scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

A novel Index of Vulnerable Homes: findings from application in Spain

Abstract

This paper develops a novel index of vulnerable homes in terms of fuel poverty that is based on the analysis of different existing fuel poverty indicators and their relationship to the residential sector. The new index of vulnerable homes unifies the many indicators hitherto employed, and assesses the home vulnerability situation regardless of whether or not it is in fuel poverty by using three dimensions: monetary cost, energy and thermal comfort. The monetary dimension analyses vulnerability in relation to the available net income to face everyday life. The energy variable assesses the vulnerability related to the constructive characteristics of the dwelling. Finally, the introduction of the thermal-comfort variable enables the evaluation of the vulnerability related to the inner temperature of the dwelling and its perception by occupants. The combination of the different resulting values in each dimension and its relationship to the quality of life of occupants establishes a hierarchy of vulnerable levels. As a result, a multi-dimensional index is defined which relates technical aspects (characteristics of the dwelling) and social aspects (quality of life of households). The index of vulnerable homes provides a more complete assessment of the home situation than the existing fuel poverty indicators by identifying which variables require a greater assistance.

Read accessible full text

A novel Index of Vulnerable Homes: findings from application in Spain

Author: Castaño Rosa, Raúl; Solís-Guzmán, Jaime; Marrero Meléndez, Madelyn
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Year: 2020
DOI: 10.1177/1420326X18764783
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/7ffe1fc8-f117-447e-bfda-5fed5d42768c/download
Depósi o de in es igación de la Uni e sidad de Se illa
h ps://idus.us.es/
Es a es la e sión acep ada del a ículo publicado en:
This is an accep ed manusc ip o a pape published in:
Indoo and Buil En i onmen (2018): 28/03/2018
DOI: h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/1420326X18764783
El acceso a la e sión publicada puede eque i susc ipción.
Access o he published e sion may equi e subsc ip ion.
“This is an Accep ed Manusc ip o an a icle published by SAGE Publica ions in
Indoo and Buil En i onmen on 28/03/2018, a ailable
a : h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/1420326X18764783.”
1
A no el Index o Vulne able Homes: indings om applica ion in Spain
Raúl Cas año-Rosa
Depa men o Building Cons uc ion II, Uni e si y o Se ille, Spain.
Jaime Solís-Guzmán
Depa men o Building Cons uc ion II, Uni e si y o Se ille, Spain.
Madelyn Ma e o
Depa men o Building Cons uc ion II, Uni e si y o Se ille, Spain.
Co esponding au ho
Raúl Cas año-Rosa, Depa men o Building Cons uc ion II, Uni e si y o Se ille, Spain, A enue Reina Me cedes,
4-a 41012, Se ille. Email: aucasd[email p o ec ed].
Abs ac
This pape de elops a no el Index o Vulne able Homes (IVH) in e ms o uel po e y (FP) ha is based on he
analysis o di e en exis ing FP indica o s and hei ela ionship o he esiden ial sec o . The new IVH uni ies he
many indica o s hi he o employed, and assesses he home ulne abili y si ua ion ega dless o whe he o no
i is in FP by using h ee dimensions: mone a y cos , ene gy and he mal com o . The mone a y dimension
analyses ulne abili y in ela ion o he a ailable ne income o ace e e yday li e. The ene gy a iable assesses
he ulne abili y ela ed o he cons uc i e cha ac e is ics o he dwelling. Finally, he in oduc ion o he
he mal-com o a iable enables he e alua ion o he ulne abili y ela ed o he inne empe a u e o he
dwelling and i s pe cep ion by enan s. The combina ion o he di e en esul ing alues in each dimension and
i s ela ionship o he quali y o li e o enan s es ablishes a hie a chy o ulne able le els. As a esul , a mul i-
dimensional index is de ined which ela es echnical aspec s (cha ac e is ics o he dwelling) and social aspec s
(quali y o li e o households). The IVH p o ides a mo e comple e assessmen o he home si ua ion han he
exis ing FP indica o s by iden i ying which a iables equi e a g ea e assis ance.
Keywo ds
Fuel po e y, Ene gy po e y, Vulne able homes, Vulne abili y Index, Heal h, The mal Com o .
In oduc ion
Fuel po e y (FP) is a global p oblem ha has been accen ua ed in Eu ope due o he economic c isis, has gi en
ise o go e nmen and poli ical pa y in e es , and has achie ed high public impac . Fo he analysis o FP in he
mos ulne able households, he e a e se e al o icial de ini ions and indica o s de eloped by coun ies such as
Uni ed Kingdom, I eland, F ance and Slo akia1. Howe e , no o icial s anda d has been es ablished ac oss he
Eu opean Union ha assesses FP in membe s a es, and he e o e in ce ain coun ies, his ype o po e y s ill
emains o be ecognized as a social p oblem. Al hough i is no he main eason, he lack o a speci ic legisla i e
p og amme o add ess he issue can lead o “FP a es a ying d as ically om coun y o coun y, o e en among
communi ies wi hin a coun y. Fo example, based on Eu os a da a o 2012, 46.5% o Bulga ia´s popula ion a e
unable o keep hei homes adequa ely wa m du ing he win e ime, while in Es onia his igu e is o icially only
4.2%, Denma k 2.6%, and Sweden 1.4%” (see EnAc p ojec 2 o a e iew). Acco ding o some sou ces, 50 million
people in Eu ope li e in FP, bu o he esea ch indica es he amoun o be unde 20% o he o al EU popula ion
(101 million people)2.
2
The FP concep no only indica es he inabili y o keep a home adequa ely wa m du ing di e en pe iods o he
yea , o he exis ence o p oblems paying o he ene gy consumed o he high cos o ene gy p ices, bu i has
also e ol ed in o a mul i-dimensional concep . Fuel po e y is cu en ly de ined as ha si ua ion which may
dep i e households no only o hea ing o cooling, bu also o ho wa e , elec ici y and o he essen ial household
needs3,4.
Fuel po e y was in oduced by Ishe wood and Hancock5 in 1979 a e he ene gy p ice in la ion due o he
pe oleum c isis (1973-1974). Howe e , he concep was de ined o he i s ime in 1991 by D B enda
Boa dman, who s a ed ha FP occu s when households a e unable o “ha e adequa e ene gy se ices o 10 pe
cen o income” (Boa dman).6 The Eu opean Commission (EC), con a y o a gumen s om many o he EU
ins i u ions, “has s a ed ha hey do no suppo a Eu opean de ini ion o FP, and ha a common de ini ion
would be inapp op ia e due o he di e se ene gy con ex s ound ac oss he Union” (Thomson).1 The e is much
discussion on how o de ine and iden i y FP, and se e al esea che s, B aubach and Fe and7, Rosenow e
al.8, and Boa dman9, a e iden i ying ene gy e iciency in households as an e ec i e policy app oach in o de o
educe FP in socie y.
Cu en ly, he e a e nume ous FP de ini ions de eloped in coun ies such as he Uni ed Kingdom, F ance, I eland
and Slo akia1, as well as a di e si y o indica o s o hei analysis. These indica o s can be di ided in o wo
ca ego ies: hose based on a household’s income and expenses (Table 1) and hose based on sel - epo ed
household condi ions (Table 2).
Table 1. Indica o s based on household income and expendi u es.
