scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Phenolic content, antioxidant capacity, radical oxygen species scavenging and lipid peroxidation inhibiting activities of extracts of five black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa (Michx.) Elliot) cultivars

Abstract

Aronie (Aronia melanocarpa (Michx.) Elliot) jsou druhem, který se vyznačuje vysokým obsahem polyfenolů a jejich výzkum je dnes aktuální. Cílem práce bylo srovnat pět odrůd tohoto ovocného druhu, a to dánský ´Aron´, maďarský ´Fertödi´, švédský ´Hugin´, český ´Nero´ a finský ´Viking´. Nejvyšší obsahy fenolů byly u odrůdy ´Viking´, a to 12,85 gramů kyseliny galové/kg čerstvé hmoty a u odrůdy ´Nero´ dosahovaly 11,12 gramů kyseliny galové/kg čerstvé hmoty. U obou odrůd byly zjištěny také nejvyšší hodnoty antioxidační kapacity a korelace r2 = 0,943. Korelace mezi antioxidační kapacitou a kyselinou chlorogenovou a neochlorogenovou byla r2 = 0,788 a r2 = 0,940. Pro srovnání byla provedena i úbytková aktivita kyslíkatých radikálů a peroxidace lipidů účinkem 25 % metanolového výluhu plodů. Odrůdy ´Viking´ a ´Nero´ se jeví jako nejperspektivnější v potravinářském a farmaceutickém průmyslu.

Read accessible full text

Phenolic content, antioxidant capacity, radical oxygen species scavenging and lipid peroxidation inhibiting activities of extracts of five black chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa (Michx.) Elliot) cultivars

Author: Rop, Otakar,Mlček, Jiří,Juríková, Tünde,Valšíková, Magdalena,Sochor, Jiří,Řezníček, Vojtěch,Kramářová, Daniela
Publisher: Academic Journals
Year: 2010
Source: https://publikace.k.utb.cz/bitstream/10563/1001202/1/Fulltext_1001202.pdf
Jou nal o Medicinal Plan s Resea ch Vol. 4(22), pp. 2431-2437, 18 No embe , 2010
A ailable online a h p://www.academicjou nals.o g/JMPR
ISSN 1996-0875 ©2010 Academic Jou nals
Full Leng h Resea ch Pape
Phenolic con en , an ioxidan capaci y, adical oxygen
species sca enging and lipid pe oxida ion inhibi ing
ac i i ies o ex ac s o i e black chokebe y
(A onia melanoca pa (Michx.) Ellio ) cul i a s
O aka Rop1*, Ji i Mlcek1, Tunde Ju iko a2, Magdalena Valsiko a3, Ji i Socho 4,
Voj ech Reznicek4 and Daniela K ama o a5
1Depa men o Food Technology and Mic obiology, Facul y o Technology, Tomas Ba a Uni e si y in Zlin, Names i T. G.
Masa yka 275, 762 72 Zlin, Czech Republic.
2Depa men o Na u al and In o ma ics Sciences, Facul y o Cen al Eu opean S udies, Cons an ine he Philosophe
Uni e si y in Ni a, D azo ska 4, 949 74 Ni a, Slo ak Republic.
3Ho icul u e and Landscape Enginee ing Facul y, Slo ak Uni e si y o Ag icul u e, Tulipano a 7, 949 76 Ni a, Slo ak
Republic.
4Depa men o B eeding and P opaga ion o Ho icul u al Plan s, Facul y o Ho icul u e, Mendel Uni e si y o
Ag icul u e and Fo es y in B no, Val icka 337, 691 44 Lednice, Czech Republic.
5Depa men o Food Biochemis y and Analysis, Facul y o Technology, Tomas Ba a Uni e si y in Zlin, Names i T. G.
Masa yka 275, 762 72 Zlin, Czech Republic.
Accep ed 29 Sep embe , 2010
Black chokebe ies (A onia melanoca pa (Michx.) Ellio ) a e species, he ui o which a e conside ed o
be one o he mos aluable sou ces o phenolic subs ances and he esea ch in he ield o he ui
u iliza ion as a ood supplemen is mo e han opical. Ne e heless, as a as his species is conce ned,
in pa icula cul i a s he e a e di e ences which a e caused by bo h hei o igin and gene ic
p edisposi ions. The e o e, he aim o ou measu emen was o compa e i e widely g own cul i a s o
his plan , namely ´A on´ which is Danish in o igin, ´Fe ödi´ which is Hunga ian in o igin, ´Hugin´ which
is o Swedish o igin, ´Ne o´ which is o Czech o igin and ´Viking´ which is Finnish in o igin. The highes
con en s o o al phenolics (TPC) we e obse ed in he cul i a ´Viking´ wi h he alue o 12.85 g ams o
gallic acid/kg FM and in he cul i a ´Ne o´ he alue eached 11.12 g ams o gallic acid/kg FM.
