scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Transient response of magnetorheological fluid on rapid change of magnetic field in shear mode

Abstract

The transient behaviour of magnetorheological (MR) devices is an important parameter for modern semi-actively controlled suspension systems. A significant part of the MR device response time is the MR fluid response time itself. A significant factor is the so-called rheological response time. The rheological response time is connected with the structuring particle's time and the development of shear stress in MR fluid during the deformation. The main aim of this paper is to experimentally determine the rheological response time of MR fluid and evaluated the effect of shear rate, magnetic field level, and carrier fluid viscosity. The unique design of the rheometer, which allows the rapid change of a magnetic field, is presented. The rheological response time of MRF 132-DG and MRC-C1L is in the range of 0.8-1.4 ms, depending on the shear rate. The higher the shear rate, the shorter the response time. It can be stated that the higher the magnetization of the MR fluid, the lower the response time. The higher the viscosity, the higher the rheological response time. The measured data of rheological response time was generalized and one master curve was determined.

Read accessible full text

Transient response of magnetorheological fluid on rapid change of magnetic field in shear mode

Author: Kubík, Michal; Válek, Josef; Žáček, Jiří; Jeniš, Filip; Strecker, Zbyněk; Mazůrek, Ivan
Publisher: Springer Nature
Year: 2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14718-5
Source: https://dspace.vut.cz/bitstreams/d1004db6-0eb7-428e-a5c1-6c21e921575e/download
1
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scien i ic Repo s | (2022) 12:10612 | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41598-022-14718-5
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s
T ansien esponse
o magne o heological luid
on apid change o magne ic ield
in shea mode
Michal Kubík1*, Jose Válek1, Jiří Žáček1, Filip Jeniš1, Dmi y Bo in2, Zbyněk S ecke 1 &
I an Mazů ek1
The ansien beha iou o magne o heological (MR) de ices is an impo an pa ame e o mode n
semi-ac i ely con olled suspension sys ems. A signi ican pa o he MR de ice esponse ime is
he MR luid esponse ime i sel . A signi ican ac o is he so-called heological esponse ime. The
heological esponse ime is connec ed wi h he s uc u ing pa icle’s ime and he de elopmen
o shea s ess in MR luid du ing he de o ma ion. The main aim o his pape is o expe imen ally
de e mine he heological esponse ime o MR luid and e alua ed he e ec o shea a e, magne ic
ield le el, and ca ie luid iscosi y. The unique design o he heome e , which allows he apid
change o a magne ic ield, is p esen ed. The heological esponse ime o MRF 132-DG and MRC-
C1L is in he ange o 0.8–1.4 ms, depending on he shea a e. The highe he shea a e, he sho e
he esponse ime. I can be s a ed ha he highe he magne iza ion o he MR luid, he lowe he
esponse ime. The highe he iscosi y, he highe he heological esponse ime. The measu ed da a
o heological esponse ime was gene alized and one mas e cu e was de e mined.
Magne o heological (MR) luid is he suspension o ine, non-colloidal, low-coe ci i y, high-magne izable pa -
icles in a ca ie luid. These pa icles a e usually made o ca bonyl i on and ha e a sphe ical shape due o
hei du abili y and ibological p ope ies. The con inuous phase o MR luids is ypically silicon o syn he ic
hyd oca bon oils1. The lowes possible iscosi y o he con inuous phase is equi ed, bu his signi ican ly a ec s
he sedimen a ion s abili y2. MR luid also con ains se e al addi i es ha a ec heological3, ibological4, o
sedimen a ion s abili y5. When he MR luid is ene gized by he magne ic ield, he e omagne ic pa icles a e
magne ized and o m chain-like s uc u es in he di ec ion o he magne ic ield6. The heology o MR luid in
ac i a ed s a e is cha ac e ized by p e-yield and pos -yield egime. In he p e-yield egime, he MR luid exhibi s
iscoelas ic beha iou . The complex modulus G is a magne ic ield H and pa icle concen a ion dependen . The
shea s ess τ in he luid can be desc ibed by he equa ion below
whe e
γ
is shea s ain,
˙γ
is shea a e and τ0(H) is MR luid yield s ess. The pos -yield egime is usually desc ibed
by Bingham model as ollows:
whe e τ(H) is shea s ess,
η
is Bingham iscosi y, and H magne ic lux in ensi y. I is he simples model ha
can desc ibed his beha iou . The MR dampe s7,8, clu ches/b akes9, o seals10,11 ake ad an age o he unique
beha io o MR luid.
The ansien beha iou ( ansien esponse) o MR luid is an impo an pa ame e o mode n magne o -
heological de ices wo king wi h eal- ime con ol12,13. The MR luid esponse ime is composed o o he pa ial
esponse imes which a e di e en ly impo an depending on he ope a ing condi ions and he me hod o MR
luid loading. The esponse ime o MR luid can be di ided in o (1) hyd odynamic esponse ime, (2) pa icle
s uc u e de elopmen esponse ime,and (3) heological esponse ime.
