1
Composi e nano ib ous memb anes o PLGA/Aloe e a con aining lipid nanopa icles o
wound d essing applica ions
I xaso Ga cia-O ue 1,2, Ga azi Gainza3, Pa icia Ga cia-Ga cia4, F ancisco Bo ja Gu ie ez5, Jose Ja ie Agui e3,5, Rosa Ma ia
He nandez1,2, A aceli Delgado5, Manoli Iga ua1,2
1 NanoBioCel G oup, Labo a o y o Pha maceu ics, School o Pha macy, Uni e si y o he Basque Coun y (UPV/EHU).
2 Biomedical Resea ch Ne wo king Cen e in Bioenginee ing, Bioma e ials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN). Vi o ia-Gas eiz, Spain.
3 Biop axis Resea ch AIE, Miñano, Vi o ia-Gas eiz.
4 Depa men o Chemical Enginee ing and Pha maceu ical Technology, School o Pha macy, Ins i u e o Biomedical Technologies
(ITB), Cen e o Biomedical Resea ch o he Cana y Islands (CIBICAN), Uni e si y o La Laguna, Tene i e, Spain
5 Hospi al Uni e si a io de Ála a (HUA) Txago i xu, Vi o ia-Gas eiz, 01009, Spain.
M. Iga ua (manoli.iga [email protected]) and A. Delgado ([email protected]) equally sha e c edi o senio au ho ship.
*Co esponding au ho : A. Delgado
Depa men o Chemical Enginee ing and Pha maceu ical Technology. School o Pha macy. Uni e si y o La Laguna, Tene i e,
Spain.
Telephone: +34922318507
Fax: +34922318506
E-mail: [email protected]
**Co esponding au ho : M. Iga ua
Labo a o y o Pha maceu ics, Uni e si y o he Basque Coun y. School o Pha macy, Paseo de la Uni e sidad, 7. 01006 – Vi o ia-
Gas eiz, Spain
Telephone: +34 945013007
Fax: +34 945013040
E-mail: manoli.iga [email protected]
ABSTRACT
Elec ospun nano ib ous d essings p esen sui able cha ac e is ics o be used in wound
healing, such as high po osi y and high su ace a ea- o- olume a io. In his s udy, a wound
d essing based on PLGA and Aloe e a con aining lipid nanopa icles (NLCs) was de eloped.
NLCs we e added in o de o add a lipid componen ha could a oid he adhesion o he
d essing o he wound and imp o e i s handling. Memb anes wi h and wi hou NLCs we e
composed o uni o m ibe s o abou 1 µm in diame e . Thei po osi y was abo e 80 % and
hei hickness was abou 160 µm. Bo h d essings showed simila wa e apou ansmission
a e 1100 g/m2day. The o mula ion con aining NLCs p esen ed a highe ul ima e ensile
s eng h (2.61 ± 0.46 MPa) and a highe wa e up ake. Bo h o mula ions we e biocompa ible
in i o. Fu he mo e, he cell adhesion assay demons a ed ha bo h memb anes had a low
adhe ence p o ile, al hough i was lowe wi h he d essing con aining NLCs. Finally, hei
e icacy was e alua ed in a ull hickness wound healing assay conduc ed in db/db mice, whe e
bo h enhanced healing simila ly. Acco dingly, he PLGA-AV-NLC memb ane migh be a
p omising s a egy o he ea men o ch onic wounds, since i imp o ed handling in
compa ison o he o mula ion wi hou NLCs.
KEYWORDS
Elec ospinning, wound healing, Aloe e a, PLGA, lipid nanopa icles, db/db mice
This is he accep ed manusc ip o he a icle ha appea ed in inal o m in In e na ional Jou nal o Pha maceu ics 556 : 320-329
(2019), which has been published in inal o m a h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.ijpha m.2018.12.010. © 2018 Else ie unde
CC BY-NC-ND license (h p://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
2
1. In oduc ion
Elec ospinning is a echnique o ob ain memb anes composed o polyme ic nano ibe s, which
uses elec ic o ce o elu e nano ibe s om a polyme ic solu ion. Due o he elec os a ic
epulsion p oduced by he applica ion o high ol age cha ges o he solu ion, he polyme ic
d ople is s e ched and ejec ed o he collec o . The inal nano ibe s a e o med du ing he
ejec ion p ocess in which sol en is e apo a ed, allowing he a i al o solid nano ibe s o he
collec o (Felguei as and Amo im 2017; Liu, e al. 2017). This p ocess p oduces memb anes
composed o nonwo en polyme ic nano ibe s ha mimic he h ee dimensional s uc u e o
ex acellula ma ix (Ab igo, e al. 2014). Thei dis inc i e cha ac e is ics a e high po osi y and
a high su ace a ea- o- olume a io. Those p ope ies make hem sui able o de elop d essings
o wound healing, as hey allow gas pe mea ion and hus cells b ea hing (Ga cia-O ue, e al.
2017). In addi ion, hey help o egula e wound mois u e, enhancing issue egene a ion
(Ma hew S. B own, e al. 2018), since hey p omo e he emo al o exuda es om he wound
bed, and hey e ain mois u e o p e en wound desicca ion (Pachuau 2015). Fu he mo e, he
small size o he po es hinde s he en ance o mic oo ganisms, and hus wound in ec ion
(Felguei as and Amo im 2017).
Resea ch o de elop no el wound d essings has gained impo ance due o he g ea inc ease
in ch onic wound incidence; in ac , only in he US, ch onic wounds annually a ec 5.7 million
people (a ound 2% o he popula ion) and cos $20 billions (Jä b ink, e al. 2017). A ac o
in ol ed in ha g ow h is he ise o diseases associa ed wi h wound ch onici y, such as,
diabe es, enous insu iciency and obesi y (Han and Ceilley 2017; Sen, e al. 2009). Wounds
occu ing in pa ien s su e ing hose diseases, usually ail o p og ess h ough he o ganized
s eps o physiological healing ha comp ises he ollowing subsequen bu o e lapping phases:
hemos asis, in lamma ion, p oli e a ion and emodelling phase (Diegelmann and E ans 2004;
Velna , e al. 2009). Ch onic wounds emain s agna ed in o he in lamma o y phase, wi h a
cons an in il a ion o mac ophages and neu ophils o he wound bed (Sch eml, e al. 2010).
Those cells sec e e a g ea amoun o p oin lamma o y cy okines and p o eases, ha deg ade
healing media o s and ex acellula ma ix and hampe he o ma ion o new epi helia, leading
o a delay in healing (B iquez, e al. 2015; Velna , e al. 2009).
