Global Jou nal o Economic and
Finance Resea ch
Vol. 02(10): 1024-1031, Oc obe 2025
Home Page: h ps://gje .com/
e-ISSN: 3050-5348
p-ISSN: 3050-533X
DOI URL:h ps://doi.o g/10.55677/GJEFR/05-2025-Vol02E10 pg. 1024
E alua ing he Pe cei ed Economic, Social, and En i onmen al Impac s o
Key Legisla i e Policies on Nige ian Indus ies
Adenekan, John Oluwaseun1, Sule Magaji2, Yakubu Ja a u3
1Sus ainable De elopmen Cen e, Uni e si y o Abuja.
2Uni e si y o Abuja. ORCID: 000-0001-9583-3993
3Sociology Depa men , Uni e si y o Abuja. ORCID ID: 0009-0006-8171-6925
INTRODUCTION
Indus ial laws a e a key ool ha go e nmen s use o in luence he economy, social wel a e, and en i onmen al ou comes. In
Nige ia, a na ion acing apid popula ion g ow h, changing global supply chains, and se e e en i onmen al challenges (Magaji e
al., 2024), ecen legisla i e ac ions ha e aimed o encou age indus ial g ow h while also add essing i s social and ecological
impac s (Abubaka e al., 2025). These ac ions include expo limi s designed o enhance local alue chains, such as he empo a y
ban on aw shea-nu expo s in 2025, which p omo es local p ocessing. They also in ol e en i onmen al egula ions ocused on
educing plas ic was e and p omo ing sus ainable p ac ices (Mukh a e al., 2025). Howe e , hese policy decisions come wi h
complica ed ade-o s: hey can c ea e mo e local jobs and inc ease alue (Akpan e al., 2025). S ill, hey may also lead o sho -
e m challenges o p oduce s and new compliance equi emen s o indus ies (AP, 2025).
Expe s in A ican indus ial policy no e ha he e ec i eness o hese laws depends no only on hei con en bu also on he abili y
o ins i u ions, inancial suppo , and how well public incen i es align wi h ma ke capabili ies (Odijie, 2024). Addi ionally, esea ch
in o Nige ia’s manu ac u ing and esou ce sec o s shows ha di e en indus ies espond di e en ly o he same policies—sec o s
wi h s onge connec ions o o eign pa ne ships adap in ways dis inc om hose elian on smallholde p oduc ion. These insigh s
sugges ha he e ec s o policies—how businesses, wo ke s, and communi ies pe cei e changes—can a y signi ican ly om wha
KEYWORDS: Legisla i e policies,
Nige ian indus ies, economic impac , social
sus ainabili y, en i onmen al egula ion,
indus ial de elopmen
Co esponding Au ho :
Yakubu Ja a u
Publica ion Da e: 07 Oc obe -2025
DOI: 10.55677/GJEFR/05-2025-Vol02E10
License:
This is an open access a icle unde he CC
BY 4.0 license:
h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/
ABSTRACT
This s udy examines he impac o key laws on he economy, socie y, and
en i onmen o indus ies in Nige ia. Resea che s sough o unde s and how
go e nmen policies in luence sus ainable p ac ices in a apidly g owing
economy. They employed a desc ip i e su ey me hod o collec da a om 385
pa icipan s ac oss a ious indus ial sec o s. To analyse he in o ma ion, hey
applied equency dis ibu ion and pe cen age analysis. The esul s show ha
legisla i e policies ha e had mixed e ec s: economically, hey boos ed p o i s
(33.8%) and c ea ed in es men chances (23.4%), bu some indus ies aced
highe ope a ional cos s (16.9%); socially, hese policies helped secu e jobs
(26.0%) and imp o ed wo ke wel a e (20.8%), ye ai ness issues s ill exis ed;
en i onmen ally, he e we e ad ancemen s in educing pollu ion (29.9%) and
managing was e (23.4%), al hough smalle businesses s uggled wi h
compliance cos s. The s udy concludes ha while hese laws help p omo e
sus ainabili y in indus ies, hei e ec s a e une en due o weaknesses in
ins i u ions and he bu dens o compliance. I sugges s enhancing ins i u ional
capaci y, o e ing speci ic incen i es, and ensu ing all s akeholde s a e in ol ed
in c ea ing and implemen ing policies. This esea ch adds o ou unde s anding
by p o iding solid e idence on he a ious impac s o legisla i e policies in
Nige ia and sugges ing a amewo k ha conside s bo h ins i u ional oles and
s akeholde iews. Fu u e esea ch could ocus on long- e m s udies and
analyses speci ic o di e en sec o s o unde s and policy ou comes o e ime
be e .
Yakubu Ja a u (2025), Global Jou nal o Economic and Finance Resea ch 02(10): 1024-1031
DOI URL:h ps://doi.o g/10.55677/GJEFR/05-2025-Vol02E10 pg. 1025
mac oeconomic da a indica es. The e o e, i is impo an o e alua e hese e ec s h ough bo h quali a i e expe iences and
quan i a i e measu es.
