scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

Reduction of Hydrogen Peroxide by Human Mitochondrial Amidoxime Reducing Component Enzymes

Abstract

The mitochondrial amidoxime reducing component (mARC) is a human molybdoenzyme known to catalyze the reduction of various N-oxygenated substrates. The physiological function of mARC enzymes, however, remains unknown. In this study, we examine the reduction of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) by the human mARC1 and mARC2 enzymes. Furthermore, we demonstrate an increased sensitivity toward H2O2 for HEK-293T cells with an MTARC1 knockout, which implies a role of mARC enzymes in the cellular response to oxidative stress. H2O2 is a reactive oxygen species (ROS) formed in all living cells involved in many physiological processes. Furthermore, H2O2 constitutes the first mARC substrate without a nitrogen-oxygen bond, implying that mARC enzymes may have a substrate spectrum going beyond the previously examined N-oxygenated compounds.

Read accessible full text

Reduction of Hydrogen Peroxide by Human Mitochondrial Amidoxime Reducing Component Enzymes

Author: Rixen, Sophia,Indorf, Patrick,Kubitza, Christian,Struwe, Michel Alexander,Klopp, Cathrin,Scheidig, Axel J,Kunze, Thomas,Clement, Bernd
Year: 2023
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28176384
Source: https://macau.uni-kiel.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/macau_derivate_00005615/molecules-28-06384-v2.pdf
Ci a ion: Rixen, S.; Indo , P.M.;
Kubi za, C.; S uwe, M.A.; Klopp, C.;
Scheidig, A.J.; Kunze, T.; Clemen , B.
Reduc ion o Hyd ogen Pe oxide by
Human Mi ochond ial Amidoxime
Reducing Componen Enzymes.
Molecules 2023,28, 6384. h ps://
doi.o g/10.3390/molecules28176384
Academic Edi o : Domenico Osella
Recei ed: 1 Augus 2023
Re ised: 23 Augus 2023
Accep ed: 29 Augus 2023
Published: 31 Augus 2023
Copy igh : © 2023 by he au ho s.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land.
This a icle is an open access a icle
dis ibu ed unde he e ms and
condi ions o he C ea i e Commons
A ibu ion (CC BY) license (h ps://
c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/
4.0/).
molecules
A icle
Reduc ion o Hyd ogen Pe oxide by Human Mi ochond ial
Amidoxime Reducing Componen Enzymes
Sophia Rixen 1,† , Pa ick M. Indo 1,†, Ch is ian Kubi za 2, Michel A. S uwe 1,2 , Ca h in Klopp 1,2 ,
Axel J. Scheidig 2, Thomas Kunze 1and Be nd Clemen 1,*
1Depa men o Pha maceu ical and Medicinal Chemis y, Pha maceu ical Ins i u e, Kiel Uni e si y,
24118 Kiel, Ge many; [email p o ec ed] (S.R.); [email p o ec ed] (P.M.I.);
[email p o ec ed] (M.A.S.); cklopp@s ubio.uni-kiel.de (C.K.);
[email p o ec ed] (T.K.)
2Depa men o S uc u al Biology, Zoological Ins i u e, Kiel Uni e si y, 24118 Kiel, Ge many;
[email p o ec ed] (C.K.); [email p o ec ed] (A.J.S.)
*Co espondence: [email p o ec ed]
†These au ho s con ibu ed equally o his wo k.
Abs ac :
The mi ochond ial amidoxime educing componen (mARC) is a human molybdoenzyme
known o ca alyze he educ ion o a ious N-oxygena ed subs a es. The physiological unc ion o
mARC enzymes, howe e , emains unknown. In his s udy, we examine he educ ion o hyd ogen
pe oxide (H
2
O
2
) by he human mARC1 and mARC2 enzymes. Fu he mo e, we demons a e an
inc eased sensi i i y owa d H
2
O
2
o HEK-293T cells wi h an MTARC1 knockou , which implies
a ole o mARC enzymes in he cellula esponse o oxida i e s ess. H
2
O
2
is a eac i e oxygen
species (ROS) o med in all li ing cells in ol ed in many physiological p ocesses. Fu he mo e, H
2
O
2
cons i u es he i s mARC subs a e wi hou a ni ogen–oxygen bond, implying ha mARC enzymes
may ha e a subs a e spec um going beyond he p e iously examined N-oxygena ed compounds.
Keywo ds: eac i e oxygen species; hyd ogen pe oxide; molybdenum enzyme
1. In oduc ion
The human mARC enzyme was i s desc ibed in 2006 as he hi d componen o he
N- educing complex oge he wi h hemop o ein cy och ome b5 (Cyb5B) and la op o ein
cy och ome b5 educ ase (Cyb5R3) [
1
]. Toge he wi h hese wo elec on ca ie p o eins,
mARC enzymes educe a ious N-hyd oxyla ed subs a es like amidoximes, N-hyd oxy-
guanidines, hyd oxylamines, N-oxides o hyd oxamic acids [
2
]. mARC u ilizes a Mo-
molybdop e in co ac o (Moco), he coo dina ion o he ca aly ic molybdenum ion being
e y simila o ha obse ed in sul i e oxidase (SO) [
3
,
4
] despi e no sha ing many o he
cha ac e is ics wi h SO. Thus, mARC enzymes a e classi ied as pa o a sepa a e, new amily
o molybdenum enzymes, he MOSC domain amily [
5
,
6
]. All mammalian genomes encode
wo pa alogues o mARC: mARC1 and mARC2 (gene names MTARC1,MTARC2) [4].
Hyd ogen pe oxide (H
2
O
2
) is he majo eac i e oxygen species (ROS) in euka yo ic
cells and some 37 human enzymes a e known o gene a e H
2
O
2
by he wo-elec on
educ ion o dioxygen [
7
]. In e es ingly, among hese H
2
O
2
-p oducing enzymes a e he
euka yo ic molybdenum enzymes xan hine oxidase (XO) [
8
], aldehyde oxidase (AO) [
9
]
and sul i e oxidase (SO) [10].
While high concen a ions o H
2
O
2
cause oxida i e damage o cells, i is conside ed o
be a physiologically ele an signaling molecule a lowe concen a ions. These di e en
e ec s o H2O2ha e been e iewed in de ail elsewhe e [7].
Va ious cell compa men s con ain H
2
O
2
-deg ading enzymes, ensu ing igh egu-
la ion o H
2
O
2
concen a ions. Examples a e ca alase o myelope oxidase, which, due
o hei high K
M
alues, a e sui able o deg ading high H
2
O
2
concen a ions, e.g., in
Molecules 2023,28, 6384. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/molecules28176384 h ps://www.mdpi.com/jou nal/molecules
Molecules 2023,28, 6384 2 o 12
pe oxisomes [11,12]. O he enzymes like GPx1 o pe oxi edoxins ac a much lowe H2O2
concen a ions cha ac e is ic o hei espec i e cell compa men s [13,14].
Un il now, no H
2
O
2
-deg ading enzyme has been iden i ied in he ou e mi ochond ial
memb ane (OMM), whe e mARC enzymes a e localized [15].
The mARC enzyme sys em is known bes o i s educ i e ac i i y owa d N-oxygena ed
compounds. Howe e , some s udies ha e shown links be ween mARC and ROS. Fo ex-
ample, he common mARC1 p.A165T a ian is associa ed wi h highe le els o lipid
pe oxida ion, while he o al an ioxidan ac i i y (TAA) in se um and exp ession o ca alase
a e inc eased [16].
In his wo k, we p esen he NADH-dependen deg ada ion o H
2
O
2
by he human
mARC1 and mARC2 enzymes in conce wi h hei elec on ca ie s Cyb5B and CYB5R3
using ecombinan p o eins. We go on o show he e ec o an MTARC1 knockou on he
iabili y o HEK-293T cells in he p esence o high ex e nal H2O2concen a ions.
2. Resul s
2.1. Molybdenum-Con aining mARC1 and mARC2 Bo h Reduce H2O2
To assess he educ ion o H
2
O
2
by mARC enzymes, we compa ed he NADH con-
sump ion, measu ed in he NADH assay, and he amoun o esidual H
2
O
2
, quan i ied by
he luo ome ic assay, o se e al di e en se ups. Impo an ly, ex ensi e con ol eac ions
we e examined o unambiguously iden i y he e ec o molybdenum-con aining mARC
enzymes. The esul s om hese assays a e isualized in Figu e 1. No e ha di e en H
2
O
2
concen a ions (50
µ
M o mARC1 and 80
µ
M o mARC2) we e used due o di e en
s abili ies o he enzymes owa d high H2O2concen a ions.
Molecules2023,28,xFORPEERREVIEW2o 12


