ISBN: 978-93-7143-285-6
127
Chap e - 8
Religious T ans o ma ion, Cul u al Con inui y, And
En i onmen al Sus ainabili y Among he Ta ao o Manipu
D . Shanoi Moses Ta ao
Dep o An h opology, Sou h Eas Manipu College,
Komla habi, Chandel Dis ic , Manipu
Co esponding au ho : [email p o ec ed]
ABSTRACT:
This pape examines he complex ela ionship be ween
eligious ans o ma ion, cul u al con inui y, and
en i onmen al sus ainabili y among he Ta ao ibe o
Manipu , India. His o ically oo ed in animism and spi i
wo ship, he Ta aos expe ienced signi ican social, cul u al, and
ideological change ollowing he in oduc ion o Ch is iani y in
he mid- wen ie h cen u y. Th ough e hnog aphic ieldwo k,
a chi al esea ch and li e a u e e iew, he s udy in es iga es
how Ch is ian con e sion in luenced communi y o ganiza ion,
ecological p ac ices, educa ion and gende oles. Despi e hese
ans o ma ions, elemen s o indigenous ecological knowledge,
i ual symbolism and communal iden i y pe sis ,
demons a ing he in e play be ween adap a ion and
con inui y. This esea ch highligh s how eligious change can
coexis wi h he p ese a ion o cul u al and en i onmen al
e hics, o e ing insigh s in o ai h-based app oaches o
sus ainable de elopmen in ibal socie ies.
Religious T ans o ma ion, Cul u al Con inui y, And
128
Keywo ds: Ta ao ibe, Ch is iani y, En i onmen al
sus ainabili y, Religious ans o ma ion, Cul u al con inui y,
Manipu , Indigenous knowledge, Social change
1. In oduc ion
Religion unc ions no only as a spi i ual o i ualis ic domain
bu also as a c i ical de e minan o social o ganiza ion, mo al
sys ems and ecological s ewa dship. Among indigenous
socie ies, eligious belie s o en encode ecological knowledge,
egula ing esou ce use, seasonal ac i i ies, and conse a ion
no ms (Be kes, 1999; Rappapo , 1968). The Ta ao ibe o
Manipu , loca ed along he Indo-Myanma bo de , ep esen s
a compelling case o eligious and cul u al ans o ma ion.
His o ically, he Ta aos p ac iced animism, ene a ing Akpu,
he sup eme dei y, alongside a hos o spi i s associa ed wi h
o es s, i e s and hills. Thei i uals, including es i als such as
T ik u and Shayamcha , unc ioned as mechanisms o
main ain ha mony be ween humans and na u e, while sac ed
g o es and aboos p o ec ed biodi e si y (Be kes, 1999;
Rappapo , 1968).
The wen ie h cen u y ma ked a p o ound shi wi h he
in oduc ion o Ch is iani y. E angelis s such as Roel Thoma
and Se bum Ngamdil ini ia ed con e sion in 1941, despi e
se e e pe secu ion and esis ance om adi ional leade s.
Ch is iani y b ough li e acy, educa ion, new mo al
amewo ks and gende e o ms, undamen ally al e ing he
social, economic and eligious landscape o he Ta aos
(Ba puja i, 1998; Laldena, 1991). Ye , he p ocess o change did
no e ase adi ional knowledge sys ems. Ins ead, he
Shanoi Moses Ta ao
129
communi y nego ia ed a dynamic in e play be ween con inui y
and ans o ma ion, p ese ing ecological and cul u al
p ac ices wi hin a new ai h-based amewo k (Thomas, 1965;
Kuma , 2018).
Sociologically, he Ta ao case can be in e p e ed h ough he
lens o bo h Du kheim and Webe . Du kheim (1912/1995)
emphasized eligion’s ole in c ea ing mo al cohesion and
main aining social solida i y, while Webe (1958) highligh ed
he capaci y o eligious e hics o in luence economic beha io ,
social mobili y and o ganiza ional s uc u es. Ch is iani y, by
in oducing li e acy, coope a i e labo and e hical s ewa dship,
became a ca alys o bo h mode niza ion and sus ainable
communi y p ac ices, wi hou en i ely se e ing ies o
indigenous spi i uali y.
