Ho, Sin-Yu; Odhiambo, N. M.
A icle
Analysing he mac oeconomic d i e s o s ock ma ke
de elopmen in he Philippines
Cogen Economics & Finance
P o ided in Coope a ion wi h:
Taylo & F ancis G oup
Sugges ed Ci a ion: Ho, Sin-Yu; Odhiambo, N. M. (2018) : Analysing he mac oeconomic d i e s o
s ock ma ke de elopmen in he Philippines, Cogen Economics & Finance, ISSN 2332-2039, Taylo
& F ancis, Abingdon, Vol. 6, Iss. 1, pp. 1-18,
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/23322039.2018.1451265
This Ve sion is a ailable a :
h ps://hdl.handle.ne /10419/194770
S anda d-Nu zungsbedingungen:
Die Dokumen e au EconS o dü en zu eigenen wissenscha lichen
Zwecken und zum P i a geb auch gespeiche und kopie we den.
Sie dü en die Dokumen e nich ü ö en liche ode komme zielle
Zwecke e iel äl igen, ö en lich auss ellen, ö en lich zugänglich
machen, e eiben ode ande wei ig nu zen.
So e n die Ve asse die Dokumen e un e Open-Con en -Lizenzen
(insbesonde e CC-Lizenzen) zu Ve ügung ges ell haben soll en,
gel en abweichend on diesen Nu zungsbedingungen die in de do
genann en Lizenz gewäh en Nu zungs ech e.
Te ms o use:
Documen s in EconS o may be sa ed and copied o you pe sonal
and schola ly pu poses.
You a e no o copy documen s o public o comme cial pu poses, o
exhibi he documen s publicly, o make hem publicly a ailable on he
in e ne , o o dis ibu e o o he wise use he documen s in public.
I he documen s ha e been made a ailable unde an Open Con en
Licence (especially C ea i e Commons Licences), you may exe cise
u he usage igh s as speci ied in he indica ed licence.
h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/
Ho & Odhiambo, Cogen Economics & Finance (2018),
6: 1451265
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/23322039.2018.1451265
FINANCIAL ECONOMICS | RESEARCH ARTICLE
Analysing he mac oeconomic d i e s o s ock
ma ke de elopmen in he Philippines
Sin-Yu Ho
1
* and N.M. Odhiambo
1
Abs ac :This pape analyses he mac oeconomic d i e s o s ock ma ke de elop-
men in he Philippines du ing he pe iod 2001Q4–2016Q4. In pa icula , he pape
examines he impac o banking sec o de elopmen , in la ion a e, exchange a e,
economic g ow h, ade openness and s ock ma ke liquidi y on he de elopmen
o he Philippine s ock ma ke . Theo e ical and empi ical li e a u e e eals di e se
iews on he ela ionship be ween each de e minan and s ock ma ke de elop-
men . In addi ion, he Philippine s ock ma ke has expe ienced ema kable g ow h
in ecen decades. Howe e , he e is no simila s udy on his coun y in he li e a-
u e. The pape , he e o e, en iches he li e a u e by in es iga ing he mac oeco-
nomic d i e s o s ock ma ke de elopmen in he Philippines using he ARDL bounds
es ing p ocedu e. The esul s show ha ade openness has had a nega i e impac
on Philippine s ock ma ke de elopmen in he long un, whe eas banking sec o
de elopmen and he exchange a e ha e had posi i e impac s on he de elopmen
o he Philippine s ock ma ke in he sho un. These indings a e obus o al e na-
i e speci ica ions o he model.
Subjec s: Economics; Econome ics; Finance
Keywo ds: mac oeconomic d i e s; s ock ma ke de elopmen ; he Philippines; ARDL
bounds es ing
JEL codes: C22; E44; G23
*Co esponding au ho : Sin-Yu Ho,
Depa men o Economics, Uni e si y o
Sou h A ica, P.O. Box 392, UNISA 0003,
P e o ia, Sou h A ica
E-mails: [email p o ec ed]a,
alicehosin[email p o ec ed]
Re iewing edi o :
Da id McMillan, Uni e si y o S i ling, UK
Addi ional in o ma ion is a ailable a
he end o he a icle
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
Sin-Yu Ho is a senio lec u e a he Depa men o
Economics o he Uni e si y o Sou h A ica whe e
she ocuses on opics ela ing o de elopmen
inance, s ock ma ke s, eme ging ma ke s and
de eloping coun ies.
N.M. Odhiambo is a p o esso a he Depa men
o Economics o he Uni e si y o Sou h A ica. His
esea ch ocuses on issues in mac oeconomics,
including bu no limi ed o inancial de elopmen ,
po e y, economic g ow h, go e nmen
expendi u e and ene gy consump ion.
PUBLIC INTEREST STATEMENT
The Philippine s ock ma ke has expe ienced
phenomenal g ow h in ecen decades. The global
anking o he s ock exchange imp o ed om 55 h
in 2005 o 12 h in 2014 as measu ed by he ma ke
capi alisa ion a io. In iew o his ema kable
g ow h, his pape analyses he mac oeconomic
d i e s o s ock ma ke de elopmen in he
Philippines du ing he pe iod 2001Q4–2016Q4.
The s udy shows ha ade openness has had
a nega i e impac on Philippine s ock ma ke
de elopmen in he long un, whe eas banking
sec o de elopmen and he exchange a e ha e
had posi i e impac s on he de elopmen o he
Philippine s ock ma ke in he sho un. Based on
hese indings, policymake s should p omo e he
use o equi y inancing in he p oduc ion o main
expo s, enhance banking sec o de elopmen , and
main ain he s abili y o i s domes ic cu ency o
os e s ock ma ke de elopmen .
Recei ed: 29 Sep embe 2017
Accep ed: 08 Ma ch 2018
Fi s Published: 13 Ma ch 2018
© 2018 The Au ho (s). This open access a icle is dis ibu ed unde a C ea i e Commons A ibu ion
(CC-BY) 4.0 license.
Page 1 o 18
Page 2 o 18
Ho & Odhiambo, Cogen Economics & Finance (2018),
6: 1451265
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/23322039.2018.1451265
1. In oduc ion
Wha a e he key mac oeconomic d i e s o s ock ma ke de elopmen ? A numbe o s udies show
he impo ance o s ock ma ke s in p omo ing economic g ow h h ough a ious channels. These
channels encompass educing he cos o mobilising sa ings, p o iding ma ke liquidi y, imp o ing
co po a e go e nance and p omo ing in e na ional isk-sha ing (see Benci enga, Smi h, & S a ,
1996; G eenwood & Smi h, 1997; Jensen & Mu phy, 1990; Le ine, 1991; Obs eld, 1994). Owing o i s
impo ance, an inc easing numbe o s udies ha e ied o answe he ques ion by in es iga ing he
ac o s leading o he g ow h o s ock ma ke s. The mac oeconomic ac o s being iden i ied include
economic de elopmen , banking sec o de elopmen , in la ion a e, exchange a e, o eign di ec
in es men , ade openness and s ock ma ke liquidi y.
