XIX a. vidurio lietuvių (aukštaičių rytiečių) – lenkų kalbų rankraštinis nežinomo autoriaus žodynas

LITHUANIAN LINGUISTICS QUESTIONS XXXVII (1997) PROBLEMS OF LEXICOGRAPHY AND LEXICOLOGY Vidmantas KUPREVIČIUS LITHUANIAN (AUKŠTAIČIŲ RYTIEČIŲ)-POLISH LANGUAGE MANUSCRIVED DICTIONARY OF AN UNKNOWN AUTHOR OF THE 19TH CENTURY RtŽ (this is how this dictionary is abbreviated LKŽ) is so far almost unresearched, and in order to have a comprehensive picture of the past lexicography, it is necessary to study each surviving old dictionary separately, monographically. The material for a wider work is still being accumulated. Detailed analysis of archive data (comparison of the author’s handwriting with the handwriting of well-known authors of the time, etc.) is carried out in parallel with other works. This paper aims to clarify some of the data of the previous research of RtZ. The dictionary of unknown author is preserved in the M. Akelaitis Manuscript Fund (F1-1) of the Lithuanian Literature and Folklore Institute. It has 548 numbered handwritten pages. This is how it came into the LMD manuscript: JIATOBCKiŪ CJIOBapb Cb TaJIKOBaH -|ieM CJIOBb Ha IOJbCKIii SI3bIKb.| HaunHaercss cJIOBapb Cb GyKBLI A H KOHUYaeETCHS CJIOBOMb Zwagieje! Pykoriucb 0e€3b repervilleta. COJIEDXHTb 3548 CTpaHHIIbI (Catalogus). The format of pages 1-338 is 22.3 x 17.6, 0 339-548-21.4 x 16.6 mm. J. Kruopas, the first to review this Zodyna, gives undifferentiated dimensions (Kruopas 1969: 183). There were more pages, because there is an unwritten, completely clean sheet marked with page numbers 557-558 attached to the cover. The sheets of the dictionary are stapled into 55 booklets, and these are sewn (bound). On the unnumbered page of the dictionary I at the top in the middle is the older manuscript signature: /n. R-/7, and slightly below —a round stamp with Vytis: Lietuvių Mokslo Draugija- .1907., overlapping the lower part of the said stamp, written: M. Akielewicza, (Agricola- ), and slightly below and to the left, under this —pseudonym. A gt 1c ol a —Nickname of Nikolaus Akelaitis (Otrębski 1970: 7). The cited entries are of the same style and written with the same writing tool (grey pencil). About the third quarter of the page from the top in the middle there is an entry by Dr. J. Basanavičius: Dovanojo A. Šutinas* 30 V 1912! RtŽ line: Zwagiejey, br3eczafes; In the article of the author of RtŽ the letter Z with a cross is printed as Ž, and the entry of Dr. J. Basanavičius z with a cross is reproduced here as ž. 2 This is a former collector of antiques, the sacristan of Bernardinai church. This is what “Życie Ilustrowane. " Weekly supplement of “Kurjer Litewski” (1909.1.25/- II.7. No.4). The author of the article thanks art historian R. Janoniene for the aforementioned position of “Życie Ilustrowane”. P. Razmukas, librarian of the Lithuanian Science Society, has told the author of these lines that Antanas Šutinas, 215 Sutinas received the dictionary in 1889 from the official Andruškevičius, who had received it from M. Akelaitis in 1863|before he went abroad,|J. Basanavičius. On page II, also unnumbered, there are no entries, only a small round red stamp: LITHUANIAN LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE INSTITUTE, After checking all pages of the RtZ original with a special paper translucent machine, van de nZ e n k 11 y was not found, but RtZ in the upper right corners of some pages are colourless in s p a u d ų“ (their periodicity order is rather chaotic, it is quite possible that the stamp mark of some pages is only a reprint of the contour of the real mark from previous pages): in the rectangular, somewhat rounded corners stamp, the word KUCZKURISZKI is clearly readable, arranged along the edges of the dry stamp around the emblem in the center. The prints on pages 167 and 359 are particularly striking. In the book “Paper in Lithuania XVXVIII a.” In Figure 28, part b, that mark is reproduced (Laucevičius 1967: 68). There, p. 65-67, it is written: "In 1823 the well-known wealthy manor owner and industrialist Vaitiekus Puslovskis began building a paper workshop in Kučkuriškės. In 1824, this workshop was already producing paper and brought its owner considerable profits. In 1826, the workshop was enlarged, improved, new machines were installed.