scieee Open visual document viewer

Performance of joint diversity and equalization techniques in M -QAM indoor radio systems

Casadevall Palacio, Fernando José

Abstract

The performance of the joint diversity and equalization techniques in an indoor radio environment are analyzed. 4, 16, and 64-QAM (quadrature amplitude modulation) is considered. The results show that a system without protection yields very limited performance. When the channel introduces a low level of distortion, the diversity techniques perform better than the equalizer techniques; if the channel introduces a high degree of intersymbol interference, then the equalizer techniques are slightly better than the diversity techniques. Moreover, the joint equalization and diversity techniques are very effective tools for combating the degrading effect introduced by the indoor channel. Improvement in the system performances, with respect to a system without any protection, ranging from 10 to 100 has been obtained

Full text

PERFORMANCE OF JOINT DIVERSITY AND EQUALIZATION TECHNIQUES IN M-QAM INDOOR RADIO SYSTEMS Fe nando J. CASADEVALL Depa amen de Teo ia del Senyal i Comunicacions Uni e si a Poli kcnica de Ca alunya Apdo. 30002.08080 Ba celona, SPAIN In his pape we analyze he pe o mances o he join di e si y and equaliza ion echniques in an indoo adio en i onmen . 4, 16 and 64 QAM modula ion a e conside ed. The sys em pe o mances a e desc ibed in e ms o he Ou age P obabili y. The esul s show ha a sys em wi hou p o ec ion has e y limi ed pe o mances. When he channel in oduces low le el o dis o ion, he di e si y echnique p oduces be e pe o mances han he equalize echnique, bu i he channel in oduces a high deg ee o in e symbol in e e ence, hen he equalize echniques a e sligh ly be e han he di e si y echniques. Mo eo e , he join equaliza ion and di e si y echniques a e e y e ec i e ools o comba he deg ading e ec in oduced by he indoo channel. Imp o emen in he sys em pe o mances , wi h espec o a sys em wi hou any p o ec ion, anging om 10 o 100 ha e been ob ained. We will shown ha he sys em pe o mances emain almos unchanged o alues o he co ela ion coe icien be ween di e si y b anches lowe han 0.6 ,0.7 app oxima ely. E en hough some pa ial analysis abou his subjec ha e been ca ied ou .[l],[2], o example aking in o accoun speci ic bi a es, pa icula p opaga ion condi ions ando asymp o ic app oaches o he equalize beha io , in OUT knowledge, he e is no ye a gene al analysis o indoo adio channels ha p o ides a global cha ac e iza ion o he beha io o he di e si y and equaliza ion echniques wo king join ly when M-QAM modula ions a e conside ed. In his pape . we assess he pe o mances o M-QAM indoo adio sys ems ha use join di e si y and equaliza ion echniques. 4-QAM, 16-QAM and 64-QAM ha e been conside ed. The in luences on he sys em pe o mances o a ious sys em and channel pa ame e s, like he shape and .m.s. delay sp ead o he Powe Delay P o ile ha cha ac e ize he p opaga ion condi ions, he equalize s uc u e (linea and non-liiea ) as well as he numbe o aps e c... ha e been aken in o accoun . The sys em pe o mances a e desc ibed in e ms o bo h a e aged Bi E o Ra e an Ou age P obabili y. INTRODUCTION TRANSMISSION MODEL The use o adio in indoo da a communica ions is an a ac i e p oposi ion because i gi es o al mobili y o he inc easing numbe o e minal equipmen s in la ge buildings. Howe e , indoo adio sys ems a e a ec ed by equency selec i e ading caused by he mul ipa h ime delay sp ead ha p oduces in e symbol in e e ence (ISI). hus esul ing in an i educible bi e o a e @ER) and imposing an upjw limi on he da a symbol a e. In o de o comba his si ua ion di e si y echniques and o adap i e channel equalize s could be used. Di e si y echniques a e e icien when low o medium bi