scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Evaluation of Root-End Preparation with Two Different Endodontic Microsurgery Ultrasonic Tips

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare root-end preparation performed with two different ultrasonic tips-CVDentus and NSK-and respective time requirements. After root-end resection, 32 teeth were randomly divided in two groups, according to the ultrasonic tip used for root-end preparation. Preparation time was recorded. Photomicrographs were taken to assess the following parameters: root surface microcracking, marginal integrity and presence of debris. One ultrasonic tip from each group was analyzed through scanning electron microscopy before and after root-end preparation. The significance level was set at α = 0.05. Incidence of microcracks in both groups was 12.5%. Solely intracanal microcracking was found, consistently positioned within the widest side of the remaining dentine. No statistically significant differences were verified between both experimental groups regarding marginal integrity (p = 0.102) and preparation time (p = 0.780), whereas statistical differences (p = 0.003) were found concerning the presence of debris (the minimum registered score was mostly verified in CVDentus group). NSK tips showed major morphological changes, with extensive surface wear and noticeable loss of particles, which was not verified on CVDentus tips. Our findings suggest significant differences regarding root-end preparation walls quality, with CVDentus tips showing better results. Concerning microcracking, as well as preparation time and marginal integrity, both ultrasonic tips showed similar results. Qualitative analysis exposed NSK tips major morphological changes and wear after use, which was not verified on CVDentus tips.

Read accessible full text

Evaluation of Root-End Preparation with Two Different Endodontic Microsurgery Ultrasonic Tips

Author: Palma, Paulo J.,Marques, Joana A.,Casau, Margarida,Santos, André,Caramelo, Francisco,Falacho, Rui I.,Santos, João Miguel
Publisher: MDPI
Year: 2020
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines8100383
Source: https://estudogeral.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/105818/1/Evaluation-of-rootend-preparation-with-two-different-endodontic-microsurgery-ultrasonic-tipsBiomedicines.pdf
biomedicines
A icle
E alua ion o Roo -End P epa a ion wi h Two
Di e en Endodon ic Mic osu ge y Ul asonic Tips
Paulo J. Palma 1,2,* , Joana A. Ma ques 1, Ma ga ida Casau 3, And éSan os 3,
F ancisco Ca amelo 4, Rui I. Falacho 5and João Miguel San os 1,2
1Ins i u e o Endodon ics, Facul y o Medicine, Uni e si y o Coimb a, 3000-075 Coimb a, Po ugal;
[email p o ec ed] (J.A.M.); [email p o ec ed] (J.M.S.)
2Cen e o Inno a ion and Resea ch in O al Sciences (CIROS), Facul y o Medicine, Uni e si y o Coimb a,
3000-075 Coimb a, Po ugal
3Den is y Depa men , Facul y o Medicine, Uni e si y o Coimb a, 3000-075 Coimb a, Po ugal;
[email p o ec ed] (M.C.); [email p o ec ed] (A.S.)
4Coimb a Ins i u e o Clinical and Biomedical Resea ch (iCBR), Labo a o y o Bios a is ics and Medical
In o ma ics (LBIM), Facul y o Medicine, Uni e si y o Coimb a, 3000-548 Coimb a, Po ugal;
[email p o ec ed]
5Ins i u e o O al Implan ology and P os hodon ics, Facul y o Medicine, Uni e si y o Coimb a,
3000-075 Coimb a, Po ugal; [email p o ec ed]
*Co espondence: [email p o ec ed]; Tel.: +351-239-249-151
Recei ed: 11 Augus 2020; Accep ed: 25 Sep embe 2020; Published: 28 Sep embe 2020


Abs ac :
The aim o his s udy is o compa e oo -end p epa a ion pe o med wi h wo di e en
ul asonic ips—CVDen us and NSK—and espec i e ime equi emen s. A e oo -end esec ion,
32 ee h we e andomly di ided in wo g oups, acco ding o he ul asonic ip used o oo -end
p epa a ion. P epa a ion ime was eco ded. Pho omic og aphs we e aken o assess he ollowing
pa ame e s: oo su ace mic oc acking, ma ginal in eg i y and p esence o deb is. One ul asonic
ip om each g oup was analyzed h ough scanning elec on mic oscopy be o e and a e oo -end
p epa a ion. The signi icance le el was se a
α
=0.05. Incidence o mic oc acks in bo h g oups
was 12.5%. Solely in acanal mic oc acking was ound, consis en ly posi ioned wi hin he wides
side o he emaining den ine. No s a is ically signi ican di e ences we e e i ied be ween bo h
expe imen al g oups ega ding ma ginal in eg i y (p=0.102) and p epa a ion ime (p=0.780),
whe eas s a is ical di e ences (p=0.003) we e ound conce ning he p esence o deb is ( he minimum
egis e ed sco e was mos ly e i ied in CVDen us g oup). NSK ips showed majo mo phological
changes, wi h ex ensi e su ace wea and no iceable loss o pa icles, which was no e i ied on
CVDen us ips. Ou indings sugges signi ican di e ences ega ding oo -end p epa a ion walls
quali y, wi h CVDen us ips showing be e esul s. Conce ning mic oc acking, as well as p epa a ion
ime and ma ginal in eg i y, bo h ul asonic ips showed simila esul s. Quali a i e analysis exposed
NSK ips majo mo phological changes and wea a e use, which was no e i ied on CVDen us ips.
Keywo ds:
apical su ge y; endodon ic mic osu ge y; oo -end p epa a ion; ul asonic; ul asonic ips
1. In oduc ion
Apical pe iodon i is comp ises he hos ’s esponse o pa hogenic mic oo ganisms colonizing
he oo canal sys em o he oo h [
1
,
2
]. The p incipal goal o con en ional endodon ic ea men
is p e en ion and/o elimina ion o apical pe iodon i is [
1
,
2
]. Today, he success a e o endodon ic
ea men s ands be ween 85% and 95%, being equen ly applied o ea i e e sible in lamma ion
o nec osis o he oo canal con en [
3
]. Endodon ic mic osu ge y is o en he las op ion when
nonsu gical e ea men ails, is un easible o unlikely o imp o e he ini ial endodon ic ea men [
4
].
Biomedicines 2020,8, 383; doi:10.3390/biomedicines8100383 www.mdpi.com/jou nal/biomedicines
Biomedicines 2020,8, 383 2 o 19
In pa icula , only su gical in e en ion may esol e cases in ol ing a pe sis en lesion wi h e iology
ela ed o complex canal ana omy, ex a- adicula in ec ion, o eign body eac ion ma e ial, and/o
cys ic issue [3].
Pe iapical su ge y acili a es comple e deb idemen o he oo canal and placemen o a oo -end
illing o ensu e adequa e apical sealing. The su gical app oach comp ises se e al sequen ial p ocedu es
in o de o ul ill he a o emen ioned goals: (a) pe iapical esec ion (apicoec omy), (b) p epa a ion o
he oo -end ca i y, and (c) sealing o he oo canal sys em by means o a bioac i e and biocompa ible
oo -end illing ma e ial placemen [4,5].
