Surface modification of nanocrystalline LiMn2O4 using graphene oxide flakes

materials Article Surface Modification of Nanocrystalline LiMn2O4Using Graphene Oxide Flakes Monika Michalska 1,2,* , Dominika A. Buchberger 3, Jacek B. Jasi´nski 4, Arjun K. Thapa 4and Amrita Jain 5   Citation: Michalska, M.; Buchberger, D.A.; Jasi´nski, J.B.; Thapa, A.K.; Jain, A. Surface Modification of Nanocrystalline LiMn2O4Using Graphene Oxide Flakes. Materials 2021,14, 4134. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14154134 Academic Editor: George Wardeh Received: 29 June 2021 Accepted: 20 July 2021 Published: 24 July 2021 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). 1Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Materials Science and Technology, VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 2172/15, 708 00 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic 2Łukasiewicz Research Network—Institute of Microelectronics and Photonics, Al. Lotników 32/46, 02-668 Warsaw, Poland 3Faculty of Chemistry, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 1, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] 4Conn Center for Renewable Energy Research, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA; [email protected] (J.B.J.); [email protected] (A.K.T.) 5Institute of Fundamental Technological Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Pawi´nskiego 5B, 02-106 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: In this work, a facile, wet chemical synthesis was utilized to achieve a series of lithium manganese oxide (LiMn 2 O 4 , (LMO) with 1–5%wt. graphene oxide (GO) composites. The average crystallite sizes estimated by the Rietveld method of LMO/GO nanocomposites were in the range of 18–27 nm. The electrochemical performance was studied using CR2013 coin-type cell batteries prepared from pristine LMO material and LMO modified with 5%wt. GO. Synthesized materials were tested as positive electrodes for Li-ion batteries in the voltage range between 3.0 and 4.3 V at room temperature. The specific discharge capacity after 100 cycles for LMO and LMO/5%wt. GO were 84 and 83 mAh g −1 , respectively. The LMO material modified with 5%wt. of graphene oxide flakes retained more than 91% of its initial specific capacity, as compared with the 86% of pristine LMO material. Keywords: lithium manganese oxide; LiMn2O4; graphene oxide; cathode material; lithium ion battery 1. Introduction The discovery of new innovative materials as well as adding new functionalities to well-known materials using various “bottom up” and “top down” techniques is highly important from the practical point of view for various applications, including the energy sector [ 1 – 7 ]. The development of energy technologies, especially renewable energy and energy storage systems will play a key role in urgently needed de-carbonization and transition to a low-emission economy. The importance of these technologies has been recognized in recent years. For example, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2019 (John B. Goodenough, M. Stanley Whittingham, and Akira Yoshino) was awarded for the development of lithiumion batteries (LiBs) and for the first time for an application commonly used in portable electronic devices, such as mobile phones, laptops, different gadgets, and electric cars. LiBs are also used to store energy from renewable sources, such as solar and wind power [ 8 – 17 ]. Cubic lithium manganese oxide (LiMn 2 O 4 , LMO) is recognized as an attractive candidate for a positive electrode material in lithium ion batteries and supercapacitors [ 12 , 16 – 19 ]. Its uniqueness lies in its simplicity. In particular, it is non-toxic, low-cost, easy to prepare, possesses high discharge potential (4.1 V vs. Li metal), and is environmentally friendly compared to other commercially-viable cathode materials, such as layered lithium cobalt (LiCoO 2 ) or lithium nickel (LiNiO 2 ) oxides [ 18 – 22 ]. However, this material has disadvantages, particularly capacity fading during charge-discharge cycles at higher voltages than 4.1 V (vs. Li/Li + ), especially at elevated temperature regions of 50–60 ◦ C, Materials 2021,14, 4134. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14154134 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/materials Materials 2021,14, 4134 2 of 12 which limits the use of LMO in commercial LiBs [ 23 – 25 ]. This problem originates from: (1) a cooperative Jahn-Teller transition effect from cubic to hexagonal structure, which generates strains and fracturing, and (2) Mn loss caused by disproportional reaction 2Mn3+ -> Mn4+ + Mn2+ followed by Mn2+ dissolution into the commonly used standard liquid electrolyte [ 12 , 24 , 25 ]. These are the challenges that need to be addressed for a large-scale commercial use of this material. One of the promising strategies is surface modification of LMO grains with formation of a coating or thin film layers such as carbon, metallic, or ceramic oxides [ 24 – 41 ]. This kind of modification can prevent direct contact between the electrolyte solution and the electrode material, helping to improve structural stability and suppress phase transitions [ 24 – 41 ]. With its superior electrical characteristics, graphene has recently become the most sought-after addition for electrode materials. It is usually used in the form as graphene oxide (GO) or reduced graphene oxide (RGO), which enables the creation of composites with a variety of materials. With the addition of graphene material to LiMn 2 O 4 synthesis, fine, homogeneous, and nonagglomerated powders with small particles and outstanding electrochemical characteristics are typically obtained. A one-step hydrothermal approach without thermal treatment to synthesize LMO/graphene nanosheets (GNS) has been proposed by B. Lin et al. [ 42 ]. Their as-synthesized LMO/GNS nanocomposite showed good cathode performance with high specific capacity, good cycling stability, and rate capability as compared with the pristine LMO [ 42 ]. K.-Y. Jo and co-authors [ 43 ] used the solvothermal route to modify the LMO surface with reduced graphene oxide (RGO) nanosheets. Their prepared composite material exhibited high ionic diffusivity and electrochemical performance [ 43 ]. Y. Chen et al. [ 44 ] obtained an LMO/RGO nanocomposite using a low-temperature solvothermal process. They produced composites with 137.5 mAh g −1 of initial discharge capacity at a 0.5 C rate, while after 200 charging and discharging cycles, 75.6% of initial capacity remained [44]. Hybrid materials composed of LMO/RGO was synthesized by a microwave-assisted hydrothermal method by S.-M. Bak et al. [ 45 ]. The obtained material revealed a high specific capacity of 137, 117, and 101 mAh g −1 at 1 C, 50 C, and 100 C rates, respectively [ 45 ]. The precipitation synthesis was developed to modify LiMn 2 O 4 with graphene by A. Li and co-authors [ 46 ]. The graphene-modified LMO material achieved 127 mAh g −1 of initial discharge capacity, while the after 100 charging and discharging cycles capacity retention rate was 96.2% [ 46 ]. All the aforementioned works [ 42 – 46 ] have claimed that coating LiMn 2 O 4 with graphene led to the enhanced electrochemical performances due to the establishment of fast Li + channels and improved structural stability of the LMO material. The main challenge in the battery technology is to achieve the highest capacity but it has yet to be reached as expected. In the present study, we have tried to modify the materials to address this issue. Herein, we present a facile, wet chemical approach based on a simple, wet chemical, low-temperature process of surface modification of LMO grains using graphene oxide flakes. A lithium-manganese oxide powder was first synthesized using a modified sol-gel method [ 20 – 25 ]. Then, such pre-synthesized LMO powder was coated with GO flakes using a low-temperature process to obtain LMO/GO composites. For the first time in this work, we demonstrate the wet chemical and low temperature technique of the surface modification of the cathode material LiMn 2 O 4 with graphene oxide flakes. Contrary to other studies, our technique is relatively fast, non-toxic, and cost-effective. The synthesis was conducted without the use of advanced and expensive equipment, such as autoclave used for the hydrothermal or solvothermal synthesis. After the surface modification of LMO material with GO flakes, no destruction of the LMO structure was observed. All synthesized materials were characterized extensively by a number of methods, including X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, and scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM, TEM). Electrochemical tests were performed for pristine LMO and LMO modified with 5%wt. of graphene oxide. Materials 2021,14, 4134 3 of 12 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Synthesis of LMO Modified with 1–5%wt. of Graphene Oxide Flakes A modified sol-gel method was applied to create nanocrystalline LiMn 2 O 4 powder using citric and acetic acids as chelating agents. The synthesis description of LMO material was demonstrated in our earlier work [ 20 – 25 ]. The modified Hummers technique was utilized to obtain a graphene oxide aqueous suspension [ 47 – 50 ]. A facile, wet chemical synthesis was proposed to modify LMO surface with graphene