Fu he mo e, in bo h men ioned cul i a s he alues o o al an ioxidan capaci y (TAC) we e he
highes . The co ela ion coe icien be ween TPC and TAC was 2 = 0.943. The con en o chlo ogenic
and neochlo ogenic acid showed an in luence on TAC ( 2 = 0.788 and 2 = 0.940). Fo compa ison,
sca enging ac i i y o eac i e oxygen species (supe oxide anion, hyd oxyl adical and ni ic oxide)
was de e mined by using 25% me hanolic ex ac s o ui o pa icula cul i a s. In addi ion, an ioxidan
po en ial was assessed using he a li e slice model. Simila ly, he highes alues o sca enging
ac i i y we e ound in he cul i a s ´Viking´ and ´Ne o´ which seem o be mos p omising o u he
u iliza ion in alimen a y and pha maceu ical p ac ices.
Key wo ds: Chokebe y, phenolics, an ioxidan capaci y, ROS, lipid pe oxida ion.
INTRODUCTION
Chokebe y (A onia melanoca pa (Michx.) Ellio ) is a
membe o he Rosaceae amily and ui a e ac ually a
pome (Wal he and Schnell, 2009). Nowadays, he ui
a e highligh ed wi h espec o hei po en ial as a ood
colo an (B idle and Timbe lake, 1997) and as a sui able
ood supplemen in ela ion o s eng hening human
immuni y sys em (Jakobek e al., 2007). Pe haps he
mos impo an cons i uen s ound in chokebe ies a e he
phenolic compounds which a e esponsible o many
medicinal p ope ies (Kulling and Rawel, 2008). In he
2432 J. Med. Plan . Res.
ui , chlo ogenic and neochlo ogenic acids a e dominan
among he a oma ic acids (Slimes ad e al., 2005). High
con en s o cyanidin-3-a abinoside, cyanidin-3-
galac oside and (-)epica echin a e also ypical o
chokebe ies (Skupien and Oszmianski, 2007). ROS a e
gene a ed in many edox p ocesses in human body and
o en induce oxida i e damage o biomolecules. When
he gene a ion o ROS induced by a ious s imuli in he
o ganism exceeds he an ioxidan capaci y o he
o ganism, i will lead o a a ie y o pa hophysiological
p ocesses (Yang e al., 2008). ROS can cause oxida ion
o biomolecules such as DNA, p o ein and enzymes (Wu
and Ng, 2008). ROS can cause oxida ion o biomolecules
such as DNA, p o ein and enzymes. ROS also a ack
lipids o ini ia e ee adical chain eac ions and cause
lipid pe oxida ion (Wu and Ng, 2008). An ioxidan
capaci y o phenolics agains lipid pe oxida ion is e y
e ec i e and was desc ibed by many au ho s e.g (Takao
e al., 1994; Bane jee e al., 2005; G acia-Alonso e al.,
2004).
In compa ison wi h o he ui species, ela i ely high
alues o an ioxidan capaci y we e epo ed in
chokebe y ui (Kulling and Rawel, 2008). An ioxidan
p ope ies a e asc ibed o a high con en o polyphenols
(Wal he and Schnell, 2009). The aim o ou wo k was o
measu e TPC, TAC and he con en o cyanidin-3-
a abinoside, cyanidin-3-galac oside, (-)epica echin,
chlo ogenic and neochlo ogenic acids as impo an
phenolic cons i uen s in black chokebe y ui . To suppo
he esul s, e iciency o pa icula chokebe y cul i a
ex ac s on adical oxygen species (ROS) sca enging
ac i i y (hyd oxyl adical, ni ic oxide and supe oxide
anion) was measu ed. An ioxidan po en ial was also
assessed using he a li e slice model and lipid
pe oxida ion sca enging ac i i y was measu ed. The
wo k is o p o ide wi h use ul in o ma ion when
compa ing he mos widesp ead cul i a s o his ui
species (pa icula ly as a as TPC, TAC and ROS a e
conce ned).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Desc ip ion o locali y
F ui we e ha es ed in expe imen al o cha ds o Tomas Ba a
Uni e si y in Zlin wi hin he pe iod o 2008 – 2010. These o cha ds
a e si ua ed in he sou h-wes e n pa o he Whi e Ca pa hians
*Co esponding au ho . E-mail: op@ .u b.cz. Tel:
+420 576 031 129. Fax: + 420 577 210 172.
