scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Women in urban poverty in Hungary Maids and women workers in the labour market before 1945

Abstract

The economic and social transition caused by the industrial revolution at the end of the 19th century has brought about several changes in Hungary. The development of infrastructure and transportation enabled women to access new job opportunities, to abandon traditional communities and to try new ways of living. In Hungary, keeping maids continued to be a social custom and even between the two world wars affected a large number of people.

Read accessible full text

Women in urban poverty in Hungary Maids and women workers in the labour market before 1945

Author: Czibere, Ibolya
Year: 2013
Source: https://dea.lib.unideb.hu/bitstreams/91027a82-cc2a-4b57-9f47-9fc79690a935/download
■ Me sze ek ■ 2012/4. szám – 2013/1. szám ■
Ibolya Czibe e
Women in u ban po e y in Hunga y
Maids and women wo ke s in he labou ma ke be o e 1945
The economic and social ansi ion caused by he indus ial e olu ion a he end o he 19 h
cen u y has b ough abou se e al changes in Hunga y. The de elopmen o in as uc u e and
anspo a ion enabled women o access new job oppo uni ies, o abandon adi ional
communi ies and o y new ways o li ing.
The s a us o maids
In Hunga y, keeping maids con inued o be a social cus om and e en be ween he wo wo ld
wa s a ec ed a la ge numbe o people. Acco ding o Gyáni (2003), wo king as a maid was a
dis inc ly u ban job. This was a cha ac e is ic phenomenon in Hunga y, especially in he
capi al. Du ing he p ocess in which an inc easing p opo ion o socie y became bou geois,
mo e and mo e middle-class o ice s, lea ned people, indus ialis s and me chan s s a ed o
keep maids. “[Fo ] he e ol ing bou geoisie ha ing maids had become a s a us symbol, hey
we e ea ed in a condescending, de ini e and loud manne o make social dominance el ;
ladies p e ending o be noble expec ed hand-kissing, i le, o be add essed poli ely, while
maids we e add essed by hei i s names and migh had been subjec s o discipline in
ex eme cases. Maids did no ha e ad ocacy o ganiza ions, [bu ] a e a ime, insu ance and
pa ien assis ance companies ied o help hem. Only ew maids u ilized he se ices o
employmen agencies, he majo i y o hem accep ed e bal [labo ] con ac s; hey we e so
isola ed ha hey had been mo e ulne able han any o he g oups o socie y” (Paládi
Ko ács–Sá kány–Szilágyi 2000). Maids we e almos en i ely women. This ype o se ice
was he easies accessible job o women in u ban a eas and especially in Budapes . A
signi ican p opo ion o women we e wo king as a maid. This phenomenon also s ongly
induced immig a ion. In Budapes (and o he ci ies as well), maid gi ls we e almos
exclusi ely immig an s. Acco ding o Gyáni, “we can s a e i in gene al ha in Budapes ,
du ing he bou geois e a, he posi ion o maids and se an s was he mos gene al
employmen oppo uni y o women” (Gyáni 1987: 26). This ype o job was empo a y in
mos cases. Women s a ed o wo k as maids a ound he age o 15-20 and con inued o wo k
un il hey go ma ied. As a esul , ma ied maids we e e y a e. The majo i y o hem we e
coming om poo peasan , c a smen o ag icul u al p ole a amilies wi h a high numbe o
child en. I was gene ally po e y ha o ced hem o unde ake his ype o employmen .
The e we e also o he s o whom going o ci ies was he only way o escape om he
physically mo e demanding peasan li e (Paládi Ko ács–Sá kány–Szilágyi 2000). Acco ding
o he social ules o ha e a maids we e seen as being dependen on hei mas e : “maids,
om he e y beginning o hei se ice, ell unde he ules o domes ic disciplina y law,
hei employe s con olled hei e e y single mani es a ion o li e. Acco ding o domes ic
disciplina y law, physical punishmen was an accep ed ool o sanc ioning. Maids, unde he
du a ion o employmen , we e pe sonally subo dina ed o hei mas e s o he ex en ha hey
64
■ Me sze ek ■ 2012/4. szám – 2013/1. szám ■
we e no e en conside ed o be sepa a e legal en i ies, hei s a us was simila o ha o
someone placed unde gua dianship” (Gyáni 2003: 339).
