Energy cost reduction in the administrative building by the implementation of technical innovations in Slovakia

Teplická, Katarína; Khouri, Samer; Mehana, Ibrahim; Petrovská, Ivana Article Energy cost reduction in the administrative building by the implementation of technical innovations in Slovakia Economies Provided in Cooperation with: MDPI – Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Basel Suggested Citation: Teplická, Katarína; Khouri, Samer; Mehana, Ibrahim; Petrovská, Ivana (2024) : Energy cost reduction in the administrative building by the implementation of technical innovations in Slovakia, Economies, ISSN 2227-7099, MDPI, Basel, Vol. 12, Iss. 10, pp. 1-17, https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12100260 This Version is available at: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/329187 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your personal and scholarly purposes. You are not to copy documents for public or commercial purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. If the documents have been made available under an Open Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Citation: Teplická, Katarína, Samer Khouri, Ibrahim Mehana, and Ivana Petrovská. 2024. Energy Cost Reduction in the Administrative Building by the Implementation of Technical Innovations in Slovakia. Economies 12: 260. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/economies12100260 Academic Editor: António Cardoso Marques Received: 15 August 2024 Revised: 5 September 2024 Accepted: 15 September 2024 Published: 25 September 2024 Copyright: © 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). economies Article Energy Cost Reduction in the Administrative Building by the Implementation of Technical Innovations in Slovakia Katarína Teplická1,* , Samer Khouri 2, Ibrahim Mehana 2and Ivana Petrovská2 1Department of Management, Faculty BERG, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia 2Institute of Earth Resources, Faculty BERG, Technical University of Košice, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia; samer[email protected] (S.K.); [email protected] (I.M.); [email protected] (I.P.) *Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +421-556022997 Abstract: The presented article investigates the effects of technical innovations in administrative buildings on the financial side of the business, with a main focus on reducing energy costs and energy consumption. The administrative buildings in a business contribute significantly to the business’s total energy consumption. The basic pillar of Industry 4.0 is the optimization of resources such as energy, which, in production enterprises, represents economic value—costs. The article is orientated to investigate the effect of the technical innovations of administrative buildings on the financial side of the enterprise, with a main focus on reducing energy costs and energy consumption. This research was conducted in Slovakia’s manufacturing sector. In this research, we used economic and financial analysis and economic indicators. This research was conducted between 2019 and 2023. In this period, the results were positive. The results indicated a reduction in energy consumption of 143 GJ (39,722 kWh), reduced energy costs of EUR 6356, reduction in the energy cost structure of 1.3%, and the indicator, the payback period, was determined to be in the range of 6 to 12 years for individual technical innovations. The new design of administrative buildings is an advantage for manufacturing enterprises and can be used as a marketing tool to attract both customers and suppliers. The suggested energy, environmental, and economic sustainability model will allow production enterprises to improve their energy use in administrative buildings. Keywords: innovations; energy costs; energy consumption; energy management; optimization 1. Introduction The basic pillar of Industry 4.0 is resource optimization, including materials, energy, technical, technological, personnel, and financial, which, in production enterprises, represent economic value as the core costs to the business. Ozbalta et al. (2021) commented that the energy efficiency concept, including notions of environmental safety, is today the major theme for all buildings in production enterprises. This problem also affects administrative, as well as production, buildings. All production enterprises use administrative buildings for administrative activities. This research fills in the gap in the research regarding energy and economic efficiency in administrative buildings. This gap exists because this area is considered less important for production enterprises. Administrative buildings make a significant contribution to a business’s total energy consumption, so it is crucial to improve their energy performance at both the environmental and economic levels. The economic view means that energy costs are an important part of operational costs, and their reduction is based on lower energy consumption and using renewable resources. Ekung et al. (2020) said that the costs of clean-energy technologies are very high and their implementation in administrative buildings is voluntary. The best strategies for photovoltaic cost reduction are mandating green buildings, ensuring building design standardization, the use of photovoltaic components, facilitating import licensing, and massive public education. Developing these strategies to improve the photovoltaic value chain will increase the supply capacity of clean energy, which is one of the solutions for improving administrative Economies 2024,12, 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12100260 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/economies Economies 2024,12, 260 2 of 17 buildings. Shukla Siddharth et al. (2022) said that there is significant interest in using transparent organic photovoltaics to generate on-site electricity and reduce building energy demand. The net energy benefit is positive for all buildings in various locations. This means that more energy is produced or saved than used. The payback times are less than other buildings using integrated photovoltaic technologies. This study aims to investigate the effects of technical and technological modifications