scieee Open visual document viewer

Significance and possibilities of major accident insurance

Jindrová, Pavla

Abstract

The development of human society is placing ever increasing demands on their production. This action brings the company not only positive but also negative impacts. Along with the development of industrial production, people have to face the risks posed their activity brings. The accidents, which occurred in the recent past, they still have a negative impact not only on humans but also on the environment and the economy. In this paper, we address the issue of major accidents. Major accidents are meant only accidents caused induced by human activities. The paper presents the best known major accidents since the beginning of the 20th century. They have come in the European Union to modify the legislation that is valid for the all EU Member States. In the Czech Republic, these rules are enshrined in Act No. 59/2009 Coll., on the prevention of major accidents. For human society is a necessary protection against the effects arising from major accidents. One of the possibilities is the insurance of major accidents. Since in major accidents frequently occurs very high damage is therefore utilized modelling and simulation of extreme values. One of the options that can be used is modelling using the quantile function. The paper recalled model and process simulation of extreme values. It is possible to estimate the values of the damage amounts thanks to the help of the simulation of the quantile function, and it is also possible to estimate the maximum limit of the interval of damage. This knowledge can be used in deciding on the appropriate type of non-proportional reinsurance and also for the management of catastrophic risk insurance.

Full text

121 4, XVIII, 2015 Finance DOI: 10.15240/ ul/001/2015-4-009 In oduc ion The de elopmen o human socie y places con inuously inc easing demands on i s p oduc ion. This b ings o he socie y no only posi i e bu also nega i e e ec s. Along wi h he de elopmen o indus ial p oduc ion, people ha e o ace associa ed isks. Indus ial acciden s, which ha e occu ed ecen ly, s ill ha e a nega i e impac on human li e, heal h, he en i onmen and he economy. Majo acciden s a e de i ned as e en s esul ing om uncon olled de elopmen s du ing an indus ial ac i i y, such as a se ious leakage, i e o explosion, which may immedia ely o subsequen ly lead o se ious h ea o indi iduals in o ou side he p emises, o o he en i onmen , in which one o mo e haza dous subs ances a e in ol ed. This a icle deals wi h di e en aspec s and issues o majo acciden s wi h ocus on he p e en ion o hei occu ence and possible consequences. Since he isks o majo acciden s ake ca as ophic p opo ions, he quali y legisla ion on his issue is needed. O e iew o legisla i e ac ions is in he sepa a e chap e o a icle. This legisla ion imposes o indus ial companies wi h he isk o majo acciden he obliga ion o liabili y insu ance o damages caused by he ealiza ion o hese isks. The main objec i e o he a icle is o p esen he possibili y o loss dis ibu ion o majo acciden s and simula ion o po en ial ex eme losses which a e necessa y o de e mining he p emiums. Fo he sake o illus a ion ha e been selec ed he majo acciden s and hei consequences since he ea ly wen ie h cen u y. The expe ience gained om hese and o he disas e s ha e played a signi i can ole in he de elopmen o legisla ion in ela ion o he p e en ion and liquida ion o consequences o majo acciden s. Minama a, Japan (1932–1968): The Company p oducing e ilize s eleased a o al o 27 ons o me cu y compounds in o he sea. The esul was a mass poisoning o local esiden s called Minama a disease. In he wake o his e en , 2,000 o 3,000 people died. [6] Se eso, I aly (1976): An explosion o a chemical eac o in he chemical plan o Gi audan company. The company’s managemen announced ha i had been a common acciden and hey ailed o p o ide in o ma ion abou he leakage o