scieee Open visual document viewer

Linguistic wokeism: Revisionism of the gypsy moth and Asian carp, and fate of the Russian salad

Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

Abstract

The concept of wokeism in academia might represent two radically ideological poles: neoliberally, it is a symbol of socio-cultural liberation, but conservatively, it is a symbol of unnecessary revisionism that tests the limits of traditional culture. Academia is in the belly of this socio-cultural battle. In this discussion, the term “linguistic wokeism” describes an attempt to correct perceived social inequalities through the medium of         language. Two cases are highlighted, the gypsy moth, which was revised to sponge moth (Lymantria dispar), and Asian carp, which was revised to invasive carp. It is argued that “linguistic wokeism” is effectively propagated and established when neoliberal ideologies are aligned among academia, socio-political action groups, and    neoliberal media, including social media. Finally, in the current ongoing Russo-Ukrainian war, early bans on the letters “V” and “Z” in some countries, as a linguistic form of Russophobia, suggests the possibility that geo-political animosities may also be linguistically expressed in neoliberal ways, with a tongue-in-cheek risk being suggested for the Russian salad. The greater risk, in an academic publishing context, if neoliberal revisionist policies are converted into “ethical” policies, is that those who do not agree or align with such policies might be labelled as unethical.

Full text

Ac a Linguis ica Li huanica 2025, ol. 92, pp. 1–8 Con en s link / Tu inio nuo oda ISSN 2669-218X (online / elek oninis) Copy igh © 2025 Jaime A. Teixei a da Sil a. Published by he Ins i u e o he Li huanian Language. This is an Open Access a icle dis ibu ed unde he e ms o he C ea i e Commons A ibu ion Licence, which pe mi s un es ic ed use, dis ibu ion, and ep oduc ion in any medium, p o ided he o iginal au ho and sou ce a e c edi ed. // Išleido Lie u ių kalbos ins i u as. Šis s aipsnis y a a i os p ieigos, pla inamas pagal „C ea i e Commons“ p isky imo licencijos sąlygas, leidžiančias ne ibo ai naudo i, pla in i i a ku i u inį be kokioje laikmenoje, nu odan au o ių i šal inį. Recei ed: / Gau a: 2025-03-26. Accep ed: / P iim a: 2025-05-10. 1 LINGUISTIC WOKEISM: REVISIONISM OF THE GYPSY MOTH AND ASIAN CARP, AND FATE OF THE RUSSIAN SALAD Ling is inis okeizmas: čigonų d ugys i azijinio ka pio e izionizmas bei usiškos miš ainės likimas JAIME A. TEIXEIRA DA SILVA Independen esea che E-mail: [email p o ec ed] ORCID ID: h ps://o cid.o g/0000-0003-3299-2772 Fields o esea ch: biomedical esea ch, science e hics and policy. h ps://doi.o g/10.35321/all92-12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ABSTRACT The concep o wokeism in academia migh ep esen wo adically ideological poles: neolibe ally, i is a symbol o socio-cul u al libe a ion, bu conse a i ely, i is a symbol o unnecessa y e isionism ha es s he limi s o adi ional cul u e. Academia is in he belly o his socio-cul u al ba le. In his discussion, he e m “linguis ic wokeism” desc ibes an a emp o co ec pe cei ed social inequali ies h ough he medium o language. Two cases a e highligh ed, he gypsy mo h, which was e ised o sponge mo h ( Lyman ia dispa ), and Asian ca p, which was e ised o in asi e ca p. I is a gued ha “linguis ic wokeism” is e ec i ely p opaga ed and es ablished when neolibe al ideologies a e aligned among academia, socio-poli ical ac ion g oups, and neolibe al media, including social media. Finally, in he cu en ongoing Russo-Uk ainian wa , ea ly bans