scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Energy frictional dissipating algorithm for rigid and ellastic body’s contact problems

Abstract

An Energy Frictional Dissipating Algorithm (EFDA) for time integration of Coulomb frictional impact–contact problems is presented. Using the Penalty Method, and in the context of a conserving framework, linear and angular momenta are conserved and energy is consistently dissipated. Published formulations were stable, forcing the energy dissipation to be monotonic in order to prevent unstable energy growth. The shortcoming of many was that they were not able to reproduce the real kinematics and dissipation of physical processes, provided by analytical formulations and experiments. EFDA formulates a conserving framework based on a physical energy dissipation estimator. This framework uses an enhanced Penalty contact model based on a spring and a dashpot, enforcing physical frictional energy dissipation, controlling gap vibrations and modifying the velocities and contact forces during each time step. The result is that the dissipated energy, kinematics and contact forces are consistent with the expected physical behavior.

Read accessible full text

Energy frictional dissipating algorithm for rigid and ellastic body’s contact problems

Author: Bravo, R.,Pérez-Aparicio, J. L.
Publisher: CIMNE
Year: 2011
Source: https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/2117/183541/1/COMPLAS-2011_12-Energy%20frictional%20dissipating.pdf
135
ENERGY FRICTIONAL DISSIPATING ALGORITHM FOR
RIGID AND ELLASTIC BODY’S CONTACT PROBLEMS
R. B a o∗and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio†
∗Depa men S uc u al Mechanics and Hyd aulic Enginee ing
Uni e si y o G anada Campues de Fuen enue a, 18071 G anada, Spain
e-mail: b a [email p o ec ed]
†Depa men o Con inuum Mechanics and Theo y o S uc u es
Uni e sidad Poli ´ecnica de Valencia
46022 Valencia, Spain
e-mail: jopeap@up ne .up .es
Key wo ds: Con ac , Time in eg a ion scheme, Consis en Dissipa ion, F ic ion
Abs ac . An Ene gy F ic ional Dissipa ing Algo i hm (EFDA) o ime in eg a ion o
Coulomb ic ional impac –con ac p oblems is p esen ed. Using he Penal y Me hod, and
in he con ex o a conse ing amewo k, linea and angula momen a a e conse ed and
ene gy is consis en ly dissipa ed.
Published o mula ions we e s able, o cing he ene gy dissipa ion o be mono onic in
o de o p e en uns able ene gy g ow h. The sho coming o many was ha hey we e
no able o ep oduce he eal kinema ics and dissipa ion o physical p ocesses, p o ided
by analy ical o mula ions and expe imen s. EFDA o mula es a conse ing amewo k
based on a physical ene gy dissipa ion es ima o . This amewo k uses an enhanced
Penal y con ac model based on a sp ing and a dashpo , en o cing physical ic ional
ene gy dissipa ion, con olling gap ib a ions and modi ying he eloci ies and con ac
o ces du ing each ime s ep. The esul is ha he dissipa ed ene gy, kinema ics and
con ac o ces a e consis en wi h he expec ed physical beha io .
1 INTRODUCTION
The nume ically accu a e analysis o ic ional dynamic con ac p oblems has been a
challenge o he las 30 yea s. Complex p oblems do no ha e analy ical solu ion and due
o hei high nonlinea i y, non–smoo h unila e al es ic ion and he p esence ic ion, hey
