scieee Science in your language
[en] (orig)

The communication format Science & Cinema: reflecting on representations of science in movies for joint meaning-making

Abstract

We present 'Science & Cinema', a science communication format combining a cinematic atmosphere with scientific expertise. By examining clips from various movies, the format encourages the audience to critically reflect on representations of scientific topics in our popular culture. The evaluation of pre- and post-event questionnaires, along with a focus group session, revealed that the format appeals to different target groups, entertains, creates interest, and fosters understanding and reflection. By making images explicit, the format shows potential to contribute to the understanding and meaning-making of scientific topics that are strongly present in social discourses.

Read accessible full text

The communication format Science & Cinema: reflecting on representations of science in movies for joint meaning-making

Author: Walter, Hildrun; Treiber, Fritz; Brohmer, Hilmar; Brudermann, Thomas; Foelsche, Ulrich; Beranek-Knauer, Heide; Eder, Lucas; Maier, Christina; Jungwirth, Helmut
Publisher: Zenodo
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17257045
Source: https://zenodo.org/records/17257045/files/Walter_etal_2025.pdf
The communica ion o ma Science &
1
Cinema: e lec ing on ep esen a ions
2
o science in mo ies o join meaning-
3
making
4
5
Hild un Wal e *, F i z M. T eibe , Hilma B ohme , Thomas B ude mann, Ul ich
6
Foelsche, Heide Be anek-Knaue , Lucas Ede , Ch is ina Maie , Helmu Jungwi h
7
8
ABSTRACT: We p esen ‘Science & Cinema, a science communica ion o ma
9
combining a cinema ic a mosphe e wi h scien i ic expe ise. By examining clips om
10
a ious mo ies, he o ma encou ages he audience o c i ically e lec on
11
ep esen a ions o scien i ic opics in ou popula cul u e. The e alua ion o p e- and
12
pos -e en ques ionnai es, along wi h a ocus g oup session, e ealed ha he o ma
13
appeals o di e en a ge g oups, en e ains, c ea es in e es , and os e s
14
unde s anding and e lec ion. By making images explici , he o ma shows po en ial o
15
con ibu e o he unde s anding and meaning-making o scien i ic opics ha a e
16
s ongly p esen in social discou ses.
17
18
Keywo ds: Science and Cinema; ilm; audience; ic ion; e lec ion; public
19
unde s anding o science
20
In oduc ion
21
In his p ac ice-insigh , we p esen ‘Science & Cinema (S&C)’ o he i s ime – an
22
inno a i e science communica ion o ma ha uses he powe ul isual language o
23
mo ies o anspo he audience in o popula concep ions o science and scien i ic
24
opics. The sc eening o ilm clips se s he s age o a scien is who analyzes he
25
anspo ed images and examines he con o mi ies and di e gences wi h es ablished
26
scien i ic ac s and esea ch. This o ma aims (1) o a ac people’s a en ion owa ds
27
science, (2) o p o ide deepe insigh s in o he espec i e scien i ic ield, and (3) o
28
engage he audience in a c i ical e lec ion on he ep esen a ion o science and
29
scien i ic opics in mo ies. He e, we p esen he episode ‘Science & Cinema: Clima e,
30
Collapse, Ca as ophes’ as an example o he implemen a ion o he o ma o he
31
opic o clima e change. We epo on he esul s o he concep e alua ion and
32
conclude wi h p ac ical ecommenda ions o designing u u e science communica ion
33
e en s.
34
35
THIS MANUSCRIPT IS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW!
* all au ho s a e a ilia ed wi h he Uni e si y o G az;
co espondence: [email p o ec ed]
The ‘science communica ion as cul u e’ amewo k
36
Recen ly, b oade concep ions o science communica ion ha e been p oposed: Bucchi
37
and T ench (2021, p. 6) de ine science communica ion as “ he social con e sa ion
38
a ound science,” also ecognizing images and ideas ela ed o science in popula
39
cul u e. Ins ead o limi ing science communica ion by s ic s a egic and p esc ip i e
40
no ions, hey acknowledge he di e si y o o ma s and p ac ices and sugges hinking
41
o science communica ion as “encou aging he public o hink abou , espond o and
42
discuss science and i s ole in socie y” (Bucchi & T ench 2021, p. 5).