The ad en o no el diagnos ic ools, ins umen s, and ma e ials has g ea ly bene i ed endodon ic
su ge y [
5
,
6
]. Fo y- i e-deg ee oo -end esec ion be els, bu d i en e og ade p epa a ions and
amalgam o in e media e es o a i e ma e ials o oo -end illing we e o many yea s conside ed
he s a e-o - he-a wi h inconsis en success a es anging om 44.2% o 59% epo ed p io o he
in oduc ion o mic osu gical echniques [7,8].
The in oduc ion o he den al ope a i e mic oscope (DOM) in he ea ly 1990s led o a new e a in
mode n mic osu gical endodon ics [
9
]. Besides magni ica ion, con empo a y echniques inco po a e
he use o ul asonic ips, mic osu gical ins umen s and illing ma e ials which exhibi supe io
biocompa ibili y such as mine al ioxide agg ega e (MTA), Bioden ine [
7
,
10
–
13
], and p emixed
icalcium silica e pu y (To alFill FS pu y) [
14
]. This new mic osu gical app oach allowed o a
signi ican imp o emen in success a es, eaching le els abo e 91% [7,15].
The a ailable li e a u e highligh s he impo ance o an adequa e oo -end p epa a ion o a a o able
p ognosis, wi h i s quali y being di ec ly ela ed o he ea men success [
16
]. Roo -end p epa a ion
should be pa allel o he long axis o he oo , 3 mm deep, and cen e ed wi hin he oo in o de o
p ese e adequa e wall hickness and e ain a biocompa ible illing ma e ial [4,5,17].
Ul asonic ips p esen an al e na i e o he con en ional o a y bu s and show se e al ad an ages
when used o pe o m oo -end p epa a ion. In ac , he ad en o ul asonic ips esul ed in he
imp o emen o oo -end p epa a ion mainly due o he a ailabili y o ips wi h di e en shapes
and angula ions, which a e me iculously selec ed acco ding o he oo ea u es and loca ion [
18
].
Mo eo e , ul asonic ips ca y nume ous ad an ages including he possibili y o pe o ming a mo e
conse a i e os eo omy and o ob aining oo -end esec ion wi h minimal o inexis en be el angles [
19
],
hus educing he numbe o exposed den inal ubules and consequen ly he possibili y o apical
leakage [
20
]. Addi ionally, hese ips enable he emo al o is hmus issue p esen be ween wo canals
wi hin he same oo [
5
] and exhibi lowe isk o damaging he su ounding so issues du ing he
su gical p ocedu e [
7
]. Ul ima ely, ul asonic p epa a ion esul s in oo -end ca i ies ha a e smalle ,
cleane , and mo e e en i e, as well as mo e cen ally placed and aligned wi h he di ec ion o he
o iginal oo canal [
17
]. Howe e , he incidence o apical mic oc acks ollowing oo -end p epa a ion
wi h ul asonic ips has been epo ed [21–24].
Al hough no o mally es ablished, mic oc acks may inc ease he chance o apical leakage
and jeopa dize he o e all s eng h o he oo -end [
25
], wi h nega i e in luence in he long- e m
ou come o endodon ic mic osu ge y [
10
]. Op ical magni ica ion wi h o wi hou he use o dyes [
9
,
26
],
his ologicalsec ions[
26
], s e eomic oscopy[
27
], scanningelec onmic oscopy(SEM)[
28
], and luo escence
con ocal mic oscopy [
26
] a e commonly used me hods o de ec ing mic oc acks esul ing om
ul asound-ac i a ed oo p epa a ion. A ew ac o s ha e been iden i ied ha po en ially con ibu e o
he occu ence o mic oc acks—namely, he use o dehyd a ed ex ac ed ee h, absence o pe iodon al
ligamen , imp ope powe se ings o he ul asound uni , spu e -coa ing o specimens o SEM
examina ion, ime equi ed o oo -end p epa a ion, ini ial oo condi ion, and emaining den inal
hickness [
29
]. Addi ionally, he ype o coa ing o he ul asonic ips may play a signi ican ole in
mic oc ack de elopmen [30].
Recen ly some a emp s ha e been made o imp o e ul asonic ins umen s bo h in e ms o
usabili y, as well as pe o mance. New zi conium-coa ed and diamond-coa ed oo -end p epa a ion
ips ep esen a ele an issue in his ield [
31
]. Howe e new echnologies a ise, such as he chemical
Biomedicines 2020,8, 383 3 o 19
apo deposi ion which comp ises he o ma ion o a hick pu e diamond laye ha shall p oduce a
single s one co e ing he en i e ip’s su ace [32].
The aim o he p esen ex i o s udy is o compa e oo -end p epa a ion pe o med wi h wo
di e en ul asonic ips—chemical apo deposi ion CVDen us (CVDen us, S
ã
o Paulo, B azil) and
diamond-coa ed NSK (NSK, Tochigi, Japan)— ega ding oo su ace mic oc acking ( h oughou he
se en-day e alua ion pe iod), quali y o he oo -end ca i y ma gins, p esence o deb is, oo -end
p epa a ion ips’ wea , and espec i e ime equi emen s.
The null hypo hesis s a es he e a e no di e ences be ween bo h ul asonic ips ega ding he
e alua ed pa ame e s.
2. Ma e ials and Me hods
2.1. Specimen Selec ion
The p esen s udy has been app o ed by he E hical Commi ee o he Facul y o Medicine o he
Uni e si y o Coimb a (no i ica ion CE001/2013, 2 Feb ua y 2015) and ollowed he guidelines o he
Decla a ion o Helsinki. Fo y single- oo ed p emola s wi h ully de eloped apices, eshly ex ac ed
o o hodon ic easons, we e selec ed. Sample size calcula ion was based on a p e ious, unpublished,
pilo s udy using G* Powe (3.1.9.3 so wa e, Kiel, Ge many), conside ing a signi icance le el o
5% and a powe o 80%. All ee h we e imme sed in 1% sodium hypochlo i e (NaOCl, CanalP o,
Col ene/Whaleden AG, Al s a en, Swi ze land) o 15 min, immedia ely a e ex ac ion. A e wa d,
so issue and deb is we e emo ed om he ex e nal oo su aces wi h pe iodon al scale s.
The in eg i y o he oo s was assessed using DOM (Leica M300 Su gical mic oscope, Leica Mic osys ems,
We zla , Ge many) unde 16
×
magni ica ion. Tee h we e hen kep imme sed in 0.5% chlo amine T o
a pe iod o one o h ee weeks in an incuba o (Gallenkamp, London, Uni ed Kingdom) wi h con olled
empe a u e o 37 ◦C, o simula e he o al en i onmen clinical condi ions.
2.2. Specimen P epa a ion
Tee h we e deco ona ed using a high-speed conical unk diamond bu (In ini y, CVDen us, S
ã
o Paulo,
B azil) unde con inuous wa e sp ay. The wo king leng h was de e mined using a size 10 K- ile (a 0.5 mm
dis ance om he apex was conside ed as e e ence o wo king leng h de e mina ion). Roo canals we e
hen cleaned and mechanically p epa ed up o F2 (P oTape uni e sal, Den sply Maille e , Baillaigues,
Swi ze land) applying a c own-down echnique. The oo canals we e i iga ed wi h 1 mL o 1% NaOCl
be ween each ile usage, o aling a olume o i igan solu ion o 4 mL. When p epa a ion was comple ed,
a inal inse wi h 2 mL o 70% alcohol (Meda Pha ma, Lisboa, Po ugal) was pe o med, and oo canal
sys em was hen d ied using s e ile abso ben pape poin s (Zippe e Abso ben Pape Poin s Endo
Easy E icien , VDW; Munich, Ge many).