Indica o
Desc ip ion
10 pe cen measu e4
A household is said o be in FP i i needs o spend mo e han 10% o i s
income on uel o keep he home adequa ely wa m
2M Indica o s10
- Double he median o household expendi u e on ene gy
- Double he mean o household expendi u e on ene gy
- Double he median sha e o household expendi u e on ene gy
- Double he mean sha e o household expendi u e on ene gy
Minimum Income
S anda d (MIS)11,12
The amoun needed o achie e an accep able s anda d o li ing. A household
is said o be in FP due o i s domes ic ene gy expenses
Low Income High Cos
(LIHC)13
A household is in FP i he cos o adequa e ene gy se ices pushes hem
below he h eshold o mone a y po e y, and i he ene gy cos s a e highe
han hose o a median household
A e Fuel Cos Po e y
(AFCP)13–15
A household is said o be in FP i i s ne income (a e sub ac ing ene gy and
housing cos s) alls below he h eshold o po e y
Sou ce: Schuessle 10
Due o he limi a ions o an expendi u e app oach, some au ho s p opose he inclusion o subjec i e and
objec i e da a in o he analysis, such as he p esence o mould, he absence o cen al hea ing, and abili y o
keep dwellings wa m. Fu he mo e, he Eu opean Commission (EC), in a s a wo king pape 16, has sugges ed
h ee c i e ia o e alua e FP: he inabili y o keep homes adequa ely wa m; he delay in he paymen o u ili y
bills; and he occupa ion o de ec i e dwellings (meaning hey ha e leaky oo s, damaged walls o ounda ions,
and condi ions such as mould and o ). A guably, his is he key ad an age o a consensual FP indica o ,
pa icula ly o compa a i e esea ch on a Eu opean scale17, and cau ion is necessa y gi en due o hei subjec i e
and cul u ally dependen na u e18 (Table 2).
3
Table 2. Indica o s based on sel - epo ed household condi ions.
Indica o
Desc ip ion
Eu opean Union Su ey on Income and Li ing Condi ions (EU-SILC)19
Abili y o keep a home adequa ely
wa m
This p o ides an insigh in o he pe cei ed a o dabili y o hea ing
homes ac oss he EU
Household wi h a ea s on u ili y bills
This shows households epo ing di icul ies o pay hei u ili y bills.
I may indica e ha a household is s uggling o a o d adequa e
se ices
De ec i e dwellings (meaning hey
ha e leaky oo s, damaged walls o
ounda ions, and condi ions such as
mould and o )
This shows households epo ing he p esence o a leaking oo ,
damp walls o o en windows. The p esence o damp indica es ha
he dwelling is no ene gy e icien . I may also be an indica ion o a
con inuously unhea ed o ine ec i ely hea ed home
Su ey on pe cep ions and s a emen s om households (SPS)19,20
Abili y o keep a home adequa ely
cool in summe ime
This p o ides an insigh in o he pe cei ed a o dabili y o unning
ai -condi ioning in homes in egions wi h ho summe s
Sou ce: Thomson and Snell21
Rega ding he allegedly di e en meaning o Fuel and Ene gy Po e y e minologies, Ene gy Po e y (EP) “has
been adi ionally used o cap u e p oblems ela ed o he inadequa e access o ene gy supplies in de eloping
coun ies, and in ol es a hos o economic, in as uc u al, social equi y, educa ion and heal h conce ns”
(Bouza o ski e al.).22 Mo eo e , a numbe o au ho s ha e been using EP in e e ence o he lack o access o
mode n ene gy se ices in de eloping coun ies, mainly in Cen al and Sou h Ame ica, sub-Saha an A ica, and
Asia23–26, leading o hose a eas wi h limi ed and ine icien in as uc u es, such as socially excluded subu bs and
u al a eas o be iden i ied. These a eas ace added disad an ages due o hei isola ion and/o geog aphical
sp awl. The esul s ob ained ac oss Eu ope by Bouza o ski and Ti ado He e o27, and by Bake , Whi e and P es on
in 200828, help owa ds he unde s anding o his concep . Howe e , acco ding o a la ge numbe o key EU policy
documen s29, he e ms FP and EP can be conside ed as he same phenomenon, and bo h a e he mani es a ion
o Ene gy Vulne abili y (EV), which is de ined as “ he p opensi y o an indi idual o become incapable o secu ing
a ma e ially and socially needed le el o ene gy se ice in he home” (Bouza o ski e al.).22 Following his
p emise, his pape adop s his la e posi ion o uni y he wo e ms. Hence, he e m FP and EP mean he same
h oughou he pape .
This pape con ibu es owa ds iden i ying hose homes in a ulne able si ua ion by analysing he cha ac e is ics
o he dwelling and he social si ua ion o he enan s.
The analysis o he concep o FP will allow he ela ionship be ween he echnical and social aspec s and an
ene gy-e iciency imp o emen o be es ablished, which will imp o e li ing condi ions and wel a e, mo i a ed
mainly by:
- An inc ease in a ailable income o ace e e yday li e due o a educ ion in ene gy expenses.
- Main enance o he home a heal hy and com o able empe a u es.
Backg ound
FP is a mul i- ace ed issue ha a ies spa ially, empo ally, cul u ally and longi udinally. Ce ain key ac o s
iden i ied in he li e a u e base ha a ec he pe o mance o homes, can be g ouped in o ou main
componen s: Geog aphic loca ion, Ene gy p ices, Income and Quali y o dwelling (Figu e 1).
4
The cha ac e is ics o he a ea whe e he home is loca ed exe di ec o indi ec in luence on he pe o mance
o he dwelling, such as he a ailabili y o in as uc u e and equipmen , and social and clima ology
cha ac e is ics o he a ea (old own, subu bs, social exclusion, e c.). This ac o is ela ed wi h hose a eas wi h
highe le els o po e y, a om he ci y cen e, wi h ine icien in as uc u e and equipmen and a popula ion
wi h high le els o economic dep i a ion. I will he e o e be possible o iden i y hose a eas wi h high numbe s
o households in a ulne able si ua ion. F om his con ex , he econome ic analysis by Legend e and Ricci in
F ance30, and ha by Miniaci, Sca pa and Valbonesi in I aly31, iden i y g oups wi h a high ulne abili y o en e ing
FP, bu ail o iden i y FP i sel . These analyses examine he pa e n wi hin he demog aphic, socio-economic and
physical condi ions, which migh gi e ise o households d opping below he FP h eshold. To his end, he
po en ial a ea-based pla o ms ha e been shown o imp o e he a ge ing o an i- uel-po e y policies by using
a wide ange o demog aphic and socio-economic a iables, such as income, housing enu e, household ype and
age o dwelling.32 A ea-based, Geog aphic In o ma ion Sys ems (GIS)-based app oaches, which lead o all
ele an in o ma ion being b ough oge he and analysed, a e eme ging as a ealis ic s a egy o he
iden i ica ion o a eas which a e a high isk o FP33.
Ene gy p ice, which is used in he Low Income High Cos (LIHC) indica o 34,35 and o he FP indica o s (Table 1),
allows he uel p ice used by households o be analysed. This ac o depends mainly on he ype o uel and he
powe company, and also on he a ea whe e he home is loca ed36 (Figu e 1).
Household income is applied o e alua e he mone a y ulne abili y o enan s and has been conside ed by all
FP indica o s since hei concep ion. This depends on ac o s such as: housing expenses, employmen si ua ion
o enan s, ype o amily (p esence o he elde ly, young child en, o eenage s), and size o amily37. Household
income, o economic esou ces o deal wi h he paymen o he minimum ene gy consump ion, is cu en ly
conside ed he mos in luen ial ac o in FP38. The FP si ua ion can he e o e be a consequence o he cu en
economic c isis ac oss he EU. In gene al, households in FP ha e high ene gy consump ion expenses, and hence
hei ne a ailable income o ood dec eases39. This si ua ion can cause malnou ishmen in child en in pa icula
and is gene ally called he ‘‘hea -o -ea ’’ e ec (Liddell).40 In addi ion, hese households ha e shown a highe isk
o su e ing om men al illnesses, such as dep ession, wi h a p obabili y g ea e han 25%, whe eas he e is only
a 5% isk in he es o he popula ion41.