43
44
In a simila ein, Da ies and colleagues (Da ies e al., 2019; Ho s & Da ies, 2021)
45
a gue o concep ualizing science communica ion as cul u al in na u e. They conside
46
science communica ion as pa o he public communica ion abou science and
47
he e o e p opose ha ocusing on he meaning c ea ed by public s o ies can help
48
guide science communica ion p ac ice and esea ch. This cul u al app oach seems o
49
be pa icula ly help ul when i comes o equen ly deba ed opics in socie y, such as
50
clima e change.
51
52
I has been a gued ha clima e change is an especially challenging opic o
53
communica ion: i is abs ac in na u e, which acili a es psychological dis ance o he
54
opic (Spence e . al, 2012); poli ical pola iza ion and emo ional deba es aise
55
skep icism (Hahnel e al., 2020); misin o ma ion s eng hens exis ing misconcep ions
56
(T een e al., 2020), and lay people’s knowledge abou he opic is o en limi ed and
57
cha ac e ized by mul iple misunde s andings (Fische e al., 2019; Thalle &
58
B ude mann, 2020). In ligh o hese challenges, he e is a clea need o engaging
59
communica ion o ma s ha ecognize he ole o con e sa ions a ound science in
60
meaning-making.
61
62
The ep esen a ions o scien i ic opics in popula cul u e in luence ou indi idual
63
pe cep ions and sha ed concep ions abou science (Bucchi & T ench, 2021; Da ies e
64
al., 2019). S udies ha e shown ha clima e- ic ion ilms d aw a en ion o clima e
65
change, shaping ou unde s anding and emo ional esponses h ough dys opian
66
isions (e.g., Ha & Leise owi z, 2009; Lowe e al., 2006; Sakella i, 2015). When
67
de eloping a science communica ion s a egy, i may be use ul o ac i ely accoun o
68
hese science- ela ed cul u al de ini ions, depic ions, and s o ies p esen in ou socie y
69
(Ho s & Da ies, 2021; Sakella i, 2015).
70
Science & Cinema (S&C)
71
We designed he S&C o ma o a ac people’s a en ion o science using he
72
engaging powe o mo ies. In he landscape o science-audio isual engagemen ,
73
o ma s di e in e ms o ilm gen es and in ol emen o expe s and audiences. Sci- i
74
nigh s a e sc eenings o ic ional mains eam ilms ocusing on en e ainmen , whe eas
75
cinema deba es ake up documen a y ilms and include e lec i e discussions wi h
76
expe s and he audience. Science ilm es i als and sci-a exhibi ions mos ly show
77
independen sho ilms co e ing documen a ies o a is ic ic ion. Film es i als mos ly
78
a e s uc u ed e en s wi h a ying deg ees o expe and audience in ol emen , while
79
exhibi ions a e usually disco e ed indi idually.
80
81
S&C akes i s own place wi hin his landscape showing clips om mul iple mo ies. S&C
82
episodes las a ound 90 minu es and a e o ganized in o i e na a i e blocks. Each
83
block consis s o a sc eening o hema ically cu a ed and compiled ilm clips ollowed
84
by a mode a ed discussion. In ou episodes, we in i e a scien is om ou uni e si y,
85
bu o he expe s in he espec i e ield (scien is s, science communica o s, science
86
jou nalis s) could ake on he ole o discussion pa icipan . The al e na ion o
87
sc eenings o 5-10 minu es wi h discussion no only p o ides clea s uc u e, i aims a
88
s imula ing he audience’s a en ion. Clip selec ion allows a ocused, ye emo ional,
89
explo a ion o he cinema ic ep esen a ion o he scien i ic opic and i s e olu ion in
90
mo ies o e ime. Whe eas ull-leng h ilms may be s onge in men ally abso bing
91
people in o he s o y (na a i e anspo a ion) and in iden i ica ion wi h cha ac e s, hey
92
may dis ac he audience om he opic a hand (G i in, 2017). Documen a ies be e
93
ep esen he na u e o science; independen ilms a e cha ac e ized by ealism and
94
challenging classical cinema ic opes (Felguei as & Ruão, 2025). S&C, howe e , uses
95
mo ies o in eg a e p ecisely hese cul u al images ha hey con ey. The mode a o -
96
scien is dialogue adds he scien i ic iew on he opics and e lec s how he images
97
may suppo o dis o ou pe cep ion o science. The pa icipa ing expe analyzes he
98
clips o hei deg ee o ealism, co ec s ac ual mis ep esen a ions, cla i ies po en ial
99
misunde s andings, and con ex ualizes he in o ma ion based on cu en scien i ic
100
knowledge. In he end, he audience is in i ed o join he discussion. The S&C o ma
101
is sui able o a ious disciplines, as long as he opic has been add essed in mo ies
102
o e ime. We ha e c ea ed a ious episodes co e ing opics o na u al sciences and
103
humani ies, e.g., o mic obiology (‘Zombies, mons e s and mu an s in science and
104
ilm’) o medie al esea ch (‘Mongols, monks, mins elsy: Wha medie al ilms like
105
Robin Hood and B a ehea e eal’).