oxic subs ances. I was as la e as se en een days a e he acciden ha he ac o y managemen admi ed ha abou wo kilog ams o dioxin leaked in he ai , an amoun o poison capable o killing 19,000 people. [5] Bhopal, India (1984): Bhopal disas e is conside ed o be he wo s indus ial acciden in he wo ld. I s a ed in a plan o he U.S. Company Union Ca bide India Limi ed, p oducing pes icides, whe e deadly hyd ogen cyanide gas and me hylisocyana e (MIC) escaped. To his da e, mo e han 20,000 people died and app oxima ely 500,000 we e inju ed as a esul . [1] Cuba ão, B azil (1984): An explosion in a pe ochemical plan o Pe obas esul ed in a i e in local slums. The amoun o demises was due o he comple e bu ning o some si es ne e p ecisely de e mined; i is es ima ed o be app oxima ely 500. San Juan Ixhua epec, Mexico (1984): A se ies o explosions in he la ge wa ehouse LPG Company Pe oleos Mexicanos des oyed pa o he ci y. Abou 500 people died. Sandoz, Swi ze land (1986): A i e in he ag o-chemical company Sandoz wa ehouse caused he elease o oxic ag ochemicals in o he ai , bu also abou 30–40 ons o hese chemicals escaped in o he Rhine Ri e . Mix u e o subs ances in he i e con ained pes icides, dioxins, me cu y, chlo ine compounds, l uo escen dyes, o ganophospha es and o he s. Ciba-Geib, chemical company ound SIGNIFICANCE AND POSSIBILITIES OF MAJOR ACCIDENT INSURANCE Pa la Jind o á, Radim Jakubínský EM_4_2015.indd 121EM_4_2015.indd 121 1.12.2015 8:44:491.12.2015 8:44:49 122 2015, XVIII, 4 Finance close o his si e, a emp ed o make use o his si ua ion eleasing 400 li es o a azine in o he i e , belie ing his will no be e ealed. Chemicals immedia ely caused he dea h o aqua ic animals in he i e . 100 ons o i sh we e killed and pollu ion o he Rhine eached as a as he Ne he lands. [3] Baia Ma e, Romania (2000): Many expe s belie e ha i is Eu ope’s wo s en i onmen al disas e since he Che nobyl explosion. A dam holding back 100,000 cubic me e s o con amina ed wa e bu s con amina ing d inking-wa e supplies o mo e han 2.5 million Hunga ians. Due o he oxici y o cyanide in wa e , especially a ound he basin o he Tisza, i ually all li ing o ganisms pe ished along he i e . Fu he sou hwa ds, in he Se bian pa , app oxima ely 80% o aqua ic li e was killed. Two yea s a e , he ecosys em began o e u n o i s o iginal s a e, al hough s ill a om he le el be o e he disas e . [5] Enschede, The Ne he lands (2000): Fi e a S.E. Fi ewo ks caused a subsequen explosion o i ewo ks ha he company had p oduced. Nume ous explosions ensued wi hin he ollowing 30 minu es, de as a ing an a ea o 5 km2. The i e sp ead o a neighbou ing b ewe y. The esul ing cloud o smoke om he wo companies was seen a a dis ance o 60 km. In his disas e , 22 people los hei li e, including ou i e- i gh e s, and o e 940 people we e inju ed. I des oyed app oxima ely 500 apa men s, 1,500 homes, 60 businesses. [5] Toulouse, F ance (2001): Explosion in he AZF chemical ac o y. I was equi alen o 20– 40 ons o TNT, i caused a emo o 3.4 on Rich e scale and was hea d up o a dis ance o 80 km. The explosion caused a o al o 29 dea hs, 2,500 se ious inju ies and 8,000 mino inju ies. Damages paid ou o insu ance claims exceeded € 1.5 billion. [5] Wes , Texas (2013): Ammonium ni a e exploded in a e ilize ac o y. As a esul 15 people died, nea ly 200 people we e wounded and 150 buildings we e des oyed o damaged. The essen ial in o ma ion, howe e , is he ac ha he company had liabili y insu ance o damages only in he amoun o one million dolla s, bu he o al damage exceeded one hund ed million U.S. dolla s. Wi h espec o he o al damage, i may sound inadequa e ha he company was i ned $ 118,300 agg ega ely. In many s a es, including Texas, he e is no legal obliga ion o he company o conclude liabili y insu ance o he damage wi h he insu ed sum co esponding wi h he ange o possible damages. 