Sustainable organic phase change materials for sustainable energy efficiency solutions

Academic Editor: Rui Yang Received: 18 April 2025 Revised: 10 May 2025 Accepted: 13 May 2025 Published: 14 May 2025 Citation: Sarcinella, A.; Cunha, S.; Aguiar, I.; Aguiar, J.; Frigione, M. Sustainable Organic Phase Change Materials for Sustainable Energy Efficiency Solutions. Polymers 2025,17, 1343. https://doi.org/10.3390/ polym17101343 Copyright: © 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/). Review Sustainable Organic Phase Change Materials for Sustainable Energy Efficiency Solutions Antonella Sarcinella 1, Sandra Cunha 2, Ingried Aguiar 2, José Aguiar 2and Mariaenrica Frigione 1,* 1Innovation Engineering Department, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy; [email protected] 2Centre for Territory, Environment and Construction (CTAC), Department of Civil Engineering, Campus de Azurém, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimarães, Portugal; [email protected] (S.C.); [email protected] (I.A.); [email protected] (J.A.) *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The growing demand for sustainable energy solutions has intensified research on phase change materials (PCMs) due to their ability to efficiently store and release thermal energy. However, traditional PCMs are often made from petroleum-derived materials or rely on processes that pose environmental concerns. The aim of this work is therefore to explore the development and use of sustainable organic PCMs, in particular those based on bio-based or waste-derived materials. Bio-based PCMs, including fatty acids, natural waxes, and biopolymers, are in fact characterized by renewability and biodegradability. Waste-derived PCMs, such as those from the lost-wax casting industry and industrial by-products, offer an environmentally friendly approach to energy storage by reusing waste materials. This paper aims to analyze the thermal, mechanical, and in-service performance of these sustainable materials, highlighting their advantages and limitations compared to the most widely used commercial PCMs. Furthermore, recent progress in the integration of sustainable PCMs into building materials is illustrated to assess their practical implementation. Challenges and limitations, as well as possible solutions and future research directions, are also discussed. Keywords: sustainable organic PCMs; bio-based PCMs; waste-derived PCMs; energy efficiency; building materials 1. Introduction Sustainability is a multifaceted concept that has become central to global discussions on environmental, economic, and social challenges. At its core, sustainability refers to “meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” [ 1 ]. This broad definition includes environmental protection, economic growth, and social equity, recognizing that human activities must be conducted in ways that preserves natural resources, reduces environmental degradation, and ensures the wellbeing of all communities. In recent decades, sustainability has become a guiding principle for industries worldwide, leading to innovations that prioritize renewable resources, energy efficiency, waste reduction, and the minimization of ecological footprints. When applied to materials science, sustainability focuses on the development and use of materials and processes that minimize their impact on the environment. This includes considering the entire life cycle of a material, from raw material extraction to production, use/reuse, and end-of-life disposal. In this context, sustainable materials are considered to be those obtained from renewable resources, possibly biodegradable (i.e., with zero impact Polymers 2025,17, 1343 https://doi.org/10.3390/polym17101343 Polymers 2025,17, 1343 2 of 22 at the end of their useful life), capable of reducing or offsetting environmental impacts during their production and/or use, such as carbon emissions, resource depletion, and pollution [2]. Phase change materials (PCMs) are well known as a promising technology capable of improving energy efficiency and thermal management in various applications. These materials, characterized by their ability to absorb and release thermal energy during phase transitions (from solid to liquid and from liquid to solid), offer an effective and intrinsically sustainable solution to energy storage needs. PCMs are widely used in solar energy storage devices, energy efficiency in buildings, electronic cooling technologies, pharmaceutical, healthcare, food, beverage, and even textile applications [3–8]. When used in buildings, PCMs are able to store excess heat during the day and release it at night when outdoor temperatures drop, reducing energy consumption for heating and cooling. This represents a great advantage since buildings are responsible for a significant amount of global energy consumption and CO 2 emissions. Indeed, the integration of PCMs that store and release thermal energy can improve the energy efficiency of a building and reduce the overall environmental impact of the built environment, as widely demonstrated in the literature [9–12]. However, the production and use of common PCMs often pose significant concerns. Traditional PCMs are often associated with major environmental impacts due to their dependence on non-renewable resources: they are produced from petroleum, their production involves high energy consumption, and they are difficult to dispose of because they are mostly non-biodegradable. More sustainable solutions are therefore being sought, in line with the objectives of reducing dependance on fossil fuels, conserving natural resources, and minimizing waste [ 13 , 14 ]. In the study by Cabeza et al. [ 15 ], a life cycle assessment (LCA) analysis was performed to determine whether the reduction in energy demand offered by PCMs could offset the environmental impact associated with their production (including the encapsulation process) and disposal. The study compared three different types of PCMs, namely, paraffin, salt hydrates, and esters. The results of the analysis showed that paraffin has the highest environmental impact, being 2.4 times greater than that of salt hydrates and 3 times greater than esters. Based on these findings, the study concluded that materials from renewable resources, such as salt hydrates and esters, are more environmentally friendly and should be selected to make PCMs for sustainable applications. In a similar study authored by Menoufi et al. [ 16 ], an LCA study was carried out to compare the environmental impact of esters, salt hydrates, and paraffin used as PCMs in building envelopes. The study evaluated the production, service, and disposal phases of the PCMs. The results showed that esters have a slightly lower impact on the production phase than salt hydrates. In conclusion, the use of esters and salt hydrates as PCMs led to a reduction in the overall environmental impact of approximately 10.5% and 9%, respectively, compared to paraffin. Sustainability in the choice of using a PCM can be, then, further strengthened by selecting raw materials and production processes that are as sustainable as possible [17]. Bio-based organic PCMs represent one of the most promising sustainable options in this context. Made from renewable resources such as fatty acids, natural waxes, and biopolymers, these materials offer the added benefit of also being biodegradable. They therefore contribute to a more sustainable energy storage solution and are in line with the growing trend towards environmentally friendly technologies [18]. Natural waxes, commonly used in cosmetics and candles, have been explored for their thermal storage capabilities. Fatty acids, which are abundant in plant and animal oils, are very promising due to their latent heat storage capacities and biodegradability [19–21]. Polymers 2025,17, 1343 3 of 22 Even organic PCMs obtained from waste are able to improve the sustainability characteristics of this technology. The reuse of industrial by-products and/or waste generated during production processes can reduce the need for the supply of new natural resources and contribute to the reduction in industrial waste [ 22 – 24 ]. Therefore, waste-derived PCMs support a circular economy model, where the reuse of materials reduces the need for new raw materials, decreases environmental pollution, and promotes resource efficiency. This