The majo i y o domes ic maids had been wo king unde con inuous and di ec con ol.
Nei he hei wo king ime, no hei job i les we e de ined speci ically (Paládi Ko ács–
Sá kány–Szilágyi 2000). The majo i y o hem wo ked om ea ly mo ning un il la e nigh as
a do-all se an . Maid women’s ulne abili y made eminis s o igh o women’s igh s.
Feminis p o es ed agains hei ea men , agains hei mas e ’s unlimi ed powe o e hem,
agains hei sla e y and ough o hei human digni y. The con empo a y p ess made a local
uling o 1907 om Kapos á popula . Feminis s, howe e objec ed o ha decision o he
cou by claiming ha i was e en mo e se e e han he 12 d enac men o 1876 on he gene al
ules o domes ic se an s. The mos c i icized poin s o his uling we e hose ha , om
p ima ily mo al conside a ions, limi ed women’s igh s o be ee.
These es ic ions s ipula ed ha mas e s could no ole a e hei maids’ “immo al” conduc
and we e compelled o epo ha o he au ho i ies o we e also subjec ed o punishmen .
This egula ion os e ed mas e s o keep a keen eye on hei maids. They ended o employ a
ha sh judgmen on hei ac i i ies. Ano he ule p ohibi ed emale maids o walk on he s ee s
a e 9pm. Women igno ing ha egula ion isked o being called o be a oaming maid.
Roaming maids – acco ding o he enac men – we e o be collec ed by police and examined
by a doc o . A house o maids was also o de ed o be es ablished. The police con inuously
moni o ed i . Female maids wi hou a place o sleep we e o ced o s ay he e. They we e
allowed o lea e i only wi h pe mission, only in day ime and only o sho in e als. Using
he p ess o le hei oices hea d eminis made un o he ci y-leading men who ea ed hei
emale maids wi h supe io i y and indi e ence: “you wise alde men […] accep ed his
p oposal in ull ex en . Unanimously. Wi hou [conduc ing] a single deba e. A e discussing
he amoun o du y on ca lub ican s o be se o 2 o 3 ille o hou s. They did no ha e a
wo d abou he maid egula ion, no a commen o he smalles amendmen ” (A nő és a
á sadalom /The woman and socie y/ 1907: 38). Feminis ega ded his igh o be b u al,
incompa ible wi h human digni y and hono , and made b eak h ough sugges ions. They
sugges ed abolishing he concep “maid” and, simila ly o o he indus ial wo ke s allowing
hese women be ee employees. “The concep o “maid” should be e ased om he legal
code, hose ha a e called oday maids should be ee wo ke s simila ly o o he s and he
ela ionship be ween employe s and employees – independen o he na u e o wo k – should
be cha ac e ized by egula ions based on equali y be o e he law. I he wo k a ound he
house and amily equi es special ac ions o be aken, hese should no be conside ed di e en
om hose ha a e based on se ice o job con ac s. Accep ing domes ic disciplina y law o
unpunished libels is no app op ia e o jus i ied agains maids o anybody else ha unde ook
du ies o se ice bu no hono , human digni y, physical in eg i y o sel -es eem” (100).
In ou iew his special g oup o women expe ienced he me ging o hei wo king and p i a e
li e. They had o unde ake hei du ies by wo king in o he amilies han hei own in he
en i onmen domina ed by pa ia chal alues. As a esul , in an eme ging bou geois socie y
hey we e o ced o li e in he leas bou geois li ing condi ions.
