scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Functionality and Quality of Life with Parkinson’s Disease after Use of a Dynamic Upper Limb Orthosis: A Pilot Study

Abstract

This study was supported by grants for the financing of research projects in biomedicine, health management and social health care approved by the Regional Health Management of the Junta de Castilla y León (No. EXP. GRS2020/A/19). Regional Health Management of Castilla y León–Sacyl GRS/2010/A/19.

Read accessible full text

Functionality and Quality of Life with Parkinson’s Disease after Use of a Dynamic Upper Limb Orthosis: A Pilot Study

Author: Jiménez Barrios, María,González Bernal, Jerónimo,Cubo Delgado, Esther,Gabriel Galán, José María,García López, Beatriz,Berardi, Anna,Tofani, Marco,Galeoto, Giovanni,Matthews, Martin J. A.,Santamaría Peláez, Mirian,González Santos, Josefa
Publisher: MDPI
Year: 2023
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20064995
Source: https://riubu.ubu.es/bitstream/10259/8838/1/Jimenez-ijerph_2023.pdf
Ci a ion: Jiménez-Ba ios, M.;
González-Be nal, J.; Cubo, E.;
Gab iel-Galán, J.M.; Ga cía-López, B.;
Be a di, A.; To ani, M.; Galeo o, G.;
Ma hews, M.J.A.; San ama ía-Peláez,
M.; e al. Func ionali y and Quali y o
Li e wi h Pa kinson’s Disease a e
Use o a Dynamic Uppe Limb
O hosis: A Pilo S udy. In . J.
En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2023,20,
4995. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/
ije ph20064995
Academic Edi o : Al onsina D’Io io
Recei ed: 20 No embe 2022
Re ised: 4 Ma ch 2023
Accep ed: 7 Ma ch 2023
Published: 12 Ma ch 2023
Copy igh : © 2023 by he au ho s.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land.
This a icle is an open access a icle
dis ibu ed unde he e ms and
condi ions o he C ea i e Commons
A ibu ion (CC BY) license (h ps://
c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/
4.0/).
In e na ional Jou nal o
En i onmen al Resea ch
and Public Heal h
A icle
Func ionali y and Quali y o Li e wi h Pa kinson’s Disease a e
Use o a Dynamic Uppe Limb O hosis: A Pilo S udy
Ma ía Jiménez-Ba ios 1, Je ónimo González-Be nal 1,* , Es he Cubo 2, JoséMa ía Gab iel-Galán2,
Bea iz Ga cía-López 3, Anna Be a di 4, Ma co To ani 4, Gio anni Galeo o 4, Ma in J. A. Ma hews 5,
Mi ian San ama ía-Peláez 1and Jose a González-San os 1
1Depa men o Heal h Sciences, Uni e si y o Bu gos, 09001 Bu gos, Spain
2Neu ology Se ice, Bu gos Uni e si y Hospi al, 09006 Bu gos, Spain
3Neu ophysiology Se ice, Bu gos Uni e si y Hospi al, 09006 Bu gos, Spain
4Depa men o Human Neu osciences, Uni e si y o la Sapienza, 00188 Rome, I aly
5Facul y o Heal h, School o Heal h P o essions Peninsula Allied Heal h Cen e, Uni e si y o Plymou h,
De i o d Rd., Plymou h PL6 8BH, UK
*Co espondence: [email p o ec ed]; Tel.: +34-606363553
Abs ac :
Pa kinson’s disease (PD) is a ch onic, neu odegene a i e mo emen diso de , whose
symp oms ha e a nega i e impac on quali y o li e and unc ionali y. Al hough i s main ea men is
pha macological, non-pha macological aids such as he dynamic elas ome ic ab ic o hosis (DEFO)
me i an e alua ion. Ou objec i e is o assess he DEFO in uppe limb (UL) unc ional mobili y and
in he quali y o li e o PD pa ien s. A o al o 40 pa ien s wi h PD pa icipa ed in a andomized
con olled c osso e s udy, and we e assigned o a con ol g oup (CG) and o an expe imen al g oup
(EG). Bo h g oups used he DEFO o wo mon hs, he expe imen al g oup he i s wo mon hs o
he s udy and he con ol g oup he las wo. Mo o a iables we e measu ed in he ON and OFF
s a es a he baseline assessmen and a wo mon hs. Di e ences om he baseline assessmen we e
obse ed in some mo o i ems o he Kinesia assessmen , such as es emo , ampli ude, hy hm o
al e na ing mo emen s in he ON and OFF s a es wi h and wi hou o hosis. No di e ences we e
ound in he uni ied Pa kinson’s disease a ing scale (UPDRS) o he PD quali y-o -li e ques ionnai e.
The DEFO imp o es some mo o aspec s o he UL in PD pa ien s bu his does no ansla e o he
amelio a ion o he s anda d o unc ional and quali y-o -li e scales.
Keywo ds:
Pa kinson’s disease; dynamic elas ome ic ab ic o hosis; unc ionali y; quali y o li e;
non-pha macological ea men
1. In oduc ion
In he Global Bu den o Diseases, Inju ies and Risk Fac o s (GBD) s udy conduc ed in
2016, i was es ima ed ha be ween he yea s 1990 and 2016 he numbe o people a ec ed
by Pa kinson’s disease (PD) doubled wo ldwide, wi h an incidence a e o 8 o 18 people
pe 100,000 pe yea [
1
]. PD is de ined as a ch onic, neu odegene a i e mo emen diso de ,
whose mos cha ac e is ic mo o symp oms a e es ing emo , igidi y, and b adykinesia.
