scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Exploiting transmission spatial diversity in frequency selective systems with feedback channel

Abstract

In this paper we address the design of a multiple transmit antenna system in which the Channel State Information (CSI) at the transmitter is not perfect. Two different approaches are analyzed one based on the Minimization of the Mean Square Error (MMSEj and the other based on the application of the Maximum Likelihood Sequence Estimation (MLSE). In both cases a Bayesian criterion is used in order to take into account the error between the CSI and the real channel. Finally, some simulation results and conclusions are provided, showing which is the gain of these approaches when the error between the CSI and the real channel is either Gaussian or uniform, where this last case corresponds to a quantization of the channel time response in order to transmit the CSI through a feedback channel from the receiver to the transmitter.

Read accessible full text

Exploiting transmission spatial diversity in frequency selective systems with feedback channel

Author: Pérez Neira, Ana Isabel,Pascual, T.,Lagunas Hernandez, Miguel A.
Year: 2003
Source: https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/2117/8929/1/ExploitingTransmission.pdf
EXPLOITING TRANSMISSION SPATIAL DIVERSITY IN FREQUENCY SELECTIVE
SYSTEMS WITH FEEDBACK CHANNEL
An onio
Pascual
Ise e,
Ana
I.
Pi ez-Nei a, Miguel
A.
Lagunas
He ndndez
Depa men o Signal Theo y and Communica ions
Poly echnic Uni e si y o Ca alonia (UPCj
Telecommunica ions Technological Cen e o Ca alonia
ClTC
-
Edi ici NEXUS
I
C/ Jo di Gi ona
1-3
(Campus No d UPC
-
mhdul DS),
08034
Ba celona (SPAIN)
e-mai/:{ onip,anuskaj
@gps. sc.upc.es.
[email p o ec ed]
,
ABSTRACT
In
his pape we add ess he design o a mul iple ansmi an enna
sys em in which he Channel S a e In o ma ion
(CSI)
a he ans-
mi e is
no
pe ec . Two di e en app oaches a e analyzed
one
based
on
he Minimiza ion o he Mean Squa e E o (MMSEj and
he o he based
on
he applica ion o he Maximum Likelihood Se-
quence Es ima ion (MLSE).
In
bo h cases a Bayesian c i e ion is
used
in
o de o ake in o accoun he e o be ween he CSI and
he eal channel. Finally, some simula ion esul s and conclusions
a e p o ided, showing which is he gain o hese app oaches when
he e o be ween he CSI and he eal channel is ei he Gaussian
o uni o m, whe e his las case co esponds
o
a quan iza ion o
he channel ime esponse in o de o ansmi he CSI h ough a
eedback channel om he ecei e
o
he ansmi e .
1.
INTRODUCTION
Spa ial di e si y is
an
e icien me hod
so
as o comba he impai -
men s p esen in he wi eless channel.
In
cellula communica ions
o
Wi eless LAN's he ecei e an enna di e si y is no a ac i e
o he downlink channel because he mobile s a ion should
be
equipped wi h mul iple ecei e an ennas. Fo his eason, he use
o ansmi an enna di e si y o he downlink is mo e desi able.
Exis ing ansmission schemes o exploi ing he po en ial o -
e ed by ansmi an enna a ays a e gene ally conce ned wi h in-
c easing he di e si y o de . The e a e se e al examples o such
echniques, such
as
he
delay di e si y
s a egy,
a
special case
o
a
mo e gene al solu ion p esen ed in
[I].
O he possible app oaches
ha inc ease he di e si y o de consis in he applica ion o
spnce-
ime
coding,
echnique p esen ed in wo ks such as
[Z]
and
131.
Space- ime codes
do
no
exploi channel knowledge a he
ansmi c . In o ma ion abou he channel,
i
a ailable, should
be used
o
imp o e he pe o mance by means
o
op imal e minal
il e ing.
I
can be shown ha unde a ze o o cing c i e ion, he
maximiza ion o he Signal
o
Noise Ra io (SNR) esul s in a de-
coupled o spa ially scalable solu ion whe e each ansmi b anch
can be designed independen ly. Fig.