65
■ Me sze ek ■ 2012/4. szám – 2013/1. szám ■
The s a us o impo e ished indus ial wo ke women
The o he segmen o u ban eminine po e y in ol ed indus ial women wo ke s in Hunga y.
Fo decades, hei p opo ion among wo ke s has only slowly inc eased and o a long pe iod
i has emained minimal. In he i s phase o he indus ial e olu ion in Hunga y, he
p opo ion o indus ial women wo ke s among he wo ke s has con inued o emain small.
Acco ding o he 1880 census, he a io o women among indus ial wagewo ke s was only
10%. A ha ime, only obacco and suga , b ick and ile ac o ies employed women in
signi ican numbe s (Lackó quo ed by Paládi Ko ács–Sá kány–Szilágyi 2000). As he au ho s
desc ibe i , wo k s a ed a 4-5 am in b ick ac o ies. Women and gi ls d essed in di y and
o n clo hes ca ied mud and ound some es lying on s aw o in di y dens. In hese days,
he majo i y ype o women wo ke s we e no wo king wi h machines bu we e emale day-
oile s in obacco, suga and b ick ac o ies. Acco ding o s a is ics, emale amily membe s,
i.e., wi es and daugh e s o indus ial wo ke s we e o ced o unde ake jobs o a la ge ex en
han o he emale membe s o o he social g oups. This was mo e common in ac o ies o
Budapes and ci ies o he Small Hunga ian Plain (especially a ex ile, suga and can
indus ies) han i was in he no he n indus ial egion. Se e al ac o s played a pa in
o cing wo ke amilies in o ype o employmen . Among hese ac o s he po e y o single
mo he s has emained and i is well known e en oday. This phenomenon was no hing special
in ha e a ei he . A ha ime women go in o ha condi ion p ima ily by he dea h,
immig a ion o disabili y o he householde and as a esul , hey had o unde ake jobs a
wha e e cos . Acco ding o B aun (1909), e en me allu gies we e ying o o e jobs o
such women wo ke s. In hese wo ke amilies, child en we e o en le una ended by
pa en s. Howe e , i was ypical ha elde siblings o nice neighbo s ook ca e o younge
child en. This p o ided huge suppo o hese amilies which we e, by his way we e able o
secu e hei li ing. In 1908 a epo was published
1
in which F eund, desc ibing he s a us o
women wo ke s a obacco ac o ies no ed: “ his ype o po e y igu es should eally be
conside ed wice as high, as his include women wo ke s who a e employed by he s a e. I
wan ed o poin ou o his unjus , uncon olled economic ep ession and exploi a ion o
women” (F eund 1908: 97).
Wha does his pic u e look like? Depending on when hey could comple e he daily equi ed
labou s anda ds hese poo , unskilled women wo ke s wo ked 9, 10 o 11 hou s a day.
Wo king condi ions included places whe e windows we e no opened o weeks, and, as a
esul , he ai was s u y, muggy and illed wi h u mos il h. The e we e no inspec o s a
ac o ies, and as a esul , hese women we e wo king in inhumane condi ions. Men we e
employed only in posi ions ha equi ed e y demanding wo k. Apa om hese jobs, almos
he en i e p oduc ion p ocess was pe o med by women. Supe iso s ook ad an age o
women’s ulne abili y a almos all le els, ha included a daily ou ine o employing
insul ing language and applying physical abuse ( o example, logging). Women who qui
hei jobs because o he in ole able condi ions, unbea able heal h condi ions and low wages
called ac o ies “gophe ca che s” and acco ding o F eund, “ hey we e eady o s a e a he
han o con inue wo king he e”. Thei sexual and mo al ulne abili y was high, hei po e y
1
The woman and socie y, 1908, ol. 2. No. 6.
66
■ Me sze ek ■ 2012/4. szám – 2013/1. szám ■
made hem ole a e con inuous ha assmen and bullying, and he in imida ion o woman
wo ke s p e en ed such scandalous conduc s o become public.