In he cu en s udy, we de eloped a composi e nano ib ous memb ane o PLGA (poly lac ic-
co-glycolide acid) and Aloe e a ex ac con aining lipid nanopa icles (nanos uc u ed lipid
ca ie s o NLC) (Ga cia-O ue, e al. 2016a). PLGA is a syn he ic polyme which has good
biocompa ibili y and biodeg adabili y (Che eddy, e al. 2016). In compa ison o na u al
polyme s, i p esen s some ad an ages, among which a e lowe p ice; well-de ined s uc u e
3
and deg ada ion kine ics; eliabili y (Ga g, e al. 2015b); be e mechanical p ope ies, ha
make hem mo e easily elec ospinable (Ga g, e al. 2015a); and he p esence o lac a e as a
deg ada ion p oduc , which has p o en o accele a e wound healing (Po po a o, e al. 2012).
In o de o imp o e he wound healing p ope ies o he PLGA nano ibe s, hey we e also
composed o Aloe e a, which has been widely used in wound healing since ancien imes (Da ,
e al. 2012), because i has shown o p omo e healing in addi ion o i s an i-in lamma o y,
an i ungal, an ibac e ial and hypoglycemic p ope ies (Choi and Chung 2003). Due o he
ac ion o glucomannan, Aloe e a a ec s ib oblas g ow h ac o (FGF), s imula ing he ac i i y
and p oli e a ion o ib oblas , and hus, enhancing hei collagen p oduc ion and sec e ion, as
well as he ans e sal connec ion among collagen chains (Hashemi, e al. 2015; Su jushe, e al.
2008). In addi ion, Aloe e a con ains some i amins, amino acids and an h aquinones in ol ed
in he enhancemen o wound healing due o hei an ioxidan ac i i y (Boud eau and Beland
2006). Finally, i is no ewo hy o men ion ha due o i s an imic obial ac i i y, Aloe e a can
help in he p e en ion o wound in ec ion (Hashemi, e al. 2015). Fo all he abo e easons,
Aloe e a has been al eady used o de elop nano ib ous wound d essings using di e en
polyme s. In ha ega d, a esea ch g oup de eloped a nano ib ous d essing composed o
poly- cap olac one (PCL), silk ib oin, cu cumin and Aloe e a ex ac . The o al con en o Aloe
e a was 16.6 % (w/w), and he d essing showed sui able p ope ies o be used as a wound
d essing (Ka uppuswamy, e al. 2014). The combina ion o silk ib oin and Aloe e a was used
o de elop ano he wo d essings. The i s one was composed o Aloe e a (25% w/w), silk
ib oin and poly-lac ic-co-ε-cap olac one (PLLA) and i showed a a ou able e ec in ib oblas
p oli e a ion and collagen sec e ion (Suganya, e al. 2014). The second one was composed o
Aloe e a (10-20% w/w), silk ib oin and poly( inyl) alcohol nano ibe s which had loaded s a ch
nanopa icles con aining i amin E, and i was able o imp o e ib oblas a achmen ,
p oli e a ion and collagen deposi ion due o Aloe e a and i amin E (Khe ad a , e al. 2018).
In a pos e io s udy ca ied ou by ou esea ch g oup, a nano ib ous memb ane composed o
PLGA, Aloe e a (50% w/w) and EGF was de eloped and was able o imp o e ib oblas
p oli e a ion in i o and eepi helisa ion and wound closu e in a ull hickness wounds in lic ed
o db/db mice (Ga cia-O ue, e al. 2016a). Finally, Jouyba e al. de eloped a poly-L-lac ic acid
(PLLA) nano ib ous memb ane and hey coa ed i wi h esh Aloe e a gel. In i o, he
d essings accele a ed wound healing in a ull hickness skin de ec in lic ed o mice (Jouyba , e
al. 2017).
T adi ionally, p ima y d essings ha e been imp egna ed in aseline o pa a in o p e en
adhesion o he wound su ace. Ne e heless, he lipid componen equen ly was abso bed
4
in o he seconda y d essing o in he wound, d ying he p ima y d essing and inc easing he
isk o adhe ence o he wound (Benbow 2002; Da id, e al. 2018). In o de o a oid ha
limi a ion, U go ul™ was de eloped, a non-occlusi e hin shee composed o a polyes e ne
imp egna ed wi h hyd ocolloid pa icles dispe sed in a pe oleum jelly ma ix. In con ac wi h
wound exuda es he hyd ocolloid pa icles hyd a e, and join ly wi h he pe oleum jelly, hey
o m a lipido-colloid in e phase ha p e en wound adhe ence (Benbow and Iosson 2004; Tan,
e al. 2009). Conside ing his, in he p esen s udy, NLCs we e inco po a ed o he PLGA/Aloe
e a o mula ion in o de o add a lipid componen ha could a oid adhesion o he wound.
The NLCs we e dis ibu ed in he PLGA nano ib ous s uc u e du ing he elec ospinning
p ocess, in o de o a oid i s di usion o he seconda y d essing and hus, dec ease he isk o
adhe ence. Fu he mo e, we hypo hesise ha he addi ion o he NLCs could imp o e some
ea u es o he d essing, such as, handling, elas ici y and occlusi i y. The ab ica ed
nano ib ous PLGA-AV-NLC memb anes we e subjec ed o physical, mechanical and
cy ocompa ibili y e alua ion. Thei wound healing e icacy was assessed in i o in a splin ed
ull hickness wound model pe o med in diabe ic db/db mice.
2. Ma e ial and me hods
2.1 Nano ibe s p epa a ion
PLGA-AV-NLC nano ibe s we e p oduced elec ospinning an emulsion con aining all he
componen s. The o ganic phase was composed o 300 mg o PLGA (Resome , LG824; E onik,
Ge many) in o 2.5 ml o hexa luo oisop opanol (HFIP, Fluka, Swi ze land), and he aqueous
phase was composed o 300 mg o Aloe e a ex ac (Ago a Valencia SL:, Spain) and 30 mg o
NLCs in 1.2 ml o a 0.5 % (w/ ) PVA solu ion. To c ea e he emulsion bo h phases we e
o exed a le el 10 o 3 min (Vo ex-Genie 2, Scien i ic Indus ies Inc., USA). The esul ing
emulsion was loaded in o a Lue -lock sy inge (No m-Jec ) con aining a 14 G needle and
a ached o a pump (Ha a d Appa a us, MA) ha p o ided a low a e o 2.7 mL/h. The
nano ibe s we e elec ospun ho izon ally on a o a ing collec o (250 pm) loca ed a 8 cm
om he needle, unde 10 kV powe supply. Simila ly, PLGA-AV nano ibe s we e p epa ed
wi hou adding NLCs o he aqueous phase.
The NLCs inco po a ed in o he nano ibe s we e p epa ed ollowing he p ocedu e desc ibed
p e iously by ou esea ch g oup (Gainza, e al. 2014; Gainza, e al. 2015; Ga cia-O ue, e al.