of administrative buildings on the financial side of the enterprise. The main focus is on reducing energy costs and energy consumption. The study is orientated toward solving the various technical innovations in the administrative buildings that will help bring about improvements in energy consumption. Through appropriately chosen innovations, energy costs and energy consumption should be reduced. This approach brings scientific and practical benefits (suggestion of possibilities for energy saving for administrative buildings), social benefits (motivation of employees to engage with low-cost measures), and economic benefits (reducing energy costs). Optimization of resources is a central component of Industry 4.0. This aspect is aimed at energy, environmental, and economic (EEE) sustainability, and using various models of resource improvement is a priority. The priority document in the EU for energy sustainability is the transformative power of the 2030 Agenda. The 2030 Agenda was determined by the 17 Sustainable Development Goals. The integration element is manifested in the agenda as a connection of all three dimensions of sustainable development: economic, social, and environmental. This research is oriented towards energy cost reduction in the administrative building of a manufacturing enterprise in Slovakia through the implementation of energy management with technical innovations. This paper investigates the following hypothesis: implementing innovations brings positive results in reducing the energy costs of administrative buildings and their total energy consumption. The effort to solve the problem of energy consumption was started in the European Union Energy Performance of Buildings Directive and in the state statement for energy performance. Gatt et al. (2020) commented that the complex renovation of buildings to ensure nearly zero energy consumption and addressing “smart-readiness” is a possibility for solving the energy consumption problem. The benefits are reduced energy costs of administrative buildings and reduced energy consumption. The best managerial instrument is energy management implementation. Energy management implementation enables the management of energy consumption and contributes to energy, environmental, and economic sustainability. 2. Literature Review Vranayováet al. (2020) commented that buildings in the EU account for 40% of total energy consumption and 36% of total CO 2 emissions. The cornerstone of EU policy in the field of energy efficiency is the reduction in energy consumption, strengthening the energy efficiency of buildings, the rapid pace of building renovation, the minimization of energy costs, the construction of buildings at the A1 level (ultra-low-energy buildings), and the design of buildings with zero energy needs at the A0 level. In industrial enterprises, the main goal of the system energy-saving instrument is to improve energy use and reduce energy costs by implementing various technical innovations. Lukáˇc et al. (2021) commented that energy efficiency and costs are important economic, environmental, and energy sustainability parameters. Strategic modifications (technical, technological, social, personal, and other) of all business processes create the base for performance evaluation in enterprises (for example, EVA indicator) and build the frame of sustainable development. Hu et al. (2023) created a multi-objective mathematical optimization model for energy systems. This model considered energy cost reduction, and efficiency maximization rather than objective functions. This mathematical model solved the economic side of energy efficiency. Al Muala et al. (2023) presented how to reduce energy costs by using renewable energy sources and storage systems in buildings. The results of their research were the energy management system implementation as a managerial instrument. The results showed that the proposed system reduced the real cost, and energy losses in buildings. Economies 2024,12, 260 3 of 17 Sayed et al. (2023) commented that the renewable and ecologically friendly alternatives for energy consumption are renewable energy sources. Significant progress has been made to produce renewable energy sources with acceptable prices at a commercial range such as solar, wind, and biomass energy. This success has been due to technological growth that can use renewable energy sources effectively at lower prices. Renewable energy sources generated new barriers such as visualization effects, noise, stink, and others. Beer et al. (2023) investigated the inverse visual influence associated with infrastructure of the renewable energy. The energy infrastructure may prevent their wider deployment in the energy mix. Knight et al. (2022) showed relationships between costs and energy savings in the mathematical model. The base of energy efficiency is cost-effectiveness. Based on an analysis of costs energy savings are followed such as energy efficiency indicators. This approach is the possibility for electric utilities and state regulators in the energy efficiency area. Paramati et al. (2022) dealt with the role of environmental technologies. In this area of energy demand, energy capability and performance are important factors. The results of their research, across various estimates, confirm that those technologies have a significant effect on energy consumption. Environmental technologies play a major position in improving energy efficiency through energy intensity reduction and energy cost. Arumägi and Kalamees (2020) demonstrated the options for energy reduction and construction costs. They provided evidence that wooden nearly zero-energy buildings are technically possible. The novel design processes and procurement models reduce construction costs and energy costs. Financial calculations were based on the investment needed to achieve nearly zero energy levels. Wu and Skye (2021) commented on advances in net-zero-energy residential buildings (NZEB—net-zero-energy buildings) that could reduce energy consumption, energy costs, and greenhouse gas emissions. NZEB proposals are connected by energy infrastructure interconnections, renewable energy sources, and energy efficiency measures. Terés-Zubiaga et al. (2020) showed that building