scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Does Higher Intensity Increase the Rate of Responders to Endurance Training When Total Energy Expenditure Remains Constant? : A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background Standardized training prescriptions often result in large variation in training response with a substantial number of individuals that show little or no response at all. The present study examined whether the response in markers of cardiorespiratory ftness (CRF) to moderate intensity endurance training can be elevated by an increase in training intensity. Methods Thirty-one healthy, untrained participants (46±8 years, BMI 25.4±3.3 kg m−2 and V˙O2max 34±4 mL min−1 kg−1 ) trained for 10 weeks with moderate intensity (3 day week−1 for 50 min per session at 55% HRreserve). Hereafter, the allocation into two groups was performed by stratifed randomization for age, gender and VO2max response. CON (continuous moderate intensity) trained for another 16 weeks at moderate intensity, INC (increased intensity) trained energy-equivalent for 8 weeks at 70% HRreserve and then performed high-intensity interval training (4×4) for another 8 weeks. Responders were identifed as participants with VO2max increase above the technical measurement error. Results There was a signifcant diference in V˙O2max response between INC (3.4±2.7 mL kg−1 min−1 ) and CON (0.4±2.9 mL kg−1 min−1 ) after 26 weeks of training (P=0.020). After 10 weeks of moderate training, in total 16 of 31 participants were classifed as VO2max responders (52%). After another 16 weeks continuous moderate intensity training, no further increase of responders was observed in CON. In contrast, the energy equivalent training with increasing training intensity in INC signifcantly (P=0.031) increased the number of responders to 13 of 15 (87%). The energy equivalent higher training intensities increased the rate of responders more efectively than continued moderate training intensities (P=0.012). Conclusion High-intensity interval training increases the rate of response in VO2max to endurance training even when the total energy expenditure is held constant. Maintaining moderate endurance training intensities might not be the best choice to optimize training gains. Trial Registration German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00031445, Registered 08 March 2023—Retrospectively registered, https://www.drks.de/DRKS00031445

Read accessible full text

Does Higher Intensity Increase the Rate of Responders to Endurance Training When Total Energy Expenditure Remains Constant? : A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author: Reuter, Marcel,Rosenberger, Friederike,Barz, Andreas,Venhorst, Andreas,Blanz, Laura,Hecksteden, Anne,Meyer, Tim
Publisher: Saarländische Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek
Year: 2023
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22028/D291-39924
Source: https://publikationen.sulb.uni-saarland.de/bitstream/20.500.11880/35929/1/s40798-023-00579-3.pdf
Reu e e al. Spo s Medicine - Open (2023) 9:35
h ps://doi.o g/10.1186/s40798-023-00579-3
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access
© The Au ho (s) 2023. Open Access This a icle is licensed unde a C ea i e Commons A ibu ion 4.0 In e na ional License, which
pe mi s use, sha ing, adap a ion, dis ibu ion and ep oduc ion in any medium o o ma , as long as you gi e app op ia e c edi o he
o iginal au ho (s) and he sou ce, p o ide a link o he C ea i e Commons licence, and indica e i changes we e made. The images o
o he hi d pa y ma e ial in his a icle a e included in he a icle’s C ea i e Commons licence, unless indica ed o he wise in a c edi line
o he ma e ial. I ma e ial is no included in he a icle’s C ea i e Commons licence and you in ended use is no pe mi ed by s a u o y
egula ion o exceeds he pe mi ed use, you will need o ob ain pe mission di ec ly om he copy igh holde . To iew a copy o his
licence, isi h p:// c ea i eco mmons. o g/ licen ses/ by/4. 0/.
Spo s Medicine - Open
Does Highe In ensi y Inc ease heRa e
o Responde s oEndu ance T aining When
To al Ene gy Expendi u e Remains Cons an ?
ARandomized Con olled T ial
Ma cel Reu e 1,2* , F iede ike Rosenbe ge 2,3, And eas Ba z1,2, And eas Venho s 1, Lau a Blanz1,2,
Anne Hecks eden4 and Tim Meye 1
Abs ac
Backg ound S anda dized aining p esc ip ions o en esul in la ge a ia ion in aining esponse wi h a subs an-
ial numbe o indi iduals ha show li le o no esponse a all. The p esen s udy examined whe he he esponse in
ma ke s o ca dio espi a o y i ness (CRF) o mode a e in ensi y endu ance aining can be ele a ed by an inc ease in
aining in ensi y.
Me hods Thi y-one heal hy, un ained pa icipan s (46 ± 8 yea s, BMI 25.4 ± 3.3 kg m−2 and
˙
V
O2max
34 ± 4 mL min−1 kg−1) ained o 10 weeks wi h mode a e in ensi y (3 day week−1 o 50 min pe session a 55%
HR ese e). He ea e , he alloca ion in o wo g oups was pe o med by s a i ied andomiza ion o age, gende and
VO2max esponse. CON (con inuous mode a e in ensi y) ained o ano he 16 weeks a mode a e in ensi y, INC
(inc eased in ensi y) ained ene gy-equi alen o 8 weeks a 70% HR ese e and hen pe o med high-in ensi y in e al
aining (4 × 4) o ano he 8 weeks. Responde s we e iden i ied as pa icipan s wi h VO2max inc ease abo e he echni-
cal measu emen e o .
Resul s The e was a signi ican di e ence in
˙
V
O2max esponse be ween INC (3.4 ± 2.7 mL kg−1 min−1) and CON
(0.4 ± 2.9 mL kg−1 min−1) a e 26 weeks o aining (P = 0.020). A e 10 weeks o mode a e aining, in o al 16 o 31
pa icipan s we e classi ied as VO2max esponde s (52%). A e ano he 16 weeks con inuous mode a e in ensi y ain-
ing, no u he inc ease o esponde s was obse ed in CON. In con as , he ene gy equi alen aining wi h inc eas-
ing aining in ensi y in INC signi ican ly (P = 0.031) inc eased he numbe o esponde s o 13 o 15 (87%). The ene gy
equi alen highe aining in ensi ies inc eased he a e o esponde s mo e e ec i ely han con inued mode a e
aining in ensi ies (P = 0.012).