a e ha d o model. The e o e, nume ical ime–s epping schemes a e de eloped o emula e
he conse a i e p ope ies o he co esponding con inuous p oblem.
P e ious au ho s ha e add essed ic ionless con ac p oblems, o ins ance [7] ocused
on i e a i e bu no ime–s epping o mula ions, [1] and [3] o implici . These au ho s
1
XI In e na ional Con e ence on Compu a ional Plas ici y. Fundamen als and Applica ions
COMPLAS XI
E. Oña e, D.R.J. Owen, D. Pe ic and B. Suá ez (Eds)
136
R. B a o and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio
in ended o c ea e obus and s able algo i hms o he en o cemen o he con ac con-
s ain s, while ecen o mula ions ha e ocused on ic ional o mula ion and p oposed
uncondi ionally posi i e ene gy dissipa ion. Re . [3] de eloped a posi i e ene gy dissipa -
ing algo i hm, s able o ic ion wi h he Penal y Me hod and showed an a i icial ene gy
ans e be ween bodies–penal y sp ings in which he inal ene gy was always lowe han
he ini ial o S ick and Slip cases. The e o e he beha io o he simula ion was no
consis en wi h he physical con ac p oblem. Re . [1] minimized ha a i icial ene gy
ans e be ween body and penal y sp ing. Fo he non–sliding si ua ion he ene gy a e
con ac was equal o he ini ial and lowe du ing con ac while o he Slip case ob ained a
igo ous posi i e ene gy dissipa ion. The dissipa ion in bo h e e ences was no based on
a consis en conse ing amewo k: he dissipa ion, al hough dec easing mono onically,
was no in acco dance o ha o he con inuous p oblem. Re . [5] de eloped a conse -
a i e amewo k ha en o ced he impene abili y condi ion, elimina ed he a i icial
ene gy ans e be ween body–penal y sp ing and ook in o accoun he ic ional dissipa-
ion h ough an ene gy es ima o . This o mula ion used a con ac eloci y ha modi ied
a p edic o –co ec o scheme, hen he con ac esponse ag eed in eloci ies bu no in
o ces and posi ions, no being accu a e o pe sis en con ac .
This a icle p esen s an Ene gy F ic ional Dissipa ing Algo i hm (EFDA) based on he
ic ionless algo i hm o [2]. Fo Penal y con ac p oblems, he new o mula ion conse es
momen a, simula es he kinema ics, con ac o ces and dissipa es ene gy consis en ly, ac-
co ding o he physical p oblem in each ime s ep. The algo i hm key is a conse a i e
amewo k based on upda ing con ac o ces and momen a o e e y con ac . The ame-
wo k akes in o accoun dissipa ion by an ene gy es ima o based on ic ional Coulomb
law, and is able o en o ce ene gy conse a ion o he S ick con ac and he igh dissi-
pa ion o he Slip con ac .
2 DEFINITION OF THE PROBLEM AND GOVERNING EQUATIONS
2.1 Hamil onian desc ip ion o mo ion
The Hamil onian Mechanics pe mi o ob ain he equa ions o mo ion o mul iple bod-
ies ha in e ac by con ac . This subsec ion b ie ly desc ibes he Hamil onian equa ions
o a con inuous p oblem. Conside a mani old Q ha desc ibes he con igu a ion o a
mechanical sys em whose phase space is P=T⋆Q, he angen space o Q. This space is
composed o each poin o body iby posi ions Qi(x,y, ) and linea momen a Pi(x,y, )
as unc ion o ime . The Hamil onian unc ion HQi(x,y, ),Pi(x,y, )de ines he
o al ene gy o he sys em and is assumed o be sepa able in kine ic K(Pi(x,y, )) and
po en ial V(Qi(x,y, )) ene gies, Eqs. 1.
2
137
R. B a o and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio
HQi(x,y, ),Pi(x,y, )=
nbd