hei highK
M
 alues,a esui able o deg adinghighH
2
O
2
concen a ions,e.g.,inpe oxi-
somes[11,12].O he enzymeslikeGPx1o pe oxi edoxinsac a muchlowe H
2
O
2
con-
cen a ionscha ac e is ic o  hei  espec i ecellcompa men s[13,14].
Un ilnow,noH
2
O
2
-deg adingenzymehasbeeniden i iedin heou e mi ochond ial
memb ane(OMM),whe emARCenzymesa elocalized[15].
ThemARCenzymesys emisknownbes  o i s educ i eac i i y owa dN-oxygen-
a edcompounds.Howe e ,somes udiesha eshownlinksbe weenmARCandROS.Fo 
example, hecommonmARC1p.A165T a ian isassocia edwi hhighe le elso lipid
pe oxida ion,while he o alan ioxidan ac i i y(TAA)inse umandexp essiono ca a-
lasea einc eased[16].
In hiswo k,wep esen  heNADH-dependen deg ada iono H
2
O
2
by hehuman
mARC1andmARC2enzymesinconce wi h hei elec onca ie sCyb5BandCYB5R3
using ecombinan p o eins.Wegoon oshow heeffec o anMTARC1knockou on he
iabili yo HEK-293Tcellsin hep esenceo highex e nalH
2
O
2
concen a ions.
2.Resul s
2.1.Molybdenum-Con ainingmARC1andmARC2Bo hReduceH
2
O
2

Toassess he educ iono H
2
O
2
bymARCenzymes,wecompa ed heNADHcon-
sump ion,measu edin heNADHassay,and heamoun o  esidualH
2
O
2
,quan i iedby
he luo ome icassay, o se e aldiffe en se ups.Impo an ly,ex ensi econ ol eac-
ionswe eexamined ounambiguouslyiden i y heeffec o molybdenum-con aining
mARCenzymes.The esul s om heseassaysa e isualizedinFigu e1.No e ha di -
e en H
2
O
2
concen a ions(50µM o mARC1and80µM o mARC2)we euseddue o
diffe en s abili ieso  heenzymes owa dhighH
2
O
2
concen a ions.

