scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Performance of joint diversity and equalization techniques in M -QAM indoor radio systems

Abstract

The performance of the joint diversity and equalization techniques in an indoor radio environment are analyzed. 4, 16, and 64-QAM (quadrature amplitude modulation) is considered. The results show that a system without protection yields very limited performance. When the channel introduces a low level of distortion, the diversity techniques perform better than the equalizer techniques; if the channel introduces a high degree of intersymbol interference, then the equalizer techniques are slightly better than the diversity techniques. Moreover, the joint equalization and diversity techniques are very effective tools for combating the degrading effect introduced by the indoor channel. Improvement in the system performances, with respect to a system without any protection, ranging from 10 to 100 has been obtained

Read accessible full text

Performance of joint diversity and equalization techniques in M -QAM indoor radio systems

Author: Casadevall Palacio, Fernando José
Publisher: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
Year: 1991
DOI: 10.1109/VETEC.1991.140483
Source: https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/2117/83780/1/Performance%20of%20joint%20diversity%20and%20equalization%20techniques%20in%20M%20-QAM%20indoor%20radio%20systems.pdf
PERFORMANCE
OF
JOINT
DIVERSITY
AND
EQUALIZATION TECHNIQUES
IN M-QAM INDOOR RADIO SYSTEMS
Fe nando
J.
CASADEVALL
Depa amen de Teo ia del Senyal i Comunicacions
Uni e si a Poli kcnica
de
Ca alunya
Apdo.
30002.08080
Ba celona, SPAIN
In his pape we analyze he pe o mances o he join
di e si y and equaliza ion echniques in an indoo adio
en i onmen . 4, 16 and 64 QAM modula ion a e conside ed. The
sys em pe o mances a e desc ibed
in
e ms o he Ou age
P obabili y. The esul s show ha a sys em wi hou p o ec ion has
e y limi ed pe o mances. When he channel in oduces low le el
o dis o ion, he di e si y echnique p oduces be e pe o mances
han he equalize echnique, bu
i
he channel in oduces a high
deg ee
o
in e symbol in e e ence, hen he equalize echniques
a e sligh ly be e han he di e si y echniques. Mo eo e , he join
equaliza ion and di e si y echniques a e e y e ec i e ools o
comba he deg ading e ec in oduced by he indoo channel.
Imp o emen in he sys em pe o mances
,
wi h espec
o
a sys em
wi hou any p o ec ion, anging om
10
o
100
ha e been ob ained.
We will shown ha he sys em pe o mances emain almos
unchanged o alues o he co ela ion coe icien be ween
di e si y b anches lowe han 0.6
,0.7
app oxima ely.
E en hough some pa ial analysis abou
his
subjec ha e
been ca ied ou .[l],[2], o example aking in o accoun speci ic
bi a es, pa icula p opaga ion condi ions
ando
asymp o ic
app oaches
o
he equalize beha io , in
OUT
knowledge, he e is
no ye a gene al analysis o indoo adio channels ha p o ides
a global cha ac e iza ion o he beha io o he di e si y and
equaliza ion echniques wo king join ly when M-QAM modula ions
a e conside ed.
In his pape . we assess he pe o mances o M-QAM
indoo adio sys ems ha use join di e si y and equaliza ion
echniques. 4-QAM, 16-QAM and 64-QAM ha e been conside ed.
The in luences on he sys em pe o mances o a ious sys em and
channel pa ame e s, like he shape and .m.s. delay sp ead o he
Powe Delay P o ile ha cha ac e ize he p opaga ion condi ions,
he equalize s uc u e (linea and non-liiea )
as
well
as
he numbe
o aps e c... ha e
been
aken in o accoun . The sys em
pe o mances a e desc ibed in e ms o bo h a e aged Bi E o
Ra e an Ou age P obabili y.
INTRODUCTION TRANSMISSION MODEL
The use o adio in indoo da a communica ions
is
an
a ac i e p oposi ion because i gi es o al mobili y
o
he
inc easing numbe o e minal equipmen s in la ge buildings.
