1
SILVA FENNICA
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017
Ca ego y: esea ch a icle
h ps://doi.o g/10.14214/s .2017
h p://www.sil a ennica. i
Licenced CC BY-SA 4.0
ISSN-L 0037-5330 | ISSN 2242-4075 (Online)
The Finnish Socie y o Fo es Science
Pen i Niemis ö1, Soili Kojola 2, Anssi Ah ikoski 3 and Raija Laiho
2
F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce? – Financial
pe o mance o downy bi ch managemen on d ained
pea lands
Niemis ö P., Kojola S., Ah ikoski A., Laiho R. (2017). F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?
– Financial pe o mance o downy bi ch managemen on d ained pea lands. Sil a Fennica ol.
51 no. 3 a icle id 2017. 28 p. h ps://doi.o g/10.14214/s .2017
Highligh s
• The mos p o i able managemen egimes o pulpwood and ene gy wood p oduc ion in dense
downy bi ch s ands on d ained pea lands include no hinnings, bu inal cu ing a he s and
age o 40–45 yea s as whole- ee ha es ing, o as in eg a ed ha es ing o pulpwood and
delimbed ene gy wood s ems abou 10 yea s la e depending on applicable ha es ing me hod.
• A compe i i e managemen egime is ea ly p ecomme cial hinning a 4 m dominan heigh
o a densi y o 2500 s ems pe hec a e and p oduc ion o pulpwood wi h a o a ion o 55–65
yea s. Equal p o i abili y is achie ed wi h o wi hou adi ional i s hinning, which can hus
be included o o he easons, o example o imp o e egene a ion o sp uce.
Abs ac
Downy bi ch (Be ula pubescens Eh h.) s ands on d ained pea lands a e o en conside ed useless
because hey ypically do no yield good-quali y sawn imbe . Howe e , co e ing an a ea o ca.
0.5 million hec a es and wi h o al yields o up o 250 m3 ha–1, downy bi ch s ands on pea lands in
Finland ha e a po en ial o pulpwood and/o ene gy wood p oduc ion. We examined he inancial
pe o mance o al e na i e managemen egimes (wi h o wi hou hinnings, di e en hinning
in ensi ies, se e al o a ion leng hs) combined wi h al e na i e ha es ing me hods (pulpwood,
ene gy wood, o in eg a ed, ene gy wood being delimbed s ems o whole ees). We used da a
om 19 expe imen al s ands, moni o ed o 20–30 yea s. Fo ha es ing emo als we conside ed
bo h ac ual hinning emo als and inal-cu ing emo als wi h al e na i e imings ha we e based
on he moni o ing da a. We assessed he p o i abili y as a combina ion o he ne p esen alue
o he bi ch gene a ion and he ba e land alue o u u e gene a ions o No way sp uce (Picea
abies (L.) Ka s .). The mos p o i able managemen was g owing wi hou hinnings un il whole-
ee inal cu ing a he s and age o 40–45 yea s wi h an ad anced mul i- ee ha es ing me hod.
In con as , he s anda d me hod in whole- ee inal cu ing esul ed in he lowes p o i abili y,
and an in eg a ed me hod wi h he ene gy wood as delimbed s ems was he bes o he s anda d
me hods. Thinnings we e unp o i able especially when aiming o p oduce ene gy wood, whe eas
aiming o pulpwood, ligh p ecomme cial hinning was compe i i e. Comme cial hinning a he
adi ional “pulpwood s age” had li le e ec on p o i abili y. The bes s and age o inal cu ing
was 40–65 yea s – ea lie o e y dense s ands and whole- ee ene gy wood ha es ing wi h
ad anced me hod, la e o p ecomme cially hinned s ands and pulpwood ha es ing.
Keywo ds Be ula pubescens; ene gy wood; inal cu ing; o es managemen ; p o i abili y; pulp-
wood; hinning
2
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
Add esses 1 Na u al Resou ces Ins i u e Finland (Luke), Managemen and P oduc ion o Renew-
able Resou ces, Kampus an a 9 C, 60320 Seinäjoki, Finland; 2 Na u al Resou ces Ins i u e Fin-
land (Luke), Managemen and P oduc ion o Renewable Resou ces, La oka anonkaa i 9, 00790
Helsinki, Finland; 3 Na u al Resou ces Ins i u e Finland (Luke), Managemen and P oduc ion o
Renewable Resou ces, Paa o Ha aksen ie 3, 90014 Uni e si y o Oulu, Finland
E-mail [email p o ec ed]
Recei ed 13 Janua y 2017 Re ised 29 May 2017 Accep ed 30 May 2017
1 In oduc ion
Downy bi ch (Be ula pubescens Eh h.) is one o he mos common ee species in No he n Eu ope.
In Finland, i ep esen s abou 12% o he o al olume o he g owing s ock (Niemis ö and Ko honen
2008). Downy bi ch ole a es mois condi ions and hus g ows well on we soils, and as a pionee
ee species e y easily o ms dense s ands on, e.g., d ained pea lands (Kel ikangas and Seppälä
1977; Sa amäki 1977; Moilanen 1985). In Finland, whe e d ainage o pea lands o imp o e o es
g ow h has ema kably inc eased he a ea (ca. 5 million hec a es; Me in o 2014) and he annual
ha es ing po en ial (9–12 million m3 ha–1 a–1; Nuu inen e al. 2007) o pea land o es s, downy
bi ch s ands ha e a no able ole in o es y, especially egionally. Based on he Finnish Na ional
Fo es In en o y da a (NFI11, measu ed in 2009–2013), he o al a ea o bi ch-domina ed s ands
(p opo ion o bi ch a leas 50% o s and olume) on d ained pea lands ep esen ing “ o es land”
was 572 000 ha. These s ands we e mos common in he no he n pa s o Finland, especially in
No he n Os obo hnia and sou h-wes e n Lapland (Niemis ö and Ko honen 2008; Kojola e al.
2015). The e we e u he 29 000 ha o bi ch-domina ed s ands on “poo ly p oduc i e o es land”.
The downy bi ch s ands g owing on d ained pea lands a e o en conside ed useless hick-
e s, wi hou any easonable o es managemen pu pose. Ye , hei wood-p oduc ion po en ial is
o en good. When g owing on well-p oduc i e si e ypes, he o al yield o downy bi ch s ands
may each 250 m3 ha–1 (Niemis ö 2013). In he NFI11, he o al olume o he g owing s ock on
bi ch-domina ed d ained pea lands was es ima ed o be close o 60 million cubic me e s. Based on
Niemis ö and Ko honen (2008), app oxima ely h ee qua e s o ha can be expec ed o be bi ch
wood. E en i he sawn- imbe yield may be low in bi ch-domina ed pea land o es s (Koi is o
1959; F ies 1964; B aas ad 1967; Ve kasalo 1997; Hynynen e al. 2010), he yield o pulpwood
and especially biomass o ene gy can be no able. P o i able managemen o hese s ands calls o
app op ia e ha es ing p ocedu es (Fe nandez-Lac uz e al. 2013; Jylhä and Be gs öm 2016), o
which up- o-da e guidelines a e cu en ly lacking.
Such guidelines a e u gen ly needed, since he o al a ea o young downy bi ch s ands may
be expec ed o inc ease in he nea u u e. This is because p esen ly o in he nea u u e la ge
a eas o pea land s ands a e in he inal-cu ing s age due o he ac i e pe iod o d ainage du ing
1960s and 1970s. In cases o ailed o o ally neglec ed o es egene a ion, insu icien ea lie
ca e o sapling s ands, o os damages in sp uce saplings, downy bi ch as a pionee ee species
(Hynynen e al. 2010) is likely o ake dominance o he si es. Fo ins ance, as much as 29% o
he plan ed pea land sp uce s ands (age unde 20 yea s) in he Os obo hnia, Kainuu, and Lapland
egions ha e su e ed om os damages (NFI11, unpublished).
Un il ecen ly, he managemen o d ained pea land o es s has gene ally aimed a p oduc ion
o pulpwood and sawlogs. Howe e , he cu en iew is ha some s ands may be mo e sui able o
ene gy wood p oduc ion (Kojola e al. 2015). Because o he ela i ely small size and low quali y
o he s ems o sawlogs o enee logs, downy bi ch s ands may be in mo e e ec i e use when
managed pa ly o o ally o ene gy wood. The apidly inc eased consump ion o o es chips has
inc eased he demand o wood biomass sui able o ene gy in gene al. In 2015, 7.3 million solid
3
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
cubic me e s o o es chips we e used in hea ing and powe plan s in Finland (Na u al Resou ces
Ins i u e Finland 2016), a majo pa o he aw ma e ial o he o es chips, 3.9 million cubic
me e s, being small-sized ees. Bi ch-domina ed pea land s ands would appea o make a sui able
biomass ese e o his pu pose.
