1
ISSN 1695-6494
* Co espondencia a / Co espondence o: Rachael Neb aska Lynch. The Geo ge Washing on Uni e si y (EE.UU.), English Depa men . 801 22nd S NW,
Sui e643–[email p o ec ed]–h p://o cid.o g/0000-0002-2965-9883.
ISSN1695-6494 / © 2020 UPV/EHU
Es a ob a es á bajo una licencia
C ea i e Commons A ibución 4.0 In e nacional
Papeles del CEIC, 2020/2
h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1387/pceic.21676
PaPel c í ico 71
Rachael Neb aska Lynch*
The Geo ge Washing on Uni e si y (EE.UU.)
Ge ou
Géne o: D ama, comedia
Di ección: Jo dan Peele
Nacionalidad: Es ados Unidos
P oduc o a: Blumhouse P oduc ions / QC En e ainmen
Du ación: 103 minu os
Año: 2017
CONTEXTUALIZING GET OUT AS DISABILITY NARRATIVE
Mos analyses o Uni e sal’s awa d-winning sa i ical ho o ilm Ge Ou di ec ed by Jo dan
Peele cen e on ace, bu hese analyses o e look he impo ance o disabili y o he ilm’s
hemes. Many o hese in e p e a ions iden i y he pe sis ence o acism co e ed o e by
he pos - acial an asy o he Obama e a in he Uni ed S a es (Keegan, 2017; S aples, 2017).
The ilm’s ocus on he Black p o agonis Ch is Washing on isi ing his whi e gi l iend Rose
A mi ages’s amily in ups a e New Yo k ce ainly cen e s ace in he ilm’s i s ac . Rose
a emp s o soo he his anxie ies by p oclaiming ha he pa en s «would ha e o ed o
Obama a hi d ime» o demons a e hei acial inclusi i y (min. 8). Bu an uncom o able
ga den pa y a he A mi ages e eals he acism wi hin Ame ica’s whi e communi y,
e en i i ’s le -leaning and libe al. No only do he whi e gues s e ishize Ch is’s Blackness,
bu hey ac i ely seek o app op ia e Blackness h ough Peele’s sci- i me apho iza ion o
ensla emen . The A mi ages p ocu e Black olks hen a emp b ain issue ansplan s
so hei whi e iends can con ol Black bodies. The ilm is explici ly abou ace. Bu Peele
explo es how an ebellum-e a bina ies o he whi e able-mind and he Black able-body
pe sis in he pos mode n e a. This essay’s dis inc ion be ween he Black body e sus he
Black bodymind is no mean o essen ialize able-mindedness as whi e bu a he expose
how Black bodyminds a e educed o solely he Black body (o lesh) due o he a e ma h
Ge ou
2 Papeles del CEIC, 2020/2, 1-8
o Ame ican sla e y (Spille s, 2003; Weheliye, 2014). I is impe a i e o explo e he ilm using
bo h c i ical ace heo y and c ip heo y. To do so, his essay iden i ies he oles o aes he ic
ne ousness, compulso y able-bodiedness, compulso y able-mindedness, and na a i e
p os hesis in Ge Ou .
AESTHETIC NERVOUSNESS AND POLICE BRUTALITY
Peele u ilizes aes he ic ne ousness o o ce he whi e audience membe s o con on
pe asi e acism in he Uni ed S a es. Quayson a icula es «aes he ic ne ousness» as an
ine i able esponse o expe iencing disabili y in na a i e; his pa icula dimension o he
concep occu s «be ween he eade and he ex » (2007: 15). Aes he ic ne ousness occu s
du ing Ge Ou no only as audience ecogni ion o hei own discom o in con on ing
disabili y bu also sys emic acism esul ing in whi e p i ilege. Quayson’s concep equa es
o a so o «aes he ic dis up ion» which elies on a «sho -ci cui ing» o expec a ion based
on knowledge o na a i e con en ion (ibid.: 19, 15). Peele in i es aes he ic ne ousness in
his audience h ough h ee momen s in he ilm in which Black cha ac e s a e con on ed by
images o law en o cemen . These in e ac ions allow us o iew Ge Ou h ough Quayson’s
heo e ical amewo k as i ela es o he «aes he ic dis up ion» o eal li e na a i es o Black
olks who expe ience police b u ali y.