The dwelling quali y is he mos complex ac o in he e alua ion o he home, and is analysed by he ene gy
consump ion o he dwelling. The ene gy e iciency o he dwelling can be conside ed as a s a ing poin in o de
o assess i s quali y acco ding o i s ela ionship wi h FP. Dwelling ene gy e iciency depends on ac o s such as
ene gy a ing, building en elope, sys ems, en ila ion le el, main enance and yea o cons uc ion (Figu e
1). Homes wi h insu icien hea ing mos o he ime can a ec child en’s school p og ess and emo ional well-
being: i is nea ly wice as likely o child en li ing in homes wi h insu icien hea ing o su e om espi a o y
diseases. I has also been no ed ha child en li ing in FP homes un a highe isk o being admi ed o hospi al
o o needing p ima y ca e acili ies, and su e inc eased se e i y and isk om as hma (see Liddell and Mo is42
o he li e a u e), and hence child en and he elde ly can be conside ed as ulne able cus ome s who ha e a
highe possibili y o su e ing illnesses.43
The dwelling quali y can also be e alua ed by means o com o analyses ( he mal, ligh and acous ic), in o de
o conside as many a iables as possible. This pape is ocused on he he mal com o and i s ela ionship wi h
FP, he emaining ac o s will be analysed a a u u e ime. The e a e many s udies on his opic ha show ha
imp o emen s in he mal com o educe he ene gy consump ion o a dwelling44–46, and imp o e he heal h o
he household47,48. I is known ha hose households wi h inadequa e empe a u es du ing he win e su e
om mino heal h p oblems, such as colds and lu, and om wo sening a h i is and heuma ism (see Gilbe son
e al.49 o e idence). The impac o ex eme empe a u es on he elde ly is well known, in ha “i inc eases he
p obabili y o su e ing om ch onic medical condi ions, such as ca dio ascula and ce eb o ascula diseases,

5
diabe es, espi a o y and enal diseases, Pa kinson’s disease, Alzheime ’s disease, and epilepsy” (O mandy and
Ez a y),50 and i can cause a highe mo ali y a e du ing win e ime. This is known as excess win e mo ali y,51
and is es ima ed as he inc eased numbe o dea hs occu ing du ing he win e season (Decembe o Ma ch
inclusi e) as compa ed o he a e age du ing he es o he yea ; he e is an empi ical ela ionship be ween
seasonal mo ali y and housing ene gy e iciency.
Healy52 epo ed ha excess win e mo ali y in Eu ope is 5% o 30%. Howe e , he e emains an open deba e
on why ce ain coun ies expe ience d ama ically highe a es o seasonal mo ali y han o he s, leading a
numbe o au ho s o ad oca e al e na i e measu es o quan i y heal h impac s associa ed wi h cu en and
u u e win e ime wea he 53,54. In his ega d, Po ugal su e s he highes a es (28%) o seasonal mo ali y
ollowed closely by Spain, I eland and G eece (21%, 21%, and 18%, espec i ely) (Healy).52 The Eu owin e G oup
(1997)51 concluded ha mo ali y inc eased o a g ea e ex en in egions wi h wa m win e s and in popula ions
wi h coole homes. Al hough hei s udy has no p o ed causali y, he s ong, posi i e co ela ion be ween
empe a u e and he mal s anda ds in cons uc ion indica es ha imp o ing he he mal e iciency o housing in
sou he n and wes e n Eu ope could play a s ong pa in educing he la ge seasonal a ia ions in mo ali y ound
in hese coun ies55.
The mal com o has been assessed by o he esea che s, in e ms o FP indica o s, by using subjec i e indica o s
based on sel - epo ed household condi ions (Table 2) and i has been ound ha be e he mal com o in he
home is ela ed o be e heal h and well-being56. Fu he mo e, se e al p ojec s also aim o show he ela ionship
be ween quali y housing and FP. Wa m om be e heal h57 (Regional, Economic and Social Cen e, UK) e alua es
he quali y o he dwelling be o e and a e he ins alla ion o imp o emen s in ene gy e iciency, and also
enan s’ opinions o imp o emen s in hei homes; a second p ojec is A o dable Wa m h and Heal h Impac
E alua ion Toolki (Depa men o Ene gy and Clima e Change (DECC) and Cen e o Sus ainable Ene gy
(CSE)58,59, UK), which epo s case s udies whe e he ela ionship be ween heal h and ene gy e iciency o he
dwelling is made clea .
The new index, he Index o Vulne able Homes (IVH), as p oposed in his pape , uni ies a high numbe o
in luen ial ac o s in home pe o mance, leading o he de ini ion o hose ulne able households whose si ua ion
is de e mined by physical, social, economic, en i onmen al and com o ac o s ha inc ease he isk o su e ing
heal h p oblems and social well-being p oblems. In addi ion, his pape conside s i essen ial o addi ionally
inco po a e enan cha ac e is ics, which may be conside ed he mos in luen ial ac o s, in o he assessmen o
he ulne able si ua ion o he home (Figu e 1).
6
Figu e 1. Key ac o s in a si ua ion o uel po e y.
Me hodology
In o de o combine he a o emen ioned FP indica o s oge he wi h he ene gy e iciency o buildings, a new
index o ulne able homes (IVH) has been de ined, which allows a pa icula home o be analysed. This IVH
depends on he p e iously de ined concep o FP, and is ob ained by analysing h ee dimensions (mone a y
po e y, ene gy and he mal com o indica o s) and he heal h- ela ed quali y o li e o he household. The h ee
dimensions o he IVH a e based on FP indica o s cu en ly used (Tables 1 and 2), al hough he IVH uni ies and
s i es o imp o e i s implemen a ion. Finally, o assess how well he IVH has been de eloped, a case s udy in
Se ille, Spain was analysed, and a sensi i i y analysis was pe o med unde a ious household condi ions.
Mone a y Po e y Indica o (MPI)
The p oposed MPI is based on he i s o he h ee componen s o he AROPE (A Risk o Po e y and/o
Exclusion) indica o . The AROPE indica o was se up by he Eu ope 2020 s a egy60, and i iden i ies people a
isk o po e y o social exclusion. Acco ding o he i s componen o he AROPE indica o , 60 which ep esen s
he condi ion o li ing wi h a low income (60% o he median equi alised disposable income a e social
ans e s), he po e y h eshold was se in eu os, and hence a home is conside ed a isk o po e y and social
exclusion i i s annual income di ided by he numbe o household membe s alls below his h eshold. The
po e y h eshold will depend on he household's size and composi ion, and i is calcula ed using equa ion (1):
T = To × Uc (1)
7
whe e T0 is he po e y h eshold o a pe son and Uc is he equi alised household size. I is exp essed by using a
s anda d (equi alence) scale, he modi ied scale p o ided by he O ganisa ion o Economic Co po a ion and
De elopmen (OECD) 61, acco ding o equa ion (2):
Uc = 1 + (a-1) x 0.5 + b x 0.3 (2)
whe e a is he numbe o adul s, and b is he numbe o child en.
In o de o imp o e he indica o , his pape conside s wo po e y h esholds: i s , a mone a y po e y
h eshold (MPT) which is se a 60% o he median equi alised disposable income in each egion acco ding o
Eu os a s a is ics; and second, a se e e mone a y po e y h eshold (SMPT), which de ines a mo e p eca ious
le el o po e y, ep esen ing he lowes disposable income o a household. This h eshold is se in acco dance
wi h he social bene i g an ed by he go e nmen o amilies in social exclusion.
Rega ding equa ion (1), T0 is 60% o he median equi alised disposable income o a pe son and he social bene i
g an ed o a pe son in social exclusion in he s udied a ea o he calcula ion o he MPT and SMPT, espec i ely.
The mone a y po e y indica o (MPI) is calcula ed using equa ion (3):
MPI = (I + B) - (HE + OE + WMSW)
T (3)
whe e:
I: household income. Annual household incomes a e gi en a e sub ac ing housing expendi u es. Unlike he
MIS, LIHC and AFC indica o s analysed (Table 1), MPI excludes ene gy expenses in o de o a oid “ alse nega i es”
ha may a ise due o an inadequa e home pe o mance o a poo mone a y si ua ion ha esul s in a household
no being able o a o d he minimum ene gy consump ion.