1
shows a gene alized a chi-
ec u e ha allows
a
no maliza ion
o
he il e s dynamic, while
he beam o ming weigh s
{ uq):=,
a e in cha ge o adjus ing he
ansmi powe . Modula ion can be seen
as
a quan iza ion p ocess
and i s e ec s can be s udied as quan iza ion noise. This quan i-
za ion a he ou pu o each il e a oids ins abili ies, and
so,
IIR
designs could also be used. By depa ing om his a chi ec u e,
0-7803-7663-3/03/$17.00 02003
IEEE
IV
-
85
FILTERING MODULATION BEAMFORMING
2,
Q
[.I
WI
.z
Q
b
QPI
b
WQ
5(4
Fig.
1.
T ansmission di e si y a chi ec u e.
a clea ade-o be ween op imali y and c ucial aspec s like o-
bus ness, p ac icali y, so -deg ada ion o he
QoS,
eliabili y, e c.
can be easily aken in o accoun . Conce ning p ac ical conside -
a ions, pa ial and quan ized Channel S a e In o ma ion (CSI) a
he ansmi e can be in oduced in a na u al way by adap ing, o
ins ance, each complex weigh
wp
o he s onges channel pa h
a each b anch o , i
a
con olled uni a y dynamic is desi ed, jus
by compensa ing he phase o he s onges pa h.
To
sum up, o-
bus ness
[4]
implies insensi i i y
o
de ia ions om he heo e ical
assump ions, being he impe ec CSI one o he possible sou ces
o de ia ion.
So
a we ha e commen ed
on
ansmi e design based ei he
on coding o linea p ocessing depending
on
he channel knowl-
edge, and how impe ec ions o bad knowledge can be aken in o
accoun by mo ling
o
obus a chi ec u es. Ano he al e na i e
exis ing in he li e a u e o inco po a ing bad channel knowledge
in
ansmi space- ime p ocessing is by means
o
a Bayesian poin
o iew, ha is, modeling he side channel in o ma ion using a
pu ely s a is ical app oach. P e ious and ela ed wo k includes he
pe o mance analysis o
[SI
o la ading channels
o
he design
p oposed in
[6]
o OFDM sys ems.
.In
[7]
he bene i s o ans-
mi beam o ming and o hogonal space- ime block coding o la
ading channels a e combined.
[8]
conside s he e o in he CSI
om a MAXMIN poin o iew di e en om he Bayesian one.
In
his pape we analyze he gene al case o
a
equency selec-
i e channel and p opose wo space- ime p ocessing solu ions ha
ollow he Bayesian app oach in o de
o
inco po a e he e o in
he CSI. Simula ions compa e he p oposed echniques wi h space-
ime p ocessing designs ha assume pe ec CSI and schemes ha
do no need CSI such as delay di e si y. Al hough he Bayesian
app oach will ei he esul in spa ially non-scalable solu ions, o
non- obus when he s a is ical assump ions a e no ue, i se es
as a use ul benchma k
o
analyze and compa e he commen ed o-
bus a chi ec u es.
ICASSP
2003
Fig.
2.
Gene al scheme o ansmi di e si y wi h eedback chan-
nel and impe ec
CSI
a he ansmi e .
2.
PRE-FILTERING WITH FEEDBACK CHANNEL
In
his sec ion we ocus ou a en ion on he case o a eal sys em in
which a digi al eedback channel is implemen ed om he ecei e
o he ansmi e . The single-an enna ecei e
is
esponsible o
es ima ing he channel, quan ize his es ima e. code i in o a digi-
al o ma and send i o he ansmi e ia he eedback channel.
By means
o
his, he ansmi e has an es ima e o he channel,
possibly impe ec
CSI.
In his wo k we exploi his
CSI
in o de
o design linea il e s a he ansmi e om a Bayesian poin o
iew and wi hou o cing he design o he spa ially scalable. The
gene al scheme is p esen ed in Fig.
2.
