scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Tremor, Uncertainty, Invention Europe and the sea

Abstract

In recent years the migrations that cross the sea around Europe call into question philosophy, which is urged to think about this Outside. How can we avoid an objective discourse, but also the offence of being too familiar with situations so different from our own, as European citizens? By calling into question the category of "intercessor" proposed by Deleuze, the artistic narrative can perhaps help us in this approach. The sea as a mobile territory can then be described in the tremor that animates it (Glissant), in the uncertainty that it implies (Melville), in the invention of a new space and of a new people that it could bring with it (Deleuze and Guattari). These three characteristics emerge in the work of video artist Laura Waddington, Border, as an example of invention and intercession that makes tremor and uncertainty visible

Read accessible full text

Tremor, Uncertainty, Invention Europe and the sea

Author: ANGELUCCI, Daniela
Publisher: CEAA/ESAP-CESAP
Year: 2021
Source: https://comum.rcaap.pt/bitstreams/738d7381-9ae2-411a-8392-eee5d85d9cd4/download
Machines, Spide s and Buccanee s
WALKING AROUND THE SUN. No es on Eu ope. The Dogma ic Sleep.
36
Uni e si à Roma T e - Dipa imen o di A chi e u a e Filoso ia
Roma T e Uni e si y - Depa men o Philosophy, communica ion and media s udies, Rome,I aly
ABSTRACT
T emo , Unce ain y,
In en ion Eu ope and he sea.
Daniela Angelucci
In ecen yea s he mig a ions ha c oss he sea a ound Eu ope call in o ques ion
philosophy, which is u ged o hink abou his Ou side. How can we a oid an objec i e
discou se, bu also he o ence o being oo amilia wi h si ua ions so di e en om
ou own, as Eu opean ci izens? By calling in o ques ion he ca ego y o "in e cesso "
p oposed by Deleuze, he a is ic na a i e can pe haps help us in his app oach.
The sea as a mobile e i o y can hen be desc ibed in he emo ha anima es i
(Glissan ), in he unce ain y ha i implies (Mel ille), in he in en ion o a new space
and o a new people ha i could b ing wi h i (Deleuze and Gua a i). These h ee
cha ac e is ics eme ge in he wo k o ideo a is Lau a Wadding on, Bo de , as an
example o in en ion and in e cession ha makes emo and unce ain y isible.
TREMOR, UNCERTAINTY, INVENTION EUROPE AND THE SEA
Daniela Angelucci 37
The si ua ion o Eu ope and i s bo de s is an u gen heme o ou p esen , calling philoso phy in o
ques ion. The mos u gen e en oday conce ns he mig a ions ha c oss he sea a ound Eu ope,
and i should o ce philosophy o hink. In 2016 mo e han 5000 mig an s died in he Medi e anean;
in 2017 mo e han 100,000 people landed in I aly, including abou 15,000 unaccompanied mino s;
3 Oc obe 2016, nea he island o Lampedusa, in Sicily, 366 pe sons died jus hal a mile om he
coas and om being sa ed.
In on o he Eu opean sea, c ossed by mig a ions, he i s s ep o philosophy should be o hink abou
he kind o na a i e ha we aim o legi imize in his espec . The ques ion is: How can we a oid an
objec i e discou se (wha Lacan called he discou se o uni e si y), bu also he o ense o an exces-
si e amilia i y wi h si ua ions so di e en om ou own si ua ion, so ha de han ou own si ua ion,
as Eu opean ci izens? To bo ow a concep om Deleuze and Gua a i, we can call in o ques ion he
ca ego y o "in e cesso ": becoming someone's in e cesso means ying a con inuous exchange o
poin s o iew, in an a ec i e, poli ical and s ylis ic adhe sion, ins ead o speaking in his/he place. The
heo e ical and poli ical sense o his concep – in e cession – is ha one o e u ing he claim o he
in ellec ual, o he philosophe , o speak o o he s, a ibu ing o himsel he igh o he du y o be
hei spokespe son. I quo e Deleuze, who asks: "Who speaks and who ac s? I is always a mul iplici y,
e en in he unique pe son who speaks o ac s”. This mul iplici y is wha p oduces a s amme ing, an
unce ain y, o Deleuze and Gua a i, a becoming-mino o he language.