τ
=
Gγ,τ<τ
0(H)and
˙
γ
=
0
τ(H)=τ0(H)+η˙γ
OPEN
1Facul y o Mechanical Enginee ing, B no Uni e si y o Technology, B no, Czech Republic. 2Chai o
Magne o luiddynamics, Ins i u e o Mecha onic Enginee ing, Technische Uni e si a D esden, D esden,
Ge many. *email: Michal.kubik@ u b .cz
2
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scien i ic Repo s | (2022) 12:10612 | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41598-022-14718-5
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
The esea ch s udies o She man14 o Goldasz e al.15 show ha MR al e p essu e d op due o MR luid
yield s ess dec eases wi h he inc easing gap eloci y. A high eloci ies, his p essu e d op is app oaching o be
ze o. This s a emen is based on CFD (compu a ional luid dynamics) simula ions. This phenomenon is ela ed
o ansien heology connec ed wi h he de elopmen o he eloci y p o ile in he gap and is o en e e ed o
as he hyd odynamic luid esponse ime. Goncal es e al.16 expe imen ally de e mined ha he hyd odynamic
esponse ime is 0.73ms o magne ic ield 100kA/m and 0.53ms o magne ic ield 200kA/m. The comme cial
MRF-132LD (Lo d Co p., USA) was used in his s udy. Kubík e al.17 published simila s udy. This eam measu ed
he hyd odynamic esponse ime o MR luid MRF-132DG (Lo d Co p., USA) and anges om 0.4 o 1ms o a
selec ed gap size and a ange o magne ic ield s imuli. The eloci y p o ile de elopmen mechanism is simila o
MR luid and elec o heological (ER) luid18. Howe e , ER luid show as e esponse ime han MR al e. ER luid
is he suspension o ine elec ically ac i e pa icles in luid. This luid exhibi s a apid inc ease o luid yield s ess
unde he applica ion o an elec ic ield. Ga in e al.19 modelled he ansi ion om a ully de eloped Bingham
p o ile o a New onian low o ER luid. The yield s ess o ER luid was assumed o d op o ze o quicke han
he dissipa ion ene gy due o he de elopmen o he eloci y p o ile19. I can be s a ed ha his hyd odynamic
esponse ime is connec ed wi h high shea a es o as changes o he magne ic ield in al e mode.
The pa icle s uc u e de elopmen esponse ime is ela ed o he ime needed o he s uc u ing o pa icles
in he di ec ion o he magne ic ield wi hou he low condi ions o he MR luid. Jolly e al.20 p oposed an expe i-
men al me hod ha mic os uc u e o ma ion ime can be deduced om he ansien changes in he ela i e
magne ic pe meabili y o he MR luid. The chained pa icles a e assumed o ha e a highe magne ic pe meabili y
han he dispe sed. Two- ime esponses we e obse ed20. The i s a ibu es he connec ion wi h he ans e o
pa icles in o di e se chains (pai o ma ion) and he second (an o de o magni ude slowe ) connec ion wi h
he mig a ion o hese ini ial chains in o longe and s onge s uc u es. The esponse ime was be ween 5 and
10ms. A simila measu emen me hod was also published by Ho á h e al.21. Pei e al.22 s a ed ha he esponse
ime o d y MR luid was in he o de o µs by he model. This s a emen is based on simula ion esul s.
The heological esponse ime is connec ed wi h he s uc u ing pa icle’s ime and he de elopmen o shea
s ess in MR luid du ing he de o ma ion ( low). She man e al.23 c ea e a chain model o MR luid. This model
is based on one million pa icles. One esul o his pape is he shea s ess ime his o y on he s ep change o a
magne ic ield. Fo his da a, he heological esponse ime can be de e mined as oughly 0.4ms. The MR luid
had a olume pa icle ac ion o 25% and was unde he shea a e o 500 s−1. Laun and Gab iel24 de e mined
he esponse ime o MR luid o 2.8ms. They used sinusoidal exci a ion and he de e mined ime lag be ween
magne ic lux densi y and shea s ess. Kikuchi e al.25 examined he esponse ime o a s ep elec ic cu en and
in oduce non-dimensional esponse ime pa ame e . I can be expec ed ha he mechanism o chain o ma ion
in Elec o- heological (ER) luids and MR luids is simila . Koyanagi e al.26 de eloped a me hod o a measu e-
men esponse ime o ER luid. This eam expe imen ally de e mined he esponse ime as 0.95ms.
The in o ma ion abou he ansien beha iou o MR luid is limi ed. This issue is becoming mo e impo an
due o he de elopmen o MR de ices wi h a sho esponse ime7,27, whe e he limi ing pa is now he MR luid
i sel . The cu en design o he MR dampe achie ed a esponse ime o abou 1.2ms. In he cu en s a e o he
a , mo e s udies can be ound dealing wi h he esponse ime o MR luid7,12 han is p esen ed abo e. In hese
se e al cases, he au ho s measu ed he ime cons an o measu ing de ices ins ead o he ime cons an o MR
luid14. The heological esponse ime o MR o ER luid was jus expe imen ally de e mined in s udies24,26. Bo h
s udies p esen ed esponse ime jus o one expe imen al condi ion. The main aim o ou pape is o expe i-
men ally de e mine he heological esponse ime o MR luid and e alua ed he e ec o shea a e, magne ic
ield le el, and ca ie luid iscosi y. Ou esul s will be compa ed wi h he published analy ical app oach14.
