Trikalbis terminų žodynas

St. Joseph's cuckold zool. ‘Melolontha vulgaris’. Plg. var. St. Jūzakuilipo s® (File). St. Petro carvelé (cattle) see dievo barboryté b) when the noun is followed by a suffix, e.g. dievo barboryté zool. ‘Ladybird’ (Coccinella septempunctata). Plg. var. By the way. : babuska —mariuska (Eiš, Mrk), the cat-like goddess (Vb), god maryté (Jnsk, Pbr, Pn, Ps), god petruska (Pbr), katryté—maryté, maryté —katryté, maryté — karusyté (plg. asmenvardį Karolina), katriusyté—mariusyté (Vb), mariusyté— katriusyté, maruska— petruska, sv. Petro carvelé (carved) (Vb), damn it. But plg. vok. Marienkdferchen. (It may also be mentioned that in the colloquial language the ladybird is sometimes confused with the small light red beetle (Trombidium holosericum). su babuška—mariuška see god barborytė god katrytė see. » 3 god mary see. 3 3 Oh, my God. » 33 katryté—maryté (marinated-cured) see 2 2 maryté—karusyté žr. 5 > Marius-Katrius (katriusyté — mariusyté) zr. ,, k, maruška—petruška žr. 3 5 devil's maryté see. 33 3> foundations The zool. ‘common toad’ (Bufo vulgaris) (Ms.) Astronomical names: when a a) person's name goes with a pointer, e.g. Abakuk astr. "one of the iš stars". Grigo wheels (Jnš, Sk) astr. “one of the constellations; constellation of seven stars in the harsh sky (Ursa Major). The rod of Jacob "one of the iš stars". Noah's dove "one of the iš stars". J. V. Kairys, A. Kaminskas, Z. Kudirka, R. Kundrotienė, | M. Lipšicas, | A. Mačernius, J. Norkus, J. Riaubūnas, J. Stanaitis, B. Stulpinas, A. Šliavas. Russian-Lithuanian-English Dictionary of Computing Technology Terms, Vilnius, 1971, 600 p. 1. Three years ago the list of Lithuanian terminology dictionaries was supplemented by another new term dictionaries. It was prepared by a collective of authors — a group of engineers of the Vilnius V. Lenin calculating machine factory and the special design office of calculating machines. It is a comprehensive dictionary of computational technology terms, including some technical and physics terms in addition to special terms in this field. Both in volume and type, it differs greatly from previous Lithuanian dictionaries of technical terms, for example, A. Novodvorskis’s “English-Lithuanian Dictionary of Technical Terms”. * Synonyms for the genus are given below. Lithuanian language atlas (Leksika), I, on the map 84 (printable), 253 of the Lithuanian Polytechnic Dictionary (1958), the Russian-Lithuanian Polytechnic Dictionary (1959) and others. The appearance of this dictionary was caused by the rapid progress in the construction and production of computational technology in our republic. The establishment of calculating services in the Lithuanian SSR began in 1954, and by the end of 1969 there were about 200 calculating offices, 30 calculating stations, about 11,000 keyboard and 79 sets of perforating calculating machines. Perforating computing complexes, powerful fast-acting electronic calculating machines with software control, were used in the computing centres for processing economic information. At present, the latter machines are “successfully used to solve the following tasks: technical preparation of production; operational planning, accounting and management of production; normative organization and management of the farm; technical economic planning; keeping accounts of materials and raw materials, wages, produced output, scrap; statistical and accounting tasks, etc. : mathematical and engineering, linear programming, network planning, etc. Along with new computing technology, many new devices, various mechanisms and their parts, concepts related to work and auxiliary processes, etc., appeared. Specialists faced with an obvious lack of Lithuanian computational technology terms?. The Russian terminology of computational technology began to be systematized and standardized a little earlier. In the 1960s and 1970s, several terms in this field appeared Zodyny®. The compilers of the Lithuanian dictionary of computational technology terms relied on them, and it is clear that our dictionary in some respects (e.g., in terms of lexicographical technique) is similar to the Russian ones, especially to the dictionary of computational technology terms edited by academician S. Lebedev. However, in general, the Lithuanian dictionary of computational technology terms should be regarded as an original, not a translated work. In this review we will examine the structure