Sunny, Fa uque As; Je onen, Eila; Lan, Juping
A icle
In luen ial heo ies o economics in shaping sus ainable
de elopmen concep s
Adminis a i e Sciences
P o ided in Coope a ion wi h:
MDPI – Mul idisciplina y Digi al Publishing Ins i u e, Basel
Sugges ed Ci a ion: Sunny, Fa uque As; Je onen, Eila; Lan, Juping (2025) : In luen ial heo ies o
economics in shaping sus ainable de elopmen concep s, Adminis a i e Sciences, ISSN 2076-3387,
MDPI, Basel, Vol. 15, Iss. 1, pp. 1-33,
h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/admsci15010006
This Ve sion is a ailable a :
h ps://hdl.handle.ne /10419/321152
S anda d-Nu zungsbedingungen:
Die Dokumen e au EconS o dü en zu eigenen wissenscha lichen
Zwecken und zum P i a geb auch gespeiche und kopie we den.
Sie dü en die Dokumen e nich ü ö en liche ode komme zielle
Zwecke e iel äl igen, ö en lich auss ellen, ö en lich zugänglich
machen, e eiben ode ande wei ig nu zen.
So e n die Ve asse die Dokumen e un e Open-Con en -Lizenzen
(insbesonde e CC-Lizenzen) zu Ve ügung ges ell haben soll en,
gel en abweichend on diesen Nu zungsbedingungen die in de do
genann en Lizenz gewäh en Nu zungs ech e.
Te ms o use:
Documen s in EconS o may be sa ed and copied o you pe sonal
and schola ly pu poses.
You a e no o copy documen s o public o comme cial pu poses, o
exhibi he documen s publicly, o make hem publicly a ailable on he
in e ne , o o dis ibu e o o he wise use he documen s in public.
I he documen s ha e been made a ailable unde an Open Con en
Licence (especially C ea i e Commons Licences), you may exe cise
u he usage igh s as speci ied in he indica ed licence.
h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/licenses/by/4.0/
Recei ed: 10 Oc obe 2024
Re ised: 20 Decembe 2024
Accep ed: 23 Decembe 2024
Published: 25 Decembe 2024
Ci a ion: Sunny, F. A., Je onen, E.,
& Lan, J. (2025). In luen ial Theo ies o
Economics in Shaping Sus ainable
De elopmen Concep s.
Adminis a i e Sciences,15(1), 6.
h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/
admsci15010006
Copy igh : © 2024 by he au ho s.
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Swi ze land.
This a icle is an open access a icle
dis ibu ed unde he e ms and
condi ions o he C ea i e Commons
A ibu ion (CC BY) license
(h ps://c ea i ecommons.o g/
licenses/by/4.0/).
adminis a i e
sciences
A icle
In luen ial Theo ies o Economics in Shaping Sus ainable
De elopmen Concep s
Fa uque As Sunny 1, Eila Je onen 2,* and Juping Lan 3
1School o Managemen , Zhejiang Uni e si y, Hangzhou 310058, China; [email p o ec ed]
2Facul y o Educa ion and Psychology, Uni e si y o Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland
3School o Two Moun ains, Lishui Uni e si y, Lishui 323000, China; [email p o ec ed]
*Co espondence: eila.je [email p o ec ed]
Abs ac : This s udy explo es he pi o al ole o heo ies o economics in shaping he
mul i ace ed concep o sus ainable de elopmen and in eg a es economic, social, and
en i onmen al dimensions. I aces he in ellec ual ajec o y o classical, neoclassical, and
con empo a y economic pa adigms, analysing hei con ibu ions o sus ainabili y-o ien ed
policies and p ac ices. The s udy c i ically analyses key concep s, including equi able in-
come edis ibu ion, esou ce s ewa dship, and ecological p ese a ion. I con as s libe al
and dependency heo ies while also compa ing insigh s om en i onmen al and ecological
economics. Employing a igo ous li e a u e e iew and compa a i e analy ical me hodol-
ogy, he s udy b idges he heo e ical ounda ions wi h eal-wo ld applica ions, illus a ing
he dynamic in e play be ween heo ies o economics and sus ainabili y impe a i es. The
indings elucida e he dicho omy be ween weak and s ong sus ainabili y amewo ks,
ad oca ing o e hical and in e disciplina y app oaches o policymaking. By o e ing a
comp ehensi e syn hesis o he mos in luen ial heo ies o economics and sus ainable
de elopmen p ac ices, his s udy p o ides p o ound insigh s o policymake s, academics,
and p ac i ione s seeking o add ess p essing global challenges h ough in o med and
in eg a i e s a egies.
Keywo ds: economics; heo ies; sus ainable de elopmen ; esou ce managemen ; en i on-
men al economics; weak and s ong sus ainabili y; e hics; policy
1. In oduc ion
In he wake o he indus ial e a, humani y’s ajec o y has inad e en ly igge ed a
se ies o clima e uphea als, en i onmen al disas e s, social disco d, and economic ins abil-
i y. This disconce ing end jeopa dises u u e gene a ions, necessi a ing an u gen and
occasionally con en ious shi owa ds mo e judicious and e ec i e managemen o na u al
esou ces (Kla in,2018). Cen al o his u gency a e he Ea h’s ecological limi s, encapsu-
la ed by he plane a y bounda ies. These bounda ies delinea e he in ica e ela ionship
be ween he economic, social, and ecological aspec s o de elopmen , highligh ing na u e’s
ini e capaci y. Indeed, he sus ainabili y o ou plane is undamen al o all li e o ms,
unde pinning bo h economic p ospe i y and socie al esilience (Rocks öm e al.,2009).
Th oughou his o y, he seeds o p og ess and de elopmen can be aced back o he
classical G eco-Roman e a. Howe e , he concep o sus ainable de elopmen eme ged
mo e en a i ely in he 18 h cen u y, p ima ily wi hin o es y managemen . Plane a y
bounda ies—unal e able limi s dic a ed by na u al sys ems—unde sco e he c i ical need o
p ese e and os e he en i onmen as he bed ock o sus ainable li ing. In he con ex o
de elopmen , a ans o ma i e shi owa ds sus ainabili y eme ges as an essen ial p io i y
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 h ps://doi.o g/10.3390/admsci15010006
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 2 o 33
(UN,2019). This ansi ion demands a holis ic app oach ha encompasses ecological, social,
and economic dimensions aimed a mi iga ing and adap ing o he my iad challenges we
ace (Da idson,2014). This e ol ing unde s anding has b ough o ligh he impo ance
o judiciously managing enewable na u al esou ces, he eby se ing he s age o u u e
discou se (Kla in,2018).
Ea ly economic analyses in luenced by he seminal wo ks o hinke s such as Mal hus
and Rica do g appled wi h he spec e o esou ce sca ci y. They sugges ha he ini e
na u e o ag icul u al land could hampe economic g ow h and socie al ad ancemen ,
o e shadowing aspi a ions o imp o ed li ing s anda ds. While hese ini ial inqui ies
ouched upon sus ainabili y p inciples, he e m ‘sus ainable de elopmen ’ only c ys-
allised in he la e 20 h cen u y, when he ‘B und land Repo ’ was published in 1987
(Kla in,2018;Meadows e al.,1972;Smi h,2009). This epo ma ked a pi o al momen in
global en i onmen al discou se, igni ing conside able in e es . By he 1990s, he no ion o
‘sus ainable de elopmen ’ eme ged as a p edominan opic o con e sa ion, i s in Eu ope
and subsequen ly on a global scale (Pu is e al.,2019). I emphasised he necessi y o
collec i e ac ion owa ds sha ed objec i es and a icula ed a ounda ional de ini ion o
sus ainable de elopmen as he ul ilmen o p esen needs wi hou jeopa dising hose o
u u e gene a ions (Kla in,2018).
The B und land Repo iden i ies sus ainable de elopmen as comp ising h ee in eg al
componen s. Fi s , de elopmen mus p io i ise socio-economic ad ancemen wi hin
ecological bounda ies. Second, equi able esou ce edis ibu ion is essen ial o ensu e a high
quali y o li e o all membe s o socie y. Thi d, he esponsible managemen o esou ces is
c ucial o main aining he li ing s anda ds equi ed by u u e gene a ions. This concep
aligns wi h he ‘ iple bo om line’ amewo k, which highligh s he “ h ee P’s”, namely
p o i , people, and plane , as he ounda ion o sus ainable de elopmen (Kla in,2018).
These ca ego ies p o ide a amewo k o unde s anding en i onmen al esponsibili y and
assessing he socie al impac s o human ac i i ies. Consequen ly, sus ainable de elopmen
encompasses he na u al, social, and human capi als ha a e essen ial o income gene a ion
and he main enance o li ing s anda ds. A c i ical componen o his concep in ol es a
delica e equilib ium be ween en i onmen al, social, and economic ad ancemen s. This
no ion also in eg a es e hical conside a ions and a p o ound dedica ion o he wel a e o
bo h cu en and u u e gene a ions (Kibe e al.,2012).
Though he de ini ion o sus ainable de elopmen emains a opic o ongoing dis-
cou se, i can be cha ac e ised as a dynamic p ocess aimed a balancing en i onmen al,
social, and economic aspec s o ensu e a be e quali y o li e o cu en and u u e gene a-
ions. I emphasises in e gene a ional equali y, gende equali y, social ole ance, po e y
alle ia ion, en i onmen al p o ec ion and es o a ion, conse a ion o na u al esou ces,
and he building o jus and peace ul socie ies (Je onen,2024). A i s hea , he p inciple o
s ong sus ainabili y ad oca es o he p ese a ion and enhancemen o na u al capi al—a
p e equisi e o endu ing p ospe i y (Ma ins,2016). The concep o ‘ esponsible beha iou ’
ex ends beyond a me e ideal, as i o ms he bed ock o sus ainable de elopmen . I embod-
ies a powe ul impe a i e, s ee ing socie y owa ds a u u e in which he p ospe i y o bo h
humani y and he plane is sa egua ded o gene a ions ye o come (
Beng sson e al.,2018
;
Kla in,2018). Since hen, he wo ld has inc easingly p io i ised sus ainable de elopmen ,
culmina ing in he launch o he 2030 Agenda, which ea u es 17 global goals o sus ainable
de elopmen in 2015 (Pezzey,1992;Uni ed Na ions,2015).
Economics undeniably plays a pi o al ole in shaping he sus ainable de elopmen
concep . A he hea o his concep lies he undamen al ques ion o how o alloca e ini e
Ea h esou ces o sus ainably mee p esen and u u e needs (Kla in,2018). Economics
e ol es a ound he concep s o sca ci y, choice, and oppo uni y cos , in es iga ing he
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 3 o 33
essen ial d i e s o de elopmen , including he p oduc ion, consump ion, and dis ibu ion
o goods and se ices ha a e i al o enhancing li ing s anda ds. Economics also examines
he in e ac ions be ween human ac i i ies and he unde lying ac o s in luencing changes
in Ea h sys ems. By in eg a ing economic p inciples wi h Ea h science, we can achie e a
comp ehensi e unde s anding o he posi i e and nega i e impac s o a ious al e na i es
and hei ade-o s.
Economics, in conjunc ion wi h social and beha iou al sciences, o e s aluable in-
sigh s in o po en ial s a egies o guiding human beha iou owa ds he a ainmen o
sus ainable de elopmen goals. Fields such as de elopmen , ecological, en i onmen al,
and na u al esou ce economics con ibu e ex ensi e esea ch ha is ele an o sus ainable
de elopmen challenges. Thus, g asping economic p inciples and empi ical indings is
essen ial o ul illing humani y’s aspi a ions o a p ospe ous exis ence while managing
sca ce esou ces e ec i ely.