The single cone echnique was hen used o oo canal illing wi h calib a ed gu a-pe cha
P oTape poin s F2 (P oTape uni e sal, Den sply Maille e , Baillaigues, Swi ze land) and AH Plus
(Den sply, Kons anz, Ge many) as seale . Sec ion o he gu a-pe cha cone was pe o med a he cemen
enamel junc ion (CEJ) by using a hea ed ins umen and hen e ically condensed wi h Buchanan
Sys em B Plugge s (Syb onEndo, O ange, CA, USA).
Following ob u a ion, each oo h was numbe ed, and an X- ay image was aken o con i m he
quali y o ob u a ion. Finally, ee h we e posi ioned p io o he subsequen p ocedu es by placing he
oo ’s wo co onal hi ds in high— iscosi y silicone ma e ial (Col
è
ne Lab-Pu y, Col
è
ne/Whaleden
AG, Swi ze land).
All specimens we e s o ed in an incuba o (Gallenkamp, London, UK) a 37
◦
C and 98% humidi y
h oughou he expe imen al pe iod.
Biomedicines 2020,8, 383 4 o 19
2.3. Roo -End Resec ion
The sec ion le el was se a 3 mm om he apex, and all he oo s we e esec ed acco ding
o a 90-deg ee angle o hei longi udinal axis. Roo -end esec ion was pe o med using a H23LR
(Kome , Geb . B assele , Lemgo, Ge many) ca bide ungs en ope a i e bu and he sec ion su ace
was pos e io ly smoo hed wi h a H375R (Kome , Geb . B assele , Lemgo, Ge many) ca bide ungs en
inishing bu .
He ea e , he oo su aces we e checked by an examine , wi h a DOM (Leica M300 Su gical
mic oscope, Leica Mic osys ems, We zla , Ge many) unde 16
×
magni ica ion, o assess he p esence
o mic oc acks. Pho omic og aphs o he cu ing sec ion we e aken wi h a s e eomic oscope
(objec i e HR Plan Apo 1X WD 54—Nikon SMZ 1500, Tokyo, Japan) be o e and a e me hylene
blue dye 1% (Canal blue, Den splySi ona, Kons anz, Ge many), which was applied di ec ly on he
su ace du ing 5 min, and ollowed by insing wi h abundan wa e o 1 min, in o de o imp o e
mic oc acks isualiza ion.
2.4. Roo -End P epa a ion
Thi y- wo ee h ha did no p esen any mic oc acks o ac u es we e s a i ied by ans e sal
oo shape and su ace a ea, and andomly di ided in wo g oups (s a i ied andom sampling me hod),
acco ding o he ul asonic ip used in oo -end p epa a ion:
•
G oup 1 (n =16): ul asonic chemical apo deposi ion ip TOF-L (CVDen us, S
ã
o Paulo,
B azil)—lo numbe E7009;
•
G oup 2 (n =16): ul asonic diamond-coa ed ip E32D (NSK, Tochigi, Japan)—lo numbe Z217211.
Roo -end p epa a ion was pe o med using he ma ching ul asound uni and ollowing he
manu ac u e s’ ecommenda ions ega ding in ensi y, namely 30% in ensi y o powe when using
CVDen us Ul asonic Sys em (CVDen us; S
ã
o Paulo, B azil) and Endo mode le el 6 o in ensi y
wi h Va ios 970 (NSK iPiezo engine, Tochigi, Japan), unde con inuous saline solu ion i iga ion.
Roo -end p epa a ion was pe o med applying in e mi en and minimal p essu e, wi h in-and-ou
mo ion un il an apical ca i y 3 mm deep om he esec ed su ace was achie ed, ollowed by
ci cum e en ial mo emen s o comple e he en i e p epa a ion. Specimens we e kep in he silicone
blocks and main ained hyd a ed h oughou he p ocedu es. Each ip was used on a maximum
o eigh oo s and eplaced in case o ip ac u e. This p ocedu e was accomplished by a single
ope a o , using a DOM (Leica M300 Su gical mic oscope, Leica Mic osys ems, We zla , Ge many)
unde 16
×
magni ica ion. The oo -end ca i y was conside ed inished when he ope a o deemed o
ha e ob ained a isibly deb is- ee p epa a ion. All p epa a ions we e class I (acco ding o Black’s
classi ica ion). P epa a ions we e eco ded using a ideo came a and ime was measu ed using a ideo
playback so wa e in o de o ge a mo e p ecise measu emen , coun ing solely he ac ual ime o
ip- oo -end con ac .
Pho omic og aphs we e aken ollowing p epa a ion o each oo be o e and immedia ely a e
(T
PO
) applying me hylene blue dye 1% (Canal blue, Den splySi ona, Kons anz, Ge many) as p e iously
desc ibed, as well as 24 h (T24H) and se en days (T7D) a e oo -end p epa a ion.
2.5. Da a Analysis
The p eope a i e and he pos ope a i e pho omic og aphs we e coded and e alua ed by wo
blinded ope a o s. The examine s assessed he ollowing c i e ia, h ough pho omic og aphs analysis
unde 20×and 40×magni ica ion:
•
The numbe , ype and loca ion (in ela ion o den inal walls) o oo su ace mic oc acking
(Table 1a);
•The quali y o oo -end ca i y ma gins p oduced by he ul asonic ips (Table 1b).
Biomedicines 2020,8, 383 5 o 19
Table 1.
Classi ica ions adap ed o e alua e (
a
) oo su ace mic oc acking, (
b
) quali y o oo -end
ca i y ma gins, and (c) p esence o deb is wi hin he apical ca i y, ollowing oo -end p epa a ion.
(a)
Roo -End Su ace Mic oc acking.
Adap ed Classi ica ion om Rainwa e e al. [24] and De B uyne and De Moo [33].
Type Loca ion
Designa ion Comple e Incomple e Na owe Wide
In acanal Ex a-canal In a-den inal
Desc ip ion
F om he
oo canal o
he oo
su ace
O igina ing
om he oo
canal and
adia ing in o
he den ine
O igina ing
om he
oo
su ace
adia ing
in o he
den ine
Con ined o he den ine
Loca ed a
he na owe
side o he
emaining
den ine
su ace
Loca ed a
he wide
side o he
emaining
den ine
su ace
(b) Ma ginal In eg i y
Adap ed Classi ica ion om Taschie i e al. [31].
Sco e 0 1 2 3
Desc ip ion
Ideal
p epa a ion,
wi h no
de ec s
A single isible de ec
p oduced by he con ac
be ween he angle o he ip
and he ca i y ma gin
Chipped, agged ca i y
ma gin
Chipped, agged ca i y
ma gin plus some de ec s
due o he ips bouncing
o he oo du ing
oo -end p epa a ion
(c) P esence o Deb is
Adap ed Classi ica ion om Khabbaz e al. [34].