approach to the development of new PCMs also addresses the issue of waste management, a critical challenge in many industrial sectors [14]. It can therefore be stated that the use of more sustainable PCMs, whether bio-based or waste-derived, offers a double benefit that goes beyond the simple reduction in environmental impact. On one hand, these materials, derived from renewable resources or industrial waste, reduce their dependence on fossil resources and lower the energy consumption and CO 2 emissions associated with their production compared to traditional synthetic PCMs. On the other hand, sustainable PCMs retain the ability to improve the thermal efficiency of buildings and other structures [25]. The aim of this review is, therefore, to analyze the literature related to the development and application of bio-based or waste-derived (organic) PCMs as more sustainable alternatives to traditional petroleum-derived materials. The analysis of their in-service performance will highlight the advantages and limitations of sustainable PCMs compared to traditional and commercial ones. Additionally, the integration of these PCMs into building materials will be reported, as this represents one of the most promising pathways for their practical application. This review will finally discuss the challenges that remain in the adoption of these new materials as well as future research directions needed to overcome these obstacles. 2. Materials and Methods PCMs are compounds that are able to absorb and release thermal energy during their phase transitions. These materials have been, in particular, widely tested in construction materials and elements thanks to their ability to thermo-regulate the internal environment of buildings, improving their energy efficiency. PCMs help improve the thermal performance of building materials in which they are included, such as walls, floors, roof, and insulation elements [ 26 ]. Therefore, their thermal storage effect limits the need for heating/cooling devices, resulting in significant energy savings. PCMs can be classified into different categories based on their composition, namely, organic, inorganic, and eutectic PCMs [ 27 ]. Each of these types has different thermal and physical characteristics that determine their heat storage capacity and suitability for different applications. Organic PCMs are typically based on natural or synthetic organic compounds. These materials are characterized by a relatively high latent heat, so they can store a significant amount of energy during phase transitions and by a fairly low thermal conductivity. Common examples of organic PCMs include paraffins, fatty acids, and certain esters. Organic PCMs are often preferred for their thermal stability and ease of use, making them ideal for diverse applications, particularly in building materials and energy storage systems. However, they have some environmental disadvantages; some types of paraffin, for example, are derived from petroleum. The production of these materials can generate CO 2 emissions, which somewhat diminishes their environmental benefits. Other paraffins, however, are derived from natural oils. There is, therefore, a growing interest in organic PCMs derived from renewable sources that can replace conventional synthetic compounds with a reduced environmental impact [28,29]. Polymers 2025,17, 1343 4 of 22 Inorganic PCMs include salts, salt hydrates, and metals. These compounds generally have a higher latent heat than organic PCMs, making them more efficient at storing thermal energy. However, inorganic PCMs are often thermally unstable, which can lead to problems during repeated thermal cycles. Salt hydrates, for example, can present problems of supercooling or deliquescence when they absorb moisture from the air. Nonetheless, inorganic PCMs are very useful in applications that require high latent heat, such as in concentrated solar power (CSP) systems or industrial processes [29,30]. Eutectic PCMs are a mixture of two or more pure PCMs, organic–organic, inorganic– inorganic or a combination of organic and inorganic. These blends are developed to overcome some of the limitations of pure organic or inorganic PCMs. Eutectic mixtures are not subject to segregation or phase separation during their solidification, unlike pure inorganic PCMs, which can suffer from phase separation. Eutectic PCMs often are able to offer a higher latent heat than organic ones while maintaining stable thermal properties. The possibility to tune the composition of eutectic PCMs makes them a very attractive option for a wide range of thermal management applications [29,31]. Sustainable PCMs PCMs with “sustainability” characteristics are becoming increasingly important to reduce the environmental impact of all applications in which they are used. Sustainable PCMs are those that, based on their composition or production process, contribute to reducing the environmental impact compared to conventional and commercial PCMs [ 13 ]. Bio-based PCMs are a prime example of sustainable organic phase-change materials. Among their environmental advantages, they are derived from renewable resources (i.e., not from fossil resources), are non-toxic, and are often biodegradable. Sustainable organic PCMs can also be obtained as by-products or waste from agricultural or food processing, offering an additional benefit in reducing waste. For example, some waste vegetable oils and fats from the food industry or by-products from the pharmaceutical sector can be proposed (i.e., they are effective) as PCMs. Therefore, renewable/waste-derived PCMs are particularly attractive from an environmental point of view [19–21]. Other materials derived from waste streams, but which are not biodegradable, offer the functional characteristics of PCMs. Such materials include industrial by-products, polymer processing waste, wax molds, waste oils, and plastic waste. Although they are not biodegradable, these organic PCMs are considered sustainable because they do not require the sourcing of new raw materials and help reduce the volume of waste that might otherwise end up in landfills, in line with the principles of a circular economy. In conclusion, even if their environmental benefits are not as direct as those of bio-based materials, they still contribute to sustainability by transforming waste into useful products that can support energy storage and thermal management in buildings [22–24]. 3. Bio-Based PCMs Bio-based organic PCMs are derived from renewable sources and include substances of plant or animal origin, fatty acids, esters, and polyols [ 32 ]. Figure 1illustrates the bio-based PCMs classified according to their nature and origin. Polymers 2025,17, 1343 5 of 22 Polymers 2025,17, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5of 23 Figure 1. Bio-based organic PCMs organized into categories: natural-based, fatty acids–alcohols– esters, polyols. Figure 2. Melting temperature vs. latent heat of melting for bio-based PCMs. Source: Scopus. The data presented were derived from an analysis of publications from 2020 to 2025, conducted on 15 March 2025. As observed in Figure 2, most of these materials have a melting temperature between 20 and 75 °C and melting enthalpies above 100 J/g. Interestingly, eutectic mixtures composed by bio-based PCMs can offer higher melting heats, typically above 150 J/g, allowing for greater heat storage and release capacity, with a narrow melting range, from 25° to 40 °C. These features are particularly important in building applications. PCMs used in buildings must, in fact, have a melting point close to indoor comfort temperatures, i.e., between 20° and 30 °C, to efficiently store and release thermal energy during external temperature fluctuations. On the other hand, a high latent heat of melting ensures significant heat absorption without drastic temperature changes, thus improving energy efficiency, maintaining a thermal comfort inside the building. It is worth noting that polyethylene glycol (PEG) is considered a sustainable PCM even though it is not directly derived from renewable resources (it is a synthetic polymer); for this reason, PEG has not been included in this discussion. PEG is preferred for its nontoxic nature; furthermore, despite being of synthetic origin, it is biodegradable. It has great potential as PCM due to high phase-change enthalpy, good thermal stability, and