106
The episode ‘Clima e, Collapse, Ca as ophes’
107
We implemen ed he S&C concep o he opic o clima e change in he episode
108
‘Clima e, Collapse, Ca as ophes’ (Figu e 1). P ominen clima e scena ios and hei
109
impac s build he i e na a i e blocks ice (in o an ice age), wa e (mel ing poles, sea
110
le el ise and loods), wind and ex eme wea he e en s, d ough s, and mig a ion;
111
co e ing i e o se en main hemes aken up in cli- i ilms (S oboda, 2016; excluding
112
p eclima(c) ic s ess diso de and an agonis s which do no ocus on impac s). Fo
113
de ailed clip desc ip ion and ilmog aphy see Supplemen a y File S1. The dense
114
p esen a ion in hema ic blocks makes he na a i es and anspo ed images explici .
115
Du ing a mode a ed discussion, he scien is examines hese images and esumes he
116
scien i ic pe spec i e
117
118
• Block 1 (ice): Clips show an ice age caused by he hal o he No h A lan ic
119
cu en due o global wa ming. The ice-p esiden admi s mis akes made in he
120
CO2 educ ion policy (The Day A e Tomo ow; Emme ich, 2004). This is
121
ollowed by scenes om Snowpie ce (Joon-Ho, 2013), showing an ice-co e ed
122
ci y in he USA a e a ailed scien i ic Ea h-cooling expe imen .
123
124
A e his sc eening, he mode a o asks he scien is abou he physical
125
connec ion o global wa ming and ice ages in geological his o y, and he
126
p obabili y o hem eoccu ing in he (nea ) u u e.
127
128
• Block 2 (wa e ): The squi el Sc a (Ice Age; Saldanha, 2006) causes a dam
129
b each o a mel wa e lake. Film sequences om AI, The Day A e Tomo ow,
130
Wa e wo ld (Reynolds & Cos ne , 1995), and Ha d Rain (Salomon, 1998)
131
al e na e, d ama ically showing he des uc i e powe o wa e . A.I. (Spielbe g,
132
2001) depic s coas al ci ies wo ldwide si ua ed me e s unde wa e due o
133
mel ed pola ice caps.
134
135
The scien is ou lines he connec ion be ween CO2 emissions and he mel ing
136
o he pola ice, he possible ex en o sea le el ise, and i s consequences.
137
138
• Block 3 (wind/ex eme wea he ): A o nado sucks a man ou o his bunke
139
(Twis e ; De Bon , 1996), ollowed by images o a ious ex eme wea he e en s
140
(deadly hea wa es, d ough s, hu icanes and o nadoes, sunamis) om The
141
Day A e Tomo ow, Geos o m (De lin, 2017), and Mad Max - Fu y Road
142
(Mille , 2015).
143
144
The scien is explains he F- o nado scale and whe he o nadoes can also
145
occu locally. I is discussed how ecen ly expe ienced se e e s o ms and hea y
146
ain alls ela e o clima e change.