a e ansmission sys em a e conside ed because in hese cases he signal ading can be assumed o be non-selec i e. Howe e , o sys ems ope a ing a high bi a e, whe e he selec i e ading na u e caused by he mul ipa h p opaga ion in oduces ISI, he di e si y echniques a en’ sui able because hey can’ cope wi h he abo e men ioned ISI. On he o he hand, he equaliza ion echniques, ha a e able o compensa e he IS1 in oduced by he mul ipa h p opaga ion, ha e limi ed pe o mances due o he luc ua ions on he signal o noise a io p oduced by he Rayleigh na u e o he p opaga ion. Then, in o de o inc ease he sys em pe o mances i could be con enien o conside he beha io o he join di e si y and equaliza ion echniques. 228 Figu e 1 shows he low-pass equi alen model o he ansmission sys em. The ansmi ed signal can be o mula ed as: - S( )= (a,+jb,).& -kT) =E d,.& - m, k--- - km -- whe e [ ak), [ b) a e da a sequences o du a ion T o he in-phase and quad a u e channels. They a e kl, 3, .... k(M”-I) wi h M=4 o 4-QAM, M=16 o 16-QAM,andM=64 o 64-QAM. Mo eo e , ak and 4, a e independen andom a iables. The o e all il e ing ans e unc ion H-,-( ).H,( ) is a aised-cosine ype wi h a oll-o ac o equal o 0.5. The il e ing is spli equally be ween he ansmi e and he ecei e . h& ) models he channel beha io ha in oduces selec i e ading in he adio link. The channel is assumed o be wide sense s a iona y unco ela ed sca e ing (WSSUS) and i is ep esen ed by a unique co ela ion unc ion e e ed o as he Powe Delay P o ile, P( ),[3]. A measu e o he wid h o P( ) is he oo mean-squa e delay sp ead, T. F om he Powe Delay P o ile unc ion , a sample o he channel impulse CH2944-7/91/0000/0228 $1 .OO 0 1991 IEEE -__ - -~ esponse can be cons uc ed by he ollowing o mula : whe e kj and hgn,i a e ze o mean gaussian andom a iables wi h a iance P(n. ,,)/;! and ,, is he ime be ween samples. The numbe o samples, L, needed o ep esen he indoo mobile channel in an accu a e o m, depends on he shape o he Powe Delay P o ile, P( ). and on i s ms delay sp ead. Measu emen s om many di e en buildmgs,[4],[5], allow us o conside ha he mos common shape o he Powe Delay P o ile is he one-side exponen ial p o ile, gi en by: In he analyzed cases i is su icien o conside ed a ime du a ion o he one-side exponen ial p o ile app oxima ely equal o 14. and ,,=~J2. The ecei ed signal l( ) ( esp. ,( )) can be exp essed by: m j( )= [a,.h” -~~)-b,.hl( -k~)l + k--m m +j [bk.hF( -KT) +u,.h ( -KT)] + k--- + n,W+j ny( ) whe e, in gene al wi h i=1,2 . F’ deno es he in e se con olu ion ope a o , and G; is a Fou ie ans o m, * is he gain ac o in oduced o conside ed he p esence o au oma ic gin con ol (AGC). We ha e aken in o accoun a ca ie eco e y ci cui ha minimizes he ou pu mean squa e e o .[6]. Assuming ha he bandwid h o he ca ie eco e y ci cui is much highe han he ading a e, i could be conside ed ha he ca ie phase can be acked as i he global impulse esponse, h,( ). is ime-in a ian . As we ocus on he e ec s o he delay sp ead, he phase ji e on he eco e ed ca ie caused by he gaussian noise will no be aken in o accoun . The op imum sampling ins an is ob ained om a classical squa ing iming eco e y loop,[7]. Two baseband equalize s uc u es a e analyzed. Linea and Non-Linea equalize s bo h wi h baud pe iod T spacing be ween s ages. In all he cases, he minimum mean- 229 squa e e o (MMSE) echnique has been adop ed o calcula e he ap alues. RESULTS We ha e examined he e ec i eness o he join adap i e equaliza ion and di e si y echniques in igh ing he mul ipa h and ading in oduced by he indoo adio channel. The objec i e is o de e mine he da a a e limi a ion o indoo communica ion sys ems. The c i e ium used o e alua e he sys em quali y is he ou age.p obabili y, de ined as : P,=P Ob.