Ou goal is o design he
il e s
{z,},"=,
o he
Q
ansmi an ennas aking in o accoun he
impe ec ions in he
CSI
a he ansmi e .
2.1.
Sys em and Signal Models
Le
us
conside a equency selec i e channel wi h
Q
ansmi
an ennas, whe e each o he channels in he Mul i-Inpu -Single-
Ou pu (MISO) link has
L
aps.
h,
=
[
h!p)hp).
.
.
h.!)
ep esen s he ime impulse esponse o he q h ansmi an enna.
I
is
possible o collec
all
hese ime impulse esponses in
a
sin-
gle ec o
h
by means o his no a ion:
h
=
[
hTh ..
.
hz
]',
whe e he numbe o componen s
o
h
is
K
=
QL.
The channel
is
modeled as a complex andom Gaussian ec o , whe e i s co a i-
ance ma ix
Rh
collec s he spa ial co ela ion and he powe delay
p o ile
o
he channel. In case ha he e is a di ec line o sigh ,
hen hese andom ec o would ha e a ce ain mean
m
di e en
om ze o. The e o e, he P obabili y Densi y Func ion (PDF)
o
he channel ollows he s a is ical law:
h
-
G
(m,
Rh).
Ou
goal is o design he ansmi il e s while conside ing e y
simple de ec o s a he ecei e .
As
i is seen
in
Fig.
2,
wo possible
ecei e s a e conside ed:
a
symbol-by-symbol de ec o and a Max-
imum Likelihood Sequence De ec o (MLSE) based
on
he appli-
ca ion o he Vi e bi algo i hm. Le
zp
=
[
zj )z?)
. . .
zk)
1'
be he ime M- aps impulse esponse o he q h ansmi il e .
Once again, i is possible o ep esen in a single ec o
z
all hese
il e s:
z
=
[
zTzT.
.
.
z:
1'.
In he design o he ansmi
il-
e s, he ollowing ansmi powe cons ain mus be ul illed
I'
112//2
=
ZHZ
=
P,
(1)
-
A he ansmi e side, only a channel es ima e
h
o pa ial
CSI
is a ailable.
e
ep esen s he e o be ween he channel es i-
ma e
h
and he eal channel ealiza ion
h: h
=
h
+
e.
In he
conside ed sys em, his channel e o is due o he own es ima ion
p ocess a he ecei e and/o he quan iza ion
o
he channel es-
ima e
so
ha i can be ansmi ed h ough he eedback channel
om he ecei e
o
he ansmi e . In gene al, we model his e o
s a is ically by means
o
i s PDF, which is assumed o be known:
e(e).
In case ha no quan iza ion is ca ied ou , hen he s a is ics
o
he e o would usually co espond o a Gaussian PDF, whe eas
in
case ha only quan iza ion is conside ed, he PDF would be
uni-
o m. By making use
o
his no a ion, i is possible o o mula e he
PDF
0:
G
condi io_ned o he eal channel ealiza ion
h
as
ollows:
Glh(hlh) = c(h-h).
-
-
3.
SYSTEM DESIGNS
In his sec ion we p esen he wo conside ed design s a egies.
The i s one co esponds o a symbol-by-symbol de ec o based
on
he
Minimum Mean
Squa e
E o (MMSE) c i e ion, whe eas
he o he one makes use o a
MLSE
de ec o by means o he ap-
plica ion o he W e bi algo i hm.
3.1.
Symbol-by-Symbol De ec o
When applying a symbol-by-symbol de ec o a he ecei e ,
an
ad-
equa e design c i e ion is MMSE, as i akes in o accoun he noise
powe and also he signal dis o ion o In e Symbol In e e ence
(1%).
In
case ha he
CSI
was pe ec , he equi alen channel im-
pulse esponse a he ecei e would be almos equalized.
As
his
is
no he case in a eal scena io,
we
add a il e
hn
a he ecei e
esponsible o equalizing he esidual
ISI.
When designing his
il e , he MMSE c i e ion is conside ed and i is assumed ha he
eal channel impulse esponse
h
is
known a he ecei e , as i is
also assumed in
171.