Abb e ia ions: AAE, asco bic acid equi alen s; DPPH, 2,2-
Diphenyl-1-pic ylhyd azyl; FM, esh mass; GAE, gallic acid;
ROS, adical oxygen species; TAC, o al an ioxidan capaci y;
TPC, o al phenolic con en .
nea Zlin, he Czech Republic. The a e age al i ude is 340 m abo e
sea le el, and he mean annual empe a u e and p ecipi a ion a e
7.9°C and 760 mm, espec i ely. The soil ype was classi ied as he
Meso ophic Cambisol (Anonymous, 2007).
Collec ion and p ocessing o samples o chemical analyses
F ui we e ha es ed in ull ipeness (H ico sky, 2002) om h ee
plan s o each cul i a unde s udy in he cou se o Augus . 40
andomly chosen ui om each plan we e mixed oge he and
used o analyses ( ha is, al oge he 120 pe each cul i a ). F ui o
indi idual cul i a s we e p ocessed immedia ely a e he ha es
(no la e han wi hin wo days). Ha es ed ui we e pu éed in a
mixe and he a e age sample was ob ained by di iding in o
qua e s. Each pa ame e was measu ed in i e eplica ions. The
esul s we e exp essed as a e age o a h ee-yea expe imen . The
ollowing cul i a s o black chokebe ies we e analyzed – ´A on´
which is Danish in o igin, a Hunga ian cul i a ´Fe ödi´, ´Hugin´
which is o Swedish o igin, ´Ne o´ which is a Czech cul i a and
´Viking´ which is Finnish in o igin (Kulling and Rawel, 2008).
Sample p epa a ion
Ex ac ion was pe o med acco ding o he me hod desc ibed by
Kim e al. (2003) and modi ied acco ding o Ba os e al. (2007),
using he ollowing p ocedu e: 10 g o a esh sample we e
homogenized o 10 seconds in 100 mL o me hanol. The esul ing
pas e was placed in o E lenmeye lasks (120 mL) and le o s and
in a wa e ba h wi h he empe a u e o +25°C o a pe iod o 24
hou s. The esidue was hen ex ac ed wi h wo addi ional po ions
o me hanol. The combined me hanolic ex ac s we e e apo a ed a
40˚C o d yness and edissol ed in me hanol a a concen a ion o
100 mg/mL, and s o ed a 4˚C o u he use.
To al phenolic con en assay
To measu e o al con en s o phenolic subs ances, 0.5 mL o he
sample was aken and dilu ed wi h wa e in a 50 mL olume ic
lask. The ea e , 2.5 mL o Folin-Ciocal eau eagen and 7.5 mL o
a 20% solu ion o sodium ca bona e we e added. The esul ing
abso bance was measu ed in he spec opho ome e LIBRA S6 a
he wa eleng h o 765 nm agains a blind sample, which was used
as e e ence. The esul s we e exp essed as g o gallic acid/kg o
esh mass (FM) (Kim e al., 2003).
An ioxidan capaci y by he DPPH es assay
The DPPH es (2,2-Diphenyl-1-pic ylhyd azyl) was done acco ding
o he me hod o B and-Williams e al. (1995) wi h some
modi ica ions (Thaipong e al., 2006). The s ock solu ion was
p epa ed by dissol ing 24 mg o DPPH wi h 100 mL o me hanol
and hen s o ed a -20°C un il needed. The wo king solu ion was
ob ained by mixing 10 mL o he s ock solu ion wi h 45 mL o
me hanol o ob ain he abso bance o 1.1 ± 0.02 uni s a 515 nm
using he spec opho ome e LIBRA S6. F ui ex ac s (150 µL)
we e allowed o eac wi h 2.850 µL o he DPPH solu ion o 1 h in
he da k. Then, he abso bance was aken a 515 nm. The
an ioxidan capaci y was calcula ed as a dec ease in abso bance
alue using he o mula:
(%) = (A0 – A1/A0) x 100%
Whe e, A0 is he abso bance o he con ol (wi hou he sample) and
A1 is he abso bance o he mix u e con aining he sample. The
esul s o abso bance we e con e ed using a calib a ion cu e o
he s anda d and exp essed in asco bic acid equi alen s (AAE)/kg
FM (Rupasinghe e al., 2006).
Phenolic con en assay
Fo he measu emen o cyanidin-3-a abinoside, cyanidin-3-
galac oside, (-)epica echin, chlo ogenic and neochlo ogenic acids
he s o ed me hanolic ex ac was dilu ed a hund ed imes wi h ACS
wa e , which is deionized wa e supplied by Sigma-Ald ich and
il a ed h ough a memb ane il e Nylon (0.45 µm Nylon il e disk).
The ins umen used o phenolic analysis consis ed o a sol en
deli e y pump (ESA Inc., Model 582), gua d cell (ESA Inc., Model
5010A, wo king elec ode po en ial K1 = 600 mV, K2 = 650 mV),
ch oma og aphic column - Model Supelcosil LC8 (150.0 × 4.6 mm),
5 µm pa icle size and an elec ochemical de ec o (Coulochem III).