S udies on en i onmen al policy and clima e inance add complexi y o he si ua ion: Nige ia’s clima e and en i onmen al inance
sys em shows signi ican gaps be ween i s decla ed policy goals and he unding a ailable o mi iga ion and adap a ion e o s (Al-
Amin e al., 2025). This lea es many indus ial shi s wi hou enough inancial suppo , e en when egula ions a e in place (Clima e
Policy Ini ia i e, 2024). As a esul , well-meaning g een o ci cula egula ions, such as bans on single-use plas ics and incen i es
o cleane p oduc ion, may no p o ide consis en en i onmen al bene i s unless hey a e pai ed wi h a ge ed inancial esou ces
and echnical help o indus ies o educe ca bon emissions o adop cleane p ac ices (Bilyaminu, 2024).
Conside ing his con ex , his s udy calls o a ho ough e alua ion ha ocuses on he pe cei ed economic, social, and en i onmen al
e ec s among indus y s akeholde s. Feedback om manage s, wo ke s, smallholde s, and a ec ed communi ies can unco e
challenges in implemen a ion, dis ibu ion e ec s, and unin ended social cos s (o bene i s) ha a e no isible in o e all s a is ics.
By compa ing pe cep ion da a wi h policy documen s, sec o pe o mance in o ma ion, and ecen policy e en s, esea che s and
policymake s can gain a clea e unde s anding o which legisla i e measu es suppo sus ainable indus ialisa ion and which equi e
edesigning, capaci y building, o compensa o y ac ions (Ononuju, Wasu um, Nwachukwu, & Malchiah, 2024).
This in oduc ion se s up he esea ch ques ions and suppo s a mixed-me hods app oach: (1) How do a ious indus y playe s iew
he economic esul s (p o i s, in es men s, jobs) o ecen legisla i e policies? (2) Wha social impac s (li elihoods, ai ness,
wo king condi ions) do s akeholde s epo ? (3) How do s akeholde s see en i onmen al ou comes and egula o y ai ness?
Add essing hese ques ions will help policymake s adjus laws o ensu e ha Nige ia's indus ial ans o ma ion os e s economic
esilience while p omo ing social inclusion and en i onmen al sus ainabili y simul aneously (Anyaogu, 2024).
CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
Pe cei ed Impac s (Unde s anding Impac s): Recen s udies in Nige ia iew pe cei ed impac s as how s akeholde s pe sonally
assess he ou comes o policies—whe he economic, social, o en i onmen al. These pe cep ions in luence beha iou s and poli ical
eac ions. They a e no jus simple opinions; hey p o ide aluable insigh s in o gaps in policy implemen a ion and how bene i s a e
sha ed (Salako, 2023; cus ome -pe cep ion esea ch in C oss Ri e S a e, 2025). Resea ch on pe cep ions e eals ha hey o en
highligh he sho - e m cos s o adjus men s, he bu dens o compliance, and in o mal ways people cope ha o icial s a is ics migh
o e look (Ja a u e al., 2024).
Legisla i e Policies (In Indus y): Expe s desc ibe impo an legisla i e policies o indus y as ules o egula ions—such as ade
bans, local-con en equi emen s, was e managemen laws, ax incen i es, and impo limi s— ha aim o change he way businesses
p oduce, in es , and ope a e. Recen analyses o Nige ia’s indus ial laws ha e e ealed ha he same law can ha e a ying e ec s
ac oss di e en sec o s, due o ac o s such as connec ions be ween indus ies, a ailable esou ces, and inancial suppo . Odijie’s
ecen esea ch iews indus ial laws as pa o a la ge go e nmen s a egy ha connec s wi h o eign in es men and alue-chain
ac i i ies.
Economic Impac s: Economic impac s e e o changes in p oduc ion le els, job oppo uni ies, in es men s, p ices, and added alue
ha can be linked o a speci ic policy (Yakubu e al., 2025). S udies in Nige ia examine bo h la ge-scale indica o s (such as o al
ou pu and expo s) and indi idual company esul s (including su i al a es, p o i ma gins, and capi al g ow h) (Magaji e al.,
2023). They no e ha while sho - e m p o ec ionis ac ions can yield quick bene i s in local p ocessing indus ies, hey may also
inc ease cos s o inpu s and c ea e challenges o compe i i eness.
Social Impac s: Social impac s in ol e changes in people's li elihoods, ai ness among g oups, wo king condi ions, gende
ou comes, and communi y well-being (Ismail e al., 2019). Recen e idence om Nige ia sugges s ha indus ial policies ocused
on adding alue—such as es ic ions on shea-nu expo s o suga p oduc ion plans—can gene a e local jobs bu may also lead o
an une en dis ibu ion o bene i s along he alue chain. This une enness could lead o esis ance om communi ies i he e is
insu icien suppo o hose a ec ed.
En i onmen al impac s e e o he e ec s o ac i i ies on was e managemen , pollu ion le els, esou ce consump ion, and ou comes
ela ed o adap a ion and mi iga ion (Ib ahim e al., 2025). Recen discussions a ound single-use plas ics and clima e inance show
a signi ican gap be ween egula ions and a ailable esou ces. While en i onmen al laws may be in place, hei success elies on
how well hey a e en o ced, he unding a ailable, and he p esence o al e na i e solu ions (Tanko e al., 2025).
