scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Significance and possibilities of major accident insurance

Abstract

The development of human society is placing ever increasing demands on their production. This action brings the company not only positive but also negative impacts. Along with the development of industrial production, people have to face the risks posed their activity brings. The accidents, which occurred in the recent past, they still have a negative impact not only on humans but also on the environment and the economy. In this paper, we address the issue of major accidents. Major accidents are meant only accidents caused induced by human activities. The paper presents the best known major accidents since the beginning of the 20th century. They have come in the European Union to modify the legislation that is valid for the all EU Member States. In the Czech Republic, these rules are enshrined in Act No. 59/2009 Coll., on the prevention of major accidents. For human society is a necessary protection against the effects arising from major accidents. One of the possibilities is the insurance of major accidents. Since in major accidents frequently occurs very high damage is therefore utilized modelling and simulation of extreme values. One of the options that can be used is modelling using the quantile function. The paper recalled model and process simulation of extreme values. It is possible to estimate the values of the damage amounts thanks to the help of the simulation of the quantile function, and it is also possible to estimate the maximum limit of the interval of damage. This knowledge can be used in deciding on the appropriate type of non-proportional reinsurance and also for the management of catastrophic risk insurance.

Read accessible full text

Significance and possibilities of major accident insurance

Author: Jindrová, Pavla
Publisher: Technická Univerzita v Liberci
Year: 2015
Source: https://dspace.tul.cz/bitstreams/fdc943bb-ad07-4cac-a21d-b1f37e74dfee/download
121
4, XVIII, 2015
Finance
DOI: 10.15240/ ul/001/2015-4-009
In oduc ion
The de elopmen o human socie y places
con inuously inc easing demands on i s
p oduc ion. This b ings o he socie y no only
posi i e bu also nega i e e ec s. Along wi h
he de elopmen o indus ial p oduc ion,
people ha e o ace associa ed isks. Indus ial
acciden s, which ha e occu ed ecen ly, s ill
ha e a nega i e impac on human li e, heal h,
he en i onmen and he economy.
Majo acciden s a e de i ned as e en s
esul ing om uncon olled de elopmen s
du ing an indus ial ac i i y, such as a se ious
leakage, i e o explosion, which may
immedia ely o subsequen ly lead o se ious
h ea o indi iduals in o ou side he p emises,
o o he en i onmen , in which one o mo e
haza dous subs ances a e in ol ed.
This a icle deals wi h di e en aspec s
and issues o majo acciden s wi h ocus
on he p e en ion o hei occu ence and
possible consequences. Since he isks o
majo acciden s ake ca as ophic p opo ions,
he quali y legisla ion on his issue is needed.
O e iew o legisla i e ac ions is in he sepa a e
chap e o a icle. This legisla ion imposes o
indus ial companies wi h he isk o majo
acciden he obliga ion o liabili y insu ance
o damages caused by he ealiza ion o
hese isks. The main objec i e o he a icle
is o p esen he possibili y o loss dis ibu ion
o majo acciden s and simula ion o po en ial
ex eme losses which a e necessa y o
de e mining he p emiums.
Fo he sake o illus a ion ha e been selec ed
he majo acciden s and hei consequences
since he ea ly wen ie h cen u y. The expe ience
gained om hese and o he disas e s ha e
played a signi i can ole in he de elopmen
o legisla ion in ela ion o he p e en ion and
liquida ion o consequences o majo acciden s.
Minama a, Japan (1932–1968): The
Company p oducing e ilize s eleased a o al
o 27 ons o me cu y compounds in o he
sea. The esul was a mass poisoning o local
esiden s called Minama a disease. In he wake
o his e en , 2,000 o 3,000 people died. [6]
Se eso, I aly (1976): An explosion o
a chemical eac o in he chemical plan
o Gi audan company. The company’s
managemen announced ha i had been
a common acciden and hey ailed o p o ide
in o ma ion abou he leakage o oxic
subs ances. I was as la e as se en een days
a e he acciden ha he ac o y managemen
admi ed ha abou wo kilog ams o dioxin
leaked in he ai , an amoun o poison capable
o killing 19,000 people. [5]
Bhopal, India (1984): Bhopal disas e is
conside ed o be he wo s indus ial acciden
in he wo ld. I s a ed in a plan o he U.S.
Company Union Ca bide India Limi ed,
p oducing pes icides, whe e deadly hyd ogen
cyanide gas and me hylisocyana e (MIC)
escaped. To his da e, mo e han 20,000 people
died and app oxima ely 500,000 we e inju ed
as a esul . [1]
Cuba ão, B azil (1984): An explosion in
a pe ochemical plan o Pe obas esul ed in
a i e in local slums. The amoun o demises
was due o he comple e bu ning o some si es
ne e p ecisely de e mined; i is es ima ed o be
app oxima ely 500.