The densi y o young s ands domina ed by downy bi ch is o en e y high, ens o hou-
sands o s ems pe hec a e (Fe m and Kauppi 1990; Fe m 1993). Managemen guidelines (Hy än
me sänhoidon… 2007) o pulpwood p oduc ion ha e ecommended ending young s ands o
2000–2500 s ems pe hec a e, and applying he i s comme cial hinning when s and dominan
heigh has eached 13–15 me e s. A e hinning he basal a ea should be 12–13 squa e me e s
o densi y 1100 s ems pe hec a e. Howe e , downy bi ch has p o ed o espond only weakly o
hinning (Niemis ö 2013). Many low-diame e s ems a e also was ed in such managemen , and
hus he g owing capaci y o he si e is no ully used. The e o e, s udies conce ning al e na i e
ways o manage downy bi ch s ands a e needed.
When compa ing di e en ha es ing me hods, he esul ing p o i abili y alues a e bound
o a y wi h he me hod and machine y used in ha es ing. The common o es y p ac ice is o
ha es he ene gy wood, small s ems wi h o wi hou b anches and ops, simul aneously wi h he
pulpwood. This in eg a ed ha es ing gene ally educes p ocu emen cos s o small-diame e wood
(Rummukainen e al. 2003; Kä hä 2011; Pe y and Kä hä 2014), and o ins ance Heikkilä e al.
(2009) ound he o al s and managemen o be mo e p o i able wi h in eg a ed i s hinning han
wi h whole- ee i s hinning in young pine o sp uce s ands. Whole- ee ha es ing, whe e all
ees including b anches and ops a e conside ed ene gy wood, may dec ease he cos s o cu ing
(no delimbing) bu , on he o he hand, inc ease he cos o o wa ding due o he dec easing load
size (Lai ila e al. 2010; Lai ila and Vää äinen 2012). P elimina y s udies conce ning downy bi ch
s ands on d ained pea lands ha e also shown ha whole- ee ene gy wood ha es ing, especially,
may ha e poo p o i abili y (Kojola e al. 2015). In spi e o he mul i- ee me hod used, cu ing o
small s ems is gene ally ime-consuming (Lai ila e al. 2016; Kä hä 2011; Pe y and Kä hä 2014).
The aim o his s udy was o ind ou wha kind o managemen egimes, ha is, hinning
in ensi ies and o a ion leng hs, combined wi h di e en ha es ing me hods, would be he mos
p oduc i e o bi ch pulpwood and biomass, and he mos p o i able o be pu in o p ac ice. The
ocus in ou examina ion was in he ime poin s, when managemen decisions o he es o he
o a ion a e made. The key ques ion examined was whe he he managemen should be ocused on
ene gy wood p oduc ion a he han on adi ional pulpwood p oduc ion. This s udy is a sequel o
he epo s o Niemis ö (1991, 2013) analyzing he s and dynamics and managemen o pea land
bi ch s ands.
2 Ma e ials and me hods
2.1 Expe imen al s ands and hei measu emen s
We u ilized a se o 19 expe imen al downy bi ch s ands ea ed wi h di e en hinnings ha com-
p ised a hinning expe imen implemen ed by he Finnish Fo es Resea ch Ins i u e (Me la; cu -
en ly me ged in o he Na u al Resou ces Ins i u e Finland, Luke) in 1975–1990. The s ands we e
loca ed in Os obo hnia and wes e n Lapland (Table 1). A de ailed desc ip ion o he expe imen al
design and measu emen s has been p esen ed by Niemis ö (2013). The d ained pea land o es
si e ypes we e MT2 (Vaccinium my illus ype II) o H T (He b- ich ype), M kg II and Rh kg
in he Finnish nomencla u e (Laine e al. 2012; b ie ly in English in Wes man and Laiho 2003),
which ep esen ela i ely high le els o wood-p oduc ion po en ial. The s ands we e pu e downy
4
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
Table 1. Mean cha ac e is ics o he expe imen al s ands a he onse o he expe imen and he leng h o he s udy pe iods. S and g oups: Sapling s and s age (SS; H0 < 8 m), ene gy
wood hinning s age (EW; 8 m < H0 < 11 m), and pulpwood hinning s age (PW; H0 > 12 m). Exp #: Code o he s ands in Luke’s da a a chi e.
1) 2) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8)
S and
code
Loca ion Temp.
sum, dd
No h
coo dina e
Eas
coo dina e
Si e
ype
H50,
m
Hdom,
m
H0,
m
D0,
ha–1
S ems,
ha–1
Volume,
m3 ha–1
Age,
y
S udy
pe iod, y
Numbe o
measu e-
men s
Repli-
ca es
Numbe
o plo s
Exp #
SS1 Oulu 1125 7216691 426800 MT2 17.2 3.9 3.0 1.6 30500 11 10–30 20 5 2–3 8 8550
SS2 Yli o nio 945 7360051 384943 MT2 14.3 6.0 5.0 5.1 20600 57 20–47 27 6 2 6 981
SS3 Kola i 829 7453094 358504 MT2 13.7 7.0 5.3 4.2 39200 66 22–50 28 c) 6+1 3 12 185
SS4 Kola i 829 7450500 358400 MT2 14.2 7.2 5.5 4.6 43000 78 23–45 22 5+1 3 12 286
SS5 Kola i 829 7451825 358394 MT2 14.2 7.7 5.7 4.7 34300 80 20–49 29 7 4 19 383
SS6 Ro aniemi 905 7355142 490371 MT2 14.1 6.7 5.9 5.9 a) 6700 45 22–53 31 7 3 14 881
SS7 Yli o nio 945 7360052 385064 MT2 13.2 8.3 6.4 5.6 29800 90 27–51 24 6 4 20 188
SS8 Ro aniemi 865 7353534 487942 MT2 15.4 8.4 6.9 7.3 10000 79 23–40 17 4 2 16 189
SS9 Kola i 793 7483287 372735 H T 13.4 9.4 7.6 7.8 18100 112 29–54 25 6 2–3 9 183
EW10 Kola i 793 7483288 372737 H T 13.9 10.4 8.1 7.7 17200 127 30–57 27 6 1–2 6 481
EW11 Oulu 1125 7216329 426907 H T 16.8 10.7 8.8 6.8 7100 73 25–55 30 7 2 10 855
EW12 Liminka 1136 7192518 424218 MT2 14.7 11.2 8.9 8.6 4600 66 31–60 29 7 3 15 856
EW13 K uunupyy 1161 7063962 309881 MT2 17.7 10.1 9.0 9.0 a) 2500 54 20–52 32 6+1 2 8 6
EW14 Pyhäjä i 1060 7069128 434011 H T 16.6 11.3 9.2 10.1 3800 85 34–65 31 7 2–3 9 854
EW15 Muu ola 954 7359401 418050 H T 13.1 12.0 9.8 8.3 6000 113 41–61 15 5 1 5 882
EW16 Käl iä 1099 7076704 346710 MT2 19.5 12.1 10.8 10.7 4700 123 19–40 21 3+1 4–7 28 86
PW17 Haapa esi 1089 7107747 411534 H T 15.7 13.9 12.1 12.5 b) 2100 107 44–74 30 7 5–10 30 852
PW18 Kä sämäki 1091 7101751 447121 H T 15.1 14.8 12.4 12.7 b) 1800 96 52–83 31 7 2–4 10 853
PW19 U ajä i 1082 7185571 463722 MT2 15.2 16.5 13.8 12.7 4700 208 52–67 15 4 2 8 885
1) Cumula i e annual empe a u e sum wi h +5 °C h eshold alue, calcula ions based on he pe iod 1980–2010
2) ETRS-TM35FIN
3) D ained pea land o es si e ypes: MT2 (Vaccinium my illus ype II) and H T (He b- ich ype) (M kg II and Rh kg in Finnish nomencla u e. see Laine e al. 2012)
4) Si e index (dominan heigh a he age o 50 yea s)
5) Dominan heigh = mean heigh o 100 la ges bi ch ha–1
6) Mean heigh , weigh ed by basal a ea
7) Mean DBH, weigh ed by basal a ea
8) S and age a he onse o he expe imen and a he end o he s udy pe iod
a) S em numbe was low compa ed o o he s ands in he g oup
b) Tending a sapling s and s age
c) +1 means ha one o he esul s has been in e pola ed due o he ex ao dina y long ime be ween measu emen s (2 × 5 y s).
5
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
bi ch s ands and ep esen ed he i s ee gene a ion a e he ini ial d ainage o he pea lands.
The s and ages a ied om 10 o 52 yea s and om 30 o 83 yea s a he onse and a he end o
he expe imen , espec i ely.