While he e is a numbe o s udies examining he ac o s leading o he s ock ma ke de elop-
men , he exis ing li e a u e shows ha he ela ionship be ween each o he mac oeconomic ac-
o s and s ock ma ke de elopmen is highly deba able. Fo example, on he ela ionship be ween
he banking sec o and he s ock ma ke , some s udies show ha hey a e nega i ely ela ed, while
o he s show ha hey a e posi i ely ela ed (see, o example, El-Nade & Al aimony, 2013; Le ine,
1997, 2005). Fo he in la ion a e, exis ing s udies also show inconclusi e esul s. Some a gue ha
a highe in la ion a e has a nega i e impac on s ock ma ke de elopmen , whe eas o he s a gue
ha he in la ion a e can be posi i ely associa ed wi h s ock ma ke e u ns in a high in la iona y
en i onmen (see Ben Naceu , Ghazouani, & Om an, 2007; Boyd, Le ine, & Smi h, 1996, 2001). Wi h
ega d o he exchange a e, s udies also show mixed esul s conce ning he ela ionship be ween
exchange a e beha iou and s ock ma ke pe o mance (see Ga in, 1989; Phylak is & Ra azzolo,
2005). On he ela ionship be ween o eign di ec in es men (FDI) and s ock ma ke de elopmen ,
s udies also e eal opposing iews (see Hausmann & Fe nández-A ias, 2000a, 2000b; Malik & Amjad,
2013). On he ela ionship be ween ade openness and s ock ma ke de elopmen , some s udies
show ha ade openness exe s a posi i e impac on s ock ma ke de elopmen , whe eas o he s
ind ha i hu s s ock ma ke de elopmen (see Kim, Lin, & Suen, 2011; Ni oomand, Hajilee, & Al
Nasse , 2014; Rajan & Zingales, 2003). To sum up, he li e a u e e eals di e se iews on he impac
o mac oeconomic ac o s on s ock ma ke de elopmen . Agains his backg ound, his pape con-
ibu es o he exis ing deba e by in es iga ing he impac o a ious mac oeconomic ac o s on
s ock ma ke de elopmen in he Philippines.
In ecen decades, he Philippine s ock ma ke has expe ienced phenomenal g ow h. Measu ed in
e ms o he sha e p ice index, namely PSEi, i inc eased om 1,869 poin s in 1997 o 7,230 poin s in
2014 (PSE, 2000–2014; Wo ld Fede a ion o Exchanges [WFE], 2015). The g ow h momen um was
shown by he consecu i e g ow h o PSEi du ing he pe iod 2009–2014, wi h a cumula i e g ow h o
286 pe cen in hese six consecu i e yea s (WFE, 2015). In addi ion, he ex ao dina y g ow h o he
s ock ma ke in he coun y can be indica ed by he size o he s ock ma ke as measu ed by he
ma ke capi alisa ion a io. The global anking o he PSE imp o ed om 55 h in 2005 o 12 h in 2014
(Wo ld De elopmen Indica o s [WDI], 2016). Despi e i s ema kable g ow h, he e is, o he bes o
ou knowledge, no simila s udy on he d i e s o s ock ma ke de elopmen in he Philippines.
The e o e, his pape en iches he li e a u e by in es iga ing he mac oeconomic d i e s o s ock
ma ke de elopmen in he coun y using au o eg essi e dis ibu ed lag (ARDL) bounds es ing
echnique.
The es o he pape is o ganised as ollows: Sec ion 2 p o ides an o e iew o s ock ma ke de-
elopmen in he Philippines. Sec ion 3 discusses he heo e ical and empi ical unde pinning o he
de e minan s o s ock ma ke de elopmen . Sec ion 4 ou lines he empi ical me hodology and he
da a. Sec ion 5 p esen s he empi ical esul s. Finally, Sec ion 6 concludes he pape .
Page 3 o 18
Ho & Odhiambo, Cogen Economics & Finance (2018),
6: 1451265
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/23322039.2018.1451265
2. S ock ma ke de elopmen in he Philippines
The Philippine S ock Exchange (PSE), namely he Manila S ock Exchange es ablished in 1927, is one
o he oldes s ock exchanges in Asia (PSE, 2015; Visda, C isos omo, & Padilla, 2013). O e ime, he
numbe o lis ed secu i ies inc eased as public in e es g ew. In 1963, a second s ock exchange,
namely he Maka i S ock Exchange, was es ablished and s a ed o ope a e in 1965 in Maka i (PSE,
2012; Wo ld Bank, 1992). Du ing he 1970s, s ock ma ke ac i i ies we e insigni ican bo h in abso-
lu e and ela i e e ms compa ed wi h o he inancial sec o s. The ading olume was small and
many lis ed companies we e inac i e o a signi ican pe iod o ime. Companies lis ing on he ex-
changes mainly consis ed o hose in he mining and oil sec o s, whe e pu ely specula i e mo e-
men s ook place (Wo ld Bank, 1992).
In o de o e i alise he s ock ma ke , he coun y has unde gone a se ious o e o ms since he
1990s. These e o ms include he uni ica ion o he wo s ock exchanges, he demu ualisa ion o he
s ock exchange, and he enac men o he Secu i ies Regula ion Code (see Ho & Odhiambo, 2015).
The aim o he s ock exchanges uni ica ion was o educe con usion among in es o s. Such con u-
sion s emmed om he di e en policies, di e en membe s, and, mos impo an ly, di e en p ices
o he same lis ed s ocks on he wo s ock exchanges (PSE, 2015). Ano he eason o he uni ica ion
o he exchanges was o achie e economies o scale h ough educing ope a ing cos s. The e o e, in
1992, he go e nmen in oduced a policy o consolida ing he ope a ions o he wo exchanges, and
a uni ied s ock exchange named he Philippine S ock Exchange (PSE) was inco po a ed (PSE, 2015).
This measu e encou aged he de elopmen o a mo e e icien capi al ma ke by ensu ing a le el
playing ield o all in es o s, by consolida ing logis ics, and, as s a ed, by educing ope a ing cos s
(see De los Angeles, 1995).