oxide flakes. At the first stage of synthesis, the as-prepared LMO nanocrystalline powder was dispersed in ethanol (96% pure p.a., CHEMPUR) solution to achieve a black suspension. Next, the LMO-EtOH-H 2 O suspension GO was added. This part of the synthesis was performed for 4 h under constant magnetic stirring at room temperature to obtain a homogenously dispersed suspension. Then, the EtOH-H 2 O solution was slowly evaporated at 60 ◦ C for 12 h. Afterward, the lithium manganese oxide with graphene oxide (1–5%wt. GO) samples were air-dried overnight at 150 ◦ C. LMO/1–5% GO fine powders were reached after grinding all materials in agate mortar. The flowchart of facile, wet chemical synthesis is presented in Figure 1. Materials 2021, 14, 4134 3 of 14 The main challenge in the battery technology is to achieve the highest capacity but it has yet to be reached as expected. In the present study, we have tried to modify the materials to address this issue. Herein, we present a facile, wet chemical approach based on a simple, wet chemical, low-temperature process of surface modification of LMO grains using graphene oxide flakes. A lithium-manganese oxide powder was first synthesized using a modified sol-gel method. [20–25]. Then, such pre-synthesized LMO powder was coated with GO flakes using a low-temperature process to obtain LMO/GO composites. For the first time in this work, we demonstrate the wet chemical and low temperature technique of the surface modification of the cathode material LIMn 2 O 4 with graphene oxide flakes. Contrary to other studies, our technique is relatively fast, non-toxic, and costeffective. The synthesis was conducted without the use of advanced and expensive equipment, such as autoclave used for the hydrothermal or solvothermal synthesis. After the surface modification of LMO material with GO flakes, no destruction of the LMO structure was observed. All synthesized materials were characterized extensively by a number of methods, including X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, and scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM, TEM). Electrochemical tests were performed for pristine LMO and LMO modified with 5%wt. of graphene oxide. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Synthesis of LMO Modified with 1–5%wt. of Graphene Oxide Flakes A modified sol-gel method was applied to create nanocrystalline LiMn 2 O 4 powder using citric and acetic acids as chelating agents. The synthesis description of LMO material was demonstrated in our earlier work [20–25]. The modified Hummers technique was utilized to obtain a graphene oxide aqueous suspension [47–50]. A facile, wet chemical synthesis was proposed to modify LMO surface with graphene oxide flakes. At the first stage of synthesis, the as-prepared LMO nanocrystalline powder was dispersed in ethanol (96% pure p.a., CHEMPUR) solution to achieve a black suspension. Next, the LMO-EtOHH 2 O suspension GO was added. This part of the synthesis was performed for 4 h under Figure 1. The flowchart of facile, wet chemical synthesis of LMO/1–5%wt. GO. 2.2. Characterization of LMO/1–5%wt. GO Materials The structural properties of LMO/1–5%wt. GO materials were investigated using powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy at room temperature. A SIEMENS D500 diffractometer (München, Germany) equipped with a Cu K α ( λXRD = 1.542 Å) radiation source was used to perform the structural analysis in order to identify the crystal structure, determine the crystallite sizes, and measure unit cell parameters of as-synthesized LMO/1–5%wt. GO samples. The XRD patterns in the range of 15 ◦≤ 2 θ≤ 60 ◦ were registered with a step size of 0.002 ◦ and acquisition time of 3 s per step. The average size of crystallites dwas determined from the linewidths of XRD peaks using the Scherrer Formula (1) in its simplest form, assuming that XRD peak broadening was solely dependent on crystallite size [21]. d=Kλ(βcosθ)−1(1) where Kis a shape factor between 0.9 and 1.1, λCuKα is the incident X-ray wavelength (here CuK α = 1.542 Å), β is the full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the selected peak, and θ is the Bragg’s angle of the peak. The Raman spectra were collected using Renishaw in Via Raman Microscope (Charfield, UK) equipped with a 532 nm emission line of Nd:YAG laser. The surface morphology and particle size of synthesized LMO/1–5%wt. GO powders was examined by using a Carl Materials 2021,14, 4134 4 of 12 Zeiss CrossBeam Auriga (Oberkochen, Germany) scanning electron microscope (SEM). The powders were also analyzed using a FEI Tecnai F20 (Hillsboro, OR, USA) transmission electron microscope (TEM), operating at 200 kV accelerating voltage. TEM specimens were prepared by dispersing sample powders on commercial holey carbon-coated TEM copper grids. 