The Evolution of the Accounting Practices During the Recent Economic Crisis: Empirical Survey Regarding the Earnings Management

Gorgan, Cătălina; Gorgan, Vasile; Dumitru, Valentin Florentin; Pitulice, Ileana Cosmina Article The Evolution of the Accounting Practices During the Recent Economic Crisis: Empirical Survey Regarding the Earnings Management Amfiteatru Economic Journal Provided in Cooperation with: The Bucharest University of Economic Studies Suggested Citation: Gorgan, Cătălina; Gorgan, Vasile; Dumitru, Valentin Florentin; Pitulice, Ileana Cosmina (2012) : The Evolution of the Accounting Practices During the Recent Economic Crisis: Empirical Survey Regarding the Earnings Management, Amfiteatru Economic Journal, ISSN 2247-9104, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Vol. 14, Iss. 32, pp. 550-562 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/168763 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ AE The Evolution of the Accounting Practices During the Recent Economic Crisis: Empirical Survey Regarding the Earnings Management Amfiteatru Economic 550 THE EVOLUTION OF THE ACCOUNTING PRACTICES DURING THE RECENT ECONOMIC CRISIS: EMPIRICAL SURVEY REGARDING THE EARNINGS MANAGEMENT Cătălina Gorgan1, Vasile Gorgan2, Valentin Florentin Dumitru 3 and Ileana Cosmina Pitulice 4 1) 2)3)4) Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania Abstract Financial markets rely on confidence and confidence is supported by the presumption that financial statements are accurate and reflect the economic reality. Financial scandals from 2001-2002 as well as the recent economic crisis have raised questions about the integrity of accounting information provided to investors and other categories of users. In this context, our study aims to analyze the extent to which financial reporting is involved in financial crisis and, on the other hand to outline the changes produced by the crisis in the quality of financial information reported by companies. The main objective of the paper consist in arguing that earnings management by discretionary accruals for big European companies decline during the recent economic crisis compared to previous period. Keywords: discretionary accruals, earnings management, accounting information quality, international financial reporting standards (IFRS), economic crisis JEL Classification: M 41 Introduction After the boom that followed the major financial scandals, the economic landscape dominated by globalization was overshadowed by the appearance of an awkward character: the global economic crisis. The origins of the crisis have been investigated within several fields, ranging from subprime loans to quality of financial reporting and the use of fair value accounting. Financial markets rely on confidence and confidence is supported by the presumption that financial statements offer a fair view of financial position, performances and changes in equity. Under the crisis circumstances, worries were raised concerning the integrity of accounting information offered to investors and other categories of users. The quality of financial reporting is vital in building the global economy. This is the reason why IFRS states in the first paragraph of its constitution that it acts in “public interest” in order to develop a set of accounting standards that require financial statements which  Corresponding author, Valentin Florentin Dumitru – v[email protected] Amfiteatru Economic recommends AE Vol. XIV • No. 32 • June 2012 551 contain high quality, transparent and comparable information, useful to global markets participants and other categories of users in making decisions. Under the circumstances of financial markets expansion and multinational companies development, it becomes obvious the need of complex, transparent and comparable financial information. In this context, it is noted the significance of large scale application of high quality global standards, accepted by the national standard setters. The global implementation of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is a solution in this respect, the quality of financial information being the result of the way these standards are applied in each country or company. Many of the decisions taken by the accounting professionals in the process of the activities developed at the level of the company relies on anticipating the future, on assumptions, expectations, estimates. All of these ask the management for the most difficult, subjective or complex professional judgments. Financial statements preparation often requires the intervention of the professional judgment. Its role is extremely important when developing accounting policies if they are selected from the alternatives allowed in standards and interpretations. Although it is recommended that the choice of accounting policies and estimation techniques of those accepted will be made in order to obtain the best information for decision making, the manager may be often tempted to make a subjective choice (for example: reduction in income or increase in it). Exercising the professional judgment, combined with the flexibility of financial reporting that allows entities freedom in the implementation of accounting regulations, plus the managers’ behaviour under agency theory1, lead to a situation where earnings management affects the quality of financial statements. Big financial scandals and economic crisis burst have proved