Curbing Financial Crimes with Anti-Graft Bureaus in Nigeria: The Accountants' Perception

Uthman, Ahmad Bukola; Oke, Lukman Adebayo; Ajape, Mohammed Kayode; AbdulBaki, Zayyad; Tijani, Murhtala Oladipupo Article Curbing Financial Crimes with Anti-Graft Bureaus in Nigeria: The Accountants' Perception Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems (JAMIS) Provided in Cooperation with: The Bucharest University of Economic Studies Suggested Citation: Uthman, Ahmad Bukola; Oke, Lukman Adebayo; Ajape, Mohammed Kayode; Abdul-Baki, Zayyad; Tijani, Murhtala Oladipupo (2015) : Curbing Financial Crimes with AntiGraft Bureaus in Nigeria: The Accountants' Perception, Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems (JAMIS), ISSN 2559-6004, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, pp. 107-127 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/310583 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Accounting and Management Information Systems Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 107-127, 2015 Curbing financial crimes with anti-graft bureaus in Nigeria: The accountants’ perception Ahmad Bukola Uthmana, 1, Lukman Adebayo Okeb, Mohammed Kayode Ajapec, Zayyad Abdul-Bakid and Murhtala Oladipupo Tijania aAl-Hikmah University, Ilorin, Nigeria bKwara State University, Malete, Nigeria cUniversity of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria dUniversity of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria Abstract: Corruption, be it financial or non-financial is a global cankerworm that has eaten deep into the fabrics of many nations and war against it has been a recurring decimal in every economy. In Nigeria, recent attempts at nipping corruption in the bud gave rise to some anti-graft agencies such as the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC). Against this background, opinion of 140 accountants in various capacities was sought on the efficacy of the anti-graft agencies in curbing financial crimes through a survey questionnaire. The study found that respondents group perceived the anti-graft agencies as highly effective but could not establish that accountants in various walks of life differ significantly in their perception of the efficacy of the Nigerian Anti-graft bureaus (Overall Mean= 2.98, F= 2.263 and P>0.05) using ANOVA as statistical analysis tool. It was recommended that Nigerian government should strengthen the Anti-financial crimes agencies given that the influence of highly placed offenders, the dignity, societal bondage and shame inherent in financial crimes may affect the potency of anti-financial crimes measures put in place. Keywords: Financial crimes, anti-graft bureaus, opportunity theory, defiance theory, Nigeria JEL codes: D04, H24, M48 1 Corresponding author: Department of Accounting, Al-Hikmah University, Ilorin, PMB 1605, Ilorin, Nigeria (+234) 80-593-749-11, Email address: [email protected] Curbing financial crimes with anti-graft bureaus in Nigeria: The accountants’ perception Vol. 14, No. 1 108 1. Introduction “... A new global standard regarding corruption began to take place ... and tackling corruption, [is seen] as essential elements of a framework within which economies can prosper.” (Pogoson, 2009, p. 60). Nipping corruption in the bud has thus been one of the key issues articulated by most developing nations deepened in corrupt practices. Various government regimes in Nigeria, since independence, have reacted in different ways to deter the spread of corruption. Anti-corruption laws have severally been enacted, repealed and re-enacted. Agencies commissioned and committees set up. Infact, the 1983 coup led by, Gen. Muhammadu Buhari, was said to have been carried out with the aim of halting corruption and restoring discipline, integrity and dignity to public life (Ogbeidi, 2012: 8). The pervasion of corruption in Nigeria has attracted criticisms from various quarters and has been widely reported. Nigeria, as an economy was reported to have lost an estimated sum of £205 million (N105.4 billion) in tax revenues between 2005 and 2007 to the United Kingdom, the European Union and Ireland, as a result of corruption in the form of trade mispricing (Chriatain Aid, 2008; Otusanya, 2011). More so, the joint audit conducted by the central bank of Nigeria(CBN) and the Nigeria deposit insurance commission (NDIC) on the five indicted banks in 2009 revealed how corrupt practices have led to loss of huge funds in non-performing loan. It showed that the five banks had a total loan portfolio of N2.8 trillion. Aggregate of non-performing of these loans represents 40.81 per cent of the total loans (Otusanya, 2012). Recently, “the Senate had asked the president to fire Mr. Maina and ordered his prosecution for his alleged role in a N195 billion pension fraud” (Dailytimes NG, March 9, 2013). As with many developing nations, Nigeria has built her anti-corruption agencies on the sociological theories of anticorruption (e.g. Opportunity theory, defiance theory etc.). She adopts both post mortem and proactive measures in her fight against corruption. Post mortem exercises