B: addi ional mone a y bene i s (social bene i s, en al incomes, e c.).
HE: housing expendi u e ( en o mo gage). Housing expendi u e depends on he ype o amily and i s social
si ua ion. Annual household incomes a e he e o e di e en in each home (i is calcula ed by he nume a o in
equa ion (3)).
OE: o he addi ional housing expendi u es. I shows he ela ionship be ween a home and addi ional expenses
om degene a i e diseases, mobili y, disabled ela i es, e c. These ypes o expenses exe a majo impac on
he mone a y si ua ion o a home, and in mos imes, i can cause a se e e ulne able si ua ion. Fo his eason,
he inclusion o his “special expenses” in he MPI is jus i ied.
WMSW: expendi u e o wa e and municipal solid was e managemen . These expenses ha e ye o be aken in o
accoun by he di e en FP indica o s. They a e ca alogued as an essen ial need by he Wo ld Heal h O ganiza ion
(WHO) and mo i a e i s inclusion.
T: po e y h eshold, is calcula ed by equa ion (1).
The e o e, he MPI is de ined by a de i ed equa ion (4) aking in o accoun o T and ne income.
MPI = NI
T (4)
whe e:
NI: ne Income (nume a o in equa ion (3)).
8
T: po e y h eshold, which will depend on he coun y o egion. A household is said o be in a mone a y po e y
o se e e mone a y po e y si ua ion i i s ne incomes all below he se h eshold (MPI <1.00).
Ene gy Indica o (EnI)
The majo i y o FP indica o s analyse he ene gy consump ion o dwellings by using he ene gy expenses in hei
domes ic ene gy se ices, and da a is collec ed h ough u ili y bills o sel - epo ed ene gy expendi u es. Fuel
Po e y can also be caused by li ing in ene gy-ine icien homes17, and he e o e he p oposed EnI aims o
e alua e he ene gy e iciency o dwellings and bene i s a e an ene gy-e iciency imp o emen . The household-
le el uel po e y indica o de eloped by Ryan Walke e al62, which is based on he UK’s S anda d Assessmen
P ocedu e (SAP), leads o ene gy simula ion so wa e being conside ed as an op ion o he e alua ion o he
expec ed ene gy consump ion o he dwelling i sys ems a e co ec ly and ully used. Fu he mo e, he
cha ac e is ics, p io i ies and cus oms o hese households ha e no e ec on he equi ed ene gy consump ion
alue, and consequen ly i can be conside ed mo e signi ican han he ac ual ene gy consump ion (see Thomson
e al.,63 o a e iew). Wi h his p emise, he EnI e alua es whe he equi ed ene gy consump ion o he dwelling
is s anda d o he median ene gy consump ion equi ed o he ype o building in he loca ed a ea (using he
median alue would allow hose unusually high alues o ene gy consump ion o be conside ed). Hence, he
ene gy h eshold comes om he idea used in o he FP indica o s (Tables 1 and 2), and his is se as he median
ene gy consump ion equi ed o he ype o building in he a ea o s udy.
The e o e, he ene gy indica o (EnI) is calcula ed using equa ion (5):
EnI = EC
MEC (5)
whe e:
EC: ene gy consump ion equi ed (ob ained om he so wa e simula ion).
MEC: median ene gy consump ion equi ed o he ype o building in he a ea o s udy.
The e o e, he housing ene gy consump ion is adequa e i i is below he ene gy h eshold o “admissible” (EnI
<1.00), o he wise i is conside ed “inadmissible” (EnI >1.00).
Ene gy consump ion based on he cha ac e is ics o he dwelling ( om he ene gy simula ion) p e en s he
inclusion o bias owa ds hose homes wi h an inadequa e sys ems usage o hose in a poo mone a y si ua ion,
who canno a o d minimum ene gy consump ion. Hence, hidden ene gy po e y (HEP)64, which iden i ies hose
households whose ene gy expendi u es a e abno mally low, can be analysed.
Com o Indica o (CI)
The mal com o is included in he p oposed indica o in acco dance wi h i s ela ionship wi h FP indica o s and
i s in luence in he ulne able si ua ion o a home. The emaining ac o s (ligh and acous ics) a e o be
conside ed in u u e s udies. The e alua ion o he mal com o in a home is complex mainly due o he in luence
o he ollowing ac o s:
1. Indoo a ea65,66: posi ion o ooms, en ila ion con ol and na u al ligh , con ol o physical condi ions.
2. En i onmen al67,68: ai empe a u e, adian empe a u e, ela i e humidi y and ai eloci y.
3. Pe sonal69–71: heal h, age, gende , me abolism, ac i i y le el, clo hing, he mal sensa ion.
Mos FP indica o s e alua e he he mal com o based on subjec i e da a om Su ey on Li ing Condi ions (SLC)
and EU-SILC (Table 2). Howe e , his esea ch aims o e alua e he mal com o by using he adap i e model
ASHRAE 55-201072 and by supplemen ing i wi h he no ma i e UNE EN 15251:200773. Bo h models e alua e he
15
- EnI: his will equi e he adap a ion o he MEC, which is he median ene gy consump ion equi ed o
he ype o building in he a ea o s udy.
- CI: his will equi e he adap a ion o he he mal com o ange, which can be calcula ed by using he
co esponden equa ion in he UNE EN 15251:200773.
- The cos -e ec i eness alue o a human li e, which is se by he Na ional Heal h Se ice wi hin he
s udied coun y, will be equi ed o he calcula ion o he HRQLC.
In o de o assess how well he IVH has been de eloped, his sec ion p esen s he esul s o he case s udy in
which he IVH has been applied o he Spanish con ex . This con ex is chosen mainly due o he a ailabili y o
he da a sou ces equi ed.
Case s udy
The IVH was applied o a dwelling in a esiden ial block in Se ille (Spain), speci ically in he wo king-class dis ic
o El Ta dón, loca ed on he ou ski s o he ci y. This choice ep esen s he ypical ype o building in he di e en
dis ic s o he ci y, and all necessa y da a o he applica ion o he indica o is a ailable93. The analysed la was
buil in 1978 be o e he in oduc ion o i s ene gy-e iciency egula ions (CT-79)94 and he e o e i has poo
ene gy condi ions. The dwelling comp ises a li ing-dining oom, a ki chen, a ba h oom and h ee bed ooms. The
li ing oom and one o he bed ooms a e o ien ed owa ds he sou heas (di e ed 4° owa ds he eas ), and he
o he wo bed ooms and ki chen owa ds he no hwes (di e ed 4° owa ds he wes ) (Figu e 2). The s uc u al
cha ac e is ics, ene gy and economic da a o he home a e de ined in Tables 6-8. The basic da a o he
calcula ion o he IVH is summa ized in Table 9.
Figu e 2. Geog aphic localiza ion and plan o he analysed dwelling93.
Table 6. S uc u al cha ac e is ics o he dwelling.
Dimension da a
Sys em da a
S uc u al da a

16
Rooms
Floo A ea
(m2)
Type
Desc ip ion
Componen
T ansmi ance
(W/m2K)
Bed oom 1
8.17
Hea ing
P opane gas boile ,
100% clima ised a ea
Façade
1.35
Bed oom 2
9.06
Floo
1.78
Bed oom 3
7.10
Ai -condi ioning
Elec ic mul i-spli
de ice, 100% clima ised
a ea
Indoo wall
2.35
Li ing-dining oom
21.74
Common wall
1.94
Ki chen
6.56
Ho wa e
P opane gas boile ,
nominal powe o 9.40
kW, e iciency o 85%
and 52.56 m3/day
Windows
2.69
Ba h oom
3.84
Hallway
6.86
Ene gy da a (Table 7) was ob ained om he o icial Spanish so wa e, CE3_Vi iendas95, o he ene gy simula ion
o buildings. The so wa e also de e mines he ene gy e iciency o exis ing buildings in Spain96.