147
148
• Block 4 (d ough s) s a s wi h a na a i e oiceo e om Mad Max 2 (Mille ,
149
1981), whe e he ailu e o poli ics led o a pos -apocalyp ic wo ld, ea u ing
150
wa e sca ci y and dese s. Scenes om Soylen G een (Fleische , 1973) show
151
a wo ld di ided in o ich and poo , whe e co pses a e p ocessed in o ood o
152
o e come sho ages.
153
154
The mode a o -scien is discussion ouches upon dese i ica ion and i s
155
consequences, ood was e as sou ce o CO2 emissions, and o he li es yle
156
issues like excessi e wa e consump ion.
157
158
• Block 5 (mig a ion): In Sudan, a g oup o e ugees s a hei jou ney o Eu ope
159
due o sho ages in uels and c op ailu es. A young man shoo s a pis ol in o he
160
ai ou o joy a e a i ing on he Spanish coas and is hen sho by soldie s (all
161
clips om The Ma ch; Whea ley, 1990).
162
163
Conside ing ha The Ma ch p esen ed se e al social challenges ela ed o
164
clima e change as ea ly as 1990, he scien is men ions ha he e was al eady
165
a lo o scien i ic knowledge abou clima e change and possible s a egies o
166
ac ion a ailable a ha ime. He discusses he slow implemen a ion o clima e
167
policy in ela ion o scien i ic p og ess. To a oid lea ing he audience wi h
168
eelings o helplessness, he scien is in eg a es messages in line wi h he
169
concep o “cons uc i e hope”, like hinking abou ways o each a desi ed goal
170
(pa hway hinking; “Le 's ake eigh anspo as an example: anspo cos s
171
can be adjus ed so ha he absu d back-and- o h anspo o goods ac oss
172
Eu ope is no longe economically iable.”) o o s i e o ac i ely each hese
173
goals (agency seeking; “We ha e shown as humani y ha we can sol e
174
p oblems i we eally ecognize hem, like he p oblem wi h he hole in he ozone
175
laye .”) (Ojala, 2023).
176

177
Figu e 1: Concep o he science communica ion e en ‘Science & Cinema: Clima e, Collapse,
178
Ca as ophes’ wi h imp essions o he images used in mo ies.
179
Objec i es
180
We e alua e he S&C o ma wi h ega ds o i e ques ions: (1) which kind o audience
181
pa icipa es; (2) which impac does he enue ha e on he composi ion o he audience;
182
(3) wha does he audience expec ; (4) how do hey pe cei e he e en in e ms o
183
en e ainmen , spa king in e es , and scien i ic in o ma ion; and (5) wha a e he
184
mo i a ions and goals o he scien is engaged in he S&C? The in ended ou come o
185
he e en is o inspi e c i ical e lec ion on scien i ic opics and hei ep esen a ions in
186
mo ies. As an indica o o ini ia ed e lec ion, we examined how he e en in luenced
187
he audiences’ a i udes owa d clima e change ega ding conce n, isk pe cep ion, and
188
mo i a ion.
189
Me hods
190
The S&C e en was held wice: once in a uni e si y lec u e hall ha was open o he
191
public and once in a cinema as pa o a local ilm es i al (see Figu e 2).
192
193
We e alua ed he S&C o ma as ollows (1) a quan i a i e e alua ion wi h p e-/pos -
194
e en online ques ionnai es wi h he audiences, (2) a quali a i e e alua ion h ough a
195
ocus g oup a e he e en , and (3) a sho , w i en in e iew wi h he pa icipa ing
196
scien is .
197
198
199
Figu e 2: Imp essions o he wo S&C: Clima e, Collapse, Ca as ophes e en s aking place in a
200
uni e si y lec u e hall (1s ow) and in a cinema as pa o he ‘Science mee s Fic ion Fes i al’ (2nd ow).