A simila si ua ion was desc ibed by Samuel Gompe s in 1909
2
when he po ayed mo a
ca ie women in Budapes : “The e is, o example he mo a ca ie woman in Budapes .
The spec acles she o e s while doing he job is simila o a d a ho se. On ba e ee , she is
walking on ladde s o climbing up boa ds o he op loo s o new buildings. This spec acle
de ini ely canno be pe pe ua ed on pho os, no is i possible o ind he a place among he
pho o se ies ca ego izing indus ial wo ke s. He wide legs end in c us y ee ha esembles
o pigskin, some hing ha co e s ou a eling packs, he oenails a e black and dingy om
ubbing hem o b icks and gi de s. He legs a e ba e up o he knees; she is li ing hem like
a mule, she is aking ca e ul bu de ini e s eps as she walks up ha single boa d o gi de .
He wais is hunchbacked; he head is co e ed wi h a no e y clean bu b igh -colo ed
ke chie . He acial ea u es do no show any hing special excep o he unde eloped b ain;
he mo es a e no powe ul, which seems na u al o he obse e i you ake he sex – and
indeed, his is a woman! – and he p obable quali y o he nu i ion in o conside a ion”
(Gompe s 1974: 123).
We ha e no w i en abou hose women who ied o o e come hei po e y by selling hei
bodies, who we e walking on he s ee s day and nigh , some imes in g oups. In he shiny
ca es ha we e loud o gipsy music, hese women we e conside ed o be – acco ding o
Gompe s – “accesso ies like whi e able clo h o he wai e wea ing ail coa s”. I is no by
acciden ha o a long ime, up un il 1907, women we e no allowed o wo k as wai esses is
ca es as his job could ha e easily been associa ed wi h he p o ision o sexual se ice (Nagy
1996). Gompe s es ima ed he numbe o women ha “one-day, made a de e mined choice
be ween being an hones ag o a mo a ca ie o a shiny accesso y, o pa iah”. Howe e , he
also no ed ha he li e o poo women is s ill mise able ei he way.
Du ing Wo ld Wa I, he numbe o women employed in gun ac o ies g ew mos apidly;
hey we e wo king wi h machines (p ima ily wi h la hes) a ha ime wo king in ex emely
demanding jobs (B esz o szky 1974). A ha ime ( he 1910s), some ac i i ies became
eminized, women ou numbe ed men in nume ous ields o he labou ma ke . Howe e ,
egis ies om ha ime indica ed signi ican inequali y in e ms o wages o women s epping
in o men’s posi ions. Women ea ned only a ac ion o he sala ies o hei men p edecesso s:
“Women comple ely supe seded men in can ac o ies p oducing canis e s. The numbe o men
excluded om can ac o ies in Budapes was o e 400. The numbe o women who we e
unde aking asks ha had p e iously been pe o med by men was a ound 600-650. Women’s
wages o 50-60%, o in many cases 75% less han wo king men’s. Women did no e en ha e
a wo d when hey ea ned 3.5 Hunga ian ko onas in a job ha paid p e iously 10 Hunga ian
ko onas o he same wo k. Pe haps he saddes cases in his espec a e he ammuni ion
ac o y in Csepel, he can ac o y and he lamp ac o y in Kőbánya. Since women employed in
2
He isi ed Budapes in1909b as he p esiden o he Ame ican Fede a ion o Labou and summed up his
expe iences in a sec ion o his book en i led Labou in Eu ope and Ame ica.
67
■ Me sze ek ■ 2012/4. szám – 2013/1. szám ■
hese ac o ies mos ly came om a social backg ound in which he concep o sel -
o ganiza ion was no oo ed sel -o ganizing mo emen s we e only slowly g ew he e.
