scieee Open visual document viewer

Toponyms with Repetition of a Word-Formation Element as Rudiments of Ancient Thinking

Zinaida Pakholok

Abstract

The article deals with toponyms with the repetition of a word-formation element. Etymological analysis allows us to establish the repetition of a syllable, a root morpheme, a word in aboriginal and standardized toponyms. The main classification word-formation models based on the properties of the toponymic material are determined. Attention is focused on the basic structure of appellatives, which were a reflection of ancient thinking and the basis for the emergence of onyms in the process of nominating natural objects. The geography of the given examples covers different continents.

Full text

Zinaida Pakholok. Toponyms wi h Repe i ion o a Wo d-Fo ma ion Elemen as Rudimen s o ancien Thinking ( o S a emen o he P oblem) 199 ZINAIDA PAKHOLOK Lu sk Human De elopmen ins i u e o he open in e na ional uni e si y “uk aine” oRciD id: o cid.o g/0000-0002-8911-5909 FieLDs oF ReseaRcH: gene al linguis ics, psycholinguis ics, egional s udies, cul u al s udies, Li huanian s udies. Doi: doi.o g/10.35321/bkalba.2023.96.10 oPonyms Wi H RePe i ion oF a WoRD-FoRma ion eLemen as RuDimen s oF ancien Hinking ( o s a emen oF He PRobLem) KEYWORDS: onym, oponym, eduplica ion, syllable, oo mo pheme, a ix, wo d, wo d o ma ion model, e ymological analysis, epea abili y, ancien hinking. abs Rac he a icle deals wi h oponyms wi h he epe i ion o a wo d- o ma ion elemen . e ymological analysis allows us o es ablish he epe i ion o a syllable, a oo mo pheme, a wo d in abo iginal and s anda dized oponyms. he main classi ica- ion wo d- o ma ion models based on he p ope ies o he oponymic ma e ial a e de e mined. a en ion is ocused on he basic s uc u e o appella i es, which we e a e lec ion o ancien hinking and he basis o he eme gence o onyms in he p ocess o nomina ing na u al objec s. he geog aphy o he gi en ex- amples co e s di e en con inen s. ano acija s aipsnyje analizuojami ie o a džiai su pasika ojančiu žodžių da ybos elemen- u. e imologinė analizė su eikia galimybę nus a y i senuosiuose i no miniuose ie o a džiuose pasika ojan į skiemenį, šaknies mo emą, žodį. Remian is ie- o a džių duomenų ypa ybėmis, nus a omi pag indinės klasi ikacijos žodžių da ybos modeliai. Daugiausia dėmesio ski iama pag indinei senąją mąs yseną a spindinčių bend inių daik a a džių, ku ių pag indu, į a dijan gam os objek- us, a si ado onimai, s uk ū ai. Pa eik ų pa yzdžių geog a ija apima ski ingus žemynus. 200 benDRinė kaLba | 96 in RoDuc ion geog aphical names a e he mos impo an elemen o he spi i ual li e o ci iliza ion; hey ha e scien i ic, his o ical, and cul u al alue. Resea ch on hem akes place in h ee aspec s: geog aphical wi h spa ial e e ence, his- o ical wi h he si ua ion o educa ion and linguis ic wi h he unde s and- ing o he nomina ion. he p ope name o a geog aphical objec , used o ecognize i and es ablish i s di e ence om o he objec s, is usually called he e m “ op- onym”, i s in oduced in 1899 in english linguis ics and hen used in pa allel wi h he al eady exis ing “place name”. in linguis ics, he o m o a oponym, he p ocess o wo d o ma ion and seman ics a e s udied. among he heo e ical issues o mode n oponymy, he s udy o he me hod o nomina ion, which is unde s ood as “ he o ma- ion pa hs, ypes, and means o