u al a eas appea s only a he ac ion
le el. The e a e no pa icula s a egic axis o objec i es o u al a eas.
The decen alisa ion o he social policies should mean an oppo uni y o design and o ganise he social
policy om a e i o ial app oach. Howe e , in gene al, his does no ansla e in o comple e and speci ic
a en ion on u al eali ies in he di e en ACs. The ac ha u ban ACs ba ely acknowledge ha po e y and
social exclusion in u al a eas ha e peculia i ies ha make hem di e en om he coun e pa p ocesses in
u ban a eas, cas a shadow upon he ele ance o he measu es implemen ed.
Ha ing his in o accoun is i al in a con ex in which many u al e i o ies (pa icula ly hose expe ienc-
ing depopula ion and socio-economic issues) claim o policies and measu es ha a end be e o hei
si ua ions and needs. In he case o social exclusion, i is e iden ha he exis ing policy ools al eady ha e
he capaci y o ackle hose speci ic issues. This migh be he case o he social inclusion plans, bu i would
be necessa y ha hey we e p epa ed and implemen ed wi h a e i o ial app oach.