on he le e s “V” and “Z” in some coun ies, as a linguis ic o m o Russophobia, sugges s he possibili y ha geo- poli ical animosi ies may also be linguis ically exp essed in neolibe al ways, wi h a ongue-in-cheek isk being sugges ed o he Russian salad. The g ea e isk, in an academic publishing con ex , i neolibe al e isionis policies a e con e ed in o “e hical” policies, is ha hose who do no ag ee o align wi h such policies migh be labelled as une hical. KEYWORDS: media and social media, neolibe al, p ejudice, e isionism, socio-poli ical ideologies. ANOTACIJA Vokeizmo są oka akademinėje bend uomenėje gali ep ezen uo i du ideologinius polius: neolibe aliu požiū iu ji y a sociokul ū inio išsilais inimo simbolis, o konse a y iu požiū iu – ne eikalingo e izionizmo, ku iuo ik inamos adicinės kul ū os ibos, simbolis. Akademinė bend uomenė y a šios sociokul ū inės ko os 2 cen e. Šioje diskusijoje są oka „ling is inis okeizmas“ apibūdina bandymą kalbos p iemonėmis iš aisy i su o- kiamą socialinę nelygybę. Išski iami du a ejai: čigonų d ugys, ku is bu o pakeis as į kempininę kandį ( Lyman ia dispa ), i azijinis ka pis, ku is bu o pakeis as į in azinį ka pį. Teigiama, kad „kalbinis okeiz- mas“ eiksmingai skleidžiamas i į i inamas, kai neolibe alios ideologijos sude inamos a p akademinės bend uomenės, socialinių-poli inių eiksmų g upių i neolibe alios žiniasklaidos, įskai an socialinę žiniasklaidą. Galiausiai yks ančio Rusijos i Uk ainos ka o me u anks y i aidžių „V“ i „Z“ d audimai kai ku iose šalyse, kaip kalbinė uso obijos o ma, leidžia many i, kad geopoli inis p iešiškumas aip pa gali bū i ling is iškai iš eikš as neoli-be aliais būdais, keliančiais iziką usiškai miš ainei. Didesnė izika akademinės leidybos kon ek- s e, jei neolibe ali e izionis inė poli ika pa e čiama „e ine“ poli ika, y a a, kad nesu inkan ys su okia poli ika a jai nep i a ian ys gali bū i į a dy i kaip nee iški. ESMINIAI ŽODŽIAI: žiniasklaida i socialinės medijos, neolibe alus, išanks inis nusis a ymas, e izionizmas, socialinės-poli inės ideologijos. A NOTE ON NEOLIBERAL WOKE CULTURE, AND WOKEISM IN ACADEMIA Depending on whe he a pe son lies o he a le (neolibe al) o a igh (ul aconse a i e o adi ionalis ) o he ideological social ba le ha is sp eading a ound he wo ld, he issue o “woke” may be pe cei ed di e en ly. Using he wo ds o Cowen, wokeism may ep esen a s a e o being “highly awa e o acism and social injus ice, and is gal anized owa d aising awa eness” o membe s he ex eme a -le , bu o membe s he ex eme a - igh , i could ep esen “p eachy, aliena ing, o e ly conce ned wi h symbols and sel - igh eous” 1 . An online dic iona y de ines “woke” h ough a le -leaning p ism, as “awa e o and ac i ely a en i e o impo an ac s and issues (especially issues o acial and social jus ice)” 2 . The neolibe al academic mo emen has induced challenges o issues ela ed o cul u al ideologies, he economy, socie y, and “emo ional in eg i y” (Gai e al. 2021). One angible ou come o he ise in wokeism as a mains eam socio-cul u al phenomenon, and as a buzzwo d in social media, is ha social ac i ism is being ans o med in o a b anding ool o companies, and hus he issue o au hen ici y o he message may become de ac ed om i s o iginal social in en ions (Mi zaei e al. 2022). In hei desi e o c ea e a new and e o med social ab ic, “neolibe al academics emb ace a new se o assump ions and no ms ha s and in sha p elie o many o he alues ha we e p e iously espoused” (Mac a lane 2021). In ex eme cases, in an academic publishing con ex , should neolibe al ideologies no be emb aced, indi iduals may be socially shamed o no accep ing hem, o o emb acing adi ional o conse a i e alues, o hey may exp ess unpopula opinions, any o all o which may lead o an a emp o “cancel” hem, hei oices, and hei in luence, i.e., cancel cul u e (Teixei a da Sil a, 2021). 