Mos o he s ands we e measu ed 5–7 imes in 5-yea in e als. Based on he measu e-
men s, we knew he ac ual s and de elopmen du ing he 15–30 s udy yea s o each o he 245
plo s wi hin he 19 expe imen al s ands (Table 1). Fo each single s and-measu emen e en he
esul ing da a was used o es ima e he olumes o pulpwood and small diame e s em wood in
solid cubic me e s ha–1 (Heinonen 1994) and he b anch biomass in Mg ha–1 (Repola 2008), all
sepa a ely o : he o al ee s and, he na u al emo al, he ha es ing emo al, and he emaining
s and. T ans o ma ion o b anch biomass om Mg o solid cubic me e s was made by he coe -
icien 2.0 acco ding o b anch densi y epo ed by Bjö klund and Fe m (1982).
We g ouped he da a based on he ini ial s age o he s ands and, consequen ly, he i s ea -
men applied a he onse o he expe imen : sapling s and s age (SS s ands; mean heigh 3–8 m; 9
expe imen al s ands; p ecomme cial hinning), ene gy wood hinning s age (EW s ands; 8–11 m;
7 expe imen al s ands; ene gy wood hinning), o pulpwood hinning s age (PW s ands; 12–14 m;
3 expe imen al s ands; pulpwood hinning). Following a andomized block design, each s and
included 5–30 ec angula plo s eaching om di ch o di ch, he a ea a ying be ween 800 and 1400
squa e me e s. The in ensi y o he i s ea men s on he plo s a ied, including: un hinned con ol
plo s; e y ligh ; ligh ; mode a e; and hea y hinning (Niemis ö 2013). On an a e age, 40% o he
basal a ea was emo ed in he hea y hinning o he PW, and 70–80% in he EW and SS s ands.
A second hinning was applied on 20% o he p e iously hinned plo s (hence o h: wice- hinned
s ands). A ligh p ecomme cial hinning o he densi y o 1900–2500 s ems pe hec a e had been
ca ied ou be o e he ini ia ion o he expe imen in he PW s ands (see Fig. 1 in Niemis ö 2013).
2.2 De iningal e na i emanagemen  egimesand hei  emo als o downybi ch
We de ined al e na i e managemen egimes as combina ions o he i s ac ual hinning ea -
men s and ‘ i ual’ inal cu ings ha we e compu ed om he ee-le el moni o ing da a o each
measu emen ime (i.e., he di e en measu emen imes yielded he al e na i e imings o he
inal cu ings). Six di e en ha es ing me hods we e conside ed (A–F; Table 2), o which F was
Table 2. The al e na i e ha es ing me hods and he s uc u e o he esul ing emo als (me chan able wood).
Ha es ing me hod Remo al Pulpwood componen Ene gy wood componen
A. Pulpwood ha es ing Pulpwood Pulpwood pa o he
s em 1) –
B. In eg a ed ha es ing Pulpwood + ene gy wood
as delimbed s ems
Pulpwood pa o he
s em 1) Top was e 2) + small s ems 3) −
ops 4)
C. In eg a ed ha es ing Pulpwood + ene gy wood
as whole- ee
Pulpwood pa o he
s em 1) Top was e 2) + small s ems 3) +
b anches − b anch was e 5)
D. Ene gy wood ha es ing Ene gy wood as delimbed
s ems
– La ge s ems + op was e 2) +
small s ems 3) − ops 4)
E. Ene gy wood ha es ing Ene gy wood as whole- ee – La ge s ems + small s ems 3) +
b anches − b anch was e 5)
F. Ad anced ene gy wood
ha es ing 6) Ene gy wood as whole- ee – La ge s ems + small s ems 3) +
b anches − b anch was e 5)
1) minimum op diame e o he pulpwood poles was 6.5 cm.
2) op was e = he pa o he s em which is no pulpwood size.
3) small s ems = s ems smalle han pulpwood s ems, diame e a b eas heigh (d1.3) o e 3.5 cm.
4) ops = he hinnes pa o he s ems cu away (diame e smalle han ~2 cm).
5) b anch was e = b anches ha we e d opped a he cu ing a ea (see ex o es ima ion).
6) o SS and EW s ands. Simila o me hod E, bu ha es ed by an accumula ing elling head ha is designed o be mo e e icien han
egula mul i- ee elling heads in dense s ands wi h small s ems (Jylhä and Be gs öm 2016)

6
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
applicable only in he SS and EW s ands. As ha es ing emo als, hese included only pulpwood
(A); only ene gy wood, ha es ed as ei he whole ees including b anches o delimbed s ems
(D–F); o pulpwood plus ene gy wood, ha es ed as whole ees o delimbed s ems ob ained wi h
in eg a ed ha es ing (B–C). In he in eg a ed ha es ing, he b anches om he pulpwood pa
o he s em a e cu and d opped a he ha es ed a ea. We calcula ed he olume o his b anch
was e using a sepa a e model (Lai ila e al. 2014), and excluded i om he emo als. In p ac ice,
some b anches a e s ill shed in whole- ee ha es ing (Hy önen and Moilanen 2014), and we
assumed he amoun shed o be hal o he b anch was e es ima ed o in eg a ed ha es ing. We
also p oduced compu a ional hinning emo als o SS s ands o acili a e compa isons among
he i s ea men s, bu igno ed hem when calcula ing he o al emo als and p o i abili y. Di ch
ne wo k main enance was no conside ed necessa y be o e he inal cu ing in hese ela i ely
dense, highly-s ocked bi ch s ands. Thus, he al e na i e managemen egimes included al oge he
i e in ensi y le els o he i s ea men s, six ha es ing me hods, and 4–7 o a ion leng hs.
Hence o h, he o al managemen egimes a e e e ed o as A–F, acco ding o he codes o he
ha es ing me hods applied.
2.3 Es ima ingincomes,cos s,and inancialpe o mance
We es ima ed he cos s o all ea men s as well as he ha es ing incomes om bo h hinnings
and inal cu ings ha would be applicable o each managemen egime and ha es ing me hod.
Fo ha es ing incomes om he bi ch s ands we used eal oadside p ices acco ding o s a is ics
(Me in o 2014; To elainen 2014). Because o he gene ally poo quali y o bi ch sawlogs om
pea lands (Ve kasalo 1997), all wood wi h a diame e ≥ 6.5 cm o e ba k was conside ed pulpwood,
wi h he p ice o 30 € m–3. The ene gy wood p ice was 24 € m–3 and 21 € m–3 o delimbed s ems
and whole ees, espec i ely.
The ha es ing cos s o each ha es ing me hod we e es ima ed using he olumes and
s uc u es o he emo als, published ime-consump ion models, and uni cos s o he wo k. The
ime-consump ion models we e based on ield s udies u ilizing de ined machine ies. We selec ed
hose models ha we conside ed o be he mos app op ia e o each managemen egime and
ha es ing me hod. We u he a emp ed o main ain he compa abili y o he models as good
as possible, ha is, as a as possible we used models om he same s udy. Fo he ha es -
ing me hods A–E (hence o h called “s anda d me hods”), we used he models o Lai ila e al.
(2016). Since he me hod E does no i well o he younges and denses s ands conside ed,
we complemen ed he selec ion wi h he me hod F (hence o h called “ad anced whole- ee
ha es ing me hod”) and he co esponding ime-consump ion model by Jylhä and Be gs öm
(2016). The models used in he me hods A–E we e based on he use o a medium-size 6-wheel
ha es e (Koma su 901.4), equipped wi h a ha es e head capable o mul i- ee handling
(Koma su 350.1). The model in he me hod F was based on a co esponding 6-wheel ha es e
(Valme 911.3) wi h an accumula ing biomass elling head (B acke C16). Bo h he pulpwood
and ene gy wood ha es ing me hods we e hus based on mul i- ee-handling in all egimes, bu
he numbe o small s ems collec ed simul aneously in he elling head was much highe in he
me hod F as compa ed o he o he s and only bunching on o he pile was needed. Fu he , in
he me hod F, la ge s ems can be cu in wo phases – he uppe and lowe pa s sepa a ely. Fo
he ha es ing me hod F, we selec ed o he models o Jylhä and Be gs öm (2016) he one ha
was based on mean s em olume. Conside ing he ee size and he modelling da a used o he
ime-consump ion model in he me hod F, his me hod could be applied in all he measu emen
poin s o he SS s ands, hose up o he ou h measu emen o he EW s ands, and in none o
he PW s ands.
7
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
In calcula ions o o wa ding cos s we used he models o Kui o e al. (1994) o he
pulpwood, and Lai ila e al. (2007) o he ene gy wood, espec i ely. The models a e based on a
medium-size o wa de . We speci ied he load size o 6 m3 o whole ees, and 9 m3 o s emwood
(pulpwood and delimbed s ems), espec i ely (Lai ila e al. 2010; Lai ila and Vää äinen 2011). To
acqui e he g oss e ec i e- ime p oduc i i y (E15), we mul iplied he e ec i e- ime p oduc i i y
(E0) wi h 1.393 and 1.302 in ha es ing and o wa ding, espec i ely, as sugges ed by Lai ila and
Vää äinen (2011). Fo ope a ing-hou cos s, upda ed by he cos index (S a is ics Finland 2013a),
we used 95.4 € E15–1 and 68.9 € E15–1 o ha es e and o wa de , espec i ely (Lai ila and
Vää äinen 2011).