Howe e , indoo adio sys ems a e a ec ed by equency selec i e
ading caused by he mul ipa h ime delay sp ead ha p oduces
in e symbol in e e ence (ISI). hus esul ing in an i educible bi
e o a e @ER) and imposing an
upjw
limi on he da a symbol
a e. In o de
o
comba
his
si ua ion di e si y echniques and o
adap i e channel equalize s could be used.
Di e si y echniques a e e icien when low
o
medium
bi a e ansmission sys em a e conside ed because in hese cases
he signal ading can be assumed o be non-selec i e. Howe e , o
sys ems ope a ing a high bi a e, whe e he selec i e ading na u e
caused by he mul ipa h p opaga ion in oduces
ISI,
he
di e si y
echniques a en’ sui able because hey can’ cope wi h he abo e
men ioned ISI.
On
he o he hand, he equaliza ion echniques, ha
a e able o compensa e he IS1 in oduced by he mul ipa h
p opaga ion, ha e limi ed pe o mances due
o
he luc ua ions on
he signal
o
noise a io p oduced by he Rayleigh na u e o he
p opaga ion. Then, in o de o inc ease he sys em pe o mances i
could be con enien
o
conside he beha io o he join di e si y
and equaliza ion echniques.
228
Figu e 1 shows he low-pass equi alen model o he
ansmission sys em. The ansmi ed signal can be o mula ed
as:
-
S( )=
(a,+jb,).& -kT)
=E
d,.& - m,
k---
-
km
--
whe e
[
ak),
[
b)
a e da a sequences o du a ion T o he in-phase
and quad a u e channels. They a e kl,
3,
....
k(M”-I)
wi h
M=4
o 4-QAM, M=16 o 16-QAM,andM=64
o
64-QAM. Mo eo e ,
ak and
4,
a e independen andom a iables. The o e all il e ing
ans e unc ion
H-,-( ).H,( )
is
a aised-cosine
ype
wi h a oll-o
ac o equal
o
0.5.
The il e ing is spli equally be ween he
ansmi e and he ecei e . h& ) models he channel beha io ha
in oduces selec i e ading in he adio link. The channel is
assumed o be wide
sense
s a iona y unco ela ed sca e ing
(WSSUS) and i
is
ep esen ed by
a
unique co ela ion unc ion
e e ed o
as
he
Powe Delay P o ile,
P( ),[3].
A
measu e o he
wid h o P( ) is he oo mean-squa e delay sp ead,
T.
F om he
Powe Delay P o ile unc ion
,
a sample o he channel impulse
CH2944-7/91/0000/0228 $1
.OO
0
1991
IEEE
-__
-
-~
esponse can be cons uc ed by he ollowing o mula
:
whe e
kj
and hgn,i a e ze o mean gaussian andom a iables wi h
a iance P(n. ,,)/;! and
,,
is he ime be ween samples. The numbe
o samples,
L,
needed o ep esen he indoo mobile channel in an
accu a e o m, depends on he shape o he Powe Delay P o ile,
P( ). and on i s
ms
delay sp ead. Measu emen s om many
di e en buildmgs,[4],[5], allow
us
o
conside ha he mos
common shape o he Powe Delay P o ile is he one-side
exponen ial p o ile, gi en by:
In
he analyzed cases
i
is su icien o conside ed a ime
du a ion o he one-side exponen ial p o ile app oxima ely equal o
14. and
,,=~J2.
The ecei ed signal l( ) ( esp. ,( )) can be exp essed by:
m
j( )=
[a,.h” -~~)-b,.hl( -k~)l
+
k--m
m
+j
[bk.hF(
-KT)
+u,.h ( -KT)]
+
k---
+
n,W+j
ny( )
whe e, in gene al
wi h i=1,2
.
F’
deno es he in e se
con olu ion ope a o , and
G;
is a Fou ie ans o m,
*
is
he
gain ac o in oduced o
conside ed he p esence o au oma ic gin con ol (AGC). We ha e
aken in o accoun a ca ie eco e y ci cui ha minimizes he
ou pu mean squa e e o .[6]. Assuming ha he bandwid h o he
ca ie eco e y ci cui is much highe han he ading a e, i could
be
conside ed ha he ca ie phase can be acked
as
i he global
impulse esponse, h,( ). is ime-in a ian .