of the dictionary, some peculiarities of the terminology it contains and make some general methodological remarks. In the preface, the authors indicate the purpose and objective of the dictionary, namely: to facilitate the use of technical literature in the Russian language, which is faced with scientific and technical workshops, especially young students, and “to form and standardize Lithuanian technical terminology”. A priori, it can be said that the first task was better accomplished than the second: the dictionary is generally more suitable for translation purposes than for the need to standardize terms. Undoubtedly, in this respect, the mentioned Russian dictionaries of computational technology terms, in which the standardization of terms is also not a primary task, had an influence. For example, in S. Lebedev’s dictionary of computational technology terms, English terms are very often translated with 2-3 Russian synonyms. Lietuviškojo 1 See P, Kulvietis, Scientific and technical potential of production and its efficiency, Vilnius, 1972, p. 68. 2 See. A. Kaminskas, A. Mačernius, How was prepared the,,Dictionary of Computing Technology Terms”, —„Language Culture”, 25, Vilnius, 1973, p. 95. 8 Zr. Aurso-pyccekalt C0Bapb 10 BbriHcjiuTejibHoR TexHHke, TocyjjaperBeHHbilt KomuTer CoBera Munucrpos CCCP no paxmosnektponnke, Mocksa, 1960; Cemusiablunblii cJ10Bapb no aBTOMaTHKE BHIYHCIHTE BHO H u3aMepuTe bnoii TexHHKe, Mocksa, 1963; Akan. C. A. JleGenes, Anro-pycckuil caosaph no BbluHC/IHTEJILHON Texuuke, H3n-Bo,Coserckas Duunknonejas“, Mocksa, 1964. 254 the dictionary authors went even further. In this dictionary the Russian term often has 3—4 ir even 5—6 Lithuanian equivalents. This means that all the attention of the dictionary authors was devoted to the most accurate translation of the Russian term. 2. 0. The largest part of the dictionary consists of computational terms in Russian, Lithuanian and English. ir The most ir commonly used or closest meanings are listed in the first place of the Lithuanian English equivalents, followed by synonyms according to o the shades of the meanings, which are separated from each other by commas. More distant values are separated by a semicolon. In addition to some Lithuanian equivalents, notes and abbreviations explaining or specifying the ir scope of use of the term are presented in italics, e.g.: onucamenb progr. description mark declarator onpedenumocmo (166)! log. definability (167) Optional affixes of ir Lithuanian English terms are given in square brackets, e.g.: ncdaenenue (nu)slopinimas suppression, guendring paccmanoexa is(si)désiymas (196) ordering, arrangement, spacing, disposition (244) Term variants are enclosed in square brackets, e.g.: cxpeimoe cocmoanue hidden state latencystate (288). The Pratarmie states that if a Russian term has several Lithuanian (and also English) equivalents with different meanings, they are separated by Arabic digits. For example: : 601609p Ka 1. election 1. access; readout selection 2. 2. (35) Janena |. substitution 1. substitution, replacing 2. substitute, equivalent, substitute dummy (66) However, this order is not always followed: often such matches are separated only by a comma or a semicolon, e.g.: 3aaxKnaOKa bookmark flag (65) CRUCH description, inventory, —description list (166) soipasicerue phenomenon, expression; expression term; expression connective écmaska idéklas, jterpimas, insert, embedding intarpas Adjectives usually follow the démens of compound terms, while adjective (38) abstracts — names of properties — ; are independent (34) terms. It is doubtful whether it is worthwhile to include the corresponding adjectives in the dictionary besides the adjective abstracts, e.g.: commonality (161); abundance (140); homogeneity (162); duplicity (50) and 4 The digits hereafter indicate the pages of the dictionary. When speaking about this dictionary, we will use the abbreviation common; abundant; homogeneous, all the more so —their synonyms (dual, twofold) etc. " SKŽ, 255 ir The dictionary does not distinguish between optional elements of compound terms. Not completely consistent nesting system in Lithuanian registry. Lithuanian terms are not pronounced. These, of course, are not the advantages of the structure of the dictionary, but its disadvantages. 