Conclusion High-in ensi y in e al aining inc eases he a e o esponse in VO2max o endu ance aining e en when
he o al ene gy expendi u e is held cons an . Main aining mode a e endu ance aining in ensi ies migh no be he
bes choice o op imize aining gains.
T ial Regis a ion Ge man Clinical T ials Regis e , DRKS00031445, Regis e ed 08 Ma ch 2023—Re ospec i ely egis e ed,
h ps:// www. d ks. de/ DRKS0 00314 45
*Co espondence:
Ma cel Reu e
[email p o ec ed]
Full lis o au ho in o ma ion is a ailable a he end o he a icle
Page 2 o 11
Reu e e al. Spo s Medicine - Open (2023) 9:35
Key poin s
• P olonging an ae obic aining p og am a e 10weeks wi h cons an in ensi y o 55% HR ese e and cons an
ene gy expendi u e o 16 mo e weeks will no inc ease he a e o aining esponde s.
• Inc easing aining in ensi y o 70% HR ese e a cons an ene gy expendi u e is no su icien o u he inc ease
he a e o esponde s a e a 10-week mode a e-in ensi y aining pe iod.
• T aining in he high in ensi y domain inc eases he a e o esponde s in ene gy-ma ched aining in e en ions.
Keywo ds Ae obic i ness,
˙
V
O2max, HIIT, Ene gy expendi u e, Endu ance aining, Non esponde , Response
In oduc ion
Endu ance aining is an e ec i e way o imp o e ca di-
o espi a o y i ness (CRF) and posi i ely impac on isk
ac o s o ca dio ascula disease [1–3]. Ye , i is also
known ha adap a ions o a s anda dized aining g ea ly
di e be ween indi iduals. Pe sons showing only mino
o no adap ions o aining s imuli a e equen ly e med
non esponde s. The e o e, conside a ion o indi idual
a iabili y in aining esponse has become inc easingly
impo an in aining s udies in ecen yea s. The He -
i age s udy was one o he i s examples o la ge-scale
in e en ion s udies ha has epo ed a la ge he e ogene-
i y in esponses o VO2max a e a s anda dized aining
in e en ion [4]. The phenomenon o li le o no aining
esponse has been in es iga ed by o he esea che s since
hen [5–7]. Ross and colleagues compa ed eigh endu -
ance aining s udies and ound a ange o adap ions om
minus 33% o plus 118%, independen o exe cise du a-
ion, in ensi y and ial sample size [8].
I is no clea whe he adjus ing he aining modali ies
(e.g., aining olume o in ensi y) has a posi i e in lu-
ence on he a e o esponde s. The dose– esponse ela-
ionship o endu ance aining is in luenced by aining
olume, in ensi y and aining equency [9–11]. Highe
doses o aining ha e p o en o elici mo e p onounced
aining adap ions [12, 13]. Fu he mo e, Bona iglia and
colleagues ha e shown ha be ween-subjec a iabili y in
aining esponse is due o he aining dose and ex e nal
ac o s a he han in e indi idual di e ences in ain-
abili y [14]. The ex en o which modi ica ions o ei he
in ensi y o olume a e he leading ac o is a ques ion
wi h la ge ele ance o exe cise aining p esc ip ions
o achie e he in ended aining adap ions. The e is e i-
dence ha aining p o ocols wi h highe in ensi ies such
as high-in ensi y in e al aining (HIIT) a e mo e e ec-
i e in elici ing inc eases in VO2max han mode a e in en-
si y aining [10, 15, 16].
Due o he high a iabili y o adap ions o endu -
ance aining, i has been sugges ed ha he e icacy o
aining in e en ions has o be analysed beyond me e
compa ison o main e ec s like VO2max [17, 18]. In his
ega d, a common app oach is o compa e he a es o
non esponde s be ween g oups [6, 19]. In e ms o in e -
indi idual a ia ions in aining esponse, Bona iglia
and colleagues [12] ound ha highe doses o aining
p oduce highe a es o esponse. In a di ec compa i-
son o mode a e in ensi y aining wi h ene gy-ma ched
HIIT, Ma u ana and colleagues [7] ound a g ea e e ec
on VO2max and a lowe non esponde a e o HIIT.
Mon e o and Lundby [19] obse ed ha highe aining
dose h ough inc eased olume is an e ec i e app oach
o achie e a meaning ul esponse in VO2max o pa ici-
pan s showing no esponse a e an ini ial aining in e -
en ion. Howe e , his ine i ably leads o mo e ime
consump ion. And since he s udy was lacking a con ol
g oup, he ques ion o whe he ex ended exposu e o
he same aining dose is su icien o elici a esponse
emains unanswe ed. Fo a s anda dized EE, pa icipan s
who pe o med aining wi h highe in ensi ies we e less
likely o show a non esponse han pa icipan s aining
wi h lowe in ensi ies [6]. Howe e , i should be no ed
ha in his s udy he aining equency was 5 week−1
and he e o e p esumably highe han in mos aining
beginne s. These indings indica e ha o non espond-
e s who a e unable o pe o m mo e o longe ain-
ing sessions, aining wi h highe in ensi ies migh be a
p omising al e na i e o achie e g ea e and con inuous
aining adap ions.