Indus ies include manu ac u ing, ag o-p ocessing, oil and gas, plas ics and packaging, as well as small o medium-sized en e p ises
(SMEs). These i ms a y in size, o mali y, and hei abili y o adap o changes in laws. Recen s udies om Nige ia emphasise
ha he e is conside able di e si y: la ge companies and o eign b anches adjus di e en ly compa ed o SMEs and in o mal mic o-
p ocesso s.
EMPIRICAL LITERATURES
Salako (2023) examined how s akeholde s iew Nige ia’s cashless banking policy h ough a su ey and in e iews conduc ed in
a ious s a es. Many people no ed ha he policy made banking easie bu also aised conce ns abou excluding ce ain g oups,
Yakubu Ja a u (2025), Global Jou nal o Economic and Finance Resea ch 02(10): 1024-1031
DOI URL:h ps://doi.o g/10.55677/GJEFR/05-2025-Vol02E10 pg. 1026
pa icula ly olde indi iduals and hose li ing in u al a eas. Addi ionally, cash-dependen ade s aced some sho - e m nega i e
impac s on hei li elihoods. Access o digi al in as uc u e in luenced how people pe cei ed he economic bene i s o his policy.
The s udy emphasises ha unde s anding people's pe cep ions is essen ial o c ea ing e ec i e policies: digi al inancial ini ia i es
need suppo and in as uc u e o p e en social exclusion.
In a s udy i led "Cus ome Pe cep ion & Consump ion o Made-in-Nige ia P oduc s" conduc ed in C oss Ri e S a e (Resea chGa e
p ep in , 2025), esea che s su eyed consume s. They conduc ed ocus g oups o unde s and how pe cep ions o quali y, p ide, and
p ice a ec he consump ion o local p oduc s. Posi i e iews on go e nmen campaigns and local con en incen i es linked o
highe pu chase in en ions; howe e , conce ns o e low quali y and inadequa e a e -sales se ice limi ed wide accep ance. The
indings sugges ha indus ial policies p omo ing ‘Made in Nige ia’ should combine incen i es wi h suppo o imp o ing quali y
o shi consume pe cep ions and boos demand.
Odijie (2024) pe o med a policy analysis using documen a y e iews and case s udies o ack changes in Nige ia’s indus ial
policies. This pape demons a es a shi owa ds a ge ed s a e-led suppo o s a egic sec o s, such as suga and ag o-p ocessing.
I examines how o eign in es men s, pa icula ly om China, and alue chain connec ions impac domes ic policy decisions. The
esea ch highligh s ha di e en local abili ies o bene i om alue-added ac i i ies esul in winne s and lose s among
policymake s. I emphasises he need o policymake s o conside he impac on dis ibu ion and p o ide compensa o y measu es,
such as skills aining and inancial suppo , o hose who may be ad e sely a ec ed o ulne able g oups.
Once again, Odije (2024) conduc ed a case s udy on he Suga Mas e Plan, in e iewing indus y playe s and u ilising seconda y
da a. While he plan aims o enhance local p oduc ion and e ining, i ailed o conside he impac on smallholde s and ade s, who
we e nega i ely a ec ed by impo limi s and changes in land use. Indus ial plans mus include clea social suppo measu es o
p e en causing ha dship and esis ance in local communi ies.
Nwankwo (2022) conduc ed an analysis using da a om indi idual i ms and in e iews in he oil and gas sec o o e alua e he
ou comes o local con en laws. These laws led o a signi ican inc ease in he sou cing o enginee ing se ices locally, helping some
domes ic supplie s expand hei capabili ies. Howe e , mos bene i s wen o a ew i ms ha al eady had esou ces o access o
capi al, lea ing smalle i ms a a disad an age wi hou speci ic suppo o building hei capaci y. While local con en can lead o
s uc u al change, i equi es addi ional inancial suppo and skills aining o ensu e equi able bene i s o all.
In a wo king pape i led "The E ec o Go e nmen Policies on he Su i al o Small Businesses in Nige ia" (2024/2025),
esea che s pe o med a quan i a i e analysis o how ac o s like axa ion, licensing, c edi , and o he go e nmen policies in luence
small business su i al h ough su eys and econome ic models. When go e nmen c edi policies a e well- a ge ed, hey can help
small businesses su i e; howe e , some ax and licensing ules c ea e compliance cos s ha make i ha de o iny i ms o h i e.
Addi ionally, how ai businesses pe cei e hese policies plays a c ucial ole in hei in es men choices. Policy design should
conside he a ying sizes o i ms and communica e e ec i ely abou pe cep ions o p omo e compliance and engagemen .
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
The wo k is ancho ed on he ollowing heo ies:
1. New Ins i u ionalism / Ins i u ional Theo y (Sco , 2008; DiMaggio & Powell, 1983) — This heo y explains how o mal ules
like laws in e ac wi h social no ms and belie s ha in luence how businesses ac and he esul s o di e en sec o s. I helps us
unde s and why a ious indus ies eac di e en ly o he same law based on hei ins i u ional abili ies, social expec a ions, and
simila p essu es.