This simula ed da a was used due o he lack o ac ual u ili y bills, and also in o de o p e en an o e - o unde -
consump ion igu e om being applied due o an inadequa e usage o sys ems o a poo economic si ua ion,
which would esul in less han he minimum ene gy consump ion.
Table 7. Ene gy da a o he dwelling95.
Hea ing
Ai -condi ioning
Ho
wa e
Ligh
Elec ical
appliances
Cooking
appliance
To al
Ene gy
consump ion
(kWh/m2·yea )
51.67
15.29
19.73
3.55
8.37
2.34
100.96
Ene gy a ing
E
Economic da a (Table 8) shows he ypical economic si ua ion o a household in Spain97, which consis s o wo
adul s and one child. Income and mone a y bene i s we e calcula ed om mic oda a o he Spanish Household
Budge Su ey (HBS) om he Spanish Na ional S a is ics Ins i u e (SNSI)98. The en expense was ob ained om
he a e age en expense wi hin he s udied a ea99. The wa e and municipal solid was e cos was he minimum
cos acco ding o he o icial supplie 100.
Table 8. Economic da a o he household.
Income
(€/mon h)
Bene i s
(€/mon h)
Housing expendi u es
(€/mon h)
O he expendi u es
(€/mon h)
Wa e and solid u ban was e
expendi u es (€/mon h)
1200
0
200
0
50
Table 9 sums up all he da a necessa y o calcula e he IVH om he p e ious ables. The loo a ea was calcula ed
by adding he a eas o he ooms o he dwelling (Table 6). The ne income (nume a o in equa ion (3)) was
ob ained a e he sub ac ion o housing and wa e and municipal solid was e expenses (Table 8). Ene gy
consump ion was aken om he ene gy simula ion (Table 7).
17
Table 9. Da a o he IVH calcula ion.
Household da a
Dwelling da a
U. a ea
(m2)
Ne income
(€/yea )
Nº people
Ene gy consump ion
(kWh/yea )
Adul s
Child en
63.59
11,400
2
1
6420
Rega ding he he mal com o ac o , his was e alua ed using he numbe o hou s (%) he dwelling was inside
o ou side he com o ange du ing he analysed pe iod, o which he com o da a ob ained by Sanchez-
Gue a a e al.101 was used. This da a was ob ained om he dynamic he mal e alua ion o he dwelling in he
Ene gy Plus 7.0 modelling so wa e. The clima ological da a o Se ille used in he so wa e was ob ained om
he IWEC da a o Ene gyPlus. The daily com o anges we e calcula ed by using he co esponding equa ion73
depending on he assessed pe iod: sp ing, summe and win e . The au umn was excluded om he analysis since
i s he mal alues a e simila o hose in sp ing ime. Figu e 3 shows a g aphic example o how he numbe o
hou s o com o was calcula ed acco ding o he he mal com o anges and he indoo empe a u e o he
dwelling. The ed and blue lines ep esen uppe and lowe limi s o com o o he in e io o he dwelling,
espec i ely, which we e calcula ed by using he co esponding equa ion73, and he g een line shows he indoo
empe a u e o he dwelling du ing he analysed pe iod in he s udied a ea ( om he dynamic he mal e alua ion
in he Ene gy Plus 7.0 modelling so wa e). No e ha hese alues we e calcula ed in 2015 acco ding o he
cha ac e is ics o he speci ic dwelling. The e o e, depending on whe he he cha ac e is ics o he dwelling we e
modi ied (a e he imp o emen s had aken place), hese alues migh be di e en . The analysis o Figu e 3 ( he
sou heas o ien a ion in sp ing ime) shows ha on only wo days o he analysed pe iod, 19 and 21 May o 2015,
he indoo empe a u e o he dwelling was ou side he limi o com o , leading o 3.57 hou s (0.51% o hou s)
ou side he com o ange in he dwelling du ing ha pe iod.
Figu e 3. Uppe and lowe limi o he mal com o anges o he dwelling in he sou heas o ien a ion.
Sp ing ime93.
Table 10 summa izes esul s ob ained om he applica ion o calcula ion o pe cen age o he mal com o hou s
o each analysed pe iod: sp ing ime, summe ime, and win e ime (au umn was conside ed o ha e simila
he mal com o hou s (%) as compa ed o sp ing ime in Se ille).
18
Table 10. Pe cen age o The mal com o hou s101.
Sp ing ime
Summe ime
Win e ime
No hwes
açade
Sou heas
açade
No hwes
açade
Sou heas
açade
No hwes
açade
Sou heas
açade
Ou side com o ange
Hou s
0
3.57
6.71
104.9
464.86
464.73
Pe cen age
0.00%
0.51%
0.93%
14.49%
96.85%
96.82%
Wi hin com o ange
Hou s
696
692.43
713.29
615.71
15.14
15.29
Pe cen age
100.00%
99.49%
99.07%
85.51%
3.15%
3.18%
Mone a y Po e y Indica o (MPI). In o de o analyse he mone a y ac o , mone a y po e y and se e e
mone a y po e y h esholds we e se acco ding o he s udied a ea (Se ille) and he household size (Uc) (Table
11). The in e -p o essional minimum income102 ( e y simila o 60% o he median equi alised disposable income
in Se ille103 in 2015) was used as he mone a y po e y h eshold, and he g an ed social bene i s by he Spanish
go e nmen , named Plan PREPARA104 (€400 pe mon h), was used as he se e e mone a y po e y h eshold.
The equi alisa ion ac o de ined in equa ion (2) was used o apply he household size (Uc) in Table 11, and he
a ious h esholds we e hen calcula ed.
Table 11. Po e y h esholds in Se ille (Spain).
Nº people
Mone a y po e y (€)
Se e e mone a y po e y (€)
1 pe son
8114
4800
2 people
12,171
7200
2 adul s and 1 child
14,605
8640
2 adul s and 2 child en
17,040
10,080
2 adul s and 3 child en
19,474
11,520
Acco ding o da a in Table 11, he MPT was se a €14,605 and he SMPT co esponds o €8640. The home
analysed has a ne income o €11,400 pe yea (ob ained om Table 9), and om he applica ion o equa ion (4),
he MPI was se a "mone a y po e y" (MPI <1.00).
Ene gy Indica o (EnI). The ene gy consump ion h eshold (as explained in he Ene gy Indica o sec ion, as pa
o he me hodology) was se acco ding o he da a on he median ene gy consump ion equi ed on he
clima ology o he s udied zone (Se ille, sou h o Spain, Medi e anean clima ology) and he dwelling ypology
( he case s udy was a dwelling in a mul i amily esiden ial block).
Acco ding o he la es da a published by he IDAE105, he median ene gy consump ion equi ed o he ype o
building o he case s udy (ene gy consump ion h eshold) is 8360.46 kWh/yea . The ene gy consump ion
equi ed o he analysed dwelling is 6420 kWh/yea (Table 9), om so wa e CE3_Vi iendas95, and hence, by
applying equa ion (5), he EnI is "admissible" (EnI <1.00).
Com o Indica o (CI). The com o h eshold, acco ding o he explana ion o he com o indica o ou lined
abo e, was aken as 80% o hou s in which he e alua ed oom spaces mus be wi hin he he mal com o
anges. An example o he he mal com o ange is as shown in Figu e 3 o he mal com o anges in a dwelling
19
wi h a sou heas açade du ing he sp ing ime. As a esul , he CI is "admissible" (CI >80%) du ing sp ing and
summe ime. On he o he hand, he CI esul is “inadmissible" (CI <80%) du ing win e ime since he pe cen age
o hou s ha he indoo empe a u e s ays wi hin he he mal com o ange is lowe han 80% ( he mal com o
h eshold) (Table 10).
