scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

dP Automata versus Right-Linear Simple Matrix Grammars

Abstract

We consider dP automata with the input string distributed in an arbitrary (hence not necessary balanced) way, and we investigate their language accepting power, both in the case when a bound there is on the number of objects present inside the system and in the general case. The relation with right-linear simple matrix grammars is useful in this respect. Some research topics and open problems are also formulated.

Read accessible full text

dP Automata versus Right-Linear Simple Matrix Grammars

Author: Paun, Gheorghe; Pérez Jiménez, Mario de Jesús
Publisher: Fénix Editora
Year: 2011
Source: https://idus.us.es/bitstreams/5171efee-dc8f-4ad8-a4de-48c209af2b05/download
dP Au oma a e sus Righ -Linea
Simple Ma ix G amma s
Gheo ghe P˘aun1,2, Ma io J. P´e ez-Jim´enez2
1Ins i u e o Ma hema ics o he Romanian Academy
PO Box 1-764, 014700 Bucu e¸s i, Romania
2Depa men o Compu e Science and A i icial In elligence
Uni e si y o Se illa
A da. Reina Me cedes s/n, 41012 Se illa, Spain
[email p o ec ed], [email p o ec ed]
Summa y. We conside dP au oma a wi h he inpu s ing dis ibu ed in an a bi a y
(hence no necessa y balanced) way, and we in es iga e hei language accep ing powe ,
bo h in he case when a bound he e is on he numbe o objec s p esen inside he sys em
and in he gene al case. The ela ion wi h igh -linea simple ma ix g amma s is use ul
in his espec . Some esea ch opics and open p oblems a e also o mula ed.
1 In oduc ion
dP au oma a a e a class o compu ing de ices conside ed in memb ane compu ing
a ea in o de o ha e a dis ibu ed language accep ing machine y, wi h he s ings
o ecognize being spli among he componen s o he sys em and wi h hese com-
ponen s wo king in pa allel on he inpu s ings. In he gene al case, dP sys ems
consis o a gi en numbe o componen s in he o m o a usual sympo /an ipo
P sys em, which can ha e hei sepa a e inpu s and communica e om skin o skin
memb anes by means o an ipo ules like in issue-like P sys ems. Such de ices
we e in oduced in [7] and u he in es iga ed in [3], [8], [9], mainly compa ing
hei powe wi h ha o usual P au oma a and wi h amilies o languages in he
Chomsky hie a chy. In he basic de ini ion and in all hese pape s, ollowing he
s yle o he communica ion complexi y a ea (see, [4]), he so-called balanced mode
o in oducing he inpu s ing is conside ed: he s ing is spli in equal pa s,
modulo one symbol, and dis ibu ed among componen s.
He e we conside he gene al case, wi h no es ic ion on he inpu s ing dis i-
bu ion; each componen jus akes symbols om he en i onmen when i can do
i i , wi hou any es ic ion on hei numbe . This is a e y na u al and gene al
se -up, which, howe e , was only inciden ally in es iga ed so a . Two cases a e
dis inguished: wi h a bound on he size o he sys em (on he o al numbe o ob-
jec s p esen inside) and wi hou such a bound. Bo h cases a e na u ally ela ed o
294 Gh. P˘aun, M.J. P´e ez-Jim´enez
a classic amily o egula ed g amma s, he simple ma ix g amma s o [5] (see also
[2]). Ac ually, as expec ed, igh -linea simple ma ix g amma s a e closely ela ed
o dP au oma a, and we will examine below his connec ion (looking o mu ual
simula ions among he wo ypes o language iden i ying machine ies). This con-
nec ion was al eady poin ed ou in [8], whe e he conjec u e was o mula ed ha ,
in he same way as a usual ini e au oma on can be simula ed by a P au oma on,
a igh -linea simple ma ix g amma can be simula ed by a dP au oma on. We
con i m he e his conjec u e (in he gene al, no he balanced case).
2 Fo mal Language Theo y P e equisi es
The eade is assumed o ha e some amilia i y wi h basics o memb ane compu -
ing, e.g., om [6], [10], and o o mal language heo y, e.g., om [2], [11], bu we
ecall below all no ions necessa y in he subsequen sec ions.
In wha ollows, V∗is he ee monoid gene a ed by he alphabe V,λis
he emp y wo d, V+=V∗− {λ}, and |x|deno es he leng h o he s ing x∈
V∗.REG, LIN, CF, CS, RE deno e he amilies o egula , linea , con ex - ee,
con ex -sensi i e, and ecu si ely enume able languages, espec i ely.