In he SS s ands he ime consump ion o p ecomme cial hinning using a clea ing saw was
es ima ed as a unc ion o he s em numbe and he mean diame e a s ump heigh (es ima ed as
1.2 × mean DBH), based on he model o Kaila e al. (1999; 2001). A maximum ime consump ion
o 60 h ha–1 was se o e y dense sapling s ands, whe e he model p oduced un ealis ic alues.
We also included he cos o clea ing in he ha es ing cos s in such cases, whe e only pulpwood
was ha es ed in he inal cu ing (me hod A), and a lo o small s ems would hus emain in he
cu ing a ea. Consequen ly, clea ing is needed be o e soil p epa a ion and s and egene a ion. Fo
he ime consump ion o clea ing, we used he model o Fe nandez-Lac uz e al. (2013). We used
he uni cos o 35 € h–1 bo h o p ecomme cial hinning and clea ing.
When examining he inancial pe o mance o he al e na i e managemen egimes o downy
bi ch, he conside ably di e en egime-speci ic o a ion ime spans had o be made commensu a-
ble. This was done by combining he ne p esen alue (NPV, Eq. 1) o he bi ch o a ion wi h he
discoun ed ba e land alue (BLV, Eq. 2 and Eq. 3) o he managemen o u u e o a ions o No way
sp uce (Picea abies (L.) Ka s .), assumed o be es ablished igh a e he bi ch o a ion. The cos s
and incomes o he bi ch o a ion we e discoun ed o he decision poin , i.e., o he es ablishmen
o he expe imen , which was he ime poin when he ac ual decision be ween al e na i e egimes
was being made. In he discoun ing, we used he in e es a es 1, 2, and 3%, and co espondingly,
he NPVs a e hence o h abb e ia ed as NPV1, NPV2, and NPV3. The NPV was calcula ed as:
NPV=−
++−
+−+
=
−=
∑
∑
(()
)() ()
,(
)
HC
VM
sc
ii
i
i
TTT
T
kl
k
K
l
1111
0
11
whe e:
NPV = ne p esen alue a s and le el in bi ch s and, € ha–1
Hi = income om hinning a ime i, alued a oadside (i=0 deno es he decision poin )
VT = income om inal cu ing a o a ion T, alued a oadside
Ci = cos o hinning a ime i
MT = cos o inal cu ing a o a ion T
SCkl = cos o sil icul u al ope a ion k a ime l (No e ha l=i o l≠i)
= a e o in e es (he e 1%, 2%, o 3%)
We chose No way sp uce managemen ins ead o downy bi ch managemen o he u u e s and
gene a ions since i gene ally p o ides be e g ow h and yield as well as p o i abili y han downy
bi ch (Koi is o 1959; Sa amäki 1977; Hökkä 1997). Fu he mo e, he onse o he expe imen s
and, consequen ly, he decision poin s o ou s udy occu ed mo e o less in he middle o he bi ch
o a ion, and he e o e, i was no possible o calcula e he BLV acco ding o he ongoing bi ch
o a ion wi hou s ong (specula i e) assump ions conce ning he ea ly s ages o he s ands. The
u u e o a ions o No way sp uce managemen we e based on he gene al managemen guidelines
8
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
(Hy än me sänhoidon… 2007), and a subs an ial mix u e o downy bi ch was assumed o occu
also in he No way sp uce s ands, mainly because o summe - os damages in he No way sp uce,
which concu s wi h he indings in he NFI11 o wes e n and no he n Finland (unpublished).
Technically, he No way sp uce managemen was simula ed by he Mo i-simula o (Hynynen
e al. 2005; Salminen e al. 2005), which includes speci ic g ow h models o d ained pea land
s ands (Hökkä e al. 1997; Hynynen e al. 2002; Hökkä and Salminen 2006). In b ie , he simula ed
No way sp uce managemen included one in e media e hinning and a inal cu ing a he s and age
o 95 yea s, p oducing a o al yield o 295 m3 ha–1. In he inancial calcula ions we applied a e age
s umpage p ices in eal e ms (a e age om 2011 o 2014, sepa a ely o i s and la e hinnings
and inal cu ings; Me in o 2014, hen nominal p ices de la ed by he cos -o -li ing index, S a is-
ics Finland…2013b) and sil icul u al cos s in eal e ms o No he n Os obo hnia and Sou he n
Lapland (Me in o 2014). The No way sp uce managemen included he ollowing sil icul u al
measu es: plan ing (500 € ha–1), ending o he sapling s and (350 € ha–1), o p ecomme cial hin-
ning (350 € ha–1) and a di ch ne wo k main enance combined wi h mounding (300 € ha–1). In he
calcula ions o he BLV (Chang and Gadow 2010; Chang 2014), we applied he Faus mann o a ion
model (Faus mann 1849). The BLV was calcula ed as:
BLV=
−+
−+
==
−
−
∑∑
()*( )
()
,(
)
Rc
i
i
s
ik
k
mi
s
01
1
11 2
whe e:
BLV = ba e land alue o a sp uce s and, € ha–1
Ri = ha es ing income in yea i alued a s umpage, € ha–1
Cik = sil icul u al cos k (k = 1, …, m) in yea i
s = o a ion leng h o sp uce s and, yea s
= a e o in e es (he e 1%, 2%, o 3%)
Because he examined ime pe iods om he onse o he expe imen s o he inal cu ings o he
ongoing bi ch o a ion a ied, he BLV o he sp uce gene a ions had o be discoun ed o he deci-
sion poin . This was done acco ding o:
BLV×+
−−
()
,(
)
()
1 3 Tb
whe e:
T = o a ion o he downy bi ch s and, in yea s
b = age o he downy bi ch s and a he onse o expe imen , in yea s
Finally, we combined he NPV o he ongoing bi ch o a ion and he discoun ed BLV o he u u e
sp uce gene a ions by summing up he ou comes o Eq. 1 and Eq. 3 o each case. Hence o h, hese
combined alues a e e e ed o as CoV1, CoV2 and CoV3, he numbe s indica ing he discoun
a es 1%, 2% and 3%, espec i ely.
2.4 Compa isons be ween managemen egimes and ha es ing me hods
We analysed he di e ences in ha es ing emo als and p o i abili y among managemen egimes
h ough co a iance analysis. We es ed he e ec s o hinning in ensi ies, wi h di e en ha es ing
me hods, o a ion leng hs, and in e es a es by a mixed model (Eq. 4), sepa a ely o he s and
9
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
g oups SS, EW and PW. The s and was included as a andom block e ec . We used he s and
dominan heigh a he onse o he expe imen as a co a ia e, because o he a ia ion in ee heigh
(de elopmen s age) wi hin he s and g oups. We adjus ed he es ima ed emo als and p o i abili ies
on he basis o he o e all means ac oss he s and g oups: Hdom: 7.45 m, 11.35 m, and 14.5 m in SS,
EW and PW s ands, espec i ely, o make he esul s compa able wi hin s and g oups. Because o
he small a ia ion in s and age wi hin each s and g oup, we used he mean age o s ands a each
o a ion leng h, no he exac age o he indi idual s ands. The model was:
YHue
sp T dom ssp
=+ +++
µδ β
14
,(
)
whe e:
Ysp = emo al o p o i abili y
µ = o e all mean in he s and g oup (SS, EW, o PW)
δT = ec o o ea men e ec s ( hinning in ensi y, ha es ing me hod, o a ion leng h, in e es a e)
β = coe icien o he co a ia e
Hdom1 = s and dominan heigh a he onse o he expe imen
us = andom e m o expe imen al s and s
esp = esidual e m (s and and plo )
To simpli y he p esen a ion o ou esul s ha spanned o e di e en ime in e als, we calcula ed
he means and a ia ion o he pa ame e s o one speci ic ime poin , 20 yea s a e i s hinning,
i.e., a he ime o he 4 h (me hod F) o he 5 h (o he me hods) measu emen . We selec ed his
ime poin , because he e ec s o he i s hinning could hus be ollowed o as long as possible
using da a om all s ands.