1. De elopmen o he Numbe o Acciden s Human socie y is also exposed o he ac ion o na u al causes, o en in he o m o na u al disas e s. The numbe and consequences o man-made disas e s is inc easing wi h he de elopmen o human socie y. De elopmen o indus ial p oduc ion also b ings abou he isk o majo acciden s. Figu e 1 shows he de elopmen o he numbe o disas e s caused by human in l uence, compa ed o na u al disas e s be ween 1970 and 2012. This da a shows a long- e m g ow h o bo h ypes o ca as ophic e en s. The cha shows ha om 1970 onwa ds, he yea 2010 is he i s yea whe e a highe occu ence o na u al disas e s appea ed mo e han man- made disas e s. This is also one o he ala ming signals o he socie y o p o ec hemsel es and hei en i onmen om he e ec s o man- made disas e s. The p ima y challenge o he company is o ake such measu es so ha no majo acciden s occu . Howe e , people mus be adequa ely p epa ed o possible explosions, i es, spills, and o he se ious aul s. Fo his eason i is ad isable o use eme gency scena ios. Damages a ising om indus ial disas e s can each ex eme alues o billions o Eu os. I a company should be able o bea he i nancial consequences o majo acciden s, i is necessa y o ha e insu ance ha co e s possible damages in an adequa e amoun . A his poin i should be no ed ha he insu ance company i sel , howe e , canno bea he isks in such olumes ha a e ypical o hese isks. I is he e o e necessa y o nego ia e ensu ing o each insu ance con ac . 2. Legisla ion a Issue P e en ion o Majo Acciden s The need o legisla ion o ope a o s o indus ial acili ies and o ganisa ions, which a e h ea ened by majo acciden s, was es ablished immedia ely a e he i s occu ence o se ious e en s. U gen alks on a new EU di ec i e on whole egula o y amewo k in ensu ing he sa e y o haza dous ins alla ions s a ed a e EM_4_2015.indd 122EM_4_2015.indd 122 1.12.2015 8:44:491.12.2015 8:44:49 123 4, XVIII, 2015 Finance he explosion o cyclohexane in he ac o y NYPRO L d. in Flixbo ough (UK, 1974). O e he nex wo yea s in he Eu opean Communi y amewo k occu ed h ee addi ional se ious chemical acciden s: Beek (Ne he lands, 1975), Man edonia (I aly, 1976) and Se eso (I aly, 1976). [5] In he ligh o hese ca as ophic acciden s, i was clea ha new legisla ion o imp o e he sa e y o indus ial si es, planning o eme gencies o -si e acciden s and dealing wi h he aspec s o b oade egional and c oss- bo de indus ial sa e y is needed. Di ec i e Se eso, p epa ed in Feb ua y 1977, which was adop ed by he Council o Minis e s o he Eu opean Communi y on 24 6 h, 1982, is he esul o hose e o s. The ollowing measu es ha e o be adop ed by indi idual Membe S a es no la e han Janua y 8 h, 1984. [18] The Di ec i e applies o he p e en ion o majo acciden s which may be caused by ce ain indus ial ac i i ies, and o limi hei consequences o a man and he en i onmen . I ocuses on he con e gence o he measu es aken by he Membe S a es in his a ea. A icle 1 de i nes e ms such as indus ial ac i i y, ope a o , majo acciden s and haza dous subs ances. The Di ec i e was modi i ed wice, in 1987 Di ec i e 87/216/EEC o 19 Ma ch 1987 (O i cial Jou nal No L 85 o 28 Ma ch 1987) and he 1988 Di ec i e 88/610/EEC o 24 No embe 1988 (OJ L 336 o 7 Decembe 1988). Bo h amendmen s aimed o ex end he scope o his Di ec i e, la gely in o de o include he s o age o haza dous subs ances. [18] Changes occu ed in esponse o a majo acciden in he Union Ca bide ac o y in Bhopal, India in 1984 and acciden s in he Sandoz wa ehouse in Basel, Swi ze land in 1986. Se eso I does no apply o nuclea acili ies and plan s p ocessing adioac i e subs ances and ma e ials, mili a y equipmen , p oduc ion and sepa a e s o age o explosi es, gunpowde and ammuni ion, mining and o he mining ope a ions, equipmen used o he disposal o oxic and haza dous was e, which a e subjec o Communi y law, i hei aim is o p e en majo acciden s. As he Council o Eu ope and ep esen a i es o he Go e nmen s o he Membe S a es si ing in he Council s essed he need o a mo e e ec i e implemen a ion o Di ec i e 82/501/EEC and called o a e iew o he di ec i e which, i