A me hodological di icul y is he iden i ica ion o
non esponde s, as he e is no uni o m es ablished de i-
ni ion o high-, low- o non esponse. Indi iduals a e
e med esponde s when hei indi idual esponse
exceeds a ce ain h eshold. The h eshold o non e-
sponse has o example been as se as a VO2max imp o e-
men ≤ 0L min−1 [20], o less han 5% [21, 22]. Mo eo e ,
some s udies use a coe icien o a ia ion o 5.6% [5]
de i ed om he li e a u e. Al hough hese h esholds a e
a s aigh o wa d me hod o ca ego ize esponde s, hey
do no conside he ue aining-induced esponse. In
his con ex , mo e a en ion has been gi en o he neces-
si y o dis inguishing he ue aining-induced esponse
om wi hin-subjec a iabili y and measu emen e o s
Page 3 o 11
Reu e e al. Spo s Medicine - Open (2023) 9:35
o he speci ic se ing [17]. Acco dingly, some au ho s
ha e sugges ed o use speci ic s udy designs such as
epea ed es ing o eliabili y ials o analyse ue ain-
ing esponses [23, 24]. A mo e indi idualized app oach
o ake he day- o-day biological e o and measu emen
e o in o accoun when in e p e ing and ca ego izing
he esponse is calcula ing he echnical e o o meas-
u emen (TEM) and using i as h eshold o adap ions
[24, 25]. I should be no ed ha a dicho omous app oach
in which indi iduals a e labelled as (non-) esponde s on
he basis o a single h eshold is no wi hou c i icism.
A single esponse h eshold is mo e likely o dis inguish
a “ ue” esponse om an unce ain esponse han a
“ ue” non esponse [26, 27]. Mo eo e , classi ying sub-
jec s as non esponde s on he basis o a single pa ame e
neglec s he wide ange o possible biological aining
adap a ions [28]. Ano he me hodological challenge in
es ing he independen e ec o aining in ensi y lies in
he necessi y o con ol o he o e all aining dose ( ol-
ume × in ensi y). This can be achie ed by es ima ing and
s anda dizing he o al ene gy expendi u e (EE) be ween
di e en aining modali ies.
In his s udy, we sough o compa e esponse a es
be ween 26weeks o mode a e in ensi y aining (55%
HR ese e) and aining wi h an inc ease in aining in en-
si y ( o 70%HR ese e and o 95%HRmax) a e 10 and
18 weeks, espec i ely. The di e ences on he g oup
le el a e subjec in ano he publica ion and no dis-
cussed in de ail he e [29]. I was hypo hesized ha non-
esponse a e can be educed o e en elimina ed h ough
an inc ease in in ensi y wi h ene gy expendi u e held
cons an .
Ma e ial andMe hods
All pa icipan s signed w i en in o med consen . The
s udy p ocedu es we e in acco dance wi h he Decla a-
ion o Helsinki and he s udy was app o ed by he E hics
Commi ee o he Medical Associa ion o Saa land (iden-
i ica ion numbe 219/19).
S udy Design andRandomiza ion
Two aining g oups o un ained indi iduals pe -
o med 26 weeks o endu ance aining. The con ol
g oup (CON) kep all aining a iables cons an o e
he 26 weeks, whe eas he in e en ion g oup (INC)
inc eased aining in ensi y a e 10 and again a e
18 weeks o aining ( o de ails see aining below).
The exe cise EE was s anda dized on a wi hin-subjec
basis by p opo ionally lowe ing he aining olume in
INC when he aining in ensi y was inc eased. T ead-
mill es s o olun a y exhaus ion we e pe o med h ee
imes a baseline (T01, T02, T03), a e 10weeks (weeks
10), a e 18weeks (weeks 18) and a e 26weeks (weeks
26) o aining. Using a minimiza ion echnique a week
10, subjec s we e alloca ed o ei he CON o INC [30,
31]. Fac o s o balancing we e age, sex, baseline VO2max,
VO2max esponse a week 10 (yes/no), and he magni ude
o VO2max esponse a week 10. The objec i e o his p o-
cedu e was o balance he amoun o esponde s in bo h
g oups. Fo his eason he in aindi idual a iabili y in
VO2max (mL min−1) was used as each pa icipan ’s h esh-
old o esponse [5]. The in aindi idual a iabili y (iV)
ep esen s he day- o-day a iabili y o VO2max be ween
T02 and T03 and was calcula ed as ollows:
Pa icipan s
Fo y-eigh (48), un ained subjec s we e ec ui ed o
pa icipa ion. Inclusion c i e ia we e, age 30–60 yea s,
un ained s a us (las 6 mon hs: < 1 h week−1 endu -
ance- ype physical ac i i y) and non-smoking ( o
a oid e ec s om cessa ion/ educ ion). Exclusion c i-
e ia we e BMI > 30 kg m−2, es ing blood p essu e
(RR es ) ≥ 160/100mmHg, o al choles e ol ≥ 300mg dL−1,
maximum oxygen up ake (VO2max) > 50mL kg−1 min−1 o
men; > 45mL kg−1 min−1 o women, i on de iciency (Fe -
i in ≤ 34ng mL−1), hy oid dys unc ion (TSH ≤ 0.34 mU
L−1 ≥ 4.0ng mL−1), medica ions wi h po en ial in luence
on a ge pa ame e s (e.g. be a-blocke s) and p egnancy.
Thi y- wo pa icipan s (46 ± 8 yea s, 25.4 ± 3.3 kg m−2
and 34 ± 4mL min−1 kg−1) comple ed he 26weeks ain-
ing p og amme o which one da a se could no be ana-
lysed due o echnical issues. A pa icipan low cha is
gi en in Fig.1. A baseline and a weeks 10, he e we e no
be ween-g oup di e ences o CON and INC (P > 0.05).
Pa icipan s’ cha ac e is ics a e displayed in Table1.
T aining
Pa icipan s pe o med 26weeks o walking o jogging
on 3day week−1. Fo he i s 10weeks all pa icipan s
ained a mode a e in ensi y (50min pe session a 55%
HR ese e [%HRR]). A e week 10, INC inc eased in ensi y
o 70% HRR and o a HIIT p o ocol a e week 18. HIIT
was pe o med wi h a 10min wa m-up a 70% HRmax ol-
lowed by 4 imes 4min a 95% HRmax in e spe sed wi h
3min a 70% HRmax and a cool-down a he same in en-
si y. CON ained wi h mode a e in ensi y h oughou
he en i e cou se o he s udy. The leng h o aining ses-
sions we e adjus ed o main ain a cons an wi hin-subjec
EE. Adhe ence o he p esc ibed aining in ensi y was
eco ded wi h a hea a e moni o (Sigma R1 Duo + ID.