In he no able book Mig ancy, Cul u e, Iden i y, Iain Chambe s alks abou hinking wi h mig a ion, and
emphasizes how hinking wi h mig a ion and no abou mig a ion means ques ioning ou posi ion
wi h espec o language, o ou his o y and cul u e. Thinking wi h mig a ions p omo es a di e en
ela ionship, mo e dis u bing, wi h ou own philosophical backg ound. Thus, i needs o gi e up
a mo e consequen ial, mo e s uc u ed a gumen a ion, o adhe e p ecisely o he unce ain y o
he i le, o be cap u ed and modi ied om he ou side and escape he pleasu e o objec i ica ion.
No o speak o anyone, no o be someone's ep esen a i e, bu nei he o emain a a dis ance: he
concep s p oduced in he encoun e be ween he e en o he sea c ossings and he philosophical
p ac ice p oduces a app oche men , an a ea o indisce nibili y, an in e cession. And maybe he a is ic
na a ion can help us in his app oach, maybe i can help us speak abou he sea and i s con empo a y
si ua ion wi hou aking a dis ance and a he same ime wi hou showing an excessi e amilia i y.
S a ing om a ious eadings, philosophical in he b oad sense bu , abo e all, li e a y and isual, I
p opose hen h ee cha ac e s o he sea, which speak o us o he con empo a y si u a ion and a
he same ime o he philosophical p ac ice and a new way (di e en , dis u bing, Chambe s would
say) o ela ing o i .
Thinking o he sea as a e i o y, analogous bu e y di e en om he land, he emo is he cha ac e is ic
ha we could use o exp ess in he i s place i s mobili y, i s luidi y. Bo owing a concep om Edoua d
Glissan ’s book, Pensée du emblemen , we can alk abou a " em bling hinking" ( emblemen in F ench
is also emblemen de e e, ea hquake, some hing ha no by chance has o do wi h he e i o y).
Agains e e y dogma ism Glissan opposes he a chipelagic hinking, which is declined as a emblemen ,
emo : in ac , such hinking does no aim a he cons i u ion o p econcei ed g ids o in e p e a ion o
Machines, Spide s and Buccanee s
WALKING AROUND THE SUN. No es on Eu ope. The Dogma ic Sleep.
38
eali y, bu adap s o an uns able pe cep ion o he wo ld in i s own modi ica ions. In he e hical ield,
he embling p ese es he desi e o and unce ain y in disco e ing he O he . I is a hinking ha
esis s he s i ening o sys emic hough s and he impe us o sys ems o hough ; i opens he iden i y
o he ela ionship wi h he O he , i is “ he seismic hinking o he wo ld” ha embles inside and
ou side o us. Glissan a i ms ha we a e “noble” enough, “magni icen ” and “wild”, and also, when
necessa y, “mise able”, when conside ing ou ela ionship o he O he and o he Wo ld as a emo .
T emo can be used o indica e he luidi y o wa e and he ippling o wa es, bu also he mo emen
o li es, bo h human and animal, ha popula e and c oss he sea. T emo desc ibes he i ali y o he
sea, i s mobili y bu also he ac ha i is ull o li ing beings, animals and humans. The emo he e
is closely linked o a poe ics o he ela ionship: he embling hinking also means li ing he open-
ness o he whole wo ld, a isk o embling, a isk o unce ain y.
The e a e many li e a y ex s abou he sea ha desc ibe i s unce ain y, he impossibili y o seeing wha
is hidden unde he su ace, he possibili y o shipw ecking, o dying while c ossing i . Ca l Schmi , in
his book Land and Sea, w i es ha Mel ille, wi h his Moby Dick, ep esen s o he oceans wha Home
and Odyssey ep esen ed o he Medi e anean. Well, in bo h cases he elemen ha cha ac e izes
he sea is ha o unce ain y. In he Odyssey, he sea has he colou o wine, i is in ini e, da k, ull o
ish, bu abo e all, wi h i s wa es and s o ms, i des oys any a emp by humans o ollow a ou e.