necessa y, included a possible ex ension o he p o ince scope o Di ec i e and a g ea e exchange o in o ma ion in his i eld be ween Membe S a es. Also he need o imp o ed managemen o isks and acciden s was s essed. In addi ion, he acciden in Bhopal and Mexico highligh ed he dange posed by he p oximi y o esiden ial Fig. 1: De elopmen o he numbe o disas e s 1970–2012 Sou ce: own EM_4_2015.indd 123EM_4_2015.indd 123 1.12.2015 8:44:501.12.2015 8:44:50 124 2015, XVIII, 4 Finance buildings and dange ous a eas. Las bu no leas , om he impo ance and bene i s o in o ming he indi idual Membe S a es was on Decembe 9 h, 1996, a new Di ec i e 96/82/EC accep ed, known as he Se eso II. [6] Due o se e e indus ial acciden s in Toulouse, F ance, in Baia Ma e, Romania and Enschede, in he Ne he lands and conclusions o s udies on ca cinogens and subs ances dange ous o he en i onmen was Se eso II ex ended by Di ec i e 2003/105/EC. The new Di ec i e equi es Membe S a es o ensu e a e y de ailed app aisal o isks by using possible acciden scena ios ha co e isks a ising om s o age and p ocessing ac i i ies in mining, s o age o py o echnics and explosi es s o age o ammonium ni a e based e ilize s [5] The main eason o eplacing he Se eso II Di ec i e is a change in he sys em o classi i ca ion o dange ous subs ances es ablished by he Eu opean Di ec i e No. 1272/2008 o Decembe 16 h 2008, abou classi i ca ion, labelling and packaging o subs ances and mix u es. I was also necessa y o cla i y and upda e ce ain pa s o he di ec i e, o imp o e he implemen a ion and en o cemen o he Di ec i e. In o al, in he Se eso III (2012/18/EU) is lis ed 32 easons. This Di ec i e was adop ed on July 4 h, 2012, published July 24 h, 2012, coming in o o ce on Augus 13 h 2012, o be implemen ed by May 31s , 2015 wi h he excep ion o he implemen a ion o he A icle 30, wi h he la es da e Feb ua y 14 h, 2014. This pa applies o hea y uel oils. Se eso III Di ec i e is ex ended o onsho e unde g ound gas s o age acili ies. The Se eso II di ec i e de i nes 8 concep s: plan , equipmen , ope a o , haza dous subs ances, majo acciden haza ds, isks and wa ehouse. The new Se eso III Di ec i e de i nes 19 concep s, including 7 om he p e ious di ec i e (excluding concep s o e). The Se eso I, II and III, which a e g adually eleased by he Eu opean Economic Communi y, he Eu opean Communi y and he Eu opean Union, a e inco po a ed by indi idual Membe S a es in o hei na ional legisla ion. In he Czech Republic, he law No. 59/2006 Coll is being add essed. The legisla ion also includes access o isk assessmen , eme gency scena ios and plans, he need o insu ance, public access o in o ma ion and many o he se ious measu es. Acco ding o Law No. 59/2006 Coll., abou he p e en ion o majo acciden s, a se e e acciden is de i ned as an abno mal, pa ially o o ally uncon ollable, spa ially and empo ally bounded e en , such as a majo leakage, i e o explosion, which occu ed o he o igin is imminen ly h ea en in he con ex o wi h he use o he building o acili y in which he haza dous subs ance is manu ac u ed, p ocessed, used, anspo ed o s o ed, and leading o se ious dange o se ious impac on he li es and heal h o people, li es ock and he en i onmen o ha m o p ope y. [17] This law pe ained o app oxima ely 150 indus ial companies in he Czech Republic and es ablished basic obliga ions o ope a o s o hese objec s. I can be said ha his law ep esen ed a signi i can con ibu ion o he p e en ion om majo acciden s in he Czech Republic. Howe e , i is clea ha mos companies we e no su i cien ly p epa ed o ul i l obliga ions s emming om his law; he e o e he sa e y documen a ion was in la ge numbe s epea edly e u ned o ep ocessing [1]. Law No. 59/2006 Coll. was pa ially amended se e al imes and by he 1s o Ma ch in 2010 came in o e ec he law No. 488/2009 Coll. ha amends he law No. 59/2006 Coll., abou he p e en ion o majo acciden s caused by dange ous chemicals o chemical p epa a ions and abou amending he law