In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
58
B idging he Gap: Ru al-U ban Dispa i ies in Heal hca e Access
Owoade O. Odesanya
1
, Ola unji Bolanle Blessing
2
Ijeoma Chioma Mo di
3
, Ngozi Blessing Umo u
4
,
Sand a A Palme
5
, Olajide O, Olajojo
6
, Rukaya Abisola Olawale
7
, Kemi K.Oladapo
8
,
1
Depa men o Social Ca e, Heal h and Well-being, Uni e si y o Bol on, UK
2
Depa men o Ma ke ing, Kwa a S a e Poly echnic, Ilo in, Nige ia,
3
Depa men o In o ma ion, In ellec ual P ope y Law, Uni e si y o Lagos, Nige ia
,
4
Depa men o Social Science Educa ion, Uni e si y o No ingham, No ingham, Uni ed Kingdom
5
Depa men o Social Science Educa ion, Leading Lea ning & Teaching, The Uni e si y o Dundee, U.K
6
Depa men o Economics, Facul y o Educa ion, Olabisi Onabanjo Uni e si y, Nige ia
7
School o Managemen Sciences, Babcock Uni e si y, Ilishan Remo, Ogun S a e, Nige ia,
8
MBA wi h P ojec Managemen , Abe ay Uni e si y, Bell S ee , Dundee, DD1 1HG, Uni ed Kingdom,
*Co esponding au ho , E-mail: [email protected]
ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT
©2025 RS Publica ion
Pape ID: IJRM-
6922009C0B976
Recei ed: 2025-10-27
Published: 2025-11-26
DOI:
h ps://dx.doi.o g
/10.5281/zenodo.17
723243
Page No: 58-61
This s udy examines dispa i ies in heal hca e access and ou comes be ween u al and
u ban popula ions, wi h a ocus on iden i ying s a egies o educe inequi ies in u al
se ings. Using a c oss-sec ional design, da a we e ex ac ed om na ional heal h
da abases and pee - e iewed s udies published be ween 2015 and 2024. Mul ile el
eg ession models we e employed o assess p o ide - o-popula ion a ios, a el imes,
and hospi alisa ion ou comes, while Concen a ion Index analysis quan i ied
socioeconomic inequi ies. The esul s e ealed ha u al egions had 42% ewe p ima y
ca e p o ide s pe 10,000 esiden s compa ed o u ban a eas (p < 0.01), wi h a e age
a el imes o acu e ca e acili ies nea ly ipled (28.7 km s. 9.6 km). P e en able
hospi aliza ions o ch onic condi ions we e 31% highe in u al popula ions, and 30-day
eadmission a es exceeded u ban benchma ks by 11%. Equi y analysis con i med a
signi ican nega i e concen a ion index (CI = –0.24), indica ing disp opo iona e disease
bu den among low-income u al households. Model alida ion yielded a oo mean
squa e e o (RMSE) o 0.087, sugges ing obus p edic i e accu acy. These indings
highligh u gen sys emic challenges while demons a ing ha a ge ed in e en ions,
such as eleheal h and communi y heal h wo ke p og ams, hold p omise o add essing
u al-u ban heal h gaps.
Keywo ds: Ru al heal h dispa i ies, Heal hca e access, P e en able hospi aliza ions,
P o ide - o-popula ion a io, socioeconomic inequi ies, Teleheal h in e en ions
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MANAGEMENT
A ailable online on
h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m
ISSN 2249-5908
Ci e This Pape : Rukaya Abisola Olawale, Owoade O. Odesanya, Ola unji
Bolanle Blessing Ijeoma Chioma Mo di, Ngozi Blessing Umo u, Sand a A
Palme , Olajide O, Olajojo and Kemi K.Oladapo8(2025). "B idging he Gap:
Ru al-U ban Dispa i ies in Heal hca e Access". INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
OF RESEARCH IN MANAGEMENT (IJRM), ol. 15, no. 6, 2025, pp. 58-61.
DOI: h ps://dx.doi.o g/10.5281/zenodo.17723243
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
59
1. In oduc ion
Heal hca e dispa i ies be ween u al and u ban popula ions emain a pe sis en and deeply
en enched public heal h issue. Despi e decades o ecogni ion and e o m e o s, signi ican
inequi ies con inue o shape mo bidi y, mo ali y, and access o ca e ac oss geog aphic di ides [1].
Ru al esiden s expe ience disp opo iona ely highe a es o ch onic diseases, delayed diagnoses,
and p e en able hospi aliza ions, while access o bo h p ima y and specialized ca e emains limi ed
[2]. One o he mos endu ing challenges lies in he une en dis ibu ion o heal hca e p o ide s.
Ru al a eas consis en ly epo lowe pe capi a a ailabili y o physicians, specialis s, and
beha iou al heal h p ac i ione s, which con ibu es o poo e heal h ou comes and educed
con inui y o ca e [3]. Beyond wo k o ce sho ages, geog aphic isola ion exace ba es hese
dispa i ies. Longe a el dis ances, limi ed public anspo a ion, and inadequa e eme gency
se ices make i di icul o u al esiden s o ecei e imely and coo dina ed ca e [4].
Consequen ly, u al popula ions emain s uc u ally disad an aged, pa icula ly when acu e o
ime-sensi i e condi ions a ise [5].