So, unce ain y is i s o all he unce ain y o he sea’s condi ions, gi en ha he mo emen o he sea
changes con inuously and suddenly. Bu unce ain y is also he unce ain y o ecogni ion: on he
su ace o he sea i is di icul o dis inguish who o wha may a ise ou o i : he whi e whale? he
si ens? an o e u ned dinghy? o a boa ull o humans beings? dead o ali e? The I alian w i e Elena
S ancanelli, in he book Venne alla spiaggia un assassino, desc ibes he expe ience in he au umn o
2018 aboa d he ship Ma e Jonio o he Medi e anean lee , p epa ed o in e ene in he sigh ing
and escue o mig an s. S ancanelli desc ibes e y well he unce ain y o he sigh ing, bu also he
unce ain y abou he na u e and in en ions o he O he coming om he sea (a e hese people in
need o escue o a e hey dange ous?), as well as he unce ain y o he su i al. A he beginning o
he book she w i es ha he Medi e anean Sea is illing up wi h dea hs, which is a so o quo a ion
ha e e s o Mel ille, ha de ined he sea loo – he Ocean in his case – as “a g ea ceme e y”. Bu
abo e all he sea’s unce ain y is ha o su i al: in he Odyssey Ulysses, du ing he s o ms unleashed
by Poseidon, o en complains abou he ea o no e u ning home. In he i h book, which ells he
depa u e om he island o Calypso and he pa h in o he sea be o e a i ing om he Phaeacians,
a he cou o Alcinous, Ulysses is despe a e du ing he s o m, and eg e s no ha ing died in he
wa , because dying a sea means no ha ing a bu ial, no ha ing ma ked g a es.
Howe e , i is p ecisely he ecogni ion o his unce ain y ha dic a es he app op ia e ules o conduc ,
he law o hospi ali y owa ds cas aways o hose who come om he sea: he s o ies o hospi ali y
owa ds shipw ecked people a e many in he Odyssey, bu pe haps he mos beau i ul e ses a e p es-
en in he Telemachy, a he beginning o he Odyssey, when Telemachus goes in sea ch o Odysseus
un il Spa a a he palace o Menelaus: he squi e asks Menelaus i he should accommoda e he wo
o eigne s o no , and Menelaus esponds disdain ully o he idea ha he e may e en be a doub .
TREMOR, UNCERTAINTY, INVENTION EUROPE AND THE SEA
Daniela Angelucci 39
Telemachus and Nes o 's son a e washed, w apped in beau i ul obes and sea ed on wo h ones,
hen ed and quenched wi h wa e . Only hen a e ques ions asked abou hei iden i y.
The hi d cha ac e ha I p opose, e e ing o Deleuze and Gua a i, is ha o he in en ion o a new
space and a new people. Meanwhile, he idea o he in en ion o a new space mus be aken se iously:
he expe ience o hose bodies ha come om A ica li e ally c ea es a e i o y, a pa h ha was no
he e be o e. Unce ain y in ac leads o he sea ch o an escape ou e, which, as Hen i Labo i
w i es in L'éloge de la ui e (1976), is no only some imes he only sal a ion, bu also he possibili y
o gaining "unknown sho es". The in en ion o a new, mino , nomadic people, which is missing, is a
poli ical, a is ic and philosophical ask o Deleuze and Gua a i. Using Glissan 's eading o Deleuze
and Gua a i, we could say i is a ma e o in en ing and no c ea ing, i by c ea ing we mean a u u e
al eady included in he p esen . Ins ead, his in en ed people is always a “becoming people", i is
in con inuous change. In a , bu also in philosophy and poli ics, he in en ion o a people can only
ake place by aking a mino posi ion, ejec ing he g ea e canon. F om he poin o iew o he wo
F ench au ho s, mino i y and majo i y do no cons i u e hemsel es on a quan i a i e le el, bu on
he basis o an opposi ion o he o me o he majo i y cha ac e o he managemen and o gan-
iza ion o socie y. Majo i y is de ined h ough cons ancy, homogenei y, cen ali y and uni ica ion,
mino i y is ins ead he diso ien ing, plas ic and de e i o ializing elemen o he sys em.
Iain Chambe s, who I quo ed be o e, in i es us o hink wi h he e en o mig a ions, highligh ing wha
he sea as a e i o y and as a bo de can each philosophy. Tha hese h ee concep s – emo , unce -
ain y, in en ion – can desc ibe he sea as a bounda y migh also be p oposed as cha ac e is ics o
philosophical wo k, exposing he la e o isk, accep ing he possibili ies o e ed by unce ain y,
gi ing space o in en ion.