the weakness of some financial information and their negative impact on the good functioning of the market. According to reviewed literature, we conducted an empirical study on the quality of earnings reported by companies through determining the discretionary accruals incorporated in these earnings. The importance of our study is given by the current context of global economic crisis and particularly of heated discussions about the role of financial reporting the outbreak of the crisis. We aim to capture the evolution of earnings management before and after the global economic crisis. Unlike our work, previous studies focused on the evolution of earnings management, but in other conditions, for example, the auditor, the application of IFRS in one country or more, the outbreak of the Asian crisis, etc. Our research is structured as follows: literature review on the quality of financial reporting, global economic crisis and earnings management; research methodology; results of the empirical study; conclusions outlining and future research directions. 1 The agency theory states that there is a significant information asymmetry between the mangers and the company’s owners (stockholders), asymmetry that generates a conflict of interests. As most of the time the owners do not have the necessary knowledge and cannot control the managers’ activity, they make decisions that lead to a decrease in the benefits that should get to the stockholders. In the same time, the managers can manipulate the information they communicate the stockholders, to answer better the control analyzing their activity. AE The Evolution of the Accounting Practices During the Recent Economic Crisis: Empirical Survey Regarding the Earnings Management Amfiteatru Economic 552 1. Literature review Accounting development kept up with economy and society overall progress. In order to adapt to world changes and to meet the more and more complex user needs, accounting should increase the value of information provided (Gorgan et al., 2008). Vital conditions for market efficiency consist in users’ confidence in the companies’ financial reporting. The emergence of seemingly contradictory information (for example, in 1996, FranceTélécom reported a profit of 350 million according to French standards, but a loss of 5.65 billion USD according to international standards), big financial scandals from the beginning of this century (e.g. Enron) and recent economic crisis have eroded confidence in financial statements. Improving the quality of financial reporting is a must in the context of global economy. Standard setters’ concerns should target the creation of a framework for trusted and transparent financial reporting in order to serve as a foundation for decisions of different categories of users. In the process of global accounting convergence which involves most of the world countries, significant steps were taken. The global implementation of IFRSs is seen as solution for achieving high-quality financial reporting. Results of many studies showed as effects of mandatory IFRSs adoption: enhanced financial reporting, comparability and financial statement transparency (Jermakowicz and GornikTomaszewski, 2006; Ball, 2006; Christensen et al., 2007; Horton et al., 2010). Nevertheless, Ball (2006) considers that "Implementation is the Achilles heel of IFRS”. Because of the existence of different reasons, especially economic or political, it is expected that the implementation of IFRS will be unequal in the world, including Europe. Significant international differences in financial reporting practices and financial reporting quality are unavoidable. The main concern raised by the wide adoption of IFRS is related to investors’ situation who will be misled thinking that there is more uniformity in practice than it really is. Such uneven adoption reduces the advantages of a single set of standards from which investors should benefit, such as reducing information costs and obtaining risk free information. On the background of international accounting convergence efforts and of those aiming to improve the quality of financial reporting, the economic crisis emerged. The literature provides plenty of information on the causes of economic-crisis, often contradictory even among the leading specialists in the field. Most of those who approach crisis (insurance companies, banks, university or other entities) believe that it began as a result of the U.S. housing bubble burst. Banks were again in the centre of discussions, due to subprime loans. The magnitude of recent economic crisis is given by innovations related to derivatives. Todt (2009) deem that the origins of recent crisis is the US-American housing market, which, although is only one market in one specific nation is a significant one in the world’s most important economy. U.S. housing market was driven by a speculative bubble financed by the cheap-money policy of the Federal Reserve System. In a first step banks sold mortgages on bonds. In a second step they used the cash obtained from the sale of the securities mentioned above in order to expand mortgage loans using leverage. It is obvious in this process the ease of lending without proper assessment of risks. The process was repeated over and over, resulting a tremendous amount of loans accompanied by a large number of securities with uncertain value and investors uninformed about their quality. The proof that system