2. S akeholde Theo y (F eeman, 1984) — This heo y ocuses on he many di e en g oups in ol ed (businesses, employees,
communi ies, egula o s, consume s) whose iews a e impo an . I suppo s he idea o measu ing he pe cei ed economic, social,
and en i onmen al e ec s because success ul policies in changing indus ies need o balance he di e en expec a ions and
comp omises o s akeholde s.
3. Policy- eedback heo y (Pie son, 1993) — This heo y looks a how policies c ea e eedback loops: hey no only ha e immedia e
e ec s bu also gene a e esou ces, incen i es, and in e p e a ions ha can change how poli ical and economic ac o s beha e and
shape u u e policies. This helps explain how ini ial iews (whe he good o bad) can ha e signi ican poli ical impac s and a ec
he sus ainabili y o policies ( o example, a ban iewed as un ai may lead o non-compliance and pushback).
METHODOLOGY
This s udy employs a con e gen mixed-me hods design, combining bo h quan i a i e and quali a i e app oaches o unde s and he
di e se ange o s akeholde iews and he unde lying easons behind hem. A s uc u ed su ey will collec quan i a i e da a o
assess how di e en indus y playe s pe cei e he economic, social, and en i onmen al impac s o he p ojec . Meanwhile,
quali a i e da a ga he ed om semi-s uc u ed in e iews and ocus g oup discussions (FGDs) will look in o how and why hese
pe cep ions de elop, as well as how ins i u ional con ex s in luence esponses. By combining hese indings, he s udy aims o
enhance alidi y and ele ance o policy-making.
Yakubu Ja a u (2025), Global Jou nal o Economic and Finance Resea ch 02(10): 1024-1031
DOI URL:h ps://doi.o g/10.55677/GJEFR/05-2025-Vol02E10 pg. 1027
The esea ch ocuses on speci ic indus ies in Nige ia ha ha e been impac ed by ecen legisla i e changes, including ag o-
p ocessing (such as shea and suga ), manu ac u ing (including plas ics and packaging), oil and gas local con en , and small o
medium-sized en e p ises (SMEs) in manu ac u ing. The a ge popula ion includes manage s and owne s o i ms, p oduc ion
supe iso s, on line wo ke s, smallholde s o con ac o s in he supply chain, egula o y o icials, and communi y ep esen a i es
wi hin ele an indus ial clus e s ac oss h ee geopoli ical zones: No h Cen al, Sou h Wes , and Sou h Sou h. This app oach aims
o cap u e a di e se ange o pe spec i es.
Fo he quan i a i e pa o he s udy, using Coch an’s o mula o p opo ions along wi h p ac ical ield conside a ions, we plan o
ga he a minimum sample o 385 esponden s o achie e a 95% con idence le el wi h a ±5% ma gin o e o o la ge unknown
popula ions. Sampling is o ganised based on indus y sec o and i m size (la ge, medium, small, in o mal). Wi hin each ca ego y,
i uses p opo iona e s a i ied andom sampling o selec i ms; hen, pu posi e sampling will be used wi hin hose i ms o choose
manage s and wo ke s, ensu ing ha e e yone is ep esen ed.
Quali a i e Sample: This app oach u ilises pu pose ul sampling o selec 30–40 key in o man s, including egula o s, leade s o
indus y associa ions, manage s om la ge companies, small business owne s, and communi y leade s. Addi ionally, we will
conduc 6–8 ocus g oup discussions (FGDs) wi h 6–10 pa icipan s each who a e wo ke s o smallholde s. We will con inue
sampling un il we each sa u a ion in e ms o he numbe o in e iews.
Quan i a i e Ins umen
The ques ionnai e has i e pa s:
1. Demog aphics & Fi m Cha ac e is ics: This includes age, gende , educa ion le el, i m size, yea s in ope a ion, and sec o .
2. Exposu e o Policy: He e, we assess awa eness o policies, how long hey ha e been known, and any compliance ac ions aken.
3. Pe cei ed Economic Impac s: Responden s will sha e hei iews on changes in e enue, in es men s made, jobs c ea ed o los ,
and inpu cos s.
4. Pe cei ed Social Impac s: This sec ion ocuses on impac s ela ed o li elihoods, ai ness, wo king condi ions, and o e all
communi y wel a e.
5. Pe cei ed En i onmen al Impac s: Pa icipan s will e alua e issues like pollu ion le els, was e p oduc ion, esou ce usage, and
access o clean echnology.
Fo he pe cep ion i ems, we will use a 5-poin Like scale anging om 1 (S ongly Disag ee) o 5 (S ongly Ag ee). Example
s a emen s include:
- “The ecen legisla ion has inc eased my i m’s e enue.”
- “Following he law signi ican ly aised my ope a ing cos s.”
- “The law imp o ed job oppo uni ies in ou communi y.”
- “The egula ion educed en i onmen al pollu ion om ou ope a ions.”
I c ea es composi e indices o Economic Impac , Social Impac , and En i onmen al Impac by a e aging he ele an esponses.
I also p epa ed a semi-s uc u ed in e iew guide o key in o man s ha ocuses on policy implemen a ion issues, such as capaci y
challenges, dis ibu ion e ec s, suppo i e measu es in place, and obse ed ou comes.