Figu e1.S ackedba -cha  ep esen ing heconsump iono NADH(b owncolumns)on opo  he
esidualamoun o H
2
O
2
(bluecolumns) o mARC1(panelA)andmARC2(panelB).Theindi idual
se upscompa ed oeacho he a e( omle  o igh ):nop o ein—assaycon ainingonlyNADH
andH
2
O
2
bu noenzymes;mARC1/2comple e—con ainsmARC1o mARC2andbo helec onca -
ie p o eins;apo-mARC1comple e—sameasbe o ebu wi hmolybdenum- eeapo-mARC;only
mARC1/2—jus mARC1/2,bu noelec onca ie s;onlyCyb5BandCyb5R—onlyelec onca ie s
bu nomARCenzymes.
I isclea lyobse ed ha , o bo hmARC1andmARC2, heby a g ea es deple ion
o NADHisobse edwhen hecomple e, econs i u edmARC1/2enzymesys emsa e
used.Co espondingly,in hese eac ions, helowes concen a ionso  esidualH
2
O
2
we e
ound,whichcon i ms ha NADHconsumedby hemARCenzymesys emdoesin ac 
educeH
2
O
2
.Thecon ol eac ionsindica e ha onlyholo-mARCenzymeswi hamolyb-
dop e inp os he icg oupcan educeH
2
O
2
inconce wi hCyb5BandCyb5R3.
Figu e 1.
S acked ba -cha ep esen ing he consump ion o NADH (b own columns) on op o he
esidual amoun o H
2
O
2
(blue columns) o mARC1 (panel A) and mARC2 (panel B). The indi idual
se ups compa ed o each o he a e ( om le o igh ): no p o ein—assay con aining only NADH
and H
2
O
2
bu no enzymes; mARC1/2 comple e—con ains mARC1 o mARC2 and bo h elec on
ca ie p o eins; apo-mARC1 comple e—same as be o e bu wi h molybdenum- ee apo-mARC; only
mARC1/2—jus mARC1/2, bu no elec on ca ie s; only Cyb5B and Cyb5R—only elec on ca ie s
bu no mARC enzymes.
I is clea ly obse ed ha , o bo h mARC1 and mARC2, he by a g ea es deple ion
o NADH is obse ed when he comple e, econs i u ed mARC1/2 enzyme sys ems a e
used. Co espondingly, in hese eac ions, he lowes concen a ions o esidual H
2
O
2
we e ound, which con i ms ha NADH consumed by he mARC enzyme sys em does
Molecules 2023,28, 6384 3 o 12
in ac educe H
2
O
2
. The con ol eac ions indica e ha only holo-mARC enzymes wi h a
molybdop e in p os he ic g oup can educe H2O2in conce wi h Cyb5B and Cyb5R3.
2.2. Kine ics o mARC-Dependen H2O2Reduc ion
Bo h mARC1 and mARC2 display Michaelis–Men en kine ics o H
2
O
2
educ ion, as is
shown in Figu e 2. The u no e a es and K
M
alues o H
2
O
2
educ ion by mARC1
and mARC2 a e compa able, wi h mARC1 showing a sligh ly lowe K
M
bu highe
u no e a es.
Molecules2023,28,xFORPEERREVIEW3o 12


2.2.Kine icso mARC-Dependen H
2
O
2
Reduc ion
Bo hmARC1andmARC2displayMichaelis–Men enkine ics o H
2
O
2
 educ ion,as
isshowninFigu e2.The u no e  a esandK
M
 alues o H
2
O
2
 educ ionbymARC1and
mARC2a ecompa able,wi hmARC1showingasligh lylowe K
M
bu highe  u no e 
a es.

Figu e2.(A)Kine icp o ileo mARC1-andmARC2-ca alyzedH
2
O
2
 educ ion.(B)Kine icpa am-
e e sob ained om i ing o heMichaelis–Men enequa ion.Valuesinpa en hesesindica e he
95%likelihoodin e al o K
M
andV
max
.
Usingou  ecen lyes ablished luo escence-basedhigh- h oughpu assay[17],we
we eable omeasu e e ysimila con e sion a es o  hemARC-ca alyzed educ iono 
hyd ogenpe oxide.
2.3.MTARC1Knockou Dec easesCellViabili yinP esenceo H
2
O
2
Tode e minewhe he o no  he educ iono H
2
O
2
by ecombinan mARCenzymes
is ele an incellulo,weexamined heimpac o diffe en H
2
O
2
concen a ionsoncell i-
abili yusinganHEK-293T-basedknockou model.SinceHEK-293Tcellsexp essonly e y
lowle elso mARC2, heMTARC1knockou  esul sincellsp ac icallyde oido mARC
ac i i y(mARC2exp essionle elsdono inc ease ocompensa e heMTARC1knockou ,
.Theknockou wasshown obeeffec i eon hep o einle elbyWes e nblo analysis
(Figu e3).Be o eincuba ionwi hH
2
O
2
,somecellswe e ea edwi hbu hioninesul-
oximine(BSO),aninhibi o o glu a hionesyn hesis.
Figu e 2.
(
A
) Kine ic p o ile o mARC1- and mARC2-ca alyzed H
2
O
2
educ ion. (
B
) Kine ic pa ame-
e s ob ained om i ing o he Michaelis–Men en equa ion. Values in pa en heses indica e he 95%
likelihood in e al o KMand Vmax.
Using ou ecen ly es ablished luo escence-based high- h oughpu assay [
17
], we
we e able o measu e e y simila con e sion a es o he mARC-ca alyzed educ ion o
hyd ogen pe oxide.
2.3. MTARC1 Knockou Dec eases Cell Viabili y in P esence o H2O2
To de e mine whe he o no he educ ion o H
2
O
2
by ecombinan mARC enzymes
is ele an in cellulo, we examined he impac o di e en H
2
O
2
concen a ions on cell
iabili y using an HEK-293T-based knockou model. Since HEK-293T cells exp ess only
e y low le els o mARC2, he MTARC1 knockou esul s in cells p ac ically de oid o
mARC ac i i y (mARC2 exp ession le els do no inc ease o compensa e he MTARC1
Molecules 2023,28, 6384 4 o 12
knockou . The knockou was shown o be e ec i e on he p o ein le el by Wes e n blo
analysis (Figu e 3). Be o e incuba ion wi h H
2
O
2
, some cells we e ea ed wi h bu hionine
sul oximine (BSO), an inhibi o o glu a hione syn hesis.
Molecules2023,28,xFORPEERREVIEW4o 12