201
202
P e-/pos -e en s udy
203
Fo da a collec ion, pa icipan s comple ed he ques ionnai es online (Supplemen a y
204
File S2). We ga he ed 62 comple e ques ionnai es a he uni e si y and 33 a he
205
cinema. The p e-e en ques ionnai e cap u ed pa icipa ion mo i es, expec a ions,
206
cu en knowledge, and demog aphics. The pos -e en ques ionnai e ga he ed
207
eedback on he e en , including whe he expec a ions we e me in e ms o
208
en e ainmen , in e es , and scien i ic in o ma ion. In o de o assess he o ma ’s
209
po en ial o ini ia e e lec ion, pa icipan s we e asked o which deg ee hey had
210
changed hei iew on clima e change in e ms o unde s anding, knowledge, isk
211
pe cep ion, conce n, and in en ion o ac . The ques ionnai es a e pa ially based on
212
an de Linden’s clima e pe cep ion ins umen (2015) and we e adap ed o ou s udy’s
213
que ies. The desc ip i e and quan i a i e da a analysis was ca ied ou in R.
214
Focus g oup session
215
To gain deepe insigh s and desc ip i e in o ma ion abou how he e en was
216
pe cei ed, pa icipan s we e in i ed o ake pa in a ocus g oup, which was only
217
ealized a e he uni e si y e en due o o ganiza ional cons ain s. I was held h ee
218
days a e he e en (see Supplemen a y File S3 o he in e iew guide). Fi e people
219
pa icipa ed, all be ween he ages o 24 and 34: ou om a mas e ’s p og am, one
220
uni e si y g adua e. S a emen s and conclusions a e he e o e based on a small and
221
homogenous sample. The in e iew las ed 100 minu es. Fo quali a i e con en
222
analysis, he in e iew was ansc ibed and coded in MAXQDA2022 ( o he ansc ip
223
and de ailed esul s, see Supplemen a y Files S4 and S5).
224
Resul s
225
The S&C audience
226
We obse ed di e ences be ween he wo audiences. Pa icipan s we e younge a
227
uni e si y: 65% (n=40) we e be ween 18 and 27 yea s old, whe eas a he cinema,
228
60% (n=20) we e be ween 28 and 45 (all da a ables a e a ailable in Supplemen a y
229
File S6). Pa icipan s we e balanced acco ding o gende (uni e si y: 53%; cinema:
230
52% women).
231
232
Rega ding educa ion le el, a he uni e si y, 39% indica ed A-le els, 32% bachelo ’s
233
deg ees and 23% mas e ’s deg ees, 3% indica ed a PhD, one compulso y school
234
(<1%). A he cinema, we obse ed highe alues in he ma ginal ca ego ies wi h 12%
235
indica ing compulso y school, and 15% holding a PhD. Also he e, mos pa icipan s
236
held A-le els (21%), bachelo ’s (18%) o mas e ’s deg ee (33%). We see clea
237
di e ences o he audiences’ a ilia ion wi h uni e si y (see Figu e 3): whe eas he
238
majo i y o he pa icipan s a uni e si y (77%) indica ed close a ilia ion ia hei s udy
239
o wo k, 73% o he people isi ing he cinema e en had no a ilia ion wi h uni e si y.
240
241
242
Figu e 3: Audiences' a ilia ion wi h he uni e si y di e en ia ed o he wo enues.
243
In bo h g oups, pa icipan s o en hink abou clima e change (uni e si y: 85%, cinema:
244
75%) and exp ess high conce n ( a ing 5 on a 7-poin -Like scale; uni e si y: 92%,
245
cinema: 87%). In he p e es , he majo i y indica ed high mo i a ion o pe sonally
246
engage agains clima e change ( a ing 5; uni e si y: 85%, cinema: 63%). Howe e ,
247
o he cinema se ing, almos one hi d exp essed a he low mo i a ion (30% a ed 2
248
o 3).
249
Pe cep ion o he S&C e en
250
Pa icipan s mainly ound ou abou he e en ia pe sonal con ac s (uni e si y: 66%,
251
cinema: 55%) and o he cinema ia pos e ad e ising (27%). Social media,
252
newsle e s, and websi es played mino oles (< 10%).
253
254
Pa icipan s expec ed p ima ily in o ma ion (uni e si y: 89%, cinema: 88%) and
255
en e ainmen (uni e si y: 74%, cinema: 58%). Insigh s in o esea ch esul s
256
(uni e si y: 48%, cinema: 52%) and sugges ions o clima e ac ion (uni e si y: 35%,
257
cinema: 39%) we e expec ed a lowe a es.