Ma e ials and me hods
Desc ip ion o he measu ed phenomenon and measu ing me hods. The aim o he measu e-
men is o expe imen ally de e mine he ime cons an o MR luid in he shea mode ( om he inc ease in shea
s ess τ) on a apid change in he magne ic ield B. The p ocedu e o he expe imen is desc ibed in Fig.1. A
ime T1, he MR luid is loaded by gi en shea a es and he magne ic ield is o . A ime 0, he magne ic ield is
ac i a ed and, a ime T2, he magne ic ield is al eady a he maximum alue. Howe e , un il ime T3, he shea
s ess emains a he same le el as a ime T1. In he au ho ’s opinion, his delay is associa ed wi h pa icle s uc-
u e o ma ion in he MR luid. In eali y, he e a e no sepa a e single chains. Tha is jus a en a i e simpli ica-
ion. A ime T4, he e is a apid inc ease in shea s ess in he MR luid due o he de o ma ion o he pa icle
s uc u e. This is shown as il ing chains in he shea di ec ion bu he mechanisms o s uc u e ac u e a e mo e
complex. Gene ally, he simples dynamic sys em, ha can se e as an app oxima ion o he ansien beha io o
MR luid is a i s -o de sys em. The ansien esponse is exp essed by he ime cons an T63 (p ima y esponse
ime), which de e mines he ime when moni o ed o que (calcula ed shea s ess) achie ed 63.2% o he inal
con olled alue (s eady-s a e). This app oxima ion can be used o he desc ip ion o he dynamic beha iou o
MR ac ua o s28. In he case o heology measu emen , he MR luid can be desc ibed by a simple Maxwell model
and by Bingham cons i u i e equa ion. Fo s ep change on magne ic ield, he excep ed shea s ess esponse τ( )
would be:
whe e is ime. Mo e names o a a iable T63 can be ound in he li e a u e as swi ching ime24, esponse ime17
o heological esponse ime14. Howe e , he ansien esponse o MR luid exhibi s di e en beha iou han
he i s -o de sys em, see Fig.5. The e o e, we decided o de e mine hose ime cons an s in ou pape : (1) i s -
o de ime cons an T63 (0–63.2%) and (2) ise ime T90 (0–90%), see Fig.1. This esponse ime we e so-called
(1)
τ
( )=τ0

1−e−
T63

+η
˙γ
3
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scien i ic Repo s | (2022) 12:10612 | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41598-022-14718-5
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
heological esponse ime because i is connec ed wi h changes in he heology o MR luid. Those ime cons an s
we e selec ed due o a sui able compa ison o ou expe imen al da a wi h esul s om published pape s.
Expe imen al es ig. The expe imen al es ig is composed o an elec ic mo o wi h encode (1), de el-
oped heome e (2), load ine ia (3), le e (4), and o ce senso (5), see Fig.2A. The load ine ia accumula ed
ene gy o s abilize o a ion du ing he ac i a ion o MR luid using he magne ic ield (an inc ease mo o load).
The load ine ia had 4.6kg (momen ine ia 5900kg/mm2). The whole sys em is moun ed o a ionally and he
o que is measu ed by a o ce senso on he le e (52mm). The homemade heome e is composed o he o o
(a), s a o (b), and MR luid sample (c), see Fig.2. The elec omagne ic coil c ea es he magne ic lux (d) in he
magne ic ci cui (show in g ey). The gap size was 0.6mm, see Fig.2. The ansien beha iou o he heome e
is undamen al o he p ecise measu emen o MR luid esponse ime. The esponse ime o ha dwa e ( heom-
e e ) has o be as sho as possible and wo main sou ces we e iden i ied in he li e a u e: (1) eddy cu en s in
he magne ic ci cui 7, and (2) induc ance o he heome e elec omagne ic coil7. In ou heome e , we used so
magne ic composi e (SMC) ma e ial ( adema k Sin ex) o he magne ic ci cui o elimina e eddy cu en s.
SMC ma e ial is magne ic conduc i e and elec ic non-conduc i e ( esis i i y 280µΩm). The sui able design o
a magne ic ci cui wi h ou pa en ed cu en con olle allows a apid inc ease o elec ic cu en on he elec o-
magne ic coil (T63I = 0.21ms).
Me hodology measu emen . The aim o he expe imen s was o de e mine shea s ess in MR luid and
magne ic ield o e ime. The shea s ess τ was calcula ed om a ea and o que which was measu ed indi ec ly
based on da a om he o ce senso (MEG20) on he le e , see Fig.2. The o ce senso measu ing ange was
0–200N. The o ce ange (de o ma ion) was chosen o maximize sys em igidi y and only he i s 10% o he
ange was used o measu emen . The magne ic ield in he gap co esponds wi h he elec ic cu en cou se and
was measu ed by Fluke i30 cu en clamps. These wo signals we e eco ded and condi ioned wi h a sampling
equency o 200kHz by he Dewe on USB-50 analyze . The MFG-2120MA signal gene a o gene a es a squa e
wa e ol age signal which inpu s o he cu en con olle a a equency o 1Hz. Ou de eloped cu en con-
olle gene a es an elec ic cu en on he elec omagne ic coil wi h o e - ol age up o 100V. The measu emen
p ocedu e was as ollows: (1) 10s measu emen wi hou magne ic ield, and (2) 10s measu emen wi h he appli-
ca ion o he magne ic ield. This p ocedu e was necessa y o he elimina ion o non-cons an ic ion o ces in
he heome e and iscous o ces. Those phenomena can signi ican ly complica e he subsequen e alua ion o
esponse ime. The expe imen s we e conduc ed 5 imes unde he same condi ions. The da a was no il e ed bu
a e aged om aw da a. Then, he amp da a was no malized. All measu emen s we e pe o med a 25°C ± 1°C.