Employe s knew his and ob iously ook ad an age o his” (B esz o szky 1974: 2). In o he
wo ds, we can see ha when, swi ching o mili a y p oduc ion in he economy inc eased he
demand o labou , mo e and mo e women could go o ci ies and go employed as unskilled
wo ke s. Tha si ua ion g an ed immedia e inancial p o i o ac o y owne s. They made use
o he oppo uni ies he new si ua ion o e ed o hem and au oma ically employed women in
much less a o able condi ions han men p e iously. Acco ding o na ional s a is ics,
women’s employmen in he Ho hy e a s a ed o g ew s eadily, and by 1941, i eached 23%
(Gyáni 2003). This mean ha masses o women a ha ime we e no employed exclusi ely
as maids in u ban a eas, which was he case be o e he Wo ld Wa , bu we e employed as
unskilled labou women wo ke s in he indus y, oo. By his ime i had become ob ious ha
he sala y o he b eadwinne is no su icien o co e ing he needs o wo ke amilies.
Acco ding o a epo om ha e a, many hough ha he inc easing numbe o women
wo ke s was only he esul o he wa , which was supposed o dec ease when he wa will be
o e . Ins ead o his howe e , hei numbe con inually g ew and a a as e pace han men’s.
Acco ding o jou nalis s his phenomenon in Hunga y was due o special causes
3
: p ima ily,
o he e olu ion o he ex ile indus y, o he imp o emen o he spinning and wea ing
indus y, which employed masses o skilled women and day- oile s. The inc easing numbe o
emale skilled labo e s was only cha ac e is ic o he ex ile indus y and he numbe o
emale day- oile s was ising only in he spinning and wea ing indus y in his pe iod. The
eme gence o his phenomenon has u he b ough abou by he ac ha “capi alis s
employed unskilled, uneduca ed, hus uno ganized wo k o ce o ill acancies. I was easy o
ind uno ganized day- oile s and emale wo ke s. The ag icul u al c isis o ced wo ke s o
ind u ban wo k o a g ea e deg ee han e e be o e. This is how ag icul u al c isis,
indus ializa ion, a ionaliza ion, he low wages o b eadwinne s, he de elopmen o he
spinning and wea ing indus y was in e wea ing wi h he o ganiza ional, poli ical and
ac ical issues o he wo king class” (Li án 1974: 245).
Gyula Rézle ca ied ou some esea ch on ex ile ac o ies in 1942, and he depic s he
si ua ion o poo women wo ke s inside he ac o y and he inequali ies be ween men and
women. To unde s and he causes o inequali ies, we need o examine he special social g oup
o ex ile ac o y wo ke s. The s uc u e o hei g oup was de ined by he di e en skills and
expe ise o he wo ke s
4
. A he op o he hie a chy, he ound skilled wo ke s. He called
hem ex ile mas e s since hey we e he middle manage s o p oduc ion and hei p opo ion
among wo ke s was abou 9%. The middle s a um o he hie a chy was made up by semi-
skilled labo e s, being he mos popula ed g oup, gi ing abou 70% o he wo ke s. The
bo om s a a included day ale s (unskilled wo ke s) who pe o med ac i i ies no equi ing
expe ise o aining bu only physical s eng h.
3
The calenda o he New Ma ch magazine, 1929
4
Rézle men ions he ac o y as Kamme ac o y.