Figu e3.P o einp oduc ion o e i yMTARC1KO.MTARC1
−/−
andWTcellswe elysed,36µgo 
p o einwasappliedpe laneandWes e nblo analyseswe epe o medusinganan i-mARC1an-
ibody.
Diffe encesseenbe weenwild ypeandknockou cellsa eal eady e lec edbycell
mo phology.Achangedcellmo phologyinducedbyH
2
O
2
,whichcanbeobse edinKO
cellsa 20µM,onlyoccu sinWTcellsa 30µM,while heKOcellsa 30µMcanha dly
beconside edmo phologicallyali e(Figu e4).Fu he mo e,Hoechs s aining e ealed
ha knockou cells ea edwi h30µMH
2
O
2
hadhighe nuclea condensa ionand he eby
aninc easedapop osis a ecompa ed owild ypecells(Figu e5C).

Figu e4.Cy o oxici yo H
2
O
2
 oHEK-293TMTARC1-KOandWTcells.Cellswe eseededon o96-
wellpla esandincuba edwi hmediumcon aining0.3mMBSO o 16h, ollowedbyincuba ion
Figu e 3.
P o ein p oduc ion o e i y MTARC1 KO. MTARC1
−/−
and WT cells we e lysed,
36
µ
g o p o ein was applied pe lane and Wes e n blo analyses we e pe o med using an
an i-mARC1 an ibody.
Di e ences seen be ween wild ype and knockou cells a e al eady e lec ed by cell
mo phology. A changed cell mo phology induced by H
2
O
2
, which can be obse ed in KO
cells a 20
µ
M, only occu s in WT cells a 30
µ
M, while he KO cells a 30
µ
M can ha dly be
conside ed mo phologically ali e (Figu e 4). Fu he mo e, Hoechs s aining e ealed ha
knockou cells ea ed wi h 30 µM H2O2had highe nuclea condensa ion and he eby an
inc eased apop osis a e compa ed o wild ype cells (Figu e 5C).
This obse a ion was con i med in a esazu in-based cell iabili y assay. While low
concen a ions o H
2
O
2
do no appea o ha e a nega i e in luence on cell iabili y in
ei he WT o KO cells, when inc easing H
2
O
2
concen a ions abo e 10
µ
M, WT and KO
cells clea ly show di e gence, wi h he iabili y o WT cells being signi ican ly highe
(Figu e 5A,B). A dec eased iabili y o knockou cells can al eady be obse ed a e 8 h
and only becomes e en mo e p onounced a e longe incuba ion pe iods. A e 48 h,
KO cells a e no iable a 30
µ
M H
2
O
2
, whe eas he same is obse ed wi h WT cells a a
concen a ion o 80 µM H2O2. A a concen a ion o 30 µM, he iabili y o he WT cells is
s ill app ox. 70%.
These indings show ha H
2
O
2
deg ada ion by he mARC1 enzyme does occu
in cell cul u e, and i has a measu able e ec on cell physiology a high ex acellula
H2O2concen a ions.
Molecules 2023,28, 6384 5 o 12
Molecules2023,28,xFORPEERREVIEW4o 12



Figu e3.P o einp oduc ion o e i yMTARC1KO.MTARC1
−/−
andWTcellswe elysed,36µgo 
p o einwasappliedpe laneandWes e nblo analyseswe epe o medusinganan i-mARC1an-
ibody.
Diffe encesseenbe weenwild ypeandknockou cellsa eal eady e lec edbycell
mo phology.Achangedcellmo phologyinducedbyH
2
O
2
,whichcanbeobse edinKO
cellsa 20µM,onlyoccu sinWTcellsa 30µM,while heKOcellsa 30µMcanha dly
beconside edmo phologicallyali e(Figu e4).Fu he mo e,Hoechs s aining e ealed
ha knockou cells ea edwi h30µMH
2
O
2
hadhighe nuclea condensa ionand he eby
aninc easedapop osis a ecompa ed owild ypecells(Figu e5C).

Figu e4.Cy o oxici yo H
2
O
2
 oHEK-293TMTARC1-KOandWTcells.Cellswe eseededon o96-
wellpla esandincuba edwi hmediumcon aining0.3mMBSO o 16h, ollowedbyincuba ion
Figu e 4.
Cy o oxici y o H
2
O
2
o HEK-293T MTARC1-KO and WT cells. Cells we e seeded on o
96-well pla es and incuba ed wi h medium con aining 0.3 mM BSO o 16 h, ollowed by incuba ion
wi h medium con aining 20–80
µ
M H
2
O
2.
A e 48 h o incuba ion, cell mo phology was examined
mic oscopically. A 0–20
µ
M H
2
O
2
, bo h WT and KO cells ha e e y simila mo phologies. Howe e ,
when he H
2
O
2
concen a ion is inc eased o 30
µ
M, mo phology o KO cells changes d as ically,
whe eas he WT cells look la gely una ec ed. A 80
µ
M, bo h cell lines display s ong mo phological
di e ences, esembling he changes al eady seen a 30 µM o KO cells.
Fu he , an in luence on cell p oli e a ion could be obse ed. Ex acellula concen a-
ions o 10
µ
M H
2
O
2
showed no impai men on cell p oli e a ion. An ex acellula H
2
O
2
concen a ion o 20
µ
M did lead o impai ed cell p oli e a ion: a e 24 h, he p oli e a ion
o bo h WT and KO cells was dec eased compa ed o con ol cells wi hou H
2
O
2
ea men .
This impai men on cell p oli e a ion was mo e p onounced in mARC1-de icien cells,
whe e, a e 24 h, only 50% could be coun ed compa ed o cells ea ed wi h he medium
only; hus, in pu ely a i hme ical e ms, no cell di ision o he KO cells had aken place in
he las 24 h. The numbe o WT cells was educed o app ox. 70%. A e 72 h, bo h WT and
KO cells we e educed o app ox. 35%. A a H
2
O
2
concen a ion o 30
µ
M, no measu able
cell di ision occu ed in ei he he KO o WT cells (Figu e 6).