An example o a is ic in en ion, a ilmic one, in which hese h ee cha ac e is ics eme ge clea ly is he
ilm o he English ideo-a is Lau a Wadding on, Bo de , a g ea success a he Loca no Film Fes i-
al in 2004. The ilm seems o be a pe ec example o an in en ion and an in e cession ha makes
isible emo and unce ain y. I seems o me o be pa icula ly sui able o his occasion p ecisely
because o he cha ac e is ics o he sea as a bounda y, ha I ha e spoken so a . Wadding on has a
li e a y backg ound – and maybe his is signi ican in espec o he kind o na a i e ha she chose.
She a elled o Ku dis an, Middle Eas , and he Balkans, esea ching e ugee ou es in o Eu ope,
and in 2002 she li ed o a ew mon hs in he coun yside a ound he Red C oss camp in Sanga e,
a small F ench own in he No d-Pas de Calais egion, e using o join he go e nmen -au ho ised
news media linked o he Red C oss. The e she closely ollowed A ghan and I aqi e ugees who we e
ying o pass h ough he unde wa e unnel linking F ance o he Uni ed Kingdom. Joining he
mig an s wi h a small DV came a, Wadding on ilmed hei nigh ly ou ines, escape a emp s, uns
h ough he camps, wai s, police ep ession and clashes o e he closu e o he camp. The sea he e is
eally a bo de , o a he a wall o be c ossed, an objec o desi e ha is ne e seen. Fo he na a ion,
Wadding on p oposes a non-objec i e na a ion; she pa icipa es and pu s he sel a isk, no in e -
iewing, bu unning, unning away wi h he e ugees. I is no , he e o e, a ace- o- ace con on a ion
wi h eali y, bu a he an in e cession, an a ec i e adhesion, as i he a is is looking o a dele ion
o he subjec i e gaze, in o de o become pa o hose si ua ions.
Machines, Spide s and Buccanee s
WALKING AROUND THE SUN. No es on Eu ope. The Dogma ic Sleep.
40
The emo : The images, always sho in he da k and in slow mo ion, a e g ainy, con used, licke ing.
The emo o li e ha swa ms and mo es in he da k, highligh ed by he emo and lashes o he
same images is also no iced by Geo ges Didi-Hube man in his book Su i ance des lucioles (2009),
which ci es Wadding on, along wi h Jean-Luc Goda d and Claude Lanzmann, acing he lines o a
su i al policy: “Wadding on's images a e like i e lies sligh ly pie cing he da kness o he e hical
oid in o which con empo a y socie y seems o be plunged”. The unce ain y: he ilm ecoun s
he unce ain y o hese li es; i is abou ying a chance ha is o en a ailu e; losing he people
who a el wi h you; isking hei li es. This unce ain y o he sea, o he expe ience o he bo de
in his case, is shown in all i s scope in his powe ul and diso ien ing ideo. Finally, he in en ion:
di e en om con en ional na a i e cinema, bu a beyond he o malism o some expe imen-
al cinema, Wadding on shoo s and edi s hese images in en ing a new, di e en way o ell he
expe ience o he bo de s.

41
Daniela Angelucci is an Associa e P o esso o Aes he ics a Roma T e Uni e si y. She is co-di ec o o
he Pos -g adua e cou se in En i onmen al Humani ies a Roma T e (Depa men s o Philosophy and
A chi ec u e). She has been in he P esidency Boa d o Socie à I aliana di Es e ica. She is Ad iso o
Philosophy and Cinema o Enciclopedia I aliana (T eccani). She is co-di ec o o he se ies Sgua di uo i
campo (Mimesis edizioni); membe o he scien i ic boa d o he se ies Es e ica e c i ica (Quodlibe );
membe o Scien i ic Commi ee o he jou nal La Deleuziana; managing edi o o Lebenswel and Colloquia
philosophica. In 2016 she o ganized he 9 h Deleuze S udies Con e ence. Las books: Deleuze e i conce i
del cinema, 2012 (Engl. ansl. Edinbu gh Uni e si y P ess, 2014); Filoso ia del cinema, 2013; Philosophical
Essays on Nespolo’s A and Cinema, co-ed. D. Dal Sasso, 2018.
TREMOR, UNCERTAINTY, INVENTION EUROPE AND THE SEA
Daniela Angelucci