take the form of constituting investigative panels upon suspicion and/or public outcry that corruption has been perpetrated. This hardly yields any meaningful results as the consequences of corruption are usually irreversible. The establishment of anti-graft agencies to serve as watchdogs against corrupt practices are considered proactive anticorruption agencies adopted and sustained since the dawn of the fourth republic. While the establishment of these institutions has been assiduously assailed and discredited by a number of critics, it has also been applauded by some. They are assailed of being used as political whips against opposition when they uphold fierce prosecution of offenders while also being accused of laxities when they are too cautious about sensitive issues. Mallam Shekarau, during the 2011 presidential debate outspokenly considered the establishment of EFCC a multiplication of agencies and tagged it ‘glorified police station’. He felt giving better funding to the Nigerian police would have produced Curbing financial crimes with anti-graft bureaus in Nigeria: The accountants’ perception Vol. 14, No. 1 109 better results. News reports and research outputs are also replete with conflicting views on the fidelity of the birth of these anti-corruption agencies. Theoretically, these political institutions, as they are mostly referred to, are meant to demand explanations or impose penalties to ensure accountability (Jenkins, 2007). In practical terms however, they are met with mixed reactions regarding their efficacy in the discharge of their civic responsibilities. Given this background, an objective assessment of their impact in combating financial crimes may be necessary, especially in Nigeria, as special purpose anti-financial crime institution (EFCC) has been established. We therefore identify a profession that is almost inseparable from financial crimes, both in training and practice, make a research sample there from and ‘problematise’ the impact of anti-financial crimes institutions in curbing financial crimes. Hence, the proposition: Perception of the efficacy of Nigeria’s anti-graft bureaus in fighting financial crimes does not significantly differ among accountants in Nigeria. 2. Literature review 2.1. Conceptualization and causes of financial crimes The repletion of financial crimes in literature is skewed towards its definition as breach of trusts at the macroeconomic level. Its standard definition is either the abuse of public office or misuse of entrusted trust for personal gains (Transparency International, 2010). At micro level, it may be perpetrated to meet basic needs due to prevalent poverty while greed may be attributed to the abuse of public office and trust for personal gains. Meanwhile, its abhorring nature has lent credence to its popularity in the contemporary literature. Hence, “its conceptualization is intertwined with ideological, moral, cultural and political perspectives” (Otusanya, 2011b: 388). Financial crime has widely been entangled with politics as it is usually conceived in academic literature as either misuse of public office or breach of trust for personal gains by political elites (see Osborne, 2007; Camerer, 2007; Vermeulen, 2007). Hanna et al. (2011) define it politically to include “a situation where a bureaucrat overtly asks a citizen for a monetary bribe in order to perform a basic, but often illegal, service, such as providing someone with a residency card etc” (p.8). Intrinsic in its essence is the deliberate deprivation of or causing loss to another party for selfish gain. Public recognition and power are usually the instruments possessed by political elites to deprive people of their needs for selfish gains. More so, no any single sector has the monopoly of financial malpractices. Dye (2007) sees financial crime as a behaviour that can occur in both public and private domains. He then defines it to include: “fraud, bribery, political corruption, conflict of interest, embezzlement, nepotism, and extortion. Examples of government Curbing financial crimes with anti-graft bureaus in Nigeria: The accountants’ perception Vol. 14, No. 1 110 operations particularly vulnerable to corruption are travel claims; collection of taxes and customs revenues; administration of procurement contracts; concessions of subsidies, permits, and licenses; hiring, administration of personnel, and payroll systems; privatization processes; petty cash abuse; and e-commerce and Internet credit card transactions” (p. 308) Ideologically and culturally however, it is perceived in Africa that the sub-culture of corruption is the acceptable face of capitalism and any form of commercial transaction, especially with the West/Multinational corporations must necessarily involve an element of corruption as bribery is regarded as a petty cash (Oruene, 2007). Hence financial crime is inherent in any business transaction involving people and measured on cost/benefit analysis basis. From religion stand point, the aforementioned view about corruption is succinctly believed in Islam to involve the human deeds and misdeeds