renovation plays a main position in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This approach achieves climate protection goals and energy cost reduction. Cost-effective building renovation combines energy efficiency and renewable sources. The solution is using cost-effective interventions that can lead to significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and nonrenewable primary energy use. Zhao and Mo (2023) presented in the article that buildings are responsible for significant energy consumption and carbon emissions. Green buildings offer a solution to reduce energy consumption. The energy costs should be calculated during the complex building projects and energy policy for sustainable development. Retrofitting offers great potential to promote the green building movement. This resource suggests effective subsidy programs as a public policy implication. Asim et al. (2022) dealt with the increasing demand for heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems. Their importance, as the respiratory system of buildings, in developing and spreading various microbial contaminations and diseases with their huge global energy consumption was the main goal of research. The results of the research present that the industries have to focus on improving the sustainability of HVAC systems. The greatest opportunities for improving the sustainability of HVAC systems exist at the design stage of new facilities and the retrofitting of existing equipment. Mirnaghi and Haghighat (2020) comment that the abnormal operation of HVAC systems can result in an increase in energy usage as well as poor indoor air quality, thermal discomfort, and low productivity. Building automated systems (BAS) collects a massive amount of data related to the operation of each component of HVAC systems. These data support for improvement of HVAC systems. Chen et al. (2023) presented the importance of data-driven fault detection. The diagnostics for building heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems (HVAC) is the base for detection. This process is divided into the following steps: data collection, data cleansing, data preprocessing, baseline establishment, fault detection, fault diagnostics, and potential fault prognostics. This instrument is important for building an effective HVAC system. Afroz et al. (2018) said that the appropriate application of advanced Economies 2024,12, 260 4 of 17 control strategies in heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems is the key to improving the energy efficiency of buildings. Umoh et al. (2024) commented on green architecture and energy efficiency. Green architecture has become an imperative consideration in contemporary construction practices. Their research provides a review of innovative design and construction techniques employed in green architecture to enhance energy efficiency. Guyomard et al. (2023) presented that green architecture relies on three instruments: eco-schemes, agro-environment measures, and climate measures. Elshafei et al. (2021) commented that green structures turned into a huge path to an economic future. Green building outlines include finding the harmony between living and a maintainable environment. In their research, the usage of modern technologies is seen as part of greener construction changes and utilizing the genetic algorithms innovations. Economidou et al. (2020) presented a key pillar of the European Union’s climate and energy strategy. This document informs the reduction in energy demand in buildings by using energy efficiency. Energy efficiency in the EU energy policy agenda was progressively transformed according to the real situation. da Cunha and de Aguiar (2020) presented that the energy efficiency of buildings is one of the biggest preoccupations due to the high negative impacts on the environment, economy, and society. Hummel et al. (2023) said the main key to reaching climate protection targets is reducing CO 2 emissions for space heating and hot water preparation in buildings. In this case, it is important to understand the balance between CO 2 reduction through thermal renovation activities and the change of heating systems. The results show a high share of thermal renovation until 2050 is cost-efficient to reach a 95% CO 2 reduction. In total, 90% of the buildings are applicable for thermal renovation. Energy needs are reduced more in older buildings than in newer buildings. Brockway et al. (2021) presented a macroeconomic view of energy efficiency. Most global energy predictions anticipate a structural break in the relationship between energy consumption and gross domestic product (GDP). The results of their research showed a relationship between energy consumption and GDP. They conclude that global energy prediction may underestimate the future growth rate of global energy demand. Chen et al. (2024) said that energy efficiency accounts for approximately 40% of the possibility of reducing greenhouse gases. The critical challenge is mitigating climate change while maintaining economic growth. Their research investigated the impact of energy efficiency on economic growth and environmental sustainability (Figure 1). Economies 2024, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 18 Figure 1. View on energy efficiency. Source: Chen et al. (2024). The results show that energy intensity was positively associated with CO2 emissions, ecological footprint, and economic growth. Energy depletion was negatively associated with economic growth and positively related to CO2 emissions and ecological footprint. These findings demonstrate that energy intensity positively impacts economic growth and degrades the environment. Sun et al. (2021) commented that technical and technological modifications and options reduce energy intensity and carbon emissions without compromising global economic growth. Zhao et al. (2022) presented an energy efficiency study investigating the effect of green-bond financing on energy efficiency investment for green economic recovery. The study’s findings showed that green bonds are the primary financing source for energy efficiency projects. 