- <...>In 1848, the workshop already had an English machine that produced "paper without end".<...> After "making paper without end", the products of the Kučkuriškės workshop were marked with a dry stamp. The remaining 1st and 2nd sides of the cover II, made (glued): 1) from a fragment of the Old Testament’ Polish text, on the other side of which there are no characters (so here, apparently, will be a fragment of a separate publication, perhaps Missal [?] ST or Sacraments [?] readings, not a page of the Holy Scripture folio; 2) 3-5 layers of newspapers; in one of them, somewhat copied from the “Dodatek Do Gazety Kuryera Litewskego” (1829, N 58), a section is readily readable, where the new printed works are mentioned; there is mentioned the translation of K. Pichler’s novel “Oblężenie Wiednia” <...> into Polish, published in the same year (Pichler 1829). Other fragments of newspaper layers on the cover are not documentally identified; 3) a sheet of writing paper with iSbluke™ handwriting on the glued side; It seems that this is an attempt to write a certificate, duplicating the entry in the church book, because in the upper left corner the digits 233 are clearly visible (perhaps the sequence number of the entry), below is the ordinary member of the Society, who promised to donate to the Society a collection of crosses, chapel columns, chapels, rain watercolours, but did not give the collection to LMD, thus saddening Dr. J. Basanavičius. * In the article (Kroopas 1969: 183) there is an error: printed on departure. The same inaccuracy was perceived when the RtŽ manuscript was registered for the first time in “Lietuvos bibliografija” (see Gargasaitė 1990: 98). * These stamps of J. Kruopa str.p.186 are called watermarks. Remiam:isi E. Laucevičius’ book “Paper in Lithuania in the 15th-18th centuries. "[J. Kruopo str. printed in the 13th century -V.K.] *I Moz (Pr) 42.1 -5. 8 “New children- ”. 216 not completely faded remnants of a brilliantly spelled surname [?]. Written probably in Cyrillic: [<...>?] Uypuū [?]. There is one in the bottom left. A colorless stamp of the word, the last letter of which is O. RtŽ is rarely mentioned in the press. K. Būga was the first to abbreviate it, marking RtŽ as R, among the sources of his "Dictionary of the Lithuanian language" (Būga 1924: XV). V. Urbutis, reviewing “Index lexicorum Poloniae”, correcting the errors of this work by P. Grzegorczyk and significantly supplementing it, mentioned the Eastern dictionary of 29,000 articles received from M. Akelaitis as being included (Urbutis 1968: 157). J. Kruopas was the first to publish an article about RtŽ (Kroopas 1969). Based on Kruop’s article, A. Balašaitis has described RtZ in his brief review of Lithuanian lexicography (Balašaitis 1984: 93). RtŽ was included in the general “Lietuvių bibliografija*, its supplements (Gargasaitė 1990: 98) together with other more important manuscripts. In recent years, after the RtZ was chosen as the subject of a broader study, the progress of the work and the preliminary results have already been presented to the public at the international conference organized by the Dictionaries Department of the Lithuanian Language Institute, dedicated to the 115th anniversary of K. Būga and the 110th anniversary of J. Balčikonis, and in the papers read at the VII International Baltic Congress (Kuprevičius 1995; Kuprėvičs 1995) and published in the third theses of the report (Kuprevičius 1995,). It is also mentioned in manuscript sources. In the auxiliary (catalogue) file of the Dictionary Department of the Lithuanian Language Institute and in the (word) file there are sheets marking RtŽ. Auxiliary files in the “K. Abbreviations of Boogie. and bibliography”, two sheets are stored in section R, and there is also a sheet in the Headings and Authors boxes. 