This s udy si ua es he Ta ao expe ience wi hin b oade
discussions on eligion, cul u e, and en i onmen al
sus ainabili y. I a gues ha eligious con e sion, when
localized and con ex ualized, can os e ecological awa eness,
gende equali y and social cohesion. Fu he mo e, i
demons a es ha indigenous communi ies can ha monize
ai h, adi ion and mode ni y, c ea ing models o sus ainable
de elopmen g ounded in cul u al iden i y and spi i ual e hics
(Tucke & G im, 2001; Jenkins, 2013).
2. Re iew o Li e a u e
The s udy o eligious ans o ma ion among ibal socie ies in
No heas India has been explo ed ac oss mul iple dimensions,
including social change, educa ion, gende ela ions and
ecological sus ainabili y. Howe e , ocused esea ch on he
Religious T ans o ma ion, Cul u al Con inui y, And
130
Ta ao ibe emains limi ed, necessi a ing a syn hesis o b oade
an h opological, sociological, and ecological schola ship.
Ba puja i (1998) analyzed he impac o Ame ican Bap is
missions in No heas India, emphasizing how Ch is ian
missiona y ac i i ies b ough bo h mode niza ion and social
e o m. Li e acy, educa ion, and mo al ins uc ion we e
in oduced, leading o shi s in go e nance, social hie a chy,
and gende dynamics. Thomas (1965) desc ibed a “ ibal
awakening” in which Ch is iani y ca alyzed in ellec ual and
spi i ual ans o ma ion, allowing communi ies o in eg a e
aspec s o mode ni y while p ese ing collec i e iden i y.
Simila ly, Laldena (1991) highligh ed ha missiona y
educa ion p omo ed leade ship de elopmen , in e -
communi y coope a ion and li e acy, p o iding a ounda ion
o social mobili y among ibal popula ions. Kuma (1988) and
Gang e (2011) examined changes in go e nance and social
o ganiza ion in Manipu ’s hill ibes, no ing ha con e sion o
Ch is iani y o en es uc u ed adi ional au ho i y.
Indigenous p ies s and i ual specialis s los cen al au ho i y,
while chu ch leade s assumed mo al and social leade ship.
Despi e his, cul u al con inui y pe sis ed in ce emonial o ms,
o al adi ions, and communi y solida i y. Fo example,
es i als and eas s we e e ained, albei Ch is ianized in hei
symbolism and pu pose, illus a ing he adap i e capaci y o
ibal cul u es (Kuma , 1988; Gang e, 2011). F om an ecological
pe spec i e, Rappapo (1968) emphasized he ole o i ual in
egula ing human-en i onmen in e ac ions. His s udies in
New Guinea illus a ed ha spi i ual belie s codi y sus ainable
p ac ices, con ol esou ce use, and main ain ecosys em
Shanoi Moses Ta ao
131
s abili y. This amewo k aligns wi h Be kes’ (1999) concep o
T adi ional Ecological Knowledge (TEK), whe e cul u al
no ms, aboos, and spi i ual codes guide en i onmen al
s ewa dship. In ibal socie ies, sac ed g o es, seasonal
es ic ions and i ual p ohibi ions unc ion as conse a ion
mechanisms, in eg a ing eligion wi h sus ainabili y. Whi e
(1967) and Con adie (2011) analyzed he ecological implica ions
o Wes e n eligious pa adigms. While some a gue ha
Wes e n eligions dis up local ecological sys ems by
p omo ing an h opocen ic e hics, o he s no e ha ai h-based
mo al amewo ks can ein o ce en i onmen al s ewa dship
when con ex ualized app op ia ely. Tucke and G im (2001)
u he highligh he po en ial o eligious con e sion o
suppo ecological e hics, especially when sc ip u al eachings
on c ea ion ca e a e emphasized. These insigh s a e c i ical o
unde s anding how Ch is iani y has been in eg a ed in o Ta ao
ecological and cul u al p ac ices. Sociologically, Du kheim
(1912/1995) emphasized ha eligion ein o ces mo al cohesion