Molecules 2023,28, 6384 6 o 12
Molecules2023,28,xFORPEERREVIEW5o 12


wi hmediumcon aining20–80µMH
2
O
2.
A e 48ho incuba ion,cellmo phologywasexamined
mic oscopically.A 0–20µMH
2
O
2
,bo hWTandKOcellsha e e ysimila mo phologies.Howe e ,
when heH
2
O
2
concen a ionisinc eased o30µM,mo phologyo KOcellschangesd as ically,
whe eas heWTcellslookla gelyunaffec ed.A 80µM,bo hcelllinesdisplays ongmo phological
diffe ences, esembling hechangesal eadyseena 30µM o KOcells.

Figu e5.Cell iabili yandHoechs 33342s aining.Cellswe e ea edwi hdiffe en concen a ions
o H
2
O
2
andexamineda e 8h,24h,48hand72hby esazu inassay.Cells ea edwi hmedium
wi hou supplemen edH
2
O
2
we ede inedas100% iabili y.(A)Cell iabili ya e p io  ea men 
wi h0.3mMBSO;(B)cell iabili ywi hou p io  ea men wi hBSO;(C) luo escenceandb igh 
ilmmic oscopyo HEK-293TMTARC1KOandWTcellsina40×objec i emagni ica ion.Cellswe e
ea ed o 48hwi h30µMH
2
O
2
.Thewhi ea owsma kcellnucleiwi hclea ch oma inconden-
sa ion.
Thisobse a ionwascon i medina esazu in-basedcell iabili yassay.Whilelow
concen a ionso H
2
O
2
dono appea  oha eanega i ein luenceoncell iabili yinei he 
WTo KOcells,wheninc easingH
2
O
2
concen a ionsabo e10µM,WTandKOcells
clea lyshowdi e gence,wi h he iabili yo WTcellsbeingsigni ican lyhighe (Figu e
5A,B).Adec eased iabili yo knockou cellscanal eadybeobse eda e 8handonly
becomese enmo ep onounceda e longe incuba ionpe iods.A e 48h,KOcellsa e
no  iablea 30µMH
2
O
2
,whe eas hesameisobse edwi hWTcellsa aconcen a ion
o 80µMH
2
O
2
.A aconcen a iono 30µM, he iabili yo  heWTcellsiss illapp ox.
70%.
Figu e 5.
Cell iabili y and Hoechs 33342 s aining. Cells we e ea ed wi h di e en concen a ions
o H
2
O
2
and examined a e 8 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h by esazu in assay. Cells ea ed wi h medium
wi hou supplemen ed H
2
O
2
we e de ined as 100% iabili y. (
A
) Cell iabili y a e p io ea men
wi h 0.3 mM BSO; (
B
) cell iabili y wi hou p io ea men wi h BSO; (
C
) luo escence and b igh
ilm mic oscopy o HEK-293T MTARC1 KO and WT cells in a 40
×
objec i e magni ica ion. Cells we e
ea ed o 48 h wi h 30
µ
M H
2
O
2
. The whi e a ows ma k cell nuclei wi h clea
ch oma in condensa ion
.
Molecules2023,28,xFORPEERREVIEW6o 12


These indingsshow ha H
2
O
2
deg ada ionby hemARC1enzymedoesoccu incell
cul u e,andi hasameasu ableeffec oncellphysiologya highex acellula H
2
O
2
con-
cen a ions.
Fu he ,anin luenceoncellp oli e a ioncouldbeobse ed.Ex acellula concen a-
ionso 10µMH
2
O
2
showednoimpai men oncellp oli e a ion.Anex acellula H
2
O
2

concen a iono 20µMdidlead oimpai edcellp oli e a ion:a e 24h, hep oli e a ion
o bo hWTandKOcellswasdec easedcompa ed ocon olcellswi hou H
2
O
2
 ea men .
Thisimpai men oncellp oli e a ionwasmo ep onouncedinmARC1-de icien cells,
whe e,a e 24h,only50%couldbecoun edcompa ed ocells ea edwi h hemedium
only; hus,inpu elya i hme ical e ms,nocelldi isiono  heKOcellshad akenplacein
helas 24h.Thenumbe o WTcellswas educed oapp ox.70%.A e 72h,bo hWT
andKOcellswe e educed oapp ox.35%.A aH
2
O
2
concen a iono 30µM,nomeasu -
ablecelldi isionoccu edinei he  heKOo WTcells(Figu e6).