San Juan Ixhua epec, Mexico (1984):
A se ies o explosions in he la ge wa ehouse
LPG Company Pe oleos Mexicanos des oyed
pa o he ci y. Abou 500 people died.
Sandoz, Swi ze land (1986): A i e in he
ag o-chemical company Sandoz wa ehouse
caused he elease o oxic ag ochemicals
in o he ai , bu also abou 30–40 ons o hese
chemicals escaped in o he Rhine Ri e . Mix u e
o subs ances in he i e con ained pes icides,
dioxins, me cu y, chlo ine compounds,
l uo escen dyes, o ganophospha es and
o he s. Ciba-Geib, chemical company ound
SIGNIFICANCE AND POSSIBILITIES
OF MAJOR ACCIDENT INSURANCE
Pa la Jind o á, Radim Jakubínský
EM_4_2015.indd 121EM_4_2015.indd 121 1.12.2015 8:44:491.12.2015 8:44:49
122 2015, XVIII, 4
Finance
close o his si e, a emp ed o make use o his
si ua ion eleasing 400 li es o a azine in o
he i e , belie ing his will no be e ealed.
Chemicals immedia ely caused he dea h o
aqua ic animals in he i e . 100 ons o i sh
we e killed and pollu ion o he Rhine eached
as a as he Ne he lands. [3]
Baia Ma e, Romania (2000): Many expe s
belie e ha i is Eu ope’s wo s en i onmen al
disas e since he Che nobyl explosion.
A dam holding back 100,000 cubic me e s
o con amina ed wa e bu s con amina ing
d inking-wa e supplies o mo e han 2.5 million
Hunga ians. Due o he oxici y o cyanide in
wa e , especially a ound he basin o he Tisza,
i ually all li ing o ganisms pe ished along he
i e . Fu he sou hwa ds, in he Se bian pa ,
app oxima ely 80% o aqua ic li e was killed.
Two yea s a e , he ecosys em began o e u n
o i s o iginal s a e, al hough s ill a om he
le el be o e he disas e . [5]
Enschede, The Ne he lands (2000):
Fi e a S.E. Fi ewo ks caused a subsequen
explosion o i ewo ks ha he company had
p oduced. Nume ous explosions ensued wi hin
he ollowing 30 minu es, de as a ing an a ea
o 5 km2. The i e sp ead o a neighbou ing
b ewe y. The esul ing cloud o smoke om
he wo companies was seen a a dis ance o
60 km. In his disas e , 22 people los hei li e,
including ou i e- i gh e s, and o e 940 people
we e inju ed. I des oyed app oxima ely 500
apa men s, 1,500 homes, 60 businesses. [5]
Toulouse, F ance (2001): Explosion in he
AZF chemical ac o y. I was equi alen o 20–
40 ons o TNT, i caused a emo o 3.4 on
Rich e scale and was hea d up o a dis ance
o 80 km. The explosion caused a o al o 29
dea hs, 2,500 se ious inju ies and 8,000 mino
inju ies. Damages paid ou o insu ance claims
exceeded € 1.5 billion. [5]
Wes , Texas (2013): Ammonium ni a e
exploded in a e ilize ac o y. As a esul 15
people died, nea ly 200 people we e wounded
and 150 buildings we e des oyed o damaged.
The essen ial in o ma ion, howe e , is he ac
ha he company had liabili y insu ance o
damages only in he amoun o one million
dolla s, bu he o al damage exceeded one
hund ed million U.S. dolla s. Wi h espec o he
o al damage, i may sound inadequa e ha he
company was i ned $ 118,300 agg ega ely. In
many s a es, including Texas, he e is no legal
obliga ion o he company o conclude liabili y
insu ance o he damage wi h he insu ed
sum co esponding wi h he ange o possible
damages.
1. De elopmen o he Numbe
o Acciden s
Human socie y is also exposed o he ac ion
o na u al causes, o en in he o m o na u al
disas e s. The numbe and consequences o
man-made disas e s is inc easing wi h he
de elopmen o human socie y. De elopmen o
indus ial p oduc ion also b ings abou he isk
o majo acciden s.
Figu e 1 shows he de elopmen o he
numbe o disas e s caused by human in l uence,
compa ed o na u al disas e s be ween 1970
and 2012. This da a shows a long- e m g ow h
o bo h ypes o ca as ophic e en s. The cha
shows ha om 1970 onwa ds, he yea 2010
is he i s yea whe e a highe occu ence o
na u al disas e s appea ed mo e han man-
made disas e s. This is also one o he ala ming
signals o he socie y o p o ec hemsel es
and hei en i onmen om he e ec s o man-
made disas e s.