Ano he undamen al change was he demu ualisa ion o he s ock exchange in 2001 (Akh a ,
2002). Du ing he p ocess o demu ualisa ion, he PSE was ans o med om a membe s’ associa-
ion in o a o -p o i s ock co po a ion, in he p ocess e ol ing in o a new co po a e, legal and busi-
ness model. In he cou se o i s ans o ma ion, he PSE unde wen a se ies o s uc u al changes in
e ms o owne ship s uc u e, he business o he s ock exchange, ading igh s, co po a e go e n-
ance, and i s s a u o y egula o y ole (Alinsunu in, 2002). La e , in 2003, he PSE was lis ed by way
o in oduc ion, which signi ican ly educed b oke owne ship (Akh a , 2002). Alongside he s uc-
u al e o ms unde aken by he PSE, e o ms we e ca ied ou o imp o e he egula o y capaci y o
he Secu i ies and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC was es ablished by he go e nmen ea ly in
1936 as a p ima y egula o y au ho i y in espec o he capi al ma ke s (Wo ld Bank, 1992). Howe e ,
he e ec i eness o he SEC was hinde ed by he esou ce-in ensi e asks such as company egis a-
ion and moni o ing, and quasi-judicial unc ions (In e na ional Mone a y Fund [IMF], 2004; SEC,
2015). To allow he SEC o unc ion e ec i ely, he Secu i ies Regula ion Code (SRC) was enac ed in
2000, which led o o ganisa ional change and capi al-building (IMF, 2004). The majo achie emen s
b ough abou by he SRC we e con i med by he assessmen o secu i y- egula ion p inciples con-
duc ed by he IMF. The epo no ed ha he coun y had pe o med e y well agains he p inciples
o he In e na ional O ganisa ion o Secu i ies Commissions (IMF, 2004).
As a esul o all he e o ms, he Philippine s ock ma ke has expe ienced phenomenal g ow h
o e he yea s. Measu ed by he sha e p ice index, he PSEi gene ally ended upwa d du ing he
pe iod 1997–2014. I inc eased om 1,869 poin s in 1997 o 7,230 poin s in 2014 (PSE annual e-
po s, 2000–2014; WFE, 2015). The g ow h momen um was shown by he consecu i e g ow h o he
PSEi du ing he pe iod 2009–2014, wi h a cumula i e g ow h o 286 pe cen in hese six consecu i e
yea s (WFE, 2015). In addi ion, he ex ao dina y g ow h o he s ock ma ke in he coun y was
shown by he ma ke capi alisa ion a io. As indica ed abo e, he global anking o he PSE imp o ed
om 55 h in 2005 o 29 h in 2010, and leaped o 12 h in 2014 (WDI, 2016). As shown in Figu e 1, he
ma ke capi alisa ion a io expe ienced an upwa d end, wi h ola ile mo emen s om 1990–2014.
The a io inc eased ema kably om 13 pe cen in 1990 o 92 pe cen in 2014, wi h an a e age o
8 pe cen annual g ow h (WDI, 2016). Howe e , he liquidi y o he Philippine s ock ma ke as meas-
u ed in e ms o u no e a io has been low o e he pas wo decades. In pa icula , he Philippines
Page 4 o 18
Ho & Odhiambo, Cogen Economics & Finance (2018),
6: 1451265
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/23322039.2018.1451265
had he leas liquid s ock ma ke in e ms o u no e a io among he ASEAN-5 coun ies1 du ing he
pas wo decades. Figu e 1 shows he ma ke capi alisa ion a io o he PSE du ing he pe iod 1990–
2014. Figu e 2 shows he u no e a ios o he ASEAN-5 s ock exchanges du ing he pe iod
1990–2014.
3. Li e a u e e iew
Owing o he impo ance o s ock ma ke s in p omo ing economic g ow h, he e a e an inc easing
numbe o s udies in es iga ing he ac o s leading o he g ow h o s ock ma ke s. In he asse p ic-
ing models,2 he e a e wo b oad ca ego ies o ac o s in luencing s ock p ices. The i s ca ego y is
he mac oeconomic ac o s, including economic g ow h, o eign exchange, in la ion, indus ial p o-
duc ion, in e es a es, oil p ices, s ock ma ke ola ili y, liquidi y o s ock ma ke , e u ns on in es -
men and he isk ac o s ha in luenced he s a es o he cu en and u u e consump ion. The
second ca ego y is he po olio cha ac e is ics. These cha ac e is ics include book-ma ke ela ions,
di idends o ea nings, he size o company, he a e o e u n and he a iance o asse e u ns (see
B eeden, 1979; Coch ane, 1991; Fama, 1965; Lin ne , 1965; Me on, 1973; Ross, 1976; Sha pe, 1964;
S ulz, 1981a, 1981b).
Apa om he asse p icing models, he e a e a huge olume o s udies linking s ock ma ke de-
elopmen o a ious mac oeconomic ac o s. The mac oeconomic ac o s encompass: economic
de elopmen , banking sec o de elopmen , in la ion a e, exchange a e, o eign di ec in es men ,
ade openness and s ock ma ke liquidi y. Howe e , he ela ionship be ween hese ac o s and he
de elopmen o s ock ma ke a e highly deba able in he li e a u e (see Ho & Iyke, 2017). Rega ding
he ela ionship be ween he de elopmen o he banking sec o and he s ock ma ke , he esul s o
s udies a e inconclusi e. Some s udies a gue ha he banking sec o and s ock ma ke a e nega-
i ely ela ed, while o he s sugges hey a e posi i ely ela ed. As a as nega i e ela ionship is
conce ned, a ious s udies show ha he banking sec o pe o ms be e han he s ock ma ke in
p o iding inancial unc ions o he economy (see Bhide, 1993; DeAngelo & Rice, 1983; S igli z,
1985). Howe e , o he s udies a gue ha he ocus should be on he impo ance o he o e all
Figu e 1. The ma ke
capi alisa ion a io o he PSE,
1990–2014.
Sou ce: Au ho s’ own
compila ion based on WDI
(2016).
Figu e 2. Tu no e a ios o
he ASEAN-5 s ock exchanges,
1990–2014.
Sou ce: Au ho s’ own
compila ion based on WDI
(2016).

Page 5 o 18
Ho & Odhiambo, Cogen Economics & Finance (2018),
6: 1451265
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/23322039.2018.1451265
inancial ma ke a he han he ela i e impo ance o he banking sec o compa ed wi h he s ock
ma ke (see Le ine, 1997; Me on & Bodie, 1995, 2004). Fu he mo e, Le ine (2005) a gues ha he
banking sec o and s ock ma ke a e posi i ely ela ed when hey p o ide inancial se ices o he
economy. On he empi ical on , howe e , many s udies show ha he banking sec o and s ock
ma ke a e posi i ely ela ed. These s udies include hose o Ga cia and Liu (1999), Ben Naceu e al.