3. Methodology This research dealt with energy cost reduction and energy consumption after technical innovations and modifications. The purpose of the research was realized in a production enterprise in Slovakia that uses an administrative building for administrative activities for 100% rooms. This administrative building creates high energy and operational costs. This reason is the instrument for changes in the administrative building. The administrative building is very old—its lifetime is 30 years. During its lifetime, small modifications and operational costs were acceptable. The administrative building is used for administrative activities such as an office space. The building has 4 floors—the ground floor and 3 floors. The area of the building is 1266 m2. Since the year 2019, the operational costs of administrative buildings have increased. This fact is a big problem in the enterprise in the financial area, energy consumption and energy costs and the safety of buildings. As part of the research, we established the basic hypothesis for energy cost reduction: implementing innovations brings positive results in reducing energy costs of administrative buildings and energy consumption. We tested this hypothesis. The basis for testing was economic, financial, and comparative analysis after implementing technical modifications and other without and low measures in the administrative building in selected enterprises in Slovakia. The year 2022 was a critical moment for innovations in the administrative building. The state of the administrative building was critical and energy, operational costs were too high. The administrative building did not do modifications in the year 2019–2022. The maintenance process was provided according to the real situation and crisis. All the rooms of the administrative building were used. In the administrative building, new climatic conditions (higher temperature) were accepted because the enterprise did not have the financial resources for innovations and Figure 1. View on energy efficiency. Source: Chen et al. (2024). The results show that energy intensity was positively associated with CO 2 emissions, ecological footprint, and economic growth. Energy depletion was negatively associated Economies 2024,12, 260 5 of 17 with economic growth and positively related to CO 2 emissions and ecological footprint. These findings demonstrate that energy intensity positively impacts economic growth and degrades the environment. Sun et al. (2021) commented that technical and technological modifications and options reduce energy intensity and carbon emissions without compromising global economic growth. Zhao et al. (2022) presented an energy efficiency study investigating the effect of green-bond financing on energy efficiency investment for green economic recovery. The study’s findings showed that green bonds are the primary financing source for energy efficiency projects. 3. Methodology This research dealt with energy cost reduction and energy consumption after technical innovations and modifications. The purpose of the research was realized in a production enterprise in Slovakia that uses an administrative building for administrative activities for 100% rooms. This administrative building creates high energy and operational costs. This reason is the instrument for changes in the administrative building. The administrative building is very old—its lifetime is 30 years. During its lifetime, small modifications and operational costs were acceptable. The administrative building is used for administrative activities such as an office space. The building has 4 floors—the ground floor and 3 floors. The area of the building is 1266 m 2 . Since the year 2019, the operational costs of administrative buildings have increased. This fact is a big problem in the enterprise in the financial area, energy consumption and energy costs and the safety of buildings. As part of the research, we established the basic hypothesis for energy cost reduction: implementing innovations brings positive results in reducing energy costs of administrative buildings and energy consumption. We tested this hypothesis. The basis for testing was economic, financial, and comparative analysis after implementing technical modifications and other without and low measures in the administrative building in selected enterprises in Slovakia. The year 2022 was a critical moment for innovations in the administrative building. The state of the administrative building was critical and energy, operational costs were too high. The administrative building did not do modifications in the year 2019–2022. The maintenance process was provided according to the real situation and crisis. All the rooms of the administrative building were used. In the administrative building, new climatic conditions (higher temperature) were accepted because the enterprise did not have the financial resources for innovations and modifications. In the year 2022, financial sources were prepared in the amount of EUR 65,000 for investment in the administrative building from reason of the critical situation. The reason was known—high energy costs and the critical state of the administrative building. This situation needed to be solved in the administrative building of the enterprise. The research was conducted based on the algorithm (Figure 2). Economies 2024, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 6 of 18 modifications. In the year 2022, financial sources were prepared in the amount of EUR 65 000 for investment in the administrative building from reason of the critical situation. The reason was known—high energy costs and the critical state of the administrative building. This situation needed to be solved in the administrative building of the enterprise. The research was conducted based on the algorithm (Figure 2). Figure 2. Algorithm of research realization. In the first step of the research, we collected data (Table 1) for economic and financial analysis in the selected enterprise. We obtained data from the SAP system, and POHODA accounting software (version STORMWARE 1.8 POHODA), at the individual departments of the production enterprise in Slovakia. The rate for energy according to the law was EUR 0.16/kWh and during the time period 2019–2023 was uniform. We selected data from 2019 to 2023 because, since the year 2019, the energy consumption