Figu e6. Cellp oli e a ion.Cellswe e ea edwi hdiffe en concen a ions(10µM,20µM,30µM)
o H
2
O
2
.A e 24h,48hand72h, hecellnumbe wasde e minedon heImageXp ess
®
(λ
ex
:358,
λ
em
:461)(Molecula De ices,LLC.,SanJose,CA,USA).
3.Discussion
Thes udyp esen edhe eiden i iesH
2
O
2
asanewsubs a e o  hehumanmARC1
andmARC2p o eins.Thedeg ada iono H
2
O
2
wasdemons a edin i owi h ecombi-
nan enzymesandcon i medinamo ecomplexen i onmen byincelluloknockou s ud-
ies.Thus, o  he i s  ime,a educ iono O-Obondsby hemARCenzymesys emis
desc ibed.MolybdenumenzymeslikemARC ypicallycha ac e ize wo-elec on ans e 
eac ions; he e o e, hep oduc o  his eac ionislikelywa e .
Whilewecanno a  hispoin conclude ha H
2
O
2
o o he  eac i eoxygenspeciesa e
hephysiologicalsubs a eo euka yo icmARCenzymes, his indingisimpo an none-
heless.Compoundswi hO-Obondsa eacomple elyno elg oupo po en ialmARC
subs a es ha ha eno p e iouslybeens udied.So a ,allmARC-ca alyzed eac ions
desc ibedin heli e a u ea eN- educ ionsclea ingN-Obonds[18].
The u no e  a eso  hemARC-ca alyzedH
2
O
2
 educ iona e ela i elylowcom-
pa ed oo he H
2
O
2
-deg adingenzymes.I shouldbeno ed,howe e , ha  u no e  a es
de e minedwi h hesoluble ecombinan p o einswi hou  hei OMM-ancho ingse-
quencesa e ypicallymuchlowe  o humanmARCenzymescompa edwi hp o eins
isola ed omo ganhomogena es[19].Thus,in i oH
2
O
2
- educingac i i ieso human
Figu e 6.
Cell p oli e a ion. Cells we e ea ed wi h di e en concen a ions (10
µ
M, 20
µ
M, 30
µ
M)
o H
2
O
2
. A e 24 h, 48 h and 72 h, he cell numbe was de e mined on he ImageXp ess
®
(
λex
: 358,
λem: 461) (Molecula De ices, LLC., San Jose, CA, USA).
Molecules 2023,28, 6384 7 o 12
3. Discussion
The s udy p esen ed he e iden i ies H
2
O
2
as a new subs a e o he human mARC1
and mARC2 p o eins. The deg ada ion o H
2
O
2
was demons a ed
in i o
wi h ecom-
binan enzymes and con i med in a mo e complex en i onmen by in cellulo knockou
s udies. Thus, o he i s ime, a educ ion o O-O bonds by he mARC enzyme sys em is
desc ibed. Molybdenum enzymes like mARC ypically cha ac e ize wo-elec on ans e
eac ions; he e o e, he p oduc o his eac ion is likely wa e .
While we canno a his poin conclude ha H
2
O
2
o o he eac i e oxygen species
a e he physiological subs a e o euka yo ic mARC enzymes, his inding is impo an
none heless. Compounds wi h O-O bonds a e a comple ely no el g oup o po en ial mARC
subs a es ha ha e no p e iously been s udied. So a , all mARC-ca alyzed eac ions
desc ibed in he li e a u e a e N- educ ions clea ing N-O bonds [18].
The u no e a es o he mARC-ca alyzed H
2
O
2
educ ion a e ela i ely low compa ed
o o he H
2
O
2
-deg ading enzymes. I should be no ed, howe e , ha u no e a es
de e mined wi h he soluble ecombinan p o eins wi hou hei OMM-ancho ing sequences
a e ypically much lowe o human mARC enzymes compa ed wi h p o eins isola ed om
o gan homogena es [
19
]. Thus,
in i o
H
2
O
2
- educing ac i i ies o human mARC enzymes
can be expec ed o be signi ican ly highe han he alues epo ed he e. On ano he no e,
he K
M
alues o H
2
O
2
educ ion by ecombinan human mARC p o eins (app ox. 50
µ
M)
a e e y low compa ed o hose o he well-s udied N-hyd oxyla ed compounds.
Hyd ogen pe oxide has undamen ally impo an unc ions in humans. Depending
on he in acellula concen a ion, i ini ia es, in e alia, cell p oli e a ion, cell shaping,
mig a ion and angiogenesis [
20
–
22
]. On he o he hand, he accumula ion o highe con-
cen a ions o hyd ogen pe oxide and o he ROS leads o oxida i e s ess, a condi ion o
imbalance be ween p o-oxidan s and an ioxidan s. ROS pass h ough cell memb anes and
cause oxida i e damage o lipids, p o eins and DNA, as well as mi ochond ial dys unc ion,
all o which can lead o he loss o essen ial cell unc ions and ini ia e he caspase-media ed
apop osis pa hway [23–25].
In his s udy, a coupled enzyme assay was es ablished. Two pa ame e s we e mea-
su ed: he amoun o NADH oxidized by he mARC-media ed educ ion and, o con i m
he esul s, he emaining concen a ion o hyd ogen pe oxide. Thus, i was shown ha
bo h mARC p o eins can educe H2O2.
Conside ing he enzyme kine ics o his eac ion, i is s iking ha he K
M
alues o
bo h mARC p o eins a e ema kably lowe when compa ed o well-known H
2
O
2
-deple ing
enzymes such as ca alase o pe oxi edoxin [26,27].
An in cellulo MTARC1 knockou model was gene a ed and es ablished o e i y
whe he he absence o mARC1 leads o cellula impai men upon exposu e o H
2
O
2
. A