(2007), Ku ach (2010), Ya ey (2007, 2010), El-Nade and Al aimony (2013), and Ho (2017).
As a as he in la ion a e is conce ned, exis ing s udies show inclusi e esul s on he ela ionship
be ween in la ion a e and s ock ma ke de elopmen . On he one hand, some a gue ha a highe
in la ion a e has nega i e impac on s ock ma ke de elopmen . Fo example, heo e ical s udies
such as Aza iadas and Smi h (1996), Choi, Smi h, and Boyd (1996), Huybens and Smi h (1998, 1999)
and Boyd e al. (2001) a gue ha highe in la ion a es a e associa ed wi h less liquid and smalle
s ock ma ke s. In addi ion, hey demons a e ha he e exis s a non-linea ela ionship be ween he
in la ion a e and inancial ma ke de elopmen , including s ock ma ke de elopmen . The empi ical
s udies also suppo he a gumen ha he e is a nega i e and non-linea ela ionship be ween he
in la ion a e and s ock ma ke de elopmen (see Baya , 2016; Ben Naceu e al., 2007; Boyd e al.,
1996, 2001; Ho, 2017; Şük üoğlu & Nalin, 2014). On he o he hand, o he s udies e eal ha in la ion
a e can ha e posi i e impac on he s ock ma ke h ough s ock e u ns in a high in la iona y en i-
onmen (see Ba nes, Boyd, & Smi h, 1999; Boyd e al., 1996, 2001).
In e ms o he exchange a e, economic heo ies demons a e a s ong associa ion be ween ex-
change a e beha iou and s ock ma ke pe o mance. They a gue ha cu ency app ecia ion (o
dep ecia ion) can ha e a nega i e (o posi i e) impac on s ock p ices (see Do nbusch & Fishe , 1980;
Jo ion, 1991). On he o he hand, Ga in (1989) indica es ha he ela ionship be ween exchange
a e and s ock p ices can be posi i e o nega i e unde di e en condi ions. Such inconclusi e esul s
a e also ound in he empi ical s udies. Fo example, Ma and Kao (1990) ind ha cu ency app ecia-
ion ad e sely a ec s he s ock ma ke in an expo -o ien ed economy, while i posi i ely a ec s he
s ock ma ke in an impo -o ien ed economy. In con as , Phylak is and Ra azzolo (2005) show ha
s ock p ices and exchange a es a e posi i ely ela ed.
On he ela ionship be ween FDI and s ock ma ke de elopmen , exis ing heo e ical s udies e-
eal opposing iews. Some s udies a gue ha FDI is simply a subs i u e o domes ic s ock ma ke
de elopmen , whe eas o he s show ha FDI p omo es he g ow h o s ock ma ke s (see Claessens,
Klingebiel, & Schmukle , 2001; Hausmann & Fe nández-A ias, 2000a, 2000b). These opposing iews
a e also ound in he empi ical s udies. Fo example, Je us (2004) examines he na u e o he as-
socia ion be ween FDI and s ock ma ke s in ou La in Ame ican coun ies and inds ha FDI and
s ock ma ke de elopmen a e posi i ely co ela ed. In he same ein, he indings o Malik and
Amjad (2013) also show a posi i e ela ionship be ween FDI and agg ega e ma ke capi alisa ion in
Pakis an. In con as , Rhee and Wang (2009) show a nega i e associa ion be ween FDI and s ock
ma ke liquidi y in Indonesia.
On he ela ionship be ween he ade openness and s ock ma ke de elopmen , some s udies
show ha ade openness exe s a posi i e impac on s ock ma ke de elopmen , whe eas o he s
ind ha i hu s s ock ma ke de elopmen . In e ms o posi i e ela ionship, heo ies sugges ha
ade openness bene i s inancial ma ke de elopmen , including s ock ma ke , in wo di e en
ways, which can be desc ibed as “supply-side” and “demand-side” oles (Ni oomand e al., 2014).
The o me one s a es ha ade openness is conduci e o he de elopmen o inancial ma ke
h ough he supply side o inancial ma ke (see B aun & Radda z, 2005; Rajan & Zingales, 2003). The
la e one a gues ha ade openness os e de elopmen o inancial ma ke by aising he demand
on inancial se ices and p oduc s (see Newbe y & S igli z, 1984; S ale yd & Vlachos, 2002). In e ms
Page 6 o 18
Ho & Odhiambo, Cogen Economics & Finance (2018),
6: 1451265
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/23322039.2018.1451265
o nega i e ela ionship, some empi ical s udies such as hose o Jin (2006), Bal agi, Deme iades,
and Law (2009), Kim e al. (2011), and Ho (2017) ind ha ade openness indeed inhibi s he de el-
opmen o s ock ma ke .
The only consensus ha has been eached is he impac s o economic de elopmen and he s ock
ma ke liquidi y on he s ock ma ke de elopmen . Wi h espec o he ela ionship be ween eco-
nomic de elopmen and s ock ma ke de elopmen , he heo e ical li e a u e in gene al sugges s
ha eal income le el and eal income g ow h ha e posi i e impac s on s ock ma ke de elopmen .
These models show ha he e is a signi ican ixed cos associa ed wi h he o ma ion o inancial
ma ke s, including he s ock ma ke . When he economy de elops, he ela i e impo ance o his
ixed cos educes. The e o e, mo e people can pa icipa e in he inancial ma ke (see Boyd & Smi h,
1998; G eenwood & Jo ano ic, 1990; G eenwood & Smi h, 1997). On he empi ical on , he posi i e
ela ionship be ween economic g ow h and s ock ma ke de elopmen is well documen ed in he
exis ing li e a u e – see, o ins ance, A je and Jo ano ic (1993), Le ine and Ze os (1998), Ga cia
and Liu (1999), El-Wassal (2005), Adjasi and Biekpe (2006), Ku ach (2010), Ya ey (2007, 2010), Raza,
Jawaid, A shan, and Ka im (2015), Baya (2016), Ho (2017, in p ess). In addi ion, conce ning he e-
la ionship be ween s ock ma ke liquidi y and s ock ma ke de elopmen , he e is a conce ed iew
ha he liquidi y o s ock ma ke is conduci e o he de elopmen o s ock ma ke . These s udies
include hose o Ga cia and Liu (1999), Ben Naceu e al. (2007), Ya ey (2007, 2010), Che i and
Gazda (2010), Ku ach (2010), El-Nade and Al aimony (2013), Şük üoğlu and Nalin (2014), and
Baya (2016).
