scieee Open visual document viewer

Energy frictional dissipating algorithm for rigid and ellastic body’s contact problems

Bravo, R.,Pérez-Aparicio, J. L.

Abstract

An Energy Frictional Dissipating Algorithm (EFDA) for time integration of Coulomb frictional impact–contact problems is presented. Using the Penalty Method, and in the context of a conserving framework, linear and angular momenta are conserved and energy is consistently dissipated. Published formulations were stable, forcing the energy dissipation to be monotonic in order to prevent unstable energy growth. The shortcoming of many was that they were not able to reproduce the real kinematics and dissipation of physical processes, provided by analytical formulations and experiments. EFDA formulates a conserving framework based on a physical energy dissipation estimator. This framework uses an enhanced Penalty contact model based on a spring and a dashpot, enforcing physical frictional energy dissipation, controlling gap vibrations and modifying the velocities and contact forces during each time step. The result is that the dissipated energy, kinematics and contact forces are consistent with the expected physical behavior.

Full text

135 ENERGY FRICTIONAL DISSIPATING ALGORITHM FOR RIGID AND ELLASTIC BODY’S CONTACT PROBLEMS R. B a o∗and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio† ∗Depa men S uc u al Mechanics and Hyd aulic Enginee ing Uni e si y o G anada Campues de Fuen enue a, 18071 G anada, Spain e-mail: b a [email p o ec ed] †Depa men o Con inuum Mechanics and Theo y o S uc u es Uni e sidad Poli ´ecnica de Valencia 46022 Valencia, Spain e-mail: jopeap@up ne .up .es Key wo ds: Con ac , Time in eg a ion scheme, Consis en Dissipa ion, F ic ion Abs ac . An Ene gy F ic ional Dissipa ing Algo i hm (EFDA) o ime in eg a ion o Coulomb ic ional impac –con ac p oblems is p esen ed. Using he Penal y Me hod, and in he con ex o a conse ing amewo k, linea and angula momen a a e conse ed and ene gy is consis en ly dissipa ed. Published o mula ions we e s able, o cing he ene gy dissipa ion o be mono onic in o de o p e en uns able ene gy g ow h. The sho coming o many was ha hey we e no able o ep oduce he eal kinema ics and dissipa ion o physical p ocesses, p o ided by analy ical o mula ions and expe imen s. EFDA o mula es a conse ing amewo k based on a physical ene gy dissipa ion es ima o . This amewo k uses an enhanced Penal y con ac model based on a sp ing and a dashpo , en o cing physical ic ional ene gy dissipa ion, con olling gap ib a ions and modi ying he eloci ies and con ac o ces du ing each ime s ep. The esul is ha he dissipa ed ene gy, kinema ics and con ac o ces a e consis en wi h he expec ed physical beha io . 