i=1 KPi(x,y, )+VQi(x,y, )
KPi(x,y, )=1
2Ωi
Pi(x,y, )2
ρdΩ
(1)
whe e nbd is he o al numbe o bodies, Ωi he domain o body iand ρ he densi y. The
kine ic ene gy is a eal unc ion K:P→Rand he po en ial V:Q→Ris an a bi a y
unc ion. The mo ion is go e ned by he Hamil onian canonical equa ions, Eqs. 2.
˙
Qi(x,y, )=
∂H(x,y, )
∂Pi=Ωi
Pi(x,y, )
ρdΩ
˙
Pi(x,y, )=−∂H(x,y, )
∂Qi=−∇VQi(x,y, )
(2)
The con inuum a iables om Eqs. 2 may be disc e ized, gi ing Eqs. 3.
Qi(x,y, )=
nnod

A=1
NA(x, y)qA( ); Pi(x,y, )=
nnod

A=1
NA(x, y)pA( ) (3)
Fo he igid bodies used in he cu en pape , his disc e iza ion is based on i s o de
shape unc ions NA(x, y); o he elas ic case hey may be ex ended o highe o de . Fo
hese i s o de unc ions, he disc e iza ion is based on only one node, nnod = 1, usually
de ined a he cen e o g a i y xi,yio each pa icle. The nodal displacemen s and linea
momen a o all bodies i o ka e g ouped in he ec o s q( ), p( ). Fo each body i, he
disc e iza ion Eqs. 3 applied o Eqs. 2 p oduce he sys em o equa ions:
˙
qi=M−1
ipi;˙
pi= i
c+ i
ex (4)
whe e Miis a diagonal mass ma ix, wi h en ies: Mi=Ωiρ[NA(x, y)] NA(x, y) dΩ.
Al hough con ac o ces i
ca e applied in he con ac poin s, he disc e iza ion conside s
an equi alen o ce applied o he nodes. The same hing can be said o he ex e nal
o ces i
ex .
3 NEW ALGORITHM FORMULATION AND ENERGY–MOMENTUM
CONSERVATION
The aim o his sec ion is he disc e iza ion in ime o Eqs. 4. The new equa ions will
en o ce he impene abili y condi ion and disc e ely inhe i he conse a ion p ope ies
3
138
R. B a o and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio
h ough he conse ing amewo k o sec ion 4. The main h ee cha ac e is ic o his
algo i hm a e: i) ene gy conse a ion o no mal con ac , ii) consis en dissipa ion o
angen ial Slip and iii) conse a ion o angen ial S ick.
3.1 Time–disc e e o mula ion
The ic ional de elopmen o EFDA is based on he Simo–Ta now’s algo i hm om
[6], an ene gy–momen um conse ing ime in eg a ion scheme. This scheme is a disc e e
app oxima ion o a Hamil onian sys em (Eqs. 5) in ime con igu a ion n+1/2. Conside ing
he in e al [ n,
n+1], he i s se o equa ions o his algo i hm ela es displacemen s qi
n,
qi
n+1 and linea momen a pi
n,pi
n+1; he second, is he disc e e app oxima ion o second
New on’s law a n+1/2:
˙qi=M−1
ipi→qi
n+1 −qi
n
∆ =M−1
ipi
n+1
2
˙pi= i
cN + i
cT →pi
n+1 −pi
n
∆ = i
cN n+1
2+ i
cT n+1
2
(5)
whe e ∆ = n+1 − n,qi
n≈qi( n), pi
n≈pi( n), qi
n+1 ≈qi( n+1), pi
n+1 ≈pi( n+1) and
pi
n+1/2=(pi
n+1+pi
n)/2. The e ms i
cN n+1/2and i
cT n+1/2a e he disc e e app oxima ions
o he esul ing no mal and angen ial con ac o ce ec o s.
In o de o ob ain a conse ing and a igh kinema ic esponse o con ac be ween wo
bodies i, k, in EFDA addi ional linea momen a pik
cN n+1/2,pik
cT n+1/2and con ac o ces
′ik
cN n+1/2, ′ik
cT n+1/2(upda ing a iables) a e added o Eqs. 5, gi ing Eqs. 6. Fo hese
ou a iables, in he ollowing he subsc ip n+1/2 will be omi ed o simplici y. The
ole o hese new a iables is o en o ce bodies’ ene gy conse a ion o no mal con ac
and conse a ion–consis en dissipa ion o angen ial, espec i ely:
qi
n+1 −qi
n
∆ =M−1
ipi
n+1
2
+
nbd