good durability under various conditions. Furthermore, the melting temperature of PEG varies depending on its molecular weight, which allows the most appropriate PEG grade to be used in applications requiring very different usage ranges [33,34]. Figure 1. Bio-based organic PCMs organized into categories: natural-based, fatty acids–alcohols– esters, polyols. These PCMs can be also employed to produce eutectic mixtures, such as palmitic acid–stearic acid, myristic acid–capric acid, palmitic acid–capric acid [ 19 ], to improve the thermal properties of the original bio-based PCM. Figure 2shows the values of melting temperatures and enthalpies for the main biobased PCMs found in the literature. Polymers 2025,17, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5of 23 Figure 1. Bio-based organic PCMs organized into categories: natural-based, fatty acids–alcohols– esters, polyols. Figure 2. Melting temperature vs. latent heat of melting for bio-based PCMs. Source: Scopus. The data presented were derived from an analysis of publications from 2020 to 2025, conducted on 15 March 2025. As observed in Figure 2, most of these materials have a melting temperature between 20 and 75 °C and melting enthalpies above 100 J/g. Interestingly, eutectic mixtures composed by bio-based PCMs can offer higher melting heats, typically above 150 J/g, allowing for greater heat storage and release capacity, with a narrow melting range, from 25° to 40 °C. These features are particularly important in building applications. PCMs used in buildings must, in fact, have a melting point close to indoor comfort temperatures, i.e., between 20° and 30 °C, to efficiently store and release thermal energy during external temperature fluctuations. On the other hand, a high latent heat of melting ensures significant heat absorption without drastic temperature changes, thus improving energy efficiency, maintaining a thermal comfort inside the building. It is worth noting that polyethylene glycol (PEG) is considered a sustainable PCM even though it is not directly derived from renewable resources (it is a synthetic polymer); for this reason, PEG has not been included in this discussion. PEG is preferred for its nontoxic nature; furthermore, despite being of synthetic origin, it is biodegradable. It has great potential as PCM due to high phase-change enthalpy, good thermal stability, and good durability under various conditions. Furthermore, the melting temperature of PEG varies depending on its molecular weight, which allows the most appropriate PEG grade to be used in applications requiring very different usage ranges [33,34]. Figure 2. Melting temperature vs. latent heat of melting for bio-based PCMs. Source: Scopus. The data presented were derived from an analysis of publications from 2020 to 2025, conducted on 15 March 2025. As observed in Figure 2, most of these materials have a melting temperature between 20 and 75 ◦ C and melting enthalpies above 100 J/g. Interestingly, eutectic mixtures composed by bio-based PCMs can offer higher melting heats, typically above 150 J/g, allowing for greater heat storage and release capacity, with a narrow melting range, from 25 ◦ to 40 ◦ C. These features are particularly important in building applications. PCMs used in buildings must, in fact, have a melting point close to indoor comfort temperatures, i.e., between 20 ◦ and 30 ◦ C, to efficiently store and release thermal energy during external temperature fluctuations. On the other hand, a high latent heat of melting ensures significant heat absorption without drastic temperature changes, thus improving energy efficiency, maintaining a thermal comfort inside the building. It is worth noting that polyethylene glycol (PEG) is considered a sustainable PCM even though it is not directly derived from renewable resources (it is a synthetic polymer); for this reason, PEG has not been included in this discussion. PEG is preferred for its non-toxic nature; furthermore, despite being of synthetic origin, it is biodegradable. It has Polymers 2025,17, 1343 6 of 22 great potential as PCM due to high phase-change enthalpy, good thermal stability, and good durability under various conditions. Furthermore, the melting temperature of PEG varies depending on its molecular weight, which allows the most appropriate PEG grade to be used in applications requiring very different usage ranges [33,34]. 3.1. Advantages and Limitations As already highlighted, one of the main advantages of bio-based organic PCMs is their low carbon footprint. Their use is in line with the growing demand for sustainable materials that are consistent with the principles of the circular economy. Furthermore, bio-based PCMs are often quite inexpensive due to the wide availability of the raw materials from which they are derived [19–21]. However, as already highlighted, the use of bio-based PCMs results in several problems. In fact, they sometimes present lower thermal stability, lower heat storage capacity, and higher leakage rates during state transitions than synthetic alternatives. The melting temperature and thermal conductivity values of bio-based PCMs are not always suitable for high-performance applications, which limits their use in some sectors. Furthermore, some of them may undergo degradation under service conditions, compromising their performance over time [32]. Nevertheless, bio-based PCMs are employed in different sectors and applications. The following section illustrates, in particular, the papers in which bio-based PCMs have been proposed for construction applications. 3.2. Applications of Bio-Based PCMs in Buildings The integration of bio-based PCMs into building materials is carried out using the same procedures used for conventional PCMs, namely, through direct integration (i.e., the PCM is added directly into the mortar or concrete mix) or by immersing the building material (i.e., concrete, plasterboard, porous aggregate, etc.) in a liquid PCM, which is absorbed by capillarity [ 19 ]. However, these two direct PCM inclusion procedures have some disadvantages. As an example, PCM leakage could occur, which may interfere with the cement hydration process, compromising the mechanical resistance of the building element, thus negatively affecting its lifespan. To avoid this, PCMs can be integrated indirectly into building structures by embedding them in microor macrocapsules, or by employing “form-stable” methods [ 35 ], by which the PCM is absorbed into an inert support and then included in the construction element. The encapsulation method is widely recognized as one of the most effective approaches since it physically isolates the PCM inside polymeric or inorganic shells; in this way, losses during the PCM phase transitions are prevented and interactions with the building material are reduced. This method allows the preservation of the integrity of the construction element, although it reduces its mechanical resistance. On the other hand, the form-stable method is also known to be very effective, as demonstrated by the growing trend in its adoption. In fact, with this technique, it is possible to increase the thermal conductivity of the PCM, limit costs, and simplify the implementation compared to encapsulation procedures. Furthermore, the form-stable method effectively prevents PCM leakage without compromising the durability of the construction material. Finally, the use of porous and highly conductive support matrices (such as expanded graphite or silica) not only stabilizes the PCM but also manages to improve the thermal performance of the composite, making this method particularly advantageous for large-scale applications in the construction industry. Figure 3shows the results of the literature review of the paper published in the last five years on the use of bio-based PCMs in building applications. Among the studies reviewed, Polymers 2025,17, 1343 7 of 22 22% focused on commercial bio-based PCMs; however, the exact composition of these PCMs is not always specified, leaving the nature of the bio-based materials used unclear [ 36 – 44 ]. Of the studies where the nature of the bio-based PCMs was reported, 27.5% were plant origin [ 45 – 55 ], 7.5% were animal origin [ 56 – 58 ], 15% related to single fatty acids [ 59 – 64 ], and 50% focused on eutectic mixtures based on bio-based components [ 65 – 76 ]. These data are presented in Figure 