Res ing emo is cha ac e ized by a p ominen in olun a y, hy hmic muscle mo emen
in he dis al uppe limb (UL) a a equency o abou 4 o 6 Hz. Rigidi y is an inc eased
esis ance o passi e mo emen . The hi d mos cha ac e is ic symp om is b adykinesia,
cha ac e ized by slow mo emen and di icul y planning, ini ia ing, and ca ying ou a
mo emen [
2
]. O he non-mo o symp oms such as sleep p oblems, cons ipa ion, anxie y,
dep ession and a igue may also appea [3]
The mo o and non-mo o symp oms o PD ha e nega i e epe cussions on he quali y
o li e and unc ionali y o people wi h he disease. The bu den o mo o symp oms
and impai men o some ac i i ies o daily li ing (ADLs), such as ea ing, hygiene and
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2023,20, 4995. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/ije ph20064995 h ps://www.mdpi.com/jou nal/ije ph
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2023,20, 4995 2 o 12
clo hing, ela ed o al e a ions in unc ional mobili y, has been iden i ied as one o he majo
p edic o s o quali y o li e wi h his disease [4–6].
Following he pe spec i e o he In e na ional Classi ica ion o Func ioning and Dis-
abili y (ICF) o he Wo ld Heal h O ganiza ion (WHO), h ee in e connec ed le els o
human unc ioning a e di e en ia ed: (1) Body unc ions and s uc u es, physiological
and psychological unc ions, and bodily and ana omical impai men s; (2) Limi a ions in
he pe o mance o ac i i ies; and (3) Res ic ions in pa icipa ion in daily li e [
7
,
8
]. The
p og ession o PD leads o al e a ions in body unc ion, limi ed pe o mance o ADLs and
inc eased dependence, while educing quali y o li e [4,8–10].
As he disease p og esses, he wo sening o symp oms, such as emo , igidi y and
b adykinesia, leads o a de e io a ion o manual dex e i y, which ansla es o a g ea e
di icul y in pe o ming some ADLs. The mos commonly epo ed basic sel -ca e ac i i ies
a ec ed by PD symp oms a e ba hing/showe ing, d essing, and g ooming/pe sonal hy-
giene. O he ins umen al ac i i ies o daily li ing ha a e a ec ed a e d i ing, p epa ing
ood, shopping, and w i ing [
11
]. The e o e, he p esence o hese symp oms is closely
ela ed o a poo e quali y o li e [5,12].
The ea men o PD is mainly based on he adminis a ion o le odopa, whose e icacy
dec eases o e ime and can p oduce side e ec s such as mo o luc ua ions, dyskinesias
and dopamine gic dys egula ion synd ome. The onse o he disease and he a ie y o
possible symp oms makes i di icul o design a he apeu ic egimen o he ea men o
he disease. So a , app o ed he apies ha e ocused on compensa o y app oaches aimed
a ea ing clinical symp oms. Howe e , he cu en esea ch is ocused on delaying o
hal ing disease p og ession and no only on empo a y symp oma ic elie . Cu en ly, all
he apies a e di ec ed owa d amelio a ing mo o de ici s by inc easing dopamine, bu
un o una ely, his loses e icacy o e ime as dopamine gic neu odegene a ion p og esses,
wi h symp oms wo sening in he long- e m. The e o e, new non-pha macological he apies
need o be assessed [13–15].
The e a e se e al non-pha macological he apies design o educe unc ional impai -
men s o his disease and, al hough e idence o hei e icacy is inc easing, he e is s ill a
limi ed numbe o s udies on hem and on he necessa y in e en ion doses [
16
,
17
]. New
non-pha macological he apies ha can be easily implemen ed can complemen pha ma-
cological ea men in o de o imp o e he pa ien s’ unc ional mobili y and quali y o li e.
In his ega d, he dynamic elas ome ic ab ic o hoses (DEFO, Figu e 1) may be a sui able
candida e o educing mo o symp oms and imp o ing unc ional mo emen and quali y
o li e in pa ien s wi h PD. These ypes o de ices we e de eloped by dynamic mo emen
o hoses®, led by clinical o hopedis and managing di ec o Ma in Ma hews. They a e
cus om-designed de ices o he use ’s limbs o o he pa s o his/he body. Th ough
he applica ion o ac ion o ces, hey b ing he limb in o a be e biomechanical align-
men , while allowing and guiding mo emen . The elas ic ab ic p omo es he ex ension
o inge s and w is , he s abili y o he humb and he supina ion o p ona ion o he
o ea m. In addi ion, due o he localized comp ession o he so issues and he s imula-
ion o he de mal and p op iocep i e ecep o s, i is possible o egula e mo o ac i i y,
a oiding a ophy and muscle igidi y, imp o ing he pa ien ’s quali y o li e [
18
,
19
]. These
o hoses, compa ed o o he o hopedic de ices, ha e demons a ed be e ole ance and
high use sa is ac ion [20–22].
This ype o de ice has been e ec i e in child en wi h ce eb al palsy (CP). In he s udy
conduc ed by Pa ão e al., he use, by child en wi h CP, o a es made o his ma e ial
showed be e pos u al s abili y when pe o ming a manual eaching ac i i y [
23
], and in
ano he s udy, i showed imp o ed balance, pos u al con ol, and manual dex e i y [
24
].