increased from 890 GJ to 1050 GJ. We obtained data—complex costs for administrative buildings and their operability. Table 1. Economic values of administrative building. Time Period (year) Energy Consumption (GJ) Labor Costs (EUR) Material Costs (EUR) Services Costs (EUR) 2019 890 40,230 2600 1500 2020 980 43,530 5000 2300 2021 941 46,428 5100 5200 2022 1193 37,000 13,000 4900 2023 1050 38,500 7000 5400 Economic and financial analysis: Economic analysis has used the count of energy costs (multiply energy rate and energy consumption), the development trend of the values (costs) (share of cost in the current period and in the based period), and the structure of costs (index of one kind of costs and SUM of costs) (Formulas (1)–(3)). The financial analysis contains the indicator—the payback period of investment (number of years for the back of investment) in the manufacturing enterprise (Formula (4)). Formula (1): Energy costs (EUR) Ce (€) = R × Co (1) Formula (2): Development trend of costs Figure 2. Algorithm of research realization. Economies 2024,12, 260 6 of 17 In the first step of the research, we collected data (Table 1) for economic and financial analysis in the selected enterprise. We obtained data from the SAP system, and POHODA accounting software (version STORMWARE 1.8 POHODA), at the individual departments of the production enterprise in Slovakia. The rate for energy according to the law was EUR 0.16/kWh and during the time period 2019–2023 was uniform. We selected data from 2019 to 2023 because, since the year 2019, the energy consumption increased from 890 GJ to 1050 GJ. We obtained data—complex costs for administrative buildings and their operability. Table 1. Economic values of administrative building. Time Period (Year) Energy Consumption (GJ) Labor Costs (EUR) Material Costs (EUR) Services Costs (EUR) 2019 890 40,230 2600 1500 2020 980 43,530 5000 2300 2021 941 46,428 5100 5200 2022 1193 37,000 13,000 4900 2023 1050 38,500 7000 5400 Economic and financial analysis: Economic analysis has used the count of energy costs (multiply energy rate and energy consumption), the development trend of the values (costs) (share of cost in the current period and in the based period), and the structure of costs (index of one kind of costs and SUM of costs) (Formulas (1)–(3)). The financial analysis contains the indicator—the payback period of investment (number of years for the back of investment) in the manufacturing enterprise (Formula (4)). Formula (1): Energy costs (EUR) Ce (€)=R×Co (1) Formula (2): Development trend of costs T = C1/C0 (2) Formula (3): Structure (%) S = Cj/Cc ×100 (3) Formula (4): Payback period (years) Pp = I/CF (4) where R—energy rate, Co—consumption (Kwh), Ce—energy cost, T—trend, C—costs, (0, 1)—time period, S—structure, Cj—unit cost, Cc—total cost, Pp—payback period, I—investment, and CF—cash flow in years. The economic analysis was chosen because of the established goal of the research, which was the reduction in energy costs. Energy costs were determined as the product of consumption and the energy rate established by law during the period from 2019 to 2023 (Table 2). Then, it was necessary to monitor the development of these costs in the period 2019–2023. Based on the structure of costs, it is possible to evaluate the type of costs and their reduction. The financial analysis was used for the implementation of technical modifications to the administrative building, it was necessary to allocate financial resources and determine their return due to the creation of a financial reserve. Economies 2024,12, 260 7 of 17 Table 2. Energy costs and trend of costs in the administrative building. The Rate of Energy 0.16 EUR/kWh Year Energy (kWh) Energy Costs (EUR) Trend 2019 247,223 39,556 - 2020 272,223 43,556 1.10 2021 261,389 41,823 0.96 2022 331,389 53,023 1.26 2023 291,667 46,667 0.88 4. Results The research was provided in the selected production enterprises in Slovakia. This enterprise uses administrative buildings for business activities. All rooms are used for 100% of the time in the administrative building. The research followed the algorithm of the research realization in steps in Figure 2. 4.1. Analysis of the Actual State of Administrative Building The administrative building (Figure 3) is located in the manufacturing enterprise. The building is constructed as a prefabricated skeleton. It is built from building material with good insulating properties. The perimeter consists of concrete materials. The roof is flat, not insulated. The building does not have floor thermal insulation. Solar radiation comes from three sides—south, west, and east. The north part is covered by a neighboring building. There are curtains on the windows and blinds on some of the windows. The building is supplied from a central heat supply. The water in the heating elements is heated in exchangers. Regulation is automatic depending on the external environment. The distribution route is long. The building is heated throughout the heating season. The heating system is without thermostatic valves. Pipes do not have thermal insulation. The system is not hydraulically regulated. This building has a life cycle of 30 years. Economies 2024, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 18 Figure 3. Administrative building before modifications. Source: own source in enterprise. 