In ligh o hese conside a ions, he in ica e in e play be ween a ious disciplines
wi hin economics, he p og ession o heo ies, and hei alignmen wi h sus ainable de-
elopmen ha e eme ged as signi ican subjec s o schola ly inqui y in con empo a y
discou se. Sus ainable de elopmen has eme ged as a c i ical impe a i e o add essing
he in e wined challenges o en i onmen al deg ada ion, social inequi ies, and economic
ins abili y. Howe e , he complex dynamics be ween economic pa adigms and sus ainabil-
i y emain insu icien ly explo ed in academic discou se. This is pa icula ly e iden in
he limi ed examina ion o how his o ical and con empo a y heo ies o economics shape
sus ainable de elopmen p ac ices and policies.
The lack o cla i y su ounding he in eg a ion o social, en i onmen al, and economic
dimensions wi hin hese heo e ical amewo ks impedes he o mula ion o comp ehensi e
s a egies o achie e long- e m sus ainabili y. This wo k aims o ill his gap by in es iga ing
he in luence o classical, neoclassical, and mode n heo ies on sus ainable de elopmen ,
highligh ing hei p ac ical applica ions and heo e ical con ibu ions. By examining c i ical
concep s such as esou ce managemen , equi y, and en i onmen al s ewa dship, his s udy
seeks o un a el he ex en o which heo ies o economics in o m and align wi h he
p inciples o sus ainabili y. Addi ionally, i c i ically assesses he di e gence be ween weak
and s ong sus ainabili y pe spec i es, explo ing hei implica ions o policymaking and
he e hical dimensions o economic p ac ices.
Th ough a sys ema ic li e a u e e iew and compa a i e analysis, his s udy con-
ibu es o b idging he heo e ical and p ac ical disconnec in sus ainabili y discou se. I
s i es o p o ide policymake s, schola s, and p ac i ione s wi h p o ound insigh s in o he
nexus o heo y and sus ainabili y, acili a ing in o med decision-making and he e ec i e
implemen a ion o sus ainable de elopmen s a egies. This a icle holds conside able
impo ance, as i explo es he complex in e connec ions be ween economics and sus ain-
able de elopmen — ields o inc easing pe inence in a wo ld con ending wi h u gen
global challenges. By examining he e olu ion o economic heo ies and hei eal-wo ld
implica ions, his wo k elucida es c i ical insigh s in o how hese amewo ks in luence
policymaking and impac sus ainabili y p ac ices ac oss di e se sec o s.
Unlike many discussions on sus ainabili y, his s udy in eg a es social, economic,
en i onmen al, ecological, and e hical dimensions. I o e s a comp ehensi e pe spec i e
on sus ainabili y and i s many challenges. The s udy also explo es how hese economic
heo ies connec o eal-wo ld applica ions, highligh ing hei ele ance in add essing
con empo a y issues.
In an e a ma ked by u gen challenges like clima e change, esou ce deple ion, and
social inequali y, his analysis sheds ligh on he ole o economic pa adigms in shaping
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 4 o 33
sus ainable de elopmen s a egies. I also aims o engage a di e se audience, including
s uden s, policymake s, and p ac i ione s, in meaning ul discou se.
By enhancing ou unde s anding o he complex ela ionships be ween economic
g ow h, en i onmen al s ewa dship, and social equi y, his wo k p o ides an essen ial
esou ce. I os e s in o med decision-making and encou ages collabo a i e e o s o
achie e sus ainable solu ions.
This s udy is s uc u ed o p o ide a comp ehensi e explo a ion o he in ica e in e -
play be ween economic heo ies and sus ainable de elopmen , encompassing his o ical
e olu ion, heo e ical ad ancemen s, and p ac ical implica ions. The wo k begins by con-
ex ualising he u gency o sus ainabili y, acing i s o igins om classical economics o
he pi o al B und land Repo , which o malised sus ainable de elopmen as a guiding
global p inciple. Following his ounda ion, he a icle del es in o he e olu ion o eco-
nomic hough , examining classical, neoclassical, and mode n pa adigms, alongside hei
in eg a ion—o lack he eo —o ecological and social conside a ions. Ul ima ely, he s udy
seeks o add ess a pi o al ques ion: how ha e concep s o en i onmen al, ecological and
social sus ainabili y been inco po a ed in o classical, neoclassical, and mode n economic
pa adigms o shape he concep o sus ainable de elopmen ?
The me hodology sec ion a icula es a sys ema ic app oach ha employs PRISMA
guidelines o syn hesise mul idisciplina y pe spec i es, ensu ing obus analy ical dep h.
The subsequen analysis is di ided in o h ee segmen s: he his o ical de elopmen o
economic heo ies, hei inco po a ion o sus ainabili y p inciples, and hei eal-wo ld
applica ions in di e se sec o s. By jux aposing economic pa adigms wi h sus ainabili y
impe a i es, he s udy illumina es he di e gence be ween weak and s ong sus ainabili y
amewo ks, p o iding c i ical insigh s in o policymaking and e hical go e nance.
The s udy concludes wi h ac ionable ecommenda ions, ad oca ing o holis ic s a e-
gies ha ha monise economic g ow h, social equi y, and en i onmen al s ewa dship o
achie e sus ainable de elopmen .
2. Ma e ial and Me hods
This a icle does no pu po o o e a bibliome ic e iew. Ins ead, i seeks o iden i y
and conduc a quali a i e analysis o he seminal wo ks ha signi ican ly con ibu e o he
discussion su ounding he opic. The decision o analyse essen ial wo ks on he in e play
be ween economic heo ies and sus ainable de elopmen , a he han unde aking a biblio-
me ic e iew, be e sui s he ocus o his esea ch. This app oach is mo e app op ia e
gi en he nuanced and in e disciplina y na u e o he opic. A bibliome ic e iew, while
aluable o mapping he scope and ends wi hin a ield, o en p io i ises quan i a i e
me ics o e he quali a i e dep h equi ed o dissec complex heo e ical in e sec ions. In
con as , analysing seminal wo ks allows he esea ch o explo e ounda ional concep s in
dep h. I examines he in ellec ual ajec o ies and philosophical unde pinnings ha ha e
shaped sus ainabili y discou se. This app oach also enables c i ical engagemen wi h key
economic pa adigms—classical, neoclassical, and mode n. I in eg a es hei implica ions
o esou ce managemen , equi y, and en i onmen al s ewa dship. Fu he mo e, he s udy
emphasises quali a i e syn hesis, which allows o add essing in e disciplina y hemes
beyond adi ional economic bounda ies. I inco po a es ecological, social, and e hical
dimensions. By ocusing on key con ibu ions, he esea ch ensu es a ho ough examina-
ion o how economic heo ies in luence sus ainabili y p ac ices. This app oach p o ides
insigh s ha a e bo h p o ound and di ec ly applicable o policymaking and eal-wo ld
challenges. The me hod aligns wi h he esea ch’s goal o os e ing a holis ic unde s anding
o sus ainable de elopmen , p io i ising analy ical dep h o e bibliome ic b ead h. An
o e iew o he s udy amewo k is p esen ed in Figu e 1.
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 5 o 33
Adm. Sci. 2025, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 o 34
a holis ic unde s anding o sus ainable de elopmen , p io i ising analy ical dep h o e
bibliome ic b ead h. An o e iew o he s udy amewo k is p esen ed in Figu e 1.
This esea ch used a sys ema ic sea ch o academic da abases, such as Google
Schola , Scopus, Web o Science, and Science Di ec . The sea ch aimed o loca e pee - e-
iewed a icles, books, con e ence p oceedings, documen s, and epo s ele an o he
s udy’s ocus, as shown in Table 1. The s udy adhe ed o he P e e ed Repo ing I ems
o Sys ema ic Re iews and Me a-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines o mi iga e po en ial
bias and e alua e he ele ance o he s udy con en s (Page e al., 2021). The PRISMA
me hodology offe s a e sa ile amewo k o syn hesising di e se ypes o e idence ha
add ess a ious que ies and has been u ilised in nume ous s udies. This app oach bene i s
gene al eade s by dis illing key insigh s on he opic, enabling esea che s o iden i y
u u e in es iga ion p io i ies and assis ing policymake s in assessing he applicabili y o
indings o hei con ex s (Page e al., 2021). Fo each scien i ic da abase, a hie a chical
sea ch s a egy was implemen ed, commencing wi h basic Boolean combina ions and ad-
ancing o mo e in ica e o mula ions. Fu he mo e, online esou ces we e accessed o
ob ain he mos ecen in o ma ion.
Figu e 1. An o e iew o he s udy amewo k.
All sea ches we e conduc ed in English be ween Augus and Oc obe 2024 wi hou a
empo al es ic ion, aiming o encompass all pe inen esou ces. An ini ial sea ch ac oss
he designa ed da abases yielded a subs an ial co pus o 41,481,596 esul s.
Table 1. Topics sea ched ac oss diffe en Da abases.
Sea ch Topic Google
Schola
Web o
Science Scopus Science Di-
ec
Economics heo y and sus ainable de elopmen concep 4
,
040
,
000 2486 550 71
,
282
Mos in luen ial de ini ion o economics 3,810,000 141 52 31,753
Figu e 1. An o e iew o he s udy amewo k.
This esea ch used a sys ema ic sea ch o academic da abases, such as Google Schola ,
Scopus, Web o Science, and Science Di ec . The sea ch aimed o loca e pee - e iewed
a icles, books, con e ence p oceedings, documen s, and epo s ele an o he s udy’s
ocus, as shown in Table 1. The s udy adhe ed o he P e e ed Repo ing I ems o
Sys ema ic Re iews and Me a-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines o mi iga e po en ial bias and
e alua e he ele ance o he s udy con en s (Page e al.,2021). The PRISMA me hodology
o e s a e sa ile amewo k o syn hesising di e se ypes o e idence ha add ess a ious
que ies and has been u ilised in nume ous s udies. This app oach bene i s gene al eade s
by dis illing key insigh s on he opic, enabling esea che s o iden i y u u e in es iga ion
p io i ies and assis ing policymake s in assessing he applicabili y o indings o hei
con ex s (Page e al.,2021). Fo each scien i ic da abase, a hie a chical sea ch s a egy
was implemen ed, commencing wi h basic Boolean combina ions and ad ancing o mo e
in ica e o mula ions. Fu he mo e, online esou ces we e accessed o ob ain he mos
ecen in o ma ion.
Table 1. Topics sea ched ac oss di e en Da abases.
Sea ch Topic Google Schola Web o Science Scopus
Science Di ec
Economics heo y and sus ainable
de elopmen concep 4,040,000 2486 550 71,282
Mos in luen ial de ini ion o economics 3,810,000 141 52 31,753
B und land epo and
sus ainable de elopmen 102,000 440 440 5678
Economic sus ainabili y 4,580,000 156,269 107,299 742,212
Social sus ainabili y 4,900,000 181,109 99,555 639,717
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 6 o 33
Table 1. Con .
Sea ch Topic Google Schola Web o Science Scopus
Science Di ec
En i onmen al sus ainabili y 4,440,000 283,865 169,240 1,000,000
E hics and sus ainabili y 3,110,000 9224 6067 188,259
Classical economics and sus ainabili y 555,000 597 173 27,675
Neo-classical economics and sus ainabili y 47,400 60 38 3726
Ecological economics and sus ainabili y 2,440,000 22,914 4091 64,949
En i onmen al economics and sus ainabili y
3,900,000 82,083 16,226 162,412
Keynesian Economics and
sus ainable de elopmen 75,000 59 39 3198
Theo ies o economics in eg a ing social and
en i onmen al aspec s 1,230,000 772 16 41,819
Mode n economic heo y and
sus ainable de elopmen 4,050,000 1421 532 73,758
To al 37,279,400 741,440 404,318 3,056,438
All sea ches we e conduc ed in English be ween Augus and Oc obe 2024 wi hou a
empo al es ic ion, aiming o encompass all pe inen esou ces. An ini ial sea ch ac oss
he designa ed da abases yielded a subs an ial co pus o 41,481,596 esul s.
