Dar vienas kitas žodis dėl „Ardea cinerea“ pavadinimų

is gender ([Istorija žemaitiška], p. 116). The manuscript used for the publication must have contained the word reason. It was probably deliberately or unconsciously made by the organizers, if it is not just a proofreading error. Therefore, the word “play” included in the LKŽ should be viewed with reservation. Nevertheless, we should not rely on published, somehow edited, S. Daukanto writings, but on a more reliable authentic (and not one more) source, which prefers the form with a —cause. The word cause, like the cause, is probably related to the verbs žasti, Zosti (Lyberis, 1984, p. 74 etc.). The word is derived from the words "promise, promise" and "promise 1". a pledge, a promise; 2. vow, pledge..." i 2 lh EM Bh Tl SEER SE BAS Br Ae FAIRS Tų Red ap a atras ec ahs Biruté Vanagiené PE ay Ow 8 RY IRE ERS a AE ray mi ka Cee ATS Rr GL Miki’ ien Sie Good LITERATURE "rr Uni Month Gar wl a e BT ALL BRT Si RSE or A SU ne gen SE Istoryje Zemaytyszka [manuscript] //Library of the Institute of Lithuanian Language and Literature, MA, LTSR. F. 1(SD)2. [Istorija žemaitiška] [manuscript] //Lithuanian Academy of Sciences Central Library Manuscript, F. 29-1056. Lyberis A. Zadas, the word ir jų relatives // Language culture. 1984, No. 48. History of nū Lithuania from the oldest gadyny to Written D. L. K. to Gediminas 1850 m. Simano Daukanto, Plymouth, 1893. T. I. Miilenbacha K. The Latvian language. Riga, 1925—1927, TI s&us. Rubinatio Peluzęs Giwenimas iszgėlditas isz Teutonū katbos i Žamaijtiū (manuscript) //LTSR MA Lithuanian Language and Literature Institute ir Library. F. 1(SD)24, Rudzite M. Latvian dialectology. Riga, 1964, wl Žilevičius L. The paths of the manuscript "Žemaitiška istorija" || Literature ir art, Nov. 1983, 19. gn Ami ey One more word about Ardea cinerea name list Te a i ps PE Ee T The dialectal name of the now extinct Baltic heron /Ardea cinerea/ is presented in newly published works of linguistic science as follows: lit. gén¥é, gene "guzzling, guzzling, such a puddle bird" (Vanagas, 1981, p. 112), gēšē, gēnšē (sen. - What's the matter? ); Goose, grey goose (Urbutis, 1981, p. 20). What are these options? In which linguistic systems do these facts function and what should be the norm ir of common language? jų Iš from the quotes now given, it is clear that the authors consider them all to be equal, as well as the mixed ones used in various places. As shown by the article of the word genzhe LKŽ III it was 239, used by mudmen K. Jauiaus (Kvėdarna), A. Juškos (Kaltinėnai), K. in Maciaus writings, Form g'ė.n'dž'ę 1958—1976 m. heard saying the oldest Pavandenė, Pajūrio, Kvėdarna, ryškių, Rietdvo spoken representatives, g'č.n'dž'i nugirsta — Kurščnuose, Saukénuose (Varputėnų k.), in Kūrtuvėnai (K.K.). These are the snickets entering į vad. axial vowel retention zone next to the ir words rgn'ž'i't'eis ron'ž'i"t'i"s | rūn'dž'i-- | 'i's ~ rąžyties, b'r'ė.n'e't'e |b'r'ė.n'c't'i ~ brėsti, r'ė.n'č't'čis | r'ė.n'č"'t'i's ~réities, gr'ė.n'č't'ę | gr'eii.čti ~ gręžti having g'ė.n'dž'ę | g'ė.n'dž'i as a matter of course. (Young people now don't know the word, unless they to tell the comparison 2167;r--Dra a EE Taa aa A i ES en REE elniais Sianio TPL LGR oer TL SA LR A | If, that's the way it 5 Cy To Vila Eon A is. 'i, although he doesn't understand the meaning of gėžė well, because when asked to i. say what g'f.n'dž'ė ta g'ė.n'dž'į, | he only shrugs.) ir The other ¥ semitic dia form is g'fiž'ę. (Akmčnė, Papilė) just confirms that the form of the common language is ri a Goose (as ji presented) ir DūnŽ92 sentences with phonetic transcription of the authentic £3 forms of šneki). Yeah. Tą The fluctuation in how to transpose is already evident ir LKŽ III tome. Kvėdarnos ara g'ė.n'ž'e transponuota gėžė (LKŽ III 281), o Younger analogous word of iš the same place génzé Fo (LKZ III 239). K. Macius’ one sentence is given in two places: at 3 Skinny as a pig | LKZ III 239 | ir Skinny as a goose (LKZ III 281). V. es Urbutis writes as follows: "The extinct word is a lie, which has ir occurred some time ago and has survived to this day?) i to (o in the same Žemaitija: K. Būga (matyt, iš K. Ag Jauniaus) jį gives iš Kvėdarnos ir Around ...; the rietdvo, it seems, there was a sex alive kv pe Gens? ...“ (Urbutis, 1981, p. 20). In mentioned localities of Samogitia — Kvedarnoye (see. LKA II 44 jam.) ir Rietavé ę had has an ir equivalent only en (Kuršėsaris nuose en), so such jvairuojandiy forms could not then biti, as now is not ped gėžė is only transposed form g'ė.n'ž'ę. ir — iš Thus, the general form for general language is Fs gé%é (geZé J), which is pronounced g'č.n'dž"i, g'ė.n'ž'ę, g'éi'e in conversation. a : S: : (this word has not been heard in those places where ¢ ~ ę, but Gargždų, Vėžaičių g'ė*š'e nl P. — gēšē also confirmed). In tą various articles, dictionaries so dialectal formJuga mas should be ir qualified, provided as o ne equivalents (because goose, goose; threaten, i i watering; hrēsti, brēnšti nowhere we see presenting). var Kuršėnų apylinkių giria, village upeliukstis ir g'č.n'dž'g'ir'į, doubtless, is be related form g'ė.n'dž'į, but suggest +d transpose su jį G¢Zgiré just lacked the courage, fas because it would become