(P,>lo- ) whe e P, is he e o p obabili y and y is a cons an ha we ha e aken equal o 2 o 6. To compu e he e o p obabili y in eg al we ha e conside ed he LEVI’s me hodJ81. In igu es 2 and 3 we show he e olu ion o he ou age p obabili y, agains he no malized delay sp ead o he Powe Delay P o ile, . /T. We can see ha a sys em wi hou any p o ec ion has a e y limi ed pe o mances since o . /T > 0.1 he ou age p obabili y is g ea e han 0.1 (10%). Mo eo e . o smalle alues o . /T, he ou age p obabili y goes o an asymp o ic alue (ma ked by he le e A on he igu es) ha is g ea e han 0,Ol (1%). I is impo an o emphasize ha his alue shows he beha io o he sys em pe o mances when a la ading channel is conside ed. I he di e si y echnique is conside ed we can see ha o high alues o he a io . /T he sys em pe o mances a e only sligh ly be e han he ob ained o a sys em wi hou p o ec ion, bu when smalle alues a e aken in o accoun he alues o he ou age p obabili y con e ge on he alue o a la ading channel. On he o he hand, o small alues o he no malized delay sp ead, he sys em pe o mances inc ease by a ac o o en app oxima ely. In conclusion. he di e si y echnique could be used in an e ec i e way i a la channels o channels wi h low dis o ion a e conside ed. When join equalize and di e si y echniques a e aken in o accoun , he pe o mance o he sys em inc eases quickly. Fo a BER o 1W2 and a linea equalize o 5 aps in each b anch (ma ked as 2+2 in he igu e) he sys em is able o gua an ee an ou age p obabili y lowe han 0.001 (0.1%) o alues o he no malized delay sp ead smalle han 0.8. Howe e i a BER o is conside ed he sys em is no able o gi e an ou age p obabili y lowe han 0.01 (1%). In o de o ob ain an ou age p obabili y lowe han lo3 o bo h BER alues o lo-’ and lo6 a highe signal o noise a io mus be conside ed. In pa icula we ha e chosen a signal o noise a io o 30 dB. Figu es 4 and 5 show he sys em pe o mances in his case. Conside ing a non-linea equalize wi h 3 aps (1 ap in he non-linea pa ) and o a BER equal o lo2 he ou age p obabili y is lowe han (0.01%) o alues o T/T< 0.5 . I is impo an o emphasize ha , when join equaliza ion and di e si y echniques a e conside ed, he sys em pe o mances a e be e han he ob ained o a la ading channel o alues o . /T anging om 0.01 o 0.5 . This could be explained because he sys em uses he mul ipa h as a addi ional edundan channels o inc ease he di e si y gain. Howe e , o la ge alues o T/T he induced in e symbol in e e ence .due o he mul ipa h, inc eases conside ably and he equalize can no cope comple ely wi h i , and as he esul he sys em pe o mances deg ades quickly. Fo a BER o an ou age p obabili y smalle han 10” could be ob ained o alues o T/T lowe han 0.3 . I could also be no iced ha o g ea alues o T/T he sys em pe o mances a e limi ed by he in enymbol in e e ence due o he limi ed numbe o equalize aps (3 aps a e only conside ed in each b anch). Fo highe alues o he ~ l a io, be e sys em pe o mances could be ob ained inc easing he numbe o aps. Figu es 6 and 7 show he sys em pe o mances when 16 QAM modula ion is conside ed. Again a signal o noise a io o 30 dB is aken in o accoun . The beha io o he linea and non linea equalize is shown conside ing 3 and 5 aps in each di e si y b anch (ma ked in he igu e by 1+1 and 2+2 espec i ely). Fo a BER o lo-’ a linea equalize could gua an ee an ou age p obabili y lowe han 0.01 (1%) o alues o ~ l< 0.3 i 3 aps a e aken in o accoun , and ~ l< 0.5 when 5 aps a e used. An ou age p obabili y lowe han could only be gua an eed o ~ l~0.1. Howe e i a nonlinea equalize wi h 5 aps (ma ked by 2+2) is conside ed he ou age p obabili y could be lowe han i ~ l<0.55 and lowe han lo-’ i T/T< 0.7. Fo a BER o a non linea equalize wi h 5 aps is necessa y in o de o ob ain an ou age p obabili y lowe han lo-’ o ~/T<0.4 Finally, igu es 8 and 9 show he sys em pe