and social solida i y, unc ioning as a s abilizing o ce in he
ace o apid socie al change. Webe (1958) ex ended his
analysis, demons a ing ha eligious e hics in luence
economic beha io , labo p ac ices, and social o ganiza ion. In
he case o he Ta aos, hese amewo ks help explain he
in eg a ion o Ch is ian mo al p inciples wi h communal
ag icul u al p ac ices, coope a i e labo and educa ional
a ainmen . Despi e abundan li e a u e on la ge ibes such as
he Tangkhul, Mao, and Zou, he Ta aos emain
unde ep esen ed in schola ly wo k. O al his o ies, a chi al
eco ds, and ecen e hnog aphic ieldwo k by he Depa men
Religious T ans o ma ion, Cul u al Con inui y, And
132
o An h opology, Sou h Eas Manipu College (2022–2024)
p o ide unique insigh s in o he Ta ao expe ience. Field
in e iews e eal how adi ional ecological knowledge
pe sis s alongside Ch is ian e hical amewo ks, pa icula ly in
he domains o a ming, o es managemen and wa e
conse a ion. This in eg a ion exempli ies cul u al esilience
and adap i e sus ainabili y in he con ex o eligious
ans o ma ion (Kuma , 2018; P e y e al., 2009).
In summa y, he li e a u e demons a es ha eligious
con e sion among ibal socie ies can be a ca alys o
mode niza ion, educa ion, gende equali y, and mo al e o m,
wi hou necessa ily e adica ing indigenous ecological
knowledge. The Ta ao case exempli ies his dual p ocess,
whe e Ch is iani y ans o med belie sys ems and social
s uc u es while enabling con inui y o cul u al iden i y,
en i onmen al s ewa dship and communal cohesion. This
body o schola ship p o ides he heo e ical and empi ical
ounda ion o he p esen s udy, si ua ing he Ta ao expe ience
wi hin global discussions on eligion, cul u e, and
sus ainabili y.
3. Objec i es and Me hodology
3.1 Resea ch Objec i es
This s udy seeks o explo e he in e play be ween eligious
ans o ma ion, cul u al con inui y, and en i onmen al
sus ainabili y among he Ta ao ibe o Manipu . The p ima y
objec i es a e:
1. T acing he his o ical ajec o y o eligious change among
he Ta aos.
Shanoi Moses Ta ao
133
2. Examining he con inui y o ecological and cul u al
p ac ices a e con e sion.
3. Analyzing he ole o Ch is ian e hics in os e ing
sus ainable li elihoods, educa ion, and gende equali y.
4. Explo ing how adi ional and mode n knowledge sys ems
in eg a e in Ta ao communi y de elopmen .
These objec i es aim o p o ide a comp ehensi e
unde s anding o how eligious ans o ma ion se es as bo h
a d i e o social change and a mechanism o cul u al and
en i onmen al con inui y.
3.2 Resea ch Design
The s udy adop s a quali a i e, e hnog aphic esea ch design,
which is app op ia e o cap u ing he li ed expe iences, belie
sys ems and ecological p ac ices o indigenous communi ies
(C eswell, 2013). E hnog aphy allows o deep engagemen
wi h pa icipan s, enabling he esea che o obse e i uals,
ce emonies and daily p ac ices wi hin hei na u al con ex .
This app oach is c i ical o unde s anding he nuanced ways
in which Ch is iani y in luenced Ta ao socie y while e aining
indigenous ecological knowledge.
The s udy in eg a es his o ical, sociological and ecological
pe spec i es. His o ical analysis aces missiona y ac i i y and
eligious con e sion o e ime, sociological analysis examines
social s uc u es, gende ela ions and communi y o ganiza ion
and ecological analysis e alua es adi ional and con empo a y
esou ce managemen p ac ices. This in e disciplina y design
ensu es a holis ic unde s anding o he Ta ao expe ience.