Essen ial below will be he igh -linea simple ma ix g amma s in oduced
in [5]. Such a g amma o deg ee n≥1 is a cons uc o he o m G=
(N1, . . . , Nn, T, S, M), whe e N1, N2, . . . , Nn, T a e pai wise disjoin alphabe s (we
deno e by N he union o N1, . . . , Nn), S /∈T∪N, and Mcon ains ma ices o
he ollowing o ms:
(i) (S→x), x ∈T∗,
(ii) (S→A1A2. . . An), Ai∈Ni,1≤i≤n,
(iii) (A1→x1B1, . . . , An→xnBn), Ai, Bi∈Ni, xi∈T∗,1≤i≤n,
(i ) (A1→x1, . . . , An→xn), Ai∈Ni, xi∈T∗,1≤i≤n.
A de i a ion s a ing wi h a ma ix o ype (ii) con inues wi h an a bi a y
numbe s o s eps which use ma ices o ype (iii) and ends by applying a ma ix
o ype (i ).
We deno e by L(G) he language gene a ed in his way by Gand by RSMn
he amily o languages L(G) o igh -linea simple ma ix g amma s Go deg ee
a mos n, o n≥1. The union o all hese amilies is deno ed by RSM∗. The
s ic inclusions RSMn⊂RSMn+1, n ≥1, a e known. Mo eo e , REG =RSM1,
RSM∗⊂CS,RSM∗is incompa able wi h LIN and CF, all languages in RSM∗
a e semilinea , and his amily is closed unde union, in e sec ion wi h egula
languages, di ec and in e se mo phisms (bu no unde in e sec ion, complemen
and Kleene +).
Clea ly, a no mal o m can be easily ound o hese g amma s: in ma ices o
ype (iii) we can ask o ha e xi∈T∪ {λ},1≤i≤n, and in ma ices o ype (i )
we can ha e xi=λ o all 1 ≤i≤n.
dP Au oma a e sus Righ -Linea Simple Ma ix G amma s 295
3 dP Au oma a
We in oduce now he compu ing de ices we in es iga e in his pape , also gi ing
a ele an example.
As usual in memb ane compu ing, he mul ise s o e an alphabe Va e ep e-
sen ed by s ings in V∗; a s ing and all i s pe mu a ions co espond o he same
mul ise , wi h he numbe o occu ences o a symbol in a s ing ep esen ing he
mul iplici y o ha objec in he mul ise . (We wo k he e only wi h mul ise s o
ini e mul iplici y.) The e ms “symbol” and “objec ” a e used in e changeably, all
objec s a e he e ep esen ed by symbols.
AdP au oma on (o deg ee n≥1) is a cons uc
∆= (O, E, Π1, . . . , Πn, R),
whe e:
(1) Ois an alphabe (o objec s);
(2) E⊆O( he objec s a ailable in a bi a ily many copies in he en i onmen );
(3) Πi= (O, µi, wi,1, . . . , wi,ki, E, Ri,1, . . . , Ri,ki) is a sympo /an ipo P sys em
o deg ee ki(Ois he alphabe o objec s, µiis a memb ane s uc u e o deg ee
ki,wi,1, . . . , wi,kia e he mul ise s o objec s p esen in he memb anes o µi
in he beginning o he compu a ion, Eis he alphabe o objec s p esen – in
a bi a ily many copies – in he en i onmen , and Ri,1, . . . , Ri,kia e ini e se s
o sympo /an ipo ules associa ed wi h he memb anes o µi; he sympo
ules a e o he o m (u, in),(u, ou ), whe e u∈O∗, and he an ipo ules
a e o he o m (u, ou ; , in), whe e u, ∈O∗; no e ha we do no ha e an
ou pu memb ane), wi h he skin memb ane labeled wi h (i, 1) = si, o all
i= 1,2, . . . , n;
(4) Ris a ini e se o ules o he o m (si, u/ , sj), whe e 1 ≤i, j ≤n, i 6=j, and
u, ∈O∗, u 6=λ.
The sys ems Π1, . . . , Πna e called componen s o ∆and he ules in Ra e
called communica ion ules. Fo a ule (si, u/ , sj), |u |is he weigh o his ule.