2.1 A term in any field must be verbally correct, unambiguous, short, precise and easy to use. However, very often at least one or even several of these characteristics are lacking in the terms. One of the most important shortcomings of terminology is synonymy. In the dictionaries of terms, only one, at most two (one Lithuanian, another international) terms should be used for each term, but not 4-6 synonyms, which do not provide any additional information to the terminology, but only indicate either insufficient standardization, or that the terms presented in the dictionary are not fully terminologized. In the LSI, one composite term often has two Lithuanian species names, one of which as if explains, clarifies the other. Such use is justified in some cases. This shows that the terms are not yet settled, standardized, and it is immediately difficult to select which of them is better, e.g.: untouched medium, unused medium (Russian: 4ucmas cpeda) 290; direct input, immediate input (Russian: KenccpeOcmeennbiil 6600) 23; intermediate input, indirect input (Russian: npomenxcymco4uHoiti 66¢0) 23, etc. However, when one concept is expressed by two synonyms, which do not explain each other, and one of them is almost established in terminology, it is an inadmissible thing in the dictionary of terms, e.g.: support, support (Russian: ynop) 328; durability, resistance (Russian: cmoiiKocmo) 294; non-numeric calculations, non-quantitative calculations (Russian: HeuucneHHble pacuėmoi) 245, etc. Terms lose their accuracy especially when a Russian term is translated with 3—4 and even 5—6 Lithuanian synonyms, e.g.: rezultatas, išvada, pasekmė (Russian: peszyaomam) 254; judrumas, judrumas, slankumas (Russian: ncdeunckccmo) 196; pluoštas, plaušas, skaidula (Russian: 6020KH0) 29; priėmimas, suvokimas, nuskaitymas (Russian: socnpusmue) 30; judėjimas, slinkimas, pasislinkimas (Russian: nepedsuscerue) 182; perdirbimas, pertaisymas, pakeitimas (Russian: nepedeaka) 182; pervarkymas, perdarymas, perdirinimas (Russian: nepecmpotixa) 187; kryžius, keturšakis, kryžmė (Russian: Kpecm) 112; briauna, atbraila, kraštas (Russian: Gopm) 21; pertvara, pin, bribe (Russian: uinox ra) 376; išskaitomumas, ryškumas, aiškumas (Russian: «uėmkocmo) 371; studijavimas, mokymasis, tyrimas, tyrinėjimas (Russian: uaysenue) 77; per(si)kėlimas, pasislinkimas, perstūmimas (Russian: nepemewerue) 185; užtęsimas; tightening, tightening; clamp (Russian: samsaeusearnue) 70; state, condition, position, position (Russian: cocmosrue) 287; rod, pin, plug (Russian: wmoipe) 376; inclination, inclination, inclination, inclination, inclination (Russian: KnakA0H) 146; section, area, bar, zone, place (Russian: yuacmoK) 353; snap, streak, sklendé, backdrop, latch, lock (Russian: satuenka) 70, etc. From such a multitude of synonyms, it would be sufficient to select one term for each concept of computational technology, without trying to inventory all polytechnic concepts. 5 Zr. K. P. Kpyonac, K. B. Taiisenuc, Tepmsnnojnornueckas. paGora H NOArOTOBKA TEpMHHOJIOTHUECKHX CJIOBapeli B JIntosckoit CCP, —Bonpocki paspa6orku HayuHo-TexHHUeCKOII TepMHHO.- j1orHH, Pura, 1973, p. 30. 256 Tą the same can be said about international ir synonyms of terms. In the dictionary they are usually presented next to Lithuanian ir terms often Lithuanian ir as explains international, e.g.: blenda, gaubtelis (Russian). 6.aenda) 18, plg. vok. Blended: block, cabinet (rus.: wkagh) 376, plg. English. block; focus, focus point (Russian). : (bokyc) 356, plg. lot. focus; fiber, fibre (rus.: pubpa) 354, plg. lot. fiber; vacancy, free place (rus.: éaxarcus) 22, plg. English. vacancy ir t.t. However, sometimes at least several international terms or one Lithuanian international term are given for one term, and vice versa. ir 3—4 ir Such synonyms SKUs are quite numerous, e.g.: variety, modification, variant (rus.: pasnoeudxocmo) 239; pocket, bunker, magazine (Russian). : Kapmar) pocket, 89; storage, magazine (rus.: maeasur) 120; attenuator, attenuator, attenuator (rus.: ccaabumenv) 168; destruction, demolition, decay (Russian). : pa3pytueHue) reproduction, 240; regeneration, self-reproduction (Russian). : camceccnpcusseden ue) 259; Syna, coaxial, long (rus.: wuna) representatio374; n, reproduction; uncovering, reproduction, restoration (Russian). : socnpoussederue) 30; maximum value, maximum value, maximum size (rus.: makcumanrvroe suaderue) 73; source diagram, initial diagram, primary diagram (Russian). : ucxconas duazpamma) 54; coincidence scheme, logical multiplication scheme, scheme ‘IR’ (rus.: cxema