3. Polymers 2025,17, x FOR PEER REVIEW 7of 23 Figure 3. Studies on different types of bio-based PCMs proposed for building applications. (Source: Scopus. The data presented were derived from an analysis of publications from 2020 to 2025, conducted on 15 March 2025). The majority of studies on eutectic mixtures, as can be seen in Figure 3, confirm the need to develop PCMs with particular thermal properties to meet specific application requirements. Regarding the methods of PCM integration in building materials, 10% of the studies reported the direct incorporation of PCMs in building materials [45,56,57,71] and 35% proposed the form-stable method, often using a natural support material in order to guarantee the sustainability of the entire system [47,49–51,59,61–67,72]. The widespread use of form-stable PCMs is justified by the fact that PCMs created using this method do not present leakage problems, as widely reported in the literature. Furthermore, this method allows the use of matrices capable of improving the thermal conductivity of the PCM (for example, using materials such as graphene, expanded graphite, SiO 2 ). Finally, this solution is less complex and much less expensive than encapsulation, often allowing the reuse of waste (porous) materials as inert support. A total of 17.5% of the reviewed studies examined encapsulated PCMs, with bio-based capsules, in some cases also synthetic polymeric [48,52–54,60,70,74]. Finally, 20% of the papers reported the development and characterization of bio-based PCMs not integrated into any matrix or capsule (i.e., “free PCMs”). Figure 4a shows the distribution of publications describing the different methodologies used to integrate bio-based PCMs into building materials. In terms of applications, 40% of the studies reported the inclusion of bio-based PCMs in mortars and concretes. The remaining 60% illustrated PCMs for more general purpose: in fact, no specific application in construction for them was proposed. Figure 4b summarizes these observations. Figure 3. Studies on different types of bio-based PCMs proposed for building applications. (Source: Scopus. The data presented were derived from an analysis of publications from 2020 to 2025, conducted on 15 March 2025). The majority of studies on eutectic mixtures, as can be seen in Figure 3, confirm the need to develop PCMs with particular thermal properties to meet specific application requirements. Regarding the methods of PCM integration in building materials, 10% of the studies reported the direct incorporation of PCMs in building materials [ 45 , 56 , 57 , 71 ] and 35% proposed the formstable method, often using a natural support material in order to guarantee the sustainability of the entire system [ 47 , 49 – 51 , 59 , 61 – 67 , 72 ]. The widespread use of form-stable PCMs is justified by the fact that PCMs created using this method do not present leakage problems, as widely reported in the literature. Furthermore, this method allows the use of matrices capable of improving the thermal conductivity of the PCM (for example, using materials such as graphene, expanded graphite, SiO 2 ). Finally, this solution is less complex and much less expensive than encapsulation, often allowing the reuse of waste (porous) materials as inert support. A total of 17.5% of the reviewed studies examined encapsulated PCMs, with bio-based capsules, in some cases also synthetic polymeric [ 48 , 52 – 54 , 60 , 70 , 74 ]. Finally, 20% of the papers reported the development and characterization of bio-based PCMs not integrated into any matrix or capsule (i.e., “free PCMs”). Figure 4a shows the distribution of publications describing the different methodologies used to integrate bio-based PCMs into building materials. Polymers 2025,17, 1343 8 of 22 Polymers 2025,17, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8of 23 (a) (b) Figure 4. Studies on bio-based PCMs proposed for building applications, published in the last 5 years (2020–2025). (a) Main method used to develop bio-based PCMs for building applications; (b) main applications of bio-based PCMs in buildings. (Source: Scopus. Date of the analysis: 15 March 2025). 3.3. Thermal, Mechanical and In-Service Performance of Bio-Based PCMs Several published papers have examined the performance of bio-based PCMs. In addition to mechanical and latent-heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) properties, their ability to limit temperature fluctuations in indoor environments is also often analyzed. The effectiveness of bio-based PCMs in improving the thermal regulation of buildings located in high temperature regions, such as Algeria, was analyzed in [45,49,50]. Guermat et al. [45] investigated the use of a bio-based PCM made by mixing vegetable oils with purified beeswax. The PCM was found to display notable thermal properties, including an effective latent heat and a melting range that is particularly suitable for warm Figure 4. Studies on bio-based PCMs proposed for building applications, published in the last 5 years (2020–2025). (a) Main method used to develop bio-based PCMs for building applications; (b) main applications of bio-based PCMs in buildings. (Source: Scopus. Date of the analysis: 15 March 2025). In terms of applications, 40% of the studies reported the inclusion of bio-based PCMs in mortars and concretes. The remaining 60% illustrated PCMs for more general purpose: in fact, no specific application in construction for them was proposed. Figure 4b summarizes these observations. 3.3. Thermal, Mechanical and In-Service Performance of Bio-Based PCMs Several published papers have examined the performance of bio-based PCMs. In addition to mechanical and latent-heat thermal energy storage (LHTES) properties, their ability to limit temperature fluctuations in indoor environments is also often analyzed. Polymers 2025,17, 1343 9 of 22 The effectiveness of bio-based PCMs in improving the thermal regulation of buildings located in high temperature regions, such as Algeria, was analyzed in [45,49,50]. Guermat et al. [ 45 ] investigated the use of a bio-based PCM made by mixing vegetable oils with purified beeswax. The PCM was found to display notable thermal properties, including an effective latent heat and a melting range that is particularly suitable for warm climates. The research also analyzed the effectiveness of the bio-based PCM when applied in buildings located in four different Algerian cities. The authors demonstrated that the integration of the PCM into building walls was able to reduce the temperature fluctuations in the internal environment by approximately 3–4 ◦ C, particularly during the summer months, in all the cities examined. In a different study, Kehli et al. [ 49 ] developed a lightweight gypsum composite intended for hot and dry climatic regions, such as those of southern Algeria. The composite was created by incorporating in gypsum, hot watertreated barley straws and bio-based palm oil (PO) as the PCM. The use of the original PCM allowed the composite to have a high capacity to store and release thermal energy, with high thermal regulation properties. The mechanical properties were also evaluated, highlighting a slight decrease due to the reduction in density, consistent with the expected behavior of lightweight materials. However, a reduction in density is still beneficial for improving the insulation properties of the material. Dehmous et al. [ 50 ] developed a concrete that incorporated lightweight aggregates (cLWA) impregnated with a low-cost, bio-based PCM derived from vegetable oil. Concrete containing the bio-based PCM was proposed for buildings located in warm Mediterranean climates, such as in Algeria. Three types of minerals, namely bentonite, sepiolite, and silica gel, were tested as the LWA, and two impregnation methods, namely direct impregnation and vacuum impregnation, were compared. The use of lightweight aggregates impregnated with PCM led to an average increase of 25% in the energy storage capacity of the concrete. On the other hand, the authors observed a certain decrease in both the compressive and flexural strength of the cLWA. In a work published by Fabiani et al. [ 46 ], calorimetric analysis revealed that an expired palm oil-based PCM exhibited two distinct melting peaks (i.e., − 9 ◦ C and 24 ◦ C), which allowed it to effectively buffer both the heat loss in the winter season and excessive