1 In e ne Access: h ps://www.bloombe g.com/opinion/a icles/2022-02-18/wokeism-has-peaked-in-ame- ica-bu -is-s ill-globally-in luen ial. 2 In e ne Access: h ps://www.me iam-webs e .com/dic iona y/woke. 3 INTRODUCING “LINGUISTIC WOKEISM” In his pape , he concep o “linguis ic wokeism” is in oduced, as a subse o cancel cul u e, and de ined as a neolibe al a emp o co ec pe cei ed social inequali ies h ough language. Mo e explici ly, wo ds ha migh o he wise me ely be wo ds, including common o p ope nouns, a e assigned new and nuanced meanings when placed wi hin a social lash- poin such as ace, gende , o cul u e. In his pape , I ocus on wo common nouns and one p ope noun ha a e associa ed wi h cul u e. The a gumen is made ha when no na ow o widely con lic ing cul u al associa ion o pe cep ion ac ually exis s, such e ms should no be in e p e ed as “ acis ”, disc imina o y, o o he wise o ensi e. Common examples wi h cul u al associa ions, like F ench ies ( ied po a oes), Po uguese man o’ wa ( Physalia physalis ), he Mexican wa e, o Russian oule e, a e es ablished e ms in he English language ha ha e no ye been subjec ed o neolibe al p o es and e o m, o nega i e socio-poli ical pe cep ions. In con as , ano he pa o his a gumen claims ha when eelings o disc imina ion a e in ol ed, hese a e ypically by socio-cul u al o acial g oups ha somehow eel beli led o ul a-sensi ized by such nouns, o g oups ha a e pe haps selec i ely che y-picked by neolibe al ideologies (o by ac ion g oups seeking poli ical o o he gains) o mee a “mino i y” mindse . In hese cases, a se o social ci cums ances a e used o ampli y a social con lic whe e one does no exis , inducing an ac ual s a e o con lic , one in which such wo ds o e ms – ha had p e iously had an innocuous meaning bu we e pu pose ully manipula ed o gi e hem a nega i e conno a ion – may be subjec o censo ship and adicalized sc eening. The e o e, i is u he a gued ha “linguis ic wokeism” does no occu wi hin a con ex ual acuum, bu ins ead equi es, and is bo n om, a s ong socio-cul u al, linguis ic, acial and/o gende -associa ed impe us in o de o i o de elop, o en ampli ied by media o social media. IS THE GYPSY MOTH NOW THE SPONGY MOTH, AND IS THE ASIAN CARP NOW THE INVASIVE CARP? Indi iduals may be de ined by hei cul u al g oups, and ha iden i y can some imes be challenged and associa ed wi h nega i e pe cep ions o , o p ejudices abou , a pa icula g oup o popula ion by o he g oups o cul u es. In some cases, alse pe cep ions may be c ea ed in o de o pu pose ully induce a s a e o social con lic . Such p ejudices may become en enched and nega i e s igma iza ion may become ampli ied i he g oup is classi ied as an e hnic mino i y, such as he Roma o “Gypsy” (Mo ei a e al. 2022). In he ligh o his neolibe al e hnic sensi i i y, e isionis linguis ic policies ha e now associa ed he e m “gypsy” wi h a o m o p ejudice o acism. Consequen ly, e ms ha migh employ he wo d “gypsy” may be sociologically and linguis ically challenged o e o m by neolibe al academics o mo emen s. As one angible example, en omologis s a ound he wo ld ha e known Lyman ia dispa as he gypsy mo h, as i s common English name. Despi e his, he En omological Socie y o Ame ica (ESA) ook i upon hemsel es – imposingly o e looking o no 4 conside ing he opinions o en omological socie ies a ound he wo ld – o e ise he common name o “spongy mo h” in he Common Names o Insec s and Rela ed O ganisms