2.3. Electrochemical Studies The electrochemical characterization was performed using CR2013 coin-type cells assembled in a dry argon-filled glove box. The cathodes were fabricated by mixing 10 mg of active electrode with 3 mg of teflonized acetylene black (TAB-2) as a conducting binder. The mixture was pressed onto stainless steel mesh. The average thickness of each cathode was 18–20 µ m and Li foil was used as a counter electrode separated by a porous propylene film (ADVANTEC GB-100R). The cathodes were dried at 150 ◦ C for 5 h under vacuum. The electrolyte used was 1 M LiPF 6 -EC:DMC (1:2). Every cell was cycled using the constant current mode in a potential range between 3.0 V and 4.3 V at room temperature using VMP3 Bio-Logic Science Instruments (Seyssinet-Pariset, France). 3. Results 3.1. XRD and Raman Spectra Figure 2A presents the XRD pattern of series of LMO nanocrystalline powders surface modified with 1–5%wt. of graphene oxide. The XRD pattern shown in Figure 2A reveals six characteristic peaks located at: 18.7 ◦ , 36.3 ◦ , 37.9 ◦ , 44.2 ◦ , 48.4 ◦ , and 58.4 ◦ , which correspond to the (111), (311), (222), (400), (422), and (511) crystal planes, respectively [ 20 – 22 ]. Their positions are characteristic of the cubic spinel crystal structure with Fd3m space group. The obtained unit cell parameters between 8.214 and 8.226 Å for all LMO/1–5%wt. GO powders closely match the standard value a 0 = 8.24762 Å (V 0 = 561.03 Å) for lithium manganese oxide (ICDD PDF-35-0782). The lattice parameter values measured for LMO/GO composites are presented in Table 1. They all are within the 8.206–8.251 Å, i.e., the range of LMO spinel data reported in the literature and ICDD database [ 22 ]. The measured small differences in the lattice constants could be due to variations in the actual stoichiometry (partial mixing of the positions of Li and Mn cations and possible vacancies in the positions of cations and oxygen) [ 22 ]. The analysis of peak broadening using the Scherrer formula estimated the average crystallite size, which for all studied samples, was found to be between 18 to 27 nm. The (511) XRD peak located at a relatively large 2 θ angle was chosen for the Scherrer’s analysis to assure relatively small errors from the geometry of the measurement system. A crystallite or a crystalline grain is a single crystal domain of a powder that gives rise to a coherent scattering of the X-ray beam. A particle, on the other hand, may consist of many crystallites. Based on the XRD measurements, the mean crystallite size is determined, while the mean particle size can be determined based on the SEM measurements (see below, Section 3.2). Following the Scherrer’s formula, the crystallite size affects the width and intensity of the diffraction peak. The smaller the size of the crystallites, the greater the broadening of the peak. The discrepancies in the estimated crystallite sizes obtained from the Scherrer’s formula for all investigated samples could be due to the fact that total XRD peak broadening is influenced not only by grain size but also by instrumental broadening. The instrumental broadening may dominate for samples with relatively large crystallites, which seem to be the case for our powders. Table 1summarizes the results of XRD analysis (crystallite size, lattice parameter, and cell volume). Expectedly, the crystal structure of all LiMn 2 O 4 powders was not changed after modification with graphene oxide. Raman analysis for all LMO/1–5%wt. GO powders (Figure 2B) showed a typical spinel spectrum of LiMn 2 O 4 material (in the range of 100–700 cm−1) [23–25] as well as relatively sharp D and G peaks of graphene oxide structure (in the range of 1000–3500 cm −1 ) [ 44 ]. The characteristic bands with assignments for LMO and GO are summarized in Table 2. Materials 2021,14, 4134 5 of 12 Materials 2021, 14, 4134 5 of 13 Figure 2. The XRD results (A) and Raman spectra (B) of LMO/1–5%wt. GO. Table 1. Average crystallite size, lattice parameter, and cell volume for LMO/1–5%wt. GO. Sample Average Crystallite Size (XRD), d [nm] Lattice Parameter, a [Ẩ] Cell Volume, V [Ẩ3] LMO/1%wt.GO 27 8.226 556.6 LMO/2%wt.GO 21 8.225 556.4 LMO/3%wt.GO 20 8.214 554.1 LMO/4%wt.GO 26 8.221 553.4 LMO/5%wt.GO 18 8.221 555.6 Expectedly, the crystal structure of all LiMn2O4 powders was not changed after modification with graphene oxide. Raman analysis for all LMO/1-5% wt. GO powders (Figure 2B) showed a typical spinel spectrum of LiMn2O4 material (in the range of 100–700 cm−1) [23–25] as well as relatively