As
we ocus on he
e ec s o he delay sp ead, he phase ji e on he eco e ed ca ie
caused by he gaussian noise will no be aken in o accoun . The
op imum sampling
ins an
is ob ained om a classical squa ing
iming eco e y loop,[7].
Two
baseband equalize s uc u es a e
analyzed. Linea and Non-Linea equalize s bo h wi h baud pe iod
T
spacing be ween s ages.
In
all he cases, he minimum mean-
229
squa e e o (MMSE) echnique has been adop ed
o
calcula e he
ap alues.
RESULTS
We ha e examined he e ec i eness o he join adap i e
equaliza ion and di e si y echniques
in
igh ing he mul ipa h and
ading in oduced by he indoo adio channel. The objec i e is o
de e mine he
da a
a e limi a ion o indoo communica ion
sys ems. The c i e ium used
o
e alua e he sys em quali y
is
he
ou age.p obabili y, de ined
as
:
P,=P Ob.(P,>lo- )
whe e P, is he e o p obabili y and
y
is a cons an ha we ha e
aken equal o 2 o 6.
To
compu e he
e o
p obabili y in eg al we
ha e conside ed he LEVI’s me hodJ81.
In igu es
2
and
3
we show
he
e olu ion o he ou age
p obabili y, agains he no malized delay sp ead o he Powe
Delay P o ile,
. /T.
We can
see
ha a sys em wi hou any
p o ec ion has a e y limi ed pe o mances since o
. /T
>
0.1 he
ou age p obabili y
is
g ea e han 0.1 (10%). Mo eo e . o smalle
alues o
. /T,
he ou age p obabili y
goes
o an asymp o ic alue
(ma ked by he le e A on he igu es) ha
is
g ea e han 0,Ol
(1%). I is impo an o emphasize ha
his
alue shows he
beha io o he sys em pe o mances when a la ading channel
is
conside ed. I he di e si y echnique is conside ed we can
see
ha
o high alues o he a io
. /T
he sys em pe o mances a e only
sligh ly be e han he ob ained o a sys em wi hou p o ec ion,
bu when smalle alues a e aken in o accoun he alues o he
ou age p obabili y con e ge on he alue o a la ading channel.
On
he o he hand, o small alues o
he
no malized delay sp ead,
he sys em pe o mances inc ease by a ac o o en app oxima ely.
In conclusion. he di e si y echnique could be
used
in an e ec i e
way i a la channels o channels wi h low dis o ion a e
conside ed. When join equalize and di e si y echniques a e aken
in o accoun , he pe o mance o he sys em inc eases quickly. Fo
a BER o 1W2 and a linea equalize o 5 aps in each b anch
(ma ked
as
2+2 in he igu e) he sys em is able
o
gua an ee an
ou age p obabili y lowe han 0.001 (0.1%) o alues o he
no malized delay sp ead smalle han
0.8.
Howe e i a BER o
is conside ed he sys em is no able
o
gi e an ou age
p obabili y lowe han
0.01
(1%).
In o de o ob ain an ou age p obabili y lowe han
lo3
o bo h BER alues o
lo-’
and
lo6
a highe signal
o
noise a io
mus be conside ed. In pa icula we ha e chosen a signal o noise
a io o
30
dB.
Figu es 4 and
5
show he sys em pe o mances in
his
case. Conside ing a non-linea equalize wi h
3
aps (1 ap in
he non-linea pa ) and o a BER equal
o
lo2
he ou age
p obabili y is lowe han
(0.01%)
o alues o
T/T<
0.5
.
I
is
impo an o emphasize ha , when join equaliza ion and di e si y
echniques a e conside ed, he sys em pe o mances a e be e han
he ob ained o a la ading channel o alues o
. /T
anging
om 0.01
o
0.5
.