F om his ex ensi e da abase, a o al o 3246 s udies we e me iculously selec ed o an
ini ial ele ance assessmen ( e e o Figu e 2) ollowing he exclusion o 41,478,350 s udies.
The selec ion p ocess ollowed p ecise c i e ia. I ocused on he in e sec ion o heo e ical
amewo ks and sus ainable de elopmen . I also emphasised he in eg a ion o mul idis-
ciplina y pe spec i es, including economics, ecology, and social sciences. Addi ionally, i
p io i ised he igo ous applica ion o quali a i e esea ch me hodologies. These c i e ia
o med he ounda ion o he subsequen sc eening phase, ensu ing alignmen wi h he
o e a ching esea ch objec i es.
Du ing he sc eening p ocess, 2113 s udies we e excluded. This included 530 dupli-
ca es, iden i ied as iden ical i ems appea ing ac oss all sea ch p o ocols, and 1583 s udies
we e deemed i ele an due o limi ed pe inence, unclea heo e ical amewo ks, o a lack
o in e disciplina y cohe ence. In addi ion, om he emaining 1133 s udies, we excluded
an addi ional 965 s udies ha ailed o align wi h he s udy’s objec i es. The exclusion
c i e ia ocused on s udies wi h insu icien heo e ical dep h, lacking e lexi i y, o e ing
minimal po en ial o ad ancing knowledge, and demons a ing limi ed heo e ical no -
el y. As a esul , 168 con ibu ions we e selec ed, comp ising 103 jou nal a icles, 47 book
e e ences, and 18 web-based esou ces (see e e ence numbe 15–182). These wo ks we e
chosen o hei signi ican insigh s g ounded in complexi y heo y, add essing he in e con-
nec ed ealms o social, economic, e hical, en i onmen al, and ecological dimensions ha
a e ele an o he s udy’s ocus. This me iculous exclusion p ocess e lec s he s udy’s com-
mi men o igo ous schola ly s anda ds, emphasising heo e ical dep h, in e connec i i y,
and inno a ion o e he me e quan i a i e inclusion o esea ch ma e ial.
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 7 o 33
Adm. Sci. 2025, 15, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7 o 34
Figu e 2. An o e iew o he li e a u e collec ion p ocess using he PRISMA p o ocol.
3. Resul s and Discussion
Sec ion 3 p esen s a comp ehensi e analysis o he key indings de i ed om eco-
nomic heo ies, highligh ing hei p ac ical applica ions h ough a ange o examples. The
discussion is s uc u ed in o h ee dis inc segmen s: Sec ion 3.1 examines he his o ical
and heo e ical e olu ion o economic hough , excluding di ec e e ences o sus ainabil-
i y, while Sec ion 3.2 in eg a es sus ainabili y in o he economic na a i e. Finally, Sec ion
3.3 offe s a c i ical e alua ion o he global assimila ion o hese heo e ical amewo ks,
unde sco ing hei ole in shaping policies designed o p omo e sus ainable de elopmen .
Figu e 2. An o e iew o he li e a u e collec ion p ocess using he PRISMA p o ocol.
3. Resul s and Discussion
Sec ion 3p esen s a comp ehensi e analysis o he key indings de i ed om eco-
nomic heo ies, highligh ing hei p ac ical applica ions h ough a ange o examples. The
discussion is s uc u ed in o h ee dis inc segmen s: Sec ion 3.1 examines he his o ical
and heo e ical e olu ion o economic hough , excluding di ec e e ences o sus ainabili y,
while Sec ion 3.2 in eg a es sus ainabili y in o he economic na a i e. Finally, Sec ion 3.3
o e s a c i ical e alua ion o he global assimila ion o hese heo e ical amewo ks, unde -
sco ing hei ole in shaping policies designed o p omo e sus ainable de elopmen .
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 8 o 33
The i s Sec ion 3.1 p o ides a ounda ional analysis o economic heo ies ha ha e
shaped mode n pa adigms. I explo es he seminal con ibu ions o economis s such as
Adam Smi h, Al ed Ma shall, Da id Rica do, Ka l Ma x, and John S ua Mill, ocusing
on concep s like esou ce alloca ion, ma ke e iciency, e hics in economics, and he bal-
ance be ween indi idual and collec i e wel a e. This sec ion si ua es hese ideas wi hin
hei his o ical con ex , enabling eade s o unde s and he in ellec ual ounda ions o
con empo a y economic p ac ices, e en as ea ly heo ies la gely o e looked he ecological
and social dimensions o sus ainabili y. This examina ion is pi o al, as i highligh s he
limi a ions o ea ly economic models, emphasising he need o a ans o ma i e shi in
esponse o he cu en global challenges, such as en i onmen al deg ada ion and social
inequali y. This ealisa ion unde sco es he impo ance o inco po a ing e hical p inciples
and a commi men o sus ainabili y in economic hinking, he eby se ing he s age o he
subsequen sec ions.
In con as , Sec ion 3.2 explici ly in eg a es sus ainabili y in o he economic discou se,
e lec ing he g owing ecogni ion ha adi ional economic models a e insu icien o
achie e sus ainable de elopmen . This segmen in oduces con empo a y economic heo-
ies ha encompass social and en i onmen al conside a ions, ad oca ing o a undamen al
shi owa ds amewo ks ha p io i ise ecological esilience, social equi y, and e hical
go e nance. The sec ion explo es inno a i e app oaches o sus ainabili y in economic
policy, wi h p ac ical examples demons a ing he dynamic ela ionship be ween economic
sys ems and en i onmen al s ewa dship.
Finally, Sec ion 3.3 examines how economic heo ies a e applied o eal-wo ld sus-
ainable de elopmen challenges, highligh ing hei ele ance and impac . By explo ing
p ac ical examples, his sec ion demons a es how hese amewo ks in o m policy-making
and shape sus ainabili y p ac ices ac oss a ious sec o s. I in es iga es he connec ions
be ween economic g ow h, en i onmen al s ewa dship, and social equi y, illus a ing how
hese heo ies add ess c i ical issues such as clima e change, esou ce managemen , and
social inequali y. This analysis unde sco es he essen ial ole economic heo ies play in
guiding e ec i e s a egies o sus ainable de elopmen .
In i s en i e y, Sec ion 3will p o ide an in-dep h explo a ion o he his o ical de el-
opmen o economic hough , alongside eme ging pa adigms ha in eg a e economics
wi h sus ainabili y. I will illus a e how hese heo e ical ad ancemen s ansla e in o
eal-wo ld s a egies ha aim o c ea e a mo e jus and sus ainable u u e. By ocusing on
bo h he e olu ion o economic heo ies and he in eg a ion o sus ainabili y, his sec ion
o e s eade s a nuanced unde s anding o he impo ance o embedding sus ainabili y
wi hin economic discou se. This pe spec i e lays he ounda ion o a u he examina ion
o how hese in e connec ed hemes in luence local and global esponses o he p essing
en i onmen al and socie al challenges o he p esen day.
3.1. His o ical and Theo e ical Ad ancemen s in Economic Though Wi hou Di ec ly
Add essing Sus ainabili y
The his o ical and heo e ical e olu ion o economic hough encapsula es he p og es-
si e e inemen o economic p inciples and hei implica ions o socie y. F om seminal
de ini ions ha ha e moulded he discipline o he con as ing pe spec i es o Classical,
Keynesian, and Neoclassical amewo ks, each in ellec ual epoch has o e ed unique con i-
bu ions. Mo eo e , he in e sec ion o e hical conside a ions wi h economic ad ancemen
unde sco es he mul i ace ed in luences shaping de elopmen and p ospe i y.
3.1.1. In luen ial De ini ion o Economics
The de ini ion o economics is inhe en ly mul i ace ed, wi h a ious in e p e a ions e-
lec ing he complex ela ionship be ween he economy, socie y, and indi iduals. P ominen
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 15 o 33
ligh s challenges in he u al sec o , such as o e popula ion and excessi e unp oduc i e
labou , which cons ain ag icul u al p oduc i i y. In con as , he u ban sec o o e s highe
p oduc i i y, s able wages, and ample employmen oppo uni ies, acili a ing indus ialisa-
ion h ough labou mig a ion. This mig a ion no only p opels indus ial expansion bu
also os e s sus ainable economic de elopmen (Lewis,1954). Howe e , while his model
e ec i ely add esses labou ansi ion dynamics in de eloping economies, i mus also
g apple wi h sus ainabili y challenges s emming om u al- o-u ban mig a ion.
To conclude, classical economis s adhe e o a la gely laissez- ai e app oach, empha-
sising he impo ance o ee ma ke s and sel - egula ion. They ad oca e o a compe -
i i e en i onmen d i en by minimal go e nmen in e e ence. In con as , Keynesian
economis s endo se ac i e go e nmen in e en ion, such as he p o ision o public goods,
he implemen a ion o egula ions, and adjus men s o he ax sys em, in o de o manage
economic luc ua ions and s abilise demand. Meanwhile, neoclassical economis s ocus on
a ional beha iou , u ili y maximisa ion, and he ole o p ices in coo dina ing supply and
demand wi hin ma ke s.
While Keynesian and Neoclassical economis s ha e made signi ican con ibu ions,
hei models ha e been c i iqued o hei o e simpli ica ion o complex economic eali ies.
Classical economics, o example, is o en c i icised o assuming pe ec compe i ion and
neglec ing ma ke ailu es, such as monopolies and ex e nali ies. Keynesian economics,
while ad oca ing o ac i e go e nmen in e en ion, has aced c i icism o i s po en ial o
c ea e in la ion and inc ease public deb i iscal policies a e mismanaged. Neoclassical eco-
nomics has been c i icised o elying hea ily on ma hema ical models and assump ions o
a ionali y, which o e look he complexi ies o human beha iou and ma ke impe ec ions.
Despi e hese c i iques, he con ibu ions o Keynesian, Neoclassical, and Classical
economis s ha e been ins umen al in shaping con empo a y economic hough . The
in eg a ion o hese heo ies has p o ided aluable insigh s in o ma ke dynamics, e-
sou ce alloca ion, and go e nmen in e en ion, helping o e ine he economic models and
policies ha add ess a ange o issues, om mac oeconomic s abilisa ion o mic o-le el
decision-making. These schools o hough con inue o o e impo an amewo ks o
analysing economic challenges, pa icula ly in he con ex o globalisa ion, inequali y, and
en i onmen al sus ainabili y.
3.1.4. The Role o E hics in Economic De elopmen and G ow h
The la e 1950s o 1970s ma ked a pi o al pe iod in economic hough , pa icula ly e-
ga ding he challenges o global economic dispa i y. Economis s began o exp ess conce ns
o e he g owing dissonance be ween he economic ad ancemen o indus ialised na ions
and he pe sis en unde de elopmen o poo e coun ies. These conce ns led o he ise
o he dependency model, i s a icula ed by A gen ine economis Raúl P ebisch, which
sc u inised he inequali ies inhe en in he global economic sys em (P ebisch,1981). Depa -
ing om adi ional economic pa adigms, he dependency model mo e deeply examined
economic inequali ies h ough a Ma xis lens, in oducing he no ion o semi-colonial ela-
ionships om he la e 19 h cen u y and a ibu ing he unde de elopmen o pe iphe al
na ions o he ad ancemen o cen al ones (Fe a o,2008).