E(h, h)
is he Mean Squa e E o
(MSE)
o a conc e e chan-
nel
h
and
o
a conc e e collec ion o il e s
z(G)
and gain ac o
a he ecei e
aR(h):
-
whe e i is assumed ha he symbols s(n).a e no malized
so
ha
E{ls(n)l'}
=
l,H
=
[
HlHz...Hq
]
isama ixcan ain-
ing all he Toepli z con olu ion ma ices
{Hq}:=,
co esponding
o
he
Q
channels
{h,}$,,
1
is
an
all-ze os ec o excep a
I
in
a posi ion ep esen ing he desi ed empo al esponse o he equal-
ized channel
akHz,
and
a$
ep esen s he powe
o
he Addi i e
Whi e Gaussian Noise (AWGN) a he ecei e . The con olu ion
ma ix
H,
is
de ined as he
(M+L-
1)
x
M
dimensional Toepli z
ma ix, whe e he i s ow
is
an all-ze os ec o excep he i s el-
emen which
is
equal o
hp),
and he i s column
is
an all-ze os
ec o excep he i s
L
elemen s which a e equal o he ec o
h,.
Ou goal
is
o
design he il e s
so
as o minimize he MSE
a e aged o e he
eal
channel s a is ics and he e o s a is ics.
This can be exp essed
as
ollows:
IV
-
86
As h: il e s
z
and gain ac o
an
depend only on he channel
es ima e
h,
he minimiza ion
o
E
is equi alen o he minimiza ion
o
C(g)
subjec o he ansmi powe Cons ain
(I).
The op imum
solu ion co esponds o he ollowing equali ies:
whe e
a
is
a cons an such ha he ansmi powe cons ain
(I)
is
ul illed, X(c)
=
E,,s
{HHHIG}
and
M(G)
=
Eh,c
{HI';}.
In
gene al i
is
di icul lo ob ain closed exp essions
o
X
and
M.
In he Appendix
we
show how o ob ain a closed exp ession o
he case
in
which he e o
e
is assumed o be Gaussian.
3.2.
MLSE De ec o
I is
also
possible o use o he kind o de ec o s wi h
a
highe com-
pu a ional load bu wi h a be e pe o mance, such as he MLSE
based on he Vi e bi algo i hm
(see
Fig.
2).
This de ec o
is
he
op imum one in case ha he channel is known wi h no e o a
he ecei e , which co esponds wi h ou assump ions and
as
p e-
sen ed in
[7].
The pe o mance
o
his de ec o is di ec ly ela ed
o he
SNR,
which is de ined
as
ollows:
(6)
-1
SNR(h,h)
=
-zH(c)HHHz(';)
whe ei isassumed ha E{ls(n)l'}
=
1andzandHa ede ined
as
in he p e ious subsec ion. Ou
goal
is o maximize he
SNR
a e aged o e he eal channel s a is ics and he e o s a is ics.
This can be exp essed
as
ollows:
ai
SNR
=
g(g)SNR(K)&
(7)
s
SNR(6)
=
Ehls
{SNR(h,G)IK}
=
/SNR(h,K) ,,i;(hlc)dh
The maximiza ion
o
he
SNR
is
equi alen o he maximiza-
ion o
SNR(c)
subjec o he powe cons ain
(1).
The solu ion
o his op imiza ion p oblem is ound
as an
eigen ec o p oblem:
z(G)
=
a"
(8)
x,,,u
=
xu,
lull
=
1
(9)
-
whe e he ma ix Xis de ined as in he p e ious subsec ion:
X(h)
=
{HHHlc}.
A closed exp ession o his ma ix is p esen ed
in he Appendix when he e o
is assumed o be Gaussian.
I can be shown ha his design c i e ion is equi alen o he
minimiza ion o he e o powe
P,
=
E
{Ie(n)I'}.
The equi -
alen ime impulse esponse
o
be used
when
applying he Vi e bi
algo i hm
is:
hD
=
aRHz.