In ecen yea s, echnological inno a ions such as eleheal h ha e been he alded as equalize s in
heal hca e deli e y. Howe e , e idence sugges s ha hese ad ancemen s ha e no achie ed
equi able each. S udies e eal ha eleheal h u iliza ion emains highe among u ban and a luen
popula ions, e lec ing sys emic inequi ies in digi al access, in as uc u e, and li e acy [6]. Fo
many u al communi ies, limi ed b oadband connec i i y and a o dabili y issues ha e slowed
adop ion, he eby compounding exis ing heal hca e gaps [7]. E en when se ices a e a ailable,
ac o s such as cul u al p e e ences, heal h belie s, and socioeconomic cons ain s in luence ca e-
seeking beha iou s and unde mine equi able u iliza ion [8]. These issues highligh ha dispa i ies
in heal hca e access a e no solely geog aphical— hey a e embedded in a b oade socioeconomic
con ex ha encompasses educa ion, income, and insu ance co e age [9].
Socioeconomic disad an age plays a pi o al ole in ampli ying heal h inequi ies. Ru al esiden s,
on a e age, expe ience highe po e y a es, lowe le els o educa ion, and lowe insu ance
co e age han hei u ban coun e pa s [10]. These condi ions ein o ce s uc u al ulne abili y,
limi ing indi iduals' abili y o seek p e en i e ca e o adhe e o ea men egimens [11].
Fu he mo e, he g owing digi al di ide has in ensi ied inequali y, as limi ed echnological li e acy
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
60
and inadequa e b oadband in as uc u e exclude u al communi ies om he bene i s o elec onic
heal h eco ds, digi al coo dina ion pla o ms, and eleconsul a ions [12]. Wi hou add essing hese
ounda ional gaps, echnological ad ancemen s such as a i icial in elligence–d i en diagnos ics
and p edic i e modeling may unin en ionally widen he chasm be ween u al and u ban
popula ions [13], [14]. The pe sis ence o “medical dese s,” pa icula ly in emo e o
economically disad an aged egions, unde sco es he need o sus ained in es men in bo h human
and echnological esou ces [15].
P o essional o ganiza ions ha e epea edly emphasized ha u al heal h inequi ies a e p e en able
a he han ine i able. The Ame ican Medical Associa ion, o ins ance, ad oca es o
collabo a i e in e en ions ha combine wo k o ce expansion wi h sys emic policy e o ms [16].
Simila ly, he Ame ican Hea Associa ion and Ame ican S oke Associa ion ha e issued
comp ehensi e ad iso ies calling o e o ms ha conside bo h clinical access and social
de e minan s o heal h [17]. Empi ical s udies ha e suppo ed hese calls, demons a ing wo sening
heal h ou comes among u al popula ions in a eas such as ch onic disease managemen and
hospi al eadmissions be ween 2015 and 2019 [18]. His o ical e iews p o ide a sobe ing con ex :
many o he dispa i ies obse ed oday, including hose a ec ing ma e nal mo ali y and mino i y
popula ions, echo he same challenges documen ed a cen u y ago [19]. This con inui y unde sco es
how deeply s uc u al and ins i u ional hese inequi ies a e, demanding mul idimensional solu ions
a he han isola ed in e en ions.
Readmission a es u he illus a e he dispa i ies embedded wi hin he heal hca e sys em. Ru al
pa ien s a e signi ican ly mo e likely o expe ience 30-day eadmissions ollowing discha ge,
e lec ing sys emic weaknesses in ca e coo dina ion, ollow-up, and communi y-based suppo
[20-22]. Po e y, anspo a ion challenges, and inadequa e ou pa ien in as uc u e compound
his p oblem, leading o highe eliance on eme gency depa men s as a p ima y sou ce o ca e
[23-25]. E en in con ex s whe e uni e sal heal h co e age o subsidized p og ams exis , sho ages
o quali ied pe sonnel and limi ed dis ibu ion o acili ies limi e ec i e access [26-28]. Recen
analyses ha use hospi al e e al egions as uni s o compa ison ha e ound ha u al–u ban
heal h dispa i ies s em no only om di e ences in ca e quali y bu also om sociodemog aphic
disad an age and geog aphic ba ie s [29-31].
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
61
To add ess hese challenges, public heal h schola s ha e a gued o a comp ehensi e app oach ha
ex ends beyond wo k o ce dis ibu ion o include ups eam social de e minan s such as educa ion,
income, and housing [31-33]. Ru al popula ions ace dis inc i e en i onmen al and occupa ional
isks, including ag icul u al haza ds, limi ed access o clean wa e , and inadequa e housing
condi ions, all o which in luence heal h ou comes [34-36]. The e o e, e ec i e policy esponses
mus be con ex -speci ic, sensi i e o he en i onmen al and social eali ies o u al li e, and
g ounded in local pa icipa ion. These indings con e ge on he ecogni ion ha u al heal hca e
dispa i ies ep esen no me ely ailu es o he medical sys em bu b oade mani es a ions o social
and in as uc u al inequi ies[37,38].
Mo eo e , he in e sec ion be ween digi al inequi y and heal hca e access is now a cen al conce n.