Using a ule (u, in),(u, ou ) associa ed wi h a memb ane imeans o b ing in he
memb ane, espec i ely o send ou o i he mul ise u; using a ule (u, ou ; , in)
associa ed wi h a memb ane imeans o send ou o he memb ane he objec s o
mul ise uand, simul aneously, o b ing in he memb ane, om he egion su -
ounding memb ane i, he objec s o mul ise . A communica ion ule (si, u/ , sj)
mo es he objec s o u om componen Πi o componen Πj, simul aneously wi h
mo ing he objec s in he mul ise in he opposi e di ec ion.
Each componen Πican ake symbols om he en i onmen , wo k on hem by
using he ules in se s Ri,1, . . . , Ri,ki, and communica e wi h o he componen s by
means o ules in R.
A hal ing compu a ion wi h espec o ∆accep s he s ing x=x1x2. . . xn
o e Oi he componen s Π1, . . . , Πn, s a ing om hei ini ial con igu a ions,
using he sympo /an ipo ules as well as he in e -componen s communica ion
296 Gh. P˘aun, M.J. P´e ez-Jim´enez
ules, in he non-de e minis ic maximally pa allel way, b ing om he en i onmen
he subs ings x1, . . . , xn, espec i ely, and e en ually hal s. A p oblem appea s
in he case when se e al objec s a e ead a he same ime om he en i onmen ,
by se e al ules o by a single ule o he o m (u, ou ; , in), wi h | | ≥ 2; in
such a case any pe mu a ion o he symbols b ough in he sys em in he same
s ep a e conside ed as a alid subs ing o he inpu s ing ( hus, a compu a ion
can ecognize se e al s ings, di e ing o each o he by pe mu a ions o ce ain
subs ings). No e ha we impose he e no condi ion on he ela i e leng hs o
s ings x1, x2, . . . , xn(as i is done in p e ious pape s dealing wi h dP au oma a,
unde he in luence o communica ion complexi y a ea). We deno e by L(∆) he
language o all s ings ecognized by ∆in his way, and by LdPn he amily o
languages L(∆), o ∆o deg ee a mos n≥1. The union o all hese amilies is
deno ed by LdP∗.
The dP au oma a a e synch onized de ices, a uni e sal clock exis s o all
componen s, ma king he ime in he same way o he whole dP au oma on.
When he sys em has only one componen , hen we ob ain he usual no ion o a P
au oma on, as in es iga ed in a se ies o pape s (mainly in he ex ended e sion,
wi h a e minal alphabe o objec s – see he espec i e chap e in [10] and he
e e ences he ein). We deno e by LP he amily o languages ecognized by P
au oma a. Hence, LP =LdP1and, om [3], i is known ha REG ⊂LP ⊂CS
and LP is incompa able wi h CF.
We conside now a somewha su p ising example, o a dP au oma on o deg ee
2, gene a ing a complex language, L1={ww |w∈ {a, b}∗}. The au oma on is
gi en in Figu e 1, in he s anda d way o ep esen ing a dP au oma on. We ha e
O={a, b, c1, c2, d, #}and E={a, b}.
All an ipo ules which b ing objec s om he en i onmen a e o weigh one,
hence he numbe o objec s p esen in he sys em is cons an , ou in each compo-
nen . In he i s s ep, objec s d elease c2ain he skin egion o he i s componen
and c1ain he second. Each symbol acan b ing ei he an ao a b om he en-
i onmen and, a he same ime, he objec s c1, c1a e in e changed be ween he
wo componen s (o he wise, hey elease he ap objec #, which will oscilla e
o e e ac oss memb anes (1,1), espec i ely, (2,1), and he compu a ion ne e
s ops). Wi h c1α, α ∈ {a, b}, in he i s componen and c2β, β ∈ {a, b}, in he
second one, he only con inua ion which does no elease he ap objec is possi-
ble when α=β, by using he communica ion ule (s1, c1α/c2α, s2) (i one o he
symbols α, β b ings new symbols om he en i onmen , he co esponding c1, c2
should en e he memb ane (1,2) o (2,2), b inging ou he objec #). We ob ain
a con igu a ion as ha we s a ed wi h, hence he p ocess can be i e a ed. I , a
any momen when c2is in Π1and c1is in Π2, one o he ules (c2α, in), α ∈ {a, b},
is used in he i s componen , o (c1α, in), α ∈ {a, b}, is used in he second com-
ponen , hen his should be done simul aneously in bo h componen s, o he wise
again one o c1, c2has o elease he ap objec . In conclusion, he s ings ead
om he en i onmen by he wo componen s a e iden ical, hence L(∆) = L1.