signi ican ly educed cell physiology o mARC1-de icien cells and hus a highe sensi i i y
owa d H2O2compa ed o co esponding WT cells could be obse ed. Also, highe apop-
osis le els and lowe cell iabili y le els we e seen. These indings could be con i med by
ligh and luo escence mic oscopy showing al e ed cell mo phology and declined nuclea
condensa ion. While he H
2
O
2
concen a ions used in ou cell cul u e expe imen s ce ainly
exceed hose expec ed
in i o
, i is s ill possible ha he egula ion o ROS is a physiological
unc ion o mARC enzymes.
The complex mechanisms o hyd ogen pe oxide egula ion wi h a la ge numbe o
enzymes in a ious cell o ganelles demons a e he need o di e en app oaches o con ol
he in acellula concen a ion. While majo hyd ogen pe oxide ans o ming enzymes like
ca alase, GPx o pe oxi edoxins a e p esen in he endoplasmic e iculum, cy osol, nucleus,
pe oxisomes, he in e memb ane space (IMS), inne mi ochond ial memb ane (IMM) and
mi ochond ial ma ix, mARC s ands ou h ough i s localiza ion a he OMM [
13
,
15
,
28
–
30
],
al hough he e a e some epo s abou GPx also being localized a he OMM [31].
mARC migh hus be in ol ed in p o ec ing he OMM om ROS. Since ROS a e
o med in high concen a ions in he IMS and he cy osol by di e en enzymes, a p o ec-
i e mechanism o he undesi ed oxygena ion o he OMM— o example, agains lipid
Molecules 2023,28, 6384 8 o 12
pe oxida ion o p e en oxida i e s ess and mi ochond ial dys unc ion—is concei able.
This was also desc ibed ea lie o GPx-4 a he IMM [
28
]. The e a e also some known
enzymes a he OMM, such as he monoamine oxidase MAO, ha o m hyd ogen pe oxide
as a seconda y p oduc [
28
]. I is hus also possible ha mARC in luences he ee di usion
be ween IMS and cy osol di usion and he anspo o H
2
O
2
h ough ol age-dependen
anion channels (VDACs) and pe oxipo ins due o i s high a ini y o H2O2.
Kagan and colleagues highligh ed he signi icance o ROS o apop osis by iden i-
ying he eleasing pa hway o p oapop o ic ac o s om he OMM. A H
2
O
2-
dependen
ca diolipin-speci ic pe oxidase ac i i y o cy och ome c is equi ed o he pe meabiliza ion
o he OMM, demons a ing again he signi icance o hyd ogen pe oxide egula ion in he
OMM o c i ical cell p ocesses [
32
]. Also, H
2
O
2
is o med in he pe oxisomal
β
-oxida ion
o a y acids [
33
]. Va ious s udies in mice and a s also sugges he possibili y o a dual
localiza ion o mARC in mi ochond ia and pe oxisomes [
34
,
35
]; hus, his colocaliza ion
could sugges ha mARC has a egula o y unc ion in hyd ogen pe oxide and an ioxidan
me abolism in pe oxisomes as well.
In conclusion, he educ ion o H
2
O
2
by mARC is ce ainly e y in e es ing, as i
indica es ha he spec um o subs a es ha hese enzymes can educe could go a
beyond he p e iously s udied N-oxygena ed subs a es. The in cellulo s udies con i m
ha H
2
O
2
is also educed by he na i e mARC enzyme in i s cellula con ex . We do no
claim ha H
2
O
2
o o he eac i e oxygen species a e he physiological subs a es o mARC.
An in ol emen in he cellula egula ion o H
2
O
2
is concei able, bu da a a ailable on his
poin a e no su icien o claim his o be he enzymes’ unc ion. Due o hei in ol emen
in li e disease, mARC enzymes ha e ecen ly gained much a en ion. Howe e , i emains
unknown wha he physiological unc ion o mARC ac ually is and how exac ly i exe s
i s in luence on lipid me abolism and li e disease. In he u u e, a sea ch o mARC’s
physiological subs a e ha migh no ha e p e iously been associa ed wi h mARC should
be conside ed.
4. Ma e ials and Me hods
4.1. P o ein Sou ces
Recombinan human mARC1, mARC2, Cyb5B and Cyb5R3 we e exp essed in
Esche ichia coli (E. coli) and pu i ied by column ch oma og aphy, essen ially as desc ibed p e-
iously [
36
]. Fo mARC1 and mARC2 wi h bound molybdop e in co ac o (holo-mARC1/2),
he E. coli TP1000 s ain [
37
] was used. P o eins wi hou molybdop e in we e exp essed
in RK5202 [
38
]. P o ein concen a ions we e de e mined using he Pie ce BCA P o ein
Assay Ki (The mo Fishe Scien i ic, Wal ham, MA, USA) wi h bo ine se um albumin o
calib a ion. Loading o Cyb5B wi h heme and Cyb5R3 wi h la in adenine dinucleo ide
(FAD) was quan i ied as published [36].
4.2. Pho ome ic Assay
Reduc ion o H
2
O
2
by he econs i u ed mARC enzyme sys em was assayed using he
p e iously published p o ocol [
2
]. Reac ions con ained 7.5
µ
g (224 pmol) o ei he mARC1
o mARC2, 3.5
µ
g (210 pmol) Cyb5B and 0.08
µ
g (2.4 pmol) Cyb5R3 and 200
µ
M NADH