On he o he hand, wea ing hese de ices on he oo and ankle imp o ed balance and
walking speed in mul iple scle osis [
25
,
26
], and pain and unc ion in pa ien s su e ing wi h
complex egional pain synd ome (CRPS) [
16
]. S oke has been he condi ion in which he
use o his UL o hosis has been mos in es iga ed, and se e al s udies ha e shown posi i e
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2023,20, 4995 3 o 12
e ec s on s eng h, manual dex e i y, and UL unc ionali y, which need o be con i med in
s udies wi h la ge sample sizes [27,28].
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2023, 20, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 o 12
Figu e 1. DEFO implemen ed in a pa ien wi h PD.
This ype o de ice has been e ec i e in child en wi h ce eb al palsy (CP). In he
s udy conduc ed by Pa ão e al., he use, by child en wi h CP, o a es made o his ma-
e ial showed be e pos u al s abili y when pe o ming a manual eaching ac i i y [23],
and in ano he s udy, i showed imp o ed balance, pos u al con ol, and manual dex e i y
[24]. On he o he hand, wea ing hese de ices on he oo and ankle imp o ed balance
and walking speed in mul iple scle osis [25,26], and pain and unc ion in pa ien s su e -
ing wi h complex egional pain synd ome (CRPS) [16]. S oke has been he condi ion in
which he use o his UL o hosis has been mos in es iga ed, and se e al s udies ha e
shown posi i e e ec s on s eng h, manual dex e i y, and UL unc ionali y, which need
o be con i med in s udies wi h la ge sample sizes [27,28].
DEFOs ha e no ye been in es iga ed in in a wide ange o mo o a iables in PD.
In he ecen e iew, conduc ed by Son Nguyen, s udies o di e en ypes o po able o -
hoses o UL emo supp ession we e assessed, he majo i y being ac i e o hoses (45%),
ollowed by semi-ac i e o hoses (35%), and passi e o hoses (20%). All o hoses ha e
p o en o be e ec i e in supp essing emo s, bu se e al had incon eniencies such as
being hea y and bulky, had no been e alua ed in labo a o y se ings o we e no ye
comme cially a ailable [29].
Al hough cu en o hoses ha e p o en o be e ec i e in supp essing emo , hei
clinical o home use is s ill limi ed. This limi ed hei clinical o home use o supp essing
emo . Gi en hese o me esul s and lack o s udies in PD, ou main objec i e was o
analyze he e icacy o a ligh e de ice o he UL, such as he DEFO, in mo o a iables,
unc ional mobili y and quali y o li e in PD.
2. Ma e ials and Me hods
2.1. Pa icipan s
A longi udinal c osso e s udy, wi h a con ol g oup and an expe imen al g oup,
was ca ied ou . Pa icipan s wi h PD we e ec ui ed by consecu i e non-p obabili y sam-
pling om Sep embe o Oc obe 2021. The inclusion c i e ia we e: male and emale pa-
ien s diagnosed wi h PD, who, du ing he ec ui men pe iod, we e a ending he Neu-
ology Depa men o he Bu gos Uni e si y Hospi al, in any o he s ages o se e i y o
he disease, who had emo and igidi y as a consequence o he disease in a leas one o
he UL. Pa ien s whose emo was a consequence o ano he associa ed disease acco ding
o he neu ologis ’s judgmen o /and hose wi h sco es less han o equal o 26 on he
Mon eal cogni i e assessmen (MoCA) we e excluded [30].
The diagnosis o PD was es ablished ollowing he c i e ia es ablished by he In e -
na ional Pa kinson and Mo emen Diso de Socie y. The p e equisi e o he applica ion
o hese c i e ia is he p esence o b adykinesia in combina ion wi h es ing emo , igid-
i y o bo h. In addi ion, a leas wo o he ou suppo ing c i e ia had o be me : es ing
emo , d ama ic imp o emen wi h dopamine gic he apy, occu ence o dyskinesias as
Figu e 1. DEFO implemen ed in a pa ien wi h PD.
DEFOs ha e no ye been in es iga ed in in a wide ange o mo o a iables in PD.
In he ecen e iew, conduc ed by Son Nguyen, s udies o di e en ypes o po able
o hoses o UL emo supp ession we e assessed, he majo i y being ac i e o hoses (45%),
ollowed by semi-ac i e o hoses (35%), and passi e o hoses (20%). All o hoses ha e
p o en o be e ec i e in supp essing emo s, bu se e al had incon eniencies such as
being hea y and bulky, had no been e alua ed in labo a o y se ings o we e no ye
comme cially a ailable [29].
Al hough cu en o hoses ha e p o en o be e ec i e in supp essing emo , hei
clinical o home use is s ill limi ed. This limi ed hei clinical o home use o supp essing
emo . Gi en hese o me esul s and lack o s udies in PD, ou main objec i e was o
analyze he e icacy o a ligh e de ice o he UL, such as he DEFO, in mo o a iables,
unc ional mobili y and quali y o li e in PD.
2. Ma e ials and Me hods
2.1. Pa icipan s
A longi udinal c osso e s udy, wi h a con ol g oup and an expe imen al g oup, was
ca ied ou . Pa icipan s wi h PD we e ec ui ed by consecu i e non-p obabili y sampling
om Sep embe o Oc obe 2021. The inclusion c i e ia we e: male and emale pa ien s
diagnosed wi h PD, who, du ing he ec ui men pe iod, we e a ending he Neu ology
Depa men o he Bu gos Uni e si y Hospi al, in any o he s ages o se e i y o he
disease, who had emo and igidi y as a consequence o he disease in a leas one o
he UL. Pa ien s whose emo was a consequence o ano he associa ed disease acco ding
o he neu ologis ’s judgmen o /and hose wi h sco es less han o equal o 26 on he
Mon eal cogni i e assessmen (MoCA) we e excluded [30].