Religious T ans o ma ion, Cul u al Con inui y, And
134
3.3 S udy A ea and Popula ion
The esea ch was conduc ed in h ee key Ta ao illages
Liwachangning, Shange ching and Leishokching in Chandel
Dis ic , Manipu . These illages we e selec ed due o hei
his o ical signi icance in he sp ead o Ch is iani y and hei
e en ion o indigenous cul u al p ac ices. Pa icipan s
included a di e se c oss-sec ion o he Ta ao popula ion,
encompassing:
1. T ibal elde s and adi ional leade s, o his o ical and
cul u al pe spec i es
2. Chu ch leade s and pas o s, o insigh s on eligious and
mo al ans o ma ions
3. Women and you h g oups, o examine changes in
gende oles, educa ion, and social pa icipa ion
4. Fa me s and esou ce manage s, o in o ma ion on
ecological p ac ices and li elihood s a egies
A o al o 68 pa icipan s we e engaged h ough in e iews,
ocus g oups and pa icipan obse a ion be ween 2022 and
2024.
3.4 Da a Collec ion Me hods
3.4.1 Pa icipan Obse a ion
Pa icipan obse a ion was conduc ed o documen eligious
i uals, es i als, ag icul u al p ac ices, and daily li e ac i i ies.
This me hod enabled he esea che o wi ness he in eg a ion
o Ch is ian e hics wi h adi ional ecological p ac ices such as
sac ed g o e p ese a ion and seasonal a ming i uals. No es
we e aken sys ema ically and c oss-checked wi h communi y
membe s o accu acy (Sp adley, 1980).
Shanoi Moses Ta ao
135
3.4.2 Semi-S uc u ed In e iews
Semi-s uc u ed in e iews we e conduc ed wi h elde s,
pas o s, women and you h. These in e iews ocused on:
1. His o ical accoun s o con e sion and missiona y
in luence
2. Con inui y o adi ional i uals and ecological p ac ices
3. Pe cep ions o social and en i onmen al changes
4. In eg a ion o Ch is ian e hics wi h adi ional
knowledge
In e iews allowed pa icipan s o na a e expe iences in hei
own wo ds, p o iding ich quali a i e da a ha cap u es bo h
subjec i e in e p e a ions and communi y consensus (K ale &
B inkmann, 2009).
3.4.3 A chi al Resea ch
A chi al esea ch in ol ed examina ion o :
1. Missiona y epo s and chu ch eco ds
2. Local adminis a i e documen s
3. His o ical na a i es eco ded in p e ious
an h opological s udies
These sou ces p o ided ch onological con ex o eligious
ans o ma ion and allowed c oss- alida ion o o al his o ies.
3.5 Da a Analysis
Da a we e analyzed using hema ic analysis, iden i ying
ecu ing pa e ns and hemes ela ed o eligious
ans o ma ion, cul u al con inui y and en i onmen al
p ac ices (B aun & Cla ke, 2006). The analysis in ol ed:
1. T ansc ip ion o in e iews and ield no es
Religious T ans o ma ion, Cul u al Con inui y, And
142
solida i y, indigenous ecological knowledge and i ual
symbolism ha e pe sis ed, demons a ing cul u al esilience
amids eligious ans o ma ion (Thomas, 1965; Kuma , 2018).
Ch is ian e hical amewo ks ede ined en i onmen al
s ewa dship by e aming he pe cep ion o na u e as God’s
c ea ion. Sac ed g o es, aboos and sus ainable ha es ing
p ac ices we e e ained and adap ed wi hin Ch is ian mo al
eachings, illus a ing he syne gy be ween adi ional
ecological knowledge (TEK) and ai h-based e hics (Be kes,
1999; Tucke & G im, 2001). Educa ion and chu ch-led
ini ia i es u he ein o ced sus ainable p ac ices by
in oducing hygiene, coope a i e labo and di e si ied
ag icul u al echniques. F om a sociological pe spec i e, he
Ta ao expe ience aligns wi h Du kheim’s (1912/1995) concep
o eligion as a sou ce o social cohesion and Webe ’s (1958)
no ion o eligious e hics shaping economic and social
beha io . The p ese a ion o ecological knowledge, i uals,
and communi y no ms wi hin a new eligious amewo k
exempli ies adap i e con inui y, whe ein indigenous sys ems
coexis wi h mode n ins i u ions wi hou being en i ely
displaced. The Ta ao case p o ides aluable insigh s o
sus ainable de elopmen in ibal con ex s. I demons a es ha
1. Religious ans o ma ion can se e as a ca alys o
educa ion, gende equi y, and social mode niza ion
wi hou e oding cul u al iden i y.