The neo-colonial dependency model posi s ha s imula ing economic de elopmen e-
qui es in e dependen in e na ional ade ela ions (Toda o & Smi h,2012). I delinea es wo
ca ego ies o na ions: de eloped (o capi alis ) coun ies a he cen e and de eloping (o
pe iphe al) na ions. In his amewo k, de eloped na ions, which con ol p oduc ion and
capi al, expo goods o de eloping coun ies, he eby pe pe ua ing unequal consump ion
pa e ns. This ade ela ionship keeps pe iphe al na ions dependen upon he p oduc ion
s uc u es o de eloped na ions, esul ing in cons ained g ow h p ospec s. The exploi a-
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 16 o 33
ion o cheape labou in de eloping na ions u he en enches his dispa i y, leading o
low wages and supp essed capi al accumula ion, which ul ima ely inhibi s he g ow h and
de elopmen o hese economies (Ma x,1887a,1893,1894;Toda o & Smi h,2012).
In con as , libe al economic heo ies, ini ially championed by hinke s like Vol ai e,
John Locke, Adam Smi h, and Immanuel Kan , o e a di e gen pe spec i e on economic
g ow h and de elopmen . These heo ies ad oca e o minimal go e nmen al in e en ion,
a guing ha ee ma ke s, economic eedom, p i a isa ion, and o eign in es men a e
he key d i e s o economic pe o mance. Acco ding o hese heo ies, he ee ma ke ’s
sel - egula ing na u e allows o he mos e icien alloca ion o esou ces, hus encou aging
g ow h and de elopmen . Howe e , hey also ecognise he challenges posed by sel -
in e es and he po en ial p oblems associa ed wi h s a e in e en ion. P oponen s a gue
ha he go e nmen should e ain om imposing excessi e es ic ions on he ma ke ,
lea ing economic o ces o ope a e unhinde ed o maximise p ospe i y (Hayek,1948;
Tho sen & Lie,2006)
A cen al e hical conce n wi hin bo h Keynesian and Neoclassical economics is he dis-
ibu ion o income. Economic g ow h eshapes socie al s uc u es, in luencing labou dy-
namics, ac o compensa ion, and he ela i e size o he public sec o
(Bou guihnon,2005)
.
The wo ks o John S ua Mill and John Mayna d Keynes highligh he necessi y o ad-
d essing income dis ibu ion h ough a ious social ins i u ions, unde sco ing he e hical
dimensions o economic policies. This in e play be ween edis ibu ion, e hics, and wel a e
conside a ions signi ican ly shapes a na ion’s economic ajec o y.
Ama ya Sen’s wo k u he in eg a es e hics wi h economics, posi ioning he ela-
ionship be ween e hical p inciples and economic conce ns as cen al o unde s anding
de elopmen . Sen’s capabili y app oach emphasises ha ue economic de elopmen
canno be measu ed solely by ma e ial weal h bu mus also accoun o indi iduals’ ca-
pabili ies and eedoms o li e ul illing li es. Sen ad oca es o policies ha enhance
indi iduals’ abili y o make meaning ul choices, unde sco ing ha economic g ow h
mus be inclusi e, expanding access o oppo uni ies, public goods, and social secu i y
(Sen,1979,1987,1990,1992,1999).
A is o le, in ‘The Nicomachean E hics,’ p o ides a philosophical ounda ion o un-
de s anding he e hical dimensions o economics (A is o le,1908). A is o le a gued ha
economics is a subse o e hics and poli ics, oo ed in he pu sui o human wel a e. A is-
o le c i iques he no ion ha weal h alone de ines well-being, p oposing ins ead ha i
se es as a means o enhance o e all lou ishing. Cen al o i ue e hics is he belie ha
e hical conduc , ancho ed in i ues such as jus ice, cou age, and empe ance, is essen ial
o a ul illing li e, cha ac e ised by a balance o a ional, emo ional, and social acul ies
(Richa d,2001). A is o le ou lines a hie a chy o goods ha con ibu e o a good li e,
encompassing bodily goods, ex e nal possessions, and soul goods, such as knowledge,
lo e, iendship, and sel -es eem. A is o le unde sco es he impo ance o e hical i ues
in cul i a ing mu ual us , a undamen al pilla o ade and he e icien unc ioning o
ma ke s, as a icula ed by Adam Smi h (A is o le,1908;Messe ly,2013). Smi h elabo a es
on how e hical conside a ions os e us and acili a e he di ision o labou , enhancing
p oduc i i y and con ibu ing o sus ainable economic g ow h (B uni & Sugden,2000).
Jean-Bap is e Say u he accen ua es he symbio ic ela ionship be ween mo ali y
and economic p ospe i y, asse ing ha success ul en ep eneu ship depends on mo al
a ibu es such as judgemen , pe se e ance, and wo ldly knowledge. Say claims ha a na-
ion’s economic i ali y is in insically linked o i s mo al ab ic, ein o cing he connec ion
be ween e hical beha iou and economic ad ancemen (Say & Swanson,2001).
Simila ly, John S ua Mill a icula es a nuanced pe spec i e on he common good,
esona ing wi h A is o le’s emphasis on indi idual wel a e and dis ibu i e jus ice. Mill
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 17 o 33
cau ions agains unchecked economic g ow h, ad oca ing o a s able-s a e economy o
mi iga e esou ce deple ion and p omo e equi able income dis ibu ion h ough inno a i e
social ins i u ions (Mill,1848a). Mill’s u ili a ian philosophy, g ounded in he maximisa ion
o o e all happiness and well-being, s esses he e hical du y o ac ions ha bene i he
majo i y, ega dless o in en ions (D i e ,2014;Mill,1863).
In con as , Immanuel Kan ehemen ly opposed he u ili a ian pe spec i e o e alu-
a ing ac ions solely based on ou comes, a guing ha mo ally aluable ac ions a ise om
a sense o du y, ee om pe sonal desi es o ul e io mo i es ied o happiness. Adhe -
ence o he ‘Ca ego ical Impe a i e’ was u ged, dic a ing ha one should ac only on
p inciples ha can be willed uni e sally as laws (Kan ,2002). Kan ’s e hical amewo k
unde sco es he signi icance o du y-d i en ac ions in p ese ing he mo al in eg i y o eco-
nomic sys ems, ensu ing ha indi idual ac ions con ibu e o b oade socie al well-being
(Robe & Adam,2004).
John Rawls’ heo y o jus ice p o ides ano he impo an e hical lens, ocusing on
ai ness and equali y in socie al a angemen s. Rawls’ concep o “jus ice as ai ness”
challenges con en ional economic heo ies by p io i ising he igh s o he leas ad an aged
in socie y. Rawls’ heo y a gues o policies ha ensu e equal access o basic libe ies and
esou ces, p omo ing equi y and coope a ion wi hin a democ a ic sys em. Rawls’ p inciples
o libe y and he di e ence p inciple ad oca e o an economic amewo k ha allows
o weal h gene a ion while ensu ing ha inequali ies bene i he leas well-o in socie y
(Rawls,1995,1999).
Fu he mo e, he wo k o economis s like Simon Kuzne s, Wol gang S olpe , and Paul
Samuelson explo es he complex ela ionship be ween economic g ow h and inequali y.
Simon Kuzne s iden i ied a pa e n whe e economic g ow h ini ially co ela es wi h income
inequali y. Howe e , a h eshold exis s beyond which u he inc eases in income inequali y
can hinde g ow h. Al hough pe capi a income ises, income inequali y ends o widen.
Ye , as economic de elopmen p og esses, inequali y begins o decline. Kuzne s’ indings
sugges ha indus ialisa ion and he es ablishmen o a wel a e s a e a e pi o al in he
educ ion o inequali y and p omo ing economic g ow h (Kuzne s,1955).
Wol gang S olpe and Paul Samuelson’s heo em on in e na ional ade elucida es
i s impac on inequali y be ween coun ies, pa icula ly conce ning ac o s o p oduc ion
such as capi al and labou . They asse ha ade libe alisa ion can diminish inequali y
in de eloping na ions bu exace ba e inequali y wi hin de eloped na ions. This heo em
highligh s he complexi ies o globalisa ion and ma ke isa ion, unde sco ing he necessi y
o policies ha add ess bo h domes ic and in e na ional dispa i ies (Oye aa e al.,2016).
In summa y, he e hical dimensions o economic heo y a e in eg al o unde s anding
how g ow h can be achie ed in a manne ha is jus , sus ainable, and inclusi e. The
in eg a ion o e hical conside a ions in o economic policies ensu es ha g ow h bene i s all
membe s o socie y, os e ing a mo e equi able and p ospe ous u u e.
3.2. Economics Theo ies In eg a ing Social and En i onmen al Aspec s Wi hin
Sus ainabili y F amewo ks
The concep o sus ainable de elopmen , as de ined by B und land’s epo , highligh s
humani y’s e hical obliga ions o bo h he li ing and u u e gene a ions. I accen ua es
he mo al aspec s o weal h accumula ion, esou ce edis ibu ion, and he educ ion o
inequali y as essen ial o sus ainabili y (Kei sch,2018). Indeed, sus ainabili y wi hou an
e hical amewo k esembles an emp y essel (Van,2013). In economics, pa icula ly, he
in eg a ion o no ma i e p inciples, such as social jus ice, human solida i y, compassion o
he impo e ished, and espec o ecological limi s, is i al o unde s anding and achie ing
sus ainable de elopmen . By analysing and inco po a ing socie al alues in o economic
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 18 o 33
models, he po en ial o a aining sus ainabili y is signi ican ly enhanced (Langhelle,1999;
O’Ha a,1998;Van,2013).
P ominen pos -Vic o ian economis s, such as Smi h, Mal hus, Rica do, Say, Mill, and
Ma shall, displayed scan conce n o esou ce deple ion o en i onmen al issues, p ima ily
ocusing on conse a ion and mine al esou ce managemen , hus ma ginalising esou ce
economics wi hin economic hough . Howe e , ollowing Wo ld Wa II, he ields o e-
sou ce and en i onmen al economics gained momen um wi hin he neoclassical pa adigm,
d i en by app ehensions su ounding esou ce demand and deple ion. In luen ial pub-
lica ions, such as he Paley Repo published in 1952 and Man’s Role in Changing he Face
o he Ea h published in 1955, unde sco ed he inc easing demand o esou ces and he
in ensi ying en i onmen al deg ada ion. These landma k wo ks signi ied he ini ial in-
eg a ion o en i onmen al economics in o he wide na a i e o mains eam economic
hough (Bagge hun e al.,2009;Bede ,2011;Pea ce,2002;Ropke,2004;Spash,1999).
By he la e 20 h cen u y, en i onmen al economics had i mly aligned wi h neoclassical
p inciples, wi h concep s such as ma ke ailu e and ex e nali ies becoming p ominen .
Nega i e ex e nali ies, including pollu ion, p omp ed s a e in e en ions like axes and
subsidies o mi iga e en i onmen al de imen . Howe e , challenges in quan i ying en-
i onmen al bene i s and de ining p ope y igh s complica e he alloca ion o esou ces.
Con empo a y en i onmen al economis s now concen a e on ec i ying ma ke ailu es
h ough public goods p o ision, ma ke egula ion, and in o ma ion dissemina ion, ad o-
ca ing o he p icing o en i onmen al goods and se ices o e lec hei sca ci y, he eby
mi iga ing o e use and en i onmen al ha m (Bede ,2011;Ojanen e al.,2017;Pigou,1920;
Spash,1999).
Despi e i s ad ancemen , en i onmen al economics has been c i iqued o i s eliance
on neoclassical ene s, o en o e looking he in insic alue o na u e and he ‘ igh s o
na u e’. C i ics a gue ha he ield o e simpli ies en i onmen al issues, a ibu ing hem
p edominan ly o economic in e ac ions while neglec ing he b oade ecological con ex
(Daly,1993; an den Be gh,2001). Fu he mo e, he emphasis on ma ke -d i en e iciency
wi hin en i onmen al economics necessi a es a b oade app oach, add essing he equi y
issues and biophysical limi a ions ha a e essen ial o sys ema ic socie al ad ancemen .
C i ics p opose inco po a ing en i onmen al and social cos s in o economic assessmen s
h ough mone a y and biophysical accoun s alongside o he non-mone a y alua ion
me hods (Bagge hun e al.,2009;Daly,1992,1993;Venka achalam,2006).