Because he inancial pe o mance was de e mined o he ime poin cons i u ing he onse
o he expe imen , we inally modelled he e ec o de elopmen s age (Hdom a he onse o he
expe imen ) and si e index (Hdom a he s and age o 50 yea s) on he CoVs using he ha es ing
me hod A. This allows o a gene al examina ion on how s and cha ac e is ics a ec he inancial
pe o mance. In his model (Eq. 5) we used all da a ac oss 20 yea s om he i s hinning om
all s and g oups (SS, EW and PW) oge he :
CoV ea men
ea men
=+×+×+×+×+
××+×
ab cH dH eH
Hg
dom dom
dom
50 2
ea men ×+++Huue
dom ddsdsp
25
,(
)
whe e:
CoV = CoV1, CoV2, o CoV3 a 20 yea s a e he onse o he expe imen
ea men = hinning in ensi y: un hinned, e y ligh , ligh , mode a e, hea y, wice hinned
H50 = si e index, s and dominan heigh a he age o 50 yea s
Hdom = s and dominan heigh a he onse o he expe imen
ud, uds = andom e ms o s and g oup d, and expe imen al s and s
edsp = esidual e m
Res ic ed maximum likelihood (REML) es ima ion in he “Mixed linea ” p ocedu e o hie a chi-
cally s uc u ed da a was used in hese analyses (SPSS 16.0, PASW S a is ics). Pai wise compa isons
we e pe o med h ough compu ing o gene alised leas -squa e means o he ea men e ec s.
16
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
Fig. 6. P o i abili y, exp essed as combined alues (CoV, € ha–1) o ne p esen alue o he ongoing bi ch o a ion and
discoun ed ba e land alue o u u e sp uce o a ions, as a unc ion o s and age (y s) o ene gy wood hinning s age
(EW) s ands. Lines desc ibe he di e en hinning in ensi ies and di e en panels show he ha es ing me hods A ( op),
B (middle), and C (bo om) (me hod desc ip ions a e in Table 2). Discoun ing was done o he onse o he expe imen
wi h in e es a es 2% (CoV2, le ) and 3% (CoV3, igh ). Thinning in ensi ies ma ked wi h he same le e we e no
signi ican ly di e en wi hin he ha es ing me hod and in e es a e (p > 0.05).

17
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
s ill inc easing a he s and age o 46–50 yea s. In he un hinned o e y ligh ly hinned SS s ands
he in eg a ed me hods we e no compe i i e un il he inal-cu ing ages o 42–46 yea s, when hey
eached he o e all CoV le els o he o he hinning in ensi ies.
In he EW s ands, he anking o he hinning in ensi ies was he same o all ha es ing
me hods and in e es a es (Fig. 6). The CoV was as i s highes in he un hinned s ands, and he
lowe he hea ie he hinning was. The highes CoVs we e achie ed wi h he pulpwood me hod A
and he in eg a ed me hod B a he s and age o 46 yea s, being 1800 and 1300 € ha–1 wi h CoV2
and CoV3, espec i ely (Fig. 6abcd). Fo he me hod C he maximum was 110–130 € ha–1 lowe .
In he un hinned EW s ands he p o i abili y did no inc ease a e he s and age o 46 yea s, bu in
hinned ones i con inued inc easing un il he end o s udy pe iod a he age o 58 yea s (Fig. 6).
The di e ences in CoV caused by hinning in ensi y we e almos equal wi h he in e es a es o
2% and 3%, and by he me hods A and B. By he me hods A and B he CoV in he hinned s ands
was 700, 900, 1050, and 1550 € ha–1 below he maximum in he e y ligh , ligh , mode a e and
hea y i s hinnings, espec i ely. Fo he me hod C he CoV in un hinned s ands was lowe bu
in hinned s ands almos equal o he me hods A and B. In he EW s ands he ad anced whole- ee
ha es ing me hod F was also applicable un il s and age o 40 yea s, when he s ems had g own
oo hick o he ene gy-wood ha es e used. In he un hinned EW s ands CoV2 and CoV3 we e
posi i e om he onse o he s udy a he s and age o 26 yea s. A he age o 40 yea s, hese
alues we e ou s anding in he un hinned EW s ands, being 1660 and 1250 € ha–1 o CoV2 and
CoV3, espec i ely. Tha is, he CoVs o he me hod F a he s and age o 40 yea s we e close o
he maxima eached wi h he me hods A and B se e al yea s la e .
In he PW s ands, he CoVs we e posi i e o all me hods and hinning in ensi ies (Fig. 7).
The CoVs we e equal o he pulpwood me hod A and he in eg a ed me hod B, excep ha in
wice- hinned s ands he me hod A ou pe o med me hod B (Fig. 7). Fo he in eg a ed me hod C,
CoV was only 30–50 € ha–1 lowe han o me hods A and B. The bes p o i abili y was eached in
he un hinned s ands (=ea ly ended con ol) a he s and age o 65 yea s, being 2170 (CoV2) and
1600 € ha–1 (CoV3). Fo he o he hinning in ensi ies, CoV was 250–200 € ha–1 lowe . Howe e ,
he di e ences be ween hinning in ensi ies we e no s a is ically signi ican . Ye , a u he a gu-
men in a o o managemen wi hou hinning was ha al hough he un hinned PW plo s showed
less p o i able immedia e inal cu ing han he hinned plo s, i.e., by chance hey had less aluable
emo als, a e 20 yea s he inal cu ing esul ed in highe CoVs in he un hinned plo s. Rega d-
less o he hinning in ensi y and ha es ing me hod, he mos p o i able inal-cu ing age was 65
yea s o he PW s ands, on a e age. A e ha age, he p o i abili y dec eased. Fo he PW s ands,
an immedia e clea cu ing was mo e p o i able han applying hinning and g owing he s ands o
5 yea s (Fig. 7). The s ands had o be g own o a leas 10–15 yea s a e hinning, depending
on hinning in ensi y, be o e he p o i abili y su passed ha o an immedia e clea cu . Howe e ,
g owing o PW s ands abou 20 yea s wi hou hinning was a p o i able al e na i e.
3.2.3E ec so s andde elopmen s ageandsi eindexon hep o i abili y
The expec ed CoVs calcula ed o he di e en de elopmen s ages (de ined by s and dominan
heigh , Hdom) o un hinned downy bi ch s ands by Eq. 5 (Table 3) indica ed a as alue inc ease
un il a Hdom o 10 me e s bu wi h a slowe inc ease a e wa ds (Fig. 8). On a e age, one me e
inc ease in Hdom om 6 o 7 me e s inc eased he CoV2 o un hinned s and by 519 € ha–1 and om
10 o 11 me e s by 195 € ha–1 (Fig. 8). In he un hinned s ands a one-uni change in si e index (Hdom
a he s and age o 50 yea s) co esponded o a change o 133 and 113 € ha–1 in CoV2 and CoV3,
espec i ely (no shown).
18
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
Fig. 7. P o i abili y, exp essed as combined alues (CoV, € ha–1) o ne p esen alue o he ongoing bi ch o a ion and
discoun ed ba e land alue o u u e sp uce o a ions, as a unc ion o s and age (y s) o pulpwood hinning s age (PW)
s ands. Lines desc ibe he di e en hinning in ensi ies and di e en panels show he ha es ing me hods A ( op), B
(middle), and C (bo om) (me hod desc ip ions a e in Table 2). Discoun ing was done o he onse o he expe imen
wi h in e es a es 2% (CoV2, le ) and 3% (CoV3, igh ). Thinning in ensi ies ma ked wi h he same le e we e no
signi ican ly di e en wi hin he ha es ing me hod and in e es a e (p > 0.05).
19
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
Fig. 8. Expec ed combined alues (CoV2 and CoV3, € ha–1) a 20 yea s om he onse o he expe imen s ob ained
wi h ha es ing me hod A (see Table 2) o s ands ep esen ing di e en dominan heigh s (Hdom, m, a he onse o he
expe imen s) and o e all mean si e index (H50 = 15.5) (Eq. 5). Lines desc ibe di e en hinning in ensi ies.
Table 3. Mixed model (Eq. 5) pa ame e s conce ning he whole da a. Independen a iables
CoV2 and CoV3 when g owing s ands 20 yea s a e he i s hinning.
CoV2: coe . CoV2: sig. CoV3: coe . CoV3: sig.