2016b). B ie ly, an aqueous phase composed o 40 mg o Tween® 80 (Pan eac, Spain) and 20
mg o Poloxame 188 (Pan eac, Spain) in 3 ml MilliQ wa e and a lipid phase composed o 200
mg o P eci ol® ATO 5 (Ga e ossé Spain, Spain) and 20 mg o Mygliol 812N (Sasol Ge many
5
GmbH), we e hea ed sepa a ely un il he lipid phase mel ed in o a clea solu ion (40 °C). Then,
he aqueous phase was added o he lipid phase and he mix u e was sonica ed o 15 s a 50
W (B anson® 250 Soni ie , CT, USA). The esul ing emulsion was s o ed a 4°C o e nigh o
allow he e-c ys allisa ion o he lipid.
I is no ewo hy o men ion ha be o e he in i o and in i o s udies he memb anes we e
s e ilised by keeping hem unde UV ligh o 30 min.
2.2 Nanopa icle and nano ibe s cha ac e isa ion
The mean pa icle size (Z-a e age diame e ) and he polydispe si y index (PDI) o he NLCs
inco po a ed in o he nano ibe s we e measu ed h ough Dynamic Ligh Sca e ing (DLS) and
hei ze a po en ial was de e mined by Lase Dopple mic o-elec opho esis (Mal e n®
Ze asize Nano ZS, Model Zen 3600; Mal e n ins umen s L d., UK). The elec opho e ic
mobili y was measu ed in wa e (pH 5.6) and i was con e ed in o ze a po en ial h ough he
Smoluchowski app oxima ion.
The mo phology o he nano ib ous memb anes, namely, ibe diame e and memb ane
quali y, was assessed using Scanning Elec on Mic oscopy pho og aphs (SEM, Jeol JSM-6300)
and hei hickness was measu ed using s e eo mic oscopy pho og aphs (Leica M205 C, Leica
LAS, 3 so wa e, Ge many). Memb ane’s po osi y (P) was calcula ed using he ollowing
equa ion (Eq. 1):
P (%)=�1 − ρapp
ρ eal� x 100 (1)
Whe e ρ eal is he eal densi y ha was assessed by means o a helium pycnome e
(Mic ome i ics, AccuPyc 1330, USA); and ρapp is he appa en densi y ha was calcula ed
di iding he weighed mass o he memb anes by hei olume (leng h × wid h × heigh ).
The mono onic ensile es s o bo h d essings (PLGA-AV and PLGA-AV-NLC memb anes) we e
pe o med unde displacemen con ol on a ex u e analyse , using a 5 N ull scale load cell
(Ins on 5848 mic o es e , Ins on®, UK). The samples we e loaded a a displacemen a e o
0.01 mm/s up o up u e. The load-displacemen cu e ob ained om hose es s was
ans o med in o a s ess-s ain cu e and he ul ima e ensile s eng h was ob ained om i .
A leas 5 samples we e es ed om each memb ane and he esul s we e shown as mean ±
s anda d de ia ion (SD).
To de e mine he wa e up ake o he di e en nano ib ous memb anes 1.3x1.3 cm pieces o
he memb anes we e cu and weighed. Then, he samples we e imme sed in 1 ml o PBS and
6
incuba ed a 37°C o 72 h. A e incuba ion, he excess o wa e was d ied blo ing hem wi h
il e pape and hey we e weighed again o calcula e he wa e up ake using he ollowing
equa ion (Eq. 2):
Wa e up ake (%) = M−M0
M0×100 (2)
Whe e M0 and M a e he mass o he memb anes be o e and a e 72 h incuba ion in PBS,
espec i ely.
The Wa e Vapou T ansmission Ra e (WVTR) o he memb anes was quan i ied ollowing a
modi ied p ocedu e o he me hod desc ibed by Li e al. (Li, e al. 2013). The mou h o a cup
illed wi h silica gel desiccan (1 cm in diame e ) was ho oughly sealed wi h a piece o he
nano ib ous memb ane, o make he memb ane he only way wa e apou could en e o he
cup. The assembly was weighed and placed in a chambe wi h a cons an ela i e humidi y o
75% a 30°C. A e 24 h, he assembly was weighed again o calcula e he WVTR h ough he
ollowing equa ion (Eq. 3):
WVTR =M1−M0
A × T (3)
Whe e M0 is he weigh o he assembly a he beginning o he assay, M1 is i s weigh a e he
incuba ion ime, T is he exposu e ime (1 day) and A is he exposu e a ea (0.79 cm2).
The he mal beha iou o he nano ib ous memb anes, he physical blend o hei componen s
and he componen s hemsel es was analysed using Di e en ial Scanning Calo ime y (DSC-50,
Shimadzu, Japan). 1-2 mg o each sample was weighed and sealed in o an aluminium pan.
Then, he samples we e hea ed om 25°C o 350°C a a hea ing a e o 10°C pe minu e.
2.3 In i o cell cul u e s udies
2.3.1 Cell cul u e
The cell lines used in his s udy we e HaCaT ke a inocy es and BalbC/3T3 A31 ib oblas s
(ATCC, Manassas, USA). The i s one was cul u ed on Dulbecco’s modi ied Eagle’s medium
(DMEM) (41965-039, Gibco®, Ma, USA) supplemen ed wi h 10% ( / ) oe al bo ine se um
(FBS) and 1% ( / ) penicillin-s ep omycin. The ib oblas s we e cul u ed on DMEM (30-2202,
ATCC, Manassas, USA) supplemen ed wi h 10% ( / ) oe al cal se um (FCS) and 1% ( / )
penicillin-s ep omycin. Cell lines we e incuba ed in a humidi ied incuba o a 37°C wi h a 5%
CO2 a mosphe e and cell passages we e done e e y 2-3 days depending on he cell line.
2.3.2 Cell iabili y s udies
7
The e ec o he nano ib ous memb anes on cell iabili y was assessed incuba ing hei
ex ac ed medium wi h ib oblas and ke a inocy es. The cells we e seeded in a 96 well-pla e,
ib oblas s a a densi y o 6000 cell/well and ke a inocy es a 12000 cell/well.
Cells we e cul u ed o e nigh o allow cell a achmen , and hen, he ollowing samples we e
added: (i) s a ing medium as nega i e con ol, (ii) medium incuba ed wi h a 1x1 cm piece o
PLGA-AV memb ane o 24 hou s, (iii) medium incuba ed wi h a 1x1 cm piece o PLGA-AV-NLC
memb ane o 24 hou s. The s a ing medium o he con ol and samples incuba ed wi h
HaCaT cells, was DMEM con aining 0.5% ( / ) o FBS and o he samples incuba ed wi h
ib oblas s was DMEM wi h 0.2% ( / ) o FCS.
Cells we e incuba ed wi h he samples o 48 h, and a e wa ds he iabili y was assessed using
a CCK-8 ki (cell coun ing ki -8, Sigma-Ald ich, Sain Louise, USA). B ie ly, 10 µL o he CCK-8
eagen was added o he cells. A e 4 hou s o incuba ion he abso bance o he mix u e was
ead a 450 nm, using 650 nm as e e ence wa eleng h (Pla e Reade In ini e M200, Tecan,
Swi ze land). The abso bance and he numbe o li ing cells in each well we e di ec ly
p opo ional.