Ch oma og aphic condi ions we e cons an : 30°C, as a mobile
phase me hanol was used:H2O:H3PO4 = 99:0.5:0.5, ( il a ed
h ough a il e Nylon, 0.2 µm), he ype o elu ion was isoc a ic, he
low a e o he mobile phase was 1.1 mL/min (Miki, 1981). The
con en o phenols was calcula ed as mg/kg o esh mass.
Reac i e oxygen species sca enging ac i i y assay
Fo he measu emen o eac i e oxygen species ac i i y 25%
ex ac s we e p epa ed in phospha e bu e (20 mmol/L, pH 7.4).
The hyd oxyl adical sca enging ac i i y was assayed acco ding o
he me hod o Ghiselli e al. (1998). 1 mL o he ex ac was mixed
wi h 0.8 mL o a eac ion bu e (phospha e bu e , 20 mmol/L, pH
7.4, deoxy ibose, 1.75 µmol/L, i on ammonium sulpha e, 0.1 µmol/L
and EDTA, 0.1 µmol/L). 0.1 ml o H2O2 (0.01 mol/L) was hen added
o he eac ion solu ion. The solu ion was incuba ed o 10 min a
37°C p io o he addi ion o 0.5 mL o 1% hioba bi u ic acid and 1
mL o 2.8% ichlo ace ic acid. The mix u e was boiled o 10 min
and cooled apidly. The abso bance o he mix u e was measu ed
a 532 nm (appa a us LIBRA S6). The assay o ni ic oxide
sca enging ac i i y was done acco ding o he me hod desc ibed by
G een e al. (1982). 1 mL o he ex ac was mixed wi h 1 mL o he
eac ion solu ion con aining sodium ni op usside (10 mmol/L) in
phospha e bu e (20 mmol/L, pH 7.4). The incuba ion a 37°C o 1
h ollowed and 0.5 mL o aliquo was hen mixed wi h 0.5 mL o
G iess eagen . The abso bance was measu ed a 540 nm.
The supe oxide anion sca enging ac i i y was done acco ding o
he me hod desc ibed by Beissenhi z e al. (2004) and i is based
on he educ ion o cy och ome c. 1 mL o he ex ac was mixed
wi h 1 mL o he solu ion con aining xan hine oxidase (0.07 U/mL),
xan hine (100 µmol/L) and cy och ome c (50 µmol/L). A e
incuba ion a 20°C o 3 min, he abso bance a 550 nm was
de e mined. All es s we e pe o med in iplica e. The hyd oxyl
adical sca enging ac i i y, ni ic oxide sca enging ac i i y and
supe oxide anion sca enging ac i i y we e calcula ed as ollows:
Sca enging ac i i y (%) = (A0 – A1/A0) x 100%
Whe e, A0 is he abso bance o he con ol (wi hou he sample) and
A1 is he abso bance o he mix u e con aining he sample.
Lipid pe oxida ion inhibi ion ac i i y
The inhibi ion o lipid pe oxida ion was assayed by he me hod o
Anup e al. (2006). 5 µg o a li e we e homogenized in 20 mL o
T is-HCl bu e (50 mmol/L, pH 7.6). 0.1 mL o he li e homogena e
was incuba ed wi h he sample (0.2 mL o a 25% ex ac ), 0.1 mL o
KCl (30 mmol/L), 0.1 ml o FeSO4 (0.16 mmol/L) and 0.1 mL o
asco bic acid (0.06 mmol/L) a 37°C o 1 h. The ea e , 1 mL o 1%
hioba bi u ic acid (TBA) and 1 mL o 15% ichlo ace ic acid
Rop e al. 2433
we e added. The inal solu ion was hea ed a 100°C in a boiling
wa e ba h o 15 min, cooled wi h ice o 10 min, and hen
cen i uged a 5,000 pm. o 10 min. The abso bance o he
supe na an was measu ed a 532 nm, using he LIBRA S6
spec opho ome e . The blank was pe o med by subs i u ing T is-
HCl bu e (50 mmol/L, pH 7.6) o he sample. The inhibi ion
pe cen age o he o ma ion o TBA- eac i e subs ances was
calcula ed as:
Inhibi ion ac i i y (%) = (A0 – A1/A0) x 100%
Whe e, A0 is he abso bance o he con ol (wi hou he sample) and
A1 is he abso bance o he mix u e con aining he sample.
S a is ical analysis
The da a ob ained we e analyzed s a is ically by he analysis o
a iance (ANOVA) and Tukey´s mul iple ange es o compa ison
o means (Snedeco and Coch an, 1967). Co ela ion unc ions
we e calcula ed using he s a is ical package Unis a , . 5.1 and
O ice Excel® Mic oso .