In e cep (a) –6728.3 < 0.01 –6180.2 0.00
Twice hinned (b5) 79.8 0.98 –717.9 0.83
Hea y (b4) 4543.2 < 0.01 4436.9 < 0.01
Mode a e (b3) 1850.9 0.06 1776.2 0.06
Ligh (b2) 1426.9 0.15 1467.9 0.11
Ve y ligh (b1) 1995.7 0.11 1858.2 0.11
Un hinned (b0) 0.0 0.0
Co a ia es:
H50 (c) 133.3 < 0.01 113.0 < 0.01
Hdom (d) 1044.0 < 0.01 944.8 < 0.01
Hdom2 (e) –40.4 < 0.01 –37.3 < 0.01
In e ac ions:
Twice * Hdom ( 5) –365.0 0.53 –245.4 0.65
Hea y * Hdom ( 4) –1121.6 < 0.01 –1108.6 < 0.01
Mode a e * Hdom ( 3) –492.6 0.02 –489.1 0.02
Ligh * Hdom ( 2) –387.7 0.07 –407.9 0.04
Ve y ligh * Hdom ( 1) –556.4 0.06 –520.9 0.06
Un hinned * Hdom( 0) 0.0 0.0
Twice * Hdom2 (g5) 22.8 0.34 18.7 0.40
Hea y * Hdom2 (g4) 52.9 < 0.01 52.9 < 0.01
Mode a e * Hdom2 (g3) 21.8 0.06 22.3 0.04
Ligh * Hdom2 (g2) 17.6 0.11 19.1 0.06
Ve y ligh * Hdom2 (g1) 29.2 0.08 27.0 0.09
Un hinned * Hdom2 (g0) 0.0 0.0
20
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
4 Discussion
The o al a ea o bi ch-domina ed s ands on d ained pea lands, ca. 0.5 million hec a es (Kojola
e al. 2015), is a signi ican ese e o bo h pulpwood and ene gy wood in Finland. The s uc u e,
olume, and g ow h po en ial o he si es (Sa amäki 1977; Kel ikangas and Seppälä 1977; Niemis ö
2013) enable applica ion o di e en ha es ing me hods and managemen egimes so ha he bes
possible gain may be eached.
4.1 Choosing he bes managemen egime
Based on ou esul s, he o emos h ee hings o conside when deciding how o manage a downy
bi ch s and a e 1) managemen his o y, 2) p oduc ion ocus (whe he pulpwood o ene gy wood
p oduc ion is emphasized), and 3) he ha es ing machine y a ailable. I he s and has no been
managed ea lie , he e a e no speci ic easons o aim a pulpwood p oduc ion, and i an e ec i e
mul i- ee ha es e o ad anced whole- ee ha es ing is a ailable, he mos p o i able op ion
clea ly is o g ow he s and un ea ed un il inal cu ing as whole- ee ene gy wood a he s and age
o 40–45 yea s. I such a machine y is no a ailable, i is be e o op o in eg a ed ha es ing o
bo h pulpwood and ene gy-wood poles a abou en yea s la e . P oducing only ene gy wood hus
seems o be p o i able only wi h a speci ic me hod (like me hod F in ou s udy).
I he aim is o speci ically p oduce pulpwood, applying a ligh p ecomme cial hinning a
4–5 me e dominan heigh o he densi y o 2000–2500 s ems pe hec a e is a compe i i e al e na-
i e. I p ecomme cial hinning o ea ly ligh hinning has al eady been done, he inal cu ing should
be delayed un il he s and age o 50–65 yea s, when pulpwood ha es ing is he mos p o i able
op ion. In ha case, comme cial hinning is no necessa y bu i is possible wi hou any signi ican
economic e ec . Tending be o e 4 me e s heigh is eached would be a cheape ope a ion, bu , due
o coppicing, may lead o he s and becoming e en dense , wi h sp ou s almos equal in size o he
ees in un hinned sapling s ands (Niemis ö 2013).
In pulpwood p oduc ion, o a ion leng hs sho e han 40–50 yea s, wi h o wi hou hin-
nings, we e economically in e io o longe o a ions, due o he low emo al and high ha es ing
cos s o small s ems. In un hinned s ands he p o i able inal-cu ing age seemed o be ea lie han
in ligh ly hinned s ands. In spi e o he inc easing na u al mo ali y, qui e a long ma u ing pe iod
was compe i i e o he un hinned s ands, because sel - hinning was mos ly selec ing he smalles
s ems ha a e he mos expensi e o cu .
These choices a e based on he es ima ed p o i abili y only, bu he e may be o he easons
also o hinning: egene a ion h ough u ilizing a No way sp uce unde s o y ha o en appea s
in his kind o si es, p oducing saw logs o plywood in e y high quali y and e ile downy bi ch
s ands, o es he ic easons only.
4.2 To hin o no o hin
Among he combina ions o he i e in ensi y le els o he i s ea men s, six ha es ing me hods,
and se e al o a ion leng hs, he mos p o i able managemen in young and dense downy bi ch
s ands was g owing wi hou any hinnings o inal cu ing as whole- ee ene gy wood a he s and
age o 40–45 yea s. The bes p o i abili y equi ed, howe e , ha i was possible o use an ad anced
whole- ee ha es ing me hod speci ically designed o small s ems in he inal cu ing (Jylhä and
Be gs öm 2016), whe eas wi h he s anda d, non-speci ic, whole- ee me hod he p o i abili y
d opped d as ically. As expec ed, he dense a bi ch-s and was g own, he highe was he p oduc-
ion o small-diame e poles and b anch biomass. A sligh ly unexpec ed esul , in con as , was ha
21
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
he pulpwood emo al also was he highes in e y dense s ands, as Niemis ö (2013) has al eady
epo ed. Gene ally, opposi e esul s, lowe pulpwood yields in dense s ands, ha e been obse ed
(Sco s pine: Ruha and Va mola 1997; Huuskonen and Hynynen 2006; sil e bi ch: Niemis ö 1995).
The commonly held idea is ha ligh hinning enables a maximal amoun o s ems o each he size
equi emen o pulpwood, while in dense s ands mos s ems emain oo small. This seems no o
be he case wi h downy bi ch, howe e , which hus seems o ole a e compe i ion be e han mos
species a he ea ly s ages o de elopmen .
Dis inc i ely, applying ene gy wood hinning in dense downy bi ch s ands wi h a mean heigh
o 8–11 me e s esul ed in low o e all p o i abili y. The s em size in such hinnings is modes and
he hinning emo al ends o be low, esul ing in an unp o i able ope a ion. Ge ing la ge emo als
by inc easing hinning in ensi y causes g ow h losses (Niemis ö 2013) ha lead o dec easing o al
p o i abili y o he inal cu ing, he mo e he hea ie he hinning. In he SS and EW s age s ands,
hese nega i e impac s will u he inc ease wi h ime. Rega dless o he iming o me hod o inal
cu ing he o al p o i abili y was he highes in he un hinned s ands. In he absence o hinning,
na u al mo ali y akes ca e o emo ing he smalles s ems o ee, and hus, hese will no lowe
he p o i abili y o he inal cu ing. Applying a second hinning 10–15 yea s a e he ligh i s
hinning, did no inc ease he p o i abili y, ei he .
P ecomme cial hinning as well as ene gy wood hinning seemed o be unnecessa y and
expensi e ea men s. Thinning did no inc ease he alue o he inal-cu ing emo al. Mo eo e ,
i did no signi ican ly dec ease he ha es ing cos s pe cubic me e o he inal cu ing, ei he ,
because na u al mo ali y had emo ed he smalles ees du ing he o a ion, wi hou any cos . In
all he s udied o a ion leng hs and hinning ea men s he o al emo als we e lowe in he SS
and PW s ands han in he EW s ands. This was due o he p ecomme cial hinning o he SS and
PW s ands which does no esul in a me chan able emo al, and he g ow h loss caused by ea ly
uncomme cial hinning. This conclusion was p o ed in he un hinned SS s ands, whe e he p o-
duc ion o small diame e poles and b anch biomass eached he same le el as in he EW s ands a
he s and age o 55 yea s. The cos s o la e p ecomme cial hinning o ene gy wood hinning we e
e y high in dense bi ch s ands and he e o e he p o i abili y o hinned sapling s ands (SS) we e
highe han hose o olde EW s ands, e en i he o a ion leng h was 55 yea s.
E en hough hinnings we e gene ally useless, applying a ligh p ecomme cial hinning o
he densi y o 2500–3500 s ems pe hec a e was a compe i i e op ion when he aim o he s and
managemen was o p oduce pulpwood (wi h o wi hou ene gy wood). Tha was shown in he esul s
o bo h young s ands (SS) and mo e ma u e s ands (PW). The adi ional comme cial hinning a
he PW s age had a e y small e ec on o al p o i abili y. Due o his, he decision be ween o hin
o no o hin may be based on o he goals o o es managemen . Fo he sapling s ands (SS), ou
s udy pe iod was no long enough o p oduce inal e idence o conclude, which o he wo hin-
ning in ensi ies, un hinned o ligh , and wo ha es ing ypes, pulpwood o in eg a ed, would be
he mos p o i able. Ob iously in pulpwood p oduc ion he di e ence be ween he un hinned and
ligh ly- hinned s ands was small, whe eas wi h in eg a ed ha es ing me hods he ligh - hinning
al e na i e was sligh ly be e . In any case, inal cu ing o pulpwood was a p ope me hod o he
p ecomme cially hinned mo e ma u e s ands.