Lis , and sough o implemen his change globally by 2023 (ESA 2022). Tha campaign was aided, among o he s, by le -leaning neolibe al US media ou le s such as CNN and, as e ealed a /by CNN, a US-based socio-poli ical p o-Roma ac ion g oup was linked wi h his decision 3 . Why should en omologis s a ound he wo ld – especially hose ha may w i e o English academic jou nals – abide by he decision and a ionale o he ESA, and is his a new o m o neo- colonial esea ch ha has become disguised as a o m o “ esea ch excellence” (Neylon 2020), in which he alue sys ems o a de eloped na ion (o an o ganiza ion wi hin i ) impose hei alue sys em on o he less powe ul and in luen ial de eloping na ions? A simila cul u ally o e -sensi i e ca ego iza ion o an in asi e ish in he US, he Asian ca p, coupled wi h poli iciza ion – o pe haps acializa ion – o he issue, led lawmake s in Minneso a 4 o in oduce a bill ha he Asian ca p should be known as in asi e ca p, wi h le -leaning news media ou le s like CNN 5 p omo ing his social e o m p og am wi h well- es ablished neolibe al “ acis ” a gumen s. In his case, he poo ish was in some way made esponsible o humans’ con lic ing pe cep ions. IS THE RUSSIAN SALAD DOOMED? In he con ex o he ongoing Russo-Uk ainian wa , in pa icula by “Wes e n” na ions ha ha e been p o iding mili a y and o he suppo o Uk aine, coupled wi h economic sanc ions agains Russia, a nega i e associa ion became es ablished no only wi h he coun y, bu also wi h he wo d “Russia”. Will neolibe al academics, in his clima e, seek o e ise e ms ha include “Russia”? As one example, will neolibe al socio-poli ical e isionis s seek o call he Russian salad some hing else ha excludes he e m “Russian”? Howe e , wha happened wi h he gypsy mo h and Asian ca p migh se e as indica o s o wha migh be all e ms like “Russian salad”, e en i he e m desc ibes an innocuous ood i em. One ac ic o educe Russia’s s a u e is by delibe a ely beli ling i by e e ing o i as “ ussia” 6 , i.e., emo ing he capi aliza ion o he i s le e ha ypi ies p ope nouns, as in coun y names. Ano he is by banning he le e s o he alphabe “V” and “Z”, which ha e been used symbolically by Russia du ing his wa wi h Uk aine, while also applying ines and c iminal p osecu ion 7 . Howe e , he la e app oach may become un enable, especially i one 3 In e ne Access: h ps://edi ion.cnn.com/2022/03/04/wo ld/gypsy-mo h-spongy-mo h-name-change- scn/index.h ml. 4 In e ne Access: h ps://www. e iso .mn.go /bills/ ex .php?numbe =SF2806& e sion=la es &ses- sion=ls88&session_yea =2014&session_numbe =0. 5 In e ne Access: h ps://edi ion.cnn.com/2021/07/18/us/asian-in asi e-ca p- ename-scn- nd/index.h ml. 6 In e ne Access: h ps:// o be e science.com/2022/07/13/ge manys-hi le -cul - hough s-on- ussias-wa - on-uk aine/. 7 As examples: La ia (In e ne Access: h ps://www.eu onews.com/2022/03/31/la ian-pa liamen -app o es- ban-on- ussian-mili a y-symbols- -and-z), Es onia (In e ne Access: h ps:// wi e .com/Eu omaidan- P ess/s a us/1512996386547060741), Moldo a (In e ne Access: h ps://in e ax.com/news oom/ op- 5 conside s ha ano he le e “O” 8 , is also used by one Russian ba le g oup, while he V-symbol du ing pho o-ops, especially by high-p o ile Uk ainian allies, akes on a c inge- wo hy i ony 9 , while i s use by he Is aeli IDF on i s own anks in he ongoing Is aeli- Pales inian wa 10 , makes banning his le e by Wes e n allies o Is ael, o hose na ions ha ha e allied agains i s ban due o Russian use, a con lic ing si ua ion. I also seems i onic ha , despi e he ban o hese symbols in Uk aine by he Ve kho na Rada o Uk aine (Uk ainian Pa liamen ) 11 , ha Uk ainian social