Sco e 0 1 2 3 4
Desc ip ion Clean walls Deb is on 1 wall Deb is on 2
walls
Deb is on
3 walls Deb is on 4 walls
Addi ionally, di ec s e eomic oscope isualiza ion unde 40
×
magni ica ion allowed o he
e alua ion o he p esence o deb is (den inal and/o gu a-pe cha emnan s)—Table 1c.
The sco es and numbe o c acks we e assessed independen ly by wo examine s, and in case o
disag eemen bo h examine s discussed un il a consensus was eached.
In addi ion, one ul asonic ip om each expe imen al g oup was andomly selec ed and analyzed
h ough scanning elec on mic oscopy (SEM) be o e and a e oo -end p epa a ion, wi h he pu pose
o e alua ing ip wea due o use.
2.6. S a is ical Analysis
S a is ical analysis was ca ied ou using he comme cially a ailable IBM SPSS .24 so wa e (Chicago,
IL, USA) o assess he di e ences be ween he expe imen al g oups. In o de o e alua e he incidence o
mic oc acks be o e and a e (T
PO
, T
24H
, T
7D
) oo -end p epa a ion, as well as c acking ype and loca ion,
esul s ob ained o each g oup we e analyzed h ough desc ip i e s a is ics. The Mann—Whi ney es
was pe o med o e alua e he di e ences ega ding mic oc acks, ma ginal in eg i y (quali y o apical
ca i y ma gins) and p esence o deb is be ween g oups. Conce ning he ime equi ed o oo -end
p epa a ion, he no mali y o da a dis ibu ion es ing was ca ied ou using he Shapi o–Wilk es .
The Mann—Whi ney es was used o de ec signi ican di e ences be ween he g oups as da a did no
ollow he no mal dis ibu ion. The signi icance le el was se a α=0.05.
3. Resul s
3.1. Roo -End Su ace Mic oc acking—Numbe , Type, and Loca ion
Table 2shows he esul s o he wo s udy g oups ega ding he numbe , ype and loca ion o c acks.
No isible c acks we e de ec ed a e oo -end esec ion, independen ly o he ip ype. Rega dless o he
imepoin (T
PO
, T
24H
, T
7D
) ollowing oo -end p epa a ion, in acanal oo mic oc acking was obse ed

Biomedicines 2020,8, 383 6 o 19
in wo samples o each expe imen al g oup. The e o e, an incidence o 12.5% was eco ded conce ning
he occu ence o ac u es in bo h g oups. No p opaga ion o ac u es, no he appea ance o new
ones, was e i ied h oughou he comple e se en-day pe iod o e alua ion.
Mo eo e , he maximum
numbe o mic oc acks eco ded o he same sample was one. No ex a-canal, in a-den ine, o comple e
mic oc acks we e ound. Rega ding loca ion, oo su ace mic oc acking was consis en ly posi ioned
wi hin he wides side o he emaining den ine su ace, hus egis e ing a equency o 100% o
he “wide ” pa o he oo loca ion. Figu e 1(CVDen us g oup) and Figu e 2(NSK g oup) display
ep esen a i e images o oo su ace mic oc acking o bo h expe imen al g oups.
Table 2.
Resul s o he wo expe imen al g oups ega ding he numbe , ype, and loca ion o mic oc acks.
Immedia ely a e
Roo -End Resec ion TPO T24H T7D
CVDen us NSK CVDen us NSK CVDen us NSK CVDen us NSK
Numbe 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2
Type
In acanal 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2
Ex a-canal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In a-den inal
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Comple e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Loca ion Na owe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wide 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2
Biomedicines 2020, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 o 18
o e alua ion. Mo eo e , he maximum numbe o mic oc acks eco ded o he same sample was
one. No ex a-canal, in a-den ine, o comple e mic oc acks we e ound. Rega ding loca ion, oo
su ace mic oc acking was consis en ly posi ioned wi hin he wides side o he emaining den ine
su ace, hus egis e ing a equency o 100% o he “wide ” pa o he oo loca ion. Figu e 1
(CVDen us g oup) and Figu e 2 (NSK g oup) display ep esen a i e images o oo su ace
mic oc acking o bo h expe imen al g oups.
Table 2. Resul s o he wo expe imen al g oups ega ding he numbe , ype, and loca ion o
mic oc acks.
Immedia ely a e
Roo -End Resec ion T
PO
T
24H
T
7D
CVDen us NSK CVDen us NSK CVDen us NSK CVDen us NSK
Numbe 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2
Type
In acanal 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2
Ex a-
canal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
In a-
den inal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Comple e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Loca ion Na owe 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Wide 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2
Figu e 1. Pho omic og aphs o one sample om CVDen us g oup wi h no isible mic oc ack, unde
20× magni ica ion: (a) immedia ely a e oo -end esec ion; (b) immedia ely a e oo -end
p epa a ion—T
PO
; (c) 24 h a e oo -end p epa a ion—T
24H
; (d) se en days a e oo end
p epa a ion—T
7D
.
Figu e 1.
Pho omic og aphs o one sample om CVDen us g oup wi h no isible mic oc ack,
unde 20
×
magni ica ion: (
a
) immedia ely a e oo -end esec ion; (
b
) immedia ely a e oo -end
p epa a ion—T
PO
; (
c
) 24 h a e oo -end p epa a ion—T
24H
; (
d
) se en days a e oo end
p epa a ion—T7D.
Biomedicines 2020,8, 383 7 o 19
Biomedicines 2020, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 o 18
Figu e 2. Pho omic og aphs o one sample om NSK g oup p esen ing one in acanal mic oc ack
(a ow) loca ed wi hin he “wide ” pa o he emaining den ine walls, unde 20× magni ica ion: (a)
immedia ely a e oo -end esec ion; (b) immedia ely a e oo -end p epa a ion—TPO; (c) 24 h a e
oo -end p epa a ion—T24H; (d) se en days a e oo -end p epa a ion—T7D.
3.2. Ma ginal In eg i y (Roo -End Ca i y Ma gins)
Rega ding ma ginal in eg i y (Table 3a), he maximum alue o “3” was ound in one oo om
NSK g oup, o aling 6.2% o he samples om he e e ed expe imen al g oup. The minimum
egis e ed sco e was “0” mos ly e i ied in specimens om CVDen us g oup (25% o he samples
om he g oup). The sco e “1” was he one wi h highes incidence in CVDen us g oup wi h a
pe cen age o 62.5%, whe eas in NSK g oup he alue wi h he highes incidence was “2” (43.8%). No
s a is ically signi ican di e ences (U = 84.00; Z = −1.783; P = 0.102) we e e i ied be ween bo h
CVDen us and NSK g oups ega ding ma ginal in eg i y (Figu e 3a).
Table 3. F equencies and pe cen ages ob ained in he wo expe imen al g oups ega ding (a) ma ginal
in eg i y and (b) p esence o deb is.
CVDen us NSK CVDen us NSK
(a) Ma ginal in eg i y *
0 4 3 25.0 18.8
1 10 5 62.5 31.2
2 2 7 12.5 43.8
3 0 1 − 6.2
(b) P esence o deb is **
0 9 2 56.2 12.5
1 6 6 37.5 37.5
2 1 7 6.2 43.8
3 0 1 − 6.2
4 0 0 − −
* N = 32; Mann—Whi ney es ; P = 0.102, ** N = 32; Mann—Whi ney es ; P = 0.003.