No. 258/2000 Coll., abou he p o ec ion o public heal h and amendmen o some ela ed laws. [17] Legisla ion o liabili y o damages incu ed as a esul o majo acciden is newly ound in § 12. The ope a o is obliged o conclude new insu ance wi hin 100 days om he en y in o o ce o he decision on he app o al o he secu i y so wa e o secu i y epo s. The limi o indemni y mus e l ec he ange o possible impac s o se e e acciden s, which a e cu en ly lis ed in he app o ed secu i y p og am o in an app o ed sa e y epo . [17] In he new legisla ion a e speci i ed indi idual adminis a i e o enses in a sepa a e § 36, which is used in § 37, which deals wi h i nes, while in he p e ious law, he indi idual adminis a i e o enses a e lis ed igh a he indi idual le el o i nes. The legisla ion o majo acciden s in he Czech Republic uses a o al o i e ins umen s o p o ec ion, namely:  Inclusion o an objec o de ice. EM_4_2015.indd 124EM_4_2015.indd 124 1.12.2015 8:44:501.12.2015 8:44:50 125 4, XVIII, 2015 Finance The obliga ion o he ope a o o p epa e a lis o haza dous subs ances; p opose ca ego iza ion o g oup A o B, o handle he p o ocol on non-inclusion.  Risk analysis, secu i y p og am and epo . The obliga ion o he ope a o o pe o m analysis and e alua ion o isk o a majo acciden and on i s basis o p ocess sa e y p og am o p e en ion o majo acciden s o he g oup A, g oup B, hen a sa e y epo .  Plan o he physical p o ec ion o he building o acili y.  In e nal and ex e nal eme gency plan.  Liabili y insu ance. [8] 3. Majo Acciden Insu ance Fo insu ance o majo acciden s in he Czech Republic i is compulso y o conclude con ac ual insu ance, wi h espec o he Law No. 59/2006 Coll. Fo se ious indus ial acciden insu ance, § 12 o Law No 59/2006 Coll. mus be abided by, whe e he limi s o insu ance a e se . The le el o limi o insu ance bene i mus e l ec he ange o possible impac s o se e e acciden s, which a e cu en ly lis ed in he app o ed secu i y p og am o in an app o ed sa e y epo . The le el o limi o insu ance bene i ag eed by he ope a o o he es ing o he ope a ion s age should e l ec he ange o possible impac s o majo acciden based on he esul s o isk analysis and assessmen , submi ed o he Regional O i ce. [17] To al insu ance p emium is de e mined by he ela ion: CP = ZP * KSP * KRM + DN, (1) whe e: CP is he o al insu ance p emium, ZP is he basic insu ance, including pa icipa ion, KSP is he coe i cien o pa icipa ion, KRM is he isk ac o , DN a e addi ional cos s. Fo calcula ion o he isk ac o , a pa ial isk analysis need be ca ied ou , he esul o he e alua ion is h, whe ein: 1 ≤ h ≤ 5, (2) while 1 is he bes a ing and 5 he wo s a ing; co esponding wi h he highes possible isk. Subsequen ly, he o e all coe i cien o he isk ac o KRM is se , whe e: 0.3 ≤ KRM ≤ 6. (3) The o al insu ance p emium inc eases when inc easing he sum and inc easing ela i e pa icipa ion dec eases he o al insu ance p emium. The basic p oblem in de e mining he p emium acco ding o (1) is co ec iden i i ca ion o he basic p emium. Fo his aim, he insu ance company needs o know he ex en o damage p obabili y models including in o ma ion abou possible ex eme losses. In he nex sec ion, he issue o modeling and simula ion o ex eme damages is deal wi h. 3.1 Modelling and Simula ion o he Ex eme Losses Se ious indus ial acciden s a e o en classi i ed as ex eme, ca as ophic damages wi h he insu ance claims amoun ing o billions o eu os. Ex eme alues heo y is used o assess he isks o highly imp obable e en s. To such e en s belong se ious indus ial acciden s and also a ious na u al disas e s (hu icanes, l oods, ea hquakes, i es, e c.) and man-made disas e s, including nuclea acciden s and e o ism. As al eady shown in i gu e 1, he amoun o ca as ophic e en s has a endency o inc ease. The o al insu ance bene i o insu ance companies is made up o 80% paymen o damages om such e en s, while hei sha e in he o al numbe o insu ance bene i is app oxima ely 20%. Insu ance companies a e o ced o inno a e