almost unrecognizable place name. When GéZgiré was said to a farmer in ae a joke, the man didn’t understand anything at all. Thus, the transposed ¥ ts placename has lost its communication power altogether. Transposed place names, which have no similarity to a common į language word that exists in the ir conversation, are hardly accepted by ge local people and avoided to use, so it may be good that in this case the dialectal ir pronunciation of the root ir "recommended for ir general language. And one. Similarly, there have been ir variations of the aforementioned words gėšė, gėnšė, although in current e Ą conversations I have heard only g'ė'š'e (Gynecology). Eastern In Prussian Lithuanian writings, it Ea seems to have survived longer. nostril marking, so this Sen, it's there (in various Zodynuose, “IB see. LKZ The 237) 19th-century translation of the text was not translated into the English language until į the 20th century. 22 There are many different interpretations of the word. Since the ši form mainly Known iš Eastern Prussian dictionaries, ir grammar books (Urbutis, = Years p. 21, 22), so it was ji in those ir Lithuanian conversations. The r appearance of the prefix here can be nicely linked su to the appearance of the same sound in those ar nearby conversations: štruolas i ‘oak’, grfps ‘vąšas’ (Vitkauskas, 1978, p. 62), saršlavos ‘sąšlavos’ (Kudirkos Naiimiestis, Tauragė) — LKZ XII 167. Polarization, when these snitches simply looked for ways to avoid uncomfortable sound compounds -nš-, -nž-, will not ar have any ir meaning here, replacing sonantg with another sound m — r, therefore génsé changed | to grére even before en>e. she k E these ral. Sr oh ie ahh Taa aed ak ah, LITERATURE Cg, rhe 5 0 Bi T Bo m a PIT will leave Sasna Jao aa Saias abs LE Urbutis V. Ethnologue Ethnologue. V., 1981, Vanagas A. Etymological dictionary of Lithuanian hydronyms. V., 1981. Vitkauskas V. Names of meat in Samogitian dialects // Baltistica. 1978. T. 14, 100 mg/dL 1. P. 61—65. Se i The language ir of politeness js Vacant SRSA gs a ox stack Ero aarti es 1% i Kučinskaitė A. Lithuanian language etiquette V.: Science; 1985. — 112 i r It is sometimes said that politeness adorns a person. It is difficult to accept that it is only a human ornament, an essential feature, an integral part o ne jo of being. O, as the linguist quite rightly writes Antanė Kučinskaitė, in her recently published booklet “Lithuanian Language Etiquette”, the culture of human behavior is primarily determined by language. iš In the same way, as the image most often iš formed by speech, a person is generally cultured, ar educated. “Lithuanian Language Etiquette” is the first larger Lithuanian publication — of this kind, a long-awaited book needed by everyone. ir It is not possible to blame the publisher for the low circulation of the booklet. At — the end of the booklet it is written that it was published in thousands of 20 copies, several times more than other books of the same series. “Talking ir People” publications. But they disappeared so suddenly from the bookshelves that many did not see them. nė We can only be glad that our people are very interested in language matters, care about conversation and want to be even more polite. vo ir Such desires ir worries ennoble a person, they need to be ir supported encouraged. Therefore, the author’s publishiir ng house should ir think about a new, perhaps even wider edition of this book. How nice it would be if every family, everybody who wants could have such a publication! A. Kučinskaitė- ’s book did not be disappoint readers. It covers a number of different cases of life and human communication, in which the inner iš beauty, simplicity, nobility or formality, reflectiveness, coarseness of the interlocutors can be seen as on the palm of the hand. A person is constantly in a certain environment, sometimes in a cozy cool house, sometimes in a friendly official work ir collective, — sometimes he is doing his own business ar in various institutions. Many of our contemporarar ies may not remember when it was the last time they had to be alone for at ar least a little longer, to concentrate and think. nė ir Maybe because of to ne one, involved in the whirlwind of į bubbling life, unknowingly cools down, ir formalizes. In a crowded hall diplomas, certificates, maybe awards ar are presented. o Young, po neatly dressed ne workers, veterans, į climb the podium with one another’s barely ar noticeable footsteps. A short hand click, "Congratulations ... Congratulations. ... Congratulations. ... Good luck. ... Good luck. ... Good luck." Fifty, a hundred, o maybe even ir more times: "Congratulations ... Good luck. ...“ Half an hour, probably an hour, maybe even o longer ir "Congratulations ... Congratulations. ... Good luck. ...“ Iš at first warm, heartfelt applause gradually shortens to scattered splashes. It's getting boring... But what ką to do? How to keep the uplifting mood of the holiday? How to find those more diverse, individually designed jackets, but warm sincere words? ir A. Kučinskaitė- ’s book dazzles to look for such warmer, more sincere words. O for it has been known from time immemorial: he who seeks, he finds. So the booklet > Akai: Davis K See his cost