Ma a, Má io Nuno; Shah, Sadaqa Hussain; Sohail, Nida; Co ei a, Anabela Ba is a
A icle
The e ec o inancial de elopmen and MFI's
cha ac e is ics on he e iciency and sus ainabili y o mic o
inancial ins i u ions
Economies
P o ided in Coope a ion wi h:
MDPI – Mul idisciplina y Digi al Publishing Ins i u e, Basel
Sugges ed Ci a ion: Ma a, Má io Nuno; Shah, Sadaqa Hussain; Sohail, Nida; Co ei a, Anabela
Ba is a (2023) : The e ec o inancial de elopmen and MFI's cha ac e is ics on he e iciency and
sus ainabili y o mic o inancial ins i u ions, Economies, ISSN 2227-7099, MDPI, Basel, Vol. 11, Iss. 3,
pp. 1-16,
h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/economies11030078
This Ve sion is a ailable a :
h ps://hdl.handle.ne /10419/328703
S anda d-Nu zungsbedingungen:
Die Dokumen e au EconS o dü en zu eigenen wissenscha lichen
Zwecken und zum P i a geb auch gespeiche und kopie we den.
Sie dü en die Dokumen e nich ü ö en liche ode komme zielle
Zwecke e iel äl igen, ö en lich auss ellen, ö en lich zugänglich
machen, e eiben ode ande wei ig nu zen.
So e n die Ve asse die Dokumen e un e Open-Con en -Lizenzen
(insbesonde e CC-Lizenzen) zu Ve ügung ges ell haben soll en,
gel en abweichend on diesen Nu zungsbedingungen die in de do
genann en Lizenz gewäh en Nu zungs ech e.
Te ms o use:
Documen s in EconS o may be sa ed and copied o you pe sonal
and schola ly pu poses.
You a e no o copy documen s o public o comme cial pu poses, o
exhibi he documen s publicly, o make hem publicly a ailable on he
in e ne , o o dis ibu e o o he wise use he documen s in public.
I he documen s ha e been made a ailable unde an Open Con en
Licence (especially C ea i e Commons Licences), you may exe cise
u he usage igh s as speci ied in he indica ed licence.
h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/
Ci a ion: Ma a, Má io Nuno, Sayyed
Sadaqa Hussain Shah, Nida Sohail,
and Anabela Ba is a Co ei a. 2023.
The E ec o Financial De elopmen
and MFI’s Cha ac e is ics on he
E iciency and Sus ainabili y o Mic o
Financial Ins i u ions. Economies 11:
78. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/
economies11030078
Academic Edi o : Robe Czudaj
Recei ed: 18 Augus 2022
Re ised: 20 Decembe 2022
Accep ed: 11 Janua y 2023
Published: 1 Ma ch 2023
Copy igh : © 2023 by he au ho s.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land.
This a icle is an open access a icle
dis ibu ed unde he e ms and
condi ions o he C ea i e Commons
A ibu ion (CC BY) license (h ps://
c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/
4.0/).
economies
A icle
The E ec o Financial De elopmen and MFI’s Cha ac e is ics
on he E iciency and Sus ainabili y o Mic o
Financial Ins i u ions
Má io Nuno Ma a 1, Sayyed Sadaqa Hussain Shah 2,* , Nida Sohail 2and Anabela Ba is a Co ei a 1,*
1ISCAL-Ins i u o Supe io de Con abilidade e Adminis ação de Lisboa, Ins i u o Poli écnico de Lisboa,
A enida Miguel Bomba da 20, 1069-035 Lisbon, Po ugal
2Facul y o A s and Social Science, Depa men o Comme ce and Finance, Go e nmen College Uni e si y
Laho e, Laho e 54000, Pakis an
*Co espondence: [email p o ec ed] (S.S.H.S.); [email p o ec ed] (A.B.C.);
Tel.: +92-333-445-3189 (S.S.H.S.)
Abs ac :
The Mic o Financial Ins i u ions (MFIs) ha e been ou ed as de elopmen s a egies o
Eme ging Ma ke s and De eloping Economies (EMDEs) which me i s esea ch in o he e ec o
inancial de elopmen on he e iciency and sus ainabili y o he MFIs. The E icien and sus ain-
able MFIs signi ican ly pa ed he way o he economic de elopmen o a coun y pa icula ly in
de eloping coun ies. Su p isingly he e a e e y a e s udies ha examine he nexus o inancial
de elopmen , MFIs e iciency, and sus ainabili y. Also, hese s udies a e con ined o he impac o
inancial de elopmen ei he on he e iciency o sus ainabili y o MFIs. Add essing his gap, he
s udy a emp s o explo e he coun y-speci ic and MFIs-speci ic ac o s which signi ican ly a ec
he e iciency and sus ainabili y o he MFIs. Fo his pu pose, he s udy i s de e mines whe he
inancial de elopmen con ibu es o he e iciency and sus ainabili y o MFI. Secondly, he e ec o
MFIs’ speci ic cha ac e is ics such as c edi isk, ma ke isk, liquidi y isk, lending s a egy, De elop-
men Financial Ins i u ions (DFIs) unds managemen , inancial ou each, and po e y alle ia ion
on he e iciency and sus ainabili y o MFIs. The s udy has been conduc ed o Bangladesh, India,
and Pakis an consis ing o a panel da a se o 12 MFIs o e a pe iod spanning om 2008–2018 using
S ochas ic F on ie Analysis and Cobb Douglas p oduc ion unc ion eg ession analysis. O e all
empi ical analysis e eals ha inancial de elopmen has signi ican ly a ec ed he e iciency and
sus ainabili y o he MFIs. While speci ic cha ac e is ics such as po e y alle ia ion and DFIs unds
managemen ha e been shown o imp o e MFIs e iciency whe eas an inc ease in c edi isk, lending
s a egy, and ma ke isk dec ease MFIs sus ainabili y and liquidi y isk along wi h an inc ease
in inancial ou each leads o a dec ease in MFIs e iciency. The di ec ions and magni udes o he
indings sugges he s akeholde s o all h ee coun ies o he signi ican di ec ion leads o he
e iciency and sus ainabili y o MFIs. Mo eo e , u u e esea ch could s i e o unde s and he aspec s
o inancial de elopmen which nega i ely co ela e wi h he MFIs’ e iciency and sus ainabili y such
as s ingen ax policies, c edi o igh s p o ec ion, and implemen a ion o ules and egula ions.