The gain ac o
a~
is
a bi a y and
does no a ec he pe o mance o he sys em. Usually,
a.q
is cal-
cula ed
so
ha he mean powe
a
he inpu o he
MLSE
block
is no malized o he uni y. I mus be said ha in his sec ion
we
assume ha he Vi e bi decode admi s any leng h o he equi a-
len esponse
ho,
and he e o e, he complexi y
and
compu a ional
load can be e y high. Fu he wo k will analyze o he kinds o de-
ec o s based on MLSE bu wi h
a
lowe compu a ional complexi y
by means
o
a
sho ening o
ho.
. ;...;.
A
.,
,
...... ..
'
. .
..{
.
<
-.
.~
Fig.
3.
Simula ions esul s o he MMSE echnique.
Fig.
4.
Simula ions esul s o he echniques based on
a
MLSE
ecei e .
4.
SIMULATION RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
In
his sec ion we p esen some simula ions ha help o unde s and
he bene i s
o
using he designs p esen ed in his wo k. We ha e
simula ed no malized channels
(E{~~hq~~z}
=
1)
wi h
a
delay
sp ead o
3
symbol pe iods, an angula sp ead o
3(P
and
BPSK
symbols. The leng h
L
o
he channel o he MMSE echnique is
5,
whe eas o he case o MLSE
is
3.
In Fig.
3
we p esen some esul s o he
MMSE
echnique,
in which he ecei e is based on
a
symbol-by-symbol de ec o .
The ansmi il e s
zp
ha e
7
aps, whe eas
bq
has
IO
aps.
In
hese simula ions,
we
ha e always made use o he ma hema ical
exp essions p esen ed in he Appendix, i. e., we ha e assumed
ha he e o is Gaussian.
Two
di e en si ua ions ha e been an-
alyzed. The i s one co esponds o an e o which is ac ually
Gaussian, whe eas in he second case he e o is due o he quan-
iza ion
o
he channel impulse esponse.
so,
in his las case, he
1V
-
87
s a is ical model o he e o does no co espond wi h he eali y.
We ha e simula ed di e en powe s
o
he Gaussian e o and di -
e en numbe o bi s o
ca y
ou he quan iza ion ( he numbe
o
bi s in he igu e ep esen s he numbe o bi s wi h which each ap
o he channel is quan ized).
As
i can be seen, he solu ion ha
does no ake in o accoun he e o in he CSI and assumes ha
he channel es ima e is pe ec , is no able o dec ease he BER
al-
hough he SNR
is
inc eased, whe eas in he case o he solu ion
based on he Bayesian poin
o
iew (Eq.
(4)),
he BER dec eases
as he SNR inc eases. I can be also concluded ha , al hough o
he case o quan iza ion he e o model does no co espond wi h
he eal s a is ics, he Bayesian design is able o inc ease he pe -
oimance in on o he non-s a is ical based solu ion, ha is, he
solu ion ha assumes ha he CSI is pe ec .
In
Fig.
4
he equi alen esul s o he MLSE echnique a e
p esen ed o
4
an ennas and a Gaussian channel es ima ion e o .
The ansmi il e s ha e only
I
ap. We ha e also made compa -
isons be ween his solu ion, which needs CSI. and he delay di-
e si y echnique o
I
and
4
an ennas, also de ec ed by means o
MLSE (Vi e bi). Delay di e si y is a linea p ecoding echnique
ha does no need any CSI a he ansmi e .
As
i can be seen,
in his case he gains ob ained by means o he Bayesian app oach
a e less impo an han he ones ob ained wi h he MMSE ech-
nique. The eason o i is ha he Vi e bi decode is no sensi-
i e o non-equalized channels and ha he gains o mean SNR by
means
o
he Bayesian app oach a e no ex emely impo an and
do no ha e a di ec impac on he BER. I can be also concluded
ha , al hough he noise powe
in
he CSI is e y high and he qual-
i y o he channel es ima e is e y bad, he solu ion based on he
MLSE echnique pe mi s inc easing impol an ly he pe o mance
o he delay di e si y scheme.