This could be explained because he sys em
uses
he mul ipa h
as
a addi ional edundan channels
o
inc ease he
di e si y gain. Howe e , o la ge alues o
T/T
he induced
in e symbol in e e ence .due
o
he mul ipa h, inc eases
conside ably and he equalize can no
cope
comple ely wi h i
,
and
as
he esul he sys em pe o mances deg ades quickly. Fo a
BER o an ou age p obabili y smalle han
10”
could be
ob ained o alues o
T/T
lowe han 0.3
.
I could also be no iced
ha o g ea alues o
T/T
he sys em pe o mances a e limi ed
by
he in enymbol in e e ence due
o
he limi ed numbe o equalize
aps (3 aps a e only conside ed in each b anch). Fo highe alues
o he
~ l
a io, be e sys em pe o mances could be ob ained
inc easing he numbe o aps.
Figu es 6 and
7
show he sys em pe o mances when 16
QAM
modula ion
is
conside ed. Again a signal o noise a io o 30
dB
is
aken in o accoun . The beha io o he linea and non linea
equalize
is
shown conside ing
3
and
5
aps in each di e si y
b anch (ma ked in he igu e by 1+1 and
2+2
espec i ely). Fo a
BER
o
lo-’
a
linea equalize could gua an ee an ou age
p obabili y lowe han 0.01 (1%) o alues o
~ l<
0.3
i
3 aps
a e aken in o accoun , and
~ l<
0.5
when
5
aps a e used.
An
ou age p obabili y lowe han could only be gua an eed o
~ l~0.1.
Howe e
i
a nonlinea equalize wi h
5
aps (ma ked by
2+2)
is conside ed he ou age p obabili y could be lowe han
i
~ l<0.55
and lowe han
lo-’
i
T/T<
0.7.
Fo a BER o a
non linea equalize wi h
5
aps is necessa y in o de o ob ain an
ou age p obabili y lowe han
lo-’
o ~/T<0.4
Finally, igu es
8
and
9
show he sys em pe o mances
when 64
QAM
modula ion
is
conside ed.
In
his case a signal
o
noise a io o
40
dB is aken in o accoun . Again, he beha io o
he linea and non linea equalize conside ing 3 and
5
aps in each
di e si y b anch (ma ked in he igu e by 1+1 and
2+2
espec i ely) is also analyzed. Fo a BER o
lo-’
a linea equalize
could gua an ee an ou age p obabili y lowe han 0.01
(1%)
o
alues o
T/T
<
0.2
i 3 aps a e
aken
in o accoun , and
~ k
0.5
when
5
aps a e used. I a nonlinea equalize wi h
5
aps (ma ked
by
2+2)
is
conside ed he ou age p obabili y could be lowe han
10-3 i
/T<O.4
and lowe han
IO-’
i
T/T<
0.55.
a non linea equalize wi h
5
aps is
necessa y in o de
o
ob ain an ou age p obabili y lowe han
lo-’
o T/T4.4
Fo a BER o
CORRELATED CHANNELS
We ha e also conside ed he in luence on he sys em
pe o mances o he impulse esponse co ela ion be ween bo h
di e si y channels.
Gi en a alue o he co ela ion coe icien ,p, de ied
as:
E[(X-X).(Y-Y)I
=
lsIY
P=
-,
/E[(x-m’l.E[(Y-n’l
/GG
p
=m
mu=m,=02
XY XY
wi h
02
he a iance, he wo complex impulse esponse o he
sys em a e ob ained by means o he ollowing p du e:
a-
b.-
C.-
whe e
X
and
Y
a e ze o mean a iables and:
230
Two unco ela ed complex gaussian impulse esponse,
h( ) and b( ), a e gene a ed, wi h
:
L
h( )=c.x
(h,+jhqn).8( -n n)
bO)=c.h
nil
(b,+jbq,,).& -n n)
n-
1
Fo each couple o andom a iables,
h,,,
and b, ( esp.
bqn and b
)
wo new co ela ed andom a iables a e
ob ained using he ollowing exp essions:
q?