Keywo ds:
Mic o Financial Ins i u ions; Eme ging Ma ke s and De eloping Economies; sus ain-
abili y; De elopmen Financial Ins i u ions; S ochas ic F on ie Analysis; Cobb Douglas p oduc ion
unc ion; ma ke isk
1. In oduc ion
The Global Financial Sys em wi h i s as and in e connec ed inancial ins i u ions
cons i u ing cen al banks, comme cial banks, insu ance co po a ions, in es men compa-
nies, capi al ma ke s, money ma ke s, and inance minis ies holds immense impo ance in
he inancial s abili y o he wo ld economy h ough managing public money being c ea ed
Economies 2023,11, 78. h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/economies11030078 h ps://www.mdpi.com/jou nal/economies
Economies 2023,11, 78 2 o 16
by economic sec o s ensu ing i s’ sui able use o bene icial objec i es p omo ing he ex-
pansion o economic ac i i y (Khawja 2013). Howe e , inancial de elopmen de ined as
ensu ing c edi o ’s igh s p o ec ion, educing agency- ela ed cos s, alle ia ing imbalance
in in o ma ion, easing in o ma ion accessibili y, imp o ing inancial ins i u ion quali y,
commi men o accoun ing policies, and inancial disclosu e anspa ency has p ima ily
been concen a ed in de eloped economies (Lei e al. 2018).
The non-p e alence o inancial de elopmen in he Eme ging Ma ke s and De el-
oping Economies (EMDEs) has esul ed in he inancial exclusion o he 1.7 billion wo ld
popula ion om he o mal inancial sec o de ined as he inabili y o ce ain popula ion
segmen s om a ailing inances due o hei socioeconomic ci cums ances and he chal-
lenges hey ha e in mee ing he equi emen s o con en ional inancial ins i u ions, hei
in ol emen in he inancial sec o is es ic ed (Demi guc-Kun e al. 2017). De elopmen
Financial Ins i u ions (DFIs) p ima ily unc ion o p o ide capi al o economic de elop-
men p ojec s se ing as d i e s o indus ializa ion which necessi a es hei p esence o
economic g ow h. Mic o Financial Ins i u ions (MFIs) se ices a e an ex ension o DFIs op-
e a ing o he p o ision o inancial se ices o he Mic o, Small, and Medium En e p ises
(MSMEs) which o m an in eg al pa o he de eloping economies (PIDE 2021).
As a esul o he ini ia i e aken by Muhammad Yunus o Bangladesh in he 1970s
in he o m o G ameen Bank o mains eam he ma ginalized sec o s o he economy by
p o iding inancial se ices ailo ed o he c edi needs o he poo , he wo ld’s i s mic o-
inance ins i u ion wi h he dual unc ionali y o social and inancial inclusion eme ged
MSMEs (Mainsah e al. 2004). The only objec i e o es ablishing MFIs was o comba he
in o mal in e media ion impeding he economic de elopmen o MSMEs, a signi ican
economic sec o in he Eme ging Ma ke s and De eloping Economies (EMDEs) (IBRD IDA
2022). Lack o conside able colla e al, bo owe quali y e alua ion, and high expenses
associa ed wi h p ocessing small loans ha e ende ed MFIs he only sou ce o g an ing
mic oloans o bo owe s wi hou colla e al and c edi checks, making i di icul o emo e
c edi es ic ions on low-income MSMEs (Wo ld Bank 2015).
T adi ional inancial ins i u ions a e highly egula ed due o hei i al ole in he
inancial s abili y o a na ion. The e o e, MFIs ha aim o inc ease inancial inclusion
while con ibu ing o po e y alle ia ion mus demons a e inancial sus ainabili y and
p o i abili y in hei po olio quali y (Basha a e al. 2014;Falcone 2018). The issue o
shadow banking has led o he inancial exclusion o MSMEs in eme ging ma ke s and
g owing coun ies such as India, Pakis an, and Bangladesh. Howe e , MSMEs ha ha e
he po en ial o con ibu e o economic g ow h need inancial suppo , and MFIs se e
he goal o in eg a ing impo e ished households and MSMEs in o he inancial sec o ,
con ibu ing o he de elopmen o he inancial sec o (Falcone 2020;Jassim and Khawa
2018;Wu 2022).
To gene a e insigh s o he MFIs, i is necessa y o in es iga e he cause-and-e ec
ela ionship be ween inancial de elopmen and he sus ainabili y and e icacy o he mi-
c o inance sec o o he MFIs’ mission o b oadening inancial in eg a ion h ough po e y
alle ia ion and expanding he each o an economy’s inancial sec o . The E icien and
sus ainable MFIs signi ican ly pa ed he way o he economic de elopmen o a coun y
pa icula ly in de eloping coun ies (Ba 2004). Bu mos o policymake s and schola s
conduc sepa a e con e sa ions abou inancial de elopmen and mic o inance (Ba 2004).
While inancial de elopmen and MFIs a e insepa able ha guide he s akeholde s o de ise
he policyholde o subs an ial u u e inancial de elopmen goals. Fo b idging he gap
o hese unno iced phenomena, he s udy a emp s o e alua e he e ec o inancial de el-
opmen on he e iciency and sus ainabili y o mic o- inancial ins i u ions. Also, his s udy
inco po a ed MFI-speci ic cha ac e is ics such as inancial ou each, po e y alle ia ion,
lending s a egy, and DFIs’ unding managemen o o inancial isks such as ma ke isk,
c edi isk, and liquidi y isk on he e iciency and sus ainabili y o MFIs o iden i y he
signi ican g ass oo ac o s ha lead o economics p og ess.