The diagnosis o PD was es ablished ollowing he c i e ia es ablished by he In e na-
ional Pa kinson and Mo emen Diso de Socie y. The p e equisi e o he applica ion o
hese c i e ia is he p esence o b adykinesia in combina ion wi h es ing emo , igidi y
o bo h. In addi ion, a leas wo o he ou suppo ing c i e ia had o be me : es ing
emo , d ama ic imp o emen wi h dopamine gic he apy, occu ence o dyskinesias
as a consequence o le odopa o ol ac o y loss, o ca diac sympa he ic dene a ion on
myoca dial scin ig aphy [31,32].
Each pa icipan signed a w i en in o med consen app o ed by he Clinical Resea ch
E hics Commi ee o he Heal h A ea o Bu gos and So ia (Spain) wi h e e ence numbe
CEIM-2119/2019 be o e pa icipa ing in he p esen s udy (ClinicalT ials.go es numbe :
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2023,20, 4995 4 o 12
NCT04815382). Likewise, he s udy was conduc ed in acco dance wi h he e hical p inciples
se o h in he Decla a ion o Helsinki [33].
2.2. P ocedu es
The calcula ion o he sample size was based on he emo and igidi y imp o emen
as he main a iables o he s udy. Gi en alpha isk o 0.05 and a be a isk o 0.20, in
bila e al con as , i is es ima ed ha 40 pa icipan s (20 o each g oup) we e equi ed o
de ec a minimum di e ence o 0.50 in he igidi y and emo sco es o he mos a ec ed
UL using he uni ied Pa kinson’s disease a ing scale, mo o subscale pa III (UPDRS) [
34
].
Conside ing he 10% d opou a e du ing ollow-up, a o al sample o 40 pa ien s was
deemed necessa y.
Using he Epida 4.2 p og am, pa icipan s we e andomly assigned o he expe i-
men al g oup (EG) o he con ol g oup (CG). The EG ea men p o ocol consis ed o
implemen ing he DEFO in he mos a ec ed UL o wo mon hs (in e en ion pe iod),
whe eas subjec s in he CG led li e as usual du ing he i s wo mon hs (con ol pe iod).
One mon h p io o he implemen a ion o he DEFO, measu emen s o he size and pos u e
o he UL we e conduc ed o he cus omiza ion o he o hosis in he pa icipan s o bo h
g oups. A he i s isi , he sociodemog aphic and clinical da a o he pa icipan s we e
collec ed, and hei ul ilmen o he inclusion c i e ia was ensu ed. The pa icipan s we e
ins uc ed o main ain hei p esc ibed dopamine gic medica ion egimen. The e ec s o
he DEFO we e e alua ed du ing he ON s a e (unde he bene i o le odopa) and du ing
he OFF s a e (1 h be o e he nex le odopa in ake).
Mo o assessmen s we e conduc ed in he EG, a he end o he DEFO implemen a ion
pe iod. Then, he DEFO was wi hd awn and a second assessmen was conduc ed
wo mon hs
la e o e alua e i a ca y-o e e ec was main ained du ing ha ime (Figu e 2).
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2023, 20, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 o 12
a consequence o le odopa o ol ac o y loss, o ca diac sympa he ic dene a ion on myo-
ca dial scin ig aphy [31,32].
Each pa icipan signed a w i en in o med consen app o ed by he Clinical Re-
sea ch E hics Commi ee o he Heal h A ea o Bu gos and So ia (Spain) wi h e e ence
numbe CEIM-2119/2019 be o e pa icipa ing in he p esen s udy (ClinicalT ials.go es
numbe : NCT04815382). Likewise, he s udy was conduc ed in acco dance wi h he e hical
p inciples se o h in he Decla a ion o Helsinki [33].
2.2. P ocedu es
The calcula ion o he sample size was based on he emo and igidi y imp o emen
as he main a iables o he s udy. Gi en alpha isk o 0.05 and a be a isk o 0.20, in bila -
e al con as , i is es ima ed ha 40 pa icipan s (20 o each g oup) we e equi ed o de ec
a minimum di e ence o 0.50 in he igidi y and emo sco es o he mos a ec ed UL
using he uni ied Pa kinson’s disease a ing scale, mo o subscale pa III (UPDRS) [34].
Conside ing he 10% d opou a e du ing ollow-up, a o al sample o 40 pa ien s was
deemed necessa y.
Using he Epida 4.2 p og am, pa icipan s we e andomly assigned o he expe i-
men al g oup (EG) o he con ol g oup (CG). The EG ea men p o ocol consis ed o im-
plemen ing he DEFO in he mos a ec ed UL o wo mon hs (in e en ion pe iod),
whe eas subjec s in he CG led li e as usual du ing he i s wo mon hs (con ol pe iod).