U,
=U1
.hi,
in=uZ1
.h,
+uz2.bin
U
¶n
=ull.h,
qn=uZ1
.h,
+%.bqn
wi h:
mXY
a21
=-
J;;;;
The impulse esponse
o
he wo new co ela ed channels
a e ob ained
as
:
In igu e
10
we show he e olu ion o he ou age
p obabili y, o a BER o agains he co ela ion coe icien
p
o a 4-QAM modula ion and a signal
o
noise a io a I.F. o 20
dB.
Th ee di e en a io
l,
ela ed
o
channels wi h small,
medium and high le el o he in e symbol in e e ence, ha e been
conside ed.
F om
he
igu e we can conclude ha o co ela ion
coe icien s,
p.
lowe han 0.7 he sys em pe o mances emain
almos unchanged. Howe e when he co ela ion coe icien
inc eases i s alue he sys em pe o mances deg ades quickly.
Simila esul s we e ob ained o highe signal o noise a ios and
high le el M-QAM modula ion:
Fu he mo e,
in
each igu e we a e able
o
compa e he
beha io o h ee di e en sys ems. The poin deno ed by A in he
uppe cu e gi es he sys em pe o mance when an unp o ec ed
sys em
is
conside ed. The eason is ha i we conside a sys em
wi h only di e si y echnique when he co ela ion coe icien is
equal
o
one,
bo h
di e si y channels ha e he same impulse
esponse and
as
a esul he sys em pe o mances a e co esponding
o an unp o ec ed sys em. O e he same cu e, he
poin
B
indica es he sys em pe o mance when ideal di e si y echnique is
conside ed.
In
a simila o m, on he lowe cu e we can
dis inguish wo poin s. The poin deno ed by C ep esen s he
sys em pe o mances when join equaliza ion and di e si y
echniques a e conside ed. Finally he poin
D
deno es he sys em
pe o mances o an equalized sys em, because
as
he co ela ion
coe icien is equal
o
one bo h di e si y channels ha e he same
impulse esponse and
as
a esul only he equaliza ion echnique
becomes ope a i e. Compa ing he h ee igu es i can be
concluded
a.- When he impulse esponses p esen low le el o
dis o ion wi h, e.g. o
. / =0.05,
he di e si y echnique
p oduces be e pe o mances
han
he equalize
echniques.
b.- When he impulse esponses show a high deg ee o
in e symbol in e e ence, e.g. o
~/T=0.5,
he equalize
echniques a e sligh ly be e han he di e si y
echniques.
c.- The imp o emen on he sys em pe o mances due
o
use
join ly di e si y and equaliza ion echniques, wi h espec
o an unp o ec ed sys em, anges be ween
10
o 100.
CONCLUSIONS
In
his
pape we ha e analyzed he pe o mances o he
join di e si y and equaliza ion echniques in an indoo adio
en i onmen . 4,16 and 64 QAM modula ion ha e been conside ed.
F om he ob ained esul s we can conclude ha a sys em wi hou
p o ec ion has e y limi ed pe o mances. When he channel
in oduces low le el o dis o ion, he di e si y echnique p oduces
be e pe o mances han he equalize echnique, bu i he channel
in oduces a high deg ee o in e symbol in e e ence. hen he
equalize echniques a e sligh ly be e han he di e si y
echniques.
On
he o he hand he join equaliza ion and di e si y
echniques a e e y e ec i e
ools
o
comba he deg ading e ec
in oduced by he indoo channel. Imp o emen
in
he
sys em
pe o mances
,
wi h espec
o
a sys em wi hou any
p o ec ion,
anging om 10
o
100
ha e been ob ained. Mo eo e he sys em
pe o mances emain almos unchanged
i
he alue o he
co ela ion coe icien be ween di e si y b anches
is
lowe han
0.6
,0.7 app oxima ely.
REFERENCES
R.A. VALENZUELA,
Pe o munce o ADap i e
Equaliza ion o Indoo Radio Communica ions,
IEEE
T ans. on Communica ions, ol. COM-37,
pp.
291-293,
Ma ch 1989.