dP Au oma a e sus Righ -Linea Simple Ma ix G amma s 297
'
&
$
%
'
&
$
%
º
¹
·
¸
º
¹
·
¸º
¹
·
¸
º
¹
·
¸
-¾
s1
d
(1,1)
a
c2
(c2a, ou ;d, in)
(c2a, in)
(c2b, in)
(#, in)
(#, ou )
#
(#, ou ;c1, in)
(#, ou ;c2, in)
(a, ou ;a, in)
(a, ou ;b, in)
(b, ou ;a, in)
(b, ou ;b, in)
(s1, c1a/c2a, s2)
(s1, c1b/c2b, s2)
(s1, c2/c1, s2)
s2
d
(2,1)
c1
a
(c1a, ou ;d, in)
(c1a, in)
(c1b, in)
(#, in)
(#, ou )
(2,2)(1,2)
#
(#, ou ;c2, in)
(#, ou ;c1, in)
(a, ou ;a, in)
(a, ou ;b, in)
(b, ou ;a, in)
(b, ou ;b, in)
Fig. 1. A dP au oma on ecognizing he language L1.
No e he impo an ac s ha he sys em eads he inpu in a balanced way and
ha i is bounded, he o al numbe o objec s p esen inside is always bounded by
a cons an (8 in ou case) gi en in ad ance. This las cha ac e is ics is impo an ,
so ha we deno e by LdPb
n, n ≥1, he amily o languages ecognized by bounded
dP au oma a o deg ee a mos n; when nis no speci ied, we eplace i by ∗.
4 The Powe o dP Au oma a
We s a by e o mula ing in a mo e gene al way a esul al eady sugges ed by a
p oo in [9].
Theo em 1. LdPb
n⊆RSMn, o all n≥1.
P oo . Le ∆be a dP au oma on o deg ee n(wi h he se o objec s O) which is
bounded. Then, he se o all i s con igu a ions is ini e. Le σ0, σ1, . . . , σpbe his
se , wi h σ0being he ini ial con igu a ion. We cons uc he ollowing igh -linea
simple ma ix g amma :

298 Gh. P˘aun, M.J. P´e ez-Jim´enez
G= (N1, . . . , Nn, O, S, M),wi h
Ni={(σj)i|0≤j≤p}, i = 1,2, . . . , n,
M={(S→(σ0)1(σ0)2. . . (σ0)n)}
∪ {(σi)1→α1(σj)1, . . . , (σi)n→αn(σj)n)|
om con igu a ion σi he dP au oma on ∆can pass o
he con igu a ion σjby a co ec ansi ion, aking om he
en i onmen he objec s α1, . . . , αnby i s componen s, whe e
αs∈O∪ {λ},1≤s≤n}
∪ {(σh)1→λ, . . . , (σh)n→λ)|σhis a hal ing con igu a ion}.
No e ha all non e minals in he ules o a ma ix con ain he same “co e in-
o ma ion”, namely he cu en con igu a ion o he sys em, hence he comple e
con ol o he sys em wo king is ob ained in his way. The equali y L(∆) = L(G)
is ob ious. 2
This esul canno be ex ended o a bi a y dP au oma a. Ac ually, we ha e:
Theo em 2. LdP2−RSM∗6=∅.
P oo . Le us conside he ollowing dP au oma on:
∆= (O, E, Π1, Π2, R),wi h
O={a, c, d, e, , #},
E={a, c, d, e},
Π1= (O, [ ]s1, , E, {( , ou ;a, in),(a, ou ;aa, in)}),
Π2= (O, [ [ ](2,1) ]s2, E, {( , ou ;d, in),(a, ou ;c, in),(d, ou ;e, in)},
{( , ou ; , in)}),
R={(s1, a/λ, s2)}.
Fo an easie examina ion o he wo k o he sys em, we also ep esen i g aph-
ically, in Figu e 2.
Le us look o s ings accep ed by his dP au oma on which a e o he o m
aidcje, o some i, j ≥1.
