Wojciech Smoczyński. „Laringalų teorija ir lietuvių kalba“

Reviews of Wosciecu SmoczyNski Laringaly teorija in ir English Certified translation i§ of Polish language IS rankra8¢io verté Vestava Crzak-Proxadsva, Diana SiLelkarre Learning editors Diana Seikarre, Axe Feed Vilnius: Lithuanian Language Institute, 2006, 292 pp. ISBN 978-9955-704-17-1, ISSN 1822-3257 (Bibliotheca Salensis, 3) Lietuvos kalbininky sociologiniy apzvalgy, tarmiy garsy virpesiy nagrinejimy sraute lietuviy kalbos instituto leidykla i8leido i8 rankra8¢io i8versta At the moment The book of the most important Polish Baltic comparative scholar. As the curator of the book prof. Habil. Dr. Axel'is Holvoet,,,Krakow comparative Baltist ir Wojciechas Smoczynski has been applying the new model of laryngalistic reconstruction to the study of the history of Belarusian language for several decades« (p. 9). ylvade* (p. 13tt) all (it does not learn primirge) ar we can learn patios laringaly theory, ir methody application, i8vestiniy struktiiry, try to understand large scales, kity archajiskesniy ide. ir language hidden, differential poZymyus. Summary solidly iSdéstytat at the end of the chapter (p. 15-18). Su the author, whose teacher at the University of Krakow was the great linguist J. Kurytowicz’ius, on the theory issues you can only be pleased ir with the — penetration of thought, in fact with many different Lithuanian studies i8 Saltiniu (LKZ, LKZ moksliniy K, Zurnaly ir pan. ). It is only necessary to draw j attention to each other Lithuanian language jo data, form, ar need for some addition. We must start with the form sen. minzd (p. 60), this is a dialect form from K. In the past: m’ezit Z., (K.) Nu Donel), m’ef.dzit Krrv, Saux, Krs, Varn mezil, ~ aukSt. myZt; ji common ir bk. $in a non-common language; unfortunately, it is not iS indicated where the quoted form was taken, we would add In the LKZ corrections, if ever we will have published the entire nation's lexical fund. Zodis Zmond has 3 branches Zodiac, %name (p. 69) bitty tik The Saxon Man. Verb ardyti pronounced visy lietuviy (plg. 'LKZ,?LK239, Z, todél 294-295, drditi (p. 99, 105, 191) is an unexpected, unexpected form. The formation is apyusris correctible (p. 99, 101) - "About Us". www.abo- ~ utus.com- (1) .au. "About Us". www.aboutus.com.au. about ausra’ ‘LKZ, (and 184 apyasriu), *LKZ, cf. 230; ir book author mentioned Zodj ira (p. 93, 101). Many mentions are caused by the forms “gertl, *kelil, *lemil, *perit (i8 pefti, ne i8 pérti tai — 141 Recenze spreading a completely new form), tremu, vemil, stumi, because such forms are now said in a large part of Zemai¢iy. So Gia is some sort of reversible phenomenon. Apparently, from the original geri, lemiii, tremii (p. 102-103) vél was merge (?) to geril, lemi, tremii, pleti, stumii (but Sita stwmi form is also southern high Drsk, Rtn and others.), pg still widespread form m’énto /m’efi.ta ~ mentit. This is what the dialectal form cycles are like. Zemaiciy and jutiniy aukStaigiy (dziiku) are also repeated in lejil, glejii (p. 104), riedu (p. 104) Zem. is a strongly retractable preposition r7td, r’idd Kr’, Ketv and others, as well as Slava mentioned by the author. Perhaps the author may be interested in the Zemaitic verbThe word tuméti, tima ‘tirstéti’ instead of aut. tunéti (p. 108), perhaps Gia some kind of assimilation? (there is also cumé ‘the power of dilution’, tmis /tomds rt. t.). Kazkodél uZmirSta senesné, rodos, form pét’is ~ petis, péti's ~ petiés, instr. sing. peti ~ petim (Z. Kr, Uzv, Pvn and elsewhere) (only the new form petys is mentioned, p. 109). ampalas (< afitpalas) —p. 110, 112 according to P. Jonika (Pagramantis dialect) is a form of the common language, Snektos has dntpala Per, dnpala Py. Liet. Sard skuba, nelaimé‘ (p. 114) —more commonly used Sora (Siiord, Suoriit’i ssmarkiai darbuotis‘ Krs, Krk, Suordut- ’e Ti,labai skubéti‘ = Sort. Lietuviy béda (b%edd Z.), latviy béda (p. 116) is doubtful due to “b'eh,d®- formulés taikymo. Ar Gia néra ¢: ir slavu jat’ relation- (6) ship as sénys, mésd others ir Words (plg. K. Biga, Rinktiniai rastai, 1959, t. II, p. 554-555; J. Baléikonis, Rinktiniai raStai, t. I, p. 383). The word yla, latviy ilens is considered a Baltic word (p. 119, isnaSa). A strong and substantiated statement is required (cf. Fraenkelio LKEZ, p. 183 with all the literature). Zemaiéiy vakarinése In Snektos there is the pronounced bruot’eré.l’is (sounds bruot’eré.l’is) ‘brother’, and broterélis is only a highly elaborated form in8 ir Zodyny and folklore collections (p. 122). Dubious ir i-pipe stétis kiréiavimas (p. 128, 132, 138). Also unknown is the PD after exposure; as surikus, Sviésus and others. bidvardZiy may be an ancient crossing, only not know what was the pregadé at that time. The same goes for dél vétis, ir votj (p. 122, 132), ziitis, -ies (p. 162) = itis, -iés (4). Only Zemaiziy is mylas, -d, it is common with Latvians, kurSiais or priisais (p. 148). Wherever the verb pyti is used, the present tense form is always pyna, 0 pyja is created according to the LKZ editing provision (p. 148). Long Known That Winter wheat for the part Zemaiciy is piers (4) ar Pyrrhic acid (2) - 142 Reviews LKK t., 8 1966, p. 166-167; LKZ, 847, ra’yta perias (4) NZ (jra8é ten salanti8kis prof. A. The islands were inhabited 1969 in the Bronze Age. In this book there are only piers. 