ccénadexus) continuous 305; adjustment, continuous (continuous) adjustment, stepless adjustment (Russian). : The synonymy of the terms 249 ir t. t. 2.2. Su Henpepoisroe peeyauposarnue is very closely related to variantity. Synonyms are words of different phonological composition, but of the same or very similar meaning, used to denote certain shades of meaning or style, variants words differing only in morphological structure o — (prefix, suffix, shorter ar longer form). Importantness of the ICC ir (Russian: eascrccme) 22; saturation size ir saturation size (Russian). : eauvuna Hacoiujerus) 24; interference ir interference (Russian: sosamyuierue) 28; disturbing ir disturbing (rus.: nomexa) 203; density ir density (rus.: naomucemo) 194; urgency ir hurry (rus.: cpcumcemo) 291 ir t. t. Such a method of shortening terms is acceptable in the ir practice of standardization of terminology, which is currently widespread in technology, especially physics. However, for reasons of significant differentiation alone (longer form means more abstract concept, shorter one o more — concrete) it is not worth making all possible endings of neologisms — -is or derivatives, -a which in — most cases replace or adjectives abstract suffix su -umas, or verb suffixes -it's abstract. The reviewed dictionary contains variants ir of a different nature (prepositional, adverbial, adverbial), which indicate that the terms are not yet sufficiently standardized, e.g.: prepositional variants fixation fixation — ir (rus.: saxpenaerue) 66; suveikimas ir paveikimas (rus.: cpa6amoieanue) 290; (with) ir comparison comparison (rus.: cpaekenue) 299; pri(si)saturation degree ir to(si)saturation degree (Russian). : Uypo6eHKb Kacouuenus) 331; sequences (pa)jungimas ir sequential connection (rus.: nociedoeamenbnoe coeJuneHue) 283; prepositional variants — significant digit ir significant digit (tus.: sHauawas yugpa) 368; graphic compositiir on graphic composition (rus.: epagpuueckoe cAo0xenue) 280; automatic analysis ir automatic analysis (Russian: aemomamus4eckuiū anarus) inert 12; atmosphere inert atmosphere ir (rus.: ukepmnas ammuocihepa) 16; printed circuit board ir printed circuit board (Russian: newamnasn cxema) 303; composite function ir complex function (Russian). : cAcdkcHasn (bykytius) 360; prepositional variants — number sign be unsigned ir number 17. Lithuanian terminology 257 (Russian: wucao Ges skara) 371; decimal number with sign and marked decimal number (Russian: OecamuuHroe wucao co aKakom) 375; one stroke delay and one stroke soldering (Russian: sadepnckKa Ha cOux maxm) 65; fluxless soldering and fluxless soldering (Russian: Gecibarocoeasa naka) 175, etc. Some of these variants are not considered terms at all, and their use only reduces the stability and specificity of the terminology. A large group of variants consists of insufficiently standardized compound terms, one component of which is: 1) noun origin or adjective with suffix -inis -ė, e.g.: mašininis laikas, mašinos laikas (Russian: maumunnoe epems) 32; emitter capacitance, emitter capacitance (Russian: amumepHasn ĖmMKocmb) 63; positional impulse, positional impulse (Russian: nosuyuoKHotiū umnynbc) 78; index calculation, index calculation (Russian: uxdekcroe ucuucnenue) 87; collector capacitance, collector capacitance (Russian: Koarexmopran émxccme) 62; code letter, code letter (Russian: Kcdosas 6ykea) 21; control program, control program (Russian: kKoHMpOAbHas npozpamma) 225; thermal radiation, heat radiation (Russian: men1080€ usayuenue) 76; weight function, weight function (Russian: secosas (ynxyus) 359; workflow, workflow (Russian: pa6ouut xcd) 363; element chain, element chain (Russian: snemenmnasn yens) 367, etc. ; 2) the originator or participant of the noun, e.g.: (pa)distribution panel, (pa)distribution panel (Russian: pacnpedesumensHott tum) 377; colouring wheel, colouring wheel (Russian: kKpacatųee Koneco) 98; vibration circuit, vibrating circuit (Russian: xone6GamenoHas yenv) 365; correcting circuit, correction circuit, correction circuit (Russian: Koppekmupyowas yeno) 365; tension state, tension state (Russian: kanpsoxcėnnoe cecmosnue) 287; reflection signal, reflected signal (Russian: omo6paxcėkHotiiė cuenan) 267; regulation effect, regulation effect (Russian: pezyaupyroujee eo3deiicmeue) 28; modulation generator, modulating generator (Russian: modyaupyouwjud eenepamop) 42; damping diode, damping diode (Russian: demnpupyrowjuii