news media channels used hese symbols o e e o he mo emen s o Russian oops 12 . Thus, a e media and social media accoun s ha employ hese banned le e s 13 also, by associa ion, banned? Wha would happen i all 26 le e s o he English alphabe we e o be co-op ed in o mili a y campaigns, how hen should he English language and i s alphabe be in e p e ed? Would language and ee communica ion be banned? E en i some o hese linguis ic aspec s appea i ial, hey collec i ely become o ms o Russophobia (Diesen, 2022), wi h geo-poli ical ami ica ions, including a emp s o “decolonize” Russia 14 . Those in ehemen disag eemen wi h his p oposal should e lec on how hey migh eel i hei own na ion was e e ed o, in an ac o pu pose ul linguis ic denig a ion, as “uk aine”, “usa”, “uk”, “japan”, o “ge many” o eplace and beli le Uk aine, USA, UK, Japan, o Ge many, espec i ely. THE WIDER RISKS OF NEOLIBERAL REVISIONIST POLICIES In his pape , i has been a gued ha wokeism is no me ely a social ool o a emp ing o co ec , some imes in an appa en ly a bi a y way, an ac ual o pe cei ed social injus ice o p ejudice. I has in ac become a powe ul socio-poli ical ool, and so powe o social e o m, p o ided ha he messaging and e o ma i e objec i es o neolibe al academia, socio-poli ical g oups, and media a e aligned. In he la e case, libe al media, as well as social media (including X hash ags) can se e as messaging pla o ms o ampli y he message. The socio- poli ical s uggles o mino i y g oups o popula ions ha ha e “ adi ionally” been p o iled o o he wise associa ed wi h a nega i e s igma canno be denied. In such cases, i can be a gued s o ies/78365/) and Ge many (In e ne Access: h ps://www.ju is .o g/news/2022/03/ge many- o-c iminally- p osecu e-indi iduals-who-display-p o- ussia-wa -symbol-z/). 8 In e ne Access: h ps:// .me/RV oenko /15752. 9 In e ne Access: h ps:// .me/ uexanewsua/42447. 10 In e ne Access: h ps://socialbi es.ca/la es -news/391065.h ml. 11 In e ne Access: h ps:// .me/ uexanewsua/41185; h ps:// .me/ uexanewsua/47887; h ps:// .me/RV oenko /13170. 12 In e ne Access: h ps:// .me/ uexanewsua/48880; h ps:// .me/ uexanewsua/48925; h ps:// .me/ uexanewsua/49159. 13 As one example: In e ne Access h ps:// .me/s/milin oli e. 14 In e ne Access: h ps://www.csce.go /in e na ional-impac /p ess-and-media/p ess- eleases/decoloniza- ion- ussia-be-discussed-upcoming. 6 ha co ec i e measu es a e wa an ed. Howe e , i can also be a gued ha he co ec ion o his o y, as well as cul u al a i udes and policies, may be excessi e i hey also in ol e ex eme e isionis policies o wo ds, such as common o p ope nouns. This is because he use o such “objec s” o poli ical objec i ica ion (o de-objec i ica ion) may i sel pose a deon ological p oblem, i.e., u ning an insec o ish in o a “ ool” o “weapon” o d i e la ge and mo e ambi ious socio-poli ical ideologies, and hus po en ial unding o speci ic ac ion g oups wi h a socio-poli ical agenda. Thus, “linguis ic wokeism”, as a neolibe al phenomenon o he weaponiza ion o language, equi es g ea e a en ion, sc u iny, and deba e. Many academics migh no pay close a en ion o his opic, o hey migh conside i o be un ela ed o hei wo k, o i ele an . They may e en ind i o be oo poli ically cha ged and hus oo isky o deba e, o ea o pee e alia ion. Howe e , hey should ake no ice now be o e i is oo la e, i.e., be o e legal bills and laws a e enac ed, because he e a e e y p ac ical implica ions i adical neolibe al policies a e no ca e ully e ed and s opped. Fo example, i neolibe al policies become excessi e, o i hey a e de e mined by a mino i y o he majo i y, such as ESA’s gypsy mo h policy implemen