Economies 2023,11, 78 3 o 16
2. Li e a u e Re iew
Financial sec o de elopmen assessed on ou key dimensions o size, access, e i-
ciency, and sus ainabili y ocusing on inc easing inclusi eness in he inancial sys ems
while imp o ing access o inancial se ices o he unde se ed alida es he ole o MFIs
in elimina ing he cons ain s o g ow h o MSMEs (Wo ld Bank 2009). Financial in eg a ion
o he shadow banking sec o can assis he inancial sec o in he managemen o liquidi y,
ma u i y, and c edi isk he eby imp o ing he inancial sys em s abili y o Eme ging
Ma ke s and De eloping Economies (EMDEs) (Ghosh e al. 2012). Financial de elopmen
leads o a educ ion in liquidi y isk, p o ec ing c edi o igh s and acili a ing possession o
colla e al in case o de aul allowing in angibles such as pa en s o be pledged as colla e al
o secu ing inancial bo owing (Lei e al. 2018).
The impo ance o mic o inance in eaping he bene i s o an inclusi e inancial sys em
has been implemen ed in Islamic inance h ough he inno a ion o Islamic mic o inance
cu ency encou aging inancial s abili y while c ea ing a communi y o Islamic mic o i-
nance p o ide s, pa icipa ing me chan s, Zaka and Waq ins i u ions p o iding capi al
assis ance o allow ecipien s in achie ing po e y educ ion and become Zaka paye in
he u u e (Rozzani e al. 2015). The heo y o economic g ow h pos ula es he G ow h
Model o analyze he e ec o changes in echnological p og ess modeled as p oduc ion
unc ion augmen a ion on he le el o ou pu Y in a p oduc ion unc ion o e ime. Capi al
augmen a ion includes e iciency pa ame e s in he p oduc ion unc ion h ough mul i-
plica ion by Capi al K and can be used o assess he e ec o changes in echnological
ac o s such as inancial de elopmen on he p oduc i i y o he inpu s in he p oduc ion
o ou pu (Mankiw 2012). Taking his in o accoun , i seems possible o o mula e he
ollowing hypo heses:
Hypo heses 1 (H1).
Financial de elopmen leads o a dec ease in he echnical e iciency o
he MFIs.
Hypo heses 2 (H2).
Financial de elopmen esul s in he de e io a ion o he sus ainabili y
o MFIs.
The uniqueness o mic o inance in ul illing social objec i es as well as con ibu ing
o inancial de elopmen h ough se ing p oduc i e sec o s o he economy domina ed
by MSMEs in de eloping economies has shown o be a ec ed by he na ional income
and de elopmen s age o he coun y (Maksudo a 2010). The impac o he inancial
c isis o 2008 ac oss di e en owne ship ypes o MFIs showed ha mic o inance banks
showed a p oduc i i y d op due o a decline in echnology, NBFIs showed dec eased
p oduc i i y due decline in echnology and ine iciency, coope a i es showed dec eased
p oduc i i y due o a educ ion in e iciency and inno a ion while among all he owne ship
ypes, NGOs showed he lowes p oduc i i y decline (Wijesi i 2016). The e ec o inancial
de elopmen in e ms o MFI owne ship ansi ion om s a e-owned o p i a ely owned
banks on he p o i and cos e iciency o MFIs showed be e in e nal echnical e iciency as
well as alloca i e e iciency o p i a ely owned MFIs along wi h e o ms such as lis ing on
s ock exchanges and mac oeconomic condi ions such as g ow h a e and GDP pe capi a
(Mu a indwa e al. 2021).
Economic g ow h indica i e o he de eloped inancial sec o inc eases demand o
c edi due o he expansion o p o i able oppo uni ies o mic oen e p ises allowing MFIs
o cha ge highe in e es a es he eby lowe ing he cos o unds along wi h bols e ing
inancial sus ainabili y h ough educing de aul as P i a e C edi o GDP is nega i ely
associa ed wi h Po olio a Risk o mo e han 30 days (PAR-30) which is a majo indica o
o MFIs’ sus ainabili y (Ahlin e al. 2011). Recen inancial de elopmen s in mic o inance
such as inc easing compe i ion, comme cializa ion, echnological ad ancemen , inancial
libe aliza ion, and egula ion policies o go e nmen ha e esul ed in inc easing ocus
on he inancial sus ainabili y o he MFIs o educe he cos o lending money and co e
Economies 2023,11, 78 4 o 16
i om he ou s anding loan po olio (He mes and Lensink 2011). Compliance wi h
p uden ial egula ions and supe ision can be especially cos ly o MFIs equaling 12–13%
o hei non-in e es paymen s as MFI supe ision has a causal e ec on he ade-o
be ween p o i abili y and ou each wi h p o i -o ien ed MFIs acing p uden ial supe ision
esponding h ough cu ailing hei ou each (Cull e al. 2011). The ollowing hypo hesis is
as ollows:
Hypo heses 3 (H3).
MFIs’ sus ainabili y is a ec ed by he ma ke isk a ising om he ex en o
inancial de elopmen in he economy.
The in e sec ion o mic o inance a h ee poin s ende s MFIs iable as a de elopmen
s a egy wi h i s ly he p ima y pu pose se ed by MFIs being po e y alle ia ion, sec-
ondly p o iding in e media ion channels o inancial inclusion and hi dly egula ing
MFIs ha ing access o capi al ma ke s and aking deposi s o ensu e an inc ease in he
inancial ou each (O e o 1999). P o i -o ien ed MFIs ha e been shown o ope a e e icien ly
se ing mo e app op ia e loan p ices due o being able o easily access in es men in o
he sec o ega dless o ‘Mission D i ’ conce ns o ading-o social impac o inancial
pe o mance while no - o -p o i o ganiza ions ha e been assumed o be insula ed om
compe i i e p essu es and hence p one o ine iciencies (Robe s 2013). The success o MFIs
in a coun y is de e mined by he incumben go e nmen ’s poli ical ideology as inancial
inclusion o he poo ly ecei ed a en ion in he poli ical agendas o go e nmen s in de-
eloping economies while MFIs unde igh -wing go e nmen s o cen is egimes ha e
highe e iciency han MFIs ope a ing unde le -wing go e nmen s due o go e nmen
in e en ion o cing cha ging o lowe in e es a es on loans (Gul e al. 2017).