1958-1968 year walking yesterday in Zemaiéiai, collecting material LKA ir kurSizmams, uzraSyta Saknis pur- (4 kiréiuotés noun) Risnéje, Satigose, Kintuosé, Plikiuosé, Veivirzénuose, SvékSnoje, Endriejevé elsewhere ir (current Kulii Four dialectologists have studied the heard form ptira: (can be reduced by the su griidy gauge?). K. Biigos Rinktiniy rasty rhizome (p. 157), in one nest there is a ir bird (II t. Pp. 652, raSoma ,,time’’) ir Root pur- (II t. 388 — pure, purely ,,; Winter wheat” I am, I am; 527 p. - parat ir Jn ir t. t.). Tas piirai In this case, it's not at all true. I ir don't i8 know where it was taken. 1964 years had to participate in interviews at SvékSnos ir Judrény, where the agronomists just laughed i8 ,,seniy vytvorty kvailyséiy“, as they say, so long the word has been to avoided, even ,,SvékSnos tarmés tekstuose“ 2005 jo not recorded (0 for the author Bidvietiy, Tvaskuéiy villages still had to hear, Jaunius Kvédarnoje recorded, LKA volume authors did 0 not draw). I jo K. Baga compared pairs ir su latviy snektomis par’i, 0 to volume p. 713 purai, pirrai is iSkraipyty lietuviy language Get out of here, Sarah. LKA, 167 presented: the most common porcupine, porcupine, rarer ir porcupine only in two places porcupine (Slideshow ir "Zdikuosé nykstančio Zodzio gal atsitiktinai ir i8girsti". There's ir one more purr ‘pilliai’ is LKZ, 946 — J. I8 in comparison frequently used Word determined by the transitive plurality of the need, e.g. as piers drimb (already ‘pilliai’), 0 Dirsés birst piirais Vs — no, all o Zemaitiu % The earth, the water, if the rotten ears are buried. Krs, pitrais Ziniy bobos carrier(s) Us ir t. t. (Now in his Lithuanian etymological dictionary iStaisé has been replaced, no longer split in both cases. AGiti For God's sake.) Ty paciy Zemaitéliy present tense sangraziniy actionazZodziy nesys, pletys, kemsys is -y-, I've read about it in one Icelandic magazine, so how do you know how it goes with h,nekeh,i nes-i?, > p. 165. Books by author eal idomo bitty forma raplés Ron, Sv ir kt (LKZ,, 177) greta prisy raples (p. 178). It seems that -riauir -rauvariantai are mainly Zemaitiy snektoje ir it can be grauzgrauz, raukti / raukti, drazé / / di ir daug kity dél *lau rau, > *rid > ra > ro, *riu > ru ir t. t. The verb to lead, vado, vadé is southern aukStai¢iy Zodis, ir * is unnecessary. ga (p. 185). Reikety still remind dél one another Requirements for ZodZio: Salnd, Sdlnq (p. 195) = Sand, Salng (4); nameSa (p. 184) = névesa sub. (1) ar n’evea verb. iltis, -iés (p. 214) = iltis, -ies tempes- (1); ta (i8 dudra) 2. (p. 186) appeared quite recently, po 1930 in time, according to Lithuanian custom to change the newly ir learned words in the case of the place of interjection (K. Baga, Collected Found, Ul, t. at the p. 785). 143 Reviews What surprised me the only form of Word in the book. Instead of the Polish clergyman Cienia, ir the same duchy pony introduced the su tsar's descendant Cienia, Lithuanian intelligentsia of 19 the time. end ir 20 My friend. Patije early Zemaitiy dialect found Zodj kdina (1). Jo net K. Baga did not know, J. Jablonskiui dél Zemaiti8kos prepositions kdina the rest of the second diphthong, maybe saying kding, vard. kaind (but there uzrasé, apparently, already prigudis to "Zemaitiy tarmés fonetikos ir kdina". Part of the miisa Zmoniy uses Earth. I'm not sure, but he's used a different kirey sometimes, (4), especially yesterday. It is an ne inherited form, so historical grammar studies can only examine it as (1), ji exactly agrees su with slavu cena. The first impressi- - on of prof. Habil. Dr. Krakow Scientist W. Smoczyriski’s book is be extremely interesting, important for linguistics, a work of centennial importance, an examination of the historical grammar of the Lithuanian language. One another Gia uZra8yta note can only make you want to fuck j A snow-covered peak (ypaé dél parg ar piry). Vytautas Antanas Vitkauskas Lithuanian Language Institute P. Vileisio g. 5, 10308 Vilnius, Lithuania 144