2. Indigenous ecological knowledge can be p ese ed and
in eg a ed in o mode n sus ainabili y p ac ices h ough
adap i e amewo ks.
Shanoi Moses Ta ao
143
3. Fai h-based mo al sys ems can ein o ce en i onmen al
s ewa dship, highligh ing he po en ial o eligion as a
ool o ecological sus ainabili y.
In conclusion, he Ta aos exempli y a communi y ha has
success ully nego ia ed he challenges o mode ni y and
eligious ans o ma ion while main aining ecological
consciousness and cul u al iden i y. Thei expe ience
unde sco es he impo ance o in eg a ing cul u al he i age,
ai h-based e hics and sus ainable de elopmen p ac ices in
policy and communi y planning. Fo o he indigenous socie ies
acing simila ansi ions, he Ta ao model demons a es ha
eligion, cul u e and en i onmen al sus ainabili y can coexis
ha moniously, o e ing a pa hway o socially inclusi e and
ecologically esponsible de elopmen .
Re e ences
1. Ba puja i, S. K. (1998). The Ame ican Bap is Mission in
No heas India. Spec um Publica ions.
2. Be kes, F. (1999). Sac ed ecology: T adi ional ecological
knowledge and esou ce managemen . Taylo & F ancis.
3. B aun, V., & Cla ke, V. (2006). Using hema ic analysis in
psychology. Quali a i e Resea ch in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
4. Con adie, E. (2011). Ecology and Ch is ian ai h: Explo ing he
ela ionship. Wip and S ock Publishe s.
5. C eswell, J. W. (2013). Quali a i e inqui y & esea ch design:
Choosing among i e app oaches (3 d ed.). Sage.
6. Du kheim, E. (1995). The elemen a y o ms o eligious li e (K.
E. Fields, T ans.). F ee P ess. (O iginal wo k published 1912)
Religious T ans o ma ion, Cul u al Con inui y, And
144
7. Gang e, T. (2011). Ch is iani y and social ans o ma ion among
Manipu ibes. Mi al Publica ions.
8. Jenkins, W. (2013). Fai h and sus ainabili y: The ole o
eligion in en i onmen al p o ec ion. Jou nal o
En i onmen al S udies, 45(2), 125–142.
9. Kuma , B. B. (1988). T ibal socie ies in No heas India.
Omsons Publica ions.
10. Kuma , S. (2018). Indigenous knowledge and cul u al
con inui y in No heas India. Indian An h opologis , 48(1),
23–42.
11. K ale, S., & B inkmann, S. (2009). In e Views: Lea ning he
c a o quali a i e esea ch in e iewing (2nd ed.). Sage.
12. Laldena, P. (1991). Missiona y ac i i ies in Manipu . Imphal
P ess.
13. P e y, J., Adams, B., Be kes, F., de A hayde, S., Dudley, N.,
Hunn, E., … Pilg im, S. (2009). The in e sec ions o
biological di e si y and cul u al di e si y: Towa ds
in eg a ion. Conse a ion and Socie y, 7(2), 100–112.
14. Rappapo , R. A. (1968). Pigs o he ances o s: Ri ual in he
ecology o a New Guinea people. Yale Uni e si y P ess.
15. Sp adley, J. P. (1980). Pa icipan obse a ion. Hol , Rineha
and Wins on.
16. Thomas, M. M. (1965). T ibal awakening and he gospel. Indian
Ch is ian Li e a u e Socie y.
17. Tucke , M. E., & G im, J. (2001). Religion and ecology: Can he
clima e change? Ha a d Uni e si y P ess.
18. Webe , M. (1958). The P o es an e hic and he spi i o
capi alism (T. Pa sons, T ans.). Cha les Sc ibne ’s Sons.
Shanoi Moses Ta ao
145
19. Whi e, L. (1967). The his o ical oo s o ou ecological c isis.
Science, 155(3767), 1203–1207.
********