In mid-20 h cen u y discou se, wel a e economics, g ounded in cos –bene i analysis,
eme ged as a s uc u ed app oach o policy egula ion and esou ce alloca ion (Pea ce,
1998). Resea ch by economis s such as Hicks, Kaldo , and Robbins acili a ed he p ac ical
applica ion o wel a e economics, pa icula ly in in as uc u e p ojec s and policy egula-
ions. While he cos –bene i analysis p o ided a p agma ic amewo k, i s applica ion o en
aced challenges ela ed o equi y, e hical conside a ions, and he alua ion o in angible
bene i s (Gowdy,2004;Hicks,1939,1943;Kaldo ,1939;Pea ce,1998).
By he la e 1980s, ecological economics eme ged as a dis inc discipline, ca alysed
by heo e ical i s wi hin en i onmen al and esou ce economics (Bagge hun e al.,2009;
Bede ,2011;
Spash,1999). The o ma ion o he In e na ional Socie y o Ecological Eco-
nomics (ISEE) in 1987 epi omised his pa adigm shi owa ds in eg a ing economics,
ecology, and sus ainabili y. Ecological economics o e s esh pe spec i es on en i onmen-
al policy and esou ce managemen , p omo ing a plu alis ic me hodology o s udying
mac oeconomic dynamics, ecological oo p in s, long- e m sus ainabili y, and he in i-
ca e ela ionship be ween en i onmen al ac o s and economic sys ems (Cos anza,1989;
Daly,2007;Ropke,2005;Venka achalam,2006).
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 19 o 33
Ecological economics con as s wi h en i onmen al economics, al hough bo h ields
in es iga e he in ica e ela ionships be ween human ac i i y, he economy, and he en-
i onmen o os e sus ainable de elopmen . Ecological economics ques ions se e al
neoclassical assump ions, such as hose ega ding consume beha iou , pe ec in o ma-
ion, he heo y o ma ginal p oduc i i y in dis ibu ion, and he applica ion o cos –bene i
analysis (Bagge hun e al.,2009;Daly,1992). P oponen s con end ha adi ional neoclas-
sical pe spec i es po ay he economy as an isola ed en i y, neglec ing c ucial elemen s
such as ene gy lows ha sus ain i al biogeochemical cycles. They a gue ha , while
en i onmen al economics p ima ily seeks o op imise esou ce alloca ion and e iciency, i
o en o e looks conside a ions ega ding he op imal physical scale o he economy and
equi able dis ibu ion (Cos anza & Neill,1984;Daly,2007;Hammond & Winne ,2009).
Ecological economis s also emphasise he need o philosophical and e hical dimen-
sions in economic discou se, ad oca ing o in a- and in e gene a ional equi y, mo al
esponsibili ies owa d non-human en i ies, communal alues, and he socio-cul u al con-
ex (Bede ,2011;Daly,1992;Spash,1999). They con es he idea ha echnology alone
can alle ia e en i onmen al deg ada ion, asse ing ha ma e ial expansion has eached
c i ical limi s and ha a luen na ions disp opo iona ely exploi na u al esou ces, ex-
ace ba ing en i onmen al bu dens and inequali ies (Bede ,2011). Ul ima ely, ecological
economis s champion an economic amewo k ha p io i ises e icien alloca ion, equi able
dis ibu ion, and sus ainable scale, ecognising he in e connec edness o hese p inciples
wi h social, poli ical, and e hical conce ns. They ad oca e o a communal app oach o
sha ing alues and esponsibili ies, shi ing he ocus om me e esou ce p ese a ion o
os e ing a jus and sus ainable socie y, he eby en iching economic analysis wi h social,
poli ical, and e hical conside a ions ha we e p e iously elega ed o policymake s o
ma ke mechanisms (Cos anza,1989;Daly,2007;Spash,1993).
Mo eo e , he dispa i y be ween weak and s ong sus ainabili y highligh s a signi i-
can con en ion be ween hese pa adigms. En i onmen al economics gene ally suppo s
weak sus ainabili y, while ecological economics ad oca es s ong sus ainabili y. Weak
sus ainabili y posi s ha main aining o subs i u ing one o m o capi al o ano he o e
ime can acili a e in e gene a ional equi y and sus ainable de elopmen . This pe spec i e,
oo ed in neoclassical g ow h heo y, elies hea ily on he wo ks o economis s such as
Robe Solow and John Ha wick (Ha wick,1977,1978;Solow,1974,1993). I ca ego ises
capi al in o inancial, human, and na u al o ms, encompassing he esou ces, en i on-
men s, and biodi e si y ha a e essen ial o ecosys em se ices. Wi hin his amewo k,
he o al s ock o human-made and na u al capi al is an icipa ed o emain s able o e
ime. Sus ainabili y, in his con ex , is cha ac e ised by a non-dec easing o al capi al s ock,
which assumes ha human-made capi al can adequa ely subs i u e o na u al capi al.
This pe spec i e, howe e , o e looks he inhe en limi a ions o capi al subs i u ion and
ails o assign any unique signi icance o he p ese a ion o na u al capi al (Figge,2005;
Gu es,1996)
. Howe e , c i ics highligh ha eliance on capi al subs i u ion in weak sus-
ainabili y can yield bo h posi i e and nega i e ou comes. While i may enhance quali y
o li e, such as h ough coal use o elec ici y p oduc ion, i can also p ecipi a e ecologi-
cal de as a ion, as exempli ied by Nau u’s phospha e mining. Despi e ini ial economic
bene i s, he ensuing en i onmen al deg ada ion and economic ins abili y unde sco e he
limi a ions o weak sus ainabili y (Pollock,2014).
In con as , s ong sus ainabili y p io i ises he p ese a ion o exis ing na u al capi al
and i s i eplaceable ecological se ices. Rejec ing he no ion o subs i u abili y be ween na -
u al and human-made capi al, i iden i ies ce ain ‘c i ical na u al capi als’— unc ions ha
a e i al and canno be eplaced. Fo ins ance, he ozone laye ’s ole in sus aining ecosys-
ems is indispensable. S ong sus ainabili y places ecological in eg i y abo e economic
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 20 o 33
gains, ad oca ing o na u e’s inhe en igh o exis and unde sco ing he need o p ese e
esou ces in hei o iginal s a e o u u e gene a ions (Daly,1990;
Ha is & Codu ,2004
).
Addi ionally, i inco po a es biophysical cons ain s in o i s alua ion amewo k, ecognis-
ing he in insic link be ween biophysical and socioeconomic ep oduc ion, a s a k con as
o weak sus ainabili y’s subjec i e u ili y-based pe spec i e, which dis ega ds biophysical
limi a ions (Boos,2015;Ropke,2005;Venka achalam,2006).
The dis inc ion be ween weak and s ong sus ainabili y illus a es di e ing s a egies
o add essing en i onmen al challenges. While weak sus ainabili y emphasises capi al
subs i u ion and subjec i e u ili y, s ong sus ainabili y o eg ounds ecological in eg i y
and acknowledges he i eplaceable na u e o ce ain na u al esou ces. The p e e ence o
ei he pa adigm signi ican ly shapes economic heo y, en i onmen al policy, and esou ce
managemen s a egies, ul ima ely in luencing socie y’s collec i e capaci y o achie e
sus ainable de elopmen (Ma ins,2016).
In summa y, he heo ies ou lined abo e in Sec ions 3.1 and 3.2 exhibi s a complex
in e play o simila i ies and dis inc ions ega ding economic pe spec i es and sus ainabili y,
pa icula ly d awn om he wo ks o seminal economis s. Mos undamen ally, classical
economis s like Adam Smi h, Al ed Ma shall, and Da id Rica do ame hei a gumen s
a ound he p oduc ion and alloca ion o esou ces, emphasising he indi idual choices,
ma ke dynamics, and mo al dimensions wi hin economic ansac ions. They p opose
ha alues such as us , empa hy, and ai ness signi ican ly in luence ma ke ope a ions,
indica ing a sha ed ecogni ion o e hical conside a ions in economic beha iou .
In con as , Paul Samuelson expands on ea lie de ini ions by p io i ising b oade
socie al dynamics in managing sca ce esou ces, aligning closely wi h sus ainable p ac-
ices. The ocus e lec s an e olu ion in economic hough ha anscends indi idualism,
ad oca ing o a balance be ween cu en p ospe i y and u u e sus ainabili y. This b oade
pe spec i e ep esen s a signi ican ex ension o ea lie a gumen s by in eg a ing he e hical
amewo ks and concep s o social jus ice in o economic discou se, poin ing owa ds a
mo e collec i e app oach o esou ce managemen .
Fu he ex ending his dialogue, Keynesian economics adds ano he laye by empha-
sising agg ega e demand and he dis ibu ion o income, which shapes economic ou comes
and wel a e. In con as o mo e adi ional pe spec i es ha p io i ise supply ac o s,
Keynesian hough unde lines he ole o go e nmen in e en ion in s abilising economies,
pa icula ly du ing down u ns—ma ks o a mo e p og essi e economic philosophy.
C i ics o neoclassical and en i onmen al economics p esen opposing iewpoin s
ega ding sus ainable ins umen s. These c i ics a gue ha such amewo ks o en o e look
undamen al ecological p inciples and sys emic inequali ies, p io i ising ma ke -d i en
e iciency o e in insic na u al alues. P oponen s o ecological economics challenge he
assump ions o neoclassical models, which hey claim isola e he economy om ecological
eali ies and ail o ecognise he limi s o esou ce subs i u ion. They a gue o s ong
sus ainabili y, which emphasises he p ese a ion o na u al capi al and ejec s he idea
ha economic g ow h can ully eplace ecological sys ems. Dependency heo is s add
ano he laye o c i ique by highligh ing he s uc u al inequali ies in global economic
sys ems, con as ing sha ply wi h libe al economic heo ies ha p omo e ee ma ke s
and minimal s a e in e en ion. They a gue ha weal h gene a ion in de eloped na ions
o en pe pe ua es unde de elopmen in pe iphe al coun ies, hus highligh ing s uc u al
inequali ies in global ade. This illus a es a undamen al con en ion su ounding he
economic and e hical implica ions o policy decisions, placing social jus ice a he o e on
o economic discou se.
Economic heo ies ha e p og essi ely e ol ed o inco po a e social and en i onmen al
conside a ions in o sus ainabili y amewo ks. While ea ly economic models p ima ily
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 21 o 33
ocused on p oduc ion and e iciency, con empo a y app oaches inc easingly ecognise
he in e connec edness o ecological sys ems, social equi y, and economic g ow h. The
in eg a ion o e hical p inciples in o economic analysis en iches he discou se, os e ing
s a egies ha p io i ise long- e m sus ainabili y and socie al well-being. As sus ainabili y
challenges g ow mo e p essing, hese in e disciplina y app oaches o e aluable insigh s
o add essing he complexi ies o a apidly changing wo ld.
3.3. Connec ing Theo ies o Real-Wo ld Applica ions
Classical economics, wi h i s ocus on ma ke e iciency and limi ed go e nmen
in e en ion, has p o oundly in luenced global ade policies. Fo ins ance, he Wo ld
T ade O ganiza ion’s (WTO) p inciples o ee ade e lec Adam Smi h and Da id Ri-
ca do’s ad ocacy o minimising ade es ic ions (Howse,2002). Smi h’s concep o he
‘in isible hand’ inds exp ession in Denma k’s policies p omo ing g een echnologies and
enewable ene gy. Businesses inno a e in esponse o consume demand o sus ainable
solu ions, d i ing ad ancemen s in wind powe , o ganic a ming, and ene gy e iciency
(
K. Ali e al.,2023
;James,2005). Simila ly, in Kenya, mobile money se ices like M-Pesa
empowe small-scale en ep eneu s by enhancing inancial access, esona ing wi h Smi h’s
p inciples o economic empowe men and socie al wel a e (Des oche s,2009;James,2005;
Kikulwe e al.,2014).