The COVID-19 pandemic demons a ed how une en access o echnology can ein o ce heal hca e
exclusion, as u ban and weal hie popula ions we e able o pi o o eleheal h models a mo e
e ec i ely han u al coun e pa s. The esul was a widening o he e y dispa i ies ha digi al
heal h inno a ions we e mean o close. These gaps a e u he ein o ced by educa ional
dispa i ies: lowe digi al li e acy among u al esiden s educes hei abili y o na iga e eleheal h
sys ems, elec onic eco ds, and online heal h in o ma ion pla o ms. Consequen ly, he bene i s
o echnological inno a ion emain concen a ed among hose al eady ad an aged by geog aphy
and socioeconomic s a us.
While hese challenges a e o midable, eme ging e idence o e s p omising di ec ions. In eg a ed
ca e models ha combine p ima y, beha iou al, and digi al heal h se ices ha e shown po en ial
o imp o e access and educe p e en able hospi aliza ions among u al popula ions. Likewise,
ini ia i es ha employ communi y-based digi al ca e coo dina ion ha e yielded measu able
imp o emen s in ch onic disease managemen , pa icula ly o hype ension and diabe es.
Howe e , scaling hese in e en ions emains di icul due o unding cons ain s, inconsis en
b oadband in as uc u e, and limi ed wo k o ce capaci y. The success o such models depends on
aligning echnological inno a ion wi h equi able policy amewo ks, sus ained inancial
in es men , and cul u ally esponsi e implemen a ion.
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
62
In conclusion, he pe sis ence o u al–u ban heal hca e dispa i ies e lec s a con e gence o
socioeconomic, geog aphic, and echnological inequi ies. The s uc u al disad an ages aced by
u al popula ions— anging om p o ide sho ages and economic ha dship o limi ed digi al
access—unde sco e he inadequacy o piecemeal in e en ions. Achie ing equi y equi es
comp ehensi e s a egies ha add ess ups eam de e minan s while esponsibly le e aging
inno a ion. This s udy he e o e, con ibu es o ongoing discou se by sys ema ically quan i ying
u al–u ban dispa i ies ac oss domains such as p o ide a ailabili y, hospi aliza ion a es, ch onic
disease bu den, and digi al access. D awing on con empo a y e idence and equi y- ocused
modelling, i seeks o illumina e he complex in e play be ween s uc u al disad an age and
heal hca e deli e y, p o iding an empi ical ounda ion o policy e o ms ha meaning ully b idge
he u al–u ban di ide.
2. Me hodology
This s udy employs a mixed-me hods design ha combines sys ema ic li e a u e analysis,
quan i a i e da a modeling, and compa a i e ou come analysis o examine heal hca e dispa i ies
be ween u al and u ban popula ions. The app oach is s uc u ed in h ee phases: (i) iden i ica ion
o ele an s udies, (ii) da a ex ac ion and s anda diza ion, and (iii) s a is ical modelling and
e alua ion o dispa i ies.
2.1. Li e a u e Iden i ica ion
Rele an wo ks we e iden i ied h ough a sys ema ic sea ch p o ocol in da abases such as PubMed,
Scopus, and Web o Science. The sea ch s a egy included Boolean ope a o s and con olled
ocabula y e ms:
whe e Q deno es he inal sea ch que y, s udies we e included i hey (i) compa ed u al and u ban
popula ions, (ii) epo ed quan i a i e measu es o heal hca e access o ou comes, and (iii) we e
published be ween 2000–2025.
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
63
Sc eening was pe o med in wo s ages: i le/abs ac e iew ollowed by ull- ex analysis. To
educe bias, wo independen e iewe s conduc ed he p ocess, and in e - a e ag eemen was
quan i ied using Cohen’s kappa s a is ic:
2.2. Da a Ex ac ion and Va iables
F om each eligible s udy, he ollowing a iables we e ex ac ed: (i) p o ide - o-popula ion a ios,
(ii) a el dis ance/ ime o acili ies, (iii) a es o p e en able hospi aliza ions, (i ) ch onic disease
p e alence, and ( ) mo ali y a es. To ensu e compa abili y, all ou comes we e s anda dized pe
10,000 indi iduals.
Socioeconomic de e minan s, such as po e y a es and insu ance co e age, we e also eco ded as
co a ia es. Missing da a we e impu ed using mul iple impu a ion by chained equa ions (MICE),
which p oduces unbiased es ima es unde he missing-a - andom (MAR) assump ion.
2.3. S a is ical Modeling
Dispa i ies in heal hca e access we e quan i ied using a e a ios (RR) and absolu e di e ences
(AD) be ween u al and u ban popula ions:
A mul ile el eg ession model was applied o accoun o clus e ing o indi iduals wi hin
geog aphical egions:
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
64
To e alua e he in luence o heal hca e wo k o ce densi y, a Poisson eg ession model was i ed
o hospi aliza ion coun s:
2.4. Equi y Me ics
To assess inequi ies, we employed he Concen a ion Index (CI), which measu es inequali y in
heal h ou comes ac oss socioeconomic s a a:
2.5. Rep oducibili y F amewo k
To ensu e ep oducibili y, all sea ch que ies, inclusion/exclusion decisions, and ex ac ed a iables
we e documen ed in a s uc u ed da a eposi o y. S a is ical analyses we e conduc ed using R
( 4.3) and Py hon ( 3.11), wi h open-sou ce packages o eg ession modelling and impu a ion.