The p ima y challenge o he company
is o ake such measu es so ha no majo
acciden s occu . Howe e , people mus be
adequa ely p epa ed o possible explosions,
i es, spills, and o he se ious aul s. Fo
his eason i is ad isable o use eme gency
scena ios. Damages a ising om indus ial
disas e s can each ex eme alues o billions
o Eu os. I a company should be able o bea
he i nancial consequences o majo acciden s,
i is necessa y o ha e insu ance ha co e s
possible damages in an adequa e amoun . A
his poin i should be no ed ha he insu ance
company i sel , howe e , canno bea he isks
in such olumes ha a e ypical o hese isks. I
is he e o e necessa y o nego ia e ensu ing o
each insu ance con ac .
2. Legisla ion a Issue P e en ion
o Majo Acciden s
The need o legisla ion o ope a o s o
indus ial acili ies and o ganisa ions, which a e
h ea ened by majo acciden s, was es ablished
immedia ely a e he i s occu ence o se ious
e en s.
U gen alks on a new EU di ec i e on
whole egula o y amewo k in ensu ing he
sa e y o haza dous ins alla ions s a ed a e
EM_4_2015.indd 122EM_4_2015.indd 122 1.12.2015 8:44:491.12.2015 8:44:49
123
4, XVIII, 2015
Finance
he explosion o cyclohexane in he ac o y
NYPRO L d. in Flixbo ough (UK, 1974). O e
he nex wo yea s in he Eu opean Communi y
amewo k occu ed h ee addi ional se ious
chemical acciden s: Beek (Ne he lands, 1975),
Man edonia (I aly, 1976) and Se eso (I aly,
1976). [5]
In he ligh o hese ca as ophic acciden s,
i was clea ha new legisla ion o imp o e
he sa e y o indus ial si es, planning o
eme gencies o -si e acciden s and dealing
wi h he aspec s o b oade egional and c oss-
bo de indus ial sa e y is needed. Di ec i e
Se eso, p epa ed in Feb ua y 1977, which
was adop ed by he Council o Minis e s o he
Eu opean Communi y on 24 6 h, 1982, is he
esul o hose e o s. The ollowing measu es
ha e o be adop ed by indi idual Membe
S a es no la e han Janua y 8 h, 1984. [18]
The Di ec i e applies o he p e en ion
o majo acciden s which may be caused by
ce ain indus ial ac i i ies, and o limi hei
consequences o a man and he en i onmen .
I ocuses on he con e gence o he measu es
aken by he Membe S a es in his a ea. A icle
1 de i nes e ms such as indus ial ac i i y,
ope a o , majo acciden s and haza dous
subs ances.
The Di ec i e was modi i ed wice, in 1987
Di ec i e 87/216/EEC o 19 Ma ch 1987
(O i cial Jou nal No L 85 o 28 Ma ch 1987) and
he 1988 Di ec i e 88/610/EEC o 24 No embe
1988 (OJ L 336 o 7 Decembe 1988). Bo h
amendmen s aimed o ex end he scope o his
Di ec i e, la gely in o de o include he s o age
o haza dous subs ances. [18]
Changes occu ed in esponse o a majo
acciden in he Union Ca bide ac o y in Bhopal,
India in 1984 and acciden s in he Sandoz
wa ehouse in Basel, Swi ze land in 1986.
Se eso I does no apply o nuclea acili ies
and plan s p ocessing adioac i e subs ances
and ma e ials, mili a y equipmen , p oduc ion
and sepa a e s o age o explosi es, gunpowde
and ammuni ion, mining and o he mining
ope a ions, equipmen used o he disposal o
oxic and haza dous was e, which a e subjec
o Communi y law, i hei aim is o p e en
majo acciden s.
As he Council o Eu ope and
ep esen a i es o he Go e nmen s o he
Membe S a es si ing in he Council s essed
he need o a mo e e ec i e implemen a ion o
Di ec i e 82/501/EEC and called o a e iew
o he di ec i e which, i necessa y, included
a possible ex ension o he p o ince scope o
Di ec i e and a g ea e exchange o in o ma ion
in his i eld be ween Membe S a es. Also
he need o imp o ed managemen o isks
and acciden s was s essed. In addi ion, he
acciden in Bhopal and Mexico highligh ed he
dange posed by he p oximi y o esiden ial
Fig. 1: De elopmen o he numbe o disas e s 1970–2012
Sou ce: own
EM_4_2015.indd 123EM_4_2015.indd 123 1.12.2015 8:44:501.12.2015 8:44:50
124 2015, XVIII, 4
Finance
buildings and dange ous a eas. Las bu no
leas , om he impo ance and bene i s o
in o ming he indi idual Membe S a es was on
Decembe 9 h, 1996, a new Di ec i e 96/82/EC
accep ed, known as he Se eso II. [6]
Due o se e e indus ial acciden s in
Toulouse, F ance, in Baia Ma e, Romania and
Enschede, in he Ne he lands and conclusions
o s udies on ca cinogens and subs ances
dange ous o he en i onmen was Se eso II
ex ended by Di ec i e 2003/105/EC. The new
Di ec i e equi es Membe S a es o ensu e
a e y de ailed app aisal o isks by using
possible acciden scena ios ha co e isks
a ising om s o age and p ocessing ac i i ies in
mining, s o age o py o echnics and explosi es
s o age o ammonium ni a e based e ilize s [5]
The main eason o eplacing he
Se eso II Di ec i e is a change in he sys em
o classi i ca ion o dange ous subs ances
es ablished by he Eu opean Di ec i e No.