o mances when 64 QAM modula ion is conside ed. In his case a signal o noise a io o 40 dB is aken in o accoun . Again, he beha io o he linea and non linea equalize conside ing 3 and 5 aps in each di e si y b anch (ma ked in he igu e by 1+1 and 2+2 espec i ely) is also analyzed. Fo a BER o lo-’ a linea equalize could gua an ee an ou age p obabili y lowe han 0.01 (1%) o alues o T/T < 0.2 i 3 aps a e aken in o accoun , and ~ k 0.5 when 5 aps a e used. I a nonlinea equalize wi h 5 aps (ma ked by 2+2) is conside ed he ou age p obabili y could be lowe han 10-3 i /T<O.4 and lowe han IO-’ i T/T< 0.55. a non linea equalize wi h 5 aps is necessa y in o de o ob ain an ou age p obabili y lowe han lo-’ o T/T4.4 Fo a BER o CORRELATED CHANNELS We ha e also conside ed he in luence on he sys em pe o mances o he impulse esponse co ela ion be ween bo h di e si y channels. Gi en a alue o he co ela ion coe icien ,p, de ied as: E[(X-X).(Y-Y)I = lsIY P= -, /E[(x-m’l.E[(Y-n’l /GG p =m mu=m,=02 XY XY wi h 02 he a iance, he wo complex impulse esponse o he sys em a e ob ained by means o he ollowing p du e: a- b.- C.- whe e X and Y a e ze o mean a iables and: 230 Two unco ela ed complex gaussian impulse esponse, h( ) and b( ), a e gene a ed, wi h : L h( )=c.x (h,+jhqn).8( -n n) bO)=c.h nil (b,+jbq,,).& -n n) n- 1 Fo each couple o andom a iables, h,,, and b, ( esp. bqn and b ) wo new co ela ed andom a iables a e ob ained using he ollowing exp essions: q? U, =U1 .hi, in=uZ1 .h, +uz2.bin U ¶n =ull.h, qn=uZ1 .h, +%.bqn wi h: mXY a21 =- J;;;; The impulse esponse o he wo new co ela ed channels a e ob ained as : In igu e 10 we show he e olu ion o he ou age p obabili y, o a BER o agains he co ela ion coe icien p o a 4-QAM modula ion and a signal o noise a io a I.F. o 20 dB. Th ee di e en a io l, ela ed o channels wi h small, medium and high le el o he in e symbol in e e ence, ha e been conside ed. F om he igu e we can conclude ha o co ela ion coe icien s, p. lowe han 0.7 he sys em pe o mances emain almos unchanged. Howe e when he co ela ion coe icien inc eases i s alue he sys em pe o mances deg ades quickly. Simila esul s we e ob ained o highe signal o noise a ios and high le el M-QAM modula ion: Fu he mo e, in each igu e we a e able o compa e he beha io o h ee di e en sys ems. The poin deno ed by A in he uppe cu e gi es he sys em pe o mance when an unp o ec ed sys em is conside ed. The eason is ha i we conside a sys em wi h only di e si y echnique when he co ela ion coe icien is equal o one, bo h di e si y channels ha e he same impulse esponse and as a esul he sys em pe o mances a e co esponding o an unp o ec ed sys em. O e he same cu e, he poin B indica es he sys em pe o mance when ideal di e si y echnique is conside ed. In a simila o m, on he lowe cu e we can dis inguish wo poin s. The poin deno ed by C ep esen s he sys em pe o mances when join equaliza ion and di e si y echniques a e conside ed. Finally he poin D deno es he sys em pe o mances o an equalized sys em, because as he co ela ion coe icien is equal o one bo h di e si y channels ha e he same impulse esponse and as a esul only he equaliza ion echnique becomes ope a i e. Compa ing he h ee igu es i can be concluded a.- When he impulse esponses p esen low le el o dis o ion wi h, e.g. o . / =0.05, he di e si y echnique p oduces be e pe o mances han he equalize echniques. b.- When he impulse esponses show a high deg ee o in e symbol in e e ence, e.g. o ~/T=0.5, he equalize echniques a e sligh ly be e han he di e si y echniques. c.- The imp o emen on he sys em pe o mances due o use join ly di e si y and equaliza ion echniques, wi h espec o an unp o ec ed sys em, anges be ween 10 o 100. CONCLUSIONS In his pape we ha e analyzed he pe o mances o he join di e si y and equaliza ion echniques in an indoo adio en i onmen . 