Me hodology e alua ion o esponse ime. The measu ed esponse ime o he magne ic ield (elec ic
cu en ) achie ed a alue o τ63I = 0.21ms and τ90I = 0.33ms, see Fig.4. In se e al cases o he ansien beha iou
o MR ac ua o s, his ime can be expec ed as a s ep change. In ou case, we canno make his simpli ica ion
because he expec ed esponse ime o MR luid om published models14 is in he same ime scale ( oughly
1.5ms). The e o e, i was necessa y o de e mine he ans e unc ion be ween he measu ed magne ic ield and
shea s ess in MR luid. We used a p ocess model o desc ibing he MR luid ansien esponse. The p ocess
Figu e1. Demons a ing measu ed me hod and de e mina ion o ime cons an s.
4
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scien i ic Repo s | (2022) 12:10612 | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41598-022-14718-5
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
model is popula o desc ibing sys em dynamics in many indus ial applica ions29. We used he so-called simple
SISO (Single Inpu , Single Ou pu ) p ocess model which is desc ibed by his ans e unc ion:
whe e
Kp
is he p opo ional gain,
Tp
is he ime cons an , and
Td
is dead ime. A simila app oach was used in
s udy26. The Ma lab Sys em iden i ica ion oolbox was used o he iden i ica ion o cons an s. The leng h o he
e alua ed sec ion was 20ms.
Magne o heological luid samples. The comme cial MR luid MRF-132DG supplied by Lo d Co p.,
MR luid MRHCCS4-A and MRHCCS4-B supplied by Liquids Resea ch, and MRC-C1L supplied by CK Ma e i-
als we e chosen as he samples, see Table1. These luids we e chosen because hey ha e a simila pa icle size and
a di e en iscosi y o he ca ie luid.
The iscosi y lis ed in he able was measu ed by he Haake Ro o isco 1 heome e , and de e mined as a slope
be ween 400 and 800 s−1. I should be no ed ha ca ie luid o MR luids exhibi s New onian beha iou bu MR
(2)
sys
=
K
p
1+T
p
se−Td
s
Figu e2. (A) Rheome e design wi h impo an dimensions (g ey, so magne ic composi e ma e ial;
o ange, coppe ; ligh blue, aluminium; yellow, MR luid sample, g een, s eel) and (B) magne ic lux densi y
measu emen in he gap.
Table 1. MR luid samples.
MRF-132DG MRHCCS4-A MRHCCS4-B MRC-C1L
Solid con en by weigh (%) 80.98 70 80 80
MR luid iscosi y a 40°C (Pas) 0.114 0.167 0.237 0.108
Ca ie luid iscosi y a 40°C/25°C (Pas) 0.011/0.018 0.03/0.051 0.03/0.051 0.008/0.011
A e age pa icle size (µm) Sphe ical 2.1 Sphe ical 1.8 Sphe ical 1.8 Sphe ical 1–5
5
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scien i ic Repo s | (2022) 12:10612 | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41598-022-14718-5
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
luids a e in gene al non-New onian. The pa icle sizes we e measu ed by a scanning elec on mic oscope, FEG
SEM ZEISS Ul a Plus, and analysed by sc ip using ools o pic u e analysis in Ma lab. Howe e , he in o ma-
ion abou pa icle size o MRC-C1L was aken om s udy30.
Magne ic model and expe imen al alida ion se ings. The da a om he magne ic model a e nec-
essa y o he gene aliza ion o measu ed esponse ime da a. The magne ic model was c ea ed in Ansys Elec-
onics Desk op 19.2. The geome y o he magne ic ci cui was simpli ied. The magne iza ion cu e o he mag-
ne ic ci cui ma e ial (SMC ma e ial) was ex ac ed om he da ashee o he supplie . The elec omagne ic coil
(70 u ns) ca ie was made o plas ic wi h ela i e pe meabili y 1. The lids we e made o aluminium also wi h
a ela i e pe meabili y o 1. The magne iza ion cu e o MR luid was aken om a MR luid supplie da ashee .
This model was necessa y o he calcula ion o MR luid magne iza ion M, which is an impo an inpu o he
calcula ion o Mason numbe Mn. The Mason numbe Mn is he a io o magne ic o ces o iscous o ces and is
usually used o he desc ip ion o MR luid’s beha iou a he mic oscopic le el31. The magne ome e F.W. Bell
5180 wi h an ul a hin ans e se p obe (STB1X-0201) was used o magne ic measu emen . The Fluke i30 cu -
en clamps we e used o elec ic cu en measu emen . These wo signals a e eco ded and condi ioned wi h
a sampling equency o 100Hz by a on -end Dewe on USB-50-USB2-8 connec ed o he lap op, see Fig.2B.