1 INTRODUCTION The nume ically accu a e analysis o ic ional dynamic con ac p oblems has been a challenge o he las 30 yea s. Complex p oblems do no ha e analy ical solu ion and due o hei high nonlinea i y, non–smoo h unila e al es ic ion and he p esence ic ion, hey a e ha d o model. The e o e, nume ical ime–s epping schemes a e de eloped o emula e he conse a i e p ope ies o he co esponding con inuous p oblem. P e ious au ho s ha e add essed ic ionless con ac p oblems, o ins ance [7] ocused on i e a i e bu no ime–s epping o mula ions, [1] and [3] o implici . These au ho s 1 XI In e na ional Con e ence on Compu a ional Plas ici y. Fundamen als and Applica ions COMPLAS XI E. Oña e, D.R.J. Owen, D. Pe ic and B. Suá ez (Eds) 136 R. B a o and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio in ended o c ea e obus and s able algo i hms o he en o cemen o he con ac con- s ain s, while ecen o mula ions ha e ocused on ic ional o mula ion and p oposed uncondi ionally posi i e ene gy dissipa ion. Re . [3] de eloped a posi i e ene gy dissipa - ing algo i hm, s able o ic ion wi h he Penal y Me hod and showed an a i icial ene gy ans e be ween bodies–penal y sp ings in which he inal ene gy was always lowe han he ini ial o S ick and Slip cases. The e o e he beha io o he simula ion was no consis en wi h he physical con ac p oblem. Re . [1] minimized ha a i icial ene gy ans e be ween body and penal y sp ing. Fo he non–sliding si ua ion he ene gy a e con ac was equal o he ini ial and lowe du ing con ac while o he Slip case ob ained a igo ous posi i e ene gy dissipa ion. The dissipa ion in bo h e e ences was no based on a consis en conse ing amewo k: he dissipa ion, al hough dec easing mono onically, was no in acco dance o ha o he con inuous p oblem. Re . [5] de eloped a conse - a i e amewo k ha en o ced he impene abili y condi ion, elimina ed he a i icial ene gy ans e be ween body–penal y sp ing and ook in o accoun he ic ional dissipa- ion h ough an ene gy es ima o . This o mula ion used a con ac eloci y ha modi ied a p edic o –co ec o scheme, hen he con ac esponse ag eed in eloci ies bu no in o ces and posi ions, no being accu a e o pe sis en con ac . This a icle p esen s an Ene gy F ic ional Dissipa ing Algo i hm (EFDA) based on he ic ionless algo i hm o [2]. Fo Penal y con ac p oblems, he new o mula ion conse es momen a, simula es he kinema ics, con ac o ces and dissipa es ene gy consis en ly, ac- co ding o he physical p oblem in each ime s ep. The algo i hm key is a conse a i e amewo k based on upda ing con ac o ces and momen a o e e y con ac . The ame- wo k akes in o accoun dissipa ion by an ene gy es ima o based on ic ional Coulomb law, and is able o en o ce ene gy conse a ion o he S ick con ac and he igh dissi- pa ion o he Slip con ac . 