as Allah(SWT) puts: “corruption has appeared in the land and the sea on account of what the hands of men have wrought”(Q30:41). Several reasons have been adduced for the perpetration of financial crimes. Mobolaji (2012) believes that it is either induced by greed or need. It is considered greed when done by the elites to impoverish the vulnerables. Otusanya (2012) extends the discussion of greed to include the economic ties with the developed world, involvement of multinational corporations and top government officials, money laundering through offshore financial centres and other forms of abuse of Information Technology. The need-induced financial crime is perpetrated by the impoverished citizens as they are being denied of their basic needs. Poverty, lack of adequate health care and other basic facilities could also leave victims with no option than corruption. Corruption of this type takes the form of small size embezzlement, bribery, collusion to defraud organizations and other forms of mean opportunistic crimes. Though, there are no generally agreed reasons for the causes of financial crimes (Dye, 2007), they vary from country to country but majorly, unstable government and institutional faults, lack of good implementation of government programmes and policies, corrupt judicial systems and anticrime institutions, poor remuneration of workers and weak accountability and transparency structures are apparent causes in the developing worlds. The major causes are summarized in Table 1 (consistent with Mobolaji, 2012). Table 1. Causes of financial crimes Causes Main Actors Mode Greed Management employees, political elites, politicians, businessmen, financial analysts and professionals, corporate entities corporate tax evasion etc. Wholesale fraud with impunity, tax evasion scheme orchestration, creation of ghost workers, money laundering, favouritism and discrimination etc. Curbing financial crimes with anti-graft bureaus in Nigeria: The accountants’ perception Vol. 14, No. 1 111 Need Impoverished employees, petty cash officials and cashiers, opportunistic commoners. Small size embezzlement and misappropriation, bribery and kickbacks, personal tax evasion. (Source: Adapted from Kpundeh, 1998) 2.2. Theoretical framework At a macroeconomic level, opportunity theory moves the explanation of corruption away from focusing solely on the offender. It identifies the need to involve a third party in the principal-agent relationship so as to serve as guardianship for the investments of the principal. It thus exposes the flaws of agency theory by contending that a premeditated connivance of a weak guardian and a motivated offender (agent) against a vulnerable target (principal) will result in a thriving corruption. This theory was popularized by Cohen and Felson (1979) to explain how routine activity could lead to the vulnerability to crime of an unsuspecting target in the hands of groups who have both inclination and ability to commit crime. The taking place of many activities outside the sight of a suitable target of his attractive valuables may be sufficient enough motivation for the connivance of the guardian (umpire) and the offender (agent). This may therefore necessitate the need for an appropriate sanction or threat by the society. It is a commonplace practice for all societies to deter offenders by imposing or threatening sanctions on corruption, Sherman’s (1993) defiance theory contends that such sanctions may sometimes deter, but could also have no effect and sometimes could have the opposite of their intended effects. Corruption is more pronounced, even with impunity, among corrupt office holders who may want to outsmart the provisions of the law to protect his corrupt acts. They usually want to be perpetuated in office or at least are enriched corruptly to protect their future (Mobolaji, 2012). Evidences were provided in Nigeria to suggest that the economic and political elites have dominated the state and other regulatory agencies, as a result of which many anti-social practices are not investigated and a number of investigative reports remain unpublished (Fawehinmi, 2004; Otusanya, 2012). Thence, even if sanctions are imposed on corruption, the dominance of the corrupt elites would deter its effects. Sherma (2003) theoretically prophesised this as his defiance theory believes that the effect of the sanction on corruption is a function of three factors namely; (1) the dignity of the alleged offenders, (2) societal bondage of the offender and (3) the shame implicit in the sanctions. Therefore, the corrupt public officer or political elite would rather harness more benefits than cost of engaging in corruption to be well equipped against possible shame that may succeed his engagement in corruption. Given the backdrop of the above theories, this study therefore, evaluates the potency and faithfulness of the EFCC as an anti-graft agent, in order to evaluate its guardianship strength with regards to its principal (the populace) against the Curbing financial crimes with anti-graft bureaus in Nigeria: The accountants’ perception Vol. 14, No. 1 112 capitalist and corrupt tendencies of motivated offenders (corrupt public officials) in line with the argument of the routine activity theory. Further, defiance theory offers a platform to test the effect of the sanctions meted out against corrupt officials by the anti-graft agency. Thence, this study locates accountancy as a profession that is central to the discourse of financial crimes as the sample frame to test its proposition. 