Rica do’s heo y, p e alen in global ade policies, ad oca es o economic e iciency
and compa a i e ad an age. Canada, a de eloped coun y, le e ages i s ex ensi e na -
u al esou ces and echnological capabili ies o p oduce, u ilise, and expo sus ainable
p oduc s h ough ad anced me hods, he eby enhancing e iciency while main aining an
ecological balance (Mille ,2019). Likewise, E hiopia’s ocus is on high-quali y o ganic
co ee p oduc ion and om ha , apa om domes ic consump ion, hey also expo . This
exempli ies Rica do’s ideas o he na ion ha specialises in sus ainably g own co ee a-
cili a ing economic bene i s alongside en i onmen ally iendly a ming p ac ices (Wo ld
Bank,2021).
Say’s law, which posi s ha supply c ea es i s own demand, inds a mode n exp ession
in he ealm o sus ainable de elopmen , pa icula ly in he enewable ene gy sec o . As
echnological inno a ion d i es he inc eased a ailabili y o sus ainable ene gy sou ces,
such as sola panels and wind u bines, he e is a co esponding consume shi owa d
adop ing hese cleane al e na i es. This p inciple unde sco es he syne gy be ween supply-
side ad ancemen s and e ol ing ma ke demands. Ge many exempli ies his dynamic
by in eg a ing policies ha bols e sus ainable de elopmen . I s ocus on oca ional ain-
ing and en ep eneu ial skill-building enables indi iduals o inno a e g een echnologies,
such as enewable ene gy and was e managemen . These ini ia i es no only s imula e
job c ea ion bu also ad ance p ac ices like ecycling and ene gy-e icien solu ions. The
policy e lec s how go e nmen in es men s in enewable ene gy in as uc u e and clean
echnologies ca alyse bo h ma ke demand and en i onmen al bene i s (
Leh e al.,2012;
OECD & Eu opean Cen e o he De elopmen o Voca ional T aining,2014
;Lambini e al.,
2021). In addi ion, in India, a g owing numbe o s a -ups embody Say’s law by add ess-
ing sus ainabili y challenges h ough inno a i e ma ke solu ions. Companies ocusing
on was e- o-ene gy echnologies and low-cos sola panels illus a e how en ep eneu ial
e o s can c ea e demand o sus ainable p oduc s. Fo ins ance, he de elopmen o
a o dable sola ene gy sys ems inc eases access o clean powe , pa icula ly in u al a eas,
os e ing a sel -sus aining ma ke o enewable ene gy (Kol e e al.,2023;Ha ichandan
e al.,2023;Go owa a e al.,2024). These examples show ha , when go e nmen s and
en ep eneu s p io i ise in es men s in sus ainable echnologies, hey can gene a e a i u-
ous cycle o supply-d i en demand. Policies such as incen i es o elec ic ehicles o ax
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 22 o 33
b eaks o g een s a -ups u he ampli y hese e ec s by educing ba ie s o ma ke en y,
hus aligning economic ac i i ies wi h sus ainable de elopmen objec i es (Lakhanpal
e al.,2023;Al enbu g,2024). This in e play be ween supply-side inno a ion and ma -
ke adap a ion illus a es how Say’s law can se e as a amewo k o ad ancing global
sus ainabili y goals.
Ka l Ma x’s c i ique o capi alism highligh s issues o esou ce and labou exploi a-
ion. This pe spec i e esona es wi h sus ainable de elopmen mo emen s ad oca ing
o ai ade and labou igh s o ackle inequi ies wi hin he global supply chain. Fai
ade ce i ica ion ini ia i es aspi e o ensu e ha p oduce s in de eloping na ions a e
compensa ed equi ably, he eby bols e ing social equi y while p omo ing en i onmen al
sus ainabili y (Huyb ech s e al.,2023)—a e lec ion o Ma xis analysis. Sweden’s app oach
o public wel a e and en i onmen al sus ainabili y embodies Ma x’s c i iques o capi alis
inequali y, as i os e s social wel a e policies alongside s ong en i onmen al egula ions
o equi ably dis ibu e esou ces, ensu ing ha economic g ow h bene i s all socie al laye s
(Khan e al.,2023). Fu he mo e, Boli ia’s ad ocacy o wa e igh s and land e o ms e-
lec s Ma xis p inciples ega ding esou ce con ol, wi h indigenous communi ies esis ing
capi alis exploi a ion and championing sus ainable managemen o hei na u al esou ces
(Shenkin,2024).
Thomas Mal hus emphasises he ension be ween popula ion g ow h and esou ce
a ailabili y. This no ion is pe inen o con empo a y discussions su ounding o e popula-
ion and esou ce deple ion. Fo ins ance, ini ia i es aimed a sus ainable u ban planning
and ag icul u e s i e o balance popula ion g ow h wi h ecological cons ain s, ensu ing
he sus ainable u ilisa ion o esou ces like wa e and a able land wi hou comp omising
u u e gene a ions’ needs. Japan, despi e acing challenges om an ageing popula ion
and declining bi h a es, in eg a es Mal husian p inciples in o i s policies. The na ion
emphasises sus ainable ag icul u e, esou ce-e icien u ban de elopmen , and ad anced
esou ce managemen s a egies, demons a ing a p oac i e app oach o add essing bo h
demog aphic and ecological challenges (Hui e al.,2023;Li e al.,2023). Meanwhile, in
Nige ia, Mal husian anxie ies su ounding popula ion g ow h and esou ce deple ion
spu g ass oo s mo emen s ad oca ing o amily planning and sus ainable ag icul u al
p ac ices, wi h educa ional ini ia i es designed o mi iga e po en ial c ises (E ans,2023).
John S ua Mill’s u ili a ianism philosophy posi s ha ac ions should s i e o max-
imise happiness o he g ea es numbe . This p inciple in o ms policymaking in sus ainable
de elopmen , s ee ing policies ha ha monise economic g ow h wi h en i onmen al p o-
ec ion and social equi y. Fo ins ance, u ban g een spaces a e o en championed h ough
his lens, as hey yield en i onmen al bene i s, bols e esiden s’ men al well-being, and
enhance communi y cohesion—an embodimen o he u ili a ian pu sui o collec i e happi-
ness. New Zealand’s commi men o sus ainabili y exempli ies Mill’s u ili a ian e hics, as i
engende s policies in ended o bene i he g ea es numbe , as illus a ed by i s p og essi e
en i onmen al legisla ion and ocus on social equi y (Whi eside,2022).
John Mayna d Keynes’ ad ocacy o go e nmen in e en ion du ing economic down-
u ns inds applica ion in sus ainable de elopmen ini ia i es. Go e nmen in es men s
in g een in as uc u e p ojec s, such as enewable ene gy and public anspo a ion, can
s imula e economic ac i i y. Fo example, he Uni ed S a es ini ia ed nume ous p ojec s
du ing he G ea Dep ession ha p o ided employmen and also enhanced long- e m
sus ainabili y ia in es men s in g een ene gy p ojec s and in as uc u e imp o emen s
(Gal in & Healy,2020). B azil’s pos -2008 s a egies combined po e y educ ion wi h
sus ainable ag icul u al p ac ices, e lec ing Keynesian p inciples o le e aging public
spending o p omo e equi able g ow h and social wel a e (Nassi e al.,2020).
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 23 o 33
Al ed Ma shall’s insigh s in o economies o scale a e e iden in he enewable ene gy
sec o , whe e la ge-scale sola and wind a ms achie e cos e iciencies. Fo ins ance, com-
panies like Tesla ha e scaled up ba e y p oduc ion o capi alise on economies o scale, en-
de ing elec ic ehicles mo e a o dable and hus acili a ing wide
adop ion—p omo ing
sus ainable anspo a ion (Riley,2022). In addi ion, he eme gence o u ban a ms in
ci ies like De oi showcases Ma shall’s p inciples by p oducing posi i e ex e nali ies (such
as mi iga ing ood dese s and imp o ing ai quali y) and augmen ing local economic
esilience (Vaseau-Sleiman,2018).
Lionel Robbins’ emphasis on sca ci y necessi a es e icien esou ce alloca ion. This
aligns wi h sus ainable de elopmen ’s ci cula economy model, which ad oca es minimis-
ing was e h ough esou ce euse. Cali o nia’s wa e supply s a egy 2022 o enhance wa e
sca ci y issue exempli ies sys ema ic e o s o diminish esou ce consump ion h ough
sus ainable p ac ices (Newsom,2022).
Robe Solow’s g ow h model s esses he ole o echnological inno a ion in achie ing
economic ad ancemen while conside ing capi al and labou . A salien illus a ion o his
can be ound in he ansi ion o enewable ene gy echnologies, whe eby in es men in
esea ch and de elopmen ca alyses e iciency and cos educ ion. The declining cos o
sola panels se es as a pi o al ac o in p omo ing sus ainable ene gy usage on bo h
na ional and global scales. In China, signi ican in es men s in enewable ene gy ha e
p ecipi a ed subs an ial ad ancemen s in sola panel p oduc ion, e ec i ely balancing
economic g ow h wi h en i onmen al sus ainabili y (Jiang & Raza,2024).
Wal e Ros ow’s model delinea es linea s ages o economic g ow h, wi h many de el-
oping na ions now implemen ing sus ainable de elopmen ini ia i es ha align wi h his
amewo k, necessi a ing ansi ions om ag icul u al o mo e indus ialised, se ice-based
economies in sus ainable manne s. Vie nam’s ansi ion om ag a ian economic ame-
wo ks o a mo e indus ialised economy— h ough in es men s in sus ainable ag icul u e
and eco- ou ism—illus a es e o s o leap og o highe s ages o de elopmen while
conside ing en i onmen al ac o s (Raihan e al.,2024).
A hu Lewis’ model explica es he ansi ion om a adi ional ag icul u al economy
o a mode n indus ialised one. This dual-sec o model is obse able in bo h de eloped and
de eloping coun ies. Fo example, Copenhagen in es s in public anspo a ion and g een
in as uc u e o c ea e jobs and imp o e quali y o li e (Ismi & Jan,2022), illus a ing
Lewis’s ansi ion p inciples. Meanwhile, E hiopia’s G ow h and T ans o ma ion Plan
unde sco es a shi om subsis ence a ming o indus ialisa ion by in es ing in sus ainable
ag icul u al p ac ices and u al indus y (Ababa,2016). The plan aligns closely wi h Lewis’s
heo e ical amewo k while pu suing sus ainable de elopmen goals.
In he con ex o communi y-o ien ed en i onmen al ini ia i es, A is o le’s emphasis
on i ue e hics and he common good is pa icula ly ele an . A is o le con ended ha
human lou ishing is achie ed h ough i uous li ing and communal e o s. Ini ia i es
such as communi y ga dens exempli y his e hos by p omo ing en i onmen al sus ainabil-
i y and os e ing social cohesion (Kanos amhi a,2024). These ga dens no only p o ide
esh p oduce bu also engage local esiden s in heal hy collec i e ac i i ies—an embod-
imen o A is o le’s ision o he common good. Addi ionally, Copenhagen’s in eg a ed
u ban planning encou ages i uous li ing h ough walking, cycling, and public anspo
implemen a ion, mo i a ing ci izens owa ds en i onmen ally sus ainable li es yles ha
p io i ise communal well-being (S i as a a,2022).