1) where K. Būga, having selected and “marked the samples from the RtŽ printed on the sheets with the abbreviation Ryt.Ž, supplemented the LKŽ catalog" (Kruopas 1969: 185); 2) with the stamp of Akelaicio zod. mark 2050 lexicographical units written in the hand of E. Samaniūtė (later —Otrebska). RtŽ's drawing is fine, especially in the inserted lines. The graphologist Rūta Čapaitė, having reviewed the pages 100-548 of the RtŽ photocopy, confirmed that the corrections in lighter ink (insertions), just like the main, "ordinary" lines of the text, are written by the same hand. The very individual grapheme d, f and vertical parts of the grapheme B, D, F, T (verticals, "axis" of the letters) of the RtZ author's drawing, having the form of an S, remind the same grapheme of S. Daukanto, J. Butavičius, and distinguish, for example, the texts of J. Pabrėža, where the elements of the drawing of such grapheme are different. In the writings of J. Pabrėža only one grapheme has been observed, having the drawing element discussed here, says R. Čapaitė. Caution to be taken " RtZ has many inserted lines of not so neat, compressed drawing trying to insert between what was written earlier. 217 the conclusion that the author of the RtŽ was a contemporary of S. Daukanta or younger (J. Butavičius was almost 13 years younger than S. Daukanta, and J. Pabrėža sent his herbarium plants to a florist, Father J. Fedoravičius, who was 5 years younger than him (Dagys 1938: 180)). Each page of the RtZ is meticulously marked with thin horizontal, barely visible lines every 7 mm, which are intended for writing the vocabulary neatly and straightforwardly. In some places, small needle-like holes are visible: a point at the beginning and end of the line. These horizontal lines are intersected by four vertical lines, forming four graphs. At the top of each page, a line is drawn for the headings of columns a and b, indicating lie. the range of the word’s grapheme (the column headings are from 1b to 352a inclusive, they are no longer marked). Apparently, the author of RtŽ intended to write or number something even more detailed, but did not do so, because the text of RtZ is presented in only two columns, separated by a vertical dash. The RtŽ spelling follows the Polish, in it, “the phonetic principle prevails: it is written according to pronunciation” (Kroopas 1969: 190). The following letters are used: the vowels a, €, i, y, i; consonants b, ¢, cz, d (and d variant with individual ascending- ), g, J, 4, /1 (individual variant with ascending- ), m, m, p, r, s (and /), sz, t, w, 2, Z, Z (and 3, 3 3 variants with descending). Palatalization is indicated by the letter r (before the anterior and posterior vowels). Compound diphthongs (i)ai and (i)ei are marked RtZ (Jey. The RtZ word groups are dominated by the common vocabulary of the people, found in words used in Eastern dialects, e.g. : Garsiot [“garZiotis”; cf. la. garšot “to taste”’](- 80), Greimas (92), Greczium“ [“near, next to*"](92), Griczia (92), Pustit, ostrzy¢® (361), Sulobt, skarmič* (421), Pawenis, cien(316)<- ...> Wokiata'' [“envelope box"](535) (Kroopas 1969: 188), Germanisms noted: Marka, marka, czeski /moneta, szeszcz groszy. Nice, closet. There are Latvian (or even unadapted Latvian) words: Cuka, swinia. Zukutia, swinka. Dabut, cattle; sh. Douguwa- “, dz3wina /r3eka; Zenkis". Zenkia, chtopiu |? ), there are many Slavisms. The lexicographer J. Kruopas seems to have applied the key to the question of compiling the register: “RtŽ lexicon shows that it is composed of folk language words and their forms. It does not appear that the author used written sources. The only word that could be suspected of being taken from Chilinski’s translation of the Bible is Zetas, mizerak, ubogi” (187), because as the “Lithuanian Language * There is also inserted Griaczium, w rzędzie, przy, obok. ? RtŽ is written: Pustit, ostrzyč; a fan; tasty; Article 1, cited above. matching Word written osczyč. 