68

■ Me sze ek ■ 2012/4. szám – 2013/1. szám ■
A di e en ype o s uc u e could also be se up on he base o dis ibu ion o labou by
gende di e ences. In he ac o y examined, wice as much woman wo ked han men (800
women and 400 men), ha is, wo- hi d o wo ke s we e emales. I was no ha , bu a he
he opposi e was a cha ac e is ic ea u e o indus ial ac o ies, i.e. only one- hi d o wo ke s
we e women. Rézle hough ha his is no a special si ua ion as wo k a ex ile ac o ies sui s
bes women’s skills (no o men ion “ he psychological associa ions o he ex ile indus y o
he emale gende ”), hus his e e sed a io was no a su p ising one. O he h ee aining-
based job ca ego ies, he one in ol ing semi-skilled labou was belie ed o be he mos
sui able o women. This was pe ec ly implemen ed a he ex ile ac o y as 87% o women
wo ke s we e employed in his ca ego y. Acco ding o Rézle his was a ele an si ua ion as
“ he asks o semi-skilled wo ke s […] do no equi e special aining o expe ise, which
would be achie able among women wo ke s in a mo e di icul way because o hei sex and
social ela ionships. I is no insigni ican howe e ha his job ca ego y does no equi e
physical s eng h. […] Wha is mo e, his job needs p ecision, me iculous a en ion, so
ouch, handc a and hese a e all eminine cha ac e is ics a he han masculine ones” (Rézle
1974: 386). Gende disad an ages and s e eo ypes may be ound in o he con ex s as well –
ou o he 800 women wo ke s, 700 we e employed as semi-skilled wo ke s and he emaining
100 wo ked as unskilled wo ke s. Howe e , we canno ind women among skilled labo e s, a
he op o he hie a chy, in he eli e o he wo king class. On he con a y, he dis ibu ion o
male wo ke s a he ac o y was a mo e balanced, p opo ional one, ha ing almos one- hi d in
each ca ego y.
Rézle men ioned ano he ype o disad an age o emale wo ke s su e ed in compa ison o
male wo ke s: he wages o he la e ’s been much highe han ha o he o me ’s. Rega dless
o headcoun dominance, men’s wages we e highe bo h among semi-skilled wo ke s and
day ale s. Rézle hinks his is jus i ied among day ale s and a gues ha al hough we can ind
mo e women among day ale s bu men pe o m he mos challenging physical asks, and
ul ima ely ha was ewa ded by highe wages. In con as , emale unskilled labo e s we e
assigned cleaning o o he simila asks. He also ejec s he idea o ha gende di e ences
among semi-skilled labo e s we e in eali y due o age di e ences. In o he wo ds Rézle
claims ha he e we e no di e ences be ween men and women a his le el since hey bo h
pe o med he same asks bu he e we e signi ican a iance in hei wages. In his iew, his
occu ed qui e independen ly om he o icial wage egula ions which did no make a
dis inc ion be ween he wages o male and emale semi-skilled labo e s. Howe e , emale and
male semi-skilled wo ke s we e emune a ed di e en ly while doing he same jobs. The lowe
wage ca ego ies we e he same o bo h sexes (1100 Hunga ian pengő annually) bu he uppe
wage limi showed men’s ad an age (3100 o men and 2800 o women). Ne e heless, mos
inequali ies we e o be ound du ing he examina ion o wage ca ego ies, as he annual income
o he majo i y o women was 1100-1800 Hunga ian pengő, while his was 1350-2600 o
men. “As a esul we can s a e ha women and men doing he same quali y o wo k a e
employed unde seemingly equal income condi ions bu emale wo k o ce is gene ally less
ecognized as opposed o male wo k o ce” (Rézle 1974: 387).
69
■ Me sze ek ■ 2012/4. szám – 2013/1. szám ■
Domes ic household s a is ics co e ed he esul s o inc easing c isis in p oduc ion and
consump ion by analyzing he mos a ec ed laye s o socie y, and es ablished ha no all
social classes a e a ec ed o he same deg ee. As a esul , in es iga ions s a ed o examine
income dis ibu ion and consump ion in each employmen g oup, which included he analysis
o li ing condi ions and amilies’ economic si ua ion. The household examina ion o wo king
class amilies
5
, which was a pionee wo k a he beginning o he 1930s, in ol ed 50 amilies.