in 20 mM Na-MES bu e , pH 6.0. The o al eac ion olume was 300
µ
L. Consump ion
o NADH a 37
◦
C was moni o ed by eco ding he abso p ion spec um om 300 o
400 nm in 15 s in e als. The eac ion was s opped by hea ing 200
µ
L o he incuba ion mix
o 95
◦
C o 5 min in a wa e ba h. Tu no e a es we e calcula ed h ough he change in
abso p ion a 340 nm o e a imespan o 2 min. Kine ic pa ame e s we e de e mined by
i ing he Michaelis–Men en equa ion o he u no e a es a di e en H
2
O
2
concen a ions
in G aphPad P ism 9.5.1. All measu emen s we e pe o med in iplica e.
4.3. Fluo ome ic Ac i i y Assay
Al e na i ely, he enzyme ac i i y was assayed by moni o ing NADH consump ion
h ough a ecen ly es ablished luo ome ic p o ocol [
17
]. B ie ly, ime-dependen change
Molecules 2023,28, 6384 9 o 12
in NADH luo escence (
λex
= 340 nm;
λem
= 365 nm) was moni o ed wi h a TECAN In ini e
200 M P o pla e eade . The eac ion olume was 50
µ
L. Assays con ained 193 pmol
(=6.5
µ
g) hmARC-1, 65 pmol hCyb5B (heme), 6.5 pmol hCyb5R3 (FAD), 0.2 mM o NADH
and he subs a e o be es ed in 20 mM Na-MES bu e , pH 6.0. The eac ion mix u es
con aining all componen s excep Cyb5R3 we e p e-incuba ed a 37
◦
C o 3 min. The
eac ions we e s a ed by adding Cyb5R3, and NADH luo escence was eco ded o
15 min a 37 ◦C. BAO was always used in pa allel as a e e ence subs a e.
4.4. Pe oxide Assay
To con i m deg ada ion o H
2
O
2
by he mARC enzyme sys em, esidual H
2
O
2
con-
cen a ions we e quan i ied using a luo ome ic pe oxidase assay [
39
]. Samples om he
pho ome ic ac i i y assays we e cooled on ice o 1 min and hen p e-incuba ed a 37
◦
C o
2 min. Then, 10
µ
L o 20 mM Na-MES bu e , pH 6.0, 30
µ
L o 20 mM 4-hyd oxyphenylace ic
acid and 30
µ
L o a 30
µ
g/mL ho se adish pe oxidase solu ion we e added and incuba ion
a 37
◦
C was con inued o 10 min. A e wa ds, 10
µ
L o 10 M NaOH and 850
µ
L dis illed
wa e we e added. A o al o 150
µ
L was ans e ed o Pe kin Elme qua z SUPRASIL
cu e es. Fluo escence spec a om 340 o 450 nm we e measu ed in a Pe kin Elme LS
55 Fluo escence Spec ome e using an exci a ion wa eleng h o 320 nm. The peak a
408 nm was used o e alua ion. Co ela ion be ween he in ensi y o his peak and he
H2O2concen a ion was p o en using a calib a ion cu e.
4.5. Molecula Biology
Knockou o he MTARC1 gene in HEK-293T cells was achie ed by he CRISPR-
Cas9 me hod [
40
]. A sequence encoding sgRNA o sgRNA add essing exon 2 o he
MTARC1 gene (5
0
-GTGGCCAAAACCGAACACTAGT-
TGG
-3
0
, PAM sequence unde lined)
was cloned in o he Esp3I si e o he plen iCRISPR 2 plasmid (Addgene #49535) using
s anda d cloning me hods [
41
]. Co ec inse ion o he sgRNA-encoding sequence was
con i med by Sange sequencing using he p ime 5
0
-GAGGGCCTA-TTTCCCATGATTCC-3
0
.
4.6. Mammalian Cell Cul u e
Human emb yonic kidney cells (HEK-293T) we e g own in Dulbecco’s Modi ied
Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemen ed wi h 10% e al cal se um (FCS) in a humidi ied
incuba o a 37
◦
C in p esence o 5% CO
2
. HEK-293T cells we e e i ied by SNP analysis
and con i med o be mycoplasma- ee.
Fo ans ec ion, a ge cells we e seeded a 2
×
10
5
cells/well in a 6-well pla e. Twen y-
ou hou s a e seeding, he cul i a ion medium was eplaced wi h DMEM con aining
2% FCS. The ans ec ion mix consis ed o 100
µ
L Op i-MEM, 1
µ
g DNA (plen iCRISPR 2
con aining he sgRNA sequence) and 3
µ
L Lipo ec amine 2000
®
(The mo Fishe Scien i ic,
Wal ham, MA, USA). Medium was exchanged o DMEM incl. 10% FCS a e 6 h. A e u -
he 18 h, medium was eplaced again by DMEM incl. 10% FCS, supplemen ed wi h
2.5
µ
g/mL pu omycin. Cells we e cul i a ed and selec ed in pu omycin-con aining
medium o 6 days.
HEK-293T KO lines we e isola ed by se ial dilu ion in 96-well pla es (0.5 cells/well).
A e h ee weeks o expansion, DNA was isola ed wi h he peqGOLD mic ospin issue
DNA ki (VWR, Da ms ad , Ge many), he egion o in e es was ampli ied by PCR and he
knockou was alida ed by Sange sequencing. P ime s o bo h ampli ica ion o he gene
egion o in e es as well as sequencing we e 5
0
-AAGCTCCTCCAGGGTCTGGCTTC-3
0
and e e se 50-CGACCTGCCCTTTCCTTACCTGC-30.
Fo immunoblo analysis, cells we e de ached using ice-cold Dulbecco’s PBS (DPBS),
cen i uged, and esuspended in NP-40 lysis bu e (con aining 150 mM NaCl, 1% ( / )
Nonide P-40, 50 mM T is). A e 30 min shaking a 4
◦
C, he lysa e was cen i uged again
and he p o ein concen a ion in he supe na an was quan i ied using he Pie ce BCA
P o ein Assay Ki (The mo Fishe Scien i ic).