2.3. Accounting profession and financial crimes Conventionally, checking the conformity of financial statements with applicable financial reporting framework is the backdrop against which the periodic audit operates. Therefore, fraud detection has rather been perceived as a by-product and not one of the primary responsibilities of the audit process (Gray & Moussalli, 2006). Auditors believe that the primary responsibility for fraud detection is a managerial endeavour (Dye, 2007) and therefore, did not see fraud and corruption busting as their main goal. They believe that an auditor was expected to spontaneously ferret out fraud and inconsistencies in the examination of company’s accounts through the usual audit process. Hence, the primary responsibility of the auditors is to carry out investigations to reach an opinion on whether proper books have been kept and whether the accounts comply with the underlying entries and opine on the truth and fairness of the audited accounts (see Baxt, 1970; Cunningham, 2003). Moreover, “The accounting profession has undertaken greater responsibilities in the performance of its services” (O’Leary, 1990: 239) since the evolution of modern businesses which are now premised on agency concerns. The burden of responsibilities is expanded by the expectation of fraud detection as each wave of fraud is often accompanied with the cries of “where are the auditors?” (Jamal, 2008). Hence, as the expectation gap widens, state enactments have begun to consider “auditors’ responsibility for fraud detection” (e.g. US’s Sarbanes Oxley Act, 2002; Nigeria’s FRCN Act 2011). The challenges of the additional responsibilities have thence, exposed the accounting profession to litigation risks, loss of public confidence and stringent state scrutiny among others. The import of this is also the US Accounting Industry Reform Act of 2002 (Byington & Christensen, 2003). Accounting profession has reacted to these expectations basically in two ways. First, Technical pronouncements have been made to address the concerns about responsibility for fraud detection. Statement of Auditing Standard no. 99 was pronounced in 2002 to supersede SAS no. 82 in regulating the responsibility of auditor for fraud detection in a financial statement audit. “It aims to have the auditor’s consideration of fraud seamlessly blended into the audit process and continually updated until the audit’s completion” (Ramos, 2003: 28). Hence, the Curbing financial crimes with anti-graft bureaus in Nigeria: The accountants’ perception Vol. 14, No. 1 113 standard is considered the profession’s effort to bridge the seemingly widened expectation gap. It is the bedrock of the profession’s antifraud program, premised on a continuous and on-going exercise with detailed scrutiny spanning the period of the audit since the perpetration of fraud is as well done in the course of the routine work place activities and typically involves the “unique ability of management to frequently use its position to directly or indirectly manipulate accounting records and present fraudulent financial information to the auditors” (SAS 99, p.8). The standard therefore urges the auditor to approach audit with ardour professional scepticism and a mindset of fraud detection in the course of routine periodic audit. Second, the involvement of forensic science in the profession of accounting has reached an acceptable level both with professional accounting bodies as well as accounting researchers. During the 3rd inauguration of the certification of 125 forensic accountants by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN), the president of the body reacts: “Given the lingering crisis in the financial services sector and the government challenges at all levels, the need for forensic accounting knowledge and experts by regulators, law enforcement agencies and chartered accountants acting as external auditors, chief finance officers and heads of internal control departments of corporate entities cannot be over-emphasized” (Obuh, 2012: 1). It implies therefore that a forensic accountant is perceived to possess skills exceeding those of a traditional auditor and provides services beyond the scope of a typical financial audit engagement (Harris & Brown 2000; Christensen et al., 2005). It is noteworthy to point out at this juncture that; Christensen et al. (2005) have suggested the inclusion of a forensic accountant in every audit team because they consider forensic skills to be wider in scope and more effective in probative values. Nonetheless, they recognize the necessity of the current audit system in financial investigations. Hence, forensic experts taking