The deg ee o each amily’s expendi u e depended on he numbe and age o amily membe s
as he consump ion o amily membe s highly in luenced he deg ee o he amily’s
expendi u e. They also emphasized ha he consump ion o women, men and child en o
a ious ages was ex emely di e en , which made compa ison and assessmen e y di icul
(Zen ay 1974). Thei esul s implied ha in many cases, he income o wo king class amilies
did no co e he mon hly expendi u es, hus hey we e o ced o ake loans, aids and gi s,
and wha is mo e, many o hem made use o he se ices o pawnshops as well. They a e
unheal hy ood, consumed only a e y li le amoun o milk and mea (well-being a ha ime
was measu ed by he amoun o mea consumed). These amilies consumed po a oes ins ead
o b ead and mea . I is s iking how much o hei income was spen on ood. Acco ding o
he da a his was highe han 50% o hei income! Acco ding o esea che s, his p o es ha
“ he p ice o g oce y in ag icul u al Hunga y was oo high as compa ed o he income o he
wo king class; on he o he hand, mee ing o he p ima y and essen ial needs cos so much
ha hei sa is ac ion we e only possible wi h consuming a educed amoun and quali y o
ood” (Zen ay 1974: 255).
The esul s o a esea ch o b ick ac o y wo ke s and hei wo king condi ions om he 1930s
a e also e y ele an he e. The special s a us o b ick ac o y wo ke s o igina ed om he
ac ha hese labo e s came om he poo es amilies and s a ed o wo k e y ea ly, usually
a he ages o 11-15. The numbe o hese wo ke s was no high; p e iously hey had been
wo king as maids, se an s, day ale s, a m hands, ca e s o blacksmi hs in illages (Jo dáky
1974). Rega dless o hei age, he numbe o illi e a e was ex emely high among hem.
Acco ding o he s udy, he manage s o he b ick ac o y did no ca e abou he educa ion o
aining o hei wo ke s, hus i is no su p ising ha in apa men s and amilies associa ed
wi h he ac o y, child en we e usually illi e a e, while hose coming om illages o u ban
a eas ou side he ac o y inished 1-3 elemen a y g ades. “The majo i y is p imi i e, do no
know any hing abou he e en s o he wo ld o he coun y, no e en abou local news. Thei
li es a e sh unk a ound he ac o y. Thei knowledge abou li e: poli ics, legal ules and
egula ions, heal h, use ul and useless hings a e all based on dis o ed umo s. The
in e iewe was shocked by hei igno ance many imes. They do no know who o blame o
and how o label hese phenomena. They conside magazines, jou nals and books useless […]
5
The e had been no simila da a collec ion in Hunga y be o e. The Hunga ian Cen al S a is ical O ice did no
y o collec household s a is ics a ha ime. The i s such examina ion was pe o med by D . Lajos I. Ilye al i,
who had conduc ed o he pionee esea ch p e iously, o example, he o ganized a signi ican social da a
collec ion as he Di ec o o he Budapes S a is ical O ice o examine he li ing condi ions in Budapes . When
collec ing household da a, he was he i s o conduc such analyses, and he published his esul s in his wo k
en i led A munkások szociális és gazdasági iszonyai Budapes en (The social and economic condi ions o he
wo king class in Budapes ) (Zen ay 1974).
70
■ Me sze ek ■ 2012/4. szám – 2013/1. szám ■
he majo i y o hem had ne e been o cinemas o hea es. They a e amazed by he adio and
hink i ’s he e il’s in en ion” (Jo dáky 1974: 340).