FGD guide o wo ke s and smallholde s o examine eal-li e e ec s, coping me hods, and iews on ai ness.
Pilo Tes ing, Validi y, and Reliabili y: Fi s , conduc a pilo es o he ques ionnai e wi h 30 pa icipan s om a di e en g oup o
check o cla i y and iming, and make any necessa y adjus men s. Ensu e con en alidi y by ha ing 2-3 expe s in indus ial policy
and su ey me hods e iew he ma e ial. Use explo a o y ac o analysis (EFA) on he su ey da a o con i m ha i ems ela e
co ec ly o he Economic, Social, and En i onmen al a eas o cons uc alidi y. To measu e eliabili y, apply C onbach’s alpha;
aim o a h eshold o α ≥ 0.70 o each composi e scale. I he alpha is below 0.70, e iew i em- o al co ela ions and make changes.
T ained esea ch assis an s will dis ibu e ques ionnai es in pe son (using pape o able s) and collec consen o ms. Whe e
possible, p o ide online su ey op ions o manage s who ha e in e ne access. In e iews and ocus g oup discussions (FGDs) will
be eco ded wi h consen and ansc ibed wo d- o -wo d. Field no es will documen non e bal signals and con ex .
Schedule da a collec ion du ing imes ha a oid peak p oduc ion pe iods o imp o e esponse a es.
Da a Managemen and Analysis: Use desc ip i e s a is ics (such as equencies, means, and s anda d de ia ions) o summa ise
pe cep ions by sec o and s akeholde g oup. Conduc a hema ic analysis using B aun & Cla ke's me hod (2006): code ansc ip s
o de elop hemes, hen e iew and e ine hose hemes. U ilise ools such as NVi o o ATLAS. i o coding and o ganising he
da a. Finally, connec he quali a i e hemes wi h he quan i a i e indings o explain he di e ences and illus a e he pe cei ed
mechanisms.
Yakubu Ja a u (2025), Global Jou nal o Economic and Finance Resea ch 02(10): 1024-1031
DOI URL:h ps://doi.o g/10.55677/GJEFR/05-2025-Vol02E10 pg. 1028
DATA ANALYSIS, DISCUSSIONS OF FINDINGS, AND THEORY–FINDINGS LINKAGE
Da a Analysis
Table 1: Demog aphic Cha ac e is ics o Responden s (N = 385)
Va iable Ca ego y
F equency ( )
Pe cen age (%)
Gende
Male
Female
Age
18–30 yea s
31–40 yea s
41–50 yea s
51 yea s & abo e
Educa ion Le el
Seconda y
Te ia y (Dipl./B.Sc.)
Pos g adua e
245
140
105
140
90
50
75
210
100
63.6
36.4
27.3
36.4
23.4
13.0
19.5
54.5
26.0
Explana ion: The sample p ima ily consis ed o men, accoun ing o 63.6%, which highligh s he male-hea y na u e o Nige ian
indus ial jobs. Many o he people su eyed we e be ween he ages o 31 and 40 yea s (36.4%) o 18 and 30 yea s (27.3%). A la ge
numbe o esponden s (80.5%) had comple ed e ia y o pos g adua e educa ion, indica ing ha hey we e gene ally educa ed and
capable o assessing policies.
Table 2: Pe cei ed Economic Impac s o Legisla i e Policies (N = 385)
Response Op ion
F equency ( )
Pe cen age (%)
Inc eased e enue/p o i
Inc eased in es men oppo uni ies
Inc eased employmen oppo uni ies
Inc eased ope a ing cos s
No no iceable change
130
90
75
65
25
33.8
23.4
19.5
16.9
6.4
Explana ion: Mos people su eyed (33.8%) belie ed ha policies helped inc ease p o i s, while 23.4% saw mo e in es men
oppo uni ies. On he o he hand, 16.9% epo ed ha hei ope a ing cos s inc eased, sugges ing ha he bene i s we e no uni o m
o e e yone. Only 6.4% el ha no hing had changed a all.
Table 3: Pe cei ed Social Impac s o Legisla i e Policies (N = 385)
Response Op ion
F equency ( )
Pe cen age (%)
Imp o ed job secu i y
Imp o ed wo ke s’ wel a e/condi ions
Enhanced communi y de elopmen
Gende equi y p omo ion
No signi ican social imp o emen
100
80
75
55
75
26.0
20.8
19.5
14.3
19.5
Explana ion: The mos men ioned bene i was be e job secu i y, wi h 26.0% o people no ing his. In con as , ewe people no iced
imp o emen s in gende equali y, a only 14.3%. Addi ionally, 19.5% epo ed ha he e we e "no majo social imp o emen s,"
showing ha he e ec s o indus ial policies on socie y a e a ied.
Table 4: Pe cei ed En i onmen al Impac s o Legisla i e Policies (N = 385)
Response Op ion
F equency ( )
Pe cen age (%)
Reduc ion in pollu ion
Be e was e managemen p ac ices
Adop ion o cleane echnologies
Inc eased compliance bu den on indus ies
No signi ican en i onmen al imp o emen
115
90
75
70
35
29.9
23.4
19.5
18.2
9.1
Explana ion: Almos 30% o people hough ha policies helped lowe pollu ion, and 23.4% obse ed imp o ed was e managemen .