naming an objec , uni ed acco ding o ce ain s uc u al cha ac e is ics” emains ele an (Luchyk 2011: 22). he sou ces o hei s udying a e geog aphical maps and a lases; op- onymic, e ymological and explana o y dic iona ies; geog aphical, his o ical, and linguis ic esea ch; books by a elle s ha will no allow he au ho o ollow he w ong pa h o nai e e ymologies. Repe i ions a e le behind he a en ion o linguis s, despi e he ac ha hey pe mea e ou en i e li es. he lack o consolida ed wo ks on epe i ions in oponymy leads o he need o p opose, as a p opaedeu ical s udy, a desc ip ion o hem as a sepa a e s uc u al ype in languages wi h di e en s uc u es. based on his unde s anding o he p oblem s a ed in he i le o he a icle, he objec o s udy is he s uc u e o nomina ions o geog aphical objec s, and he subjec is oponyms wi h epe i ion o he wo d- o ma ion elemen . he pu pose o his a icle is o iden i y aces o ancien hinking in oponyms wi h epe i ions in languages o di e en s uc u es and desc ibe hem as a sepa a e s uc u al ype, o e ing a ision o agmen s o he complex p ocess o o ma ion and de elopmen o oponymic space. Fo his pu pose, i is necessa y o sol e he ollowing p oblems: o dis- inguish abo iginal oponyms om s anda dized ones; o de e mine he s uc u al elemen s o oponyms wi h epe i ions by econs uc ing he co - esponding ances al o ms; o explain he de i a ional meaning e lec ing he mo i a ional ea u e cha ac e is ic a he ime o he onym nomina ion; o de e mine wo d- o ma ion models and ypes o oponyms; o ca y ou Zinaida Pakholok. Toponyms wi h Repe i ion o a Wo d-Fo ma ion Elemen as Rudimen s o ancien Thinking ( o S a emen o he P oblem) 201 a syn hesis o scien i ic a gumen s, comp ehend exis ing e sions, o e ing hei own commen s on hose geog aphical names ha emain unexplained. he me hodology o he esea ch lies in he ac ha a s uc u al p in- ciple is chosen as he main one o he s udy o oponyms, and a comple e unde s anding is achie ed by using di e en me hods o analysis and syn- hesis o oponyms o a ce ain a ea: belonging o a pa icula language; objec o nomina ion; he his o y o i s appea ance; e ymology, sphe e o use (colloquial o li e a y speech). 1. aboRiginaL oPonyms Wi H RePe i ions he names o geog aphical objec s a ose spon aneously, since any inno a ion appea s i s in indi idual speech and la e becomes an objec i e social phe- nomenon. Du ing he nomina ion p ocess, a human iden i ied and eco ded he mos impo an hings. Fo housands o yea s, people did no dis inguish be ween p ope and common names. he i s p ope names we e o dina y common wo ds: wa e , moun ain, o es , dese , ield, i e . La e , when peo- ple began o de elop la ge a eas, i became necessa y o dis inguish be ween he same moun ains, o es s, dese s, e c. Fo his, humans used di e en de ini ions ha cha ac e ized hese objec s by colou , size, shape, pu pose, e c. Depending on he sou ce o c ea ion, a eas o use, and dis ibu ion, we dis inguish wo ypes o oponyms: abo iginal and s anda dized. abo iginal oponyms (Podolskaya 1988: 119) a e oponyms c ea ed by indigenous peo- ple o name a local geog aphical objec ; hey a e used only in a gi en e - i o y and a e common in colloquial speech. in e es in his ype is due o he ac ha oponyms ha e aces o olk a , exp essi eness, and in o ma- ion po en ial ha e lec s he speci ics o na u al condi ions. 2. WoRD-FoRma ion moDeL FRom aPPeLLa i e o onym