The en i e wo k low is e sion-con olled and can be eplica ed.
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
65
3. Resul s
The analysis included 72 pee - e iewed s udies published be ween 2000 and 2025 ha di ec ly
compa ed u al and u ban heal hca e access and ou comes in he Uni ed S a es and selec ed
in e na ional con ex s. A e ull- ex sc eening, 49 s udies me all inclusion c i e ia, yielding da a
ep esen ing mo e han 18 million indi iduals ac oss 26 s a es and i e coun ies. The in e - a e
eliabili y o s udy selec ion was s ong (κ = 0.84), con i ming consis en applica ion o he
inclusion and exclusion c i e ia.
3.1. P o ide - o-Popula ion Ra ios
A consis en dispa i y in he dis ibu ion o he heal hca e wo k o ce eme ged ac oss nea ly all
e iewed s udies. Ru al a eas had signi ican ly ewe heal hca e p o ide s pe 10,000 indi iduals
han u ban a eas. Fo ins ance, he mean a io o p ima y ca e physicians was 6.1 pe 10,000 in
u al coun ies, compa ed wi h 12.4 in u ban coun ies (p < 0.001). Simila ly, specialis a ailabili y
showed an e en g ea e gap, wi h u al egions epo ing an a e age o 4.2 specialis s pe 10,000,
compa ed o 19.8 in u ban cen es. Beha iou al heal h p o ide s we e he leas a ailable in u al
a eas, wi h u al- o-u ban a e a ios (RRs) as low as 0.21. Figu e 1 illus a es he dispa i y in
heal hca e wo k o ce dis ibu ion, showing ha u al a eas consis en ly ha e ewe p ima y ca e
physicians, specialis s, and beha iou al heal h p o ide s pe 10,000 esiden s han u ban a eas.
The gap is mos p onounced in specialis a ailabili y, unde sco ing sys emic limi a ions in u al
se ice capaci y.
Figu e 1: P o ide o popula ion a ios in u al s. u ban a ea s.
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
66
3.2. Access Ba ie s, T a el Time and Dis ance
Geog aphic access was a c i ical dimension o dispa i y. The mean a el ime o he nea es acu e
ca e hospi al in u al communi ies was 34.7 minu es, compa ed o 12.1 minu es in u ban egions.
Reg ession models con i med ha a el dis ance was independen ly associa ed wi h highe a es
o delayed ca e-seeking beha iou (β = 0.18, p < 0.05), e en a e adjus ing o insu ance s a us
and income le el. Ru al esiden s we e also mo e likely o epo anspo a ion ba ie s, wi h 23%
o esponden s indica ing di icul y secu ing eliable anspo , compa ed wi h 8% in u ban
samples. The g aph in Figu e 2 compa es a e age a el imes o acu e ca e acili ies, e ealing
ha u al esiden s ace signi ican ly longe jou neys, o en exceeding 30 minu es, while u ban
popula ions ypically a el less han 15 minu es. These geog aphic ba ie s con ibu e o delayed
ca e-seeking and educed access o imely in e en ions.
Figu e 2: A e age a el ime o nea es heal hca e acili y by popula ion densi y.
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
73
examined da ase s, u al esiden s con inue o expe ience highe a es o p e en able
hospi aliza ions, g ea e ch onic disease bu dens, longe a el dis ances o heal hca e acili ies,
and educed access o specialized ca e. These inequi ies a e no me ely he p oduc o geog aphic
emo eness bu a he he esul o a mul i ac o ial in e ac ion in ol ing social, economic,
in as uc u al, and policy-le el de e minan s. The ollowing sec ions ou line key a eas o dispa i y
and p opose con ex ually ele an policy and esea ch esponses, based on he e idence om his
s udy and suppo ing li e a u e [26,39,40].
Figu e 9: Flowcha ou lining he p og ession om s uc u al de e minan s o u al heal h
inequi ies
4.1.
Wo k o ce Dis ibu ion and Heal hca e Access
A majo d i e o u al heal h inequi y iden i ied in his s udy is he une en dis ibu ion o he
heal hca e wo k o ce. Ru al a eas consis en ly eco ded lowe p o ide - o-popula ion a ios ac oss
p ima y ca e, specialis , and beha iou al heal h disciplines. This imbalance e lec s deep-sea ed
ec ui men and e en ion challenges s emming om inadequa e aining in as uc u e, limi ed
ca ee p og ession, and lowe inancial incen i es han in u ban cen es. While exis ing u al
esidency and loan epaymen p og ams ha e demons a ed measu able imp o emen s in sho -
e m ec ui men , hei impac emains insu icien o add ess long- e m sus ainabili y. E idence
sugges s ha s a egic in es men in u al medical educa ion pipelines, coupled wi h enhanced
p o essional suppo ne wo ks, could os e g ea e e en ion among heal hca e p o essionals in
unde se ed egions [27, 40].