4,16 and 64 QAM modula ion ha e been conside ed. F om he ob ained esul s we can conclude ha a sys em wi hou p o ec ion has e y limi ed pe o mances. When he channel in oduces low le el o dis o ion, he di e si y echnique p oduces be e pe o mances han he equalize echnique, bu i he channel in oduces a high deg ee o in e symbol in e e ence. hen he equalize echniques a e sligh ly be e han he di e si y echniques. On he o he hand he join equaliza ion and di e si y echniques a e e y e ec i e ools o comba he deg ading e ec in oduced by he indoo channel. Imp o emen in he sys em pe o mances , wi h espec o a sys em wi hou any p o ec ion, anging om 10 o 100 ha e been ob ained. Mo eo e he sys em pe o mances emain almos unchanged i he alue o he co ela ion coe icien be ween di e si y b anches is lowe han 0.6 ,0.7 app oxima ely. REFERENCES R.A. VALENZUELA, Pe o munce o ADap i e Equaliza ion o Indoo Radio Communica ions, IEEE T ans. on Communica ions, ol. COM-37, pp. 291-293, Ma ch 1989. T.A. SEXTON and KPAHLAVAN, Channel Modelling and Adap i e Equaliza ion o indoo Radio Channels, IEEE J. Selec ed A eas in Communica ions, Vol. SAC-7, pp. 114-121, Janua y 1989. J.C. PROMS, Digi al Communica ions, Mc C aw Hill, 1983. Chap e 7. D.M.J. DEVASIRVATHAM, Time Delay Sp ead Measu emen s 850 MHz Radio Wa es in Building En i onmen s, IEEE T ans. An ennas and P opaga ion, Vol. AP-34, pp. 1300-1305, No embe 1986. R.J.C. BULTlTUDE, A Compa ison o Indoo Radio P opaga ion Cha ac e is ics a 9IOMHz and 1.75 GHz, IEEE J. Selec ed A eas in Communica ions, Vol. SAC-I, pp. 20-30. Janua y 1989. S. MORIDI, H. SARI, Analysis o Decision-Feedback Ca ie Reco e y Loops wi h applica ions o 16 QAh4 Digi al Radio Sys ems, In e na ional Con e ence on Communica ions (ICC’83), 1983, pp. 671-675. N. AMITAY, L.J. GREENSTEIN. Mul ipa h Ou age Pe o mance o Digi al Radio Recei e s Using Fini e- aps Adap i e Equalize s, IEEE T ans. on Communica ions, Vol. COM-32, NQ 5. May 1984. A. LEVI, Fas E o Ra e E alua ion in he P esence o In e symbol In e e ence, IEEE T ans. on Communica ions, Vol. COM-33, NQ5, May 1985, pp. 479-481 AGREEMENTS This wo k has been inanced by Spain CICYT TIC880543. 231 k Figu e 1.- LOU PASS EQUIVALENT MOOEL OF THE TRANSMISSION SYSTEM N w m LL W * +-- - =! m M 4 0 LL (L W (3 4 0 5 Tau/ T Figu e 2.- OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS NORMALIZED DELAY SPREAD. $-PAM, SNR=ZOdB, BER= lom2 1 N w m E W , .... , ,... , .... I Tau/T Figu e 4.- OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS NORMALIZED DELAY SPREAD. 4-QAM. SNR=30dB, BER=10-2. CD w m =! m m LL W - 4 0 LL a W 4 0 5 Tau/T Figu e 3.- OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS NORMALIZED DELAY SPREAD. 4-QAM, SNR=ZOdB, BER=10-6 Tau/T Figu e 5.- OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS NORMALIZED DELAY SPREAD. 4-QAM, SNRJOdB, BER=10-6. 232 ...... 10' , Tau/T ..... ..... . . ,., I ............... ..... ..... . . ,., ..... -ul hau p o ecclon . -01 . L MIII[WR EO. 104 10-4 I Tau/T Figu e 6.- OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS NORMALIZED DELAY SPREAD. 16-PAM, SNR=30dB, BER=1Om2 Figu e 7.- OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS NORMALIZED DELAY SPREAD. 16-QAM, SNR=30dB, BER=10-6 I Tau/T I Figu e 8.- OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS NORMALIZED DELAY SPREAD. &-PAM, SNR=40dB, BER=10-2 CORRELATION COEFFICIENT (a) - CD I W I, CI W + m ! > c m m U 0 E a W a Q c 3 0 10-1 109 Tau/T Figu e 9.- OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS NORMALIZED DELAY SPREAD. &-PAM, SNR=40dB, BER=10-6. le. !@L&Pl Iau/T=E. 1 CORRELATION COEFFICIENT (b) CORRELATION COEFF [CIENT (C) Figu e 10.-OUTAGE PROBABILITY VERSUS CORRELATION COEFFICIENT. SNR=20 dB, 4-QAM, T/T = 0.05, 0.1, 0.01