Dėl vieno terminologinio mažmožio K. Būgos ir E. Frenkelio raštuose

All this shows that M. Daukšos According to the Postilae, ddgaus is indeed heaven, heaven. In this way, it would probably be the only true example of the pronunciation « of root nouns only I ne In the Postilla? ?, but in the ir whole Lithuanian language*?, Chronology undeniably shows that M. Daus ddngus is an older pronunciauž tion of the present heavens. Transformation of a constant root into an end (I>1V kirč.)*! * in this example corresponds to the general basic trend of Lithuanian noun pronunciation development. J. Klimavičius ON VIENNA TERMINOLOGY LITTLE MAN K. ARCH IR E. FRENKELIO IN THE LETTER Total In Lithuania, a small bird nests in barns, piles of logs, holes in stone ir foundations and other burrows, ornithologists call it Oenanthe oenanthe in Latin L. Prof. T. Ivanauskas writes jį about it: “In Lithuania ju you will find it in pure fields, especially in barren areas. It is often found near highways, but also in the ir immediate vicinity of cities, military training grounds, stadiums, ir near railway stations, especially where there are piles of stones, logs... Po After the war, when our country was filled with all kinds of ruins, this bird found very favorable conditions for nesting, because those ruins replaced the foothills of the mountains, the rocky landscape. For example, po the war of cults a lot ir appeared in the very In Vilnius, where entire city quarters have become ruins!". The name of the bird is derived from the word for "bird". (in ir dictionaries in scientific journals there are three other variants of this word: kūltupis, kultupis ir kultupys®). The word is derived from the Latin word for circle. iš ‘stone’ +fuck. Eastern In Lithuania, it is known as angulas. ||Ancient ir inlays®. It is also known by the forms Aulnay, Aulnay-soir us-Bois, Aulnay-sous-Bois, etc. K. Būstr. ga ‘CjiaBsKo-Gajirniickue STHMOJIOTHH’? has observed that ‘Cm. gt-oka **M. Daukšos ,,Postilés jmogus 85, mogaus 134 ir kt P. Skardžius is inclined to hold as well the spelling, but this is, I as the author himself notes, only a suppositioir n, although very likely ir (see section 4.4). P. Cages, min. ill., p. 124). *0 Plg. K. A note of the buoy: "I don't have an example for a noun" (see section 4.4). K. Length, min. week, II, p. 35). # To the reason as correctly has been observed A. Girdenis, well bus "need to differentiate different verbs" (see section 4.4). A. Girdenis, Kodėl įsigalioja „,terminal’ noun pronunciation- “, „Scientific conference of higher education lecturers on Lithuanian language issues, dedicated to October 50th anniversair ry, program of thesis presentations“, Vilnius, 1967, p. 6). ! See. T. Ivanauskas, Birds of Lithuania, III, V., 1955, p. 309—310. * Unstandardized use of this term variants can be seen even in the academic ir In the Lithuanian language dictionary: to the words ir akmenė antikas (I, V., there is 1968) written kultupys, next to the word girnakalis (III, V., 1956) — Cult, to the words guzzling bird (III, V., 1956) ir inlet (IV, V, 1957) — kūltupys, o to the main word kūltupis (V, V., attributed 1962) only to the form kultupys kultupis. ir *These synonyms are also mentioned: akmenė (ornithologists call this term a buck, but ne Arenaria interpres), grey-tailed woodpecker, grey-tailed woodpecker, black-tailed woodpecker, and, probably, grey-tailed woodpecker. Even though akad. "Dictionary of Lithuanian Language" (II, V., to the latter 1969) word it is indicated that this ‘Thunder Goat’ (Scolopax gallinago), but the illustrative sentence denies this: "Oi tu čekūt, čekutčli, ko tu lendi krūsnin" (Celebration- ). “K. 1958, p. 472. 1958, p. 472. 13. From Lithuanian lexicology and lexicography 193 ‘yTKa’ = JiKT. ant-uka „eine Schnepfe“ Mielke I 6, afitukas „saxicola oenanthe“ Dūsetos (ep. Vozgéliai), ant-uka „T.c.“ Veliuona, Str. „Die Metatonie im litauischen und lettischen“ K. Būga refers to the words afitukas and ifitukas with the suffix -ukas and again compares them with the word dntis „„Duck“. In E. Frenkelio etymological dictionary of the Lithuanian language, the word duck "In the article "Duck" we find the words antuka "Schnepfe", aiitukas. "saxicola oenanthe, wheat ear, Weisskehchen", antikas (Dusetos- ), intukas (Tauragnai, Bez. These comparisons are hard to believe, because the duck is not a duck at all. K. Bugas was slightly misled, probably, by Chr. G. Milkės and other dictionaries, where the meaning of the word antuka is stated,eine Schnepfe, i.e. slanka." In the academic Lithuanian language dictionary this inaccuracy has already been corrected: the word antuka is directed to antukyps, and the latter to antikas,,- Oenanthe oenanthe- ”. The construction of the dialectical terms antukas and intukas would be more accurately interpreted as follows: anté + -ukas and intė + -ukas. The Lithuanian language dictionary states that the words asité and initė have the meaning of “dust”. In addition, the word aritė (like afitis) also has the meaning of “furnace door”.,,UZnarvio, užuolandos” —>,,peledės” correlation is very obvious. By linking the name of the hill with these words, it can be explained more convincingly. K. Gaivenis WORKING ON BALTIC PLACE-NAMES Jurgen Prinz, Die Slavisierung baltischer und Baltisierung slavischer Ortsnamen im Gebiet des ehemaligen Gouvernements Suvalki, Wiesbaden (Otto Harrassowitz leidykla), 1968, su žemėlapiu. The 320 p. su problem of the glorification of Baltic place names and personal names is not the first time raised in linguistic literature — several works on this issue have appeared in the last decade alone!. However, the reviewed book by J. Princas far exceeds other works in this field in terms of volume. The book consists of an introduction, ten chapters and conclusions. At the end of the book, the author provides a thematic index. In the introduction, J. Princas, among other things, draws attention to the difficulties of examining Baltic toponymy found in Slavic lands. He gives examples from the book of V. Toporov and O. Trubachev “Linguistic analysis of hydronyms of Upper Transnistria” (Moscow, 1962), from the works of H. Schall, which show that some of these relics of Baltic toponymy explained by the author can be interpreted in another way. In his general remarks, J. Princas briefly describes the ethnic composition of Suvalki gubernija at the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th centuries, critically reviews the 5 K. Būga, Rinktiniai raštai, II, V., 1959, p. 393. 6 E, Fraenkel, Lithuanian etymological dictionary, Heidelberg—Gottingen, 1955, tt., p. 11—12. 1 K. O. Falk, From studies on the Slavification of Lithuanian Place and Personal Names, „„Scando-Slavica- “, IX (1963), p. 87—103; On the methods of Slavification of Lithuanian Place and Personal Names. O genezy i rozpowszechnieniu nazw na -arice, „Sprakliga Bidrag“, t. 4, Nr.19, Lund, 1964, p.1—16; J. Otrebski, Slavization of Lithuanian water and place names, „Z polskich studiéw slawistycznych“, Seria 2, Jezykoznawstwo, Warszawa, 1963, p. 267—286. 194