and con inually e alua e hei app oaches o isk assessmen and indi idual insu abili y o isks associa ed wi h he design o insu ance p oduc s. Bo h hese ac s a e o cou se signi i can ly e l ec ed in he p ices o insu ance. To be able o model and simula e he ex eme losses o majo acciden s, he ollowing sec ions p o ide a heo e ical p ocedu e o p ac ical use o quan ile unc ion and o de s a is ics o he simula ion o ex eme losses. Mo e de ails abou ca as ophic isk managemen and abou modeling ca as ophic loses you can i ne in [14] o [16]. EM_4_2015.indd 125EM_4_2015.indd 125 1.12.2015 8:44:501.12.2015 8:44:50 126 2015, XVIII, 4 Finance 3.2 Quan ile Model In he po olios o se ious indus ial acciden s insu ance is he p obabili y o occu ence o he ex eme losses highe in compa ison wi h con en ional insu ance po olio. These claims ha e a la ge i nancial impac on insu ance companies, so i is impo an o he insu e o know he p obabili y model ha adequa ely desc ibes he insu ance losses also in he igh -hand ail. Fo he ex eme losses modelling he long o hea y ailed p obabili y dis ibu ions a e used. The Pa e o dis ibu ion is o en used as a model o claim amoun s needed o ob ain well- i ed ails [12]. Random a iable X has a dis ibu ion wi h he hea y ail, i applicable: limx→∞eλx P(X > x) = limx→∞ eλx F  (x) = ∞, o λ > 0. (4) Quan ile unc ions applica ion is one way o modelling he claim amoun s and subsequen simula ion o ex eme losses. When espec ing speci i c basic ules, ad an ageous ea u es o quan ile unc ions allow o combine and edi unc ions in such a way ha he esul ing shape is non- dec easing, quan ile unc ion again, wi h s a is ically in e p e ed pa ame e s [7], [15]. Quan ile unc ion Q (p) is de i ned o each eal p, 0 ≤ p ≤ 1 by ela ion: Q (p) = xp , o which F(xp) = p. (5) Quan ile unc ion Q (p) is hen de i ned as he in e se o he dis ibu ion unc ion F (x). The alue xp is called p-quan ile. By di e en ia ing he unc ion Q (p) by p we ob ain he quan ile densi y unc ion: q(p) = dQ (p) dp ,0 ≤ p ≤ 1. (6) O de s a is ics play a key ole in modelling using quan ile unc ions. A mo e de ailed explana ion quan ile models can be ound o example in [4], [13] and [15]. 3.3 Simula ion o he Ex eme Values When simula ing ex eme alues, i is p ima ily necessa y o use he p og am o gene a ing pseudo andom numbe s. Basic pseudo andom numbe s a e wi hin he in e al <0, 1> and ep esen a andom obse a ion om a con inuous uni o m dis ibu ion on his in e al. Quan ile unc ion o a uni o m dis ibu ion on his in e al <0, 1> is exp essed as: S(p) = p o 0 ≤ p ≤1. (7) I using a andom numbe gene a o , we can gene a e independen alues om a uni o m dis ibu ion on he in e al <0, 1>. In his way, he gene a ed pseudo- andom numbe s and hei use in he p obabilis ic model o any ype is called simula ion [7]. The basis o such simula ions is Q- ans o ma ion ule. I z = T(x) is a non- dec easing unc ion o x and Q (p) is he quan ile unc ion, hen also T(Q(p)) is a quan ile unc ion [7]. I is a non-dec easing unc ion o T(x) a quan ile unc ion Q (p) o any dis ibu ion, he applica ions o Q- ans o ma ion ule o he case o uni o m dis ibu ion quan ile unc ion S (p) = p we can simula e he alue o x om dis ibu ion wi h quan ile unc ion Q (p) as: xi = Q(ui) o i = 1, 2, …, n, (8) whe e u1, u2,…, un a e simula ed alues om a uni o m p obabili y dis ibu ion on he in e al <0, 1>. Subs i u ing ui o quan ile unc ion xi = Q(ui), we ob ain he a anged alues x(i), ha gua an ee a non-dec easing shape o he unc ion Q(ui). The g ea ad an age o simula ion using he quan ile unc ion is ha i also allows o simula e only he highes alues in uppe ail wi hou necessi y o simula ion he cen al alues o andom a iable. We assume he igh -hand ail o he p obabili y dis ibu ion. By [7] and [13] i is possible o simula e he highes alue as: x(n) = Q(u(n)),whe e u(n) = n 1 n, (9) while n is a andom numbe om he in e al <0, 1>. I he sequence o he ans o med a iables is de i ned in he o m: u(n) = n 1 n u(n–1) = ( n – 1 ) 1 n –1 * u(n) u(n–2) = ( n – 2 ) 1 n –2 * u(n – 1) . . . EM_4_2015.indd 126EM_4_2015.indd 126 1.12.2015 8:44:501.12.2015 8:44:50 127 4, XVIII, 2015 Finance whe e i, o i = n, n-1, n-2,, ..., a e a plu ali y o alues gene a ed as a andom selec ion om a uni o m dis ibu ion, hen by de i ni ion alues ui, o i = n, n-1, n-2..., we ge an inc easing sequence: u(i–1) < ui . (11) Values u(i) o m an o de ed sequence o alues om a uni o m dis ibu ion. I we ge one alue u(n), he ela ion o he simula ion has he o m: u(m) = ( m ) 1 m * u(m+1) , o m = n–1,n–2,… (12) The la ges obse a ions o a iable X a e hen simula ed as: x(n) =Q(u(n) ) , x(n–1) =Q(u(n–1) ) , x(n–2) =Q(u(n–2) ) , (13) ⁞ 3 .4 Simula ion o Ex eme Losses o Majo Acciden s In his pa , heo e ical knowledge abou quan ile unc ion is applied on he da a acqui ed om in o ma ion abou majo acciden s om he p e ious chap e and applied o simula e ex eme losses. In o al, 27 damages calcula ed in eu os ha e been selec ed om he in o ma ion sys ems o majo acciden s (EMARS, ZEMA, ARIA and PZHP). All o hem ook place o e he yea s 2008–2010 and hey a e o de ed in Table 1. Using he s a is ical package STATGRAPHICS Cen u ion XV by he Kolmogo o -Smi no es we ha e ound ou long ailed p obabili y dis ibu ions well i ed o da a in Table 1. Resul s o his es show Table 2. Acco ding o p- alues, he losses a e bes i ed by Pa e o dis ibu ion model in he Eu opean o m [12]: p = F(x) = 1 – ( a x )b (14) By he STATGRAPHICS Cen u ion ou pu , pa ame e s o his p obabili y model a e de e mined as a = 2,000,000; b = 0.774826. The aim is o simula e he highes i e losses, conside ing wen y majo acciden s ha ha e happened. Fo his, he simula ion o ex eme alues h ough quan ile unc ion will be used. Quan ile unc ion o Pa e o dis ibu ion can be de i ned as a unc ion in e ed o he dis ibu ion unc ion (14) in he o m: xp = Q(p) = a (1–p)1 b (15) 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,120,000 2,500,000 2,650,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 3,400,000 3,500,000 4,000,000 4,000,000 4,500,000 5,000,000 5,100,000 6,000,000 7,090,000 8,400,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 14,500,000 15,000,000 21,050,000 32,000,000 36,000,000 435,000,000 Sou ce: he in o ma ion sys ems o majo acciden s Tab. 1: Indi idual i nancial ange o se ious indus ial acciden s (in eu o) Loglogis ic (3-Pa ame e ) Logno mal Logno mal (3-Pa ame e ) Pa e o (2-Pa ame e ) DN s a is ics 0.203818 0.137538 0.110012 0.084416 P-Value 0.212352 0.686701 0.899466 0.990618 Sou ce: own calcula ions Tab. 2: Resul s o he Kolmogo o -Smi no es EM_4_2015.indd 127EM_4_2015.indd 127 1.12.2015 8:44:501.12.2015 8:44:50 128 2015, XVIII, 4 Finance The s a is ical so wa e STATGRAPHICS Cen u ion andomly gene a ed i e numbe s wi hin he in e al <0, 1> om an e en dis ibu ion. The ollowing calcula ions we e done in MS Excels, using he o mulae (10), (12) and (13). The esul o simula ion o he highes i e losses ou o wen y indemni ies gi en, including he p ocedu e, is p o ided in Tables 3 and 4. Figu e 2 shows he simula ed damage x=Q(u), u he jus o each o de s a is ics X(20), X(19), …, X(16) and also hei median alues x0.5 and quan iles x0.005 and x0.995. In [7] and [13] is de i ed he calcula ion o he s a ed quan iles including be a in e sion unc ion, which is why acqui ed ou comes a e p esen ed only. Table 4 makes i clea ha he highes amoun o claim is om he in e al <13,127,418.93 €; 88,829,890,943.26 €> wi h he p obabili y α=0.99, while he median o he highes damage eaches he alue o 156,773,540.72 €. These esul s a e use ul o he pu poses o insu ance and einsu ance. 3.5 Reinsu ance o he La ges Claims Ex eme isks, simula ed in he p e ious chap e , need o be ensu ed h ough a combina ion o nume ous einsu ance ypes. One o he mos used combina ions includes a einsu ance when he applica ion o he insu ance company’s own e en ion is ollowed by quo a einsu ance. A highe ie is ensu ed h ough non-p opo ional WXL/R einsu ance, and