258
En e ainmen and in e es
259
Mos people in he audience gene ally liked he e en (mean alue o he uni e si y
260
Muni = 6.18  0.95; mean alue o he cinema Mcin = 5.70  1.33; scale om 1 (‘no a
261
all’) o 7 (‘enjoyed i a lo ’)). They we e en e ained ( a ing 5; uni e si y: 83%, cinema:
262
63%) and showed high in e es ( a ing 5: uni e si y: 92%, cinema: 81%) (Table 1).
263
264
The ocus g oup session ein o ced indings ha he S&C o ma is able o link
265
en e ainmen and scien i ic in o ma ion (see also Table 2 and S4, pos. 265). The e en
266
e oked a ious al e na ing emo ions, spa ked in e es , and linked posi i e eelings wi h
267
he acquisi ion o knowledge (pos. 276-278, 369, 488-492).
268
Recommenda ions
414
Based on he e alua ion, we make he ollowing ecommenda ions:
415
• Main ain a balance be ween en e aining s o ies and scien i ic insigh s, and
416
co ec mis ep esen a ions. Gi en ha S&C audiences expec ed scien i ic
417
insigh s and en e ainmen a he han de ailed esea ch esul s, we ecommend
418
ocusing on gene al unde s anding o scien i ic concep s.
419
• Inco po a e e e ences o local en i onmen s o enhance he connec ion o
420
scien i ic opics o he sel and communi y, which showed high esonance in ou
421
ocus g oup discussion (e.g., o es dieback, Table 2).
422
• U ilize ilm na a i es o es ablish a connec ion wi h he audience and e oke an
423
emo ional esponse. When u ilizing emo ion-based messaging, make p uden
424
use o clips elici ing nega i e emo ions like ea and combine hem wi h
425
messages o hope and solu ions o p omo e emo ional low and mi iga e
426
maladap i e e ec s (Dennison, 2024; Nabi e al., 2018).
427
428
Based on he lessons lea ned om implemen a ion, we make he ollowing p ac ical
429
ecommenda ions:
430
• Selec e en enues and amewo ks acco ding o he a ge audience. Ou
431
esul s unde line he impo ance o o -campus e en s o acili a e access o
432
people om di e se backg ounds.
433
• Reach ou o acili a o s wi hin he communi y o you a ge audience o
434
ad e ise he e en o o pa icipa e as a discussan . Ou esul s showed ha
435
mos people engage due o pe sonal con ac s.
436
• Make su e o apply o ilm sc eening licenses while p epa ing you e en .
437
Conclusions
438
Ou pe cep ion o science and scien i ic opics is no only shaped by adi ional science
439
communica ion i sel , bu also by he cul u al con e sa ion a ound science as a whole,
440
including images and ep esen a ions con eyed in he media and ou popula cul u e.
441
Taking hese in o accoun may guide new app oaches in science communica ion
442
p ac ice, since we can make hem explici , examine hem, and encou age c i ical
443
e lec ion. This seems especially ele an in imes o in o ma ion o e load and
444
inc easing p esence o alse o misleading s a emen s. The indings om ou
445
e alua ion sugges ha he S&C o ma p esen ed he e is able o make he audience
446
ques ion hese images and o cla i y he scien i ic pe spec i e on he opic a hand.
447
Fu he , i is able o a ac in e es o bo h people wi h highe and lowe o mal a ini y
448
le els o science. We a gue ha especially o scien i ic opics ha a e s ongly p esen
449
in socie al discou ses, S&C can con ibu e o ou unde s anding, e lec ion, and
450
de elopmen o cul u al concep ions o science.
451
452

Re e ences
453
Bucchi, M., & T ench, B. (2021). Re hinking science communica ion as he
454
social con e sa ion a ound science. JCOM, 20(03), Y01.
455
h ps://doi.o g/10.22323/2.20030401
456
Busselle, R., & Bilandzic, H. (2008). Fic ionali y and pe cei ed ealism in
457
expe iencing s o ies: A model o na a i e comp ehension and
458
engagemen . Communica ion Theo y, 18(2), 255–280.