k=1
k�=ipik
cN +pik
cT =M−1
ipi
n+1
2
+pi
cN +pi
cT 
pi
n+1 −pi
n
∆ =
nbd

k=1
k�=i ik
cN + ′ik
cN + ik
cT + ′ik
cT = i
cN + ′i
cN + i
cT + ′i
cT
(6)
The exp essions o he upda ing a iables a e now o mula ed in local con ac coo -
dina es and ans o med o global by he uni no mal and angen ial ec o s Nik
n+1/2,
Tik
n+1/2, bo h a he con ac poin . To ob ain om Eqs. 6 a conse a i e solu ion o
S ick and dissipa i e o Slip, he upda ing a iables mus ul ill he disc e e conse ing
equa ions de ined in sec ion 4. These a iables a e de ined o bo h con ac di ec ions as:
4
139
R. B a o and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio
NORMAL
pik
cN =ψik
2N
2Nik
n+1
2
Nik
n+1
2
(pi
n+1 −pi
n); ′ik
cN =ψik
1N
2Nik
n+1
2KN(gik
Nn+1 −gik
Nn)
TANG. STICK
pik
cT =ψik
2T
2Tik
n+1
2
Tik
n+1
2
(pi
n+1 −pi
n); ′ik
cT =ψik
1T
2Tik
n+1
2
KT(gik
Tn+1 −gik
Tn)
TANG. SLIP
pik
cT =0; ′ik
cT = 0; ik
cT =−µΨ ik
cN + ′ik
cN Tik
n+1
2
(7)
whe e KN,KTa e use –de ined penal ies o no mal and angen ial con ac , gik
Nn+1,gik
Nn,
gik
Tn+1,gik
Tn no mal and angen ial gaps a nand n+ 1, Ψ = ±1 he Slip di ec ion, µ he
ic ion coe icien and ψik
1N,ψik
1T,ψik
2Nand ψik
2Tp opo ionali y pa ame e s o he upda ing
a iables. No ice ha pik
cN , ′ik
cN,pik
cT , ′ik
cT (a n+1/2) en o ce he conse a i e esponse
o no mal and angen ial S ick con ac s. On he o he hand, o Slip pik
cT = ′ik
cT = 0 since
no angen ial penal y sp ing is p esen ; he new Coulomb ic ion o ce ik
cT is compu ed
wi h he absolu e alue o he o al (con ac plus upda ing) no mal con ac o ces. The
no mal and angen ial–S ick con ac o ces ik
cN , ik
cT a e de ined in Eqs. 8 using he [4]
de i a i e, p o iding a disc e e exp ession ha conse es he a i icial penal y ene gy.
i
cN =
nbd

k=1
k�=i
ik
cN =
nbd

k=1
k�=i
V(gik
Nn+1)−V(gik
Nn)
gik
Nn+1 −gik
Nn
Nik
n+1
2=
nbd

k=1
k�=i
KNNik
n+1
2(gik
Nn+1 +gik
Nn)
i
cT =
nbd

k=1
k�=i
ik
cT =
nbd

k=1
k�=i
V(gik
Tn+1)−V(gik
Tn)
gik
Tn+1 −gik
Tn
Tik
n+1
2=
nbd

k=1
k�=i
KTTik
n+1
2(gik
Tn+1 +gik
Tn)
whe e V(gik
Nn+1)=KN(gik
Nn+1)2/2,V(gik
Nn)=KN(gik
Nn)2/2 a e he no mal and V(gik
Tn+1)=
KT(gik
Tn+1)2/2, V(gik
Tn)=KT(gik
Tn)2/2, he angen ial penal y po en ial con ac ene gies.
4 DISCRETE LINEAR, ANGULAR MOMENTUM CONSERVATION AND
CONSISTENT BODY ENERGY DISSIPATION
This sec ion de elops he disc e e conse ing amewo k o EFDA o ob ain he body
ene gy conse a ion o no mal con ac and conse a ion–dissipa ion o angen ial.
4.1 Disc e e linea momen um balance
The disc e e a ia ion o he linea momen um o EFDA is de ined h ough he second
o Eqs. 6, he disc e e coun e pa o second New on’s law. The e o e, o body i he
esul an o he no mal con ac o ces i
cN , ′i
cN plus he angen ial i
cT , ′i
cT is equal o he
disc e e linea momen um balance be ween nand n+1. Also, he o al linea momen um
5