also al e na i e o ms o einsu ance can be use. As shows Figu e 1, man-made disas e s ha e been inc easingly ex ensi e la ely. Thei modelling and simula ion is bene i cial o isk- managemen policies o insu ance companies and ackling c ucial issues o hei insu ance and einsu ance. Ex eme- alue simula ion is gene ally used in non-p opo ional la ges claims einsu ance LCR(p) o ECOMOR(p) einsu ance [13]. Conclusion This a icle is de o ed o he analysis o majo indus y acciden s. The isks o majo acciden s and hei consequences each ca as ophic dimensions. Tha is a eason o equi e a quali y legisla i e modi i ca ion ocused on he p e en ion and liquida ion o he consequences. The SEVESO di ec i es No. I, II and III we e sequen ially eleased n 1/n 1/n u(n) Q(u(n)) 0.6489213 20 0.050000 0.978610 0.978610 285,810,153.50 € 0.2682335 19 0.052632 0.933086 0.913127 46,829,591.89 € 0.7592468 18 0.055556 0.984815 0.899261 38,682,768.63 € 0.3568497 17 0.058824 0.941186 0.846373 22,437,953.57 € 0.4219863 16 0.062500 0.947504 0.801942 16,165,793.88 € Sou ce: own calcula ions Tab. 3: Simula ion o op i e damages in wen y insu ance indemni ies Q(BETAINV(0.5; ;n- +1)) = x0.5 Q(BETAINV(0.005; ;n- +1)) = x0.005 Q(BETAINV(0.995; ;n- +1)) = x0.995 156,773,540.72 € 13,127,418.93 € 88,829,890,943.26 € 50,049,792.19 € 8,804,780.17 € 1,732,291,027.22 € 27,432,632.79 € 6,806,971.44 € 366,468,591.03 € 18,216,901.58 € 5,613,897.44 € 147,262,811.20 € 13,353,730.93 € 4,810,419.62 € 78,297,378.84 € Sou ce: own calcula ions Tab. 4: Quan iles o o de ing s a is ics EM_4_2015.indd 128EM_4_2015.indd 128 1.12.2015 8:44:501.12.2015 8:44:50 129 4, XVIII, 2015 Finance by he Eu opean Economic Communi y, he Eu opean Communi y and he Eu opean Union a e implemen ed by indi idual membe s a es in o hei na ional legisla ions. In he Czech Republic hey a e ensh ined in he Ac No. 59/2009 Coll. a his junc u e. Fo he membe s a es o he EU, OECD and UNECE he e is an in o ma ion sys em called EMARS. This sys em collec s da a abou ope a o s subjec o he ele an laws and abou majo acciden s. EMARS p o ides basic in o ma ion abou pas acciden s also o he gene al public. Fo he companies in he EU a ea he e is a legal obliga ion o ake ou liabili y insu ance wi h insu ed sum ha has o co espond o he ex en o he possible damage. In he Czech Republic his obliga ion is es ablished by Ac No. 59/2006 Coll. I is necessa y o secu e e e y insu ance con ac , because he possible damage can each ca as ophic dimensions. Since he e a e big isks in such cases no only he classical p o ec ion bu also a combina ion o he al e na i e isk ans e me hods need o be used. Among he ART me hods ha can be used o hedge he isk o majo acciden s belongs he secu i iza ion o insu ance isks. In he a icle is used da a ela ing o 27 majo acciden s o he applica ion o he ex eme damage simula ion and modelling me hods. Wi h he s a is ic p og amming sys em STATGRAPHICS Cen u ion XV by using Kolmogo o -Smi no es he Pa e o dis ibu ion in Eu opean o m was es ablished as he bes model o goodness o i and also he pa ame e alues o his dis ibu ion we e es ima ed. Knowing he p obabili y dis ibu ion o he amoun o damages will enable he insu ance company o de e mine he basic p emium and o decide o he op imal ensu ing. Owing o ca as ophic damages o majo acciden s, he concluding pa deals wi h modelling and simula ion o possible ex eme damage. In his pa was used quan ile unc ion o Pa e o dis ibu ion in he Eu opean o m. Simula ion using quan ile unc ion enables es ima ion o in e als o he highes damages. This can be used in deciding abou app op ia e ypes o disp opo ional einsu ance and o insu ance company’s ca as ophic isks managemen . This pape was suppo ed in e ms o he p ojec SGS FES 2014 SGSFES_2014003, en i led “Vědecko- ýzkumné ak i i y Sys émo ém inžený s í a in o ma ice”. Fig. 2: G aphic o m o he ex eme losses simula ion Sou ce: Own calcula ions EM_4_2015.indd 129EM_4_2015.indd 129 1.12.2015 8:44:511.12.2015 8:44:51