Figu e 2.
Pho omic og aphs o one sample om NSK g oup p esen ing one in acanal mic oc ack
(a ow) loca ed wi hin he “wide ” pa o he emaining den ine walls, unde 20
×
magni ica ion:
(
a
) immedia ely a e oo -end esec ion; (
b
) immedia ely a e oo -end p epa a ion—T
PO
; (
c
) 24 h a e
oo -end p epa a ion—T24H; (d) se en days a e oo -end p epa a ion—T7D.
3.2. Ma ginal In eg i y (Roo -End Ca i y Ma gins)
Rega ding ma ginal in eg i y (Table 3a), he maximum alue o “3” was ound in one oo om
NSK g oup, o aling 6.2% o he samples om he e e ed expe imen al g oup. The minimum
egis e ed sco e was “0” mos ly e i ied in specimens om CVDen us g oup (25% o he samples om
he g oup). The sco e “1” was he one wi h highes incidence in CVDen us g oup wi h a pe cen age o
62.5%, whe eas in NSK g oup he alue wi h he highes incidence was “2” (43.8%). No s a is ically
signi ican di e ences (U =84.00; Z =
−
1.783; p=0.102) we e e i ied be ween bo h CVDen us and
NSK g oups ega ding ma ginal in eg i y (Figu e 3a).
Biomedicines 2020,8, 383 8 o 19
Table 3.
F equencies and pe cen ages ob ained in he wo expe imen al g oups ega ding (
a
) ma ginal
in eg i y and (b) p esence o deb is.
F equency Pe cen ages (%)
CVDen us NSK CVDen us NSK
(a) Ma ginal in eg i y *
0 4 3 25.0 18.8
1 10 5 62.5 31.2
2 2 7 12.5 43.8
3 0 1 −6.2
(b) P esence o deb is **
0 9 2 56.2 12.5
1 6 6 37.5 37.5
2 1 7 6.2 43.8
3 0 1 −6.2
4 0 0 − −
* N =32; Mann—Whi ney es ; p=0.102, ** N =32; Mann—Whi ney es ; p=0.003.
Biomedicines 2020, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 o 18
Figu e 3. Sco e dis ibu ion wi hin he es ed g oups ega ding (a) ma ginal in eg i y (Mann—
Whi ney es ; P = 0.102) and (b) p esence o deb is. (Mann—Whi ney es ; P = 0.003).
3.3. P esence o Deb is (Walls Quali y)
Conce ning he p esence o deb is ollowing oo -end p epa a ion (Table 3b), he maximum
alue o “3” was ound in one sample om NSK g oup (6.2% o he samples om he e e ed
expe imen al g oup). The minimum egis e ed sco e was “0” mos ly e i ied in specimens om
CVDen us g oup (56.2% o he samples om he g oup). In NSK g oup he sco e exhibi ing he
highes incidence was “2” wi h a pe cen age o 43.8%. Con a iwise o ma ginal in eg i y, s a is ically
signi ican di e ences (U = 50.50; Z = −3.093; P = 0.003) we e ound be ween he es ed g oups
ega ding he p esence o deb is (Figu e 3b and Figu e 4).
Figu e 4. Scanning elec on mic oscopy (SEM) images ollowing oo -end p epa a ion: (a) CVDen us
specimen exhibi ing an in acanal mic oc ack (a ow); (b) NSK specimen exhibi ing an in acanal
mic oc ack (a ow) and i egula oo -end ca i y ma gins, as well as showing isible accumula ion o
deb is (as e isk) esul ing om he oo -end p epa a ion.
3.4. Time Requi emen s
Conside ing he ime equi emen s o pe o m apical p epa a ion (Table 4), no s a is ically
signi ican di e ences could be de ec ed be ween he es ed g oups (U = 120.00; Z = −0.302; P = 0.780).
Figu e 3.
Sco e dis ibu ion wi hin he es ed g oups ega ding (
a
) ma ginal in eg i y (Mann—Whi ney
es ; p=0.102) and (b) p esence o deb is. (Mann—Whi ney es ; p=0.003).
3.3. P esence o Deb is (Walls Quali y)
Conce ning he p esence o deb is ollowing oo -end p epa a ion (Table 3b), he maximum alue
o “3” was ound in one sample om NSK g oup (6.2% o he samples om he e e ed expe imen al
g oup). The minimum egis e ed sco e was “0” mos ly e i ied in specimens om CVDen us g oup
(56.2% o he samples om he g oup). In NSK g oup he sco e exhibi ing he highes incidence was
“2” wi h a pe cen age o 43.8%. Con a iwise o ma ginal in eg i y, s a is ically signi ican di e ences
(U =50.50; Z =
−
3.093; p=0.003) we e ound be ween he es ed g oups ega ding he p esence o
deb is (Figu es 3b and 4).
Biomedicines 2020,8, 383 9 o 19
Biomedicines 2020, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 o 18
Figu e 3. Sco e dis ibu ion wi hin he es ed g oups ega ding (a) ma ginal in eg i y (Mann—
Whi ney es ; P = 0.102) and (b) p esence o deb is. (Mann—Whi ney es ; P = 0.003).
3.3. P esence o Deb is (Walls Quali y)
Conce ning he p esence o deb is ollowing oo -end p epa a ion (Table 3b), he maximum
alue o “3” was ound in one sample om NSK g oup (6.2% o he samples om he e e ed
expe imen al g oup). The minimum egis e ed sco e was “0” mos ly e i ied in specimens om
CVDen us g oup (56.2% o he samples om he g oup). In NSK g oup he sco e exhibi ing he
highes incidence was “2” wi h a pe cen age o 43.8%. Con a iwise o ma ginal in eg i y, s a is ically
signi ican di e ences (U = 50.50; Z = −3.093; P = 0.003) we e ound be ween he es ed g oups
ega ding he p esence o deb is (Figu e 3b and Figu e 4).
Figu e 4. Scanning elec on mic oscopy (SEM) images ollowing oo -end p epa a ion: (a) CVDen us
specimen exhibi ing an in acanal mic oc ack (a ow); (b) NSK specimen exhibi ing an in acanal
mic oc ack (a ow) and i egula oo -end ca i y ma gins, as well as showing isible accumula ion o
deb is (as e isk) esul ing om he oo -end p epa a ion.
3.4. Time Requi emen s
Conside ing he ime equi emen s o pe o m apical p epa a ion (Table 4), no s a is ically
signi ican di e ences could be de ec ed be ween he es ed g oups (U = 120.00; Z = −0.302; P = 0.780).
Figu e 4.
Scanning elec on mic oscopy (SEM) images ollowing oo -end p epa a ion: (
a
) CVDen us
specimen exhibi ing an in acanal mic oc ack (a ow); (
b
) NSK specimen exhibi ing an in acanal
mic oc ack (a ow) and i egula oo -end ca i y ma gins, as well as showing isible accumula ion o
deb is (as e isk) esul ing om he oo -end p epa a ion.