MFIs’ ou each is nega i ely co ela ed wi h hei e iciency, and MFIs wi h a lowe
a e age loan balance, which is a measu e o he dep h o ou each, and mo e women
bo owe s, which is a measu e o he b ead h o ou each, a e less e icien , indica ing ha
MFIs s i ing o e iciency while egis e ing dec eased ou each o he poo led o g ea e
po e y educ ion (He mes e al. 2011). One o he main unc ions o MFIs is he p o ision o
inancial se ices o he excluded segmen s o he economy measu ed as inancial ou each
and MFIs pu suing highe le els o ou each can be achie ed h ough an inc ease in
o al asse s and he numbe o ac i e bo owe s
(Liña es-Zega a and Wilson 2018).
The
s eng h o co po a e go e nance is conside ed a majo de e minan o MFI e iciency a e
indeb edness as he e iciency o he Boa d o Di ec o s in i s moni o ing and ad ising
oles is posi i ely associa ed wi h i s independence, boa d expe ise, audi commi ee, and
sepa a ion o CEO and Chai man while i is nega i ely associa ed wi h he size o he boa d
(Tchuigoua 2015). Taking his in o he accoun , i seems possible o o mula e he ollowing
hypo hesis:
Hypo heses 4 (H4).
MFIs’ objec i es o po e y alle ia ion and imp o ing he ou each o he
inancial sec o a ec MFIs’ e iciency.
The analysis o he impac o mic o inance on he MSMEs as compa ed o o he sou ces
o c edi such as bank loans and in o mal c edi showed ha mic o inance loans ha e he
ad an age o mee ing he wo king capi al expendi u e o MSMEs which aises he issue o
he ‘Financial sys ems’ app oach s essing MFIs o imp o e ope a ional sel -su iciency s.
‘Po e y lending’ app oach ocusing on po e y e adica ion h ough subsidized c edi on
low-in e es a es (He mes and Lensink 2011). The impo ance o Comp ehensi e G oup
T aining in mic o inance can be assessed h ough Mic o inance Clien Awa eness Index
used o gauge he inancial li e acy o he cus ome s o MFIs which allows esponden s o
sco e hei unde s anding o se ices being a ailed om he MFI. (Kal a e al. 2015).
The di e si ica ion o MFIs’ e enue sou ces deals wi h high ope a ional cos s as-
socia ed wi h smalle loans; howe e , di e si ied MFIs may ha e o deal wi h moni-
o ing di icul ies and ope a ional ine iciencies while MFIs employing g oup lending
s a egy show imp o ed ope a ional sus ainabili y al hough egula ion nega i ely a ec s

Economies 2023,11, 78 5 o 16
sus ainabili y (Zamo e 2018). Social capi al is a o ably connec ed wi h Eu opean MFIs’
epaymen , p o i abili y, ou each, and e icacy. h ough lowe ing c edi isk while inc eas-
ing inancial pe o mance and social ou each as he in ensi y o social capi al inc eases
(
Chmelíko áe al. 2018
). The adeo be ween he mic o inance ins i u ionalis app oach
o sus ainabili y and wel a is app oach o ou each s esses app op ia e lending s a egy
along wi h op imum loan amoun maximizing e iciency o he h ee loan echniques
o indi idual lending, g oup lending, and illage banking, o a combina ion o he h ee
loan me hods (Widia o e al. 2017). Taking his in o conside a ion, i seems possible o
o mula e he ollowing hypo hesis:
Hypo heses 5 (H5).
C edi isk a ising om MFIs’ lending s a egy a ec s he sus ainabili y
o MFIs.
In e na ional ins i u ions’ unding Sou h Asian MFIs emphasize he social objec i e
o high ope a ional cos s o loan gene a ion hu he b ead h and dep h o ou each,
while he b ead h o ou each has a posi i e co ela ion wi h pe o mance de e minan s o
MFIs and dep h o ou each has a nega i e associa ion wi h pe o mance de e minan s o
MFIs (
Bibi e al. 2013
). The p o ision o inancial se ices o he mic o-en e p ises equi es
subsidies o inancial e iciency as e icien MFIs show be e pe o mance han comme cial
banks in po olio quali y acili a ing he a e o loan eco e y by inc easing inancial li e acy
and g oup moni o ing (Ko eos and Randhawa 2004). MFIs’ ans o ma ion om NGOs in o
sha eholde -owned inancial ins i u ions o independence om dono s and gaining access
o comme cial unding caused an a e age educ ion in ope a ional cos s and ola ili y in
unding cos s while o e all p o i s dec eased due o en o cing compliance on egula ions
imposing s ic e isk managemen (D’Espallie e al. 2017).
The business model o MFIs is ca ego ized as p o i -o ien ed and sel -sus aining busi-
nesses o subsidized and no - o -p o i o ganiza ions choosing be ween maximizing hei
inancial e enue o yield which again can be seg ega ed in o ou pu ha maximizes a e -
age loan size o ou pu ha maximizes he numbe o loans (Bos and Millone 2015). The
social cos o subsidies g an ed o MFIs, as measu ed by he Subsidy Dependen Index,
is an inpu o subsidized MFIs, whe eas ou each is he social ou pu , as measu ed by
he Ou each Index. The inancial sus ainabili y o MFIs imp o es h ough lea ning by
doing, which makes ma u e MFIs inancially e icien (Wijesi i e al. 2017). The ecen de-
elopmen s in mic o inance such as inc easing comme cializa ion, he decline in subsidies,
and he in ensi ica ion o global compe i ion ha e c ea ed an unce ain en i onmen in
he mic o inance indus y wi h he MFI size a iable ha ing a nega i e and signi ican
ela ionship wi h he social e iciency as compa ed o inancial e iciency (Fall e al. 2018).
The mic o inance sec o o de eloping economies is exposed o h ee main ypes o inancial
isk, namely liquidi y isk, in e es a e isk, and o eign exchange (FX) isk, necessi a ing
inc eased inancial assis ance om in e na ional dono s and DFIs o isk mi iga ion, as
banks o e ing mic oc edi acili ies ace g ea e liquidi y isk and lowe FX isk, whe eas
MFIs ope a ing as NGOs, C edi Unions, and coope a i es ha e high-in e es a e isk and
FX isk (Gie zen 2017). In line wi h he abo e-ci ed li e a u e, i seems possible o o mula e
he ollowing hypo hesis:
Hypo heses 6 (H6).