Ouocd) 55; reflection pulse, reflection pulse (Russian: ompasxcérnotd umnyasc) 78; insulating layer, insulating layer (Russian: uzoaupyowuid caod) 281; synchronizing system, synchronization system, synchronization system (Russian: CUHXPOHUIUPYIOWAN CUCIMEMA) 276; accumulating counter, accumulation counter (Russian: nakanausarouju i caémuux) 309; compiling language, compilation language (Russian: komnuarupyrouwud s36iK) 386; 3) simple adjective or adjective with suffix -inis, -é, e.g.: stacionarinis (stacionarus) režimas (Russian: cmayucHapuold pescum) 253; elementarinė (elementiné) celė (Russian: saemenmapran sueiika) 388; optimalinis (optimalus) filtras (Russian: onmumaneHoll dunomp) 355; absolute system, absolute system (Russian: abcorromuas cucmema) 270; dual (dual) control (Russian: dyaasrce ynpaenenue) 329 and others. In this case, only one term should be used that best expresses the concept of computational technique. 3.1. The CSS contains many new concepts of computational technology, which required the creation of a number of novelties. Many of these new creations (mostly valuable) have been successful, corresponding to the normative types of construction of our language terms, for example: multi-line control system (Russian: cucmema mHo2cces3Ko20 pezynupo6anus) 273; multi-contour sequence system (Russian: MHO2OKOHMYpHaa caredauas cucmema) 273; paprogramé (Russian: ncdnpoepamma) 197; 258 orgarysys (Russian,: opeacésasv) 168; echocontrol (Russian: sxokonmpoas) 385; planeness (Russian: noaycymma) 202; paelemenčiui (rus.: nosasememno) 207 ir kt Since the authors of this dictionary relied on Russian dictionaries of computational terms, it is clear that some Lithuanian novelties were influenced by the Russian language. Such values as: leading (= main) frequency (Russian: sadaowan wacmoma) 369; integer programming (Russian: ųencuucnennoe npoepammupoeakue) 229; given size (Russian: Oannas eenusuna) 23; (over) given limit (Russian: sadannbiūiė npeden) 208; given accuracy (Russian: sadanras mceunccmo) 319; automatic plotter (= plotter) 371; current extractor (Russian: moKoctēmHuK) 318, etc., should be considered as non-creative and not quite understandable. The authors of the dictionary have unnecessarily "improved" some familiar terms: lingv. dropping (Russian: onyckanue, English: dropping) 167 omission, ellipse (syntax, lexicology), dropping (morphology, phonetics); reliability (Russian: docmoseprocme 60, dosepumeasrocms 46, 208) instead of certainty (somewhere —reliability) and others. 3.2. The dictionary is full of concepts that have no terms at all or that are referred to by so-called descriptive terms, for example: printing with a rotating letter spindle (Russian: neuamo c spawjarouiumca aumepHsim eanom) 192; algorithm for finding secondary purposes of sequence-operated synchronous schemes (Russian: arzopumm HaxoxwdeKuns BMOPUYHBIX HASHAMCHUL CUHXpOHHbIX CXEM nocAeOceamebH020 Jdeiicmeus) 10; automaton with finite memory (Russian: aemomam c Koweurnod namamero) T; Algorithm for synthesis of multiple derivations of combinatorial logic (Russian: AA20PUMM CUHME3A MHOZOKPAMHO20 86i6c0a Komburamoprod roeuku) 11; command for transition when a condition is not met (Russian: Komanda nepexcoa npu HeBLINOAHEHIU ycaceus) 100; memory device not storing information when power is switched off (Russian: 3anomuHarowee ycmpoucmeo, He coxpaHAtolee: UHDOPMAULUI0 NPU BbiKAIOqenuu arekmpcnumanun) 342; memory that deletes information when power is switched off (Russian: sanomurarowiee ycmpolcmeo, COXPAHIIOUEe UHPOPMALUIO MPU BHIKAIOYCHUU arekmponumanus) 343, etc. It is not possible to accurately inventory such combinations of terminological words, nor to determine their place in the terminology of computational technology. Some of them can be transformed, while others are not at all suitable for the dictionary. 