2.3.3 Adhesion assay
The abili y o he cells o adhe e o he nano ib ous memb anes was e alua ed by seeding cells
on op o hem and measu ing he numbe o adhe ed cells a e an incuba ion ime. PLGA-AV
and PLGA-AV-NLC memb anes we e cu in disks o 14 mm in diame e and ixed o he bo om
o 24 well-pla es using 10 µl o ib in as adhesi e. Memb anes we e incuba ed o 30 min o
allow he o ma ion o ib in clo and hen cells we e seeded on op o hem, ib oblas a a
densi y o 20,000 cells/well and ke a inocy es a a densi y o 40,000 cells/well. Con ol wells
we e also seeded wi h he same cell densi y.
Cells we e incuba ed o e nigh o allow hei a achmen o he memb anes. Then,
memb anes we e washed wi h PBS and cells we e de ached incuba ing hem wi h ypsin o
10 minu es. A e ypsin neu aliza ion, cells we e collec ed and cen i uged o 5 minu es a
100 pm. Finally, cells we e coun ed using an au oma ed cell coun e (Au oma ed Cell Coun e
TC20™, Bio-Rad, Cali o nia, USA). The adhesion o he memb anes was exp essed as he
pe cen age o cells coun ed compa ing o he con ol. Th ee independen s udies we e
pe o med.
In addi ion, SEM images we e aken o obse e he adhe ed cells and hei mo phology. Fo
his assay, memb anes and cells we e incuba ed as in he p e ious s udy bu a a highe
8
densi y, ib oblas a a densi y o 100,000 cells/well and ke a inocy es a 200,000 cells/well.
A e o e nigh incuba ion, ins ead o de aching hem, cells we e ixed in a 2.5 %
glu a aldehyde solu ion and dehyd a ed in g aded e hanol se ies. Finally, mic opho og aphs o
he memb anes we e aken using a SEM mic oscope (Hi achi S4800, Tokyo, Japan).
2.4 In i o wound healing assay
2.4.1 Animals
Fo he in i o s udy 24 male db/db mice (BKS.Cg-m+/+Lep db/J) o 6 weeks old we e used
(Jan ie labo a o ies, Sain Be he in Cedex, F ance). All he expe imen s we e conduc ed
ollowing he p o ocols app o ed by he Ins i u ional E hical Commi ee o Animal
Expe imen a ion o he Uni e si y o he Basque Coun y (P ocedu e numbe : M20_2015_155_
HERNÁNDEZ MARTÍN). Each mouse was housed indi idually unde a 12 h ligh -da k cycle, and
hey had ad libi um access o s anda d oden chow and wa e .
2.4.2. Wound healing assay
This assay was pe o med ollowing he p ocedu e desc ibed by Michaels e al. (Michaels, e al.
2007). Mice we e anes he ised wi h iso lu ane (Iso lo®, Es e e, Spain) and hei do sal hai was
emo ed. In o de o a oid healing h ough wound con ac ion, and hus enhance
eepi helisa ion, wo silicone ings o 1 cm in diame e we e su u ed on he back o he mice,
in each side o he midline using a 3-0 nylon su u e (A agó, Spain). In he middle o each splin ,
a ull hickness wound ex ending h ough he panniculus ca nosus was c ea ed using an 8 mm
in diame e punch biopsy ool (Acu-Punch, Acude m, USA). A e wa ds, ea men s we e
applied and inally he wounds we e co e ed wi h pe ola um gauze (Tegade m®, 3M,
Minneso a, USA) and adhesi e.
On days 4, 8, and 11, he memb anes we e emo ed and new ea men s we e applied. On
day 8, hal o he mice we e sac i iced h ough CO2 inhala ion, and he emaining mice we e
sac i iced on day 15.
Mice we e di ided in 3 g oups o 8 animal each (n=8). Each g oup ecei ed a di e en
ea men : (i) un ea ed con ol, (ii) a d essing o 1.5x1.5 cm o PLGA-AV memb ane p e iously
hyd a ed in PBS, and (iii) a d essing o 1.5x1.5 cm o PLGA-AV-NLC memb ane p e iously
hyd a ed in PBS.
2.4.3 E alua ion o wound healing
9
The e ec i eness o he ea men s was e alua ed assessing he wound closu e pe cen age in
each wound. On days 1, 4, 8, 11 and 15 pho og aphs o he wounds we e aken using a digi al
came a (Lumix FS16, Panasonic®, Japan) and he a ea o each wound (px2) was measu ed using
an image analysis p og amme (ImageJ®, Biopho onics Facili y, Uni e si y o McMas e ,
Canada). The wound closu e pe cen age was calcula ed using he ollowing equa ion (Eq. 4):
𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊 𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑊𝑊𝑐𝑐𝑊𝑊𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐 (%)=𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝑊𝑊𝐹𝐹𝑐𝑐 𝑤𝑤𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊 𝐹𝐹𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝐹𝐹 (𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝2)
𝐼𝐼𝑊𝑊𝐹𝐹𝐼𝐼𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝑐𝑐 𝑤𝑤𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊𝑊 𝐹𝐹𝑐𝑐𝑐𝑐𝐹𝐹 (𝑝𝑝𝑝𝑝2)×100 (4)
2.4.4 His ological analysis o wound healing
A e mice sac i ice, he wound and su ounding issue (abou 1x1 cm) we e excised and ixed
in 3.7% pa a o maldehyde. Tissue was allowed o ix du ing 24 h and hen, he biopsies we e
bisec ed, embedded in pa a in and sec ioned in laye s o a hickness o 5 µm. Those slices
we e p ocessed by hema oxylin-eosin (H&E) s aining o e alua e hei p og ess h ough wound
healing.
The eepi helisa ion p ocess was e alua ed in acco dance wi h he scale es ablished by Sinha
e al. (Sinha and Gallaghe 2003). Each wound was semi-quan i a i ely a ed wi h a alue
wi hin a ange om 0 o 4: 0, eephi elised a ea was con ined o wound ma gins; 1, he new
epi helium co e s less han hal o he wound a ea; 2, he new epi helium co e s mo e han
hal o he wound a ea; 3, he en i e wound is eepi helised wi h i egula hickness; and 4, he
en i e wound is eepi helised and he new epi helium has no mal hickness.
The esolu ion o he in lamma o y p ocess and wound ma u i y was assessed ollowing he
scale es ablished by Co an e al. (Co an, e al. 2000). Wounds we e sco ed acco ding o he
ollowing c i e ia: 0, absence o in lamma ion; 1, acu e in lamma ion, in his phase he ib in
clo and he pyogenic memb ane a e o med and he leucocy es and polynuclea neu ophils
mig a e o he wound; 2, di use acu e in lamma ion, his phase comp ises he o ma ion o
he g anula ion issue, and he disappea ance o he pyogenic memb ane; 3, ch onic
in lamma ion, his phase consis s on ib oblas p oli e a ion and 4; esolu ion and healing: his
phase consis on he disappea ance o ch onic in lamma ion, al hough occasionally ound cells
can be obse ed.