Fi s , in he ilm’s opening scene, he cha ac e And e walks alone on a subu ban s ee
a nigh (mins. 1-4). In a ho o ilm, a cha ac e walking alone a nigh possesses ce ain
signi ie s: cha ac e s who walk alone a e usually killed. Addi ionally, he na a i e
con en ions o ho o dic a e ha he Black man usually dies (B uni, 2017). Bu he e en s
leading up o T ay on Ma in’s 2012 mu de linge a he back o he mind o he Ame ican
iewe : lone Black male, e ealed o be una med, walks alone a nigh in a subu ban
Ame ican neighbo hood ypically coded as whi e1. Al hough his scene lacks a police o ice
—as did Ma in’s mu de — i s ill signals o he audience a eason o be conce ned when i
comes o in e ac ions be ween igu es signi ying law and Black olks.
Second, ea ly in he ilm, Rose accuses a whi e police o ice o acial p o iling when he
eques s o see Ch is’s d i e ’s license (mins: 12-13). This ac ma ks he as an ally o bo h
Ch is and he audience. Howe e , he e ela ion ha Rose is complici in he abduc ion o
Black bodies indic s he ini ial ins inc o us he : Ch is’s license would be included in he
o ice ’s acciden epo and hus c ea e an o icial eco d o e en s leading up o Ch is’s
disappea ance. Whe e And e calls o mind T ay on Ma in, Ch is and Rose a he side o he
oad wi h a police o ice ges u es owa d acial p o iling and he case o Philando Cas ile2.
The audience knows o be ne ous.
1 T ay on Ma in was a se en een-yea -old Black eenage who was sho and mu de ed by neighbo hood wa -
chman Geo ge Zimme mann, a whi e Hispanic man, on he nigh o Feb ua y 26, 2012 in San o d, Flo ida. His
mu de became a ligh ning od o discussions abou an i-Black acism in he Uni ed S a es and he acqui al
o Zimme man in 2013 p omp ed he #BlackLi esMa e mo emen in he U.S.
2 Philando Cas ile was mu de ed by a cop du ing wha has been a gued was a « ou ine» a ic s op. He was sho
in on o his pa ne and he daugh e . His mu de was cap u ed by a came a in he police ehicle, which de-
pic s Cas ile no i ying he o ice ha he has a legally pu chased gun, he o ice ’s eques o see he pe mi /li-
cense, and hen he o ice shoo ing Cas ile when he eached o he pe mi /license.
Papel c í ico 71
h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1387/pceic.21676 3
Thi d, ollowing his bloody escape om he A mi ages’s hospi al/basemen , Ch is a emp s
o s angle a mo ally wounded Rose. Ou anxie ies ise when he lashing ligh s o a cop ca
e lec o o Ch is’s ace, as Rose wa es o help om an ins i u ion she knows will help he
(min. 98). This is he momen in he ilm in which aes he ic ne ousness is a i s mos la en .
Peele acknowledges ha his o iginal ending o he ilm would ha e depic ed Ch is going o
jail because « he legal sys em ha alues he ich whi e people… akes hei side» (2017). His
goal was o he audience o be aced wi h he eali y o how Ch is would ealis ically end
up «because o how [ he c ime scene] looks» when hose ligh s s a lashing (ibid.). Peele’s
explici goal is o p omp he audience o expec he wo s when Ch is aces a symbol o he
legal sys em. He con ols he audience’s esponse by equi ing hem o con on he eali y
aced by hose mos likely o expe ience police b u ali y. The audience’s eels aes he ic
ne ousness upon seeing hose police ligh s. Despi e a desi e o see a p og ess na a i e in
Ame ican acial his o y, we canno a oid he impac o he na a i es su ounding o he s
who ha e been mu de ed by police b u ali y.
THE BLACK ABLE-BODY AND THE WHITE ABLE-MIND
Wi h bo h disabili y and ace o eg ounded in he ilm h ough aes he ic ne ousness, he
ilm in oduces he bina ies o Black able-bodiedness and whi e able-mindedness in o i s
na a i e. The e a e momen s in he ilm when he whi e cha ac e s demons a e a belie
ha Black olks a e physically supe io bu whi e olks a e in ellec ually supe io . These
momen s include when Rose’s b o he Je emy commen s on Ch is’s «gene ic makeup»
p edisposing him o excellence a ce ain spo s (min. 24). A he ilm’s climax, Rose’s a he
Dean e eals his wo ld iew when Ch is is cap u ed by he en i e A mi age amily; he s a es:
«we a e di ine. We a e he gods apped in cocoons» (mins. 78-79). The A mi ages belie e in
black skin and whi e minds c ea ing a eugenic ideal. Ch is iews an old ideo eco ding o he
g and a he and ounde Roman A mi age ha a i ms his ideology: «You ha e been chosen
because o he physical ad an ages you’ e enjoyed you en i e li e ime. Wi h you na u al
gi s and ou de e mina ion we can bo h be pa o some hing g ea e , some hing pe ec »
(min. 74; emphasis mine). The A mi ages demons a e hei iew ha hey a e he in ellec ual
eli e and ha hey ha e no only he igh bu he du y o o e see he supposed well-being o
Black bodies.