RESULTS
F om ou esul s one can see high a iabili y among he
ui o pa icula cul i a s. In case o TPC he highes
a e age alues we e ob ained in he ´Viking´ cul i a
(12.85 g GAE/kg FM), ollowed by he ´Ne o´ (11.12 g
GAE/kg FM) and he ´Hugin´ (9.68 g GAE/kg FM)
cul i a s. On he con a y, in he ´Fe ödi´ and ´A on´
cul i a s he alues we e only 7.78 g GAE/kg FM and
7.89 g GAE/kg FM, espec i ely. Simila ly, he alues o
TAC co esponded o he measu ed con en s. Fo
example, in he ´Viking´ cul i a , TAC was 15.96 g
AAE/kg FM and in he ´Ne o´ cul i a he alue was 15.96
g AAE/kg FM. On he o he hand, he lowes amoun o
TAC was ound in he ui o he ´Fe ödi´ cul i a wi h he
alue being 8.89 g AAE/kg FM (Table 1). The co ela ion
coe icien be ween TPC and TAC was 2 = 0.948, y =
1.5194x - 2.9191.
In case o pa icula polyphenols s a is ical signi ican
di e ences we e obse ed among he cul i a s. The
alues o hei con en s anged om 941.82 mg/kg FM
( he ´A on´ cul i a ) o 1553.29 mg/kg FM ( he ´Viking´
cul i a ) in cyanidin-3-a abinose; in cyanidin-3-
galac oside om 1010.80 mg/kg FM ( he ´A on´ cul i a )
o 1203.56 mg/kg FM ( he Viking´ cul i a ); in case o (-)
epica echin he alues we e om 467.35 mg/kg FM ( he
´A on´ cul i a ) o 862.50 mg/kg FM ( he ´Ne o´ cul i a ).
The lowes alues o chlo ogenic and neochlo ogenic
acids we e measu ed in he ´Fe ödi´ cul i a (1131.15
mg/kg FM and 845.04 mg/kg FM´).
The ch oma og am ep esen ing he pa icula peaks is
shown in Figu e 1. The co ela ion coe icien be ween
an ioxidan capaci y and chlo ogenic acid was 2 = 0.788,
y = 0.0075x – 0.1052. On he con a y, in case o
neochlo ogenic acid he co ela ion coe icien was 2 =
0.940, y = 0.0258x –1.3268. Fo compa ison, he co ela ion
2434 J. Med. Plan . Res.
Table 1. TPC and TAC con en s – in case o TPC he esul s a e exp essed as g ams o
gallic acid/kg FM, in case o TAC he esul s a e exp essed as g ams o AAE/kg FM.
Cul i a TPC TAC
A on 7.89 ± 0.35a 9.02 ± 0.56a
Fe ödi 7.78 ± 0.39a 8.89 ± 0.71a
Hugin 9.68 ± 0.44b 11.15 ± 0.88b
Ne o 11.12 ± 0.57c 15.32 ± 1.12c
Viking 12.85 ± 0.56c 15.96 ± 0.95c
Di e en supe sc ip s in each column indica e he signi ican di e ences in he mean a p < 0.05.
coe icien s be ween TAC and cyanidin-3-a abinoside,
cyanidin-3-galac oside and (-)epica echin we e 2 =
0.958, y = 0.0116x – 1.6738; 2 = 0.903, y = 0.0397x –
3.1910; and 2 = 0.948, y = 0.0190x – 0.7533,
espec i ely.
In e es ing esul s we e gi en in case o sca enging
e ec on ROS o 25% black chokebe y ui me hanolic
ex ac s. Compa ing he pa icula esul s shown in Table
3, high a iabili y be ween he cul i a s is e iden .
Gene ally, he lowes alues o sca enging ac i i y we e
eached ( he esul s a e lis ed in o de o hyd oxyl adical,
ni ic oxide, supe oxide anion and lipid pe oxida ion) in
he ´Fe ödi´ cul i a (22.08, 27.59, 21.24, 12.05%) and
ha o he ´A on´ (25.01, 28.42, 22.22, 12.57%). Highe
alues we e measu ed in he ui o he ´Hugin´ cul i a
(31.12, 33.10, 30.48, 16.19%) and he highes
sca enging ac i i y was obse ed in he ´Ne o´ cul i a
(33.51, 37.30, 35.96, 19.22%) and he ´Viking´ cul i a
(34.15, 41.46, 36.92, 19.81%).
DISCUSSION
Rega ding o he ac ha all cul i a s we e g own unde
iden ical condi ions and in he same locali y, i is possible
o conclude ha one can clea ly see he cul i a
a iabili y, which is qui e ypical o ui (Kopec, 1998).