As o o es managemen in gene al, he hinnings a e mo e p o i able (o a leas less unp o -
i able) when highe in e es a es a e used, due o he ea lie incomes (Hyy iäinen and Tah onen
2002; Ah ikoski e al. 2004). In he s ands examined he e, his was ue only in ea ly ended bi ch
s ands a he con en ional i s - hinning s age (PW), al hough he di e ence be ween hinned and
un hinned s ands e en hen was e y small. The opposi e e ec o in e es a e in dense downy
bi ch s ands s ems om a combina ion o p ecomme cial hinning causing cos s and ene gy wood
ha es ing also o en causing ne cos s o he ne income being low wi hou any subsidies. The

22
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
highe in e es a e was used, he mo e compe i i e he un hinned managemen egimes we e.
Because o he low alue inc emen and low hinning esponse o downy bi ch (Niemis ö 2013),
he compensa ion o he cos s o p ecomme cial hinning o ea ly hinning akes place e y slowly,
i a all. In addi ion, in a p ac ical scale, he yield o aluable imbe is nonexis en because o he
low quali y and small size o he s ems.
Al hough ou esul s showed low bene i s o hinnings, he goals o he han economic gain
may be ele an easons o hem, such as egene a ion o sp uce ia unde g ow h (Niemis ö
and Pou iainen 2004; Niemis ö e al. 2012) o landscaping o mul iple use aspec s. On he mos
nu ien - ich si es wi h a high p oduc ion po en ial, when he quali y o he downy bi ch s ands is
excep ionally high i may also be possible o p oduce saw o enee imbe besides pulpwood and
ene gy wood. In such cases, di e en kinds o managemen egimes han hose discussed in his
s udy should mos likely be applied.
4.3 Ha es ing me hod
Ou esul s showed ha i was possible o signi ican ly inc ease he p oduc i i y o inal cu ing in
dense bi ch s ands wi h small s ems by using an ad anced whole- ee ha es ing me hod, which
is mo e sui able o mul i- ee ha es ing o small s ems han he s anda d whole- ee me hod. The
gain o he ad anced me hod used in ou s udy ( ia p oduc i i y models) may be especially high
in downy bi ch ha es ing, whe e o en ben and c ooked s ems a e ill-sui ed o egula mul i- ee
ha es ing, which uses eeding and delimbing ha es e heads (Lai ila e al. 2016). Fu he , he
ad anced me hod is capable o wo-phase cu ing o s ems, which enables s anda d o wa ding
o up o e en 15-m all ees.
Gene ally, imp o ing he p oduc i i y o o es o wa ding also should be a ge ed o be e
p o i abili y. Ye , he small size o whole- ee loads (6 m3 a a ime) used in his s udy as model
inpu may be an unde es ima e e en o up- o-da e o wa de s in inal cu ings o ma u e bi ch
s ands wi h a conside able amoun o long s emwood logs.
In Finland, whole- ee ha es ing solu ions ha e hus a been mainly conside ed om hin-
ning ope a ions poin s o iew. Elsewhe e, whole- ee ha es ing is used in inal cu ings, bu he
a ge is usually single la ge , sawn- imbe sized ees. Mul i- ee ea men o smalle -sized ees
in inal cu ings is s ill a no el and a e app oach, and he me hodologies ha e been li le de eloped
o s udied. Because o new bio- e ine ies and an inc easing use o o es ene gy i seems ha he
need and, consequen ly, de elopmen o his kind o machine y will inc ease in he u u e.
4.4 Me hodological conside a ions
The esul s o his s udy we e based on 19 expe imen al s ands ha included a wide ange o hinning
in ensi ies and a weal h o g ow h da a om sapling s ands o ma u e s ands. These s ands co e ed
well he a ia ion exis ing in he mos common pea land si e ypes o downy bi ch domina ed s ands,
as well as hei equency in wes e n and no he n Finland. Acco ding o NFI11 46%, 39%, and
18% o he downy bi ch domina ed s ands we e si ua ed a H T, MT2, and MT1 si es (He b- ich
ype and V. my illus ype II and I; see Wes man and Laiho 2003), and mo e han hal o he o al
a ea was ound in he egions whe e ou expe imen al s ands we e loca ed (Kojola e al. 2015).
The long- ime ial wi h se e al s ands and ca e ully planned expe imen al design allowed
us o s udy a wide ange o ea men s, s and densi ies and o a ion pe iods. All he s and da a ha e
ea lie been c oss-checked and analyzed by Niemis ö (2013), gi ing a eliable s a ing poin o
his s udy. Thanks o he accu a e measu emen da a we we e able o augmen he da a u he o
ex a asso men s, like small ene gy wood s ems and b anch biomass.
23
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
Wi h models, we we e able o compa e many ypes o ha es ing me hods simul aneously.
O cou se, such calcula ions a e based on se e al assump ions ha we e made al eady a he de el-
opmen phase o he models. The ha es ing models o Lai ila e al. (2016) ha e been de eloped
o be applicable on simila ypes o pea land bi ch s ands as used in his s udy and o ha es ing
o delimbed s ems. Fu he mo e, he models dis inguish be ween hinning and clea cu ing, hus
esul ing in mo e accu a e es ima es in di e en cases. The e o e, hose models we e easily adap ed
o he ci cums ances o ou s udy s ands o ha es ing o pulpwood o delimbed s ems. Howe e ,
e en o whole- ee ha es ing, he olume o delimbed s ems is used as an inpu o he model,
which may cause a small o e es ima ion in ha es ing cos . The me hod and model o Jylhä and
Be gs öm (2016) ga e us he ad anced whole- ee ha es ing al e na i e. To ensu e he unc ion-
ing o he model in ou s ands, i s use was ca e ully es ic ed only o da a ma ching he modelling
da a. The model o Kui o e al. (1994) o o wa ding cos s was o pulpwood. The e o e we also
used he models o Lai ila e al. (2007) o he delimbed s ems and whole- ee, o ge mo e exac
esul s. Howe e , he load size may s ill be deba able.
Compa ing he esul s ob ained wi h p oduc i i y models om di e en s udies, which
in ol e di e en ope a o s, whose impac on p oduc i i y may be g ea (Lai ila e al. 2016), in ol es
some isk. He e, he me hod F was de i ed om a di e en s udy han he o he s. Howe e , we
did no conside he di e ences ha we go be ween he whole- ee me hods E and F, whe e he
me hod o mul i- ee handling bu also he ope a o changed, o be o e ly dependen on he la e .
Since he me hod F in ol es a e y di e en app oach o he whole ope a ion han me hod E, he
expe ience o he ope a o wi h he me hod in ques ion may be o mo e impo ance han u ilizing
a “s anda d” ope a o . Also, he di e ence ob ained o hese wo me hods in downy bi ch s ands,
especially, is qui e logical, as poin ed ou in he p e ious sec ion.
Uni p ices and cos s a e impo an a iables when p o i abili y is discussed. We se he
le els acco ding o s a is ics. Howe e , especially he p ice o ene gy wood is di icul o speci y
since i luc ua es in he ma ke . In ou s udy he ene gy wood p ice conside ed was a subsidized
p ice, esul ing in a ela i ely high alue when compa ed o ha o pulpwood.
In he cu en o es y con ex , i was no easonable o assume ha se e al downy bi ch
gene a ions would be epea edly managed. Ins ead, we assumed ha he main species would be
changed o No way sp uce a e he ongoing bi ch o a ion, al hough a leas some bi ch will hen
appea as mix u e. The sp uce gene a ion was used as a ep esen a i e managemen egime o
assessing he ba e land alue, BLV, enabling us o compa e he di e en inal-cu ing imes o
bi ch. Due o he g ea a ia ion in inal-cu ing imes o bi ch, he discoun ed BLV o he u u e
sp uce gene a ions needed o be included in he inancial analyses in o de o commensu a e he
al e na i e managemen egimes o he ongoing bi ch o a ion in a heo e ically solid manne
(Amache e al. 2009). In gene al, he s ands o his s udy we e loca ed on such si e ypes and cli-
ma ic condi ions whe e o es y on pea lands can be conside ed p o i able also in he u u e based
on hei BLV (Hy än me sänhoidon… 2007), i he equi ed a e o e u n and he egene a ion
cos s emain mode a e. On he o he hand, Niemis ö (2013) has shown ha he p oduc i i y o he
downy bi ch may be e y high in he si es in ques ion. Because o he di icul ies ela ed o he
es ablishmen o sp uce s ands, like os damages, i may be ques ioned i he egene a ion o
sp uce is always he bes al e na i e.
This s udy ocused on pu e downy bi ch s ands in cen al and no he n Finland ha we e
assumed o be egene a ed o sp uce a e inal cu ing. Fu he esea ch is s ill needed conce ning
he managemen o downy bi ch-domina ed mixed o es s and wo-s o ied bi ch-sp uce s ands.