certification in accounting skill and vice versa will breed scores of fraud detection experts among professional auditors. Lannacci and Morris (2000) however warned that: “the successful completion of a college program, even a Master’s degree program in forensic science, does not automatically qualify the graduate to work and testify in court as a forensic expert in his field. After completing his college work, the forensic scientist receives several additional years of training in an apprenticeship program learning how to apply his formal educational knowledge with new skills on how to examine evidence” (p.72) It may be argued therefore that the training acquired in forensic skills will enhance the scepticism to probe relevant areas of suspicion if blended with requisite Curbing financial crimes with anti-graft bureaus in Nigeria: The accountants’ perception Vol. 14, No. 1 114 accounting experience and rudimentary acumen. Though, the forensic accountant may not have become a superman in fraud detection; he perhaps would be able to discover fraud more easily as he conducts his audit with a mindset on fraud detection. Notwithstanding the foregoing antifraud measures, accounting profession has also been discredited for culpability in lending acumen to the perpetration of fraud through its various cost-saving schemes. Notable among these schemes are the tax avoidance schemes since accountancy firms have always sought to mobilise their technical knowledge to develop complementary products and adjacent markets, including the sale of tax avoidance schemes (Sikka & Willmott, 1995; Sikka & Hampton, 2005). Hence, “Accountancy firms are part of the contemporary ‘enterprise culture’ that persuades many to believe that ‘bending the rules’ for personal gain is a sign of business acumen” (Sikka & Hampton, 2005: 8). Consequently, they use “their control of auditing markets to colonise adjacent markets in order to sell consultancy services to auditing clients” (Otusanya & Lauwo, 2010: 172). Hence, attention should be spread beyond mending the output of the profession as a whole. It should encompass the regulation of the practice of accountancy and audit services so as achieve a holistic antifraud campaign. The globally acclaimed antifraud measures seem not mature in the Nigerian accountancy domain as the travails of government anti-graft institutions are marred by the outwitting acumen of fiendish accountants and accounting firms alike. Although it is traditional for accountants to acclaim public interest in the conduct of their job, they have however been implicated in Nigeria for “various acts of professional misconduct and in falsification and deliberate financial engineering in Nigeria” (Otusanya & Lauwo, 2010: 178). Prominent among these implications is the indictment of Akintola Williams Delliotte (AWD), a foremost and one of the big four accounting firms in Nigerian, for feigning ignorance of falsification concurrently in the accounts of the defunct Afribank Plc and Cadbury Plc. “This accounting manipulation occurred with the knowledge of board of directors and on the professional advice of the external auditors, AWD” (Otusanya & Lauwo, 2010: 179). Although AWD continues to claim ’high integrity and ethical values’, it however formally resigned as the auditors of Cadbury Plc before the completion of investigations on the alleged professional misconduct. More so, the swoop of investors’ and depositors’ funds during the crisis in the Nigerian Banking Sector featured the Big four accounting firms as the auditors of all the affected banks. Despite the long standing relationship established with those banks, none of the auditors ever qualified their reports nor issued warning signals of impending crisis. Table 2 below depicts the banks audited by the big four accounting firms in Nigeria. Curbing financial crimes with anti-graft bureaus in Nigeria: The accountants’ perception Vol. 14, No. 1 121 Table 2. Respondents’ profile Description Characteristics Frequency Percentage(%) Age of Respondents 21 - 30 years 31-40 years 41-50 years Above 50 years TOTAL 45 68 13 14 140 32.1 48.6 9.3 10.0 100 Qualification BSC/HND PGD MSC/MBA TOTAL 93 7 40 140 66.4 5.0 28.6 100 Professional qualification Student member Associate member Fellow member Non member TOTAL 59 62 5 14 140 42.1 44.3 3.6 10.0 100 Profession Accounting Academic External Auditor Public Sector Accountant/ Auditor Private Sector Accountant/ Auditor TOTAL 50 22 37 31 140 35.7 15.7 26.4 22.2 100 As shown in Table 2, The age grouping indicates that majority of the respondents were in the 31-40 age group with 48.6% while 9.3% of the respondents fall within the age group of 41-50 years. Cumulatively, respondents that fall within the age bracket of 21-40 constitute 80.7% of the entire respondents. This is an indication that majority of the respondents fall within the matured, experienced and active age bracket. In terms of the highest academic qualification, 66.4% of the respondents hold a bachelor degree or Higher National Diploma, 28.6% having a master degree and only 7% holding a Post Graduate Diploma. A