1272/2008 o Decembe 16 h 2008, abou
classi i ca ion, labelling and packaging o
subs ances and mix u es. I was also necessa y
o cla i y and upda e ce ain pa s o he
di ec i e, o imp o e he implemen a ion and
en o cemen o he Di ec i e. In o al, in he
Se eso III (2012/18/EU) is lis ed 32 easons.
This Di ec i e was adop ed on July 4 h, 2012,
published July 24 h, 2012, coming in o o ce
on Augus 13 h 2012, o be implemen ed
by May 31s , 2015 wi h he excep ion o he
implemen a ion o he A icle 30, wi h he la es
da e Feb ua y 14 h, 2014. This pa applies o
hea y uel oils.
Se eso III Di ec i e is ex ended o onsho e
unde g ound gas s o age acili ies. The
Se eso II di ec i e de i nes 8 concep s: plan ,
equipmen , ope a o , haza dous subs ances,
majo acciden haza ds, isks and wa ehouse.
The new Se eso III Di ec i e de i nes 19
concep s, including 7 om he p e ious di ec i e
(excluding concep s o e).
The Se eso I, II and III, which a e
g adually eleased by he Eu opean Economic
Communi y, he Eu opean Communi y and he
Eu opean Union, a e inco po a ed by indi idual
Membe S a es in o hei na ional legisla ion.
In he Czech Republic, he law No. 59/2006
Coll is being add essed. The legisla ion also
includes access o isk assessmen , eme gency
scena ios and plans, he need o insu ance,
public access o in o ma ion and many o he
se ious measu es.
Acco ding o Law No. 59/2006 Coll., abou
he p e en ion o majo acciden s, a se e e
acciden is de i ned as an abno mal, pa ially o
o ally uncon ollable, spa ially and empo ally
bounded e en , such as a majo leakage,
i e o explosion, which occu ed o he o igin
is imminen ly h ea en in he con ex o wi h
he use o he building o acili y in which
he haza dous subs ance is manu ac u ed,
p ocessed, used, anspo ed o s o ed, and
leading o se ious dange o se ious impac on
he li es and heal h o people, li es ock and he
en i onmen o ha m o p ope y. [17]
This law pe ained o app oxima ely 150
indus ial companies in he Czech Republic
and es ablished basic obliga ions o ope a o s
o hese objec s. I can be said ha his law
ep esen ed a signi i can con ibu ion o he
p e en ion om majo acciden s in he Czech
Republic. Howe e , i is clea ha mos
companies we e no su i cien ly p epa ed o ul i l
obliga ions s emming om his law; he e o e
he sa e y documen a ion was in la ge numbe s
epea edly e u ned o ep ocessing [1].
Law No. 59/2006 Coll. was pa ially
amended se e al imes and by he 1s o Ma ch
in 2010 came in o e ec he law No. 488/2009
Coll. ha amends he law No. 59/2006 Coll.,
abou he p e en ion o majo acciden s
caused by dange ous chemicals o chemical
p epa a ions and abou amending he law No.
258/2000 Coll., abou he p o ec ion o public
heal h and amendmen o some ela ed laws.
[17]
Legisla ion o liabili y o damages incu ed
as a esul o majo acciden is newly ound in
§ 12. The ope a o is obliged o conclude new
insu ance wi hin 100 days om he en y in o
o ce o he decision on he app o al o he
secu i y so wa e o secu i y epo s. The limi
o indemni y mus e l ec he ange o possible
impac s o se e e acciden s, which a e cu en ly
lis ed in he app o ed secu i y p og am o in an
app o ed sa e y epo . [17]
In he new legisla ion a e speci i ed
indi idual adminis a i e o enses in a sepa a e
§ 36, which is used in § 37, which deals wi h
i nes, while in he p e ious law, he indi idual
adminis a i e o enses a e lis ed igh a he
indi idual le el o i nes.