ed o global en omologis s, wi hou any democ a ic p ocess o choice by he academics o en omological specialis s o o he na ions, hen i becomes an ex ended mo al issue associa ed wi h au ho s’ igh s, o mo e accu a ely, a iola ion o hei igh s o choice (Al-Kha ib, Teixei a da Sil a, 2017). In his case, an a i icially c ea ed alue sys em is o ce ully imposed on en omologis s’ igh s o name a Gypsy mo h as such, including in an academic pape . I he use o such “undesi able” e ms becomes ou lawed in academia, his will be equa ed wi h an e hical issue, and he au ho s o academic pape s migh ind hemsel es ha ing o o ce ully co ec hei pape s, o i hey a e esis an o such edi o ial policies, e ac hem. Such cases, which may seemingly be innocuous socio-poli ical ideologies, migh become ans o med in o e y powe ul pseudo-e hical policies pu in o p ac ice by jou nals o publishe s wi h a e o ma i e socio-poli ical ideology. I so, his would ul ima ely empowe some academics, bu delegi imize he igh s o o he s. In essence, adical neolibe al policies a e playing Russian oule e wi h alue sys ems in academic publishing, a emp ing o con ound socially sensi i e issues wi h e hics and igh s. This opic is a ely, i e e , deba ed in academic jou nals. NEOLIBERAL REVISIONIST POLICIES IN PRACTICE: IS CORRECTION OF THE ACADEMIC LITERATURE WARRANTED? As one example, and o a gumen ’s sake, as was no ed abo e, he ESA unila e ally implemen ed a name change o he gypsy mo h. Howe e , he e a e housands o pape s ha ha e, o da e, employed he e m gypsy mo h o desc ibe L. dispa , as e idenced in some majo da abases o sea ch engines like he Web o Science, Scopus, PubMed, o Google Schola . Fo now, acco ding o hei websi e’s s a emen s, he ESA has a emp ed o ansi ion global en omologis s o – using e y empha ic language and p omo ion ia mass media – 7 adop sponge mo h o eplace gypsy mo h, which could be conside ed as he “indoc ina ion” s age. In his s age, including h ough he use o libe al and/o social media, socie y and en omologis s a ound he wo ld a e being “condi ioned” o accep his neolibe al change as he new accep ed “no mal”. Thus, by associa ion, hey a e also – pe haps inad e en ly – also accep ing i s socio-poli ical message, i.e., ha he e m “gypsy” is p ejudicial, and by associa ion, so is he innocen mo h. Howe e , his seemingly innocuous s age could be ollowed by a mo e imposi ional (o agg essi e) phase o policy c ea ion and implemen a ion. In ha case, he in eg a ion o a neolibe al policy becomes mo e o ce ul, such as manda ing academics who wish o con inue e e ing o L. dispa as he gypsy mo h o make hem adop , by “ o ce”, he e m “sponge mo h”, o he Asian ca p as in asi e ca p. How hen can en o cemen ake place? One way would be o in oduce “e hical” policies in o en omological jou nals ha would s a e ha academics mus con o m o his e m, i.e., a manda o y clause migh be inse ed in o a jou nal’s e hical policies o ins uc ions o au ho s. I could ecei e a s amp o app o al by neolibe al globalis e hics policy g oups ha migh suppo linguis ic e isionis ideologies. As was alluded o abo e, he condi ioning s age can also be simul aneously accompanied by a p ocess o social shaming, e e ing o hose who do no adop newly imposed and supposedly “neu al” e ms as acis , in ole an , o une hical, he eby a emp ing o cancel hem – as well as hei opinions and choices – in his p ocess. In ex eme cases, should, in he u u e, he ESA manda e he use o “sponge mo h” as a jou nal’s e hical equi emen , he e may be mo e se ious implica ions. As one example, ESA (o i s p oponen s) may eques au ho s o pape s o e oac i ely “co ec ” pape s ha used