Resul s and discussion
Magne ic model alida ion. The compa ison o esul s o magne ic lux densi y B o e he elec ic cu en
om he magne ic model and expe imen wi h ai in he gap can be seen in Fig.3, le . Magne ic lux densi y
measu emen s in he gap we e pe o med o wo posi ions ha a e pe pendicula , see Fig.2B. The ag eemen
be ween model and expe imen is accep able. This expe imen ally e i ied model was used o he calcula ion o
magne iza ion M in he gap wi h MR luid. The esul s can be seen in Fig.3 igh . This da a is necessa y o he
calcula ion o Mason numbe Mn.
Con ol elec ic cu en signal. Fi s o all, i was necessa y o p ecisely desc ibe he exci a ion o MR
luid. I can be assumed ha he cou se o magne ic lux densi y in he MR luid copies he cou se o an elec ic
cu en due o he elimina ion o eddy cu en in he magne ic ci cui . This is ensu ed by a special design o he
heome e . The cou se o he elec ic cu en I in ime can be seen in Fig.4 o wo le els o elec ic cu en
Figu e3. The esul s om he magne ic model and expe imen o ai gap (le ), The calcula ed magne iza ion
M dependency o elec ic cu en I on he coil o di e en MR luids ( igh ).
Figu e4. The cou se o he elec ic cu en I in he ime o he inal alue o elec ic cu en 1 A (le ) and 2
A ( igh ).

6
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scien i ic Repo s | (2022) 12:10612 | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41598-022-14718-5
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
I. A as ise in he elec ic cu en I is achie ed by connec ing a highe ol age han esul s om he Ohm law
(o e - ol age me hod). When he equi ed elec ic cu en alue is achie ed, he cu en con olle s a s o
egula e a a equency o 8kHz. The e o e, he elec ic cu en exhibi s oscilla ions in ime a e 0.5ms. Nex ,
educing he elec ic cu en esponse ime was no possible due o he a ailable cu en con olle (maximum
100V) and heome e design (coil induc ance). The esponse ime (90%) o he elec ic cu en achie ed a alue
o
T90I=0.335
ms o elec ic cu en 1A and a alue o
T90I=0.365
ms o elec ic cu en 2 A, see Fig.4.
The selec ed cou ses o MR luid shea s ess in ime. The Fig.5A show he cou se o shea s ess
τ
and elec ic cu en I o e ime . The cou se o shea s ess
τ
exhibi s oscilla ions wi h a cons an equency
o 360Hz, which is connec ed wi h he na u al equency o some pa o he heome e . This hypo hesis was
e i ied by measu emen s using an accele ome e and e alua ion based on FFT (Fas Fou ie ans o m). The
measu ed equency was 337Hz ± 4.88Hz. The igh o Fig.5B he e ec o shea a e
˙γ
on he cou se o shea
s ess τ. Wi h he inc ease o shea a es
˙γ
, he esponse ime dec eases. An ini ial dead ime o 0.4ms can also
be seen, which is independen o he shea a e le el, see Fig.5B. I should be no ed ha his phenomenon may
be associa ed wi h an inc ease in he magne ic ield. The p e ious s udy26 measu ed a dead ime o 0.5ms o
ER luids and dead ime o 0.6ms o MR luid7, which is consis en wi h ou expe imen s. We assume ha he
measu ed dead ime o 0.4ms is ela ed o he chaining o e omagne ic pa icles (mic os uc u e o ma ion)
in he MR luid.
The e ec o shea a e on he heological esponse ime. The esponse imes shown in Fig.5C we e
de e mined om he expe imen al da a and e alua ed acco ding o a p ocess model. The ela ionship be ween
esponse ime and shea a e
˙γ
is nonlinea . The measu ed da a o esponse ime can be i ed by a powe -law
unc ion, see Fig.5C. The highe he shea a e, he sho e he esponse ime. The da a we e measu ed o he
same elec ic cu en (2 A), bu he magne iza ion o he luid sample was di e en . The esponse ime
T90
anges
om 5.5 o 1.9ms o shea a e
˙γ
om 11 o 218 s−1 (MRHCCS4-A and MRHCCS4-B). Wi hin he measu e-
men and e alua ion e o , i can be s a ed ha bo h luids a e iden ical in e ms o ansien esponse. The
e ec o pa icle concen a ion is he e o e nonsigni ican . MRF 132-DG and MRC-C1L luids exhibi a sho e
esponse ime
T90
han LR luids in he ange om 1.4 o 0.8ms. This is p obably due o he lowe iscosi y o he
ca ie liquid, which is abou 3 imes lowe . The Fig.5D shows he esponse ime
T63
dependen on shea a e
˙γ
.
The e can be seen he same end as in he case o 90%. Koyanagi e al.26 expe imen ally de e mined he esponse
ime
τ90
o ER luid as 0.95ms (dead ime + ime cons an ) which is nea o ou esul s. Lee e al.32 measu ed
Figu e5. (A) The selec ed shea s ess and elec ic cu en cou se o e ime o shea a e 39 s−1 and MRF 132-
DG, (B) he e ec o shea a e on he no malized cou se o shea s ess in MRF 132-DG; The e ec o shea a e
on esponse ime 90% (C), 63% (D) o di e en MR luids a he same elec ic cu en exci a ion o 2 A.