5.
APPENDIX
In his Appendix we
de9
he exp essions co esponding
o
he
ma ices
M(G)
and
X(h)
when he e o e is assumed o be Gaus-
sian wi h he ollowing PDF
E
-
G
(0,
E). Unde his assump-
ion i can be easily p o ed ha
Glh
-
G
(h,
E) and
hjc
-
G
( ,
C),
whe e
and
C
a e
de ined
as
ollows:
C
=
(Rhl+E-’)-’
(10)
=
C
(-
R,’m+E-’h
-1
(11)
Deduc ion
o M:
le us w i e he ec o
=
Eh,~
{hlc}
de-
ined in
(11)
as ollows:
=
[
y ?.
- 6
]’,
whe e
,
=
[
j‘l g)..
. g’
1’
and
j‘)
=
Ehl~
{hj’)lG}.
The ma ix
M(G)
is de ined as
M
=
[
MiMz..
.
MQ
1,
whe e
M,
=
Eh,i;
{H&}
is he condi ioned mean o he Toepli z con olu-
ion ma ix
H,
associa ed o he channel co esponding o he q h
ansmi an enna. The ma ix
M,
is he
(M
+
L
-
1)
x
M
Toepli z
con olu ion ma ix, whe e he i s ow is an all-ze os ec o ex-
cep he i s elemen which
is
equal o
@’,
and he i s column is
an all-ze os ec o excep he i s
L
elemen s which a e equal o
he ec o
,.
Deduc ion
oJ
X:
le us w i e he ma ix de ined
in
(IO)
C
=
Eh,,{(h- )(h- )HIK}as:
By means o hese equali ies and ela ionships, he inal ex-
p ession o he ma ix
X(K)
can be ob ained.
6.
REFERENCES
[I]
G.
W.
Womell and M. T. T o , “E icien Signal P ocess-
ing Techniques o Exploi ing T ansmi An enna Di e si y on
Fading Channels,”
IEEE T ans. on Signal P oc.,
ol.
45,
no.
I,
pp. 191-205, Jan.
1997.
[2]
V.
Ta okh, N. Seshad i, and A.
R.
Calde bank. “Space-Time
Codes
o
High Da a Ra e Wi eless Communica ion: Pe o -
mance C i e ion and Code Cons uc ion,”
IEEE
T ans.
on
In-
o m.
Theo y,
ol.
44,
no.
2,
pp.
744-765,
Ma ch
1998.
[3]
G.
Fanesan and
P.
S oica, “Space-Time Block Codes: a
Max-
imum SNR App oach,”
IEEE
T uns.
on
In o m. Theo y,
ol.
47,
no.
2,
pp. 1650-1656, May
2001.
[41
P-J.
Hube ,
Robus
S a is ics,
Wiley Se ies,
1981.
[SI
Jinho Choi, “Pe o mance Analysis o T ansmi An enna Di-
e si y Wi hnVi hou Channel In o ma ion,”
IEEE T ans.
on
Veh.
Techn.,
ol.
51,no. 1,pp.
101-113,
Janua y2002.
[6]
E
Rey, M. Lama ca, and G. Vbzquez,
“A
Join T ansmi e -
Recei e Design in MIMO Sys ems Robus o Channel Unce -
ain y o W-LAN Applica ions,” in
P oceedings IST Mobile
Communic. Summi ,
Thessaloniki, June
2002.
“Combining
Beam o ming and O hogonal Space-Time Block Coding,”
IEEE
T ans.
on In o m. Theo y,
ol.
48,
no.
3,
pp.
611427,
Ma ch
2002.
[8]
D.
P.
Paloma , M. A. Lagunas Heminde , and John M.
Cio i, “Op imum Linea Join T ansmi -Recei e P ocessing
o MIMO Channels wi h
QoS
Cons ain s,”
Submi ed
o
IEEE
T ans. on Signal P oc.,
2002.
[7]
G. JBng en, M. Skoglund, and
B.
O e s en,
IV
-
88