2.4.5 Immunohis ochemical analysis
In o de o pe o m immunohis ological s udies, issue slices we e depa a inised and
au oma ically p ocesses acco ding o he U Ul a View DAB de ec ion ki (Roche, Swi ze land).
Fi s , issue biopsies we e incuba ed wi h he p ima y an ibodies a 37°C. The incuba ion
16
The main easons o include NLCs in o he nano ibe s we e he hypo hesis ha hey could
imp o e hei handling and o ease he emo al o he d essing om he wound, a oiding pain
and damage o he newly o med issue du ing d essing change. The cha ac e isa ion o he
memb anes showed ha NLCs we e able o imp o e he handling and mechanical s eng h o
he nano ibe s. The e o e, cell adhesion was analysed and i e ealed a lowe ke a inocy e
adhesion o he o mula ion con aining NLCs. Ne e heless, no di e ences we e ound in
ib oblas a achmen , since bo h memb anes wi h o wi hou NLCs p esen ed a e y low
adhesion. Conside ing hose esul s, mo e s udies should be pe o med o assess d essing
a achmen in o wounded issue, analysing he d essing emo al in i o o using a ex u e
analyse o e alua e he adhesion s eng h o he wounded issue.
Finally, he e icacy o he memb anes was e alua ed in i o in a ull hickness splin ed wound
model ca ied ou in db/db mice. Db/db mice we e chosen because hey p esen an impai ed
wound healing seconda y o diabe es, and hus, hey esemble be e a ch onic wound model.
In addi ion, hey mimic be e human wound healing han o he oden models, since hey
ha e impai ed wound con ac ion due o hei obesi y, and he e o e hei healing occu s
mainly ia eepi helisa ion, as human healing (Fang and Mus oe 2008; Tkalce ic, e al. 2009). In
o de o impai e en mo e con ac ion and enhance eephi elisa ion, silicone splin s we e
su u ed a ound he wounds (Michaels, e al. 2007).
O e all, bo h memb anes achie ed simila imp o emen in wound healing. Compa able esul s
we e ob ained in wound closu e and eepi helisa ion, as bo h we e able o accele a e healing
in compa ison o un ea ed con ol. Rega ding he esolu ion o he in lamma o y p ocess, on
day 15 only PLGA-AV memb anes p esen ed an imp o ed ou come in compa ison o he
con ol g oup. On day 8, no di e ences we e obse ed in he his ological analysis, al hough
he de eloped o mula ions, and especially he PLGA-AV-NLC memb anes, we e able o educe
he mac ophage in il a ion in he wound bed, which usually is augmen ed in oden wound
models wi h diabe es o impai ed healing. (Tsubame Nishikai-Yan Shen, e al. 2017; Yeh, e al.
2010). In addi ion, he mac ophages ound on hose wounds p esen an impai ed abili y o
phagocy e apop o ic cells, inc easing he le el o p o-in lamma o y cy okines, and hus,
pe pe ua ing a con inuous in lamma o y s a e (Sa i a Khanna, e al. 2010). Acco dingly, bo h
o mula ions showed an enhancemen o wound ma u a ion, he PLGA-AV-NLC memb anes on
mac ophage in il a ion on he ea ly s age o healing and he PLGA-AV memb anes on he
gene al in lamma o y s a e o he la e s age.
17
The e ec o he nano ib ous d essings on wound healing can be pa ially explained by he
inco po a ion o Aloe e a, since i has shown o imp o e wound healing, mainly by a ec ing
ib oblas g ow h ac o , and hus, imp o ing hei ac i i y and p oli e a ion (Boud eau and
Beland 2006). The e ec o Aloe e a in o PLGA-AV memb anes was p o en in he p e ious
s udy conduc ed by ou esea ch g oup, whe e PLGA-AV memb anes achie ed an imp o ed
wound healing in compa ison o PLGA memb anes (Ga cia-O ue, e al. 2016a). In addi ion, he
cha ac e is ics o he nano ib ous s uc u e also con ibu e o he imp o emen o wound
healing. In ac , he high su ace o olume a ea and he nanopo osi y c ea e an adequa e
en i onmen o cell mig a ion and p oli e a ion o he wound bed. Mo eo e , ha
p oli e a ing en i onmen is in ol ed in he imp o emen o he g anula ion issue o ma ion
and eepi helisa ion by enhancing he elease o healing media o s, such as g ow h ac o s,
angiogenic ac o s o collagen (Ab igo, e al. 2014; Shah e di, e al. 2014). Finally, he chosen
polyme is also in ol ed in he enhancemen o eepi helisa ion, since one o i s deg ada ion
p oduc s, lac a e, has shown o be able o induce a as e wound healing (Po po a o, e al.
2012).
Rega ding o he inclusion o NLCs in o he memb anes, hei e ec on he emo al o he
d essing could no be obse ed in i o, since bo h d essings we e humec ed wi h PBS p io o
hei elimina ion, in o de o a oid any possible damage on he newly o med issue.
Ne e heless, an imp o emen on he handling o he memb anes con aining NLCs was
obse ed along he cha ac e isa ion o he o mula ions. Hence, he nano ib ous d essing wi h
NLCs showed a bene i conce ning handling, al hough mo e s udies a e needed o assess hei
e ec in d essing emo al.
5. Conclusion
In he cu en s udy wo composi e elec ospun d essings we e de eloped, he i s one was
composed o an emulsion o PLGA and Aloe e a (1:1), and in he second one lipid
nanopa icles (NLCs) we e added o he a o emen ioned emulsion. Bo h d essings showed a
simila cha ac e isa ion, al hough an enhanced handling was obse ed in he PLGA-AV-NLC
o mula ion ega ding o elas ici y and hickness. Finally, hei e ec i i y in wound healing was
assessed in a ull hickness wound healing assay pe o med in db/db mice, achie ing simila
esul s wi h bo h o mula ions. Acco dingly, he PLGA-AV-NLC nano ib ous memb ane migh
be a p omising s a egy o he ea men o ch onic wound, since i imp o ed handling in
compa ison o he o mula ion wi hou NLCs.
6. Acknowledgmen s
18
I. Ga cía-O ue hanks he Basque Go e nmen o he ellowship g an . The au ho s hank o
echnical and human suppo p o ided by SGIke o UPV/EHU and Eu opean unding (ERDF and
ESF). This p ojec has been unded by he Basque Go e nmen (ELKARTEK 2015, Nanopla o m,
KK-2015/0000036 and Consolida ed G oups, IT-428-10 and IT-528-10).