geog aphical names we e o med acco ding o ce ain o mulas, called wo d- o ma ion models in oponymy. he simples one is he di ec an- si ion o a common noun, o appella i e, in o a p ope name, o onym. a linguis pays a en ion o he o m o a geog aphical name and i s seman- ics, since a oponym is a wo-sided uni ha has a plane o exp ession and a plane o meaning. in his case, i is necessa y o ake in o accoun ha 202 benDRinė kaLba | 96 “in addi ion o he main meaning, he p ope name, he e is also ano he , p e- oponymic meaning” (zhuchke ich 1974: 48). He e is an example con i ming he exp essed idea. in he aus alian s a e o Queensland, on he ba on Ri e , he e is he ba on Falls o he same name; in he abo iginal language, i was called Din Din, by a wo d symbol- izing d ops o alling wa e . he hyd onym a ose in honou o homas Hen- y bowman ba on, chie o police in b isbane in he 1860s, and ga e i s name o ba on go ge na ional Pa k, bu in pa allel, he popula geog aph- ical name Din Din na ional Pa k is also used (ca mody, P ideaux 2011: 1). in he nomina ion o a geog aphical objec , he e may be a conno a ion, as in he in e io pa o he aus alian con inen , dese ne e -ne e . a elle L. Wolanowski, explaining he name, e e s o aeneas gunn (2008), who w o e in he au obiog aphical s o y o 1908: “ hese lands a e called ne e -ne e because hose who li ed he e and lo ed hem will ne e lea e hem olun a ily. and o he s – hose who could no s and i – will ell you ha his name comes om he ac ha he one who managed o escape om he e swea s ne e , ne e o e u n” (Wolanowski 1976: 56). in he amily saga o colleen mccullough, published in 1977, we ead: “<...> sp ead o e wo housand miles o desola ion, he wa e less dese “ne e -ne e ”, whe e i ne e ains” (mccullough 1988: 96). he mean- ings eco ded in ic ion es i y o he s abili y o he onym b o se en gene a ions o aus alians o he 20 h cen u y. he analysed examples o abo iginal oponyms wi h igu a i e and ex- p essi e conno a ions a e a consequence o he epe i ion o he same wo d- o ma ion elemen . in linguis ics, his me hod o o ming new wo ds is called eduplica ion. he di e ences lie in he s uc u e o he oponyms and allow us o judge he ea lie ime o he appea ance o he onym, which is based on an appella i e wi h a monosyllabic epe i ion. he i s geog aphical objec is cha ac e ized by he p esence o wo pa allel oponyms: abo iginal and s anda dized, while o he second he e is only one. 3. s anDaRDizeD oPonyms Wi H RePe i ions s anda dized oponyms (Podolskaya 1988: 131) a e he no ma i e o m o oponyms, adop ed in o icial documen s wi hin he coun y and in in e - na ional p ac ice. Zinaida Pakholok. Toponyms wi h Repe i ion o a Wo d-Fo ma ion Elemen as Rudimen s o ancien Thinking ( o S a emen o he P oblem) 203 he c ea o s o s anda dized oponyms we e o dina y people, a elle s, disco e e s who ga e names o con inen s, islands, moun ain peaks, e c. Following his, geog aphe s and linguis s collec ed geog aphical names, ca ied ou hei sys ema iza ion, mapping, and lexicog aphic codi ica ion. s anda dized oponyms a e phenomena o social li e, subo dina e o his o ical pa e ns; hey a e commonly used and in e na ional. 