F ee, Sigma-Elek o GmbH, Neus ad , Ge many).
iV =|T02 −T03|/meanT02T03
Page 4 o 11
Reu e e al. Spo s Medicine - Open (2023) 9:35
Ene gy Expendi u e
Oxygen up ake a he indi idual exe cise hea a es was
measu ed du ing he eadmill es s and used o es ima e
he EE o pa icipan s exe cise hea a es by use o an
a e age calo ic equi alen (4.85kcal L−1 O2) [32]. The
EE o a ce ain hea a e was hen mul iplied wi h he
p esc ibed aining ime a ha hea a e. By adjus ing
session leng h, he o e all wi hin-subjec EE was kep
cons an in INC h oughou all in e en ion phases. Fo
HIIT, his implied an indi idual adjus men o he cool-
down leng h.
Tes ing
The i s baseline es (T01) se ed as habi ua ion o he
maximal eadmill es and a medical examina ion wi h
es ing and exe cise elec oca diog am (ECG). The ol-
lowing wo baseline measu emen s (T02, T03) we e
pe o med o de e mine he in aindi idual a iabili y
and he TEM o
˙
V
O2max. The baseline da a ep esen s he
mean om bo h es s. Be o e each eadmill es , an h o-
pome ic da a (heigh , weigh , BMI and body a ) as well
as hemodynamic cha ac e is ics ( es ing hea a e and
blood p essu e) we e aken. Body a pe cen age was es i-
ma ed by a 10-si e skin old me hod wi h a Ha penden
Fig. 1 Pa icipan low cha . Heal h issues we e espi a o y ac in ec ions o musculoskele al p oblems (e.g. o e use inju ies)
Table 1 Pa icipan s cha ac e is ics a baseline
Values a e means ± SD; BMI body mass index, HR hea a e, BP blood p essu e,
˙
V
O2max maximum oxygen up ake, Vmax maximum speed, Lamax maximum lac a e,
RERmax maximum espi a o y exchange a io, P = be ween-g oup di e ences a
baseline
Men Women P
n13 18
An h opome ic da a
Age (yea s) 47 ± 9 46 ± 8 0.65
Heigh (cm) 176.0 ± 6.8 167.2 ± 6.6 0.01
Weigh (kg) 83.9 ± 12.4 68.2 ± 11.1 0.01
BMI (kg m−2) 27.0 ± 2.9 24.3 ± 3.3 0.02
Body a (%) 21.3 ± 2.9 23.6 ± 3.9 0.09
Hemodynamic cha ac e is ics a es
HR (bpm) 68 ± 7 69 ± 8 0.79
Sys olic BP (mmHg) 124 ± 8 118 ± 9 0.06
Dias olic BP (mmHg) 83 ± 6 78 ± 8 0.04
Peak exe cise pe o mance
VO2max (mL min−1) 3019 ± 378 2231 ± 324 < 0.01
VO2max (mL min−1 kg−1) 36.3 ± 4.1 33.1 ± 4.2 0.04
Vmax (km h−1) 12.1 ± 1.1 10.4 ± 1.2 0.01
HRmax (b m−1) 186 ± 15 183 ± 11 0.47
Lamax (mmol L−1) 9.3 ± 2.0 8.7 ± 2.4 0.42
RERmax 1.2 ± 0.1 1.2 ± 0.1 0.89
Page 5 o 11
Reu e e al. Spo s Medicine - Open (2023) 9:35
calipe . Hemodynamic measu es a es we e aken a e
a en-minu e- es in supine posi ion. T eadmill es s we e
pe o med on a Woodway ELG 70 (Woodway GmbH,
Weil am Rhein, Ge many) and gas exchange measu e-
men s we e conduc ed con inuously using a b ea h-by-
b ea h sys em (Me aLyze ® 3B, Co ex Biophysik GmbH,
Leipzig, Ge many) which was calib a ed acco ding o
manu ac u e ’s ins uc ion.
T eadmill es P o ocol
The eadmill was se o a cons an incline o 0.5%.
All es s s a ed a 4.0 km h−1. E e y 3 min, speed
was inc eased by 1.0 km h−1. The submaximal hea
a e (HRsubmax) du ing he g aded exe cise es was
aken a he end o las 3min s age. When he espi a-
o y exchange a io (REF) exceeded 0.95 o a leas
30s his was de ined as las 3min s age. A e wa ds,
he es s con inued using a ampwise p o ocol wi h a
speed inc emen o 0.8km h−1 pe minu e un il ol-
un a y exhaus ion [33]. Maximal pa ame e s we e only
analysed i a leas wo o he ollowing c i e ia we e
ul illed: (1) HRmax ≥ 220-age, (2) maximal blood lac a e
concen a ion > 8mmol L−1, (3) maximal RER > 1.1 [34].
Responde Classi ica ion
Responde s we e iden i ied a e he 26-week ain-
ing in e en ion by de e mining he TEM, which is
desc ibed as a conse a i e measu e o assesso e o
and day- o-day a ia ion in conduc ing an exe cise es
[6]. This applica ion is conside ed e y eliable in p o-
iding an es ima e o he echnical e o which is una -
ec ed by a change in he mean [35]. Values ≤ 1 × TEM
we e conside ed a non esponse, > 1 × TEM a esponse.
As some au ho s sugges a mul iple o he TEM
(2 × TEM) as a mo e conse a i e measu e o esponse
[23], hese h esholds a e gi en in Fig.2, oo. The TEM
was calcula ed by di iding he s anda d de ia ion o he
di e ence sco e (Sdi ) by
√2
[35].