0 RtŽ: Sulobt, scarmič zposé The whole RtZ main line: Wokrafa, krobka. 12 pastebétas another hydronym: ~ Mūša (Musza, beats; musza r3eka w powiece Upitskim- ). Get it. equivalent. 218 Zodynas[- ”] (VII t.) the corresponding article, in this meaning /ēfas is recorded only from Chilinskis, and with similar meanings “poor, weak values” it is still used in the writings of M. Daukša and K. Sirvydas” (Kroopas 1969:189). The lexicographic method is revealed by the structure of the chosen article. The RtŽ article consists of: 1) the Lithuanian title word and 2) the Polish equivalents of the meaning. The meaning of polysemants is revealed by the use of several Polish words with different meanings. Title words are presented alphabetically according to dialectal genders and divided into 21 letter sections: A, B, C, D, E, G, I (this grapheme RtŽ also performs J functions. The J grapheme itself is also used, but at the beginning of the title word’s position it is smudged only in some later lines), K, L, £, M, N, O, P, R, S, T, U, W, Z, Z. Various morphological forms of the same word are raised by separate headings: “The noun Ziy is given many forms of playfulness, and the verbs — personification and participant forms” (Kroopas 1969: 184). Most Lithuanian words have only a Polish equivalent. There are no illustrative examples or phraseology (as illustrations —V.K.) (Kruopas 1969: 191). However, phraseologisms (or combinations of emphasized words) exist as lexicographical units. They go in headings and are listed by first word, e.g. : No eyes réybsta, I in the eyes cmi sie. There is no akis suzaliwa, and in the eyes zieleniafe. Some forms, in order to distinguish precisely jy grammatical meanings, are crossed: marked with diacritics similar to the grave and acute: Akis, oczy. Eye, eye. Akis, in the eyes. Botagu, whip. Botagū, I'm bitching. Oh, God. Diewū, bogow /mit. Ėglinis, butcher. Eglinis, iodine, with iodine. Grundia, "skrobytaal? ), scraping Grundia, colco, disc. Skowka Iewos, Ewy. Eve's belongings. Ičwos, czeromchy; Hujwy. Iéwu, czeromche; Yes; Huzeweah. Jewū, czeromchy, huzwow, etc. Diacritics highlight and clarify cases of homonymy. This avoids eventualiy homografy. Grammatical marks in RtZ are scarce and rare: 1) Lp. singular ir Lm. plural, 2) r. Z gender feminine. Other abbreviations are used: 1) 7 £. d. and so on, 2) /m. imi¢ —to the names. The full (1st) word of the species name (or one or more syllables of it) is also used to describe the semantics of the word: waga, drzewo, grzyb, midologja? )., coin, roslina), fish, cloth, etc. Abbreviations and generic names are given after a right slash (/). The punctuation is used regularly: between synonyms |]. In the case of a word, a comma is written between words, and a semicolon between different meanings (this separates or indicates the meaning of the word at the same time). Many RtŽ lines are not possible without both of these signs. For example: : Isideja, wfozyfa sig; wyniosta sie The whole RtZ vocabulary is as follows: Zefas, mizerak, ubogi, nedz3ar3. Cit. art.: significance. "*Edited: cit. str. printed by Širvydas. 