4. Me hodology and da a
4.1. ARDL bounds es ing p ocedu e o co-in eg a ion
The p esen s udy uses he au o eg essi e dis ibu ed lag (ARDL) bounds es ing p ocedu e sug-
ges ed by Pesa an, Shin, and Smi h (1996), Pesa an and Shin (1999), and Pesa an, Shin, and Smi h
(2001) o in es iga e he long- un ela ionships be ween he de elopmen o a s ock ma ke and i s
se s o mac oeconomic ac o s. This p ocedu e is p e e ed o o he p ocedu es because i does no
impose he es ic i e assump ion ha all he a iables being s udied mus be in eg a ed o he
same o de . Ins ead, i can be applied o he ime se ies which a e in eg a ed o o de ze o, one, o
a mix u e o bo h. In addi ion, while o he co-in eg a ion es s a e sensi i e o he sample size, he
ARDL bounds es is sui able e en when he sample size is small (see Pesa an & Shin, 1999; Pesa an
e al., 1996, 2001). In his pape , he ARDL bounds es ing p ocedu e employs he equa ion
whe e ɛ, γ and δ a e he whi e-noise e o e m, he sho - un coe icien s, and he long- un coe i-
cien s o he model, espec i ely, and Δ is he i s di e ence ope a o . In addi ion, deno es ime
pe iod and n is he maximum numbe o lags in he model. The a iables, namely lnMCR, lnBNK, ln-
INF, lnREERI, lnOPEN and lnTOR, a e he na u al loga i hms o he ma ke capi alisa ion a io, domes-
ic c edi o g oss domes ic p oduc (GDP), in la ion a e, eal e ec i e exchange a e index, ade as
a pe cen age o GDP and u no e a io, espec i ely. Fu he mo e, he maximum numbe o lags in
he model is chosen based on he Schwa z c i e ion (SC).
In he i s s age, he null hypo hesis o he no co-in eg a ion ela ionship
(1)
Δ
lnMCR =𝛾0+
n
∑
i=1
𝛾1iΔlnMCR −i+
n
∑
i=0
𝛾2iΔlnBNK −i+
n
∑
i=0
𝛾3iΔlnINF −i+
n
∑
i=0
𝛾4iΔlnREERI −i
+
n
∑
i=0
𝛾5iΔlnRGDPG −i+
n
∑
i=0
𝛾6iΔlnOPEN −i+
n
∑
i=0
𝛾7iΔlnTOR −i+𝛿1lnMCR −1
+𝛿
2
lnBNK
−1
+𝛿
3
lnINF
−1
+𝛿
4
lnREERI
−1
+𝛿
5
lnRGDPG
−1
+𝛿
6
lnOPEN
−1
+𝛿
7
lnTOR
−1
+𝜀
Page 7 o 18
Ho & Odhiambo, Cogen Economics & Finance (2018),
6: 1451265
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/23322039.2018.1451265
is es ed agains he al e na i e hypo hesis o he exis ence o a co-in eg a ion ela ionship
F om Equa ion (1), he e a e co-in eg a ing ela ionships be ween he se ies i a leas one o he
𝛿
s
is signi ican ly di e en om ze o. The second s age is o conside he F-s a is ic. The e a e wo se s
o c i ical alues ha ha e been cons uc ed by Pesa an e al. (2001) unde his null hypo hesis. We
do no ejec he null hypo hesis o no co-in eg a ion when he F-s a is ic alls below he lowe -
bound alues. Simila ly, we ejec he null hypo hesis o no co-in eg a ion when he calcula ed F-
s a is ic is g ea e han he uppe -bound alues. Howe e , when he F-s a is ic alls be ween he
lowe and uppe bounds, he es is inconclusi e.
I he a iables a e ound o be co-in eg a ed, hen he s udy p oceeds o es ima e he sho - un
beha iou o he a iables using an e o -co ec ion model o mula ed as
whe e δ is he coe icien o he e o -co ec ion e m, ECM −1. δ is expec ed o ha e a nega i e sign.
This implies ha , when he a iables d i apa om he equilib ium le el in he sho un, hey can
quickly adjus back o hei equilib ium le els.
4.2. Da a and iden i ica ion o a iables
This s udy u ilises qua e ly ime-se ies da a co e ing he pe iod 2001Q4–2016Q4. The co e ing pe-
iod in he s udy is solely dic a ed by he da a a ailabili y. The da a ha e been ob ained om di e -
en sou ces, including he In e na ional Financial S a is ics o he In e na ional Mone a y Fund
(In e na ional Financial S a is ics [IFS, 2017]; and he Wo ld Fede a ion o Exchanges [WFE], 2014,
2017). To assess he mac oeconomic d i e s o s ock ma ke de elopmen , he s udy needs: a meas-
u e o s ock ma ke de elopmen and measu es o mac oeconomic a iables. In e ms o s ock ma -
ke de elopmen , he s udy uses he ma ke capi alisa ion a io o measu e he de elopmen o he
s ock ma ke . This is he alue o lis ed domes ic sha es on he domes ic exchange di ided by GDP.
This indica o is used based on he ollowing conside a ions. Fi s , he le el o ma ke capi alisa ion
is a desi able indica o which e lec s he abili y o he s ock ma ke in mobilising capi al and di e -
si ying isk (Demi güç-Kun & Le ine, 1996). Second, his p oxy has also been widely used o meas-
u e s ock ma ke de elopmen in o he empi ical s udies (see, o example, Boyd e al., 2001; Ga cia
& Liu, 1999; Şük üoğlu & Nalin, 2014; Ya ey, 2007, 2010). Thi d, despi e he ac ha s ock ma ke is
a mul i ace ed concep ha can be measu ed by a ious indica o s, Demi güç-Kun and Le ine
(1996) a gue ha all o hese s ock ma ke indica o s a e signi ican ly co ela ed. The e o e, he
ma ke capi alisa ion a io is used o measu e s ock ma ke de elopmen in his s udy. Table 1 show
he p oxies, sou ces and jus i ica ions o all he a iables used in his s udy.