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
74
4.2. Geog aphic Ba ie s and Delayed Ca e
Geog aphic isola ion emains a signi ican s uc u al de e minan o access inequi ies. The s udy
ound ha u al esiden s o en a el nea ly h ee imes as a as hei u ban coun e pa s o access
eme gency and speciali y ca e. Inc eased a el ime was di ec ly co ela ed wi h delayed
ea men -seeking beha iou , which equen ly culmina es in ad anced disease p esen a ion and
highe mo ali y. These ba ie s a e exace ba ed by limi ed anspo a ion in as uc u e and he
une en dis ibu ion o e ia y ca e cen es. Expanding mobile heal h uni s, in eg a ing eleheal h,
and implemen ing communi y-based e e al sys ems ha e shown po en ial o educe a el
bu dens and imp o e imely access o ca e, especially o popula ions wi h ch onic illnesses
equi ing con inuous moni o ing [28].
4.3.
P e en able Hospi aliza ions and Ch onic Disease Bu den
Ru al popula ions expe ience disp opo iona ely high a es o p e en able hospi aliza ions,
signalling ine iciencies in p ima y ca e accessibili y and con inui y. Condi ions such as diabe es,
hype ension, and ch onic obs uc i e pulmona y disease—la gely manageable h ough ou pa ien
in e en ions— equen ly esul in hospi al admissions among u al pa ien s. The pa e n sugges s
sys emic de iciencies in p e en i e ca e deli e y and pa ien ollow-up mechanisms. Fu he mo e,
he bu den o ch onic diseases in u al se ings is compounded by socioeconomic dep i a ion,
nu i ional de ici s, and limi ed heal h li e acy. E ec i e in e en ions mus he e o e in eg a e
medical, beha iou al, and social dimensions, p omo ing communi y-based ch onic disease
managemen and public heal h educa ion [29].
4.4. Socioeconomic De e minan s o Heal h
Socioeconomic disad an age eme ged as one o he s onges p edic o s o heal h dispa i ies in
his s udy. Ru al egions exhibi ed signi ican ly highe po e y a es, which explained a la ge sha e
o he a iance in p e en able hospi aliza ions and un ea ed ch onic condi ions. Economic
cons ain s limi heal hca e u iliza ion by es ic ing insu ance co e age, anspo a ion op ions,
and he abili y o a o d p e en i e se ices. These indings a e consis en wi h he social
de e minan s o heal h amewo k, which emphasizes income, educa ion, and employmen as co e
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
75
s uc u al d i e s o inequi y. To educe u al heal h dispa i ies, a ge ed economic empowe men
ini ia i es, heal h inancing e o ms, and educa ional in es men s a e equi ed o complemen
heal hca e sys em imp o emen s [30].
4.5. Readmissions and Con inui y o Ca e
The s udy iden i ied highe 30-day hospi al eadmission a es among u al pa ien s, e lec ing gaps
in con inui y o ca e. A lack o pos -discha ge coo dina ion, weak ou pa ien ne wo ks, and
communica ion ba ie s be ween hospi als and communi y p o ide s all con ibu ed o inc eased
eadmission isk. Al hough hospi al-based se ices we e accessible o u al pa ien s who o e came
geog aphic obs acles, inadequa e ollow-up and moni o ing o en led o elapse o complica ions.
S eng hening ansi ional ca e p og ams, expanding home heal h se ices, and u ilizing digi al
moni o ing ools could mi iga e hese issues. Such e o s a e mos e ec i e when embedded
wi hin b oade communi y ca e amewo ks ha in eg a e hospi als, p ima y p o ide s, and public
heal h agencies [31].
4.6. Inequi ies in Equi y Me ics
The applica ion o he Concen a ion Index in his s udy e ealed ha socioeconomic disad an age
in ensi ies wi hin u al popula ions hemsel es, c ea ing in a- u al inequi ies. Nega i e indices o
ch onic diseases and ma e nal heal h ou comes demons a e ha low-income and ma ginalized
subg oups bea a disp opo iona e sha e o he heal h bu den. This pa e n unde sco es he
impo ance o in e sec ional analysis ha conside s bo h geog aphic and socioeconomic
dimensions o inequali y. Policy esponses mus he e o e a oid one-size- i s-all app oaches and
ins ead p io i ize he mos ulne able households, including hose a ec ed by po e y, mino i y
s a us, and limi ed educa ion [32].
4.7. Po en ial o In e en ions
Despi e hese challenges, he e idence base o e s p omising in e en ions ha can na ow u al-
u ban heal h gaps. Teleheal h se ices, o example, ha e demons a ed subs an ial success in
expanding access o beha io al and p ima y ca e among geog aphically isola ed popula ions.
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
76
Simila ly, communi y heal h wo ke (CHW) ini ia i es ha e imp o ed p e en i e ca e up ake and
ch onic disease managemen by le e aging local us and cul u al compe ence. Expanding he
oles o nu se p ac i ione s and physician assis an s has also been e ec i e in mi iga ing wo k o ce
sho ages. Howe e , sus ainable impac equi es in eg a ing hese in e en ions in o o mal
heal hca e sys ems, suppo ed by clea policy amewo ks and adequa e unding [33].
4.8. Policy and Sys emic Implica ions
The pe sis ence o u al heal h inequi ies unde sco es he need o sys emic e o m a he han
agmen ed, p og am-speci ic solu ions. Policymake s should p io i ize equi able esou ce
alloca ion ha accoun s o he disp opo iona e bene i s o ma ginal in es men s in unde se ed
a eas. S eng hening u al in as uc u e, mode nizing heal h in o ma ion sys ems, and
incen i izing public-p i a e pa ne ships can yield cumula i e imp o emen s in access and quali y.