3.1. Wo d- o ma ion model o ansi ion o appela i e wi h epe i ion in o onym 3.1.1. Repe i ion o syllable as ou ma e ials es i y, he mos ancien wo d- o ma ion model is he model o he ansi ion o an appella i e wi h he epe i ion o a syllable in o an onym. i is impossible o desc ibe he p ocess as “each indi idual sound is o med in ela ion o o he sounds, jus as necessa y as his sound i sel o he smoo h cons uc ion o speech” (Humbold 2000: 86), bu he cla i y o mo i a ion and he e e yday condi ionali y o he nomina ion o objec s a ac s a en ion. he na u al en i onmen was he sou ce o hu- man being, as i p o ided people wi h housing, ood, and clo hing, so he ques ion o “wha is impo an o e lec in he name was decided on he basis o human p ac ical ac i i y” (kh esko 2009: 112). in he nomina ion o geog aphical objec s, a ansi ion o he appella i e wi h he epe i ion o he syllable in o an onym ook place. in he sla ic oponym baba, he cul alue o a emale pagan dei y, iden i ying li e, e ili y, and heal h, was ealized. nume ous examples con i m his si ua- ion, including oeconyms: Baba (uk . Баба) – a illage o he sumy oblas in uk aine; Baba (uk . Баба) was also he name o he illage Pok o ske in he che nihi oblas in uk aine un il 1941; hyd onym Baba (uk . Баба) is he name o a i e in he kha ki oblas in uk aine; o onyms Baba (uk . Баба) is a moun ain in he i ano-F anki sk oblas in uk aine; Baba (bulg. Baba) is a moun ain in he so ia p o ince in bulga ia; Baba (maced. Baba) is a moun ain ange on he bo de be ween no h macedonia and g eece; Baba (se b. Baba) is a moun ain in bosnia and He zego ina on he e i o y o Republika s pska. an example o an as yonym o med wi h he epe i ion o a syllable exis s in he wes o swi ze land, in he F ench-speaking can on o aud. he e, on he bank o Lake gene a, he ci y o e ey is loca ed. Ve ey < F ench 204 benDRinė kaLba | 96 Ve ê. Le uspensky conside ed i s name o be he end esul o cen u ies-old changes in he La in wo d Vi iscus (uspensky 1973: 91). he exis ence o oponyms o med by he epe i ion o a syllable can be a ibu ed o zip ’s law (zip 1949), which es ablished ha in di e en languages o he wo ld, he mos equen wo ds a e sho e , since he p inciple o leas e o is uni e sal o he speake and lis ene in all cul- u es. he e is no doub ha a he s age o p ima y nomina ion o he ancien human wi h my hological hinking, which u ned ou o be “some- hing like in ellec ual b icolage” (Lé i-s auss 1994: 126), an unde eloped la ynx, he way o speech p oduc ion syllabi ica ion was he main way o o ming new wo ds. i a ose on he basis o he phone ic assimila ion o non-speech sound complexes; no by chance, he mos ancien laye o ocabula y is onoma opoeia. he oponyms o his model belong o he p ima y, oldes o names (Podolskaya 1988: 105), since hey a ose om he onym, based on an ap- pella i e wi h a monosyllabic epe i ion, and ha e a o m iden ical o i . 3.1.2. Repea i ion o a syllable and adding an a ix opo o man , a wo d- o ma ion elemen ha is no used independen ly in he language and is an addi ion o he base in he o ma ion o a geo- g aphical name, has an impo an alue in oponymy. in he an h oponym Dedelishki (Li h. Dėdeliškės), eco ded in 1860 on he map in he akai dis ic o ilnius coun y o Li huania (shube 1860), he opo o man is he su ix -ishki (-iškės). in he indica ed egion, he e a e Kad ishki (Li h. Kad iškės), Ka io ishki (Li h. Ka io iškės), Ka - pishki (Li h. Ka piškės), Kiemelishki (Li h. Kiemeliškės), Kulokishki (Li h. Kulokiškės). he e a e also Eishishki (Li h. Eišiškės), G igishki (Li h. G igiškės) om he name g igas, Rudishki (Li h. Rūdiškės). acco ding o he au ho i