One mon h p io o he implemen a ion o he DEFO, measu emen s o he size and pos-
u e o he UL we e conduc ed o he cus omiza ion o he o hosis in he pa icipan s o
bo h g oups. A he i s isi , he sociodemog aphic and clinical da a o he pa icipan s
we e collec ed, and hei ul ilmen o he inclusion c i e ia was ensu ed. The pa icipan s
we e ins uc ed o main ain hei p esc ibed dopamine gic medica ion egimen. The e -
ec s o he DEFO we e e alua ed du ing he ON s a e (unde he bene i o le odopa) and
du ing he OFF s a e (1 h be o e he nex le odopa in ake).
Mo o assessmen s we e conduc ed in he EG, a he end o he DEFO implemen a-
ion pe iod. Then, he DEFO was wi hd awn and a second assessmen was conduc ed wo
mon hs la e o e alua e i a ca y-o e e ec was main ained du ing ha ime (Figu e 2).
Figu e 2. S udy low cha . DEFO: dynamic elas ome ic ab ic o hoses.
Figu e 2. S udy low cha . DEFO: dynamic elas ome ic ab ic o hoses.
Se e al assessmen ools we e adminis e ed o e alua e he unc ional ac i i y, quali y
o li e, and manual dex e i y o he subjec s.
To ob ain he p ima y ou comes, he uni ied Pa kinson’s disease a ing scale subscale
II (UPDRS) was adminis e ed o assess unc ional ac i i y consis ing o 13 i ems. The sco e
o each i em is om 0 (no mal) o 4 (wo s ), wi h a maximum sco e o 52 poin s, whe e
highe sco es indica e wo se unc ional ac i i y [
35
–
37
]. To assess he quali y o li e o each
pa icipan , he 39-i em Pa kinson’s disease ques ionnai e (PDQ-39) was adminis e ed,
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2023,20, 4995 5 o 12
which consis s o 29 i ems g ouped in o 8 domains: mobili y, ac i i ies o daily li ing,
emo ional well-being, s igma, social suppo , cogni ion, communica ion, and g ie and
dis ess. Pa icipan s ha e o answe he ques ions based on hei expe ience in he las
ou weeks. Each i em is sco ed om 0 (ne e ) o 4 (always). The maximum possible sco e
is 156, wi h highe sco es co esponding o wo se quali y o li e [38,39].
Fo he assessmen o UL dex e i y, di e en mo o aspec s we e e alua ed. Subscale
III o he UPDRS was adminis e ed, consis ing o 17 i ems wi h a sco e ange om 0 o
4 ( om
no mal symp oma ology o he mos se e e impai men ), wi h a maximum sco e
o 68 [
35
–
37
]. The Kinesia ONE mo o assessmen was used o collec and quan i y he
se e i y o mo o symp oms such as emo , b adykinesia, and dyskinesia. I p o ides an
objec i e moni o ing o Subscale III o he UPDRS. I is an elec onic de ice consis ing o
so wa e and a mo ion senso . This senso is posi ioned on he second inge o he hand
du ing he ime he pa ien pe o ms a p o ocol o 12 asks. The so wa e sco es each i em
om 0 (no symp oms) o 4 (se e e impai men ) [40].
Finally, he Pu due boa d es (PPT), he Minneso a manual dex e i y es (MMDT)
and he squa es es (ST) we e used o assess manual dex e i y. The PPT consis s o a
wo-column boa d ha includes o 25 holes each, oge he wi h pins, washe s, and ings
loca ed in ou semici cles a he op o he boa d. The es is composed o ou sub es s
ha mus be pe o med a o al o h ee imes, so ha he o al sco e is he a e age sco e
ob ained om he h ee a emp s a each sub es . Thus, highe sco es indica e be e manual
dex e i y [
41
,
42
]. T, he abb e ia ed e sion o he MMDT, con ains a ec angula wooden
boa d ha includes 60 holes dis ibu ed in 15 columns and 4 ows, as well as 60 ci cula
pieces wi h one black and one ed side o he same dimension as he holes in he boa d. I
consis s o wo sub es s ha a e pe o med a o al o 4 imes, ob aining as he inal sco e, he
a e age o he ou a emp s o each es . The inal sco e is he ime spen in pe o ming he
es , so he longe a pa ien spends, he wo se he pa ien ’s manual dex e i y [
43
]. Finally,
he ST con ains a shee o pape wi h ou g ids p in ed wi h 6 mm long squa es. In he
p ac ice es , he pa ien mus d aw as many squa es as possible o 10 s, while o he eal
es , he/she will ha e 30 s. The sco e is ob ained o each hand by adding he numbe o
do s d awn inside he squa es, wi hou ouching he edges. Thus, a highe numbe o do s
d awn indica es a be e manual dex e i y [44] (Figu e 3).
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2023, 20, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 o 12
Se e al assessmen ools we e adminis e ed o e alua e he unc ional ac i i y, qual-
i y o li e, and manual dex e i y o he subjec s.
To ob ain he p ima y ou comes, he uni ied Pa kinson’s disease a ing scale subscale
II (UPDRS) was adminis e ed o assess unc ional ac i i y consis ing o 13 i ems. The sco e
o each i em is om 0 (no mal) o 4 (wo s ), wi h a maximum sco e o 52 poin s, whe e
highe sco es indica e wo se unc ional ac i i y [35–37]. To assess he quali y o li e o each
pa icipan , he 39-i em Pa kinson’s disease ques ionnai e (PDQ-39) was adminis e ed,
which consis s o 29 i ems g ouped in o 8 domains: mobili y, ac i i ies o daily li ing,
emo ional well-being, s igma, social suppo , cogni ion, communica ion, and g ie and
dis ess. Pa icipan s ha e o answe he ques ions based on hei expe ience in he las
ou weeks. Each i em is sco ed om 0 (ne e ) o 4 (always). The maximum possible sco e
is 156, wi h highe sco es co esponding o wo se quali y o li e [38,39].