219 - Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Karst, hot; quadruped; czochratby. Lieki, you stay, you stay, you leave, you leave. Linea," he shrugged; act; ptosis up to hours; Polish. Te, glotta: TM ""*. Utopis, zalata; Tatawszy. Zuwey, ginątes; fowifes. Only RtZ is recorded some lexemes: Acziuwiste, wdsiecinosc. Dreykafta, a solvent; The dissolver. Dubinuot, boftač, boftem nap3ač fish. Dubulis, boftacz, boftuch. Dwyley, widowed, in two, belt. Grundia, kolco, krazek. Skowka. [Eeylfei, wycieka | about plants etc. (cf. Kruopas 189). It is noteworthy that the RtZ lexicon ~ kurmiarauslis (Kurmiarousley, kretowiny, kopec kretone/- Kurmiarouslis, kretowizna) is not included in the LKŽ register at all. RtZ was formed (at the latest) until XIXa. From the end of the 1930s-1940s, rewritten (at the earliest) from 1848 (the mark of the Kučkuriškės paper workshop on the pages of the RtŽ indicates this). The statement about the time of writing (compilation) of the dictionary is confirmed by the peculiarity of the RtŽ spelling: as mentioned, the compound diphthongs (jai, (i)ei) are marked (7)ey, and this was the way Polish was written until the 1930s. The writing of the consonant in question in this position prevailed after a great debate, which began in Vilnius, activated by A. Felinski (Y.0§ 1917: 59-60), with the participation of Vilnius University professor J. Lelevelis (Kaupuž 1973: 170), his opponent J. Sniadecki (Kaupuž 1973: 171) and others, and ended with the aj(ej) driving out ay(ey) from Polish spelling from 1830 to 1840 (Bajerowa 1986: 39). It is also used in ethnographic Poland. No other notation of compound dimers than (7)ey was observed in RtZ. By the way, similar Polish-style writing is also found in the remaining printed monuments of Latgalian script (Stafecka 1995,: 277-279) “Evangelia Toto Anno“ (1753, Vilnius), which is presumed to be a collective translation led by the Jesuit Janis Lukaševičius, “kurš pēc tautibas bijis lietuvietis, labi pratis latviešu valodu, darbojies Varaklanos un Preilas, vėlak Izvalta un Puša“, as well as “Eysa satasiszona Historyas Swatas“, printed in Mogilyov about 1770 (Stafecka 1995: 45-47). The date of 1848 would contradict the date of 1840, the 30s (40s) of the 20th century, due to the peculiarities of Lithuanian orthography, but it is possible to agree with the idea that the change of Polish spelling did not necessarily have to be adapted to Lithuanian spelling at once. Perhaps the author of RtZ did not intend to print his manuscript, but only wanted to use it for personal purposes (teaching, teaching Lithuanian language), so he did not change the spelling when transcribing from draft to clear. Sudarymo viefa (apytikrė) —nemažas plotas: Biržai(?) —Tverečius —Ciskodas, ką rodo veiksmažodžio duoti būt. map. the temporal form devé (Būga 1961: 571), and the following verbs are paused in RtZ: Acidiawia, oddat sig. Acidiawiey, oddatfes sig. Diawia, daf, "RtŽ gravis supra n. 220 data. date. Diawiey, you're giving. Damn it, date. Diavis, the older. Idiawia, udat; wdat Idiawiey, udates; You're going to die. Idiawiou, let's go. Padiawia, podat; Right, right, right. Padiawiey, you pass. Padiawiou, tax. Padiavis, after passing. Pardiawia, he's eating. Pardiawiey, prjedafes. Pardiawiniei, I'm selling. Pardiawiniet, prjedawaé. Pardiawiou, the preacher. Parsidiawia, give up. Parsidiawiey, you're fucking yourself. Parsidiawiou, surrender. Pasidiawia, surrender, surrender, bend sig. You've given up. Pasidiawiou, surrender. Sudiawia, zadat Judge, you're wrong. Sudiawiou, zdatem. He wonders what to do. / Uzudiawiey, zadafeS, are also nouns Diawimas, dish. Idiawimas, success. Padiawimas, podanie, tradycya. Sudiawimas, task, once. Iš part of the vocabulary designates the area of the prefix (lexeme ~obuolys: Obali, jabtko) uo translation į a[?], 4 (Zinkevičius 1966: 504; 59 map), toponimo — Lithuania: Letuwa, litwa. Letuwnikia, litwinka, litewka. Let's go, w let's go, 44?)"