sharp D and G peaks of graphene oxide structure (in the range of 1000–3500 cm−1) [44]. The characteristic bands with assignments for LMO and GO are summarized in Table 2. The LiMn2O4 spinel crystal structure has five optical Raman active modes (see Table 2) [23–25,51,52]. A symmetric Mn–O stretching vibration of MnO6 groups contributes the strongest visible band of LMO at 636 cm−1, which is associated with the A1g mode. T2g(3) and T2g(2) are attributed to large oxygen movements and very small Li ion displacements, respectively [23–25,51,52]. The well-visible A1g shoulder peak at 581 cm−1 and the following weaker band at 491 cm−1 are assigned to large oxygen movements and very small Li ion displacements, respectively [23–25,51,52]. The T2g(1) phonon, which is assumed to be the vibrations of Li sublattice, is associated with the visible band at 385 cm−1 [23–25,51,52]. Table 2. The band assignment of spectra of LMO/1-5%wt. GO. Raman Assignment 385 cm −1 related to the T 2g(1) phonon, considered as the vibrations of Li sublattice 581 and 491 cm−1 two bands are assigned to T 2g(3) and T 2g(2) respectively and originating from large oxygen motions and very small Li ion displacements 636 cm−1 the strongest visible band of LMO, related to the A 1g mode which consisted of a symmetric Mn–O stretching vibration of MnO 6 groups 1150 cm−1 weak peak can be assigned to the phonon at K point of the graphite Brillouin zone 1350 cm−1 D line, the zone-boundary (K point) phonon due to the breathing modes (A 1g symmetry) of “honeycombed” carbon rings, or in a graphitic structure originated in the disorder due to limited crystallite size and defect Figure 2. The XRD results (A) and Raman spectra (B) of LMO/1–5%wt. GO. Table 1. Average crystallite size, lattice parameter, and cell volume for LMO/1–5%wt. GO. Sample Average Crystallite Size (XRD), d[nm] Lattice Parameter, a [Ẩ]Cell Volume, V[Ẩ3] LMO/1%wt. GO 27 8.226 556.6 LMO/2%wt. GO 21 8.225 556.4 LMO/3%wt. GO 20 8.214 554.1 LMO/4%wt. GO 26 8.221 553.4 LMO/5%wt. GO 18 8.221 555.6 Table 2. The band assignment of spectra of LMO/1–5%wt. GO. Raman Assignment 385 cm−1 related to the T 2g(1) phonon, considered as the vibrations of Li sublattice 581 and 491 cm−1two bands are assigned to T2g(3) and T2g(2) respectively and originating from large oxygen motions and very small Li ion displacements 636 cm−1the strongest visible band of LMO, related to the A1g mode which consisted of a symmetric Mn–O stretching vibration of MnO6groups 1150 cm−1weak peak can be assigned to the phonon at K point of the graphite Brillouin zone 1350 cm−1 D line, the zone-boundary (K point) phonon due to the breathing modes (A1g symmetry) of “honeycombed” carbon rings, or in a graphitic structure originated in the disorder due to limited crystallite size and defect 1490 cm−1located between D and G bands attributed to the phonon mode at M point in Brillouin zone, or to C=O vibrations of surface oxidized regions 1595 cm−1G line, a doubly degenerate E2g phonon mode active for sp2 carbon networks 2696 cm−12D peak, a second order phonon mode (an overtone of the D band) 2945 cm−1 combination of D and G peaks can be induced by disorder, or assigned to the sp2and sp3C-H stretching vibrations 3180 cm−1the overtone of the G band, or the stretching vibrations of C-OH groups The LiMn 2 O 4 spinel crystal structure has five optical Raman active modes (see Table 2) [ 23 – 25 , 51 , 52 ]. A symmetric Mn–O stretching vibration of MnO 6 groups contributes the strongest visible band of LMO at 636 cm −1 , which is associated with the A 1g mode. T 2g(3) and T 2g(2) are attributed to large oxygen movements and very small Li ion displacements, respectively [ 23 – 25 , 51 , 52 ]. The well-visible A 1g shoulder peak at 581 cm −1 Materials 2021,14, 4134 6 of 12 and the following weaker band at 491 cm −1 are assigned to large oxygen movements and very small Li ion displacements, respectively [ 23 – 25 , 51 , 52 ]. The T 2g(1) phonon, which is assumed to be the vibrations of Li sublattice, is associated with the visible band at 385 cm−1[23–25,51,52]. Seven bands were registered in the graphene oxide structure at 1150, 1350, 1490, 1595, 2696, 2945, and 3180 cm −1 (see Table 2) [ 44 , 53 , 54 ]. A, D, and G lines represented the most intensive peaks located at 1350 and 1595 cm −1 . The most intense G line was located owing to a doubly degenerate E 2g phonon mode active for sp 2 carbon networks [ 44 , 53 , 54 ]. D line was assigned to the zone-boundary (K point) phonon due to the breathing modes (A 1g symmetry) of “honey-combed” carbon rings, or in a graphitic structure originated in the disorder due to limited crystallite size and defects [ 44 , 53 , 54 ]. The phonon mode at M point in the Brillouin zone, or C=O vibrations of surface oxidized areas, was thought to be the source of the peak at 1490 cm −1 between the D and G bands [ 44 , 53 , 54 ]. A second order phonon mode was an overtone of the D band (2 × 1348 cm −1 ), and corresponded to the 2D peak at 2696 cm −1 [ 44 , 53 , 54 ]. A combination of D and G peaks located at 2945 cm −1 could be induced by disorder or assigned to the sp 2 and sp 3 C-H stretching vibrations [ 44 , 53 , 54 ]. The overtone of the G band, or the stretching vibrations of C-OH groups, is represented by the line at 3180 cm −1 [ 44 , 53 , 54 ]. In addition, Raman spectroscopy analysis also showed that with increasing content of graphene oxide from 1 to 5 wt.%, the intensity of the strongest characteristic peak of the cubic spinel LMO structure band, located at 636 cm −1 , decreased. This suggests that the graphene oxide covered the surface LMO particles. This was further confirmed by scanning electron (SEM) as well as transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses. 3.2. SEM and TEM Morphology Data Figure 3presents SEM images obtained at the same magnification (100,000 × ) from LiMn 2 O 4 powders with various contents of graphene oxide. On the powder LMO grains, crystal growth planes are clearly visible with a size distribution between 100 and 600 nm, which agglomerate into larger particles. While the morphology of LMO grains in all these samples remains practically the same, additional features in a form of folded thin coating layers (some marked with yellow arrows) can be noticed in the samples with the addition of GO flakes. Such GO flakes attached to LMO particles are better visible in TEM images obtained from these samples (Figure 4). The overall morphology of the flakes can be best seen in low-magnification TEM images. However, high-resolution TEM images of these flakes clearly show the amorphous-like structure of these flakes (see images in the last column in Figure 4). Materials 2021, 14, 4134 7 of 13 Figure 3. SEM images of (a) LMO powder with a various content of GO: (b) 1%wt., (c) 2%wt., (d) 3%wt., (e) 4%wt., (f) and 5%wt. Figure 4. TEM images of LMO (yellow) and LMO with 5% wt. GO (red). The EDS analysis for manganese (Mn), oxygen (O), and carbon (C) elements was performed for sample LMO with 5% wt. GO to confirm the presence of a carbon structure on LMO surface grains. The results are depicted in Figure 5. It may be that graphene oxide flakes are covering the LMO grains. Figure 3. SEM images of ( a ) LMO powder with a various content of GO: ( b ) 1%wt., ( c ) 2%wt., ( d ) 3%wt., ( e ) 4%wt., (f) and 5%wt. Materials 2021,14, 4134 7 of 12 Materials 2021, 14, 4134 7 of 13 Figure 3. SEM images of (a) LMO powder with a various content of GO: (b) 1%wt., (c) 2%wt., (d) 3%wt., (e) 4%wt., (f) and 5%wt. Figure 4. TEM images of LMO (yellow) and LMO with 5% wt. GO (red). The EDS analysis for manganese (Mn), oxygen (O), and carbon (C) elements was performed for sample LMO with 5% wt. GO to confirm the presence of a carbon structure on LMO surface grains. The results are depicted in Figure 5. It may be that graphene oxide flakes are covering the LMO grains. Figure 4. TEM images of LMO (yellow) and LMO with 5%wt. GO (red). The EDS analysis for manganese (Mn), oxygen (O), and carbon (C) elements was performed for sample LMO with 5%wt. GO to confirm the presence of a carbon structure on LMO surface grains. The results are depicted in Figure 5. It may be that graphene oxide flakes are covering the LMO grains. Materials 2021, 14, 4134 8 of 13 Figure 5. EDS analysis of LMO with 5% wt. GO composite: STEM images (a,e) and corresponding carbon (b,f), manganese (c,g), and oxygen (d,h) maps measured at two different regions of the sample. 3.3. Electrochemical Performances of LMO and LMO/5%GO Materials Two materials were chosen for electrochemical performance testing, namely pristine LMO and LMO modified with 5%wt. graphene oxide. The galvanostatic charge-discharge profiles of the positive electrodes were measured using constant current mode in a potential range between 3.0 and 4.3 V at room temperature (see Figure 6). The samples were examined using a CR2013 coin-type cell. The galvanostatic charge curves show two characteristic plateaus, at potentials of about 4.0 and 4.2 V, corresponding to the subsequent stages of LMO oxidation. During the discharge of the studied cells, a two-stage reduction process, with plateaus appearing at about 4.1 and 3.9 V, characteristic for LiMn 2 O 4 material, was observed. At 20 mA g −1 current density, in the first and second discharge process, the pristine LMO and with 5%wt. GO