Fo he assessmen o UL dex e i y, di e en mo o aspec s we e e alua ed. Subscale
III o he UPDRS was adminis e ed, consis ing o 17 i ems wi h a sco e ange om 0 o 4
( om no mal symp oma ology o he mos se e e impai men ), wi h a maximum sco e o
68 [35–37]. The Kinesia ONE mo o assessmen was used o collec and quan i y he se-
e i y o mo o symp oms such as emo , b adykinesia, and dyskinesia. I p o ides an
objec i e moni o ing o Subscale III o he UPDRS. I is an elec onic de ice consis ing o
so wa e and a mo ion senso . This senso is posi ioned on he second inge o he hand
du ing he ime he pa ien pe o ms a p o ocol o 12 asks. The so wa e sco es each i em
om 0 (no symp oms) o 4 (se e e impai men ) [40].
Finally, he Pu due boa d es (PPT), he Minneso a manual dex e i y es (MMDT)
and he squa es es (ST) we e used o assess manual dex e i y. The PPT consis s o a wo-
column boa d ha includes o 25 holes each, oge he wi h pins, washe s, and ings lo-
ca ed in ou semici cles a he op o he boa d. The es is composed o ou sub es s ha
mus be pe o med a o al o h ee imes, so ha he o al sco e is he a e age sco e ob-
ained om he h ee a emp s a each sub es . Thus, highe sco es indica e be e manual
dex e i y [41,42]. T, he abb e ia ed e sion o he MMDT, con ains a ec angula wooden
boa d ha includes 60 holes dis ibu ed in 15 columns and 4 ows, as well as 60 ci cula
pieces wi h one black and one ed side o he same dimension as he holes in he boa d. I
consis s o wo sub es s ha a e pe o med a o al o 4 imes, ob aining as he inal sco e,
he a e age o he ou a emp s o each es . The inal sco e is he ime spen in pe o ming
he es , so he longe a pa ien spends, he wo se he pa ien ’s manual dex e i y [43]. Fi-
nally, he ST con ains a shee o pape wi h ou g ids p in ed wi h 6 mm long squa es. In
he p ac ice es , he pa ien mus d aw as many squa es as possible o 10 s, while o he
eal es , he/she will ha e 30 s. The sco e is ob ained o each hand by adding he numbe
o do s d awn inside he squa es, wi hou ouching he edges. Thus, a highe numbe o
do s d awn indica es a be e manual dex e i y [44] (Figu e 3).
Figu e 3. E alua ion ki (Pu due pegboa d, Minneso a and Kinesia ONE).

In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2023,20, 4995 6 o 12
3. Resul s
3.1. Baseline Cha ac e is ics o he S udy Pa icipan s
The s udy had a simple c osso e design, a o al sample o 40 people wi h PD,
20 assigned o he CG, and 20 o he EG.
Table 1summa izes he baseline socio-demog aphic cha ac e is ics o he pa icipan s
acco ding o he s udy g oup. Men ep esen ed 75% o he pa icipan s (n= 30), aged
be ween 48 and 89 yea s, wi h a mean age o 71.00
±
9.20 yea s and wi h 5.38
±
4.23 yea s
o disease e olu ion. The majo i y o pa icipan s (n= 35, 87.5%) li ed accompanied a
home, a mino i y li ed alone a home (n= 4, 10%), and one in a eligious communi y.
Table 1. Baseline cha ac e is ics o pa icipan s.
Va iables To al (n= 40) CG (n= 20) EG (n= 20)
Age (yea s) 71.00 ±9.20 69.55 ±12.31 72.18 ±5.58
Gende
Male 30 15 15
Female 10 3 7
Mos a ec ed UL
Righ 25 14 11
Le 15 3 12
Yea s o disease e olu ion 5.38 ±4.23 4.72 ±3.86 5.91 ±4.52
Cu en non-pha macological ea men
Physio he apy 2 0 2
Occupa ional he apy 0 0 0
Speech he apy 1 1 0
All 1 1 0
None 35 15 20
O he s 1 1 0
Abb e ia ions: CG: con ol g oup; EG: expe imen al g oup; UL: uppe limb.
O he pa icipan s, 62.5% (n= 25) had g ea e in ol emen in he igh UL, while
37,5% (n= 15) had g ea e in ol emen in he le UL. Mos pa icipan s (87.5%, n= 35) did
no ecei e any ype o non-pha macological ea men and he es , 12.5% (n= 5), a ended
physio he apy, speech he apy, and/o occupa ional he apy.
Table 2shows he Kinesia ONE
®
measu emen s o ac ion, es ing emo , and igidi y
o he CG and EG pa icipan s be o e s a ing he in e en ion. The only di e ences be ween
he g oups a e in es ing emo o he le UL in he OFF s a e.
Table 2. Baseline UPDRS sco es— es ing and ac ion emo sub es .