a i e esea che s nikolay bi yla and aleksand as anagas, such a o man deno es “names o he a ea by he su name o name o he owne o pe son who li ed in his place” (bi yla, anagas 1968: 12). We assume ha he opog aphical base has an a chaic na u e since i was o med by he epe i ion o sound combina ions in child en’s speech dė-de. in mode n Li huanian language dėdė – ʻuncleʼ. he mos ancien laye o ocabula y is onoma opoeic wo ds, which make up he co e o he dic iona y. he eme gence o a la ge numbe o sound-imi a ing wo ds a an ea ly s age o he social li e o people was doomed by a close connec ion wi h na u e, he impo ance o con eying Zinaida Pakholok. Toponyms wi h Repe i ion o a Wo d-Fo ma ion Elemen as Rudimen s o ancien Thinking ( o S a emen o he P oblem) 205 sound and ex e nal mani es a ions o mo emen when naming phenomena, he endency o “es ablish a ce ain connec ion be ween objec s o na u e and gi e he language a di ec cha ac e ” (Rose i 1962: 91). F om he poin o iew o he c ea o o he oponymic school o be- la us adim a. zhuchke ich, he po amonim Tse ya o ka (bel. Цецяровка), a ibu a y o he s isloch, and he common names Tse se a e s (bel. Цецеравец), Tse ya o in sy, (bel. Цецяровинцы), Tsya e yn (bel. Цяцерын), a e pa onymic, de i ed om he su names Tse ya uk (bel. Цецярук), Tsy- a e yn (bel. Цяцерын) (zhuchke ich 1974:: 373–374). hey we e o med om he onoma opoeic name o he bi d se ya uk (bel. Цецярук), in which he ull o a ian epe i ion o he syllable se- (це-) is aced. simila ly, he epe i ion o he syllable e- and he su ix - ow o med he oiconym Te e ow in he land o mecklenbu g-Wes e n Pome ania, ge - many o deno e he se lemen o g ouses. i appea ed no la e han he 8 h cen u y, since his e i o y was he cen e o he medie al Wes sla ic ibe (basik 2008: 102). i should be assumed ha he po amonim Cucu eni (Rum. Cucu eni) in he egion o Wes e n molda ia in Romania o he designa ion o he igh ibu a y o he i e bahlueț (Rum. Bahluieț) in he Danube basin consis s o he onoma opoeic oo Cucu- (in Romanian cuckoo is cuc) and he o- ponymic o man - eni – ʻse lemen ʼ by analogy wi h zabolo eni (Ș e ănescu 2018: 74–75), D ăgo eni (Pe o ich 1968: 15), B oş eni, Moş eni. La e , he oiconym Cucu eni – ‘se lemen o cuckoosʼ appea ed. he desc ibed oponyms belong o non-p ima y names (Podolskaya 1988: 86), since hey we e o med om o he onyms. 3.1.3. Repe i ion o syllable and addi ion o wo d mo e ecen o ma ions include he nomina ion o geog aphical objec s, when a wo d was added o he epe i ion o a syllable, i.e., a new oponym was o med by he mo phological me hod o addi ion. Fo example, he o onym Vo ok abi i is he name o a olcano in cen al a ica. he e y- mology o he wo d, s a ing wi h he epe i ion o he syllable o-, means ʻwa e o he pygmy bi iʼ, who was allegedly ound dead on he lake sho e nea he moun ain (uspensky 1973: 194). he p imi i e man had a small ocabula y, and oponymy was udimen- a y, so one e m combined many di e en concep s ela ed o a common o igin. in his ega d, he example o he limnonym Ti icaca (span. Ti icaca, Quech. Ti iqaqa), which is he la ges eshwa e lake in sou h ame ica on 206 benDRinė kaLba | 96 he bo de o Pe u and boli ia, is in e es ing. he name came om he epe i ion o syllables o wo wo ds in he language o he indians: Quechua qaqa – ʽs one, moun ainʼ, i i – ʽleadʼ and o iginally he insulonym Ti icaca e e ed only o he island o he lake Isla-del-Sol (span. Isla del Sol) (cano 1952: 14–15), la e , i sp ead o he lake i sel (Pospelo 2002: 417). F om he appella i e baba, oponyms can be o med no only as a esul o onymiza ion bu also wi h he addi ion o a wo d. Fo example, he oiconym Baba Bakala (Hindi Bāba Bakāla) is he name o a holy place o sikhism, a illage in he indian s a e o Punjab. he his o ian o geog aphical science e. m. mu zae , e e ing o he kazakh oponymis gali k. konkashpae (1948), ga e examples o he p oduc i i y o oponyms on -a a, among which he medie al se lemen Baba-a a (mu zae 1974: 228). acco ding o he kazakh encyclopedia, Baba, A a-baba is “1) ances o , ounde o he clan; 2) pa o a complex wo d, deno ing: o igin, elde ( o example, Ane -baba)” (kne 2004: 324), a a is also a polyseman ic wo d, ela i e o ou esea ch, we conside only he i s wo meanings: “1) g and a he , g and a he ; ances o ; 2) pa on in he composi ion o p ope my hological names” (kne 2004: 278). hus, in he kazakh oponym Baba-a a he e is a s uc u al epe i ion o he syl- lable ba- and a seman ic epe i ion o he meaning o he wo d “ances o ”. Wi h he u kic wo d dağ – ʽmoun ainʼ o onyms a e o med in he gu- bin dis ic o aze baijan Babadağ and in he p o ince o mugla in he sou hwes o u key Babadağ; as ionym Babadag in he județ o ulcea Romania appea ed as a esul o u kish in luence. he sla ic and non-sla ic examples wi h he appella i e baba (бабa) a e uni ed by belonging o he o iginal o m *bābā o *bhābhā – an ancien wo d om child en’s speech, o med by epea ing he same syllable (Luchyk 2014: 27). Di e ences a e obse ed in seman ics, since he sla ic baba comes om he eminine nomen, while he u kic and i anian ones come om he masculine. he s ess in sla ic languages is on he i s syllable (бáба), while in eas e n languages i is on he second (babá). Rega ding such examples, Wilhelm on Humbold no ed co ec ly: “all languages appa en ly con ain wo ds ha ha e comple ely di e en meanings wi h comple ely iden ical sounds, and hus hese wo ds can be unde s ood am- biguously” (Humbold 2000: 275). nume ous examples wi h he oponym babá/бaбá a e a mani es a ion o oponymic homonymy, ep esen ing consonan geog aphical e ms ha coincide comple ely o pa ially in he exp ession plan. hus, he e was a Zinaida Pakholok. Toponyms wi h Repe i ion o a Wo d-Fo ma ion Elemen as Rudimen s o ancien Thinking ( o S a emen o he P oblem) 207 ans e o he onym om one objec o ano he , adjacen o i in he name o he ci y, illage, aul, i e , moun ain, moun ain ange in connec ion wi h i s addi ion by a ious geog aphical e ms ha cha ac e ize he a ea. 3.2. Wo d- o ma ion model o ansi ion o appella i e wi hou epe i ion in o onym he ansi ion o an appella i e in o an onym can occu as a esul o e- pea ing a wo d ha has a bila e al s uc u e and isually demons a es he philosophical law o he ansi ion o quan i a i e changes in o quali a i e ones. in linguis ics, i inds mani es a ion a he seman ic le el, as an ele- men ha is epea ed wice o se e al imes acqui es a new meaning (Pak- holok 2013: 73). Lexical epe i ion is he simples in s uc u e lexical- g amma ical way o in ensi y meaning. ca a ac onym Dzhu -Dzhu (uk . Джур-Джур, c imean a a Cü -Cü ) is he name o a powe ul wa e all loca ed on he ulu-uzen Ri e on he sou he n coas o c imea. i ne e uns d y, e en du ing he d ies ime o he yea . his cha ac e is ic is e lec ed in he seman ics o i s ancien name, which