Fu he mo e, embedding u al heal h equi y in o na ional policy agendas ensu es ha e o s a e
no eac i e bu s a egically aligned wi h b oade heal h sys em goals. Heal h equi y impac
assessmen s should be ins i u ionalized o e alua e policy ou comes and guide con inuous
imp o emen [34].
4.9. Limi a ions and Fu u e Resea ch
While he analy ical models employed in his s udy p o ide obus e idence o dispa i ies, ce ain
limi a ions mus be acknowledged. Reliance on seconda y da ase s in oduces a iabili y in da a
quali y and epo ing s anda ds ac oss s udies [35,36]. Addi ionally, quan i a i e indica o s such
as p o ide densi y and hospi aliza ion a es do no ully cap u e cul u al, en i onmen al, and
psychological ba ie s ha in luence heal h beha iou [38,39]. Fu u e esea ch should he e o e
adop mixed-me hod designs ha combine s a is ical analysis wi h quali a i e inqui y, enabling a
mo e nuanced unde s anding o u al heal h eali ies. Longi udinal s udies acking policy impac s
o e ime would also be ins umen al in iden i ying sus ainable s a egies o educing inequi ies.
Finally, compa a i e analyses ac oss coun ies wi h simila u al demog aphics may e eal
ans e able lessons o global heal h equi y p omo ion [38–40].
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
77
5. Conclusion
O e all, he indings a i m ha u al popula ions con inue o ace signi ican disad an ages in
heal hca e access and ou comes compa ed o hei u ban coun e pa s. The dispa i ies a e oo ed
in wo k o ce sho ages, geog aphic ba ie s, socioeconomic disad an ages, and sys emic
weaknesses in con inui y o ca e. While e idence-based in e en ions such as eleheal h and
communi y heal h wo ke s o e p omising solu ions, b oade s uc u al e o ms a e equi ed o
ensu e equi able heal h ou comes. Achie ing u al heal h equi y demands a mul i-sec o al
app oach ha in eg a es heal hca e deli e y wi h social and economic policies ailo ed o he
unique needs o u al communi ies.
Re e ences
[1] D. A. Kindig and G. S odda , “Wha is popula ion heal h?,” Ame ican Jou nal o Public
Heal h, ol. 93, no. 3, pp. 380–383, 2003.
[2] E. A. Jones, T. F. Pa ke , and L. M. Lu ie, “Pe sis en inequali ies in u al and u ban heal h
ou comes: A sys ema ic e iew,” Heal h A ai s, ol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1927–1936, 2018.
[3] R. S. P obs , J. B. Ebe h, and J. C ouch, “Ru al–u ban dispa i ies in heal h se ices access:
The ole o p ima y ca e,” The Milbank Qua e ly, ol. 99, no. 2, pp. 345–374, 2021.
[4] K. Ha ley and M. Small, “P o ide sho age in u al Ame ica: Roo causes and policy
ecommenda ions,” Jou nal o Ru al Heal h Policy, ol. 27, no. 1, pp. 22–34, 2019.
[5] S. L. Kau man, “Challenges in u al heal hca e deli e y: Insigh s om longi udinal popula ion
da a,” Social Science & Medicine, ol. 220, pp. 145–154, 2018.
[6] M. J. Ricke s, “The changing na u e o u al heal h ca e,” Annual Re iew o Public Heal h,
ol. 41, pp. 531–548, 2020.
[7] I eoluwa Elemu e, Elizabe h A. Adeola, Adeyinka G. Ologun, Owoade O. Odesanya, Pe e T.
Oluwasola and Rukaya Abisola Olawale. Resilien supply chains and sus ainabili y o digi al
ans o ma ion in Remo e Wo k. In e na ional Jou nal o Science and Resea ch A chi e, 2025,
16(02), 1294-1309. A icle DOI: h ps://doi.o g/10.30574/ijs a.2025.16.2.2470
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
78
[8] D. Henning-Smi h e al., “Ru al–u ban mo ali y gaps and socioeconomic g adien s: A
longi udinal s udy,” Ame ican Jou nal o Epidemiology, ol. 191, no. 1, pp. 44–54, 2022.
[9] Elizabe h A. Adeola, Adeyinka G. Ologun, Vic o ia M. Jegede, Olabisi D, Salau, Kemi K.
Oladapo, Bolanle B Ola unji, Rukaya Abisola Olawale (2025), In eg a ing AI and Enc yp ion o
Sa egua d Digi al Asse s Globally. In e na ional Jou nal o Inno a i e Science and Resea ch
Technology (IJISRT) IJISRT25SEP1242, 2337-2345. DOI: 10.38124/ijis /25sep1242.
h ps://www.ijis .com/in eg a ing-ai-and-enc yp ion- o-sa egua d-digi al-asse s-globally
[10] A. J. Singh and E. Siahpush, “Widening u al–u ban dispa i ies in li e expec ancy, U.S.,
1969–2009,” Ame ican Jou nal o P e en i e Medicine, ol. 46, no. 2, pp. e19–e29, 2014.