3.4. Time Requi emen s
Conside ing he ime equi emen s o pe o m apical p epa a ion (Table 4), no s a is ically
signi ican di e ences could be de ec ed be ween he es ed g oups (U =120.00; Z =
−
0.302; p=0.780).
Table 4.
Mean, s anda d de ia ion (SD), and minimum and maximum alues o each expe imen al
g oup ega ding he ime o apical p epa a ion.
Time o Apical P epa a ion
Mean SD Minimum Maximum
CVDen us 60.56 33.18 30.0 160.0
NSK 55.56 20.41 34.0 96.0
N=32; Mann—Whi ney es ; p=0.780.
3.5. Roo -End P epa a ion Tip Wea —Quali a i e Analysis
Figu es 5and 6depic images o he ul asonic ips ob ained by scanning elec on mic oscopy.
(SEM) examina ion, showing ip wea a e oo -end p epa a ion. No ul asonic ip ac u es we e
egis e ed in any o he g oups.
Biomedicines 2020,8, 383 16 o 19
10.
Pin o, D.; Ma ques, A.; Pe ei a, J.F.; Palma, P.J.; San os, J.M. Long-Te m P ognosis o Endodon ic
Mic osu ge y—A Sys ema ic Re iew and Me a-Analysis. Medicina 2020,56, 447. [C ossRe ]
11.
Kim, S.; K a chman, S. Mode n endodon ic su ge y concep s and p ac ice: A e iew. J. Endod.
2006
,32,
601–623. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
12.
To abinejad, M.; Pa i okh, M.; Dumme , P.M.H. Mine al ioxide agg ega e and o he bioac i e endodon ic
cemen s: An upda ed o e iew—Pa II: O he clinical applica ions and complica ions. In . Endod. J.
2018
,
51, 284–317. [C ossRe ]
13.
Tsesis, I.; Fai ishe sky, V.; K i , A.; Rosen, E. Ou come o su gical endodon ic ea men pe o med by a
mode n echnique: A me a-analysis o li e a u e. J. Endod. 2009,35, 1505–1511. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
14.
Taha, N.A.; Aboyounes, F.B.; Tamimi, Z.Z. Roo -end mic osu ge y using a p emixed icalcium silica e pu y
as oo -end illing ma e ial: A p ospec i e s udy. Clin. O al In es ig. 2020. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
15.
Kohli, M.R.; Be enji, H.; Se ze , F.C.; Lee, S.M.; Ka abucak, B. Ou come o endodon ic su ge y: A me a-analysis
o he li e a u e-Pa 3: Compa ison o endodon ic mic osu gical echniques wi h 2 di e en oo -end illing
ma e ials. J. Endod. 2018,44, 923–931. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
16. Pa k, E. Ul asonics in endodon ics. Endod. Top. 2013,29, 125–159. [C ossRe ]
17.
Endal, U.; Shen, Y.; Ma, J.; Yang, Y.; Haapasalo, M. E alua ion o quali y and p epa a ion ime o e og ade
ca i ies in oo canals illed wi h Gu aCo e and cold la e al condensa ion echnique. J. Endod.
2018
,44,
639–642. [C ossRe ]
18.
De Lange, J.; Pu e s, T.; Baas, E.M.; an Ingen, J.M. Ul asonic oo -end p epa a ion in apical su ge y:
A p ospec i e andomized s udy. O al Su g. O al Med. O al Pa hol. O al Radiol. Endod.
2007
,104, 841–845.
[C ossRe ]
19.
Mehlha , D.S.; Ha shall, J.G.; Baumga ne , J.C. Compa ison o ul asonic and high-speed-bu oo -end
p epa a ions using bila e ally ma ched ee h. J. Endod. 1997,23, 448–452. [C ossRe ]
20.
Gilheany, P.A.; Figdo , D.; Tyas, M.J. Apical den in pe meabili y and mic oleakage associa ed wi h oo end
esec ion and e og ade illing. J. Endod. 1994,20, 22–26. [C ossRe ]
21.
Tawil, P.Z.; Sa aiya, V.M.; Galicia, J.C.; Duggan, D.J. Pe iapical mic osu ge y: The e ec o oo den inal
de ec s on sho - and long- e m ou come. J. Endod. 2015,41, 22–27. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
22.
Tobon-A oya e, S.I.; Res epo-Pe ez, M.M.; A ismendi-Echa a ia, J.A.; Velasquez-Res epo, Z.;
Ma in-Bo e o, M.L.; Ga cia-Do ado, E.C. Ex i o mic oscopic assessmen o ac o s a ec ing he quali y o
apical seal c ea ed by oo -end illings. In . Endod. J. 2007,40, 590–602. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
23.
Ishikawa, H.; Sawada, N.; Kobayashi, C.; Suda, H. E alua ion o oo -end ca i y p epa a ion using ul asonic
e o ips. In . Endod. J. 2003,36, 586–590. [C ossRe ]
24.
Rainwa e , A.; Jeansonne, B.G.; Sa ka , N. E ec s o ul asonic oo -end p epa a ion on mic oc ack o ma ion
and leakage. J. Endod. 2000,26, 72–75. [C ossRe ]
25.
G ay, G.J.; Ha on, J.F.; Hol zmann, D.J.; Jenkins, D.B.; Nielsen, C.J. Quali y o oo -end p epa a ions using
ul asonic and o a y ins umen a ion in cada e s. J. Endod. 2000,26, 281–283. [C ossRe ]
26.
Min, M.M.; B own, C.E., J .; Legan, J.J.; Ka awy, A.H.
In i o
e alua ion o e ec s o ul asonic oo -end
p epa a ion on esec ed oo su aces. J. Endod. 1997,23, 624–628. [C ossRe ]
27.
Calzone i, K.J.; Iwanowski, T.; Komo owski, R.; F iedman, S. Ul asonic oo end ca i y p epa a ion assessed
by an in si u imp ession echnique. O al Su g. O al Med. O al Pa hol. O al Radiol. Endod.
1998
,85, 210–215.
[C ossRe ]
28.
Liu, Z.; Zhang, D.; Li, Q.; Xu, Q. E alua ion o oo -end p epa a ion wi h a new ul asonic ip. J. Endod.
2013
,
39, 820–823. [C ossRe ]
29.
Ve siani, M.A.; Souza, E.M.; De-Deus, G. C i ical app aisal o s udies on den inal adicula mic oc acks in
endodon ics: Me hodological issues, con empo a y concep s, and u u e pe spec i es. Endod. Top.
2015
,33,
87–156. [C ossRe ]
30.
Abedi, H.R.; Van Mie lo, B.L.; Wilde -Smi h, P.; To abinejad, M. E ec s o ul asonic oo -end ca i y
p epa a ion on he oo apex. O al Su g. O al Med. O al Pa hol. O al Radiol. Endod.
1995
,80, 207–213.
[C ossRe ]
31.
Taschie i, S.; Tes o i, T.; F ance i, L.; Del Fabb o, M. E ec s o ul asonic oo end p epa a ion on esec ed
oo su aces: SEM e alua ion. O al Su g. O al Med. O al Pa hol. O al Radiol. Endod.
2004
,98, 611–618.
[C ossRe ] [PubMed]

Biomedicines 2020,8, 383 17 o 19
32.