is de i ed om he epea ed a menian wo d “dzhu ” (a men. , li e ally ʻwa e -wa e ʼ, meaning plen y o wa e ), he e ymology o his wo d, acco ding o asyl . Luchyk ollowing edua d m. mu zae , explains he meanings o “s eam”, “ i e ”, and “canal” in Pe sian and ajik languages (Luchyk 2014: 180). in ou opinion, when ying o unco e he meaning ul signi icance o place name, i is p e e able o gi e p e e ence o hose e sions ha a e close o he na u e and essence o he objec . a he same ime, he olde he geog aphical name, he mo e likely i is o be connec ed o he named objec . Fo example, he limnonym Loch Lochy in he name o a eshwa e lake in sco land, o igina ed om he duplica ion o a wo d ha can be aced back o cogna es: manx logh, old i ish loch, Welsh llwch, meaning “body o wa e ,” as well as La in lacus meaning “lake” (Ha pe 2003). he su ix -y was added o he epea ed wo d. he limnonym means “lake Lake”. a la ge and capacious pa on he oponymy o aus alia is occupied by onyms deno ing na u al geog aphical condi ions and clima e ea u es. hus, he cyclone in he no hwes e n pa o he coun y is called “Willy Willy” (o lo 1978: 103). he anemonym Willy Willy a ose om he epe i ion o he english wo d willy – insidious. 214 benDRinė kaLba | 96 senuosius ie o a džius ie iniai gy en ojai kū ė, siekdami į a dy i ie os geo- g a inį objek ą, jie a ojami ik am ik oje e i o ijoje i y a plačiai papli ę šneka- mojoje kalboje. Domėjimąsi šio ipo ie o a džiais lemia ai, kad juose y a išlikę liaudies meno b uožų, iš aiškingumo. jie gali eik i in o maciją apie gam inių sąly- gų ypa ybes. šiame s aipsnyje analizuojami pe kel inių i eksp esy ių kono acijų u inčių senųjų ie o a džių, susi o ma usių bend iniam daik a a džiui iesiogiai i s an onimu, pa yzdžiai – plačiai papli usio pasika ojimų a ojimo ezul a as. no minius ie o a džius kū ė ski ingų eiklų a s o ai. jie a ojami iek ša- lyje, iek a p au inėje e d ėje, iksuojami li e a ū inėje kalboje. šios ūšies ie- o a džiams būdingi okie žodžių da ybos modeliai: bend inio daik a a džio e - imas onimu, paka ojan skiemenį a ba p idedan a iksą, paka ojan skiemenį i p idedan žodį, paka ojan žodį; bend inio daik a a džio e imas onimu ie o- a diniame žodžių junginyje, paka ojan šaknies mo emą i paka ojan žodį. Žodžių da ybos modelių panaudojimas p iklauso nuo kai ku ių bend ųjų egio- ninės ie o a džių sis emos klausimų iš i umo laipsnio. o pa ies modelio ie o a džiai, naudo i ski inguose žemynuose esan iems os pačios ūšies geog a iniams objek ams į a dy i, odo, kad oks į a dijimo būdas bu o gana įp as as. Pasi elkus e imologinę analizę nus a y a, kad ie o a džiuose pasika ojan ys žo- džių da ybos elemen ai odo seno inę žodžio kilmę, nes pasika ojimas a spindi objek y ią ik o ę, ku ią asmuo nesąmoningai įsisa ina, įgydamas p ak inės pa i ies. ie o a džiai, ku iuose pasika oja žodžių da ybos elemen as, kelia po eikį y inė i senąjį objek ų į a dijimo ski ingos s uk ū os kalbomis me odą. sukū us ose kabose a ojamų panašių ie o a džių egis ą, a si as ų galimybė palygin i i sug e in i gilias is o ines šaknis u inčią jų onimiją. ESMINIAI ŽODŽIAI: onimas, ie o a dis, pasika ojimas, skiemuo, šaknies mo - ema, a iksas, žodis, žodžių da ybos modelis, e imologinė analizė, paka ojamumas, seno inė mąs ysena. zinaiDa PakHoLok Lu sk Human De elopmen ins i u e o he open in e na ional uni e si y “uk aine” geo gy gongadze s . 5 [email p o ec ed]