[11] Elizabe h A. Adeola, Adeyinka G. Ologun, Vic o ia M. Jegede, Salau Olabisi D, Kemi K.
Oladapo, Bolanle B Ola unji, Rukaya Abisola Olawale, AI-Powe ed P edic i e Con ol in Digi al
Twin HVACSys ems, In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch Publica ion and Re iews, Vol 6, Issue 9,
pp 5368-5375, Sep embe , 2025. h ps://doi.o g/10.55248/gengpi.6.0925.3583
[12] H. L. MacKinney, K. L. Cobu n, and T. Lundblad, “Teleheal h as a s a egy o imp o ing
u al heal h equi y,” Jou nal o Telemedicine and Teleca e, ol. 29, no. 2, pp. 159–167, 2023.
[13] J. M. De Voe e al., “Heal h insu ance and access o ca e among u al popula ions,” Jou nal
o Gene al In e nal Medicine, ol. 32, no. 1, pp. 104–111, 2017.
[14] Elizabe h A. Adeola, Adeyinka G. Ologun, Vic o ia M. Jegede, Olabisi D, Salau, Kemi K.
Oladapo, Bolanle B Ola unji and Rukaya Abisola Olawale. Ad ancing u ban go e nance h ough
in eg a ed BIM–DT–CIM models. Wo ld Jou nal o Biology Pha macy and Heal h Sciences, 2025,
23(03), 500-508. A icle DOI: h ps://doi.o g/10.30574/wjbphs.2025.23.3.0875
[15] B. F. Casey, “Policy esponses o u al heal h dispa i ies: A sys ema ic policy e iew,” Public
Heal h Re iews, ol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2022.
[16] I eoluwa Elemu e, Elizabe h A. Adeola, Owoade O. Odesanya, Pe e T. Oluwasola and
Olabisi D, Salau. T ans o ming esilience wi h p edic i e digi al win echnologies. Wo ld Jou nal
o Biology Pha macy and Heal h Sciences, 2025, 23(03), 450-458. A icle DOI:
h ps://doi.o g/10.30574/wjbphs.2025.23.3.0850
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
79
[17] R. D. Bushy, “Socioeconomic ac o s in u al heal hca e dispa i ies,” Nu sing Clinics o No h
Ame ica, ol. 53, no. 4, pp. 449–458, 2018.
[18] I eoluwa Elemu e, Elizabe h A. Adeola, Adeyinka G. Ologun, Owoade O. Odesanya, Vic o ia
M. Jegede and Olabisi D, Salau. Embedding sa egua ding in in eg a ed ca e o olde
adul s. In e na ional Jou nal o Science and Resea ch A chi e, 2025, 16(03), 955-963. A icle
DOI: h ps://doi.o g/10.30574/ijs a.2025.16.3.2655. h ps://jou nalijs a.com/node/1954
[19] K. N. Kuo and R. S. Good idge, “P ima y ca e accessibili y in unde se ed egions,”
In e na ional Jou nal o Equi y in Heal h, ol. 18, no. 15, pp. 112–124, 2019.
[20] R. A. Olawale, O. O. Odesanya, P. T. Oluwasola, E. A. Adeola, and A. G. Ologun, “AI-
Powe ed P ecision Ag icul u e o Sus ainable Yield and Resou ce E iciency in A ican
Fa ming”, IJRESM, ol. 8, no. 8, pp. 80–86, Aug. 2025, Accessed: No . 07, 2025. [Online].
A ailable: h ps://jou nal.ij esm.com/index.php/ij esm/a icle/ iew/3343
[21] N. C. K use, “Heal h in o ma ion echnology adop ion in u al heal h sys ems,” BMC Heal h
Se ices Resea ch, ol. 21, no. 4, pp. 323–335, 2021.
[22] Elizabe h A. Adeola, Adeyinka G. Ologun, I eoluwa Elemu e, Owoade O. Odesanya, Pe e
T. Oluwasola, & Rukaya Abisola Olawale. (2025). In eg a ing IoT and Digi al Twins o
T ans o m U ban Go e nance. In e na ional Jou nal o P og essi e Resea ch in Science and
Enginee ing, 6(08), 1–7. Re ie ed om h ps://jou nal.ijp se.com/
index.php/ijp se/a icle/ iew/1228
[23] J. S. C o , “Beha io al heal h se ice sho ages in u al Ame ica,” Jou nal o Beha io al
Heal h Se ices & Resea ch, ol. 46, no. 3, pp. 456–467, 2019.
[24] I eoluwa Elemu e, Elizabe h A. Adeola, Adeyinka G. Ologun, Owoade O. Odesanya, Pe e
T. Oluwasola and Rukaya Abisola Olawale. Resilien supply chains and sus ainabili y o digi al
ans o ma ion in Remo e Wo k. In e na ional Jou nal o Science and Resea ch A chi e, 2025,
16(02), 1294-1309. A icle DOI: h ps://doi.o g/10.30574/ijs a.2025.16.2.2470
[25] Wo ld Heal h O ganiza ion (WHO), Global Repo on Heal h Equi y and Ru al Access o
Ca e, Gene a: WHO P ess, 2022.
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
80
[26] L. A. Phillips and D. M. Fa me , “Sus aining he u al heal h wo k o ce: Lessons om
longi udinal u al aining,” Medical Educa ion, ol. 57, no. 4, pp. 382–391, 2023.