temperature increases in summer. Thermal degradation analyses of palm oil indicated its stable performance in lowto medium-temperature applications. The developed PCM showed good thermal stability, maintaining its performance even after thousands of thermal cycles. The wide availability of bio-based PCMs, combined with the low cost and safety for people and the environment, makes them a sustainable choice for building applications. The low cost of materials and technology to produce these PCMs makes them accessible for large-scale use, such as in building applications. The study conducted by Ju et al. [ 47 ] investigated the development of a novel shapestabilized PCM (SCS@PCM) made from cenospheres (i.e., waste from coal-fired power plants), impregnated with a bio-based PCM (by-product of vegetable oil) and coated with silica coating. The composite material was integrated into cement mortars for use in building roofs. The application of a silica coating was able to limit the negative impact of SCS@PCM on the mechanical properties of mortar samples, with only a slight decrease in compressive strength compared to the reference mortar. The silica coating was also able to improve the thermal conductivity of about 13%. The developed PCM demonstrated excellent latent heat storage capabilities (melting/solidification enthalpy greater than 100 J/g) and good thermal stability, with a minimal mass loss even after extended exposure to moderate temperatures. The integration of SCS@PCM in the cement mortar led to a reduction of approximately 5 ◦ C in the peak temperature, confirming its ability to improve thermal regulation in buildings. Polymers 2025,17, 1343 16 of 22 polypropylene (PP) non-woven mats, this latter was obtained from surgical mask filter waste. The method developed to produce the two waste PCMs is illustrated in Figure 9. Polymers 2025, 17, x FOR PEER REVIEW 16 of 23 of a mixture of different vegetable fats from the food industry, showed a melting temperature of about 35 °C and a significant latent heat capacity. It was, therefore, proposed as a passive long-term thermal energy storage (LHTES) system for buildings characterized by large temperature variations. The results of the study suggested that the material is capable of improving indoor thermal comfort, in particular by mitigating temperature variations during summer heat waves if included in non-structural elements. Bragaglia et al. [85] studied the use of waste fat from the pork sausage cooking process to produce waste PCMs. The waste fat, composed of both saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, presented a melting temperature of 32 °C, i.e., still suitable for indoor applications. The waste fat was included in two different matrices, namely, biosilica (diatomite) and polypropylene (PP) non-woven mats, this latter was obtained from surgical mask filter waste. The method developed to produce the two waste PCMs is illustrated in Figure 9. Both matrices were able to effectively encapsulate a high amount of waste PCM, while maintaining unchanged thermal properties. A simplified analytical model has been developed to simulate the thermal performance of a building wall incorporating the developed PCM: a 37% reduction in thermal power was calculated compared to the wall without PCM. These results confirmed that waste cooking fat can represent an effective and eco-sustainable solution for passive heating/cooling applications in buildings. Figure 9. (a) Waste fat in liquid form and (b) waste fat in solid form used during the impregnation procedure for (c) surgical mask filter and (d) diatomite. Reprinted from [85], with permission from Elsevier (April 2025). In an experimental study performed by Rashid et al. [86], the performance of different waste materials and industrial by-products as potential PCMs for buildings was evaluated. These materials were inserted into a sandwich made up of layers of geopolymer concrete. The reference was a geopolymer concrete block. The materials tested included expanded polystyrene foam, polyurethane foam, rubber tires from industrial waste, date palm from agricultural waste, and two type of paraffin-based PCMs (PCM-30 and PCMFigure 9. (a) Waste fat in liquid form and (b) waste fat in solid form used during the impregnation procedure for (c) surgical mask filter and (d) diatomite. Reprinted from [ 85 ], with permission from Elsevier (April 2025). Both matrices were able to effectively encapsulate a high amount of waste PCM, while maintaining unchanged thermal properties. A simplified analytical model has been developed to simulate the thermal performance of a building wall incorporating the developed PCM: a 37% reduction in thermal power was calculated compared to the wall without PCM. These results confirmed that waste cooking fat can represent an effective and eco-sustainable solution for passive heating/cooling applications in buildings. In an experimental study performed by Rashid et al. [ 86 ], the performance of different waste materials and industrial by-products as potential PCMs for buildings was evaluated. These materials were inserted into a sandwich made up of layers of geopolymer concrete. The reference was a geopolymer concrete block. The materials tested included expanded polystyrene foam, polyurethane foam, rubber tires from industrial waste, date palm from agricultural waste, and two type of paraffin-based PCMs (PCM-30 and PCM-42), obtained as by-products from the petrochemical industry. With an appropriate choice of waste materials, a 47% reduction in cooling requirements in hot climates and a 59% reduction in heating requirements in cold climates have been measured. An investigation conducted by Sarcinella et al. [ 87 ] explored the possibility of exploiting by-products from the lost wax casting industry as low-cost organic PCMs. With the two PCMs obtained as by-products from the lost wax casting industry, two commercial PCMs, namely paraffin and microencapsulated PCMs, were analyzed for comparison purposes. The results showed that the waxy by-products from the casting industry offered stability under repeated (100) thermal cycles comparable, and in some cases superior, to commercial PCMs. In fact, after 100 thermal cycles, all PCMs maintained their chemical Polymers 2025,17, 1343 17 of 22 and thermal properties, ensuring excellent energy storage capacity in service. Furthermore, while commercial PCMs were more sensitive to high temperatures, the waxy by-product showed higher thermal resistance. From an LCA perspective, only a few of the previous studies has measured the impact of these materials on the environment; their ability to improve thermal efficiency in the buildings in which they are applied is mainly demonstrated. On the other hand, considering that traditional PCMs are derived from petroleum and require a lot of energy during their production, waste-derived PCMs utilize industrial and agricultural by-products, thus helping to reduce environmental impacts. A life cycle analysis of fatty acid-based PCMs from used cooking oil has shown a 40% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to the production of paraffin-based PCMs [ 46 ]. This results in a saving of approximately 2.5 kg of CO 2 equivalent for every kilogram of PCM produced. The sustainability of PCMs obtained as agricultural by-products, such as soybean oil waste, is demonstrated by a 35% reduction in energy requirements during their production, with a saving of approximately 1.2 MJ/kg. Finally, waste-based PCMs (i.e., biomass) used in solar energy systems can offset 15 tons of CO2per year for a 50 kW solar thermal system [88]. 