140
R. B a o and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio
balance (Eq. 8) is he summa ion o e ha o each body and equals he esul an o he
con ac o ces on nbd.
p o
n+1 −p o
n
∆ =
nbd

i=1  i
cN + ′i
cN + i
cT + ′i
cT =
nbd

i=1
nbd

k=1
k�=i ik
cN + ′ik
cN + ik
cT + ′ik
cT (8)
Gi en wo bodies i, k in con ac , due o he AR p inciple: ik
cN =− ki
cN, ′ik
cN =− ′ki
cN ,
ik
cT =− ki
cT , ′ik
cT =− ′ki
cT o S ick and ik
cT =− ki
cT , ′ik
cT = ′ki
cT = 0 o Slip. Then, he
igh e m o Eq. 8 is ze o in all si ua ions and p o
n+1 =p o
n.
4.2 Disc e e angula momen um balance
We again ede ine he a iables qi
n+1,qi
nas he posi ions o he con ac poin . F om
he second o Eqs. 6 and mul iplying by he c oss p oduc ×(qi
n+1 −qi
n), he disc e e
angula momen um balance o a body iis:
pi
n+1 −pi
n
∆ ×(qi
n+1 −qi
n)=Ji
n+1 −Ji
n
∆ =
nbd

k=1
k�=i ik
cN + ′ik
cN + ik
cT + ′ik
cT ×(qi
n+1 −qi
n) (9)
In oking he AR p inciple and exp essing he posi ion’s inc emen s as unc ion o he
no mal gap (qi
n+1 −qi
n)−(qk
n+1 −qk
n)=gik
Nn+1/2(Nki) , he o al angula momen um
balance o nbd is:
J o
n+1 −J o
n
∆ =
nbd

i=1
nbd

k=i+1  ik
cN + ′ik
cN + ik
cT + ′ik
cT ×gik
Nn+1
2(Nki) (10)
Since ec o s ik
cN + ′ik
cN , and he no mal gap a e collinea , hei c oss p oduc is ze o.
The p oduc be ween ik
cT + ′ik
cT and his gap is also ze o since he angen ial con ac
o ces depend on he angen ial gap: a e some algeb a we a i e o he iple p oduc
(Tik
n+1/2) Tik
n+1/2×gik
Nn+1/2(Nki) ha is ze o since he i s ec o is o hogonal o he
c oss p oduc .
4.3 Disc e e o al bodies’ ene gy balance
This equa ion is ob ained by p emul iplying bo h Eqs. 6 by (pi
n+1 −pi
n) and −(qi
n+1 −
qi
n) espec i ely, hen added o all con ac ing bodies nbd. A e some algeb a:
6
141
R. B a o and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio
∆Ekin =
nbd

i=1
(pi
n+1 −pi
n) M−1
ipi
n+1
2
 
∆Ei
kin
=−
nbd

i=1
nbd

k=1
k�=i−(qi
n+1 −qi
n) ik
cT
 
∆E ik
cT

+
nbd

i=1
nbd

k=1
k�=i(qi
n+1 −qi
n) ik
cN
 
∆E ik
cN
−(pi
n+1 −pi
n) M−1
ipik
cN
 
∆Epik
cN (ψik
2N)
−(pi
n+1 −pi
n) M−1
ipik
cT
 
∆Epik
cT (ψik
2T)
−(qi
n+1 −qi
n) ′ik
cN
 
∆E ′ik
cN (ψik
1N)
−(qi
n+1 −qi
n) ′ik
cT
 
∆E ′ik
cT (ψik
1T)
(11)
whe e ∆Ei
kin =Ei
n+1 −Ei
nis he kine ic body ene gy balance be ween nand n+1
when bodies a e igid and ex e nal o ces a e no applied. Then, ∆E ik
cN ,∆E ik
cT a e he
con ac o ces ene gy balance and ∆Epik
cN (ψik
2N), ∆Epik
cT (ψik
2T), ∆E ′ik
cN (ψik
1N), ∆E ′ik
cT (ψik
1T),
all unc ions o he p opo ionali y pa ame e s, a e he upda ing a iables ene gy balance.
This equa ion is he conse ing amewo k ha ela es he o al bodies’ ene gy balance
wi h ha o he upda ing a iables. The ole o ene gy conse a ion o no mal con ac is
included in he e ms ∆E ik
cN ,∆E ′ik
cN (ψik
1N), ∆Epik
cN (ψik
2N), while dissipa ion–conse a ion
o Slip and S ick is included in he e ms ∆E ik
cT ,∆E ′ik
cT (ψik
1T), ∆Epik
cT (ψik
2T). The e o e,
he ene gy loss is always consis en since he dissipa ion is included in he ene gy balance.
No ice ha ∆Ekin is he o al ene gy o all bodies. Since he ene gy ela ed o no mal
con ac is conse ed, ψik
1N,ψik
2Nmay be posi i e o nega i e, and ∆Epik
cN ,∆E ′ik
cN add o
sub ac ene gy. The same can be said o ψik
1T,ψik
2T o he S ick and Slip cases:
STICK: he ene gy is conse ed since he con ac o ce does no c ea e–dissipa e
angen ial wo k. This condi ion is en o ced by ze oing he igh pa o Eq. 11:
0=
nbd