The legisla ion o majo acciden s in he
Czech Republic uses a o al o i e ins umen s
o p o ec ion, namely:
 Inclusion o an objec o de ice.
EM_4_2015.indd 124EM_4_2015.indd 124 1.12.2015 8:44:501.12.2015 8:44:50
125
4, XVIII, 2015
Finance
The obliga ion o he ope a o o p epa e
a lis o haza dous subs ances; p opose
ca ego iza ion o g oup A o B, o handle
he p o ocol on non-inclusion.
 Risk analysis, secu i y p og am and epo .
The obliga ion o he ope a o o
pe o m analysis and e alua ion o isk
o a majo acciden and on i s basis o
p ocess sa e y p og am o p e en ion
o majo acciden s o he g oup A,
g oup B, hen a sa e y epo .
 Plan o he physical p o ec ion o he
building o acili y.
 In e nal and ex e nal eme gency plan.
 Liabili y insu ance. [8]
3. Majo Acciden Insu ance
Fo insu ance o majo acciden s in he
Czech Republic i is compulso y o conclude
con ac ual insu ance, wi h espec o he Law
No. 59/2006 Coll. Fo se ious indus ial acciden
insu ance, § 12 o Law No 59/2006 Coll. mus
be abided by, whe e he limi s o insu ance a e
se . The le el o limi o insu ance bene i mus
e l ec he ange o possible impac s o se e e
acciden s, which a e cu en ly lis ed in he
app o ed secu i y p og am o in an app o ed
sa e y epo . The le el o limi o insu ance
bene i ag eed by he ope a o o he es ing
o he ope a ion s age should e l ec he ange
o possible impac s o majo acciden based
on he esul s o isk analysis and assessmen ,
submi ed o he Regional O i ce. [17]
To al insu ance p emium is de e mined by
he ela ion:
CP = ZP * KSP * KRM + DN, (1)
whe e:
CP is he o al insu ance p emium,
ZP is he basic insu ance, including pa icipa ion,
KSP is he coe i cien o pa icipa ion,
KRM is he isk ac o ,
DN a e addi ional cos s.
Fo calcula ion o he isk ac o , a pa ial
isk analysis need be ca ied ou , he esul o
he e alua ion is h, whe ein:
1 ≤ h ≤ 5, (2)
while 1 is he bes a ing and 5 he wo s a ing;
co esponding wi h he highes possible isk.
Subsequen ly, he o e all coe i cien o he
isk ac o KRM is se , whe e:
0.3 ≤ KRM ≤ 6. (3)
The o al insu ance p emium inc eases
when inc easing he sum and inc easing ela i e
pa icipa ion dec eases he o al insu ance
p emium. The basic p oblem in de e mining he
p emium acco ding o (1) is co ec iden i i ca ion
o he basic p emium. Fo his aim, he insu ance
company needs o know he ex en o damage
p obabili y models including in o ma ion abou
possible ex eme losses. In he nex sec ion,
he issue o modeling and simula ion o ex eme
damages is deal wi h.
3.1 Modelling and Simula ion
o he Ex eme Losses
Se ious indus ial acciden s a e o en classi i ed
as ex eme, ca as ophic damages wi h he
insu ance claims amoun ing o billions o eu os.
Ex eme alues heo y is used o assess
he isks o highly imp obable e en s. To such
e en s belong se ious indus ial acciden s
and also a ious na u al disas e s (hu icanes,
l oods, ea hquakes, i es, e c.) and man-made
disas e s, including nuclea acciden s and
e o ism.
As al eady shown in i gu e 1, he amoun o
ca as ophic e en s has a endency o inc ease.
The o al insu ance bene i o insu ance
companies is made up o 80% paymen o
damages om such e en s, while hei sha e
in he o al numbe o insu ance bene i is
app oxima ely 20%. Insu ance companies a e
o ced o inno a e and con inually e alua e hei
app oaches o isk assessmen and indi idual
insu abili y o isks associa ed wi h he design
o insu ance p oduc s. Bo h hese ac s a e o
cou se signi i can ly e l ec ed in he p ices o
insu ance.
To be able o model and simula e he ex eme
losses o majo acciden s, he ollowing sec ions
p o ide a heo e ical p ocedu e o p ac ical
use o quan ile unc ion and o de s a is ics o
he simula ion o ex eme losses. Mo e de ails
abou ca as ophic isk managemen and abou
modeling ca as ophic loses you can i ne in [14]
o [16].
EM_4_2015.indd 125EM_4_2015.indd 125 1.12.2015 8:44:501.12.2015 8:44:50

126 2015, XVIII, 4
Finance
3.2 Quan ile Model
In he po olios o se ious indus ial acciden s
insu ance is he p obabili y o occu ence o
he ex eme losses highe in compa ison wi h
con en ional insu ance po olio. These claims
ha e a la ge i nancial impac on insu ance
companies, so i is impo an o he insu e o know
he p obabili y model ha adequa ely desc ibes he
insu ance losses also in he igh -hand ail.