Fig. 2 Indi idual changes compa ed o baseline in VO2max [mL min−1 kg−1] a e 10, 18 and 26 weeks o aining o CON and INC. The h ough line
dis inguishes ini ial esponde s om non esponde s (1 × TEM = single echnical e o , 2 × TEM = mul iple echnical e o ); + elimina ed non esponse;
− esponse u ned in o non esponse. Each ba ep esen s one subjec . The o de o ba s is consis en in all igu es. The g oup mean is illus a ed
h ough he ba in he backg ound

Page 6 o 11
Reu e e al. Spo s Medicine - Open (2023) 9:35
S a is ical Analyses
The sample size was es ima ed a p io i using an e ec
size o compa ison be ween g oups om wo ou o
ou a ms o a p e ious INC aining in e en ion s udy
by Helge ud e al. (“4 × 4” s. “LSD”: dppc2 = 0.547) [10].
G*Powe ( e sion 3.1.9.4) was used o calcula e he
sample size o an ANOVA (main and in e ac ion e ec
in VO2max [mL min−1 kg−1]) wi h α = 0.05, 80% powe , 2
g oups, 2 es ime poin s. This led o a equi ed sample
size o n = 29 in o al o 15 subjec s pe g oup, espec-
i ely. Taking in o accoun an es ima ed d op-ou a e
o 28% [36], he aim was o s a he s udy wi h n > 40
espec i ely n > 20 pe g oup.
IBM’s S a is ical Package o he Social Science (SPSS
27; IBM; USA) was used o s a is ical analysis. Sex di -
e ences a baseline we e examined using - es s o inde-
penden samples. Mann–Whi ney-U-Tes s we e used o
compa e baseline cha ac e is ics be ween esponde s and
(unce ain)non esponde s. The pe cen age o espond-
e s was calcula ed on he numbe o indi iduals who me
less han 1 × TEM be ween week 10 and week 26 o each
g oup. Fishe ’s Exac Tes was used o compa e he a e
o esponde s be ween g oups a week 10, week 18 and
week 26. The McNema Tes was used o compa e he
a es o esponse be ween week 10 and week 26 wi hin-
g oup. A P alue o < 0.05 o he α-e o was conside ed
s a is ically signi ican .
Resul s
Compliance, Exe cise In e en ion andTes C i e ia
Rega ding equency o aining, adhe ence o p esc ibed
exe cise hea a e and EE, he e we e no s a is ically
signi ican g oup di e ences (P > 0.05). CON comple ed
79.6 ± 6.95 and INC 79.8 ± 8.09 sessions. The a e age EE
pe aining session es ima ed by indi ec calo ime y
was 401 ± 105kcal wi h no g oup di e ence (P = 0.914).
A e age exe cise HR up o week 10 was 100 ± 2% (CON)
and 101 ± 2% (INC) o p esc ibed HR, om week 10 o
week 18 i was 101 ± 4% (CON) and 99 ± 1% (INC) and
om week 18 o week 26 i was 99 ± 1% (CON) and
97 ± 2% (INC). The d op-ou a e was 35% (Fig.1). HRmax
(b min−1), Lamax (mmol L−1) and RERmax indica ed maxi-
mal exhaus ion in bo h g oups om baseline (CON:
186 ± 12; 9.5 ± 2.2; 1.2 ± 0.1; INC: 182 ± 13; 8.4 ± 2.1;
1.2 ± 0.1) o weeks 26 (CON: 185 ± 11; 9.5 ± 2.2; 1.3 ± 0.1;
INC: 181 ± 12; 9.4 ± 2.0; 1.3 ± 0.1).
TE
M
=
Sdi
√2
Baseline Analysis
The e we e no g oup-di e ences a baseline o an h o-
pome ic da a o age (P = 0.73), BMI (P = 0.95), BF
(P = 0.41), hemodynamic cha ac e is ics a es o HR
(P = 0.65), BPsys (P = 0.44), BPdias (P = 0.29) and peak
exe cise da a o ela i e VO2max (P = 0.57), absolu e
VO2max (P = 0.71), Vmax (P = 0.50), HRmax (P = 0.44),
Lamax (P = 0.17) and RERmax (P = 0.52). Baseline cha -
ac e is ics a e shown in Table1. The e we e no di e -
ences be ween esponde s and non esponde s a baseline
o age (P = 0.06), BMI (P = 0.62), HR es (P = 0.65), BPsys
(P = 0.32), BPdias (P = 0.38), ela i e VO2max (P = 0.98),
absolu e VO2max (P = 0.86) and Vmax (P = 0.86).
Mean Responses
Baseline da a as well as changes o e ime o all pa am-
e e s a e p esen ed in Table2.
A e 26weeks o aining INC imp o ed
˙
V
O2max sig-
ni ican ly by 3.4 ± 2.7mL kg−1 min−1 (P = 0.002) as well
as om week 18 o week 26 (P = 0.002). Changes in CON
we e no signi ican (0.4 ± 2.9mL kg−1 min−1). Fo ela-
i e VO2max, imp o emen s we e signi ican ly highe o
INC han o CON (P = 0.02). The mean alues o ela-
i e VO2max a baseline and a e weeks 10, weeks 18 and
weeks 26 o CON we e 34.9 ± 3.6, 35.6 ± 4.5, 34.1 ± 3.9,
35.3 ± 4.0mL kg−1 min−1 and o INC we e 34.0 ± 5.2,
35.2 ± 5.5, 35.0 ± 5.1, 37.4 ± 4.9 mL kg−1 min−1, as
desc ibed elsewhe e in mo e de ail [29].
Ra e o Responde s
Changes in VO2max a e 10, 18 and 26weeks o aining
o CON and INC a e shown in Table2. INC inc eased
he a e o esponde s mo e e ec i ely han CON
(P = 0.012).
A e 10weeks o aining a an in ensi y o 55%HRR,
he e we e no be ween-g oups di e ences in he a e o
esponde s o ela i e VO2max (CON: 50%; INC: 53%;
P = 0.569), HR es (CON: 56%; INC: 33%; P = 0.179) and
HRsubmax (CON: 50%; INC: 47%; P = 0.569).