i=1
nbd

k=1
k�=i∆E ik
cT +∆E ik
cN +∆Epik
cN +∆Epik
cT +∆E ′ik
cN +∆E ′ik
cT (12)
This equa ion p o ides in ini e ela ionships ha sa is y he o al bodies’ ene gy con-
se a ion o ψik
1N,ψik
2N,ψik
1T,ψik
2T. Using he AR p inciple and he ecip oci ies ψik
1N=ψki
1N,
ψik
2N=ψki
2N,ψik
1T=ψki
1Tand ψik
2T=ψki
2T, Eq. 12 may be decoupled o he no mal (Eq. 13)
and angen ial (Eq. 14) con ac s be ween bodies i, k as:
(pi
n+1 −pi
n) M−1
ipik
cN
 
∆Epik
cN (ψik
2N)
+(pk
n+1 −pk
n) M−1
kpki
cN
 
∆Epki
cN (ψik
2N)
+(qi
n+1 −qi
n) −(qk
n+1 −qk
n)  ik
cN
 
∆E ik
cN
+(qi
n+1 −qi
n) −(qk
n+1 −qk
n)  ′ik
cN
 
∆E ′ik
cN (ψik
1N)
=0 (13)
7
142
R. B a o and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio
(pi
n+1 −pi
n) M−1
ipik
cT
 
∆Epik
cT (ψik
2T)
+(pk
n+1 −pk
n) M−1
kpki
cT
 
∆Epki
cT (ψik
2T)
+(qi
n+1 −qi
n) −(qk
n+1 −qk
n)  ik
cT
 
∆E ik
cT
+(qi
n+1 −qi
n) −(qk
n+1 −qk
n)  ′ik
cT
 
∆E ′ik
cT (ψik
1T)
=0 (14)
Bo h imply ha he ene gy ans e ed o he no mal and angen ial penal y sp ings is
eco e ed by he upda ing a iables. The ene gies ∆Epik
cN ,∆Epik
cT en o ce he o al bodies’
ene gy conse a ion, while ∆E ′ik
cN ,∆E ′ik
cT adjus he con ac o ces o he conse a i e
solu ion.
SLIP: om physical conside a ions, he o al ene gy dissipa ed by ic ion mus be
equal o he inc emen o o al ene gy, En+1 −En=−nbd
i=1 nbd
k=1
k
�
=i
∆E ik
cT . This equal-
i y is en o ced by EFDA ze oing he las summa ion o Eq. 11. Also, ∆Epik
cT (ψik
2T)=
∆E ′ik
cT (ψik
1T) = 0 and ψik
1T=ψik
2T= 0 since he e is no penal y sp ing in he angen ial di-
ec ion, see he Slip condi ion in Eq. 7. The e o e, he equa ion ha p o ides he in ini e
( he e o e unde e mined) ela ions be ween ψik
1N,ψik
2Nis:
nbd

i=1
nbd

k=1
k�=i
(pi
n+1 −pi
n) M−1
ipik
cN
 
∆Epik
cN (ψik
2N)
+(qi
n+1 −qi
n) ik
cN
 
∆E ik
cN
+(qi
n+1 −qi
n) ′ik
cN
 
∆E ′ik
cN (ψik
1N)= 0 (15)
ha ep esen s a no mal con ac ene gy balance o all bodies. As in he p e ious case,
his balance is en o ced o e e y con ac ; using again AR, ecip oci ies ψik
1N=ψki
1N,
ψik
2N=ψki
2Nand decoupling Eq. 15 o e e y con ac , one a i es o ela ionships be ween
ψik
1N,ψik
2N:
(pi
n+1 −pi
n) M−1
ipik
cN
 