electrode showed a specific capacity of 98, 91, and 95, 90 mAh g −1 , respectively. The specific capacities of the cells discharged at 20 mA g −1 current rate after the 10th and 50th cycles were: 93, 87, and 87, 84 mAh g −1 , for LMO and Figure 5. EDS analysis of LMO with 5%wt. GO composite: STEM images ( a , e ) and corresponding carbon ( b , f ), manganese ( c , g ), and oxygen ( d , h ) maps measured at two different regions of the sample. Materials 2021,14, 4134 8 of 12 3.3. Electrochemical Performances of LMO and LMO/5%GO Materials Two materials were chosen for electrochemical performance testing, namely pristine LMO and LMO modified with 5%wt. graphene oxide. The galvanostatic charge-discharge profiles of the positive electrodes were measured using constant current mode in a potential range between 3.0 and 4.3 V at room temperature (see Figure 6). The samples were examined using a CR2013 coin-type cell. The galvanostatic charge curves show two characteristic plateaus, at potentials of about 4.0 and 4.2 V, corresponding to the subsequent stages of LMO oxidation. During the discharge of the studied cells, a two-stage reduction process, with plateaus appearing at about 4.1 and 3.9 V, characteristic for LiMn 2 O 4 material, was observed. At 20 mA g −1 current density, in the first and second discharge process, the pristine LMO and with 5%wt. GO electrode showed a specific capacity of 98, 91, and 95, 90 mAh g −1 , respectively. The specific capacities of the cells discharged at 20 mA g −1 current rate after the 10th and 50th cycles were: 93, 87, and 87, 84 mAh g −1 , for LMO and LMO/5%wt. GO, respectively. After 100 cycles of charge/discharge processes, both electrodes revealed similar values of specific capacity of 84 and 83 mAhg −1 for pristine LMO and modified with 5%wt. of graphene oxide, respectively. Materials 2021, 14, 4134 9 of 13 LMO/5%wt. GO, respectively. After 100 cycles of charge/discharge processes, both electrodes revealed similar values of specific capacity of 84 and 83 mAhg−1 for pristine LMO and modified with 5%wt. of graphene oxide, respectively. Figure 6. Charge-discharge curves of LMO (A) and LMO + 5%GO; (B) spinel electrode for Li-ion battery at the voltage range of 4.3–3.0 V with a current of 20 mA g−1. Figure 7 depicts the results of charge-discharge capacities vs. cycle number tests of LMO and LMO/5%wt. GO electrodes. After 100 cycles of charging and discharging tests (at 20 mA g−1 current rate) LMO/5%wt. GO material retained 91.2% of first discharge capacity, while the pristine LiMn2O4 showed only 85.7%. Figure 7. Cyclic performance and coulombic efficiency of LMO (A) and LMO + 5%GO; (B) spinel electrode for Li-ion battery at the voltage range of 4.3–3.0 V with a current of 20 mA g−1. The coulombic efficiency of both analyzed electrodes was at the same level between 99% and 100%. The achieved cyclability tests at 20 mA g−1 current density are summarized in Table 3. Table 3. Comparison of cyclability of LMO and LMO/5%wt. GO samples. Sample LMO LMO/5%wt.GO 1st discharge capacity, mAh g −1 98 91 2nd discharge capacity, mAh g −1 95 90 10th discharge capacity, mAh g −1 93 87 50th discharge capacity, mAh g −1 87 84 100th discharge capacity, mAh g −1 84 83 Capacity retained after 100 cycles, % 85.7 91.2 Figure 6. Charge-discharge curves of LMO ( A ) and LMO + 5%GO; ( B ) spinel electrode for Li-ion battery at the voltage range of 4.3–3.0 V with a current of 20 mA g−1. Figure 7depicts the results of charge-discharge capacities vs. cycle number tests of LMO and LMO/5%wt. GO electrodes. After 100 cycles of charging and discharging tests (at 20 mA g −1 current rate) LMO/5%wt. GO material retained 91.2% of first discharge capacity, while the pristine LiMn2O4showed only 85.7%. Materials 2021, 14, 4134 9 of 13 LMO/5%wt. GO, respectively. After 100 cycles of charge/discharge processes, both electrodes revealed similar values of specific capacity of 84 and 83 mAhg−1 for pristine LMO and modified with 5%wt. of graphene oxide, respectively. Figure 6. Charge-discharge curves of LMO (A) and LMO + 5%GO; (B) spinel electrode for Li-ion battery at the voltage range of 4.3–3.0 V with a current of 20 mA g−1. Figure 7 depicts the results of charge-discharge capacities vs. cycle number tests of LMO and LMO/5%wt. GO electrodes. After 100 cycles of charging and discharging tests (at 20 mA g−1 current rate) LMO/5%wt. GO material retained 91.2% of first discharge capacity, while the pristine LiMn2O4 showed only 85.7%. Figure 7. Cyclic performance and coulombic efficiency of LMO (A) and LMO + 5%GO; (B) spinel electrode for Li-ion battery at the voltage range of 4.3–3.0 V with a current of 20 mA g−1. The coulombic