H0:
𝛿
1
=𝛿
2
=𝛿
3
=𝛿
4
=𝛿
5
=𝛿
6
=𝛿
7
=
0
H1:
𝛿
1
≠𝛿
2
≠𝛿
3
≠𝛿
4
≠𝛿
5
≠𝛿
6
≠𝛿
7
≠
0
(2)
Δ
lnMCR =𝛾0+
n
∑
i=1
𝛾1iΔlnMCR −i+
n
∑
i=0
𝛾2iΔlnBNK −i+
n
∑
i=0
𝛾3iΔlnINF −i+
n
∑
i=0
𝛾4iΔlnREERI −
i
+
n
∑
i=0
𝛾5iΔRGDPG −i+
n
∑
i=0
𝛾6iΔlnOPEN −i+
n
∑
i=0
𝛾7iΔlnTOR −i+𝛿ECM −1+𝜀
Page 8 o 18
Ho & Odhiambo, Cogen Economics & Finance (2018),
6: 1451265
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/23322039.2018.1451265
5. Empi ical esul s
5.1. Resul s o s a iona i y es s
As a p elimina y analysis, and p io o examining he na u e o he ela ionship be ween s ock ma -
ke de elopmen and i s se s o mac oeconomic d i e s, he s a iona y p ope ies a e examined. The
a iables include he ma ke capi alisa ion a io, domes ic c edi o GDP, he in la ion a e, eal e ec-
i e exchange a e index, eal GDP g ow h, alue o expo s and impo s o GDP, and u no e a io.
To examine hei s a iona y p ope ies, he s udy uses wo uni oo s es s. They a e he Dickey–
Fulle gene alised leas squa es (DF-GLS) es de eloped by Ellio , Ro henbe g, and S ock (1996), and
he Pe on (PPURoo ) es de eloped by Pe on (1997). Table 2 shows he esul s o uni oo s es s o
he a iables in le els and a he i s di e ences.
In Table 2, he esul s show ha a iables such as lnTOR a e s a iona y in le els, while lnMCR, ln-
BNK, lnREERI and lnOPEN a e s a iona y a he i s di e ences. Fo he a iables, such as lnINF, and
lnRGDPG, he Dickey–Fulle Gene alised Leas Squa es es shows ha hey a e s a iona y in le els,
while he Pe on es sugges s ha hey a e s a iona y a i s di e ences. Ha ing es ablished ha
he a iables a e in eg a ed o o de ze o [I(0)] o one [I(1)], he s udy can p oceed o es he long-
un ela ionships be ween he s ock ma ke de elopmen and i s d i e s using he ARDL bounds
es ing p ocedu e.
5.2. Empi ical analysis using he ARDL bounds es ing p ocedu e
The esul s o he ARDL bounds es o co-in eg a ion show ha he calcula ed F-s a is ic is 3.586,
which is highe han he c i ical alue epo ed by Pesa an e al. (2001) in Table CI (iii) Case III.
The e o e, he esul s show ha he a iables used a e co-in eg a ed. See Table 3 o he esul o
ARDL bounds es ing o co-in eg a ion, and he c i ical alues o he ARDL bounds es . Ha ing
ound ha lnMCR, lnBNK, lnINF, lnREERI, lnRGDPG, lnOPEN and lnTOR a e co-in eg a ed, he s udy
es ima es he model using he ARDL bounds es app oach. The i s s ep is o de e mine he op imal
lag leng h o he model using he Schwa z c i e ion (SC). The op imal lag leng h selec ed based on
SC is ARDL (2, 1, 0, 3, 0, 1, 0). The long- un and sho - un esul s o he model a e epo ed in Table 4.
Table 1. P oxies, sou ces and jus i ica ions o he a iables used in his s udy
Sou ce: Au ho s’ own compila ion.
Va iable P oxy Sou ce Jus i ica ion
S ock ma ke de elop-
men (MCR)
Ma ke capi alisa ion o
GDP
Au ho s’ calcula ion
based on WFE (2014)
and IFS (2017)
Ga cia and Liu (1999), Boyd e
al. (2001), Ya ey (2010),
Şük üoğlu and Nalin (2014)
Banking sec o
de elopmen (BNK)
Domes ic c edi o GDP Au ho s’ calcula ion
based on IFS (2017)
Le ine, Loayza, and Beck (2000),
Beck, Demi güç-Kun , and
Le ine (2007), Seh awa and Gi i
(2016)
In la ion a e (INF) Annual pe cen age
change o consume
p ice index
Au ho s’ calcula ion
based on IFS (2017)
Shan, Mo is, and Sun (2001),
Boyd e al. (2001), Ma ques,
Fuinhas, and Ma ques (2013)
Exchange a e (REERI) Real e ec i e exchange
a e index
IFS (2017) Cal o, Leide man, and Reinha
(1993), Abdalla and Mu inde
(1997), Chou (2000)
Economic g ow h
(RGDPG)
Annual pe cen age
change in eal GDP
Au ho s’ calcula ion
based on IFS (2017)
Le ine and Ze os (1998), Deb
and Mukhe jee (2008), Ca p
(2012)
T ade openness (OPEN) Sum o expo s and
impo s o goods and
se ices as a sha e o
GDP
Au ho s’ calcula ion
based on IFS (2017)
Rajan and Zingales (2003),
El-Wassal (2005), Ni oomand
e al. (2014)
S ock ma ke liquidi y
(TOR)
Tu no e a io Au ho s’ calcula ion
based on WFE (2014)
Ga cia and Liu (1999), Ya ey
(2007), Billmeie and Massa
(2009)
Page 15 o 18
Ho & Odhiambo, Cogen Economics & Finance (2018),
6: 1451265
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/23322039.2018.1451265
Huybens, E., & Smi h, B. (1999). In la ion, inancial ma ke s,
and long- un eal ac i i y. Jou nal o Mone a y Economics,
43, 283–315.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/S0304-3932(98)00060-9
IFS. (2017). Washing on, DC: In e na ional Mone a y Fund.
Re ie ed Ap il, 21, 2017, om h p://www.easyda a.co.
za/da a/dimensionnode/IFS-TREE_3/
IMF. (2004). Philippines: Financial sec o assessmen p og am
– IOSCO objec i es and p inciples o secu i ies egula ion
assessmen (IMF Coun y Repo No. 04/62). Washing on,
DC: Au ho .
Je us, W. (2004). FDI and s ock ma ke de elopmen in
selec ed La in Ame ican coun ies. In e na ional Finance
Re iew, 5, 35–44.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/S1569-3767(05)05003-X
Jensen, M. C., & Mu phy, K. J. (1990). Pe o mance pay and
op-managemen incen i es. Jou nal o Poli ical Economy,
98(2), 225–264.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1086/261677
Jin, C. (2006). Can openness be an engine o sus ained high
g ow h a es and in la ion? E idence om Japan and
Ko ea. In e na ional Re iew o Economics and Finance, 15,
228–240.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.i e .2004.03.005
Jo ion, P. (1991). The p icing o exchange a e isk in he s ock
ma ke . Jou nal o Financial and Quan i a i e Analysis, 26,
361–376.
Kim, D. H., Lin, S. C., & Suen, Y. B. (2011). Nonlinea i y be ween
ade openness and economic de elopmen . Re iew o
De elopmen Economics, 15, 279–292.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1111/ ode.2011.15.issue-2
Ku ach, R. (2010). S ock ma ke de elopmen in CEE coun ies–
he panel da a analysis. Ekonomika, 89.