MFIs’ exposu e o liquidi y isk due o he De elopmen o Financial Ins i u-
ions’ unding managemen a ec s he e iciency o MFIs.
3. Me hodology
The esea ch will de e mine he impac o inancial sec o de elopmen on he e i-
ciency and sus ainabili y o Mic o Financial Ins i u ions, wi h MFIs’ e iciency and sus ain-
abili y as he esponse o dependen a iables and inancial de elopmen as he p edic o
o independen a iable, while assessing he impac o MFIs’ inancial isk managemen ,
inancial ou each, po e y alle ia ion, ad ancing me hodology, and DFIs’ unds. wi h
Economies 2023,11, 78 6 o 16
MFIs’ e iciency and sus ainabili y as he dependen a iables and po e y alle ia ion,
inancial ou each, ma ke isk, c edi isk, and liquidi y isk as he independen a iables
while mode a ing a iables a e he MFIs’ ma ke isk
×
inancial de elopmen , c edi
isk ×ad ancing
me hodology and liquidi y isk
×
DFIs’ und’s managemen . A de ailed
explana ion o he a iables and hei cons uc s is p o ided in Table 1below:
Table 1. Explana ion o a iables and hei cons uc ions.
Va iables Indica o s Financial Ra ios
Financial De elopmen Bank Deposi s/GDP Bank Deposi s
GDP
MFI E iciency Re u n on Equi y P o i A e Tax
To al Equi y
MFI Sus ainabili y Ope a ional Sel Su iciency Ope a ing Re enue
Loan loss p o ision+Financial Exp.+Ope a ing Exp.
C edi Risk Loans W i en O Loans W i en O
A g. Loans Ou s anding
Ma ke Risk Deb o Equi y Ra io To al Liabili ies
To al Equi y
Liquidi y Risk Cash Posi ion Indica o Cash and Deposi s
To al Asse s
Lending s a egy Ope a ing Expense Ra io Ope a ing Expense
A g. G oss Po olio
DFIs’ Funds Managemen Funding Expense Ra io In e es Expense
A g. G oss Po olio
Financial Ou each Cos pe bo owe Ope a ing Expense
No. o bo owe s
Po e y Alle ia ion GNI pe capi a G oss Na ional Income Pe Capi a
No e: See Appendix A—Cha ac e is ics o Va iables.
3.1. S ochas ic F on ie Analysis
P e ious esea ch has p ima ily employed s ochas ic on ie analysis o es ima e he
e iciency o p oduc ion unc ions. I is a pa ame ic on ie echnique based on he heo y
ha no economic agen can exceed he ideal on ie , and i es ima es e iciency, which is
de ined as he maximiza ion o ou pu wi h a gi en le el o inpu o p oduc ion echnology.
S a is ically, on ie pa ame e s and ine iciency can be deduced by p o iding a p oduc ion,
cos , o p o i unc ion and di e en ia ing be ween measu emen e o and esidual e m
exp essing ine iciency. SFA p esupposes he quasi-conca i y o he p oduc ion unc ion
and p edic s a declining ma ginal a e o echnical subs i u ion, as he en i y is conside ed
echnically e icien when i is wo king a he bes p ac ice le el o p oducing maximum
ou pu wi h esou ces equal o i s capaci y. The op imal p oduc ion unc ion o bank
pe o mance has he ollowing unc ional o m and aking in o accoun he abo e, i is
possible o cons uc he ollowing exp essions o es ing he ele an hypo heses:
yi =βxi +εi (1)
whe e εi = i + ui(2)
The abo emen ioned equa ion indica es y
i
as he obse ed dependen a iable o
MFIs’ e iciency which has been measu ed h ough ROE,
β
is he pa ame e ec o o
inpu s, x
i
is ou independen a iables i.e., po e y alle ia ion, inancial ou each, ma ke
isk, c edi isk, and liquidi y isk,
εi
is he e o e m,
i
is ime- a ian andom e o
and u
i
is he ime-in a ian i m speci ic pa ame e (Mu a indwa e al. 2021). A s ochas ic
p oduc ion unc ion wi h ou pu -o ien ed echnical ine iciency is speci ied as:
lnyi= lnyi
0−ui(3)
lnyi= xiβ+ i(4)
The p esence o cons ain s will educe obse ed ROE om e icien ROE y
i
0
o op imal
ROE by non-nega i e e m u
i
and he pe cen age di e ence is a ibu ed o he p esence
o echnical ine iciency. The in e p e a ion o u is u imes 100 measu es he pe cen age
sho all o he desi ed on ie le el o ou pu due o echnical cons ain s. The alue o u
is equal o ine iciency ha ing a dis ibu ion wi h mean
µ
and a iance
σ2
exponen ially
Economies 2023,11, 78 7 o 16
dis ibu ed (
µ
=
σ2
) whe e modeling o ine iciency a iance is a unc ion o exogenous
co a ia es (Kumbhaka e al. 2015). SFA will be applied o e alua e he i s and he second
hypo hesis o assess he impac o inancial de elopmen on he e iciency and sus ainabili y
o he Mic o Financial Ins i u ions.
Hypo heses 1 (H1).
Financial de elopmen leads o a dec ease in he echnical e iciency o
he MFIs.
lnPAT
Equi yi
=α1+β1lnBank Dep.
GDP c
+ i +ui(5)
In Equa ion (5), he PAT/Equi y is he a io be ween p o i a e ax and he o al
equi y o mic o inance o ganiza ions as a p oxy o MFI E iciency, i.e., obse ed dependen
a iable while Bank Deposi /GDP is he a io be ween o al bank deposi o mic o inance
o ganiza ion o he g oss domes ic p oduc o he coun y as a p oxy o inancial de elop-
men .
α1
is a cons an ,
β1
is a co-e icien o inancial de elopmen ,
i
is he ime- a ian
e o e m, and uiis he ime-in a ian i m-speci ic e m.
Hypo heses 2 (H2).
Financial de elopmen esul s in he de e io a ion o he sus ainabili y
o MFIs.
ln(OSS)i =α2+β2lnBank Dep.