2 DEFINITION OF THE PROBLEM AND GOVERNING EQUATIONS 2.1 Hamil onian desc ip ion o mo ion The Hamil onian Mechanics pe mi o ob ain he equa ions o mo ion o mul iple bod- ies ha in e ac by con ac . This subsec ion b ie ly desc ibes he Hamil onian equa ions o a con inuous p oblem. Conside a mani old Q ha desc ibes he con igu a ion o a mechanical sys em whose phase space is P=T⋆Q, he angen space o Q. This space is composed o each poin o body iby posi ions Qi(x,y, ) and linea momen a Pi(x,y, ) as unc ion o ime . The Hamil onian unc ion HQi(x,y, ),Pi(x,y, )de ines he o al ene gy o he sys em and is assumed o be sepa able in kine ic K(Pi(x,y, )) and po en ial V(Qi(x,y, )) ene gies, Eqs. 1. 2 137 R. B a o and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio HQi(x,y, ),Pi(x,y, )= nbd  i=1 KPi(x,y, )+VQi(x,y, ) KPi(x,y, )=1 2Ωi Pi(x,y, )2 ρdΩ (1) whe e nbd is he o al numbe o bodies, Ωi he domain o body iand ρ he densi y. The kine ic ene gy is a eal unc ion K:P→Rand he po en ial V:Q→Ris an a bi a y unc ion. The mo ion is go e ned by he Hamil onian canonical equa ions, Eqs. 2. ˙ Qi(x,y, )= ∂H(x,y, ) ∂Pi=Ωi Pi(x,y, ) ρdΩ ˙ Pi(x,y, )=−∂H(x,y, ) ∂Qi=−∇VQi(x,y, ) (2) The con inuum a iables om Eqs. 2 may be disc e ized, gi ing Eqs. 3. Qi(x,y, )= nnod  A=1 NA(x, y)qA( ); Pi(x,y, )= nnod  A=1 NA(x, y)pA( ) (3) Fo he igid bodies used in he cu en pape , his disc e iza ion is based on i s o de shape unc ions NA(x, y); o he elas ic case hey may be ex ended o highe o de . Fo hese i s o de unc ions, he disc e iza ion is based on only one node, nnod = 1, usually de ined a he cen e o g a i y xi,yio each pa icle. The nodal displacemen s and linea momen a o all bodies i o ka e g ouped in he ec o s q( ), p( ). Fo each body i, he disc e iza ion Eqs. 3 applied o Eqs. 2 p oduce he sys em o equa ions: ˙ qi=M−1 ipi;˙ pi= i c+ i ex (4) whe e Miis a diagonal mass ma ix, wi h en ies: Mi=Ωiρ[NA(x, y)] NA(x, y) dΩ. Al hough con ac o ces i ca e applied in he con ac poin s, he disc e iza ion conside s an equi alen o ce applied o he nodes. The same hing can be said o he ex e nal o ces i ex . 3 NEW ALGORITHM FORMULATION AND ENERGY–MOMENTUM CONSERVATION The aim o his sec ion is he disc e iza ion in ime o Eqs. 4. The new equa ions will en o ce he impene abili y condi ion and disc e ely inhe i he conse a ion p ope ies 3 138 R. B a o and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio h ough he conse ing amewo k o sec ion 4. The main h ee cha ac e is ic o his algo i hm a e: i) ene gy conse a ion o no mal con ac , ii) consis en dissipa ion o angen ial Slip and iii) conse a ion o angen ial S ick. 3.1 Time–disc e e o mula ion The ic ional de elopmen o EFDA is based on he Simo–Ta now’s algo i hm om [6], an ene gy–momen um conse ing ime in eg a ion scheme. This scheme is a disc e e app oxima ion o a Hamil onian sys em (Eqs. 5) in ime con igu a ion n+1/2. Conside ing he in e al [ n, n+1], he i s se o equa ions o his algo i hm ela es displacemen s qi n, qi n+1 and linea momen a pi n,pi n+1; he second, is he disc e e app oxima ion o second New on’s law a n+1/2: ˙qi=M−1 ipi→qi n+1 −qi n ∆ =M−1 ipi n+1 2 ˙pi= i cN + i cT →pi n+1 −pi n ∆ = i cN n+1 2+ i cT n+1 2 (5) whe e ∆ = n+1 − n,qi n≈qi( n), pi n≈pi( n), qi n+1 ≈qi( n+1), pi n+1 ≈pi( n+1) and pi n+1/2=(pi n+1+pi n)/2. The e ms i cN n+1/2and i cT n+1/2a e he disc e e app oxima ions o he esul ing no mal and angen ial con ac o ce ec o s. In o de o ob ain a conse ing and a igh kinema ic esponse o con ac be ween wo bodies i, k, in EFDA addi ional linea momen a pik cN n+1/2,pik cT n+1/2and con ac o ces ′ik cN n+1/2, ′ik cT n+1/2(upda ing a iables) a e added o Eqs. 5, gi ing Eqs. 6. Fo hese ou a iables, in he ollowing he subsc ip n+1/2 will be omi ed o simplici y. The ole o hese new a iables is o en o ce bodies’ ene gy conse a ion o no mal con ac and conse a ion–consis en dissipa ion o angen ial, espec i ely: qi n+1 −qi n ∆ =M−1 ipi n+1 2 + nbd  k=1 k�=ipik cN +pik cT =M−1 ipi n+1 2 +pi cN +pi cT  pi n+1 −pi n ∆ = nbd  k=1 k�=i ik cN + ′ik cN + ik cT + ′ik cT = i cN + ′i cN + i cT + ′i cT (6) The exp essions o he upda ing a iables a e now o mula ed in local con ac coo - dina es and ans o med o global by he uni no mal and angen ial ec o s Nik n+1/2, Tik n+1/2, bo h a he con ac poin . To ob ain om Eqs. 6 a conse a i e solu ion o S ick and dissipa i e o Slip, he upda ing a iables mus ul ill he disc e e conse ing equa ions de ined in sec ion 4. These a iables a e de ined o bo h con ac di ec ions as: 4 139 R. B a o and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio NORMAL pik cN =ψik 2N 2Nik n+1 2 Nik n+1 2 (pi n+1 −pi n); ′ik cN =ψik 1N 2Nik n+1 2KN(gik Nn+1 −gik Nn) TANG. STICK pik cT =ψik 2T 2Tik n+1 2 Tik n+1 2 (pi n+1 −pi n); ′ik cT =ψik 1T 2Tik n+1 2 KT(gik Tn+1 −gik Tn) TANG. SLIP pik cT =0; ′ik cT = 0; ik cT =−µΨ ik cN + ′ik cN Tik n+1 2 (7) whe e KN,KTa e use –de ined penal ies o no mal and angen ial con ac , gik Nn+1,gik Nn, gik Tn+1,gik Tn no mal and angen ial gaps a nand n+ 1, Ψ = ±1 he Slip di ec ion, µ he ic ion coe icien and ψik 1N,ψik 1T,ψik 2Nand ψik 2Tp opo ionali y pa ame e s o he upda ing a iables. No ice ha pik cN , ′ik cN,pik cT , ′ik cT (a n+1/2) en o ce he conse a i e esponse o no mal and angen ial S ick con ac s. On he o he hand, o Slip pik cT = ′ik cT = 0 since no angen ial penal y sp ing is p esen ; he new Coulomb ic ion o ce ik cT is compu ed wi h he absolu e alue o he o al (con ac plus upda ing) no mal con ac o ces. The no mal and angen ial–S ick con ac o ces ik cN , ik cT a e de ined in Eqs. 8 using he [4] de i a i e, p o iding a disc e e exp ession ha conse es he a i icial penal y ene gy. i cN = nbd  k=1 k�=i ik cN = nbd  k=1 k�=i V(gik Nn+1)−V(gik Nn) gik Nn+1 −gik Nn Nik n+1 2= nbd  k=1 k�=i KNNik n+1 2(gik Nn+1 +gik Nn) i cT = nbd  k=1 k�=i ik cT = nbd  k=1 k�=i V(gik Tn+1)−V(gik Tn) gik Tn+1 −gik Tn Tik n+1 2= nbd  k=1 k�=i KTTik n+1 2(gik Tn+1 +gik Tn) whe e V(gik Nn+1)=KN(gik Nn+1)2/2,V(gik Nn)=KN(gik Nn)2/2 a e he no mal and V(gik Tn+1)= KT(gik Tn+1)2/2, V(gik Tn)=KT(gik Tn)2/2, he angen ial penal y po en ial con ac ene gies. 4 DISCRETE