459
h ps://doi.o g/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x
460
Da ies, S. R., Halpe n, M., Ho s , M., Ki by, D., & Lewens ein, B. (2019).
461
Science s o ies as cul u e: expe ience, iden i y, na a i e and emo ion in
462
public communica ion o science. JCOM, 18(05), A01.
463
h ps://doi.o g/10.22323/2.18050201
464
Dawson, E., Iqani, M., & Lock, S. (2024). Why should we hink abou social
465
jus ice in science communica ion? JCOM, 23(04), E.
466
h ps://doi.o g/10.22323/2.23040501
467
De Bon , J. (Di ec o ). (1996). Twis e [Film], Uni e sal Pic u es.
468
Dennison, J. (2024). Emo ions: unc ions and signi icance o a i udes,
469
beha iou , and communica ion. Mig a ion S udies, 12(1), 1-20.
470
h ps://doi.o g/10.1093/mig a ion/mnad018
471
De lin, D. (Di ec o ). (2017). Geos o m [Film], Skydance Media.
472
DeWi , J., & A che , L. (2017). Pa icipa ion in in o mal science lea ning
473
expe iences: The ich ge iche ? In e na ional Jou nal o Science
474
Educa ion, Pa B, 7(4), 356–373.
475
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/21548455.2017.1360531
476
Emme ich, R. (Di ec o ). (2004). The Day A e Tomo ow [Film], 20 h
477
Cen u y S udios.
478
Felguei as, E., & Ruão, T. (2025). Science on he sc een: he ep esen a ion
479
o science in independen ilms. JCOM 24(03), A02.
480
h ps://doi.o g/10.22323/2.24030202
481
Fische , H., Amelung, D., & Said, N. (2019). The accu acy o Ge man
482
ci izens’ con idence in hei clima e change knowledge. Na u e Clima e
483
Change, 9(10), 776–780. h ps://doi.o g/10.1038/s41558-019-0563-0
484
Fleische , R. (Di ec o ). (1973). Soylen G een [Film], MGM.
485
G i in, L. N. (2017). Audience Reac ions o Clima e Change and Science in
486
Disas e Cli- i Films: A Quali a i e Analysis. The Jou nal o Public In e es
487
Communica ions, 1(2), 133-152. h ps://doi.o g/10.32473/jpic. 1.i2.p133
488
Gollwi ze , P., & Shee an, P. (2006). Implemen a ion In en ions and Goal
489
Achie emen : A Me a-analysis o E ec s and P ocesses. Ad ances in
490
Expe imen al Social Psychology, 38, 69-119.
491
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1
492
Hahnel, U. J. J., Mumen hale , C., & B osch, T. (2020). Emo ional
493
ounda ions o he public clima e change di ide. Clima ic Change, 161(1),
494
9–19. h ps://doi.o g/10.1007/s10584-019-02552-0
495
Ha , P. S., & Leise owi z, A. A. (2009). Finding he Teachable Momen : An
496
Analysis o In o ma ion-Seeking Beha io on Global Wa ming Rela ed
497
Websi es du ing he Release o The Day A e Tomo ow. En i onmen al
498
Communica ion, 3(3), 355-366.
499
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/17524030903265823
500
Ho s , M., & Da ies, S. R. (2021). Science communica ion as cul u e: A
501
amewo k o analysis. In M. Bucchi, & B. T ench (Eds.), Handbook o
502
Public Communica ion o Science and Technology (3 d ed.)(p. 182-197).
503
Rou ledge. h ps://doi.o g/10.4324/9781003039242
504
Joon-Ho, B. (Di ec o ). (2013). Snowpie ce (Seolgugyeolcha) [Film], CJ
505
En e ainmen .
506
Ki by, D. A. (2008). Cinema ic science. In M. Bucchi, & B. T ench (Eds.),
507
Handbook o Public Communica ion o Science and Technology (1s
508
ed.)(p. 41-56). Rou ledge.
509
Lowe, T., B own, K., Dessai, S., de F ança Do ia, M., Haynes, K., & Vincen ,
510
K. (2006). Does omo ow e e come? Disas e na a i e and public
511
pe cep ions o clima e change. Public Unde s anding o Science, 15(4),
512
435–457. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/0963662506063796
513
Mille , G. (Di ec o ). (1981). Mad Max 2 – The Road Wa io [Film], Kennedy
514
Mille P oduc ions.