4. The dictionary does not avoid editorial inconsistencies. For example, it too often confuses two different punctuation marks, namely the hyphen and the hyphen. Unconsidered correlation of the conjunction and the above-mentioned punctuation marks when connecting the elements of homogeneous composite terms. For example, it says input and output restriction system 276, input and output control 329, but input —output control system 276, input —output device set 102, input —output block 18, etc. The hyphen is an appropriate punctuation mark in such compound terms as: addition-subtraction summer 286, multiplication-division device 345, etc., but it is not appropriate, for example, in such terms as: start-stop time 33, up-down method 134, etc. It is not clear why the regulator “yes-no” 251 is written, but the operator “and—no” 164, the n-type semiconductor 202, but the filter “m” type 356, the operator “or” 163, “OR—1R”, OR —OR —OR” 300, but the logical operations AND-NO 81, OR-OR 77, etc. Such irregularities could have been easily eliminated, 17* 259 5. The reviewed dictionary — a expected and necessary work. We can only be pleased that the engineers of the Vilnius Calculation Machine Factory and the Special Design Office of Calculation Machines took on such a huge task. SKŽ well represents the current Lithuanian terminology of computational technology. However, the extensive vocabulary material is still poorly standardized and systematized. This work is only a good start for the work of developing the terminology of computational techniques. It will not only be an example of enthusiastic work for other technical dictionaries, but also a foundation on which to build even more perfect dictionaries. B. Laumane, Zivju nosaukumi latviešu valoda, Riga, 1973, 307 p.* The monograph of Benita Laumane is very relevant not only for Latvian, but also for the linguistics and ethnogenesis of the Baltics and Indo-Europeans, since a large number of fish names have been inherited from ancient times. This monograph is the first major study of the names of white fish. B. Laumanė notes that P. Tymė, based on the fact that salmon live only in the Baltic Sea basin, and related names are found in Slavic, Baltic, Germanic, as well as Tocharian languages, tried to prove that id. ancestor was in the Baltic region. This hypothesis is related to the issue of the Baltic Sea coast aboriginals, which the author mentions in several places. B. Laumane, based on the opinion of archaeologists that the Balts or their ancestors moved to the Baltic Sea area around the 18th century BC? and here they established contacts with other inhabitants of the southeastern Baltic coast —aborigens, who, in the author’s opinion?, perhaps were Indo-Europeans related to the Balts, and Ugro-Fins (p. 14). The hypothesis that the Baltic aborigines were Indo-Europeans is very important for the question of the ethnogenesis of the Balts and Indo-Europeans. At the moment, it is particularly supported by some people." In the Mesolithic period, Eastern Baltic was characterized by two cultural (and, in Rimantiene’s opinion, ethnic) groups: microlithic-macrolithic and Kundas. The microlithic-macrolithic culture belonged to Lithuania and partly to Belarus. The Kund culture was widespread in the areas of present-day Estonia and Latvia, while in Lithuania it only affected the northernmost part of the country. 1 The review, due to its limited scope, deals only with the issue of the Baltic Sea coast aboriginals, raised in B. Laumane’s book. 2 Currently, archaeologists claim that the carriers of string pottery reached Lithuania at the end of the 3rd millennium BC, cf. R. Rimantienė, First inhabitants of Lithuania (XI—IV millennium BC), Vilnius, 1972 (hereinafter: Rimantienė PLG), p. 96. 3 With reference to: JI. B. Baukuua, TopbsknkoBas crosaukxa Capuare, Pura, 1970, pp. 140, 144—145, where the finds of Sarnates camp date to the first half or middle of the 3rd millennium BC, and the inhabitants are hypothetically considered to be Indo-Europeans; See also R. Rimantiene’s assertion that,,there can be no question of any cultural-ethnic Finno-Ugric deposit in the Lithuanian Stone Age material, and even less of the attribution of the ancient, local, pre-virvelinė culture inhabitants to Finno-Ugric tribes” (See also R. Rimantiene’s article “Finno-Ugric tribes in Lithuania”. R. Rimantienė, Lithuanian Stone Age comb pottery ornaments and the Finno-Ugric question, —Lithuanian History Chronicle. 1972, Vilnius, 1973 (hereinafter: Rimantienė LIM), p. 26; for further details, see pp. 5-26; see also : Rimantienė PLG; P. K. Pumanrene, IlaneojiuT u Me30. JiHT JlarBsi, Busibrioc, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as Pumauntene IIMJI). 4 See. A. Seibutis’ articles on popularising science: Pasavimai ir tikrovė, —Mokslas ir gyvenimas, Vilnius (hereinafter: MG), 1971, No. 5, pp. 38—40; Vėlyvojo ledynmečio vietovardžiai, —MG 1971, No. 10, pp. 16—20; Kaip Nemunas į Vislą tekėjo, —MG 1973, No. 3, pp. 28—30 and others, 260