depiction of the fact that respondents are very enlightened and educationally exposed to reasonably provide answers to questionnaire items. Further analysis shows that 44.3%, 42.1% and 3.6% of the respondents are Associate members, Student members and Fellow members of their professional accountancy bodies respectively, while only 10% of the entire respondents do not have professional attachments. The high percentage recorded for associate members and student members reflects the level of professional touch in the responses provided to the questionnaire items. More so, majority of the respondents (35.7%) are accounting academic. The highest response rate among accounting academic could not be unconnected with their attachment of importance to research. Curbing financial crimes with anti-graft bureaus in Nigeria: The accountants’ perception Vol. 14, No. 1 122 4.2. Operational data In order to ascertain if the adoption of parametric statistical analysis would be appropriate for the research data, normality test was conducted with the use data skewness and kurtosis statistics was computed. Table 3. Assessment of normality of distribution Variables Skewness Kurtosis Respondents’ profession 0.213 0.419 Efficacy of anti - corruption agencies 0.024 0.407 It thus reveals that the distribution of the research data is normally distributed and conforms to the use of parametric statistical test of research hypothesis. As shown in the Table 3, the skewness and kurtosis indicate that the data relating to each of the research variables are normally distributed as these values were within the cut of point of -3 and 3 (Peck et al., 2008). In the light of this, the researchers found parametric statistical analysis appropriate in the study. 4.3 Hypothesis testing H0: Perception of the efficacy of Nigeria’s anti-corruption agencies does not significantly differ among accountants in Nigeria. Table 4. One way ANOVA results In an attempt to test the above stated hypothesis and achieve the research objective accordingly, a one way between group analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) was conducted to explore the Nigerian accountants’ perception of the impact of anti-corruption agencies in checkmating financial crimes. As shown in Table 4, preliminary analysis of the data revealed that average perception of accounting academics, external auditors, public sector auditors and private sector auditors were Profession N Mean Standard Deviation Accounting Academic 50 2.8400 1.40495 External auditor 22 3.0909 1.00755 Public Sector Accountant/Auditor 37 2.8919 1.21983 Private Sector Accountant/Auditor 31 2.8261 0.88688 Total 140 2.9773 1.23230 F-ratio 2.263 P-value 0.084 Curbing financial crimes with anti-graft bureaus in Nigeria: The accountants’ perception Vol. 14, No. 1 123 2.84, 3.09, 2.90 and 2.83 respectively indicating high perception in each category on the efficacy of anti-corruption agencies in checkmating financial crimes. In addition the overall average perception of all categories of accountants obtained when collapsing all the items give a mean score of 2.98. Further analysis using one way ANOVA to test the research hypothesis revealed an insignificant difference in the perception of the four categories of accountants at 95% confidence interval with F-ratio of 2.26. Hence the null hypothesis cannot be rejected. The differences in means perception of the four categories of accountants were not statistically significant. However, as depicted in this analysis, anti-corruption agencies may be perceived not efficacious enough in checkmating financial crimes in Nigeria since the overall mean score of the sampled opinion on the dependent variable is 2.98 which is only slightly above the average of the measurement used in the research instrument (i.e. 5, Strongly Agree, 4, Agree, 3, Undecided, 2, Disagree and 1, Strongly Disagree). 5. Summary and conclusion The fight against financial crime in Nigeria should be one of the priorities of any political administration since perpetrators are devising new ways of committing the crime as evidenced in the recent cases involving the Securities and Exchange Commission, subsidy probe bribe as well as pensioners’ retirement benefits scam. This study conceptualizes financial crimes and it causes and offered the opportunity and defiance theories to provide the rational for this research. While the opportunity theory explains the reasons that lure people into financial crimes and the necessity of a guardianship in the principal-agent relationship, the defiance theory was used to predict the impact of punitive measures against financial crimes. The theory further portends that, given the influence of highly placed offenders, the dignity, societal bondage and shame inherent in financial crimes may affect the potency of anti-financial crimes measures put in place. More so, the study identified accountants as the research sample, drawing attention to the fact that their expertise is a factor to reckon with in an attempt to curb financial crimes hence, necessitating the discussion of the role accounting profession could