515
Mille , G. (Di ec o ). (2015). Mad Max – Fu y Road [Film], Wa ne B os.
516
Nabi, R. L., Gus a son, A., & Jensen, R. (2018). F aming Clima e Change:
517
Explo ing he Role o Emo ion in Gene a ing Ad ocacy Beha io . Science
518
Communica ion, 40(4), 442-468.
519
h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/1075547018776019
520
Müggenbu g, H. (2021). Beyond he limi s o memo y? The eliabili y o
521
e ospec i e da a in a el esea ch. T anspo a ion Resea ch Pa A,
522
145, 302-318. h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j. a.2021.01.010
523
Ojala, M. (2023). Hope and clima e-change engagemen om a
524
psychological pe spec i e. Cu en Opinion in Psychology, 49:101514.
525
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101514
526
Reynolds, K., & Cos ne , K. (Di ec o ). (1995). Wa e wo ld [Film], Uni e sal
527
Pic u es.
528
Rosin, M.S., S o ksdieck, M., O’Connell, K., Keys, B., Hoke, K., &
529
Lewens ein, B.V. (2023). B oadening pa icipa ion in science h ough a s-
530
acili a ed expe iences a a cul u al es i al. PLoS ONE, 18(5), A icle
531
e0284432. h ps://doi.o g/10.1371/jou nal.pone.0284432
532
Sakella i, M. (2015). Cinema ic clima e change, a p omising pe spec i e on
533
clima e change communica ion. Public Unde s anding o Science, 24(7),
534
827-841. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/0963662514537028
535
Saldanha, C. (Di ec o ). (2006). Ice Age – The Mel down [Film], 20 h Cen u y
536
S udios.
537
Salomon, M. (Di ec o ). (1998). Ha d Rain [Film], BBC.
538
Spence, A., Poo inga, W., & Pidgeon, N. (2012). The Psychological
539
Dis ance o Clima e Change. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957–972.
540
h ps://doi.o g/10.1111/J.1539-6924.2011.01695.X
541
Spielbe g, S. (Di ec o ). (2001). A.I. A i icial In elligence [Film], Amblin
542
En e ainmen .
543
S oboda, M. (2016). Cli- i on he sc een(s): pa e ns in he ep esen a ions o
544
clima e change in ic ional ilms. WIREs Clim Change, 7, 43-64.
545
h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/wcc.381
546
Thalle , A., & B ude mann, T. (2020). “You know no hing, John Doe” –
547
Judgmen al o e con idence in lay clima e knowledge. Jou nal o
548
En i onmen al Psychology, 69, 101427.
549
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jen p.2020.101427
550
T een, K. M. d. I., Williams, H. T. P., & O’Neill, S. J. (2020). Online
551
misin o ma ion abou clima e change. Wiley In e disciplina y Re iews:
552
Clima e Change, 11(5), 1–20. h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/wcc.665
553
an de Linden, S. (2015). The social-psychological de e minan s o clima e
554
change isk pe cep ions: Towa ds a comp ehensi e model. Jou nal o
555
En i onmen al Psychology, 41, 112-124.
556
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jen p.2014.11.012
557
Whea ley, D. (Di ec o ). (1990). The Ma ch [Film], BBC.
558
Open Science and E hics S a emen
559
This s udy was app o ed by he local Uni e si y o [anonymized] E hics Commi ee
560
(No. 2022/23/56). In o med consen o pa icipa e was ob ained om all pa icipan s.
561
Da a and ma e ials a e a ailable a he Open Science F amewo k eposi o y
562
(h ps://os .io/ahy /? iew_only=aab00304 900477cae9c3ce0b667ab3d).
563
Acknowledgemen s
564
We would like o since ely hank all pa icipan s in his s udy and [anonymized] o his
565
suppo in e en o ganiza ion. We also hank [anonymized] and he o ganiza ional
566
eam o he [anonymized] Fes i al o hos ing he e en a he cinema.
567