GDP c
+ i +ui(6)
In Equa ion (6), OSS is he Ope a ional Sel Su iciency as an indica o o MFI Sus ain-
abili y while Bank Deposi /GDP is he a io be ween o al bank deposi s o mic o inance
o ganiza ion o he g oss domes ic p oduc o he coun y as an indica o o inancial
de elopmen o es H2 men ioned abo e.
S ochas ic F on ie Analysis will be employed o examine he e ec o inancial de-
elopmen on he sus ainabili y and e icacy o MFIs ope a ing in Pakis an, India, and
Bangladesh. MFIs and o es he ele an hypo hesis we de eloped abo e.
3.2. Cobb Douglas P oduc ion Func ion
The Cobb-Douglas p oduc ion unc ion in economics illus a es he echnological
ela ionship be ween wo o mo e inpu s and he ou pu ha can be p oduced by hose
inpu s. I is a me hod o calcula ing he e ec o changes in a p oduc ion unc ion’s inpu s,
ele an e iciencies, and ou pu s. Conside ing he abo e, i is possible o cons uc he
ollowing exp essions o es ing he ele an hypo heses:
Y =α0×Lα1
×Kα2
(7)
Ln Y =α0+α1Ln L +α2Ln K + u (8)
The abo e equa ion deno es Y
as he ou pu ,
α0
as he cons an , L
as he labo
inpu , K
as he capi al inpu ,
α1
and
α2
a e he elas ici y pa ame e s and u
as a andom
dis u bance (Zellne e al. 1966). Cobb Douglas p oduc ion unc ion was used o de elop
he ma hema ical guidelines o es ima ing he sus ainabili y o MFIs h ough he impac
o inancial de elopmen on he ma ke isk hose MFIs ace and he impac o c edi isk
depending on he lending s a egy while de e mining he e iciency o MFIs h ough he
impac o po e y alle ia ion and inancial ou each as well as he impac o liquidi y isk
b ough on by DFIs’ unding managemen using Gene alized Leas Squa es
Hypo heses 3 (H3).
The e ec o he ma ke isk a ising om he ex en o he inancial de elopmen
o he economy on MFIs’ sus ainabili y.
Economies 2023,11, 78 8 o 16
To es he ela ion in H3, he ollowing equa ion is cons uc ed;
ln (OSS)i =β0+β1lnLiabs
Equi.i
+β2Bank Dep.
G oss Domes ic P oduc ×Liabs
Equi.c
+εi (9)
In Equa ion (9), OSS is he Ope a ional Sel Su iciency as an indica o o MFI Sus ain-
abili y while Bank Deposi /GDP is he a io be ween he o al bank deposi o mic o inance
o ganiza ion o he g oss domes ic p oduc o he coun y as an indica o o inancial
de elopmen o he es H3 men ioned abo e.
Hypo heses 4 (H4).
The e ec o imp o ing he ou each o he inancial sec o and MFIs’ objec i e
o po e y alle ia ion on MFIs’ e iciency.
lnPAT
Equi yi
=β0+β3ln(GNI Pe Capi a)c +β4ln(Cos Pe Bo owe )i +εi (10)
Abo e cons uc ed Equa ion (10) add esses he ela ion in H4 whe e PAT/Equi y is
he a io be ween p o i a e ax and he o al equi y o mic o inance o ganiza ions as a
poxy o MFI E iciency, i.e., obse ed dependen a iable while GNI Pe Capi a as a p oxy
o po e y alle ia ion and Cos Pe Bo owe is an indica o o inancial ou each.
Hypo heses 5 (H5).
The e ec o he c edi isk a ising om MFIs’ lending s a egy on he
MFIs’ sus ainabili y.
ln (OSS)i =β0+β1lnLoans W i en O
A g. Loans Ou s anding i
+β2LiabsLoans W i en O
A g. Loans Ou s anding ×Cash and Deposi s
To al Asse s. c +εi
(11)
Equa ion (11) explains he associa ion o H5, whe e OSS is he Ope a ional Sel Su i-
ciency as an indica o o MFI Sus ainabili y while Loans W i en O /A g. Loans Ou s and-
ing is he a io be ween loans w i en by mic o inance o ganiza ions wi h hei ou s anding
a e age loans o he poxy o c edi isk. Fu he , he Cash and Deposi s/To al Asse s a e
used o assessing he liquidi y isk associa ed wi h he MFI.
Hypo heses 6 (H6).
The e ec o he MFIs’ exposu e o liquidi y isk due o he De elopmen o
Financial Ins i u ions’ unding managemen on MFIs’ e iciency.
lnPAT
Equi. i =β0+β7lnCash and Deposi s
To al Asse s i
+β8In e es Expense
A g G oss Po olio ×Cash and Deposi s
To al Asse s i +εi
(12)
Equa ion (12) a emp s o explain he logical ela ion o H6, whe e PAT/Equi y is he
a io be ween p o i a e ax and he o al equi y o mic o inance o ganiza ions as a poxy
o MFI E iciency i.e., obse ed dependen a iable while Cash and Deposi s/To al Asse s
a e used o assessing he liquidi y isk associa ed wi h he MFI and In e es Expense/A g
G oss Po olio is used o DFIs’.
3.3. Da a Collec ion P ocedu e
The esea ch da a consis s o panel da a om wel e MFIs chosen om Bangladesh,
India, and Pakis an o e 10 yea s. The selec ed MFIs we e anked highes in each indi idual
and inancial da a we e ob ained om he Wo ld Bank’s Mic o inance In o ma ion Exchange
(MIX)
1
da a o he pe iod FY2008 o FY2018. Fo he pe iod o FY2008–FY2018, da a o
coun y-speci ic a iables such as inancial de elopmen and po e y alle ia ion we e
collec ed om he Wo ld Bank
2
and inco po a ed in o e iciency es ima ion using he Me a
on ie echnique o gene a e compa a i e e iciency sco es o each economy.
Economies 2023,11, 78 15 o 16
No es
1h ps://da aca alog.wo ldbank.o g/da ase /mix-ma ke (accessed on 12 July 2022).
2h ps://da a.wo ldbank.o g/ (accessed on 12 July 2022).