Table 12 summa izes esul s om each indica o (MPI: mone a y po e y, EnI: admissible, CI: admissible o
sp ing-summe and inadmissible o win e ), and hence he le el o ulne abili y o he home can be ob ained
om Table 5. The inal alue o he IVH was hen deduced by using equa ion (6).
Table 12. Resul s a e he IVH applica ion.
Season
Mone a y po e y
indica o (MPI)
Ene gy indica o (EnI)
Com o indica o (CI)
IVH
Sp ing-Summe
Mone a y po e y
Admissible
Admissible
4
Win e
Mone a y po e y
Admissible
Inadmissible
5
Sensi i i y analysis
To show he po en ial o he IVH, his was e alua ed in se e al scena ios based on he case s udy. The ollowing
aspec s we e analysed: ype o household, household income, ene gy-e iciency in e en ion, and inc ease in
ene gy consump ion.
Scena io 1. Type o household. The i s analysis conside ed a change in he numbe o occupan s. As a esul , he
new household was composed o wo adul s and h ee child en. The cha ac e is ics o he dwelling emained
unchanged, and he e o e he ene gy consump ion and he mal com o ac o s emained he same. Howe e ,
he mone a y ac o was shown o ha e unde gone majo changes. The IVH esul s show an inc ease in i s
ulne able si ua ion (6 in he summe ime, and 9 in he win e ime) ega ding he case s udy (Table 13). The
esul s show how ulne abili y could be inc eased in la ge households.
Scena io 2. Household income. The second analysis conside ed a educ ion in he ne income due o medica ion
expenses o €100 pe mon h o a amily membe (OE), and an inc ease o €135 pe mon h in he wa e p ice
leading o a highe wa e and solid u ban was e expendi u e (WMSW) gi en in equa ion (3). The new si ua ion
caused a educ ion o household ne income o a leas one yea (€11,400 was he ne income in he ini ial
scena io and his was educed o €8580). All o he a iables emained cons an . The IVH shows an inc ease in
he ulne able si ua ion (6 in he summe ime, and 9 in win e ime) in ela ion o he case s udy (Table 13).
Scena io 3. Ene gy-e iciency in e en ion. The hi d analysis e alua ed he ene gy-e iciency imp o emen s by
changing he en i onmen al hea ing and wa e -hea ing ins alla ions: changing he exis ing hea ing sys em o a
na u al gas boile and he ho wa e o a sola he mal sys em, in addi ion o ins alling new windows.
This equipmen eno a ion cos s €7850106, and he new windows €3500106, leading o a educ ion in he ene gy
consump ion ( om 6420 kWh/yea o iginally o 5169 kWh/yea pos -imp o emen ), and consequen ly a
educ ion in he ene gy consump ion expendi u e, and an imp o emen o he he mal com o (adequa e all
yea ound) which was due o he g ea e e iciency o he windows (wi h a low ansmi ance and mino ai leaks
in he dwelling) and he ho -wa e sys em (100% enewable). This scena io enabled he social bene i o be
e alua ed o go e nmen in es men in new sys ems o hese ulne able homes in o de o make hese
dwellings ene gy e icien .
20
The IVH shows a educ ion in he ulne able si ua ion du ing win e ime ( om 5 ini ial case o 4 new scena io)
in ela ion o he case s udy (Table 13).
Scena io 4. Inc ease in ene gy consump ion. This las analysis e alua ed a signi ican change in he ene gy
consump ion due o a ce ain damage in he insula ion o he dwelling, leading o a highe ene gy consump ion
(6420 kWh/yea ini ial case o 8546 kWh/yea new scena io). Since adequa e he mal com o was main ained
in he home, and, in u n, he ene gy consump ion expenses ose co espondingly.
The inc eased ene gy consump ion gene a ed an “inadmissible” Enl ( he h eshold was es ablished a 8360.46
kWh/yea acco ding o IDAE105). Fo his eason, he IVH shows a wo sening in i s ulne able si ua ion (7 in he
summe ime, and 8 win e ime) in ela ion o he case s udy (Table 13).
Table 13. Scena ios o he sensi i i y analysis o he IVH.
Season
Mone a y po e y
indica o (MPI)
Ene gy indica o
(EnI)
Com o
indica o (CI)
IVH
Case
s udy
Sp ing-Summe
Mone a y po e y
Admissible
Admissible
4
Win e
Mone a y po e y
Admissible
Inadmissible
5
1
Sp ing-Summe
Se e e mone a y po e y
Admissible
Admissible
6
Win e
Se e e mone a y po e y
Admissible
Inadmissible
9
2
Sp ing-Summe
Se e e mone a y po e y
Admissible
Admissible
6
Win e
Se e e mone a y po e y
Admissible
Inadmissible
9
3
Sp ing-Summe
Mone a y po e y
Admissible
Admissible
4
Win e
Mone a y po e y
Admissible
Admissible
4
4
Sp ing-Summe
Mone a y po e y
Inadmissible
Admissible
7
Win e
Mone a y po e y
Inadmissible
Inadmissible
8
Discussion
Based on he esul s o he index, he new IVH can be a i med o be able o iden i y he si ua ion o a dwelling
and clea ly shows he na u e o he p oblem. Consequen ly, IVH can con ibu e owa ds he analysis o he bes
solu ion o he imp o emen o he household si ua ion o he case s udy:
- Despi e he adequa e quali y o he dwelling, he IVH shows a highe ulne abili y du ing win e ime
due o he nega i e esul s in he CI, mainly due o he poo quali y o he exis ing windows.
- The po e y si ua ion in he household is he main cause o he si ua ion o ulne abili y.
- The ene gy-e iciency in e en ion in scena io 3 could con ibu e owa ds a be e quali y o li e due o
a educ ion o le el 4 o ulne abili y (IVH = 4) all yea ound. Howe e , he household would need
addi ional imp o emen s in o de o lea e he ulne able si ua ion, ei he by means o an income
inc ease o a educ ion in housing expenses.
- Inclusion o he mal com o in he IVH enables he ulne abili y o a home o be analysed in di e en
seasons, in addi ion o allowing an analysis o he ene gy consump ion o he dwelling, in con as wi h
he exis ing FP indica o s.
- The social bene i o an ene gy-e iciency in e en ion o ulne able homes can be e alua ed in o de
o make hei dwellings ene gy e icien , esul ing in a ool ha would enable go e nmen s o imp o e
he quali y o li e o he household i applied oge he wi h good ene gy policies.

21
Conclusions
This pape o e s a no el Index o Vulne able Homes (IVH), which leads o he de elopmen o he i s
mul i-dimensional index ha assesses he home ulne abili y si ua ion, ega dless o whe he o no i is in Fuel
Po e y (FP). The in luence ac o s include: household mone a y si ua ion, quali y o he dwelling, ine iciency in
he mal com o , inadequa e usage o sys ems, poo choice o sys em equipmen , uel ype, and uel p ice used
in ene gy consump ion. The assessmen o he mal com o in he housing allows objec i e da a o be ob ained,
and p o ides an analysis a e an ene gy-e iciency imp o emen , and aids in choosing he op imal e o i
measu e. Fu he mo e, he IVH would allow iden i ica ion o a si ua ion o ulne abili y and o FP in seasons,
which ha e ne e been aken in o accoun be o e. FP has been adi ionally ela ed wi h coun ies whe e win e s
a e e y cold and long, bu i is known ha coun ies whe e summe s a e e y ho ha e high ene gy consump ion
du ing he summe , which may esul in an FP si ua ion. Fu he mo e, h ough he applica ion o he Heal h-
Rela ed Quali y-o -Li e measu emen , all ac o s conside ed in he IVH can be ela ed: mone a y cos , ene gy,
he mal com o , heal h o he household, ype and size o he household, and geog aphical loca ion.