The cha ac e iza ion o Dean as a neu osu geon and his wi e Missy as a psychia is (son
Je emy is also s udying medicine) es ablishes he A mi ages as belonging o a p o ession wi h
a challenging his o y wi h bo h disabili y and ace. Bu hei p o essional ocus on he mind
and he ad anced deg ees necessa y o such p o essional s a us can be ead as indica o s
o a belie in hei supe io in ellec ual abili y. Peele e eals how bo h compulso y able-
bodiedness and compulso y able-mindedness se e as he bed ock o he idealized Ame ican
ci izen-subjec .
McRue a gues ha he aspi a ion o no malcy means «compulso y able-bodiedness
unc ions by co e ing o e , wi h he appea ance o choice, a sys em in which he e ac ually is
no choice» (2002: 90). Ka e (2013) adds able-mindedness o his o mula ion o compulso y
abili y, claiming ha being able-minded —which can be ead as he absence o men al illness,
lea ning disabili y, and indecisi eness, among o he s— is also a ace o able-passing. Ge Ou
Ge ou
4 Papeles del CEIC, 2020/2, 1-8
uses bo h able-bodiedness and able-mindedness as a way o he A mi ages and hei social
ci cle o exe hei cul u al biopowe o e Black bodyminds.
Cul u al biopowe , inspi ed om Foucaul ’s «biopowe » (1976), is a echnology o discipline
ha empowe s whi e ci izen-subjec s h ough an i-Black acism; i alida es whi eness and
in alida es Black li es. This cul u al biopowe can esul in signi ican , unchecked powe o e
he li es, dea hs, and bodies o Black olks, a no able example being Geo ge Zimme mann’s
mu de o T ay on Ma in. The ilm po ays cul u al biopowe i s when Rose appea s o
de end Ch is om he cop who acially p o iles him, in which she exe s he p i ileges o
whi e eminini y (mins. 12-13).
The whi e cha ac e s equen ly e ishize Ch is’s Blackness. This e ishiza ion akes he o m
o he majo i y whi e gues s’ —only one gues is a non-Black pe son o colo — awning o e
Ch is’s body. The pa y demons a es o he audience he equen mic oagg essions Ch is
aces as a Black man. One he e osexual couple he mee s ask him abou his gol skills and
o m, as he husband was once a p o essional gol e and p esumably hopes o become one
once again a e he ensla es Ch is’s bodymind (mins. 42-43). Ano he he e osexual couple
e ishize Ch is in asking Rose abou his physique and sexual p owess (mins. 43-44). Ano he
pai o gues s discuss how hey iew Blackness o be cool, claiming «Black is in ashion» (min.
44). These momen s unc ion no only o exempli y sys emic iolence wi hin Ame ican acial
and socio-economic cul u al no ms, bu also as means o e alua ing Ch is as a p oduc up o
auc ion.
Upon Ch is’s ini ial mee ing wi h Rose’s a he Dean, he audience lea ns o Dean’s a he ’s
ailu e o make he US Olympic eam o he 1936 Be lin games when he los a quali ying
hea o Jesse Owens. Dean makes a poin ed s a emen abou hose games, amous o
Owens’s medal-ea ning pe o mance and pe cei ed challenge o he Nazi Pa y’s ableis
idealiza ion o A yan No dicism (min. 17). This scene is no only an example o Peele in i ing
aes he ic ne ousness h ough Dean’s pe o mance o whi e libe al open-mindedness
bu also unc ions as a o eshadowing o he A mi ages’s biopoli ical business h ough
e e ence o Nazi eugenic ideals. The ilm implies ha Roman ounded his business o
ansplan he b ains o whi e people in o Black bodies — hus ein o cing a whi e/able-
minded and Black/able-bodied bina y— p ecisely so he could li e his d eam o ha ing a
supe io body, which he belie ed Owens possessed. «He almos go o e i », Dean s a es
quie ly (min. 17) and la e he A mi ages’ supposed g oundskeepe Wal e , who has been
ensla ed by Roman h ough he p ocedu e, is seen sp in ing a ound he p ope y (min. 30),
enjoying wha he belie es o be he physical abili y o an app op ia ed and ensla ed Black
body.