A e in oducing he symbol ain he i s componen , le us assume ha o
n≥0 s eps we use he e he ule (a, ou ;aa, in), hence we p oduce 2ncopies o ain
Π1, while he second componen uses he ule ( , ou ; , in)∈R(2,1). Suppose now
ha p≥0 copies o a emains in he i s componen and he o he s = 2n−pa e
mo ed o he second componen . He e, all copies o amus go ou , in exchange
o objec s c, hence he s ing ead by he second componen s a s wi h c . A he
same ime o one s ep be o e, he second componen mus in oduce he symbol
d. This objec becomes immedia ely e, hence he exchange o a o cshould be
done ei he in he same s ep wi h eading do a he same ime wi h eading ein
dP Au oma a e sus Righ -Linea Simple Ma ix G amma s 299
'
&
$
%
'
&
$
%
¾
½»
¼
-
s1
( , ou ;a, in)
(a, ou ;aa, in)
(s1, a/λ, s2)
s2
(2,1)
( , ou ; , in)
( , ou ;d, in)
(d, ou ;e, in)
(a, ou ;c, in)
Fig. 2. A dP sys em ecognizing a language no in RSM∗
he second componen (because any pe mu a ion o he objec s is allowed in he
s ing, ei he a ian is possible). Howe e , a e e, we do no wan o ha e any
symbol, hence all copies o awe e al eady mo ed o he second componen , and
hus he wo k o he i s componen s ops. When in oducing he symbol din
he second componen , he pcopies o a om he i s componen canno use he
ule (a, ou ;aa, in), bu hey mus come immedia ely in he second componen , o
in oduce che e a he same ime wi h in oducing e. The e o e, i he s ing has
he o m aidcje, hen i=j= 2n o some n≥0 (n= 0 is ob ained i he unique
ain oduced in he i s s ep in Π1is immedia ely sen o componen Π2).
Consequen ly, L(∆)∩a∗dc∗e={a2ndc2ne|n≥0}, which is no in RSM∗,
hence also L(∆) is no in RSM∗: his amily is closed unde in e sec ion wi h
egula languages and con ains only semilinea languages. 2
No e ha he p e ious cons uc ion akes he inpu s ing in an almos bal-
anced way, and, i in he i s s ep, he i s componen uses a ule ( , ou ;dea, in)
ins ead o ( , ou ;a, in), hen we ha e a balanced unc ioning, hence he esul in
he p e ious heo em holds ue also o he balanced way o de ining he ecog-
nized s ing.
We pass now o he coun e pa o Theo em 1 announced abo e.
Theo em 3. RSMn⊆LdPb
n+1, o all n≥1.
P oo . Le us conside a igh -linea simple ma ix g amma G=
(N1, . . . , Nn, T, S, M) as in oduced in Sec ion 2, wi h he alphabe s
N1, N2, . . . , Nn( hei union is deno ed by N) and T. Ma ices o he o m (i),
(S→x), x ∈T∗, can be eplaced by ma ices o o ms (ii), (iii) and (i ), in an
ob ious way, hence we assume ha we do no ha e such ma ices. We assume all
ma ices labeled in a one- o-one way; le mj: (A1→x1B1, . . . , An→xnBn), wi h
1≤j≤k, be all ma ices o ype (iii), wi h Ai, Bi∈Ni, xi∈T∗,1≤i≤n.
Simila ly, le mj: (A1→x1, . . . , An→xn), wi h k+ 1 ≤j≤p, be all ma ices o
300 Gh. P˘aun, M.J. P´e ez-Jim´enez
ype (i ), wi h Ai∈Ni, xi∈T∗,1≤i≤n. Wi hou any loss o he gene ali y we
can assume ha all s ings xiin hese ma ices a e om T∪ {λ}.
Fo each ma ix, o any o m, mj: (A1→u1, . . . , Ai→ui, . . . , An→un), le
us conside he symbol [mj, Ai→ui] ( hus iden i ying he ma ix and i s i h ule),
and le Xj(i) be a sho hand o i . Conside he alphabe s
Mi={Xj(i)|1≤j≤p}, o all 1 ≤i≤n.
We also deno e by M0
i he alphabe o p imed symbols in Mi.
Fo a ma ix mj: (A1→x1B1, . . . , An→xnBn) o ype (iii), le us deno e
lhsj=A1A2. . . Anand hsj=B1B2. . . Bn. Simila ly, o a ma ix mj: (A1→
x1, . . . , An→xn) o ype (i ), we deno e lhsj=A1A2. . . An.
I hsj=lhsk, hen we w i e mj;mk. Simila ly, we w i e S;mji
(S→A1A2. . . An)∈Mand A1A2. . . An=lhsj.