A e 18weeks o aining he e we e also no be ween-
g oups di e ences in he a e o esponde s o ela i e
VO2max (CON: 25%; INC: 47%; P = 0.189), HR es (CON:
62%; INC: 40%; P = 0.186) and HRsubmax (CON: 50%; INC:
67%; P = 0.283).
A e 26weeks o aining he di e ences in he a e o
esponde s we e g ea e o INC han o CON o ela-
i e VO2max (CON: 37%; INC: 87%; P = 0.009) and HR es
(CON: 25%; INC: 87%; P < 0.001) bu no o HRsubmax
(CON: 63%; INC: 67%; P = 0.553).
Wi hin g oup analysis showed ha he a e o esponse
was inc eased be ween week 10 and week 26 in INC o
ela i e VO2max om 53 o 87% (P = 0.063) and HR es
Page 7 o 11
Reu e e al. Spo s Medicine - Open (2023) 9:35
om 33 o 87% (P = 0.008). F om week 18 o week 26 INC
inc eased he a e o VO2max esponde s om 47 o 87%
(P = 0.031).
In CON he e was a non-signi ican dec ease in he
a e o esponse o ela i e VO2max om 50 o 37%
(P = 0.754) and HR es om 44 o 25% (P = 0.25) om
week 10 o week 26.
Discussion
This s udy in es iga ed he ole o an inc ease in ain-
ing in ensi y while main aining EE o inc easing
he esponde a e o endu ance aining in heal hy
un ained subjec s. Wi h an a e age EE pe aining ses-
sion o 400kcal, posi i e e ec s can be achie ed by bo h
mode a e and in ensi e aining. As expec ed, a high
in e indi idual a ia ion o he esponse was obse ed.
Table 2 Baseline alues and changes a e 10, 18 and 26 weeks o aining o g oup and esponse
Δ = changes a e 10, 18 and 26weeks o aining o CON and INC in VO2max[mL min−1 kg−1]; VO2max [mL min−1], Vmax [km h−1]; HR es [b min−1]; HRsubmax [b min−1];
alues a e p esen ed as means ± SD; = esponde , n = non esponde ; n (%) = numbe ( a e) o esponde s/non esponde s
Baseline Δ weeks 0–10 n (%) Δ weeks 10–18 n (%) Δ weeks 18–26 n (%)
VO2max [mL min−1 kg−1]
CON
34.9 ± 3.5 2.5 ± 1.4 [8 (50)] 1.5 ± 3.5 [4 (25)] 2.0 ± 2.2 [6 (37)]
n 34.9 ± 3.9 − 1.1 ± 1.1 [8 (50)] − 2.4 ± 2.3 [12 (75)] 0.7 ± 1.3 [10 (63)]
INC
33.0 ± 4.7 2.6 ± 1.1 [8 (53)] 1.3 ± 2.5 [7 (47)] 2.4 ± 2.0 [13 (87)]
n 35.0 ± 5.9 − 0.2 ± 0.8 [7 (47)] − 1.5 ± 2.3 [8 (53)] 2.1 ± 0.1 [2 (13)]
VO2max [mL min−1]
CON
2595 ± 601 167 ± 15 [6 (37)] 171.0 ± 39.6 [2 (12)] 139.3 ± 144.7 [4 (25)]
n 2596 ± 542 − 54 ± 93 [10 (63)] − 151.4 ± 175.1 [14 (88)] 47.8 ± 120.5 [12 (75)]
INC
2645 ± 531 145 ± 64 [9 (60)] 78.7 ± 124.4 [6 (40)] 123.0 ± 142.2 [11 (73)]
n 2343 ± 473 − 3 ± 60 [6 (40)] − 162.1 ± 125.9 [9 (60)] 116.8 ± 129.9 [4 (27)]
Vmax [km h−1]
CON
11.2 ± 1.4 0.8 ± 0.3 [15 (94)] 0.2 ± 0.3 [16 (100)] 0.0 ± 0.3 [16 (100)]
n 13.2 ± 0.0 0.4 ± 0.0 [1 (6)] / ± / [0] / ± / [0]
INC
10.8 ± 1.5 0.8 ± 0.3 [14 (93)] 0.5 ± 0.4 [14 (93)] 0.5 ± 0.4 [14 (93)]
n 12.2 ± 0.0 − 0.4 ± 0.0 [1 (7)] 0.2 ± 0.0 [1 (7)] − 0.6 ± 0.0 [1 (7)]
HR es [b m−1]
CON
74.4 ± 9.2 − 9.0 ± 6.8 [7 (44)] − 0.7 ± 5.8 [6 (38)] − 1.6 ± 5.2 [4 (25)]
n 65.3 ± 6.6 − 1.0 ± 1.6 [9 (56)] 3.5 ± 3.6 [10 (62)] 1.2 ± 3.0 [12 (75)]
INC
70.6 ± 4.2 − 8.2 ± 2.3 [5 (33)] − 7.2 ± 5.7 [6 (40)] − 3.0 ± 3.9 [13 (87)]
n 66.7 ± 6.3 2.3 ± 4.1 [10 (67)] − 0.3 ± 5.7 [9 (60)] − 1.0 ± 2.8 [2(13)]
HRsubmax [b m−1]
CON
137.3 ± 7.7 − 7.4 ± 3.1 [8 (50)] − 1.5 ± 5.7 [8 (50)] − 0.5 ± 4.1 [10 (63)]
n 134.6 ± 16.0 − 2.7 ± 2.3 [8 (50)] 2.1 ± 8.6 [8 (50)] 1.4 ± 4.9 [6 (37)]
INC
132.2 ± 15.6 − 10.8 ± 3.3 [7 (47)] − 3.5 ± 5.5 [10 (67)] − 2.0 ± 7.6 [10 (67)]
n 132.7 ± 8.8 4.2 ± 3.8 [8 (53)] − 4.4 ± 5.7 [5 (33)] 0.9 ± 7.5 [5 (33)]
Page 8 o 11
Reu e e al. Spo s Medicine - Open (2023) 9:35
Responde s o VO2max we e obse ed in bo h g oups
and by s a i ied andomiza ion equally dis ibu ed
(CON = 50%; INC = 53%). The main indings o his
esea ch a e (1) h ough an inc ease in aining in ensi y
esponse a e o VO2max was inc eased om 53 o 87%
despi e o al EE emaining he same, (2) gi en a cons an
ene gy consump ion, a high in ensi y in e al aining
e ec i ely inc eases he a e o esponde s as indica ed
by an addi ional inc ease in esponse a e be ween week
18 and week 26 (i should be no ed ha his inc ease
occu ed a e 18 weeks o aining had al eady been
comple ed) and (3) he aining s imulus a an in ensi y
o 70%HRR is no su icien o inc ease esponse a e
10weeks o aining a 55%HRR.