4.2. Economic Analysis of Energy Costs In this part of the research, we investigate energy consumption and energy costs and their trend (Table 2), because the main problem is high energy costs. For economic analysis, energy consumption information from Table 1 has been used, for the count of energy costs, Formula (1) has been used, and for the trend of costs, Formula (2) has been used. Energy consumption in (GJ) was translated to (kWh). The results of the indicators are presented in Table 2. Energy costs have been increasing since 2019 and reached their highest value in 2022, representing an increase of 26% compared to 2021. Energy costs were decreased by 12% in the year 2023. During the period 2019–2023, the conditions in the administrative building did not change. The building was 100% used for business activities. A climatic condition was changed (higher temperature). Despite the climatic changes, the heating condition was the same. We also examined indicators of structure in Formula (3). The results of the indicators are presented in Figure 4. The structure of the costs for the administrative building is important from the reason for the financial reserve creation. The high structure during 2019–2023 created two types of costs—energy costs and labor costs. Labor costs cannot decrease, because the maintenance department needs specialized staff. A reduction in salaries means staff fluctuation and staff deficit. The energy costs can change because they are connected by energy consumption and kind of energy. It is an available solution for the selected enterprise. The reason for the decrease in energy costs in the year 2023 was that technical modifications—innovations—were introduced in the administrative building. The implementation of without-cost measures and low-cost measures in the administrative building caused decreasing energy costs and energy consumption. Due to the increase in energy costs, it was necessary to evaluate their share in the total operating costs of the administrative building (Table 3). Total operating costs contain labor, materials, service, and energy costs for the administrative building. The significance of those operating costs is important for modifications in the administrative building and for budgeting of the modifications. Labor costs create the salary of employees who provide maintenance in the administrative building. Material costs create all costs for the repairing process in the administrative building. Service costs are costs connected with the services of external suppliers. Energy costs create costs for energy consumption and other energy fees (electrometer). The worst trend in operating costs was presented in the year 2022. In this period was the world energy crisis. The opportunities for Slovakia were investment in renewable technologies and green investments. Figure 3. Administrative building before modifications. Source: own source in enterprise. 4.2. Economic Analysis of Energy Costs In this part of the research, we investigate energy consumption and energy costs and their trend (Table 2), because the main problem is high energy costs. For economic analysis, energy consumption information from Table 1has been used, for the count of energy costs, Formula (1) has been used, and for the trend of costs, Formula (2) has been used. Energy consumption in (GJ) was translated to (kWh). The results of the indicators are presented in Table 2. Energy costs have been increasing since 2019 and reached their highest value in 2022, representing an increase of 26% compared to 2021. Energy costs were decreased by 12% in Economies 2024,12, 260 8 of 17 the year 2023. During the period 2019–2023, the conditions in the administrative building did not change. The building was 100% used for business activities. A climatic condition was changed (higher temperature). Despite the climatic changes, the heating condition was the same. We also examined indicators of structure in Formula (3). The results of the indicators are presented in Figure 4. The structure of the costs for the administrative building is important from the reason for the financial reserve creation. The high structure during 2019–2023 created two types of costs—energy costs and labor costs. Labor costs cannot decrease, because the maintenance department needs specialized staff. A reduction in salaries means staff fluctuation and staff deficit. The energy costs can change because they are connected by energy consumption and kind of energy. It is an available solution for the selected enterprise. Economies 2024, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 10 of 19 Figure 4. Structure of costs for administrative building. Source: own source. The results of the observation were as follows: • Total changes in climate in the environment; • Cold in the corridors due to climate factors; • The corridors are not properly ventilated; • Bad monitoring equipment in the building; • The maintenance system of the administrative building is not managed; • Regular inspections of heating elements are not ensured; • Not acceptable fittings in the heating system; Figure 4. Structure of costs for administrative building. Source: own source. Economies 2024,12, 260 15 of 17 the security of supply, and increases energy prices for production companies. This is the reason why energy policy is the key factor in reducing energy costs and consumption. The part of the energy policy is also renewable resources for energy and their use. This area is a priority for energy sustainable development. Li and Ho (2022) demonstrated that falling costs of renewable energy create a low-carbon transition in energy areas. The variability of renewable sources decreases the flexibility of energy deliveries. This fact indicates that we should consider the indirect impacts of renewables by their implementation. Bdour et al. (2023) commented that renewable energy was recognized as a potential source for energy savings to achieve sustainable and long-term feasible operation and reduction in energy cost in the photovoltaic water plant. The feasibility of the plant showed a fast payback period of up to 1.1 years. Utilizing clean solar photovoltaic energy to power the water plant led to a considerable reduction in greenhouse gases. Those positive benefits show the use of renewable sources for decreasing energy costs. 