Be na des, R.A.; de Mo aes, I.G.; Ga cia, R.B.; Be na dineli, N.; Baldi, J.V.; Vic o ino, F.R.; Vasconcelos, B.C.;
Dua e, M.A.; B aman e, C.M. E alua ion o apical ca i y p epa a ion wi h a new ype o ul asonic diamond
ip. J. Endod. 2007,33, 484–487. [C ossRe ]
33.
De B uyne, M.A.; De Moo , R.J. SEM analysis o he in eg i y o esec ed oo apices o cada e and ex ac ed
ee h a e ul asonic oo -end p epa a ion a di e en in ensi ies. In . Endod. J.
2005
,38, 310–319. [C ossRe ]
34.
Khabbaz, M.G.; Ke ezoudis, N.P.; A oni, E.; Tsa sas, V. E alua ion o di e en me hods o he oo -end ca i y
p epa a ion. O al Su g. O al Med. O al Pa hol. O al Radiol. Endod. 2004,98, 237–242. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
35.
Ma, X.; Li, C.; Jia, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhou, X.; Johnson, T.M.; Huang, D. Ma e ials o e og ade illing in
oo canal he apy. Coch ane Da abase Sys . Re . 2016,12, CD005517. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
36.
Flo a os, S.; Kim, S. Mode n Endodon ic Mic osu ge y Concep s: A Clinical Upda e. Den . Clin. N. Am.
2017,61, 81–91. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
37.
Kim, D.; Kim, S.; Song, M.; Kang, D.R.; Kohli, M.R.; Kim, E. Ou come o endodon ic mic o- esu ge y:
A e ospec i e s udy based on p opensi y sco e-ma ched su i al analysis. J. Endod.
2018
,44, 1632–1640.
[C ossRe ] [PubMed]
38.
Plo ino, G.; Pameije , C.H.; G ande, N.M.; Somma, F. Ul asonics in endodon ics: A e iew o he li e a u e.
J. Endod. 2007,33, 81–95. [C ossRe ]
39.
Taschie i, S.; Del Fabb o, M.; F ance i, L.; Tes o i, T. E ec o oo -end esec ion and oo -end illing on apical
leakage in he p esence o co e-ca ie oo canal ob u a ion. In . Endod. J. 2004,37, 477–482. [C ossRe ]
40.
Lay on, C.A.; Ma shall, J.G.; Mo gan, L.A.; Baumga ne , J.C. E alua ion o c acks associa ed wi h ul asonic
oo -end p epa a ion. J. Endod. 1996,22, 157–160. [C ossRe ]
41.
Lloyd, A.; Jaunbe zins, A.; Dumme , P.M.; B yan , S. Roo -end ca i y p epa a ion using he Mic oMega Sonic
Re o-p ep Tip. SEM analysis. In . Endod. J. 1996,29, 295–301. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
42.
Engel, T.K.; S eiman, H.R. P elimina y in es iga ion o ul asonic oo end p epa a ion. J. Endod.
1995
,21,
443–445. [C ossRe ]
43.
Na a e, S.W.; S eiman, H.R. Roo -end ac u e du ing e op epa a ion: A compa ison be ween zi conium
ni ide-coa ed and s ainless s eel mic osu gical ul asonic ins umen s. J. Endod.
2002
,28, 330–332. [C ossRe ]
[PubMed]
44.
God ey, M.P.; Kulild, J.C.; Walke , M.P. A compa ison o he den in cu ing e iciency o 4 poin ed ul asonic
ips. J. Endod. 2013,39, 897–900. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
45.
Be na des, R.A.; de Souza Junio , J.V.; Dua e, M.A.; de Mo aes, I.G.; B aman e, C.M. Ul asonic chemical
apo deposi ion-coa ed ip e sus high- and low-speed ca bide bu s o apicoec omy: Time equi ed o
esec ion and scanning elec on mic oscopy analysis o he oo -end su aces. J. Endod.
2009
,35, 265–268.
[C ossRe ] [PubMed]
46.
Cama go Villela Be be , F.L.; de Fa ia-Junio , N.B.; Tanoma u-Filho, M.; Gue ei o-Tanoma u, J.M.;
Bone i-Filho, I.; Leona do Rde, T.; Ma can onio, R.A. An
in i o
e alua ion o apicoec omies and
e op epa a ions using di e en me hods. O al Su g. O al Med. O a. L Pa hol. O al Radiol. Endod.
2010,110, e57–e63. [C ossRe ]
47.
Gunes, B.; Aydinbelge, H.A. E ec s o ul asonic oo -end ca i y p epa a ion wi h di e en su gical- ips and
a di e en powe -se ings on glucose-leakage o oo -end illing ma e ial. J. Conse . Den .
2014
,17, 476–480.
[C ossRe ]
48.
Pe e s, C.I.; Pe e s, O.A.; Ba bakow, F. An
in i o
s udy compa ing oo -end ca i ies p epa ed by
diamond-coa ed and s ainless s eel ul asonic e o ips. In . Endod. J. 2001,34, 142–148. [C ossRe ]
49.
Wapling on, M.; Lumley, P.J.; Walmsley, A.D. Incidence o oo ace al e a ion a e ul asonic e og ade
ca i y p epa a ion. O al Su g. O al Med. O al Pa hol. O al Radiol. Endod. 1997,83, 387–392. [C ossRe ]
50.
Onnink, P.A.; Da is, R.D.; Wayman, B.E. An
in i o
compa ison o incomple e oo ac u es associa ed wi h
h ee ob u a ion echniques. J. Endod. 1994,20, 32–37. [C ossRe ]
51.
Liu, R.; Hou, B.X.; Wesselink, P.R.; Wu, M.K.; Shemesh, H. The incidence o oo mic oc acks caused by 3
di e en single- ile sys ems e sus he P oTape sys em. J. Endod.
2013
,39, 1054–1056. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
52.
Liu, R.; Kaiwa , A.; Shemesh, H.; Wesselink, P.R.; Hou, B.; Wu, M.K. Incidence o apical oo c acks and apical
den inal de achmen s a e canal p epa a ion wi h hand and o a y iles a di e en ins umen a ion leng hs.
J. Endod. 2013,39, 129–132. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
Biomedicines 2020,8, 383 18 o 19
53.
Ba is a de Fa ia-Junio , N.; Tanoma u-Filho, M.; Gue ei o-Tanoma u, J.M.; de Toledo Leona do, R.; Cama go
Villela Be be , F.L. E alua ion o ul asonic and E C :YSGG lase e og ade ca i y p epa a ion. J. Endod.
2009,35, 741–744. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
54.
Tawil, P.Z. Pe iapical mic osu ge y: Can ul asonic oo -end p epa a ions clinically c ea e o p opaga e
den inal de ec s? J. Endod. 2016,42, 1472–1475. [C ossRe ]
55.
F ank, R.J.; An im, D.D.; Bakland, L.K. E ec o e og ade ca i y p epa a ions on oo apexes. Endod. Den .
T auma ol. 1996,12, 100–103. [C ossRe ]
56.
De-Deus, G.; Ca alcan e, D.M.; Belladonna, F.G.; Ca alhal, J.; Souza, E.M.; Lopes, R.T.; Ve siani, M.A.;
Sil a, E.; Dumme , P.M.H. Roo den inal mic oc acks: A pos -ex ac ion expe imen al phenomenon?