We we e able o show ha o s anda dized isocalo ic
aining in e en ions he choice o in ensi y a ec s he
magni ude o ΔVO2max as well as he a e o esponse.
When aining in ensi y was inc eased om 55%HRR o
70%HRR be ween week 10 and 18weeks no inc ease in
esponse a e was obse ed a e 8weeks. Only when
INC pe o med HIIT be ween week 18 and week26, he
esponse a e was signi ican ly inc eased (+ 75%) in mos
pa icipan s. This sugges s ha o isocalo ic in e en-
ions he in ensi y mus be in he high in ensi y domain
o p oduce mo e esponde s. P e ious s udies ha e
al eady shown ha HIIT is mo e e ec i e han mode a e
aining o imp o emen s o CRF when EE is con olled
o [37, 38]. A no el inding o ou s udy is ha he e
does no seem o be a linea ela ionship be ween in en-
si y and esponde a es as aining wi h 70%HRR did no
inc ease esponse a e e ec i ely. I is likely ha ce ain
physiological pa hways leading o highe VO2max a e
ac i a ed pa icula ly h ough a aining s imulus abo e
a ce ain h eshold. The e is e idence ha HIIT yields
g ea e imp o emen s in mi ochond ial con en han
wo k-ma ched mode a e aining [39]. To ma and col-
leagues ela ed he highe e ec i eness o HIIT o a la ge
ac i a ion o as - wi ch ib es and an ad anced mi o-
chond ial biogenesis [40]. Despi e hese wo ks i is s ill
unclea wha he exac pa hways a e ha lead o highe
VO2max. I seems unlikely ha e en o a s anda dized
aining p og amme esponde s imp o e hei ΔVO2max
h ough a uni o m physiological adap ion p ocess [41].
Al hough ou da a show ha HIIT is mo e likely o ig-
ge a esponse in ma ke s o CRF, he e we e s ill 2 ou
o 8 ini ial non esponde s in INC a e 26weeks. This
ag ees wi h indings o Timmons and colleagues [42]
ha 20% o indi iduals show no imp o emen in ae o-
bic capaci y e en a e high in ensi y aining. Conside -
ing Mon e o’s and Lundby’s [19] s udy which shows ha
non esponse can be elimina ed h ough aining doses
o up o 300min pe week, we conclude ha o some
indi iduals an adjus men o HIIT o a gi en aining
dose migh no be su icien and highe o e all aining
doses, i.e. highe EE, a e necessa y in hese cases o elici
a aining esponse inc ease esponse.
The o e all e ec s on VO2max as well as he a e o
esponde s a e he i s 10weeks o CON we e compa-
able wi h o he s udies in es iga ing he e ec s o mod-
e a e in ensi y aining [10, 43]. O e he nex 16weeks,
3 addi ional pa icipan s, om an ini ial 8, became
esponde s. F om he ini ial 8 esponde s a baseline 7
we e ca ego ized as non esponde s ( espec i ely unce -
ain esponde s) a weeks 18 and 5 a week 26. Ou da a
he e o e sugges ha con inued aining a he same
in ensi y does no au oma ically ha e a posi i e e ec
on he a e o esponde s. Addi ionally, in acco dance
wi h in e na ional guidelines [44], we ound ha mode -
a e in ensi y aining migh no always p oduce a las ing
aining esponse when he aining dose is no in ensi-
ied o e ime. One a ionale o his inding is ha he
i s 10weeks o aining igge ed p ima ily adap ions o
he ca dio ascula sys em ha led o imp o ed mecha-
nisms o oxygen anspo and consump ion and he e-
o e an inc ease in VO2max. These adap ions pla eaued
and, in some cases, possibly e en eg essed when he
aining dose emained he same and submaximal adap-
ions (e.g. me abolic sys em, unning economy) p esum-
ably became mo e p onounced o e ime. In his con ex ,
i mus be emphasized ha he exe cise hea a e was no
signi ican ly adjus ed in CON a any poin o e 26weeks
and e ec i ely inc eased o e ime. This may ha e caused
a lowe me abolic s ain o e ime o a gi en hea a e
because o highe me abolic e iciency, which could
cause a dec easing aining s imulus o e ime o hese
indi iduals. This assump ion is suppo ed by indings
by Wea he wax and colleagues who compa ed esponse
a es o a aining p esc ip ion based on %HRR wi h an
indi idualized aining based on en ila o y h esholds
[11]. The esponse a es we e 60% o he s anda dized
and 100% o he indi idualized aining. In line wi h
hese indings and o he s [45, 46] he ques ion emains
whe he esponse a es indica e di e ences in ain-
abili y o a e a consequence o a ia ion in he be ween-
subjec me abolic s ain o a ixed hea a e pe cen age.