T.A. SEXTON and KPAHLAVAN,
Channel
Modelling
and Adap i e Equaliza ion
o
indoo Radio
Channels,
IEEE J. Selec ed A eas
in
Communica ions, Vol. SAC-7,
pp. 114-121, Janua y 1989.
J.C.
PROMS,
Digi al Communica ions,
Mc C aw Hill,
1983. Chap e 7.
D.M.J. DEVASIRVATHAM,
Time Delay Sp ead
Measu emen s
850
MHz
Radio Wa es in Building
En i onmen s,
IEEE T ans. An ennas and P opaga ion,
Vol.
AP-34, pp. 1300-1305, No embe 1986.
R.J.C. BULTlTUDE,
A
Compa ison o Indoo Radio
P opaga ion Cha ac e is ics
a
9IOMHz
and
1.75
GHz,
IEEE J. Selec ed A eas in Communica ions, Vol. SAC-I,
pp. 20-30. Janua y 1989.
S.
MORIDI, H. SARI,
Analysis o Decision-Feedback
Ca ie Reco e y
Loops
wi h applica ions o
16
QAh4
Digi al Radio Sys ems,
In e na ional Con e ence on
Communica ions (ICC’83), 1983,
pp.
671-675.
N. AMITAY, L.J. GREENSTEIN.
Mul ipa h Ou age
Pe o mance o Digi al Radio Recei e s Using Fini e-
aps Adap i e Equalize s,
IEEE T ans. on
Communica ions, Vol. COM-32,
NQ
5.
May 1984.
A. LEVI,
Fas E o Ra e E alua ion in
he
P esence o
In e symbol In e e ence,
IEEE T ans. on
Communica ions, Vol. COM-33, NQ5, May 1985,
pp.
479-481
AGREEMENTS
This wo k has been inanced by Spain CICYT TIC880543.
231
k
Figu e
1.-
LOU PASS EQUIVALENT MOOEL
OF
THE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM
N
w
m
LL
W
*
+--
-
=!
m
M
4
0
LL
(L
W
(3
4
0
5
Tau/ T
Figu e
2.-
OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS NORMALIZED
DELAY SPREAD. $-PAM, SNR=ZOdB, BER=
lom2
1
N
w
m
E
W
,
....
,
,...
,
....
I
Tau/T
Figu e
4.-
OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS NORMALIZED
DELAY SPREAD. 4-QAM. SNR=30dB, BER=10-2.
CD
w
m
=!
m
m
LL
W
-
4
0
LL
a
W
4
0
5
Tau/T
Figu e
3.-
OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS NORMALIZED
DELAY SPREAD. 4-QAM, SNR=ZOdB, BER=10-6
Tau/T
Figu e
5.-
OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS NORMALIZED
DELAY SPREAD. 4-QAM, SNRJOdB, BER=10-6.
232

......
10'
,
Tau/T
.....
.....
. .
,.,
I
...............
.....
.....
. .
,.,
.....
-ul hau
p o ecclon
.
-01 .
L
MIII[WR
EO.
104
10-4
I
Tau/T
Figu e
6.-
OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS NORMALIZED
DELAY SPREAD. 16-PAM, SNR=30dB, BER=1Om2 Figu e
7.-
OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS NORMALIZED
DELAY SPREAD. 16-QAM, SNR=30dB, BER=10-6
I
Tau/T
I
Figu e
8.-
OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS NORMALIZED
DELAY SPREAD. &-PAM, SNR=40dB, BER=10-2
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
(a)
-
CD
I
W
I,
CI
W
+
m
!
>
c
m
m
U
0
E
a
W
a
Q
c
3
0
10-1 109
Tau/T
Figu e
9.-
OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS NORMALIZED
DELAY SPREAD. &-PAM, SNR=40dB, BER=10-6.
le.
!@L&Pl
Iau/T=E.
1
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
(b)
CORRELATION COEFF [CIENT
(C)
Figu e
10.-OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS CORRELATION COEFFICIENT. SNR=20 dB,
4-QAM,
T/T
=
0.05,
0.1,
0.01