The A mi ages ini ially demons a e conce n o Ch is when hey e eal hei dismay a his
smoking habi . Th oughou he i s hal o he ilm, he A mi ages bene olen ly admonish
Ch is o smoking ciga e es, indica ing a policing o bo h his body and his heal h. In o he
wo ds, hey en o ce compulso y able-bodiedness. Dean condemns he beha io as a «nas y
habi » and sugges s ha his wi e Missy use hypno he apy o help Ch is qui (min. 20). The
hypnosis scene begins when Missy calls ou o Ch is om he o ice, asking, «Do you ealize
how dange ous smoking is?» (min. 31). While Ch is’s smoking is a use ul plo de ice o se -up
a hypno he apy session, which is he i s phase o he A mi age’s p ocess o ensla emen , i
also doubles as pa e nalis ic body policing. Fo he A mi ages, able-bodiedness is a necessi y
o he Black indi iduals Rose p ocu es in o de o sell he bes p oduc .
Papel c í ico 71
h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1387/pceic.21676 5
The obsession wi h Ch is’s smoking habi clea ly connec s o Ch is’s ma ke abili y, as does
hei conce n wi h no damaging him. The biopoli ical and nec opoli ical dimensions o
he A lan ic sla e ade and i s signi icance o ansa lan ic cul u es and economies ha e
al eady been discussed a leng h, bo h on i s own and as i ela es o Ge Ou (Gil oy, 1993;
Mbembe, 2003; Nduaguba, 2017; Sha pe, 2016; Spille s, 2003; Th ashe , 2017). Building o
o hese analyses, he whi e/able-minded and Black/able-bodied bina ies e oke Ame ican
his o y. In pa icula , he scene in which Dean auc ions Ch is (mins. 59-60); no only does
his auc ion esemble a sla e ma ke , bu many pop cul u e w i e s no e he simila i ies
o he d a ing o Black male a hle es in o he a ious p o essional spo s o ganiza ions in
he Uni ed S a es (S aples, 2017; Th ashe , 2017; Wi he ow & Als on, 2017). The A mi ages
and hei gues s iew Ch is as a p oduc o ma ke , which is why his heal h and his able-
bodiedness a e policed.
NARRATIVE PROSTHESIS, COLORBLINDNESS, AND COMPLICITY
The winning bidde on Ch is is he blind a deale Jim, whose in oduc ion ma ks he
ilm’s use o wha Mi chell and Snyde (2000) e m «na a i e p os hesis». Desc ibed as he
dependency o na a i e on disabili y, «na a i e p os hesis» is he means by which a s o y
makes meaning h ough he deploymen o disabili y as symbol, as cha ac e ai , and/o as
plo poin . Disabili y becomes a p os hesis o he na a i e. As he only pa ygoe who does
no o e ly e ishize Ch is, Jim is posi ioned as an ally o Ch is. The p esence o compulso y
able-bodied Blackness pe mea es much o he in e es in Ch is, ha is un il Jim en e s he
na a i e. Since, as Mi chell and Snyde (2000) no e, disabili y sa u a es na a i e as ea u e,
me apho , and social c i ique, Jim’s cha ac e belies any no ions om he whi e audience
ha he e will be a whi e sa io in he ilm.
When asked by Ch is, «Why Black people?», a e lea ning o A mi ages’s plans o him, Jim
esponds wi h «Who knows? Some people wan a change. Some people wanna be s onge ,
as e , coole . Bu please don’ lump me in wi h ha . I could gi e a shi wha colo you a e»
(min. 85). Jim is li e ally blind in he ilm bu his sel -p o essed colo blindness me apho izes
his embodied disabili y. He does no alue Ch is’s Blackness he way he o he gues s do, and
Jim’s con ession is in e cu wi h lashbacks o he whi e gues s’ mic oagg essions, e ealed
o be app aisals o Ch is as a p oduc . Bu Jim ne e heless pa icipa es in ensla ing Ch is,
he e o e he is complici in objec i ica ion.