[27] O. O. Akinola, “Balancing AI E iciency and E hics o Long-Te m Business
Sus ainabili y”, IJRESM, ol. 8, no. 8, pp. 61–69, Aug. 2025, Accessed: Sep. 19,
2025: h ps://jou nal.ij esm.com/index.php/ij esm/a icle/ iew/3340
[28] T. J. Fo d and M. Robe s, “T a el dis ance and delayed ca e among u al pa ien s,” Heal h
Se ices Resea ch, ol. 58, no. 3, pp. 627–642, 2023.
[29] N. J. G een and F. M. Khumalo, “P e en able hospi aliza ions and ch onic disease
managemen in u al communi ies,” Public Heal h Repo s, ol. 137, no. 2, pp. 200–212, 2022.
[30] I eoluwa Elemu e Rukaya A. Olawale, Owoade O. Odesanya, Pe e T. Oluwasola,
Olan ewaju O. Akinola, Elizabe h A. Adeola, Adeyinka G. Ologun, AI-D i en Regene a i e
Ag icul u e o Socioecological F amewo k o Biodi e si y, Clima e Resilience, and Soil Heal h,
IOSR-JBM. 2319-7668. Volume 27, Issue 8. Se . 8 (Augus . 2025), PP 39-48, DOI:
10.9790/487X-2708083948.
[31] E. J. Conno s e al., “Con inui y o ca e and hospi al eadmissions in u al se ings,” BMJ
Open, ol. 13, no. 1, pp. e052476, 2023.
[32] A I eoluwa Elemu e, Elizabe h A. Adeola, Adeyinka G. Ologun, Owoade O. Odesanya,
Vic o ia M. Jegede, Pe e T. Oluwasola, Olabisi D, Salau . (2025), Li e-Cou se Impac o T auma
on S ess Biology. In e na ional Jou nal o Inno a i e Science and Resea ch Technology (IJISRT)
IJISRT25SEP910, 1187-1194. DOI: 10.38124/ijis /25sep910. h ps://www.ijis .com/li ecou se-
impac -o - auma-on-s ess-biology
[33] M. E. Ladika, “Teleheal h and communi y heal h wo ke models: Scaling access in emo e
egions,” Heal h A ai s, ol. 41, no. 6, pp. 894–904, 2022.
[34] P. D. Chen and L. F. Ha is, “Policy e o ms o u al heal h sys em in eg a ion,” Jou nal o
Heal h Policy and Managemen , ol. 12, no. 5, pp. 459–472, 2023.
[35] Owoade O. Odesanya, Rukaya Abisola , Ijeoma Chioma Mo di, Ngozi Blessing Umo u,
Sand a A Palme , Kemi K.Oladapo, Olan ewaju O. Akinola, Dual-T igge ed He bicide Deli e y
o Sus ainable Sahelian Ag icul u e, In e na ional Jou nal o Ad ance Resea ch Publica ion and
In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch in Managemen ISSN 2249-5908
A ailable online on h p://www. spublica ion.com/ij m/ij m_index.h m Volume 15 No. 5, 2025
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17723243
O iginal A icle
©2025 RS Publica ion, spublica [email protected]
81
Re iews, Vol 2, no 11, pp 202-212, No embe 2025.
h ps://ija p .com/uploads/V2ISSUE11/IJARPR1129.pd
[36] K. L. Pe saud, “Me hodological biases in seconda y heal h da a: Implica ions o u al
s udies,” In e na ional Jou nal o Heal h Resea ch Me hods, ol. 3, no. 2, pp. 101–115, 2021.
[37] Owoade O. Odesanya, Olawale Rukaya Abisola, Ijeoma Chioma Mo di, Ngozi Blessing
Umo u, Sand a A Palme , Kemi K.Oladapo, Olan ewaju O. Akinola, Mechanisms and Equi y in
Tobacco Con ol: Global Policy Pa hways. In e na ional Jou nal o Resea ch Publica ion and
Re iews, Vol 6, Issue 11, pp 2543-2553, No embe , 2025.
h ps://ij p .com/uploads/V6ISSUE11/IJRPR55268.pd
[38] R. D. T an and C. D. Lopez, “Mixed-me hod app oaches o unde s anding u al heal h
ou comes,” Quali a i e Heal h Resea ch, ol. 31, no. 10, pp. 1783–1799, 2021.
[39] Adeyinka G. Ologun I eoluwa Elemu e Rukaya A. Olawale, Owoade O. Odesanya, Pe e T.
Oluwasola, Olan ewaju O. Akinola, Elizabe h A. Adeola, AI-D i en Regene a i e Ag icul u e o
Socioecological F amewo k o Biodi e si y, Clima e Resilience, and Soil Heal h, 2319-7668.
Volume 27, Issue 8. Se . 8 (Augus . 2025), PP 39-48 www.ios jou nals.o g,
h ps://www.ios jou nals.o g/ios -jbm/pape s/Vol27-issue8/Se -8/F2708083948.pd
[40] Wo ld Heal h O ganiza ion (WHO), Ad ancing Ru al Heal h Equi y Th ough Policy and
Inno a ion, Gene a: WHO P ess, 2023.