Fo he ex eme losses modelling he long
o hea y ailed p obabili y dis ibu ions a e
used. The Pa e o dis ibu ion is o en used as
a model o claim amoun s needed o ob ain
well- i ed ails [12]. Random a iable X has
a dis ibu ion wi h he hea y ail, i applicable:
limx→∞eλx P(X > x) = limx→∞ eλx F  (x) = ∞,
o λ > 0. (4)
Quan ile unc ions applica ion is one way o
modelling he claim amoun s and subsequen
simula ion o ex eme losses.
When espec ing speci i c basic ules,
ad an ageous ea u es o quan ile unc ions
allow o combine and edi unc ions in
such a way ha he esul ing shape is non-
dec easing, quan ile unc ion again, wi h
s a is ically in e p e ed pa ame e s [7], [15].
Quan ile unc ion Q (p) is de i ned o each
eal p, 0 ≤ p ≤ 1 by ela ion:
Q (p) = xp , o which F(xp) = p. (5)
Quan ile unc ion Q (p) is hen de i ned as
he in e se o he dis ibu ion unc ion F (x). The
alue xp is called p-quan ile. By di e en ia ing
he unc ion Q (p) by p we ob ain he quan ile
densi y unc ion:
q(p) = dQ (p)
dp ,0 ≤ p ≤ 1. (6)
O de s a is ics play a key ole in modelling
using quan ile unc ions. A mo e de ailed
explana ion quan ile models can be ound o
example in [4], [13] and [15].
3.3 Simula ion o he Ex eme Values
When simula ing ex eme alues, i is p ima ily
necessa y o use he p og am o gene a ing
pseudo andom numbe s. Basic pseudo andom
numbe s a e wi hin he in e al <0, 1>
and ep esen a andom obse a ion om
a con inuous uni o m dis ibu ion on his in e al.
Quan ile unc ion o a uni o m dis ibu ion on
his in e al <0, 1> is exp essed as:
S(p) = p o 0 ≤ p ≤1. (7)
I using a andom numbe gene a o , we can
gene a e independen alues om a uni o m
dis ibu ion on he in e al <0, 1>. In his way,
he gene a ed pseudo- andom numbe s and
hei use in he p obabilis ic model o any ype
is called simula ion [7].
The basis o such simula ions is
Q- ans o ma ion ule. I z = T(x) is a non-
dec easing unc ion o x and Q (p) is he
quan ile unc ion, hen also T(Q(p)) is a quan ile
unc ion [7]. I is a non-dec easing unc ion o
T(x) a quan ile unc ion Q (p) o any dis ibu ion,
he applica ions o Q- ans o ma ion ule o he
case o uni o m dis ibu ion quan ile unc ion
S (p) = p we can simula e he alue o x om
dis ibu ion wi h quan ile unc ion Q (p) as:
xi = Q(ui) o i = 1, 2, …, n, (8)
whe e u1, u2,…, un a e simula ed alues om
a uni o m p obabili y dis ibu ion on he in e al
<0, 1>. Subs i u ing ui o quan ile unc ion xi =
Q(ui), we ob ain he a anged alues x(i), ha
gua an ee a non-dec easing shape o he
unc ion Q(ui).
The g ea ad an age o simula ion using he
quan ile unc ion is ha i also allows o simula e
only he highes alues in uppe ail wi hou
necessi y o simula ion he cen al alues o
andom a iable.
We assume he igh -hand ail o he
p obabili y dis ibu ion. By [7] and [13] i is
possible o simula e he highes alue as:
x(n) = Q(u(n)),whe e u(n) = n
1
n, (9)
while n is a andom numbe om he in e al
<0, 1>. I he sequence o he ans o med
a iables is de i ned in he o m:
u(n) = n
1
n
u(n–1) = ( n – 1 ) 1
n –1 *
u(n)
u(n–2) = ( n – 2 ) 1
n –2 *
u(n – 1)
.
.
.