7
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scien i ic Repo s | (2022) 12:10612 | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41598-022-14718-5
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
esponse ime
τ63
as 5.1ms and
τ90
as 6.1ms o ER luid in shea mode (da a es ima ed om he publica ion
g aph). These alues a e sligh ly highe han he p esen ed da a in his pape . Laun and Gab iel24 measu ed he
MR luid esponse ime based on sinusoidal exci a ion. The expe imen de e mined he esponse ime
τ63
o MR
luid o 2.8ms ± 0.5ms a a shea a e o 100 s−1 a a magne ic lux densi y o 0.9T. This measu ed alue is abou
3 imes highe han he p esen ed esponse ime o Liquids Resea ch luids. Howe e , i can be s a ed ha he
di ec compa ison o esul s is complica ed because he measu ing sys ems a e no compa able. The s udies24,26
used pla e-pla e con igu a ion o s udy32 used o a ing cylinde .
E ec o magne iza ion and ca ie luid iscosi y on he heological esponse ime. The e ec
o luid magne iza ion M on he esponse ime T90 was demons a ed on MRHCCS4-B luid because he e ec o
magne iza ion M was mos no iceable. The luid was measu ed a h ee le els o magne iza ion M, see Fig.6, le .
Fo all h ee le els o magne iza ion M, he dependence on he shea a e
˙γ
is exponen ial. I can be s a ed ha he
highe he magne iza ion M o he MR luid, he lowe he esponse ime
T90
. This is consis en wi h he heo y.
The e ec o ca ie luid iscosi y η on esponse ime
T90
will be demons a ed on wo selec ed MR luids
(MRF 132-DG and MRHCCS4-B). These luids ha e simila pa icle concen a ions and di e en ca ie luid
iscosi ies η. The iscosi y o he MRHCCS4-B ca ie luid is app oxima ely 2.8 imes highe han he ca ie
luid o MRF 132-DG. The igh o Fig.6 shows ha an MR luid wi h a highe ca ie luid iscosi y η shows a
signi ican ly highe esponse ime
τ90
. I should be no ed ha he MR luids had he same magne iza ions M o
230 kA/m, bu di e en elec ic cu en exci a ion (MRF 132-DG elec ic cu en o 1.5 A; MRHCCS4-B elec ic
cu en o 2A). The e ec o addi i es o ca ie luid iscosi y was no conside ed he e.
Gene aliza ion o measu ed da a. She man14 s a ed ha MR luid esponse ime da a in shea mode can
be gene alized using non-dimensional esponse ime
T∗
and Mason numbe
Mn
. This s udy p o ided he equa-
ion o he calcula ion o non-dimensional esponse ime as:
T90
is he heological esponse ime (90%),
η
is he iscosi y o ca ie luid,
M
is MR luid magne iza ion and
µ0
is acuum pe meabili y. The Mason numbe can be calcula ed as ollow:
whe e
˙γ
is shea a e. The Non-dimensional esponse ime
T∗
and Mason numbe
Mn
we e calcula ed om meas-
u ed da a, see Fig.7. The mas e cu e can be de e mined om measu ed da a, see Fig.7— ed line. The esul s
show a signi ican di e ence be ween he published model14 and ou expe imen o Mn alues highe han 0.005.
The
T∗
and Mn was also e alua ed (es ima ed) om pape s24,26. This da a is ou o ange o ou measu emen .
Howe e , i should be no ed ha he da a ob ained om he expe imen a e only om s udy24. The di e ence in
he esul s may be due o (1) he model simpli ica ion and (2) inaccu acies in he measu emen and e alua ion o
he measu ed da a. I has been hypo hesized ha he di e ence may be due o he de o ma ion o he measu ing
de ice ( heome e ), which is no included in he model. This would esul in a signi ican inc ease in esponse
ime
T90
a low shea a es
˙γ
compa ed o he model.
Figu e8 shows a compa ison o he esponse ime
T90
cou se on shea a e
˙γ
om he She man model, p o-
posed model (Fig.7 ed) and om he expe imen o MRHCCS4-B. The ca ie luid iscosi y
η
, magne iza ion
M, shea a es
˙γ
a e he same o expe imen s and also o he model. I can be seen ha he esponse ime
T90
om expe imen s is signi ican ly lowe han ha om he model. Thus, i can be s a ed ha he possible de o -
ma ion o he measu ing de ice is no he sou ce o he di e ence be ween he expe imen and he model. The
di e ence can be explained by ce ain simpli ica ions o he model. Howe e , bo h cu es ha e an exponen ial
(3)
T
∗=
T
90
144η
M
2
µ0
(4)
M
n=
144η˙γ
M
2
µ0
Figu e6. The e ec o magne iza ion M (le ) and ca ie luid iscosi y η ( igh ) on esponse ime
T90
.
8
Vol:.(1234567890)
Scien i ic Repo s | (2022) 12:10612 | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41598-022-14718-5
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
cha ac e and he e o e he model desc ibes ends e y well. Ano he signi ican di e ence is ha measu ed
MR luid con ains addi i es ha a e no included in he model. The ques ion is how signi ican a di e ence can
c ea e his simpli ica ion. The su ace oughness can also a ec MR luid dynamics33. This is also no included
in he model, and can also play an impo an ole.