6. Conclusions The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development is a comprehensive set of global priorities for achieving sustainable development. Sustainable development is connected by pillars of Industry 4.0. The purpose of this article was orientated to resource optimization as a pillar of Industry 4.0 for using administrative buildings for business with the aim of energy, environmental, and economic sustainability. The basic pillar of Industry 4.0 is resource-optimizing such as energy, which in production enterprises represents an economic value—costs. The aim was to investigate the effect of technical innovations— modifications of the administrative building on the financial side of the enterprise—with a main focus on reducing energy costs and energy consumption. This research dealt with energy cost reduction in the manufacturing enterprise in Slovakia. As part of the research, the basic hypothesis for energy cost reduction was established: implementing innovations brings positive results in reducing energy costs of administrative buildings and energy consumption. Hypothesis H1 was confirmed. During the time period 2022–2023, the results showed a reduction in the energy consumption of 143 GJ, a reduced energy cost of EUR 6356, a reduction in the cost structure of 1.3%, and the payback period was in the range of 6–12 years of individual technical innovations such as a new design of the administrative building such as marketing instrument for customers and suppliers. The results of this research suggested an EEE model of energy severity of administrative buildings. This model presents an approach to the economic dimension (such as reduction in energy costs), energy dimension (such as reduction in energy consumption) and environmental dimension (such as CO 2 reduction). The model shows the implementation of the instrument of energy management and indicators such as energy efficiency. The social dimension is orientated to green building architecture and the motivation of the persons for filling the energy measures. The environmental dimension deals with energy infrastructure and effective HVAC systems for buildings. The integration element is manifested in the 2030 Agenda as a connection of all three dimensions of sustainable development: economic, social, and environmental. The EEE model for energy, environmental, and economic sustainability will allow to production enterprises improve energy severity. Author Contributions: Conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, visualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, K.T., S.K., I.M. and I.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research was funded by ITMS: 313011T567 New possibilities and approaches of optimization within logistical processes and KEGA 010TUKE-4/2023 “Application of educational robots in the process of teaching the study program industrial logistic”. Data Availability Statement: www.registeruz.sk (accessed on 4 September 2024). Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Economies 2024,12, 260 16 of 17 References Afroz, Zakia, G. M. Shafiullah, Tania Urmee, and Gary Higgins. 2018. Modeling techniques used in building HVAC control systems: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 83: 64–84. [CrossRef] Al Muala, Zaid A., Mohammad A. Bany Issa, Daniel Sansó-Rubert Pascual, and Pastora M. Bello Bugallo. 2023. Realistic Home Energy Management System Considering the Life Cycle of Photovoltaic and Energy Storage Systems. Sustainability 15: 11205. [CrossRef] Arumägi, Endrik, and Targo Kalamees. 2020. Cost and energy reduction of a new n ZEB wooden building. Energies 13: 3570. [CrossRef] Asim, Nilofar, Marzieh Badiei, Masita Mohammad, Halim Razali, Armin Rajabi, Lim Chin Haw, and Mariyam Jameelah Ghazali. 2022. Sustainability of heating, ventilation and air-conditioning (HVAC) systems in buildings. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19: 1016. [CrossRef] Baldini, Mattia, Morten Brogger, Henrik K. Jacobsen, and Kim B. Wittchen. 2020. Cost effectiveness of energy efficiency improvements for a residfential building stock in a Danish district heating area. Energy Efficiency 13: 1737–61. [CrossRef] Bdour, A., A. Hejab, L. Almakhadmeh, and M. Hawa. 2023. Management strategies for the efficient energy production of brackish water desalination to ensure reliability, cost reduction, and sustainability. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management 9: 173–92. [CrossRef] Beer, Martin, Radim Rybár, and L’ubomíra Gabániová. 2023. Visual impact of renewable energy infrastructure: Implications for deployment and public perception. Processes 11: 2252. [CrossRef] Bouakkaz, Abderraouf, Antonio J. Gil Mena, Salim Haddad, and Mario Luigi Ferrari. 2021. Efficient energy scheduling considering cost reduction and energy saving in hybrid energy system with energy storage. Journal of Energy Storage 33: 101887. [CrossRef] Brockway, Paul, Steve Sorrell, Gregor Semieniuk, Matthew Kuperus Heun, and Victor Court. 2021. Energy efficiency and economy-wide rebound effects: A review of the evidence and its implications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 141: 110781. [CrossRef] Chen, Wei, Majed Alharthi, Jinjun Zhang, and Irfan Khan. 2024. The need for energy efficiency and economic prosperity in a sustainable environment. Gondwana Research 127: 22–35. [CrossRef] Chen, Zhelun, Zheng O’Neill, Jin Wen, Ojas Pradhan, Tao Yang, Xing Lu, and Terry Herr. 2023. A review of data-driven fault detection and diagnostics for building HVAC systems. Applied Energy 339: 121030. [CrossRef] da Cunha, Sandra Raquel Leite, and JoséLuís Barroso de Aguiar. 2020. Phase change materials and energy efficiency of buildings: A review of knowledge. Journal of Energy Storage 27: 101083. [CrossRef] Economidou, Marina, Valeria Todeschi, Paolo Bertoldi, Delia D’Agostino, Paolo Zangheri, and Luca Castellazzi. 2020. Review of 50 years of EU energy efficiency policies for buildings. Energy and Buildings 225: 110322. [CrossRef] Ekung, Samuel, Ohama Victor, and Ajiero Reginald. 2020. Strategies for reducing the costs of clean energy technologies in buildings in Nigeria. Clean Energy 4: 349–59. [CrossRef] Elia, A., Mitra Kamidelivand, Fionn Rogan, and Brian Pádraig O. Gallachóir. 2021. Impacts of innovation on renewable energy technology cost reductions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 138: 110488. [CrossRef] Elshafei, Ghada, Silvia Vilˇceková, Martina Zeleˇnáková, and Abdelazim M. Negm. 2021. An extensive study for a wide utilization of green architecture parameters in built environment based on genetic schemes. Buildings 11: 507. [CrossRef] Gatt, Damien, Cedric Caruana, and Charles Yousif. 2020. Building energy renovation and smart integration of renewables in a social housing block toward nearly—Zero energy status. Frontiers in Energy Research 8: 560892. [CrossRef] Guo, Qui, Adam Courville, and Qui Liu. 2023. Improving facility energy efficiency through energy cost analysis. Paper presented at the ASME 2023 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition IMECE 2023, New Orleans, LA, USA, October 29–November 2; p. 7. Guyomard, Herve, Cécile Détang-Dessendre, Pierre Dupraz, Luc Delaby, Christian Huyghe, Jean-Louis Peyraud, and Clélia Sirami. 