UPDRS III CG (n= 20) EG (n= 20) F p-Value
Ac ion emo ON
Righ UL 0.625 ±0.806 0.727 ±702 0.173 0.680
Le UL 0.625 ±0.619 0.863 ±0.639 1.324 0.257
Ac ion emo OFF
Righ UL 0.875 ±0.806 0.954 ±0.843 0.085 0.772
Le UL 0.750 ±0.577 1.181 ±0.795 3.403 0.073
Res emo OFF
Righ UL 0.625 ±0.619 1.136 ±1.082 2.874 0.099
Le UL 0.500 ±0.632 1.227 ±0.922 7.391 0.010
Res emo ON
Righ UL 0.375 ±0.619 0.818 ±0.906 2.845 0.100
Le UL 0.375 ±0.500 0.772 ±0.812 2.995 0.092
CG: con ol g oup; EG: expe imen al g oup; p- alue < 0.05.
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2023,20, 4995 7 o 12
3.2. Func ionali y and Quali y o Li e
Table 3shows he di e ences obse ed in he baseline assessmen wi h and wi hou
o hosis in he OFF s a e in he mo o a iables e alua ed wi h Kinesia ONE
®
. Wea ing
he o hesis educes “pos u al emo ” compa ed wi h no wea ing i (p= 0.042), which
can imp o e unc ionali y and quali y o li e. The same e ec may educe he o hesis o
“ inge apping ampli ude” (p= 0.18) and o “speed in apid al e na ing mo emen s” wi h
o hosis (p< 0.001).
Table 3. Kinessia OFF s a e, wi h and wi hou o hoses—baseline assessmen (n= 40).
Va iables Mean SD p-Value
Res emo Wi hou o hoses 1.102 0.926 0.378
Wi h o hoses 0.956 0.900
Pos u al emo Wi hou o hoses 0.864 0.761
0.042
Wi h o hoses 0.621 0.631
Kine ic emo Wi hou o hoses 1.150 0.506
0.934
Wi h o hoses 1.136 0.952
Finge apping—speed Wi hou o hoses 1.888 1.012
0.834
Wi h o hoses 1.869 1.010
Finge apping—ampli ude Wi hou o hoses 2.302 0.921 0.018
Wi h o hoses 2.016 0.988
Finge apping— hy hm Wi hou o hoses 1.352 1.041
0.719
Wi h o hoses 1.302 0.983
Hand mo emen s—speed Wi hou o hoses 2.030 0.767
0.300
Wi h o hoses 2.119 0.699
Hand mo emen s—ampli ude Wi hou o hoses 1.400 0.767
0.948
Wi h o hoses 1.408 0.926
Hand mo emen s— hy m Wi hou o hoses 0.891 0.651
0.669
Wi h o hoses 0.850 0.683
Al e na ing quick mo emen s—speed Wi hou o hoses 2.348 0.774
<0.001
Wi h o hoses 1.317 0.744
Al e na ing quick mo emen s–ampli ude Wi hou o hoses 1.251 0.702
0.307
Wi h o hoses 1.317 0.744
Al e na ing quick mo emen s— hy m Wi hou o hoses 1.285 1.247
0.367
Wi h o hoses 1.117 1.005
Pai ed samples - es ; p- alue < 0.05. SD: s anda d de ia ion.
Table 4shows he di e ences in he mo o a iables e alua ed wi h Kinesia ONE
®
(Cle eland, OH, USA) in he baseline assessmen wi h and wi hou o hosis in he ON s a e.
Wea ing he o hosis educes “ es ing emo ” compa ed wi h no wea ing i (p= 0.009),
which can imp o e unc ionali y and quali y o li e. In he same way, he educ ion wi h
he o hosis o “ inge apping ampli ude” (p= 0.027) and in he i em “ampli ude o apid
al e na ing mo emen s” (p= 0.017) wi h o hosis can a o unc ionali y and quali y o li e.
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2023,20, 4995 8 o 12
Table 4. Kinessia ON s a e, wi h and wi hou o hoses—baseline assessmen (n= 40).
Va iables Mean SD p-Value
Res emo Wi hou o hoses 0.997 0.830 0.009
Wi h o hoses 0.652 0.716
Pos u al emo Wi hou o hoses 0.832 0.877 0.432
Wi h o hoses 0.744 0.619
Kine ic emo Wi hou o hoses 1.184 0.421 0.416
Wi h o hoses 1.128 0.426
Finge apping—speed Wi hou o hoses 1.910 0.991 0.806
Wi h o hoses 1.878 1.018
Finge apping—Ampli ude Wi hou o hoses 2.273 0.932 0.027
Wi h o hoses 1.952 1.051
Finge apping— hy hm Wi hou o hoses 1.171 0.963 0.319
Wi h o hoses 0.997 0.795
Hand mo emen s—speed Wi hou o hoses 2.089 0.743 0.922
Wi h o hoses 2.097 0.672
Hand mo emen s—Ampli ude Wi hou o hoses 1.605 0.865 0.685
Wi h o hoses 1.542 0.899
Hand mo emen s— hy hm Wi hou o hoses 1.021 0.798 0.051
Wi h o hoses 0.085 0.589
Al e na ing quick mo emen s—speed Wi hou o hoses 2.278 0.720 0.198
Wi h o hoses 2.984 3.219
Al e na ing quick mo emen s—ampli ude
Wi hou o hoses 1.084 0.831 0.017
Wi h o hoses 1.265 0.696
Al e na ing quick mo emen s— hy hm Wi hou o hoses 1.294 1.319 0.479
Wi h o hoses 1.157 1.036
Pai ed samples - es ; p- alue < 0.05. SD: s anda d de ia ion.