* let's go. Letuwos, litwy translation fe į 2, (2 (Zinkevičius 1966: 506; 61 map)), the Latvian (or glossed) words quoted in this article refer to the area of present-day Latvia's Zemgale į region, the water name —-Dauguva: — Douguwa, d3wina /r3eka refers to the border of Latgale: the right bank of the Daugava is now Latgale, no longer iemgala. RtŽ is: Aria [~ arė]“, oral Arcziu, oratbym. Itekcziu, wpadtbym o forms: ario, arczio, itekczio are not present (see Kruopas 1969:185). Exceptionally, the phonetic forms of the northern Panevėžys dialects have not been observed in RtŽ, so the area of Panevėžys as a space for writing RtŽ should be eliminated. Thus, the chronotop of the RtŽ could perhaps be as follows: time —1840 —1850, place —part of Lithuania with Latgale: Biržai (?)-Ciskodas —Tverečius. The author of RtŽ is not yet clarified. It is likely that the author of the RtZ was a Catholic priest, perhaps a monk, because some vocabulary in the RtZ would clearly show the confessional affiliation of the writer: canonical reverence is expressed to the Blessed Virgin Mary: Marija, Mary[? In the name of Our Lady. Blowieszcziey, Zwiastowanie N. P. M., finds an emotional appeal j Kristy: A /ezau! o IEzu!, it is acknowledged that the pope is the high priest: Popieža, papieza, glowy kosciofa, and Calvin’s follower is rudely described as bambizu: Bumbizas, bumbis, Kalwin… The motives for writing RtŽ may be as the lexicographer J. Kruopas indicates: “It seems that it [RtŽ] is dedicated to the purpose of learning the Lithuanian language and could partly replace the basics of grammar” (Kroopas 1969: 191). This idea is supported by some moments of Kazimieras Kristupas Daukša’s activities: the person mentioned was a teacher at the Evangelical parish school in Biržai, taught Lithuanian as well, and had written a Lithuanian-- Polish dictionary that he could use during lessons” (Subačius 1991: 58). 18 J. Kruopo is mistaken: that RtŽ really is a, is proved by a line inserted slightly lower, strictly according to the alphabet: Arialis, orzefek. 19 psychologically it is very plausible: to interest students in unusual then teaching means. 221 There are links to other dictionaries. This is the Oriental dictionary of K. K. Daukša, of which 104 pages (208 p.) of 142 (284 p.) are known to have survived and which is kept in the library of the University of Poznan (Subačius 1991). The similarity of the lexicographic method of the RtŽ and K. K. Daukšos dictionary, the time of compilation of spoken dictionaries is close. Only the spelling of RtZ and K. K. Daukša’s dictionary shows significant differences, because K. K. Daukša was ahead of Polish spelling and his spelling differs significantly from that of other authors of the time. “Instead of the usual cz, dž, sz, w signs of the first half of the 19th century, the dictionary uses “ ('Tarkceti “Ciarkseti” 123),’d (mea'doimas “hunting” 63v), c (rackiti “writing” 85v), v (pacvajstea “self-indulgence” 72v), the diphthong au is written av (smeafav “I lied, I tepiausi” 99), the introduced letters u, f," (Subačius 1991: 58), and the author of RtZ consistently adheres to Polish spelling. It is important to emphasize the connection of K. K. Daukšos dictionary register with K. Sirvydo Dictionarium [Sirvydas 1642], because “Daukša included a number of his words and phrases in his dictionary, although he did not mark the material taken over in the text of the dictionary in any way. That this is really the vocabulary of K. Sirvydas’ dictionary can be judged from the similarity of the phrases (Lithuanian or even Polish), from Sirvydas’ novelties or otherwise rare words from his dictionary, which Daukša added to his own. For example, Daukšos Avksadajlis zfotnik 4v, and Sirvydo Zfotnik... auksadaylis 547; respectively Bi.ndristea spofeczenstwo spofecznošč 8 —Spotecznošč... Draugiste /byndriste 417; Bifavietea grod 8 —Grod... Bifawiete /tiesawiete baioru 75; Blavsdineas sufejaty 9 —Suleiaty... Blauzdines wettos /apawis srugnotas 427; <...> Liguma zealunti murawa 58 —Murawa... liguma zelunti /weia 182; <...> Puslis [error?