LINEAR, ANGULAR MOMENTUM CONSERVATION AND CONSISTENT BODY ENERGY DISSIPATION This sec ion de elops he disc e e conse ing amewo k o EFDA o ob ain he body ene gy conse a ion o no mal con ac and conse a ion–dissipa ion o angen ial. 4.1 Disc e e linea momen um balance The disc e e a ia ion o he linea momen um o EFDA is de ined h ough he second o Eqs. 6, he disc e e coun e pa o second New on’s law. The e o e, o body i he esul an o he no mal con ac o ces i cN , ′i cN plus he angen ial i cT , ′i cT is equal o he disc e e linea momen um balance be ween nand n+1. Also, he o al linea momen um 5 140 R. B a o and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio balance (Eq. 8) is he summa ion o e ha o each body and equals he esul an o he con ac o ces on nbd. p o n+1 −p o n ∆ = nbd  i=1  i cN + ′i cN + i cT + ′i cT = nbd  i=1 nbd  k=1 k�=i ik cN + ′ik cN + ik cT + ′ik cT (8) Gi en wo bodies i, k in con ac , due o he AR p inciple: ik cN =− ki cN, ′ik cN =− ′ki cN , ik cT =− ki cT , ′ik cT =− ′ki cT o S ick and ik cT =− ki cT , ′ik cT = ′ki cT = 0 o Slip. Then, he igh e m o Eq. 8 is ze o in all si ua ions and p o n+1 =p o n. 4.2 Disc e e angula momen um balance We again ede ine he a iables qi n+1,qi nas he posi ions o he con ac poin . F om he second o Eqs. 6 and mul iplying by he c oss p oduc ×(qi n+1 −qi n), he disc e e angula momen um balance o a body iis: pi n+1 −pi n ∆ ×(qi n+1 −qi n)=Ji n+1 −Ji n ∆ = nbd  k=1 k�=i ik cN + ′ik cN + ik cT + ′ik cT ×(qi n+1 −qi n) (9) In oking he AR p inciple and exp essing he posi ion’s inc emen s as unc ion o he no mal gap (qi n+1 −qi n)−(qk n+1 −qk n)=gik Nn+1/2(Nki) , he o al angula momen um balance o nbd is: J o n+1 −J o n ∆ = nbd  i=1 nbd  k=i+1  ik cN + ′ik cN + ik cT + ′ik cT ×gik Nn+1 2(Nki) (10) Since ec o s ik cN + ′ik cN , and he no mal gap a e collinea , hei c oss p oduc is ze o. The p oduc be ween ik cT + ′ik cT and his gap is also ze o since he angen ial con ac o ces depend on he angen ial gap: a e some algeb a we a i e o he iple p oduc (Tik n+1/2) Tik n+1/2×gik Nn+1/2(Nki) ha is ze o since he i s ec o is o hogonal o he c oss p oduc . 4.3 Disc e e o al bodies’ ene gy balance This equa ion is ob ained by p emul iplying bo h Eqs. 6 by (pi n+1 −pi n) and −(qi n+1 − qi n) espec i ely, hen added o all con ac ing bodies nbd. A e some algeb a: 6 141 R. B a o and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio ∆Ekin = nbd  i=1 (pi n+1 −pi n) M−1 ipi n+1 2   ∆Ei kin =− nbd  i=1 nbd  k=1 k�=i−(qi n+1 −qi n) ik cT   ∆E ik cT  + nbd  i=1 nbd  k=1 k�=i(qi n+1 −qi n) ik cN   ∆E ik cN −(pi n+1 −pi n) M−1 ipik cN   ∆Epik cN (ψik 2N) −(pi n+1 −pi n) M−1 ipik cT   ∆Epik cT (ψik 2T) −(qi n+1 −qi n) ′ik cN   ∆E ′ik cN (ψik 1N) −(qi n+1 −qi n) ′ik cT   ∆E ′ik cT (ψik 1T) (11) whe e ∆Ei kin =Ei n+1 −Ei nis he kine ic body ene gy balance be ween nand n+1 when bodies a e igid and ex e nal o ces a e no applied. Then, ∆E