2023. How the Green Architecture of the 2023–2027 Common Agricultural Policy could have been greener. Ambio 52: 1327–38. [CrossRef] Heravi, Gholamreza, Mohammad Mahdi Salehi, and Milad Rostami. 2020. Identifying cost optimal options fór a typical residential nearly zero energy buildings design in developing countries. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 22: 2107–28. [CrossRef] Hu, Zhengbiao, Dongfeng He, and Hongbo Zhao. 2023. Multi-objective optimization of energy distribution in steel enterprises considering both exergy efficiency and energy cost. Journal Energy 263: 125623. [CrossRef] Hummel, Marcus, Andreas Müller, Sebastian Forthuber, Lukas Kranzl, Bernhard Mayr, and Reinhard Haas. 2023. How cost efficient is energy efficiency in buildings? A comparison of building shell efficiency and heating system change in tme European building stock. Energy Efficiency 16: 32. [CrossRef] Knight, Patric, Bruce Biewald, and Kenji Takahashi. 2022. The cost of energy efficiency programs: Estimates from utility—Reported datasets. Energy 239: 122448. [CrossRef] Li, Jilanglong, and Mun Sing Ho. 2022. Indirect cost of renewable energy: Insights from dispatching. Energy Economics 105: 105778. [CrossRef] Lukáˇc, Jozef, TeplickáKatarína, ˇ CulkováKatarína, and HrehováDaniela. 2021. Evaluation of the Financial Performance of the Municipalities in Slovakia in the Context of Multidimensional Statistics. Journal of Risk and Financial Management 14: 570. [CrossRef] Mariano-Hernández, Deyslen, Luis Hernández-Callejo, Ángel Luis Zorita-Lamadrid, Óscar Duque-Pérez, and Félix García Santos. 2021. A review of strategies for building energy management system: Model predictive control, demand side management, optimization, and fault detect & diagnosis. Journal of Building Engineering 33: 101692. [CrossRef] Economies 2024,12, 260 17 of 17 Markulik, Stefan, Renata Turisova, Anna Nagyova, Tomas Vilinsky, Robert Kozel, and Katarina Vaskovicova. 2021. Production process optimization by reducing downtime and minimization of costs. In Advances in Physical, Social & Occupational Ergonomics. AHFE 2021. Cham: Springer, vol. 73, pp. 220–27. [CrossRef] Mirnaghi, Maryam Sadat, and Fariborz Haghighat. 2020. Fault detection and diagnosis of large-scale HVAC systems in buildings using data-driven methods: A comprehensive review. Energy and Buildings 229: 110492. [CrossRef] Ozbalta, Turkan Goksal, Yusuf Yildiz, Irem Bayram, and Osman Cem Yilmaz. 2021. Energy performance analysis of a historical building using cost-optimal assessment. Energy and Buildings 250: 111301. [CrossRef] Paramati, Sudharsan Reddy, Shahzad Umer, and Do˘gan Buhari. 2022. The role of environmental technology for energy demand and energy efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 153: 111735. [CrossRef] Potkány, Marek, Andrea Hajduková, and Katarína Teplická. 2012. Target costing calculation in the wood working industry to support demand at a time of global recession. Drewno 55: 89–104. Sayed, Enas Taha, Abdul Ghani Olabi, Abdul Hai Alami, Ali Radwan, Ayman Mdallal, Ahmed Rezk, and Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem. 2023. Renewable energy and Energy storage systems. Energies 16: 1415. [CrossRef] Shukla Siddharth, Eunsang Lee, Richard R. Lunt, and Annick Anctil. 2022. Net energy and cost benefit of phthalocyanine and heptamethine transparent photovoltaics in commercial buildings. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessment 53: 102631. [CrossRef] Sun, Huaping, Bless Kofi Edziah, Anthony Kwaku Kporsu, Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie, and Farhad Taghizadeh-Hesary. 2021. Energy efficiency: The role of technological innovation and knowledge spillover. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 167: 120659. [CrossRef] Teplická, Katarína, Samer Khouri, Martin Beer, and Jana Rybárová. 2021. Evaluation of the Performance of Mining Processes after the Strategic Innovation for Sustainable Development. Processes 9: 1374. [CrossRef] Terés-Zubiaga, Jon, Roman Bolliger, Manuela G. Almeida, Ricardo Barbosa, Jørgen Rose, Kirsten E. Thomsen, Eduardo Montero, and Raúl Briones-Llorente. 2020. Cost-effective building renovation at district level combining energy efficiency & renewables– methodology assessment proposed in IEA EBC Annex 75 and a demonstration case study. Energy and Buildings 224: 110280. [CrossRef] Umoh, Aniekan Akpan, Adedayo Adefemi, Kenneth Ifeanyi Ibewe, Emmanuel Augustine Etukudoh, Valentine Ikenna Ilojianya, and Zamathula Queen Sikhakhane Nwokediegwu. 2024. Green architecture and energy efficiency: A review of innovative design and construction techniques. Engineering Science & Technology Journal 5: 185–200. [CrossRef] Vranayová, Zuzana, Martin Kováˇc, Danica Košiˇcanová, VilˇcekováSilvia, SedlákováAnna, Kapalo Peter, Burák Dušan, Kováˇcová Katarína, BurdováEva, MiˇnováZuzana, and et al. 2020. Designing Buildings in the World of Sustainable Cities, 1st ed. Košice: Technical University of Košice, p. 491. ISBN 978-80-553-3873-6. Wawak, Slawomir, Andrea Sütoová, David Vykydal, and Petra Halfarová. 2023. Factors affecting Quality 4.0 implementation in Czech, Slovak and Polish organizations: Preliminary research. Advances in Production Engineering and Management 18: 345–56. [CrossRef] Weiner, Csaba, and Tekla Szép. 2021. The Residential Energy Cost Reduction Programme in Hungary. Contemporary Europe Sovremennaya-EVROPA 1: 786–94. [CrossRef] Wu, Wei, and Harrison Skye. 2021. Residential net-zero energy buildings: Review and perspective. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 142: 110859. [CrossRef] Zhao, Dong, and Yunjeong Mo. 2023. Construction cost decomposition of residential building energy retrofit. Building 13: 1363. [CrossRef] Zhao, Linhai, Ka Yin Chau, Trung Kien Tran, Muhammad Sadiq, Nguyen Thi My Xuyen, and Thi Thu Hien Phan. 2022. Enhancing green economic recovery through green bonds financing and energy efficiency investments. Economic Analysis and Policy 76: 488–501. [CrossRef] Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.