failed was outline by real estate which ceased to worth so much, loans Amfiteatru Economic recommends AE Vol. XIV • No. 32 • June 2012 553 which could not be refunded, the decrease value of financial assets regardless their category, the lack of money, investors’ concern and their increased attention on risks. Entire financial system was affected (significant fluctuations of currencies and interests, stock markets going down, etc.) Totir and Dragotă (2011) deem that these sophisticated derivatives were so complex that almost no analyst (including rating agencies as Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s etc.) could foresee in a convincing manner the danger. Global crisis generally challenged accounting and audit. IFRSs and especially fair value were severely criticized. Accounting and audit standards proved to be vulnerable, many companies taking advantage of uncertainty, lack of transparency, accounting regulations gaps especially in terms of capturing innovations related to financial instruments, reported impressive results without a real increase of value. An adjustment of global standardization process had to be considered. The role played by financial reporting and especially by fair value in the global crisis has been widely debated. For some researchers fair value influenced little or not at all the crisis, being “just a messenger who now is shut” (Turner, 2008) while others believe that it made a decisive contribution in deepening crisis. Laux and Leuz (2009) assert that the fair value model didn’t contribute to such a great extent, but also it was not just a messenger. Magnan (2009) investigate how fair value model affects financial reporting, especially for financial institutions which were deeply affected by the financial crisis of 2007-2009. After analysing the "analytical and empirical evidence (which are limited)" on the role of fair value in the current crisis, the author concludes that although the crisis is, to some extent, still on-going, the evidence suggests that the fair value amplified crisis especially for institutions that held assets during the crisis in markets that have experienced the lack of liquidity. Implementation of the fair value model is full of difficulties, which seriously affects its potential benefits. Moreover, while its role in financial crisis may have been exaggerated, there is evidence that the use of accounting in market values could contribute to a contagion effect of bankruptcy among financial institutions. Thus, accounting "could have been more than a messenger." Some authors argue that not the fair value model is the problem, but rather the quality of communication (Leone, 2008, cited in Magnan, 2009). Information on fair value can be misleading, thus, almost to the crisis, both Lehman Brothers and AIG were solvent and sufficiently capitalized, with significant portions of their balance sheet based on fair value. Thus, using the fair value model without adequate additional disclosure is neither fair nor accurate and it does not provide correct information on the risk of assets. Measures taken by the international normalization, which created an Advisory Group on Financial Crisis (FCAG), unveiled a certain vulnerability of existing accounting model before the world economic crisis (too low transparency, poor standards for financial instruments, application information on determining fair value and insufficient risk, etc.). This is compounded by the limits of corporate governance systems and problems in risk management (Gîrbină, 2009). Advisory Group examined how the quality of financial reporting could be improved in order to regain investor confidence in financial markets. Review of international standards was carried out in accordance with user needs in order to increase transparency and provide information to improve their ability to make decisions. AE The Evolution of the Accounting Practices During the Recent Economic Crisis: Empirical Survey Regarding the Earnings Management Amfiteatru Economic 554 The financial crisis has highlighted the important role played by the IASB, emphasizing the need for a single set of worldwide accounting standards. To distinguish between high quality information (most useful) and a lower quality (less useful), the characteristics that make an information useful must be taken into account. The qualitative characteristics of the accounting information and their hierarchy are examined, primarily through a conceptual accounting framework (Feleagă et al., 2008). Unlike the old international conceptual framework which required four main qualitative characteristics: understandability, relevance, reliability and comparability, in the new conceptual framework, relevance and faithful representation are considered the fundamental qualitative characteristics of accounting information as they are defined in the IASB Conceptual Framework (Conceptual Framework, qualitative characteristics – QC 5). Accounting information usefulness is increased if it is comparable, verifiable, timely and understandable (QC 4). Reliability is thus replaced by faithful representation. The information is considered relevant when it influences users decisions (QC6). The forecasting and validating role of information are closely related to relevance. In order to fulfil the faithful representation requests, financial information must meet the underlying characteristics of completeness, neutrality and