Le ine, R. (1991). S ock ma ke s, g ow h, and ax policy.
Jou nal o Finance, 46(4), 1445–1465.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991. b04625.x
Le ine, R. (1997). Financial de elopmen and economic
g ow h: Views and agenda. Jou nal o Economic
Li e a u e, 35, 688–726.
Le ine, R. (2005). Finance and g ow h: Theo y and e idence. In
P. Aghion & S. Du lau (eds.), Handbook o economic
g ow h (1 ed., Vol. 1, Numbe 1). Else ie .
Le ine, R., Loayza, N., & Beck, T. (2000). Financial
in e media ion and g ow h: Causali y and causes. Jou nal
o Mone a y Economics, 46(1), 31–77.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/S0304-3932(00)00017-9
Le ine, R., & Ze os, S. (1998). S ock ma ke s, banks, and
economic g ow h. Ame ican Economic Re iew, 88(3),
537–558.
Lin ne , J. (1965). The alua ion o isk asse s and he selec ion
o isky in es men s in s ock po olios and capi al
budge s. The Re iew o Economics and S a is ics, 13–37.
h ps://doi.o g/10.2307/1924119
Ma, C. K., & Kao, G. W. (1990). On exchange a e changes and
s ock p ice eac ions. Jou nal o Business Finance and
Accoun ing, 17(3), 441–449.
Malik, I. A., & Amjad, S. (2013). Fo eign di ec in es men and
s ock ma ke de elopmen in Pakis an. Jou nal o
In e na ional T ade Law and Policy, 12(3), 226–242.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/JITLP-02-2013-0002
Ma ques, L. M., Fuinhas, J. A., & Ma ques, A. C. (2013). Does he
s ock ma ke cause economic g ow h? Po uguese
e idence o economic egime change. Economic
Modelling, 32, 316–324.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.02.015
Me on, R. C. (1973). Theo y o a ional op ion p icing. The Bell
Jou nal o Economics and Managemen Science, 141–183.
h ps://doi.o g/10.2307/3003143
Me on, R. C., & Bodie, Z. (1995). A concep ual amewo k o
analyzing he inancial en i onmen . In D. B. C ane, K. A.
F oo , S. P. Mason, A. F. Pe old, R. C. Me on, Z. Bodie, …
P. Tu ano (Eds.), The global inancial sys em: A unc ional
pe spec i e (pp. 3–31). Bos on, MA: Ha a d Business
School P ess.
Me on, R. C., & Bodie, Z. (2004). The design o inancial
sys ems: Towa ds a syn hesis o unc ion and s uc u e
(NBER Wo king Pape No. 10620). Camb idge: NBER.
Newbe y, D., & S igli z, J. (1984). Pa e o in e io ade. Re iew o
Economic S udies, 51, 1–12.
h ps://doi.o g/10.2307/2297701
Ni oomand, F., Hajilee, M., & Al Nasse , O. M. (2014). Financial
ma ke de elopmen and ade openness: E idence om
eme ging economies. Applied Economics, 46(13), 1490–
1498. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/00036846.2013.866207
Obs eld, M. (1994). Risk aking, global di e si ica ion and
g ow h. Ame ican Economic Re iew, 84, 1310–1329.
Pe on, P. (1997). Fu he e idence on b eaking end unc ions
in mac oeconomic a iables. Jou nal o Econome ics,
80(2), 355–385.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/S0304-4076(97)00049-3
Pesa an, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1999). An au o eg essi e dis ibu ed
lag modelling app oach o coin eg a ion analysis. In S.
S om (ed.), Econome ics and economic heo y in he 20 h
cen u y: The Ragna F isch Cen ennial Symposium (Chap.
11). Camb idge: Camb idge Uni e si y P ess.
Pesa an, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smi h, R. J. (1996). Tes ing o he
exis ence o a long- un ela ionship (DAE Wo king Pape
No. 9622).
Pesa an, M. H., Shin, Y. C., & Smi h, R. (2001). Bound es ing
app oaches o he analysis o le el ela ionships. Jou nal
o Applied Econome ics, 16, 289–326.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1255
Phylak is, K., & Ra azzolo, F. (2005). S ock p ices and exchange
a e dynamics. Jou nal o In e na ional Money and
Finance, 24(7), 1031–1053.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jimon in.2005.08.001
PSE. (2000). The Philippine s ock exchange 2000 annual epo ,
he Philippines.
PSE. (2001). The Philippine s ock exchange 2001 annual epo ,
he Philippines.
PSE. (2002). The Philippine s ock exchange 2002 annual epo ,
he Philippines.
PSE. (2003). The Philippine s ock exchange 2003 annual epo ,
he Philippines.
PSE. (2004). The Philippine s ock exchange 2004 annual epo ,
he Philippines.
PSE. (2005). The Philippine s ock exchange 2005 annual epo ,
he Philippines.
PSE. (2006). The Philippine s ock exchange 2006 annual epo ,
he Philippines.
PSE. (2007). The Philippine s ock exchange 2007 annual epo ,
he Philippines.
PSE. (2008). The Philippine s ock exchange 2008 annual epo ,
he Philippines.
PSE. (2009). The Philippine s ock exchange 2009 annual epo ,
he Philippines.
PSE. (2010). The Philippine s ock exchange 2010 annual epo ,
he Philippines.
PSE. (2011). The Philippine s ock exchange 2011 annual epo ,
he Philippines.
PSE. (2012). The Philippine s ock exchange 2012 annual epo ,
he Philippines.
PSE. (2013). The Philippine s ock exchange 2013 annual epo ,
he Philippines.
PSE. (2014). The Philippine s ock exchange 2014 annual epo ,
he Philippines.
PSE. (2015). Re ie ed Ap il 3, 2016, om h p://pse.com.ph/
co po a e/home.h ml
Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (2003). The g ea e e sals: The
poli ics o inancial de elopmen in he wen ie h cen u y.
Jou nal o Financial Economics, 69, 5–50.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00125-9

Page 16 o 18
Ho & Odhiambo, Cogen Economics & Finance (2018),
6: 1451265
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/23322039.2018.1451265
Raza, S. A., Jawaid, S. T., A shan, S., & Ka im, M. Z. A. (2015). Is
s ock ma ke sensi i e o o eign capi al in lows and
economic g ow h? E idence om Pakis an. Jou nal o
Chinese Economic and Fo eign T ade S udies, 8(3), 142–
164. h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/JCEFTS-03-2015
-0012
Rhee, G. S., & Wang, J. (2009). Fo eign ins i u ional owne ship
and s ock ma ke liquidi y: E idence om Indonesia.