Many a icles on he ilm ha e also explo ed Jim’s con essed colo blindness in ela ion o
cul u al app op ia ion (Ab ams, 2017; Benjamin, 2017; Dicke son, 2017). Mo e speci ically,
Jim’s colo blindness accuses he whi e audience o complacency h ough Jim’s complici y.
Jim is ini ially po ayed as an ally who acknowledges Ch is’s a is ic skill a he han
e ishizing his body. This lulls he audience in o a sense o sa e y: Peele ini ially posi ions Jim
as an example o «good whi e people» (Sulli an, 2014). Jim acknowledges dimensions o
Ch is ha o he pa ygoe s ail o ecognize, and a e Peele makes e ishiza ion explici o
he iewe h ough aes he ic ne ousness, he absence o e ishiza ion in Ch is’s in e ac ion
wi h Jim makes him seem like a na u al ally o Ch is. The e ela ion o Jim as he highes
bidde on Ch is p o es ha none o he whi e cha ac e s can o will ul ill he ope o he
whi e sa io .
Ge ou
6 Papeles del CEIC, 2020/2, 1-8
To e u n o Quayson, one o he dimensions o aes he ic ne ousness can be a sho -
ci cui ing o audience expec a ion o how hey belie e na a i e should go (2007: 15). The ilm
sub e s he ope o he whi e sa io as i makes Ch is he he o o his own s o y in a gen e
known o dispensing wi h Black male cha ac e s ea ly and o en (B uni, 2017). Likewise,
much o he pop cul u al discussion o he ilm has cen e ed on he ilm’s sub e sion o he
whi e sa io ope as i pe ains o Rose and he ep esen a ion o whi e eminism (B uni,
2017; McCa hy, 2017; Tensley, 2017; Ngangu a, 2017). Howe e , hese analyses o e look ha
he wo whi e cha ac e s wi h whom Ch is seems o connec a e Rose and Jim. Rose’s whi e
womanhood, as a body wi h an iden i y ha is opp essed h ough misogyny and sexism
bu will ne e expe ience acism, soo hes he whi e audience in o us ing he . Simila ly,
Jim’s disabili y ma ks ye ano he opp essed iden i y wi h whom Ch is could ind some
common g ound. Howe e , Ge Ou makes clea ha he sha ed p eca i y o belonging o
any ma ginalized iden i y does no es ablish na u al alliances, especially whe e whi eness is
conce ned. The audience mus accep ha he ope o he whi e sa io has no place among
an eli e g oup o people who ac i ely pa icipa e in he e ishiza ion o Black bodies. Jim’s
colo blindness is no a i ue, and his complici y u he de elops he aes he ic ne ousness
which Peele nu u es om he ilm’s opening scene.
CONCLUSION
Disabili y s udies and c ip heo y a e essen ial amewo ks h ough which c i ical ace analy-
ses o Ge Ou can be enhanced. Th ough aes he ic ne ousness, Peele ains he audience o
eel anxie y a he policing and biopowe exhibi ed o e Black bodies o be compulso ily able.
Bu i is his e y aining ha manipula es he whi e audience in o ealizing ha he p i ile-
ges o whi eness also apply o whi e mino i ies. Fu he mo e, Peele ains he iewe o oo
o he su i al o a Black male cha ac e in a ho o ilm while chee ing o he des uc ion
o he no ma i e whi e amily whose h i ing elies on he ensla emen o Black bodyminds.
Jus as impo an ly, Peele manipula es he iewe in o eeling disgus and ho o a he euge-
nic ideology o he A mi ages. Th ough disabili y and ace, he ilm is e ealed o no only be
a sub e sion o he an asy o a pos - acial Uni ed S a es bu o also be a disabili y na a i e
in i s c i ique o whi e eugenic alues.
REFERENCES
Ab ams, J.C. (2017). Pop psych: Ge Ou is a lesson in blind injus ice. The Obse e . h ps://
obse e .com/2017/03/pop-psych-ge -ou -is-a-lesson-in-blind-injus ice/. Las isi :
02/07/2019.
Benjamin, R. (2017). ‘Ge Ou ’ and he dea h o whi e acial innocence. The New Yo ke .
h ps://www.newyo ke .com/cul u e/cul u e-desk/ge -ou -and- he-dea h-o -whi e-
acial-innocence. Las isi : 02/07/2019.
B uni, F. (2017). The ho o o smug libe als. The New Yo k Times, SR3.