freedom from error (QC 12). The accounting options, given the existence of more policies and/or estimation techniques used to solve an accounting issue, lead to choices which does not always produce the best result in decision making process. Often, the manager may be tempted to make a subjective choice (e.g. to reduce or increase the profit). Many times the manager can choose subjectively. The use of the freedom given by options in order to create an attractive image to external users leads to earnings management practices. Financial statements preparation often requires professional judgment. This, combined with the flexibility of financial reporting, which offers companies freedom in the implementation of accounting rules, and the behaviour of managers according to agency theory, lead to a situation where earnings management affects the quality of financial statements. Accrual accounting is considered to be the standard accounting practice for most companies excepting very small ones. According to accruals system the performance and the financial position of a company are measured recognizing economic events regardless of when cash transactions occur. Earnings management refers to the deliberate manipulation of accounting information by managers using discretionary options offered by the standards specific to accrual accounting system. In our opinion, although important steps were taken in order to increase the quality of financial reporting, there is still plenty of room for managers to manipulate the accounting information to serve their interest. This seems to be more obvious when companies are facing some restrictions imposes by situations determined by economic crisis, investigations of government institutions, the change of external auditor etc. Healy (1985) was the first author that dealt with earnings management using term discretionary accruals. Jenajean and Stolowy (2008) classify the methodologies of studying the earnings management as it follows:  Studies that use discretionary accruals; Amfiteatru Economic recommends AE Vol. XIV • No. 32 • June 2012 555  Studies that use specific accruals;  Studies that analyze the static characteristics of the earnings in order to identify some breakeven points. Iatridis (2010) identifies a number of situations in which earnings management is used:  Transferring earnings from “good” years to “bad” years;  Postponing income recognition to reduce the tax burden;  The eagerness of companies to reveal positive results correlated with the trend of postponing negative results;  Options of managers entitled to stock options or bonus schemes to use discretionary accounting policies in order to increase their current or future compensation. Previous studies revealed that high discretionary accruals denote earnings management. Generally, the studies analyze the evolution of discretionary accruals around some events with significant impact on subject companies (investigations on import tax exemptions, financial scandals, auditor change, financial crisis, etc.). Jones (1991) proposes a model for determining the level of discretionary accruals with two versions: cross-sectional (data from more companies within the same industry, in the same period of time) and time series (data of a single company over different periods of time). Subsequent studies on discretionary accruals use this model or slightly modified versions. Measuring discretionary accruals starts with measuring what is considered normal accruals. The following factors are considered to influence the level of normal accruals: total assets, changes in net revenue, changes in accounts receivables, gross property, plant, and equipment, and return on assets. The level of discretionary accruals is determined through a regression. Their value is given by the residuals of regression equation which is the part of total accruals that cannot be explained by the evolution of above mentioned factors. Jones’ study investigate the level of discretionary accruals during investigations on import tax exemptions, revealing that during this period managers use methods that lead to lower revenues and discretionary accruals tend to lower revenues in the final year of investigation. DeFond and Subramanyam (1998) investigate the evolution of discretionary accruals for companies which change their auditor. The results of the study show a significant decrease in the last year before the change occurs and an insignificant decrease in the first year after change. Likewise, they observe that firms with high litigation risk tend to report relatively higher discretionary accruals. Kothari et al. (2005) prove that methods used to determine discretionary accruals show lower specificity for firms with unusual performances. This is the reason why they modify the model by introducing ROA (Return on assets), proving that studies on earnings management that rely on the new model have a higher degree of confidence. Jeanjean and Stolowy (2008) investigate the impact of adopting IFRS on earnings management in Australia, France and United Kingdom. The results of the study outline that earnings management practice hasn’t declined following the mandatory introduction of IFRSs, with the opposite effect in the case of France. They conclude that institutional factors and managers incentives play an important role in shaping the characteristics of AE The Evolution of the Accounting Practices During the Recent