EM_4_2015.indd 126EM_4_2015.indd 126 1.12.2015 8:44:501.12.2015 8:44:50
127
4, XVIII, 2015
Finance
whe e i, o i = n, n-1, n-2,, ..., a e a plu ali y
o alues gene a ed as a andom selec ion om
a uni o m dis ibu ion, hen by de i ni ion alues
ui, o i = n, n-1, n-2..., we ge an inc easing
sequence:
u(i–1) < ui . (11)
Values u(i) o m an o de ed sequence o
alues om a uni o m dis ibu ion. I we ge one
alue u(n), he ela ion o he simula ion has he
o m:
u(m) = ( m ) 1
m
* u(m+1) , o m = n–1,n–2,…
(12)
The la ges obse a ions o a iable X a e
hen simula ed as:
x(n) =Q(u(n) ) ,
x(n–1) =Q(u(n–1) ) ,
x(n–2) =Q(u(n–2) ) ,
(13)
⁞
3 .4 Simula ion o Ex eme Losses
o Majo Acciden s
In his pa , heo e ical knowledge abou
quan ile unc ion is applied on he da a acqui ed
om in o ma ion abou majo acciden s
om he p e ious chap e and applied o
simula e ex eme losses. In o al, 27 damages
calcula ed in eu os ha e been selec ed om
he in o ma ion sys ems o majo acciden s
(EMARS, ZEMA, ARIA and PZHP). All o hem
ook place o e he yea s 2008–2010 and hey
a e o de ed in Table 1.
Using he s a is ical package
STATGRAPHICS Cen u ion XV by he
Kolmogo o -Smi no es we ha e ound ou
long ailed p obabili y dis ibu ions well i ed
o da a in Table 1. Resul s o his es show
Table 2.
Acco ding o p- alues, he losses a e
bes i ed by Pa e o dis ibu ion model in he
Eu opean o m [12]:
p = F(x) = 1 – ( a
x
)b (14)
By he STATGRAPHICS Cen u ion ou pu ,
pa ame e s o his p obabili y model a e
de e mined as a = 2,000,000; b = 0.774826.
The aim is o simula e he highes i e losses,
conside ing wen y majo acciden s ha ha e
happened. Fo his, he simula ion o ex eme
alues h ough quan ile unc ion will be used.
Quan ile unc ion o Pa e o dis ibu ion
can be de i ned as a unc ion in e ed o he
dis ibu ion unc ion (14) in he o m:
xp = Q(p) = a
(1–p)1
b
(15)
2,000,000 2,000,000 2,120,000 2,500,000 2,650,000
3,000,000 3,000,000 3,400,000 3,500,000 4,000,000
4,000,000 4,500,000 5,000,000 5,100,000 6,000,000
7,090,000 8,400,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000
14,000,000 14,500,000 15,000,000 21,050,000 32,000,000
36,000,000 435,000,000
Sou ce: he in o ma ion sys ems o majo acciden s
Tab. 1: Indi idual i nancial ange o se ious indus ial acciden s (in eu o)
Loglogis ic
(3-Pa ame e ) Logno mal Logno mal
(3-Pa ame e )
Pa e o
(2-Pa ame e )
DN s a is ics 0.203818 0.137538 0.110012 0.084416
P-Value 0.212352 0.686701 0.899466 0.990618
Sou ce: own calcula ions
Tab. 2: Resul s o he Kolmogo o -Smi no es
EM_4_2015.indd 127EM_4_2015.indd 127 1.12.2015 8:44:501.12.2015 8:44:50
128 2015, XVIII, 4
Finance
The s a is ical so wa e STATGRAPHICS
Cen u ion andomly gene a ed i e numbe s
wi hin he in e al <0, 1> om an e en
dis ibu ion. The ollowing calcula ions we e
done in MS Excels, using he o mulae (10),
(12) and (13). The esul o simula ion o he
highes i e losses ou o wen y indemni ies
gi en, including he p ocedu e, is p o ided in
Tables 3 and 4.
Figu e 2 shows he simula ed damage
x=Q(u), u he jus o each o de s a is ics
X(20), X(19), …, X(16) and also hei median alues
x0.5 and quan iles x0.005 and x0.995. In [7] and [13]
is de i ed he calcula ion o he s a ed quan iles
including be a in e sion unc ion, which is why
acqui ed ou comes a e p esen ed only.
Table 4 makes i clea ha he highes
amoun o claim is om he in e al
<13,127,418.93 €; 88,829,890,943.26 €>
wi h he p obabili y α=0.99, while he median
o he highes damage eaches he alue o
156,773,540.72 €.
These esul s a e use ul o he pu poses o
insu ance and einsu ance.
3.5 Reinsu ance o he La ges Claims
Ex eme isks, simula ed in he p e ious
chap e , need o be ensu ed h ough
a combina ion o nume ous einsu ance ypes.
One o he mos used combina ions includes
a einsu ance when he applica ion o he
insu ance company’s own e en ion is ollowed
by quo a einsu ance. A highe ie is ensu ed
h ough non-p opo ional WXL/R einsu ance,
and also al e na i e o ms o einsu ance can
be use.
As shows Figu e 1, man-made disas e s
ha e been inc easingly ex ensi e la ely. Thei
modelling and simula ion is bene i cial o isk-
managemen policies o insu ance companies
and ackling c ucial issues o hei insu ance
and einsu ance.