5. Conclusions The use of phase change materials, PCMs, is an effective and sustainable way of ensuring the thermal comfort of buildings. In fact, the integration of PCMs in construction materials allows a reduction in the use of fossil resources for indoor heating/cooling, at the same time allowing a significant reduction in CO 2 emissions. If organic PCMs are developed from sustainable raw materials, such as bio-based materials or industrial/agricultural waste, the environmental benefit will be twofold. Each of the different typologies analyzed presents advantages, not only from an environmental point of view, but also applicative disadvantages. As an example, bio-based PCMs are cost-effective but have a wide melting temperature range and not very high melting enthalpies, values that are not always adequate for all practical applications. They may also present thermal stability problems and leakage phenomena during thermal cycles. The form-stable method by which these PCMs are embedded in building materials can solve the leakage phenomena, also allowing the exploitation of porous waste materials capable of absorbing the PCM. Furthermore, the development of eutectics obtained from bio-based PCM mixtures allows systems to be obtained with very low melting ranges and higher melting heats. On the other hand, there is a growing interest in using waste materials and industrial by-products to produce organic PCMs capable of storing thermal energy in buildings. The use of waste materials/industrial by-products, often easily available in large quantities and at limited costs, in materials capable of storing energy also benefits the environment from other points of view; it limits the need for new resources, reducing the entry of waste into the environment, and minimizing the related disposal costs. However, considering the variability in composition and characteristics of waste, further research is needed to optimize the properties of these waste PCMs, improve their durability, and ensure their scalability in large-scale applications. Finally, future research should address the following aspects: (1) comprehensive life-cycle cost analysis to highlight the potential economic advantages of sustainable PCMs compared to traditional ones; (2) the development of bio-based eutectic mixtures with tailored thermal properties; (3) the optimization of the stability and long-term performance of waste-derived PCMs; (4) the development of new specific standards to evaluate the performance, durability, and environmental impact of bio-based and waste-derived PCMs when integrated into building materials. It would be beneficial, and not only for the environment, to achieve an interdisciplinary integration Polymers 2025,17, 1343 18 of 22 between materials science and building design to promote the field implementation of these sustainable solutions. Author Contributions: Conceptualization, M.F. and A.S.; methodology, A.S. and S.C.; software, A.S.; validation, A.S. and S.C.; resources, A.S. and S.C.; data curation, A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.; writing—review and editing, S.C., I.A., J.A. and M.F.; visualization, A.S.; supervision, M.F. and J.A.; project administration, M.F. and S.C.; funding acquisition, M.F. and S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research was partially funded by PON Ricerca e Innovazione 2014–2020 Risorse React Eu—DM 1062/2021 Azione IV. 4, “Dottorati e contratti di ricerca su tematiche dell’innovazione e Azione IV. 6”, “Contratti di ricerca su tematiche green”. This work was also developed within the scope of the REBORN project, funded by FCT (https://doi.org/10.54499/2023.11323.PEX). This work was also partially funded by FCT/MCTES through national funds (PIDDAC) under the R&D Unit for Territory, Environment and Construction (CTAC) under reference UIDB/04047/2020 and PhD grant 2023.00281.BD. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. References 1. Shah, M.M. Sustainable Development. In Encyclopedia of Ecology; Jørgensen, S.E., Fath, B.D., Eds.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2008; pp. 3443–3446. ISBN 978-0-08-045405-4. 2. Popescu, C.; Dissanayake, H.; Mansi, E.; Stancu, A. Eco Breakthroughs: Sustainable Materials Transforming the Future of Our Planet. Sustainability 2024,16, 10790. [CrossRef] 3. Shree, V.; Dwivedi, A.; Saxena, A.; Pathak, S.K.; Agrawal, N.; Tripathi, B.M.; Shukla, S.K.; Kumar, R.; Goel, V. A Comprehensive Review of Harnessing the Potential of Phase Change Materials (PCMs) in Energy-Efficient Building Envelopes. J. Build. Eng. 2025, 101, 111841. [CrossRef] 4. Awasthi, A.; Nirmalkar, N.; Tiwari, A.K. A Review of PCM Based Hybrid Battery Thermal Management Systems for the Prismatic Lithium-Ion Batteries of the Electric Vehicle. Future Batter. 2025,5, 100035. [CrossRef] 5. Takash, A.A.; Faraj, K.; Faraj, J.; Hage, H.E.; Hage-Diab, A.; Khaled, M.; Salameh, T.; Hamid, A.-K.; Hussein, M. A Review on Advanced Phase Change Material-Based Cooling for Energy-Efficient Electronics. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2025,26, 100994. [CrossRef] 6. Ismail, K.A.R.; Lino, F.A.M.; Teggar, M.; Laouer, A.; Henriquez, J.R.; Rocha, T.T.M. Potential Applications of Phase Change Materials in the Food Industry: A Review. J. Energy Storage 2025,115, 115946. [CrossRef] 7. Zhao, C.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, D.; Ma, M.; Yu, W. Polyurethane Foam Skeleton-Based Phase Change Hydrogel for Efficient Battery Thermal Management with Favorable Antivibration Performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023,15, 49653–49664. [CrossRef] 8. Li, Y.; Jiang, C.; Zhao, C.; Zhu, D.; Wang, L.; Xie, H.; Yu, W. A Comprehensive Review for the Heat Traceability in Lithium-Ion Batteries: From Generation and Transfer to Thermal Management. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025,216, 115706. [CrossRef] 9. Zhang, A.; Xiong, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, Y.; Xu, Q.; Ding, Y. A Review of Passive Building Thermal Management with Phase-Change Materials. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025,211, 115334. [CrossRef] 10. Rubio-Aguinaga, A.; Fernández, J.M.; Navarro-Blasco, Í.; Álvarez, J.I. Air Lime Renders with Microencapsulated Phase Change Materials: Assessment of Microstructural and Thermal Properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024,452, 138862. [CrossRef] 11. Duan, Q.; Zhang, X.; Lang, S.; Liu, G.; Wang, H.; Zhou, X.; Du, G. Dimensionally Stable Delignified Bamboo Matrix Phase-Change Composite under Ambient Temperature for Indoor Thermal Regulation. Polymers 2023,15, 1727. [CrossRef] 12. Anter, A.G.; Sultan, A.A.; Hegazi, A.A.; El Bouz, M.A. Thermal Performance and Energy Saving Using Phase Change Materials (PCM) Integrated in Building Walls. J. Energy Storage 2023,67, 107568. [CrossRef] 13. Kalidasan, B.; Pandey, A.K. Next Generation Phase Change Materials: State-of-the-Art towards Sustainable Future. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2025,148, 101380. [CrossRef] 14. Manikandan, S.; Devarajan, Y.; Vickram, S. Advancing Thermal Energy Storage with Industrial and Agricultural Waste-Derived Phase Change Materials: A Path towards Sustainable Energy Systems. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2025,198, 107068. [CrossRef] 15. Cabeza, L.F.; Castell, A.; Pérez, G. 13—Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Phase Change Materials (PCMs) Used in Buildings. In Eco-Efficient Construction and Building Materials; Pacheco-Torgal, F., Cabeza, L.F., Labrincha, J., de Magalhães, A., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 287–310. ISBN 978-0-85709-767-5. 16. Menoufi, K.; Castell, A.; Farid, M.M.; Boer, D.; Cabeza, L.F. Life Cycle Assessment of Experimental Cubicles Including PCM Manufactured from Natural Resources (Esters): A Theoretical Study. Renew. Energy 2013,51, 398–403. [CrossRef] Polymers 2025,17, 1343 19 of 22 17. Aridi, R.; Yehya, A. Review on the Sustainability of Phase-Change Materials Used in Buildings. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2022, 15, 100237. [CrossRef] 18. Simonsen, G.; Ravotti, R.; O’Neill, P.; Stamatiou, A. Biobased Phase Change Materials in Energy Storage and Thermal Management Technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023,184, 113546. [CrossRef] 19. Benhorma, A.; Bensenouci, A.; Teggar, M.; Ismail, K.A.R.; Arıcı, M.; Mezaache, E.; Laouer, A.; Lino, F.A.M. Prospects and Challenges of Bio-Based Phase Change Materials: An up to Date Review. J. Energy Storage 2024,90, 111713. [CrossRef] 20. Malode, S.J.; Shetti, N.P. Thermal Energy Storage Systems Using Bio-Based Phase Change Materials: A Comprehensive Review for Building Energy Efficiency. J. Energy Storage 2025,105, 114709. [CrossRef] 21. Pielichowska, K.; Nowicka-Dunal, K.; Pielichowski, K. Bio-Based Polymers for Environmentally Friendly Phase Change Materials. Polymers 2024,16, 328. [CrossRef] 22. Mohaisen, K.O.; Hasan Zahir, M.; Maslehuddin, M.; Al-Dulaijan, S.U. Development of a Shape-Stabilized Phase Change Material Utilizing Natural and Industrial Byproducts for Thermal Energy Storage in Buildings. J. Energy Storage 2022,50, 104205. [CrossRef] 23. Bošnjak Hordov, J.; Nižeti´c, S.; Jurˇcevi´c, M.; ˇ Coko, D.; ´ Cosi´c, M.; Jaki´c, M.; Arıcı, M. Review of Organic and Inorganic Waste-Based Phase Change Composites in Latent Thermal Energy Storage: Thermal Properties and Applications. Energy 2024,306, 132421. [CrossRef] 24. Wu, W.