he e m “gypsy mo h” o desc ibe L. dispa . A ha ime, i such policies we e o be implemen ed, a leas hypo he ically, hen cu en co ec i e measu es o he academic li e a u e (Teixei a da Sil a, 2022) may become “weaponized”, and used as socio-poli ical ools o neolibe al e o m, h ough language. Fo his eason, academics on bo h sides o he e isionis a gumen , as well as hose who will su ely be impac ed by such policies, need o become mo e p oac i e and ocal. They also need o exe hei igh s, and p o es decisions ha hey migh no ag ee wi h, whe he hose be conse a i e o neolibe al. Ul ima ely, academics need o s i e o c ea e a publishing en i onmen ha hey a e com o able wi h, ha se es he majo i y while espec ing and/o ecognizing he mino i y, and does no se e as ano he pla o m o ampli y o o i y he objec i es o socio-poli ical policies, o he “socially esponsible” b anding objec i es o ac ion g oups o co po a ions, including some publishe s. LIMITATIONS This po en ially polemic essay is no a deba e on he e hics o wa , so he issue o he his o ical, poli ical o socio-cul u al backg ound o he ongoing Russo-Uk ainian wa a e no conside ed, e en hough some may a gue ha i migh se e o explain he exis ence o some o ms o Russophobia. 8 REFERENCES Al-Kha ib Aceil, Teixei a da Sil a Jaime A. 2017: Wha igh s do au ho s ha e? – Science and Enginee ing E hics 23(3), 947–949. DOI: h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s11948-016- 9808-8. Diesen Glenn 2022: Russophobia. P opaganda in In e na ional Poli ics , Singapo e: Sp inge Na u e Singapo e P e L d. DOI: h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/978-981-19-1468-3. ESA 2022: Spongy Mo h T ansi ion Toolki . In e ne Access: h ps://en soc.o g/publica ions/common-names/spongy-mo h [accessed 26.3.2025]. Gai Susan, Hage Tama , He zog Om i 2021: Compliance and Resis ance Wi hin Neolibe al Academia , Swi ze land: Sp inge Na u e. DOI: h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/978-3-030- 66318-6. Mac a lane B uce 2021: The neolibe al academic: Illus a ing shi ing academic no ms in an age o hype -pe o ma i i y. – Educa ional Philosophy and Theo y 53(5), 459–468. DOI: h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/00131857.2019.1684262. Mi zaei Abas, Wilkie Dean C., Siuki Helen 2022: Woke b and ac i ism au hen ici y o he lack o i . – Jou nal o Business Resea ch 139, 1–12. DOI: h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jbus es.2021.09.044. Mo ei a Tânia, Rosá io Ped o, Aze edo Raquel, Núñez José C., Fuen es Sonia 2022: Li ing on a double-edged swo d: In e gene a ional pe spec i es o women om Gypsy g oups abou he in luence o educa ion on cul u al iden i y. – In e na ional Jou nal o Educa ional Resea ch 111, 101915. DOI: h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.ije .2021.101915. Neylon Came on 2020: Resea ch excellence is a neo-colonial agenda (and wha migh be done abou i ). – T ans o ming Resea ch Excellence: New Ideas om he Global Sou h , eds. E. K aeme -Mbula, R. Tijssen, M. L. Wallace, R. McLean, Cape Town: A ican Minds, 92–115. Teixei a da Sil a Jaime A. 2021: How o shape academic eedom in he digi al age? A e he e ac ions o opiniona ed pape s a p elude o “cancel cul u e” in academia? – Cu en Resea ch in Beha io al Sciences 2 , 100035. DOI: h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.c beha.2021.100035. Teixei a da Sil a Jaime A. 2022: A syn hesis o he o ma s o co ec ing e oneous and audulen academic li e a u e, and associa ed challenges. – Jou nal o Gene al Philosophy o Science 53(4), 583–599. DOI: h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s10838-022- 09607-4.