Ama ya Sen’s capabili ies app oach unde sco es he impe a i e o a o ding indi-
iduals oppo uni ies o ealise hei po en ial. A pe inen example lies in he Uni ed
Na ions’ Sus ainable De elopmen Goals (SDGs), which highligh educa ion (SDG 4) and
gende equali y (SDG 5) as c i ical dimensions. Ini ia i es ha imp o e access o educa ion
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 24 o 33
o women and ma ginalised communi ies in coun ies such as India and Bangladesh
augmen hei capabili ies, os e ing ull pa icipa ion in economic li e and unde pinning
sus ainable de elopmen h ough inclusi e g ow h (S. Ali & Sha eeq,2021;Sunny e al.,
2021). The Human De elopmen Index (HDI), which accoun s o heal h, educa ion, and
income me ics, exempli ies Sen’s philosophy and in o ms policies a ge ed a enhancing
social equi y. P og ammes guided by he capabili y app oach p io i ise human well-being,
u he ing inclusi e and sus ainable de elopmen (Anand,2021;Desai,1991).
Simon Kuzne s p oposed he Kuzne s Cu e, posi ing ha , while economic g ow h
may ini ially engende en i onmen al deg ada ion, i subsequen ly declines as socie ies
become weal hie and can in es in cleane echnologies and be e egula ions. In Russia,
an inc ease in ca bon dioxide emissions was obse ed wi h economic g ow h. Howe e ,
a e income eaches a ce ain h eshold, CO2 declines (Ke enci,2018). Fu he mo e, he
Uni ed Kingdom exhibi s an in e ed U-shaped en i onmen al Kuzne s Cu e, wi h a p o-
jec ed u ning poin occu ing app oxima ely in he mid- wen ie h cen u y. This in lexion
co esponds wi h egula o y measu es designed o mi iga e pollu ion and he coun y’s
dedica ion o ad ancing he ene gy ansi ion necessa y o sus ainable de elopmen
(Ben Ama ,2021).
Paul Samuelson’s economic heo ies a e p o oundly connec ed o he deploymen o
go e nmen s imulus measu es. In imes o economic down u n, go e nmen s equen ly
adop s a egies, such as ex ensi e in as uc u e in es men s o ax elie ini ia i es, o
eju ena e agg ega e demand and educe unemploymen . These in e en ions embody
he Keynesian dimension o Samuelson’s neoclassical syn hesis, which emphasises he
c ucial ole o iscal policy in sa egua ding economic s abili y du ing pe iods o con ac ion
(Skousen,1997). Mo eo e , Samuelson highligh ed he pi o al ole o in e es a es as a
mone a y policy le e o coun e ac economic luc ua ions. Wi hin he amewo k o his
neoclassical syn hesis, his aligns seamlessly wi h Keynesian p inciples, whe ein cen al
banks manipula e in e es a es o in luence bo owing, expendi u e, and in es men ,
he eby alle ia ing he impac s o cyclical economic changes. A p ominen illus a ion
o his app oach is he Fede al Rese e’s esponse o he 2008 Global Financial C isis.
The Fed educed he ede al unds a e o nea -ze o le els, aiming o enhance c edi
accessibili y, s imula e consume expendi u e, and bols e he dis essed housing sec o .
Con e sely, du ing he pos -pandemic economic eco e y, cen al banks, including he
Fede al Rese e, signi ican ly inc eased in e es a es o comba su ging in la ion. This
highligh s Samuelson’s heo ies in ac ion, showcasing how mone a y policy can unc ion
as a coun e -cyclical ool o e ec i ely mode a e economic ola ili y (Ih ig & Walle ,2024).
En i onmen al economics p io i ises ma ke -o ien ed s a egies o ackle en i on-
men al challenges, wi h ca bon p icing eme ging as a pi o al app oach. Mechanisms
such as ca bon axes and cap-and- ade sys ems aim o in e nalise he ex e nal cos s o
ca bon emissions, e ec i ely mone ising pollu ion. Sweden’s success ul implemen a ion
o a ca bon ax has signi ican ly educed emissions (Ma insson e al.,2024). Addi ion-
ally, he ield ad oca es o adop ing eco- iendly p ac ices o mi iga e g eenhouse gas
emissions and p omo e sus ainabili y. In Kenya, he G een Bel Mo emen , es ablished by
Wanga i Maa hai, exempli ies a g ass oo s ini ia i e in e wining en i onmen al es o a-
ion wi h women’s empowe men . By mobilising communi ies o plan ees and es o e
ecosys ems, i comba s de o es a ion, os e s social equi y, and highligh s he impo ance
o local go e nance and communi y pa icipa ion in achie ing sus ainable de elopmen
(
Chi andi e & Chi isa,2023
;Njagi,2022). On he o he hand, ecological economics empha-
sises he in e dependence o economies and ecosys ems, p io i ising long- e m esou ce
sus ainabili y and na u al sys em heal h. Ad oca es o he sus ainable managemen o
common esou ces employ pa icipa o y go e nance and ecosys em-based managemen
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 31 o 33
Ma insson, G., Saj os, L., S ömbe g, P., & Thomann, C. (2024). The e ec o ca bon p icing on i m emissions: E idence om he
Swedish CO2 ax. The Re iew o Financial S udies,37(6), 1848–1886. [C ossRe ]
Ma x, K. (1887a). Capi al (1s ed., Vol. 1). P og ess Publishe s.
Ma x, K. (1887b). Chap e eigh : Cons an capi al and a iable capi al. In Capi al (Vol. 1). P og ess Publishe s.
Ma x, K. (1893). Capi al (2nd ed., Vol. 2). P og ess Publishe s.
Ma x, K. (1894). Capi al (Vol. 3). In e na ional Publishe .
Ma x, K., & Engels, F. (1970). Feue bach, opposi ion o he ma e ialis and idealis ou look. In C. J. A hu (Ed.), The ge man ideology
(p. 56). In e na ional Publishe s Co.
Mason, T. W. (1988). Economics and impac assessmen : Ce e is pa ibus o mu a is mu andis. Impac Assessmen ,6(3–4), 165–171.
[C ossRe ]
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Rande s, J., & Beh ens, W. W., III. (1972). The limi s o g ow h. Uni e se Books.
Messe ly, J. (2013). A is o le on he good li e. Reason and meaning. A ailable online: h ps:// easonandmeaning.com/2013/12/19/
a is o le-on- he-good-and-meaning ul-li e/ (accessed on 5 Augus 2019).
Mille , E. (2019). B anching Ou : How Canada’s Fo es y P oduc s Sec o is Reshaping i s Fu u e. SSRN Elec onic Jou nal,36. [C ossRe ]
Mill, J. S. (1848a). CHAPTER VI: O he s a iona y s a e. In S. W. J. Ashley (Ed.), P inciples o poli ical economy wi h some o hei applica ions
o social philosophy (pp. 750–752). D. Apple on and Company.
Mill, J. S. (1848b). Chap e X: O in e e ences o go e nmen g ounded on e oneous heo ies. In S. W. J. Ashley (Ed.), P inciples o
poli ical economy wi h some o hei applica ions o social philosophy (p. 922). Book V: On he In luence o Go e nmen . D. Apple on
and Company.
Mill, J. S. (1848c). P inciples o poli ical economy wi h some o hei applica ions o social philosophy (S. W. J. Ashley, Ed.; 1s ed., Vol. 1–5).
D. Apple on and Company.
Mill, J. S. (1863). U ili a ianism (1s ed.). Pa ke , Son & Bou n, Wes S and.
Nassi , A., Feijó, C., & A aújo, E. (2020). Mac oeconomic policies in B azil be o e and a e he 2008 global inancial c isis: B azilian
policy-make s s ill apped in he New Mac oeconomic Consensus guidelines. Camb idge Jou nal o Economics,44(4), 749–779.
[C ossRe ]
Newman, P. (1960). The e osion o Ma shall’s heo y o alue. The Qua e ly Jou nal o Economics,74(4), 587–599. [C ossRe ]
Newsom, G. (2022). Cali o nia’s wa e supply s a egy: Adap ing o a ho e , d ie u u e. A ailable online: h ps://cawa e lib a y.ne /
documen /cali o nias-wa e -supply-s a egy-adap ing- o-a-ho e -d ie - u u e/ (accessed on 17 Augus 2024).
Njagi, C. (2022). The g een bel mo emen ’s usage o a ican indigenous knowledge sys ems in he p ese a ion o moun kenya o es .
A ican Though : A Jou nal o A o-Cen ic Knowledge,1(2), 38–86.
No h, C. C. (1915). The sociological implica ions o Rica do’s economics. Ame ican Jou nal o Sociology,20(6), 764–828. [C ossRe ]
OECD & Eu opean Cen e o he De elopmen o Voca ional T aining. (2014). G eene skills and jobs. OECD. [C ossRe ]
O’Ha a, S. U. (1998). Economics, e hics and sus ainabili y: Rede ining connec ions. In e na ional Jou nal o Social Economics,25(1), 43–62.
[C ossRe ]
Ojanen, M., Zhou, W., Mille , D. C., Nie o, S. H., Mshale, B., & Pe oko sky, G. (2017). Wha a e he en i onmen al impac s o p ope y
igh s egimes in o es s, ishe ies and angelands? En i onmen al E idence,6(12), 1–23. [C ossRe ]
Ox o d Re e ence. (2024). O e iew classical economics. A ailable online: h ps://www.ox o d e e ence.com/display/10.1093/oi/
au ho i y.20110803095615788 (accessed on 5 Ap il 2024).
Oye aa , M., Vazquez-B us , D., & an Bommel, H. (2016). Globaliza ion and sus ainable de elopmen : A business pe spec i e. Macmillan
In e na ional Highe Educa ion.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuy , P. M., Bou on, I., Ho mann, T. C., Mul ow, C. D., Shamsee , L., Te zla , J. M., Akl, E. A., B ennan,
S. E., Chou, R., Glan ille, J., G imshaw, J. M., H óbja sson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Lode , E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S.,
...
Mohe , D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 s a emen : An upda ed guideline o epo ing sys ema ic e iews. Sys ema ic Re iews,
10(89), 11. [C ossRe ]
Pea ce, D. (1998). Cos —Bene i analysis and en i onmen al policy. Ox o d Re iew o Economic Policy,14(4), 84–100. [C ossRe ]
Pea ce, D. (2002). An in ellec ual his o y o en i onmen al economics. Annual Re iew o Ene gy and he En i onmen ,27, 57–81. [C ossRe ]
Pezzey, J. (1992). Sus ainable de elopmen concep s: An economic analysis. Wo ld Bank En i onmen Pape . Wo ld Bank.
Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics o wel a e (4 h ed.). MACMILLAN AND CO., L d.
Pollock, N. J. (2014). Nau u phospha e his o y and he esou ce cu se na a i e. Jou nal de La Socié éDes Océanis es,2014(138–139),
107–120. [C ossRe ]
P ebisch, R. (1981). Raul p ebisch on La in Ame ican de elopmen . Popula ion and De elopmen Re iew,7(3), 563–568. [C ossRe ]
Pu is, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Th ee pilla s o sus ainabili y: In sea ch o concep ual o igins. Sus ainabili y Science,14,
681–695. [C ossRe ]
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 32 o 33
Raihan, A., Hasan, M. A., Voumik, L. C., Pa ak, D. C., Ak e , S., & Ridwan, M. (2024). Sus ainabili y in Vie nam: Examining economic
g ow h, ene gy, inno a ion, ag icul u e, and o es s’ impac on CO
2
emissions. Wo ld De elopmen Sus ainabili y,4, 100164.
[C ossRe ]
Rawls, J. (1995). Poli ical libe alism. Columbia Uni e si y P ess.
Rawls, J. (1999). A heo y o jus ice ( e . ed.). The belknap p ess o ha a d uni e si y p ess.
Rica do, D. (1821). On he p inciples o poli ical economy and axa ion (3 d ed.). John Mu ay.
Richa d, K. (2001). A is o le’s e hics. In The s an o d encyclopedia o philosophy. The S an o d Encyclopedia o Philosophy.
Riley, G. (2022). Business cos s and p o i s—economies o scale a esla. A ailable online: h ps://www. u o 2u.ne /economics/blog/
business-cos s-and-p o i s-economies-o -scale-a - esla (accessed on 12 Sep embe 2024).