Economic Crisis: Empirical Survey Regarding the Earnings Management Amfiteatru Economic 556 financial reporting, even more important than financial standards considered on an individual level. Cohen (2008) document that earnings management through discretionary accruals increased steadily since 1987 until the passage of Sarbanes Oxley Act in 2002, and decreased significantly afterwards. On the contrary real earnings management activities declined before the Sarbanes Oxley Act, followed by a significant increase. Iatridis (2010) investigates the impact of adopting IFRSs on the results of United Kingdom companies. Using inter alia a model which examines the relation between discretionary accruals and cash flows, the results of the study reveal the reduced potential of earnings management after IFRSs adoption. Conclusions rely on less smoothed accounting results, readily recognition of massive losses and less frequent reporting of small profits as signs for earnings management. Choi et al. (2011) analyze the way the information value of reported revenues changed during the Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998. Conclusions drawn from applying the model of determining the earnings components proposed by Jones (Jones, 1991) modified by Dechow et al. (1995) highlight primarily a significant decline in the information value of discretionary earnings component during crisis, and no effect on the nondiscretionary components of earnings. The information value of discretionary components was more severe in countries with weaker institutions and for firms with higher information asymmetries. In line with the works cited above, our study will try to prove that given the restrictions impose by recent economic crises the financial statements tend to incorporate to a lesser extent items (discretionary accruals in our case) that can affect the quality of financial reporting. 2. Research methodology The objective of the study consists in assessing the quality of accounting information provided by biggest European companies before and during the recent world economic crisis (2008-2009). To this purpose, consistent with previous cited works, we examine the quality of earnings reported by companies through determining the discretionary accruals incorporated in these earnings. Earnings reported by companies in their financial statements according to accrual accounting are materialized in cash flows and accruals. The latter can be divided into: 1) normal, nondiscretionary accruals, as resulted from operational and investing activity of the company and 2) abnormal, discretionary accruals which results from discretionary accounting policy of managers. In order to assess the discretionary accruals we used the cross-sectional version of Jones model modified by Dechow et al. (1995) and Kothari et al. (2005): (1) Amfiteatru Economic recommends AE Vol. XIV • No. 32 • June 2012 557 Where in year t (or t-1): TA-total accruals Assetstotal assets ΔRev –changes in net revenue ΔAR –changes in accounts receivables PPEproperty, plant and equipment α0, α1, α02, α3, α4 – the coefficients of the regression equation ROA-return on assets - residuals of regression equation The measure of discretionary accruals is given by the residuals of the regression equation (). Total accruals are measured as difference between net profit and operating cash flow. The regression equation coefficients are estimated for companies from the same industry, in the same period, a minimum of 8 to 10 firms being required for each sample. Kothari et al. (2001) require at least 10 firms for each firm sample in the same industry, while Cohen et al. (2008) require a minimum of 8 firms. The grouping criteria consist in first two digits of SIC (Standard Industrial Classification - SIC) of the company taken into account. Hypothesis tested: H1. Earnings management by discretionary accruals of big European companies decline during the recent economic crisis compared to pre-crisis period. The study is conducted on a sample of the biggest 30 European companies included in Global Fortune 2009. Company selection was driven by the restriction related to the minimum of 10 companies for each group determined by the first two digits of SIC code (Standard Industrial Classification). Companies were selected in the same order as they appear in the Forbes ranking, excluding those in the financial sector. We considered companies from the first three industries for which the minimum required number was completed (auto, energy, oil). Data requested by the model were extracted from annual reports published on their web sites by the companies included in the research (data from 2006-2009). Data were centralized with Microsoft Excel and statistically processed with IBM SPSS. 3. Results of the study In order to assess the discretionary accruals, first we used multiple regression to measure the α1, α2, α3 and α4 for each of the industries considered, in every period analyzed. The regression equation also provides residuals () for each company considered which are the part of total accruals that cannot be explained by the determinants of the model, actually the value of discretionary accruals. Concerns were raised on the measurement of discretionary accruals using Jones model. These concerns pertain to the possibility of discretionary accruals to capture nondiscretionary components. Although we accept this limit in measuring discretionary