Also, while he challenges and isks ela ed o egene a ion o he highly p oduc i e pea lands a e
well known (Hånell 1993; Moilanen e al. 2011), he e is insu icien scien i ic in o ma ion o sup-
po he alua ion o he al e na i e egene a ion me hods. In sou he n Finland, downy bi ch s ands
24
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
may yield aluable logwood on bo h pea land and mine al-soil si es o high p oduc ion po en ial,
which should be conside ed when making decisions on hei managemen . Thus, un hinned hicke s
a e no he only easible managemen op ion in downy bi ch s ands, e en hough hese esul ed in
he bes p o i abili y in his s udy ha only examined p oduc ion o pulpwood and ene gy wood.
Acknowledgemen s
Ma kus Ha man (English e ision), An i Ihalainen (Na ional Fo es In en o y), Paula Jylhä
(ha es models), Juha Lai ila (ha es models), Ee o Pou iainen & Jo ma Issakainen ( ield wo ks
and basic compu a ions).
Re e ences
Ah ikoski A., Pää alo M.-L., Niemis ö P., Ka hu J., Pou iainen E. (2004). E ec o al e na i e
hinning in ensi ies on he inancial ou come in sil e bi ch s ands: a case s udy based on
long- e m expe imen s and MOTTI s and simula ions. Bal ic Fo es y 10(2): 46˗55. h p://
www.bal ic o es y.mi.l /b /PDF_A icles/2004-10[2]/46_55%20Ah ikoski%20e %20al.pd .
Amache G.S., Ollikainen M., Koskela E. (2009). Economics o o es esou ces. The MIT P ess,
Camb idge. 448 p.
Bjö klund T., Fe m A. (1982). Pienikokoisen koi un ja ha maalepän biomassa ja eknise ominai-
suude . Summa y: Biomass and echnical p ope ies o small-sized bi ch and g ey alde . Folia
Fo es alia 500. 37 p. [In Finnish, wi h English summa y].
B aas ad H. (1967). P oduksjons abelle o bjø k. [Yield ables o bi ch]. Meddelelse a de
No ske Skog o søks esen 22: 265–365. [In No wegian].
Came on A.D., Dunham R.A., Pe y J.A. (1995). The e ec s o hea y hinning on s em quali y
and imbe p ope ies o sil e bi ch (Be ula pendula Ro h). Fo es y 68(3): 275–285. h ps://
doi.o g/10.1093/ o es y/68.3.275.
Chang S.J. (2014). Fo es alua ion unde he gene alized Faus mann o mula. Canadian Jou nal
o Fo es Resea ch 44(1): 56–63. h ps://doi.o g/10.1139/cj -2013-0298.
Chang S.J., Gadow K.V. (2010). Applica ion o he gene alized Faus mann model o une en-aged
o es managemen . Jou nal o Fo es Economics 16(4): 313–325. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.
j e.2010.06.002.
Faus mann M. (1849). Be echnung des We hes, welchen Waldboden, sowie noch nich hauba e
Holzbes ände ü die Waldwi hsca besi zen. [Calcula ion o he alue which o es land
and imma u e s ands possess o o es y]. Allegemeine Fo s und Jagd Zei ung 15: 441–455.
Fe m A. (1993). Bi ch p oduc ion and u iliza ion o ene gy. Biomass and Bioene gy 4(6): 391–404.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/0961-9534(93)90061-8.
Fe m A., Kauppi A. (1990). Coppicing as a means o inc easing ha dwood biomass p oduc ion.
Biomass 22(1–4): 107–121. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/0144-4565(90)90010-H.
Fe nandez-Lac uz R., Di Ful io F., Be gs öm D. (2013). P oduc i i y and p o i abili y o ha es ing
powe line co ido s o bioene gy. Sil a Fennica 47(1) a icle 904. h ps://doi.o g/10.14214/
s .904.
F ies J. (1964). Summa y: Yield o Be ula e ucosa Eh h. in Middle Sweden and sou he n No h
Sweden. S udia Fo es alia Suecica 14. 303 p.
Hånell B. (1993). Regene a ion o Picea abies o es s on highly p oduc i e pea lands – clea cu -
ing o selec i e cu ing? Scandina ian Jou nal o Fo es Resea ch 8(1–4): 518–527. h ps://
25
Sil a Fennica ol. 51 no. 3 a icle id 2017 · Niemis ö e al. · F om useless hicke s o aluable esou ce?…
doi.o g/10.1080/02827589309382798.
Heikkilä J., Si én M., Ah ikoski A., Hynynen J., Sau ula T., Leh onen M. (2009). Ene gy wood
hinning as a pa o s and managemen o Sco s pine and No way sp uce. Sil a Fennica 43(1):
129–146. h ps://doi.o g/10.14214/s .220.
Heinonen J. (1994). Koealojen puu- ja puus o unnus en lasken aohjelma KPL – käy öohje. Sum-
ma y: Compu e p og amme package o compu ing s and and single ee cha ac e is ics om
sample plo measu emen s. Finnish Fo es Resea ch Ins i u e Resea ch Pape s 504. 80 p. [In
Finnish wi h English summa y].
Hökkä H. (1997). Models o p edic ing g ow h and yield in d ained pea land s ands in Finland.
The Finnish Fo es Resea ch Ins i u e, Resea ch Pape s 651. 45 p.
Hökkä H., Salminen H. (2006). U ilizing in o ma ion on si e hyd ology in g ow h and yield mod-
eling: pea land models in he MOTTI s and simula o . In: Hyd ology and Managemen o
Fo es ed We lands: P oceedings o he In e na ional Con e ence 8–12 Ap il 2006, New Be n,
NC, Ame ican Socie y o Ag icul u al and Biological Enginee s (ASABE), S . Joseph, MI.
p. 302–309.
Hökkä H., Alenius V., Pen ilä T. (1997). Indi idual- ee basal a ea g ow h models o Sco s pine,
pubescen bi ch and No way sp uce on d ained pea lands in Finland. Sil a Fennica 31(2):
161–178. h ps://doi.o g/10.14214/s .a8517.
Huuskonen S., Hynynen J. (2006). Timing and in ensi y o p ecomme cial hinning and hei e ec s
on he i s comme cial hinning in Sco s pine s ands. Sil a Fennica 40(4): 645–662. h ps://
doi.o g/10.14214/s .320.
Hynynen J., Ojansuu R., Hökkä H., Salminen H., Siipileh o J., Haapala P. (2002). Models o
p edic ing s and de elopmen in MELA sys em. Finnish Fo es Resea ch Ins i u e, Resea ch
Pape s 835. 116 p.
Hynynen J., Ah ikoski A., Sii onen J., Sie änen R., Liski J. (2005). Applying he MOTTI simu-
la o o analyse he e ec s o al e na i e managemen schedules on imbe and non- imbe
p oduc ion. Fo es Ecology and Managemen 207(1–2): 5–18. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.
o eco.2004.10.015.
Hynynen J., Niemis ö P., Vihe ä-Aa nio A., B unne A., Hein S., Velling P. (2010). Sil icul u e o
bi ch (Be ula pendula Ro h and Be ula pubescens Eh h.) in no he n Eu ope. Fo es y 83(1):
103–119. h ps://doi.o g/10.1093/ o es y/cpp035.
Hy önen J., Moilanen M. (2014). E ec o ha es ing me hod on he amoun o logging esi-
dues in he hinning o Sco s pine s ands. Biomass and Bioene gy 67: 347–353. h ps://doi.
o g/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.05.004.
Hy än me sänhoidon suosi ukse u emaille (2007). [Guidelines o bes managemen p ac ices in
sil icul u e on d ained pea lands]. Finnish Fo es De elopmen Cen e, Tapio. Me säkus annus
Oy, Helsinki. 50 p. [In Finnish].
Jylhä P., Be gs öm D. (2016). P oduc i i y o ha es ing dense bi ch s ands o bioene gy. Biomass
and Bioene gy 88: 142–151. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.016.
Kaila S., Poikela A., S ands öm M. (1999). Rai aussahan yön uo a uus ja palkanmää i ys.
[Paymen and p oduc i i y o o es cleaning wi h clea ing saw]. Me sä ehon apo i 78. 43
p. [In Finnish].
Kaila S., Poikela A., S ands öm M. (2001). Henkilökoh aiseen uo a uus a oi eeseen pe us u a
ai aussaha yön palkkausjä jes elmä. Osa 2. Tulokse uoden 1999 kokeiluis a. [Pay oll sys em
o clea ing saw based on pe sonal p oduc i i y a ge s. Pa 2. Resul s om 1999 expe i-
men s]. Me sä ehon apo i 99. [In Finnish]. h p://www.me sa eho. i/uploads/7 8k khq.pd .
Kel ikangas M., Seppälä K. (1977). Oji usalueiden koi ikoiden kas a us aloudellisena aih oe-
h ona. Summa y: The economics o g owing bi ch s ands on d ained pea lands. Sil a Fennica