| menuo, Luty miesigc 84 —Luty... pusis /pustis 159; <...>Vajkagimdea pofoznica 127v —PotoZnica... Waykagimde 322; Vajkaveadis pedagog 127v —Pedagog... Waykawedis 228; Zie'duos v puo’dis 138 —Garncarz... puodzius /ziedzius 66 —67 <...>. It is obvious that K. K. Daukša has spent a lot of time on K. Sirvydo dictionary" (Subačius 1991: 60). Orientalism links K. K. Daukšos dictionary and RtZ, studying the monument of Lithuanian oriental lexicography of the middle of the 19th century. LITERATŪRA Bajerowa I. 1986: State of evolution 1, Polish language of the 19th century. Katowice: University of Silesia. Balašaitis A. 1984: Words and Dictionary, Vilnius: Mokslas. 1924: Dictionary of Lithuanian Language 1, Kaunas. 1961: The establishment of Lithuanians in Lithuania today. —Collected Writings 3, Vilnius: State Political and Scientific Literature Publishing House. Catalo gus: Catalogus Nr. 10 (manuscripts received by the LMD). LLTIB manuscript. F. 22—1014, entry 44. Dagys J. 1938: Father Juozapas Fedoravi¢ius — florist of Iluktas and Zarasai region (1776— 1860). —Natura 3, 176–183. Gargasaite D. 1990: Lithuanian-- Polish Dictionary. — Bibliography of Lithuania. Series A. Books in Lithuanian language. 1547-1861. Addendum, Vilnius. Kaupuž A. 1973: Iz istorii pol'skoj ortografii v Vil'nie v pervoj tret'i XIX v. —Acta BalticoSlavica 8, 169-181. R Kruopas J. 1969: Handwritten Lithuanian-Polish Dictionary of the Second Half of the 19th Century. —Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Series A, 2(30). Kuprevičius V. 1995: Dėl rytietiškų rankraščių žodyno (RtŽ). —Problems of lexicography: semantics, etymology, presentation of dialectal facts, Principles of compilation of dictionaries for the 115th anniversary of K. Buga and the 110th anniversary of J. Balčikonis. Thesis of the conference reports. 16-17 March 1995, Vilnius, 24-25. Kuprevičius V. 1995: Concerning the Lexicographic Method and Chronotop of the Lithuanian-Polish Dictionary. —Linguistics. The 1-st Conference of Baltic Studies. Abstracts of Scholarly Papers, Riga. Kupréviés V. 1995: On the lexicographical method of the Lithuanian-Polish Dictionary (RtZ). Baltistica VII. VII International Congress of Baltists 1995. g. —15. June. Referatu tezes, Riga. Laucevičius E. 1967: Paper in Lithuania XV-XVIII a., Vilnius. LKŽ 1, —Lietuvių kalbos žodynas 1, Vilnius: Mintis, 1968. Loš J. 1917: Polish spelling in the past and present, in Kraków. Otrębski J. 19670: Mikotlaj Akielewicz and his “Gramatyka języka litewskeg.“ —Acta Baltico-Slavica 7, 1-22. Pichler K. 1829: Siege of Vienna,romans hist. 1-4, Vilnius. Sirvyd as K 1642: The First Zodynas of the Lithuanian Language | Prepared by K. Pakalka, Vilnius: Mokslas, 1979. Stafecka A. 1995: The history of the Latgalian written language. —Latgalian literature, Riga: Zvaigzne, 41-56. Stafecka A. 19953: Language commentaries. —Latgalian literature, Riga: Zvaigzne, 277-282. 1990. "Dictionary of the English Language". —Lithuanian Revival Studies, \ "nis: Sietynas, 20-31. 1991: The Dictionary of Christianity. —Baltistica 27(1), 56-67. Urbutis V. 1968: Piotr Gregorczyk, Index lexicorum Poloniae. Bibliography of Polish stownikai. —Baltistica 4, Zinkevičius Z. 1966: Lietuvių dialektologija, Vilnius: Mintis. —Baltistica 4, Zinkeviči153-158. us Z. 1966: Lietuvių dialektologija, Vilnius: Mintis. ~ —transponuota į bk <...> —piniūros ženklas [?] —neperskaitoma ar abejojama grafemos atpažinimu | —ritės riba AN EASTERN AUKŠTAITISH LITHUANIAN -POLISH MANUSCRIPT DICTIONARY OF UNKNOWN AUTHOR OF MIDDLE OF THE 19 C. Summary The Lithuanian —Polish dictionary is kept at the Manuscript Department of the Institute of the Literature and Folklore (F1-1). The manuscript has 548 numbered pages (the format of 1-338 is 22,3 x 17,6, but the pages from 339 to 548 are —21,4 x 16,6 format). No watermarks have been found. Inprints with inscription Kuczkuriszki date back to 1848. 223