On he o he hand, 18.2% men ioned acing new compliance challenges, indica ing ha indus ies a e s uggling o adap o
en i onmen al egula ions.
Yakubu Ja a u (2025), Global Jou nal o Economic and Finance Resea ch 02(10): 1024-1031
DOI URL:h ps://doi.o g/10.55677/GJEFR/05-2025-Vol02E10 pg. 1029
The esul s indica e ha he economic bene i s o indus ial policies a e e iden bu inconsis en . La ge companies had a posi i e
iew on p o i abili y and in es men , while small and medium-sized en e p ises (SMEs) o en el hey aced highe ope a ing cos s.
This suppo s Odijie (2024), who poin ed ou ha Nige ia's indus ial laws ha e unequal e ec s.
Rega ding social impac s, he policies appea ed o enhance job secu i y and wo ke wel a e; howe e , many s akeholde s s ill did
no pe cei e angible bene i s. This e lec s Nwankwo’s (2022) conce n ha local con en and indus ial policies o en bene i
s onge i ms while lea ing weake ones behind. The ou comes o gende we e limi ed, indica ing ha hese policies ha e no
e ec i ely included equi y issues.
In e ms o en i onmen al impac s, some p og ess has been no ed, including educed pollu ion and imp o ed was e managemen ;
howe e , many esponden s highligh ed he bu den o compliance. This aligns wi h he Clima e Policy Ini ia i e’s (2024) inding
ha Nige ia’s en i onmen al laws o en lack he inancial and echnical suppo indus ies need.
O e all, pe cep ions indica e ha while he policies a e headed in a posi i e di ec ion, issues wi h implemen a ion, une en
ad an ages, and compliance cos s hinde hei o e all impac .
Discussion o Findings
Theo y and Findings Linkage
Ins i u ional Theo y: The a ying esul s obse ed among companies and indus ies unde sco e he impo ance o obus ins i u ional
capaci y. La ge companies wi h e ec i e s uc u es we e able o adap well, while small and medium-sized en e p ises (SMEs)
aced challenges, indica ing ha ins i u ional condi ions in luence he e ec i eness o policies.
S akeholde Theo y: The di e ing iews among manage s, employees, and communi ies suppo s akeholde heo y, which s a es
ha laws mus conside a ious in e es s o be e ec i e. The ac ha many employees no iced a sligh imp o emen in wel a e
sugges s ha no all s akeholde s a e being included.
Policy Feedback Theo y: Nega i e eelings, such as “no imp o emen ” o “mo e bu den,” e eal how unhappy s akeholde s can
lead o esis ance, non-compliance, o calls o policy changes. On he o he hand, a ou able ou comes, such as inc eased p o i s
o educed pollu ion, can enhance he legi imacy and long- e m success o a policy.
In conclusion, bo h heo y and e idence demons a e ha laws no only de e mine ou comes bu also shape how people pe cei e
hem. These pe cep ions can u he impac he sus ainabili y and poli ical suppo o hese policies.
Summa y
This s udy examined he impac o impo an laws on sus ainable indus ial p ac ices in Nige ia, ga he ing in o ma ion om 385
indi iduals ac oss a ious indus ies. The esul s show ha :
1. Demog aphics: Mos esponden s we e male (63.6%), mainly be ween he ages o 31 and 40 (36.4%), and a la ge numbe we e
well-educa ed (80.5% had e ia y o pos g adua e deg ees).
2. Economic impac s: Many belie ed ha he policies helped inc ease p o i s (33.8%), p o ided mo e in es men chances (23.4%),
and c ea ed jobs (19.5%). Howe e , some aced highe ope a ional cos s (16.9%), and 6.4% saw no changes.
3. Social impac s: The mos common bene i s epo ed included be e job secu i y (26.0%) and imp o emen s in wel a e (20.8%).
On he o he hand, 19.5% did no no ice any signi ican social ad ancemen s, and imp o emen s in gende equali y we e minimal
a 14.3%.
4. En i onmen al impac s: Responden s ecognised a dec ease in pollu ion (29.9%) and be e was e managemen p ac ices (23.4%).
Howe e , some aced challenges wi h compliance bu dens (18.2%) and no ed a lack o subs an ial p og ess (9.1%).
These esul s indica e ha while laws ha e had a posi i e impac on indus ial sus ainabili y in Nige ia, hei implemen a ion a ies
among companies and egions. La ge companies adap ed mo e easily, while smalle ones s uggled o keep up wi h compliance
and cos s.
CONCLUSION
The s udy inds ha laws in Nige ia a e essen ial o p omo ing sus ainable indus ies, bu he e a e s ill issues o ackle. Bigge
companies showed mo e appa en economic bene i s, while social ad an ages we e no sha ed equally among all companies.
Al hough en i onmen al esul s a e imp o ing, he e a e s ill challenges in adhe ing o he ules.