7. Re e ences
Ab igo, M., McA hu , S.L., Kingsho , P., 2014. Elec ospun nano ibe s as d essings o ch onic wound ca e:
ad ances, challenges, and u u e p ospec s. Mac omol. Biosci., 14, 772-792. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201300561.
Benbow, M., 2002. U go ul™: al e na i e o con en ional non-adhe ence d essings. B . J. Nu s. , 11, 135-138.
doi: 10.12968/bjon.2002.11.2.9315.
Benbow, M., Iosson, G., 2004. A clinical e alua ion o U go ul o ea acu e and ch onic wounds. B . J. Nu s. ,
13, 105-109. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2004.13.2.12042.
Boud eau, M.D., Beland, F.A., 2006. An e alua ion o he biological and oxicological p ope ies o Aloe ba badensis
(mille ), Aloe e a. J. En i on. Sci. Heal h C En i on. Ca cinog. Eco oxicol. Re ., 24, 103-154. doi:
10.1080/10590500600614303.
B iquez, P.S., Hubbell, J.A., Ma ino, M.M., 2015. Ex acellula ma ix-inspi ed g ow h ac o deli e y sys ems o
skin wound healing. Ad . Wound Ca e (New Rochelle), 4, 479-489. doi: 10.1089/wound.2014.0603.
Che eddy, K.K., Vande meulen, G., P éa , V., 2016. PLGA based d ug deli e y sys ems: P omising ca ie s o wound
healing ac i i y. Wound Repai Regen., 24, 223-236. doi: 10.1111/w .12404.
Choi, S., Chung, M., 2003. A e iew on he ela ionship be ween aloe e a componen s and hei biologic e ec s.
Semin. In eg . Med., 1, 53-62. doi: //dx.doi.o g/10.1016/S1543-1150(03)00005-X.
Co an, R., Kuma , G.K., Collins, T., 2000. Repa ación de los ejidos: p oli e acion celula , ib osis y cu aicón de las
he idasIn: Co an, R., Kuma , G.K., Collins, T. (Eds.), Pa ología Es uc u al Y Funcional, McG aw-Hill, In e ame icana,
Mad id, pp. 95-120.
Dashdo j, U., Reyes, M.K., Unni han, A.R., Tiwa i, A.P., Tumu baa a , B., Pa k, C.H., Kim, C.S., 2015. Fab ica ion and
cha ac e iza ion o elec ospun zein/Ag nanocomposi e ma s o wound d essing applica ions. In . J. Biol.
Mac omol., 80, 1-7. doi: //dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.06.026.
Da , A.D., Poon, F., Pham, K.B., Dous , J., 2012. Aloe e a o ea ing acu e and ch onic wounds. Coch ane Da abase
Sys . Re . doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008762.pub2.
Da id, F., Wu z, J., B e on, N., Bisch, O., Gazeu, P., Ke ihuel, J., Guibon, O., 2018. A andomised, con olled, non-
in e io i y ial compa ing he pe o mance o a so silicone-coa ed wound con ac laye (Mepi el One) wi h a
lipidocolloid wound con ac laye (U goTul) in he ea men o acu e wounds. In . Wound J., 15, 159-169. doi:
10.1111/iwj.12853.
Diegelmann, R.F., E ans, M.C., 2004. Wound healing: an o e iew o acu e, ib o ic and delayed healing. F on .
Biosci., 9, 283-289. doi: //dx.doi.o g/10.2741/.
Fang, R.C., Mus oe, T.A., 2008. Animal models o wound healing: uili y in ansgenic mice. J. Bioma e . Sci. Polym.
Ed., 19, 989-1005. doi: 10.1163/156856208784909327.
Felguei as, H.P., Amo im, M.T.P., 2017. Func ionaliza ion o elec ospun polyme ic wound d essings wi h
an imic obial pep ides. Colloids Su . B Bioin e aces, 156, 133-148. doi: //doi.o g/10.1016/j.colsu b.2017.05.001.
19
Fouad, H., Elsa nagawy, T., Almahjdi, F.N., Khalil, K.A., 2013. P epa a ion and in i o he mo-mechanical
cha ac e iza ion o elec ospun PLGA nano ibe s o so and ha d issue eplacemen . In . J. Elec ochem. Sci., 8,
2293-2304.
Gainza, G., Bona on e, D.C., Mo eno, B., Agui e, J.J., Gu ie ez, F.B., Villullas, S., Ped az, J.L., Iga ua, M., He nandez,
R.M., 2015. The opical adminis a ion o hEGF-loaded nanos uc u ed lipid ca ie s ( hEGF-NLC) imp o es healing
in a po cine ull- hickness excisional wound model. J. Con ol Release, 197, 41-47. doi:
//dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.jcon el.2014.10.033.
Gainza, G., Pas o , M., Agui e, J.J., Villullas, S., Ped az, J.L., He nandez, R.M., Iga ua, M., 2014. A no el s a egy o
he ea men o ch onic wounds based on he opical adminis a ion o hEGF-loaded lipid nanopa icles: In i o
bioac i i y and in i o e ec i eness in healing-impai ed db/db mice. J. Con ol Release, 185, 51-61. doi:
//dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.jcon el.2014.04.032.
Ga cia-O ue, I., Gainza, G., Gu ie ez, F.B., Agui e, J.J., E o a, C., Ped az, J.L., He nandez, R.M., Delgado, A., Iga ua,
M., 2016a. No el nano ib ous d essings con aining hEGF and Aloe e a o wound healing applica ions. In . J.
Pha m., 53, 556-566. doi: //dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.ijpha m.2016.11.006.
Ga cia-O ue, I., Gainza, G., Gi bau, C., Alonso, R., Agui e, J.J., Ped az, J.L., Iga ua, M., He nandez, R.M., 2016b. LL37
loaded nanos uc u ed lipid ca ie s (NLC): A new s a egy o he opical ea men o ch onic wounds. Eu . J.
Pha m. Biopha m. doi: //dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.ejpb.2016.04.006.
Ga cia-O ue, I., Ped az, J.L., He nandez, R.M., Iga ua, M., 2017. Nano echnology-based deli e y sys ems o elease
g ow h ac o s and o he endogenous molecules o ch onic wound healing. J. D ug Deli . Sci. Technol., 42, 2-17.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdds .2017.03.002.
Ga g, T., Ra h, G., Goyal, A.K., 2015a. Bioma e ials-based nano ibe sca old: a ge ed and con olled ca ie o cell
and d ug deli e y. J. D ug Ta ge ., 23, 202-221. doi: 10.3109/1061186X.2014.992899.
Ga g, T., Ra h, G., Goyal, A.K., 2015b. Comp ehensi e e iew on addi i es o opical dosage o ms o d ug deli e y.
D ug Deli ., 22, 969-987. doi: 10.3109/10717544.2013.879355.