Re e ences
Ahlin, Ch is ian, Jocelyn Lin, and Michael Maio. 2011. Whe e does mic o inance lou ish? Mic o inance ins i u ion pe o mance in
mac oeconomic con ex . Jou nal o De elopmen Economics 95: 105–20. [C ossRe ]
Augsbu g, B i a, Ralph De Haas, Heike Ha mga , and Cos as Meghi . 2015. The impac s o mic oc edi : E idence om Bosnia and
He zego ina. Ame ican Economic Jou nal: Applied Economics 7: 183–203. [C ossRe ]
Awawo yi Chu chill, Se a. 2020. Mic o inance inancial sus ainabili y and ou each: Is he e a ade-o ? Empi ical Economics 59:
1329–50. [C ossRe ]
Ayayi, Ayi Ga iel, and Ma y Sene. 2010. Wha d i es mic o inance ins i u ion’s inancial sus ainabili y. The Jou nal o De eloping A eas
44: 303–24. [C ossRe ]
Ba , Michael S. 2004. Mic o inance and inancial de elopmen . Michigan Jou nal o In e na ional Law 26: 271.
Basha a , A., Amma A shad, and Raza Khan. 2014. E iciency, P oduc i i y, Risk and P o i abili y o Mic o inance Indus y in Pakis an.
Islamabad: Pakis an Mic o inance Ne wo k.
Bibi, Uzma, Ha ice Oze Balli, Clai e D. Ma hews, and Da id W. L. T ipe. 2013. New app oaches o measu e he social pe o mance o
Mic o inance Ins i u ions (MFIs). In e na ional Re iew o Economics and Finance 53: 88–97. [C ossRe ]
Bich, Ngoc Nguyen. 2016. The e ec o capi al s uc u e and legal s a us on inancial sus ainabili y o m is in de eloping coun ies.
Re iew o Business and Economics S udies 2: 53–64.
Bos, Jaap W. B., and Ma eo Millone. 2015. P a ice Wha You P each: Mic o inance Business Models and Ope a ional E iciency. Wo ld
De elopmen 70: 28–42. [C ossRe ]
Chmelíko á, Gab iela, Anne e K auss, and Ondˇ ej D oule ý. 2018. Pe o mance o mic o inance ins i u ions in Eu ope—Does social
capi al ma e ? Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 68: 100670. [C ossRe ]
Cull, Robe , Asli Demi güç-Kun , and Jona han Mo duch. 2011. Does Regula o y Supe ision cu ail Mi o inance P o i abili y and
Ou each? Wo ld De elopmen 39: 949–65. [C ossRe ]
D’Espallie , Be , Jann Goedecke, Ma ek Hudon, and Roy Me sland. 2017. F om NGOs o Banks: Does Ins i u ional T ans o ma ion
al e he business model o Mic o inance Ins i u ions? Wo ld De elopmen 89: 19–33. [C ossRe ]
Demi guc-Kun , Asli, Leo a Klappe , Do o he Singe , Saniya Ansa , and Jake Hess. 2017. The Global Findex Da abase 2017.
Washing on DC: Wo ld Bank G oup.
Falcone, Pasquale Ma cello. 2018. G een in es men s a egies and bank- i m ela ionship: A i m-le el analysis. Economics Bulle in
38: 2225–39.
Falcone, Pasquale Ma cello. 2020. En i onmen al egula ion and g een in es men s: The ole o g een inance. In e na ional Jou nal o
G een Economics 14: 159–73. [C ossRe ]
Fall, F ançois, Al-mouksi Akim, and Ha ouna Wassongma. 2018. DEA and SFA esea ch on he e iciency o mic o inance ins i u ions:
A me a-analysis. Wo ld De elopmen 107: 176–88. [C ossRe ]
Ghosh, Swa i, Ines Gonzalez del Mazo, and ˙
Inci Ö ke -Robe. 2012. Chasing he Shadows: How Signi ican is Shadow Banking in Eme ging
Ma ke s? Washing on, DC: The Wo ld Bank.
Gie zen, Thomas. 2017. The exposu e o mic o inance ins i u ions o inancial isk. Re iew o De elopmen Finance 7: 120–33. [C ossRe ]
Gul, Fe dinand A., Jyo i moy Podde , and Abu Za a M. Shah ia . 2017. Pe o mance o Mic o inance Ins i u ions: Does Go e nmen
Ideology Ma e ? Wo ld De elopmen 100: 1–15. [C ossRe ]
Ha a ska, Valen ina, and Denis Nadolnyak. 2007. Do egula ed mic o inance ins i u ions achie e be e sus ainabili y and ou each?
C oss-coun y e idence. Applied Economics 39: 1207–22. [C ossRe ]
He mes, Niels, and Robe Lensink. 2011. Mic o inance: I s Impac , Ou each and Sus ainabili y. Wo ld De elopmen 39: 875–81.
[C ossRe ]
He mes, Niels, Robe Lensink, and Alja Mees e s. 2011. Ou each and E iciency o Mic o inance Ins i u ions. Wo ld De elopmen 39:
938–48. [C ossRe ]
Hossain, Md Sha i , and Mohd Azam Khan. 2016. Financial sus ainabili y o mic o inance ins i u ions (MFIs) o Bangladesh. De eloping
Coun y S udies 6: 69–78.
IBRD IDA. 2022. Small and Medium En e p ises (SMEs) Finance. The Wo ld Bank. A ailable online: h ps://www.wo ldbank.o g/en/
opic/sme inance (accessed on 15 Ma ch 2022).
Illangakoon, Anu udha Gishan, S. M. Azam, and Adam Am il Jaha adak. 2022. Impac o Risk Managemen owa ds Sus ainabili y o
Mic o inance Indus y in S i Lanka: A Case S udy. In e na ional Jou nal o Social Sciences and Economic Re iew 3: 1–7. [C ossRe ]
Jassim, J., and Maham Khawa . 2018. De ining Mic o, Ve y Small and Small En e p ises: Mo ing owa ds a S anda d De ini ion-Con inuum.
Islamabad: Pakis an Mic o inance Ne wo k.