This a iabili y became e iden in case o TPC, TAC,
ROS sca enging ac i i y and also lipid pe oxida ion
ac i i y. In ou measu emen e y high con en s o
polyphenolics we e obse ed. The alues o hei
con en s anged om 7.78 o 12.85 g o gallic acid/kg FM.
These con en s co espond o he alues which we e
ound ou in black chokebe ies by Zheng and Wang
(2003). Mo eo e , some au ho s no iced high alues o
phenols in black chokebe y ui , e en highe in
compa ison wi h ou esul s (Ben enu i e al., 2004;
Oszmianski and Wojdylo, 2005). Fo mos ui species
lowe con en s a e ypical. Fo example, in apples he
common con en is be ween 0.6 o 2.1 g o gallic acid/kg
FM (V ho sek e al., 2004) o in plums i is 2.2 o 5.0 g o
gallic acid/kg FM (Rop e al., 2009). An ioxidan capaci y
was de e mined by he DPPH es and i was he highes
in he cul i a ´Viking´ wi h he alue o 15.96 g o AAE/kg
FM. In o he ui species, including apples (Hube and
Rupasinghe, 2009), small be ies and s one ui (Chen e
al., 2006), he alues o an ioxidan capaci y a e mos ly
much lowe . Fo example, in che ies he e a e alues o
up o 0.9 g o AAE/kg FM (Usenik e al., 2008) and in
plums he alues can each up o 6 g o AAE/kg FM (Rop
e al., 2009). As a as s a is ical e alua ion o he esul s
is conce ned, he highes alues o co ela ion coe icien
be ween an ioxidan capaci y and he o al amoun o
phenolic subs ances we e ob ained (in case o he DPPH
es 2 = 0.948, y = 1.5194x – 2.9191). Many au ho s
no ice a high co ela ion be ween TPC and an ioxidan
capaci y in ui (Thompson and Chao analiki , 2003;
E cisli and O han, 2008). In e es ing esul s we e
ecei ed in case o he con en s o pa icula phenols.
While in case o cyanidin-3-glucoside he di e ences in
i s con en we e sligh among he cul i a s (Table 2), in
o he phenols he di e ences we e s a is ically signi ican .
The highes con en s we e demons a ed in case o
chlo ogenic acid ( om 1131.15 o 1960.72 mg/kg FM).
This acid is an impo an phenol ound in black
chokebe y ui (Skupien and Oszmianski, 2007). Zheng
and Wang (2003) d aw a en ion o he ac ha
chlo ogenic acid is he mos impo an an ioxidan in
black chokebe y, which was also con i med in ou
measu emen .
The me hanolic ex ac s (25%) o black chokebe y ui
showed mode a e inhibi o y abili y on hyd oxyl adical
(34.15%), ni ic oxide (41.46%), supe oxide anion
(36.92%) and lipid pe oxida ion (19.81%) – he cul i a
´Viking´. ROS a e known o cause aging, cance and
many o he mal-e ec s on he human body and
implica ed in pa hogenesis o se e al diseases
(Sumanon e al., 2004). In his s udy, he black
chokebe y ui ex ac was e alua ed o high abili y o
sca enge hyd oxyl adical using he deoxy ibose
deg ada ion assay. The cul i a s ´Ne o´ and ´Viking´
gene ally seemed o ha e sca enging ac i i ies o ROS
including ni ic oxide. Sca enging ac i i y o supe oxide
anion in he ex ac s o pa icula cul i a s was also
demons a ed in he xan hine/xan hine oxidase sys em.
Using ex ac s o black chokebe y ui was mo e
e ec i e han in o he ui species, e.g. mulbe y (Bae
and Suh, 2007), apples (Ma ei e al., 2007) o ui o
Rop e al. 2435
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Figu e 1. Ch oma og am ep esen ing he peaks o phenolics – he ´Viking´ cul i a ( he peak 2 = cyanidin-3-a abinoside, he peak 4 = cyanidin-3-galac oside, he
peak 5 = chlo ogenic acid, he peak 6 = neochlo ogenic acid; he peak 7 = (-) epica echin.
Table 3. Sca enging e ec o 25% black chokebe y ui me hanol ex ac s (pe cen age o inhibi ion).
Cul i a Hyd oxyl adical Ni ic oxide Supe oxide anion Lipid pe oxida ion
A on 25.01 ± 0.89a 28.42 ± 0.25a 22.22 ± 0.29a 12.57 ± 0.30a
Fe ödi 22.08 ± 0.58b 27.59 ± 0.29b 21.24 ± 0.37b 12.05 ± 0.24a
Hugin 31.12 ± 0.68c 33.10 ± 0.31c 30.48 ± 0.40c 16.19 ± 0.21b
Ne o 33.51 ± 0.67d 37.30 ± 0.28d 35.96 ± 0.36d 19.22 ± 0.20c
Viking 34.15 ± 0.51d 41.46 ± 0.31e 36.92 ± 0.38e 19.81 ± 0.26c
Di e en supe sc ip s in each column indica e he signi ican di e ences in he mean a p < 0.05.