When compa ing he change sco es ob ained on he UPDRS-II acco ding o he pa ien s’
condi ion and g oup ype, no s a is ically signi ican di e ences we e obse ed be ween he
ini ial assessmen and a e wo mon hs o o hosis implemen a ion in ei he he pa ien s’
ON o OFF s a e. This means ha no imp o emen in he UPDRS-II sco e was ob ained
a e DEFO (Table 5).
Table 5.
In e -g oup compa ison o UPDRS-II di e en ial sco e acco ding o he ype o g oup
using ANCOVA.
Va iables G oup Mean SD MS F p-Value ï2
OFF—wi h o hoses CG 0.000 0.000 40.267 1.629 0.208 0.033
EG −1.914 5.907
OFF—wi hou o hoses CG 0.500 7.033 87.233 2.546 0.117 0.048
EG −2.263 5.217
ON—wi h o hoses CG 0.000 0.000 31.762 1.430 0.238 0.029
EG −10.742 5.606
ON—wi hou o hoses CG 0.187 5.344 7.123 0.290 0.593 0.006
EG −0.631 4.732
CG: con ol g oup (n= 20); EG: expe imen al g oup (n= 20); SD: s anda d de ia ion, p- alue < 0.05.
In . J. En i on. Res. Public Heal h 2023,20, 4995 9 o 12
Likewise, no di e ences (p= 0.933) we e obse ed in he quali y o li e o he subjec s
a e he implemen a ion o he o hosis (Table 6).
Table 6. In e -g oup compa ison o PDQ-39 di e en ial sco e be ween p e- es and pos - es .
PDQ-39 nMean SD MS F p-Value ï2
CG 16 −0.625 6.830 0.441 0.007 0.933 0.000
EG 22 −0.818 8.313
CG con ol g oup (n= 20), EG: expe imen al g oup (n= 20), SD: s anda d de ia ion, p- alue < 0.05.
4. Discussion
The aim o his s udy was o analyze he e icacy o he use o a DEFO o he UL on
he unc ionali y and quali y o li e o people wi h PD. The main indings o he p esen
s udy a e an immedia e imp o emen a e he implemen a ion o he o hosis in he OFF
and ON s a es o mo o a iables in he pos u al emo ask; only in he OFF s a e in he
speed o apid al e na ing mo emen s and only in he ON s a e in he hy hm o hand
mo emen s and ampli ude o apid al e na ing mo emen s. No di e ences we e obse ed
a e wo mon hs o o hosis use in he imp o emen o unc ionali y o in he quali y o
li e o he pa ien wi h PD.
Neu ological diso de s, such as PD, a e cu en ly he leading sou ce o disabili y in
he wo ld. The global bu den o disease s udy es ima ed ha he numbe o people wi h
PD will double om abou 7 million in 2015 o app oxima ely 13 million in 2040. This
es ima ion o he g ow h o he popula ion wi h PD is wo ying conside ing he amoun o
bu den his disease ca ies o socie y [45].
The neu odegene a i e e ec s o PD lead o a loss o unc ional mobili y in balance,
pos u al s abili y and gai , dec easing independence in he pe o mance o ac i i ies,
and comp omising hei pa icipa ion bo h a home and in he communi y [
6
,
46
,
47
]. On
he o he hand, con ex ual ac o s such as age, he eeling o being a pe son wi h a dis-
abili y, unemploymen o pe cei ed con ol a e examples o pe sonal and en i onmen al
ac o s ha ha e a nega i e impac on he unc ional mobili y and quali y o li e o he
indi idual [6–8,47,48].
The e ha e been many ad ances in he knowledge o he e iopa hogenesis and in
he symp oma ic ea men o PD in ecen yea s. Howe e , he e a e no e ec i e neu-
op o ec i e o disease-modi ying he apies ha slow disease p og ession and imp o e
unc ionali y and quali y o li e wi hou p oducing side e ec s on he pa ien [5].
Due o he ac ha pha macological ea men loses i s e icacy wi h he passage
o ime and p oduces side e ec s in he pe son and he lack o p ecise knowledge abou
he cu en ly exis ing non-pha macological he apies, i is necessa y o implemen new
non-pha macological he apies ha allow an imp o emen in he unc ionali y and quali y
o li e o he pa ien [16,17].
All DEFOs a e made in he same way, being able o be designed and adap ed o
he needs o he pa hology and he use , so ha hey can be de ices o UL, lowe limbs
o es o he whole body. In diseases such as CP, di e en s udies ca ied ou wi h
es s and meshes o hese cha ac e is ics ha e demons a ed hei e icacy on pos u al
con ol, balance, walking speed, and manual dex e i y [
23
,
24
,
49
]. In he s udy conduc ed
by Yasukawa e al., in which DEFOs we e implemen ed o UL in wo cases wi h CP wi h
hemiplegia and b achial plexus palsy, imp o ed limb alignmen and imp o ed unc ionali y
o he a ec ed UL we e obse ed [
18
]. In he same way, hey ha e also been e ec i e in
imp o ing balance and walking speed in people wi h MS, as well as in imp o ing pain
and unc ionali y o he lowe limb in people wi h CRPS [
20
,
25
,
26
]. In a single case s udy
conduc ed by Wa son e al., he bene icial unc ional e ec s o a lyc a o hosis in a mul iple
scle osis pa ien we e equi ocal [
50
]. In ano he s udy o 16 pa ien s wi h hemipa esis
esul ing om b ain damage, he use o hese de ices showed a educ ion in muscle one
and swelling, and imp o ed w is and inge mo emen [
51
]. Al hough some s udies