Papel c í ico 71
h p://dx.doi.o g/10.1387/pceic.21676 7
Dicke son, J. (2017). How ‘Ge Ou ’ disp o es he my h o colo -blindness. Medium. h ps://
medium.com/@TheRealPRLady/how-ge -ou -disp o es- he-my h-o - acial-colo -
blindness-426967564c6d. Las isi : 02/07/2019.
Foucaul , M. (1976). The his o y o sexuali y: The will o knowledge. San Diego: B.E. Ha cou .
Gil oy, P. (1993). The Black A lan ic: Mode ni y and double-consciousness. Bos on: Ha a d
Uni e si y P ess.
Ka e , A. (2013). Feminis , quee , c ip. Blooming on, Indiana: Indiana Uni e si y P ess.
Keegan, R. (2017). Jo dan Peele on he ‘pos - acial lie’ ha inspi ed Ge Ou . Vani y Fai .
h ps://www. ani y ai .com/hollywood/2017/10/jo dan-peele-ge -ou -sc eening. Las
isi : 31/10/2018.
Mbembe, A. (2003). Nec opoli ics. Public Cul u e, 15(1), 11-40.
McCa hy, A. (2017). ‘Ge Ou ’ and he ine ec i eness o pos - acial whi e eminism. Bi ch
Media. h ps://www.bi chmedia.o g/a icle/ge -ou -mo ie-whi e- eminism. Las isi :
02/07/2019.
McRue , R. (2002). Compulso y abled-bodiedness an quee /disabled exis ence. In R. Ga land-
Thomson, B.J. B ueggemann & S.L. Snyde (Eds.), Disabili y S udies: Enabling he
Humani ies (pp. 88-99). New Yo k: MLA Publica ions.
Mi chell, D.T., & Snyde , S.L. (2000). Na a i e p os hesis: Disabili y and he dependencies o
discou se. Ann A bou , Michigan: The Uni e si y o Michigan P ess.
Nduaguba, A. (2017). Sla e y. In Da mou h College’s Feminis Guide o ‘Ge Ou ’. Wo dp ess.
h ps://jou neys.da mou h.edu/ eminis guide oge ou /2017/05/24/sla e-auc ion/.
Las isi : 26/05/2020.
Ngangu a, T. (2017). Whi e libe als a e aking he w ong lessons away om ‘Ge Ou ’. Vice.
h ps://www. ice.com/en_us/a icle/mg4333/whi e-libe als-a e- aking- he-w ong-
lessons-away- om-ge -ou . Las isi : 02/07/2019.
Peele, J.H. (Di .). (2017). Di ec o ’s commen a y. Ge Ou [Film]. Uni e sal Pic u es.
Quayson, A. (2007). Aes he ic ne ousness: Disabili y and he c isis o ep esen a ion. New Yo k:
Columbia Uni e si y P ess.
Sha pe, C. (2016). In he wake: On Blackness and being. Du ham: Duke Uni e si y P ess.
Spille s, H.J. (1987). ‘Mama’s baby, papa’s maybe’: An Ame ican g amma book. Diac i ics,
17(2), 64-81.
S aples, B. (2017, Ma ch 27). The mo ie ‘Ge Ou ’ is a s ong an ido e o he my h o ‘pos acial’
Ame ica. The New Yo k Times, A18.
Sulli an, S. (2014). Good whi e people: The p oblem wi h middle-class whi e an i- acism. New
Yo k: S a e Uni e si y o New Yo k P ess.
Tensley, B. (2018). ‘Ge Ou ’ Is a Welcome Rejec ion o he Whi e Sa io . Paci ic S anda d.
h ps://psmag.com/news/ge -ou -is-a-welcome- ejec ion-o - he-whi e-sa io . Las
isi : 07/03/2017.
Ge ou
8 Papeles del CEIC, 2020/2, 1-8
Th ashe , S. (2017). Why Ge Ou is he bes mo ie made abou Ame ican sla e y. Esqui e.
h ps://www.esqui e.com/en e ainmen /mo ies/a53515/ge -ou -jo dan-peele-
sla e y/. Las isi : 02/07/2019.
Weheliye, A.G. (2014). Habeas iscus: acializing assemblages, biopoli ics, and Black eminis
heo ies o he human. Du ham: Duke Uni e si y P ess.
Wi he ow, H., & Als on, C. (2017). Ge Ou . In A. Ioanes (Ed.), A e li es o Sla e y. Wo dp ess.
h ps://a e li eso sla e y.wo dp ess.com/ ilm/ge -ou /. Las isi : 26/05/2020.