2436 J. Med. Plan . Res.
Table 2. The con en o phenolics (mg/kg FM).
Cul i a cyanidin-3 a abinoside cyanidin-3-galac oside (-)epica echin chlo ogenic acid neochlo ogenic acid
A on 941.82 ± 18.25a 1010.80 ± 34.25a 467.35 ± 4.56a 1254.20 ± 51.18a 883.31 ± 26.11a
Fe ödi 972.90 ± 24.56a 1074.41 ± 31.50a 560.22 ± 9.74b 1131.15 ± 24.36b 845.04 ± 19.52a
Hugin 1015.04 ± 29.01b 1071.91 ± 39.83a 647.08 ± 6.09c 1845.19 ± 21.12c 965.81 ± 27.41b
Ne o 1420.17 ± 24.12c 1181.15 ± 28.20b 862.50 ± 8.70d 1931.45 ± 40.01d 1057.00 ± 25.30c
Viking 1553.29 ± 35.44d 1203.56 ± 31.31b 844.44 ± 10.10d 1960.72 ± 37.11d 1156.59 ± 28.02d
Di e en supe sc ip s in each column indica e he signi ican di e ences in he mean a p < 0.05.
P unus species (Jung e al., 2002). Lipid
pe oxida ion is o en caused by ROS as an
oxida i e al e a ion o polyunsa u a ed a y acids
(Wang e al., 2009). In a biological sys em, lipid
pe oxida ion gene a es a numbe o deg ada ion
p oduc s and i is ound o be an impo an cause
o cell memb ane des uc ion and cell damage
(Wang e al., 2008). The highes alues o lipid
pe oxida ion ac i i ies we e obse ed in he
cul i a s ´Ne o´ and ´Viking´, which con i ms
biological e iciency o hese cul i a s in compa-
ison wi h o he cul i a s e alua ed in his s udy.
Conclusion
In ou measu emen , e y high con en s o
polyphenolic subs ances and o al an ioxidan
capaci y we e obse ed in he black chokebe y
ui . Fu he mo e, he e was a high co ela ion
be ween polyphenolic subs ances and an ioxidan
capaci y. In addi ion, high e iciency became
e iden in eac i e oxygen species and lipid
pe oxida ion sca enging ac i i ies. F om his poin
o iew, he ui o black chokebe y ha e unique
p ope ies in compa ison wi h o he ui species.
They can become a aluable sou ce o nu i-
ionally impo an subs ances in human nu i ion.
Mo eo e , hey can ha e a signi ican in luence on
s eng hening human immuni y and he p e en ion
o many diseases.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This wo k was kindly suppo ed by unding om
he Minis y o Educa ion, You h and Spo s o he
Czech Republic (G an No. MSM 7088352101)
and he Minis y o Ag icul u e o he Czech
Republic (G an s No. NAZV 81142, NAZV 82232).
REFERENCES
Anonymous (2007). Da a om Cen al Ins i u e o Supe ising
and Tes ing in Ag icul u e. UKZUZ, B no, Czech Republic.
Anup S, She een RH, Shi anandappa T (2006). An ioxidan
ac i i y o he oo s o Decalepis hamil onii. LWT-Food Sci.
Technol., 36: 1059-1065.
Bae SH, Suh HJ (2007). An ioxidan ac i i ies o i e di e en
mulbe y cul i a s in Ko ea. LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 40:
955-962.
Bane jee A, Dasgup a N, De B (2005). In i o s udy o
an ioxidan s ac i i y o Syzigium cumini ui . Food Chem.,
90: 727-733.
Ba os L, Bap is a P, Fe ei a ICFR (2007). E ec o Lac a ius
pipe a us ui ing body ma u i y s age on an ioxidan ac i i y
measu ed by se e al biochemical assays. Food Chem.
Toxicol., 45: 1731-1737.
Beissenhi z MK, Kwan RC, Ko KM, Rennebe g R, Schille
FW, Liska F (2004). Compa ing an in i o elec ochemical
measu emen o supe oxide sca enging ac i i y wi h an in
i o assessmen o an ioxidan po en ial in Chinese oni ying
he bs. Phy o he . Res., 18: 149-153.
Ben enu i S, Pella i F, Melega i M, Be elli D (2004).
Polyphenols, an hocyanins, asco bic acid, and adical
sca enging ac i i y o Rubus, Ribes and A onia. J. Food
Sci., 69: 164-169.