Hamdani, J., Moës, A.J., Amighi, K., 2003. Physical and he mal cha ac e isa ion o P eci ol ® and Comp i ol ® as
lipophilic glyce ides used o he p epa a ion o con olled- elease ma ix pelle s. In . J. Pha m., 260, 47-57. doi:
10.1016/S0378-5173(03)00229-1.
Han, G., Ceilley, R., 2017. Ch onic Wound Healing: A Re iew o Cu en Managemen and T ea men s. Ad . The .,
34, 599-610. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0478-y.
Hashemi, S.A., Madani, S.A., Abediankena i, S., 2015. The Re iew on P ope ies o Aloe Ve a in Healing o Cu aneous
Wounds. Biomed. Res. In ., 2015, 714216. doi: 10.1155/2015/714216.
Jacquemoud, C., B uye e-Ga nie , K., Co e , M., 2007. Me hodology o de e mine ailu e cha ac e is ics o plana
so issues using a dynamic ensile es . J. Biomech., 40, 468-475. doi:
//dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.12.010.
Jä b ink, K., Ni, G., Sönne g en, H., Schmid chen, A., Pang, C., Bajpai, R., Ca , J., 2017. The humanis ic and economic
bu den o ch onic wounds: a p o ocol o a sys ema ic e iew. Sys . Re ., 6. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0400-8.
Jin, G., P abhaka an, M.P., Kai, D., Annamalai, S.K., A unachalam, K.D., Ramak ishna, S., 2013. Tissue enginee ed
plan ex ac s as nano ib ous wound d essing. Bioma e ials, 34, 724-734. doi:
//doi.o g/10.1016/j.bioma e ials.2012.10.026.
Jouyba , A., Seyedja a i, E., A deshi ylajimi, A., Zandi-Ka imi, A., Feizi, N., Khani, M., Pous i, I., 2017. Enhanced Skin
Regene a ion by He bal Ex ac -Coa ed Poly-L-Lac ic Acid Nano ib ous Sca old. A i . O gans, 41, E307. doi:
10.1111/ao .12926.
20
Ka uppuswamy, P., Venugopal, J.R., Na anee han, B., Lai a, A.L., S idha , S., Ramak ishna, S., 2014. Func ionalized
hyb id nano ibe s o mimic na i e ECM o issue enginee ing applica ions. Appl. Su . Sci., 322, 162-168. doi:
//dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.10.074.
Khe ad a , S.A., Nou mohammadi, J., Tabesh, H., Baghe i, B., 2018. S a ch nanopa icle as a i amin E-TPGS ca ie
loaded in silk ib oin-poly( inyl alcohol)-Aloe e a nano ib ous d essing. Colloids Su . B Bioin e aces, 166, 9-16. doi:
//doi.o g/10.1016/j.colsu b.2018.03.004.
Li, C., Fu, R., Yu, C., Li, Z., Guan, H., Hu, D., Zhao, D., Lu, L., 2013. Sil e nanopa icle/chi osan
oligosaccha ide/poly( inyl alcohol) nano ibe s as wound d essings: a p eclinical s udy. In . J. Nanomedicine, 8, 4131-
4145. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S51679 [doi].
Liu, M., Duan, X., Li, Y., Yang, D., Long, Y., 2017. Elec ospun nano ibe s o wound healing. Ma e . Sci. Eng. C Ma e .
Biol. Appl., 76, 1413-1423. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.03.034.
Loo dhuswamy, A.M., K ishnaswamy, V.R., Ko apa i, P.S., Thinaka an, S., Rengaswami, G.D.V., 2014. Fab ica ion o
highly aligned ib ous sca olds o issue egene a ion by cen i ugal spinning echnology. Ma e ials Science and
Enginee ing: C, 42, 799-807. doi: //doi.o g/10.1016/j.msec.2014.06.011.
Ma hew S. B own, B andon Ashley, Ahyeon Koh, 2018. Wea able Technology o Ch onic Wound Moni o ing:
Cu en D essings, Ad ancemen s, and Fu u e P ospec s. F on ie s in Bioenginee ing and Bio echnology, 6. doi:
10.3389/ bioe.2018.00047.
Michaels, J., Chu gin, S.S., Blechman, K.M., G ei es, M.R., Aa abi, S., Galiano, R.D., Gu ne , G.C., 2007. db/db mice
exhibi se e e wound-healing impai men s compa ed wi h o he mu ine diabe ic s ains in a silicone-splin ed
excisional wound model. Wound Repai Regen., 15, 665-670. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2007.00273.x.
Na a ajan, S., Williamson, D., S il z, A.J., Ha ding, K., 2000. Ad ances in Wound Ca e and Healing Technology. Am. J.
Clin. De ma ol., 1, 269-275. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200001050-00002.
Pachuau, L., 2015. Recen de elopmen s in no el d ug deli e y sys ems o wound healing. Expe . Opin. D ug
Deli ., 12, 1895-1909. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2015.1070143.
Po po a o, P., Payen, V., De Saedelee , C., P éa , V., Thissen, J., Fe on, O., Son eaux, P., 2012. Lac a e s imula es
angiogenesis and accele a es he healing o supe icial and ischemic wounds in mice. Angiogenesis, 15, 581-592.
doi: 10.1007/s10456-012-9282-0.
Sa i a Khanna, Sabyasachi Biswas, Yingli Shang, E ic Colla d, Ali Azad, Cou ney Kauh, Vinee Bhaske , Gayle M
Go dillo, Chandan K Sen, Sashwa i Roy, 2010. Mac ophage Dys unc ion Impai s Resolu ion o In lamma ion in he
Wounds o Diabe ic Mice. PLoS One, 5, e9539. doi: 10.1371/jou nal.pone.0009539.
Sch eml, S., Szeimies, R., P an l, L., Land hale , M., Babilas, P., 2010. Wound healing in he 21s cen u y. J. Am. Acad.
De ma ol., 63, 866-881. doi: //dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.jaad.2009.10.048.
Sen, C.K., Go dillo, G.M., Roy, S., Ki sne , R., Lambe , L., Hun , T.K., Go up, F., Gu ne , G.C., Longake , M.T., 2009.
Human skin wounds: a majo and snowballing h ea o public heal h and he economy. Wound Repai Regen., 17,
763-771. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00543.x.
Shah e di, S., Hajimi i, M., Es andia i, M.A., La ijani, B., A yabi, F., Rajabiani, A., Dehpou , A.R., Gha ehaghaji, A.A.,
Dina and, R., 2014. Fab ica ion and s uc u e analysis o poly(lac ide-co-glycolic acid)/silk ib oin hyb id sca old o
wound d essing applica ions. In . J. Pha m., 473, 345-355. doi: //dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.ijpha m.2014.07.021.
Sinha, U.K., Gallaghe , L.A., 2003. E ec s o S eel Scalpel, Ul asonic Scalpel, CO2 Lase , and Monopola and Bipola
Elec osu ge y on Wound Healing in Guinea Pig O al Mucosa. La yngoscope, 113, 228-236. doi: 10.1097/00005537-
200302000-00007.