play in the discourse of financial crimes as literatures were also reviewed on the major anti-financial crimes institution (EFCC) in Nigeria. Taking Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) as the statistical instrument, accountants, across various disciplines were used as the grouping variable to test the efficacy of anti-financial crime measure in Nigeria. Although a non-significant difference was found among the perception of accountants, it was concluded that the Nigerian government’s anti corruption measure may not have been efficacious enough in combating financial crimes as signalled by the overall mean score. The prophecy of Curbing financial crimes with anti-graft bureaus in Nigeria: The accountants’ perception Vol. 14, No. 1 124 routine activity theory may come to pass in Nigeria if its anti-graft agencies are not further strengthened. This study may not completely disparage the strength of the guardian (anti-graft agencies) in protecting the targets (populace) from the heinous acts of motivated offenders (corrupt officials), it however found within the limits of the scope of this study, that accountants perceive the guardianship strength not strong enough in combating financial crimes in Nigeria. On the strength of this conclusion, this study recommends that Nigerian government should strengthen her anti-graft agencies so that it could develop immunity against pressures that may be placed by influential culprits of financial crimes to water down the potency of the agency as has been observed by Sherma (2003) that the dignity and societal bondage of the offender as well as the shame implicit in sanctions may be harnessed by corrupt public officers or political elites to be well equipped against possible shame that may succeed his engagement in corruption while in office. This study however, encounters a number of constraints which may affect its generalization. These include paucity of relevant literature on the nexus between accounting profession and financial crimes. The available research works on the subject are neither empirical nor easily assessable. This study is also not free from the general problem of lax attitude of respondents towards completing and returning of completed questionnaires. More so, information about fraud and other financial related crimes of government officials are usually confidential and therefore veiled from public glare. This restricted the researcher to the use of publicly available information on the variables of interest. References Adomi, E.E. & Igun, E.E. (2007) “Combating cyber crime in Nigeria”, The Electronic Library, vol. 25(5): 716-725 AICPA (2002) “SAS 99: Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit”, New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Inc Aiyede, E. R. (2008) “The role of INEC, ICPC and EFCC in combating political corruption”, Money and Politics in Nigeria (pp. 39-52), Abuja: International Foundation for Electoral System IFES-Nigeria Anonymous (2010) Nigeria vision 20:2020 (abridged version) Retrieved June 6 from http://www.nv2020.org Baxt, R. (1970) “The modern company auditor - a nineteenth centur watchdog?”, Modern Law Review, vol. 33(4): 418-431 Byington, J. R. & Christensen, J. A. (2003) “How to prevent inventory fraud, Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, vol. 14(4): 33-39 Curbing financial crimes with anti-graft bureaus in Nigeria: The accountants’ perception Vol. 14, No. 1 125 Camerer, L. (2007) “South Africa: derailing the gravy train – controlling corruption”, Journal of Financial Crime, vol. 4(4): 364-372 ChristainAid (2008) Death and Taxes: The true toll of tax dodging, London: Christain Aid Report Christensen, J. B. & Blalock, J. (2005) “Sarbanes-Oxley: will you need a forensic accountant?”, Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, vol. 16(3): 69-75 Cohen, L. A. (1979) “Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activities approach”, American Sociological Review, vol. 44(4): 588-608 Creswell, J. W. (2008) “Education researchplanning, conducting, and evaluating qualitative and quantitative research”, New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc Cunningham, L. (2003) “Semiotics, hermeneutics and cash: An essay on the true and fair view”, Retrieved December 2, 2011, from http://poseidon01.ssrn.com/delivery.php?ID Paul. M. (2013) “Pension Scam: Jonathan fires AbdulRasheed Maina”, Nigeria: Dailytimes NG Dye, K. (2007) “Corruption and fraud detection b supreme indtitutions”, Retrieved November 30, 2011, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/ INTWBIGOVANTCOR/Resources /CorruptionSupreme.pdf EFCC (2014) “For the records: 2013 Convictions”, Retrieved June 6 from www.efccnigeria.org Fawehinmi, G. (2004) “Probing corruption in Nigeria”, Nigeria World, Retrieved 22 December 2007 from: http://nigeriaworld.com/feature /publication/fawehinmi/012604.html Field, A. (2005) “Discovering Statistics Using SPSS”. London: Sage Publications FRCN Act (2011) “Financial Reporting Council of Nigeria Act. Federal Republic of Nigerial Official Gazette”, Lagos: Federal Government Printer