Kal a, Vini a, Himendu P. Ma hu , and P. V. Rajee . 2015. A Measu e o Awa eness and Skills o Mic o inance Clien s. IIMB Managemen
Re iew 27: 252–66. [C ossRe ]

Economies 2023,11, 78 16 o 16
Kama udin, Faka udin, and Naz a ul Aina Mohamad Anwa . 2020. Dimensions o Voice and Poli ical S abili y o he E iciency o
Mic o inance Ins i u ions. Kajang: Academia Indus y Ne wo ks, p. 29.
Khawja, Ahmad Ha eez. 2013. In oduc ion o Economics & Finance. Islamabad: Khawja & Khawja Publishing House.
Ko eos, Pe e , and Dipinde Randhawa. 2004. Financial se ices o he poo : Assessing Mic o inance Ins i u ions. Manage ial Finance
30: 70–95. [C ossRe ]
Kumbhaka , Subal C., Hong en Wang, and Alan P. Ho ncas le. 2015. A P ac i ione ’s Guide o S ochas ic F on ie Analysis Using S a a.
New Yo k: Camb idge Uni e si y P ess.
Lei, Jin, Jiaping Qiu, and Chi Wan. 2018. Asse angibili y, cash holdings and inancial de elopmen . Jou nal o Co po a e Finance
50: 223–42. [C ossRe ]
Lensink, Robe , Roy Me sland, Nhung Thi Hong Vu, and S ephen Zamo e. 2018. Do mic o inance ins i u ions bene i om in eg a ing
inancial and non inancial se ices? Applied Economics 50: 2386–401. [C ossRe ]
Liña es-Zega a, José, and John O. S. Wilson. 2018. The size and g ow h o Mic o inance Ins i u ions. The B i ish Accoun ing Re iew
50: 199–213. [C ossRe ]
Mainsah, E a is us, Schuyle R. Heue , Ap aji a Kal a, and Qiulin Zhang. 2004. G ameen Bank: Taking Capi alism o he Poo . Chazen
Web Jou nal o In e na ional Business 1: 28.
Maksudo a, Na giza. 2010. Con ibu ion o Mic o inance o Financial Sec o De elopmen and G ow h. P ague: Cen e o Economic
Resea ch and G adua e Educa ion, Economics Ins i u e.
Mankiw, N. G ego y. 2012. Mac oeconomics. Camb idge: Ha a d Uni e si y.
Mu a indwa, Samuel, Ib ahim Si aj, and And eas S ephan. 2021. Owne ship and Bank E iciency in A ica: T ue Fixed E ec s S ochas ic
F on ie Analysis. Jou nal o Financial S abili y 54: 100886. [C ossRe ]
Nje u, Ca oline M. 2016. E ec o Mic o Fac o s on Financial Sus ainabili y o In o mal Finance G oups in Mwea Cons i uency. Doc o al
disse a ion, KCA Uni e si y, Nai obi, Kenya.
Nu makhano a, Mi a, Ga in K e zschma , and Hassouna Fedhila. 2015. T ade-o be ween inancial sus ainabili y and ou each o
mic o inance ins i u ions. Eu asian Economic Re iew 5: 231–50. [C ossRe ]
O e o, Ma ia. 1999. B inging De elopmen Back in o Mic o inance. F ank u : Goe he Uni e si y.
PIDE. 2021. De elopmen Finance Ins i u ion. In Pakis an Ins i u e o De elopmen Economics. Islambad: PIDE.
Robe s, Pe e W. 2013. The p o i o ien a ion o Mic o inance Ins i u i ions and e ec i e in e es a es. Wo ld De elopmen 41: 120–31.
[C ossRe ]
Rozzani, Nabilah, Rashidah Abdul Rahman, In an Salwani Mohamed, and Sha i ah No zehan Syed Yusu . 2015. De elopmen o
Communi y Cu ency o Islamic Mic o inance. P ocedia Economics and Finance 31: 803–12. [C ossRe ]
Tchuigoua, Hube Tchakou e. 2015. De e minan s o he go e nance quali y o Mic o inance Ins i u ions. The Qua e ly Re iew o
Economics and Finance 58: 32–43. [C ossRe ]
Widia o, Ind a, Ali Em ouznejad, and Leonidas Anas asakis. 2017. Obse ing choice o loan me hods in no - o -p o i mic o inance
using da a en elopmen analysis. Expe Sys ems wi h Applica ions 82: 278–90. [C ossRe ]
Wijesi i, Mahinda. 2016. Wea he ing he s o m: Owne ship s uc u e and pe o mance o mic o inance in i u ions in he wake o he
global inancial c isis. Economic Modelling 57: 238–47. [C ossRe ]
Wijesi i, Mahinda, Jacob Ya on, and Michele Meoli. 2017. Assessing he inancial and ou each e iciency o mic o inance ins i u ions:
Do age and size ma e ? Jou nal o Mul ina ional Financial Managemen 40: 63–76. [C ossRe ]
Wo ld Bank. 2009. Global Moni o ing Repo . Washing on, DC: The In e na ional Bank o Recons uc ion and De elopmen /The
Wo ld Bank.
Wo ld Bank. 2015. Mic o inance: A c i ical li e a u e su ey. In IEG Wo king Pape 2015. Edi ed by T. Beck. Washing on DC: Independen
E alua ion G oup, Wo ld Bank.
Wu, Hong. 2022. T ade openness, g een inance and na u al esou ces: A li e a u e e iew. Resou ces Policy 78: 102801. [C ossRe ]
Zamo e, S ephen. 2018. Should mic o inance ins i u ions di e si y o ocus? A global analysis. Reseaa ch in In e na ional Business and
Finance 46: 105–19. [C ossRe ]
Zellne , A nold, Jan Kmen a, and Jacques D eze. 1966. Speci ica ion and Es ima ion o Cobb Douglas P oduc ion Func ion Models.
Econome ica 34: 784–95. [C ossRe ]
Disclaime /Publishe ’s No e:
The s a emen s, opinions and da a con ained in all publica ions a e solely hose o he indi idual
au ho (s) and con ibu o (s) and no o MDPI and/o he edi o (s). MDPI and/o he edi o (s) disclaim esponsibili y o any inju y o
people o p ope y esul ing om any ideas, me hods, ins uc ions o p oduc s e e ed o in he con en .