ik cN ,∆E ik cT a e he con ac o ces ene gy balance and ∆Epik cN (ψik 2N), ∆Epik cT (ψik 2T), ∆E ′ik cN (ψik 1N), ∆E ′ik cT (ψik 1T), all unc ions o he p opo ionali y pa ame e s, a e he upda ing a iables ene gy balance. This equa ion is he conse ing amewo k ha ela es he o al bodies’ ene gy balance wi h ha o he upda ing a iables. The ole o ene gy conse a ion o no mal con ac is included in he e ms ∆E ik cN ,∆E ′ik cN (ψik 1N), ∆Epik cN (ψik 2N), while dissipa ion–conse a ion o Slip and S ick is included in he e ms ∆E ik cT ,∆E ′ik cT (ψik 1T), ∆Epik cT (ψik 2T). The e o e, he ene gy loss is always consis en since he dissipa ion is included in he ene gy balance. No ice ha ∆Ekin is he o al ene gy o all bodies. Since he ene gy ela ed o no mal con ac is conse ed, ψik 1N,ψik 2Nmay be posi i e o nega i e, and ∆Epik cN ,∆E ′ik cN add o sub ac ene gy. The same can be said o ψik 1T,ψik 2T o he S ick and Slip cases: STICK: he ene gy is conse ed since he con ac o ce does no c ea e–dissipa e angen ial wo k. This condi ion is en o ced by ze oing he igh pa o Eq. 11: 0= nbd  i=1 nbd  k=1 k�=i∆E ik cT +∆E ik cN +∆Epik cN +∆Epik cT +∆E ′ik cN +∆E ′ik cT (12) This equa ion p o ides in ini e ela ionships ha sa is y he o al bodies’ ene gy con- se a ion o ψik 1N,ψik 2N,ψik 1T,ψik 2T. Using he AR p inciple and he ecip oci ies ψik 1N=ψki 1N, ψik 2N=ψki 2N,ψik 1T=ψki 1Tand ψik 2T=ψki 2T, Eq. 12 may be decoupled o he no mal (Eq. 13) and angen ial (Eq. 14) con ac s be ween bodies i, k as: (pi n+1 −pi n) M−1 ipik cN   ∆Epik cN (ψik 2N) +(pk n+1 −pk n) M−1 kpki cN   ∆Epki cN (ψik 2N) +(qi n+1 −qi n) −(qk n+1 −qk n)  ik cN   ∆E ik cN +(qi n+1 −qi n) −(qk n+1 −qk n)  ′ik cN   ∆E ′ik cN (ψik 1N) =0 (13) 7 142 R. B a o and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio (pi n+1 −pi n) M−1 ipik cT   ∆Epik cT (ψik 2T) +(pk n+1 −pk n) M−1 kpki cT   ∆Epki cT (ψik 2T) +(qi n+1 −qi n) −(qk n+1 −qk n)  ik cT   ∆E ik cT +(qi n+1 −qi n) −(qk n+1 −qk n)  ′ik cT   ∆E ′ik cT (ψik 1T) =0 (14) Bo h imply ha he ene gy ans e ed o he no mal and angen ial penal y sp ings is eco e ed by he upda ing a iables. The ene gies ∆Epik cN ,∆Epik cT en o ce he o al bodies’ ene gy conse a ion, while ∆E ′ik cN ,∆E ′ik cT adjus he con ac o ces o he conse a i e solu ion. SLIP: om physical conside a ions, he o al ene gy dissipa ed by ic ion mus be equal o he inc emen o o al ene gy, En+1 −En=−nbd i=1 nbd k=1 k � =i ∆E ik cT . This equal- i y is en o ced by EFDA ze oing he las summa ion o Eq. 11. Also, ∆Epik cT (ψik 2T)= ∆E ′ik cT (ψik 1T) = 0 and ψik 1T=ψik 2T= 0 since he e is no penal y sp ing in he angen ial di- ec ion, see he Slip condi ion in Eq. 7. The e o e, he equa ion ha p o ides he in ini e ( he e o e unde e mined) ela ions be ween ψik 1N,ψik 2Nis: nbd  i=1 nbd  k=1 k�=i (pi n+1 −pi n) M−1 ipik cN   ∆Epik cN (ψik 2N) +(qi n+1 −qi n) ik cN   ∆E ik cN +(qi n+1 −qi n) ′ik cN   ∆E ′ik cN (ψik 1N)= 0 (15) ha ep esen s a no mal con ac ene gy balance o all bodies. As in he p e ious case, his balance is en o ced o e e y con ac ; using again AR, ecip oci ies ψik 1N=ψki 1N, ψik 2N=ψki 2Nand decoupling Eq. 15 o e e y con ac , one a i es o ela ionships be ween ψik 1N,ψik 2N: (pi n+1 −pi n) M−1 ipik cN   ∆Epik cN (ψik 2N) +(pk n+1 −pk n) M−1 kpki cN   ∆Epki cN (ψik 2N) + (qi n+1 −qi n) −(qk n+1 −qk n)  ik cN   ∆E ik cN +(qi n+1 −qi n) −(qk n+1 −qk n)  ′ik cN   ∆E ′ik cN (ψik 1N) =0 (16) The condi ion a he beginning o he SLIP i em and he las equa ion, en o ce bo h he ene gy conse a ion o he no mal con ac and he dissipa ion o angen ial con ac . 5 DYNAMIC CONTACT, ENHANCED PENALTY METHOD Fo e e y con ac , Eqs. 13, 14, 16 p o ide a non–unique ela ion be ween ψik 1N,ψik 2N and ψik 1T,ψik 2T espec i ely ha au oma icaly conse e o dissipa e consis en ly he o al 8 143 R. B a o and J.L. P´e ez–Apa icio ene gy o he angen ial S ick and Slip cases. Using modal analysis decomposi ion, [2], i is possible o ob ain he second o de dynamic equa ion associa ed wi h he desc ip i e algo i hm o Eqs. 6, de ining an enhanced penal y con ac model. The model desc ibed by Eqs. 17 consis s o a sp ing and dashpo ha con ol he gap and he pene a ion eloci y, espec i ely. 0=¨qNn+1/2+ 2ξNωN   ω2 N∆ ψ1N+ψ2N 2˙qNn+1/2+ω2 NqNn+1/2 0=¨qTn+1/2   Ine ia + 2ξTωT   ω2 T∆ ψ1T+ψ2T 2˙qTn+1/2   Dashpo +ω2 TqTn+1/2   Sp ing (17) The a iables qNn+1/2,qTn+1/2 ep esen he pa icle mo ion in no mal and angen ial di ec ion. The dashpo s a e con olled by he use –de ined pa ame e s ξN,ξT, a penaliza- ion o pene a ion eloci ies ha app oxima ely en o ce he consis ency Kuhn–Tucke condi ion. Eqs. 17 p o ide he ela ions ha can be easily gene alized o any con ac be ween igid bodies i, k: ψik 1N+ψik 2N=4ξN Ωik N ;ψik 1T+ψik 2T=4ξT Ωik T (18) whe e Ωik N=ωik N∆ ,Ω ik T=ωik T∆ ,ωik N=KN/m,ωik T=KT/m, and mis he la ges o he wo con ac ing masses. The combina ion o Eqs. 13, 14, 16 wi h Eq. 18 p o ide he unique explici exp essions o ψik 1N,ψik 2Nand ψik 1T,ψik 2T. The inse ion o hese exp essions in Eqs. 6 en o ces a conse a i e esponse o S ick and consis en dissipa i e o Slip. 6 NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS 6.1 Ellip ical pa icle Ca om p oblem In his subsec ion, he ajec o y o he successi e impac s o a igid ellipse inside a one–me e squa e is simula ed. The ellipse, o axes 15/6 cm is ini ially posi ioned a (0.45,0.1) m, inclina ion α= 50◦as seen in Fig. 1 op, and i is subjec ed o ini ial eloci y Vx=1,V y=−0.4 m/s in di ec ion θ=−22◦, wi hou spin. The ic ion angle is φ= 15◦and he es o he nume ical pa ame e s a e he same as hose in he p e ious simula ion. To isualize he o a ion o he ellipse, he o ien a ion is de ined by he la ges semiaxis. Figs. 1 depic he e olu ion o ajec o y ( op), linea eloci ies (le ), o a ional e- loci y and ene gy ( igh ) om EFDA and om he analy ical solu ion ep oduced in he 9