-Y.; Yeap, I.S.R.; Wang, S.; Tomczak, N.; Lin, M.; Kai, D.; Ye, E.; Thitsartarn, W.; Tan, J.B.H.; Yin, X.; et al. Advancements in Sustainable Phase Change Materials: Valorizing Waste for Eco-Friendly Applications. Mater. Today Chem. 2024,39, 102163. [CrossRef] 25. Sarcinella, A.; de Aguiar, J.L.B.; Frigione, M. Use of Sustainable Phase Change Material (PCM) in Mortars for Building Energy Efficiency. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2022,2385, 012009. [CrossRef] 26. Cabeza, L.F.; Castell, A.; de Barreneche, C.; De Gracia, A.; Fernández, A. Materials Used as PCM in Thermal Energy Storage in Buildings: A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011,15, 1675–1695. [CrossRef] 27. Wang, X.; Li, W.; Luo, Z.; Wang, K.; Shah, S.P. A Critical Review on Phase Change Materials (PCM) for Sustainable and Energy Efficient Building: Design, Characteristic, Performance and Application. Energy Build. 2022,260, 111923. [CrossRef] 28. Magendran, S.S.; Khan, F.S.A.; Mubarak, N.M.; Vaka, M.; Walvekar, R.; Khalid, M.; Abdullah, E.C.; Nizamuddin, S.; Karri, R.R. Synthesis of Organic Phase Change Materials (PCM) for Energy Storage Applications: A Review. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects 2019, 20, 100399. [CrossRef] 29. Cunha, S.; Sarcinella, A.; Aguiar, J.; Frigione, M. Perspective on the Development of Energy Storage Technology Using Phase Change Materials in the Construction Industry: A Review. Energies 2023,16, 4806. [CrossRef] 30. Jayathunga, D.S.; Karunathilake, H.P.; Narayana, M.; Witharana, S. Phase Change Material (PCM) Candidates for Latent Heat Thermal Energy Storage (LHTES) in Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) Based Thermal Applications—A Review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024,189, 113904. [CrossRef] 31. Anand, A.; Mansor, M.; Sharma, K.; Shukla, A.; Sharma, A.; Siddiqui, M.I.H.; Sadasivuni, K.K.; Priyadarshi, N.; Twala, B. A Comprehensive Review on Eutectic Phase Change Materials: Development, Thermophysical Properties, Thermal Stability, Reliability, and Applications. Alex. Eng. J. 2025,112, 254–280. [CrossRef] 32. Duquesne, M.; Mailhé, C.; Ruiz-Onofre, K.; Achchaq, F. Biosourced Organic Materials for Latent Heat Storage: An Economic and Eco-Friendly Alternative. Energy 2019,188, 116067. [CrossRef] 33. Sharwan, S.; Sikarwar, P.; Mazumdar, B. Recent Innovations in Support Materials for Shape-Stable Organic Composite Phase Change Materials: A Comprehensive Review. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2024,272, 112910. [CrossRef] 34. Sarcinella, A.; Frigione, M. Selection of PEG-Matrix Combinations to Achieve High Performance Form-Stable Phase Change Materials for Building Applications. Coatings 2024,14, 250. [CrossRef] 35. Li, D.; Zhuang, B.; Chen, Y.; Li, B.; Landry, V.; Kaboorani, A.; Wu, Z.; Wang, X.A. Incorporation Technology of Bio-Based Phase Change Materials for Building Envelope: A Review. Energy Build. 2022,260, 111920. [CrossRef] 36. Mathis, D.; Blanchet, P.; Lagière, P.; Landry, V. Performance of Wood-Based Panels Integrated with a Bio-Based Phase Change Material: A Full-Scale Experiment in a Cold Climate with Timber-Frame Huts. Energies 2018,11, 3093. [CrossRef] 37. Wi, S.; Yang, S.; Yeol Yun, B.; Kim, S. Exterior Insulation Finishing System Using Cementitious Plaster/Microencapsulated Phase Change Material for Improving the Building Thermal Storage Performance. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021,299, 123932. [CrossRef] 38. Righetti, G.; Zilio, C.; Guarda, D.; Feo, D.; Auerbach, M.; Butters, M.; Mancin, S. Experimental Analysis of a Commercial Size Bio-Based Latent Thermal Energy Storage for Air Conditioning. J. Energy Storage 2023,72, 108477. [CrossRef] 39. Parameshwaran, R.; Naresh, R.; Ram, V.V.; Srinivas, P.V. Microencapsulated Bio-Based Phase Change Material-Micro Concrete Composite for Thermal Energy Storage. J. Build. Eng. 2021,39, 102247. [CrossRef] 40. Choi, J.Y.; Nam, J.; Yuk, H.; Yang, S.; Kim, S. Enhancing the Hygrothermal Performance of Corn Cob Residue-Based Eco-Friendly Building Materials through Biochar and Microencapsulated Phase Change Material Incorporation. J. Build. Eng. 2024,89, 109189. [CrossRef] Polymers 2025,17, 1343 20 of 22 41. Erkizia, E.; Strunz, C.; Dauvergne, J.-L.; Goracci, G.; Peralta, I.; Serrano, A.; Ortega, A.; Alonso, B.; Zanoni, F.; Düngfelder, M.; et al. Study of Paraffinic and Biobased Microencapsulated PCMs with Reduced Graphene Oxide as Thermal Energy Storage Elements in Cement-Based Materials for Building Applications. J. Energy Storage 2024,84, 110675. [CrossRef] 42. Gbekou, F.K.; Benzarti, K.; Boudenne, A.; Eddhahak, A.; Duc, M. Mechanical and Thermophysical Properties of Cement Mortars Including Bio-Based Microencapsulated Phase Change Materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022,352, 129056. [CrossRef] 43. Alharbey, R.A.; Daqrouq, K.O.; Alkhateeb, A. Energy Exchange of Inserting Eco-Friendly Bio Phase Change Material into the Vertical Walls to Make the Buildings Energy-Efficient. J. Build. Eng. 2022,56, 104777. [CrossRef] 44. Gnanachelvam, S.; Ariyanayagam, A.; Mahendran, M. Fire Resistance of LSF Wall Systems Lined with Different Wallboards Including Bio-PCM Mat. J. Build. Eng. 2020,32, 101628. [CrossRef] 45. Guermat, Z.; Kabar, Y.; Kuznik, F.; Boukelia, T.E. Numerical Investigation of the Integration of New Bio-Based PCM in Building Envelopes during the Summer in Algerian Cities. J. Energy Storage 2024,79, 110111. [CrossRef] 46. Fabiani, C.; Pisello, A.L.; Barbanera, M.; Cabeza, L.F. Palm Oil-Based Bio-PCM for Energy Efficient Building Applications: Multipurpose Thermal Investigation and Life Cycle Assessment. J. Energy Storage 2020,28, 101129. [CrossRef] 47. Ju, S.; Miao, Y.; Shi, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, F.; Liu, Z.; Jiang, J. Thermal Storage Cementitious Materials Containing SiO2-Coated Cenosphere@bio-Based PCMs: Microstructural, Mechanical, and Thermal Properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024,437, 137005. [CrossRef] 48. Ismail, A.; Zhou, J.; Aday, A.; Davidoff, I.; Odukomaiya, A.; Wang, J. Microencapsulation of Bio-Based Phase Change Materials with Silica Coated Inorganic Shell for Thermal Energy Storage. J. Build. Eng. 2023,67, 105981. [CrossRef] 49. Kehli, K.; Belhadj, B.; Ferhat, A. Development of a New Lightweight Gypsum Composite: Effect of Mixed Treatment of Barley Straws with Hot Water and Bio-Based Phase Change Material on the Thermo-Mechanical Properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 389, 131597. [CrossRef] 50. Dehmous, M.; Franquet, E.; Lamrous, N. Mechanical and Thermal Characterizations of Various Thermal Energy Storage Concretes Including Low-Cost Bio-Sourced PCM. Energy Build. 2021,241, 110878. [CrossRef] 51. Ismail, A.; Bahmani, M.; Wang, X.; Aday, A.; Odukomaiya, A.; Wang, J. Enabling Thermal Energy Storage in Structural Cementitious Composites with a Novel Phase Change Material Microcapsule Featuring an Inorganic Shell and a Bio-Inspired Silica Coating. J. Energy Storage 2024,83, 110677. [CrossRef] 52. Frota de Albuquerque Landi, F.; Fabiani, C.; Pisello, A.L. Palm Oil for Seasonal Thermal Energy Storage Applications in Buildings: The Potential of Multiple Melting Ranges in Blends of Bio-Based Fatty Acids. J. Energy Storage 2020,29, 101431. [CrossRef] 53. Baylis, C.; Cruickshank, C.A. Economics and Lifecycle Carbon Assessment of Coconut Oil as an Alternative to Paraffin Phase Change Materials in North America. Energy Build. 2023,294, 113268. [CrossRef] 54. Eller, C.; Rida, M.; Boudier, K.; Otoni, C.; Celani, G.; Labaki, L.; Hoffmann, S. Climate-Based Analysis for the Potential Use of Coconut Oil as Phase Change Material in Buildings. Sustainability 2021,13, 10731. [CrossRef] 55. Nazari Sam, M.; Caggiano, A.; Mankel, C.; Koenders, E. A Comparative Study on the Thermal Energy Storage Performance of Bio-Based and Paraffin-Based PCMs Using DSC Procedures. Materials 2020,13, 1705. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 56. Abdulmunem, A.R.; Mazali, I.I.; Samin, P.M.; Sopian, K.; Ghazali, H. Bio-Phase Change Materials Based on Stearin of Sheep Tail-Fats Loaded with Nanoparticles: Melting Performance Analysis in Rectangular Cavity as a Sustainable Building Envelopes. Energy Build. 2025,336, 115612. [CrossRef] 57. Behruzian, M.; Najafi, G.; Heugebaert, T.; Rashidi, A.; Gorjian, S.; Banakar, A. High-Performance Shape-Stabilized Phase Change Material Modified by Bio-Based Nano Porous Graphene for Electro-to-Thermal and Solar-to-Thermal Conversion and Storage. J. Energy Storage 2025,107, 114946. [CrossRef] 58. Fabiani, C.; Pisello, A.L.; Barbanera, M.; Cabeza, L.F.; Cotana, F. Assessing the Potentiality of Animal Fat Based-Bio Phase Change Materials (PCM) for Building Applications: An Innovative Multipurpose Thermal Investigation. Energies 2019,12, 1111. [CrossRef] 59. Sawadogo, M.; Benmahiddine, F.; Hamami, A.E.A.; Belarbi, R.; Godin, A.; Duquesne, M. Investigation of a Novel Bio-Based Phase Change Material Hemp Concrete for Passive Energy Storage in Buildings. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2022,212, 118620. [CrossRef] 60. El Majd, A.; Sair, S.; Ousaleh, H.A.; Moulakhnif, K.; Younsi, Z.; Belouaggadia, N.; El Bouari, A. Advanced Gypsum/PCM Composites Incorporating Biopolymer-Encapsulated Phase Change Materials for Enhanced Thermal Management in Buildings. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024,451, 138872. [CrossRef] 61. Dora, S.; Kuznik, F.; Mini, K.M. A Novel PCM-Based Foam Concrete for Heat Transfer in Buildings -Experimental Developments and Simulation Modelling. J. Energy Storage 2025,105, 114625. [CrossRef] 62. Sun, M.; Feng, D.; Sun, F.; Di, H.; Wang, Q.; Lin, L. Insights into Effect of Lignocellulosic Biomass Framework Types on Bio-Based Shape Stable Composite Phase Change Materials. J. Energy Storage 2024,91, 112103. [CrossRef] 63. Hekimo˘glu, G.; Sarı, A.; Kar, T.; Kele¸s, S.; Kaygusuz, K.; Tyagi, V.V.; Sharma, R.K.; Al-Ahmed, A.; Al-Sulaiman, F.A.; Saleh, T.A. Walnut Shell Derived Bio-Carbon/Methyl Palmitate as Novel Composite Phase Change Material with Enhanced Thermal Energy Storage Properties. J. Energy Storage 2021,35, 102288. [CrossRef] Polymers 2025,17, 1343 21 of 22 64. Suh, W.D.; Yuk, H.; Choi, J.Y.; Nam, J.; Kim, S. Enhancing Thermal Performance of Gypsum with Luffa Fiber-Based Phase Change Materials for Application in Advanced Indoor Finishing Material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024,428, 136248. [CrossRef] 65. Hekimo˘glu, G.; Sarı, A.; Gencel, O.; Önal, Y.; Ustao˘glu, A.; Erdogmus, E.; Harja, M.; Tyagi, V.V. Thermal Energy Storage Performance Evaluation of Bio-Based Phase Change Material/Apricot Kernel Shell Derived Activated Carbon in Lightweight Mortar. J. Energy Storage 2023,73, 109122. [CrossRef] 66. Yazdani McCord, M.R.; Kankkunen, A.; Chatzikosmidou, D.; Seppälä, A.; Seppälä, J.; Baniasadi, H. Polypyrrole-Modified Flax Fiber Sponge Impregnated with Fatty Acids as Bio-Based Form-Stable Phase Change Materials for Enhanced Thermal Energy Storage and Conversion. J. Energy Storage 2024,81, 110363. [CrossRef] 67. Cao, X.; Zhang, R.; Zhang, N.; Chen, L.; Chen, D.; Li, X. Performance Improvement of Lauric Acid-1-Hexadecanol Eutectic Phase Change Material with Bio-Sourced Seashell Powder Addition for Thermal Energy Storage in Buildings. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 366, 130223. [CrossRef] 68. Nazari, M.; Jebrane, M.; Terziev, N. Multicomponent Bio-Based Fatty Acids System as Phase Change Material for Low Temperature Energy Storage. J. Energy Storage 2021,39, 102645. [CrossRef] 69. Li, D.; Brinker, S.; Mai, C.; Landry, V.; Wang, X. Impregnation of Solid Wood with 1-Octadecanol/1-Dodecanol Eutectic PCM for Potential Building Thermal Energy Storage Applications. J. Energy Storage 2025,114, 115797. [CrossRef] 70. Jain, A.; Pal, G. Development and Characterization of Saturated Fatty Acids and Biopolymer Based Novel Multilayer Encapsulated Phase Change Materials System for Buildings. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024,454, 139115. [CrossRef] 71. Taj, S.A.; Khalid, W.; Nazir, H.; Khan, A.; Sajid, M.; Waqas, A.; Hussain, A.; Ali, M.; Zaki, S.A. Experimental Investigation of Eutectic PCM Incorporated Clay Brick for Thermal Management of Building Envelope. J. Energy Storage 2024,84, 110838. [CrossRef] 72. Hua, W.; Hu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Cai, S.; Ji, J. Development and Thermal Property Analysis of Biobased Binary Composite Heat Storage Materials. J. Energy Storage 2024,95, 112556. [CrossRef] 73. Li, D.; Lenfant, T.; Landry, V.; Rodrigue, D.; Kaboorani, A.; Wang, X. Development and Investigation of Biobased Binary Eutectic Phase Change Materials for Low-Temperature Building Applications: 1-Hexadecanol/1-Dodecanol and 1-Octadecanol/1Dodecanol. J. Energy Storage 2024,103, 114345. [CrossRef] 74. Toifane, H.; Tittelein, P.; Cherif, Y.; Zalewski, L.; Leuck, H. Thermophysical Characterization of a Thermoregulating Interior Coating Containing a Bio-Sourced Phase Change Material. Appl. Sci. 2022,12, 3827. [CrossRef] 75. Duquesne, M.; Mailhé, C.; Doppiu, S.; Dauvergne, J.-L.; Santos-Moreno, S.; Godin, A.; Fleury, G.; Rouault, F.; Palomo del Barrio, E. Characterization of Fatty Acids as Biobased Organic Materials for Latent Heat Storage. Materials 2021,14, 4707. [CrossRef] 76. Ravotti, R.; Fellmann, O.; Lardon, N.; Fischer, L.J.; Stamatiou, A.; Worlitschek, J. Synthesis and Investigation of Thermal Properties of Highly Pure Carboxylic Fatty Esters to Be Used as PCM. Appl. Sci. 2018,8, 1069. [CrossRef] 77. Asadi, I.; Ji, G.; Steiner, G. Impact of Microencapsulated Phase Change Materials (PCMs) on the Thermal and Mechanical Performance of Cement Mortar. Dev. Built Environ. 2025,21, 100594. [CrossRef] 78. Das, D.; Crosby, R.; Paul, M.C. A Comprehensive Review on the Form Stable Phase Change Materials for Storing Renewable Heat Preparation, Characterization and Application. J. Energy Storage 2025,110, 115284. [CrossRef] 79. Ning, N.; Sun, C.; Ma, Z.J.; Guo, S.; Jiang, S.; Zhang, J.; Hou, D.; Wang, C. A Review of Incorporating PCMs in Various Types of Concrete: Thermal and Mechanical Properties, Crack Control, Frost-Resistance, and Workability. J. Energy Storage 2025,114, 115814. [CrossRef] 80. Cunha, S.; Lima, M.; Aguiar, J.B. Influence of Adding Phase Change Materials on the Physical and Mechanical Properties of Cement Mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016,127, 1–10. [CrossRef] 81. Frigione, M.; Lettieri, M.; Sarcinella, A.; Barroso de Aguiar, J.L. Applications of Sustainable Polymer-Based Phase Change Materials in Mortars Composed by Different Binders. Materials 2019,12, 3502. [CrossRef] 82. Zhang, Q.; Liu, J.; Zhang, J.; Lin, L.; Shi, J. A Review of Composite Phase Change Materials Based on Biomass Materials. Polymers 2022,14, 4089. [CrossRef] 83. Irsyad, M.; Amrizal; Harmen; Amrul; Susila Es, M.D.; Diva Putra, A.R. Experimental Study of the Thermal Properties of Waste Cooking Oil Applied as Thermal Energy Storage. Results Eng. 2023,18, 101080. [CrossRef] 84. Boussaba, L.; Lefebvre, G.; Makhlouf, S.; Grados, A.; Royon, L. Investigation and Properties of a Novel Composite Bio-PCM to Reduce Summer Energy Consumptions in Buildings of Hot and Dry Climates. Sol. Energy 2021,214, 119–130. [CrossRef] 85. Bragaglia, M.; Lamastra, F.R.; Berrocal, J.A.; Paleari, L.; Nanni, F. Sustainable Phase Change Materials (PCMs): Waste Fat from Cooking Pork Meat Confined in Polypropylene Fibrous Mat from Waste Surgical Mask and Porous Bio-Silica. Mater. Today Sustain. 2023,23, 100454. [CrossRef] 86. Rashid, Y.; Alnaimat, F.; Mathew, B. Energy Performance Assessment of Waste Materials for Buildings in Extreme Cold and Hot Conditions. Energies 2018,11, 3131. [CrossRef] Polymers 2025,17, 1343 22 of 22 87. Sarcinella, A.; Cunha, S.; Aguiar, J.; Frigione, M. Thermo-Chemical Characterization of Organic Phase Change Materials (PCMs) Obtained from Lost Wax Casting Industry. Sustainability 2024,16, 7057. [CrossRef] 88. Yan, C.; Abed, A.M.; Chaturvedi, R.; Dahari, M.; Abdullaev, S.; Zhou, X.; Mahariq, I.; Elmasry, Y. Sustainable Commercially-Scaled Greenhouse Building Cooling Solution: Integrating PCM Storage, Desiccant Wheels, and Absorption Chillers Powered by Dual-Source Solar/Biomass Energy. J. Energy Storage 2024,101, 113871. [CrossRef] Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.