Ex eme- alue simula ion is gene ally used
in non-p opo ional la ges claims einsu ance
LCR(p) o ECOMOR(p) einsu ance [13].
Conclusion
This a icle is de o ed o he analysis o
majo indus y acciden s. The isks o majo
acciden s and hei consequences each
ca as ophic dimensions. Tha is a eason
o equi e a quali y legisla i e modi i ca ion
ocused on he p e en ion and liquida ion o
he consequences. The SEVESO di ec i es
No. I, II and III we e sequen ially eleased
n 1/n 1/n u(n) Q(u(n))
0.6489213 20 0.050000 0.978610 0.978610 285,810,153.50 €
0.2682335 19 0.052632 0.933086 0.913127 46,829,591.89 €
0.7592468 18 0.055556 0.984815 0.899261 38,682,768.63 €
0.3568497 17 0.058824 0.941186 0.846373 22,437,953.57 €
0.4219863 16 0.062500 0.947504 0.801942 16,165,793.88 €
Sou ce: own calcula ions
Tab. 3: Simula ion o op i e damages in wen y insu ance indemni ies
Q(BETAINV(0.5; ;n- +1)) = x0.5 Q(BETAINV(0.005; ;n- +1)) = x0.005 Q(BETAINV(0.995; ;n- +1)) = x0.995
156,773,540.72 € 13,127,418.93 € 88,829,890,943.26 €
50,049,792.19 € 8,804,780.17 € 1,732,291,027.22 €
27,432,632.79 € 6,806,971.44 € 366,468,591.03 €
18,216,901.58 € 5,613,897.44 € 147,262,811.20 €
13,353,730.93 € 4,810,419.62 € 78,297,378.84 €
Sou ce: own calcula ions
Tab. 4: Quan iles o o de ing s a is ics
EM_4_2015.indd 128EM_4_2015.indd 128 1.12.2015 8:44:501.12.2015 8:44:50
129
4, XVIII, 2015
Finance
by he Eu opean Economic Communi y, he
Eu opean Communi y and he Eu opean Union
a e implemen ed by indi idual membe s a es
in o hei na ional legisla ions. In he Czech
Republic hey a e ensh ined in he Ac No.
59/2009 Coll. a his junc u e. Fo he membe
s a es o he EU, OECD and UNECE he e is
an in o ma ion sys em called EMARS. This
sys em collec s da a abou ope a o s subjec
o he ele an laws and abou majo acciden s.
EMARS p o ides basic in o ma ion abou pas
acciden s also o he gene al public.
Fo he companies in he EU a ea he e is
a legal obliga ion o ake ou liabili y insu ance
wi h insu ed sum ha has o co espond o he
ex en o he possible damage. In he Czech
Republic his obliga ion is es ablished by Ac
No. 59/2006 Coll. I is necessa y o secu e
e e y insu ance con ac , because he possible
damage can each ca as ophic dimensions.
Since he e a e big isks in such cases no only
he classical p o ec ion bu also a combina ion
o he al e na i e isk ans e me hods need
o be used. Among he ART me hods ha can
be used o hedge he isk o majo acciden s
belongs he secu i iza ion o insu ance isks.
In he a icle is used da a ela ing o 27
majo acciden s o he applica ion o he
ex eme damage simula ion and modelling
me hods. Wi h he s a is ic p og amming
sys em STATGRAPHICS Cen u ion XV by
using Kolmogo o -Smi no es he Pa e o
dis ibu ion in Eu opean o m was es ablished
as he bes model o goodness o i and also
he pa ame e alues o his dis ibu ion we e
es ima ed. Knowing he p obabili y dis ibu ion
o he amoun o damages will enable he
insu ance company o de e mine he basic
p emium and o decide o he op imal ensu ing.
Owing o ca as ophic damages o majo
acciden s, he concluding pa deals wi h
modelling and simula ion o possible ex eme
damage. In his pa was used quan ile unc ion
o Pa e o dis ibu ion in he Eu opean o m.
Simula ion using quan ile unc ion enables
es ima ion o in e als o he highes damages.
This can be used in deciding abou app op ia e
ypes o disp opo ional einsu ance and
o insu ance company’s ca as ophic isks
managemen .
This pape was suppo ed in e ms o he
p ojec SGS FES 2014 SGSFES_2014003,
en i led “Vědecko- ýzkumné ak i i y
Sys émo ém inžený s í a in o ma ice”.
Fig. 2: G aphic o m o he ex eme losses simula ion
Sou ce: Own calcula ions
EM_4_2015.indd 129EM_4_2015.indd 129 1.12.2015 8:44:511.12.2015 8:44:51