efficiency of both analyzed electrodes was at the same level between 99% and 100%. The achieved cyclability tests at 20 mA g−1 current density are summarized in Table 3. Table 3. Comparison of cyclability of LMO and LMO/5%wt. GO samples. Sample LMO LMO/5%wt.GO 1st discharge capacity, mAh g −1 98 91 2nd discharge capacity, mAh g −1 95 90 10th discharge capacity, mAh g −1 93 87 50th discharge capacity, mAh g −1 87 84 100th discharge capacity, mAh g −1 84 83 Capacity retained after 100 cycles, % 85.7 91.2 Figure 7. Cyclic performance and coulombic efficiency of LMO ( A ) and LMO + 5%GO; ( B ) spinel electrode for Li-ion battery at the voltage range of 4.3–3.0 V with a current of 20 mA g−1. Materials 2021,14, 4134 9 of 12 The coulombic efficiency of both analyzed electrodes was at the same level between 99% and 100%. The achieved cyclability tests at 20 mA g −1 current density are summarized in Table 3. Table 3. Comparison of cyclability of LMO and LMO/5%wt. GO samples. Sample LMO LMO/5%wt. GO 1st discharge capacity, mAh g−198 91 2nd discharge capacity, mAh g−195 90 10th discharge capacity, mAh g−193 87 50th discharge capacity, mAh g−187 84 100th discharge capacity, mAh g−184 83 Capacity retained after 100 cycles, % 85.7 91.2 The surface modification with graphene oxide led to improved cyclability of LMO powder. Despite the observed slightly lower values of specific capacity in all cycles for the LMO/5%wt. GO material as compared with the pristine LMO, the decrease in capacity in each cycle was smaller. As a result, a positive effect of surface modification of LMO grains with graphene oxide flakes was observed. To modify the surface of LiMn 2 O 4 grains, graphene oxide (GO) material, which contained various functional groups such as C-O hydroxyl and epoxy, O-C=O carboxyl, carbonyl functional groups, as well as C=C/C-C in aromatic rings, was utilized [ 48 , 49 ]. Depending on the form of the graphene material used to modify the LMO surface, the electrochemical properties were positively influenced by the material, which was either in the form of pure graphene or in the form of reduced graphene oxide. Chen et al. [ 44 ] used a low-temperature solvothermal method to produce an LMO/RGO nanocomposite. At a 0.5 C rate, they developed a composite with 137.5 mAh g −1 of initial discharge capacity, with 75.6% of initial capacity remaining after 200 charging and discharging cycles [ 44 ]. S.-M. Bak et al. developed a hybrid material composed of LMO/RGO using a microwave-assisted hydrothermal technique [ 45 ]. At 1, 50, and 100 C rates, the material obtained throughout this approach revealed a high specific capacity of 137, 117, and 101 mAh g −1 , respectively [ 45 ]. A. Li and coauthors proposed modifying LiMn 2 O 4 with graphene using a precipitation synthesis [ 46 ]. The initial discharge capacity of the graphene-modified LMO material was 127 mAh g −1 , with a capacity retention rate of 96.2% after 100 charging and discharging cycles [ 46 ]. The obtained results in our study seem to be promising, taking into account the relatively fast, non-toxic, and cost-effective chemical approach used for the modification of the LMO surface with graphene oxide flakes. The LMO material with the highest content of GO (5%wt.) had the smallest average crystallite sizes. Comparing our materials with other works [ 42 – 46 ], the discharge capacity values were not high, which on the other side had a positive effect on the values of capacity retained after 100 charging and discharging cycles, and as a result, almost 100% of coulombic efficiency was revealed. This, in turn, indicated that by modifying the surface of the LMO material with graphene oxide flakes, the effect of shortening the transport path of electrons and Li ions (between the electrode and electrolyte) should be reached. We demonstrated here the preliminary EIS results, since it was expected to work with reduced graphene oxide (more conductive material), which possesses less functional groups, as shown in other studies [ 42 – 46 ], and in turn was possible to attain better electrochemical results, such as specific capacity and cyclability. 4. Conclusions In this work, we reported a facile, wet chemical synthesis of surface modification of LMO grains with graphene oxide flakes. The XRD results showed that LiMn 2 O 4 crystallizes in the cubic spinel structure with the Fd3m space group. The LMO structure remained intact after the surface modification by GO coatings. Raman analysis showed a typical spinel feature of LiMn 2 O 4 and relatively sharp D and G peaks of graphene oxide flakes. The electrochemical characterization was performed using a CR2013 coin-type cell configu-