Robbins, L. (1932). An essay on he na u e and signi icance o economic science (1s ed.). MACMILLAN AND CO.
Robe , J., & Adam, C. (2004). Kan ’s mo al philosophy. In The s an o d encyclopedia o philosophy. Me aphysics Resea ch Lab, S an o d
Uni e si y.
Rocks öm, J., S e en, W., Noone, K., Pe sson, A., Chapin, F. S., III, Lambin, E. F., Len on, T. M., Sche e , M., Folke, C., Schellnhube , H.
J., Nyk is , B., de Wi , C. A., Hughes, T., an de Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sö lin, S., Snyde , P. K., Cos anza, R., S edin, U., . . . Foley,
J. A. (2009). A sa e ope a ing space o humani y. Na u e,461, 472–475. [C ossRe ] [PubMed]
Ropke, I. (2004). The ea ly his o y o mode n ecological economics. Ecological Economics,50(3–4), 293–314. [C ossRe ]
Ropke, I. (2005). T ends in he de elopmen o ecological economics om he la e 1980s o he ea ly 2000s. Ecological Economics,55,
262–290. [C ossRe ]
Samuelson, P. A., & No dhaus, W. D. (1998). Economics (16 h ed.). McG aw-Hill.
Say, J. B. (1843). A ea ise on poli ical economy; o he p oduc ion, dis ibu ion, and consump ion o weal h (6 h ed.). G igg & Ellio .
Say, J. B. (2001). CHAPTER VIII. O he Ad an ages and Disad an ages Resul ing om Di ision o Labou , and o he Ex en o Which
i May Be Ca ied (Book I. O he P oduc ion o Weal h). In A T ea ise on Poli ical Economy; o he P oduc ion, Dis ibu ion,
and Consump ion o Weal h, ed. Clemen C. and Biddle, Biddle, LL. D. ans. C. R. P insep om he 4 h ed. O he F ench,
(Philadelphia: Lippinco , G ambo & Co., 1855. 4 h-5 h ed.) (New Ame ican Edi ion, p. 38). Ba oche Books. A ailable online:
h ps://his o yo economic hough .mcmas e .ca/say/ ea ise.pd (accessed on 11 Sep embe 2024).
Say, J. B., & Swanson, R. A. (2001). T ansla ion: OLBIE. O Essay on he Means o Imp o ing he Mo als o a Na ion. U opian S udies,
12(1), 79–107.
Sen, A. (1979). Equali y o wha ? S an o d Uni e si y. A ailable online: h ps://ophi.o g.uk/si es/de aul / iles/Sen-1979
_
Equali y-o
-Wha .pd (accessed on 2 Oc obe 2024).
Sen, A. (1987). On e hics and economics. Blackwell Publishing.
Sen, A. (1990). De elopmen as capabili y expansion. In K. G i in, & J. Knigh (Eds.), Human de elopmen and he in e na ional de elopmen
s a egy o he 1990s (pp. 41–58). Palg a e Macmillan.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequali y eexamined. Ox o d Uni e si y P ess Inc.
Sen, A. (1999). De elopmen as eedom. Al ed A. Knop , Inc.
Shenkin, E. N. (2024). Bi u ca ed Boli ia: Indigenous Go e nance and Land S uggles in he Eas e n Lowlands. La in Ame ican
Pe spec i es,51(5), 5–23. [C ossRe ]
Skousen, M. (1997). The pe se e ance o Paul Samuelson’s economics. Jou nal o Economic Pe spec i es,11(2), 137–152. [C ossRe ]
Smi h, A. (1776a). An inqui y in o he na u e and causes o he weal h o na ions (S. M. Soa es, Ed.; 1s ed., Vol. I–V). Random House, Inc.
Smi h, A. (1776b). Chap e II: On es ain s upon he impo a ion om o eign coun ies o such goods as can be p oduced a home. In
An inqui y in o he na u e and causes o he weal h o na ions, book IV: On sys ems o poli ical economy. Random House, Inc.
Smi h, A. (1776c). Chap e III: On he accumula ion o capi al, o o p oduc i e and unp oduc i e labou . In An inqui y in o he na u e
and causes o he weal h o na ions, book II: On he na u e, accumula ion, and employmen o s ock. Random House, Inc.
Smi h, A. (1776d). Chap e III: On he ex ao dina y es ain s upon he impo a ion o goods o almos all kinds om hose coun ies
wi h which he balance is supposed o be disad an ageous. In An inqui y in o he na u e and causes o he weal h o na ions, book IV:
On sys ems o poli ical economy. Random House, Inc.
Smi h, A. (1776e). Tha he di ision o labou is limi ed by he ex en o he ma ke . In An inqui y in o he na u e and causes o he weal h
o na ions, book I: On he causes o imp o emen in he p oduc i e powe s. On labou , and on he o de acco ding o which i s’ p oduce is
na u ally dis ibu ed among he di e en anks o he people (Vol. I). Random House, Inc.
Smi h, A. (1790). The heo y o mo al sen imen s (6 h ed.). MεταLib i.
Smi h, A. C., Hu ni, K., Fox, J., & Van Den Hoek, J. (2023). Communi y o es managemen led o apid local o es gain in Nepal: A 29
yea mixed me hods e ospec i e case s udy. Land Use Policy,126, 106526. [C ossRe ]
Smi h, J. L. (2009). Wo ld oil: Ma ke o mayhem? The Jou nal o Economic Pe spec i es,23(3), 145–164. [C ossRe ]
Smi h, V. R. (1985). John s ua mill’s amous dis inc ion be ween p oduc ion and dis ibu ion. Economics and Philosoph,1(2), 267–284.
[C ossRe ]
Snippe, J. (1985). Finance, sa ing and in es men in Keynes’s economics. Camb idge Jou nal o Economics,9(3), 257–269. [C ossRe ]
Adm. Sci. 2025,15, 6 33 o 33
Solow, R. M. (1956). A con ibu ion o he heo y o economic g ow h. The Qua e ly Jou nal o Economics,70(1), 65–94. [C ossRe ]
Solow, R. M. (1957). Technical change and he agg ega e p oduc ion unc ion. The Re iew o Economics and S a is ics,39(3), 312–320.
[C ossRe ]
Solow, R. M. (1974). In e gene a ional equi y and exhaus ible esou ces. The Re iew o Economic S udies,41, 29–45. [C ossRe ]
Solow, R. M. (1993). An almos p ac ical s ep owa ds sus ainabili y. Resou ces Policy,17, 147–156. [C ossRe ]
Spash, C. L. (1993). Economics, e hics, and long- e m en i onmen al damages. En i onmen al E hics,15(2), 117–132. [C ossRe ]
Spash, C. L. (1999). The De elopmen o En i onmen al Thinking in Economics. En i onmen al Values,8(4), 413–435. [C ossRe ]
Spengle , J. J. (1959). Adam Smi h’s heo y o economic g ow h: Pa I. Sou he n Economic Jou nal,25(4), 397–415. [C ossRe ]
S i as a a, S. (2022). The sus ainable ci y: Lea ning om Copenhagen’s plan o ze o ca bon. A ailable online: h ps://www.spu .o g/news/
2022-08-31/sus ainable-ci y-lea ning-copenhagens-plan-ze o-ca bon (accessed on 2 Decembe 2024).
Sunny, F. A., Zuhui, H., Fu, L., & Ka imanzi a, T. T. P. (2021). Sus ainable u al de elopmen : Ini ia i es in amelio a ing key d i e s o
u al economy and associa ed challenges in achie ing SDGs in Bangladesh. In e na ional Jou nal o Business S udies and Inno a ion,
1(2), 140–163. [C ossRe ]
Ta ascio, V. J. (1971). Keynes on he sou ces o economic g ow h. The Jou nal o Economic His o y,31(2), 429–444. [C ossRe ]
Thi lwall, A. P. (2006). G ow h and de elopmen : Wi h special e e ence o de eloping economies (8 h ed.). Palg a e Macmillan.
Tho sen, D. E., & Lie, A. (2006). Wha is Neolibe alism? A ailable online: h ps://glasgow. l. alis.com/i ems/9CDBDAC2-BBEF-A00A
-8C24-25B20F95703D.h ml (accessed on 10 Janua y 2019).
Toda o, M. P., & Smi h, S. C. (2012). Economic de elopmen (11 h ed.). Pea son Educa ion, Inc.
UN. (2019). Global sus ainable de elopmen epo 2019: The u u e is now—Science o achie ing sus ainable de elopmen (p. 216). Uni ed
Na ions (UN). A ailable online: h ps://sdgs.un.o g/si es/de aul / iles/2020-07/24797GSDR
_
epo
_
2019.pd (accessed on 20
Sep embe 2024).
Uni ed Na ions. (2015). Sus ainable de elopmen goals. A ailable online: h ps://www.un.o g/sus ainablede elopmen /sus ainable
-de elopmen -goals/ (accessed on 7 No embe 2018).
Vallie e, K. (2010). P oduc ion, Dis ibu ion, and J. S. Mill. U ili as,22(2), 103–125. [C ossRe ]
an den Be gh, J. C. (2001). Ecological economics: Themes, app oaches, and di e ences wi h en i onmen al economics. Regional
En i onmen al Change,2(1), 13–23. [C ossRe ]
Van, H. G. (2013). E hics and sus ainabili y: A p ime wi h sugges ed eadings. A ailable online: h ps://isee hics. iles.wo dp ess.com/
2013/09/e hics_and_sus ainabili y_p ime .pd (accessed on 2 Sep embe 2018).
Vaseau-Sleiman, K. (2018). U ban a ming in de oi . A ailable online: h ps://glass.h cc.edu/2018/05-23/u ban- a ming-de oi
(accessed on 10 Sep embe 2024).
Venka achalam, L. (2006). En i onmen al economics and ecological economics: Whe e hey can con e ge? Ecological Economics,61,
550–558. [C ossRe ]
Vi es, G. T., Tashi, S., & Singay, J. (2023). O d agons, da a and clouds: Bhu an’s jou ney in o ca bon ma ke s, echnology, and a esilien u u e.
Wo ld Bank Blogs. A ailable online: h ps://blogs.wo ldbank.o g/en/clima echange/d agons-da a-and-clouds-bhu ans-jou ney
-ca bon-ma ke s- echnology-and- esilien (accessed on 3 Decembe 2024).
Whi eside, J. (2022). Sus ainabili y in New Zealand en i onmen al legisla ion: Sho comings o he esou ce managemen ac and
oppo uni ies p esen ed by he p oposed legisla ion. New Zealand Jou nal o En i onmen al Law,26, 21–51.
Wo ld Bank. (2021). E hiopian a me s iple co ee yields wi h sus ainable ee s umping. A ailable online: h ps://www.wo ldbank.o g/en/
news/ ea u e/2021/04/20/e hiopian- a me s- iple-co ee-yields-wi h-sus ainable- ee-s umping#:~: ex =The%20quali y%20
o %20E hiopian%20co ee,g own%20conside ably%20since%20 he%201990s (accessed on 21 Sep embe 2024).
Zhang, D., & Tu, Y. (2021). G een building, p o-en i onmen al beha io and well-being: E idence om Singapo e. Ci ies,108, 102980.
[C ossRe ]
Zhao, R. (2018). Technology and economic g ow h: F om Robe Solow o Paul Rome . Human Beha io and Eme ging Technologies,1,
62–65. [C ossRe ]
Disclaime /Publishe ’s No e: The s a emen s, opinions and da a con ained in all publica ions a e solely hose o he indi idual
au ho (s) and con ibu o (s) and no o MDPI and/o he edi o (s). MDPI and/o he edi o (s) disclaim esponsibili y o any inju y o
people o p ope y esul ing om any ideas, me hods, ins uc ions o p oduc s e e ed o in he con en .