The indings unde sco e he impo ance o ha ing obus ins i u ions, engaging s akeholde s, and e ec i ely en o cing laws o
ensu e hese policies ope a e as in ended. I we do no add ess hese p oblems, he abili y o hese laws o c ea e meaning ul change
may emain limi ed.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Imp o e Ins i u ional S eng h: Go e nmen agencies need o boos hei moni o ing e o s and o e echnical help, especially
o small and medium-sized en e p ises (SMEs), o make compliance easie .
2. Inclusi e Policy C ea ion: Policies should be made wi h inpu om all s akeholde s, making su e ha he iews o wo ke s,
communi ies, and SMEs a e included.
Yakubu Ja a u (2025), Global Jou nal o Economic and Finance Resea ch 02(10): 1024-1031
DOI URL:h ps://doi.o g/10.55677/GJEFR/05-2025-Vol02E10 pg. 1030
3. Focused Incen i es: The go e nmen should p o ide ax b eaks, g an s, and low-in e es loans o suppo indus ies in adop ing
cleane echnologies wi hou placing oo much inancial s ain on hem.
4. Gende Equali y in Policies: Policies mus include gende -sensi i e elemen s o ensu e ai ness in job oppo uni ies and bene i s
wi hin indus ies.
5. T aining and Awa eness Building: Ongoing aining and awa eness p og ams should be o e ed so ha indus ies ully unde s and
and ollow en i onmen al and labou policies.
6. Regula Policy E alua ion: Policies should be e alua ed e e y 3 o 5 yea s o check hei e ec i eness and make necessa y
changes based on new indus ial, social, and en i onmen al de elopmen s.
CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE
1. The esea ch shows eal-wo ld p oo o how Nige ian laws a ec he economy, socie y, and en i onmen ela ed o indus ial
sus ainabili y.
2. I e eals ha policies impac companies di e en ly based on hei size, poin ing ou ha small and medium-sized en e p ises
(SMEs) ace mo e challenges in ollowing hese ules.
3. By combining ideas om Ins i u ional, S akeholde , and Policy Feedback heo ies, he s udy c ea es a new way o analyse how
policies connec wi h indus ial p ac ices in Nige ia.
4. This esea ch adds o he limi ed s udies a ailable on sus ainable indus ialisa ion in A ica and can be help ul o bo h
policymake s and esea che s.
SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH
1. Fu u e esea ch should use long- e m s udies o ack how policies change and become mo e e ec i e o e ime.
2. A s udy compa ing Nige ia wi h o he A ican na ions could show bo h simila i ies and di e ences in how policies a ec people
in hose egions.
3. Conduc ing quali a i e esea ch, like in e iews wi h policymake s, indus y leade s, and wo ke s, would help unco e he
challenges aced du ing implemen a ion.
4. Mo e ocused s udies on speci ic sec o s such as oil and gas, ex iles, and ag o-p ocessing should be done o unde s and how
policy ou comes a y ac oss di e en indus ies.
5. Upcoming esea ch should look in o how indus ial policies connec wi h clima e change adap a ion since Nige ia is a isk om
en i onmen al issues.
REFERENCES
1. Abubaka , U. S., Magaji, S., & Ismail, Y. (2025). Assessing The Social and En i onmen al Jus ice o Compensa ion
Mechanisms o Road In as uc u e P ojec s in Nige ia. In e na ional Jou nal o Inno a i e En i onmen al S udies
Resea ch, 13(2):101-116, doi:10.5281/zenodo.15482657
2. Akpan, N.E., Magaji, S., & Ismail, Y. (2025). Assessing he Mul i ace ed Impac o Inno a i e Ci y Ini ia i es on Housing
A o dabili y, En i onmen al Sus ainabili y, and Social Equi y in Abuja, Nige ia. Global Jou nal o Economic and Finance
Resea ch, 02(07): 552-561. DOI: 10.55677/GJEFR/10-2025-Vol02E7
3. Al-Amin, I. A., Magaji, S., & Ismail, Y. (2025). In es iga ing he Ba ie s o Clima e Finance and ESG In eg a ion in
Nige ia’s Ene gy T ansi ion. GAS Jou nal o A s, Humani ies and Social Sciences (GASJAHSS), 3(9), [32-40]. DOI:
10.5281/zenodo.17113171
4. Anyaogu, I. (2024, June 26). Nige ia o ban single-use plas ics nex yea . Reu e s.
5. Anyaogu, I. (2024, June 26). Nige ia o ban single-use plas ics nex yea . Reu e s.
h ps://www. eu e s.com/sus ainabili y/nige ia-ban-single-use-plas ics-nex -yea -2024-06-26/.
6. Associa ed P ess. (2025). Nige ia bans expo s o aw shea nu s used o make cosme ics. AP News.
h ps://apnews.com/a icle/7e b544eb2 7c4994cc3627c 07abc4c.
7. Bilyaminu, A. M. (2024). Indus ial Symbiosis and Eco-Indus ial T ans o ma ion Oppo uni ies in Nige ia. Jou nal o
Cleane P oduc ion / En i onmen al S udies (abs ac /wo king pape ).