Al hough he li e a u e shows ha indi idualized ain-
ing p esc ip ion can p oduce mo e homogenous aining
esponses [47], i should no be o e looked ha in many
p ac ical se ings he necessa y me abolic es ing o ha
ype o p esc ip ion is no easible. Fo he ime being,
he majo i y o indi iduals ha ake up an unsupe ised
exe cise egimen will ely on he in e na ional guidelines
and use hea a e as he only physiological measu e o
moni o aining in ensi y. In his con ex , ou s udy has
shown ha he implemen a ion o high in ensi y e o s
inc eases he likelihood o imp o ed i ness.
Page 9 o 11
Reu e e al. Spo s Medicine - Open (2023) 9:35
Al hough he magni ude o adap ion o Vmax be ween
he wo g oups we e in a ou o INC, he e we e no
di e ence in he esponse a es o his pa ame e .
This highligh s ha mode a e as well as in ense ain-
ing p o ocols yield imp o emen s in unc ional capac-
i y. Vollaa d and colleagues ha e al eady shown ha o
un ained indi iduals imp o emen s in maximal un-
ning speed a e no ela ed o VO2max [48]. Ou s udy
has con i med hese indings, as he e was no uni o m
pa e n o esponse o Vmax and VO2max. Al hough he
p ognos ic alue o VO2max o o e all heal h and all-
cause mo ali y is widely accep ed, i is s ill unclea
o which deg ee VO2max o he highe le els o physi-
cal ac i i y h ough which i is achie ed a e he causal
ac o o imp o ed heal h [49]. We he e o e sug-
ges u u e esea ch o ocus mo e on he connec ion
be ween non esponse and heal h bene i s, acknowledg-
ing he me hodical challenges in such esea ch designs.
In his con ex i should be no ed ha an adap a ion
below a ce ain h eshold is no equal o a non e-
sponse as he e is a ange o unce ain y be ween “ ue”
esponse and non esponse.
Limi a ions
Ou da a poin ou ha a single pos - es migh no be
su icien o ca ego ize indi iduals as esponde s wi h
ce ain y. We ha e shown ha o a s anda dized aining
in e en ion he e is a conside able wi hin-subjec luc-
ua ion o esponse o e ime. This is in line wi h o he
ecommenda ions o epea ed es ing du ing an exe cise
in e en ion [23, 24]. Ne e heless, he s eng h o his
s udy is ha he wi hin-subjec a iabili y o VO2max was
analysed by wo baseline measu emen s. In ou s udy, he
TEM was 4.2 ± 2.7% and was compa able in bo h g oups.
Thus, i was simila o he o en used coe icien o a i-
a ion o 5.6% epo ed in li e a u e [5]. In o he s udies,
mos subjec s showed a esponse in a leas one pa am-
e e , excep o VO2max [5]. This highligh s ha he e i-
cacy o aining in e en ions should be assessed h ough
se e al measu es.
Since he le el o in aindi idual a iabili y may ha e
an in luence on he esponse, i would be in e es ing o
see how in aindi idual a iabili y changes in he aining
p ocess. Fo his pu pose, Ross and colleagues [8] ecom-
mend including a con ol g oup o measu e he in e in-
di idual esponse a iabili y and o pe o m addi ional
measu emen s a he p e- and pos - es s. Pa icipan s
we e ins uc ed o main ain ea ing habi s as well as daily
physical ac i i y. As we did no eco d he daily physi-
cal ac i i y, we canno ule ou iny in luences om his
sou ce and sugges u u e esea ch o include he in lu-
ence o li es yle habi s on he aining esponse.
Conclusion
The cu en s udy demons a es ha aining in he high
in ensi y domain inc eases he a e o esponde s o
VO2max o mos indi iduals e en when he o al ene gy
expendi u e emains he same. Thus, aining a in ensi-
ies a ound VO2max such as in HIIT is well sui ed o e ec-
i ely inc ease he a e o esponde s. I he speci ica ions
o a s anda dized mode a e endu ance aining emain
cons an a e he pe iod o 10weeks o aining, u he
aining adap a ions a e unlikely. The e o e, aining in
he high in ensi y domain is an e ec i e way o achie e
and main ain a aining esponse wi hou he need o
a highe o al aining olume. This is o pa icula el-
e ance o se ings, whe e indi idualized ainings p e-
sc ip ions a e no easible.
Abb e ia ions
BMI Body mass index
BP Blood p essu e
CON Con ol g oup (mode a e in ensi y)
CRF Ca dio espi a o y i ness
EE To al ene gy expendi u e
HIIT High-in ensi y in e al aining
HR es Res ing hea a e
HR ese e Hea a e ese e
HRsubmax Submaximal hea a e
INC In e en ion g oup (inc easing in ensi y)
iV In aindi idual a iabili y
Lamax Maximum lac a e
RER Respi a o y exchange a io
T01 Habi ua ion o he maximal eadmill es and a medical
examina ion
T02 Baseline measu emen 1
T03 Baseline measu emen 2
TEM Technical e o o measu emen
Vmax Maximum speed
VO2max Maximum oxygen up ake
wk10 10 Weeks o aining
wk18 18 Weeks o aining
wk26 26 Weeks o aining
Acknowledgemen s
No applicable.
Au ho Con ibu ions
MR w o e he i s d a o he manusc ip and analysed and in e p e ed he
da a om he subjec s. Me hodological quali y assessmen s we e conduc ed
by FR, AV and TM. AH con ibu ed o idea concep ion. AB and LB conduc ed
he da a collec ion and supe ised he aining in e en ion. All au ho s ead
and app o ed he inal manusc ip .
Funding
Open Access unding enabled and o ganized by P ojek DEAL. We did no
ecei e any unding o ou wo k om any o ganiza ions.
A ailabili y o Da a and Ma e ials
The da ase s used and/o analysed du ing he cu en s udy a e a ailable om
he co esponding au ho on easonable eques .
Decla a ions
E hics App o al and Consen o Pa icipa e
All pa icipan s signed w i en in o med consen . The s udy p ocedu es we e
in acco dance wi h he Decla a ion o Helsinki and he s udy was app o ed