Gray, R. & Moussalli, S. (2006) “Forensic accounting and auditing united again: a historic perspective”, Journal of Business Issues, vol. 2(1): 15-25 Hanna, R. Bishop, S. Nadel, S. Scheffler, G. & Durlacher, K. (2011) “The effectiveness of anti-corruption policy: what has worked, what hasn’t, and what we don’t know–a systematic review”, London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education Harris, C. & Brown, A. (2000) “The qualities of a forensic accountant”. Pennsylvania CPA Journal , vol. 71(1): 6-7 Idehen, M. (2013) “ANAN, EFCC, ICPC to partner on financial crimes investigations”, Retrieved 2014, October 19 from: http://nationalmirroronline.net/new Jamal, K. (2008) “Building a better audit profession: align incentives and reduce regulation”, Accounting Perspectives, vol. 7 (2): 123-126 Khan, M.M. & Al-Hilali, M.T. (1999) “The Noble Quran: Interpretation of the Meanings of the Noble Qur’an in the English Language”, Riyadh: Dar-usSalam Publications Curbing financial crimes with anti-graft bureaus in Nigeria: The accountants’ perception Vol. 14, No. 1 126 Kpundeh, S.J. (1998) “Political will in fighting corruption”, New York: Corruption and Integrity, Improvement Initiatives in Developing Countries, UNDP, OECD Lannacci, J. A. (2000) “Access device fraud and related financial crimes”, Washington: CRC press Malgwi, C.A. (2004) “Fraud as economic terrorism: The efficacy of the Nigerian Economic and Financial Crimes Commission”, Journal of Financial Crime, vol. 12 (2): 144-164 Mobolaji, H. I. (2012) “Fighting Corruption: an expectation augmented approach”, Humanomics, vol. 28 (2): 133-147 Obuh, P. (2012) “Anti-corruption war: ICAN certifies 125 members as forensic accountants”, Nigeria: The Vanguard Odinkalu, C. A. (2010) “Corruption and Governance in Africa: How do we break the Cycle in Nigeria?” By Chidi Anselm Odinkalu. In CLEEN Foundation, "Corruption and governance challenges in Nigeria (pp. 14-42), Lagos: Cleen Foundation Ogbeidi, M. M. (2012) “Political Leadership and Corruption in Nigeria Since 1960: A Socio-economic Analysis”, Journal of Nigeria Studies, vol. 1(2): 1-25 O'Leary, J. J. (1990) “The auditor's responsibility to detect errors, irregularities, and illegal acts by clients”, Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, vol. 1(3): 239-253 Oruene, T.O (2007) “Corruption in Nigeria: A cultural phenomenon”, Journal of Financial Crime, vol. 5(3): 232-240 Osborne, D. (2007) “Deciding to fight corruption”, Journal of Financial Crime, vol. 7(1): 26-35 Otusanya, J. A. (2010) “The role of auditors in the Nigerian banking crisis”, Accounting Business and the Public Interest, vol. 9(1): 159-204 Otusanya, O. (2011) “The role of multinational companies in corrupt practices: the case of Nigeria”, International Journal of Critical Accounting, vol. 3(2): 171-202 Otusanya, O. (2011b) “Corruption as an Obstacle to development in developing countries: A review of literature”, Journal of Money Laundering Control, vol. 14(4): 387-422 Otusanya, O. J. (2012) “An investigation of the financial criminal practices of the elite in developing countries: Evidence from Nigeria”, Journal of financial crime, vol. 19 (2): 175-206 Owuamanam, J. (2013) “ANAN to introduce froensic training against financial crimes”, Retrieved 2014, October 19 from: http://www.punchng.com/ news/anan-to-introduce-forensic-training-against-financial-crimes Pallant, J. (2007) “SPSS Survival Manual”, Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Curbing financial crimes with anti-graft bureaus in Nigeria: The accountants’ perception Vol. 14, No. 1 127 Pogoson, I. (2009) “Globalization and anti-corruption reform in Nigeria: 20032007”, In D. Enweremadu, & E. Okafor, “Anti-corruption reforms in Nigeria since 1999: Issues, Challenges and the Way forward”, Ibadan: IFRA Special Research Issues Ramos, M. (2003) “Auditors' Responsibility for Fraud Detection”, Journal of Accountancy, vol. 195(1): 28-35 Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002) Retrieved 2014, January 17 from: http://www.sec.gov/ about/laws/soa2002.pdf Sherman, L. (1993) “Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: a theory of the criminal sanction”, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency , vol. 30(4): 445-473 Sikka, P. & Hampton, M. (2005) “The role of accountancy firms in tax avoidance: some evidence and issues”, Accounting Forum, vol. 29(3): 325-343 Sikka, P. & Willmott, H. (1995) “The power of ‘independence’: defending and extending the jurisdiction of accounting in the UK”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, vol. 20(6): 547-581 Transparency International (2000) “TI Sourcebook. Confronting corruption: The elements of a national integrity system”, Berlin: Transparency International Vermeulen, G. (2007) “European Union: The Fight against International Corruption — Modelling the Member States' National Laws through Multilateral Anti-Corruption Instruments?” Journal of Money Laundering Control, vol.1(1): 79-84 Waziri, F. (2010) “Chairman's Operning Remark on Corruption and Governance Challenges in Nigeria”, Lagos: CLEEN Foundation