In . Endod. J. 2019,52, 857–865. [C ossRe ]
57.
A ashi o, F.N.; De-Deus, G.; Belladonna, F.G.; Ca alcan e, D.M.; Coelho, M.S.; Sil a, E.; Pe ei a, K.F.S.; da
Sil a, P.G.; Lopes, R.T.; Souza, E.M. Den inal mic oc acks on eshly ex ac ed ee h: The impac o he
ex ac ion echnique. In . Endod. J. 2020,53, 440–446. [C ossRe ]
58.
Gondim, E., J .; Gomes, B.P.; Fe az, C.C.; Teixei a, F.B.; Souza-Filho, F.J. E ec o sonic and ul asonic
e og ade ca i y p epa a ion on he in eg i y o oo apices o eshly ex ac ed human ee h: Scanning
elec on mic oscopy analysis. J. Endod. 2002,28, 646–650. [C ossRe ]
59.
Del Fabb o, M.; Tsesis, I.; Rosano, G.; Bo olin, M.; Taschie i, S. Scanning elec on mic oscopic analysis o he
in eg i y o he oo -end su ace a e oo -end managemen using a piezoelec ic de ice: A cada e ic s udy.
J. Endod. 2010,36, 1693–1697. [C ossRe ]
60.
Sla on, C.C.; Loushine, R.J.; Welle , R.N.; Pa ke , M.H.; Kimb ough, W.F.; Pashley, D.H. Iden i ica ion o
esec ed oo -end den inal c acks: A compa a i e s udy o isual magni ica ion. J. Endod.
2003
,29, 519–522.
[C ossRe ]
61.
W igh , H.M., J .; Loushine, R.J.; Welle , R.N.; Kimb ough, W.F.; Walle , J.; Pashley, D.H. Iden i ica ion o
esec ed oo -end den inal c acks: A compa a i e s udy o ansillumina ion and dyes. J. Endod.
2004
,30,
712–715. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
62.
Vi an, R.R.; Gue ei o-Tanoma u, J.M.; Be na des, R.A.; Reis, J.M.; Hunga o Dua e, M.A.; Tanoma u-Filho, M.
E ec o ul asonic ip and oo -end illing ma e ial on bond s eng h. Clin. O al In es ig.
2016
,20, 2007–2011.
[C ossRe ] [PubMed]
63.
Lima, L.M.; Mo isuki, C.; San os-Pin o, L.d.; San os-Pin o, A.d.; Co a , E.J. Cu ing cha ac e is ics o den al
diamond bu s made wi h CVD echnology. B az. O al Res. 2006,20, 155–161. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
64.
Cama go Dos San os, B.; Pedano, M.S.; Gi aldi, C.K.; De Oli ei a, J.C.M.; Lima, I.C.B.; Lamb ech s, P.
Mesiobuccal Roo Canal Mo phology o Maxilla y Fi s Mola s in a B azilian Sub-Popula ion—A Mic o-CT
S udy. Eu . Endod. J. 2020,5, 105–111. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
65.
Sbe na, M.T.; Rizzo, G.; Zacchi, E.; Cappa
è
, P.; Rubinacci, A. A p elimina y s udy o he use o pe iphe al
quan i a i e compu ed omog aphy o in es iga ing oo canal ana omy. In . Endod. J.
2009
,42, 66–75.
[C ossRe ]
66.
Reymus, M.; Liebe mann, A.; Dieg i z, C. Vi ual Reali y: An e ec i e ool o eaching oo canal ana omy
o unde g adua e den al s uden s—A p elimina y s udy. In . Endod. J. 2020. [C ossRe ]
67.
Palma, P.J.; Ma ins, J.; Diogo, P.; Sequei a, D.; Ramos, J.C.; Diogenes, A.; San os, J.M. Does apical papilla
su i e and de elop in apical pe iodon i is p esence a e egene a i e endodon ic p ocedu es? Appl. Sci.
2019,9, 3942. [C ossRe ]
68.
Palma, P.J.; Ramos, J.C.; Ma ins, J.B.; Diogenes, A.; Figuei edo, M.H.; Fe ei a, P.; Viegas, C.; San os, J.M.
His ologic e alua ion o egene a i e endodon ic p ocedu es wi h he use o chi osan sca olds in imma u e
dog ee h wi h apical pe iodon i is. J. Endod. 2017,43, 1279–1287. [C ossRe ]
69.
San os, J.M.; Pe ei a, S.; Sequei a, D.B.; Messias, A.L.; Ma ins, J.B.; Cunha, H.; Palma, P.J.; San os, A.C.
Biocompa ibili y o a bioce amic silicone-based seale in subcu aneous issue. J. O al Sci.
2019
,61, 171–177.
[C ossRe ]
70.
Sequei a, D.B.; Seab a, C.M.; Palma, P.J.; Ca doso, A.L.; Peca, J.; San os, J.M. E ec s o a new bioce amic
ma e ial on human apical papilla cells. J. Func . Bioma e . 2018,9, 74. [C ossRe ]
71.
Ballini, A.; Mas angelo, F.; Gas aldi, G.; Te aman i, L.; Buk ic, N.; Can o e, S.; Cocco, T.; Saini, R.; Desia e, A.;
Ghe lone, E.; e al. Os eogenic di e en ia ion and gene exp ession o den al pulp s em cells unde low-le el
lase i adia ion: A good p omise o issue enginee ing. J. Biol. Regul. Homeos . Agen s
2015
,29, 813–822.
[PubMed]
Biomedicines 2020,8, 383 19 o 19
72.
Te
è
, G.; Cappa
è
, P.; Ghe lone, E. New Applica ion o Os eogenic Di e en ia ion om HiPS S em Cells o
E alua ing he Os eogenic Po en ial o Nanoma e ials in Den is y. In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h
2020
,17,
1947. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
73. Aly, R.M. Cu en s a e o s em cell-based he apies: An o e iew. S em Cell In es ig. 2020,7, 8. [C ossRe ]
74.
Jankowski, M.; Dompe, C.; Sibiak, R.; W ˛asia ycz, G.; Mozdziak, P.; Ja´skowski, J.M.; An osik, P.; Kempis y, B.;
Dyszkiewicz-Konwi´nska, M. In Vi o Cul u es o Adipose-De i ed S em Cells: An O e iew o Me hods,
Molecula Analyses, and Clinical Applica ions. Cells 2020,9, 1783. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
75.
Yoshida, S.; Tomokiyo, A.; Hasegawa, D.; Hamano, S.; Sugii, H.; Maeda, H. Insigh in o he Role o Den al
Pulp S em Cells in Regene a i e The apy. Biology 2020,9, 160. [C ossRe ]
76.
A an aggia o, P.; A an aggia o, P.; Pi a, A.; Cando o, V.; Mo eo, G. Mesenchimal s em cells in o al medicine:
An o e iew. J. Biol. Regul. Homeos Agen s 2020,34, 99–105.
©
2020 by he au ho s. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land. This a icle is an open access
a icle dis ibu ed unde he e ms and condi ions o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion
(CC BY) license (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/).