Suganya, S., Venugopal, J., Ramak ishna, S., Lakshmi, B.S., De , V.R.G., 2014. Na u ally de i ed bio unc ional
nano ib ous sca old o skin issue egene a ion. In . J. Biol. Mac omol., 68, 135-143. doi:
//dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.04.031.
21
Su jushe, A., Vasani, R., Saple, D.G., 2008. Aloe e a: a sho e iew. Indian J. De ma ol., 53, 163-166. doi:
10.4103/0019-5154.44785.
Tan, P.W.W., Ho, W.C., Song, C., 2009. The use o U go ul in he ea men o pa ial hickness bu ns and spli -
hickness skin g a dono si es: a p ospec i e con ol s udy. In . Wound J., 6, 295-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-
481X.2009.00611.x.
Thomas, R., Soumya, K., Ma hew, J., Radhak ishnan, E., 2015. Elec ospun Polycap olac one Memb ane
Inco po a ed wi h Biosyn hesized Sil e Nanopa icles as E ec i e Wound D essing Ma e ial. Appl. Biochem.
Bio echnol., 176, 2213-2224. doi: 10.1007/s12010-015-1709-9.
Tkalce ic, V.I., Cužic, S., Pa nham, M.J., Pašalic, I., B ajša, K., 2009. Di e en ial E alua ion o Excisional Non-occluded
Wound Healing in db/db Mice. Toxico. Pa hol., 37, 183-192. doi: 10.1177/0192623308329280.
To , S., Aca ü k, F., Beşikci, A., 2017. E alua ion o h ee-laye ed doxycycline-collagen loaded nano ibe wound
d essing. In e na ional Jou nal o Pha maceu ics, 529, 642-653. doi: //doi.o g/10.1016/j.ijpha m.2017.07.027.
Tsubame Nishikai-Yan Shen, Shigeyuki Kanazawa, Makiko Kado, Kayoko Okada, Lin Luo, Aya o Hayashi, Hi oshi
Mizuno, Rica Tanaka, 2017. In e leukin-6 s imula es Ak and p38 MAPK phospho yla ion and ib oblas mig a ion in
non-diabe ic bu no diabe ic mice. PLoS One, 12, e0178232. doi: 10.1371/jou nal.pone.0178232.
Tu, Y., Zhou, M., Guo, Z., Li, Y., Hou, Y., Wang, D., Zhang, L., 2015. P epa a ion and cha ac e iza ion o
he mosensi i e a i icial skin wi h a Sandwich s uc u e. Ma e . Le ., 147, 4-7. doi:
//dx.doi.o g/10.1016/j.ma le .2015.01.163.
Velna , T., Bailey, T., Sm kolj, V., 2009. The wound healing p ocess: an o e iew o he cellula and molecula
mechanisms. J. In . Med. Res., 37, 1528-1542. doi: 10.1177/147323000903700531.
Yeh, J., Yeh, L., Jung, S., Chang, T., Wu, H., Shiu, T., Liu, C., Kao, W.W., Chu, P., 2010. Impai ed skin wound healing in
lumican-null mice. B . J. De ma ol., 163, 1174. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10008.x.
22
Fig 1. SEM images o he PLGA-AV and PLGA-AV-NLC memb anes. The scale ba o each image
indica es 100 µm.
Fig 2. Cell iabili y s udy. (A) CCK-8 esul s a e cul u ing he memb anes´ ex ac ed medium
wi h ib oblas s. *** p<0.001 compa ing all g oups. (B) CCK-8 esul s a e cul u ing he
memb anes´ ex ac ed medium wi h ke a inocy es. *** p<0.001 compa ing PLGA-AV
memb anes wi h he con ol; and ** p<0.01 compa ing PLGA-AV-NLC nano ibe s wi h he
con ol. Resul s a e gi en as he mean % o li ing cells ega ding o he con ol ± SD.
23
Fig. 3. In i o adhesion assay. (A) SEM images o memb anes wi h cells seeded on op: 1,
PLGA-AV-NLC memb anes incuba ed wi h ke a inocy es; 2, PLGA-AV-NLC memb anes
incuba ed wi h ib oblas s; 3, PLGA-AV memb anes incuba ed wi h ke a inocy es; and 4, PLGA-
AV memb anes incuba ed wi h ib oblas s. The scale ba in each image indica es 25 µm. (B)
Ke a inocy es adhesion pe cen age. *** p<0.001 compa ing PLGA-AV-NLC memb anes wi h
con ol g oup; ** p<0.01 compa ing PLGA-AV memb anes wi h con ol g oup; * p<0.05
compa ing bo h memb anes. (C) Fib oblas s adhesion pe cen age. *** p<0.001 compa ing
PLGA-AV-NLC and PLGA-AV memb anes wi h con ol g oup.
Fig 4. In i o wound closu e. (A) Wounds pho og aphs o each g oup on days 1, 4, 8, 11 and 15.
(B) Wound closu e ep esen ed as he pe cen age o educ ion o he ini ial a ea on days 4, 8,
11 and 15 pos inju y. The scale ba indica es 5 mm. * p<0.05 compa ing PLGA-AV-NLC
memb anes g oups wi h he un ea ed g oups, *** p>0.001 compa ing wi h he un ea ed
g oup.
24
Fig. 5. His ological e alua ion o he wounds. (A) His ological images o issue sec ions o each
g oup on days 8 and 15, p ocessed wi h H&E. (B) Reepi helisa ion g ade on days 8 and 15. ***
p<0.001 compa ing g oups ea ed wi h he d essings and un ea ed g oup. (C) G ade o
esolu ion o he in lamma o y p ocess. ** p0.01 compa ing he g oup ea ed wi h PLGA-AV
memb anes and he un ea ed g oup.
Fig 6. Immunohis ological analysis. (A) Numbe o lymphocy es (CD4+ and CD8+ cells) on day 8.
(B) Ra io be ween CD8+ and CD4+ cells on day 8. (C) Numbe o CD68+ cells on day 8. **
p<0.01 compa ing he g oup ea ed wi h PLGA-AV memb anes wi h he un ea ed g oup. ***
p<0.001 compa ing he g oup ea ed wi h PLGA-AV-NLC memb anes wi h he un ea ed
g oup.
25
Figu e
S1. DSC he mog ams. (A) The mog ams o he aw ma e ials used o he p oduc ion o
nano ibe s, PLGA, AV and NLCs. (B) he mog ams o he PLGA-AV-NLC and PLGA-AV nano ibe s
and he physical blend o he componen s, i.e., PLGA, AV and NLC. I is no ewo hy o men ion
ha he da a in able 2, e e s o he mean alue o he endo he mic peaks o h ee
independen expe imen s, while he he mog ams o his igu e a e om one o hose
expe imen s, hus he alues o he peaks a ies sligh ly.