Jou nal o Banking and Finance, 33, 1312–1324.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/j.jbank in.2009.01.008
Ross, S. A. (1976). The a bi age heo y o capi al asse p icing.
Jou nal o Economic Theo y, 13(3), 341–360.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/0022-0531(76)90046-6
SEC. (2015). Reaping he bene i s o eo ganiza ion: The
Secu i ies and Exchange Commission a 67. Re ie ed Ap il
9, 2015, om h p://www.sec.go .ph/abou sec/
annual epo /annual epo .h ml
Seh awa , M., & Gi i, A. K. (2016). Financial de elopmen and
po e y educ ion in India: An empi ical in es iga ion.
In e na ional Jou nal o Social Economics, 43(2), 106–
122. h ps://doi.o g/10.1108/IJSE-01-2014-0019
Shan, J. Z., Mo is, A. G., & Sun, F. (2001). Financial
de elopmen and economic g ow h: An egg-and-chicken
p oblem? Re iew o In e na ional Economics, 9(3), 443–
454. h ps://doi.o g/10.1111/ oie.2001.9.issue-3
Sha pe, W. F. (1964). Capi al asse p ices: A heo y o ma ke
equilib ium unde condi ions o isk. The Jou nal o
Finance, 19(3), 425–442.
S igli z, J. E. (1985). C edi ma ke s and he con ol o capi al.
Jou nal o Money, C edi , Banking, 17(2), 133–152.
h ps://doi.o g/10.2307/1992329
S ulz, R. (1981a). A model o in e na ional asse p icing.
Jou nal o Financial Economics, 9(4), 383–406.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1016/0304-405X(81)90005-2
S ulz, R. (1981b). On he e ec s o ba ie s o in e na ional
in es men . The Jou nal o Finance, 36(4), 923–934.
h ps://doi.o g/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1981. b04893.x
Şük üoğlu, D., & Nalin, H. T. (2014). The mac oeconomic
de e minan s o s ock ma ke de elopmen in selec ed
Eu opean coun ies: Dynamic panel da a analysis.
In e na ional Jou nal o Economics and Finance, 6(3), 64–71.
S ale yd, H., & Vlachos, J. (2002). Ma ke s o isk and
openness o ade: How a e hey ela ed? Jou nal o
In e na ional Economics, 57, 369–395. h ps://doi.
o g/10.1016/S0022-1996(01)00153-2
Visda, M. F. V., C isos omo, R. G. R., & Padilla, S. L. (2013).
Philippines s ock ma ke in pe spec i e. Con e ence
P oceedings o he 12 h Na ional Con en ion on S a is ics.
Mandaluyong Ci y, he Philippines, 1–2 Oc obe 2013.
WDI. (2016). Washing on DC: Wo ld Bank. Re ie ed Ap il 24,
2016, om h p://da a.wo ldbank.o g/da a-ca alog/
wo ld-de elopmen -indica o s
WFE. (2014). Re ie ed Oc obe 10, 2014, om h p://www.
wo ld-exchanges.o g
WFE. (2015). Re ie ed Ap il 20, 2015, om h p://www.wo ld-
exchanges.o g
WFE. (2017). Re ie ed Ap il 21, 2017, om h p://www.wo ld-
exchanges.o g
Wo ld Bank. (1992). Philippines capi al ma ke s udy (Repo
No. 10053PH). Washing on, DC: Wo ld Bank.
Ya ey, C. A. (2007). Well-de eloped inancial in e media y
sec o p omo es s ock ma ke de elopmen : E idence
om A ica. Jou nal o Eme ging Ma ke Finance, 6(3),
269–289. h ps://doi.o g/10.1177/097265270700600303
Ya ey, C. A. (2010). The ins i u ional and mac oeconomic
de e minan s o s ock ma ke de elopmen in eme ging
economies. Applied Financial Economics, 20(21), 1615–
1625. h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/09603107.2010.522519
Figu e A1(a). The plo o he
cumula i e sum o ecu si e
esiduals o he main model.
-2
0
-1
0
0
10
20
06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
CUSUM 5% Signi icance
Appendix 1
Page 17 o 18
Ho & Odhiambo, Cogen Economics & Finance (2018),
6: 1451265
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/23322039.2018.1451265
Figu e A2(b). The plo o he
cumula i e sum o squa es
o ecu si e esiduals o he
second model.
Sou ce: Au ho s’ own
compila ion.
No e: The s aigh lines
ep esen c i ical bounds a 5%
signi ican le el.
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
CUSUM o Squa es 5% Signi icance
Figu e A2(a). The plo o he
cumula i e sum o ecu si e
esiduals o he second model.
-2
0
-1
0
0
10
20
05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
CUSUM 5% Signi icance
Figu e A1(b). The plo o he
cumula i e sum o squa es o
ecu si e esiduals o he main
model.
-0.4
-0.2
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
CUSUM o Squa es 5% Signi icance
Page 18 o 18
Ho & Odhiambo, Cogen Economics & Finance (2018),
6: 1451265
h ps://doi.o g/10.1080/23322039.2018.1451265
©
2018 The Au ho (s).
This open access a icle is dis ibu ed unde a C ea i e Commons A ibu ion (CC-BY) 4.0 license.
You a e ee o:
Sha e — copy and edis ibu e he ma e ial in any medium o o ma
Adap — emix, ans o m, and build upon he ma e ial o any pu pose, e en comme cially.
The licenso canno e oke hese eedoms as long as you ollow he license e ms.
Unde he ollowing e ms:
A ibu ion — You mus gi e app op ia e c edi , p o ide a link o he license, and indica e i changes we e made.
You may do so in any easonable manne , bu no in any way ha sugges s he licenso endo ses you o you use.
No addi ional es ic ions
You may no apply legal e ms o echnological measu es ha legally es ic o he s om doing any hing he license pe mi s.
Cogen Economics & Finance (ISSN: 2332-2039) is published by Cogen OA, pa o Taylo & F ancis G oup.
Publishing wi h Cogen OA ensu es:
• Immedia e, uni e sal access o you a icle on publica ion
• High isibili y and disco e abili y ia he Cogen OA websi e as well as Taylo & F ancis Online
• Download and ci a ion s a is ics o you a icle
• Rapid online publica ion
• Inpu om, and dialog wi h, expe edi o s and edi o ial boa ds
• Re en ion o ull copy igh o you a icle
• Gua an eed legacy p ese a ion o you a icle
• Discoun s and wai e s o au ho s in de eloping egions
Submi you manusc ip o a Cogen OA jou nal a www.Cogen OA.com