Conclusion
This pape deals wi h he expe imen al de e mina ion o magne o heological luid ansien esponse ( heological
esponse ime) on he apid change o a magne ic ield in shea load mode. A unique heome e was p esen ed
ha allows almos uni s ep o magne ic ields and also allows he measu ing o he de elopmen o MR luid
shea s ess o e ime. The ansien esponse was de e mined on ou MR luids ha di e in supplie , pa icle
concen a ion, o ca ie luid iscosi y. The pape also includes a magne ic model and i s expe imen al e i ica-
ion. The mos impo an conclusions o he pape a e he ollowing:
• The esponse ime o he magne ic ield is
T90I=0.335
ms and sligh ly inc eases wi h an inc easing maximum
alue o elec ic cu en .
• The ise o shea s ess exhibi s an ini ial dead ime o 0.4ms, which is independen o he shea a e le el.
• The alue o he shea a e signi ican ly in luences he heological esponse ime a low shea a es. The
highe he shea a e, he sho e he esponse ime. The measu ed da a o he esponse ime can be i ed by
a powe -law unc ion. The esponse ime
T90
anges om 5.5 o 1.9ms o shea a e
˙γ
om 11 o 218 s−1 o
MR luid MRHCCS4-A and MRHCCS4-B.
• The luid magne iza ion M signi ican ly a ec s he heological esponse ime. The highe he magne iza ion
M o he MR luid, he lowe he esponse ime
T90
.
• The ca ie luid iscosi y also a ec s he heological esponse ime. The MR luid wi h a highe ca ie luid
iscosi y
η
shows a signi ican ly highe esponse ime
T90
.
Figu e7. Dependency non-dimensional esponse ime
T∗
on Mason numbe
Mn
; Da a om o he publica ions
ha e been es ima ed acco ding o a ailable in o ma ion.
Figu e8. The compa ison o model and expe imen o he same inpu s (MRHCCS4-B, elec ic cu en 2 A).
9
Vol.:(0123456789)
Scien i ic Repo s | (2022) 12:10612 | h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41598-022-14718-5
www.na u e.com/scien i ic epo s/
• All measu ed da a was gene alized in he e m o non-dimensional esponse ime
T∗
and Mason numbe
Mn
.
One mas e cu e (T* = 4.1939Mn−0.35) can be de e mined om measu ed da a independen o magne iza ion
M, ca ie luid iscosi y
η
, shea a es
˙γ
, e c. This is an impo an conclusion because he mas e cu e allows
he de e mina ion o heological ime esponse o a gi en MR luid and gi en load (shea a es).
I should be no ed ha he ou expe imen ally de e mined mas e cu e shows a de ia ion om he model14.
MR luids used in he expe imen and model di e in he ype o concen a ion o addi i es ( he model does
no include addi i es), which may also a ec he ansien esponse. Fo his eason, a plan o u he esea ch
in his a ea is o de e mine he heological esponse ime o homemade MR luid ( ull con ol o addi i es) and
measu emen o a highe ange o Mason numbe s. We also see he po en ial o u u e esea ch in he a ea o
a pa icle chaining model ha allows he showing o pa icle mo ion du ing he s ep change o a magne ic ield.
Da a a ailabili y
The da a p esen ed in his s udy a e a ailable on eques om he co esponding au ho .
Recei ed: 29 Ap il 2022; Accep ed: 10 June 2022
Re e ences
1. Zhang, Y. e al. E ec o base oil lub ica ion p ope ies on magne o heological luids. Sma Ma e . S uc . 30, 095011 (2021).
2. Roupec, J. e al. In luence o clay-based addi i e on sedimen a ion s abili y o magne o heological luid. Sma Ma e . S uc . 30,
027001 (2021).
3. Gü gen, S., Li, W. & Kuşhan, M. C. The heology o shea hickening luids wi h a ious ce amic pa icle addi i es. Ma e . Des.
104, 312–319 (2016).
4. Rosa, W. O., Ve eda, F. & de Vicen e, J. T ibological beha io o glyce ol/wa e -based magne o heological luids in PMMA poin
con ac s. F on . Ma e . 6, 32 (2019).
5. Kuma , S., Sehgal, R., Wani, M. F. & Sha ma, M. D. S abiliza ion and ibological p ope ies o magne o heological (MR) luids:
A e iew. J. Magn. Magn. Ma e . 538, 168295 (2021).
6. Mo illas, J. R. & de Vicen e, J. Yielding beha io o model magne o heological luids. So Ma e 15, 3330–3342 (2019).
7. S ecke , Z., Jeniš, F., Kubík, M., Macháček, O. & Choi, S.-B. No el app oaches o he design o an ul a- as magne o heological
al e o semi-ac i e con ol. Ma e ials (Basel). 14, 2500 (2021).
8. Zhang, H., Zou, Z., Choi, S.-B. & Yang, X. Ac i e dispe sing mechanism o se led magne o heological luid ea u ing wi h o a y
blades and induc i e coils in win- ube dampe . Sma Ma e . S uc . 30, 067001 (2021).