Thei deep po e y and closed wo ld could be pe cei ed h ough he gende oles inside hei
amilies, ans e ing all domes ic wo k bo h a he weekdays and he only es day o women:
“ he majo i y spend hei ee ime a home (only on Sundays, o he wise hey wo k 10-15
hou s a day), men a e ha ing a es while women a e cooking, washing and sewing clo hes”
(Jo dáky 1974: 340). Thei housing and ca e ing condi ions a e ue e lec ions o hei
income le els. Resea che s men ioned “dens names apa men s” and “ icke y buildings”,
which se ed as homes o hese amilies. The houses o he ac o y we e simila o hese:
small ooms wi h no ai , elec ici y and accommoda ing usually 4-8 pe sons. The e we e
ooms ha se ed wo amilies bu i was no unusual ha 7-8 s ange s, he mix u e o
women and men li ed oge he in one iny li le oom. Thei ca e ing condi ions we e simila ,
hei e e yday meal included “ha ico bean, po a o o cumin soup”. One g oup o hem ne e
a e mea , a li le bi la ge g oup a e mea once in a mon h bu he majo i y o hem ied o ea
mea e e y Sunday (Jo dáky 1974). The numbe o child en among b ick ac o y amilies was
signi ican ly high (in con as o he a e age wo king class amilies), each amily had 4-7
child en. Desc ibing he si ua ion o b ick ac o y women, hey claim, “I seems ha he li es
o hese women simply consis s o wo king and gi ing bi h. They ea n wages ha co e only
he apa men en and basic ood. They canno be ill, ha would be a luxu y, which hey
canno a o d. They go o hei ombs om he ki chen; he e is no special ansi ion om li e
o dea h. As hey ha e no sick-lea e, hey go o wo k e en i hey a e ill o p e en s a ing o
dea h due o he lack o income” (Jo dáky 1974: 342).
In sum we can s a e ha , despi e he ac ha he e was no hing in he legal amewo k ha
would ha e os e ed he disc imina ion o women, s ill, in con as o men, hey su e ed om
disad an ages in many a eas o hei li es. This could be a esul o powe dis ibu ion by
gende . Highe powe was associa ed wi h oles ha we e usually pe o med by men in
e e yday li e, and ha o ced women o accommoda e o male decisions and o p o ec his
s uc u e despi e o hei own “ill-being”. I is s iking ha in Hunga y he li es o poo
peasan women can only be depic ed by desc ibing he li e o hei amilies. This is no
su p ising howe e , i we conside ha a ha ime amily s uc u e was de e mined by wo k.
Howe e , he po e y o indus ialized women wo ke s could be be e pe cei ed i one
ocuses on he examina ion o hose segmen s o hei li es ha hey li ed ou side o hei
amilies. The eason o ha is ha indus ializa ion and u baniza ion placed p oduc i e
ac i i ies ou side he immedia e li e o he amily; i made p ocesses and no ms associa ed
wi h hem a ac o ies isible; spec acula and also, i made amily li e p i a e and closed. The
li es o poo women wo ke s in u ban a eas emained unde double p essu e: on he one hand
unde he capi alis exploi a ion o ac o ies and he pa ia chal ep ession in hei amilies on
he o he . Indus ializa ion and indus ial capi alism expanded he cycle o commodi y
p oduc ion and u no e and hus ul ima ely induced social changes. The p e iously
widesp ead p ac ice o amilies elying p ima ily on sel -supply has become mo e and mo e
uncommon, he p ac ice o en ing and pu chasing has become mo e and mo e common, and
71
■ Me sze ek ■ 2012/4. szám – 2013/1. szám ■
all ha i s inc eased he impo ance o ha ing inancial income and hen made ha
indispensable among he amilies o bou geois socie y (Somlai 1986). All o hese esul ed in
a signi ican change, namely ha new concep s and ca ego ies eme ged in ela ion o he
ea nings and he dis ibu ion o household incomes: he ca ego ies o dependen s and ea ne s
appea ed. Acco ding o Somlai, his dis inc ion is new since hese ca ego ies we e unknown in
adi ional households: a m mas e s we e no called as ea ne s and hei amily membe s
we e no called dependen s and indeed hey we e no . We can s a e ha he concep o
householde as an ea ne is he esul o he eme gence o bou geois socie y, which b ough a
new hie a chy o women and men, wi h hose being a he op who con ibu ed mos o he
amily’s li elihood. Among poo wo ke s, hese pe sons we e almos exclusi ely men. We
could see ha women we e placed in a signi ican ly disad an aged posi ion in e ms o
income and ca ee by he labou ma ke disc imina ion o he eme ging capi alis indus y.
72