B and-Williams W, Cu elie ME, Ve se C (1995). Use o a ee
adical me hod o e alua e an ioxidan ac i i y. LWT-Food
Sci. Technol., 28: 25-30.
B idle P, Timbe lake CF (1997). An hocyanins as na u al ood
colou s-selec ed aspec s. Food Chem., 58: 103-109.
Chen PN, Chu SC, Chiou HL, Kuo WH, Chiang CL, Hsien YS
(2006). Mulbe y an hocyanins, cyanidin 3- u inoside and
cyanidin 3-glucoside, exhibi ed an inhibi o y e ec on he
mig a ion and in asion o a human lung cance cell line.
Cance Le ., 235: 248-259.
E cisli S, O han E (2008). Some physico-chemical
cha ac e is ics o black mulbe y (Mo us nig a L.) geno ypes
om No heas Ana olia egion o Tu key. Sci. Ho ic., 116:
41-46.
Ghiselli A, Na dini M, Baldi A, Scaccini C (1998). An ioxidan
ac i i y o di e en phenolic ac ions sepa a ed om an
I alian ed wine. J. Ag ic. Food Chem., 46: 361-367.
G acia-Alonso M, Pascual-Te esa S, San os-Buelga C, Ri al-
Gonzalo JC (2004). E alua ion o an ioxidan p ope ies o
ui s. Food Chem., 84: 13-18.
G een LC, Wagne DA, Glogowski J, Skippe PL, Wishnok JS,
Tannenbaum SR (1982). Analysis o ni a e, ni i e, and [15N]
ni a e in biological luids. Anal. Biochem., 126: 131-138.
H ico sky I (2002). D obne o oce. P i oda, B a isla a, Slo ak
Republik.
Hube GM, Rupasinghe HPV (2009). Phenolic p o iles and
an ioxidan p ope ies o apple skin ex ac s. J. Food Sci.,
74: 693-700.
Jakobek I, Se uga M, Med ido ic-Kosano ic M, No ak I
(2007). An hocyanin con en and an ioxidan ac i i y o
Sumanon Y, Mu akami Y, Tohda M, Vaj agup a O,
Ma sumo o K, Wa anabe H (2004). E alua ion o he ni ic
oxide adical sca enging ac i i y o manganese complex o
cu cumin and i s de i a e. Biol.Pha m. Bull. 27: 170-173.
Takao T, Ki a ani F, Wa anabe N, Yagi A, Saka a K (1994). A simple
sc eening me od o an ioxidan s and isola ion o se e al
an ioxidan s p oduced by ma ine bac e ia om ish and shell ish.
Biosci. Bio ech. Bioch., 58: 1780-1783.
Thaipong K, Boonp akob U, C osby K, Cisne os-Ze allos L, By ne DH
(2006). Compa ison o ABTS, DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC assays o
es ima ing an ioxidan ac i i y om gua a ui ex ac s. J. Food
Compos. Anal., 19: 669-675.
Thompson MM, Chao analiki A (2003). P elimina y obse a ions on
adap ion and nu aceu ical alues o blue honeysuckle (Lonice a
cae ulea) in O egon, USA. Ac a Ho icul u ae, 626: 65-72.
Usenik V, Fabcic J, S ampa F (2008). Suga s, o ganic acids, phenolic
composi ion and an ioxidan ac i i y o swee che y (P unus a ium
L.). Food Chem., 107: 185-192.
V ho sek U, Rigo A, Tonon D, Ma i i F (2004). Quan i a ion o
polyphenols in di e en apple a ie ies. J. Ag ic. Food Chem., 52:
6532-6538.
Wal he E, Schnell S (2009). Black chokebe y (A onia melanoca pa) –
a special c op ui . Zei sch i ü A znei und Gewu zp lanzen, 14:
179-182.
Rop e al. 2437
Wang H, Gao XG, Zhou GC, Cai L, Yao WB (2008). In i o and in i o
an ioxidan ac i i y o aqueous ex ac om Choe ospondias axilla is
ui . Food Chem., 106: 888-895.
Wang Z, Hsu Ch, Yin M (2009). An ioxida i e cha ac e is ics o aqueous
and e hanol ex ac s o glossy p i a ui . Food Chem., 112: 914-918.
Wu SJ, Ng LT (2008). An ioxidan and ee adical sca enging ac i i ies
o wild bi e melon (Momo dica cha an ia Linn. a . abb e ia a Se .)
in Taiwan. LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 41: 323-330.
Yang J, Guo J, Yuan J (2008). In i o an ioxidan p ope ies o u in.
LWT-Food Sci. Technol., 41: 1060-1066.
Zheng W, Wang SY (2003). Oxygen adical abso bing capaci y o
phenolics in bluebe ies, c anbe ies, chokebe ies, and
lingonbe ies. J. Ag ic. Food Chem., 51: 502-509