9. Wang, H. & Bi, C. S udy o a magne o heological b ake unde comp ession-shea mode. Sma Ma e . S uc . 29, 017001 (2020).
10. Kubík, M., Pa líček, D., Macháček, O., S ecke , Z. & Roupec, J. A magne o heological luid sha seal wi h low ic ion o que.
Sma Ma e . S uc . 28, 047002 (2019).
11. Hegge , C. & Maas, J. Sma sealing o magne o heological luid ac ua o s. J. In ell. Ma e . Sys . S uc . 30, 689–700 (2019).
12. Yoon, D.-S., Kim, G.-W. & Choi, S.-B. Response ime o magne o heological dampe s o cu en inpu s in a semi-ac i e suspension
sys em: Modeling, con ol and sensi i i y analysis. Mech. Sys . Signal P ocess. 146, 106999 (2021).
13. S ecke , Z., Mazů ek, I., Roupec, J. & Klapka, M. In luence o MR dampe esponse ime on semiac i e suspension con ol e i-
ciency. Meccanica 50, 1949–1959 (2015).
14. She man, S. G. Magne o heological Fluid Dynamics o High Speed Ene gy Abso be s (Uni e si y o Ma yland, College Pa k, 2017).
h ps:// doi. o g/ 10. 13016/ M21P2M.
15. Gołdasz, J. & Sapiński, B. Insigh in o magne o heological shock abso be s. Insigh Magne o heol. Shock Abso be s h ps:// doi. o g/
10. 1007/ 978-3- 319- 13233-4 (2015).
16. Goncal es, F. D. Cha ac e izing he Beha io o Magne o heological Fluids a High Veloci ies and High Shea Ra es (Vi ginia Poly-
echnic Ins i u e and S a e Uni e si y, Blacksbu g, 2005).
17. Kubík, M. e al. Hyd odynamic esponse ime o magne o heological luid in al e mode: model and expe imen al e i ica ion.
Sma Ma e . S uc . 30, 125020 (2021).
18. Choi, Y.-T. & We eley, N. M. Assessmen o ime esponse cha ac e is ics o elec o heological and magne o heological dampe s.
In: (ed. Inman, D. J.) P oceedings o he Socie y o Pho o-Op ical Ins umen a ion Enginee s, SPIE - The In e na ional Socie y o
Op ical Enginee ing. 92–102 (Bellingham, WA, 2001). h ps:// doi. o g/ 10. 1117/ 12. 432693
19. Ga in, H. P., Hanson, R. D. & Filisko, F. E. Elec o heological dampe s, pa i: Analysis and design. J. Appl. Mech. 63, 669–675
(1996).
20. Jolly, M. R., Bende , J. W. & Ma he s, R. T. Indi ec measu emen s o mic os uc u e de elopmen in magne o heological luids.
In . J. Mod. Phys. B 13, 2036–2043 (1999).
21. Ho á h, B., Decsi, P. & Szalai, I. Measu emen o he esponse ime o magne o heological luids and e o luids based on he
magne ic suscep ibili y esponse. J. In ell. Ma e . Sys . S uc . 33, 918–927 (2022).
22. Pei, L. e al. Simula ions on he heology o d y magne o- heological luid unde a ious wo king modes. Sma Ma e . S uc . 31,
015031 (2022).
23. She man, S. G., Paley, D. A. & We eley, N. M. Massi ely pa allel simula ions o chain o ma ion and es uc u ing dynamics in
a magne o heological luid. In ASME 2011 Con e ence on Sma Ma e ials, Adap i e S uc u es and In elligen Sys ems, Volume 1
651–658 (ASMEDC, 2011). h ps:// doi. o g/ 10. 1115/ SMASI S2011- 5188
24. Laun, H. M. & Gab iel, C. Measu emen modes o he esponse ime o a magne o- heological luid (MRF) o changing magne ic
lux densi y. Rheol. Ac a 46, 665–676 (2007).
25. Kikuchi, T., Noma, J., Akaiwa, S. & Ueshima, Y. Response ime o magne o heological luid–based hap ic de ice. J. In ell. Ma e .
Sys . S uc . 27, 859–865 (2016).
26. Koyanagi, K. & Te ada, T. Time Response Model o ER Fluids o P ecision Con ol o Mo o s. J. In ell. Ma e . Sys . S uc . 21,
1517–1522 (2010).
27. Yoon, D.-S., Pa k, Y.-J. & Choi, S.-B. An eddy cu en e ec on he esponse ime o a magne o heological dampe : Analysis and
expe imen al alida ion. Mech. Sys . Signal P ocess. 127, 136–158 (2019).
28. Guan, X., Guo, P. & Ou, J. S udy o he esponse ime o MR dampe s. In: (eds. Leng, J., Asundi, A. K. & Ecke, W.) P oceedings o
SPIE - The In e na ional Socie y o Op ical Enginee ing 74930U (2009). h ps:// doi. o g/ 10. 1117/ 12. 840217
29. The Ma hWo ks, I. P ocess Models. h ps:// www. ma hw o ks. com/ help/ iden / p oce ss- models. h ml.
30. U ami, D. e al. Ma e ial cha ac e iza ion o a magne o heological luid subjec ed o long- e m ope a ion in dampe . Ma e ials
(Basel). 11, 2195 (2018).