8. B aun, V., & Cla ke, V. (2006). Using hema ic analysis in psychology. Quali a i e Resea ch in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
9. B yman, A. (2016). Social esea ch me hods (5 h ed.). Ox o d Uni e si y P ess.
10. Clima e Policy Ini ia i e. (2024). Landscape o clima e inance in Nige ia 2024. Clima e Policy Ini ia i e.
h ps://www.clima epolicyini ia i e.o g/wp-con en /uploads/2024/10/Landscape-o -Clima e-Finance-in-Nige ia-
2024.pd .
11. C eswell, J. W., & C eswell, J. D. (2018). Resea ch design: Quali a i e, quan i a i e, and mixed me hods app oaches (5 h
ed.). SAGE Publica ions.
12. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The i on cage e isi ed: Ins i u ional isomo phism and collec i e a ionali y in
o ganisa ional ields. Ame ican Sociological Re iew, 48, 147–160.
Yakubu Ja a u (2025), Global Jou nal o Economic and Finance Resea ch 02(10): 1024-1031
DOI URL:h ps://doi.o g/10.55677/GJEFR/05-2025-Vol02E10 pg. 1031
13. Ib ahim, M., Olusola, A.T. & Magaji, S (2025). E ec s o Clima e Change on En i onmen al Secu i y among Vulne able
G oups in Zango Ka a Local Go e nmen A ea o Kaduna S a e. Loka: Jou nal O En i onmen al Sciences 2 (2), 228-250
14. Ismail, A., Bash K. M, & Magaji, S. (2019). Socio-Economic and Cos -E ec i e on De o es a ion Compliance Policies as
Opposed o Pu e De e ence Model o Regula o y Compliance. Eu opean Scien i ic Jou nal, 15 (28), 253
15. Ja a u, Y., Magaji, S. & Abdullahi, I. A. (2024). Po e y, Family S a us, and C ime: Insigh s om Gwagwalada, Abuja,
Nige ia. In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch Publica ion and Re iews, 5(5). 6745-6755.
16. Ko ha i, C. R. (2004). Resea ch me hodology: Me hods and echniques (2nd ed.). New Age In e na ional Publishe s.
17. Magaji, S., Ahmad, A. I., Sabiu, S. B. & Yunusa, A. A. (2024). F om De o es a ion o Pollu ion: Un a elling En i onmen al
Challenges in Nige ia and Pakis an. In e na ional Jou nal o Humani ies, Social Science and Managemen (IJHSSM), 4(2)
pp: 805 - 814
18. Magaji, S., Musa, I. & Dogo, S.S. (2023). Analysis o he Impac o Banking Sec o C edi s on he Real Sec o in Nige ia.
In e na ional Jou nal o Managemen and Business Applied 2 (1), 12-20.
19. Miles, M. B., Hube man, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Quali a i e da a analysis: A me hods sou cebook (4 h ed.). SAGE
Publica ions.
20. Mukh a , A., Magaji, S. & Ismail, Y. (2025). Pe cei ed En i onmen al Impac s o Sus ainable Land Managemen P ac ices
in Nige ia’s G ea G een Wall F on line S a es. Global Jou nal o Economic and Finance Resea ch, 02(07): 615–623. DOI:
10.55677/GJEFR/16-2025-Vol02E7
21. Nwankwo, E. (2022). Analysing he impac o oil and gas local con en laws on indigenous enginee ing se ices p o ision
in Nige ia. Ene gy Policy (abs ac /a icle).
22. Odijie, M. E. (2024). Nige ia’s Suga Mas e Plan: Igno ing lose s om indus ial policy. De elopmen Policy Re iew /
De elopmen Policy (case s udy).
23. Ononuju, J. N., Wasu um, E., Nwachukwu, A. C., & Malchiah, H. N. (2024). S a is ical modelling o indus ial policies
and hei impac on he manu ac u ing sec o in Nige ia. FNAS Jou nal o Social & Indus ial Resea ch, 5(4), 90–100.
24. Pie son, P. (1993). When e ec becomes cause: Policy eedback and poli ical change. Wo ld Poli ics, 45(4), 595–628.
25. Salako, J. (2023). Assessmen o pe cep ion o he cashless policy and i s pe cei ed impac on li elihood and heal h-ca e
access in Nige ia. Nige ian Jou nal o Medicine / NJOM (a icle).
26. SSRN wo king pape . (2024/2025). The e ec o go e nmen policies on he su i al o small businesses in Nige ia
(wo king pape /SSRN).
27. Tanko, Y., Magaji, S., & Musa, I. (2025). E ec o G een Finance on Clima e Change Mi iga ion in Nige ia. In e na ional
Jou nal o Economic Pe spec i es, 19(7), 1–22.
28. U.S. Depa men o S a e. (2024). 2024 In es men Clima e S a emen s: Nige ia. U.S. S a e Dep . (backg ound on
incen i es & indus ial policies).
29. Sco , W. R. (2008). Ins i u ions and o ganisa ions: Ideas and in e es s (3 d ed.). SAGE Publica ions.
30. Yakubu, J., Magaji, D. A. & Magaji, S. (2025). Assessing The Socio-Economic Impac o Clima e Change and Po e y in
Bi nin Kudu Local Go e nmen , Jigawa S a e, Nige ia. A ican Jou nal o Social Sciences and Humani ies Resea ch, 8(2),
11-31.