Re u ning o he aim o he pape , he new IVH p o ides a mo e comple e assessmen o he si ua ion
o a home han he exis ing FP indica o s, by iden i ying which ac o s ha e he g ea es impac on he si ua ion
o ulne abili y. In addi ion, he IVH ela es he echnical aspec s ( he cha ac e is ics o he dwelling) and social
aspec s ( he quali y o li e o he enan s). I also uni ies e idence, de eloped in he FP concep , om mixed
me hods and in e disciplina y s udies: medicine, psychology, en i onmen al sciences, ene gy, cons uc ion, and
social s udies. Mo e impo an ly, he IVH may be used in di e en disciplines and in o he coun ies due o he
app oaches aken in o accoun in he de ini ion o he h ee ac o s: mone a y cos , ene gy and he mal com o .
To his end, new lines o esea ch will be accomplished in o de o be able o use he IVH o he analysis o
di e en ene gy and Heal h-Rela ed Quali y-o -Li e cos s, income o cul u e.
In con as o he FP indica o s, he new IVH con ibu es owa ds he assessmen o ulne abili y in
e ms o i s consequence o in ensi y, and leads o he possibili y o e alua ing he op imal e o i measu emen
in o de o imp o e he quali y o li e o households, by p omo ing ene gy e iciency. The sensi i i y analysis
demons a es how he IVH assesses eal-li e changes ha could occu in a home, whe he hey a e mino , as in
Scena io 3 (modi ica ion in he ype o housing sys ems and windows), o whe he hey a e o g ea e impac ,
such as in Scena io 1 (wi h an inc ease in he household size), Scena io 2 (whe eby he household su e s a
educ ion in i s ne income by €235 pe mon h) and Scena io 4 (signi ican inc ease in he ene gy consump ion
o he dwelling).
While he e a e nume ous FP and ulne able consume s udies ha s i e o yield a solu ion o he
add essed p oblem, his pape b ings a new pe spec i e in he assessmen and iden i ica ion o ulne able
homes, and p o ides a s a ing poin o new lines o esea ch aimed a achie ing op imal and e icien
pe o mances o households in g ea need.
Au ho s’ con ibu ion
All au ho s con ibu ed equally in he p epa a ion o his manusc ip .
Acknowledgemen s
We hank he e iewe s o hei aluable commen s, which signi ican ly imp o ed he po en ial o his pape .
Funding
This esea ch ecei ed no speci ic g an om any unding agency in he public, comme cial, o non-p o i sec o s.
Decla a ion o con lic o in e es
22
The au ho (s) decla ed no po en ial con lic s o in e es wi h espec o he esea ch, au ho ship, and/o
publica ion o his a icle.
Re e ences
1. Thomson H, Snell C, Liddell C. Fuel po e y in he Eu opean Union: a concep in need o de ini ion?
People, Place Policy Online 2016; 10/1: 5–24.
2. EnAc . The ENERGY ACTION p ojec . h p://www.colda home. oday/ (accessed 1 Janua y 2016).
3. Bouza o ski S, Pe o a S. A global pe spec i e on domes ic ene gy dep i a ion: O e coming he ene gy
po e y- uel po e y bina y. Ene gy Resea ch and Social Science 2015; 10: 31–40.
4. Boa dman B. Fixing Fuel Po e y. Challenges and Solu ions. London: Ea hscan, 2010.
5. Ishe wood BC and Hancock RM. Household expendi u e on uel: dis ibu ional aspec s. Economic
Ad ise 's O ice, DHSS, London, 1979.
6. Boa dman B. Fuel Po e y: F om Cold Homes o A o dable Wa m h. London: Belha en P ess, 1991.
7. B aubach M, Fe and A. Ene gy e iciency, housing, equi y and heal h. In e na ional Jou nal o Public
Heal h 2013; 58: 331–332.
8. Rosenow J, Pla R, Flanagan B. Fuel po e y and ene gy e iciency obliga ions - A c i ical assessmen o
he supplie obliga ion in he UK. Ene gy Policy 2013; 62: 1194–1203.
9. Boa dman B. Achie ing ze o. Deli e ing u u e- iendly buildings. Ox o d: Ox o d, 2012.
10. Schuessle R. Ene gy Po e y Indica o s: Concep ual Issues. Cen e o Eu opean Economic Resea ch
(ZEW), Mannheim. Discussion Pape Se ies 2014; 14: 37.
11. Moo e R. De ini ions o uel po e y: Implica ions o policy. Ene gy Policy 2012; 49: 19–26.
12. B adshaw J, Middle on S, Da is A, Old ield N, Smi h N, Cuswo h L, Williams J, Old i N, Smi h N. A
Minimum Income S anda d o B i ain: Wha people hink. Yo k: Joseph Rown ee Founda ion, 2008.
13. Hills J. Ge ing he measu e o uel po e y. Final Repo o he Fuel Po e y Re iew. Cen e o he Analysis
o Social Exclusion. London, 2012.
14. Heindl P. Measu ing Fuel Po e y: Gene al Conside a ions and Applica ion o Ge man Household Da a.
Finanz A ch 2015; 71: 178–215.
15. Rome o JC, Lina es P, López O e o X, Labandei a X, Pé ez Alonso A. Ene gy po e y in Spain. Economic
analysis and p oposals o ac ion. Mad id, 2015.
16. Eu opean Commission. Commission s a wo king pape : an ene gy policy o consume s. Council o
B ussels, he Eu opean Union, 11 No embe 2010.
17. Healy JD, Clinch JP. Quan i ying he se e i y o uel po e y, i s ela ionship wi h poo housing and
easons o non-in es men in ene gy-sa ing measu es in I eland. Ene gy Policy 2004; 32: 207–220.
18. F iel S. Housing, Fuel Po e y and Heal h: A Pan-eu opean Analysis. Heal h Sociology Re iew 2006; 30:
194–195.
19. Eu opean Comission. Eu opean Union S a is ics on Income and Li ing Condi ions (EU-SILC). B ussels:
Eu os a 2014.
20. Spanish Na ional S a is ics Ins i u e. Su ey on Li ing Condi ions (SLC). Mad id, Na ional S a is ics
Ins i u e, 2014.
21. Thomson H, Snell C. Quan i ying he p e alence o uel po e y ac oss he Eu opean Union. Ene gy Policy
2013; 52: 563–572.
22. Bouza o ski S, Pe o a S, Ti ado-He e o S. F om Fuel Po e y o Ene gy Vulne abili y: The Impo ance o
Se ices, Needs and P ac ices. Science Policy Resea ch Uni Wo king Pape 2014; 25: 1-28.
23. Pachau i S, Sp eng D. Ene gy Use and Ene gy Access in Rela ion o Po e y. Economic and Poli ical Weekly
23
2004; 39: 271–278.
24. Li K, Lloyd B, Liang X, Wei Y. Ene gy poo o uel poo : Wha a e he di e ences? Ene gy Policy 2014; 68:
476-481.
25. Bi ol F. Ene gy Economics: A Place o Ene gy Po e y in he Agenda? Ene gy Jou nal 2007; 28: 1–6.
26. Bazilian M, Saga A, De chon R, Yumkella K. Mo e hea and ligh . Ene gy Policy 2010; 38: 5409–5412.
27. Bouza o ski S, Ti ado He e o S. The ene gy di ide: In eg a ing ene gy ansi ions, egional inequali ies
and po e y ends in he Eu opean Union. Eu opean U ban and Regional S udies 2015; 24: 1–18.
28. Bake W, P es on I. Quan i ying u al uel po e y: in e im epo . Eaga Cha i able T us 2008; 298740:
1–49.
29. Tamás MESZERICS. Membe o he Eu opean Pa liamen . Ene gy Po e y Handbook. 1a. B ussels,
Eu opean Commission, 2016.
30. Legend e B, Ricci O. Measu ing uel po e y in F ance: which households a e he mos ulne able? Ene gy
Economics 2014; 49: 620–628.