Fo a se Q, we deno e by Qalso he mul ise consis ing o he elemen s o Q,
wi h he mul iplici y one o each o hem (hence Qcan be conside ed also as he
s ing composed by he elemen s o he se , in any o de ing).
We a e now eady o cons uc he dP sys em we look o (a0is an a bi a y
symbol o T ixed in ad ance):
∆= (O, E, Π1, . . . , Πn+1, R),wi h :
O=
n
[
i=1
(Mi∪M0
i)∪T∪ {ci|1≤i≤n}∪{d, , #},
E=T,
Πi= (O, [ [ ](i,1)[ ](i,2) ]si, λ, M0
iTci,#, Rsi, R(i,1), R(i,2)),
Rsi={(a, ou ;b, in)|a, b ∈T},
R(i,1) ={(X0
j(i), ou ;Xj(i), in),
(Xj(i)cia, ou ;X0
j(i)cia, in)|1≤j≤p,
i Xj(i) = [mj, Ai→aBi], a ∈T}
∪ {(X0
j(i)a, ou ;Xj(i)a, in),
(Xj(i)cia, ou ;X0
j(i)cia, in)|1≤j≤p, a ∈T,
i Xj(i) = [mj, Ai→Bi]}
∪ {(#, in),(#, ou )},
R(i,2) ={(#, ou ;ci, in)}
∪ {(#, ou ;Xj(i), in)|1≤j≤p, i Xj(i) = [mj, Ai→Bj]},
o all 1 ≤i≤n,
Πn+1 = (O, [ [ ](n+1,1) ]sn+1 , c1. . . cn , M2
1. . . M2
nTnan
0,∅, R(n+1,1)),
R(n+1,1) ={(Xj(1) . . . Xj(n)an
0, ou ; , in)|1≤j≤pi S;mj}
∪ {(Xk(1)a1. . . Xk(n)an, ou ;Xj(1)a1. . . Xj(n)an, in)
|1≤j, k ≤p, ai∈T, 1≤i≤n, i mj;mk}
dP Au oma a e sus Righ -Linea Simple Ma ix G amma s 301
∪ {(Xj(1)c1a1. . . Xj(n)cnan, in)
|ai∈T, 1≤i≤n, i mjis a e minal ma ix},
R={(si, λ/ci, sn+1),
(si, ci/Xj(i)a, sn+1,
(si, Xj(i)cia/λ, sn+1)|1≤j≤p, 1≤i≤n, a ∈T}.
This dP sys em, wi h one componen Πiand wi h Πn+1 gi en in ull de ails,
is ep esen ed in Figu e 3.
'
&
$
%
'
&
$
%
'
&
$
%
'
&
$
%
'
&
$
%






















6
?
6
?
6
?
s1
(1,1)
(1,2)
...
si
(i, 1)
(i, 2)
...
sn
(n,1)
(n,2)
sn+1
(n+1,1)
(a, ou ;b, in), a, b ∈T
(X0
j(i), ou ;Xj(i), in),
(Xj(i)cia, ou ;X0
j(i)cia, in),
i Xj(i) = [mj, Ai→aBi], a ∈T, 1≤j≤p
(X0
j(i)a, ou ;Xj(i)a, in),
(Xj(i)cia, ou ;X0
j(i)cia, in),
i Xj(i) = [mj, Ai→Bi],1≤j≤p, a ∈T
(#, in)
(#, ou )
(#, ou , ci, in)
(#, ou ;Xj(i), in),
i ule iin mjis Ai→Bi,1≤j≤p
(si, λ/ci, sn+1)
(si, ci/Xj(i)a, sn+1), a ∈T, 1≤j≤p
(si, Xj(i)cia/λ, sn+1), a ∈T, 1≤j≤p
c1c2...cn
Sn
i=1 M2
i
Tn
an
0
(Xj(1) ...Xj(n)an
0, ou ; , in) i S;mj
(Xk(1)a1...Xk(n)an, ou ;Xj(1)a1. . . Xj(n)an, in), i mj;mk
(Xj(1)c1a1...Xj(n)cnan, in) i mjis e minal
Fig. 3. The dP sys em in he p oo o Theo em 3
The componen s Πi,1≤i≤n, simula e he co esponding “componen ” o he
g amma G, while Πn+1 is a “synch onize ” o he o he componen s, i akes no