∆Epik
cN (ψik
2N)
+(pk
n+1 −pk
n) M−1
kpki
cN
 
∆Epki
cN (ψik
2N)
+
(qi
n+1 −qi
n) −(qk
n+1 −qk
n)  ik
cN
 
∆E ik
cN
+(qi
n+1 −qi
n) −(qk
n+1 −qk
n)  ′ik
cN
 
∆E ′ik
cN (ψik
1N)
=0 (16)
The condi ion a he beginning o he SLIP i em and he las equa ion, en o ce bo h
he ene gy conse a ion o he no mal con ac and he dissipa ion o angen ial con ac .
5 DYNAMIC CONTACT, ENHANCED PENALTY METHOD
Fo e e y con ac , Eqs. 13, 14, 16 p o ide a non–unique ela ion be ween ψik
1N,ψik
2N
and ψik
1T,ψik
2T espec i ely ha au oma icaly conse e o dissipa e consis en ly he o al
8
143
R. B a o and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio
ene gy o he angen ial S ick and Slip cases. Using modal analysis decomposi ion, [2],
i is possible o ob ain he second o de dynamic equa ion associa ed wi h he desc ip i e
algo i hm o Eqs. 6, de ining an enhanced penal y con ac model. The model desc ibed by
Eqs. 17 consis s o a sp ing and dashpo ha con ol he gap and he pene a ion eloci y,
espec i ely.
0=¨qNn+1/2+
2ξNωN
 
ω2
N∆ ψ1N+ψ2N
2˙qNn+1/2+ω2
NqNn+1/2
0=¨qTn+1/2
 
Ine ia
+
2ξTωT
 
ω2
T∆ ψ1T+ψ2T
2˙qTn+1/2
 
Dashpo
+ω2
TqTn+1/2
 
Sp ing
(17)
The a iables qNn+1/2,qTn+1/2 ep esen he pa icle mo ion in no mal and angen ial
di ec ion. The dashpo s a e con olled by he use –de ined pa ame e s ξN,ξT, a penaliza-
ion o pene a ion eloci ies ha app oxima ely en o ce he consis ency Kuhn–Tucke
condi ion. Eqs. 17 p o ide he ela ions ha can be easily gene alized o any con ac
be ween igid bodies i, k:
ψik
1N+ψik
2N=4ξN
Ωik
N
;ψik
1T+ψik
2T=4ξT
Ωik
T
(18)
whe e Ωik
N=ωik
N∆ ,Ω
ik
T=ωik
T∆ ,ωik
N=KN/m,ωik
T=KT/m, and mis he la ges
o he wo con ac ing masses. The combina ion o Eqs. 13, 14, 16 wi h Eq. 18 p o ide he
unique explici exp essions o ψik
1N,ψik
2Nand ψik
1T,ψik
2T. The inse ion o hese exp essions
in Eqs. 6 en o ces a conse a i e esponse o S ick and consis en dissipa i e o Slip.
6 NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS
6.1 Ellip ical pa icle Ca om p oblem
In his subsec ion, he ajec o y o he successi e impac s o a igid ellipse inside a
one–me e squa e is simula ed. The ellipse, o axes 15/6 cm is ini ially posi ioned a
(0.45,0.1) m, inclina ion α= 50◦as seen in Fig. 1 op, and i is subjec ed o ini ial
eloci y Vx=1,V
y=−0.4 m/s in di ec ion θ=−22◦, wi hou spin. The ic ion angle is
φ= 15◦and he es o he nume ical pa ame e s a e he same as hose in he p e ious
simula ion. To isualize he o a ion o he ellipse, he o ien a ion is de ined by he la ges
semiaxis.
Figs. 1 depic he e olu ion o ajec o y ( op), linea eloci ies (le ), o a ional e-
loci y and ene gy ( igh ) om EFDA and om he analy ical solu ion ep oduced in he
9