31. Miniaci R, Sca pa C, Valbonesi P. Fuel Po e y and he Ene gy Bene i s Sys em: The I alian Case. 66,
Milano, 2014. P oceedings o he Con e ence: The Economics and "Poli ical Economy" o Ene gy
Subsidies, a Venice In e na ional Uni e si y, San Se olo, 21 - 22 July 2014.
32. Walke R, McKenzie P, Liddell C, Mo is C. A ea-based a ge ing o uel po e y in No he n I eland: An
e idenced-based app oach. Applied Geog aghy 2012; 34: 639–649.
33. Mo ison C, Sho N. Fuel po e y in Sco land: e ining spa ial esolu ion in he Sco ish Fuel Po e y
Indica o using a GIS-based mul iple isk index. Heal h and place 2008; 14: 702–717.
34. Depa men o Ene gy & Clima e Change (DECC). Annual Fuel Po e y S a is ics Repo 2014. London,
HMSO, 2014.
35. Depa men o Ene gy & Clima e Change (DECC). Addi ional Indica o s 2014. Go e nmen ’s Annual
S a is ics Repo on Fuel Po e y, London, HMSO, 2014.
36. Ti ado He e o S, López Fe nández JL, Ma ín G acía P. Ene gy po e y in Spain. Employmen gene a ion
po en ial de i ed om housing ehabili a ion. 1a. Mad id, Asociación de Ciencias Ambien ales, 2012.
37. Ti ado He e o S, Jiménez Meneses L, López Fe nández JL, Ma ín G acía J, Pe e o Van Ho e E. Ene gy
po e y in Spain. T end analysis. 2a. Mad id, Asociación de Ciencias Ambien ales, 2014.
38. B unne KM, Spi ze M, Ch is anell A. Expe iencing uel po e y. Coping s a egies o low-income
households in Vienna/Aus ia. Ene gy Policy 2012; 49: 53–59.
39. San amou is M, Ale izos SM, Aslanoglou L, Man zios D, Milonas P, Sa elli I, Ka a asou S, Ca alis K,
Pa a an is J. F eezing he poo - Indoo en i onmen al quali y in low and e y low income households
du ing he win e pe iod in A hens. Ene gy and Buildings 2014; 70: 61–70.
40. Liddell C. The impac o Fuel Po e y on Child en. London: Sa e he Child en 2008.
41. Howden-Chapman P, Vigge s H, Chapman R, O'Sulli an K, Tel a Ba na d L, Lloyd B. Tackling cold housing
and uel po e y in New Zealand: A e iew o policies, esea ch, and heal h impac s. Ene gy Policy 2012; 49: 134–
142.
42. Liddell C, Mo is C. Fuel po e y and human heal h: A e iew o ecen e idence. Ene gy Policy 2010; 38:
2987–2997.
43. Dea KBG, McMichael AJ. The heal h impac s o cold homes and uel po e y. BMJ (Clinical Resea ch ed)
2011; 342: d2807.
44. Van Hoo T, Blocken B, Hensen JLM, Timme mans HJP. Rep in o : On he p edic ed e ec i eness o
clima e adap a ion measu es o esiden ial buildings. Building and En i onmen 2015; 83: 142–158.
45. Ma ínez PW, Kelly MT. In eg a ion o pe o mance c i e ia in he ene gy-en i onmen al imp o emen
o exis ing social housing in Chile. Ambien e Cons uído 2015; 15: 47–63.
24
46. Ha T, Saelze G, Hempel R, Ge be A. High indoo com o and e y low ene gy consump ion h ough
he implemen a ion o he Passi e House s anda d in Chile. Re is a de la Cons ucción 2012; 11: 123–
134.
47. Koloko sa D, San amou is M. Re iew o he indoo en i onmen al quali y and ene gy consump ion
s udies o low income households in Eu ope. Science o he To al En i onmen 2015; 536: 316–330.
48. Bu che J. Fuel Po e y How To Imp o e Heal h and Wellbeing Th ough Ac ion on A o dable Wa m h.
London: UK Heal h Fo um 2014, 2014.
49. Gilbe son J, G imsley M, G een G. Psychosocial ou es om housing in es men o heal h: E idence om
England’s home ene gy e iciency scheme. Ene gy Policy 2012; 49: 122–133.
50. O mandy D, Ez a y V. Heal h and he mal com o : F om WHO guidance o housing s a egies. Ene gy
Policy 2012; 49: 116–121.
51. The Eu owin e G oup. Cold exposu e and win e mo ali y om ischaemic hea disease,
ce eb o ascula disease, espi a o y disease, and all causes in wa m and cold egions o Eu ope. Lance
1997; 349: 1341–1346.
52. Healy JD. Excess win e mo ali y in Eu ope: a c oss coun y analysis iden i ying key isk ac o s. Jou nal
o Epidemiology & Communi y Heal h 2003; 57: 784–789.
53. Liddell C, Mo is C, Thomson H, Guiney C. Excess win e dea hs in 30 Eu opean coun ies 1980–2013: a
c i ical e iew o me hods. Jou nal o Public Heal h 2016; 38(4): 806–814.
54. Haja S, Gaspa ini A. The Excess Win e Dea hs Measu e: Why I s Use Is Misleading o Public Heal h
Unde s anding o Cold- ela ed Heal h Impac s. Epidemiology 2016; 27(4): 486-491.
55. Eu opean Comission. Cold can kill - excess win e dea hs. B ussels, 2007.
56. Milne G, Boa dman B. Making cold homes wa me : he e ec o ene gy e iciency imp o emen s in low-
income homes A epo o he Ene gy Ac ion G an s Agency Cha i able T us . Ene gy Policy 2000; 28:
411–424.
57. G een G, Gilbe son J. Wa m F on Be e Heal h - Heal h Impac E alua ion o he Wa m F on Scheme.
Cen e o Regional, Economic and Social Resea ch. She ield Hallam Uni e si y, She ield, 2008.
58. Hodges N, Redg o e Z, Mo is P, Simpson K, Ashe M. A o dable Wa m h and Heal h Impac E alua ion
Toolki . 1a. B is ol: Depa men o Ene gy and Clima e Change, 2016.
59. Ma yon-Da is A, Balla d T. Fuel Po e y Tackling Cold Homes and Ill-Heal h. London: UK Heal h Fo um,
2014.
60. Spanish Na ional S a is ics Ins i u e. A Risk o Po e y and/o Exclusion (AROPE indica o ), Eu ope 2020
s a egy. Na ional S a is ics Ins i u e, Mad id, 2015.
61. OECD. OECD amewo k o s a is ics on he dis ibu ion o household income, consump ion and weal h.
Pa ís, OECD, 2013.
62. Walke R, McKenzie P, Liddell C, Mo is C. Es ima ing uel po e y a household le el: An in eg a ed
app oach. Ene gy and Buildings 2014; 80: 469-479.
63. Thomson H, Bouza o ski S, Snell C. Re hinking he measu emen o ene gy po e y in Eu ope: A c i ical
analysis o indica o s and da a. Indoo and Buil En i onmen 2017; 26(7): 879-901. DOI:
10.1177/1420326X17699260.
64. Rademaeke s K, Yea wood J, Fe ei a A, Pye S, Ian Hamil on P, Agnolucci D, Ka ásek J, Anisimo a N.
Selec ing Indica o s o Measu e Ene gy Po e y. F amewo k Con ac ENER/A4/516-2014, Ro e dam,
T inomics, 2016.
65. Bluyssen P M. Unde s anding he indoo en i onmen . In: Inaugu al speech May 22, 2013 a he Facul y
o A chi ec u e o he Del Uni e si y o Technology. Del , 2013.
66. Zhang H, Huizenga C, A ens EA, Yu T. Modeling he mal com o in s a i ied en i onmen s. Cen e o